Roman Amphorae: a digital resource

University of Southampton, 2005 (updated 2014)

Data copyright © University of Southampton unless otherwise stated

Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) logo

Primary contact

Dr David Williams
Dept of Archaeology
University of Southampton
Avenue Campus
SO17 1BJ
Tel: 080 593032

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:
Sample Citation for this DOI

University of Southampton (2014) Roman Amphorae: a digital resource [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor]

University of Southampton logo

Keay 61C

Distinctive Features

These two types Keay 61C and 62 variation, defined by Keay (1984; 1998) and Bonifay (1986), should be treated jointly, as they are comparable from both a morphological and fabric point of view (Bonifay, 2004).

Type Keay 62 var. (Bonifay, 1986, Fig. 12.55) : This form has a cylindrical, slightly globular body, narrow neck and cup-shaped rim with an inner thickened lip.

Type Keay 61 : This is a taller and more slender amphora, with a narrow neck and a simple almond-shaped everted rim.

Both types have short bowed handles, elliptical in section, and a pulley-shaped foot. Complete examples have been recovered from Marseille (Type Keay 62 var. Bonifay, 1986: Fig. 12.55) and Arles (Type Keay 61C) (Bonifay, 2004).

Minimum height: 105cm (type Keay 62 var. Bonifay, 1986: Fig. 12.55); 111cm (Type Keay 61C)
Minimum width: 35cm (type Keay 62 var. Bonifay, 1986: Fig. 12.55); 37cm (Type Keay 61C)
See characteristics

Date Range

End of the sixth to the first half of the seventh centuries AD.
Search: [6th century AD] [7th century AD]


Production is attested to in the Sullecthum region (workshop of Ksour Essaf-Henchir Ech-Chekaf) (Peacock et alii, 1989; Bonifay, 2004).
Search: [North Africa] [Tunisia]


Distributed in small quantities in the western Mediterranean (Catalunya, south of France, Liguria). Cartagena (Reynolds, 1995; Ramallo Asensio et alii, 1996), Catalunya (Keay, 1984; Remolà, 2000), Marseille (Bonifay, 1986; Bonifay & Piéri, 1995; Bien, 2005) and Sant’Antonino di Perti (Murialdo, 2001).
Search: [France] [Italy] [North Africa] [North West Europe] [Spain] [Tunisia] [Western Mediterranean]


Unknown. Capacity around 58 litres
Search: [Unknown]


Principal contributor: Michel Bonifay


Keay 62 variant