Data copyright © Society of Museum Archaeologists unless otherwise stated
Society of Museum Archaeologists
Society of Museum Archaeologists
Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.
DOIs should be the last element in a citation irrespective of the format used. The DOI citation should begin with "doi:" in lowercase followed by the DOI with no spaces between the ":" and the DOI.
DOIs can also be cited as a persistent link from another Web page. This is done by appending the DOI Resolver with the DOI. This would look like:
However, if it is possible it is best to hide the URL in the href property of the <a> tag and have the link text be of the form doi:10.5284/1018089. The HTML for this would look like:
Society of Museum Archaeologists (2013) Archaeological Collections Areas Database and Map [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] (doi:10.5284/1018089)
1.1.1 The project gathered information on the current position of archaeological archive collecting in England, compiled a report to inform the profession of where things stand, and updated the map and database of museum collecting areas. A range of related issues was investigated concerning the use, storage, and curation of archaeological archives in museums, and the provision of specialist expertise.
1.1.2 The core of the project consisted of a survey of the 161 museums in England that accept, were believed to accept, or have previously accepted, archaeological archives. Curators and staff from 134 museums responded, including 39 who were interviewed by telephone. The questionnaire sought information at four distinct levels, from outline data to a comprehensive account of archaeological collecting history over the past fifty years. Only nineteen respondents completed the survey at all four levels of detail.
1.1.3 Alongside the survey of museums, FAME undertook a survey of archaeological contracting organisations to investigate the issue of completed archives which could not be deposited because there was no store or museum willing or able to accept them. Thirty-one major archaeological contracting organisations based in England responded.
1.2.1 Although 120 respondents said that their museum was able to accept archaeological archives, just 84 were able to accept archives without known conditions. Thirty-six respondents mentioned that lack of space might be an issue, or identified specific non-geographical conditions to acceptance.
1.2.2 Gaps in collecting areas: there were no museums collecting from 47 local authorities, plus parts of another four. In two others alternative museums were covering for museums unable to accept archives.
1.2.3 There were specialist archaeological curators in around 30% of museums contacted. The effects of local authority cuts were apparent from survey responses. Staff numbers had been reduced, and curators have taken on additional responsibilities for collections or management.
1.2.4 In some museums archaeological collections took up more space than other collections, but on average local history collections took up 45% of storage space compared with 22% for archaeological collections. More museums appeared to use archaeological collections for loans, teaching collections, and handling packs than other types of collections.
1.2.5 Data from 40 museums suggested that together they receive around 2,000 visits to archaeological collections in store each year, or about 50 visits per museum per year.
1.2.6 Respondents used archaeological collections and archives in many different ways, including contributions to specific exhibitions and projects. A significant number of these would be impossible without specialist archaeological expertise. Archaeological collections, including archaeological archives, have been used by respondents to reach a very wide and diverse range of audiences.
1.2.7 FAME estimated that there were 9,000 undepositable archaeological archives in England. The estimated volume of undepositable archives was 1,1
1.2.8 Taken together both surveys identified a wide range of issues relating to archaeological archives and museums. Whilst general trends can be identified nationally, many of the issues are locally based, influenced by the local history and development of museums in their towns, districts, or counties, and subject to local pressures and political agendas.
1.3.1 The following eight recommendations were agreed by the Project Board: