Evaluating Aggregate in North West England

David Jordan, 2007

Data copyright © Dr David Jordan unless otherwise stated


Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund logo
English Heritage logo

Primary contact

Dr David Jordan
Institute of Archaeology
University of Bern
Langasse Strasse 10
3012 Bern
Switzerland
Tel: 01874 636345

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000282
Sample Citation for this DOI

David Jordan (2007) Evaluating Aggregate in North West England [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000282

Terra Nova Limited logo

Introduction

The Evaluating Aggregate in North West England project was undertaken by Terra Nova and funded through the Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund as distributed by English Heritage.

geophysics_image

Questions have been raised about the effectiveness of geophysical techniques as a means of evaluating archaeological remains in the North West of England. There have been sufficient doubts, in the judgement of some professional archaeologists, to abandon its use altogether. Others, however, regard geophysical survey as one of the key evaluation techniques and commission its use on many of their projects. Concerns over the effectiveness of geophysical survey in the North West are particularly significant since there are often no good alternatives.

This project investigated the uses and products of geophysical surveys carried out for archaeological evaluation in the North West, concentrating on commercial projects since 1990. It gathered information about the methods, sites, natural contexts and outcomes of all surveys for which information was available. It then analysed this data to reach conclusions about the use and effectiveness of such survey in the roles chosen for it.