Roman Amphorae: a digital resource

University of Southampton, 2005 (updated 2014)

Data copyright © University of Southampton unless otherwise stated


Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) logo

Primary contact

Dr David Williams
Dept of Archaeology
University of Southampton
Avenue Campus
Highfield
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
England
Tel: 080 593032

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1028192
Sample Citation for this DOI

University of Southampton (2014) Roman Amphorae: a digital resource [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1028192

University of Southampton logo

Kuzmanov 9



Kuzmanov 9

Courtesy of Dr. S. Ladstaetter, Institut für Kulturgeschichte der Antike der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Tamás Bezeczky

Distinctive Features

This type was mistakenly included by Sciallano & Sibella (1991) under their Late Roman 7 classification but Kuzmanov 9 is quite distinct from this form. The neck is long and cylindrical, topped by an everted rim. The handles are attached towards the lower part of the neck and on the shoulder. The shoulder is the widest part of the amphora, which then tapers downwards in a narrow, inverted and pear shape, to a fairly sharp point at the base. Opaiţ (1996) includes this type under his Conical amphora of Seleucia form.
See characteristics

Date Range

Fourth to fifth centuries AD.
Search: [4th century AD] [5th century AD]

Origin

The discovery of a potential workshop at Seleucia in Peireia (Empereur & Picon, 1989: 232) led Opaiţ to indicate an origin in Syria (Opaiţ, 1996: 210), though their frequency around the Black Sea coast and at Byzantium might suggest an alternative origin in that region (pers. comm. D. Peacock).
Search: [Black Sea] [The Levant] [Western Asia Minor]

Distribution

Opaiţ notes that this was a well known type on the lower Danube, being quite common at Topraichioi, Murighiol and Iatrus but also present at Bodrum, Lebanon, Egypt and Ephesus (1996; 2004; 2004a; see also Alpozen et al, 1995 and pers. comm. from T. Bezeczky).
Search: [Black Sea] [Egypt] [Lebanon] [North Africa] [The Levant] [Western Asia Minor]

Contents

Unknown but perhaps wine (Opaiţ, 2004a). Capacity is around 7-15 litres (Opaiţ, 2004; 2004a).
Search: [Wine]

Comments

Principal contributor: David Williams