Surrey Archaeological Collections

Surrey Archaeological Society, 2003. (updated 2023) https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

Data copyright © Surrey Archaeological Society unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


Surrey Archaeological Society logo

Primary contact

Surrey Archaeological Society
Castle Arch
Guildford
Surrey
GU1 3SX
UK
Tel: 01483 532454
Fax: 01483 532454

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

The Cordwell family, gunpowder producers at Chilworth 1636–1650

K R FAIRCLOUGH

Chilworth mills had first been deveolped as a gunpowder production site by the East India Company during the winter of1626–7 but in 1636 the Company ceased to have any interestin Chilworth and the site was taken over by Samuel Cordwell. He was acting on behalf of the king, Charles I, who had decided to take control of the gunpowder industry. The resultant gunpowder monopoly was a great success for the king but it aroused resentment and was one of the bones of contention between him and parliament before the Civil War. Cordwell’s production monopoly was cancelled by parliament in 1641 but he was able to continue manufacturing and he emerged as one of the two important suppliers of gunpowder to parliament during the Civil War. After Samuel’s death the business was continued by his brother Robert and his widow Mary until 1650, after which the family ceased to have any involvement in the industry. This article recounts events at Chilworth during the Cordwell era when Chilworth mills first emerged as the most important gunpowder production site in England.

<< back


ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo