Data copyright © Wardell Armstrong Archaeology unless otherwise stated
Wardell Armstrong Archaeology
Tel: +44 (0) 1228 564820
Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.
The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:
Wardell Armstrong Archaeology (2016) Brockhill East Geophysical Survey, Redditch, Worcestershire (OASIS ID: wardella2-246553) [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1040793
In March 2016 Wardell Armstrong Archaeology (WAA) undertook a geophysical survey of land at Brockhill East, Redditch, Worcestershire. The survey was undertaken for Persimmon Homes South Midlands, to provide information in relation to a planning application for a housing development at the site.
Previous archaeological work in the ‘Phase 1’ development area to the southwest of the site identified an Iron Age enclosure of Middle to Late Iron Age date, with a single internal pit, the whole site being very truncated. A rare Iron Age cremation was recovered from the enclosure ditch (Worcestershire Archaeology 2012).
The objective of the geophysical survey was therefore to determine the presence/absence, nature and extent of potential archaeological features within the study area, and the presence/absence of any known modern features within the survey area, which may affect the results.
Geomagnetic survey was undertaken over the majority of the study area on a field-by-field basis, which comprised arable land at the time of the survey. A number of the geophysical anomalies were detected at the site, which are believed to be agricultural in origin, including evidence for plough furrows and former field boundaries. A number of former gravel pits were also present on site. A number of other possible soil-filled features were detected, although no definite archaeological remains were identified.