Surrey Archaeological Collections

Surrey Archaeological Society, 2003. (updated 2023) https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

Data copyright © Surrey Archaeological Society unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


Surrey Archaeological Society logo

Primary contact

Surrey Archaeological Society
Castle Arch
Guildford
Surrey
GU1 3SX
UK
Tel: 01483 532454
Fax: 01483 532454

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

A Tudor hinterland: drainage, bridging and tanning at 156-170 Bermondsey Street, Southwark

FIONA KEITH-LUCAS

Marshy conditions and flooding indicated by peat and alluvial layers showed the excavation area to have been largely uninhabitable prior to the post-medieval period. Attempts to reclaim the low-lying land, which was set back from medieval Bermondsey Street, were indicated by a substantial late medieval drainage ditch. The area, which remained a waterlogged hinterland during the Tudor period, was drained by a further network of channels, the fills of which contained pottery and leather that were both of interest. One ditch had been partially cleared of its fills, leaving a section in place supported by a revetment of timber boards and wattle, to form a causeway. Simple footbridges were built across the cleared portions of ditch in the early 16th century, probably providing access to pasture to the west. Material surrounding and sealing the footbridges contained noteworthy finds assemblages, particularly of imported Mediterranean pottery. The animal bone assemblage showed an intensification of tawing towards the end of the 17th century, to be replaced by tanning as the dominant industry. The unlawful tanning of sheep skins may be indicated at this time, and deposits to consolidate the excavated area were laid down. Tawing in a re-used tar barrel then preceded an early 18th century brick and cobble yard surface with timber and brick drains and evidence of the local tanning industries.

<< back


ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo