The Sutton Hoo Research Project 1983-2001

Martin Carver, 2004. https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266
Sample Citation for this DOI

Martin Carver (2004) The Sutton Hoo Research Project 1983-2001 [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266

Data copyright © Prof Martin Carver unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


University of York logo

Primary contact

Prof Martin Carver
Department of Archaeology
University of York
King's Manor
Exhibition Square
York
YO1 7EP
England

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266
Sample Citation for this DOI

Martin Carver (2004) The Sutton Hoo Research Project 1983-2001 [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266

Downloads


Index to Field Report Volume 6: Field Report For The West Sector Int 48

Authors: M.R. Hummler and M.O.H. Carver

  1. SUMMARY
  2. STRATEGY
    • 2.1 Aims and Objectives
    • 2.2 Operations undertaken
    • 2.3 Recovery levels
    • 2.4 Modifications to strategy
    • 2.5 Analyses Undertaken
  3. THE DATA ACQUIRED
    • 3.1 Procedures
    • 3.2 Pre-excavation surface and sub-surface surveys and previous excavation
    • 3.3 Horizon definition and recording
    • 3.4 Definition and recording of features at Horizon 1
    • 3.5 Definition and recording of features at Horizon 2
    • 3.6 - 3.8 [unused]
    • 3.9 Definition and recording of features: Anglo-Saxon features
    • 3.10 Assemblages
  4. MODELLING THE SEQUENCE
    • 4.1 Evidence for strata function [ie for the formation of the strata as encountered]
    • 4.2 Evidence for the sequence from stratigraphy
    • 4.3 Evidence for the sequence and its dating from finds
    • 4.4 Evidence for sequence and date from context designations
    • 4.5 Evidence from absolute dating
    • 4.6 Model of the sequence
  5. SELECTED STUDIES: THE PREHISTORIC PERIOD (MRH)
    • 5.1 Neolithic
    • 5.2 Late Neolithic - Early Bronze Age
    • 5.3 Bronze-Age
    • 5.4 Iron Age
  6. SELECTED STUDIES: THE ROMAN PERIOD
    • 6.1 Cultivation
  7. SELECTED STUDIES: THE EARLY MEDIEVAL PERIOD
    • 7.1 Mound 17
    • 7.2 Mound 18
    • 7.3 Evidence for Anglo-Saxon burials from earlier interventions reconsidered [Burials 13, 14, 56]
    • 7.4 Quarry pits to Mound 5 (F3-6, 288) and Burial 53 in quarry pit F287
  8. SELECTED STUDIES: MEDIEVAL AND LATER
    • 8.1 Bank and ditch, F224, 338, etc.
Download full report:
Vol 6 Excavations for the West Sector: Int 48 (PDF, 557Kb)

ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo
alt=