Roman Amphorae: a digital resource

University of Southampton, 2005 (updated 2014)

Data copyright © University of Southampton unless otherwise stated


Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) logo

Primary contact

Dr David Williams
Dept of Archaeology
University of Southampton
Avenue Campus
Highfield
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
England
Tel: 080 593032

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

DOIs should be the last element in a citation irrespective of the format used. The DOI citation should begin with "doi:" in lowercase followed by the DOI with no spaces between the ":" and the DOI.

doi:10.5284/1028192

DOIs can also be cited as a persistent link from another Web page. This is done by appending the DOI Resolver with the DOI. This would look like:

http://dx.doi.org/10.5284/1028192

However, if it is possible it is best to hide the URL in the href property of the <a> tag and have the link text be of the form doi:10.5284/1028192. The HTML for this would look like:

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5284/1028192">doi:10.5284/1028192</a>
Sample Citation for this DOI

University of Southampton (2014) Roman Amphorae: a digital resource [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] (doi:10.5284/1028192)

University of Southampton logo

Keay 62A, D & E



Distinctive Features

Keay (1984) subdivides this type into variants A-V, with at least twenty rim types and fifteen foot types. Three of these are particularly common (A-D-E).

The most common, Variant A, consists of a ribbed cylindrical body with a rounded base and distinctive foot. The shoulders are sharply curved and the neck is wide, squat and gently conical. The rim consists of two well-defined and everted sections. The uppermost is well pronounced with a vertical face and an undercut at its junction with the lower face. The face of the lower section is gently convex. The handles are ear-shaped in profile and elliptical in section (for a complete example from Filicudi Porto see Albore Livadie, 1984). It it possible to distinguish between the products of Zeugitana by their heavy and quite rectilinear profile and those of Byzacena which have a more rounded profile (Bonifay, 2004).

Variant D is characterised by a clearly marked groove or ledge running around the inside of the rim.

Variant E (late) is characterised by a massive upper rim section with a wide diameter. In addition, the junction between upper and lower sections is marked by an exaggerated undercut.
See characteristics

Date Range

Late fifth to middle sixth centuries AD (Variant A); end of the sixth to the beginning of the seventh centuries AD (Variant E).
Search: [5th century AD] [6th century AD] [7th century AD]

Origin

Production is attested to both in the region of Byzacena, near Sullecthum (workshop of Ksour Essaf - Henchir Ech-Chekaf) (Peacock et alii, 1989) and in the Zeugitana region near Nabeul (workshop of Sidi Zahruni (Ghalia et alii, 2005).
Search: [North Africa] [Tunisia]

Distribution

Very wide distribution in the western Mediterranean (Spain, south of France and Italy) and also found in the eastern Mediterranean. Numerous examples are found in Spain (Keay, 1984; Reynolds,1995; Remolà, 2000), the south of France (see the cargo of the La Palud wreck, Long & Volpe, 1998 and Marseille, Bonifay & Piéri, 1995), Italy (Saguì, 1998), the eastern Mediterranean (examples from Chersonese; Sazanov, 1991), Romania (Tomis; Opaiţ, 1997-98), Constantinople (Turnovsky, 1992), Chios (Boardman, 1989) and Samos (Hautumm, 1981).
Search: [Black Sea] [Eastern Mediterranean] [France] [Greek Islands] [Italy] [North Africa] [Spain] [Tunisia] [Western Asia Minor] [Western Mediterranean]

Contents

Uncertain. Perhaps fish-sauce or wine (several examples were found to be pitched at Filicudi Porto, Albore Livadie, 1984; and Carthage, Opaiţ 1998), but olive oil cannot be excluded. Capacity around 62 litres for the Filicudi Porto example.
Search: [Fish Sauce] [Olive Oil] [Wine]

Comments

Principal contributor: Michel Bonifay

CEIPAC link

The following link will take you to the Centro para el Estudio de la Interdependencia Provincial en la Antiguedad Clásica CEIPAC database. In the CEIPAC system this amphora has the ID KE51+BYZ. Note: access to CEIPAC requires registration, which is possible via http://ceipac.ub.edu/corpus_reg.php?IDM=e