Lower Palaeolithic technology, raw material and population ecology (bifaces)

Gilbert Marshall, David Dupplaw, Derek Roe, Clive Gamble, 2002. https://doi.org/10.5284/1000354. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000354
Sample Citation for this DOI

Gilbert Marshall, David Dupplaw, Derek Roe, Clive Gamble (2002) Lower Palaeolithic technology, raw material and population ecology (bifaces) [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000354

Data copyright © University of Southampton unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


Arts and Humanities Research Board (AHRB) logo

Primary contact

Dr Gilbert Marshall
Royal Holloway, University of London
Egham
Surrey
TW20 0EX
England

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000354
Sample Citation for this DOI

Gilbert Marshall, David Dupplaw, Derek Roe, Clive Gamble (2002) Lower Palaeolithic technology, raw material and population ecology (bifaces) [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000354

University of Southampton logo

Query

Explanation of fieldnames used in the database

Site nameThe name by which the site is commonly known (between 29 and 3588, excluding 48,551,552,3453).
CountryThe country in which the site is located.
ContinentThe continent in which the site is located.
Biface typeA general definition of biface type. Categories include handaxes, cleavers, picks and knives.
CompletenessWhether or not the biface was complete. Broken pieces were rarely included and if so, because of some distinctive aspect.
FinderName of the person who found the artefact.
Finders numberNumber given to the artefact by the finder.
Site subdivisionThe location where the artefact was found. If unavailable or the artefact was simply attributed to the site as a whole, this entry was defined as unclear.
Context/levelThe stratigraphic context or level in which the artefact was found.
Date foundThe date on which the artefact was found.
Museum/holderThe museum or location where the artefact was recorded during this study.
Museum accession numberThe accession number given to the artefact by the museum or institution where it was originally deposited.
Museum accession dateDate on which the artefact was accessioned by the museum or institution in which it was originally deposited.
Raw material typeVisual categorization of raw material type.
Raw material textureGrain size from FINE through MEDIUM to COARSE, or combinations thereof.
Raw material hardnessFrom FRIABLE if marked by light pressure through RESILIENT to TOUGH. These were primarily visual descriptions of the degree of sedimentation within the matrix.
Degree of patinationResults of post-depositional non-mechanical processes, including BURNING, STAINING and PATINATION.
Outer cortex typeA description of the outer cortical surface (if present) of the raw material. Includes mechanical effects (listed according to declining severity) BATTERING, ABRASION, POLISHED, chemical effects including RIND STAINED, and general descriptions including NATURAL SURFACE and HARD CHALK RIND.
% cortex on front surfaceVisual estimate of the amount of cortex to the closest 5%. Cortex was defined as the outer surface present on the raw material prior to working having begun, and therefore excluded ventral surfaces on flake blanks.
% cortex on rear surfaceAs above but on the rear surface.
Biface conditionA description of post-depositional mechanical effects including in declining order of severity ROLLED and ABRADED.
Biface edge profileThe degree of linearity when viewed edge on, of the most extensively worked region of the biface circumference. Defined as IRREGULAR if sinuous rather than linear, or if straightened through deliberate alternating retouch over a length of less than 20% of the complete circumference. Bifaces were defined as LINEAR if deliberately straightened for over 20%, or TWISTED if possessing deliberate 'S' or 'Z' profiles. All TWISTED edge biface were also LINEAR. On TWISTED bifaces, the angle and direction of twist is given in Description. Artefacts where edges were formed by intersecting surfaces rather than deliberate alternating retouch were described as IRREGULAR.
Probable blank typeThe most likely blank used to produce the biface itself. They include COBBLE blanks, where the biface was shaped directly from the nodule, and FLAKE blanks, which were removed from a larger core and then shaped. The use of naturally exfoliated flakes at Montagu Cave and Cape Hangklip is a distinct possibility, however if present they were indistinguishable from deliberately struck flakes, and were therefore all grouped as flake blanks. A small number of bifaces were made on TABULAR raw materials.
Butt typeThe amount of cortex on the butt. Artefacts were defined as NON-CORTICAL if all of the original outer material of the blank had been removed, PARTIALLY CORTICAL if some was present or CORTICAL if the whole of the butt was covered in cortex.
Butt workingThe amount of deliberate secondary shaping of the butt, but not including intersection surfaces. Described as COMPLETLEY WORKED if the whole of the butt had been shaped through secondary retouch, PARTIALLY WORKED if only partly shaped and UNWORKED if no deliberate shaping was present.
Weight (g)Measured to the closest gram.
Front view of measurements Side view of measurements
Length (mm)Measured from butt to tip with the biface orientated through its longest and most symmetrical axis.
Breadth (mm)Measured perpendicular to length. Note that this is not necessarily the widest point (see Breadth at L1), but rather the width of the fitted rectangle.
L1 (mm)Length from the butt to the widest point of the biface as measured from edge to edge (Breadth at L1).
Breadth at L1 (mm)Breadth from edge to edge at L1. Note that this is not the same a Breadth, which is that of the fitted rectangle.
BA (mm)Breadth at 20% down from the tip or bit.
BM (mm)Breadth in the middle of the biface.
BB (mm)Breadth at 20% up from the butt.
Breadth/LengthRatio reflecting elongation.
L1/LengthRatio indicating the position of the widest point relative to overall length.
BA/BBRatio indicating the degree of taper or splay from butt to tip.
Circumference (mm)Length as measured around the edge of the front view of the biface.
Area (mm2)Surface area of front view.
% of circumference workedThe proportion of the edge deliberately shaped through secondary retouch, expressed as a percentage of the complete front view circumference. Included were acute edges shaped through secondary retouch as well as those formed simply by the intersection of flake, or cortical and flake surfaces.
Thickness (mm)Measured across the thickest portion of the biface. Note that this is not the thickest point (see Edge view thickness at L1), but that of the fitted rectangle.
Thickness/BreadthRatio indicating thinning.
Edge view L1 (mm)Length from the butt to the thickest (Edge view thickness at L1) portion of the biface when viewed edge on.
Edge view thickness at L1 (mm)Maximum thickness of the biface from edge to edge. Note that this is not the same a thickness, which is that of the fitted rectangle.
TA (mm)Thickness at 20% down from the tip or bit.
TM (mm)Thickness in the middle of the biface.
TB (mm)Thickness at 20% up from the butt.
DescriptionAny additional relevant information not covered in the preceding categories.

ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo