The Rural Settlement of Roman Britain: an online resource

Martyn Allen, Nathan Blick, Tom Brindle, Tim Evans, Michael Fulford, Neil Holbrook, Lisa Lodwick, Julian D Richards, Alex Smith, 2015. (updated 2018) https://doi.org/10.5284/1030449. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1030449
Sample Citation for this DOI

Martyn Allen, Nathan Blick, Tom Brindle, Tim Evans, Michael Fulford, Neil Holbrook, Lisa Lodwick, Julian D Richards, Alex Smith (2018) The Rural Settlement of Roman Britain: an online resource [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1030449

Data copyright © University of Reading unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


Leverhulme Trust logo
Historic England logo

Primary contact

Prof Michael Fulford
Professor of Archaeology
School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science
University of Reading
Whiteknights
PO Box 218
Reading
RG6 6AA
England
Tel: 0118 3788048

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1030449
Sample Citation for this DOI

Martyn Allen, Nathan Blick, Tom Brindle, Tim Evans, Michael Fulford, Neil Holbrook, Lisa Lodwick, Julian D Richards, Alex Smith (2018) The Rural Settlement of Roman Britain: an online resource [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1030449

University of Reading logo
Cotswold Archaeology logo

Malmo Road, Hull (East Riding)


The map above shows the site in its geographical and thematic context, to view all other sites from the database in this view select 'All sites' from the list of layers.

Unpublished Sources

Tibbles, J. (1992) Trial Excavations at Malmo Road, Hull. Hull: Humber Field Archaeology https://doi.org/10.5284/1029252

Tibbles, J. (1991) An Archaeological Watching Brief at Worlds End, Malmo Road, Hull. Hull: Humber Field Archaeology https://doi.org/10.5284/1029253


Database ID 35040
Site Type (Major) Rural settlement
Site Type (Minor) farm
Region North-East
County East Riding
Summary Two adjacent investigations - one a watching brief, the other trial trenches - located within a bend of the River Hull on its northern bank, revealed evidence of Romano-British settlement from features including numerous ditches, gullies, pits and postholes. The full extent of the settlement was not exposed due to the limited nature of the investigations, though the density of features certainly indicated the existence of an active site. No stone structures and very little ironwork was observed, though Romano-British roof tile and brick possibly indicated the presence of a more substantial building. Pottery from sites suggested occupation spanning the 2nd to 4thC AD. A special deposit of 4-5 semi-articulated sheep specimens was interpreted from a ditch.
Organisation Humberside Archaeology Unit
Area of investigation (ha) 0.4
Easting 509044
Northing 432368
Start Date 100
End Date 400
Rural settlement form unclassified
Number of circular buildings 0
Number of rectangular buildings Not recorded
Paddocks No evidence
Multi-room building No evidence
Aisled building No evidence
Masonry building No evidence
Trackway/Road No evidence
Structured deposits Evidence
Burial data
Burials summary No data
Disarticulated bone Not present or no data
Animal bone Not present or no data
Associated settlement Not present or no data
Associated enclosure Not present or no data
Grave goods Not present or no data
Brooch data
Brooch summary No data
Coins data
Coin summary No data
Other finds data
Finds summary The majority of the material can be classified as structural ironwork. Other finds included a snaffle bit, an iron ferrule, a hold-fast, 3 whetstones, a loomweight, an ard tip, a shale finger ring or bead, lead weight, a bucket strip, a spindlewhorl, vessel glass, a blown flute manufactured from a sheep tibia, CBM, daub, iron slag, and coal.
Finger rings 1
Equine/transport objects 1
Knives/tools 5
Agricultural tools 1
Recreation 1
Objects associated with weighing 1
Spinning (spindlewhorls) 1
Weaving (loomweights) 1
Vessel glass 2
Shale objects 1
Iron slag Present
Hobnails Not present or no data
Evidence for salt production Not present or no data
Evidence for bone-working Not present or no data
Evidence for metalworking Not present or no data
Structural worked stone Not present or no data
Painted plaster Not present or no data
Window glass Not present or no data
Tesselated floor/mosaic Not present or no data
Tiled roof Not present or no data
Briquetage Not present or no data
Inscriptions Not present or no data
Hypocaust Not present or no data
Evidence for Christianity Not present or no data
Pottery data
Pottery summary The Romano-British component of the pottery assemblage was not fully quantified, though more than 2000 sherds may have been identified. The assemblage was predominantly 2nd-4thC AD. The majority of the pottery sherds were grey ware fabrics, some probably derive from the Holme on Spalding Moor kilns. Colour coated ware sherds were all from beakers. Bowls, beakers and jars were all present. Production centres such as Crambeck supplied a range of distinctive kitchen-wares including red painted bowls and mortaria (mixing-bowls).
Religious vessels Not present or no data
Pottery wasters Not present or no data
Graffito Not present or no data
Amphora presence Not present or no data
Mortarium presence Present
Samian presence Present
Plant data
Summary No data
Zooarchaeological data
The data below is divided into an overarching record for the whole site and, if recorded, separate records for individual phases.
Summary An abundance of well preserved animal bone was said to have been recovered from the watching brief site, though no quantification was given. These were predominantly bones of domestic mammals, whilst the lack of sieving probably precluded the recovery of fish and bird bones. 1480 animal bone specimens were recovered from the trial trench excavations however. Preservation of this assemblage was more variable, with a large proportion showing extensive evidence of gnawing. A horse and a cattle bone showed signs of butchery. 2 specimens of red deer were intimated to have been post-cranial, but this is not certain. Wild bird bones included two of mallard, goose and cormorant. A ditch deposit appeared to contain the semi-articulated remains of four to five Individuals (268 bones), all exclusively identified as sheep, and interpreted as a 'special deposit'. All biometric data are given in the report. Oyster shell was prevalent on both sites. The upper valves on several shells bore small knife marks, made when opening the shells. A small amount of mussel shell was also recovered.
Sheep/Goat NISP 79
Cattle NISP 56
Pig NISP 8
Sheep/Goat ABGs 4
Domestic fowl NISP 1
Wetland fowl (ducks, geese and waders) NISP 4
End date 400
Total bone fragments 1480
Fish No
Egg shell No
Assemblage sieved? No
Red deer NISP (bone) 2
ABGs in NISP No
Marine shell Yes
Overall
Horse NISP 8
Start date 150
Faunal Ageing data
The data below is divided into an overarching record for the whole site and, if recorded, separate records for individual phases. Concordance with existing published ageing criteria is provided in the tables below

