Roman Amphorae: a digital resource

University of Southampton, 2005 (updated 2014)

Data copyright © University of Southampton unless otherwise stated


Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) logo

Primary contact

Dr David Williams
Dept of Archaeology
University of Southampton
Avenue Campus
Highfield
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
England
Tel: 080 593032

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1028192
Sample Citation for this DOI

University of Southampton (2014) Roman Amphorae: a digital resource [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1028192

University of Southampton logo

Keay 34



Distinctive Features

Two examples are published in Keay (1984) but only the first one seems to really correspond to this amphora now known by two complete examples at Dougga (Tunisia) (Bonifay, 2004). Keay’s original description can now be completed in the following way :
The body of this type was tall and nearly perfectly cylindrical with a wide shoulder and tall cylindrical neck. The rim consisted of a developed flange with an upright face and triangular section. The handles were ear-shaped in profile and elliptical in section. The lower section of the body tapered to a narrow base terminating in a filled spinning top-shaped spike.

There are two probable variants (Bonifay, 2004):
- A: broad and upright band-shaped rim, the of which neck is perfectly cylindrical
- B: triangular-in-section rim with hanging lip, the neck is slightly widened in the upper section with combed decoration on certain examples.
See characteristics

Date Range

Mainly sixth to seventh centuries AD, with early variants of fifth century AD date.
Search: [5th century AD] [6th century AD] [7th century AD]

Origin

The fabric suggests southern Byzacena, perhaps the region between El Jem and Acholla (Bonifay, 2004).
Search: [North Africa] [Tunisia]

Distribution

In Tunisia, this type is frequent in the region of El Jem. Thinly distributed in the western Mediterranean (Catalunya, southern France, Liguria and Sicily), and in the eastern Mediterranean (Egypt) and Romania. There are numerous examples from a survey of the Tunisian coastline (Bonifay et al., 2002-2003). In the western Mediterranean, apart from the examples from Catalunya (Keay, 1984), examples are known from Sant’Antonino di Perti (Murialdo, 2001) and Giarrananti (Sicily) (Basile, 1996). The example from Tomi (Romania) bears a titulus pictus (Opaiţ, 1997-98).
Search: [Black Sea] [France] [Italy] [North Africa] [North West Europe] [Spain] [Tunisia] [Western Mediterranean]

Contents

Unknown.

Comments

Principal contributor: Michel Bonifay