56B Park Road, Ware, Hertfordshire. Recording Project (OASIS ID: heritage1-264190)

The Heritage Network, 2018

Data copyright © The Heritage Network unless otherwise stated

Primary contact

Alison Hudson
The Heritage Network
11 Furmston Court
Icknield Way
Letchworth
SG6 1UJ

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1047224
Sample Citation for this DOI

The Heritage Network (2018) 56B Park Road, Ware, Hertfordshire. Recording Project (OASIS ID: heritage1-264190) [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1047224

Introduction

56B Park Road, Ware, Hertfordshire. Recording Project (OASIS ID: heritage1-264190)

In response to a planning condition on the redevelopment of land at the rear of 56b Park Road, Ware, Hertfordshire, SG12 0AN, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the landowner to undertake a programme of archaeological monitoring on the development groundworks. Planning permission for the development (3/15/1745/HH) was granted by East Herts District Council (EHDC), subject to a standard archaeological condition issued under the provisions set out in the Department of Communities and Local Government's National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). A full specification for the work carried out is contained in the Heritage Network's approved Project Design dated October 2016. The site lies in Area of Archaeological Significance no.117 (AAS117) and close to known remains of Roman date. Groundworks involved footing trenches for a small extension to the existing house. The excavation revealed a great deal of overburden, interpreted as re-deposited material from neighbouring developments. No archaeology was observed.