Roman Amphorae: a digital resource

University of Southampton, 2005 (updated 2014)

Data copyright © University of Southampton unless otherwise stated


Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) logo

Primary contact

Dr David Williams
Dept of Archaeology
University of Southampton
Avenue Campus
Highfield
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
England
Tel: 080 593032

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1028192
Sample Citation for this DOI

University of Southampton (2014) Roman Amphorae: a digital resource [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1028192

University of Southampton logo

Keay 61 A, B & D



Keay 61 A, B & D

Courtesy of the Church of S. Maria, Tarrasa
Simon Keay

Distinctive Features

Keay (1984) subdivides this type into five variants (A-E). The more frequent are variants A-B-D (variant C is treated separately). Generally, this type comprises a cylindrical body with a gently tapering base and a very distinctive conical foot with a ring-shaped bulge and a short rounded bottom which may have acted as a sort of axial pivot.

Variant A (classic) : The upper section has a sharply curved shoulder and tall conical neck. The rim has a pronounced everted profile, with a slightly splayed outer face and a shallow undercut at its junction with the neck. The handles are tall and circular in profile and elliptical in section, while the attachment to the neck is generally marked by a finger impression on the inside.

Variant B (early ?) : The shoulder here has a more rounded hemispherical profile, while the neck has a similar profile to Variant A although it is lower and squatter. The rim is also similar except that the undercut at its junction with the neck is less marked. Finally, the handles have a more rounded profile.

Variant D (early): This variant is characterised by a shallow grove running around the inside of the rim at its lower point. Perhaps a transition form between types Keay 62 and 61.
See characteristics

Date Range

Mid-fifth century through to the seventh century.
Search: [7th century AD]

Origin

Produced at Leptiminus and Moknine in the Sahel region of Tunisia (Dore, 2001; Bonifay, 2004).
Search: [North Africa] [Tunisia]

Distribution

Very broad distribution in the western Mediterranean (Spain, south of France and, Italy) and is also present in eastern Mediterranean. Numerous examples in Spain (Keay, 1984; Reynolds, 1995; Remolà, 2000), the south of France, especially Marseille (Bonifay, 1986; Bonifay & Piéri, 1995; Bien, 2003; 2005), Italy (at Sant’Antonino; Murialdo, 2001; Saguì 1998) and the eastern Mediterranean at Chios (Boardman, 1989) and Samos (Hautumm, 1981).
Search: [Eastern Mediterranean] [France] [Greek Islands] [Italy] [Spain] [Western Mediterranean]

Contents

Unknown.

Comments

Principal contributor: Michel Bonifay