Cattle

Age category Grant stage Halstead stage Maltby stage
Neonate 0-2 A 1
Juvenile 3-16 B-C 2-3
Subadult 17-37 D-E 4-5
Young adult 38-42 F 6
Adult >43 G 7
Elderly >43 H-I 7

Sheep/Goat

Age category Grant stage Payne stage Payne stage Maltby stage
Neonate 0-1 A 0-2 months 1
Juvenile 2-17 B-C 2-12 months 2-3
Immature 18-28 D 1-2 years 4
Subadult 28-39 E-F 2-4 years 5-6
Adult >40 G 4-6 years 7
Elderly >40 H-I 6-10 years 7

Pig

Age category Grant stage Hambleton stage Maltby stage O'Connor stage
Neonate 0-1 A 1
Juvenile 2-14 B-C 2-3 juvenile
Immature 15-25 D-E 4-5 immature
Subadult 26-35 F 6 subadult
Adult 36-41 G 7 adult
Elderly >42 H-I 8 elderly
Summary Based upon epiphyseal fusion data, the majority of caprovids (43%) were killed as sub-adults, between one and three years of age. No young lambs were present and a small proportion (approximately 17%) had reached maturity. However the lack of systematic recovery, probably affects these results. Neonatal, juvenile and young adult cattle specimens were all present. Tooth wear data were given for cattle, sheep and pig but not as mandible wear data.
Evidence of neonatal (unknown) bones No
Evidence of neonatal horse bones No
Evidence of neonatal domestic fowl No
End date 400
Evidence of neonatal sheep/goat bones No
Phase - Overall
Evidence of neonatal cattle bones Yes
Start date 150
Evidence of neonatal pig bones No
Site plans (unpublished sources):
Thumbnail of 35040_1
35040_1
Image from: Tibbles, J. (1992) Trial Excavations at Malmo Road, Hull. Hull: Humber Field Archaeology 10.5284/1029252
[DOWNLOAD] right-click and save link

ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo