"EntityID","Entity","ConstructionPhase","DestructionPhase","EntityDescription","Author","EntityStage","EntityLevel","IsDetailed","SiteEntityName","FeatureGIS","SiteCode","Feature"
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 121118","WPR98",121118
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 121153","WPR98",121153
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 128194","WPR98",128194
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 130119","WPR98",130119
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 136075","WPR98",136075
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 136085","WPR98",136085
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 141237","WPR98",141237
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 149129","WPR98",149129
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 166138","WPR98",166138
4,"Bronze Age Field System 12","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This field system mainly comprises BA ditch 9, with some further boundaries to its north and south.  The field system is associated with BA trackway 4, which lies immediately to its west and partly shares its western boundary.  The ditches of this field system were very finds-poor, and this may imply that this block of fields was situated in a zone peripheral to any settlement/ general domestic activity.   However, in the southern part of LBA Ditch 20, some MBA Deverel-Rimbury sherds were retrieved.  It is possible that this element of the field system is of slightly earlier date than originally proposed - ie MBA rather than LBA.  Its southern boundary has been lost (truncated) but may carry on the alignment of M-LBA Ditch 14.  This field system may have articulated with the one immediately to its south - BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 166140","WPR98",166140
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510052","PSH02",510052
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528052","PSH02",528052
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528154","PSH02",528154
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542227","PSH02",542227
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542228","PSH02",542228
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542259","PSH02",542259
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542263","PSH02",542263
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544061","PSH02",544061
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544069","PSH02",544069
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544092","PSH02",544092
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 548053","PSH02",548053
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551006","PSH02",551006
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551163","PSH02",551163
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554230","PSH02",554230
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556124","PSH02",556124
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556139","PSH02",556139
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558001","PSH02",558001
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558016","PSH02",558016
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561022","PSH02",561022
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561023","PSH02",561023
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 579172","PSH02",579172
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582132","PSH02",582132
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582135","PSH02",582135
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582137","PSH02",582137
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582139","PSH02",582139
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582141","PSH02",582141
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582143","PSH02",582143
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594041","PSH02",594041
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594057","PSH02",594057
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594060","PSH02",594060
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594074","PSH02",594074
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594091","PSH02",594091
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594107","PSH02",594107
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594109","PSH02",594109
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594112","PSH02",594112
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594115","PSH02",594115
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594116","PSH02",594116
5,"Settlement 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which potentially form part of MBA settlement in Area 72.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594120","PSH02",594120
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 960077","POK96",960077
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961631","POK96",961631
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962259","POK96",962259
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962313","POK96",962313
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103019","WPR98",103019
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107013","WPR98",107013
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107029","WPR98",107029
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111012","WPR98",111012
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119014","WPR98",119014
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 138019","WPR98",138019
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 143011","WPR98",143011
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147026","WPR98",147026
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
6,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"Land holding in WPR98 to the east of Land holding 2. Western boundary is the eastern ditch of WPR trackway 1, and the eastern boundary is the western  ditch of WPR trackway 2. This landholding consists of a series of larger rectangular fields orientated N-S. however it also includes a MBA D shaped enclosure and the Neolithihc horsehoe enclosure HE1. The southern POK96 area of this landholding has been very severely truncated.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
9,"Medieval - Post-Medieval Ditch 1","720 Later Medieval","900 Modern","This ditch is spatially and chronologically linked to two post-medieval ditches immediately to its west, since they all run roughly parallel and generally follow a similar alignment.  However this ditch is cut by post-medieval ditch 15, and may have slightly earlier origins.  It also contained a few sherds of relatively unabraded medieval pottery and hence may have formed the earliest component of this trackway that is known from  post-medieval maps as Long Lane.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 516037","PSH02",516037
9,"Medieval - Post-Medieval Ditch 1","720 Later Medieval","900 Modern","This ditch is spatially and chronologically linked to two post-medieval ditches immediately to its west, since they all run roughly parallel and generally follow a similar alignment.  However this ditch is cut by post-medieval ditch 15, and may have slightly earlier origins.  It also contained a few sherds of relatively unabraded medieval pottery and hence may have formed the earliest component of this trackway that is known from  post-medieval maps as Long Lane.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 516038","PSH02",516038
9,"Medieval - Post-Medieval Ditch 1","720 Later Medieval","900 Modern","This ditch is spatially and chronologically linked to two post-medieval ditches immediately to its west, since they all run roughly parallel and generally follow a similar alignment.  However this ditch is cut by post-medieval ditch 15, and may have slightly earlier origins.  It also contained a few sherds of relatively unabraded medieval pottery and hence may have formed the earliest component of this trackway that is known from  post-medieval maps as Long Lane.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 111046","WPR98",111046
9,"Medieval - Post-Medieval Ditch 1","720 Later Medieval","900 Modern","This ditch is spatially and chronologically linked to two post-medieval ditches immediately to its west, since they all run roughly parallel and generally follow a similar alignment.  However this ditch is cut by post-medieval ditch 15, and may have slightly earlier origins.  It also contained a few sherds of relatively unabraded medieval pottery and hence may have formed the earliest component of this trackway that is known from  post-medieval maps as Long Lane.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 111047","WPR98",111047
10,"Settlement 5","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Unusual in that a large quantity of LBA pottery was retrieved from the ring gully of this structure.  It is even more unusual in that this structure is situated in close spatial association with a number of E-MIA roundhouses which were also of ring gully construction.  The LBA structure is of a slightly different shape however.  It is composed of two separate pennanular ring gullies, with a largish entrance to the east.  Overall it has a slightly ovoid plan, narrower in the eastern entrance area and widening out to the west.  Its dimensions are c. 12m N-S and 10.7m E-W.  This structure is important because it supports the suggestion that LBA settlement is present in this zone, continuing into the E and MIA's.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 308005","PSH02",308005
11,"Palaeochannel","150 Early Mesolithic",,"Palaeochannel excavated in Bed B. dated to the early mesolithic.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 110119","WPR98",110119
11,"Palaeochannel","150 Early Mesolithic",,"Palaeochannel excavated in Bed B. dated to the early mesolithic.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 148371","WPR98",148371
14,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 61","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","Ditch that forms part of a MBA field system in Area 77.  Orientated roughly north-east-east - south-south-west.  A waterhole of LBA-EIA date cuts the upper fill of this ditch and is later inserted as a component of the field.  It is likely that field system continued to function in the LBA, and probably also into the EIA.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 510066","PSH02",510066
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961046","POK96",961046
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961047","POK96",961047
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961048","POK96",961048
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961107","POK96",961107
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961113","POK96",961113
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961116","POK96",961116
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961117","POK96",961117
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961118","POK96",961118
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961119","POK96",961119
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961127","POK96",961127
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961130","POK96",961130
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961131","POK96",961131
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961132","POK96",961132
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961594","POK96",961594
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961595","POK96",961595
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961598","POK96",961598
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961599","POK96",961599
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961661","POK96",961661
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961692","POK96",961692
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961693","POK96",961693
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961694","POK96",961694
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961702","POK96",961702
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 962308","POK96",962308
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 515182","PSH02",515182
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 533055","PSH02",533055
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 542168","PSH02",542168
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 542170","PSH02",542170
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 542172","PSH02",542172
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 552044","PSH02",552044
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 552046","PSH02",552046
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 552048","PSH02",552048
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553018","PSH02",553018
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553020","PSH02",553020
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553022","PSH02",553022
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553105","PSH02",553105
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555266","PSH02",555266
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555269","PSH02",555269
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 559035","PSH02",559035
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 564002","PSH02",564002
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 588029","PSH02",588029
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 589043","PSH02",589043
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 594003","PSH02",594003
17,"1a\medieval settlement\treethrows",,,"treethrows in the med settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 598013","PSH02",598013
18,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter1/SE of site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Small scatter of flint (one piece is in situ and the others occur residually in later features).  The in situ find is from a tree throw which contains Plain Bowl ware pottery.  Small scatter but may suggest a small focus of activity of this broad generic date in this locale in Area 72 and surrounds.  Finds include a blade and a blade-like flake","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 528154","PSH02",528154
18,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter1/SE of site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Small scatter of flint (one piece is in situ and the others occur residually in later features).  The in situ find is from a tree throw which contains Plain Bowl ware pottery.  Small scatter but may suggest a small focus of activity of this broad generic date in this locale in Area 72 and surrounds.  Finds include a blade and a blade-like flake","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531011","PSH02",531011
18,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter1/SE of site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Small scatter of flint (one piece is in situ and the others occur residually in later features).  The in situ find is from a tree throw which contains Plain Bowl ware pottery.  Small scatter but may suggest a small focus of activity of this broad generic date in this locale in Area 72 and surrounds.  Finds include a blade and a blade-like flake","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 544092","PSH02",544092
18,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter1/SE of site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Small scatter of flint (one piece is in situ and the others occur residually in later features).  The in situ find is from a tree throw which contains Plain Bowl ware pottery.  Small scatter but may suggest a small focus of activity of this broad generic date in this locale in Area 72 and surrounds.  Finds include a blade and a blade-like flake","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554208","PSH02",554208
18,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter1/SE of site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Small scatter of flint (one piece is in situ and the others occur residually in later features).  The in situ find is from a tree throw which contains Plain Bowl ware pottery.  Small scatter but may suggest a small focus of activity of this broad generic date in this locale in Area 72 and surrounds.  Finds include a blade and a blade-like flake","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 556124","PSH02",556124
18,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter1/SE of site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Small scatter of flint (one piece is in situ and the others occur residually in later features).  The in situ find is from a tree throw which contains Plain Bowl ware pottery.  Small scatter but may suggest a small focus of activity of this broad generic date in this locale in Area 72 and surrounds.  Finds include a blade and a blade-like flake","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
18,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter1/SE of site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Small scatter of flint (one piece is in situ and the others occur residually in later features).  The in situ find is from a tree throw which contains Plain Bowl ware pottery.  Small scatter but may suggest a small focus of activity of this broad generic date in this locale in Area 72 and surrounds.  Finds include a blade and a blade-like flake","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 562078","PSH02",562078
18,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter1/SE of site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Small scatter of flint (one piece is in situ and the others occur residually in later features).  The in situ find is from a tree throw which contains Plain Bowl ware pottery.  Small scatter but may suggest a small focus of activity of this broad generic date in this locale in Area 72 and surrounds.  Finds include a blade and a blade-like flake","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 651024","PSH02",651024
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 518056","PSH02",518056
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 518073","PSH02",518073
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 528015","PSH02",528015
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 545019","PSH02",545019
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 546009","PSH02",546009
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 554011","PSH02",554011
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 555008","PSH02",555008
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 111065","WPR98",111065
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 111070","WPR98",111070
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 121135","WPR98",121135
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 126038","WPR98",126038
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 126042","WPR98",126042
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 128246","WPR98",128246
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 128296","WPR98",128296
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 149031","WPR98",149031
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 151063","WPR98",151063
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 161124","WPR98",161124
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 161126","WPR98",161126
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 161130","WPR98",161130
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 171063","WPR98",171063
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 180005","WPR98",180005
19,"Bronze Age Field System 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Situated to the south of BA Field System 7 and to the west of BA Field System 8, this group of fields may have been subject to quite a number of subdivisions. The blocks of land partitioned seem to be rather small in comparison to other fields.  However, it is difficult to be sure whether all the internal field system divisions were contemporary, or indeed even of Bronze Age date.  However, if indeed they are all part of the same complex, then these components imply that the fields and presumably the activities associated with them were of a different nature here.  There may be elements of sorting of animals and allocating animals to different pens/ paddocks.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 180011","WPR98",180011
20,"Four Post Structure 4","420 Middle Iron Age","430 Late Iron Age","Middle Iron Age  4 Post Structure excavated in area C1 possibly associated with MIA roundhouse gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 133056","WPR98",133056
20,"Four Post Structure 4","420 Middle Iron Age","430 Late Iron Age","Middle Iron Age  4 Post Structure excavated in area C1 possibly associated with MIA roundhouse gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 133059","WPR98",133059
20,"Four Post Structure 4","420 Middle Iron Age","430 Late Iron Age","Middle Iron Age  4 Post Structure excavated in area C1 possibly associated with MIA roundhouse gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134064","WPR98",134064
20,"Four Post Structure 4","420 Middle Iron Age","430 Late Iron Age","Middle Iron Age  4 Post Structure excavated in area C1 possibly associated with MIA roundhouse gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134066","WPR98",134066
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 211030","GAI99",211030
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214015","GAI99",214015
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214075","GAI99",214075
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218023","GAI99",218023
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121116","WPR98",121116
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121118","WPR98",121118
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121153","WPR98",121153
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128194","WPR98",128194
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136085","WPR98",136085
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141237","WPR98",141237
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166138","WPR98",166138
22,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 7 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"same as LH 7 but with ditches from Trackway 5+6 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166140","WPR98",166140
23,"Bronze Age Waterholes Plants analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze age waterholes with Waterlogged Plant assemblages analysed to publication standard for Volume 1 by Wendy Caruthers","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
23,"Bronze Age Waterholes Plants analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze age waterholes with Waterlogged Plant assemblages analysed to publication standard for Volume 1 by Wendy Caruthers","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
23,"Bronze Age Waterholes Plants analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze age waterholes with Waterlogged Plant assemblages analysed to publication standard for Volume 1 by Wendy Caruthers","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
23,"Bronze Age Waterholes Plants analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze age waterholes with Waterlogged Plant assemblages analysed to publication standard for Volume 1 by Wendy Caruthers","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
23,"Bronze Age Waterholes Plants analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze age waterholes with Waterlogged Plant assemblages analysed to publication standard for Volume 1 by Wendy Caruthers","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
23,"Bronze Age Waterholes Plants analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze age waterholes with Waterlogged Plant assemblages analysed to publication standard for Volume 1 by Wendy Caruthers","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
23,"Bronze Age Waterholes Plants analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze age waterholes with Waterlogged Plant assemblages analysed to publication standard for Volume 1 by Wendy Caruthers","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
26,"Bronze Age field system reused boundaries","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity demonstrates the reuse of the field boundaries within the field system located in Bed B of WPR 98.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
26,"Bronze Age field system reused boundaries","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity demonstrates the reuse of the field boundaries within the field system located in Bed B of WPR 98.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 524232","PSH02",524232
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 552123","PSH02",552123
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 578133","PSH02",578133
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 586060","PSH02",586060
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 586061","PSH02",586061
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 586062","PSH02",586062
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 591035","PSH02",591035
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 591038","PSH02",591038
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 591055","PSH02",591055
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 591059","PSH02",591059
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 591061","PSH02",591061
27,"Bronze Age trackway","300 Bronze Age",,"This entity describes a BA trackway which runs N/S. From area 49 it proceeds north through POK96, area 47, WPR98 to area 45. The route north of this is unknown as this area was truncated by lagoon beds. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It consists of two ditches roughly 2-3m apart and runs for approximately 255m. There are exits and entranceways onto the trackway and evidence of modification at certain locations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This trackway is essentially a means of controlling and easing movement of livestock* through and within the BA landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *may not necessarily simply be livestock, but also people and goods i.e.; micro-economic communication link?? (DMT 512). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2 illustrates the extent, location and constituent groups which make up this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The construction of the trackway may have occurred after the initial laying out of the BA enclosures or at least some of them. SG[105008] in the north and SG's[107029], [192005], [552123] and [962257] in the centre are cut into what have been described as enclosure ditches, elsewhere it appears that the trackway ditches also form the enclosure boundaries, See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The enclosures have been broadly dated to the early to mid BA and the trackway to the mid to late BA, so it may just fit in with the development of the enclosure system rather than a separate phase as such. Or equally it could point to a modification of the enclosures and a move to a less open, more restricted landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The function of the trackway would have been to control and ease the movement of livestock within the landscape, the restricted space and controlled flow would have made the herding of livestock a much less labour intensive activity and if dogs were involved possibly quite a solitary activity? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Points where the control of access and movement of livestock occurred can be illustrated from a number of locations. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Postholes [154009] and[128003] may have been part of systems of gates or hurdles so livestock could have been directed into the enclosures to the east and west of this part of the trackway. These enclosures contain waterholes [152018] and [141024] so the link with livestock is strong. Also to the east near PH [128003] is an E/W trackway so some sort of control would have been necessary there. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Towards the middle of the trackway is another posthole, [962247], again hinting at the control of movement and access, but here also this control appears to have undergone some modification. [961900], a short gully,  is modified by the addition of [961754] and [961577] to completely alter the flow along the trackway, possibly even stopping it, so the movement of livestock is directed more specifically into the enclosures to the east and west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could this suggest that there is instead of a N/S flow that there is a flow from the north, south to this point and from the south, north to this point, does this suggest that entity 10009, BA settlement area is associated with ownership development with these southern enclosures and a possible settlement area somewhere to the north, providing ownership of the northern enclosures? Therefore division of landscape through ownership rather than simply division through topographical change. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Conversely this could point to a formalisation of a routine carried out in the landscape. If livestock were moved from enclosure to enclosure, to follow the grazing perhaps, then this particular part of the trackway would have become obsolete. Livestock would still be moving within the landscape and along the trackway but instead of a simple  trackway to enclosure to trackway to enclosure etc more of a trackway to enclosure to enclosure to trackway to enclosure and so on. So the routine movement of livestock throughout the landscape as a whole rather than packages of ownership. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The location of most control of access and of movement and the modification thereof can be found at the southern end of the trackway near entity 10009: This consists of SG's [962328], [591061], [591074], [591035], [591055], [591059], [591038] and [962327] and has been nicknamed 'the tooth'. See sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This part of the trackway is connected with access to and from the settlement area (entity10009) and the enclosures. It appears initially that access was quite open and free flowing but over time the channelling of livestock to and from the settlement area became more formalised with SG[591074], access was later narrowed by SG[591059] before eventually being cut off entirely by SG[591038] (and [962327]). Group sheet [591061] is well worth a read for the detail of what is going on here and its phasing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the modification of 'the tooth' over what may have been a considerable amount of time points to entity 10009 being a focal point for this trackway and probably of some significance within the landscape. Does its eventual blocking suggest that the settlement is abandoned? - The narrowing of 'the tooth' may suggest a shrinking of the settlement or a lessening of its importance prior to abandonment. Alternatively it may point to a shift in focus, the settlement still occupied but the trackway of no further use as access may have only been needed to the enclosures to the south. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This trackway has its functional aspect, it is after all about the control and ease of movement of livestock within the landscape. The recutting and modification of various parts illustrate the flexibility of the system and how it adapted to changing needs. However it also allows us to look at aspects of the lives of those who experienced it, from the routine day to day to more generalised themes of order, control, ownership and such. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I have discussed earlier how the routine experience of moving livestock from trackway to enclosure to enclosure may have become formalised by the modification of areas of the trackway and no doubt the day to day life of the trackway was probably quite routine and 'everyday'.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Perhaps the construction of the trackway itself is connected with the formalisation of the routine, livestock moving from enclosure to enclosure,- the trackway making this an easier less labour intensive task? Perhaps this also suggests a move away from an open to a more restricted landscape, also the modification of parts of the trackway e.g. 'the tooth' may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However is this a piecemeal response to specific situations or part of an overall plan? The construction itself would have required some organisation and effort and even the modifications appear to remain part of the whole trackway, so an organised and controlled effort to make a trackway which itself is about controlling and ordering livestock, making life easier for those people who lived here; they wouldn’t have put the effort in unless there was some sort of return. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The link between the trackway and entity 10009 seems to be significant and the families of this settlement may well have been connected with the construction of this trackway, there may have been other settlements elsewhere, indeed the communal impression the trackway gives may hint at this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However other aspects of the trackway,- modification of access and even blocking of access e.g. at 'the tooth' as well as pointing on one hand to possible shrinking of settlement or shift of focus as a passive occurrence could also point to a deliberate alteration within the landscape. Alterations to the trackway appear to have been deliberate elsewhere so this leads to suggestions of a tier of control above that exerted by the inhabitants of the settlement(10009) alone. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So this trackway seems to be a deliberate part of the layout of the field systems encountered in a routine way and probably modified to reflect that in some instances. It also suggests control and order, not just in terms of herding livestock but in terms of the people living in the landscape, - a certain amount of sophistication needs to be attributed to these people. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  (512 DMT): It may be pertinent to suggest that if the settlement 10009 was not occupied on a permanent basis, but on a more seasonal function, then might it be that the trackway reflects this utility. The link between 10009 and an as yet unspecified area to the north may imply a communication of function and the season associated with that practice, for example, shearing etc…","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10017","PSH02 - 591074","PSH02",591074
29,"Bronze Age indeterminate pits WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All pits from WPR no closely dated than Bronze Age","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210106","GAI99",210106
29,"Bronze Age indeterminate pits WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All pits from WPR no closely dated than Bronze Age","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214098","GAI99",214098
29,"Bronze Age indeterminate pits WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All pits from WPR no closely dated than Bronze Age","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216098","GAI99",216098
29,"Bronze Age indeterminate pits WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All pits from WPR no closely dated than Bronze Age","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216112","GAI99",216112
29,"Bronze Age indeterminate pits WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All pits from WPR no closely dated than Bronze Age","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221054","GAI99",221054
29,"Bronze Age indeterminate pits WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All pits from WPR no closely dated than Bronze Age","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148320","WPR98",148320
35,"Late Roman Postholes","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","All postholes dated to the RCP4 phase not belonging to a structure.","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146147","WPR98",146147
36,"Late Bronze Age Treethrow","325 Late Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","LBA tree throw excavated in Bed B. Cuts bank related deposit of MBA ditch.","ab","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 136054","WPR98",136054
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509129","PSH02",509129
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509130","PSH02",509130
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509131","PSH02",509131
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509139","PSH02",509139
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509140","PSH02",509140
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509141","PSH02",509141
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510138","PSH02",510138
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510141","PSH02",510141
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510144","PSH02",510144
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510148","PSH02",510148
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510153","PSH02",510153
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510155","PSH02",510155
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510158","PSH02",510158
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510160","PSH02",510160
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525200","PSH02",525200
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525212","PSH02",525212
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528197","PSH02",528197
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542276","PSH02",542276
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542325","PSH02",542325
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542332","PSH02",542332
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547331","PSH02",547331
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 549187","PSH02",549187
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552236","PSH02",552236
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554584","PSH02",554584
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554586","PSH02",554586
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554598","PSH02",554598
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555561","PSH02",555561
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568265","PSH02",568265
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568269","PSH02",568269
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578157","PSH02",578157
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578159","PSH02",578159
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578170","PSH02",578170
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578189","PSH02",578189
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578213","PSH02",578213
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578215","PSH02",578215
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578229","PSH02",578229
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578596","PSH02",578596
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578628","PSH02",578628
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578630","PSH02",578630
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580157","PSH02",580157
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580223","PSH02",580223
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580225","PSH02",580225
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580227","PSH02",580227
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580372","PSH02",580372
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581268","PSH02",581268
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581294","PSH02",581294
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582195","PSH02",582195
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582434","PSH02",582434
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589086","PSH02",589086
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589098","PSH02",589098
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589336","PSH02",589336
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591093","PSH02",591093
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594133","PSH02",594133
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594147","PSH02",594147
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594149","PSH02",594149
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594152","PSH02",594152
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594249","PSH02",594249
37,"MLBA field system on Area 34, 100 and 99 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity created to group all ditches on the 'northern taxiway' sites which look to form part of the north west to south east orientated field system which is thought to be of MLBA date.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 599081","PSH02",599081
38,"Penannular Gully 16","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 158143","WPR98",158143
38,"Penannular Gully 16","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 158148","WPR98",158148
38,"Penannular Gully 16","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 184026","WPR98",184026
38,"Penannular Gully 16","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 184028","WPR98",184028
38,"Penannular Gully 16","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 184030","WPR98",184030
38,"Penannular Gully 16","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 184032","WPR98",184032
38,"Penannular Gully 16","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 184034","WPR98",184034
38,"Penannular Gully 16","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 184038","WPR98",184038
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111127","WPR98",111127
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 112021","WPR98",112021
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 112025","WPR98",112025
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113160","WPR98",113160
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157080","WPR98",157080
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157127","WPR98",157127
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157131","WPR98",157131
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157133","WPR98",157133
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 174019","WPR98",174019
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 174024","WPR98",174024
39,"Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 189023","WPR98",189023
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 653082","PSH02",653082
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 655146","PSH02",655146
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113098","WPR98",113098
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126155","WPR98",126155
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128119","WPR98",128119
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146272","WPR98",146272
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148121","WPR98",148121
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149114","WPR98",149114
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151143","WPR98",151143
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151145","WPR98",151145
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172012","WPR98",172012
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172014","WPR98",172014
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172018","WPR98",172018
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172032","WPR98",172032
40,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group a","420 Middle Iron Age",,"2 small MIA ring gullies which probably served aas ancilliary buildings","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 183050","WPR98",183050
41,"Middle Bronze Age Pit 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","MBA pit excavated in POK 96. Possibly part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 962043","POK96",962043
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960529","POK96",960529
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103038","WPR98",103038
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125244","WPR98",125244
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146039","WPR98",146039
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146043","WPR98",146043
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146048","WPR98",146048
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157065","WPR98",157065
49,"Late Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
52,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 63","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"NW-Se aligned ditch that forms part of a field system in Area 77.  Contained small quantities of MBA pottery.  Relationship between this ditch and MBA Ditch 61, that forms right angles with it, is difficult to discern.  This may be partly because of truncation but it appears that the two ditches respect/ abut one another with no evidence of one cutting the other.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 510175","PSH02",510175
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"GAI99 - 212086","GAI99",212086
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"GAI99 - 218004","GAI99",218004
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"GAI99 - 218066","GAI99",218066
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 578170","PSH02",578170
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 589098","PSH02",589098
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 129081","WPR98",129081
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 130119","WPR98",130119
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 130123","WPR98",130123
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 130127","WPR98",130127
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 136075","WPR98",136075
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 141056","WPR98",141056
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 149129","WPR98",149129
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 149139","WPR98",149139
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 149141","WPR98",149141
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 149150","WPR98",149150
53,"Bronze Age Trackway 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather truncated and ephemeral trackway situated in the eastern part of the Site.  It follows a similar orientation to Trackway 3, in that it is aligned roughly north-west - south-east across the landscape.  This trackway does seem to be quite extensive,  perhaps originally running from the settlement on Northern Taxiway to Area 77.  Middle Bronze Age pottery was retrieved from interventions in its northern extent where it was less truncated.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 509145","PSH02",509145
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 543406","PSH02",543406
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 543408","PSH02",543408
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 543412","PSH02",543412
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 543414","PSH02",543414
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 543416","PSH02",543416
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 543419","PSH02",543419
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 547351","PSH02",547351
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 547353","PSH02",547353
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 547357","PSH02",547357
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 547359","PSH02",547359
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 547363","PSH02",547363
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 552243","PSH02",552243
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 554659","PSH02",554659
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578509","PSH02",578509
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 589240","PSH02",589240
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 589242","PSH02",589242
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 589244","PSH02",589244
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 589247","PSH02",589247
61,"Settlement 8 (nee LBA Round House Area 99)","325 Late Bronze Age",,"This structure potentially sits in the corner of a field system.  Two of the post holes produced LBA pottery and others produced struck flint.  Some of the posts had post pipes.  The structure is roughly circular in form, although there are a number of possible post outliers, and perhaps even internal structural posts.  Some of the posts may relate to repair.  The structure is roughly 8.5 m in diameter, although it is not completely circular.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 589249","PSH02",589249
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212066","GAI99",212066
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216063","GAI99",216063
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217044","GAI99",217044
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217052","GAI99",217052
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218013","GAI99",218013
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218018","GAI99",218018
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960529","POK96",960529
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960572","POK96",960572
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963235","POK96",963235
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963256","POK96",963256
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122076","WPR98",122076
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122078","WPR98",122078
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125034","WPR98",125034
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125247","WPR98",125247
63,"Late Bronze Age Pits WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"All LBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178139","WPR98",178139
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 509180","PSH02",509180
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525287","PSH02",525287
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525293","PSH02",525293
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525295","PSH02",525295
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525301","PSH02",525301
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525323","PSH02",525323
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525327","PSH02",525327
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525331","PSH02",525331
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525333","PSH02",525333
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525335","PSH02",525335
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525338","PSH02",525338
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525340","PSH02",525340
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547384","PSH02",547384
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555733","PSH02",555733
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555735","PSH02",555735
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555738","PSH02",555738
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555742","PSH02",555742
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555748","PSH02",555748
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555752","PSH02",555752
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555754","PSH02",555754
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555759","PSH02",555759
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555767","PSH02",555767
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555773","PSH02",555773
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555775","PSH02",555775
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555789","PSH02",555789
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555793","PSH02",555793
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 589223","PSH02",589223
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 612087","PSH02",612087
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 612090","PSH02",612090
68,"Saxon pits (PSH02)","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"All Saxon features from PSH02 which are described as pits.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 613067","PSH02",613067
69,"Penannular Gully 7","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully for roundhouse in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 140112","WPR98",140112
71,"Bronze Age Field 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small field - the quantity of material culture associated with these ditches is comparatively high.  A number of pot sherds were retrieved from ditch fill.  Does this imply proximity of settlement or activities of a non-domestic nature?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582195","PSH02",582195
71,"Bronze Age Field 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small field - the quantity of material culture associated with these ditches is comparatively high.  A number of pot sherds were retrieved from ditch fill.  Does this imply proximity of settlement or activities of a non-domestic nature?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 594133","PSH02",594133
71,"Bronze Age Field 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small field - the quantity of material culture associated with these ditches is comparatively high.  A number of pot sherds were retrieved from ditch fill.  Does this imply proximity of settlement or activities of a non-domestic nature?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 594149","PSH02",594149
81,"Middle Iron Age Pit 3","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","MIA pit excavated in top the top of the MIA ring ditch. Excavated in area C1.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 127217","WPR98",127217
82,"HE2 Neolithic enclosure","225 Late Neolithic","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age","Small enclosure or hengiform monument with internal bank or platform.   **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The majority of finds (including sherds of Grooved Ware pottery) were of Late Neolithic date, although a chisel arrowhead and Peterborough ware of Middle Neolithic date was rerieved from a bank-derived secondary deposit. These are likely to be residual.","jscl","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 528117","PSH02",528117
82,"HE2 Neolithic enclosure","225 Late Neolithic","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age","Small enclosure or hengiform monument with internal bank or platform.   **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The majority of finds (including sherds of Grooved Ware pottery) were of Late Neolithic date, although a chisel arrowhead and Peterborough ware of Middle Neolithic date was rerieved from a bank-derived secondary deposit. These are likely to be residual.","jscl","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 556070","PSH02",556070
83,"Possible Roman Building B3",,,"Remains of possible building  as described in Perryoaks Publication","nad","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 163097","WPR98",163097
87,"Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age Pit","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age","LN/EBA pit located to the north of Bed B. contained flint which dated the feature?","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 960112","POK96",960112
89,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches3",,,"a possible phase of enclosures","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512072","PSH02",512072
89,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches3",,,"a possible phase of enclosures","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512083","PSH02",512083
89,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches3",,,"a possible phase of enclosures","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527192","PSH02",527192
89,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches3",,,"a possible phase of enclosures","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527195","PSH02",527195
89,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches3",,,"a possible phase of enclosures","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527197","PSH02",527197
89,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches3",,,"a possible phase of enclosures","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
89,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches3",,,"a possible phase of enclosures","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529237","PSH02",529237
89,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches3",,,"a possible phase of enclosures","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546065","PSH02",546065
89,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches3",,,"a possible phase of enclosures","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546066","PSH02",546066
92,"Early Bronze Age Pit 2","305 Early Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","EBA pit excavated in area C2 the formation of the lower deposits in this cut have been extrapolated to the EBA taken from the analysis done on the pollen data. The top fill so the pit probably dated to the LBA.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 155144","WPR98",155144
94,"Bronze Age Pit 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA pit excavated in the west end of Bed B. the pit appears to have cut the remnanat bank of the cursus. Possible that this is in fact a segment of ditch.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 162003","WPR98",162003
96,"Penannular Gully 1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 140084","WPR98",140084
97,"Neolithic pit complex 1  Area 99 (PSH02)","220 Middle or Late Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 south of the MBA waterhole.  This cluster of pits is intriguing and potentially unusual.  Many of the pits contained deliberate backfill deposits and had been closed/ filled in shortly after they had been cut.  These acts made sense in the context that some provided evidence of placed deposits at their bases.  The concentrated nature of intercutting  (nine intercutting pits were identified) implies a rather intense focus of activity in a very specific area.  It is possible that some of the smaller pits originally held posts and may also have been designed to demarcate this locus.  Datable finds included a number of sherds of Peterborough pottery, suggesting a Middle Neolithic date for some of these pits.  However, other pits contained quantities of Late Neolithic diagnostic material, including chisel arrowheads and Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age flintwork (cores etc.)  It is feasible that the revisiting and recutting of this point in the landscape occurred over a relatively long period of time.  It is also interesting that a similar group of intercutting pits, also containing Neolithic material, was found just to to the north of these features, with a large Bronze Age waterhole separating the two clusters.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555910","PSH02",555910
97,"Neolithic pit complex 1  Area 99 (PSH02)","220 Middle or Late Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 south of the MBA waterhole.  This cluster of pits is intriguing and potentially unusual.  Many of the pits contained deliberate backfill deposits and had been closed/ filled in shortly after they had been cut.  These acts made sense in the context that some provided evidence of placed deposits at their bases.  The concentrated nature of intercutting  (nine intercutting pits were identified) implies a rather intense focus of activity in a very specific area.  It is possible that some of the smaller pits originally held posts and may also have been designed to demarcate this locus.  Datable finds included a number of sherds of Peterborough pottery, suggesting a Middle Neolithic date for some of these pits.  However, other pits contained quantities of Late Neolithic diagnostic material, including chisel arrowheads and Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age flintwork (cores etc.)  It is feasible that the revisiting and recutting of this point in the landscape occurred over a relatively long period of time.  It is also interesting that a similar group of intercutting pits, also containing Neolithic material, was found just to to the north of these features, with a large Bronze Age waterhole separating the two clusters.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555912","PSH02",555912
97,"Neolithic pit complex 1  Area 99 (PSH02)","220 Middle or Late Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 south of the MBA waterhole.  This cluster of pits is intriguing and potentially unusual.  Many of the pits contained deliberate backfill deposits and had been closed/ filled in shortly after they had been cut.  These acts made sense in the context that some provided evidence of placed deposits at their bases.  The concentrated nature of intercutting  (nine intercutting pits were identified) implies a rather intense focus of activity in a very specific area.  It is possible that some of the smaller pits originally held posts and may also have been designed to demarcate this locus.  Datable finds included a number of sherds of Peterborough pottery, suggesting a Middle Neolithic date for some of these pits.  However, other pits contained quantities of Late Neolithic diagnostic material, including chisel arrowheads and Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age flintwork (cores etc.)  It is feasible that the revisiting and recutting of this point in the landscape occurred over a relatively long period of time.  It is also interesting that a similar group of intercutting pits, also containing Neolithic material, was found just to to the north of these features, with a large Bronze Age waterhole separating the two clusters.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555922","PSH02",555922
97,"Neolithic pit complex 1  Area 99 (PSH02)","220 Middle or Late Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 south of the MBA waterhole.  This cluster of pits is intriguing and potentially unusual.  Many of the pits contained deliberate backfill deposits and had been closed/ filled in shortly after they had been cut.  These acts made sense in the context that some provided evidence of placed deposits at their bases.  The concentrated nature of intercutting  (nine intercutting pits were identified) implies a rather intense focus of activity in a very specific area.  It is possible that some of the smaller pits originally held posts and may also have been designed to demarcate this locus.  Datable finds included a number of sherds of Peterborough pottery, suggesting a Middle Neolithic date for some of these pits.  However, other pits contained quantities of Late Neolithic diagnostic material, including chisel arrowheads and Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age flintwork (cores etc.)  It is feasible that the revisiting and recutting of this point in the landscape occurred over a relatively long period of time.  It is also interesting that a similar group of intercutting pits, also containing Neolithic material, was found just to to the north of these features, with a large Bronze Age waterhole separating the two clusters.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555931","PSH02",555931
97,"Neolithic pit complex 1  Area 99 (PSH02)","220 Middle or Late Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 south of the MBA waterhole.  This cluster of pits is intriguing and potentially unusual.  Many of the pits contained deliberate backfill deposits and had been closed/ filled in shortly after they had been cut.  These acts made sense in the context that some provided evidence of placed deposits at their bases.  The concentrated nature of intercutting  (nine intercutting pits were identified) implies a rather intense focus of activity in a very specific area.  It is possible that some of the smaller pits originally held posts and may also have been designed to demarcate this locus.  Datable finds included a number of sherds of Peterborough pottery, suggesting a Middle Neolithic date for some of these pits.  However, other pits contained quantities of Late Neolithic diagnostic material, including chisel arrowheads and Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age flintwork (cores etc.)  It is feasible that the revisiting and recutting of this point in the landscape occurred over a relatively long period of time.  It is also interesting that a similar group of intercutting pits, also containing Neolithic material, was found just to to the north of these features, with a large Bronze Age waterhole separating the two clusters.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555937","PSH02",555937
97,"Neolithic pit complex 1  Area 99 (PSH02)","220 Middle or Late Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 south of the MBA waterhole.  This cluster of pits is intriguing and potentially unusual.  Many of the pits contained deliberate backfill deposits and had been closed/ filled in shortly after they had been cut.  These acts made sense in the context that some provided evidence of placed deposits at their bases.  The concentrated nature of intercutting  (nine intercutting pits were identified) implies a rather intense focus of activity in a very specific area.  It is possible that some of the smaller pits originally held posts and may also have been designed to demarcate this locus.  Datable finds included a number of sherds of Peterborough pottery, suggesting a Middle Neolithic date for some of these pits.  However, other pits contained quantities of Late Neolithic diagnostic material, including chisel arrowheads and Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age flintwork (cores etc.)  It is feasible that the revisiting and recutting of this point in the landscape occurred over a relatively long period of time.  It is also interesting that a similar group of intercutting pits, also containing Neolithic material, was found just to to the north of these features, with a large Bronze Age waterhole separating the two clusters.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555941","PSH02",555941
97,"Neolithic pit complex 1  Area 99 (PSH02)","220 Middle or Late Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 south of the MBA waterhole.  This cluster of pits is intriguing and potentially unusual.  Many of the pits contained deliberate backfill deposits and had been closed/ filled in shortly after they had been cut.  These acts made sense in the context that some provided evidence of placed deposits at their bases.  The concentrated nature of intercutting  (nine intercutting pits were identified) implies a rather intense focus of activity in a very specific area.  It is possible that some of the smaller pits originally held posts and may also have been designed to demarcate this locus.  Datable finds included a number of sherds of Peterborough pottery, suggesting a Middle Neolithic date for some of these pits.  However, other pits contained quantities of Late Neolithic diagnostic material, including chisel arrowheads and Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age flintwork (cores etc.)  It is feasible that the revisiting and recutting of this point in the landscape occurred over a relatively long period of time.  It is also interesting that a similar group of intercutting pits, also containing Neolithic material, was found just to to the north of these features, with a large Bronze Age waterhole separating the two clusters.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555948","PSH02",555948
97,"Neolithic pit complex 1  Area 99 (PSH02)","220 Middle or Late Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 south of the MBA waterhole.  This cluster of pits is intriguing and potentially unusual.  Many of the pits contained deliberate backfill deposits and had been closed/ filled in shortly after they had been cut.  These acts made sense in the context that some provided evidence of placed deposits at their bases.  The concentrated nature of intercutting  (nine intercutting pits were identified) implies a rather intense focus of activity in a very specific area.  It is possible that some of the smaller pits originally held posts and may also have been designed to demarcate this locus.  Datable finds included a number of sherds of Peterborough pottery, suggesting a Middle Neolithic date for some of these pits.  However, other pits contained quantities of Late Neolithic diagnostic material, including chisel arrowheads and Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age flintwork (cores etc.)  It is feasible that the revisiting and recutting of this point in the landscape occurred over a relatively long period of time.  It is also interesting that a similar group of intercutting pits, also containing Neolithic material, was found just to to the north of these features, with a large Bronze Age waterhole separating the two clusters.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555951","PSH02",555951
97,"Neolithic pit complex 1  Area 99 (PSH02)","220 Middle or Late Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 south of the MBA waterhole.  This cluster of pits is intriguing and potentially unusual.  Many of the pits contained deliberate backfill deposits and had been closed/ filled in shortly after they had been cut.  These acts made sense in the context that some provided evidence of placed deposits at their bases.  The concentrated nature of intercutting  (nine intercutting pits were identified) implies a rather intense focus of activity in a very specific area.  It is possible that some of the smaller pits originally held posts and may also have been designed to demarcate this locus.  Datable finds included a number of sherds of Peterborough pottery, suggesting a Middle Neolithic date for some of these pits.  However, other pits contained quantities of Late Neolithic diagnostic material, including chisel arrowheads and Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age flintwork (cores etc.)  It is feasible that the revisiting and recutting of this point in the landscape occurred over a relatively long period of time.  It is also interesting that a similar group of intercutting pits, also containing Neolithic material, was found just to to the north of these features, with a large Bronze Age waterhole separating the two clusters.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555953","PSH02",555953
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 512072","PSH02",512072
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 517229","PSH02",517229
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 517232","PSH02",517232
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 517262","PSH02",517262
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 517284","PSH02",517284
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 525172","PSH02",525172
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526276","PSH02",526276
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526279","PSH02",526279
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526281","PSH02",526281
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 527192","PSH02",527192
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 527195","PSH02",527195
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 527197","PSH02",527197
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 527215","PSH02",527215
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 527261","PSH02",527261
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529228","PSH02",529228
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529233","PSH02",529233
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529237","PSH02",529237
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529239","PSH02",529239
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529241","PSH02",529241
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529266","PSH02",529266
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529267","PSH02",529267
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529268","PSH02",529268
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537016","PSH02",537016
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537023","PSH02",537023
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537034","PSH02",537034
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537044","PSH02",537044
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537056","PSH02",537056
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537068","PSH02",537068
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537082","PSH02",537082
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537093","PSH02",537093
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537118","PSH02",537118
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537134","PSH02",537134
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537187","PSH02",537187
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 539051","PSH02",539051
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542094","PSH02",542094
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542095","PSH02",542095
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542102","PSH02",542102
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542106","PSH02",542106
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 546065","PSH02",546065
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 546066","PSH02",546066
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 546100","PSH02",546100
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 546103","PSH02",546103
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 546107","PSH02",546107
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 553032","PSH02",553032
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 553037","PSH02",553037
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 553044","PSH02",553044
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 553092","PSH02",553092
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 553096","PSH02",553096
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555271","PSH02",555271
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555276","PSH02",555276
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555281","PSH02",555281
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555283","PSH02",555283
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555285","PSH02",555285
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555287","PSH02",555287
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555290","PSH02",555290
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 560023","PSH02",560023
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 560027","PSH02",560027
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561121","PSH02",561121
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561126","PSH02",561126
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561131","PSH02",561131
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561133","PSH02",561133
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561138","PSH02",561138
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561140","PSH02",561140
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561153","PSH02",561153
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 568068","PSH02",568068
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 568079","PSH02",568079
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 568083","PSH02",568083
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 569022","PSH02",569022
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 569080","PSH02",569080
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 570027","PSH02",570027
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 570039","PSH02",570039
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 570107","PSH02",570107
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575181","PSH02",575181
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578112","PSH02",578112
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578115","PSH02",578115
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 579121","PSH02",579121
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 579123","PSH02",579123
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582101","PSH02",582101
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582117","PSH02",582117
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 587037","PSH02",587037
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 591043","PSH02",591043
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 592033","PSH02",592033
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 593006","PSH02",593006
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 598017","PSH02",598017
99,"Saxon and Medieval Enclosures","620 Late Saxon","800 Post-Medieval","Although this seems like a very broad and general entity (both chronologically and spatially), it brings together all the components that represent the emergence and development of the Medieval enclosure, field system and associated structures in Area 49 and its surrounds.  The emergence may date to Saxon times, when a number of post-built timber buildings (barns and houses) were constructed.  Although small sherds of Medieval pottery were also found in some of the posts comprising these structures, these come from fills deposited after the timber posts had been removed/structures dismantled.  A waterhole and other posts (?pens/fencelines) may be contemporary with these structures. These buildings were later envelopped by an enclosure which shifted over time to the east.  In turn, this enclosure was linked with a series of other features including waterholes and two polygnal animal enclosures, a small northern one (for herding, sorting and controlling animals), and a larger southern one - for holding animals - an animal pen.  When this uber-entity is divided up into different temporal phases through IG's, it should become possible to see clearly the nature of the origins, development and demise of the Saxon and Medieval activity in this area, the form it took and the different functions associated with its various aspects.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 603039","PSH02",603039
102,"Penannular Gully 32","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Partial MIA ring gully. Significant as a penannummar gully replaced by a leter sub-rectangular structure and therefore an important chronological feature","lb","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 107098","WPR98",107098
103,"Mesolithic pits (PSH02)","160 Mesolithic",,"All Meso features from PSH02 which are described as pits.  Excludes those which are described as broadly Meso/Neo.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524218","PSH02",524218
103,"Mesolithic pits (PSH02)","160 Mesolithic",,"All Meso features from PSH02 which are described as pits.  Excludes those which are described as broadly Meso/Neo.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524220","PSH02",524220
103,"Mesolithic pits (PSH02)","160 Mesolithic",,"All Meso features from PSH02 which are described as pits.  Excludes those which are described as broadly Meso/Neo.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524224","PSH02",524224
103,"Mesolithic pits (PSH02)","160 Mesolithic",,"All Meso features from PSH02 which are described as pits.  Excludes those which are described as broadly Meso/Neo.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555536","PSH02",555536
103,"Mesolithic pits (PSH02)","160 Mesolithic",,"All Meso features from PSH02 which are described as pits.  Excludes those which are described as broadly Meso/Neo.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578138","PSH02",578138
103,"Mesolithic pits (PSH02)","160 Mesolithic",,"All Meso features from PSH02 which are described as pits.  Excludes those which are described as broadly Meso/Neo.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578423","PSH02",578423
103,"Mesolithic pits (PSH02)","160 Mesolithic",,"All Meso features from PSH02 which are described as pits.  Excludes those which are described as broadly Meso/Neo.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621094","PSH02",621094
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210026","GAI99",210026
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210033","GAI99",210033
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210034","GAI99",210034
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210035","GAI99",210035
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210036","GAI99",210036
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210037","GAI99",210037
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210038","GAI99",210038
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210039","GAI99",210039
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210061","GAI99",210061
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210062","GAI99",210062
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210063","GAI99",210063
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210064","GAI99",210064
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210065","GAI99",210065
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210066","GAI99",210066
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210069","GAI99",210069
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210070","GAI99",210070
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210071","GAI99",210071
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210072","GAI99",210072
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210077","GAI99",210077
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210078","GAI99",210078
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210098","GAI99",210098
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210102","GAI99",210102
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210104","GAI99",210104
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210108","GAI99",210108
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 211081","GAI99",211081
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212055","GAI99",212055
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212066","GAI99",212066
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212086","GAI99",212086
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213034","GAI99",213034
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213036","GAI99",213036
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213038","GAI99",213038
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213040","GAI99",213040
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213042","GAI99",213042
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213044","GAI99",213044
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213046","GAI99",213046
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213048","GAI99",213048
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213050","GAI99",213050
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213052","GAI99",213052
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213054","GAI99",213054
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213056","GAI99",213056
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213058","GAI99",213058
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213062","GAI99",213062
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214106","GAI99",214106
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214108","GAI99",214108
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214110","GAI99",214110
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214112","GAI99",214112
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214114","GAI99",214114
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214116","GAI99",214116
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214118","GAI99",214118
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214120","GAI99",214120
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214122","GAI99",214122
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214126","GAI99",214126
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214128","GAI99",214128
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214130","GAI99",214130
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214132","GAI99",214132
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214134","GAI99",214134
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214136","GAI99",214136
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214138","GAI99",214138
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216046","GAI99",216046
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216048","GAI99",216048
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216063","GAI99",216063
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216076","GAI99",216076
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216080","GAI99",216080
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216082","GAI99",216082
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216090","GAI99",216090
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216092","GAI99",216092
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217044","GAI99",217044
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217052","GAI99",217052
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217061","GAI99",217061
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218013","GAI99",218013
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218038","GAI99",218038
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218042","GAI99",218042
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218058","GAI99",218058
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218066","GAI99",218066
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221005","GAI99",221005
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221007","GAI99",221007
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221009","GAI99",221009
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221011","GAI99",221011
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221014","GAI99",221014
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221017","GAI99",221017
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221020","GAI99",221020
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221022","GAI99",221022
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221025","GAI99",221025
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221080","GAI99",221080
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221082","GAI99",221082
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221084","GAI99",221084
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221086","GAI99",221086
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221088","GAI99",221088
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221090","GAI99",221090
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221092","GAI99",221092
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222018","GAI99",222018
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222020","GAI99",222020
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222022","GAI99",222022
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222024","GAI99",222024
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222026","GAI99",222026
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222028","GAI99",222028
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222030","GAI99",222030
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222032","GAI99",222032
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222034","GAI99",222034
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222036","GAI99",222036
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222040","GAI99",222040
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222042","GAI99",222042
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222044","GAI99",222044
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222046","GAI99",222046
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222050","GAI99",222050
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222052","GAI99",222052
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222064","GAI99",222064
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 225041","GAI99",225041
104,"Bronze Age ntaxiway all settlement ex GW pit","300 Bronze Age",,"same as BA ntaxiway all settlement elements entity but does not include Grooved Ware pit 216009","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 225043","GAI99",225043
109,"Unphased Wells","999 Unphased",,"entity to group all unphased wells.","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963443","POK96",963443
111,"Middle Bronze Age Settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA settlement entity contans all features which may be related to settlement activity.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222032","GAI99",222032
111,"Middle Bronze Age Settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA settlement entity contans all features which may be related to settlement activity.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962043","POK96",962043
112,"Middle Roman Pit 4","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","RCP3 pit excavated in area C1 within the MIA ring ditch.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 127138","WPR98",127138
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 960074","POK96",960074
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 960091","POK96",960091
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961026","POK96",961026
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961030","POK96",961030
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961052","POK96",961052
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961063","POK96",961063
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961067","POK96",961067
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961069","POK96",961069
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961070","POK96",961070
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961073","POK96",961073
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961074","POK96",961074
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961079","POK96",961079
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961081","POK96",961081
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961082","POK96",961082
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961094","POK96",961094
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961095","POK96",961095
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961096","POK96",961096
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961104","POK96",961104
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961109","POK96",961109
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961114","POK96",961114
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961151","POK96",961151
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961737","POK96",961737
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961752","POK96",961752
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961988","POK96",961988
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 962022","POK96",962022
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 962041","POK96",962041
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963016","POK96",963016
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963039","POK96",963039
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963103","POK96",963103
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963132","POK96",963132
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963133","POK96",963133
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963136","POK96",963136
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963151","POK96",963151
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963168","POK96",963168
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963170","POK96",963170
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963305","POK96",963305
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963433","POK96",963433
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963434","POK96",963434
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963435","POK96",963435
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 963436","POK96",963436
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 121219","WPR98",121219
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 121225","WPR98",121225
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 121227","WPR98",121227
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 121229","WPR98",121229
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 121233","WPR98",121233
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 123129","WPR98",123129
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 123131","WPR98",123131
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 124167","WPR98",124167
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 125126","WPR98",125126
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 125174","WPR98",125174
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 125176","WPR98",125176
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 125178","WPR98",125178
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 125184","WPR98",125184
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 125186","WPR98",125186
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 126123","WPR98",126123
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 126127","WPR98",126127
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 126139","WPR98",126139
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 127141","WPR98",127141
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 127176","WPR98",127176
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 127178","WPR98",127178
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 127182","WPR98",127182
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 127191","WPR98",127191
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 130246","WPR98",130246
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 130248","WPR98",130248
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 130250","WPR98",130250
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 130260","WPR98",130260
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 132146","WPR98",132146
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 132321","WPR98",132321
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 133039","WPR98",133039
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 133042","WPR98",133042
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 133049","WPR98",133049
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 133119","WPR98",133119
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 133125","WPR98",133125
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 133132","WPR98",133132
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 134112","WPR98",134112
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 134114","WPR98",134114
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 146149","WPR98",146149
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 146254","WPR98",146254
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 147300","WPR98",147300
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 147302","WPR98",147302
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 147310","WPR98",147310
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 147317","WPR98",147317
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 147329","WPR98",147329
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 147331","WPR98",147331
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 147336","WPR98",147336
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 148138","WPR98",148138
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 148140","WPR98",148140
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 148157","WPR98",148157
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 148217","WPR98",148217
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 148219","WPR98",148219
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 148224","WPR98",148224
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 148226","WPR98",148226
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 148228","WPR98",148228
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 148236","WPR98",148236
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 149197","WPR98",149197
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 149203","WPR98",149203
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 149247","WPR98",149247
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 153033","WPR98",153033
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 154009","WPR98",154009
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 158103","WPR98",158103
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 158105","WPR98",158105
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 159007","WPR98",159007
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 160332","WPR98",160332
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 166162","WPR98",166162
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 166164","WPR98",166164
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 166166","WPR98",166166
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 166168","WPR98",166168
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 166170","WPR98",166170
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 172020","WPR98",172020
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 180003","WPR98",180003
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 182048","WPR98",182048
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 184009","WPR98",184009
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 185005","WPR98",185005
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 185009","WPR98",185009
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 185011","WPR98",185011
114,"Unphased postholes","999 Unphased",,"All unphased postholes at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 185013","WPR98",185013
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961009","POK96",961009
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961012","POK96",961012
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961020","POK96",961020
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961071","POK96",961071
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961085","POK96",961085
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961086","POK96",961086
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961093","POK96",961093
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961103","POK96",961103
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961532","POK96",961532
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961578","POK96",961578
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961631","POK96",961631
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961747","POK96",961747
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962303","POK96",962303
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963055","POK96",963055
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963389","POK96",963389
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103046","WPR98",103046
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103054","WPR98",103054
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 105009","WPR98",105009
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107149","WPR98",107149
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110007","WPR98",110007
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111012","WPR98",111012
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119014","WPR98",119014
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119034","WPR98",119034
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119317","WPR98",119317
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119322","WPR98",119322
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 120013","WPR98",120013
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121009","WPR98",121009
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132028","WPR98",132028
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132029","WPR98",132029
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 143011","WPR98",143011
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147026","WPR98",147026
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149112","WPR98",149112
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 156143","WPR98",156143
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
117,"Bronze Age field system earliest in the west","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is the Bronze Age field system located to the west of the neutral zone on site. In WPR 98 and POK 96. Earliest ditches and general entity for this section.","ab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575287","PSH02",575287
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582360","PSH02",582360
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582362","PSH02",582362
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582367","PSH02",582367
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582369","PSH02",582369
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 602073","PSH02",602073
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 602076","PSH02",602076
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636166","PSH02",636166
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636167","PSH02",636167
118,"Roman Enclosure 2","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","This is a rather unusually shaped enclosure, situated in Area 61.  The northern side of the enclosure is roughly curvilinear with rounded corners, while the southern side is straight with rectangular corners.  Its main axis is aligned roughly north-south, and it is roughly 46 m N-S by 35 m E-W in dimensions.  The enclosure cuts across an earlier Roman NW-SE orientated ditch, which may form part of Roman field system.  There is some evidence of recutting along the enclosure ditches, implying some element of maintenance.  Furthermore the fact that significant quantities of pottery spanning the LIA-LRB periods were retrieved may imply that it was established and maintained over a relatively long period of time. Large quantities of finds, particularly pottery, were retrieved from these ditch fills implying the presence of domestic/ settlement activity in the vicinity.  Although the pottery provides a range of dates, it suggests more intensive activity in the  late Roman period.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 648091","PSH02",648091
122,"Late Iron Age Ditch 5","430 Late Iron Age","430 Late Iron Age","LIA ditch located in area C1 possibly part of a segmented trackway and connected to later ditch RCP1 ditch 13","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 125197","WPR98",125197
123,"Early/Middle Iron Age ring gullies","410 Early Iron Age",,"Iron Age ring gullies which appear to contain a mixture of both Early Iron Age and Middle Iron Age material","cdg","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 614227","PSH02",614227
123,"Early/Middle Iron Age ring gullies","410 Early Iron Age",,"Iron Age ring gullies which appear to contain a mixture of both Early Iron Age and Middle Iron Age material","cdg","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 632089","PSH02",632089
123,"Early/Middle Iron Age ring gullies","410 Early Iron Age",,"Iron Age ring gullies which appear to contain a mixture of both Early Iron Age and Middle Iron Age material","cdg","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636013","PSH02",636013
125,"Penannular Gully 4","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1 cuts MIA ditch although no finds from the fill of this ditch.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146272","WPR98",146272
125,"Penannular Gully 4","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1 cuts MIA ditch although no finds from the fill of this ditch.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 149114","WPR98",149114
127,"Middle / Late Bronze Age Pit 1","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age","MLBA pit excavated in north of POK 96. No dating from fill of the pit possibly associated with enterance way into MBA field system.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961746","POK96",961746
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517229","PSH02",517229
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517232","PSH02",517232
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517284","PSH02",517284
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527215","PSH02",527215
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527261","PSH02",527261
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527270","PSH02",527270
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537134","PSH02",537134
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537136","PSH02",537136
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537183","PSH02",537183
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537184","PSH02",537184
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570107","PSH02",570107
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575181","PSH02",575181
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575200","PSH02",575200
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578112","PSH02",578112
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578115","PSH02",578115
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 587037","PSH02",587037
136,"Medieval Building 2","715 Early Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two rows of 6 postholes aligned NNE-SSW all of similar form and dimensions. These 12 postholes suggest a structure which was situated in the central part of area 49. (see sheet2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  In addition to these twelve posts there are a number of features which may or may not be related, postholes[587035], [527235] and pit [527217], however none can be dated, so may be more of a hindrance when discussing the twelve post structure. Posthole [575146] cuts C12th-C14th gully [512083], however I would argue that the 12 poster is pre C12th so this posthole is not directly connected. Never the less this structure is long lived and may have undergone alterations throughout its life and some of these features may hint at that. Robber cuts in several of the post holes indicate that the twelve post structure was dismantled at the end of its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating of this 12 poster is problematic due to an extreme lack of finds; a late neo flake and two undiagnostic flakes are all that come from the postholes themselves. Also a sherd of moderately abraded LBA pot was recovered from robber cut [527270]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Stratigraphically the only relationship is with the eastern cursus ditch SG[512070]. The 12 poster cuts this ditch and in fact pays no respect to the cursus whatsoever. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An OSL reading was taken from deposit (537139), fill of robber cut [537136] and provided a date range of 930BC +/- 150 years, which spans the late bronze age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So datewise, the structure is definitely post cursus and the fact it pays little respect to the cursus may also push its date forward beyond the BA; (it has been noted that some BA features respect or utilise aspects of the cursus). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The artefacts were all located in postholes that cut the fills of the cursus ditch (see sheet 2), so the likelihood that they are residual, even those from the robber cut , is high. This may be strengthened by the total absence of finds from any of the other postholes. All the artefacts really do is confirm the stratigraphic evidence, - that the 12 poster is post cursus. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL data provided a LBA date, but as has been discussed elsewhere (see entity 10014) the nature of OSL dating is such that the taphonomy of the sample must be considered and so may not actually provide a date for the actual cutting or filling of the feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This leaves us relying on alignments and relationships with other features in the landscape. This is much the same situation as with the ten post structure(10014). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of the postholes themselves appears similar to those of the TPS (10014) and entity 10002 (structure to NE of 12 poster). Also the 12 poster is on a similar alignment to entity10002, so I would argue they are of a similar date.- The TPS has been argued as an early medieval structure (see entity 10014), entity 10002 has dating suggesting C11th-C12th. As well as sharing a similar alignment to entity 10002 the 12 poster is bounded on its eastern and western sides by features of medieval date; ditch [526276] and features [570068], [601007], which are possibly pre C12th. (see sheet 2). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So it is by a string of likely associations that the 12 poster can be placed into the medieval period and most likely a pre C12th phase. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The setting of the 12 poster as well as helping to suggest a date may also indicate its function or help in aspects of its interpretation.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To its north are several storage pits, [546065-067] (see sheet 2), which are later bounded by gullies [513083] and [512083]. The pits are of C11th-C12th date and lie just outside the northern end of the structure, respecting or being respected by it. Perhaps the 12 poster is connected to storage? The gullies suggest that these pits went out of use at a later date, C12th-C14th, but they still respect the twelve poster, could this suggest a possible change in function? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the west are features [601007] and [570068] (see sheet 2), these contain postholes and are a possible pre C12th structured boundary modified into the C12th-C14th. This feature appears to divide the space between the 12 and ten post structure suggesting they were for a time contemporaries, strengthening the dating of 10022. It may also hint at the structuring of activities in specific areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east are ditches [526281], [526279] and [526276] one can be dated to med and all have a bank on the east suggesting a long lived boundary parallel to the eastern side of the 12 poster, again possibly hinting at the structuring of space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 12 post structure located within a NNE/SSW alignment of ditches, storage pits on its northern side and divided from 10 post structure to west (see sheet6), so in the earliest med we can place this 12 poster into a fairly organised landscape; - see entity 10029 for a full discussion of this pre C12th landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The exact nature of this 12 post structure is uncertain, the postholes probably contained quite substantial posts and the internal dimensions point to an internal area of approximately 70 square metres. So this is not an insubstantial structure, large enough for a range of activities. However as any associated surfaces no longer survive the exact function(s) is unknown. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity of storage pits may hint at this area being specifically for storage and as it is bounded on east and west, possibly to exclude livestock,  this may further support this. That this land may have been used for grazing livestock rather than growing crops can be supported by the two waterholes [529139] and [569022] situated to the north and south of the western boundary of the 12 post structure (see sheet 6). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the 12 poster structure is separated from the rest of the landscape,  from the 10 post structure and to a degree from the storage pits, is this significant? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If the TPS is for livestock and fodder storage, where are those tending the  livestock, storing the fodder? Is it not inconceivable that the 12 poster could in whole or part have been occupied by these people, with storage pits right outside the backdoor? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The 12 poster is separate, it appears to be in its own space, entities 10014 and 10002 aren't apparently treated in the same way, to some extent 10022 appears as a focal point and may have been of some significance to the people who encountered it in their day to day lives.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This significance may be furthered due to the longevity of this structure; the ditches to the east, [526276], [526579], [526281] show a long lived boundary, the TPS goes out of use and is cut by a C14th enclosure ditch (SG[537118]) which respects the 12 poster. The structure to the NE (entity 10002) appears to have gone out of use by the C13th, leaving 10022, the 12 post structure on its own. This points to some sort of significance, if it was inhabited, this may explain its longevity, however its function may have changed over its lifespan. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the medieval field systems suggests a focal point to the SE of area 49 and possible settlement there, so it is within this broader scheme that we find the 12 poster, which may have been significant at one point, but towards the end of its life found itself on the periphery of medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  512says: The distribution of medieval CBM may support some of what 529 has suggested as it mainly seems to be concentrated around the entities 10014 and 10022. This may provide indirect evidence of the 10 and 12 posters being medieval and being substantial structures that may have been roofed with fired clay tile. These may be more than simple barn structures and may suggest periodic habitation? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 2: plan of constituents of 12 poster **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Sheet 6: plan of features related to 12 poster","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592033","PSH02",592033
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 960003","POK96",960003
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 960035","POK96",960035
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961028","POK96",961028
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961129","POK96",961129
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961506","POK96",961506
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961509","POK96",961509
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961510","POK96",961510
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961597","POK96",961597
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961608","POK96",961608
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961670","POK96",961670
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961676","POK96",961676
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961680","POK96",961680
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963024","POK96",963024
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 112037","WPR98",112037
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 112040","WPR98",112040
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 119234","WPR98",119234
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 120015","WPR98",120015
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 120017","WPR98",120017
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 122009","WPR98",122009
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128206","WPR98",128206
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 137008","WPR98",137008
138,"Modern Features","900 Modern","900 Modern","entity created to group together modern features","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 142003","WPR98",142003
141,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 3","700 Medieval","800 Post-Medieval","medieval and post-medieval reinforcement of boundary line 2. Also contains 1 x posthole - [581228] - prob forming part of earliest phase of boundary 2.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555868","PSH02",555868
141,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 3","700 Medieval","800 Post-Medieval","medieval and post-medieval reinforcement of boundary line 2. Also contains 1 x posthole - [581228] - prob forming part of earliest phase of boundary 2.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 581224","PSH02",581224
141,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 3","700 Medieval","800 Post-Medieval","medieval and post-medieval reinforcement of boundary line 2. Also contains 1 x posthole - [581228] - prob forming part of earliest phase of boundary 2.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 581226","PSH02",581226
141,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 3","700 Medieval","800 Post-Medieval","medieval and post-medieval reinforcement of boundary line 2. Also contains 1 x posthole - [581228] - prob forming part of earliest phase of boundary 2.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 581228","PSH02",581228
141,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 3","700 Medieval","800 Post-Medieval","medieval and post-medieval reinforcement of boundary line 2. Also contains 1 x posthole - [581228] - prob forming part of earliest phase of boundary 2.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 581230","PSH02",581230
141,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 3","700 Medieval","800 Post-Medieval","medieval and post-medieval reinforcement of boundary line 2. Also contains 1 x posthole - [581228] - prob forming part of earliest phase of boundary 2.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 581232","PSH02",581232
141,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 3","700 Medieval","800 Post-Medieval","medieval and post-medieval reinforcement of boundary line 2. Also contains 1 x posthole - [581228] - prob forming part of earliest phase of boundary 2.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 581234","PSH02",581234
141,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 3","700 Medieval","800 Post-Medieval","medieval and post-medieval reinforcement of boundary line 2. Also contains 1 x posthole - [581228] - prob forming part of earliest phase of boundary 2.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 581236","PSH02",581236
146,"Bronze Age waterhole located far east of the site","325 Late Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity draws together all the waterholes, wells and pits located in the east of the site.","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 126025","WPR98",126025
146,"Bronze Age waterhole located far east of the site","325 Late Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity draws together all the waterholes, wells and pits located in the east of the site.","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 148042","WPR98",148042
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 311014","PSH02",311014
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 311033","PSH02",311033
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 311035","PSH02",311035
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 312027","PSH02",312027
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523145","PSH02",523145
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523146","PSH02",523146
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523202","PSH02",523202
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523217","PSH02",523217
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523222","PSH02",523222
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523241","PSH02",523241
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527388","PSH02",527388
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542387","PSH02",542387
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542390","PSH02",542390
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553191","PSH02",553191
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575287","PSH02",575287
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582360","PSH02",582360
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582362","PSH02",582362
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582369","PSH02",582369
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 602073","PSH02",602073
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614222","PSH02",614222
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 624001","PSH02",624001
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 634011","PSH02",634011
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 634013","PSH02",634013
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 634112","PSH02",634112
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636166","PSH02",636166
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636167","PSH02",636167
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 643125","PSH02",643125
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 643127","PSH02",643127
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 643129","PSH02",643129
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 643131","PSH02",643131
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 656044","PSH02",656044
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 664006","PSH02",664006
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108040","WPR98",108040
147,"1A\Livestock Management\enclosures","401 Iron Age","500 Romano-British","poss enclosures used for livetock management in IA/RB","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160222","WPR98",160222
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212019","GAI99",212019
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212045","GAI99",212045
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212090","GAI99",212090
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218025","GAI99",218025
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218064","GAI99",218064
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960573","POK96",960573
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960574","POK96",960574
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511112","PSH02",511112
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539370","PSH02",539370
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580190","PSH02",580190
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598077","PSH02",598077
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636027","PSH02",636027
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 676033","PSH02",676033
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113038","WPR98",113038
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119286","WPR98",119286
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122053","WPR98",122053
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122055","WPR98",122055
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128107","WPR98",128107
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128123","WPR98",128123
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128126","WPR98",128126
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129067","WPR98",129067
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130131","WPR98",130131
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130145","WPR98",130145
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136076","WPR98",136076
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 143023","WPR98",143023
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 145018","WPR98",145018
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151137","WPR98",151137
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151163","WPR98",151163
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151224","WPR98",151224
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151228","WPR98",151228
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159064","WPR98",159064
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159066","WPR98",159066
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159068","WPR98",159068
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159072","WPR98",159072
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159076","WPR98",159076
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159125","WPR98",159125
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160097","WPR98",160097
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160100","WPR98",160100
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160102","WPR98",160102
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161166","WPR98",161166
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 171065","WPR98",171065
154,"LRB/enclosure system 3/early and floating ditches/",,,"early ditches and ditches floating stratigraphically","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 171067","WPR98",171067
158,"Late Neolithic/EBA scatter1/E of C2 cursus","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"Material of Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age date (predominantly lithics) that suggests activity of this general date in the zone to the east of the small Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539392","PSH02",539392
158,"Late Neolithic/EBA scatter1/E of C2 cursus","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"Material of Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age date (predominantly lithics) that suggests activity of this general date in the zone to the east of the small Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614222","PSH02",614222
160,"Middle / Late Bronze Age Pit","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"MLBA pit excavated in the terminus of a MBA ditch in Bed B.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 307006","WPR98",307006
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210026","GAI99",210026
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221005","GAI99",221005
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221007","GAI99",221007
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221009","GAI99",221009
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221011","GAI99",221011
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221014","GAI99",221014
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221017","GAI99",221017
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221020","GAI99",221020
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221022","GAI99",221022
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221025","GAI99",221025
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221080","GAI99",221080
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221082","GAI99",221082
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221084","GAI99",221084
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221086","GAI99",221086
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221088","GAI99",221088
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221090","GAI99",221090
167,"Bronze Age structure 1 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of post holes which appear to make up the western structure on the NTW, part of the MBA settlement.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 221092","GAI99",221092
176,"Neolithic segmented ditch enclosure (in Area 77)","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Although this series of interrupted ditch segments contained relatively few finds, those that were present (mainly retouched flint) were indicative of a Neolithic/EBA date.  Some of these segments of the ditch seem to have real terminals, but many of the interruptions along its length are due to modern truncation.  Thus it is difficult to be sure about the original form of these ditches.  However, on the basis of location and orientation, it is possible to suggest that these ephemeral ditches represent the remains of a  rectangular bank and ditch earthwork.  This putative earthwork is constituted by two parallel east-west aligned segmented ditches c. 48 m apart, surrounding the horseshoe enclosure.  The full length of this monument has not been exposed, but it may extend for over 250 m, and thus was intended to demarcate space not simply around the horseshoe enclosure.  The horseshoe monument does not lie centrally within this possible earthwork monument, but is skewed towards its northern side.  These ditch segments may be associated with other features including pits.  One pit in particular, 556104 is located on the southern ditch alignment and contained Neolithic pottery and LN/EBA struck flint flakes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510050","PSH02",510050
176,"Neolithic segmented ditch enclosure (in Area 77)","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Although this series of interrupted ditch segments contained relatively few finds, those that were present (mainly retouched flint) were indicative of a Neolithic/EBA date.  Some of these segments of the ditch seem to have real terminals, but many of the interruptions along its length are due to modern truncation.  Thus it is difficult to be sure about the original form of these ditches.  However, on the basis of location and orientation, it is possible to suggest that these ephemeral ditches represent the remains of a  rectangular bank and ditch earthwork.  This putative earthwork is constituted by two parallel east-west aligned segmented ditches c. 48 m apart, surrounding the horseshoe enclosure.  The full length of this monument has not been exposed, but it may extend for over 250 m, and thus was intended to demarcate space not simply around the horseshoe enclosure.  The horseshoe monument does not lie centrally within this possible earthwork monument, but is skewed towards its northern side.  These ditch segments may be associated with other features including pits.  One pit in particular, 556104 is located on the southern ditch alignment and contained Neolithic pottery and LN/EBA struck flint flakes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525386","PSH02",525386
176,"Neolithic segmented ditch enclosure (in Area 77)","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Although this series of interrupted ditch segments contained relatively few finds, those that were present (mainly retouched flint) were indicative of a Neolithic/EBA date.  Some of these segments of the ditch seem to have real terminals, but many of the interruptions along its length are due to modern truncation.  Thus it is difficult to be sure about the original form of these ditches.  However, on the basis of location and orientation, it is possible to suggest that these ephemeral ditches represent the remains of a  rectangular bank and ditch earthwork.  This putative earthwork is constituted by two parallel east-west aligned segmented ditches c. 48 m apart, surrounding the horseshoe enclosure.  The full length of this monument has not been exposed, but it may extend for over 250 m, and thus was intended to demarcate space not simply around the horseshoe enclosure.  The horseshoe monument does not lie centrally within this possible earthwork monument, but is skewed towards its northern side.  These ditch segments may be associated with other features including pits.  One pit in particular, 556104 is located on the southern ditch alignment and contained Neolithic pottery and LN/EBA struck flint flakes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544170","PSH02",544170
176,"Neolithic segmented ditch enclosure (in Area 77)","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Although this series of interrupted ditch segments contained relatively few finds, those that were present (mainly retouched flint) were indicative of a Neolithic/EBA date.  Some of these segments of the ditch seem to have real terminals, but many of the interruptions along its length are due to modern truncation.  Thus it is difficult to be sure about the original form of these ditches.  However, on the basis of location and orientation, it is possible to suggest that these ephemeral ditches represent the remains of a  rectangular bank and ditch earthwork.  This putative earthwork is constituted by two parallel east-west aligned segmented ditches c. 48 m apart, surrounding the horseshoe enclosure.  The full length of this monument has not been exposed, but it may extend for over 250 m, and thus was intended to demarcate space not simply around the horseshoe enclosure.  The horseshoe monument does not lie centrally within this possible earthwork monument, but is skewed towards its northern side.  These ditch segments may be associated with other features including pits.  One pit in particular, 556104 is located on the southern ditch alignment and contained Neolithic pottery and LN/EBA struck flint flakes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551100","PSH02",551100
176,"Neolithic segmented ditch enclosure (in Area 77)","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Although this series of interrupted ditch segments contained relatively few finds, those that were present (mainly retouched flint) were indicative of a Neolithic/EBA date.  Some of these segments of the ditch seem to have real terminals, but many of the interruptions along its length are due to modern truncation.  Thus it is difficult to be sure about the original form of these ditches.  However, on the basis of location and orientation, it is possible to suggest that these ephemeral ditches represent the remains of a  rectangular bank and ditch earthwork.  This putative earthwork is constituted by two parallel east-west aligned segmented ditches c. 48 m apart, surrounding the horseshoe enclosure.  The full length of this monument has not been exposed, but it may extend for over 250 m, and thus was intended to demarcate space not simply around the horseshoe enclosure.  The horseshoe monument does not lie centrally within this possible earthwork monument, but is skewed towards its northern side.  These ditch segments may be associated with other features including pits.  One pit in particular, 556104 is located on the southern ditch alignment and contained Neolithic pottery and LN/EBA struck flint flakes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551102","PSH02",551102
176,"Neolithic segmented ditch enclosure (in Area 77)","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Although this series of interrupted ditch segments contained relatively few finds, those that were present (mainly retouched flint) were indicative of a Neolithic/EBA date.  Some of these segments of the ditch seem to have real terminals, but many of the interruptions along its length are due to modern truncation.  Thus it is difficult to be sure about the original form of these ditches.  However, on the basis of location and orientation, it is possible to suggest that these ephemeral ditches represent the remains of a  rectangular bank and ditch earthwork.  This putative earthwork is constituted by two parallel east-west aligned segmented ditches c. 48 m apart, surrounding the horseshoe enclosure.  The full length of this monument has not been exposed, but it may extend for over 250 m, and thus was intended to demarcate space not simply around the horseshoe enclosure.  The horseshoe monument does not lie centrally within this possible earthwork monument, but is skewed towards its northern side.  These ditch segments may be associated with other features including pits.  One pit in particular, 556104 is located on the southern ditch alignment and contained Neolithic pottery and LN/EBA struck flint flakes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551138","PSH02",551138
176,"Neolithic segmented ditch enclosure (in Area 77)","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Although this series of interrupted ditch segments contained relatively few finds, those that were present (mainly retouched flint) were indicative of a Neolithic/EBA date.  Some of these segments of the ditch seem to have real terminals, but many of the interruptions along its length are due to modern truncation.  Thus it is difficult to be sure about the original form of these ditches.  However, on the basis of location and orientation, it is possible to suggest that these ephemeral ditches represent the remains of a  rectangular bank and ditch earthwork.  This putative earthwork is constituted by two parallel east-west aligned segmented ditches c. 48 m apart, surrounding the horseshoe enclosure.  The full length of this monument has not been exposed, but it may extend for over 250 m, and thus was intended to demarcate space not simply around the horseshoe enclosure.  The horseshoe monument does not lie centrally within this possible earthwork monument, but is skewed towards its northern side.  These ditch segments may be associated with other features including pits.  One pit in particular, 556104 is located on the southern ditch alignment and contained Neolithic pottery and LN/EBA struck flint flakes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556104","PSH02",556104
176,"Neolithic segmented ditch enclosure (in Area 77)","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Although this series of interrupted ditch segments contained relatively few finds, those that were present (mainly retouched flint) were indicative of a Neolithic/EBA date.  Some of these segments of the ditch seem to have real terminals, but many of the interruptions along its length are due to modern truncation.  Thus it is difficult to be sure about the original form of these ditches.  However, on the basis of location and orientation, it is possible to suggest that these ephemeral ditches represent the remains of a  rectangular bank and ditch earthwork.  This putative earthwork is constituted by two parallel east-west aligned segmented ditches c. 48 m apart, surrounding the horseshoe enclosure.  The full length of this monument has not been exposed, but it may extend for over 250 m, and thus was intended to demarcate space not simply around the horseshoe enclosure.  The horseshoe monument does not lie centrally within this possible earthwork monument, but is skewed towards its northern side.  These ditch segments may be associated with other features including pits.  One pit in particular, 556104 is located on the southern ditch alignment and contained Neolithic pottery and LN/EBA struck flint flakes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558107","PSH02",558107
176,"Neolithic segmented ditch enclosure (in Area 77)","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Although this series of interrupted ditch segments contained relatively few finds, those that were present (mainly retouched flint) were indicative of a Neolithic/EBA date.  Some of these segments of the ditch seem to have real terminals, but many of the interruptions along its length are due to modern truncation.  Thus it is difficult to be sure about the original form of these ditches.  However, on the basis of location and orientation, it is possible to suggest that these ephemeral ditches represent the remains of a  rectangular bank and ditch earthwork.  This putative earthwork is constituted by two parallel east-west aligned segmented ditches c. 48 m apart, surrounding the horseshoe enclosure.  The full length of this monument has not been exposed, but it may extend for over 250 m, and thus was intended to demarcate space not simply around the horseshoe enclosure.  The horseshoe monument does not lie centrally within this possible earthwork monument, but is skewed towards its northern side.  These ditch segments may be associated with other features including pits.  One pit in particular, 556104 is located on the southern ditch alignment and contained Neolithic pottery and LN/EBA struck flint flakes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559782","PSH02",559782
178,"Late Iron Age Pits","430 Late Iron Age",,"entity for all LIA pits.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119380","WPR98",119380
178,"Late Iron Age Pits","430 Late Iron Age",,"entity for all LIA pits.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125123","WPR98",125123
178,"Late Iron Age Pits","430 Late Iron Age",,"entity for all LIA pits.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130237","WPR98",130237
178,"Late Iron Age Pits","430 Late Iron Age",,"entity for all LIA pits.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134108","WPR98",134108
178,"Late Iron Age Pits","430 Late Iron Age",,"entity for all LIA pits.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148342","WPR98",148342
178,"Late Iron Age Pits","430 Late Iron Age",,"entity for all LIA pits.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156219","WPR98",156219
178,"Late Iron Age Pits","430 Late Iron Age",,"entity for all LIA pits.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180106","WPR98",180106
180,"Possible Roman Building B2",,,"Possible remains of Romano-British building as described in Perryoaks publication","nad","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 178011","WPR98",178011
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401011","GAA00",401011
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401065","GAA00",401065
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401068","GAA00",401068
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401071","GAA00",401071
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401075","GAA00",401075
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 403030","GAA00",403030
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 403040","GAA00",403040
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405038","GAA00",405038
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405050","GAA00",405050
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405054","GAA00",405054
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 211030","GAI99",211030
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214015","GAI99",214015
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214075","GAI99",214075
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218023","GAI99",218023
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 229149","POK96",229149
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960077","POK96",960077
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961532","POK96",961532
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961578","POK96",961578
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961631","POK96",961631
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962313","POK96",962313
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963017","POK96",963017
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963018","POK96",963018
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963019","POK96",963019
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963020","POK96",963020
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963021","POK96",963021
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963040","POK96",963040
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963055","POK96",963055
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963074","POK96",963074
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963097","POK96",963097
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963106","POK96",963106
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963109","POK96",963109
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963138","POK96",963138
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963159","POK96",963159
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963161","POK96",963161
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963218","POK96",963218
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963280","POK96",963280
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963389","POK96",963389
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963426","POK96",963426
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963489","POK96",963489
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963494","POK96",963494
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963517","POK96",963517
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963519","POK96",963519
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107082","WPR98",107082
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107109","WPR98",107109
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108043","WPR98",108043
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108045","WPR98",108045
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108048","WPR98",108048
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108050","WPR98",108050
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108055","WPR98",108055
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108057","WPR98",108057
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108060","WPR98",108060
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111044","WPR98",111044
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111049","WPR98",111049
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111065","WPR98",111065
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111067","WPR98",111067
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111069","WPR98",111069
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111070","WPR98",111070
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111071","WPR98",111071
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113032","WPR98",113032
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113036","WPR98",113036
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113062","WPR98",113062
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121116","WPR98",121116
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121118","WPR98",121118
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121135","WPR98",121135
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121137","WPR98",121137
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121153","WPR98",121153
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122035","WPR98",122035
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122036","WPR98",122036
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122088","WPR98",122088
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122100","WPR98",122100
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124076","WPR98",124076
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126038","WPR98",126038
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126042","WPR98",126042
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127043","WPR98",127043
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127053","WPR98",127053
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127055","WPR98",127055
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128051","WPR98",128051
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128068","WPR98",128068
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128088","WPR98",128088
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128117","WPR98",128117
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128194","WPR98",128194
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128244","WPR98",128244
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128246","WPR98",128246
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128248","WPR98",128248
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128250","WPR98",128250
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128252","WPR98",128252
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128294","WPR98",128294
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129081","WPR98",129081
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129084","WPR98",129084
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130149","WPR98",130149
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130178","WPR98",130178
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132028","WPR98",132028
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132029","WPR98",132029
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132071","WPR98",132071
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136085","WPR98",136085
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137044","WPR98",137044
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137069","WPR98",137069
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137084","WPR98",137084
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137244","WPR98",137244
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138019","WPR98",138019
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138170","WPR98",138170
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140135","WPR98",140135
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140137","WPR98",140137
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141033","WPR98",141033
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141038","WPR98",141038
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141237","WPR98",141237
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141254","WPR98",141254
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 145016","WPR98",145016
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146090","WPR98",146090
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146091","WPR98",146091
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147026","WPR98",147026
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147056","WPR98",147056
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147081","WPR98",147081
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147083","WPR98",147083
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148063","WPR98",148063
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148181","WPR98",148181
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149031","WPR98",149031
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149141","WPR98",149141
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151063","WPR98",151063
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151210","WPR98",151210
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151214","WPR98",151214
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155080","WPR98",155080
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157025","WPR98",157025
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157034","WPR98",157034
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160031","WPR98",160031
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160092","WPR98",160092
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160184","WPR98",160184
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160356","WPR98",160356
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161124","WPR98",161124
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161126","WPR98",161126
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161130","WPR98",161130
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161132","WPR98",161132
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161162","WPR98",161162
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166138","WPR98",166138
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166140","WPR98",166140
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166160","WPR98",166160
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166194","WPR98",166194
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 171063","WPR98",171063
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172057","WPR98",172057
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 176017","WPR98",176017
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180005","WPR98",180005
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180011","WPR98",180011
181,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1 to 7 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR landholdings 1-7 but excluding trackway ditches so that finds signature can be compared.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180018","WPR98",180018
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960033","POK96",960033
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960575","POK96",960575
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960578","POK96",960578
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961501","POK96",961501
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961634","POK96",961634
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962200","POK96",962200
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527288","PSH02",527288
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 577016","PSH02",577016
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 577024","PSH02",577024
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 641033","PSH02",641033
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 659082","PSH02",659082
182,"Plain Bowl scatter 3/E of HE1 and C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"Although the majority of the Plain Bowl pottery recovered from a concentration of features in the immediate vicinity of the C2 cursus is residual, it does imply a focus of Plain Bowl activity in this zone; intriguingly an area that is intimately associated with a complex of monuments (C1 and C2 cursus monuments and HE1 enclosure) that are likely of similar date.  Some of the Plain Bowl ware includes larger unabraded sherds from treethrows and is probably 'in situ'. Can we characterise the nature of this activity with more precision?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148303","WPR98",148303
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550083","PSH02",550083
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550095","PSH02",550095
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550096","PSH02",550096
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561064","PSH02",561064
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561067","PSH02",561067
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575004","PSH02",575004
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575006","PSH02",575006
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588260","PSH02",588260
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119240","WPR98",119240
183,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC1","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","The southern enclosure Middle Iron Age settlement enclosure  as described in Volume 1. Mostly excavated in WPR98 with additional portions of the north and west sides excavated in PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure had a south-east facing entrance and was designed to accommodate at least 4 roundhouses while possibly excluding others. There are marked differences in distribution for the finds recovered in the enclosure.","EN","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119259","WPR98",119259
184,"Early Bronze Age Posthole","305 Early Bronze Age",,"EBA posthole excavated in POK 96 dating is a bit uncertain as dated through flint in fill which may have been the result of natural erosion.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961105","POK96",961105
188,"Penannular Gully 11","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavcated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134170","WPR98",134170
189,"Early Medieval Well","715 Early Medieval","715 Early Medieval","EM well excavated in the corner of a field system dated to the EM period. Well stratified deposits in this feature.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961959","POK96",961959
191,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Postholes","515 Early Romano-British",,"entity created to group together all postholes of RCP1 date no attatched to structures.","ab","Analysis","Overview","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 127172","WPR98",127172
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960006","POK96",960006
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960007","POK96",960007
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960009","POK96",960009
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960010","POK96",960010
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960013","POK96",960013
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960014","POK96",960014
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960016","POK96",960016
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960081","POK96",960081
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960105","POK96",960105
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960518","POK96",960518
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961010","POK96",961010
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961013","POK96",961013
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961014","POK96",961014
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961039","POK96",961039
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961072","POK96",961072
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961075","POK96",961075
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961078","POK96",961078
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961080","POK96",961080
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961613","POK96",961613
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961655","POK96",961655
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961675","POK96",961675
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961686","POK96",961686
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961695","POK96",961695
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961753","POK96",961753
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961826","POK96",961826
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961887","POK96",961887
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962027","POK96",962027
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962252","POK96",962252
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963028","POK96",963028
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963036","POK96",963036
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963038","POK96",963038
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963042","POK96",963042
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963099","POK96",963099
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963100","POK96",963100
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963125","POK96",963125
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963134","POK96",963134
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963158","POK96",963158
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963169","POK96",963169
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963353","POK96",963353
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963438","POK96",963438
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963442","POK96",963442
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110053","WPR98",110053
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111096","WPR98",111096
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 123011","WPR98",123011
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124026","WPR98",124026
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124027","WPR98",124027
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124028","WPR98",124028
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126091","WPR98",126091
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130254","WPR98",130254
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132323","WPR98",132323
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134128","WPR98",134128
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134138","WPR98",134138
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146133","WPR98",146133
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146304","WPR98",146304
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147176","WPR98",147176
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147298","WPR98",147298
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147325","WPR98",147325
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148134","WPR98",148134
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148159","WPR98",148159
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149195","WPR98",149195
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149252","WPR98",149252
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151189","WPR98",151189
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157007","WPR98",157007
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159031","WPR98",159031
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160023","WPR98",160023
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160272","WPR98",160272
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161011","WPR98",161011
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161188","WPR98",161188
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 162013","WPR98",162013
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 162014","WPR98",162014
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 163076","WPR98",163076
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167050","WPR98",167050
192,"Unphased pits","999 Unphased",,"Unphased pits at Heathrow","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 176028","WPR98",176028
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509129","PSH02",509129
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509131","PSH02",509131
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509140","PSH02",509140
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509141","PSH02",509141
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510032","PSH02",510032
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510048","PSH02",510048
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510141","PSH02",510141
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510144","PSH02",510144
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510153","PSH02",510153
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510155","PSH02",510155
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510158","PSH02",510158
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510160","PSH02",510160
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517113","PSH02",517113
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517247","PSH02",517247
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523250","PSH02",523250
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524232","PSH02",524232
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526084","PSH02",526084
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528197","PSH02",528197
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 530059","PSH02",530059
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538035","PSH02",538035
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544229","PSH02",544229
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545050","PSH02",545050
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545054","PSH02",545054
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545056","PSH02",545056
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545077","PSH02",545077
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546258","PSH02",546258
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 549063","PSH02",549063
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 549065","PSH02",549065
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551355","PSH02",551355
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551363","PSH02",551363
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552118","PSH02",552118
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552123","PSH02",552123
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552236","PSH02",552236
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555426","PSH02",555426
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555436","PSH02",555436
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555530","PSH02",555530
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568265","PSH02",568265
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568269","PSH02",568269
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570337","PSH02",570337
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570501","PSH02",570501
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570504","PSH02",570504
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570507","PSH02",570507
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570511","PSH02",570511
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578133","PSH02",578133
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578170","PSH02",578170
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578213","PSH02",578213
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578215","PSH02",578215
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578596","PSH02",578596
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578628","PSH02",578628
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580223","PSH02",580223
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580225","PSH02",580225
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580227","PSH02",580227
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582309","PSH02",582309
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582325","PSH02",582325
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582332","PSH02",582332
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582434","PSH02",582434
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 586060","PSH02",586060
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 586061","PSH02",586061
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 586062","PSH02",586062
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589098","PSH02",589098
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589336","PSH02",589336
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591038","PSH02",591038
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591051","PSH02",591051
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591074","PSH02",591074
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 599081","PSH02",599081
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 599122","PSH02",599122
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 599125","PSH02",599125
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 602117","PSH02",602117
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 603025","PSH02",603025
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615113","PSH02",615113
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615115","PSH02",615115
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615119","PSH02",615119
193,"MBA droveway ditches","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches which form droveways and are dated to the MBA","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 618002","PSH02",618002
194,"Late Bronze Age Cremation","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA cremation excavated in Bed B.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 106013","WPR98",106013
195,"Late Bronze Age / Early Iron Age pit 1","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"LBA / EIA pit excavated in A8. Stuffed with pot of both dates. 'Earliest' Iron Age ?!!","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146048","WPR98",146048
200,"Bronze Age pits with settlement beetles WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze age pits with settlement indicating coleoptera in WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
200,"Bronze Age pits with settlement beetles WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze age pits with settlement indicating coleoptera in WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 402023","GAA00",402023
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 402027","GAA00",402027
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 212019","GAI99",212019
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 212045","GAI99",212045
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 212090","GAI99",212090
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 216104","GAI99",216104
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 218025","GAI99",218025
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 218064","GAI99",218064
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 106026","WPR98",106026
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107084","WPR98",107084
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107088","WPR98",107088
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110040","WPR98",110040
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111032","WPR98",111032
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111038","WPR98",111038
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111042","WPR98",111042
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111082","WPR98",111082
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111125","WPR98",111125
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111137","WPR98",111137
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113038","WPR98",113038
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113041","WPR98",113041
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113043","WPR98",113043
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113045","WPR98",113045
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113060","WPR98",113060
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113079","WPR98",113079
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119286","WPR98",119286
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122053","WPR98",122053
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122055","WPR98",122055
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125117","WPR98",125117
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126121","WPR98",126121
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126135","WPR98",126135
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127088","WPR98",127088
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127159","WPR98",127159
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128123","WPR98",128123
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128126","WPR98",128126
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128226","WPR98",128226
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128228","WPR98",128228
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128230","WPR98",128230
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129067","WPR98",129067
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130145","WPR98",130145
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130161","WPR98",130161
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136113","WPR98",136113
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 140050","WPR98",140050
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 140143","WPR98",140143
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 143050","WPR98",143050
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 145018","WPR98",145018
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146105","WPR98",146105
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147108","WPR98",147108
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147371","WPR98",147371
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148155","WPR98",148155
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149231","WPR98",149231
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151059","WPR98",151059
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151076","WPR98",151076
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151132","WPR98",151132
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151134","WPR98",151134
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151137","WPR98",151137
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151163","WPR98",151163
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151175","WPR98",151175
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151181","WPR98",151181
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156223","WPR98",156223
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157108","WPR98",157108
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157110","WPR98",157110
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159064","WPR98",159064
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159066","WPR98",159066
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159068","WPR98",159068
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159072","WPR98",159072
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159078","WPR98",159078
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159115","WPR98",159115
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159119","WPR98",159119
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160088","WPR98",160088
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160097","WPR98",160097
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160100","WPR98",160100
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160102","WPR98",160102
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166195","WPR98",166195
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 167099","WPR98",167099
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 171065","WPR98",171065
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 171067","WPR98",171067
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 172043","WPR98",172043
203,"Roman landscape","500 Romano-British",,"RB features that cannot be closely dated","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 176022","WPR98",176022
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 962259","POK96",962259
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 512119","PSH02",512119
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 538239","PSH02",538239
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 538241","PSH02",538241
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 552118","PSH02",552118
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 552123","PSH02",552123
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 575201","PSH02",575201
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 595018","PSH02",595018
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 595020","PSH02",595020
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 103019","WPR98",103019
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 107013","WPR98",107013
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 107029","WPR98",107029
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 138019","WPR98",138019
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
205,"Bronze Age Field System 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Long meandering field system which is adjacent and immediately to the east of Trackway 1.  This field system comprises three fields minimum, all  with their longer axes roughly orientated north-south.  Development of the field system would appear to occur during the Middle Bronze Age with alterations and reuse/ recutting into the Late Bronze Age.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
207,"Bronze Age Gully","300 Bronze Age",,"BA gully excavated in the west end of Bed B. the shallowness of the gully suggests originally cut the remnant bank of the cursus.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157205","WPR98",157205
207,"Bronze Age Gully","300 Bronze Age",,"BA gully excavated in the west end of Bed B. the shallowness of the gully suggests originally cut the remnant bank of the cursus.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157207","WPR98",157207
207,"Bronze Age Gully","300 Bronze Age",,"BA gully excavated in the west end of Bed B. the shallowness of the gully suggests originally cut the remnant bank of the cursus.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157210","WPR98",157210
208,"Peterborough Ware Tree Throws","215 Middle Neolithic",,"All tree throws that can be assigned to the Peterborough Ware phase (roughly Middle Neolithic) on the basis of diagnostic finds","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554080","PSH02",554080
208,"Peterborough Ware Tree Throws","215 Middle Neolithic",,"All tree throws that can be assigned to the Peterborough Ware phase (roughly Middle Neolithic) on the basis of diagnostic finds","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561096","PSH02",561096
209,"Bronze Age Field 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a large Bronze Age field enclosing an area of over a hectare. The north, east and southern sides have been demarcated by ditches, while the western side, like Bronze Age Field 5, was delineated by the extant bank of the Stanwell cursus, perhaps with an associated hedgerow. Trackway 1 leads to the north-west corner of this enclosure, implying that access was at this point.  Other gaps along its norther and eastern boundary may also relate to openings, although they are also a product of truncation.  A north-south aligned ditch coming of the southern boundary may imply an internal subdivision. It is likely that this large field, in association with the droveway, functioned in a more pastoral rather than arable way, providing grazing for animals.  However, the internal sub-division may be a later alteration  It is also feasible that the trackway was blocked off at the same time, rendering it defunct.  Thus one could argue that over time this large field enclosure changed functionally over time, and may have been involved in arable production.  Perhaps the change was linked to the creation of settlement in the vicinity, although at the moment this is all hypothetical.  There is a possibility that there is an extension to the northern boundary of the field enclosure that was cut right across the cursus and links up with the settlement enclosure - this may have been a later enhancement.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 512066","PSH02",512066
209,"Bronze Age Field 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a large Bronze Age field enclosing an area of over a hectare. The north, east and southern sides have been demarcated by ditches, while the western side, like Bronze Age Field 5, was delineated by the extant bank of the Stanwell cursus, perhaps with an associated hedgerow. Trackway 1 leads to the north-west corner of this enclosure, implying that access was at this point.  Other gaps along its norther and eastern boundary may also relate to openings, although they are also a product of truncation.  A north-south aligned ditch coming of the southern boundary may imply an internal subdivision. It is likely that this large field, in association with the droveway, functioned in a more pastoral rather than arable way, providing grazing for animals.  However, the internal sub-division may be a later alteration  It is also feasible that the trackway was blocked off at the same time, rendering it defunct.  Thus one could argue that over time this large field enclosure changed functionally over time, and may have been involved in arable production.  Perhaps the change was linked to the creation of settlement in the vicinity, although at the moment this is all hypothetical.  There is a possibility that there is an extension to the northern boundary of the field enclosure that was cut right across the cursus and links up with the settlement enclosure - this may have been a later enhancement.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 525170","PSH02",525170
209,"Bronze Age Field 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a large Bronze Age field enclosing an area of over a hectare. The north, east and southern sides have been demarcated by ditches, while the western side, like Bronze Age Field 5, was delineated by the extant bank of the Stanwell cursus, perhaps with an associated hedgerow. Trackway 1 leads to the north-west corner of this enclosure, implying that access was at this point.  Other gaps along its norther and eastern boundary may also relate to openings, although they are also a product of truncation.  A north-south aligned ditch coming of the southern boundary may imply an internal subdivision. It is likely that this large field, in association with the droveway, functioned in a more pastoral rather than arable way, providing grazing for animals.  However, the internal sub-division may be a later alteration  It is also feasible that the trackway was blocked off at the same time, rendering it defunct.  Thus one could argue that over time this large field enclosure changed functionally over time, and may have been involved in arable production.  Perhaps the change was linked to the creation of settlement in the vicinity, although at the moment this is all hypothetical.  There is a possibility that there is an extension to the northern boundary of the field enclosure that was cut right across the cursus and links up with the settlement enclosure - this may have been a later enhancement.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 538227","PSH02",538227
209,"Bronze Age Field 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a large Bronze Age field enclosing an area of over a hectare. The north, east and southern sides have been demarcated by ditches, while the western side, like Bronze Age Field 5, was delineated by the extant bank of the Stanwell cursus, perhaps with an associated hedgerow. Trackway 1 leads to the north-west corner of this enclosure, implying that access was at this point.  Other gaps along its norther and eastern boundary may also relate to openings, although they are also a product of truncation.  A north-south aligned ditch coming of the southern boundary may imply an internal subdivision. It is likely that this large field, in association with the droveway, functioned in a more pastoral rather than arable way, providing grazing for animals.  However, the internal sub-division may be a later alteration  It is also feasible that the trackway was blocked off at the same time, rendering it defunct.  Thus one could argue that over time this large field enclosure changed functionally over time, and may have been involved in arable production.  Perhaps the change was linked to the creation of settlement in the vicinity, although at the moment this is all hypothetical.  There is a possibility that there is an extension to the northern boundary of the field enclosure that was cut right across the cursus and links up with the settlement enclosure - this may have been a later enhancement.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 538231","PSH02",538231
209,"Bronze Age Field 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a large Bronze Age field enclosing an area of over a hectare. The north, east and southern sides have been demarcated by ditches, while the western side, like Bronze Age Field 5, was delineated by the extant bank of the Stanwell cursus, perhaps with an associated hedgerow. Trackway 1 leads to the north-west corner of this enclosure, implying that access was at this point.  Other gaps along its norther and eastern boundary may also relate to openings, although they are also a product of truncation.  A north-south aligned ditch coming of the southern boundary may imply an internal subdivision. It is likely that this large field, in association with the droveway, functioned in a more pastoral rather than arable way, providing grazing for animals.  However, the internal sub-division may be a later alteration  It is also feasible that the trackway was blocked off at the same time, rendering it defunct.  Thus one could argue that over time this large field enclosure changed functionally over time, and may have been involved in arable production.  Perhaps the change was linked to the creation of settlement in the vicinity, although at the moment this is all hypothetical.  There is a possibility that there is an extension to the northern boundary of the field enclosure that was cut right across the cursus and links up with the settlement enclosure - this may have been a later enhancement.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 538239","PSH02",538239
209,"Bronze Age Field 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a large Bronze Age field enclosing an area of over a hectare. The north, east and southern sides have been demarcated by ditches, while the western side, like Bronze Age Field 5, was delineated by the extant bank of the Stanwell cursus, perhaps with an associated hedgerow. Trackway 1 leads to the north-west corner of this enclosure, implying that access was at this point.  Other gaps along its norther and eastern boundary may also relate to openings, although they are also a product of truncation.  A north-south aligned ditch coming of the southern boundary may imply an internal subdivision. It is likely that this large field, in association with the droveway, functioned in a more pastoral rather than arable way, providing grazing for animals.  However, the internal sub-division may be a later alteration  It is also feasible that the trackway was blocked off at the same time, rendering it defunct.  Thus one could argue that over time this large field enclosure changed functionally over time, and may have been involved in arable production.  Perhaps the change was linked to the creation of settlement in the vicinity, although at the moment this is all hypothetical.  There is a possibility that there is an extension to the northern boundary of the field enclosure that was cut right across the cursus and links up with the settlement enclosure - this may have been a later enhancement.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 538241","PSH02",538241
209,"Bronze Age Field 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a large Bronze Age field enclosing an area of over a hectare. The north, east and southern sides have been demarcated by ditches, while the western side, like Bronze Age Field 5, was delineated by the extant bank of the Stanwell cursus, perhaps with an associated hedgerow. Trackway 1 leads to the north-west corner of this enclosure, implying that access was at this point.  Other gaps along its norther and eastern boundary may also relate to openings, although they are also a product of truncation.  A north-south aligned ditch coming of the southern boundary may imply an internal subdivision. It is likely that this large field, in association with the droveway, functioned in a more pastoral rather than arable way, providing grazing for animals.  However, the internal sub-division may be a later alteration  It is also feasible that the trackway was blocked off at the same time, rendering it defunct.  Thus one could argue that over time this large field enclosure changed functionally over time, and may have been involved in arable production.  Perhaps the change was linked to the creation of settlement in the vicinity, although at the moment this is all hypothetical.  There is a possibility that there is an extension to the northern boundary of the field enclosure that was cut right across the cursus and links up with the settlement enclosure - this may have been a later enhancement.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 538247","PSH02",538247
209,"Bronze Age Field 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a large Bronze Age field enclosing an area of over a hectare. The north, east and southern sides have been demarcated by ditches, while the western side, like Bronze Age Field 5, was delineated by the extant bank of the Stanwell cursus, perhaps with an associated hedgerow. Trackway 1 leads to the north-west corner of this enclosure, implying that access was at this point.  Other gaps along its norther and eastern boundary may also relate to openings, although they are also a product of truncation.  A north-south aligned ditch coming of the southern boundary may imply an internal subdivision. It is likely that this large field, in association with the droveway, functioned in a more pastoral rather than arable way, providing grazing for animals.  However, the internal sub-division may be a later alteration  It is also feasible that the trackway was blocked off at the same time, rendering it defunct.  Thus one could argue that over time this large field enclosure changed functionally over time, and may have been involved in arable production.  Perhaps the change was linked to the creation of settlement in the vicinity, although at the moment this is all hypothetical.  There is a possibility that there is an extension to the northern boundary of the field enclosure that was cut right across the cursus and links up with the settlement enclosure - this may have been a later enhancement.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561142","PSH02",561142
209,"Bronze Age Field 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a large Bronze Age field enclosing an area of over a hectare. The north, east and southern sides have been demarcated by ditches, while the western side, like Bronze Age Field 5, was delineated by the extant bank of the Stanwell cursus, perhaps with an associated hedgerow. Trackway 1 leads to the north-west corner of this enclosure, implying that access was at this point.  Other gaps along its norther and eastern boundary may also relate to openings, although they are also a product of truncation.  A north-south aligned ditch coming of the southern boundary may imply an internal subdivision. It is likely that this large field, in association with the droveway, functioned in a more pastoral rather than arable way, providing grazing for animals.  However, the internal sub-division may be a later alteration  It is also feasible that the trackway was blocked off at the same time, rendering it defunct.  Thus one could argue that over time this large field enclosure changed functionally over time, and may have been involved in arable production.  Perhaps the change was linked to the creation of settlement in the vicinity, although at the moment this is all hypothetical.  There is a possibility that there is an extension to the northern boundary of the field enclosure that was cut right across the cursus and links up with the settlement enclosure - this may have been a later enhancement.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 569092","PSH02",569092
211,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 60","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"East-west aligned segmented and truncated ditch, associated with the BA settlement enclosure in Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541152","PSH02",541152
211,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 60","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"East-west aligned segmented and truncated ditch, associated with the BA settlement enclosure in Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575172","PSH02",575172
211,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 60","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"East-west aligned segmented and truncated ditch, associated with the BA settlement enclosure in Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575201","PSH02",575201
211,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 60","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"East-west aligned segmented and truncated ditch, associated with the BA settlement enclosure in Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575219","PSH02",575219
211,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 60","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"East-west aligned segmented and truncated ditch, associated with the BA settlement enclosure in Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 603053","PSH02",603053
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 212086","GAI99",212086
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218066","GAI99",218066
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129084","WPR98",129084
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130119","WPR98",130119
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130123","WPR98",130123
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130127","WPR98",130127
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136075","WPR98",136075
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141056","WPR98",141056
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149129","WPR98",149129
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149139","WPR98",149139
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149150","WPR98",149150
214,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"The furthest NW- SE trackway in the WPR bed C + A areas. Very faint due to truncation. Continues into northern Taxiway area, where it forms the eastern most trackway / boundary of the MBA settlement there.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
216,"Early Roman Water-hole 1","515 Early Romano-British","565 Middle Romano-British","RCP2 waterhole excavated in area C! an earlier phase of water-hole which continues into the RCP3 phase as RCP3 waterhole 2.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 174019","WPR98",174019
225,"Stanwell Cursus Eastern Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together all of the components from all phases of excavation that constitute the eastern ditch of the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961501","POK96",961501
225,"Stanwell Cursus Eastern Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together all of the components from all phases of excavation that constitute the eastern ditch of the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 512070","PSH02",512070
225,"Stanwell Cursus Eastern Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together all of the components from all phases of excavation that constitute the eastern ditch of the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 526381","PSH02",526381
225,"Stanwell Cursus Eastern Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together all of the components from all phases of excavation that constitute the eastern ditch of the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529310","PSH02",529310
225,"Stanwell Cursus Eastern Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together all of the components from all phases of excavation that constitute the eastern ditch of the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 549109","PSH02",549109
225,"Stanwell Cursus Eastern Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together all of the components from all phases of excavation that constitute the eastern ditch of the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 594241","PSH02",594241
225,"Stanwell Cursus Eastern Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together all of the components from all phases of excavation that constitute the eastern ditch of the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 617042","PSH02",617042
225,"Stanwell Cursus Eastern Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together all of the components from all phases of excavation that constitute the eastern ditch of the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 134029","WPR98",134029
226,"Bronze Age structure 2 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of postholes which appear to make up one of the structures on the NTW site.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214130","GAI99",214130
226,"Bronze Age structure 2 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of postholes which appear to make up one of the structures on the NTW site.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214132","GAI99",214132
226,"Bronze Age structure 2 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of postholes which appear to make up one of the structures on the NTW site.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214134","GAI99",214134
226,"Bronze Age structure 2 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of postholes which appear to make up one of the structures on the NTW site.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214136","GAI99",214136
226,"Bronze Age structure 2 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links the group of postholes which appear to make up one of the structures on the NTW site.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214138","GAI99",214138
228,"Grooved Ware Scatter 4/C3 cursus zone & SE/Ritual","225 Late Neolithic",,"Scatter of Grooved Ware material (predominantly ‘in situ’) in a zone in the immediate surrounds of and to the SE of the C3 cursus.  One pit in particular within this cluster (531011) was absolutely full of Grooved ware pottery and LN flint and suggests a series of placed deposits here.  Much of the material in this wider scatter may be indicative of activities of a ritual nature.  However, these activities would not appear to be chronologically linked with the C3 cursus, since that is likely of a much earlier date.  It may be no coincidence that ritual activities were undertaken in this zone during succeeding periods, since it is clear from the series of intercutting pits directly to the north-west of the C3 cursus that pit cutting and pit deposition events were ocuuring in a specific spot in the landscape from the earlier to later Neolithic periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517191","PSH02",517191
228,"Grooved Ware Scatter 4/C3 cursus zone & SE/Ritual","225 Late Neolithic",,"Scatter of Grooved Ware material (predominantly ‘in situ’) in a zone in the immediate surrounds of and to the SE of the C3 cursus.  One pit in particular within this cluster (531011) was absolutely full of Grooved ware pottery and LN flint and suggests a series of placed deposits here.  Much of the material in this wider scatter may be indicative of activities of a ritual nature.  However, these activities would not appear to be chronologically linked with the C3 cursus, since that is likely of a much earlier date.  It may be no coincidence that ritual activities were undertaken in this zone during succeeding periods, since it is clear from the series of intercutting pits directly to the north-west of the C3 cursus that pit cutting and pit deposition events were ocuuring in a specific spot in the landscape from the earlier to later Neolithic periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 531011","PSH02",531011
228,"Grooved Ware Scatter 4/C3 cursus zone & SE/Ritual","225 Late Neolithic",,"Scatter of Grooved Ware material (predominantly ‘in situ’) in a zone in the immediate surrounds of and to the SE of the C3 cursus.  One pit in particular within this cluster (531011) was absolutely full of Grooved ware pottery and LN flint and suggests a series of placed deposits here.  Much of the material in this wider scatter may be indicative of activities of a ritual nature.  However, these activities would not appear to be chronologically linked with the C3 cursus, since that is likely of a much earlier date.  It may be no coincidence that ritual activities were undertaken in this zone during succeeding periods, since it is clear from the series of intercutting pits directly to the north-west of the C3 cursus that pit cutting and pit deposition events were ocuuring in a specific spot in the landscape from the earlier to later Neolithic periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 543201","PSH02",543201
228,"Grooved Ware Scatter 4/C3 cursus zone & SE/Ritual","225 Late Neolithic",,"Scatter of Grooved Ware material (predominantly ‘in situ’) in a zone in the immediate surrounds of and to the SE of the C3 cursus.  One pit in particular within this cluster (531011) was absolutely full of Grooved ware pottery and LN flint and suggests a series of placed deposits here.  Much of the material in this wider scatter may be indicative of activities of a ritual nature.  However, these activities would not appear to be chronologically linked with the C3 cursus, since that is likely of a much earlier date.  It may be no coincidence that ritual activities were undertaken in this zone during succeeding periods, since it is clear from the series of intercutting pits directly to the north-west of the C3 cursus that pit cutting and pit deposition events were ocuuring in a specific spot in the landscape from the earlier to later Neolithic periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561104","PSH02",561104
229,"Late Roman Ditch 6","598 Late Romano-British",,"Originally this was called Roman Ditch 7.  However further excavation iduring PSH02 has revealed further sections of this ditch, and provided a closer date for it.  It is a fairly shallow ditch, aligned roughly NNE-SSW, that cuts another Roman Ditch that was dated to Roman Phase 5.  Thus this ditch is likely of Late Roman date.  A few sherds of R-B pottery were retrieved from interventions along its extent.  This ditch follows a slightly different alignment to the R-B field system to its east, but it shares a common orientation with Roman features to the west, in particular the small ladder-like enclosure.  It was fairly narrow and shallow (c. 0.18 m deep) partly as a result of truncation.  The ditch terminates in the north nearby a complex of curvilinear ditches and enclosures.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 113084","WPR98",113084
229,"Late Roman Ditch 6","598 Late Romano-British",,"Originally this was called Roman Ditch 7.  However further excavation iduring PSH02 has revealed further sections of this ditch, and provided a closer date for it.  It is a fairly shallow ditch, aligned roughly NNE-SSW, that cuts another Roman Ditch that was dated to Roman Phase 5.  Thus this ditch is likely of Late Roman date.  A few sherds of R-B pottery were retrieved from interventions along its extent.  This ditch follows a slightly different alignment to the R-B field system to its east, but it shares a common orientation with Roman features to the west, in particular the small ladder-like enclosure.  It was fairly narrow and shallow (c. 0.18 m deep) partly as a result of truncation.  The ditch terminates in the north nearby a complex of curvilinear ditches and enclosures.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 113088","WPR98",113088
230,"Late Roman Building B5","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","RCP4 ditch excavated in area C1 although dating is not certain only one sherd of pot in fill.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 149106","WPR98",149106
230,"Late Roman Building B5","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","RCP4 ditch excavated in area C1 although dating is not certain only one sherd of pot in fill.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 183020","WPR98",183020
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512087","PSH02",512087
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522122","PSH02",522122
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529278","PSH02",529278
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539093","PSH02",539093
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539094","PSH02",539094
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542197","PSH02",542197
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 550021","PSH02",550021
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583148","PSH02",583148
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 593239","PSH02",593239
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 593317","PSH02",593317
234,"1a\medieval fields\ditches2","720 Later Medieval",,"later med ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615343","PSH02",615343
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512052","PSH02",512052
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529267","PSH02",529267
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529268","PSH02",529268
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537115","PSH02",537115
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537118","PSH02",537118
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537171","PSH02",537171
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546100","PSH02",546100
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546103","PSH02",546103
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547167","PSH02",547167
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547179","PSH02",547179
235,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2",,,"another possible phase","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568083","PSH02",568083
237,"Medieval Well 1","700 Medieval","900 Modern","Med well excavated in POK 96 appears to cut the top of an EM ditch.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961036","POK96",961036
243,"Neolithic C2 Cursus Western Ditch 1","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Part of C2 western cursus ditch excavated in Bed B. the ditch was constructed in segments.","ab","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 960023","POK96",960023
243,"Neolithic C2 Cursus Western Ditch 1","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Part of C2 western cursus ditch excavated in Bed B. the ditch was constructed in segments.","ab","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 105026","WPR98",105026
243,"Neolithic C2 Cursus Western Ditch 1","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Part of C2 western cursus ditch excavated in Bed B. the ditch was constructed in segments.","ab","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 132009","WPR98",132009
243,"Neolithic C2 Cursus Western Ditch 1","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Part of C2 western cursus ditch excavated in Bed B. the ditch was constructed in segments.","ab","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 133035","WPR98",133035
243,"Neolithic C2 Cursus Western Ditch 1","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Part of C2 western cursus ditch excavated in Bed B. the ditch was constructed in segments.","ab","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 134011","WPR98",134011
243,"Neolithic C2 Cursus Western Ditch 1","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Part of C2 western cursus ditch excavated in Bed B. the ditch was constructed in segments.","ab","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 142008","WPR98",142008
243,"Neolithic C2 Cursus Western Ditch 1","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Part of C2 western cursus ditch excavated in Bed B. the ditch was constructed in segments.","ab","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 153011","WPR98",153011
243,"Neolithic C2 Cursus Western Ditch 1","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Part of C2 western cursus ditch excavated in Bed B. the ditch was constructed in segments.","ab","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 153048","WPR98",153048
248,"Possible Roman Building B4",,,"Possible remains of mid Romano-British building as described in Perryoaks publication","nad","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 192021","WPR98",192021
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128138","WPR98",128138
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128170","WPR98",128170
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128172","WPR98",128172
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128174","WPR98",128174
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128176","WPR98",128176
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128178","WPR98",128178
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128180","WPR98",128180
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128182","WPR98",128182
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 149205","WPR98",149205
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 151141","WPR98",151141
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 307008","WPR98",307008
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 307009","WPR98",307009
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 307010","WPR98",307010
249,"Penannular Gully 10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 307011","WPR98",307011
253,"Bronze Age Field 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is the furthest east field hitherto revealed during the excavations at T5.  It has been highly truncated in places but would appear to represent a field immediately adjacent to Trackway 6.  It is possible that in this case the field was established prior to the construction of the Trackway, which is interesting.  In tandem with this, perhaps the field was initiallly created for growing crops rather than grazing, and the establishment of the trackway may have heralded a change in its function in the LBA-EIA, towards a pastoral regime (grazing land).   The truncation does not help with determining where an entrance (s) to this field lay, although it is possible that one was situated in the north-west corner.  In the LBA-EIA, it is possible that the field became sub-divided through the construction of east-west ditch SG 509145.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 509145","PSH02",509145
253,"Bronze Age Field 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is the furthest east field hitherto revealed during the excavations at T5.  It has been highly truncated in places but would appear to represent a field immediately adjacent to Trackway 6.  It is possible that in this case the field was established prior to the construction of the Trackway, which is interesting.  In tandem with this, perhaps the field was initiallly created for growing crops rather than grazing, and the establishment of the trackway may have heralded a change in its function in the LBA-EIA, towards a pastoral regime (grazing land).   The truncation does not help with determining where an entrance (s) to this field lay, although it is possible that one was situated in the north-west corner.  In the LBA-EIA, it is possible that the field became sub-divided through the construction of east-west ditch SG 509145.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 568265","PSH02",568265
253,"Bronze Age Field 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is the furthest east field hitherto revealed during the excavations at T5.  It has been highly truncated in places but would appear to represent a field immediately adjacent to Trackway 6.  It is possible that in this case the field was established prior to the construction of the Trackway, which is interesting.  In tandem with this, perhaps the field was initiallly created for growing crops rather than grazing, and the establishment of the trackway may have heralded a change in its function in the LBA-EIA, towards a pastoral regime (grazing land).   The truncation does not help with determining where an entrance (s) to this field lay, although it is possible that one was situated in the north-west corner.  In the LBA-EIA, it is possible that the field became sub-divided through the construction of east-west ditch SG 509145.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 568269","PSH02",568269
253,"Bronze Age Field 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is the furthest east field hitherto revealed during the excavations at T5.  It has been highly truncated in places but would appear to represent a field immediately adjacent to Trackway 6.  It is possible that in this case the field was established prior to the construction of the Trackway, which is interesting.  In tandem with this, perhaps the field was initiallly created for growing crops rather than grazing, and the establishment of the trackway may have heralded a change in its function in the LBA-EIA, towards a pastoral regime (grazing land).   The truncation does not help with determining where an entrance (s) to this field lay, although it is possible that one was situated in the north-west corner.  In the LBA-EIA, it is possible that the field became sub-divided through the construction of east-west ditch SG 509145.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 581268","PSH02",581268
256,"Possible structural postholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Area of post-holes, possibly forming a structure, very truncated. Interpretation problematic. All features comprised in this entity cover an area 3m x 3m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Dating/artefacts : 3 microliths recovered from various parts of this area during surface cleaning. Two over the ditch, and one not associated with any feature. Not secure- could have been created during machining, or brought onto area, attached onto someone’s foot. Otherwise sterile. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General: Basically, what I think is happening is that the small gully/ditch SG 543037 is contemporary with/related to the two BA ditch segments running parallel with it to the south. The most westerly terminus has been later destroyed by later root action, as fare as can been seen on the surface anyway, so it seems reasonable to suggest that it terminates somewhere beneath the “tree throw” [543035]. This indicates that it falls quite nicely between the terminii of the two ditches to the south, and respects their boundaries. These three ditches run broadly E-W. Then there is a line of postholes running SE-NW. Technically, by a “line”, I mean three postholes broadly aligned. They are of similar dimensions and profiles and two of them at least, post-date the ditches. [543018] just cuts the eastern terminus of SG543037 and [524052] cuts [524090]. There are no stratigraphic relationships between the final posthole and any of the other features, but it seems at least moderately likely that it is associated with the other two. I also excavated 3 other possible stakeholes/postholes, but there is no obvious alignment or patterns as each of them is different and they are scattered over the area.  It is possible to play ‘join the dots’ but it would be pure conjecture, and could be done in several different ways. Interestingly, if the three main postholes are indeed aligned, this represents a shift from the alignment of the ditch system although the postholes appear to bear some relationship with the ditches. Both 543018 and 524052 are on the northern side of the edge of their respective terminii, overlapping just enough to suggest a relationship. And the similarities in the fill materials could indicate that all features were open at the same time, in which case the overlap is not enough to destabilise the posts within the postholes. To a certain extent, the decision to assign the postholes to a later phase than the ditch segments was largely intuitive, and the overlap was not large enough or clear enough to state categorically that this is correct. It did however, seem to both Steve and myself that stratigraphically it fits best this way round. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation: There are several interpretation, that have been put forward for this area, and as there is hardly any evidence of date or function it is very difficult to be more precise. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, there is no broad consensus that 543037 is in fact a ditch although this seems to me to be the best interpretation.  However, it could instead be a tap root coming from the tree throw 543035, or a hedgerow associated with a series of fence posts, or alternatively a beam slot, associated structurally with the post holes in the area.  Of these three possibilities, I prefer the latter, as it seems to have a very regular, formal cut, and doesn’t really seem to have a typical root style profile.  Although personally, I felt it developed into a linear feature that was slightly too wide too comfortably be described as a beam slot, thinking about it now this idea is possibly supported by the fact that I now think 543038 could be deliberate backfill of stones into the ditch or gully, which could offer more solid support for any structure built up from this potential beam.  Considered as a cut, it looks to me more like a ditch or gully, but I think it is almost certainly worth bearing this possibility in mind.  It may actually bear no relationship other than a spatial one to the segmented ditch system, although I do think there is a connection.  This is only partly based on the position of the “ditch” in the gap between the segments, and partly to do with the fact that both 543037 and 524090 appear broadly contemporary with the post holes that are cut into them, and I believe these post holes to be related to each other.  Unfortunately, as none of this is strategraphically or artefactually provable, I could say anything really.  It being a beam slot does not necessarily preclude it being related to the ditch system – it could be that a structure was built in the gap (or the ditches were dug using the structure as some sort of marker) – although it is obviously slightly easier to argue this if we accept for the sake of argument that it is a ditch. That being the case, it raises some interesting questions relating to control and use of landscape. It is clearly possible to see through the gap between the two main segments of ditch, but you can not walk straight through. Not only is there a palisade or fence running SE-NW, but there is a hole in the ground immediately in front of you. If you are trying to move around the landscape, you have to turn corners. Therefore people’s movements are controlled and limited even during excavation, it has been apparent how much influence these features have had on the way we have moved around the area while on site. The space just to the south of the gap in the segmented ditch has been fairly thoroughly trampled on during the past few weeks, and mud has been deposited there from people’s boots due to poor weather conditions. The original surface is now completely turn up, as if the pathway between the ditches, leading northwards to this area. The series of features here have made us as archaeologists react to the space in a certain way and given I believe that at least most of these features were contemporary with each other, it suggests that the people who produced them would have had a similar series of interactions with the landscape then as we have found now. I quite like this idea.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There are also 3 small features as yet un-discussed {543023], [543025], [543030]. It would be possible to draw a line connecting [543018], [543023] and [543025] running almost directly north but as the profiles are so different I would suggest that this is more co-incidence than anything else. Of course it could illustrate a change in alignment, represented by a short palisade. [543030] could potentially be related to [543020] despite its small almost non existent shallow profile, as it could perhaps be where a hole was started but then discovered to be several centimetres out. Pure conjecture of course, but it doesn’t obviously relate to anything else, and there isn’t an awful lot more I can say about this feature. It may of course be similar to some of the unexcavated patches to the north of [543035] but there is no evidence for this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note (548): All these features were very shallow and not convincing. There are definitely at least a couple of very truncated postholes but SG 543037 was quite dubious, and could partly be due to bioturbation. General interpretation of these features is therefore to take with caution!","543","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10004","PSH02 - 524052","PSH02",524052
256,"Possible structural postholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Area of post-holes, possibly forming a structure, very truncated. Interpretation problematic. All features comprised in this entity cover an area 3m x 3m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Dating/artefacts : 3 microliths recovered from various parts of this area during surface cleaning. Two over the ditch, and one not associated with any feature. Not secure- could have been created during machining, or brought onto area, attached onto someone’s foot. Otherwise sterile. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General: Basically, what I think is happening is that the small gully/ditch SG 543037 is contemporary with/related to the two BA ditch segments running parallel with it to the south. The most westerly terminus has been later destroyed by later root action, as fare as can been seen on the surface anyway, so it seems reasonable to suggest that it terminates somewhere beneath the “tree throw” [543035]. This indicates that it falls quite nicely between the terminii of the two ditches to the south, and respects their boundaries. These three ditches run broadly E-W. Then there is a line of postholes running SE-NW. Technically, by a “line”, I mean three postholes broadly aligned. They are of similar dimensions and profiles and two of them at least, post-date the ditches. [543018] just cuts the eastern terminus of SG543037 and [524052] cuts [524090]. There are no stratigraphic relationships between the final posthole and any of the other features, but it seems at least moderately likely that it is associated with the other two. I also excavated 3 other possible stakeholes/postholes, but there is no obvious alignment or patterns as each of them is different and they are scattered over the area.  It is possible to play ‘join the dots’ but it would be pure conjecture, and could be done in several different ways. Interestingly, if the three main postholes are indeed aligned, this represents a shift from the alignment of the ditch system although the postholes appear to bear some relationship with the ditches. Both 543018 and 524052 are on the northern side of the edge of their respective terminii, overlapping just enough to suggest a relationship. And the similarities in the fill materials could indicate that all features were open at the same time, in which case the overlap is not enough to destabilise the posts within the postholes. To a certain extent, the decision to assign the postholes to a later phase than the ditch segments was largely intuitive, and the overlap was not large enough or clear enough to state categorically that this is correct. It did however, seem to both Steve and myself that stratigraphically it fits best this way round. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation: There are several interpretation, that have been put forward for this area, and as there is hardly any evidence of date or function it is very difficult to be more precise. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, there is no broad consensus that 543037 is in fact a ditch although this seems to me to be the best interpretation.  However, it could instead be a tap root coming from the tree throw 543035, or a hedgerow associated with a series of fence posts, or alternatively a beam slot, associated structurally with the post holes in the area.  Of these three possibilities, I prefer the latter, as it seems to have a very regular, formal cut, and doesn’t really seem to have a typical root style profile.  Although personally, I felt it developed into a linear feature that was slightly too wide too comfortably be described as a beam slot, thinking about it now this idea is possibly supported by the fact that I now think 543038 could be deliberate backfill of stones into the ditch or gully, which could offer more solid support for any structure built up from this potential beam.  Considered as a cut, it looks to me more like a ditch or gully, but I think it is almost certainly worth bearing this possibility in mind.  It may actually bear no relationship other than a spatial one to the segmented ditch system, although I do think there is a connection.  This is only partly based on the position of the “ditch” in the gap between the segments, and partly to do with the fact that both 543037 and 524090 appear broadly contemporary with the post holes that are cut into them, and I believe these post holes to be related to each other.  Unfortunately, as none of this is strategraphically or artefactually provable, I could say anything really.  It being a beam slot does not necessarily preclude it being related to the ditch system – it could be that a structure was built in the gap (or the ditches were dug using the structure as some sort of marker) – although it is obviously slightly easier to argue this if we accept for the sake of argument that it is a ditch. That being the case, it raises some interesting questions relating to control and use of landscape. It is clearly possible to see through the gap between the two main segments of ditch, but you can not walk straight through. Not only is there a palisade or fence running SE-NW, but there is a hole in the ground immediately in front of you. If you are trying to move around the landscape, you have to turn corners. Therefore people’s movements are controlled and limited even during excavation, it has been apparent how much influence these features have had on the way we have moved around the area while on site. The space just to the south of the gap in the segmented ditch has been fairly thoroughly trampled on during the past few weeks, and mud has been deposited there from people’s boots due to poor weather conditions. The original surface is now completely turn up, as if the pathway between the ditches, leading northwards to this area. The series of features here have made us as archaeologists react to the space in a certain way and given I believe that at least most of these features were contemporary with each other, it suggests that the people who produced them would have had a similar series of interactions with the landscape then as we have found now. I quite like this idea.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There are also 3 small features as yet un-discussed {543023], [543025], [543030]. It would be possible to draw a line connecting [543018], [543023] and [543025] running almost directly north but as the profiles are so different I would suggest that this is more co-incidence than anything else. Of course it could illustrate a change in alignment, represented by a short palisade. [543030] could potentially be related to [543020] despite its small almost non existent shallow profile, as it could perhaps be where a hole was started but then discovered to be several centimetres out. Pure conjecture of course, but it doesn’t obviously relate to anything else, and there isn’t an awful lot more I can say about this feature. It may of course be similar to some of the unexcavated patches to the north of [543035] but there is no evidence for this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note (548): All these features were very shallow and not convincing. There are definitely at least a couple of very truncated postholes but SG 543037 was quite dubious, and could partly be due to bioturbation. General interpretation of these features is therefore to take with caution!","543","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10004","PSH02 - 543001","PSH02",543001
256,"Possible structural postholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Area of post-holes, possibly forming a structure, very truncated. Interpretation problematic. All features comprised in this entity cover an area 3m x 3m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Dating/artefacts : 3 microliths recovered from various parts of this area during surface cleaning. Two over the ditch, and one not associated with any feature. Not secure- could have been created during machining, or brought onto area, attached onto someone’s foot. Otherwise sterile. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General: Basically, what I think is happening is that the small gully/ditch SG 543037 is contemporary with/related to the two BA ditch segments running parallel with it to the south. The most westerly terminus has been later destroyed by later root action, as fare as can been seen on the surface anyway, so it seems reasonable to suggest that it terminates somewhere beneath the “tree throw” [543035]. This indicates that it falls quite nicely between the terminii of the two ditches to the south, and respects their boundaries. These three ditches run broadly E-W. Then there is a line of postholes running SE-NW. Technically, by a “line”, I mean three postholes broadly aligned. They are of similar dimensions and profiles and two of them at least, post-date the ditches. [543018] just cuts the eastern terminus of SG543037 and [524052] cuts [524090]. There are no stratigraphic relationships between the final posthole and any of the other features, but it seems at least moderately likely that it is associated with the other two. I also excavated 3 other possible stakeholes/postholes, but there is no obvious alignment or patterns as each of them is different and they are scattered over the area.  It is possible to play ‘join the dots’ but it would be pure conjecture, and could be done in several different ways. Interestingly, if the three main postholes are indeed aligned, this represents a shift from the alignment of the ditch system although the postholes appear to bear some relationship with the ditches. Both 543018 and 524052 are on the northern side of the edge of their respective terminii, overlapping just enough to suggest a relationship. And the similarities in the fill materials could indicate that all features were open at the same time, in which case the overlap is not enough to destabilise the posts within the postholes. To a certain extent, the decision to assign the postholes to a later phase than the ditch segments was largely intuitive, and the overlap was not large enough or clear enough to state categorically that this is correct. It did however, seem to both Steve and myself that stratigraphically it fits best this way round. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation: There are several interpretation, that have been put forward for this area, and as there is hardly any evidence of date or function it is very difficult to be more precise. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, there is no broad consensus that 543037 is in fact a ditch although this seems to me to be the best interpretation.  However, it could instead be a tap root coming from the tree throw 543035, or a hedgerow associated with a series of fence posts, or alternatively a beam slot, associated structurally with the post holes in the area.  Of these three possibilities, I prefer the latter, as it seems to have a very regular, formal cut, and doesn’t really seem to have a typical root style profile.  Although personally, I felt it developed into a linear feature that was slightly too wide too comfortably be described as a beam slot, thinking about it now this idea is possibly supported by the fact that I now think 543038 could be deliberate backfill of stones into the ditch or gully, which could offer more solid support for any structure built up from this potential beam.  Considered as a cut, it looks to me more like a ditch or gully, but I think it is almost certainly worth bearing this possibility in mind.  It may actually bear no relationship other than a spatial one to the segmented ditch system, although I do think there is a connection.  This is only partly based on the position of the “ditch” in the gap between the segments, and partly to do with the fact that both 543037 and 524090 appear broadly contemporary with the post holes that are cut into them, and I believe these post holes to be related to each other.  Unfortunately, as none of this is strategraphically or artefactually provable, I could say anything really.  It being a beam slot does not necessarily preclude it being related to the ditch system – it could be that a structure was built in the gap (or the ditches were dug using the structure as some sort of marker) – although it is obviously slightly easier to argue this if we accept for the sake of argument that it is a ditch. That being the case, it raises some interesting questions relating to control and use of landscape. It is clearly possible to see through the gap between the two main segments of ditch, but you can not walk straight through. Not only is there a palisade or fence running SE-NW, but there is a hole in the ground immediately in front of you. If you are trying to move around the landscape, you have to turn corners. Therefore people’s movements are controlled and limited even during excavation, it has been apparent how much influence these features have had on the way we have moved around the area while on site. The space just to the south of the gap in the segmented ditch has been fairly thoroughly trampled on during the past few weeks, and mud has been deposited there from people’s boots due to poor weather conditions. The original surface is now completely turn up, as if the pathway between the ditches, leading northwards to this area. The series of features here have made us as archaeologists react to the space in a certain way and given I believe that at least most of these features were contemporary with each other, it suggests that the people who produced them would have had a similar series of interactions with the landscape then as we have found now. I quite like this idea.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There are also 3 small features as yet un-discussed {543023], [543025], [543030]. It would be possible to draw a line connecting [543018], [543023] and [543025] running almost directly north but as the profiles are so different I would suggest that this is more co-incidence than anything else. Of course it could illustrate a change in alignment, represented by a short palisade. [543030] could potentially be related to [543020] despite its small almost non existent shallow profile, as it could perhaps be where a hole was started but then discovered to be several centimetres out. Pure conjecture of course, but it doesn’t obviously relate to anything else, and there isn’t an awful lot more I can say about this feature. It may of course be similar to some of the unexcavated patches to the north of [543035] but there is no evidence for this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note (548): All these features were very shallow and not convincing. There are definitely at least a couple of very truncated postholes but SG 543037 was quite dubious, and could partly be due to bioturbation. General interpretation of these features is therefore to take with caution!","543","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10004","PSH02 - 543018","PSH02",543018
256,"Possible structural postholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Area of post-holes, possibly forming a structure, very truncated. Interpretation problematic. All features comprised in this entity cover an area 3m x 3m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Dating/artefacts : 3 microliths recovered from various parts of this area during surface cleaning. Two over the ditch, and one not associated with any feature. Not secure- could have been created during machining, or brought onto area, attached onto someone’s foot. Otherwise sterile. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General: Basically, what I think is happening is that the small gully/ditch SG 543037 is contemporary with/related to the two BA ditch segments running parallel with it to the south. The most westerly terminus has been later destroyed by later root action, as fare as can been seen on the surface anyway, so it seems reasonable to suggest that it terminates somewhere beneath the “tree throw” [543035]. This indicates that it falls quite nicely between the terminii of the two ditches to the south, and respects their boundaries. These three ditches run broadly E-W. Then there is a line of postholes running SE-NW. Technically, by a “line”, I mean three postholes broadly aligned. They are of similar dimensions and profiles and two of them at least, post-date the ditches. [543018] just cuts the eastern terminus of SG543037 and [524052] cuts [524090]. There are no stratigraphic relationships between the final posthole and any of the other features, but it seems at least moderately likely that it is associated with the other two. I also excavated 3 other possible stakeholes/postholes, but there is no obvious alignment or patterns as each of them is different and they are scattered over the area.  It is possible to play ‘join the dots’ but it would be pure conjecture, and could be done in several different ways. Interestingly, if the three main postholes are indeed aligned, this represents a shift from the alignment of the ditch system although the postholes appear to bear some relationship with the ditches. Both 543018 and 524052 are on the northern side of the edge of their respective terminii, overlapping just enough to suggest a relationship. And the similarities in the fill materials could indicate that all features were open at the same time, in which case the overlap is not enough to destabilise the posts within the postholes. To a certain extent, the decision to assign the postholes to a later phase than the ditch segments was largely intuitive, and the overlap was not large enough or clear enough to state categorically that this is correct. It did however, seem to both Steve and myself that stratigraphically it fits best this way round. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation: There are several interpretation, that have been put forward for this area, and as there is hardly any evidence of date or function it is very difficult to be more precise. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, there is no broad consensus that 543037 is in fact a ditch although this seems to me to be the best interpretation.  However, it could instead be a tap root coming from the tree throw 543035, or a hedgerow associated with a series of fence posts, or alternatively a beam slot, associated structurally with the post holes in the area.  Of these three possibilities, I prefer the latter, as it seems to have a very regular, formal cut, and doesn’t really seem to have a typical root style profile.  Although personally, I felt it developed into a linear feature that was slightly too wide too comfortably be described as a beam slot, thinking about it now this idea is possibly supported by the fact that I now think 543038 could be deliberate backfill of stones into the ditch or gully, which could offer more solid support for any structure built up from this potential beam.  Considered as a cut, it looks to me more like a ditch or gully, but I think it is almost certainly worth bearing this possibility in mind.  It may actually bear no relationship other than a spatial one to the segmented ditch system, although I do think there is a connection.  This is only partly based on the position of the “ditch” in the gap between the segments, and partly to do with the fact that both 543037 and 524090 appear broadly contemporary with the post holes that are cut into them, and I believe these post holes to be related to each other.  Unfortunately, as none of this is strategraphically or artefactually provable, I could say anything really.  It being a beam slot does not necessarily preclude it being related to the ditch system – it could be that a structure was built in the gap (or the ditches were dug using the structure as some sort of marker) – although it is obviously slightly easier to argue this if we accept for the sake of argument that it is a ditch. That being the case, it raises some interesting questions relating to control and use of landscape. It is clearly possible to see through the gap between the two main segments of ditch, but you can not walk straight through. Not only is there a palisade or fence running SE-NW, but there is a hole in the ground immediately in front of you. If you are trying to move around the landscape, you have to turn corners. Therefore people’s movements are controlled and limited even during excavation, it has been apparent how much influence these features have had on the way we have moved around the area while on site. The space just to the south of the gap in the segmented ditch has been fairly thoroughly trampled on during the past few weeks, and mud has been deposited there from people’s boots due to poor weather conditions. The original surface is now completely turn up, as if the pathway between the ditches, leading northwards to this area. The series of features here have made us as archaeologists react to the space in a certain way and given I believe that at least most of these features were contemporary with each other, it suggests that the people who produced them would have had a similar series of interactions with the landscape then as we have found now. I quite like this idea.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There are also 3 small features as yet un-discussed {543023], [543025], [543030]. It would be possible to draw a line connecting [543018], [543023] and [543025] running almost directly north but as the profiles are so different I would suggest that this is more co-incidence than anything else. Of course it could illustrate a change in alignment, represented by a short palisade. [543030] could potentially be related to [543020] despite its small almost non existent shallow profile, as it could perhaps be where a hole was started but then discovered to be several centimetres out. Pure conjecture of course, but it doesn’t obviously relate to anything else, and there isn’t an awful lot more I can say about this feature. It may of course be similar to some of the unexcavated patches to the north of [543035] but there is no evidence for this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note (548): All these features were very shallow and not convincing. There are definitely at least a couple of very truncated postholes but SG 543037 was quite dubious, and could partly be due to bioturbation. General interpretation of these features is therefore to take with caution!","543","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10004","PSH02 - 543020","PSH02",543020
256,"Possible structural postholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Area of post-holes, possibly forming a structure, very truncated. Interpretation problematic. All features comprised in this entity cover an area 3m x 3m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Dating/artefacts : 3 microliths recovered from various parts of this area during surface cleaning. Two over the ditch, and one not associated with any feature. Not secure- could have been created during machining, or brought onto area, attached onto someone’s foot. Otherwise sterile. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General: Basically, what I think is happening is that the small gully/ditch SG 543037 is contemporary with/related to the two BA ditch segments running parallel with it to the south. The most westerly terminus has been later destroyed by later root action, as fare as can been seen on the surface anyway, so it seems reasonable to suggest that it terminates somewhere beneath the “tree throw” [543035]. This indicates that it falls quite nicely between the terminii of the two ditches to the south, and respects their boundaries. These three ditches run broadly E-W. Then there is a line of postholes running SE-NW. Technically, by a “line”, I mean three postholes broadly aligned. They are of similar dimensions and profiles and two of them at least, post-date the ditches. [543018] just cuts the eastern terminus of SG543037 and [524052] cuts [524090]. There are no stratigraphic relationships between the final posthole and any of the other features, but it seems at least moderately likely that it is associated with the other two. I also excavated 3 other possible stakeholes/postholes, but there is no obvious alignment or patterns as each of them is different and they are scattered over the area.  It is possible to play ‘join the dots’ but it would be pure conjecture, and could be done in several different ways. Interestingly, if the three main postholes are indeed aligned, this represents a shift from the alignment of the ditch system although the postholes appear to bear some relationship with the ditches. Both 543018 and 524052 are on the northern side of the edge of their respective terminii, overlapping just enough to suggest a relationship. And the similarities in the fill materials could indicate that all features were open at the same time, in which case the overlap is not enough to destabilise the posts within the postholes. To a certain extent, the decision to assign the postholes to a later phase than the ditch segments was largely intuitive, and the overlap was not large enough or clear enough to state categorically that this is correct. It did however, seem to both Steve and myself that stratigraphically it fits best this way round. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation: There are several interpretation, that have been put forward for this area, and as there is hardly any evidence of date or function it is very difficult to be more precise. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, there is no broad consensus that 543037 is in fact a ditch although this seems to me to be the best interpretation.  However, it could instead be a tap root coming from the tree throw 543035, or a hedgerow associated with a series of fence posts, or alternatively a beam slot, associated structurally with the post holes in the area.  Of these three possibilities, I prefer the latter, as it seems to have a very regular, formal cut, and doesn’t really seem to have a typical root style profile.  Although personally, I felt it developed into a linear feature that was slightly too wide too comfortably be described as a beam slot, thinking about it now this idea is possibly supported by the fact that I now think 543038 could be deliberate backfill of stones into the ditch or gully, which could offer more solid support for any structure built up from this potential beam.  Considered as a cut, it looks to me more like a ditch or gully, but I think it is almost certainly worth bearing this possibility in mind.  It may actually bear no relationship other than a spatial one to the segmented ditch system, although I do think there is a connection.  This is only partly based on the position of the “ditch” in the gap between the segments, and partly to do with the fact that both 543037 and 524090 appear broadly contemporary with the post holes that are cut into them, and I believe these post holes to be related to each other.  Unfortunately, as none of this is strategraphically or artefactually provable, I could say anything really.  It being a beam slot does not necessarily preclude it being related to the ditch system – it could be that a structure was built in the gap (or the ditches were dug using the structure as some sort of marker) – although it is obviously slightly easier to argue this if we accept for the sake of argument that it is a ditch. That being the case, it raises some interesting questions relating to control and use of landscape. It is clearly possible to see through the gap between the two main segments of ditch, but you can not walk straight through. Not only is there a palisade or fence running SE-NW, but there is a hole in the ground immediately in front of you. If you are trying to move around the landscape, you have to turn corners. Therefore people’s movements are controlled and limited even during excavation, it has been apparent how much influence these features have had on the way we have moved around the area while on site. The space just to the south of the gap in the segmented ditch has been fairly thoroughly trampled on during the past few weeks, and mud has been deposited there from people’s boots due to poor weather conditions. The original surface is now completely turn up, as if the pathway between the ditches, leading northwards to this area. The series of features here have made us as archaeologists react to the space in a certain way and given I believe that at least most of these features were contemporary with each other, it suggests that the people who produced them would have had a similar series of interactions with the landscape then as we have found now. I quite like this idea.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There are also 3 small features as yet un-discussed {543023], [543025], [543030]. It would be possible to draw a line connecting [543018], [543023] and [543025] running almost directly north but as the profiles are so different I would suggest that this is more co-incidence than anything else. Of course it could illustrate a change in alignment, represented by a short palisade. [543030] could potentially be related to [543020] despite its small almost non existent shallow profile, as it could perhaps be where a hole was started but then discovered to be several centimetres out. Pure conjecture of course, but it doesn’t obviously relate to anything else, and there isn’t an awful lot more I can say about this feature. It may of course be similar to some of the unexcavated patches to the north of [543035] but there is no evidence for this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note (548): All these features were very shallow and not convincing. There are definitely at least a couple of very truncated postholes but SG 543037 was quite dubious, and could partly be due to bioturbation. General interpretation of these features is therefore to take with caution!","543","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10004","PSH02 - 543023","PSH02",543023
256,"Possible structural postholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Area of post-holes, possibly forming a structure, very truncated. Interpretation problematic. All features comprised in this entity cover an area 3m x 3m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Dating/artefacts : 3 microliths recovered from various parts of this area during surface cleaning. Two over the ditch, and one not associated with any feature. Not secure- could have been created during machining, or brought onto area, attached onto someone’s foot. Otherwise sterile. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General: Basically, what I think is happening is that the small gully/ditch SG 543037 is contemporary with/related to the two BA ditch segments running parallel with it to the south. The most westerly terminus has been later destroyed by later root action, as fare as can been seen on the surface anyway, so it seems reasonable to suggest that it terminates somewhere beneath the “tree throw” [543035]. This indicates that it falls quite nicely between the terminii of the two ditches to the south, and respects their boundaries. These three ditches run broadly E-W. Then there is a line of postholes running SE-NW. Technically, by a “line”, I mean three postholes broadly aligned. They are of similar dimensions and profiles and two of them at least, post-date the ditches. [543018] just cuts the eastern terminus of SG543037 and [524052] cuts [524090]. There are no stratigraphic relationships between the final posthole and any of the other features, but it seems at least moderately likely that it is associated with the other two. I also excavated 3 other possible stakeholes/postholes, but there is no obvious alignment or patterns as each of them is different and they are scattered over the area.  It is possible to play ‘join the dots’ but it would be pure conjecture, and could be done in several different ways. Interestingly, if the three main postholes are indeed aligned, this represents a shift from the alignment of the ditch system although the postholes appear to bear some relationship with the ditches. Both 543018 and 524052 are on the northern side of the edge of their respective terminii, overlapping just enough to suggest a relationship. And the similarities in the fill materials could indicate that all features were open at the same time, in which case the overlap is not enough to destabilise the posts within the postholes. To a certain extent, the decision to assign the postholes to a later phase than the ditch segments was largely intuitive, and the overlap was not large enough or clear enough to state categorically that this is correct. It did however, seem to both Steve and myself that stratigraphically it fits best this way round. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation: There are several interpretation, that have been put forward for this area, and as there is hardly any evidence of date or function it is very difficult to be more precise. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, there is no broad consensus that 543037 is in fact a ditch although this seems to me to be the best interpretation.  However, it could instead be a tap root coming from the tree throw 543035, or a hedgerow associated with a series of fence posts, or alternatively a beam slot, associated structurally with the post holes in the area.  Of these three possibilities, I prefer the latter, as it seems to have a very regular, formal cut, and doesn’t really seem to have a typical root style profile.  Although personally, I felt it developed into a linear feature that was slightly too wide too comfortably be described as a beam slot, thinking about it now this idea is possibly supported by the fact that I now think 543038 could be deliberate backfill of stones into the ditch or gully, which could offer more solid support for any structure built up from this potential beam.  Considered as a cut, it looks to me more like a ditch or gully, but I think it is almost certainly worth bearing this possibility in mind.  It may actually bear no relationship other than a spatial one to the segmented ditch system, although I do think there is a connection.  This is only partly based on the position of the “ditch” in the gap between the segments, and partly to do with the fact that both 543037 and 524090 appear broadly contemporary with the post holes that are cut into them, and I believe these post holes to be related to each other.  Unfortunately, as none of this is strategraphically or artefactually provable, I could say anything really.  It being a beam slot does not necessarily preclude it being related to the ditch system – it could be that a structure was built in the gap (or the ditches were dug using the structure as some sort of marker) – although it is obviously slightly easier to argue this if we accept for the sake of argument that it is a ditch. That being the case, it raises some interesting questions relating to control and use of landscape. It is clearly possible to see through the gap between the two main segments of ditch, but you can not walk straight through. Not only is there a palisade or fence running SE-NW, but there is a hole in the ground immediately in front of you. If you are trying to move around the landscape, you have to turn corners. Therefore people’s movements are controlled and limited even during excavation, it has been apparent how much influence these features have had on the way we have moved around the area while on site. The space just to the south of the gap in the segmented ditch has been fairly thoroughly trampled on during the past few weeks, and mud has been deposited there from people’s boots due to poor weather conditions. The original surface is now completely turn up, as if the pathway between the ditches, leading northwards to this area. The series of features here have made us as archaeologists react to the space in a certain way and given I believe that at least most of these features were contemporary with each other, it suggests that the people who produced them would have had a similar series of interactions with the landscape then as we have found now. I quite like this idea.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There are also 3 small features as yet un-discussed {543023], [543025], [543030]. It would be possible to draw a line connecting [543018], [543023] and [543025] running almost directly north but as the profiles are so different I would suggest that this is more co-incidence than anything else. Of course it could illustrate a change in alignment, represented by a short palisade. [543030] could potentially be related to [543020] despite its small almost non existent shallow profile, as it could perhaps be where a hole was started but then discovered to be several centimetres out. Pure conjecture of course, but it doesn’t obviously relate to anything else, and there isn’t an awful lot more I can say about this feature. It may of course be similar to some of the unexcavated patches to the north of [543035] but there is no evidence for this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note (548): All these features were very shallow and not convincing. There are definitely at least a couple of very truncated postholes but SG 543037 was quite dubious, and could partly be due to bioturbation. General interpretation of these features is therefore to take with caution!","543","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10004","PSH02 - 543025","PSH02",543025
256,"Possible structural postholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Area of post-holes, possibly forming a structure, very truncated. Interpretation problematic. All features comprised in this entity cover an area 3m x 3m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Dating/artefacts : 3 microliths recovered from various parts of this area during surface cleaning. Two over the ditch, and one not associated with any feature. Not secure- could have been created during machining, or brought onto area, attached onto someone’s foot. Otherwise sterile. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General: Basically, what I think is happening is that the small gully/ditch SG 543037 is contemporary with/related to the two BA ditch segments running parallel with it to the south. The most westerly terminus has been later destroyed by later root action, as fare as can been seen on the surface anyway, so it seems reasonable to suggest that it terminates somewhere beneath the “tree throw” [543035]. This indicates that it falls quite nicely between the terminii of the two ditches to the south, and respects their boundaries. These three ditches run broadly E-W. Then there is a line of postholes running SE-NW. Technically, by a “line”, I mean three postholes broadly aligned. They are of similar dimensions and profiles and two of them at least, post-date the ditches. [543018] just cuts the eastern terminus of SG543037 and [524052] cuts [524090]. There are no stratigraphic relationships between the final posthole and any of the other features, but it seems at least moderately likely that it is associated with the other two. I also excavated 3 other possible stakeholes/postholes, but there is no obvious alignment or patterns as each of them is different and they are scattered over the area.  It is possible to play ‘join the dots’ but it would be pure conjecture, and could be done in several different ways. Interestingly, if the three main postholes are indeed aligned, this represents a shift from the alignment of the ditch system although the postholes appear to bear some relationship with the ditches. Both 543018 and 524052 are on the northern side of the edge of their respective terminii, overlapping just enough to suggest a relationship. And the similarities in the fill materials could indicate that all features were open at the same time, in which case the overlap is not enough to destabilise the posts within the postholes. To a certain extent, the decision to assign the postholes to a later phase than the ditch segments was largely intuitive, and the overlap was not large enough or clear enough to state categorically that this is correct. It did however, seem to both Steve and myself that stratigraphically it fits best this way round. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation: There are several interpretation, that have been put forward for this area, and as there is hardly any evidence of date or function it is very difficult to be more precise. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, there is no broad consensus that 543037 is in fact a ditch although this seems to me to be the best interpretation.  However, it could instead be a tap root coming from the tree throw 543035, or a hedgerow associated with a series of fence posts, or alternatively a beam slot, associated structurally with the post holes in the area.  Of these three possibilities, I prefer the latter, as it seems to have a very regular, formal cut, and doesn’t really seem to have a typical root style profile.  Although personally, I felt it developed into a linear feature that was slightly too wide too comfortably be described as a beam slot, thinking about it now this idea is possibly supported by the fact that I now think 543038 could be deliberate backfill of stones into the ditch or gully, which could offer more solid support for any structure built up from this potential beam.  Considered as a cut, it looks to me more like a ditch or gully, but I think it is almost certainly worth bearing this possibility in mind.  It may actually bear no relationship other than a spatial one to the segmented ditch system, although I do think there is a connection.  This is only partly based on the position of the “ditch” in the gap between the segments, and partly to do with the fact that both 543037 and 524090 appear broadly contemporary with the post holes that are cut into them, and I believe these post holes to be related to each other.  Unfortunately, as none of this is strategraphically or artefactually provable, I could say anything really.  It being a beam slot does not necessarily preclude it being related to the ditch system – it could be that a structure was built in the gap (or the ditches were dug using the structure as some sort of marker) – although it is obviously slightly easier to argue this if we accept for the sake of argument that it is a ditch. That being the case, it raises some interesting questions relating to control and use of landscape. It is clearly possible to see through the gap between the two main segments of ditch, but you can not walk straight through. Not only is there a palisade or fence running SE-NW, but there is a hole in the ground immediately in front of you. If you are trying to move around the landscape, you have to turn corners. Therefore people’s movements are controlled and limited even during excavation, it has been apparent how much influence these features have had on the way we have moved around the area while on site. The space just to the south of the gap in the segmented ditch has been fairly thoroughly trampled on during the past few weeks, and mud has been deposited there from people’s boots due to poor weather conditions. The original surface is now completely turn up, as if the pathway between the ditches, leading northwards to this area. The series of features here have made us as archaeologists react to the space in a certain way and given I believe that at least most of these features were contemporary with each other, it suggests that the people who produced them would have had a similar series of interactions with the landscape then as we have found now. I quite like this idea.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There are also 3 small features as yet un-discussed {543023], [543025], [543030]. It would be possible to draw a line connecting [543018], [543023] and [543025] running almost directly north but as the profiles are so different I would suggest that this is more co-incidence than anything else. Of course it could illustrate a change in alignment, represented by a short palisade. [543030] could potentially be related to [543020] despite its small almost non existent shallow profile, as it could perhaps be where a hole was started but then discovered to be several centimetres out. Pure conjecture of course, but it doesn’t obviously relate to anything else, and there isn’t an awful lot more I can say about this feature. It may of course be similar to some of the unexcavated patches to the north of [543035] but there is no evidence for this. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note (548): All these features were very shallow and not convincing. There are definitely at least a couple of very truncated postholes but SG 543037 was quite dubious, and could partly be due to bioturbation. General interpretation of these features is therefore to take with caution!","543","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10004","PSH02 - 543037","PSH02",543037
260,"Middle Roman Water-hole","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","RCP3 water-hole excavated in area C1.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 133198","WPR98",133198
261,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\ pit cluster 3","700 Medieval",,"guess","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578421","PSH02",578421
261,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\ pit cluster 3","700 Medieval",,"guess","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578422","PSH02",578422
261,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\ pit cluster 3","700 Medieval",,"guess","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578423","PSH02",578423
261,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\ pit cluster 3","700 Medieval",,"guess","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578424","PSH02",578424
261,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\ pit cluster 3","700 Medieval",,"guess","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578425","PSH02",578425
261,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\ pit cluster 3","700 Medieval",,"guess","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578438","PSH02",578438
261,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\ pit cluster 3","700 Medieval",,"guess","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578439","PSH02",578439
261,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\ pit cluster 3","700 Medieval",,"guess","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578440","PSH02",578440
261,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\ pit cluster 3","700 Medieval",,"guess","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578442","PSH02",578442
265,"Middle Bronze Age pits / waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits and waterholes at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960514","POK96",960514
265,"Middle Bronze Age pits / waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits and waterholes at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963043","POK96",963043
265,"Middle Bronze Age pits / waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits and waterholes at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
265,"Middle Bronze Age pits / waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits and waterholes at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
265,"Middle Bronze Age pits / waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits and waterholes at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
265,"Middle Bronze Age pits / waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits and waterholes at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
265,"Middle Bronze Age pits / waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits and waterholes at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 170007","WPR98",170007
265,"Middle Bronze Age pits / waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits and waterholes at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
265,"Middle Bronze Age pits / waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits and waterholes at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178122","WPR98",178122
268,"Middle Iron Age Pit 6","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","MIA pit excavated in area C2 cuts across the top of the trackway ditches.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 178015","WPR98",178015
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 311014","PSH02",311014
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 311031","PSH02",311031
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 311033","PSH02",311033
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 311035","PSH02",311035
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 312002","PSH02",312002
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 312027","PSH02",312027
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 312032","PSH02",312032
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 312035","PSH02",312035
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523145","PSH02",523145
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523202","PSH02",523202
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523206","PSH02",523206
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523222","PSH02",523222
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523241","PSH02",523241
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523254","PSH02",523254
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 569155","PSH02",569155
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 569157","PSH02",569157
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575215","PSH02",575215
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582353","PSH02",582353
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 624001","PSH02",624001
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 628008","PSH02",628008
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 628010","PSH02",628010
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 634011","PSH02",634011
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 634020","PSH02",634020
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636029","PSH02",636029
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636031","PSH02",636031
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636033","PSH02",636033
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636035","PSH02",636035
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636038","PSH02",636038
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636041","PSH02",636041
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636045","PSH02",636045
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636097","PSH02",636097
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 643094","PSH02",643094
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 643125","PSH02",643125
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 643127","PSH02",643127
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 643129","PSH02",643129
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 643131","PSH02",643131
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 656044","PSH02",656044
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 656053","PSH02",656053
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 664004","PSH02",664004
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 664006","PSH02",664006
269,"Early/Middle Roman Ditch (Trackway) System 1","565 Middle Romano-British",,"A number of braided (intensively recut)  ditches in Area 61 and Twin Rivers seem to form some sort of coherant pattern as possible drove/trackways and ?associated blocks of fields.  However, only a small component has been exposed.  Finds suggest a E-MRB date.  The majority of the ditches follow an E-W alignment, and unlike further east, they are not as straight as a die.  In fact they are quite organic and wiggly, which would be more in keeping with meandering east-west routes through the landsape.  Perhaps rather than being a field system, this zone of E-W ditches represent a series of trackways, that linked up with the major Roman fields and ladder enclosure to the east, promoting the movement of animals in this direction.  It has also been noted that the development of this system may expand progressively northwards over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 664010","PSH02",664010
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 960023","POK96",960023
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961741","POK96",961741
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 522154","PSH02",522154
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 524226","PSH02",524226
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 547241","PSH02",547241
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 570377","PSH02",570377
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 570379","PSH02",570379
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 596044","PSH02",596044
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 110011","WPR98",110011
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 124043","WPR98",124043
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 132009","WPR98",132009
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 133035","WPR98",133035
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134011","WPR98",134011
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 137019","WPR98",137019
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 142008","WPR98",142008
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 153011","WPR98",153011
270,"Neolithic Landgrab Cursus (PSH02+WPR98)","205 Early Neolithic","300 Bronze Age","Entity created to combine elements of Landgrab Cursus excavated in WPR98, POK96 and PSH02","EN","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 153048","WPR98",153048
272,"LBA/PostDevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Post Deverel Rimbury element of trackway already discussed as MBA/ DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D. This entity gathers the re-cuts of these ditches, most of which contain Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Suggests heavy use/ long life span of this route throughout the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582319","PSH02",582319
272,"LBA/PostDevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Post Deverel Rimbury element of trackway already discussed as MBA/ DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D. This entity gathers the re-cuts of these ditches, most of which contain Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Suggests heavy use/ long life span of this route throughout the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582332","PSH02",582332
272,"LBA/PostDevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Post Deverel Rimbury element of trackway already discussed as MBA/ DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D. This entity gathers the re-cuts of these ditches, most of which contain Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Suggests heavy use/ long life span of this route throughout the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 599125","PSH02",599125
272,"LBA/PostDevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Post Deverel Rimbury element of trackway already discussed as MBA/ DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D. This entity gathers the re-cuts of these ditches, most of which contain Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Suggests heavy use/ long life span of this route throughout the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 103054","WPR98",103054
272,"LBA/PostDevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Post Deverel Rimbury element of trackway already discussed as MBA/ DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D. This entity gathers the re-cuts of these ditches, most of which contain Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Suggests heavy use/ long life span of this route throughout the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 119317","WPR98",119317
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960023","POK96",960023
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961501","POK96",961501
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961515","POK96",961515
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961741","POK96",961741
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512070","PSH02",512070
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512071","PSH02",512071
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522123","PSH02",522123
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522128","PSH02",522128
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,,"PSH02",522139
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522140","PSH02",522140
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522142","PSH02",522142
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,,"PSH02",522147
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,,"PSH02",522149
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522153","PSH02",522153
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522154","PSH02",522154
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524167","PSH02",524167
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524226","PSH02",524226
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524234","PSH02",524234
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524238","PSH02",524238
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524398","PSH02",524398
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526381","PSH02",526381
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526493","PSH02",526493
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529310","PSH02",529310
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529311","PSH02",529311
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529312","PSH02",529312
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529313","PSH02",529313
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537175","PSH02",537175
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537181","PSH02",537181
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541166","PSH02",541166
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547241","PSH02",547241
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 549109","PSH02",549109
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570377","PSH02",570377
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570379","PSH02",570379
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580554","PSH02",580554
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580556","PSH02",580556
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580561","PSH02",580561
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580570","PSH02",580570
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580580","PSH02",580580
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580582","PSH02",580582
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588222","PSH02",588222
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588229","PSH02",588229
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588324","PSH02",588324
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594241","PSH02",594241
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 596044","PSH02",596044
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603048","PSH02",603048
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 617042","PSH02",617042
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621051","PSH02",621051
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110011","WPR98",110011
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124043","WPR98",124043
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128028","WPR98",128028
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132009","WPR98",132009
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133035","WPR98",133035
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134011","WPR98",134011
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134029","WPR98",134029
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137019","WPR98",137019
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 153011","WPR98",153011
274,"All Cursus Monuments (PSH02, WPR98 and POK)","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic Cursus monuments","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 153048","WPR98",153048
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 218064","GAI99",218064
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960071","POK96",960071
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960109","POK96",960109
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960517","POK96",960517
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960578","POK96",960578
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103027","WPR98",103027
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107084","WPR98",107084
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111032","WPR98",111032
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111038","WPR98",111038
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111082","WPR98",111082
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111125","WPR98",111125
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113041","WPR98",113041
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119286","WPR98",119286
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127073","WPR98",127073
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128226","WPR98",128226
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128228","WPR98",128228
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128230","WPR98",128230
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130145","WPR98",130145
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 135087","WPR98",135087
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 140050","WPR98",140050
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148093","WPR98",148093
275,"Late Roman landscape","598 Late Romano-British",,"'Uberentity' containing all elements of the late Roman landscape","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151082","WPR98",151082
278,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 2","700 Medieval",,"Ditches, ditch segments, postholes and tree throws marking N-S boundary. Perpendicular to Boundary Group 1. Very little dating evidence. Currently thought to be medieval or post-med and therefore later than the earliest occupation.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 538314","PSH02",538314
278,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 2","700 Medieval",,"Ditches, ditch segments, postholes and tree throws marking N-S boundary. Perpendicular to Boundary Group 1. Very little dating evidence. Currently thought to be medieval or post-med and therefore later than the earliest occupation.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578385","PSH02",578385
278,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 2","700 Medieval",,"Ditches, ditch segments, postholes and tree throws marking N-S boundary. Perpendicular to Boundary Group 1. Very little dating evidence. Currently thought to be medieval or post-med and therefore later than the earliest occupation.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578387","PSH02",578387
278,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 2","700 Medieval",,"Ditches, ditch segments, postholes and tree throws marking N-S boundary. Perpendicular to Boundary Group 1. Very little dating evidence. Currently thought to be medieval or post-med and therefore later than the earliest occupation.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578395","PSH02",578395
278,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 2","700 Medieval",,"Ditches, ditch segments, postholes and tree throws marking N-S boundary. Perpendicular to Boundary Group 1. Very little dating evidence. Currently thought to be medieval or post-med and therefore later than the earliest occupation.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578488","PSH02",578488
278,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 2","700 Medieval",,"Ditches, ditch segments, postholes and tree throws marking N-S boundary. Perpendicular to Boundary Group 1. Very little dating evidence. Currently thought to be medieval or post-med and therefore later than the earliest occupation.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578497","PSH02",578497
278,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 2","700 Medieval",,"Ditches, ditch segments, postholes and tree throws marking N-S boundary. Perpendicular to Boundary Group 1. Very little dating evidence. Currently thought to be medieval or post-med and therefore later than the earliest occupation.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 589228","PSH02",589228
278,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 2","700 Medieval",,"Ditches, ditch segments, postholes and tree throws marking N-S boundary. Perpendicular to Boundary Group 1. Very little dating evidence. Currently thought to be medieval or post-med and therefore later than the earliest occupation.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 589234","PSH02",589234
281,"Middle Iron Age ring gully recut","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Partial recut of Middle Iron Age ring gully around round house.","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128354","WPR98",128354
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512049","PSH02",512049
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529200","PSH02",529200
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529233","PSH02",529233
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529237","PSH02",529237
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529241","PSH02",529241
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529260","PSH02",529260
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529266","PSH02",529266
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546065","PSH02",546065
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547168","PSH02",547168
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547169","PSH02",547169
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568079","PSH02",568079
283,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 589034","PSH02",589034
286,"Bronze Age waterholes in the central area entity 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is an entity representing the waterholes in the central area of the site later than thoose seen in the west.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 122076","WPR98",122076
286,"Bronze Age waterholes in the central area entity 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is an entity representing the waterholes in the central area of the site later than thoose seen in the west.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 124085","WPR98",124085
286,"Bronze Age waterholes in the central area entity 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is an entity representing the waterholes in the central area of the site later than thoose seen in the west.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
286,"Bronze Age waterholes in the central area entity 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is an entity representing the waterholes in the central area of the site later than thoose seen in the west.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157065","WPR98",157065
289,"Enclosure or Structure","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"Enclosure or structure constructed after Pennanular Gully 3 fell into disuse. Consists of a length of rectilinear gully, 2 post-holes marking an entrance in the south-east and 4 post-holes, possibly representing a structure in the South-east corner external to the boundary gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Described in detail in Volume 1 and interpreted as possibly Midddle to Late Iron Age on the basis of the pottery recovered from the post-holes.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 108018","WPR98",108018
289,"Enclosure or Structure","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"Enclosure or structure constructed after Pennanular Gully 3 fell into disuse. Consists of a length of rectilinear gully, 2 post-holes marking an entrance in the south-east and 4 post-holes, possibly representing a structure in the South-east corner external to the boundary gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Described in detail in Volume 1 and interpreted as possibly Midddle to Late Iron Age on the basis of the pottery recovered from the post-holes.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 108020","WPR98",108020
289,"Enclosure or Structure","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"Enclosure or structure constructed after Pennanular Gully 3 fell into disuse. Consists of a length of rectilinear gully, 2 post-holes marking an entrance in the south-east and 4 post-holes, possibly representing a structure in the South-east corner external to the boundary gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Described in detail in Volume 1 and interpreted as possibly Midddle to Late Iron Age on the basis of the pottery recovered from the post-holes.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 108025","WPR98",108025
289,"Enclosure or Structure","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"Enclosure or structure constructed after Pennanular Gully 3 fell into disuse. Consists of a length of rectilinear gully, 2 post-holes marking an entrance in the south-east and 4 post-holes, possibly representing a structure in the South-east corner external to the boundary gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Described in detail in Volume 1 and interpreted as possibly Midddle to Late Iron Age on the basis of the pottery recovered from the post-holes.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 133056","WPR98",133056
289,"Enclosure or Structure","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"Enclosure or structure constructed after Pennanular Gully 3 fell into disuse. Consists of a length of rectilinear gully, 2 post-holes marking an entrance in the south-east and 4 post-holes, possibly representing a structure in the South-east corner external to the boundary gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Described in detail in Volume 1 and interpreted as possibly Midddle to Late Iron Age on the basis of the pottery recovered from the post-holes.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 133059","WPR98",133059
289,"Enclosure or Structure","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"Enclosure or structure constructed after Pennanular Gully 3 fell into disuse. Consists of a length of rectilinear gully, 2 post-holes marking an entrance in the south-east and 4 post-holes, possibly representing a structure in the South-east corner external to the boundary gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Described in detail in Volume 1 and interpreted as possibly Midddle to Late Iron Age on the basis of the pottery recovered from the post-holes.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134064","WPR98",134064
289,"Enclosure or Structure","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"Enclosure or structure constructed after Pennanular Gully 3 fell into disuse. Consists of a length of rectilinear gully, 2 post-holes marking an entrance in the south-east and 4 post-holes, possibly representing a structure in the South-east corner external to the boundary gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Described in detail in Volume 1 and interpreted as possibly Midddle to Late Iron Age on the basis of the pottery recovered from the post-holes.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134066","WPR98",134066
289,"Enclosure or Structure","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"Enclosure or structure constructed after Pennanular Gully 3 fell into disuse. Consists of a length of rectilinear gully, 2 post-holes marking an entrance in the south-east and 4 post-holes, possibly representing a structure in the South-east corner external to the boundary gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Described in detail in Volume 1 and interpreted as possibly Midddle to Late Iron Age on the basis of the pottery recovered from the post-holes.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146321","WPR98",146321
289,"Enclosure or Structure","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"Enclosure or structure constructed after Pennanular Gully 3 fell into disuse. Consists of a length of rectilinear gully, 2 post-holes marking an entrance in the south-east and 4 post-holes, possibly representing a structure in the South-east corner external to the boundary gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Described in detail in Volume 1 and interpreted as possibly Midddle to Late Iron Age on the basis of the pottery recovered from the post-holes.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 160243","WPR98",160243
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961515","POK96",961515
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 512071","PSH02",512071
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524167","PSH02",524167
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524238","PSH02",524238
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524398","PSH02",524398
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529311","PSH02",529311
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529313","PSH02",529313
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 541166","PSH02",541166
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 588222","PSH02",588222
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 588229","PSH02",588229
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 588324","PSH02",588324
290,"Stanwell Cursus Western Ditch (PSH02, WPR98+POK96)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Entity that brings together all elements of this western ditch that defines the Stanwell Cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 128028","WPR98",128028
292,"Penannular Gully 8","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch located in area C1. Appears to be aligned and in some places cut over the LN/EBA pennanular ditch.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 113114","WPR98",113114
292,"Penannular Gully 8","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch located in area C1. Appears to be aligned and in some places cut over the LN/EBA pennanular ditch.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 113117","WPR98",113117
292,"Penannular Gully 8","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch located in area C1. Appears to be aligned and in some places cut over the LN/EBA pennanular ditch.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 113173","WPR98",113173
292,"Penannular Gully 8","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch located in area C1. Appears to be aligned and in some places cut over the LN/EBA pennanular ditch.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 125123","WPR98",125123
292,"Penannular Gully 8","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch located in area C1. Appears to be aligned and in some places cut over the LN/EBA pennanular ditch.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 147136","WPR98",147136
293,"Middle Bronze Age Waterhole 3","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Middle Bronze Age  waterhole excxavated in the north of Bed B. this was later used as a well but can be considered as one feature. Cuts the north south aligned ditch of the field system. This contained structured deposition and radio carbon dated artefacts.","ab","Excavation","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
295,"Roman Enclosure 3","565 Middle Romano-British",,"This may form a livestock enclosure situated south of a series of braided E-W aligned trackways/ droveways and just north of the RB animal management complex.  This enclosure may have articulated closely with the funnelling system and holding pens of this system.  Pottery suggests a M-LRB date.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 634035","PSH02",634035
295,"Roman Enclosure 3","565 Middle Romano-British",,"This may form a livestock enclosure situated south of a series of braided E-W aligned trackways/ droveways and just north of the RB animal management complex.  This enclosure may have articulated closely with the funnelling system and holding pens of this system.  Pottery suggests a M-LRB date.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636053","PSH02",636053
295,"Roman Enclosure 3","565 Middle Romano-British",,"This may form a livestock enclosure situated south of a series of braided E-W aligned trackways/ droveways and just north of the RB animal management complex.  This enclosure may have articulated closely with the funnelling system and holding pens of this system.  Pottery suggests a M-LRB date.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 640007","PSH02",640007
297,"Middle Bronze Age Beamslot","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","The date of this feature is dubious dated through alignment and appears to match that of the MBA field system. no other MBA beamslots excavated in this area.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963113","POK96",963113
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 229149","POK96",229149
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963017","POK96",963017
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963018","POK96",963018
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963019","POK96",963019
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963020","POK96",963020
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963021","POK96",963021
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963040","POK96",963040
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963074","POK96",963074
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963097","POK96",963097
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963106","POK96",963106
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963109","POK96",963109
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963138","POK96",963138
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963159","POK96",963159
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963161","POK96",963161
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963218","POK96",963218
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963280","POK96",963280
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963489","POK96",963489
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963494","POK96",963494
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963517","POK96",963517
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963519","POK96",963519
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148181","WPR98",148181
299,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA field system west of the palaeochnnel in WPR and POK. Different alignemenmt to landholding 2 which straddles the C1 cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160356","WPR98",160356
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 538270","PSH02",538270
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555831","PSH02",555831
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555861","PSH02",555861
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582389","PSH02",582389
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582394","PSH02",582394
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582395","PSH02",582395
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582402","PSH02",582402
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582407","PSH02",582407
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 595089","PSH02",595089
301,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 4","700 Medieval",,"group of pits, at least some dated to EAS and possibly forming circumstantial evidence for a second structural 'hotspot'","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 597115","PSH02",597115
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961036","POK96",961036
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961040","POK96",961040
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961043","POK96",961043
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961044","POK96",961044
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961050","POK96",961050
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961121","POK96",961121
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961122","POK96",961122
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961124","POK96",961124
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961125","POK96",961125
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961126","POK96",961126
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961133","POK96",961133
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961134","POK96",961134
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961502","POK96",961502
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961847","POK96",961847
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961855","POK96",961855
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961864","POK96",961864
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961874","POK96",961874
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961875","POK96",961875
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961959","POK96",961959
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962146","POK96",962146
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962155","POK96",962155
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962206","POK96",962206
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962327","POK96",962327
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512032","PSH02",512032
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512052","PSH02",512052
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512054","PSH02",512054
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512072","PSH02",512072
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512083","PSH02",512083
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512085","PSH02",512085
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512094","PSH02",512094
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512096","PSH02",512096
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512126","PSH02",512126
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 513083","PSH02",513083
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 513086","PSH02",513086
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517120","PSH02",517120
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517123","PSH02",517123
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517125","PSH02",517125
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517128","PSH02",517128
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517130","PSH02",517130
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517133","PSH02",517133
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517134","PSH02",517134
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517135","PSH02",517135
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517229","PSH02",517229
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517262","PSH02",517262
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517284","PSH02",517284
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526276","PSH02",526276
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526279","PSH02",526279
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526281","PSH02",526281
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526283","PSH02",526283
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526285","PSH02",526285
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527170","PSH02",527170
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527171","PSH02",527171
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527172","PSH02",527172
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527192","PSH02",527192
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527195","PSH02",527195
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527197","PSH02",527197
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527215","PSH02",527215
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527217","PSH02",527217
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527235","PSH02",527235
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527261","PSH02",527261
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527270","PSH02",527270
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527300","PSH02",527300
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529056","PSH02",529056
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529060","PSH02",529060
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529076","PSH02",529076
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529077","PSH02",529077
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529078","PSH02",529078
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529088","PSH02",529088
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529089","PSH02",529089
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529094","PSH02",529094
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529096","PSH02",529096
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529099","PSH02",529099
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529103","PSH02",529103
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529107","PSH02",529107
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529108","PSH02",529108
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529172","PSH02",529172
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529228","PSH02",529228
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529233","PSH02",529233
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529237","PSH02",529237
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529239","PSH02",529239
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529241","PSH02",529241
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529246","PSH02",529246
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529249","PSH02",529249
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529266","PSH02",529266
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529267","PSH02",529267
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529268","PSH02",529268
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529278","PSH02",529278
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537016","PSH02",537016
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537023","PSH02",537023
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537032","PSH02",537032
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537034","PSH02",537034
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537044","PSH02",537044
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537056","PSH02",537056
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537068","PSH02",537068
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537082","PSH02",537082
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537093","PSH02",537093
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537098","PSH02",537098
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537100","PSH02",537100
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537105","PSH02",537105
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537115","PSH02",537115
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537118","PSH02",537118
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537121","PSH02",537121
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537134","PSH02",537134
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537136","PSH02",537136
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537164","PSH02",537164
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537171","PSH02",537171
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537183","PSH02",537183
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537187","PSH02",537187
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537189","PSH02",537189
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538251","PSH02",538251
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538260","PSH02",538260
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539051","PSH02",539051
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542094","PSH02",542094
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542095","PSH02",542095
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542102","PSH02",542102
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542106","PSH02",542106
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542109","PSH02",542109
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 543088","PSH02",543088
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 543093","PSH02",543093
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 543095","PSH02",543095
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 543100","PSH02",543100
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 543103","PSH02",543103
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 543105","PSH02",543105
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546065","PSH02",546065
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546066","PSH02",546066
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546067","PSH02",546067
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546100","PSH02",546100
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546103","PSH02",546103
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546107","PSH02",546107
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547161","PSH02",547161
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547167","PSH02",547167
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547168","PSH02",547168
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547169","PSH02",547169
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547171","PSH02",547171
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547173","PSH02",547173
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547179","PSH02",547179
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547231","PSH02",547231
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553032","PSH02",553032
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553037","PSH02",553037
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553044","PSH02",553044
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553048","PSH02",553048
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553083","PSH02",553083
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553092","PSH02",553092
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553096","PSH02",553096
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553100","PSH02",553100
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555249","PSH02",555249
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555251","PSH02",555251
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555254","PSH02",555254
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555257","PSH02",555257
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555261","PSH02",555261
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555264","PSH02",555264
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555271","PSH02",555271
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555276","PSH02",555276
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555279","PSH02",555279
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555281","PSH02",555281
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555283","PSH02",555283
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555285","PSH02",555285
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555287","PSH02",555287
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555290","PSH02",555290
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555453","PSH02",555453
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 560023","PSH02",560023
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 560027","PSH02",560027
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561121","PSH02",561121
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561126","PSH02",561126
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561131","PSH02",561131
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561133","PSH02",561133
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561138","PSH02",561138
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561140","PSH02",561140
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561153","PSH02",561153
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 562123","PSH02",562123
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 562126","PSH02",562126
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 562129","PSH02",562129
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 562132","PSH02",562132
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 562135","PSH02",562135
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 562137","PSH02",562137
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 562142","PSH02",562142
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 566049","PSH02",566049
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568002","PSH02",568002
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568004","PSH02",568004
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568009","PSH02",568009
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568011","PSH02",568011
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568014","PSH02",568014
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568068","PSH02",568068
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568070","PSH02",568070
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568079","PSH02",568079
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568083","PSH02",568083
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569022","PSH02",569022
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569039","PSH02",569039
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569045","PSH02",569045
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569050","PSH02",569050
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569052","PSH02",569052
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569080","PSH02",569080
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570027","PSH02",570027
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570029","PSH02",570029
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570039","PSH02",570039
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570051","PSH02",570051
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570053","PSH02",570053
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570055","PSH02",570055
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570068","PSH02",570068
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570107","PSH02",570107
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575146","PSH02",575146
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575181","PSH02",575181
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575200","PSH02",575200
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578069","PSH02",578069
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578071","PSH02",578071
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578073","PSH02",578073
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578075","PSH02",578075
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578112","PSH02",578112
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578115","PSH02",578115
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 579121","PSH02",579121
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 579123","PSH02",579123
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 579129","PSH02",579129
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 579154","PSH02",579154
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580068","PSH02",580068
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580070","PSH02",580070
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580072","PSH02",580072
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580074","PSH02",580074
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580076","PSH02",580076
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580078","PSH02",580078
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580082","PSH02",580082
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580084","PSH02",580084
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580086","PSH02",580086
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580088","PSH02",580088
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582101","PSH02",582101
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582117","PSH02",582117
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 583053","PSH02",583053
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 587035","PSH02",587035
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 587037","PSH02",587037
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589034","PSH02",589034
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589045","PSH02",589045
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591043","PSH02",591043
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591048","PSH02",591048
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592007","PSH02",592007
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592009","PSH02",592009
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592011","PSH02",592011
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592025","PSH02",592025
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592032","PSH02",592032
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592033","PSH02",592033
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593006","PSH02",593006
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593236","PSH02",593236
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593239","PSH02",593239
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593252","PSH02",593252
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593317","PSH02",593317
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598017","PSH02",598017
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 601005","PSH02",601005
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 601007","PSH02",601007
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 601011","PSH02",601011
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 601013","PSH02",601013
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 603039","PSH02",603039
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615343","PSH02",615343
304,"1a\medieval settlement\all settlement features.","700 Medieval",,"All features of the medieval settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621038","PSH02",621038
308,"Post-Medieval Ditch 5","800 Post-Medieval",,"PM ditch excavated in area C3.  This ditch was also identified in other areas including Area 75.  The ditch, along with two others to its east that follow the same alignment, run parallel to medieval/post medieval Long Lane that has been identified on maps.  Finds included post-medieval CBM and pottery, and the ditch had been subject to several recuts.  This indicates that it was in use for some time, and its origins may stem back to the medieval period.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 518003","PSH02",518003
308,"Post-Medieval Ditch 5","800 Post-Medieval",,"PM ditch excavated in area C3.  This ditch was also identified in other areas including Area 75.  The ditch, along with two others to its east that follow the same alignment, run parallel to medieval/post medieval Long Lane that has been identified on maps.  Finds included post-medieval CBM and pottery, and the ditch had been subject to several recuts.  This indicates that it was in use for some time, and its origins may stem back to the medieval period.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 124072","WPR98",124072
309,"Roman rectangular enclosure","500 Romano-British",,"RB enclosure or field","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128123","WPR98",128123
309,"Roman rectangular enclosure","500 Romano-British",,"RB enclosure or field","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128126","WPR98",128126
309,"Roman rectangular enclosure","500 Romano-British",,"RB enclosure or field","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159115","WPR98",159115
309,"Roman rectangular enclosure","500 Romano-British",,"RB enclosure or field","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159119","WPR98",159119
309,"Roman rectangular enclosure","500 Romano-British",,"RB enclosure or field","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160097","WPR98",160097
319,"Middle Iron Age postholes 3","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA postholes","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 123029","WPR98",123029
319,"Middle Iron Age postholes 3","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA postholes","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 166077","WPR98",166077
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 509129","PSH02",509129
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 509130","PSH02",509130
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 509131","PSH02",509131
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 509140","PSH02",509140
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 509141","PSH02",509141
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 547331","PSH02",547331
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 552236","PSH02",552236
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 554649","PSH02",554649
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 568265","PSH02",568265
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 568269","PSH02",568269
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 578213","PSH02",578213
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 578215","PSH02",578215
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 578596","PSH02",578596
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 578628","PSH02",578628
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 582434","PSH02",582434
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 589336","PSH02",589336
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 594249","PSH02",594249
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 599081","PSH02",599081
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 812029","TEC05",812029
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 812030","TEC05",812030
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 812034","TEC05",812034
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 815024","TEC05",815024
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 815026","TEC05",815026
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 815029","TEC05",815029
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 817096","TEC05",817096
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 827126","TEC05",827126
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 830076","TEC05",830076
320,"Bronze Age Trackway 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is situated in the far east of the Site.  It was revealed in both Area 100 and Area 99.  It follows a similar alignment to Trackway 5, demonstrating a slight shift in alignment of the Bronze Age field systems in the eastern part of the landscape.  A few sherds of Middle Bronze Age pottery have been retrieved from interventions through the ditch.  In Area 99 the trackway was repeatedly maintained, as evidenced by the numerous recuts in this area.  Furthermore, it is segmented in this zone, perhaps associated with access points along its length.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"TEC05 - 830140","TEC05",830140
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546407","PSH02",546407
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559458","PSH02",559458
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 574018","PSH02",574018
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663120","PSH02",663120
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126091","WPR98",126091
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126093","WPR98",126093
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127201","WPR98",127201
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127217","WPR98",127217
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146283","WPR98",146283
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146293","WPR98",146293
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146304","WPR98",146304
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148345","WPR98",148345
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158156","WPR98",158156
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167141","WPR98",167141
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172112","WPR98",172112
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 175012","WPR98",175012
321,"1A\nucleated settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes truncating ring gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 184023","WPR98",184023
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 522123","PSH02",522123
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 522128","PSH02",522128
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 522153","PSH02",522153
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526493","PSH02",526493
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537175","PSH02",537175
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 537181","PSH02",537181
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580554","PSH02",580554
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580556","PSH02",580556
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580561","PSH02",580561
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580570","PSH02",580570
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580580","PSH02",580580
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580582","PSH02",580582
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 615369","PSH02",615369
322,"Neolithic C3 cursus","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","See Entity description Neolithic cursus/Bank barrow on Area 54/ 49 for full description.  This entity is purely for semantic reasons.  This entity was created to cover the cursus monument excavated on Area 54 and terminating on Area 49.  It comprises all phases of the feature.  The monument is of a quite different nature to the Stanwell Cursus.  Firstly it is far less substantial, and secondly it follows a diffeferent alignment.  Instead of a NW-SE orientation, it is aligned roughly NE-SW, and thus shares the orientation of the 'land-grab' cursus.  In total the 'bank barrow' is c. 20 m wide and at least 90 m long, but its ditches are only c. 2 m in width and are shallower than the main cursus (max 0.57 m deep).  Banks deposits were identified deriving from both sides in the western ditch of the monument, but only internally to the monument in the eastern ditch.  Small quantities of finds were retrieved from the numerous interventions placed through the ditches, but included a number of diagnostic Neolithic - Early Bronze Age flints and a few sherds of undiagnostic Neolithic pottery.  The monument was constructed from a number of segmented ditch sections, and evidence of recutting of both later ditch segments and pits imply this monument may have had some longevity.  A possible entrance may be detected in its north-western corner, immediatedly beyond which a number of intercutting pits containing large quantities of Neolithic finds, were situated.  There has been some suggestion that this monument may pre-date the Stanwell Cursus, but there is no direct evidence that concurs with such a suggestion.  There is no physical relationship between the two monuments, and the finds may imply that this cursus is actually later in date  than Stanwell.  Although the intercutting pits to the NW of the monument (and potentially associated with activity occurring within the monument) contained a sherd of Early Neolithic pottery, they contained far larger quantities of Middle and Late Neolithic flint and pottery.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 621319","PSH02",621319
324,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 62","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"NW-SE aligned ditch of MBA date.  Forms  acomponent of a field system in Area 77","cdg","Analysis","Detailed","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 510067","PSH02",510067
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960002","POK96",960002
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960011","POK96",960011
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960012","POK96",960012
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960021","POK96",960021
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960026","POK96",960026
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960029","POK96",960029
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960031","POK96",960031
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961029","POK96",961029
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961059","POK96",961059
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961131","POK96",961131
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961132","POK96",961132
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961548","POK96",961548
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961595","POK96",961595
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961598","POK96",961598
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961689","POK96",961689
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961690","POK96",961690
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961692","POK96",961692
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961693","POK96",961693
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961694","POK96",961694
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961702","POK96",961702
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961906","POK96",961906
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963023","POK96",963023
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963025","POK96",963025
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963098","POK96",963098
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963101","POK96",963101
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963123","POK96",963123
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963127","POK96",963127
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963135","POK96",963135
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963140","POK96",963140
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963149","POK96",963149
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963171","POK96",963171
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963441","POK96",963441
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119339","WPR98",119339
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119371","WPR98",119371
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 120082","WPR98",120082
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 120099","WPR98",120099
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 120101","WPR98",120101
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121217","WPR98",121217
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121221","WPR98",121221
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121231","WPR98",121231
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122062","WPR98",122062
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122072","WPR98",122072
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122082","WPR98",122082
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 123077","WPR98",123077
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 123082","WPR98",123082
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 123120","WPR98",123120
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 123126","WPR98",123126
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 123137","WPR98",123137
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124145","WPR98",124145
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124169","WPR98",124169
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124173","WPR98",124173
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124181","WPR98",124181
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124197","WPR98",124197
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124202","WPR98",124202
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125154","WPR98",125154
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125204","WPR98",125204
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125206","WPR98",125206
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125251","WPR98",125251
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125253","WPR98",125253
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127119","WPR98",127119
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127127","WPR98",127127
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127170","WPR98",127170
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127194","WPR98",127194
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127196","WPR98",127196
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127198","WPR98",127198
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127206","WPR98",127206
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128149","WPR98",128149
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128306","WPR98",128306
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128308","WPR98",128308
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129056","WPR98",129056
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130214","WPR98",130214
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130242","WPR98",130242
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130244","WPR98",130244
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130252","WPR98",130252
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130262","WPR98",130262
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132079","WPR98",132079
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132112","WPR98",132112
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132245","WPR98",132245
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133121","WPR98",133121
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133127","WPR98",133127
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133129","WPR98",133129
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133140","WPR98",133140
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133143","WPR98",133143
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133191","WPR98",133191
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133193","WPR98",133193
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134103","WPR98",134103
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134105","WPR98",134105
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137063","WPR98",137063
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138149","WPR98",138149
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138159","WPR98",138159
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141228","WPR98",141228
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 145032","WPR98",145032
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 145044","WPR98",145044
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146131","WPR98",146131
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146256","WPR98",146256
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146258","WPR98",146258
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147179","WPR98",147179
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147196","WPR98",147196
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147304","WPR98",147304
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147319","WPR98",147319
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147321","WPR98",147321
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147327","WPR98",147327
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147338","WPR98",147338
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148203","WPR98",148203
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148205","WPR98",148205
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148207","WPR98",148207
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148209","WPR98",148209
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148211","WPR98",148211
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148335","WPR98",148335
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149085","WPR98",149085
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149201","WPR98",149201
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149211","WPR98",149211
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149213","WPR98",149213
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149250","WPR98",149250
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 150017","WPR98",150017
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 152017","WPR98",152017
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156067","WPR98",156067
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156098","WPR98",156098
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156125","WPR98",156125
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156131","WPR98",156131
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157152","WPR98",157152
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157165","WPR98",157165
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157277","WPR98",157277
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160014","WPR98",160014
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160227","WPR98",160227
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160313","WPR98",160313
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160330","WPR98",160330
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160347","WPR98",160347
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161140","WPR98",161140
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 171015","WPR98",171015
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 171051","WPR98",171051
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172005","WPR98",172005
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172022","WPR98",172022
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 175042","WPR98",175042
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 175071","WPR98",175071
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178074","WPR98",178074
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180023","WPR98",180023
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 184003","WPR98",184003
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 184005","WPR98",184005
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 184011","WPR98",184011
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 191026","WPR98",191026
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 191029","WPR98",191029
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 191031","WPR98",191031
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 193023","WPR98",193023
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 193025","WPR98",193025
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 194016","WPR98",194016
326,"Unphased Tree Throws","999 Unphased",,"Entity created for the grouping of unphased tree throws.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 194018","WPR98",194018
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 507019","PSH02",507019
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511071","PSH02",511071
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511089","PSH02",511089
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511109","PSH02",511109
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511116","PSH02",511116
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511121","PSH02",511121
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512066","PSH02",512066
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512119","PSH02",512119
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515039","PSH02",515039
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515083","PSH02",515083
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517240","PSH02",517240
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517247","PSH02",517247
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 518145","PSH02",518145
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523019","PSH02",523019
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523029","PSH02",523029
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524232","PSH02",524232
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524242","PSH02",524242
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524575","PSH02",524575
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524580","PSH02",524580
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524582","PSH02",524582
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525048","PSH02",525048
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525170","PSH02",525170
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526084","PSH02",526084
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526092","PSH02",526092
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526093","PSH02",526093
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526223","PSH02",526223
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526237","PSH02",526237
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526239","PSH02",526239
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526240","PSH02",526240
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526446","PSH02",526446
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526462","PSH02",526462
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527001","PSH02",527001
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538160","PSH02",538160
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538163","PSH02",538163
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538166","PSH02",538166
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538239","PSH02",538239
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538241","PSH02",538241
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538247","PSH02",538247
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539149","PSH02",539149
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 541005","PSH02",541005
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 541030","PSH02",541030
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 541116","PSH02",541116
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 541119","PSH02",541119
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 541121","PSH02",541121
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 541123","PSH02",541123
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 541152","PSH02",541152
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542063","PSH02",542063
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 543191","PSH02",543191
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547215","PSH02",547215
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547217","PSH02",547217
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547219","PSH02",547219
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547279","PSH02",547279
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547291","PSH02",547291
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 548041","PSH02",548041
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550039","PSH02",550039
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550041","PSH02",550041
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552040","PSH02",552040
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552042","PSH02",552042
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552096","PSH02",552096
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552118","PSH02",552118
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552123","PSH02",552123
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552309","PSH02",552309
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552312","PSH02",552312
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554235","PSH02",554235
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555530","PSH02",555530
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559086","PSH02",559086
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559159","PSH02",559159
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559181","PSH02",559181
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559188","PSH02",559188
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559357","PSH02",559357
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559361","PSH02",559361
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559368","PSH02",559368
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559370","PSH02",559370
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559372","PSH02",559372
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559721","PSH02",559721
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561116","PSH02",561116
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561142","PSH02",561142
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 566038","PSH02",566038
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569092","PSH02",569092
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570467","PSH02",570467
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570478","PSH02",570478
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570479","PSH02",570479
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 572041","PSH02",572041
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 573038","PSH02",573038
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 573040","PSH02",573040
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 573042","PSH02",573042
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 573052","PSH02",573052
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575099","PSH02",575099
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575101","PSH02",575101
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575129","PSH02",575129
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575172","PSH02",575172
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575201","PSH02",575201
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575217","PSH02",575217
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575219","PSH02",575219
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 576030","PSH02",576030
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 576041","PSH02",576041
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 576043","PSH02",576043
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 576047","PSH02",576047
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 576050","PSH02",576050
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 576057","PSH02",576057
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578133","PSH02",578133
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578559","PSH02",578559
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 579094","PSH02",579094
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 579101","PSH02",579101
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580125","PSH02",580125
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580137","PSH02",580137
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580140","PSH02",580140
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580587","PSH02",580587
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582148","PSH02",582148
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 586060","PSH02",586060
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 586061","PSH02",586061
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 586062","PSH02",586062
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591038","PSH02",591038
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 595018","PSH02",595018
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 595020","PSH02",595020
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 597033","PSH02",597033
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 597036","PSH02",597036
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598081","PSH02",598081
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598082","PSH02",598082
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598093","PSH02",598093
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 603025","PSH02",603025
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 603053","PSH02",603053
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621135","PSH02",621135
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621144","PSH02",621144
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621154","PSH02",621154
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621173","PSH02",621173
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621190","PSH02",621190
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621192","PSH02",621192
330,"MBA field system on Area 49, 51, 45 +47  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies from PSH02 which relate to the block of MBA enclosures local to the cursus - west of the twin rivers.  This is possibly the earliest area to be enclosed in the BA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621194","PSH02",621194
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 108027","WPR98",108027
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110042","WPR98",110042
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110058","WPR98",110058
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110078","WPR98",110078
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119352","WPR98",119352
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125195","WPR98",125195
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126093","WPR98",126093
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126099","WPR98",126099
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129112","WPR98",129112
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132085","WPR98",132085
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132232","WPR98",132232
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 134056","WPR98",134056
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 134058","WPR98",134058
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137070","WPR98",137070
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137127","WPR98",137127
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137129","WPR98",137129
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137136","WPR98",137136
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137138","WPR98",137138
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 138145","WPR98",138145
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148232","WPR98",148232
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 155061","WPR98",155061
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156047","WPR98",156047
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156049","WPR98",156049
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 163097","WPR98",163097
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 167007","WPR98",167007
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 167119","WPR98",167119
340,"Late Iron Age / Early Roman Landscape","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP ditches early roman in date.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 192021","WPR98",192021
341,"HE1 Enclosure","200 Neolithic",,"This is the HE1 horse shoe enclosure within the extents of the  cursus C2  in BED B WPR98 - it is adjacent to the Stanwell Cursus.","fab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 107042","WPR98",107042
341,"HE1 Enclosure","200 Neolithic",,"This is the HE1 horse shoe enclosure within the extents of the  cursus C2  in BED B WPR98 - it is adjacent to the Stanwell Cursus.","fab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 107052","WPR98",107052
341,"HE1 Enclosure","200 Neolithic",,"This is the HE1 horse shoe enclosure within the extents of the  cursus C2  in BED B WPR98 - it is adjacent to the Stanwell Cursus.","fab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 107058","WPR98",107058
341,"HE1 Enclosure","200 Neolithic",,"This is the HE1 horse shoe enclosure within the extents of the  cursus C2  in BED B WPR98 - it is adjacent to the Stanwell Cursus.","fab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 107059","WPR98",107059
346,"Mid / Late Bronze Age pits / waterholes","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"All M/LBA pits or waterholes excavated at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960529","POK96",960529
346,"Mid / Late Bronze Age pits / waterholes","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"All M/LBA pits or waterholes excavated at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963235","POK96",963235
346,"Mid / Late Bronze Age pits / waterholes","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"All M/LBA pits or waterholes excavated at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963267","POK96",963267
346,"Mid / Late Bronze Age pits / waterholes","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"All M/LBA pits or waterholes excavated at Heathrow.","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963519","POK96",963519
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960514","POK96",960514
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961744","POK96",961744
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963114","POK96",963114
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963267","POK96",963267
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
347,"Middle Bronze Age steep Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA waterholes with steep sides from WPR","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178122","WPR98",178122
349,"1a\medieval settlement\funnel","700 Medieval",,"funnel","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546107","PSH02",546107
349,"1a\medieval settlement\funnel","700 Medieval",,"funnel","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 603039","PSH02",603039
351,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\Corral system new","420 Middle Iron Age",,"merging of posthole group 10 with suggested corral system from MIA","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 615138","PSH02",615138
351,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\Corral system new","420 Middle Iron Age",,"merging of posthole group 10 with suggested corral system from MIA","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 130115","WPR98",130115
354,"Late Bronze Age Ditch 30","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA ditch excavated in POK96 appears to have bween added on to the end of a ditch dated to the MBA, forming a complete divider in the field system.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
356,"different size gullies3",,,"different size gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113114","WPR98",113114
356,"different size gullies3",,,"different size gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155095","WPR98",155095
356,"different size gullies3",,,"different size gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158143","WPR98",158143
367,"Middle Iron Age Tree Throw 1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA tree throws located in area C1, these tree throws were probably cleared as part of the remaodelling of the monument.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 123061","WPR98",123061
367,"Middle Iron Age Tree Throw 1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA tree throws located in area C1, these tree throws were probably cleared as part of the remaodelling of the monument.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146135","WPR98",146135
367,"Middle Iron Age Tree Throw 1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA tree throws located in area C1, these tree throws were probably cleared as part of the remaodelling of the monument.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146143","WPR98",146143
367,"Middle Iron Age Tree Throw 1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA tree throws located in area C1, these tree throws were probably cleared as part of the remaodelling of the monument.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146151","WPR98",146151
367,"Middle Iron Age Tree Throw 1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA tree throws located in area C1, these tree throws were probably cleared as part of the remaodelling of the monument.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 147151","WPR98",147151
367,"Middle Iron Age Tree Throw 1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA tree throws located in area C1, these tree throws were probably cleared as part of the remaodelling of the monument.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 148136","WPR98",148136
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 509185","PSH02",509185
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 510066","PSH02",510066
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 510067","PSH02",510067
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 510162","PSH02",510162
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 510175","PSH02",510175
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 510179","PSH02",510179
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 528009","PSH02",528009
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 528028","PSH02",528028
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 558253","PSH02",558253
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 580302","PSH02",580302
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 580306","PSH02",580306
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 581168","PSH02",581168
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 581200","PSH02",581200
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 113032","WPR98",113032
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 113036","WPR98",113036
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 141033","WPR98",141033
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 148063","WPR98",148063
368,"Bronze Age Field System 13","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity comprises a small block of at least three small rectangular fields, mainly located in Area 77.  The field system may be related to BA Field System 12 directly to its north.  Although it is quite truncated it would appear that the main axis of this field system is aligned NE-SW, although this may be an artificial distinction.  It is possible that some highly truncated (very very ephemeral) elements of ditches to the N of M-LBA Ditch 14 form components of another field system.  At least one waterhole may be related to the use of this field system.  A rather unusual ditch (MBA Ditch 64) also seems to a form an element of this field system, although it is rather wiggly and segmented and does not conform to the usual straight ditches of the BA.  Perhaps it was a precursor or later add-on to the boundaries.  Unfortunately it lacked finds that might help with its phasing.  The field system may enclose an area of c. 185 x 50 m.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 172057","WPR98",172057
371,"1a\medieval settlement\middle area1",,,"middle area phases.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529228","PSH02",529228
375,"Middle Bronze Age Waterhole 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","MBA waterhole excavated in Bed B.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
383,"Penannular Gully 13","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1. Contained pottery from earlier period in fill also.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 147215","WPR98",147215
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961001","POK96",961001
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961087","POK96",961087
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961088","POK96",961088
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961505","POK96",961505
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961549","POK96",961549
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961679","POK96",961679
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961681","POK96",961681
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963075","POK96",963075
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963189","POK96",963189
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963295","POK96",963295
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963390","POK96",963390
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119119","WPR98",119119
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119125","WPR98",119125
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 123012","WPR98",123012
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124072","WPR98",124072
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 139005","WPR98",139005
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 140047","WPR98",140047
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148381","WPR98",148381
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151218","WPR98",151218
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 153014","WPR98",153014
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 154006","WPR98",154006
384,"Post-Medieval Landscape","800 Post-Medieval",,"entitiy created to group together the features of the PM landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178086","WPR98",178086
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103046","WPR98",103046
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103054","WPR98",103054
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107109","WPR98",107109
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107149","WPR98",107149
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108043","WPR98",108043
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108045","WPR98",108045
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108048","WPR98",108048
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108050","WPR98",108050
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108055","WPR98",108055
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108057","WPR98",108057
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108060","WPR98",108060
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 112042","WPR98",112042
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119317","WPR98",119317
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119322","WPR98",119322
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125100","WPR98",125100
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125102","WPR98",125102
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126053","WPR98",126053
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126066","WPR98",126066
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128109","WPR98",128109
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137244","WPR98",137244
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 138162","WPR98",138162
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 138170","WPR98",138170
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149116","WPR98",149116
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159101","WPR98",159101
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159103","WPR98",159103
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 163063","WPR98",163063
385,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"Two large fields located bewteen WPR trackways 2 and 3. In the first millenium this is the space that becomes the site of the Middle Iron Age settlement. Often refered to as the 'open area' or 'common area' in the archive. A further east-west subdivision (121075) located within the middle Iron age enclosure in the southern field may also be part of the second millenium field system, but contained no dating.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 176017","WPR98",176017
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401011","GAA00",401011
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401065","GAA00",401065
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401068","GAA00",401068
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401071","GAA00",401071
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401075","GAA00",401075
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 403030","GAA00",403030
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 403040","GAA00",403040
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405038","GAA00",405038
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405050","GAA00",405050
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405054","GAA00",405054
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111049","WPR98",111049
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113032","WPR98",113032
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113036","WPR98",113036
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122035","WPR98",122035
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122036","WPR98",122036
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124076","WPR98",124076
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128068","WPR98",128068
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129081","WPR98",129081
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129084","WPR98",129084
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130149","WPR98",130149
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137044","WPR98",137044
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141033","WPR98",141033
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141038","WPR98",141038
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147056","WPR98",147056
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148063","WPR98",148063
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149141","WPR98",149141
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
388,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 6 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 6 except ditches from trackways 4 and 5 subtracted","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172057","WPR98",172057
389,"Late Bronze Age ramped Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA Waterholes with ramped access in WPRPOK etc dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126025","WPR98",126025
389,"Late Bronze Age ramped Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA Waterholes with ramped access in WPRPOK etc dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135055","WPR98",135055
389,"Late Bronze Age ramped Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA Waterholes with ramped access in WPRPOK etc dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148042","WPR98",148042
389,"Late Bronze Age ramped Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA Waterholes with ramped access in WPRPOK etc dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155144","WPR98",155144
389,"Late Bronze Age ramped Waterholes WPR","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA Waterholes with ramped access in WPRPOK etc dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
392,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 64","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is a rather unusual ditch - it recuts an earlier segmented ditch, but more or less follows the alignment of MBA Ditch 6, although it is a  more meandering feature, and is slightly offset from the former ditch.  The different character of the ditch, implying it was constructed in a different way, may suggest that it forms a precursor to the main MBA phase of ditch digging.  However it does appear to form a component of BA Field System 13.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 510162","PSH02",510162
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 216033","GAI99",216033
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 217021","GAI99",217021
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 528197","PSH02",528197
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580223","PSH02",580223
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580225","PSH02",580225
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580227","PSH02",580227
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 812007","TEC05",812007
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 812021","TEC05",812021
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 812026","TEC05",812026
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 812038","TEC05",812038
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 813064","TEC05",813064
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 814076","TEC05",814076
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 814078","TEC05",814078
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 815039","TEC05",815039
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 817092","TEC05",817092
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 817094","TEC05",817094
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 817098","TEC05",817098
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 817101","TEC05",817101
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 820065","TEC05",820065
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 820073","TEC05",820073
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 820200","TEC05",820200
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 823065","TEC05",823065
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 823109","TEC05",823109
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 823146","TEC05",823146
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 827154","TEC05",827154
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 827371","TEC05",827371
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 827373","TEC05",827373
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 827375","TEC05",827375
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 827379","TEC05",827379
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 827381","TEC05",827381
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 827383","TEC05",827383
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 827385","TEC05",827385
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 827387","TEC05",827387
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 833109","TEC05",833109
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 838059","TEC05",838059
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 838062","TEC05",838062
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"TEC05 - 838065","TEC05",838065
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPM00 - 240032","WPM00",240032
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPM00 - 241014","WPM00",241014
397,"Bronze Age Trackway 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Only a small section of this trackway has been revealed, although originally it was likely far more extensive.  It has been truncated completely to the north and south, and at present is only evident on Area 100.  More may be revealed during the current excavations however.  This trackway follows the same alignment as Trackway 6 to the east.  It swings in alignment from the field systems and associated trackways to the west, and follows a more north-west-west - south-east-east orientation.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPM00 - 242020","WPM00",242020
399,"Early Neolithic pits and postholes WPR","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Pits and postholes which can be dated to sometime between 4000 and 3000 BC with some degree of certainty on the basis of lithics and pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961634","POK96",961634
399,"Early Neolithic pits and postholes WPR","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Pits and postholes which can be dated to sometime between 4000 and 3000 BC with some degree of certainty on the basis of lithics and pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962022","POK96",962022
399,"Early Neolithic pits and postholes WPR","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Pits and postholes which can be dated to sometime between 4000 and 3000 BC with some degree of certainty on the basis of lithics and pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962027","POK96",962027
399,"Early Neolithic pits and postholes WPR","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Pits and postholes which can be dated to sometime between 4000 and 3000 BC with some degree of certainty on the basis of lithics and pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962033","POK96",962033
399,"Early Neolithic pits and postholes WPR","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Pits and postholes which can be dated to sometime between 4000 and 3000 BC with some degree of certainty on the basis of lithics and pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158121","WPR98",158121
400,"Neolithic pit complex 2 on Area 99 (PSH02)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 north of the MBA waterhole.This group of six intercutting Neolithic pits mirrors a very similar sequence of pit cutting activity c. 9 m directly to its south (Neolithic pit complex 1).  A Bronze Age waterhole was located between the two pit groups.  It seems rather strange that such a small point in the landscape became a focus for a high level of intense activity.  Again these pits like thos to the south demonstrate a potentially long history of revisiting and recutting that may date from the Early Neolithic.  Early Neolithic Plain Bowl ware came from a deliberate backfill of one of the earliest pits and polished axe fragments and other sherds of Neolithic pottery came from some of the later pit fills.   Is this repeated referencing of pits indicating a gradual move away from features such as treethrows as markers in the landscape?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561277","PSH02",561277
400,"Neolithic pit complex 2 on Area 99 (PSH02)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 north of the MBA waterhole.This group of six intercutting Neolithic pits mirrors a very similar sequence of pit cutting activity c. 9 m directly to its south (Neolithic pit complex 1).  A Bronze Age waterhole was located between the two pit groups.  It seems rather strange that such a small point in the landscape became a focus for a high level of intense activity.  Again these pits like thos to the south demonstrate a potentially long history of revisiting and recutting that may date from the Early Neolithic.  Early Neolithic Plain Bowl ware came from a deliberate backfill of one of the earliest pits and polished axe fragments and other sherds of Neolithic pottery came from some of the later pit fills.   Is this repeated referencing of pits indicating a gradual move away from features such as treethrows as markers in the landscape?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561278","PSH02",561278
400,"Neolithic pit complex 2 on Area 99 (PSH02)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 north of the MBA waterhole.This group of six intercutting Neolithic pits mirrors a very similar sequence of pit cutting activity c. 9 m directly to its south (Neolithic pit complex 1).  A Bronze Age waterhole was located between the two pit groups.  It seems rather strange that such a small point in the landscape became a focus for a high level of intense activity.  Again these pits like thos to the south demonstrate a potentially long history of revisiting and recutting that may date from the Early Neolithic.  Early Neolithic Plain Bowl ware came from a deliberate backfill of one of the earliest pits and polished axe fragments and other sherds of Neolithic pottery came from some of the later pit fills.   Is this repeated referencing of pits indicating a gradual move away from features such as treethrows as markers in the landscape?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561279","PSH02",561279
400,"Neolithic pit complex 2 on Area 99 (PSH02)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 north of the MBA waterhole.This group of six intercutting Neolithic pits mirrors a very similar sequence of pit cutting activity c. 9 m directly to its south (Neolithic pit complex 1).  A Bronze Age waterhole was located between the two pit groups.  It seems rather strange that such a small point in the landscape became a focus for a high level of intense activity.  Again these pits like thos to the south demonstrate a potentially long history of revisiting and recutting that may date from the Early Neolithic.  Early Neolithic Plain Bowl ware came from a deliberate backfill of one of the earliest pits and polished axe fragments and other sherds of Neolithic pottery came from some of the later pit fills.   Is this repeated referencing of pits indicating a gradual move away from features such as treethrows as markers in the landscape?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561280","PSH02",561280
400,"Neolithic pit complex 2 on Area 99 (PSH02)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 north of the MBA waterhole.This group of six intercutting Neolithic pits mirrors a very similar sequence of pit cutting activity c. 9 m directly to its south (Neolithic pit complex 1).  A Bronze Age waterhole was located between the two pit groups.  It seems rather strange that such a small point in the landscape became a focus for a high level of intense activity.  Again these pits like thos to the south demonstrate a potentially long history of revisiting and recutting that may date from the Early Neolithic.  Early Neolithic Plain Bowl ware came from a deliberate backfill of one of the earliest pits and polished axe fragments and other sherds of Neolithic pottery came from some of the later pit fills.   Is this repeated referencing of pits indicating a gradual move away from features such as treethrows as markers in the landscape?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561282","PSH02",561282
400,"Neolithic pit complex 2 on Area 99 (PSH02)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 north of the MBA waterhole.This group of six intercutting Neolithic pits mirrors a very similar sequence of pit cutting activity c. 9 m directly to its south (Neolithic pit complex 1).  A Bronze Age waterhole was located between the two pit groups.  It seems rather strange that such a small point in the landscape became a focus for a high level of intense activity.  Again these pits like thos to the south demonstrate a potentially long history of revisiting and recutting that may date from the Early Neolithic.  Early Neolithic Plain Bowl ware came from a deliberate backfill of one of the earliest pits and polished axe fragments and other sherds of Neolithic pottery came from some of the later pit fills.   Is this repeated referencing of pits indicating a gradual move away from features such as treethrows as markers in the landscape?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561290","PSH02",561290
400,"Neolithic pit complex 2 on Area 99 (PSH02)","205 Early Neolithic",,"Features forming one of the intercutting pit complexes on Area 99 north of the MBA waterhole.This group of six intercutting Neolithic pits mirrors a very similar sequence of pit cutting activity c. 9 m directly to its south (Neolithic pit complex 1).  A Bronze Age waterhole was located between the two pit groups.  It seems rather strange that such a small point in the landscape became a focus for a high level of intense activity.  Again these pits like thos to the south demonstrate a potentially long history of revisiting and recutting that may date from the Early Neolithic.  Early Neolithic Plain Bowl ware came from a deliberate backfill of one of the earliest pits and polished axe fragments and other sherds of Neolithic pottery came from some of the later pit fills.   Is this repeated referencing of pits indicating a gradual move away from features such as treethrows as markers in the landscape?","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 561303","PSH02",561303
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113066","WPR98",113066
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113103","WPR98",113103
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119380","WPR98",119380
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125123","WPR98",125123
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126103","WPR98",126103
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130237","WPR98",130237
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 133086","WPR98",133086
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 134064","WPR98",134064
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 134108","WPR98",134108
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 134110","WPR98",134110
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137131","WPR98",137131
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 138092","WPR98",138092
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146283","WPR98",146283
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148175","WPR98",148175
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148342","WPR98",148342
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149207","WPR98",149207
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156115","WPR98",156115
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160245","WPR98",160245
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 163082","WPR98",163082
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166101","WPR98",166101
401,"Late Iron Age Landscape","430 Late Iron Age",,"Entity for all features which are part of the LIA landscape and not ditches.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166112","WPR98",166112
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213034","GAI99",213034
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213036","GAI99",213036
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213038","GAI99",213038
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213040","GAI99",213040
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213042","GAI99",213042
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213044","GAI99",213044
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213046","GAI99",213046
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213048","GAI99",213048
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213050","GAI99",213050
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213052","GAI99",213052
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213054","GAI99",213054
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213056","GAI99",213056
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213058","GAI99",213058
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216076","GAI99",216076
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216080","GAI99",216080
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216082","GAI99",216082
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216090","GAI99",216090
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216092","GAI99",216092
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 225041","GAI99",225041
403,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 2","300 Bronze Age","300 Bronze Age","Scatter of post holes just north of southern fenceline boundary to N Taxiway settlement. No dating evidence from any of them. They probably represent a number of buildings of possible recatangualr form, but it is now too difficult to distinguish individual floor plans.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 225043","GAI99",225043
405,"Post-Medieval Gully","800 Post-Medieval",,"Part of the PM landscape this is part of a trackway which crossed over the Longford River.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 153014","WPR98",153014
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210026","GAI99",210026
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210033","GAI99",210033
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210034","GAI99",210034
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210035","GAI99",210035
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210036","GAI99",210036
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210037","GAI99",210037
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210038","GAI99",210038
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210039","GAI99",210039
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210061","GAI99",210061
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210062","GAI99",210062
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210063","GAI99",210063
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210064","GAI99",210064
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210065","GAI99",210065
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210066","GAI99",210066
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210069","GAI99",210069
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210070","GAI99",210070
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210071","GAI99",210071
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210072","GAI99",210072
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210077","GAI99",210077
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210078","GAI99",210078
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210102","GAI99",210102
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210104","GAI99",210104
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 210108","GAI99",210108
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213034","GAI99",213034
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213036","GAI99",213036
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213038","GAI99",213038
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213040","GAI99",213040
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213042","GAI99",213042
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213044","GAI99",213044
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213046","GAI99",213046
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213048","GAI99",213048
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213050","GAI99",213050
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213052","GAI99",213052
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213054","GAI99",213054
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213056","GAI99",213056
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213058","GAI99",213058
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214106","GAI99",214106
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214108","GAI99",214108
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214110","GAI99",214110
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214112","GAI99",214112
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214114","GAI99",214114
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214116","GAI99",214116
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214118","GAI99",214118
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214120","GAI99",214120
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214122","GAI99",214122
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214126","GAI99",214126
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214128","GAI99",214128
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214130","GAI99",214130
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214132","GAI99",214132
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214134","GAI99",214134
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214136","GAI99",214136
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214138","GAI99",214138
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216046","GAI99",216046
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216048","GAI99",216048
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216076","GAI99",216076
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216080","GAI99",216080
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216082","GAI99",216082
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216090","GAI99",216090
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216092","GAI99",216092
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221005","GAI99",221005
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221007","GAI99",221007
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221009","GAI99",221009
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221011","GAI99",221011
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221014","GAI99",221014
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221017","GAI99",221017
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221020","GAI99",221020
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221022","GAI99",221022
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221025","GAI99",221025
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221080","GAI99",221080
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221082","GAI99",221082
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221084","GAI99",221084
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221086","GAI99",221086
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221088","GAI99",221088
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221090","GAI99",221090
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 221092","GAI99",221092
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222018","GAI99",222018
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222020","GAI99",222020
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222022","GAI99",222022
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222024","GAI99",222024
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222026","GAI99",222026
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222028","GAI99",222028
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222030","GAI99",222030
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222032","GAI99",222032
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222034","GAI99",222034
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222040","GAI99",222040
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222042","GAI99",222042
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222044","GAI99",222044
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222046","GAI99",222046
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222050","GAI99",222050
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222068","GAI99",222068
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222070","GAI99",222070
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 225041","GAI99",225041
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 225043","GAI99",225043
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961009","POK96",961009
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961012","POK96",961012
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961020","POK96",961020
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961071","POK96",961071
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961085","POK96",961085
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961086","POK96",961086
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961093","POK96",961093
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961103","POK96",961103
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962043","POK96",962043
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 510052","PSH02",510052
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511119","PSH02",511119
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511121","PSH02",511121
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 513069","PSH02",513069
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 513075","PSH02",513075
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 513077","PSH02",513077
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515103","PSH02",515103
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515105","PSH02",515105
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515109","PSH02",515109
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515114","PSH02",515114
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515126","PSH02",515126
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515130","PSH02",515130
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515134","PSH02",515134
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515136","PSH02",515136
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515143","PSH02",515143
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515148","PSH02",515148
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515165","PSH02",515165
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515168","PSH02",515168
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515188","PSH02",515188
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515191","PSH02",515191
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515193","PSH02",515193
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515224","PSH02",515224
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515227","PSH02",515227
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515229","PSH02",515229
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515231","PSH02",515231
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515233","PSH02",515233
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515253","PSH02",515253
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515266","PSH02",515266
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515272","PSH02",515272
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515275","PSH02",515275
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515279","PSH02",515279
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515281","PSH02",515281
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515284","PSH02",515284
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515291","PSH02",515291
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515293","PSH02",515293
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515296","PSH02",515296
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515307","PSH02",515307
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515316","PSH02",515316
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 516199","PSH02",516199
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517251","PSH02",517251
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526080","PSH02",526080
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526249","PSH02",526249
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526343","PSH02",526343
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527078","PSH02",527078
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 528052","PSH02",528052
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 528154","PSH02",528154
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 532021","PSH02",532021
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538077","PSH02",538077
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538088","PSH02",538088
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538151","PSH02",538151
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538156","PSH02",538156
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538160","PSH02",538160
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538163","PSH02",538163
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538166","PSH02",538166
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538191","PSH02",538191
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538223","PSH02",538223
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538227","PSH02",538227
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538231","PSH02",538231
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538235","PSH02",538235
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542227","PSH02",542227
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542228","PSH02",542228
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542259","PSH02",542259
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542263","PSH02",542263
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 544061","PSH02",544061
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 544069","PSH02",544069
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 544092","PSH02",544092
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546039","PSH02",546039
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546043","PSH02",546043
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546045","PSH02",546045
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546047","PSH02",546047
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546049","PSH02",546049
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546051","PSH02",546051
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546053","PSH02",546053
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546055","PSH02",546055
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546167","PSH02",546167
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546171","PSH02",546171
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546202","PSH02",546202
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546210","PSH02",546210
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546214","PSH02",546214
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546220","PSH02",546220
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546246","PSH02",546246
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546248","PSH02",546248
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546251","PSH02",546251
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546255","PSH02",546255
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546258","PSH02",546258
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546262","PSH02",546262
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546264","PSH02",546264
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546266","PSH02",546266
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546268","PSH02",546268
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546270","PSH02",546270
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546272","PSH02",546272
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546275","PSH02",546275
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546277","PSH02",546277
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 548053","PSH02",548053
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 551006","PSH02",551006
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 551163","PSH02",551163
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554230","PSH02",554230
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555476","PSH02",555476
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555478","PSH02",555478
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555481","PSH02",555481
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555483","PSH02",555483
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555485","PSH02",555485
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555487","PSH02",555487
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555489","PSH02",555489
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555491","PSH02",555491
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555493","PSH02",555493
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555495","PSH02",555495
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555497","PSH02",555497
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555499","PSH02",555499
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 556124","PSH02",556124
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 556139","PSH02",556139
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557022","PSH02",557022
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557034","PSH02",557034
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557146","PSH02",557146
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558001","PSH02",558001
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558016","PSH02",558016
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559290","PSH02",559290
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559305","PSH02",559305
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559328","PSH02",559328
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561022","PSH02",561022
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561023","PSH02",561023
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563046","PSH02",563046
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563060","PSH02",563060
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563062","PSH02",563062
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563066","PSH02",563066
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563071","PSH02",563071
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563088","PSH02",563088
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563089","PSH02",563089
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563093","PSH02",563093
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568179","PSH02",568179
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568197","PSH02",568197
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568204","PSH02",568204
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568207","PSH02",568207
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568212","PSH02",568212
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575186","PSH02",575186
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575217","PSH02",575217
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579172","PSH02",579172
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582132","PSH02",582132
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582135","PSH02",582135
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582137","PSH02",582137
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582139","PSH02",582139
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582141","PSH02",582141
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582143","PSH02",582143
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583118","PSH02",583118
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588115","PSH02",588115
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588149","PSH02",588149
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588155","PSH02",588155
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588160","PSH02",588160
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588162","PSH02",588162
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588165","PSH02",588165
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 591035","PSH02",591035
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 591038","PSH02",591038
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 593044","PSH02",593044
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594041","PSH02",594041
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594057","PSH02",594057
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594074","PSH02",594074
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594091","PSH02",594091
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594107","PSH02",594107
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594109","PSH02",594109
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594112","PSH02",594112
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594115","PSH02",594115
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594116","PSH02",594116
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594120","PSH02",594120
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 596013","PSH02",596013
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 596017","PSH02",596017
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598081","PSH02",598081
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598090","PSH02",598090
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598093","PSH02",598093
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 613092","PSH02",613092
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614001","PSH02",614001
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614022","PSH02",614022
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614078","PSH02",614078
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614122","PSH02",614122
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615008","PSH02",615008
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146043","WPR98",146043
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
406,"All Bronze Age settlements (PSH02, POK 96+WPR98)","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity to describe all features which look to be components of BA settlements.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
408,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Two very short ditches in the eastern part of the Northern Taxiway excavation area that PSH02 work confirmed form part of a NW- SE aligned trackway.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216033","GAI99",216033
408,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Two very short ditches in the eastern part of the Northern Taxiway excavation area that PSH02 work confirmed form part of a NW- SE aligned trackway.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 217021","GAI99",217021
409,"Medieval Ditch 8","700 Medieval",,"Medieval Ditch excavated on the west end of Bed B. aligned on the parish boundary.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 148255","WPR98",148255
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 555271","PSH02",555271
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 555276","PSH02",555276
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 555279","PSH02",555279
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 555281","PSH02",555281
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 561121","PSH02",561121
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 561126","PSH02",561126
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 561131","PSH02",561131
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 561133","PSH02",561133
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 561138","PSH02",561138
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 561140","PSH02",561140
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 579121","PSH02",579121
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 579123","PSH02",579123
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 582101","PSH02",582101
410,"Medieval building 3","700 Medieval",,"General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Remains of a rectangular structure, consisting of 12 surviving posts, although a further one may be hidden under a later ditch and others were lost to modern truncation at the southern end of the building. The posts are aligned in two rows, which run roughly NE-SW at the eastern extremity of site 49. The spacing between the posts is quite regular; but there is a general tendency for them to become slightly shallower from south to north. The distance between the two rows is not constant and does appear to be slightly greater towards the centre giving a bowed effect in plan. This may infer a crook construction to the structure, with the northern end forming the 'prow' to the building with what would have formed the 'stern' having been truncated away by modern dumping trench. This method of building construction may support the early date implied by the two sherds of (possible) Saxo-Norman pottery, taking the form of an inverted boat hull following a slight bow outwards towards the central posts. The two northernmost postholes, 561131 and 561133, are a bit further away from the two main rows and stand closer together. They are also much shallower. This suggests that they played no part in bearing the load of the roof, but rather formed an entranceway or small antechamber. Either side of 561133, and at an angle to the main axis, the two possible stakeholes 561138 and 561140 were uncovered. These are extremely truncated and had at first been discounted, but due to their regularity in plan and proximity to the building they were assigned numbers. They could be the remains of a lean-to shelter or other ephemeral addition to the main house, although with no datable finds this relationship is impossible to prove. Two irregular oval features towards the northern end of the building, originally believed to be possible beam slots, have turned out to be root disturbance.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships and dating **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There has not been much dating evidence from the structure itself. The sherds recovered from the upper fill of posthole 555276 are fairly undiagnostic and have been assigned a date range from the 10th to the 14th century. However, the building is cut by a 13th century ditch in its northern half, which gives a date for the definite abandonment of the structure. There are also signs that before being abandoned, the building was at least partially dismantled: postholes 555271, 555276, 555281, 561121 and 561126 all show signs of the posts being extracted from the ground. Removal cuts have been recorded on most of the post-holes along the western flank of the structure. Indeed, the sherds are believed to date to this episode of deconstruction. The building was probably constructed during the Pre-12th century phase of the medieval enclosure system, possibly Saxo-Norman, and was possibly dismantled in conjunction with greater changes in the landscape which also included redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces towards the 12th and 13th centuries. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This structure was located in the north-eastern corner of Area 49, and as such was fairly removed from the building Entities 10014 and 10022 further to the south-west. The building falls on a northeast-southwest alignment, and mirrors the orientation of Entity 10022 and the dividing structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 512085, 601011 and 601013. This alone would imply a contemporanaeity with those structures and the axis created by the pivotal alignment taken by the waterholes 529139 and 569022 (see Entity 10029). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  A possible side east-west entranceway to this building has been identified (between postholes 561126 and 582103 on the eastern row and postholes 555276 and 555287 on the western row) and this alignment is orientated directly upon the northern waterhole 529139 to the west. There does appear to be a continual level of cross referencing of structures and features within the landscape and this may reflect the level of importance or utility that each one held within the local community. The question of utility of the building at this stage is a difficult one, but it seems unlikely that given the Early Medieval date, that this was purely a storage structure or barn. It is more likely that this structure was at least in part utilised on several levels as habitation, shelter, storage facility and drying area. If this early medieval landscape is taken as a whole, then this structure would have played a major part in its definition and scope for utilisation. It did not stand alone, but was accompanied by further structural division and enhancement to the south. Its mere presence seems to have influenced the design of the polygonal enclosure (Entity 10031) as it was constructed around this orientation of movement through the landscape already laid out by the Pre-12th century development.","Unknown","Excavation","Unassigned",,"10002","PSH02 - 582117","PSH02",582117
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961036","POK96",961036
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961040","POK96",961040
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961502","POK96",961502
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961959","POK96",961959
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962327","POK96",962327
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963095","POK96",963095
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963150","POK96",963150
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110045","WPR98",110045
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111079","WPR98",111079
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111093","WPR98",111093
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 112044","WPR98",112044
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113074","WPR98",113074
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113076","WPR98",113076
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119230","WPR98",119230
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119262","WPR98",119262
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121110","WPR98",121110
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 123012","WPR98",123012
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129037","WPR98",129037
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148183","WPR98",148183
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148189","WPR98",148189
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148199","WPR98",148199
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148201","WPR98",148201
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148237","WPR98",148237
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148240","WPR98",148240
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148242","WPR98",148242
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148244","WPR98",148244
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148255","WPR98",148255
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148257","WPR98",148257
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148259","WPR98",148259
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149110","WPR98",149110
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 155110","WPR98",155110
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157114","WPR98",157114
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160323","WPR98",160323
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160349","WPR98",160349
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160352","WPR98",160352
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160362","WPR98",160362
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 161170","WPR98",161170
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166065","WPR98",166065
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166119","WPR98",166119
412,"Medieval Landscape","715 Early Medieval",,"Entity created to group together all ditches assigned to the medieval landscape.","ab","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178086","WPR98",178086
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960077","POK96",960077
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961631","POK96",961631
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962313","POK96",962313
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138019","WPR98",138019
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 143011","WPR98",143011
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147026","WPR98",147026
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
413,"Bronze age land holding WPR 3 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as Landholding 3 but with the ditches of trackways 1 and 2 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509185","PSH02",509185
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 516052","PSH02",516052
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517051","PSH02",517051
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517068","PSH02",517068
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517070","PSH02",517070
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517098","PSH02",517098
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517102","PSH02",517102
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517104","PSH02",517104
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517113","PSH02",517113
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 518033","PSH02",518033
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 518056","PSH02",518056
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 518073","PSH02",518073
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 522100","PSH02",522100
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 522102","PSH02",522102
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524029","PSH02",524029
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525016","PSH02",525016
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528009","PSH02",528009
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528015","PSH02",528015
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528016","PSH02",528016
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528028","PSH02",528028
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528030","PSH02",528030
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 531024","PSH02",531024
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539420","PSH02",539420
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542032","PSH02",542032
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542034","PSH02",542034
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542036","PSH02",542036
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545019","PSH02",545019
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545050","PSH02",545050
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545054","PSH02",545054
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545056","PSH02",545056
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545077","PSH02",545077
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545081","PSH02",545081
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546009","PSH02",546009
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 549063","PSH02",549063
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 549065","PSH02",549065
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554011","PSH02",554011
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555008","PSH02",555008
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556014","PSH02",556014
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556016","PSH02",556016
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556025","PSH02",556025
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556033","PSH02",556033
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556041","PSH02",556041
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556043","PSH02",556043
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556060","PSH02",556060
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556142","PSH02",556142
421,"MLBA field system on Area 67a, 72, 73 and 75","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity is designed to group together all ditches on a north west to south east alignment which are though to date to the MLBA.  It deliberately excludes the features to the east of Area 75 (67a) which are thought to be earlier.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561022","PSH02",561022
425,"Penannular Gully 6","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146220","WPR98",146220
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 529077","PSH02",529077
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 529078","PSH02",529078
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 529107","PSH02",529107
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 529108","PSH02",529108
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 537105","PSH02",537105
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 537115","PSH02",537115
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 546065","PSH02",546065
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 546066","PSH02",546066
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 546067","PSH02",546067
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553083","PSH02",553083
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553100","PSH02",553100
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555453","PSH02",555453
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 559037","PSH02",559037
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 559041","PSH02",559041
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 562137","PSH02",562137
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 568002","PSH02",568002
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 568004","PSH02",568004
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 568009","PSH02",568009
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 568011","PSH02",568011
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 580068","PSH02",580068
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 580072","PSH02",580072
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 589045","PSH02",589045
426,"1a\medieval settlement\all pits",,,"All pits within the medieval settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 601005","PSH02",601005
427,"Post-Medieval Ditch 3","800 Post-Medieval",,"PM ditch excavated on Bed B part of the PM landscape. This is part of a trackway which  crosses the Longford River.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 123012","WPR98",123012
429,"Bronze Age Ditch 1","300 Bronze Age",,"BA ditch excavated in Bed B, situated between the 2 cursus ditches. the shallowness of the cut is attributed to the ditch being cut through the remnant bank of the cursus.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 160031","WPR98",160031
430,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 21","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA ditch excavated in Bed B. the ditch is segmentally cut and appears to form a trackway surrounding an enclosed field.","ab","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
432,"Medieval Ditch 21","700 Medieval",,"Part of an enclosure ditch that demonstrates recutting within it.  Shows that it has been reutilised and maintained over a period of time.  Forms part of an enclosure that it of a similar size and on same alignment as the one to the east which contains post hole structures including a barn and possible building.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 526228","PSH02",526228
438,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"NW-SE trackway in WPR beds C+ A. Very ephemeral due to truncation. Only really survives in N txiway area, where it forms the western boundary of the settlement, in the north of bed C and the south of bed A.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
438,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"NW-SE trackway in WPR beds C+ A. Very ephemeral due to truncation. Only really survives in N txiway area, where it forms the western boundary of the settlement, in the north of bed C and the south of bed A.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
438,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"NW-SE trackway in WPR beds C+ A. Very ephemeral due to truncation. Only really survives in N txiway area, where it forms the western boundary of the settlement, in the north of bed C and the south of bed A.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121130","WPR98",121130
438,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"NW-SE trackway in WPR beds C+ A. Very ephemeral due to truncation. Only really survives in N txiway area, where it forms the western boundary of the settlement, in the north of bed C and the south of bed A.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130182","WPR98",130182
438,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"NW-SE trackway in WPR beds C+ A. Very ephemeral due to truncation. Only really survives in N txiway area, where it forms the western boundary of the settlement, in the north of bed C and the south of bed A.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136153","WPR98",136153
438,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"NW-SE trackway in WPR beds C+ A. Very ephemeral due to truncation. Only really survives in N txiway area, where it forms the western boundary of the settlement, in the north of bed C and the south of bed A.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136156","WPR98",136156
438,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"NW-SE trackway in WPR beds C+ A. Very ephemeral due to truncation. Only really survives in N txiway area, where it forms the western boundary of the settlement, in the north of bed C and the south of bed A.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166174","WPR98",166174
438,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 4","300 Bronze Age",,"NW-SE trackway in WPR beds C+ A. Very ephemeral due to truncation. Only really survives in N txiway area, where it forms the western boundary of the settlement, in the north of bed C and the south of bed A.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
439,"Middle Bronze Age Ditch 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA ditch excavated in Bed B, ditch is situated between the 2 cursus ditches possible remnant bank material within the fill of the ditch.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157034","WPR98",157034
440,"Bronze Age Field 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This long rectangular field is located in the eastern part of the Site, and follows a slightly different alignment to the central field systems.   It moves on to a more NW-SE axis, and this changing orientation is at least partly related to topography.  Although dating evidence was very poor, it is likely related to other fields in the vicinity, particularly in Area 77, that are of MBA date.  In size, the field is c. 116 m long and 50 m wide, and has an internal subdivision.  Trackway 4 runs immediately to the west of this field and in part shares its western ditch boundary.  This field is not directly associated with any waterholes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 121118","WPR98",121118
440,"Bronze Age Field 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This long rectangular field is located in the eastern part of the Site, and follows a slightly different alignment to the central field systems.   It moves on to a more NW-SE axis, and this changing orientation is at least partly related to topography.  Although dating evidence was very poor, it is likely related to other fields in the vicinity, particularly in Area 77, that are of MBA date.  In size, the field is c. 116 m long and 50 m wide, and has an internal subdivision.  Trackway 4 runs immediately to the west of this field and in part shares its western ditch boundary.  This field is not directly associated with any waterholes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128194","WPR98",128194
440,"Bronze Age Field 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This long rectangular field is located in the eastern part of the Site, and follows a slightly different alignment to the central field systems.   It moves on to a more NW-SE axis, and this changing orientation is at least partly related to topography.  Although dating evidence was very poor, it is likely related to other fields in the vicinity, particularly in Area 77, that are of MBA date.  In size, the field is c. 116 m long and 50 m wide, and has an internal subdivision.  Trackway 4 runs immediately to the west of this field and in part shares its western ditch boundary.  This field is not directly associated with any waterholes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 130119","WPR98",130119
440,"Bronze Age Field 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This long rectangular field is located in the eastern part of the Site, and follows a slightly different alignment to the central field systems.   It moves on to a more NW-SE axis, and this changing orientation is at least partly related to topography.  Although dating evidence was very poor, it is likely related to other fields in the vicinity, particularly in Area 77, that are of MBA date.  In size, the field is c. 116 m long and 50 m wide, and has an internal subdivision.  Trackway 4 runs immediately to the west of this field and in part shares its western ditch boundary.  This field is not directly associated with any waterholes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 136075","WPR98",136075
440,"Bronze Age Field 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This long rectangular field is located in the eastern part of the Site, and follows a slightly different alignment to the central field systems.   It moves on to a more NW-SE axis, and this changing orientation is at least partly related to topography.  Although dating evidence was very poor, it is likely related to other fields in the vicinity, particularly in Area 77, that are of MBA date.  In size, the field is c. 116 m long and 50 m wide, and has an internal subdivision.  Trackway 4 runs immediately to the west of this field and in part shares its western ditch boundary.  This field is not directly associated with any waterholes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 136085","WPR98",136085
440,"Bronze Age Field 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This long rectangular field is located in the eastern part of the Site, and follows a slightly different alignment to the central field systems.   It moves on to a more NW-SE axis, and this changing orientation is at least partly related to topography.  Although dating evidence was very poor, it is likely related to other fields in the vicinity, particularly in Area 77, that are of MBA date.  In size, the field is c. 116 m long and 50 m wide, and has an internal subdivision.  Trackway 4 runs immediately to the west of this field and in part shares its western ditch boundary.  This field is not directly associated with any waterholes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 149129","WPR98",149129
440,"Bronze Age Field 9","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This long rectangular field is located in the eastern part of the Site, and follows a slightly different alignment to the central field systems.   It moves on to a more NW-SE axis, and this changing orientation is at least partly related to topography.  Although dating evidence was very poor, it is likely related to other fields in the vicinity, particularly in Area 77, that are of MBA date.  In size, the field is c. 116 m long and 50 m wide, and has an internal subdivision.  Trackway 4 runs immediately to the west of this field and in part shares its western ditch boundary.  This field is not directly associated with any waterholes.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 166138","WPR98",166138
441,"Early Roman water hole 3","515 Early Romano-British",,"ERB waterhole within 'ladder enclosure'","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 189023","WPR98",189023
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510063","PSH02",510063
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510066","PSH02",510066
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510067","PSH02",510067
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510162","PSH02",510162
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510164","PSH02",510164
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510166","PSH02",510166
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510175","PSH02",510175
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510177","PSH02",510177
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510179","PSH02",510179
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510181","PSH02",510181
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510184","PSH02",510184
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525091","PSH02",525091
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529410","PSH02",529410
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 531041","PSH02",531041
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 531053","PSH02",531053
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 531064","PSH02",531064
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544166","PSH02",544166
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556080","PSH02",556080
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556082","PSH02",556082
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556102","PSH02",556102
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558033","PSH02",558033
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558035","PSH02",558035
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558051","PSH02",558051
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558253","PSH02",558253
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558255","PSH02",558255
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580302","PSH02",580302
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580306","PSH02",580306
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580312","PSH02",580312
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581182","PSH02",581182
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581200","PSH02",581200
442,"MLBA field system on Area 77 and 89 (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to group together all ditches on Area 77 which are on a north west to south east alignment and are thought to date to the MLBA.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 619047","PSH02",619047
443,"Middle Iron Age pit 13","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA pit excavated in the southern enclosure, closely associated with one of the roundhouses.","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 183030","WPR98",183030
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555733","PSH02",555733
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555735","PSH02",555735
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555738","PSH02",555738
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555748","PSH02",555748
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555752","PSH02",555752
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555754","PSH02",555754
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555759","PSH02",555759
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555767","PSH02",555767
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555773","PSH02",555773
444,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit cluster 2","610 Early or Middle Saxon","610 Early or Middle Saxon","rapidly intercutting pits in area of postulated farmstead. Similar to pit cluster 1 but does not feature curious 'fan' spread of pits around a central point. Different usage?","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555793","PSH02",555793
450,"Penannular Gully 18","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully - the fills contain both LIA and MIA pottery. This may re-cut an earlier MIA ring ditch.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 166094","WPR98",166094
450,"Penannular Gully 18","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully - the fills contain both LIA and MIA pottery. This may re-cut an earlier MIA ring ditch.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 166096","WPR98",166096
450,"Penannular Gully 18","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully - the fills contain both LIA and MIA pottery. This may re-cut an earlier MIA ring ditch.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 166098","WPR98",166098
450,"Penannular Gully 18","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully - the fills contain both LIA and MIA pottery. This may re-cut an earlier MIA ring ditch.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 166101","WPR98",166101
450,"Penannular Gully 18","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully - the fills contain both LIA and MIA pottery. This may re-cut an earlier MIA ring ditch.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 166112","WPR98",166112
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210033","GAI99",210033
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210034","GAI99",210034
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210035","GAI99",210035
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210036","GAI99",210036
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210037","GAI99",210037
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210038","GAI99",210038
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210039","GAI99",210039
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210061","GAI99",210061
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210062","GAI99",210062
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210063","GAI99",210063
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210064","GAI99",210064
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210065","GAI99",210065
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210066","GAI99",210066
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210069","GAI99",210069
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210070","GAI99",210070
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210071","GAI99",210071
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210072","GAI99",210072
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210077","GAI99",210077
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210078","GAI99",210078
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210102","GAI99",210102
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210104","GAI99",210104
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 210108","GAI99",210108
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 216046","GAI99",216046
454,"Middle Bronze Age  fenceline bounds settlement","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity grous together all the post holes which make up and bound the settlement in the northern taxiway site. Although most are undated they have been extrapolated to this date.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 216048","GAI99",216048
458,"1A\EarlySaxon farmstead\posthole group 1","605 Early Saxon",,"Exactly what it says on the tin. Undated but spatial proximity and curious shape of pit cluster suggest that the activity represented may have involved some structure(s) such as hoists?","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525224","PSH02",525224
458,"1A\EarlySaxon farmstead\posthole group 1","605 Early Saxon",,"Exactly what it says on the tin. Undated but spatial proximity and curious shape of pit cluster suggest that the activity represented may have involved some structure(s) such as hoists?","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581208","PSH02",581208
458,"1A\EarlySaxon farmstead\posthole group 1","605 Early Saxon",,"Exactly what it says on the tin. Undated but spatial proximity and curious shape of pit cluster suggest that the activity represented may have involved some structure(s) such as hoists?","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581214","PSH02",581214
458,"1A\EarlySaxon farmstead\posthole group 1","605 Early Saxon",,"Exactly what it says on the tin. Undated but spatial proximity and curious shape of pit cluster suggest that the activity represented may have involved some structure(s) such as hoists?","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581216","PSH02",581216
458,"1A\EarlySaxon farmstead\posthole group 1","605 Early Saxon",,"Exactly what it says on the tin. Undated but spatial proximity and curious shape of pit cluster suggest that the activity represented may have involved some structure(s) such as hoists?","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581218","PSH02",581218
458,"1A\EarlySaxon farmstead\posthole group 1","605 Early Saxon",,"Exactly what it says on the tin. Undated but spatial proximity and curious shape of pit cluster suggest that the activity represented may have involved some structure(s) such as hoists?","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581220","PSH02",581220
465,"Middle Bronze Age waterhole","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this is an entity created for a waterhole located in the north of the site within the early central zone","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555701","PSH02",555701
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555712","PSH02",555712
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555717","PSH02",555717
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555723","PSH02",555723
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555725","PSH02",555725
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555870","PSH02",555870
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555880","PSH02",555880
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555882","PSH02",555882
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555887","PSH02",555887
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578284","PSH02",578284
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578348","PSH02",578348
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578362","PSH02",578362
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578364","PSH02",578364
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578370","PSH02",578370
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578490","PSH02",578490
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578492","PSH02",578492
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578495","PSH02",578495
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 580261","PSH02",580261
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 580263","PSH02",580263
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 589189","PSH02",589189
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 589219","PSH02",589219
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 597127","PSH02",597127
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 603200","PSH02",603200
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 613112","PSH02",613112
467,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 4","605 Early Saxon",,"E-W linear north of the postulated EAS farmstead - also features an earliest phase of ditch segments and postholes.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 613113","PSH02",613113
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 311010","PSH02",311010
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 311025","PSH02",311025
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 312048","PSH02",312048
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 510079","PSH02",510079
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 516066","PSH02",516066
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 516082","PSH02",516082
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 516125","PSH02",516125
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 521069","PSH02",521069
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 521096","PSH02",521096
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 521098","PSH02",521098
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 523172","PSH02",523172
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 523315","PSH02",523315
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 525043","PSH02",525043
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 537202","PSH02",537202
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 538348","PSH02",538348
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 538351","PSH02",538351
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 538353","PSH02",538353
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 539398","PSH02",539398
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 539430","PSH02",539430
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 543041","PSH02",543041
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 543051","PSH02",543051
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 550057","PSH02",550057
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553191","PSH02",553191
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 568048","PSH02",568048
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 569176","PSH02",569176
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 569188","PSH02",569188
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 570381","PSH02",570381
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 574018","PSH02",574018
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582274","PSH02",582274
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 592385","PSH02",592385
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 593111","PSH02",593111
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 593173","PSH02",593173
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 593190","PSH02",593190
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 593194","PSH02",593194
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 594192","PSH02",594192
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 614186","PSH02",614186
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 615138","PSH02",615138
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 615156","PSH02",615156
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 623023","PSH02",623023
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 625018","PSH02",625018
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 626050","PSH02",626050
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 627042","PSH02",627042
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 630108","PSH02",630108
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 633048","PSH02",633048
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 633102","PSH02",633102
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 634013","PSH02",634013
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 635070","PSH02",635070
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 639062","PSH02",639062
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 641085","PSH02",641085
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 641098","PSH02",641098
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 641144","PSH02",641144
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 643003","PSH02",643003
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 643144","PSH02",643144
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 648106","PSH02",648106
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 648108","PSH02",648108
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 648110","PSH02",648110
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 651091","PSH02",651091
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 653041","PSH02",653041
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 653046","PSH02",653046
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 653050","PSH02",653050
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 653053","PSH02",653053
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 653055","PSH02",653055
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 653060","PSH02",653060
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 653062","PSH02",653062
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 653068","PSH02",653068
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 658134","PSH02",658134
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 658188","PSH02",658188
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 659030","PSH02",659030
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 661130","PSH02",661130
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 662035","PSH02",662035
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 663118","PSH02",663118
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 663133","PSH02",663133
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 668026","PSH02",668026
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 677010","PSH02",677010
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 677022","PSH02",677022
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 678001","PSH02",678001
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 679059","PSH02",679059
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 125244","WPR98",125244
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 125247","WPR98",125247
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 129112","WPR98",129112
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 130237","WPR98",130237
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 132301","WPR98",132301
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 134108","WPR98",134108
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 134184","WPR98",134184
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 137114","WPR98",137114
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141088","WPR98",141088
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141106","WPR98",141106
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141108","WPR98",141108
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141110","WPR98",141110
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141112","WPR98",141112
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141114","WPR98",141114
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141118","WPR98",141118
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141120","WPR98",141120
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141124","WPR98",141124
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141126","WPR98",141126
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141128","WPR98",141128
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141130","WPR98",141130
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141136","WPR98",141136
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141138","WPR98",141138
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141147","WPR98",141147
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141149","WPR98",141149
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141151","WPR98",141151
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141186","WPR98",141186
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141202","WPR98",141202
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141204","WPR98",141204
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141208","WPR98",141208
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141212","WPR98",141212
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141214","WPR98",141214
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141216","WPR98",141216
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141222","WPR98",141222
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141226","WPR98",141226
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 148342","WPR98",148342
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 155116","WPR98",155116
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156100","WPR98",156100
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156215","WPR98",156215
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156219","WPR98",156219
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 158035","WPR98",158035
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 158038","WPR98",158038
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 158042","WPR98",158042
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 160156","WPR98",160156
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 161089","WPR98",161089
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 161093","WPR98",161093
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 161099","WPR98",161099
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 161101","WPR98",161101
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 166075","WPR98",166075
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 167119","WPR98",167119
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 178015","WPR98",178015
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 178139","WPR98",178139
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 180106","WPR98",180106
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 180107","WPR98",180107
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 180108","WPR98",180108
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 180110","WPR98",180110
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 183030","WPR98",183030
470,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\pits and waterholes",,,"All pits and wsterholes for settlement entity.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 183034","WPR98",183034
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401050","GAA00",401050
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401053","GAA00",401053
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213062","GAI99",213062
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217048","GAI99",217048
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217050","GAI99",217050
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222052","GAI99",222052
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961091","POK96",961091
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962043","POK96",962043
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962303","POK96",962303
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963043","POK96",963043
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963056","POK96",963056
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122096","WPR98",122096
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124085","WPR98",124085
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167004","WPR98",167004
476,"Middle Bronze Age Pits WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All MBA pits from Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 170007","WPR98",170007
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 960033","POK96",960033
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962200","POK96",962200
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511067","PSH02",511067
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525372","PSH02",525372
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525481","PSH02",525481
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527229","PSH02",527229
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527288","PSH02",527288
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 532033","PSH02",532033
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555449","PSH02",555449
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555466","PSH02",555466
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561111","PSH02",561111
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588042","PSH02",588042
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 600009","PSH02",600009
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641033","PSH02",641033
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 659082","PSH02",659082
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130051","WPR98",130051
479,"Plain Bowl Phase Tree Throws","205 Early Neolithic",,"All treethrows that contain plain bowl ware and can be ascribed therefore an earlier Neolithic date","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130218","WPR98",130218
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214106","GAI99",214106
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214108","GAI99",214108
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214110","GAI99",214110
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214112","GAI99",214112
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214114","GAI99",214114
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214116","GAI99",214116
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214118","GAI99",214118
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214120","GAI99",214120
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214122","GAI99",214122
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214126","GAI99",214126
485,"Bronze Age structure 4 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links together the postholes which appear to form a structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 214128","GAI99",214128
489,"Medieval Ditch 7","700 Medieval",,"Medieval Ditch excavated in the west end of Bed B. aligned on the parish boundary.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 148237","WPR98",148237
495,"Post-Medieval Ditch 15","800 Post-Medieval","900 Modern","A roughly N-S aligned ditch forming one of three ditches that relates to a post-medieval lane.  These ditches cut everything else in the landscape.  They  follow the line of Long Lane, that can be identified from maps.  Finds including modern CBM, but it may be that these ditches have their origins in the medieval period.  After roughly 200m from the southern point where thees ditches were exposed, the ditches kink slightly and become re-orientated on a NE-SW alignment.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 524015","PSH02",524015
495,"Post-Medieval Ditch 15","800 Post-Medieval","900 Modern","A roughly N-S aligned ditch forming one of three ditches that relates to a post-medieval lane.  These ditches cut everything else in the landscape.  They  follow the line of Long Lane, that can be identified from maps.  Finds including modern CBM, but it may be that these ditches have their origins in the medieval period.  After roughly 200m from the southern point where thees ditches were exposed, the ditches kink slightly and become re-orientated on a NE-SW alignment.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 524028","PSH02",524028
498,"Mesolithic pits in bed B","160 Mesolithic",,"Cluster of meso pits contianing bunrt fl and TL dates in cursus","JSCL","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 120028","WPR98",120028
498,"Mesolithic pits in bed B","160 Mesolithic",,"Cluster of meso pits contianing bunrt fl and TL dates in cursus","JSCL","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 137021","WPR98",137021
498,"Mesolithic pits in bed B","160 Mesolithic",,"Cluster of meso pits contianing bunrt fl and TL dates in cursus","JSCL","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 159025","WPR98",159025
498,"Mesolithic pits in bed B","160 Mesolithic",,"Cluster of meso pits contianing bunrt fl and TL dates in cursus","JSCL","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 160021","WPR98",160021
498,"Mesolithic pits in bed B","160 Mesolithic",,"Cluster of meso pits contianing bunrt fl and TL dates in cursus","JSCL","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 162010","WPR98",162010
498,"Mesolithic pits in bed B","160 Mesolithic",,"Cluster of meso pits contianing bunrt fl and TL dates in cursus","JSCL","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 165005","WPR98",165005
498,"Mesolithic pits in bed B","160 Mesolithic",,"Cluster of meso pits contianing bunrt fl and TL dates in cursus","JSCL","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 165007","WPR98",165007
498,"Mesolithic pits in bed B","160 Mesolithic",,"Cluster of meso pits contianing bunrt fl and TL dates in cursus","JSCL","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 165009","WPR98",165009
500,"Bronze Age Waterholes Insects Analysis WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"BA Waterholes form WPR98 with insects analysed to publication standard by M. Robinson","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103040","WPR98",103040
500,"Bronze Age Waterholes Insects Analysis WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"BA Waterholes form WPR98 with insects analysed to publication standard by M. Robinson","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
500,"Bronze Age Waterholes Insects Analysis WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"BA Waterholes form WPR98 with insects analysed to publication standard by M. Robinson","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
500,"Bronze Age Waterholes Insects Analysis WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"BA Waterholes form WPR98 with insects analysed to publication standard by M. Robinson","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
500,"Bronze Age Waterholes Insects Analysis WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"BA Waterholes form WPR98 with insects analysed to publication standard by M. Robinson","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
500,"Bronze Age Waterholes Insects Analysis WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"BA Waterholes form WPR98 with insects analysed to publication standard by M. Robinson","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178122","WPR98",178122
501,"different size gullies5",,,"different size gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128138","WPR98",128138
501,"different size gullies5",,,"different size gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166112","WPR98",166112
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 508007","PSH02",508007
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 516052","PSH02",516052
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 516062","PSH02",516062
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517070","PSH02",517070
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517113","PSH02",517113
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 518035","PSH02",518035
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 518073","PSH02",518073
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 519045","PSH02",519045
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542036","PSH02",542036
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543004","PSH02",543004
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 544001","PSH02",544001
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 544011","PSH02",544011
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547007","PSH02",547007
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547008","PSH02",547008
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 548010","PSH02",548010
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 549063","PSH02",549063
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 549065","PSH02",549065
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555053","PSH02",555053
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111044","WPR98",111044
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 120064","WPR98",120064
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121173","WPR98",121173
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121261","WPR98",121261
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122088","WPR98",122088
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125108","WPR98",125108
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128244","WPR98",128244
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130161","WPR98",130161
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130206","WPR98",130206
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141228","WPR98",141228
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146105","WPR98",146105
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147361","WPR98",147361
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148092","WPR98",148092
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148093","WPR98",148093
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151082","WPR98",151082
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156191","WPR98",156191
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157065","WPR98",157065
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160088","WPR98",160088
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160097","WPR98",160097
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160105","WPR98",160105
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
502,"Late Neolithic Scatter3/Halfwy btwn HE2+C1/Setlmnt","225 Late Neolithic",,"Area of LN flint roughly corresponding to area of Plain Bowl scatter 2 but western edge poorly defined. Scatter consists of mostly residual LNEB and LNBA flint flakes as well as some scrapers, cores and an arrowhead. Area may suggest some sort of settlement activity in this area or a flint working location, possibly a continuation of  or return to the activity represented by PB Scatter 2. However this entity is defined in part by the presence of Plain Bowl scatter 2 and indeed does roughly conform to its limits except for the western edge which is poorly defined, so in many ways this is quite an artificial division of the Late Neolithic background signature.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160184","WPR98",160184
503,"Nicks roman recuts",,,"Recuts in the 'ladder enclosure' on firm stratigraphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 112029","WPR98",112029
503,"Nicks roman recuts",,,"Recuts in the 'ladder enclosure' on firm stratigraphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161157","WPR98",161157
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"POK96 - 960077","POK96",960077
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"POK96 - 960502","POK96",960502
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 507019","PSH02",507019
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 523234","PSH02",523234
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 523247","PSH02",523247
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 523250","PSH02",523250
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 538247","PSH02",538247
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 580137","PSH02",580137
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 580140","PSH02",580140
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 595018","PSH02",595018
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 595020","PSH02",595020
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 615051","PSH02",615051
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"PSH02 - 636072","PSH02",636072
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 136054","WPR98",136054
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 138019","WPR98",138019
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
507,"Bronze Age D-shaped enclosure 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These ditches may form fragments of a second D-shaped enclosure surrounding the smaller D-shaped settlement enclosure, but in turn, ringed by a larger 3rd D-shaped enclosure.  These ditches also form the western ditch of a droveway and eastern boundary of a field system.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Denclosure",,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
511,"Penannular Gully 5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in area A1. Later excavation at Terminal 5 (PSH02) uncovered the remainder of the structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Postholes may be associated with the structure and it is possible that a small stretch of gully 578536 represents some recutting of the northern side of the gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526451","PSH02",526451
511,"Penannular Gully 5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in area A1. Later excavation at Terminal 5 (PSH02) uncovered the remainder of the structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Postholes may be associated with the structure and it is possible that a small stretch of gully 578536 represents some recutting of the northern side of the gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 546413","PSH02",546413
511,"Penannular Gully 5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in area A1. Later excavation at Terminal 5 (PSH02) uncovered the remainder of the structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Postholes may be associated with the structure and it is possible that a small stretch of gully 578536 represents some recutting of the northern side of the gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578534","PSH02",578534
511,"Penannular Gully 5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in area A1. Later excavation at Terminal 5 (PSH02) uncovered the remainder of the structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Postholes may be associated with the structure and it is possible that a small stretch of gully 578536 represents some recutting of the northern side of the gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578536","PSH02",578536
511,"Penannular Gully 5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in area A1. Later excavation at Terminal 5 (PSH02) uncovered the remainder of the structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Postholes may be associated with the structure and it is possible that a small stretch of gully 578536 represents some recutting of the northern side of the gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 123129","WPR98",123129
511,"Penannular Gully 5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in area A1. Later excavation at Terminal 5 (PSH02) uncovered the remainder of the structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Postholes may be associated with the structure and it is possible that a small stretch of gully 578536 represents some recutting of the northern side of the gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 123131","WPR98",123131
511,"Penannular Gully 5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in area A1. Later excavation at Terminal 5 (PSH02) uncovered the remainder of the structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Postholes may be associated with the structure and it is possible that a small stretch of gully 578536 represents some recutting of the northern side of the gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 130097","WPR98",130097
511,"Penannular Gully 5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in area A1. Later excavation at Terminal 5 (PSH02) uncovered the remainder of the structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Postholes may be associated with the structure and it is possible that a small stretch of gully 578536 represents some recutting of the northern side of the gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 149108","WPR98",149108
511,"Penannular Gully 5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully excavated in area A1. Later excavation at Terminal 5 (PSH02) uncovered the remainder of the structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Postholes may be associated with the structure and it is possible that a small stretch of gully 578536 represents some recutting of the northern side of the gully.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 307012","WPR98",307012
513,"Medieval Ditch 2","700 Medieval",,"Medieval Ditch located in Bed B. Part of the medieval parish boundary.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 148201","WPR98",148201
519,"Late Bronze Age Waterhole 2","325 Late Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","LBA waterhole excavated in Bed B. 1 of 3 features located in the eastern end of the bed.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
521,"Middle Bronze Age Enclosure Area 45 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Comprises MBA enclosure ditch as excavated in Area 45, 47 POK96 and WPR98.   May be a settlement enclosure.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511119","PSH02",511119
521,"Middle Bronze Age Enclosure Area 45 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Comprises MBA enclosure ditch as excavated in Area 45, 47 POK96 and WPR98.   May be a settlement enclosure.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511121","PSH02",511121
521,"Middle Bronze Age Enclosure Area 45 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Comprises MBA enclosure ditch as excavated in Area 45, 47 POK96 and WPR98.   May be a settlement enclosure.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598081","PSH02",598081
521,"Middle Bronze Age Enclosure Area 45 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Comprises MBA enclosure ditch as excavated in Area 45, 47 POK96 and WPR98.   May be a settlement enclosure.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598090","PSH02",598090
521,"Middle Bronze Age Enclosure Area 45 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Comprises MBA enclosure ditch as excavated in Area 45, 47 POK96 and WPR98.   May be a settlement enclosure.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"POK96 - 961747","POK96",961747
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"POK96 - 962259","POK96",962259
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 524232","PSH02",524232
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 552118","PSH02",552118
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 552123","PSH02",552123
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 555426","PSH02",555426
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 555530","PSH02",555530
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 573074","PSH02",573074
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 578133","PSH02",578133
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 586060","PSH02",586060
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 586061","PSH02",586061
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 586062","PSH02",586062
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 603025","PSH02",603025
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 103019","WPR98",103019
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 105008","WPR98",105008
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 105009","WPR98",105009
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 107013","WPR98",107013
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 107029","WPR98",107029
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 110007","WPR98",110007
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 111012","WPR98",111012
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 119014","WPR98",119014
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 119032","WPR98",119032
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 119034","WPR98",119034
524,"Bronze Age Trackway 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slighly meandering and segmented trackway orientated roughly north-south in the landscape.  This trackway is the westernmost trackway in the T5 excavation area and would appear to have its point of origin/ or its end point  at the eastern ditch of the Stanwell cursus.  This is a relatively short trackway and does not appear to extend in areas to the north and south (although undoubtedly the lagoon beds have destroyed large transects of it).  The trackway has evidence of reuse through a number of recuts.  It has clearly been maintained and modified over time.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 121009","WPR98",121009
527,"Middle / Late Bronze Age Ditch 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"No finds were retrieved from this ditch, however on the basis of alignment it is undoubtedly Bronze Age.  Furthermore, it is likely associated with other MBA ditches in the vicinity and forms part of BA Field System 13.  Although form in plan suggests that it is segmented, it is more likely interrupted as a result of truncation.","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 141033","WPR98",141033
552,"Bronze Age Field 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This roughly rectangular field (ca. 120 m by 95 m) is situated immediately adjacent and to the east of Trackway 2,  Although the ditches that comprise this field have been dated to different phases (some MBA, some LBA and one even to the MIA), some are recut and some are likely filled with intrusive material.  For instance the western N-S aligned ditch of this field contained two MIA pot sherds and on that basis was dated to that phase.  However the pottery is from the upper fill and also is abraded.  Furthermore, the western ditch follows the same alignment of BA trackway 2 and furthermore it respects the terminus of LBA ditch 4 and is aligned directly N-S from its terminal end. Thus even if the ditches were later recut and reused it is likely that they all originally constituted a large rectangular field, framed on either dide by trackways or droveways (trackway 2 to the west and 3 to the east).  At least two gaps where entrances into the field may be discerned.  The first lies in the south-west corner, where access could be gained from the droveway.  The second is situated approximately a third of the way up from the south-eastern corner of the field, this time promoting access from Trackway 3.  This latter entrance was subsequently blocked by a large pit in the MIA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 107109","WPR98",107109
552,"Bronze Age Field 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This roughly rectangular field (ca. 120 m by 95 m) is situated immediately adjacent and to the east of Trackway 2,  Although the ditches that comprise this field have been dated to different phases (some MBA, some LBA and one even to the MIA), some are recut and some are likely filled with intrusive material.  For instance the western N-S aligned ditch of this field contained two MIA pot sherds and on that basis was dated to that phase.  However the pottery is from the upper fill and also is abraded.  Furthermore, the western ditch follows the same alignment of BA trackway 2 and furthermore it respects the terminus of LBA ditch 4 and is aligned directly N-S from its terminal end. Thus even if the ditches were later recut and reused it is likely that they all originally constituted a large rectangular field, framed on either dide by trackways or droveways (trackway 2 to the west and 3 to the east).  At least two gaps where entrances into the field may be discerned.  The first lies in the south-west corner, where access could be gained from the droveway.  The second is situated approximately a third of the way up from the south-eastern corner of the field, this time promoting access from Trackway 3.  This latter entrance was subsequently blocked by a large pit in the MIA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 108043","WPR98",108043
552,"Bronze Age Field 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This roughly rectangular field (ca. 120 m by 95 m) is situated immediately adjacent and to the east of Trackway 2,  Although the ditches that comprise this field have been dated to different phases (some MBA, some LBA and one even to the MIA), some are recut and some are likely filled with intrusive material.  For instance the western N-S aligned ditch of this field contained two MIA pot sherds and on that basis was dated to that phase.  However the pottery is from the upper fill and also is abraded.  Furthermore, the western ditch follows the same alignment of BA trackway 2 and furthermore it respects the terminus of LBA ditch 4 and is aligned directly N-S from its terminal end. Thus even if the ditches were later recut and reused it is likely that they all originally constituted a large rectangular field, framed on either dide by trackways or droveways (trackway 2 to the west and 3 to the east).  At least two gaps where entrances into the field may be discerned.  The first lies in the south-west corner, where access could be gained from the droveway.  The second is situated approximately a third of the way up from the south-eastern corner of the field, this time promoting access from Trackway 3.  This latter entrance was subsequently blocked by a large pit in the MIA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 108050","WPR98",108050
552,"Bronze Age Field 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This roughly rectangular field (ca. 120 m by 95 m) is situated immediately adjacent and to the east of Trackway 2,  Although the ditches that comprise this field have been dated to different phases (some MBA, some LBA and one even to the MIA), some are recut and some are likely filled with intrusive material.  For instance the western N-S aligned ditch of this field contained two MIA pot sherds and on that basis was dated to that phase.  However the pottery is from the upper fill and also is abraded.  Furthermore, the western ditch follows the same alignment of BA trackway 2 and furthermore it respects the terminus of LBA ditch 4 and is aligned directly N-S from its terminal end. Thus even if the ditches were later recut and reused it is likely that they all originally constituted a large rectangular field, framed on either dide by trackways or droveways (trackway 2 to the west and 3 to the east).  At least two gaps where entrances into the field may be discerned.  The first lies in the south-west corner, where access could be gained from the droveway.  The second is situated approximately a third of the way up from the south-eastern corner of the field, this time promoting access from Trackway 3.  This latter entrance was subsequently blocked by a large pit in the MIA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 108057","WPR98",108057
552,"Bronze Age Field 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This roughly rectangular field (ca. 120 m by 95 m) is situated immediately adjacent and to the east of Trackway 2,  Although the ditches that comprise this field have been dated to different phases (some MBA, some LBA and one even to the MIA), some are recut and some are likely filled with intrusive material.  For instance the western N-S aligned ditch of this field contained two MIA pot sherds and on that basis was dated to that phase.  However the pottery is from the upper fill and also is abraded.  Furthermore, the western ditch follows the same alignment of BA trackway 2 and furthermore it respects the terminus of LBA ditch 4 and is aligned directly N-S from its terminal end. Thus even if the ditches were later recut and reused it is likely that they all originally constituted a large rectangular field, framed on either dide by trackways or droveways (trackway 2 to the west and 3 to the east).  At least two gaps where entrances into the field may be discerned.  The first lies in the south-west corner, where access could be gained from the droveway.  The second is situated approximately a third of the way up from the south-eastern corner of the field, this time promoting access from Trackway 3.  This latter entrance was subsequently blocked by a large pit in the MIA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 112042","WPR98",112042
552,"Bronze Age Field 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This roughly rectangular field (ca. 120 m by 95 m) is situated immediately adjacent and to the east of Trackway 2,  Although the ditches that comprise this field have been dated to different phases (some MBA, some LBA and one even to the MIA), some are recut and some are likely filled with intrusive material.  For instance the western N-S aligned ditch of this field contained two MIA pot sherds and on that basis was dated to that phase.  However the pottery is from the upper fill and also is abraded.  Furthermore, the western ditch follows the same alignment of BA trackway 2 and furthermore it respects the terminus of LBA ditch 4 and is aligned directly N-S from its terminal end. Thus even if the ditches were later recut and reused it is likely that they all originally constituted a large rectangular field, framed on either dide by trackways or droveways (trackway 2 to the west and 3 to the east).  At least two gaps where entrances into the field may be discerned.  The first lies in the south-west corner, where access could be gained from the droveway.  The second is situated approximately a third of the way up from the south-eastern corner of the field, this time promoting access from Trackway 3.  This latter entrance was subsequently blocked by a large pit in the MIA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 138162","WPR98",138162
552,"Bronze Age Field 1","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This roughly rectangular field (ca. 120 m by 95 m) is situated immediately adjacent and to the east of Trackway 2,  Although the ditches that comprise this field have been dated to different phases (some MBA, some LBA and one even to the MIA), some are recut and some are likely filled with intrusive material.  For instance the western N-S aligned ditch of this field contained two MIA pot sherds and on that basis was dated to that phase.  However the pottery is from the upper fill and also is abraded.  Furthermore, the western ditch follows the same alignment of BA trackway 2 and furthermore it respects the terminus of LBA ditch 4 and is aligned directly N-S from its terminal end. Thus even if the ditches were later recut and reused it is likely that they all originally constituted a large rectangular field, framed on either dide by trackways or droveways (trackway 2 to the west and 3 to the east).  At least two gaps where entrances into the field may be discerned.  The first lies in the south-west corner, where access could be gained from the droveway.  The second is situated approximately a third of the way up from the south-eastern corner of the field, this time promoting access from Trackway 3.  This latter entrance was subsequently blocked by a large pit in the MIA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 176017","WPR98",176017
554,"Roman enclosure group a","500 Romano-British",,"RB ditches on a similar alignment, perhaps forming a coherent group","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122053","WPR98",122053
554,"Roman enclosure group a","500 Romano-British",,"RB ditches on a similar alignment, perhaps forming a coherent group","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122055","WPR98",122055
554,"Roman enclosure group a","500 Romano-British",,"RB ditches on a similar alignment, perhaps forming a coherent group","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 143050","WPR98",143050
554,"Roman enclosure group a","500 Romano-British",,"RB ditches on a similar alignment, perhaps forming a coherent group","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159064","WPR98",159064
554,"Roman enclosure group a","500 Romano-British",,"RB ditches on a similar alignment, perhaps forming a coherent group","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159066","WPR98",159066
554,"Roman enclosure group a","500 Romano-British",,"RB ditches on a similar alignment, perhaps forming a coherent group","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159068","WPR98",159068
554,"Roman enclosure group a","500 Romano-British",,"RB ditches on a similar alignment, perhaps forming a coherent group","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159072","WPR98",159072
554,"Roman enclosure group a","500 Romano-British",,"RB ditches on a similar alignment, perhaps forming a coherent group","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160100","WPR98",160100
558,"Settlement 3 [Middle Bronze Age structure 1]","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish post-hole constructed structure on GAI 00.  The post holes suggest a roughly rectangular structure in this area possibly 3.5 m by 2.5 m in size (ie really quite small), although some of the post holes may have been completely truncated.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAA00 - 404026","GAA00",404026
558,"Settlement 3 [Middle Bronze Age structure 1]","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish post-hole constructed structure on GAI 00.  The post holes suggest a roughly rectangular structure in this area possibly 3.5 m by 2.5 m in size (ie really quite small), although some of the post holes may have been completely truncated.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAA00 - 404028","GAA00",404028
558,"Settlement 3 [Middle Bronze Age structure 1]","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish post-hole constructed structure on GAI 00.  The post holes suggest a roughly rectangular structure in this area possibly 3.5 m by 2.5 m in size (ie really quite small), although some of the post holes may have been completely truncated.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAA00 - 404030","GAA00",404030
558,"Settlement 3 [Middle Bronze Age structure 1]","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish post-hole constructed structure on GAI 00.  The post holes suggest a roughly rectangular structure in this area possibly 3.5 m by 2.5 m in size (ie really quite small), although some of the post holes may have been completely truncated.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAA00 - 404032","GAA00",404032
558,"Settlement 3 [Middle Bronze Age structure 1]","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish post-hole constructed structure on GAI 00.  The post holes suggest a roughly rectangular structure in this area possibly 3.5 m by 2.5 m in size (ie really quite small), although some of the post holes may have been completely truncated.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAA00 - 404035","GAA00",404035
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523193","PSH02",523193
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523311","PSH02",523311
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526451","PSH02",526451
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546413","PSH02",546413
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570182","PSH02",570182
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 574040","PSH02",574040
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 577003","PSH02",577003
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 577024","PSH02",577024
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578534","PSH02",578534
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578536","PSH02",578536
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614227","PSH02",614227
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 632089","PSH02",632089
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633062","PSH02",633062
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633086","PSH02",633086
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633088","PSH02",633088
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633090","PSH02",633090
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633094","PSH02",633094
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633096","PSH02",633096
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633098","PSH02",633098
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633115","PSH02",633115
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633117","PSH02",633117
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636013","PSH02",636013
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636144","PSH02",636144
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636147","PSH02",636147
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636149","PSH02",636149
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 641057","PSH02",641057
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 658192","PSH02",658192
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663208","PSH02",663208
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 680099","PSH02",680099
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113117","WPR98",113117
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 123129","WPR98",123129
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 123131","WPR98",123131
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125123","WPR98",125123
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128138","WPR98",128138
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128170","WPR98",128170
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128172","WPR98",128172
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128174","WPR98",128174
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128176","WPR98",128176
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128178","WPR98",128178
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128180","WPR98",128180
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128182","WPR98",128182
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128344","WPR98",128344
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128346","WPR98",128346
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128352","WPR98",128352
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128354","WPR98",128354
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130097","WPR98",130097
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134101","WPR98",134101
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134170","WPR98",134170
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134180","WPR98",134180
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134182","WPR98",134182
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134184","WPR98",134184
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134186","WPR98",134186
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134188","WPR98",134188
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134191","WPR98",134191
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134193","WPR98",134193
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134195","WPR98",134195
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134197","WPR98",134197
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134199","WPR98",134199
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140112","WPR98",140112
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146220","WPR98",146220
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147136","WPR98",147136
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147215","WPR98",147215
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149108","WPR98",149108
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149205","WPR98",149205
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151141","WPR98",151141
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158160","WPR98",158160
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158163","WPR98",158163
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160254","WPR98",160254
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166094","WPR98",166094
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166096","WPR98",166096
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166098","WPR98",166098
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166101","WPR98",166101
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166112","WPR98",166112
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 307008","WPR98",307008
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 307009","WPR98",307009
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 307010","WPR98",307010
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 307011","WPR98",307011
560,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group b","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter of between 11 and 13m","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 307012","WPR98",307012
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 516052","PSH02",516052
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 548010","PSH02",548010
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 120092","WPR98",120092
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 125108","WPR98",125108
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 127069","WPR98",127069
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 127073","WPR98",127073
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 130051","WPR98",130051
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141228","WPR98",141228
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141230","WPR98",141230
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141232","WPR98",141232
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156169","WPR98",156169
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156191","WPR98",156191
566,"Plain Bowl Scatter2/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"An area of features containing Plain Bowl pottery and lithics located approximately halfway between HE2 and the Stanwell cursus C1. May be suggestive of EN  settlement. There appears to be a higher concentration of material towards the south west part of this entity (Plain Bowl Scatter4).","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 157065","WPR98",157065
567,"different size gullies2",,,"different size gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146272","WPR98",146272
567,"different size gullies2",,,"different size gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149114","WPR98",149114
567,"different size gullies2",,,"different size gullies","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172032","WPR98",172032
571,"C4 Cursus","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"Although the full extent of this monument has not been uncovered, the present plan suggests that it relates to either a Late Neolithic hengiform monument or an Early Bronze Age barrow.  If it is a barrow, it is a rather unusal shape, and slighly more elongated than the typical circular ring ditch.  Despite the large number of interventions, few finds were retrieved.  However the majority of finds comprised struck flint flakes and cores or core fragments.  Diagnostic pieces (including retouched blades, flake cores and denticulates) date to the Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age.  One sherd of abraded pottery was also retrieved, of LBA date, but is likely intrusive on the basis of the larger quantities of Neolithic and EBA material.  This monument is situated  over 300m to the east of the cursus.  Recuts were identified within the ditch.  No obvious internal features were identified and no clear entrance was noted although it must be remembered that the full plan of this monument has not been revealed.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 621211","PSH02",621211
573,"1a\medieval settlement\southern ditch1",,,"southern ditch phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 566049","PSH02",566049
578,"Early Roman Water-hole 2","515 Early Romano-British",,"RCP2 water-hole phase 1 of the water-hole which has 3 more phases.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 174024","WPR98",174024
581,"Middle / Late Bronze Age waterhole","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"?M/LBA waterhole excavated in POK 96. Dating uncertain","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963518","POK96",963518
581,"Middle / Late Bronze Age waterhole","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"?M/LBA waterhole excavated in POK 96. Dating uncertain","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963519","POK96",963519
586,"Middle Bronze Age Waterhole 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","MBA water hole excavated in Bed B part of 1 of 3 features excavated on the eastern end of the bed. Cuts MBA ditch.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218064","GAI99",218064
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107084","WPR98",107084
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110032","WPR98",110032
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110035","WPR98",110035
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110036","WPR98",110036
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110037","WPR98",110037
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110040","WPR98",110040
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111032","WPR98",111032
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111038","WPR98",111038
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111082","WPR98",111082
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111125","WPR98",111125
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 112027","WPR98",112027
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 112029","WPR98",112029
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119286","WPR98",119286
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119333","WPR98",119333
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122098","WPR98",122098
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122104","WPR98",122104
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127073","WPR98",127073
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128107","WPR98",128107
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128226","WPR98",128226
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128228","WPR98",128228
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128230","WPR98",128230
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129097","WPR98",129097
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130131","WPR98",130131
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130145","WPR98",130145
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130161","WPR98",130161
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140143","WPR98",140143
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148092","WPR98",148092
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148093","WPR98",148093
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151082","WPR98",151082
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151084","WPR98",151084
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151224","WPR98",151224
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151226","WPR98",151226
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159070","WPR98",159070
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159076","WPR98",159076
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159080","WPR98",159080
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161157","WPR98",161157
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161159","WPR98",161159
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161164","WPR98",161164
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161166","WPR98",161166
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166195","WPR98",166195
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 171065","WPR98",171065
595,"Late Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Entity created to group together the ditches which make up part of the RB ladder enclosure.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 171067","WPR98",171067
597,"Penannular Gully 3","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1. Originally interpreted as a Ritual House.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 108008","WPR98",108008
597,"Penannular Gully 3","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1. Originally interpreted as a Ritual House.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 108011","WPR98",108011
597,"Penannular Gully 3","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1. Originally interpreted as a Ritual House.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 108014","WPR98",108014
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 960023","POK96",960023
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961741","POK96",961741
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 105026","WPR98",105026
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110011","WPR98",110011
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 124043","WPR98",124043
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132009","WPR98",132009
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133035","WPR98",133035
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134011","WPR98",134011
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137019","WPR98",137019
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 142008","WPR98",142008
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 153011","WPR98",153011
600,"Neolithic C2 Cursus WPR+POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"C2 cursus in WPR98 and POK96","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 153048","WPR98",153048
611,"Middle Bronze Age Well 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","MBA well excavated in POK 96. Top fills of the feature dated to the LBA period through the pottery recorded.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 960514","POK96",960514
612,"Post-Medieval Beamslot","800 Post-Medieval",,"PM beamslot excavated in POK 96. Unsure of dating.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961087","POK96",961087
612,"Post-Medieval Beamslot","800 Post-Medieval",,"PM beamslot excavated in POK 96. Unsure of dating.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961088","POK96",961088
613,"Late Roman pit, containing lead font","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Entity for late Roman pit containing lead font - subject to very detailed analysis","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 135087","WPR98",135087
619,"Roman tree throws","500 Romano-British",,"RB tree throws","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127159","WPR98",127159
619,"Roman tree throws","500 Romano-British",,"RB tree throws","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146251","WPR98",146251
622,"Enclosure E2","515 Early Romano-British",,"Double ditched roman enclosure cut by later ladder enclosure.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 112021","WPR98",112021
622,"Enclosure E2","515 Early Romano-British",,"Double ditched roman enclosure cut by later ladder enclosure.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 112025","WPR98",112025
622,"Enclosure E2","515 Early Romano-British",,"Double ditched roman enclosure cut by later ladder enclosure.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157127","WPR98",157127
622,"Enclosure E2","515 Early Romano-British",,"Double ditched roman enclosure cut by later ladder enclosure.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157131","WPR98",157131
622,"Enclosure E2","515 Early Romano-British",,"Double ditched roman enclosure cut by later ladder enclosure.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157133","WPR98",157133
622,"Enclosure E2","515 Early Romano-British",,"Double ditched roman enclosure cut by later ladder enclosure.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 157139","WPR98",157139
628,"Bronze Age post hole containing placed deposit","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"BA post hole located on Northern taxiway site contains placed deposit of pottery fabric FL 10.","ab","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210026","GAI99",210026
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110032","WPR98",110032
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110037","WPR98",110037
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 112027","WPR98",112027
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119333","WPR98",119333
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148093","WPR98",148093
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151082","WPR98",151082
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151224","WPR98",151224
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159080","WPR98",159080
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161159","WPR98",161159
629,"Late Roman ladder enclosure recut","598 Late Romano-British",,"recut of late Roman ladder enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161164","WPR98",161164
630,"Middle Bronze Age  waterhole","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Middle Bronze Age  waterholes containing structured deposition or other unusual deposits.","ab","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 103040","WPR98",103040
630,"Middle Bronze Age  waterhole","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Middle Bronze Age  waterholes containing structured deposition or other unusual deposits.","ab","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961036","POK96",961036
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961040","POK96",961040
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961043","POK96",961043
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961044","POK96",961044
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961050","POK96",961050
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961121","POK96",961121
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961122","POK96",961122
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961124","POK96",961124
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961126","POK96",961126
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961133","POK96",961133
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961134","POK96",961134
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961502","POK96",961502
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961847","POK96",961847
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961855","POK96",961855
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961864","POK96",961864
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961874","POK96",961874
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961875","POK96",961875
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961959","POK96",961959
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962206","POK96",962206
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962327","POK96",962327
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963095","POK96",963095
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963150","POK96",963150
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110045","WPR98",110045
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111079","WPR98",111079
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111093","WPR98",111093
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 112044","WPR98",112044
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113074","WPR98",113074
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113076","WPR98",113076
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119119","WPR98",119119
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119125","WPR98",119125
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119230","WPR98",119230
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119262","WPR98",119262
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121110","WPR98",121110
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 123012","WPR98",123012
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129037","WPR98",129037
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 140047","WPR98",140047
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148183","WPR98",148183
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148189","WPR98",148189
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148191","WPR98",148191
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148199","WPR98",148199
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148201","WPR98",148201
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148237","WPR98",148237
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148240","WPR98",148240
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148242","WPR98",148242
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148244","WPR98",148244
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148255","WPR98",148255
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148257","WPR98",148257
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148259","WPR98",148259
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149110","WPR98",149110
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 155110","WPR98",155110
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157114","WPR98",157114
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160323","WPR98",160323
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160349","WPR98",160349
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160352","WPR98",160352
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160362","WPR98",160362
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 161170","WPR98",161170
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166065","WPR98",166065
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166119","WPR98",166119
631,"post-roman landscape","700 Medieval",,"Post roman landscape (basically all medieval stuff)","nc","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178086","WPR98",178086
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 212045","GAI99",212045
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107088","WPR98",107088
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111040","WPR98",111040
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129067","WPR98",129067
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151059","WPR98",151059
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151134","WPR98",151134
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151137","WPR98",151137
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151175","WPR98",151175
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151181","WPR98",151181
634,"Roman precursor to ladder enclosure system","515 Early Romano-British",,"RB enclosures possibly acting as forerunners to ladder enclosure of late C3 r C4. Dated to ?mid C2 or later through to Late C3","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160102","WPR98",160102
637,"Penannular Gully 17","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch in enclosure to south of main settlement.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 158160","WPR98",158160
637,"Penannular Gully 17","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch in enclosure to south of main settlement.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 158163","WPR98",158163
651,"Medieval post-hole arrangement","700 Medieval",,"These post holes would seem to form some type of fence structure/field boundary which runs in a west/east alignment to a possible connection with another series of post holes that may or may not be a part of the original group. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    This does not mean that there are no more to consider, however they may have been lost in the machining and therefore are lost. The closest relationship with these other post holes is 15.60m west, [571037], which in themselves constitute another alignment. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    To help in dating this line of postholes, it is important to note that in context (571007) there was found a single piece of Medieval pottery ,it`s weight was 4 grams, but it does help in dating at least one of the post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Looking at the larger narrative there are other postholes that may have to be included, though their pattern does not really correspond with this entity, mainly due to the irregular dispersed pattern. [573006]- (573007), [573008] - (573009) and [573014] - (573013). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    The setting for these post holes could relate to a field boundary system in the Middle Ages enabling the control of farm animals in a confined area. They may also imply a hwat is termed ' in field-out-field system ' of grazing, where cows, sheep and goats are kept in a field close to the farm for a number of months/years, then moved 'out' to other fields to allow the regeneration of these fields to re-establish themselves.","Barry Atkinson","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10011","PSH02 - 571004","PSH02",571004
651,"Medieval post-hole arrangement","700 Medieval",,"These post holes would seem to form some type of fence structure/field boundary which runs in a west/east alignment to a possible connection with another series of post holes that may or may not be a part of the original group. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    This does not mean that there are no more to consider, however they may have been lost in the machining and therefore are lost. The closest relationship with these other post holes is 15.60m west, [571037], which in themselves constitute another alignment. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    To help in dating this line of postholes, it is important to note that in context (571007) there was found a single piece of Medieval pottery ,it`s weight was 4 grams, but it does help in dating at least one of the post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Looking at the larger narrative there are other postholes that may have to be included, though their pattern does not really correspond with this entity, mainly due to the irregular dispersed pattern. [573006]- (573007), [573008] - (573009) and [573014] - (573013). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    The setting for these post holes could relate to a field boundary system in the Middle Ages enabling the control of farm animals in a confined area. They may also imply a hwat is termed ' in field-out-field system ' of grazing, where cows, sheep and goats are kept in a field close to the farm for a number of months/years, then moved 'out' to other fields to allow the regeneration of these fields to re-establish themselves.","Barry Atkinson","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10011","PSH02 - 571006","PSH02",571006
651,"Medieval post-hole arrangement","700 Medieval",,"These post holes would seem to form some type of fence structure/field boundary which runs in a west/east alignment to a possible connection with another series of post holes that may or may not be a part of the original group. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    This does not mean that there are no more to consider, however they may have been lost in the machining and therefore are lost. The closest relationship with these other post holes is 15.60m west, [571037], which in themselves constitute another alignment. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    To help in dating this line of postholes, it is important to note that in context (571007) there was found a single piece of Medieval pottery ,it`s weight was 4 grams, but it does help in dating at least one of the post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Looking at the larger narrative there are other postholes that may have to be included, though their pattern does not really correspond with this entity, mainly due to the irregular dispersed pattern. [573006]- (573007), [573008] - (573009) and [573014] - (573013). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    The setting for these post holes could relate to a field boundary system in the Middle Ages enabling the control of farm animals in a confined area. They may also imply a hwat is termed ' in field-out-field system ' of grazing, where cows, sheep and goats are kept in a field close to the farm for a number of months/years, then moved 'out' to other fields to allow the regeneration of these fields to re-establish themselves.","Barry Atkinson","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10011","PSH02 - 571008","PSH02",571008
651,"Medieval post-hole arrangement","700 Medieval",,"These post holes would seem to form some type of fence structure/field boundary which runs in a west/east alignment to a possible connection with another series of post holes that may or may not be a part of the original group. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    This does not mean that there are no more to consider, however they may have been lost in the machining and therefore are lost. The closest relationship with these other post holes is 15.60m west, [571037], which in themselves constitute another alignment. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    To help in dating this line of postholes, it is important to note that in context (571007) there was found a single piece of Medieval pottery ,it`s weight was 4 grams, but it does help in dating at least one of the post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Looking at the larger narrative there are other postholes that may have to be included, though their pattern does not really correspond with this entity, mainly due to the irregular dispersed pattern. [573006]- (573007), [573008] - (573009) and [573014] - (573013). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    The setting for these post holes could relate to a field boundary system in the Middle Ages enabling the control of farm animals in a confined area. They may also imply a hwat is termed ' in field-out-field system ' of grazing, where cows, sheep and goats are kept in a field close to the farm for a number of months/years, then moved 'out' to other fields to allow the regeneration of these fields to re-establish themselves.","Barry Atkinson","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10011","PSH02 - 571010","PSH02",571010
651,"Medieval post-hole arrangement","700 Medieval",,"These post holes would seem to form some type of fence structure/field boundary which runs in a west/east alignment to a possible connection with another series of post holes that may or may not be a part of the original group. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    This does not mean that there are no more to consider, however they may have been lost in the machining and therefore are lost. The closest relationship with these other post holes is 15.60m west, [571037], which in themselves constitute another alignment. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    To help in dating this line of postholes, it is important to note that in context (571007) there was found a single piece of Medieval pottery ,it`s weight was 4 grams, but it does help in dating at least one of the post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Looking at the larger narrative there are other postholes that may have to be included, though their pattern does not really correspond with this entity, mainly due to the irregular dispersed pattern. [573006]- (573007), [573008] - (573009) and [573014] - (573013). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    The setting for these post holes could relate to a field boundary system in the Middle Ages enabling the control of farm animals in a confined area. They may also imply a hwat is termed ' in field-out-field system ' of grazing, where cows, sheep and goats are kept in a field close to the farm for a number of months/years, then moved 'out' to other fields to allow the regeneration of these fields to re-establish themselves.","Barry Atkinson","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10011","PSH02 - 571012","PSH02",571012
651,"Medieval post-hole arrangement","700 Medieval",,"These post holes would seem to form some type of fence structure/field boundary which runs in a west/east alignment to a possible connection with another series of post holes that may or may not be a part of the original group. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    This does not mean that there are no more to consider, however they may have been lost in the machining and therefore are lost. The closest relationship with these other post holes is 15.60m west, [571037], which in themselves constitute another alignment. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    To help in dating this line of postholes, it is important to note that in context (571007) there was found a single piece of Medieval pottery ,it`s weight was 4 grams, but it does help in dating at least one of the post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Looking at the larger narrative there are other postholes that may have to be included, though their pattern does not really correspond with this entity, mainly due to the irregular dispersed pattern. [573006]- (573007), [573008] - (573009) and [573014] - (573013). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    The setting for these post holes could relate to a field boundary system in the Middle Ages enabling the control of farm animals in a confined area. They may also imply a hwat is termed ' in field-out-field system ' of grazing, where cows, sheep and goats are kept in a field close to the farm for a number of months/years, then moved 'out' to other fields to allow the regeneration of these fields to re-establish themselves.","Barry Atkinson","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10011","PSH02 - 571020","PSH02",571020
651,"Medieval post-hole arrangement","700 Medieval",,"These post holes would seem to form some type of fence structure/field boundary which runs in a west/east alignment to a possible connection with another series of post holes that may or may not be a part of the original group. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    This does not mean that there are no more to consider, however they may have been lost in the machining and therefore are lost. The closest relationship with these other post holes is 15.60m west, [571037], which in themselves constitute another alignment. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    To help in dating this line of postholes, it is important to note that in context (571007) there was found a single piece of Medieval pottery ,it`s weight was 4 grams, but it does help in dating at least one of the post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Looking at the larger narrative there are other postholes that may have to be included, though their pattern does not really correspond with this entity, mainly due to the irregular dispersed pattern. [573006]- (573007), [573008] - (573009) and [573014] - (573013). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    The setting for these post holes could relate to a field boundary system in the Middle Ages enabling the control of farm animals in a confined area. They may also imply a hwat is termed ' in field-out-field system ' of grazing, where cows, sheep and goats are kept in a field close to the farm for a number of months/years, then moved 'out' to other fields to allow the regeneration of these fields to re-establish themselves.","Barry Atkinson","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10011","PSH02 - 573006","PSH02",573006
651,"Medieval post-hole arrangement","700 Medieval",,"These post holes would seem to form some type of fence structure/field boundary which runs in a west/east alignment to a possible connection with another series of post holes that may or may not be a part of the original group. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    This does not mean that there are no more to consider, however they may have been lost in the machining and therefore are lost. The closest relationship with these other post holes is 15.60m west, [571037], which in themselves constitute another alignment. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    To help in dating this line of postholes, it is important to note that in context (571007) there was found a single piece of Medieval pottery ,it`s weight was 4 grams, but it does help in dating at least one of the post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Looking at the larger narrative there are other postholes that may have to be included, though their pattern does not really correspond with this entity, mainly due to the irregular dispersed pattern. [573006]- (573007), [573008] - (573009) and [573014] - (573013). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    The setting for these post holes could relate to a field boundary system in the Middle Ages enabling the control of farm animals in a confined area. They may also imply a hwat is termed ' in field-out-field system ' of grazing, where cows, sheep and goats are kept in a field close to the farm for a number of months/years, then moved 'out' to other fields to allow the regeneration of these fields to re-establish themselves.","Barry Atkinson","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10011","PSH02 - 573008","PSH02",573008
651,"Medieval post-hole arrangement","700 Medieval",,"These post holes would seem to form some type of fence structure/field boundary which runs in a west/east alignment to a possible connection with another series of post holes that may or may not be a part of the original group. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    This does not mean that there are no more to consider, however they may have been lost in the machining and therefore are lost. The closest relationship with these other post holes is 15.60m west, [571037], which in themselves constitute another alignment. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    To help in dating this line of postholes, it is important to note that in context (571007) there was found a single piece of Medieval pottery ,it`s weight was 4 grams, but it does help in dating at least one of the post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Looking at the larger narrative there are other postholes that may have to be included, though their pattern does not really correspond with this entity, mainly due to the irregular dispersed pattern. [573006]- (573007), [573008] - (573009) and [573014] - (573013). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    The setting for these post holes could relate to a field boundary system in the Middle Ages enabling the control of farm animals in a confined area. They may also imply a hwat is termed ' in field-out-field system ' of grazing, where cows, sheep and goats are kept in a field close to the farm for a number of months/years, then moved 'out' to other fields to allow the regeneration of these fields to re-establish themselves.","Barry Atkinson","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10011","PSH02 - 573014","PSH02",573014
652,"medieval fenceline","700 Medieval",,"This entity is associated with the Medieval field system found in Area 51, and which can be found on the 1767 Rocque map ( see additional sheet). Can also, I think, be associated with entity 10011. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Postholes [571055] and [571051] and [571027] and [571029] all run very closely along length of ditch SG [571061]. I would say that the postholes, though fairly shallow, form the foundations of a fencing system, a system very likley associated with entity 10011, another collection of associated post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    On context sheet [571055] it is hoped that the postholes were dug probably when the ditch began to silt up, and that the ditch was still remaining when they were dug so close (in other words the ditch was still in use). I think this is a fairly intriquing factor; if the ditch is falling into disrepair, why go to all the time and effort to re-cut and strengthen the ditch when one can simply errect a simple fencing system, especially if times become hard. A controlling fence to control movement of livestock would seem to indicate a greater desire to control and manage the livestock, and the question why is fairly valid to answer with such a consideration as economic hardship. It is worth bearing in mind that the field system was extended with further ditches SGs [575090] and [575092] **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    It is worth noting that the two post holes are cut close to the ditch, whereas the two post holes towards the terminus fan away from the ditch (see sketch). Is the projected fence there to prevent livestock from further disturbing ditch? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Original survey of area indicated more postholes, though these seem to have been disproved on excavation, features did not exist. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Another possible explanation is that postholes could be a re-establishment of a previous field boundary which had fallen out of use; a re-usage of the land at a later time.","JT","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10012","PSH02 - 571027","PSH02",571027
652,"medieval fenceline","700 Medieval",,"This entity is associated with the Medieval field system found in Area 51, and which can be found on the 1767 Rocque map ( see additional sheet). Can also, I think, be associated with entity 10011. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Postholes [571055] and [571051] and [571027] and [571029] all run very closely along length of ditch SG [571061]. I would say that the postholes, though fairly shallow, form the foundations of a fencing system, a system very likley associated with entity 10011, another collection of associated post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    On context sheet [571055] it is hoped that the postholes were dug probably when the ditch began to silt up, and that the ditch was still remaining when they were dug so close (in other words the ditch was still in use). I think this is a fairly intriquing factor; if the ditch is falling into disrepair, why go to all the time and effort to re-cut and strengthen the ditch when one can simply errect a simple fencing system, especially if times become hard. A controlling fence to control movement of livestock would seem to indicate a greater desire to control and manage the livestock, and the question why is fairly valid to answer with such a consideration as economic hardship. It is worth bearing in mind that the field system was extended with further ditches SGs [575090] and [575092] **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    It is worth noting that the two post holes are cut close to the ditch, whereas the two post holes towards the terminus fan away from the ditch (see sketch). Is the projected fence there to prevent livestock from further disturbing ditch? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Original survey of area indicated more postholes, though these seem to have been disproved on excavation, features did not exist. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Another possible explanation is that postholes could be a re-establishment of a previous field boundary which had fallen out of use; a re-usage of the land at a later time.","JT","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10012","PSH02 - 571029","PSH02",571029
652,"medieval fenceline","700 Medieval",,"This entity is associated with the Medieval field system found in Area 51, and which can be found on the 1767 Rocque map ( see additional sheet). Can also, I think, be associated with entity 10011. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Postholes [571055] and [571051] and [571027] and [571029] all run very closely along length of ditch SG [571061]. I would say that the postholes, though fairly shallow, form the foundations of a fencing system, a system very likley associated with entity 10011, another collection of associated post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    On context sheet [571055] it is hoped that the postholes were dug probably when the ditch began to silt up, and that the ditch was still remaining when they were dug so close (in other words the ditch was still in use). I think this is a fairly intriquing factor; if the ditch is falling into disrepair, why go to all the time and effort to re-cut and strengthen the ditch when one can simply errect a simple fencing system, especially if times become hard. A controlling fence to control movement of livestock would seem to indicate a greater desire to control and manage the livestock, and the question why is fairly valid to answer with such a consideration as economic hardship. It is worth bearing in mind that the field system was extended with further ditches SGs [575090] and [575092] **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    It is worth noting that the two post holes are cut close to the ditch, whereas the two post holes towards the terminus fan away from the ditch (see sketch). Is the projected fence there to prevent livestock from further disturbing ditch? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Original survey of area indicated more postholes, though these seem to have been disproved on excavation, features did not exist. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Another possible explanation is that postholes could be a re-establishment of a previous field boundary which had fallen out of use; a re-usage of the land at a later time.","JT","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10012","PSH02 - 571051","PSH02",571051
652,"medieval fenceline","700 Medieval",,"This entity is associated with the Medieval field system found in Area 51, and which can be found on the 1767 Rocque map ( see additional sheet). Can also, I think, be associated with entity 10011. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Postholes [571055] and [571051] and [571027] and [571029] all run very closely along length of ditch SG [571061]. I would say that the postholes, though fairly shallow, form the foundations of a fencing system, a system very likley associated with entity 10011, another collection of associated post holes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    On context sheet [571055] it is hoped that the postholes were dug probably when the ditch began to silt up, and that the ditch was still remaining when they were dug so close (in other words the ditch was still in use). I think this is a fairly intriquing factor; if the ditch is falling into disrepair, why go to all the time and effort to re-cut and strengthen the ditch when one can simply errect a simple fencing system, especially if times become hard. A controlling fence to control movement of livestock would seem to indicate a greater desire to control and manage the livestock, and the question why is fairly valid to answer with such a consideration as economic hardship. It is worth bearing in mind that the field system was extended with further ditches SGs [575090] and [575092] **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    It is worth noting that the two post holes are cut close to the ditch, whereas the two post holes towards the terminus fan away from the ditch (see sketch). Is the projected fence there to prevent livestock from further disturbing ditch? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Original survey of area indicated more postholes, though these seem to have been disproved on excavation, features did not exist. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**    Another possible explanation is that postholes could be a re-establishment of a previous field boundary which had fallen out of use; a re-usage of the land at a later time.","JT","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10012","PSH02 - 571055","PSH02",571055
654,"Middle/Late  Iron Age Enclosure EC6","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Enclosure associated with MIA roundhouse - appears to cut the backfilled ring gully.","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 167037","WPR98",167037
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636130","PSH02",636130
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636133","PSH02",636133
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663108","PSH02",663108
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663113","PSH02",663113
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107100","WPR98",107100
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107101","WPR98",107101
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108008","WPR98",108008
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108011","WPR98",108011
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108014","WPR98",108014
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113114","WPR98",113114
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113173","WPR98",113173
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137103","WPR98",137103
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140084","WPR98",140084
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155095","WPR98",155095
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158143","WPR98",158143
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158148","WPR98",158148
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 184026","WPR98",184026
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 184028","WPR98",184028
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 184030","WPR98",184030
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 184032","WPR98",184032
656,"Middle Iron Age ring gullies group c","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gullies with diameter between 14 and 16 m (not the hengiform)","nc","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 184034","WPR98",184034
657,"Bronze Age ditches on the Northern Taxiway","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Excavation","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212055","GAI99",212055
657,"Bronze Age ditches on the Northern Taxiway","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Excavation","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214075","GAI99",214075
657,"Bronze Age ditches on the Northern Taxiway","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Excavation","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218004","GAI99",218004
657,"Bronze Age ditches on the Northern Taxiway","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Excavation","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
657,"Bronze Age ditches on the Northern Taxiway","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Excavation","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218023","GAI99",218023
657,"Bronze Age ditches on the Northern Taxiway","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Excavation","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
657,"Bronze Age ditches on the Northern Taxiway","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Excavation","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218058","GAI99",218058
657,"Bronze Age ditches on the Northern Taxiway","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Excavation","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218066","GAI99",218066
662,"Tree throw hedgeline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Tree throw hedgeline. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is formed by a series of treethrows running along the same alignment as ditches SG [575129] and [511089].  Both these ditches terminate and the tree throws and a linear form a line of features in the landscape, linking the ditch features in the landscape, linking the ditch termini.  I think therefore that these features can be banded together into an entity, associated with the bronze age field system which SG's [573052] [575129] and [511089].  All features run in a NW-SE alignment between the two ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although we refer to such features as tree throws this was their final function.  These tree throws appeared to once have a living, functioning role in the landscape.  They were initally incorporated into the field system as part of the land boundary.  Tree throws [541023] and [541021] are both part of this usage, felled at a later date once field system fell out of use.  If these trees weren't deliberately planted then it could well be that the field system was dug with respect for these natural features, incorporating natural forms into the enclosure of the landscape.  If we accept this interpretation then the landscape is consciously being appropriated and utilised as a form of control. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A number of the features raise certain questions as to this theory.  Tree throw [541031] actually cuts a Bronze Age ditch.  This tree was thus deliberately placed, it can be suggested, which rather alters the emphasis of land usage.  The other Bronze Age fatures such as linear [541030] seem to respect it; they do not cut it.  It could well be that the tree was placed here to reinforce the natural/manmade boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** However, this is not uniformly the case, with linear [541041] cutting a number of tree throws, their cuts being [541041] and [541039].  For some reason these were not considered necessary/useful and a short linear feature was dug.  Is it possible that certain kinds of trees were being used in a more symbolic/ritual form? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As to the more practical uses of the trees, it is difficult to say that the they were to keep animal in/out and there is no evidence of posts of stakeholes for a fencing.  Is it that the line of trees were used a rudimentary sighting posts? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In summary we can say that the bronze age field system respects a possibly natural line of trees with some deliberate cultivation ie tree throw [541037].  As to their usage, this is open to question - they could simply be markers in the landscape or possibly fulfilling a more definate role such as a land boundary.  Would the gaps formed between trees have been utilized for control/movement of livestock during herding? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note: Two features that could have been included into the entity were either not excavated due to lack of time or that upon excavation they turned out to be nothing.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,"10013","PSH02 - 511089","PSH02",511089
662,"Tree throw hedgeline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Tree throw hedgeline. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is formed by a series of treethrows running along the same alignment as ditches SG [575129] and [511089].  Both these ditches terminate and the tree throws and a linear form a line of features in the landscape, linking the ditch features in the landscape, linking the ditch termini.  I think therefore that these features can be banded together into an entity, associated with the bronze age field system which SG's [573052] [575129] and [511089].  All features run in a NW-SE alignment between the two ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although we refer to such features as tree throws this was their final function.  These tree throws appeared to once have a living, functioning role in the landscape.  They were initally incorporated into the field system as part of the land boundary.  Tree throws [541023] and [541021] are both part of this usage, felled at a later date once field system fell out of use.  If these trees weren't deliberately planted then it could well be that the field system was dug with respect for these natural features, incorporating natural forms into the enclosure of the landscape.  If we accept this interpretation then the landscape is consciously being appropriated and utilised as a form of control. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A number of the features raise certain questions as to this theory.  Tree throw [541031] actually cuts a Bronze Age ditch.  This tree was thus deliberately placed, it can be suggested, which rather alters the emphasis of land usage.  The other Bronze Age fatures such as linear [541030] seem to respect it; they do not cut it.  It could well be that the tree was placed here to reinforce the natural/manmade boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** However, this is not uniformly the case, with linear [541041] cutting a number of tree throws, their cuts being [541041] and [541039].  For some reason these were not considered necessary/useful and a short linear feature was dug.  Is it possible that certain kinds of trees were being used in a more symbolic/ritual form? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As to the more practical uses of the trees, it is difficult to say that the they were to keep animal in/out and there is no evidence of posts of stakeholes for a fencing.  Is it that the line of trees were used a rudimentary sighting posts? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In summary we can say that the bronze age field system respects a possibly natural line of trees with some deliberate cultivation ie tree throw [541037].  As to their usage, this is open to question - they could simply be markers in the landscape or possibly fulfilling a more definate role such as a land boundary.  Would the gaps formed between trees have been utilized for control/movement of livestock during herding? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note: Two features that could have been included into the entity were either not excavated due to lack of time or that upon excavation they turned out to be nothing.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,"10013","PSH02 - 541021","PSH02",541021
662,"Tree throw hedgeline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Tree throw hedgeline. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is formed by a series of treethrows running along the same alignment as ditches SG [575129] and [511089].  Both these ditches terminate and the tree throws and a linear form a line of features in the landscape, linking the ditch features in the landscape, linking the ditch termini.  I think therefore that these features can be banded together into an entity, associated with the bronze age field system which SG's [573052] [575129] and [511089].  All features run in a NW-SE alignment between the two ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although we refer to such features as tree throws this was their final function.  These tree throws appeared to once have a living, functioning role in the landscape.  They were initally incorporated into the field system as part of the land boundary.  Tree throws [541023] and [541021] are both part of this usage, felled at a later date once field system fell out of use.  If these trees weren't deliberately planted then it could well be that the field system was dug with respect for these natural features, incorporating natural forms into the enclosure of the landscape.  If we accept this interpretation then the landscape is consciously being appropriated and utilised as a form of control. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A number of the features raise certain questions as to this theory.  Tree throw [541031] actually cuts a Bronze Age ditch.  This tree was thus deliberately placed, it can be suggested, which rather alters the emphasis of land usage.  The other Bronze Age fatures such as linear [541030] seem to respect it; they do not cut it.  It could well be that the tree was placed here to reinforce the natural/manmade boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** However, this is not uniformly the case, with linear [541041] cutting a number of tree throws, their cuts being [541041] and [541039].  For some reason these were not considered necessary/useful and a short linear feature was dug.  Is it possible that certain kinds of trees were being used in a more symbolic/ritual form? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As to the more practical uses of the trees, it is difficult to say that the they were to keep animal in/out and there is no evidence of posts of stakeholes for a fencing.  Is it that the line of trees were used a rudimentary sighting posts? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In summary we can say that the bronze age field system respects a possibly natural line of trees with some deliberate cultivation ie tree throw [541037].  As to their usage, this is open to question - they could simply be markers in the landscape or possibly fulfilling a more definate role such as a land boundary.  Would the gaps formed between trees have been utilized for control/movement of livestock during herding? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note: Two features that could have been included into the entity were either not excavated due to lack of time or that upon excavation they turned out to be nothing.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,"10013","PSH02 - 541023","PSH02",541023
662,"Tree throw hedgeline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Tree throw hedgeline. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is formed by a series of treethrows running along the same alignment as ditches SG [575129] and [511089].  Both these ditches terminate and the tree throws and a linear form a line of features in the landscape, linking the ditch features in the landscape, linking the ditch termini.  I think therefore that these features can be banded together into an entity, associated with the bronze age field system which SG's [573052] [575129] and [511089].  All features run in a NW-SE alignment between the two ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although we refer to such features as tree throws this was their final function.  These tree throws appeared to once have a living, functioning role in the landscape.  They were initally incorporated into the field system as part of the land boundary.  Tree throws [541023] and [541021] are both part of this usage, felled at a later date once field system fell out of use.  If these trees weren't deliberately planted then it could well be that the field system was dug with respect for these natural features, incorporating natural forms into the enclosure of the landscape.  If we accept this interpretation then the landscape is consciously being appropriated and utilised as a form of control. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A number of the features raise certain questions as to this theory.  Tree throw [541031] actually cuts a Bronze Age ditch.  This tree was thus deliberately placed, it can be suggested, which rather alters the emphasis of land usage.  The other Bronze Age fatures such as linear [541030] seem to respect it; they do not cut it.  It could well be that the tree was placed here to reinforce the natural/manmade boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** However, this is not uniformly the case, with linear [541041] cutting a number of tree throws, their cuts being [541041] and [541039].  For some reason these were not considered necessary/useful and a short linear feature was dug.  Is it possible that certain kinds of trees were being used in a more symbolic/ritual form? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As to the more practical uses of the trees, it is difficult to say that the they were to keep animal in/out and there is no evidence of posts of stakeholes for a fencing.  Is it that the line of trees were used a rudimentary sighting posts? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In summary we can say that the bronze age field system respects a possibly natural line of trees with some deliberate cultivation ie tree throw [541037].  As to their usage, this is open to question - they could simply be markers in the landscape or possibly fulfilling a more definate role such as a land boundary.  Would the gaps formed between trees have been utilized for control/movement of livestock during herding? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note: Two features that could have been included into the entity were either not excavated due to lack of time or that upon excavation they turned out to be nothing.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,"10013","PSH02 - 541030","PSH02",541030
662,"Tree throw hedgeline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Tree throw hedgeline. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is formed by a series of treethrows running along the same alignment as ditches SG [575129] and [511089].  Both these ditches terminate and the tree throws and a linear form a line of features in the landscape, linking the ditch features in the landscape, linking the ditch termini.  I think therefore that these features can be banded together into an entity, associated with the bronze age field system which SG's [573052] [575129] and [511089].  All features run in a NW-SE alignment between the two ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although we refer to such features as tree throws this was their final function.  These tree throws appeared to once have a living, functioning role in the landscape.  They were initally incorporated into the field system as part of the land boundary.  Tree throws [541023] and [541021] are both part of this usage, felled at a later date once field system fell out of use.  If these trees weren't deliberately planted then it could well be that the field system was dug with respect for these natural features, incorporating natural forms into the enclosure of the landscape.  If we accept this interpretation then the landscape is consciously being appropriated and utilised as a form of control. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A number of the features raise certain questions as to this theory.  Tree throw [541031] actually cuts a Bronze Age ditch.  This tree was thus deliberately placed, it can be suggested, which rather alters the emphasis of land usage.  The other Bronze Age fatures such as linear [541030] seem to respect it; they do not cut it.  It could well be that the tree was placed here to reinforce the natural/manmade boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** However, this is not uniformly the case, with linear [541041] cutting a number of tree throws, their cuts being [541041] and [541039].  For some reason these were not considered necessary/useful and a short linear feature was dug.  Is it possible that certain kinds of trees were being used in a more symbolic/ritual form? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As to the more practical uses of the trees, it is difficult to say that the they were to keep animal in/out and there is no evidence of posts of stakeholes for a fencing.  Is it that the line of trees were used a rudimentary sighting posts? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In summary we can say that the bronze age field system respects a possibly natural line of trees with some deliberate cultivation ie tree throw [541037].  As to their usage, this is open to question - they could simply be markers in the landscape or possibly fulfilling a more definate role such as a land boundary.  Would the gaps formed between trees have been utilized for control/movement of livestock during herding? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note: Two features that could have been included into the entity were either not excavated due to lack of time or that upon excavation they turned out to be nothing.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,"10013","PSH02 - 541037","PSH02",541037
662,"Tree throw hedgeline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Tree throw hedgeline. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is formed by a series of treethrows running along the same alignment as ditches SG [575129] and [511089].  Both these ditches terminate and the tree throws and a linear form a line of features in the landscape, linking the ditch features in the landscape, linking the ditch termini.  I think therefore that these features can be banded together into an entity, associated with the bronze age field system which SG's [573052] [575129] and [511089].  All features run in a NW-SE alignment between the two ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although we refer to such features as tree throws this was their final function.  These tree throws appeared to once have a living, functioning role in the landscape.  They were initally incorporated into the field system as part of the land boundary.  Tree throws [541023] and [541021] are both part of this usage, felled at a later date once field system fell out of use.  If these trees weren't deliberately planted then it could well be that the field system was dug with respect for these natural features, incorporating natural forms into the enclosure of the landscape.  If we accept this interpretation then the landscape is consciously being appropriated and utilised as a form of control. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A number of the features raise certain questions as to this theory.  Tree throw [541031] actually cuts a Bronze Age ditch.  This tree was thus deliberately placed, it can be suggested, which rather alters the emphasis of land usage.  The other Bronze Age fatures such as linear [541030] seem to respect it; they do not cut it.  It could well be that the tree was placed here to reinforce the natural/manmade boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** However, this is not uniformly the case, with linear [541041] cutting a number of tree throws, their cuts being [541041] and [541039].  For some reason these were not considered necessary/useful and a short linear feature was dug.  Is it possible that certain kinds of trees were being used in a more symbolic/ritual form? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As to the more practical uses of the trees, it is difficult to say that the they were to keep animal in/out and there is no evidence of posts of stakeholes for a fencing.  Is it that the line of trees were used a rudimentary sighting posts? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In summary we can say that the bronze age field system respects a possibly natural line of trees with some deliberate cultivation ie tree throw [541037].  As to their usage, this is open to question - they could simply be markers in the landscape or possibly fulfilling a more definate role such as a land boundary.  Would the gaps formed between trees have been utilized for control/movement of livestock during herding? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note: Two features that could have been included into the entity were either not excavated due to lack of time or that upon excavation they turned out to be nothing.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,"10013","PSH02 - 573052","PSH02",573052
662,"Tree throw hedgeline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Tree throw hedgeline. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is formed by a series of treethrows running along the same alignment as ditches SG [575129] and [511089].  Both these ditches terminate and the tree throws and a linear form a line of features in the landscape, linking the ditch features in the landscape, linking the ditch termini.  I think therefore that these features can be banded together into an entity, associated with the bronze age field system which SG's [573052] [575129] and [511089].  All features run in a NW-SE alignment between the two ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although we refer to such features as tree throws this was their final function.  These tree throws appeared to once have a living, functioning role in the landscape.  They were initally incorporated into the field system as part of the land boundary.  Tree throws [541023] and [541021] are both part of this usage, felled at a later date once field system fell out of use.  If these trees weren't deliberately planted then it could well be that the field system was dug with respect for these natural features, incorporating natural forms into the enclosure of the landscape.  If we accept this interpretation then the landscape is consciously being appropriated and utilised as a form of control. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A number of the features raise certain questions as to this theory.  Tree throw [541031] actually cuts a Bronze Age ditch.  This tree was thus deliberately placed, it can be suggested, which rather alters the emphasis of land usage.  The other Bronze Age fatures such as linear [541030] seem to respect it; they do not cut it.  It could well be that the tree was placed here to reinforce the natural/manmade boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** However, this is not uniformly the case, with linear [541041] cutting a number of tree throws, their cuts being [541041] and [541039].  For some reason these were not considered necessary/useful and a short linear feature was dug.  Is it possible that certain kinds of trees were being used in a more symbolic/ritual form? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As to the more practical uses of the trees, it is difficult to say that the they were to keep animal in/out and there is no evidence of posts of stakeholes for a fencing.  Is it that the line of trees were used a rudimentary sighting posts? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In summary we can say that the bronze age field system respects a possibly natural line of trees with some deliberate cultivation ie tree throw [541037].  As to their usage, this is open to question - they could simply be markers in the landscape or possibly fulfilling a more definate role such as a land boundary.  Would the gaps formed between trees have been utilized for control/movement of livestock during herding? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note: Two features that could have been included into the entity were either not excavated due to lack of time or that upon excavation they turned out to be nothing.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,"10013","PSH02 - 575129","PSH02",575129
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 511089","PSH02",511089
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 511116","PSH02",511116
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541021","PSH02",541021
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541023","PSH02",541023
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541030","PSH02",541030
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541121","PSH02",541121
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 558072","PSH02",558072
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 559181","PSH02",559181
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 559357","PSH02",559357
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 559361","PSH02",559361
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 559368","PSH02",559368
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 559372","PSH02",559372
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 572041","PSH02",572041
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 573038","PSH02",573038
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 573042","PSH02",573042
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 573052","PSH02",573052
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575129","PSH02",575129
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 621190","PSH02",621190
663,"Bronze Age Field System 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a series of ditches forming at least two fields or enclosures in Area 51.  Some of the dating evidence implies that this field system was constructed quite early, perhaps in the Early Bronze Age.  If indeed this group of fields was created in the EBA, this provides good evidence for the emergence of field systems prior to the MBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 621192","PSH02",621192
664,"Structure","715 Early Medieval",,"layers (553033), (553034), (553038), (553039), (553045), (553046), (553047) should also be on the list of constituent feature numbers, but the data base would not accept them because they are apparently not on the list. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The entity consists of three post pits and  abeam slot, which are thought to be related.  Though they are of uncertain function, they may have formed a structure of some kind.   **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are cut by a Medieval ditch SG [560023].  This ditch is possibly enclosing the ten- and twelve-post structures.  The ditch could possible be contemporary with the structures or encloses them later.  If they are later they clearly reference the structures and may likewise be referencing this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The beamslot is 3.40m long and on average 0.80m wide.  The beam slot SG [560027] contains SG [560026], SG [560025] and OG [560020].  Due to truncation by ditch [560023], the beamslot is on average 0.40m deep but was likely to have been much deeper.  It is unknown how large the beam would have been.  The beam slot is 12m away from [553032], the nearest pit. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The three post pits are all of a similar size and dimension, and all appear to have been robbed out, [553032] to the East and [553037]/[553044] to the South.  They are on average 1.50m in diameter and around 1m deep.  All three contain post pipes (553034)/(553046)/(553038) though some are clearer to see than others (this is partly caused by the robber cuts).  The three posts are evenly spaced (or would have been save for the robber cuts), and are 2.40m apart. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**     Most of the possibly related features were excavated and did not appear to be related to this entity in their form and nature.  Some features were left unexcavated and could potentially have been related.  However, due to depth and clear nature of the feature fills, which was completely different to the unexcavated features, it seems unlikely that they were related. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The function of this entity is not certain.  It is possible that these features may have been some kind of fence posts.  These could have either been associated with the 10/12-post structures, or possible with a precursor to the ditch [560023].  It is also possible that this entity was some kind of structure precursing the 10/12-post structures in this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 512 says:  the posts in this entity were of a similar form both in dimension and profile as those found to constitute the 10-post structure (Entity 10014) and the 12-post structure.  Although it is not possible to prove that the 'beam slot' is part of the same structural system or post pits 553032/553037/553044, but for the purposes of describing their associationwith rectilinear ditch SG [560123] they have been provisionally linked together.  As the 12-post structure (Entity 10022) was mostly concealed within brickearth spreads, it is possible that further associated slots or pits with Entity 10018 could also have been missed in such a way.  The main point of this Entity as far as interpretation is concerned relates to the fact that it doesreflect a phase pre-dating the insertion of the 12th c. rectilinear ditch/enclosure SG [560023].  This may indicate a contemporary structural grouping with Entities 10014, 10022 and 10002, forming a potential for a Saxo-Norman (??)/End 11th c. collection of buildings across Area 49 with possible links with pits [546065] and [546066], which may or may not have been formalised for storage.  It is dubious whether we can interpret these features any further and if indeed [560027] is indeed a beam-slot.  If not it is likely to be formed by intercutting post-pits as it is surely structural.","howard brown","Excavation","Monument",,"10018","PSH02 - 553032","PSH02",553032
664,"Structure","715 Early Medieval",,"layers (553033), (553034), (553038), (553039), (553045), (553046), (553047) should also be on the list of constituent feature numbers, but the data base would not accept them because they are apparently not on the list. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The entity consists of three post pits and  abeam slot, which are thought to be related.  Though they are of uncertain function, they may have formed a structure of some kind.   **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are cut by a Medieval ditch SG [560023].  This ditch is possibly enclosing the ten- and twelve-post structures.  The ditch could possible be contemporary with the structures or encloses them later.  If they are later they clearly reference the structures and may likewise be referencing this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The beamslot is 3.40m long and on average 0.80m wide.  The beam slot SG [560027] contains SG [560026], SG [560025] and OG [560020].  Due to truncation by ditch [560023], the beamslot is on average 0.40m deep but was likely to have been much deeper.  It is unknown how large the beam would have been.  The beam slot is 12m away from [553032], the nearest pit. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The three post pits are all of a similar size and dimension, and all appear to have been robbed out, [553032] to the East and [553037]/[553044] to the South.  They are on average 1.50m in diameter and around 1m deep.  All three contain post pipes (553034)/(553046)/(553038) though some are clearer to see than others (this is partly caused by the robber cuts).  The three posts are evenly spaced (or would have been save for the robber cuts), and are 2.40m apart. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**     Most of the possibly related features were excavated and did not appear to be related to this entity in their form and nature.  Some features were left unexcavated and could potentially have been related.  However, due to depth and clear nature of the feature fills, which was completely different to the unexcavated features, it seems unlikely that they were related. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The function of this entity is not certain.  It is possible that these features may have been some kind of fence posts.  These could have either been associated with the 10/12-post structures, or possible with a precursor to the ditch [560023].  It is also possible that this entity was some kind of structure precursing the 10/12-post structures in this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 512 says:  the posts in this entity were of a similar form both in dimension and profile as those found to constitute the 10-post structure (Entity 10014) and the 12-post structure.  Although it is not possible to prove that the 'beam slot' is part of the same structural system or post pits 553032/553037/553044, but for the purposes of describing their associationwith rectilinear ditch SG [560123] they have been provisionally linked together.  As the 12-post structure (Entity 10022) was mostly concealed within brickearth spreads, it is possible that further associated slots or pits with Entity 10018 could also have been missed in such a way.  The main point of this Entity as far as interpretation is concerned relates to the fact that it doesreflect a phase pre-dating the insertion of the 12th c. rectilinear ditch/enclosure SG [560023].  This may indicate a contemporary structural grouping with Entities 10014, 10022 and 10002, forming a potential for a Saxo-Norman (??)/End 11th c. collection of buildings across Area 49 with possible links with pits [546065] and [546066], which may or may not have been formalised for storage.  It is dubious whether we can interpret these features any further and if indeed [560027] is indeed a beam-slot.  If not it is likely to be formed by intercutting post-pits as it is surely structural.","howard brown","Excavation","Monument",,"10018","PSH02 - 553037","PSH02",553037
664,"Structure","715 Early Medieval",,"layers (553033), (553034), (553038), (553039), (553045), (553046), (553047) should also be on the list of constituent feature numbers, but the data base would not accept them because they are apparently not on the list. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The entity consists of three post pits and  abeam slot, which are thought to be related.  Though they are of uncertain function, they may have formed a structure of some kind.   **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are cut by a Medieval ditch SG [560023].  This ditch is possibly enclosing the ten- and twelve-post structures.  The ditch could possible be contemporary with the structures or encloses them later.  If they are later they clearly reference the structures and may likewise be referencing this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The beamslot is 3.40m long and on average 0.80m wide.  The beam slot SG [560027] contains SG [560026], SG [560025] and OG [560020].  Due to truncation by ditch [560023], the beamslot is on average 0.40m deep but was likely to have been much deeper.  It is unknown how large the beam would have been.  The beam slot is 12m away from [553032], the nearest pit. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The three post pits are all of a similar size and dimension, and all appear to have been robbed out, [553032] to the East and [553037]/[553044] to the South.  They are on average 1.50m in diameter and around 1m deep.  All three contain post pipes (553034)/(553046)/(553038) though some are clearer to see than others (this is partly caused by the robber cuts).  The three posts are evenly spaced (or would have been save for the robber cuts), and are 2.40m apart. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**     Most of the possibly related features were excavated and did not appear to be related to this entity in their form and nature.  Some features were left unexcavated and could potentially have been related.  However, due to depth and clear nature of the feature fills, which was completely different to the unexcavated features, it seems unlikely that they were related. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The function of this entity is not certain.  It is possible that these features may have been some kind of fence posts.  These could have either been associated with the 10/12-post structures, or possible with a precursor to the ditch [560023].  It is also possible that this entity was some kind of structure precursing the 10/12-post structures in this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 512 says:  the posts in this entity were of a similar form both in dimension and profile as those found to constitute the 10-post structure (Entity 10014) and the 12-post structure.  Although it is not possible to prove that the 'beam slot' is part of the same structural system or post pits 553032/553037/553044, but for the purposes of describing their associationwith rectilinear ditch SG [560123] they have been provisionally linked together.  As the 12-post structure (Entity 10022) was mostly concealed within brickearth spreads, it is possible that further associated slots or pits with Entity 10018 could also have been missed in such a way.  The main point of this Entity as far as interpretation is concerned relates to the fact that it doesreflect a phase pre-dating the insertion of the 12th c. rectilinear ditch/enclosure SG [560023].  This may indicate a contemporary structural grouping with Entities 10014, 10022 and 10002, forming a potential for a Saxo-Norman (??)/End 11th c. collection of buildings across Area 49 with possible links with pits [546065] and [546066], which may or may not have been formalised for storage.  It is dubious whether we can interpret these features any further and if indeed [560027] is indeed a beam-slot.  If not it is likely to be formed by intercutting post-pits as it is surely structural.","howard brown","Excavation","Monument",,"10018","PSH02 - 553044","PSH02",553044
664,"Structure","715 Early Medieval",,"layers (553033), (553034), (553038), (553039), (553045), (553046), (553047) should also be on the list of constituent feature numbers, but the data base would not accept them because they are apparently not on the list. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The entity consists of three post pits and  abeam slot, which are thought to be related.  Though they are of uncertain function, they may have formed a structure of some kind.   **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are cut by a Medieval ditch SG [560023].  This ditch is possibly enclosing the ten- and twelve-post structures.  The ditch could possible be contemporary with the structures or encloses them later.  If they are later they clearly reference the structures and may likewise be referencing this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The beamslot is 3.40m long and on average 0.80m wide.  The beam slot SG [560027] contains SG [560026], SG [560025] and OG [560020].  Due to truncation by ditch [560023], the beamslot is on average 0.40m deep but was likely to have been much deeper.  It is unknown how large the beam would have been.  The beam slot is 12m away from [553032], the nearest pit. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The three post pits are all of a similar size and dimension, and all appear to have been robbed out, [553032] to the East and [553037]/[553044] to the South.  They are on average 1.50m in diameter and around 1m deep.  All three contain post pipes (553034)/(553046)/(553038) though some are clearer to see than others (this is partly caused by the robber cuts).  The three posts are evenly spaced (or would have been save for the robber cuts), and are 2.40m apart. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**     Most of the possibly related features were excavated and did not appear to be related to this entity in their form and nature.  Some features were left unexcavated and could potentially have been related.  However, due to depth and clear nature of the feature fills, which was completely different to the unexcavated features, it seems unlikely that they were related. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The function of this entity is not certain.  It is possible that these features may have been some kind of fence posts.  These could have either been associated with the 10/12-post structures, or possible with a precursor to the ditch [560023].  It is also possible that this entity was some kind of structure precursing the 10/12-post structures in this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 512 says:  the posts in this entity were of a similar form both in dimension and profile as those found to constitute the 10-post structure (Entity 10014) and the 12-post structure.  Although it is not possible to prove that the 'beam slot' is part of the same structural system or post pits 553032/553037/553044, but for the purposes of describing their associationwith rectilinear ditch SG [560123] they have been provisionally linked together.  As the 12-post structure (Entity 10022) was mostly concealed within brickearth spreads, it is possible that further associated slots or pits with Entity 10018 could also have been missed in such a way.  The main point of this Entity as far as interpretation is concerned relates to the fact that it doesreflect a phase pre-dating the insertion of the 12th c. rectilinear ditch/enclosure SG [560023].  This may indicate a contemporary structural grouping with Entities 10014, 10022 and 10002, forming a potential for a Saxo-Norman (??)/End 11th c. collection of buildings across Area 49 with possible links with pits [546065] and [546066], which may or may not have been formalised for storage.  It is dubious whether we can interpret these features any further and if indeed [560027] is indeed a beam-slot.  If not it is likely to be formed by intercutting post-pits as it is surely structural.","howard brown","Excavation","Monument",,"10018",,"PSH02",560025
664,"Structure","715 Early Medieval",,"layers (553033), (553034), (553038), (553039), (553045), (553046), (553047) should also be on the list of constituent feature numbers, but the data base would not accept them because they are apparently not on the list. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The entity consists of three post pits and  abeam slot, which are thought to be related.  Though they are of uncertain function, they may have formed a structure of some kind.   **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are cut by a Medieval ditch SG [560023].  This ditch is possibly enclosing the ten- and twelve-post structures.  The ditch could possible be contemporary with the structures or encloses them later.  If they are later they clearly reference the structures and may likewise be referencing this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The beamslot is 3.40m long and on average 0.80m wide.  The beam slot SG [560027] contains SG [560026], SG [560025] and OG [560020].  Due to truncation by ditch [560023], the beamslot is on average 0.40m deep but was likely to have been much deeper.  It is unknown how large the beam would have been.  The beam slot is 12m away from [553032], the nearest pit. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The three post pits are all of a similar size and dimension, and all appear to have been robbed out, [553032] to the East and [553037]/[553044] to the South.  They are on average 1.50m in diameter and around 1m deep.  All three contain post pipes (553034)/(553046)/(553038) though some are clearer to see than others (this is partly caused by the robber cuts).  The three posts are evenly spaced (or would have been save for the robber cuts), and are 2.40m apart. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**     Most of the possibly related features were excavated and did not appear to be related to this entity in their form and nature.  Some features were left unexcavated and could potentially have been related.  However, due to depth and clear nature of the feature fills, which was completely different to the unexcavated features, it seems unlikely that they were related. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The function of this entity is not certain.  It is possible that these features may have been some kind of fence posts.  These could have either been associated with the 10/12-post structures, or possible with a precursor to the ditch [560023].  It is also possible that this entity was some kind of structure precursing the 10/12-post structures in this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 512 says:  the posts in this entity were of a similar form both in dimension and profile as those found to constitute the 10-post structure (Entity 10014) and the 12-post structure.  Although it is not possible to prove that the 'beam slot' is part of the same structural system or post pits 553032/553037/553044, but for the purposes of describing their associationwith rectilinear ditch SG [560123] they have been provisionally linked together.  As the 12-post structure (Entity 10022) was mostly concealed within brickearth spreads, it is possible that further associated slots or pits with Entity 10018 could also have been missed in such a way.  The main point of this Entity as far as interpretation is concerned relates to the fact that it doesreflect a phase pre-dating the insertion of the 12th c. rectilinear ditch/enclosure SG [560023].  This may indicate a contemporary structural grouping with Entities 10014, 10022 and 10002, forming a potential for a Saxo-Norman (??)/End 11th c. collection of buildings across Area 49 with possible links with pits [546065] and [546066], which may or may not have been formalised for storage.  It is dubious whether we can interpret these features any further and if indeed [560027] is indeed a beam-slot.  If not it is likely to be formed by intercutting post-pits as it is surely structural.","howard brown","Excavation","Monument",,"10018",,"PSH02",560026
664,"Structure","715 Early Medieval",,"layers (553033), (553034), (553038), (553039), (553045), (553046), (553047) should also be on the list of constituent feature numbers, but the data base would not accept them because they are apparently not on the list. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The entity consists of three post pits and  abeam slot, which are thought to be related.  Though they are of uncertain function, they may have formed a structure of some kind.   **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are cut by a Medieval ditch SG [560023].  This ditch is possibly enclosing the ten- and twelve-post structures.  The ditch could possible be contemporary with the structures or encloses them later.  If they are later they clearly reference the structures and may likewise be referencing this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The beamslot is 3.40m long and on average 0.80m wide.  The beam slot SG [560027] contains SG [560026], SG [560025] and OG [560020].  Due to truncation by ditch [560023], the beamslot is on average 0.40m deep but was likely to have been much deeper.  It is unknown how large the beam would have been.  The beam slot is 12m away from [553032], the nearest pit. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The three post pits are all of a similar size and dimension, and all appear to have been robbed out, [553032] to the East and [553037]/[553044] to the South.  They are on average 1.50m in diameter and around 1m deep.  All three contain post pipes (553034)/(553046)/(553038) though some are clearer to see than others (this is partly caused by the robber cuts).  The three posts are evenly spaced (or would have been save for the robber cuts), and are 2.40m apart. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**     Most of the possibly related features were excavated and did not appear to be related to this entity in their form and nature.  Some features were left unexcavated and could potentially have been related.  However, due to depth and clear nature of the feature fills, which was completely different to the unexcavated features, it seems unlikely that they were related. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**      The function of this entity is not certain.  It is possible that these features may have been some kind of fence posts.  These could have either been associated with the 10/12-post structures, or possible with a precursor to the ditch [560023].  It is also possible that this entity was some kind of structure precursing the 10/12-post structures in this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 512 says:  the posts in this entity were of a similar form both in dimension and profile as those found to constitute the 10-post structure (Entity 10014) and the 12-post structure.  Although it is not possible to prove that the 'beam slot' is part of the same structural system or post pits 553032/553037/553044, but for the purposes of describing their associationwith rectilinear ditch SG [560123] they have been provisionally linked together.  As the 12-post structure (Entity 10022) was mostly concealed within brickearth spreads, it is possible that further associated slots or pits with Entity 10018 could also have been missed in such a way.  The main point of this Entity as far as interpretation is concerned relates to the fact that it doesreflect a phase pre-dating the insertion of the 12th c. rectilinear ditch/enclosure SG [560023].  This may indicate a contemporary structural grouping with Entities 10014, 10022 and 10002, forming a potential for a Saxo-Norman (??)/End 11th c. collection of buildings across Area 49 with possible links with pits [546065] and [546066], which may or may not have been formalised for storage.  It is dubious whether we can interpret these features any further and if indeed [560027] is indeed a beam-slot.  If not it is likely to be formed by intercutting post-pits as it is surely structural.","howard brown","Excavation","Monument",,"10018","PSH02 - 560027","PSH02",560027
666,"10021 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is comprised of a series of very ephemeral lines and linear gullies, all running e-w across area 47. Most have one cut and one fill, all very easily excavated. Even if heavily truncated by machining, features aren't very deep. There is no sign of these features respecting or referencing the cursus. They do widen slightly, but too significantly; contexts [575167] and [575170] are signs of recuts, nowhere  near the cursus.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these rather blobby, vague linears form part of the bronze age landscape. There does indeed seem to be a superficial alignment. However, on closer analysis of the overall plan (see additional sheet 2 showing areas 47 and 49), this clearly makes no sense; there is no way you can fit entity 10021 into the bronze age field system without mangling the whole pattern i.e.., they would make the shape of the field enclosures very odd.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Entity 10021 fits in more with the medieval/post medieval landscape (see add sheets 2 +3), part of the field system, possible even some form of access way or pathway, maybe for livestock control.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is worth noting that sometimes the medieval/post medieval landscape seems to mimic the bronze age alignment; this is also present in area 51. Could well be a reusage of land following the bronze age pattern, either consciously or unconsciously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Nature of fill change from a more a gravely fill to a siltier fill; more brick earth to the east could account for this? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 586 Addition: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is impossible to state  definitively that this ditch could not be a part of the bronze-age landscape because: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, It is on the same alignment as the other phased bronze-age field systems : E-W **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, There is no dating evidence as yet recovered from these linears. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, They are adjacent to the Bronze-age trackway and form enclosures which could have easily facilitated overnight/daytime corralling for livestock en route to the settlement. This track-way was only fully operational during the bronze-age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4, Although they would form fairly small enclosures these could also have been used in the practice of 'mixed' farming: rotation of grazing areas and crops in order to let areas of farmland replenish, there is evidence of sheep and cattle being kept as well as crop growing occurring during the bronze-age within this landscape.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575201","PSH02",575201
666,"10021 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is comprised of a series of very ephemeral lines and linear gullies, all running e-w across area 47. Most have one cut and one fill, all very easily excavated. Even if heavily truncated by machining, features aren't very deep. There is no sign of these features respecting or referencing the cursus. They do widen slightly, but too significantly; contexts [575167] and [575170] are signs of recuts, nowhere  near the cursus.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these rather blobby, vague linears form part of the bronze age landscape. There does indeed seem to be a superficial alignment. However, on closer analysis of the overall plan (see additional sheet 2 showing areas 47 and 49), this clearly makes no sense; there is no way you can fit entity 10021 into the bronze age field system without mangling the whole pattern i.e.., they would make the shape of the field enclosures very odd.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Entity 10021 fits in more with the medieval/post medieval landscape (see add sheets 2 +3), part of the field system, possible even some form of access way or pathway, maybe for livestock control.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is worth noting that sometimes the medieval/post medieval landscape seems to mimic the bronze age alignment; this is also present in area 51. Could well be a reusage of land following the bronze age pattern, either consciously or unconsciously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Nature of fill change from a more a gravely fill to a siltier fill; more brick earth to the east could account for this? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 586 Addition: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is impossible to state  definitively that this ditch could not be a part of the bronze-age landscape because: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, It is on the same alignment as the other phased bronze-age field systems : E-W **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, There is no dating evidence as yet recovered from these linears. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, They are adjacent to the Bronze-age trackway and form enclosures which could have easily facilitated overnight/daytime corralling for livestock en route to the settlement. This track-way was only fully operational during the bronze-age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4, Although they would form fairly small enclosures these could also have been used in the practice of 'mixed' farming: rotation of grazing areas and crops in order to let areas of farmland replenish, there is evidence of sheep and cattle being kept as well as crop growing occurring during the bronze-age within this landscape.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575219","PSH02",575219
666,"10021 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is comprised of a series of very ephemeral lines and linear gullies, all running e-w across area 47. Most have one cut and one fill, all very easily excavated. Even if heavily truncated by machining, features aren't very deep. There is no sign of these features respecting or referencing the cursus. They do widen slightly, but too significantly; contexts [575167] and [575170] are signs of recuts, nowhere  near the cursus.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these rather blobby, vague linears form part of the bronze age landscape. There does indeed seem to be a superficial alignment. However, on closer analysis of the overall plan (see additional sheet 2 showing areas 47 and 49), this clearly makes no sense; there is no way you can fit entity 10021 into the bronze age field system without mangling the whole pattern i.e.., they would make the shape of the field enclosures very odd.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Entity 10021 fits in more with the medieval/post medieval landscape (see add sheets 2 +3), part of the field system, possible even some form of access way or pathway, maybe for livestock control.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is worth noting that sometimes the medieval/post medieval landscape seems to mimic the bronze age alignment; this is also present in area 51. Could well be a reusage of land following the bronze age pattern, either consciously or unconsciously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Nature of fill change from a more a gravely fill to a siltier fill; more brick earth to the east could account for this? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 586 Addition: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is impossible to state  definitively that this ditch could not be a part of the bronze-age landscape because: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, It is on the same alignment as the other phased bronze-age field systems : E-W **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, There is no dating evidence as yet recovered from these linears. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, They are adjacent to the Bronze-age trackway and form enclosures which could have easily facilitated overnight/daytime corralling for livestock en route to the settlement. This track-way was only fully operational during the bronze-age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4, Although they would form fairly small enclosures these could also have been used in the practice of 'mixed' farming: rotation of grazing areas and crops in order to let areas of farmland replenish, there is evidence of sheep and cattle being kept as well as crop growing occurring during the bronze-age within this landscape.","JT","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 603053","PSH02",603053
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 516199","PSH02",516199
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555476","PSH02",555476
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555478","PSH02",555478
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555481","PSH02",555481
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555483","PSH02",555483
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555485","PSH02",555485
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555487","PSH02",555487
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555489","PSH02",555489
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555491","PSH02",555491
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555493","PSH02",555493
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555495","PSH02",555495
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555497","PSH02",555497
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 555499","PSH02",555499
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 559290","PSH02",559290
667,"Bronze Age fenceline","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"This entity number has been assigned to a line of postholes (interpreted as a fence-line), a tree throw, and two other postholes, which may have functioned as a kind of gate or entrance way (see add sheet 2 for location of features). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** All these features are located in Area 47, and interpreted as an entity as they are all thought to have an interrelated function, probably associated with a bronze age water-hole (entity 10019, and see add sheet 3 for a reconstruction drawing by 555, of how these feature may relate to each other).  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The features in this entity will be discussed in 4 parts; 1) the fence-line or postholes, 2) the two other postholes, 3) the tree throw, and 4) a note on the function of the features in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1) The line of postholes run broadly in an east to west direction. They run along the northern side of a bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081]. Because of this shared alignment, the postholes probably respect the ditch. The postholes are all thought to be related because of their shared similarities. They are, for instance, spaced at equal distance from each other, are similar in diameter and depth, and they all share deposits of mid grey moderate clay. Because of all these attributes the postholes probably once formed a fence-line.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no datable finds found within the deposits of the postholes, but if it is given that the postholes respect the bronze age ditch enclosure SG[598081], then they are probably of a comparable age (see entity sheets 10019 for further discussion on the relationship between the postholes (fence-line) and the bronze age ditch.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2) There are two other postholes which probably belong to this entity, but possibly not as part of the fence-line. There are two main thoughts behind these postholes; 1) They functioned as some kind of gate or entrance way. Possibly restricting access to the water-hole, thought to be in operation at this time. 2) The postholes had a previous function to the fence-line, and were removed, so as to create a fluent access way to the water-hole. There is evidence to suggest that the postholes had been removed at some point in time (see context sheets [559290], [559291], and [555498].  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In both of these situations the postholes functioned in this entity.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3) The tree throw is also thought to belong to this entity. The tree that would have once belonged to this tree throw is located at the end of the fence line. This location is suggestive of a relationship. Its presence does not seem to be intrusive and it would be easy to picture the trees' place in the settlement pattern, perhaps providing shade during the hot parts of the day, while the water-hole was being used. It is also interesting to note that two of the deposits in the water-hole, (559317) and (559296), contained organic matter that probably belonged to a tree. (559317) contained a high concentration of leaf-like matter, and (559296) contained some wood and twig remains.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4) The function of this entity probably relates to some kind of entrance way/access way to the water-hole. Whether this was for animals or humans has been discussed at length in respect to the function of the water-hole on entity sheets 10019. It was argued that access from the east was for humans, and indirect access from the west was for a field system and animals.","559","Excavation","Monument",,"10020","PSH02 - 559291","PSH02",559291
669,"10025 Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Introduction, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Roman Ladder Enclosure, Area 47: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is located in the eastern corner of area 47 as well as further south in the POK96 and WPR98 projects (see map 1). It has been phased as a Late Romano-British enclosure from the ceramic artefacts recovered from its deposits during excavation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the following narrative it will be interpreted in 3 ways: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Relationships with other features and the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, How it compares to other similar enclosures at Perry Oaks. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and Function, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It's form takes that of a Roman Ladder Enclosure. The ditches appear to de-marcate 4 pens with a trackway leading up to the northern most pen. A pit is located in the southern most enclosure which has been dated to the same period. (See diagram attached) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These individual pens would've been used to divide the livestock i.e. to separate cattle according to age, sex, disease, ownership. There is evidence for 'mixed farming' in the late Antique period which could have easily been facilitated by using these pens to rotate grazing/crop growing areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In addition to forming boundaries, these ditches would have also served a drainage function, which would've been essential in this type of low lying wet area. The strong evidence of bovine livestock at the site supports this drainage theory: otherwise the cattle would be susceptible to 'hoof rot', and the subsoil would not be allowed to drain making it impossible for grass to grow for grazing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The SG sheets for these ditches comment on how difficult it was for the stratigraphic relationships to be established, and have thus concluded that they are contemporary. This does not follow the accepted sequence of construction for a 'Roman Ladder Enclosure' : usually the enclosure is added to and built up over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This could be due to a number of reasons: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The relationships are unclear due to the remains being viewed after a final cleaning phase of the ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Only a small part of the enclosure has been excavated, a lot of the area has been heavily truncated, thus other additions/parts have been lost. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The entire enclosure could in fact have been constructed in one phase, it is a lot smaller than the other ladder enclosures further to the east, therefore, it could have been an imitation constructed by the local populace to serve their own purposes. (see map 2 for locations of these other enclosures). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Thus the enclosure was a multi-functional agricultural construction: housing and division of livestock as well as drainage. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Associations with other features and landscape: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The NNE-SSW alignment of this roman enclosure system (see map 2), shows the Roman phase's total disregard for the Bronze-age's N-S field systems and landscape. This is illustrated within this enclosure where E-W linears: [960574] & [960517] and pit [960578] cut N-S linear [960579] which dates from the Late Bronze-age (see map 1). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However, it is also interesting to note that the Bronze-age pallasaded boundary ditch running N-SW above 10025 (see map 1) is not consistent with the rest of the Bronze-age field systems. This change in alignment suggests it was purposely constructed to avoid a feature/system which had been situated there prior to the 'Roman ladder enclosure' 10025, suggesting some roman re-use of the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Unfortunately, heavy modern truncation means that there is no surviving evidence for any earlier features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** L-shaped ditch SG [575208] which occurs at the northern most part of the enclosure is not consistent with the alignment or form of the 'ladder enclosure'. It's terminus cuts SG [575205] (see previous sketch} and contained no dating evidence, thus it seems likely that it was a later addition and re-use of the area, not part of the original construction, as linears [575210] and [960573] also appear to be. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, Comparison with other 'ladder enclosures': **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Referring to map 2, there are 2 other such enclosures located further to the east of 10025. However, although their form and alignment are the same, the scale at which they were constructed was much larger. This suggests a different or additional function may have been intended for them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these larger enclosures with trackways, were part of a wide network of 'droveways' which were used to transport: stock, people and materials through the landscape, with the adjacent 'pens' being used to corale livestock overnight whilst en route, map 3 illustrates this form. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Other evidence to support this is supplied by similar enclosures excavated nearby at 'Imperial College Sports Ground' (see map 4) and 'Wall garden farm' both of which have been interpreted as 'droveways' mainly due to their alignment which continues the line of one of the Roman roads out of London. The enclosures excavated at Heathrow seen on map 2, would meet this alignment at right angles to the NNE and SSW to Roman Staines (map 5). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This evidence suggests that the two larger enclosures probably functioned primarily to facilitate movement across the landscape, taking traffic that could not or did not need to travel on the official Roman road network. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Consequently, due to the smaller scale and discreet location of entity 10025, it would seem that its function was probably mainly enclosure and division of stock (its trackway and pens would not have the capacity to cope with much traffic). It also has a later Romano-British date: 240-400 A.D, which could point to a down-sizing in the scale of Roman construction at this point, or it even being a local imitation of these larger more official structures. Which would also support the theory that it was constructed in one phase, rather than developed over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Either way, it is associated with these larger structures and is part of a large-scale operation concerned with controlling the landscape and movement of stock.","586 Nikki Pee","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575205","PSH02",575205
669,"10025 Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Introduction, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Roman Ladder Enclosure, Area 47: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is located in the eastern corner of area 47 as well as further south in the POK96 and WPR98 projects (see map 1). It has been phased as a Late Romano-British enclosure from the ceramic artefacts recovered from its deposits during excavation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the following narrative it will be interpreted in 3 ways: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Relationships with other features and the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, How it compares to other similar enclosures at Perry Oaks. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and Function, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It's form takes that of a Roman Ladder Enclosure. The ditches appear to de-marcate 4 pens with a trackway leading up to the northern most pen. A pit is located in the southern most enclosure which has been dated to the same period. (See diagram attached) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These individual pens would've been used to divide the livestock i.e. to separate cattle according to age, sex, disease, ownership. There is evidence for 'mixed farming' in the late Antique period which could have easily been facilitated by using these pens to rotate grazing/crop growing areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In addition to forming boundaries, these ditches would have also served a drainage function, which would've been essential in this type of low lying wet area. The strong evidence of bovine livestock at the site supports this drainage theory: otherwise the cattle would be susceptible to 'hoof rot', and the subsoil would not be allowed to drain making it impossible for grass to grow for grazing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The SG sheets for these ditches comment on how difficult it was for the stratigraphic relationships to be established, and have thus concluded that they are contemporary. This does not follow the accepted sequence of construction for a 'Roman Ladder Enclosure' : usually the enclosure is added to and built up over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This could be due to a number of reasons: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The relationships are unclear due to the remains being viewed after a final cleaning phase of the ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Only a small part of the enclosure has been excavated, a lot of the area has been heavily truncated, thus other additions/parts have been lost. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The entire enclosure could in fact have been constructed in one phase, it is a lot smaller than the other ladder enclosures further to the east, therefore, it could have been an imitation constructed by the local populace to serve their own purposes. (see map 2 for locations of these other enclosures). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Thus the enclosure was a multi-functional agricultural construction: housing and division of livestock as well as drainage. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Associations with other features and landscape: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The NNE-SSW alignment of this roman enclosure system (see map 2), shows the Roman phase's total disregard for the Bronze-age's N-S field systems and landscape. This is illustrated within this enclosure where E-W linears: [960574] & [960517] and pit [960578] cut N-S linear [960579] which dates from the Late Bronze-age (see map 1). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However, it is also interesting to note that the Bronze-age pallasaded boundary ditch running N-SW above 10025 (see map 1) is not consistent with the rest of the Bronze-age field systems. This change in alignment suggests it was purposely constructed to avoid a feature/system which had been situated there prior to the 'Roman ladder enclosure' 10025, suggesting some roman re-use of the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Unfortunately, heavy modern truncation means that there is no surviving evidence for any earlier features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** L-shaped ditch SG [575208] which occurs at the northern most part of the enclosure is not consistent with the alignment or form of the 'ladder enclosure'. It's terminus cuts SG [575205] (see previous sketch} and contained no dating evidence, thus it seems likely that it was a later addition and re-use of the area, not part of the original construction, as linears [575210] and [960573] also appear to be. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, Comparison with other 'ladder enclosures': **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Referring to map 2, there are 2 other such enclosures located further to the east of 10025. However, although their form and alignment are the same, the scale at which they were constructed was much larger. This suggests a different or additional function may have been intended for them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these larger enclosures with trackways, were part of a wide network of 'droveways' which were used to transport: stock, people and materials through the landscape, with the adjacent 'pens' being used to corale livestock overnight whilst en route, map 3 illustrates this form. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Other evidence to support this is supplied by similar enclosures excavated nearby at 'Imperial College Sports Ground' (see map 4) and 'Wall garden farm' both of which have been interpreted as 'droveways' mainly due to their alignment which continues the line of one of the Roman roads out of London. The enclosures excavated at Heathrow seen on map 2, would meet this alignment at right angles to the NNE and SSW to Roman Staines (map 5). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This evidence suggests that the two larger enclosures probably functioned primarily to facilitate movement across the landscape, taking traffic that could not or did not need to travel on the official Roman road network. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Consequently, due to the smaller scale and discreet location of entity 10025, it would seem that its function was probably mainly enclosure and division of stock (its trackway and pens would not have the capacity to cope with much traffic). It also has a later Romano-British date: 240-400 A.D, which could point to a down-sizing in the scale of Roman construction at this point, or it even being a local imitation of these larger more official structures. Which would also support the theory that it was constructed in one phase, rather than developed over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Either way, it is associated with these larger structures and is part of a large-scale operation concerned with controlling the landscape and movement of stock.","586 Nikki Pee","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,,"PSH02",575208
669,"10025 Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Introduction, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Roman Ladder Enclosure, Area 47: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is located in the eastern corner of area 47 as well as further south in the POK96 and WPR98 projects (see map 1). It has been phased as a Late Romano-British enclosure from the ceramic artefacts recovered from its deposits during excavation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the following narrative it will be interpreted in 3 ways: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Relationships with other features and the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, How it compares to other similar enclosures at Perry Oaks. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and Function, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It's form takes that of a Roman Ladder Enclosure. The ditches appear to de-marcate 4 pens with a trackway leading up to the northern most pen. A pit is located in the southern most enclosure which has been dated to the same period. (See diagram attached) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These individual pens would've been used to divide the livestock i.e. to separate cattle according to age, sex, disease, ownership. There is evidence for 'mixed farming' in the late Antique period which could have easily been facilitated by using these pens to rotate grazing/crop growing areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In addition to forming boundaries, these ditches would have also served a drainage function, which would've been essential in this type of low lying wet area. The strong evidence of bovine livestock at the site supports this drainage theory: otherwise the cattle would be susceptible to 'hoof rot', and the subsoil would not be allowed to drain making it impossible for grass to grow for grazing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The SG sheets for these ditches comment on how difficult it was for the stratigraphic relationships to be established, and have thus concluded that they are contemporary. This does not follow the accepted sequence of construction for a 'Roman Ladder Enclosure' : usually the enclosure is added to and built up over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This could be due to a number of reasons: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The relationships are unclear due to the remains being viewed after a final cleaning phase of the ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Only a small part of the enclosure has been excavated, a lot of the area has been heavily truncated, thus other additions/parts have been lost. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The entire enclosure could in fact have been constructed in one phase, it is a lot smaller than the other ladder enclosures further to the east, therefore, it could have been an imitation constructed by the local populace to serve their own purposes. (see map 2 for locations of these other enclosures). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Thus the enclosure was a multi-functional agricultural construction: housing and division of livestock as well as drainage. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Associations with other features and landscape: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The NNE-SSW alignment of this roman enclosure system (see map 2), shows the Roman phase's total disregard for the Bronze-age's N-S field systems and landscape. This is illustrated within this enclosure where E-W linears: [960574] & [960517] and pit [960578] cut N-S linear [960579] which dates from the Late Bronze-age (see map 1). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However, it is also interesting to note that the Bronze-age pallasaded boundary ditch running N-SW above 10025 (see map 1) is not consistent with the rest of the Bronze-age field systems. This change in alignment suggests it was purposely constructed to avoid a feature/system which had been situated there prior to the 'Roman ladder enclosure' 10025, suggesting some roman re-use of the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Unfortunately, heavy modern truncation means that there is no surviving evidence for any earlier features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** L-shaped ditch SG [575208] which occurs at the northern most part of the enclosure is not consistent with the alignment or form of the 'ladder enclosure'. It's terminus cuts SG [575205] (see previous sketch} and contained no dating evidence, thus it seems likely that it was a later addition and re-use of the area, not part of the original construction, as linears [575210] and [960573] also appear to be. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, Comparison with other 'ladder enclosures': **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Referring to map 2, there are 2 other such enclosures located further to the east of 10025. However, although their form and alignment are the same, the scale at which they were constructed was much larger. This suggests a different or additional function may have been intended for them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these larger enclosures with trackways, were part of a wide network of 'droveways' which were used to transport: stock, people and materials through the landscape, with the adjacent 'pens' being used to corale livestock overnight whilst en route, map 3 illustrates this form. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Other evidence to support this is supplied by similar enclosures excavated nearby at 'Imperial College Sports Ground' (see map 4) and 'Wall garden farm' both of which have been interpreted as 'droveways' mainly due to their alignment which continues the line of one of the Roman roads out of London. The enclosures excavated at Heathrow seen on map 2, would meet this alignment at right angles to the NNE and SSW to Roman Staines (map 5). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This evidence suggests that the two larger enclosures probably functioned primarily to facilitate movement across the landscape, taking traffic that could not or did not need to travel on the official Roman road network. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Consequently, due to the smaller scale and discreet location of entity 10025, it would seem that its function was probably mainly enclosure and division of stock (its trackway and pens would not have the capacity to cope with much traffic). It also has a later Romano-British date: 240-400 A.D, which could point to a down-sizing in the scale of Roman construction at this point, or it even being a local imitation of these larger more official structures. Which would also support the theory that it was constructed in one phase, rather than developed over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Either way, it is associated with these larger structures and is part of a large-scale operation concerned with controlling the landscape and movement of stock.","586 Nikki Pee","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 598071","PSH02",598071
669,"10025 Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Introduction, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Roman Ladder Enclosure, Area 47: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is located in the eastern corner of area 47 as well as further south in the POK96 and WPR98 projects (see map 1). It has been phased as a Late Romano-British enclosure from the ceramic artefacts recovered from its deposits during excavation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the following narrative it will be interpreted in 3 ways: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Relationships with other features and the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, How it compares to other similar enclosures at Perry Oaks. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and Function, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It's form takes that of a Roman Ladder Enclosure. The ditches appear to de-marcate 4 pens with a trackway leading up to the northern most pen. A pit is located in the southern most enclosure which has been dated to the same period. (See diagram attached) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These individual pens would've been used to divide the livestock i.e. to separate cattle according to age, sex, disease, ownership. There is evidence for 'mixed farming' in the late Antique period which could have easily been facilitated by using these pens to rotate grazing/crop growing areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In addition to forming boundaries, these ditches would have also served a drainage function, which would've been essential in this type of low lying wet area. The strong evidence of bovine livestock at the site supports this drainage theory: otherwise the cattle would be susceptible to 'hoof rot', and the subsoil would not be allowed to drain making it impossible for grass to grow for grazing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The SG sheets for these ditches comment on how difficult it was for the stratigraphic relationships to be established, and have thus concluded that they are contemporary. This does not follow the accepted sequence of construction for a 'Roman Ladder Enclosure' : usually the enclosure is added to and built up over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This could be due to a number of reasons: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The relationships are unclear due to the remains being viewed after a final cleaning phase of the ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Only a small part of the enclosure has been excavated, a lot of the area has been heavily truncated, thus other additions/parts have been lost. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The entire enclosure could in fact have been constructed in one phase, it is a lot smaller than the other ladder enclosures further to the east, therefore, it could have been an imitation constructed by the local populace to serve their own purposes. (see map 2 for locations of these other enclosures). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Thus the enclosure was a multi-functional agricultural construction: housing and division of livestock as well as drainage. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Associations with other features and landscape: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The NNE-SSW alignment of this roman enclosure system (see map 2), shows the Roman phase's total disregard for the Bronze-age's N-S field systems and landscape. This is illustrated within this enclosure where E-W linears: [960574] & [960517] and pit [960578] cut N-S linear [960579] which dates from the Late Bronze-age (see map 1). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However, it is also interesting to note that the Bronze-age pallasaded boundary ditch running N-SW above 10025 (see map 1) is not consistent with the rest of the Bronze-age field systems. This change in alignment suggests it was purposely constructed to avoid a feature/system which had been situated there prior to the 'Roman ladder enclosure' 10025, suggesting some roman re-use of the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Unfortunately, heavy modern truncation means that there is no surviving evidence for any earlier features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** L-shaped ditch SG [575208] which occurs at the northern most part of the enclosure is not consistent with the alignment or form of the 'ladder enclosure'. It's terminus cuts SG [575205] (see previous sketch} and contained no dating evidence, thus it seems likely that it was a later addition and re-use of the area, not part of the original construction, as linears [575210] and [960573] also appear to be. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, Comparison with other 'ladder enclosures': **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Referring to map 2, there are 2 other such enclosures located further to the east of 10025. However, although their form and alignment are the same, the scale at which they were constructed was much larger. This suggests a different or additional function may have been intended for them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these larger enclosures with trackways, were part of a wide network of 'droveways' which were used to transport: stock, people and materials through the landscape, with the adjacent 'pens' being used to corale livestock overnight whilst en route, map 3 illustrates this form. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Other evidence to support this is supplied by similar enclosures excavated nearby at 'Imperial College Sports Ground' (see map 4) and 'Wall garden farm' both of which have been interpreted as 'droveways' mainly due to their alignment which continues the line of one of the Roman roads out of London. The enclosures excavated at Heathrow seen on map 2, would meet this alignment at right angles to the NNE and SSW to Roman Staines (map 5). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This evidence suggests that the two larger enclosures probably functioned primarily to facilitate movement across the landscape, taking traffic that could not or did not need to travel on the official Roman road network. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Consequently, due to the smaller scale and discreet location of entity 10025, it would seem that its function was probably mainly enclosure and division of stock (its trackway and pens would not have the capacity to cope with much traffic). It also has a later Romano-British date: 240-400 A.D, which could point to a down-sizing in the scale of Roman construction at this point, or it even being a local imitation of these larger more official structures. Which would also support the theory that it was constructed in one phase, rather than developed over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Either way, it is associated with these larger structures and is part of a large-scale operation concerned with controlling the landscape and movement of stock.","586 Nikki Pee","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 598075","PSH02",598075
669,"10025 Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Introduction, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Roman Ladder Enclosure, Area 47: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is located in the eastern corner of area 47 as well as further south in the POK96 and WPR98 projects (see map 1). It has been phased as a Late Romano-British enclosure from the ceramic artefacts recovered from its deposits during excavation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the following narrative it will be interpreted in 3 ways: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Relationships with other features and the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, How it compares to other similar enclosures at Perry Oaks. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and Function, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It's form takes that of a Roman Ladder Enclosure. The ditches appear to de-marcate 4 pens with a trackway leading up to the northern most pen. A pit is located in the southern most enclosure which has been dated to the same period. (See diagram attached) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These individual pens would've been used to divide the livestock i.e. to separate cattle according to age, sex, disease, ownership. There is evidence for 'mixed farming' in the late Antique period which could have easily been facilitated by using these pens to rotate grazing/crop growing areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In addition to forming boundaries, these ditches would have also served a drainage function, which would've been essential in this type of low lying wet area. The strong evidence of bovine livestock at the site supports this drainage theory: otherwise the cattle would be susceptible to 'hoof rot', and the subsoil would not be allowed to drain making it impossible for grass to grow for grazing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The SG sheets for these ditches comment on how difficult it was for the stratigraphic relationships to be established, and have thus concluded that they are contemporary. This does not follow the accepted sequence of construction for a 'Roman Ladder Enclosure' : usually the enclosure is added to and built up over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This could be due to a number of reasons: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The relationships are unclear due to the remains being viewed after a final cleaning phase of the ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Only a small part of the enclosure has been excavated, a lot of the area has been heavily truncated, thus other additions/parts have been lost. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The entire enclosure could in fact have been constructed in one phase, it is a lot smaller than the other ladder enclosures further to the east, therefore, it could have been an imitation constructed by the local populace to serve their own purposes. (see map 2 for locations of these other enclosures). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Thus the enclosure was a multi-functional agricultural construction: housing and division of livestock as well as drainage. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Associations with other features and landscape: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The NNE-SSW alignment of this roman enclosure system (see map 2), shows the Roman phase's total disregard for the Bronze-age's N-S field systems and landscape. This is illustrated within this enclosure where E-W linears: [960574] & [960517] and pit [960578] cut N-S linear [960579] which dates from the Late Bronze-age (see map 1). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However, it is also interesting to note that the Bronze-age pallasaded boundary ditch running N-SW above 10025 (see map 1) is not consistent with the rest of the Bronze-age field systems. This change in alignment suggests it was purposely constructed to avoid a feature/system which had been situated there prior to the 'Roman ladder enclosure' 10025, suggesting some roman re-use of the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Unfortunately, heavy modern truncation means that there is no surviving evidence for any earlier features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** L-shaped ditch SG [575208] which occurs at the northern most part of the enclosure is not consistent with the alignment or form of the 'ladder enclosure'. It's terminus cuts SG [575205] (see previous sketch} and contained no dating evidence, thus it seems likely that it was a later addition and re-use of the area, not part of the original construction, as linears [575210] and [960573] also appear to be. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, Comparison with other 'ladder enclosures': **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Referring to map 2, there are 2 other such enclosures located further to the east of 10025. However, although their form and alignment are the same, the scale at which they were constructed was much larger. This suggests a different or additional function may have been intended for them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these larger enclosures with trackways, were part of a wide network of 'droveways' which were used to transport: stock, people and materials through the landscape, with the adjacent 'pens' being used to corale livestock overnight whilst en route, map 3 illustrates this form. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Other evidence to support this is supplied by similar enclosures excavated nearby at 'Imperial College Sports Ground' (see map 4) and 'Wall garden farm' both of which have been interpreted as 'droveways' mainly due to their alignment which continues the line of one of the Roman roads out of London. The enclosures excavated at Heathrow seen on map 2, would meet this alignment at right angles to the NNE and SSW to Roman Staines (map 5). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This evidence suggests that the two larger enclosures probably functioned primarily to facilitate movement across the landscape, taking traffic that could not or did not need to travel on the official Roman road network. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Consequently, due to the smaller scale and discreet location of entity 10025, it would seem that its function was probably mainly enclosure and division of stock (its trackway and pens would not have the capacity to cope with much traffic). It also has a later Romano-British date: 240-400 A.D, which could point to a down-sizing in the scale of Roman construction at this point, or it even being a local imitation of these larger more official structures. Which would also support the theory that it was constructed in one phase, rather than developed over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Either way, it is associated with these larger structures and is part of a large-scale operation concerned with controlling the landscape and movement of stock.","586 Nikki Pee","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 598077","PSH02",598077
669,"10025 Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Introduction, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Roman Ladder Enclosure, Area 47: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is located in the eastern corner of area 47 as well as further south in the POK96 and WPR98 projects (see map 1). It has been phased as a Late Romano-British enclosure from the ceramic artefacts recovered from its deposits during excavation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the following narrative it will be interpreted in 3 ways: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Relationships with other features and the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, How it compares to other similar enclosures at Perry Oaks. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and Function, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It's form takes that of a Roman Ladder Enclosure. The ditches appear to de-marcate 4 pens with a trackway leading up to the northern most pen. A pit is located in the southern most enclosure which has been dated to the same period. (See diagram attached) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These individual pens would've been used to divide the livestock i.e. to separate cattle according to age, sex, disease, ownership. There is evidence for 'mixed farming' in the late Antique period which could have easily been facilitated by using these pens to rotate grazing/crop growing areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In addition to forming boundaries, these ditches would have also served a drainage function, which would've been essential in this type of low lying wet area. The strong evidence of bovine livestock at the site supports this drainage theory: otherwise the cattle would be susceptible to 'hoof rot', and the subsoil would not be allowed to drain making it impossible for grass to grow for grazing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The SG sheets for these ditches comment on how difficult it was for the stratigraphic relationships to be established, and have thus concluded that they are contemporary. This does not follow the accepted sequence of construction for a 'Roman Ladder Enclosure' : usually the enclosure is added to and built up over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This could be due to a number of reasons: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The relationships are unclear due to the remains being viewed after a final cleaning phase of the ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Only a small part of the enclosure has been excavated, a lot of the area has been heavily truncated, thus other additions/parts have been lost. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The entire enclosure could in fact have been constructed in one phase, it is a lot smaller than the other ladder enclosures further to the east, therefore, it could have been an imitation constructed by the local populace to serve their own purposes. (see map 2 for locations of these other enclosures). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Thus the enclosure was a multi-functional agricultural construction: housing and division of livestock as well as drainage. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Associations with other features and landscape: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The NNE-SSW alignment of this roman enclosure system (see map 2), shows the Roman phase's total disregard for the Bronze-age's N-S field systems and landscape. This is illustrated within this enclosure where E-W linears: [960574] & [960517] and pit [960578] cut N-S linear [960579] which dates from the Late Bronze-age (see map 1). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However, it is also interesting to note that the Bronze-age pallasaded boundary ditch running N-SW above 10025 (see map 1) is not consistent with the rest of the Bronze-age field systems. This change in alignment suggests it was purposely constructed to avoid a feature/system which had been situated there prior to the 'Roman ladder enclosure' 10025, suggesting some roman re-use of the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Unfortunately, heavy modern truncation means that there is no surviving evidence for any earlier features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** L-shaped ditch SG [575208] which occurs at the northern most part of the enclosure is not consistent with the alignment or form of the 'ladder enclosure'. It's terminus cuts SG [575205] (see previous sketch} and contained no dating evidence, thus it seems likely that it was a later addition and re-use of the area, not part of the original construction, as linears [575210] and [960573] also appear to be. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, Comparison with other 'ladder enclosures': **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Referring to map 2, there are 2 other such enclosures located further to the east of 10025. However, although their form and alignment are the same, the scale at which they were constructed was much larger. This suggests a different or additional function may have been intended for them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these larger enclosures with trackways, were part of a wide network of 'droveways' which were used to transport: stock, people and materials through the landscape, with the adjacent 'pens' being used to corale livestock overnight whilst en route, map 3 illustrates this form. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Other evidence to support this is supplied by similar enclosures excavated nearby at 'Imperial College Sports Ground' (see map 4) and 'Wall garden farm' both of which have been interpreted as 'droveways' mainly due to their alignment which continues the line of one of the Roman roads out of London. The enclosures excavated at Heathrow seen on map 2, would meet this alignment at right angles to the NNE and SSW to Roman Staines (map 5). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This evidence suggests that the two larger enclosures probably functioned primarily to facilitate movement across the landscape, taking traffic that could not or did not need to travel on the official Roman road network. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Consequently, due to the smaller scale and discreet location of entity 10025, it would seem that its function was probably mainly enclosure and division of stock (its trackway and pens would not have the capacity to cope with much traffic). It also has a later Romano-British date: 240-400 A.D, which could point to a down-sizing in the scale of Roman construction at this point, or it even being a local imitation of these larger more official structures. Which would also support the theory that it was constructed in one phase, rather than developed over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Either way, it is associated with these larger structures and is part of a large-scale operation concerned with controlling the landscape and movement of stock.","586 Nikki Pee","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636011","PSH02",636011
669,"10025 Roman Ladder Enclosure","598 Late Romano-British",,"Introduction, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Roman Ladder Enclosure, Area 47: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity is located in the eastern corner of area 47 as well as further south in the POK96 and WPR98 projects (see map 1). It has been phased as a Late Romano-British enclosure from the ceramic artefacts recovered from its deposits during excavation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the following narrative it will be interpreted in 3 ways: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Relationships with other features and the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, How it compares to other similar enclosures at Perry Oaks. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1, Form and Function, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It's form takes that of a Roman Ladder Enclosure. The ditches appear to de-marcate 4 pens with a trackway leading up to the northern most pen. A pit is located in the southern most enclosure which has been dated to the same period. (See diagram attached) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These individual pens would've been used to divide the livestock i.e. to separate cattle according to age, sex, disease, ownership. There is evidence for 'mixed farming' in the late Antique period which could have easily been facilitated by using these pens to rotate grazing/crop growing areas. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In addition to forming boundaries, these ditches would have also served a drainage function, which would've been essential in this type of low lying wet area. The strong evidence of bovine livestock at the site supports this drainage theory: otherwise the cattle would be susceptible to 'hoof rot', and the subsoil would not be allowed to drain making it impossible for grass to grow for grazing. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The SG sheets for these ditches comment on how difficult it was for the stratigraphic relationships to be established, and have thus concluded that they are contemporary. This does not follow the accepted sequence of construction for a 'Roman Ladder Enclosure' : usually the enclosure is added to and built up over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This could be due to a number of reasons: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The relationships are unclear due to the remains being viewed after a final cleaning phase of the ditches. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Only a small part of the enclosure has been excavated, a lot of the area has been heavily truncated, thus other additions/parts have been lost. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * The entire enclosure could in fact have been constructed in one phase, it is a lot smaller than the other ladder enclosures further to the east, therefore, it could have been an imitation constructed by the local populace to serve their own purposes. (see map 2 for locations of these other enclosures). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Thus the enclosure was a multi-functional agricultural construction: housing and division of livestock as well as drainage. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2, Associations with other features and landscape: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The NNE-SSW alignment of this roman enclosure system (see map 2), shows the Roman phase's total disregard for the Bronze-age's N-S field systems and landscape. This is illustrated within this enclosure where E-W linears: [960574] & [960517] and pit [960578] cut N-S linear [960579] which dates from the Late Bronze-age (see map 1). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  However, it is also interesting to note that the Bronze-age pallasaded boundary ditch running N-SW above 10025 (see map 1) is not consistent with the rest of the Bronze-age field systems. This change in alignment suggests it was purposely constructed to avoid a feature/system which had been situated there prior to the 'Roman ladder enclosure' 10025, suggesting some roman re-use of the landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Unfortunately, heavy modern truncation means that there is no surviving evidence for any earlier features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** L-shaped ditch SG [575208] which occurs at the northern most part of the enclosure is not consistent with the alignment or form of the 'ladder enclosure'. It's terminus cuts SG [575205] (see previous sketch} and contained no dating evidence, thus it seems likely that it was a later addition and re-use of the area, not part of the original construction, as linears [575210] and [960573] also appear to be. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3, Comparison with other 'ladder enclosures': **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Referring to map 2, there are 2 other such enclosures located further to the east of 10025. However, although their form and alignment are the same, the scale at which they were constructed was much larger. This suggests a different or additional function may have been intended for them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has been suggested that these larger enclosures with trackways, were part of a wide network of 'droveways' which were used to transport: stock, people and materials through the landscape, with the adjacent 'pens' being used to corale livestock overnight whilst en route, map 3 illustrates this form. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Other evidence to support this is supplied by similar enclosures excavated nearby at 'Imperial College Sports Ground' (see map 4) and 'Wall garden farm' both of which have been interpreted as 'droveways' mainly due to their alignment which continues the line of one of the Roman roads out of London. The enclosures excavated at Heathrow seen on map 2, would meet this alignment at right angles to the NNE and SSW to Roman Staines (map 5). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This evidence suggests that the two larger enclosures probably functioned primarily to facilitate movement across the landscape, taking traffic that could not or did not need to travel on the official Roman road network. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Consequently, due to the smaller scale and discreet location of entity 10025, it would seem that its function was probably mainly enclosure and division of stock (its trackway and pens would not have the capacity to cope with much traffic). It also has a later Romano-British date: 240-400 A.D, which could point to a down-sizing in the scale of Roman construction at this point, or it even being a local imitation of these larger more official structures. Which would also support the theory that it was constructed in one phase, rather than developed over time. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Either way, it is associated with these larger structures and is part of a large-scale operation concerned with controlling the landscape and movement of stock.","586 Nikki Pee","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636025","PSH02",636025
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541139","PSH02",541139
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541143","PSH02",541143
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541146","PSH02",541146
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541149","PSH02",541149
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 552089","PSH02",552089
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 552093","PSH02",552093
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 552096","PSH02",552096
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 552098","PSH02",552098
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 559118","PSH02",559118
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 566087","PSH02",566087
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 566090","PSH02",566090
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 566093","PSH02",566093
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 571061","PSH02",571061
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575090","PSH02",575090
671,"10024 Medieval field system","700 Medieval",,"This entity is an expansion of an onsite framework forum talk I gave called 'The medieval field systems of areas 51 and 52' . However, when I actually came to examine the evidence for this talk, I began to worry slightly as to whether there was any medieval activity: it's relationship to the medieval remains of nearby area 49 wasn't good and moreover it looked more in line with the general post medieval landscape. Then I looked at the 1867 map and was further dismayed to see that the medieval field system I was supposed to be talking about fitted like a glove over the post medieval field boundaries on the map. Had I shot down my dream of medieval field system?? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Possibly not: A good case can be made for a medieval origin to the field system. SG [552098] contained an 11th century coin, found by metal detector. The various recuts of this ditch all contained medieval material in the form of medieval coarse ware, with a small amount of post medieval cbm. It must be noted though that the 11th century coin came out of a later recut and was metal detected, so exact context would be difficult to find. A very small piece of sandy ware came out of a later recut also, so small that it can't be taken too seriously. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although no interventions were put through them a segmented series of linears runs along the same alignment as SG's 559093/89/98/96 & 575090/92. It would have been interesting to see whether they also contained medieval material, making an initial foundation for the later post medieval activity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This postmedieval activity is firmly represented by SG's [566090] & [566087] and also [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149]. They form an enclosure with other SG's which is visible on the 1867 map. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** [566087] & [566090] is running roughly N-S, cutting through palaeochannel. It is noted by 566 that ditch is fairly deep, possibly built for control of water? It is worth noting that there is a Bronze-age ditch running on the same alignment close by. Also fairly deep with signs of possible water erosion. Machining revealed mostly post-medieval material from this ditch. SG [566093] features an alignment of posts at western edge of feature for prevention of slumping, a feature that recurs in 541's grouping. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG's [541139] [541143] [541146] & [541149] also contained a high amount of post-medieval material e.g. modern brick, post medieval glass, redware & iron nails. It also contained signs of a post, possibly part of a revetment against a bank collapsing in. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Cut of SG's [552096], [552093] etc running roughly E-W stop over Bronze-age ditch, before being later continued by SG's [575092] & [575090]. A sign of respect? Maybe some form of marker. Difficult to say really. It is difficult to believe that the medieval world view would be as conscious of the past as certain 21st century archaeologists would have it, especially peasants/artisans. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Much of the archaeology is truncated by something called the western outfall balancing tank, present on 1950's maps. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** What were they using it for? Arable Vs Livestock: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No clear evidence for what the field systems were used for but there are some interesting hints/possibilities. A series of postholes form an alignment around the terminus of  SG's [571061] and [552093]. This could well be for the control and movement of livestock. Also there are plough and furrow marks which are characteristic of Medieval/post medieval period. Are we seeing a kind of 3 course crop rotation system: The area to the North East on 51 I've suggested may have been used for livestock, heads in the direction of the 10 post structure (barn) on 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG [559118]: a short linear heading N-S from 552's SG's contained cbm and burnt flint, with fill containing signs of burning. Possibly a windbreak. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** NB; 511 10/12/02, **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Is this roughly N-S linear SG [571061] definitely part of this entity?, What is the dating based upon? Despite the fact that there are animal teeth within the deposit ( judging by the preservation across the rest of the site this may indicate a med/post med date). There is no ceramic evidence from this ditch to provide us with a positive date. One intervention did produce LN/EBA flint flakes and the ditch does appear to be on a roughly B/A alignment so this date is still very up in the air and the fact that this ditch's terminus ends just at a point to respect the E-W remnants of the later recut B/A ditch makes me lean towards the earlier date as it would seem to serve no coherent purpose to these medieval ditches.","JT 575","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 575092","PSH02",575092
672,"10027 Neolithic/Bronze Age segmented ditch system","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch system excavated on area 72 of uncertain date. An attempt of phasing the various development has been made, presented below. Features possibly associated to these phases are being discussed but have not been attached to this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** To the west of the site, an L-shaped ditch (SG 562077) was cut by one large pit (SG 562078), truncated in turn by a smaller pit (SG 562121). One of the ditch branches was also re-cut (SG 562085) at a later date. 3 sherds of Early Neolithic pot were retrieved from the re-cut of the ditch and one flint flake from the original ditch. Two further undiagnostic flakes were retrieved from the larger pit. The lack of later pottery fragments suggests a Neolithic date for the original ditch. It seems to be at a right angle with a possible segmented ditch system located directly to the north. 3 phases have been identified in this ditch alignment. The earlier feature is a pit [591051] later cut by a ditch segment that appears to be associated with a series of other segmented ditches, including SG 580032 and SG 591066. These segments were re-cut at a later date by another short segment (SG 580030) and by a 32m long ditch, orientated SW-NE (SG 580028). To the east of this ditch, another series of segmented ditches with evidence of re-cutting could be associated within the same phases. Stratigraphic relationships indicate that the easternmost segment is cut by the Middle BA ditch. One sherd of Late Bronze Age pottery was found in the top fill of SG 580028 showing that at least this segment was either much later than shown on the plan (see additional sheet) or that it was still in use and probably kept clean through the BA period. In both cases, the relationships between these various feature and their respect of the SW-NE alignment are an evidence of continuity possibly from the Late Neolithic through to the Late Bronze Age. This constant reference to the past is, once again, a reminder of the importance of respecting their ancestors heritage for the inhabitants of this landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** To the south of the L-shape ditch, another stretch of ditch (SG 554235), orientated NNW-SSE, is also cut by a Middle Bronze Age waterhole and revealed through excavations 3 worked flint and 1 sherd of pottery dated to the Late Neolithic - Early Bronze Age. Another small curving stretch of ditch (SG 594107), located to the south of the BA enclosure contained a small Beaker leaf-shaped knife (EBA) and two sherds of Neolithic pottery; it does not appear associated with any surrounding features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the north-west of the site, the corner of a possible enclosure system (SG 561181) revealed 2 sherds of Grooved Ware pottery. Another 2 sherds of Grooved Ware were recovered from a small linear segment (SG 517191) located just to the east of the ‘enclosure’. The recovery of these artefacts may indicate a Neolithic date for these two features although this is not certain given the small quantity (only two from each) and limited sherd size of the pottery.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In light of the evidence presented above, the presence of activity previous to the Middle Bronze Age (which represent the main phase identified on site 72) seems likely. The nature of this activity, the dating and the association of some of the ditches within the same phase are problematic and cannot be proven for definite. However, an attempt is made to understand the development of this early system, based on the stratigraphic evidence and the few finds discovered mentioned in the above section. Subsequently, at least 4 phases can be identified: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Phase 1: Landmarks (add sheet) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 2: Dividing the landscape (add sheet) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 3: Formalising the landscape (add sheet) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4: Referencing the past / the settlement enclosures (add sheet Entity 10028) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 1 is likely to belong to the Neolithic period while Phases 2 and 3 probably took place some time between the beginning and the Middle of the Bronze Age period. Phase 4 is represented by the Middle Bronze Age enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is likely that the segmented ditch system have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 548060","PSH02",548060
672,"10027 Neolithic/Bronze Age segmented ditch system","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch system excavated on area 72 of uncertain date. An attempt of phasing the various development has been made, presented below. Features possibly associated to these phases are being discussed but have not been attached to this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** To the west of the site, an L-shaped ditch (SG 562077) was cut by one large pit (SG 562078), truncated in turn by a smaller pit (SG 562121). One of the ditch branches was also re-cut (SG 562085) at a later date. 3 sherds of Early Neolithic pot were retrieved from the re-cut of the ditch and one flint flake from the original ditch. Two further undiagnostic flakes were retrieved from the larger pit. The lack of later pottery fragments suggests a Neolithic date for the original ditch. It seems to be at a right angle with a possible segmented ditch system located directly to the north. 3 phases have been identified in this ditch alignment. The earlier feature is a pit [591051] later cut by a ditch segment that appears to be associated with a series of other segmented ditches, including SG 580032 and SG 591066. These segments were re-cut at a later date by another short segment (SG 580030) and by a 32m long ditch, orientated SW-NE (SG 580028). To the east of this ditch, another series of segmented ditches with evidence of re-cutting could be associated within the same phases. Stratigraphic relationships indicate that the easternmost segment is cut by the Middle BA ditch. One sherd of Late Bronze Age pottery was found in the top fill of SG 580028 showing that at least this segment was either much later than shown on the plan (see additional sheet) or that it was still in use and probably kept clean through the BA period. In both cases, the relationships between these various feature and their respect of the SW-NE alignment are an evidence of continuity possibly from the Late Neolithic through to the Late Bronze Age. This constant reference to the past is, once again, a reminder of the importance of respecting their ancestors heritage for the inhabitants of this landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** To the south of the L-shape ditch, another stretch of ditch (SG 554235), orientated NNW-SSE, is also cut by a Middle Bronze Age waterhole and revealed through excavations 3 worked flint and 1 sherd of pottery dated to the Late Neolithic - Early Bronze Age. Another small curving stretch of ditch (SG 594107), located to the south of the BA enclosure contained a small Beaker leaf-shaped knife (EBA) and two sherds of Neolithic pottery; it does not appear associated with any surrounding features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the north-west of the site, the corner of a possible enclosure system (SG 561181) revealed 2 sherds of Grooved Ware pottery. Another 2 sherds of Grooved Ware were recovered from a small linear segment (SG 517191) located just to the east of the ‘enclosure’. The recovery of these artefacts may indicate a Neolithic date for these two features although this is not certain given the small quantity (only two from each) and limited sherd size of the pottery.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In light of the evidence presented above, the presence of activity previous to the Middle Bronze Age (which represent the main phase identified on site 72) seems likely. The nature of this activity, the dating and the association of some of the ditches within the same phase are problematic and cannot be proven for definite. However, an attempt is made to understand the development of this early system, based on the stratigraphic evidence and the few finds discovered mentioned in the above section. Subsequently, at least 4 phases can be identified: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Phase 1: Landmarks (add sheet) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 2: Dividing the landscape (add sheet) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 3: Formalising the landscape (add sheet) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4: Referencing the past / the settlement enclosures (add sheet Entity 10028) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 1 is likely to belong to the Neolithic period while Phases 2 and 3 probably took place some time between the beginning and the Middle of the Bronze Age period. Phase 4 is represented by the Middle Bronze Age enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is likely that the segmented ditch system have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554235","PSH02",554235
672,"10027 Neolithic/Bronze Age segmented ditch system","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch system excavated on area 72 of uncertain date. An attempt of phasing the various development has been made, presented below. Features possibly associated to these phases are being discussed but have not been attached to this entity. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** To the west of the site, an L-shaped ditch (SG 562077) was cut by one large pit (SG 562078), truncated in turn by a smaller pit (SG 562121). One of the ditch branches was also re-cut (SG 562085) at a later date. 3 sherds of Early Neolithic pot were retrieved from the re-cut of the ditch and one flint flake from the original ditch. Two further undiagnostic flakes were retrieved from the larger pit. The lack of later pottery fragments suggests a Neolithic date for the original ditch. It seems to be at a right angle with a possible segmented ditch system located directly to the north. 3 phases have been identified in this ditch alignment. The earlier feature is a pit [591051] later cut by a ditch segment that appears to be associated with a series of other segmented ditches, including SG 580032 and SG 591066. These segments were re-cut at a later date by another short segment (SG 580030) and by a 32m long ditch, orientated SW-NE (SG 580028). To the east of this ditch, another series of segmented ditches with evidence of re-cutting could be associated within the same phases. Stratigraphic relationships indicate that the easternmost segment is cut by the Middle BA ditch. One sherd of Late Bronze Age pottery was found in the top fill of SG 580028 showing that at least this segment was either much later than shown on the plan (see additional sheet) or that it was still in use and probably kept clean through the BA period. In both cases, the relationships between these various feature and their respect of the SW-NE alignment are an evidence of continuity possibly from the Late Neolithic through to the Late Bronze Age. This constant reference to the past is, once again, a reminder of the importance of respecting their ancestors heritage for the inhabitants of this landscape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** To the south of the L-shape ditch, another stretch of ditch (SG 554235), orientated NNW-SSE, is also cut by a Middle Bronze Age waterhole and revealed through excavations 3 worked flint and 1 sherd of pottery dated to the Late Neolithic - Early Bronze Age. Another small curving stretch of ditch (SG 594107), located to the south of the BA enclosure contained a small Beaker leaf-shaped knife (EBA) and two sherds of Neolithic pottery; it does not appear associated with any surrounding features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In the north-west of the site, the corner of a possible enclosure system (SG 561181) revealed 2 sherds of Grooved Ware pottery. Another 2 sherds of Grooved Ware were recovered from a small linear segment (SG 517191) located just to the east of the ‘enclosure’. The recovery of these artefacts may indicate a Neolithic date for these two features although this is not certain given the small quantity (only two from each) and limited sherd size of the pottery.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** In light of the evidence presented above, the presence of activity previous to the Middle Bronze Age (which represent the main phase identified on site 72) seems likely. The nature of this activity, the dating and the association of some of the ditches within the same phase are problematic and cannot be proven for definite. However, an attempt is made to understand the development of this early system, based on the stratigraphic evidence and the few finds discovered mentioned in the above section. Subsequently, at least 4 phases can be identified: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Phase 1: Landmarks (add sheet) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 2: Dividing the landscape (add sheet) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 3: Formalising the landscape (add sheet) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4: Referencing the past / the settlement enclosures (add sheet Entity 10028) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 1 is likely to belong to the Neolithic period while Phases 2 and 3 probably took place some time between the beginning and the Middle of the Bronze Age period. Phase 4 is represented by the Middle Bronze Age enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is likely that the segmented ditch system have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580028","PSH02",580028
674,"10036 Segmented ditch","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S running segmented ditch, composed of 3 segments. Most southern segment is SG 556241, middle segment is SG 556239, Northern segment is OG 556235. Especially 556235 is very much truncated, has been preserved to a depth of 0.06m only. SG 556241 is best preserved, to a depth of 0.25m. The orientation of the ditches is roughly N-S, but they are not very straight: see sketch [scanned in]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There is an opening of 1.25m between 556235 and 556239 that is possibly an entrance. This entrance might look bigger now than it originally was, due to truncation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There is an opening of 0.15m between 556239 and 556241 that probably means nothing, the two segments were possibly conjoined at a higher level. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 556235 is cut in the north by an E-W modern ditch. Its continuation might be found under the modern road. To the south of 556242, no further ditch segments are found. Not clear why 556241 stops here. I don't think it is truncation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no finds from any of the fills from 556241. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Positive features: perhaps. There were a lot of pebbles in most fills of 556240, that could be the remnants of a bank. This bank might have been located at the western side of 556240, because the pattern of 556237 suggests that it slumped into the ditch from the west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *510 adds* **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity remains undated. It was periodically suggested that the North-South ditch alignment may represent a continuation of the NE-SW post cursus monument/cursus ? Already examined on site to the South West (ie areas POK 96/47) it should be noted however that this entity (10036) not share a precise alignment with that entity/monument. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note also that the axis of this entity is shared with SG [581121] though this feature appeared to be comprised of a largely bioturbated deposit, was not segmeted and its fills were entirely different in character.","556","Excavation","Monument",,,,"PSH02",510126
674,"10036 Segmented ditch","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S running segmented ditch, composed of 3 segments. Most southern segment is SG 556241, middle segment is SG 556239, Northern segment is OG 556235. Especially 556235 is very much truncated, has been preserved to a depth of 0.06m only. SG 556241 is best preserved, to a depth of 0.25m. The orientation of the ditches is roughly N-S, but they are not very straight: see sketch [scanned in]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There is an opening of 1.25m between 556235 and 556239 that is possibly an entrance. This entrance might look bigger now than it originally was, due to truncation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There is an opening of 0.15m between 556239 and 556241 that probably means nothing, the two segments were possibly conjoined at a higher level. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 556235 is cut in the north by an E-W modern ditch. Its continuation might be found under the modern road. To the south of 556242, no further ditch segments are found. Not clear why 556241 stops here. I don't think it is truncation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no finds from any of the fills from 556241. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Positive features: perhaps. There were a lot of pebbles in most fills of 556240, that could be the remnants of a bank. This bank might have been located at the western side of 556240, because the pattern of 556237 suggests that it slumped into the ditch from the west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *510 adds* **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity remains undated. It was periodically suggested that the North-South ditch alignment may represent a continuation of the NE-SW post cursus monument/cursus ? Already examined on site to the South West (ie areas POK 96/47) it should be noted however that this entity (10036) not share a precise alignment with that entity/monument. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note also that the axis of this entity is shared with SG [581121] though this feature appeared to be comprised of a largely bioturbated deposit, was not segmeted and its fills were entirely different in character.","556","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556239","PSH02",556239
674,"10036 Segmented ditch","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S running segmented ditch, composed of 3 segments. Most southern segment is SG 556241, middle segment is SG 556239, Northern segment is OG 556235. Especially 556235 is very much truncated, has been preserved to a depth of 0.06m only. SG 556241 is best preserved, to a depth of 0.25m. The orientation of the ditches is roughly N-S, but they are not very straight: see sketch [scanned in]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There is an opening of 1.25m between 556235 and 556239 that is possibly an entrance. This entrance might look bigger now than it originally was, due to truncation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There is an opening of 0.15m between 556239 and 556241 that probably means nothing, the two segments were possibly conjoined at a higher level. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 556235 is cut in the north by an E-W modern ditch. Its continuation might be found under the modern road. To the south of 556242, no further ditch segments are found. Not clear why 556241 stops here. I don't think it is truncation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no finds from any of the fills from 556241. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Positive features: perhaps. There were a lot of pebbles in most fills of 556240, that could be the remnants of a bank. This bank might have been located at the western side of 556240, because the pattern of 556237 suggests that it slumped into the ditch from the west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *510 adds* **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity remains undated. It was periodically suggested that the North-South ditch alignment may represent a continuation of the NE-SW post cursus monument/cursus ? Already examined on site to the South West (ie areas POK 96/47) it should be noted however that this entity (10036) not share a precise alignment with that entity/monument. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note also that the axis of this entity is shared with SG [581121] though this feature appeared to be comprised of a largely bioturbated deposit, was not segmeted and its fills were entirely different in character.","556","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556241","PSH02",556241
674,"10036 Segmented ditch","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S running segmented ditch, composed of 3 segments. Most southern segment is SG 556241, middle segment is SG 556239, Northern segment is OG 556235. Especially 556235 is very much truncated, has been preserved to a depth of 0.06m only. SG 556241 is best preserved, to a depth of 0.25m. The orientation of the ditches is roughly N-S, but they are not very straight: see sketch [scanned in]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There is an opening of 1.25m between 556235 and 556239 that is possibly an entrance. This entrance might look bigger now than it originally was, due to truncation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There is an opening of 0.15m between 556239 and 556241 that probably means nothing, the two segments were possibly conjoined at a higher level. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 556235 is cut in the north by an E-W modern ditch. Its continuation might be found under the modern road. To the south of 556242, no further ditch segments are found. Not clear why 556241 stops here. I don't think it is truncation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** There were no finds from any of the fills from 556241. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Positive features: perhaps. There were a lot of pebbles in most fills of 556240, that could be the remnants of a bank. This bank might have been located at the western side of 556240, because the pattern of 556237 suggests that it slumped into the ditch from the west. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *510 adds* **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity remains undated. It was periodically suggested that the North-South ditch alignment may represent a continuation of the NE-SW post cursus monument/cursus ? Already examined on site to the South West (ie areas POK 96/47) it should be noted however that this entity (10036) not share a precise alignment with that entity/monument. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Note also that the axis of this entity is shared with SG [581121] though this feature appeared to be comprised of a largely bioturbated deposit, was not segmeted and its fills were entirely different in character.","556","Excavation","Monument",,,,"PSH02",556242
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960033","POK96",960033
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960112","POK96",960112
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960575","POK96",960575
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961017","POK96",961017
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961018","POK96",961018
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961135","POK96",961135
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962022","POK96",962022
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962027","POK96",962027
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962033","POK96",962033
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962200","POK96",962200
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963439","POK96",963439
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636180","PSH02",636180
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 120092","WPR98",120092
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121261","WPR98",121261
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125108","WPR98",125108
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130051","WPR98",130051
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130218","WPR98",130218
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134148","WPR98",134148
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136174","WPR98",136174
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136177","WPR98",136177
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136180","WPR98",136180
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136182","WPR98",136182
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141230","WPR98",141230
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141232","WPR98",141232
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156169","WPR98",156169
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156191","WPR98",156191
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167082","WPR98",167082
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180045","WPR98",180045
676,"Neolithic Tree Throws","200 Neolithic",,"All the tree throws in the area of the WPR98, POK 96, GA21 and Northern Taxi way excavations that have been dated to the neolithic by finds etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180069","WPR98",180069
683,"10007 Medieval fencelines","700 Medieval",,"Sketch- see add sheet 1 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity comprises a series of post-holes that are associated with the medieval enclosure system c. 20m to the south of waterhole [529139]. These form a concentric pattern of curvilinear fence lines reflecting an emphasised system of control within the funnelling system of enclosure. These probable fencelines appear to be directly associated with the converging east and west gullies (SG 546107, SG 603039) which have post-holes incorporated into their southern termini.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although related in a generic term to the surrounding phase of enclosure system and interior partition, these lines of posts seem to have few physical relationships with other features apart from the previously mentioned gullies. The post attached to the southern end of gully SG 546107 appears to be cut by the ditch system SG 527195, fitting the posts into one of the earlier identified phases of medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although only a small quantity of finds were recovered from the post-holes excavated, the one single relationship shown puts these structural elements well into phase. Taking the form of slightly curved concentric linear fencelines (?), and using the converging internal gully system as a focus to the division and internal spatial utility of the enclosure of which they are a part, this alignment enhances control of movement not only in a directional form but also in a system of controlling access and egress. Presumably they are linked to the focal point of this area of enclosure, the waterhole 529139. It is probable that these posts were an initial part of the pre-12th century development within Area 49 along with the gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Because finds were not recovered from all post-holes excavated, and not all possible post-holes were excavated, more may be included in this group of interpreted alignments. It is equally true to say that although these posts have been initially grouped together, there is a real possibility of some of these post-holes not being contemporary or related in any way. The likelihood of these post-holes being anything other than medieval is reasonably slim, but as to whether they really represent a concentric fenceline or an edge of an unidentified stockade area or structure it is difficult to ascertain. As far as we are able to suggest from the evidence on the ground, these post-holes are associated and do appear to retain the southern end of gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. As such it is reasonable to form an associated group of these features fitting into the on-going interpretation of the medieval enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If these post-holes were a fenceline, they would have worked in such a way as to be deliberately restrictive, controlling livestock as they were moved from Entity 10031(Polygonal) to the south and into Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'). Whether or not these posts represent a concentric system of internal partition or not they definitely represent a physical prevention of mass herding and would have made the initial control and separation of individuals from the group far more efficient.","DMT","Excavation","Monument",,"10007","PSH02 - 542094","PSH02",542094
683,"10007 Medieval fencelines","700 Medieval",,"Sketch- see add sheet 1 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity comprises a series of post-holes that are associated with the medieval enclosure system c. 20m to the south of waterhole [529139]. These form a concentric pattern of curvilinear fence lines reflecting an emphasised system of control within the funnelling system of enclosure. These probable fencelines appear to be directly associated with the converging east and west gullies (SG 546107, SG 603039) which have post-holes incorporated into their southern termini.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although related in a generic term to the surrounding phase of enclosure system and interior partition, these lines of posts seem to have few physical relationships with other features apart from the previously mentioned gullies. The post attached to the southern end of gully SG 546107 appears to be cut by the ditch system SG 527195, fitting the posts into one of the earlier identified phases of medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although only a small quantity of finds were recovered from the post-holes excavated, the one single relationship shown puts these structural elements well into phase. Taking the form of slightly curved concentric linear fencelines (?), and using the converging internal gully system as a focus to the division and internal spatial utility of the enclosure of which they are a part, this alignment enhances control of movement not only in a directional form but also in a system of controlling access and egress. Presumably they are linked to the focal point of this area of enclosure, the waterhole 529139. It is probable that these posts were an initial part of the pre-12th century development within Area 49 along with the gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Because finds were not recovered from all post-holes excavated, and not all possible post-holes were excavated, more may be included in this group of interpreted alignments. It is equally true to say that although these posts have been initially grouped together, there is a real possibility of some of these post-holes not being contemporary or related in any way. The likelihood of these post-holes being anything other than medieval is reasonably slim, but as to whether they really represent a concentric fenceline or an edge of an unidentified stockade area or structure it is difficult to ascertain. As far as we are able to suggest from the evidence on the ground, these post-holes are associated and do appear to retain the southern end of gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. As such it is reasonable to form an associated group of these features fitting into the on-going interpretation of the medieval enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If these post-holes were a fenceline, they would have worked in such a way as to be deliberately restrictive, controlling livestock as they were moved from Entity 10031(Polygonal) to the south and into Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'). Whether or not these posts represent a concentric system of internal partition or not they definitely represent a physical prevention of mass herding and would have made the initial control and separation of individuals from the group far more efficient.","DMT","Excavation","Monument",,"10007","PSH02 - 542095","PSH02",542095
683,"10007 Medieval fencelines","700 Medieval",,"Sketch- see add sheet 1 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity comprises a series of post-holes that are associated with the medieval enclosure system c. 20m to the south of waterhole [529139]. These form a concentric pattern of curvilinear fence lines reflecting an emphasised system of control within the funnelling system of enclosure. These probable fencelines appear to be directly associated with the converging east and west gullies (SG 546107, SG 603039) which have post-holes incorporated into their southern termini.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although related in a generic term to the surrounding phase of enclosure system and interior partition, these lines of posts seem to have few physical relationships with other features apart from the previously mentioned gullies. The post attached to the southern end of gully SG 546107 appears to be cut by the ditch system SG 527195, fitting the posts into one of the earlier identified phases of medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although only a small quantity of finds were recovered from the post-holes excavated, the one single relationship shown puts these structural elements well into phase. Taking the form of slightly curved concentric linear fencelines (?), and using the converging internal gully system as a focus to the division and internal spatial utility of the enclosure of which they are a part, this alignment enhances control of movement not only in a directional form but also in a system of controlling access and egress. Presumably they are linked to the focal point of this area of enclosure, the waterhole 529139. It is probable that these posts were an initial part of the pre-12th century development within Area 49 along with the gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Because finds were not recovered from all post-holes excavated, and not all possible post-holes were excavated, more may be included in this group of interpreted alignments. It is equally true to say that although these posts have been initially grouped together, there is a real possibility of some of these post-holes not being contemporary or related in any way. The likelihood of these post-holes being anything other than medieval is reasonably slim, but as to whether they really represent a concentric fenceline or an edge of an unidentified stockade area or structure it is difficult to ascertain. As far as we are able to suggest from the evidence on the ground, these post-holes are associated and do appear to retain the southern end of gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. As such it is reasonable to form an associated group of these features fitting into the on-going interpretation of the medieval enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If these post-holes were a fenceline, they would have worked in such a way as to be deliberately restrictive, controlling livestock as they were moved from Entity 10031(Polygonal) to the south and into Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'). Whether or not these posts represent a concentric system of internal partition or not they definitely represent a physical prevention of mass herding and would have made the initial control and separation of individuals from the group far more efficient.","DMT","Excavation","Monument",,"10007","PSH02 - 542102","PSH02",542102
683,"10007 Medieval fencelines","700 Medieval",,"Sketch- see add sheet 1 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity comprises a series of post-holes that are associated with the medieval enclosure system c. 20m to the south of waterhole [529139]. These form a concentric pattern of curvilinear fence lines reflecting an emphasised system of control within the funnelling system of enclosure. These probable fencelines appear to be directly associated with the converging east and west gullies (SG 546107, SG 603039) which have post-holes incorporated into their southern termini.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although related in a generic term to the surrounding phase of enclosure system and interior partition, these lines of posts seem to have few physical relationships with other features apart from the previously mentioned gullies. The post attached to the southern end of gully SG 546107 appears to be cut by the ditch system SG 527195, fitting the posts into one of the earlier identified phases of medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although only a small quantity of finds were recovered from the post-holes excavated, the one single relationship shown puts these structural elements well into phase. Taking the form of slightly curved concentric linear fencelines (?), and using the converging internal gully system as a focus to the division and internal spatial utility of the enclosure of which they are a part, this alignment enhances control of movement not only in a directional form but also in a system of controlling access and egress. Presumably they are linked to the focal point of this area of enclosure, the waterhole 529139. It is probable that these posts were an initial part of the pre-12th century development within Area 49 along with the gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Because finds were not recovered from all post-holes excavated, and not all possible post-holes were excavated, more may be included in this group of interpreted alignments. It is equally true to say that although these posts have been initially grouped together, there is a real possibility of some of these post-holes not being contemporary or related in any way. The likelihood of these post-holes being anything other than medieval is reasonably slim, but as to whether they really represent a concentric fenceline or an edge of an unidentified stockade area or structure it is difficult to ascertain. As far as we are able to suggest from the evidence on the ground, these post-holes are associated and do appear to retain the southern end of gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. As such it is reasonable to form an associated group of these features fitting into the on-going interpretation of the medieval enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If these post-holes were a fenceline, they would have worked in such a way as to be deliberately restrictive, controlling livestock as they were moved from Entity 10031(Polygonal) to the south and into Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'). Whether or not these posts represent a concentric system of internal partition or not they definitely represent a physical prevention of mass herding and would have made the initial control and separation of individuals from the group far more efficient.","DMT","Excavation","Monument",,"10007","PSH02 - 542106","PSH02",542106
683,"10007 Medieval fencelines","700 Medieval",,"Sketch- see add sheet 1 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity comprises a series of post-holes that are associated with the medieval enclosure system c. 20m to the south of waterhole [529139]. These form a concentric pattern of curvilinear fence lines reflecting an emphasised system of control within the funnelling system of enclosure. These probable fencelines appear to be directly associated with the converging east and west gullies (SG 546107, SG 603039) which have post-holes incorporated into their southern termini.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although related in a generic term to the surrounding phase of enclosure system and interior partition, these lines of posts seem to have few physical relationships with other features apart from the previously mentioned gullies. The post attached to the southern end of gully SG 546107 appears to be cut by the ditch system SG 527195, fitting the posts into one of the earlier identified phases of medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although only a small quantity of finds were recovered from the post-holes excavated, the one single relationship shown puts these structural elements well into phase. Taking the form of slightly curved concentric linear fencelines (?), and using the converging internal gully system as a focus to the division and internal spatial utility of the enclosure of which they are a part, this alignment enhances control of movement not only in a directional form but also in a system of controlling access and egress. Presumably they are linked to the focal point of this area of enclosure, the waterhole 529139. It is probable that these posts were an initial part of the pre-12th century development within Area 49 along with the gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Because finds were not recovered from all post-holes excavated, and not all possible post-holes were excavated, more may be included in this group of interpreted alignments. It is equally true to say that although these posts have been initially grouped together, there is a real possibility of some of these post-holes not being contemporary or related in any way. The likelihood of these post-holes being anything other than medieval is reasonably slim, but as to whether they really represent a concentric fenceline or an edge of an unidentified stockade area or structure it is difficult to ascertain. As far as we are able to suggest from the evidence on the ground, these post-holes are associated and do appear to retain the southern end of gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. As such it is reasonable to form an associated group of these features fitting into the on-going interpretation of the medieval enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If these post-holes were a fenceline, they would have worked in such a way as to be deliberately restrictive, controlling livestock as they were moved from Entity 10031(Polygonal) to the south and into Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'). Whether or not these posts represent a concentric system of internal partition or not they definitely represent a physical prevention of mass herding and would have made the initial control and separation of individuals from the group far more efficient.","DMT","Excavation","Monument",,"10007","PSH02 - 555283","PSH02",555283
683,"10007 Medieval fencelines","700 Medieval",,"Sketch- see add sheet 1 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity comprises a series of post-holes that are associated with the medieval enclosure system c. 20m to the south of waterhole [529139]. These form a concentric pattern of curvilinear fence lines reflecting an emphasised system of control within the funnelling system of enclosure. These probable fencelines appear to be directly associated with the converging east and west gullies (SG 546107, SG 603039) which have post-holes incorporated into their southern termini.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although related in a generic term to the surrounding phase of enclosure system and interior partition, these lines of posts seem to have few physical relationships with other features apart from the previously mentioned gullies. The post attached to the southern end of gully SG 546107 appears to be cut by the ditch system SG 527195, fitting the posts into one of the earlier identified phases of medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although only a small quantity of finds were recovered from the post-holes excavated, the one single relationship shown puts these structural elements well into phase. Taking the form of slightly curved concentric linear fencelines (?), and using the converging internal gully system as a focus to the division and internal spatial utility of the enclosure of which they are a part, this alignment enhances control of movement not only in a directional form but also in a system of controlling access and egress. Presumably they are linked to the focal point of this area of enclosure, the waterhole 529139. It is probable that these posts were an initial part of the pre-12th century development within Area 49 along with the gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Because finds were not recovered from all post-holes excavated, and not all possible post-holes were excavated, more may be included in this group of interpreted alignments. It is equally true to say that although these posts have been initially grouped together, there is a real possibility of some of these post-holes not being contemporary or related in any way. The likelihood of these post-holes being anything other than medieval is reasonably slim, but as to whether they really represent a concentric fenceline or an edge of an unidentified stockade area or structure it is difficult to ascertain. As far as we are able to suggest from the evidence on the ground, these post-holes are associated and do appear to retain the southern end of gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. As such it is reasonable to form an associated group of these features fitting into the on-going interpretation of the medieval enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If these post-holes were a fenceline, they would have worked in such a way as to be deliberately restrictive, controlling livestock as they were moved from Entity 10031(Polygonal) to the south and into Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'). Whether or not these posts represent a concentric system of internal partition or not they definitely represent a physical prevention of mass herding and would have made the initial control and separation of individuals from the group far more efficient.","DMT","Excavation","Monument",,"10007","PSH02 - 555287","PSH02",555287
683,"10007 Medieval fencelines","700 Medieval",,"Sketch- see add sheet 1 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity comprises a series of post-holes that are associated with the medieval enclosure system c. 20m to the south of waterhole [529139]. These form a concentric pattern of curvilinear fence lines reflecting an emphasised system of control within the funnelling system of enclosure. These probable fencelines appear to be directly associated with the converging east and west gullies (SG 546107, SG 603039) which have post-holes incorporated into their southern termini.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although related in a generic term to the surrounding phase of enclosure system and interior partition, these lines of posts seem to have few physical relationships with other features apart from the previously mentioned gullies. The post attached to the southern end of gully SG 546107 appears to be cut by the ditch system SG 527195, fitting the posts into one of the earlier identified phases of medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although only a small quantity of finds were recovered from the post-holes excavated, the one single relationship shown puts these structural elements well into phase. Taking the form of slightly curved concentric linear fencelines (?), and using the converging internal gully system as a focus to the division and internal spatial utility of the enclosure of which they are a part, this alignment enhances control of movement not only in a directional form but also in a system of controlling access and egress. Presumably they are linked to the focal point of this area of enclosure, the waterhole 529139. It is probable that these posts were an initial part of the pre-12th century development within Area 49 along with the gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Because finds were not recovered from all post-holes excavated, and not all possible post-holes were excavated, more may be included in this group of interpreted alignments. It is equally true to say that although these posts have been initially grouped together, there is a real possibility of some of these post-holes not being contemporary or related in any way. The likelihood of these post-holes being anything other than medieval is reasonably slim, but as to whether they really represent a concentric fenceline or an edge of an unidentified stockade area or structure it is difficult to ascertain. As far as we are able to suggest from the evidence on the ground, these post-holes are associated and do appear to retain the southern end of gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. As such it is reasonable to form an associated group of these features fitting into the on-going interpretation of the medieval enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If these post-holes were a fenceline, they would have worked in such a way as to be deliberately restrictive, controlling livestock as they were moved from Entity 10031(Polygonal) to the south and into Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'). Whether or not these posts represent a concentric system of internal partition or not they definitely represent a physical prevention of mass herding and would have made the initial control and separation of individuals from the group far more efficient.","DMT","Excavation","Monument",,"10007","PSH02 - 555290","PSH02",555290
683,"10007 Medieval fencelines","700 Medieval",,"Sketch- see add sheet 1 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** General **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity comprises a series of post-holes that are associated with the medieval enclosure system c. 20m to the south of waterhole [529139]. These form a concentric pattern of curvilinear fence lines reflecting an emphasised system of control within the funnelling system of enclosure. These probable fencelines appear to be directly associated with the converging east and west gullies (SG 546107, SG 603039) which have post-holes incorporated into their southern termini.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Relationships **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although related in a generic term to the surrounding phase of enclosure system and interior partition, these lines of posts seem to have few physical relationships with other features apart from the previously mentioned gullies. The post attached to the southern end of gully SG 546107 appears to be cut by the ditch system SG 527195, fitting the posts into one of the earlier identified phases of medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although only a small quantity of finds were recovered from the post-holes excavated, the one single relationship shown puts these structural elements well into phase. Taking the form of slightly curved concentric linear fencelines (?), and using the converging internal gully system as a focus to the division and internal spatial utility of the enclosure of which they are a part, this alignment enhances control of movement not only in a directional form but also in a system of controlling access and egress. Presumably they are linked to the focal point of this area of enclosure, the waterhole 529139. It is probable that these posts were an initial part of the pre-12th century development within Area 49 along with the gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Because finds were not recovered from all post-holes excavated, and not all possible post-holes were excavated, more may be included in this group of interpreted alignments. It is equally true to say that although these posts have been initially grouped together, there is a real possibility of some of these post-holes not being contemporary or related in any way. The likelihood of these post-holes being anything other than medieval is reasonably slim, but as to whether they really represent a concentric fenceline or an edge of an unidentified stockade area or structure it is difficult to ascertain. As far as we are able to suggest from the evidence on the ground, these post-holes are associated and do appear to retain the southern end of gullies SG 546107 and SG 603039. As such it is reasonable to form an associated group of these features fitting into the on-going interpretation of the medieval enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If these post-holes were a fenceline, they would have worked in such a way as to be deliberately restrictive, controlling livestock as they were moved from Entity 10031(Polygonal) to the south and into Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'). Whether or not these posts represent a concentric system of internal partition or not they definitely represent a physical prevention of mass herding and would have made the initial control and separation of individuals from the group far more efficient.","DMT","Excavation","Monument",,"10007","PSH02 - 593006","PSH02",593006
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 537016","PSH02",537016
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 537023","PSH02",537023
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 537034","PSH02",537034
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 537044","PSH02",537044
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 537056","PSH02",537056
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 537068","PSH02",537068
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 537082","PSH02",537082
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 537093","PSH02",537093
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 570027","PSH02",570027
684,"Medieval Building 1","715 Early Medieval",,"Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two parallel rows of five postholes aligned east west forming a group of ten posts all of similar form and dimension. (see sheet 2). These form the infamous ten post structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ten post structure (TPS) has been the centre of attention for quite some time, this due to its location between the cursus ditches on area 49. This raised all sorts of possibilities regarding a pre cursus structure/neo house. It is also located within a medieval enclosure, so much discussion ensued, with the discovery of the 'eleventh post' this intensified with notions of a sighting post of a pre cursus monument! This eleventh post turned out to be part of a separate structure (12 post entity 10022). The debate continued. This is why the strategies regarding excavation and sampling were so intense and why this short paragraph and discussion that follows are pertinent; lots of activity and effort put into these ten posts to try and answer the questions we posed and to refine these questions. Have these questions been answered? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So what was the nature of this structure? The ten post holes obviously point to ten posts forming a structure, other features around these were investigated, many turned out to be tree throws, burrows or nothing, a few small postholes; [569045] [569050] [569052] [569039] (see sheet 2 for location) were discovered which may or may not be associated with the structure, so basically all we have are ten posts. The post holes themselves also indicate that this structure was dismantled, some show postpipes and robber cuts, explicit in some, implied in others, particularly post pipes and packing. (see sheet 2) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So we have ten posts, postholes suggest they were of similar dimensions. They could point to ten posts making monumental rows of 'totems' or ten posts forming a two story barn. The interpretation depends a great deal on what date we apply to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Can we associate some sort of function with this structure, again this depends on the dating to an extent, any associated landsurface is gone and associated features are indiscernible so we can't look to those for answers. Environmental data from the postholes seems to consist mostly of modern roots and weeds. If we have a Neolithic date much of the discussion will centre on the monumental on the other hand if we go for medieval we will be talking about barns and agriculture. As before, the interpretation will depend a great deal on the date applied to this structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  I've gone on about the dating quite a bit and how it is key to the interpretations of this TPS. So now a fuller discussion of the dating and what this means in terms of particular arguments/ interpretations. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The dating has come from a variety of sources; artefactual, strategraphic and the OSL. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Artefacts were recovered from seven of the ten postholes (see sheet 2), mostly flint and some pottery. The flint appears to be well rolled and generally undiagnostic but where dates have been assigned they broadly cover late neo/ bronze age. A few abraded pottery sherds give both late bronze age and medieval dates. Finds from the robber cuts include flint, again rolled and of late neo / bronze age date. A piece of abraded late bronze age/ early iron age pottery and a piece of medieval pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The only strategraphic relationship with the TPS is that with sg[537118] (see sheet 2). This is a medieval ditch which is dated to the C14th and cuts the two eastern most postholes providing at least a tpq. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The OSL has produced a provisional date of 2220 BC +/- 560 years. This would give a date range of late neo to early bronze age, which would tie in with the flint at least. However as OSL measures the last time soil was exposed to sunlight we must be cautious as to the actual taphonomy of the sample which may provide a date but not necessarily of the original cutting of the postholes. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So how does this fit in with the competing arguments, could the TPS be pre cursus?.- A structure possibly a house monumentalised and incorporated into the cursus, referenced and respected by it? The dating doesn't point to this in any way, the OSL and finds both suggest much later dates. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So could it somehow be contemporary with the cursus and part of that monument? However although respected by the cursus ditches its axis is off perpendicular and there would need to be a gap in the central bank. The assemblage of finds suggests that the postholes were cut through remnant bank material. The depth of the postholes it has been suggested may indicate a remnant bank if the central posts were shallower, this is the case for the northern five but the southern show the opposite- they are shallower to east and west, this may in fact hint at the central bank being very degraded and along with the abraded nature of the artefacts suggest a date well beyond the Neolithic. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Could the TPS be bronze age?- It is situated at the eastern end of a BA enclosure on the southern part of area 49 (see sheet 5) and is on a similar alignment.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The OSL date would fit BA but to rely on it alone would be inadvisable, the abraded nature of the finds, particularly the pottery suggests a later date. Also the eastern side of this enclosure, it is suggested may have been defined by remnant of the cursus central bank and indeed it has been reutilised elsewhere in the bronze age, but this would mean the TPS cut through a remnant bank and as discussed above this is unlikely. This pushes the TPS forward I believe. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This brings us to the third option of the TPS being medieval. It is situated in the north west corner of a med enclosure sg[560023] (see sheet 5). Enclosure ditch sg [560023] is dated to early medieval and may even have been constructed in the late C11th and used into the C12th. This ditch is also cut by sg [537118] which is the same one which provides the tpq of C14th for the TPS. The medieval pottery from the TPS is mostly abraded however one sherd from a robber cut[537038] is less abraded and other from the southern row is apparently unabraded and of C12th date. Does this suggest the TPS was dismantled some time after the C12th prior to the laying out of sg[537118] in the C14th and so was standing in the C11th or C12th and thus contemporary with sg[560023]? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The TPS appears to sit most happily with a medieval date and within this medieval enclosure sg[560023] OR at least, is most readily explained. The rolled and abraded nature of the late neo / bronze age flint and pottery pushes the TPS forward. The relationship of postholes with the cursus bank or remnant bank material appears to concur, the cautious use of the OSL dates also makes it unattractive to rely on that alone, so leaving:- ten posts forming a structure, probably of medieval, probably pre C12th date within an associated enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So can we say something more about this structure now? (see sheet 11 for things mentioned in text) The size of the structure, which has internal dimensions of approximately 10.5m x 5.4m, giving an area of around 55 square metres, suggests quite a grand scale and the possibility of two storeys is not unimaginable. A likely explanation would be of a storage / shelter barn type structure with the lower floor for livestock and the upper for storage of cereal or fodder. However as any associated surfaces are no longer in existence as mentioned before, all of this is just speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the east of the TPS is entity 10022 the twelve post  structure which appears to have a similar form and therefore be a similar structure, the area between them contains features which appear to demarcate this space suggesting they were contemporaries.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the north of this twelve post structure are two pits [546065] and[546066] both interpreted as storage  pits and provisionally dated to the C11th - C12th, making them contemporaries with the TPS and the twelve post structure this may be suggesting this area as specific to storage? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south of the TPS is waterhole [569022] which has C12th dates which may support the idea of livestock also being present at this location and part of the TPS being related to functions connected with them. This waterhole probably pre dates enclosure sg[560023] as its entrance would be unusable otherwise, also pre dating sg[560023] is entity 10018 which consists of a beamslot and three post pits and may represent a structure or an earlier form of enclosure, both the waterhole and entity 10018 although pre dating sg[560023] could still have been contemporary with the TPS as although the TPS sits nicely within this enclosure the precise relationship / function is uncertain, only that at some point both existed together. So  these features may have existed together before being enclosed by sg[560023]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  To the south east of the ten and twelve post structures there appears to be an area of features some of which have been investigated and are postholes, - this may point to a structure or structures within this part of the medieval enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This possible structure(s) appears to be separated from the ten and twelve post structures by north south linears, parallel to the twelve poster and so probably contemporary, so setting this part of the  enclosure apart from that of the ten and twelve posters and possibly setting different functions /  activities apart.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is set within what appears to be an area of concentrated activity with other features and other structures all enclosed by sg[560023] which in itself may be a development of something represented by entity 10018. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The division of space within this enclosure appears to be a constant theme, the TPS is separated from the twelve poster by features, the storage pits are again separated and demarcated, the features to the south east of the enclosure are again separated and this separation marked by linears, even the waterhole is set apart from these other areas. This division of space it could be suggested is a division of function or activity also, as hinted at by the storage pits in proximity to the ten and twelve posters, away from whatever is going on to the south east and away from the waterhole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So the TPS is situated within what is apparently an ordered and controlled part of the landscape with divisions of space suggesting a division of activity and even within these divisions possibly further ones (the TPS is divided from the 12 poster and storage pits). Inspite of this division/ separation and even our own view of the TPS an isolated entity, it only really works as part of something else, only really works when we put it in relation to other things. To those who encountered it in the past  surely it was perceived of and functioned as part of something else, as part of the various activities occurring in this medieval landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So there we have it; the nature and function of the TPS have been discussed within a medieval context as this is the most likely, although the dating was in no way concrete and didn't favour any interpretation exclusively, the evidence as a whole favours medieval. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  This medieval context suggests that the TPS was a barn, probably connected both to livestock and agrarian aspects of agriculture, situated within an enclosure where the structuring of space and therefore possibly activity is strongly hinted at. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Add sheets mentioned in text: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2    plan of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 5    plan of 10014 in relation to other groups **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 11  plan of TPS within enc SG[560023]","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,"10014","PSH02 - 570039","PSH02",570039
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 529246","PSH02",529246
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 562123","PSH02",562123
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 562126","PSH02",562126
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 562129","PSH02",562129
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 562132","PSH02",562132
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 562135","PSH02",562135
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 562137","PSH02",562137
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 578069","PSH02",578069
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 578071","PSH02",578071
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 578073","PSH02",578073
687,"Structure","700 Medieval",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10016 consists of an irregular distribution of ten postholes and a pit. The pit, OG[562137], possibly had up to three postholes contained within it. This irregularity makes defining what type of structure/s it represents very difficult. Any pattern can be found by 'joining the dots'. At first glance, the plan of the entity appears to show a round structure. However excavation established the archaeology from the unrelated natural soil spreads, resulting in the constituentOG's of entity 10016. Vaguely, the postholes follow a north-west to south-east orientation, based on the positions of OG[578075] and OG[562129]. It can be suggested that they occupy a rectangular area defined by OG's [578075], [562135] and [529246]. It must be stressed though that this is mere conjecture. An important consideration in the interpretation and analysis process is modern truncation, comparing a 1943 contour survey with a recent one comes up with a loss of between 0.30m and 0.80m. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpretation  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No finds were found in any of the constituent OG’s of entity 10016. However if posthole OG [529246] is treated as part of the structure/s then an important stratigraphic relationship exists in the form of truncation by 14th century boundary ditch SG [529241]. So by then the structure/s represented by entity 10016 must have been abandoned or dismantled. This though merely places it in the period before the 14th century, not very specific to say the least. There isn’t anything stopping it from being prehistoric but it is more than likely that it functioned in the south-east corner of a 12th century enclosure consisting of ditches SG’s [560023] and [561153]. Two other entities appear to exist within the enclosure; 10 post structure entity 10014 and 12 post structure entity 10022 (both approximately 20m to the north-west of 10016) which seem to represent substantial buildings that probably served as barns. Whether they co-existed or one replaced the other is unknown. There is also the question as to where entity 10016 fits into this medieval agricultural landscape but judging by the small size of its postholes and the lack of any clear layout it can’t have represented anything that substantial. Entities 10014 and 10022 have postholes up to 1.5m wide and a metre deep whereas 10016’s are only up to a metre wide and 0.35m deep. Conceivably entity 10016 was only a minor agricultural outbuilding such as a pig pen or chicken coup. However this is mere conjecture. At a higher level there is evidence of changes in the landscape in the medieval period that took the form of redefinition and reorganisation of enclosed spaces after the 12th century. Twelve post structure, entity 10002 (approximately 70m to the north-east), bears witness to these changes as a 13th century ditch, SG [591048] truncates it. This is repeated in the 14th century within the enclosure containing entity 10016. Ten post structure (entity 10014) is cut by ditch SG [537118] and is possibly replaced by 12-post structure, (entity 10022) close by. Also, as already mentioned, entity 10016 is truncated by ditch SG [529241]. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Additional sheets: 4 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  consisting of: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 1 location of constituent OG's **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 2 conjectural round structure **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 3 area occupied by entity10016 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 4 phase plan","LJH","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10016","PSH02 - 578075","PSH02",578075
689,"10038 Bronze Age Enclosure","300 Bronze Age",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Large bronze age enclosure on eastern part of area 49. (see sheet 2). Noticeably the largest of all those surrounding it, area of approximately 11000 square metres (1.1 hectares), about twice the size of most other BA enclosures. North, east and southern sides marked by ditches, western side by remnant cursus bank presumably. Absence of BA features from within this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This enclosure in spite of its size is still part of the BA enclosure system overall and was probably laid out as part of this development. There is no evidence to suggest it was an add on and there is no indication of internal divisions being laid out through the lifetime of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Where there is evidence for bank material it is suggested that the bank was external  to the enclosure and it can be assumed a hedgerow was established along this, tree throws have been noted, particularly along SG[538241], also in the medieval period some of these ditches were recut, they can't have been visible, but an extant hedgerow would have been. So we have a large field with a big hedge. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There is no evidence from within the enclosure itself to suggest what it was used for, e.g.; a waterhole to link it to livestock or structures to suggest settlement. However the proximity of entity 10009, settlement area and entity 10017, trackway may suggest the function of this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The trackway does lead to this area and during its earlier phases was open, only blocked later, which may suggest that at some stage access for livestock was desirable,  then later was not. Also possibly hinting at a change in function for this enclosure. Entity 10009 is also close and the trackway does appear to funnel from the enclosure to settlement suggesting an association and further connection to livestock. The durability of the hedges into the medieval period may suggest they were maintained during their early life which in turn suggests they were important for this enclosure,- probably to contain livestock. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity to the settlement may also suggest an arable aspect to the enclosure,- close to home, less distance to walk? If the trackway was blocked perhaps it was for this reason,- a shift to crops at this location? However the evidence is slight. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Another possible explanation may be that after the trackway was blocked this enclosure may have reverted to scrub, possibly there was a reduction in cattle numbers, a shift away from grazing, whether for environmental or economic reasons would be hard to say and this enclosure was just left as 'set aside' land or fallow. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the BA landscape is believed to have started in the west near the river Colne and progressed east towards the river Crane. The nature of the enclosures has also developed, they are narrower and E/W orientated in the west, moving to narrow N/S, then to larger enclosures, then to narrow NW/SE orientated enclosures. Entity 10038's location within this can be seen on Sheet 4. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It would appear that 10038 lies to the south of the narrow N/S enclosures and just to the west of the very large enclosures and could be seen as a transitional phase in the development of these enclosures. Perhaps a need for larger enclosures was first recognised here or a large enclosure at this location was part of the overall plan, as these 'zones' are quite distinct. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So a large enclosure, part of a wider planned/ organised BA landscape, which appears, for some of the BA at least to have probably been a livestock enclosure, a change in use is hinted at by the blocking off of access to the trackway 10017. Its size and proximity to the settlement 10009 may have been significant and indeed it must have survived more or less as a visible entity until some of the ditches were recut in the medieval period. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of any activity, if indeed there was any, in the intervening period from the BA to med is unknown, although I would suggest it survived as scrub land. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The next activity within the enclosure is the pre C12th structures,- see entity 10029. The suggestion is that the enclosure may have been visible in some form or other,- remnant/ overgrown hedgelines, within which most of this pre C12th activity occurred.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If there was some sort of continuity within the rest of the enclosures, as pasture for livestock through the iron age, roman and Saxon period, and 10038 remained marginal, then rather than build on valuable grazing land, 10038 would have been a suitable location. This is speculative of course.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Equally a certain amount of continuity of use into the iron age combined with the marginalisation of certain enclosures with progressive marginalisation through the following periods would have resulted in a large area of scrub/ heath, some of which may have been more readily converted back to grazing or arable and some not such as 10038 and consequently built on due to its lesser value. Although through the following medieval it does revert to grazing. Again this is pure speculation and may or may not support the theory that this enclosure became marginal land in the BA initially. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Anyway, this enclosure which was part of the everyday life of some people in the bronze age persisted as a more or less recognisable framing of space to become part of the everyday for some in the medieval. So how those people perceived and experienced the landscape they inhabited or part of it was determined quite some time previous in the Bronze Age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** (512, DMT): It is also possible that this enclosure may have contained small concentrations of post structures. These may have been truncated by the later medieval activity, or been relatively shallow in the first place and therefore not survived. Many of the postholes within this area are either undated or simply phased via extrapolation and therefore some may indeed relate to the original BA phase of enclosure. The level of modern truncation must also be considered as a large  central area, (contained within the medieval polygonal enclosure) has been well disturbed, as well as specific areas to the north of the polygonal space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It may be noted that the northern E-W boundary ditch SG[526240](recut 526249) to the west of the cursus aligns centrally to this enclosure (entity 10038) -See Sheet 2- and gives the impression of the two systems working as a whole within a newly organised and associated anthropogenic landscape. This does evoke the image of a planned discipline implemented upon the environment forcing the issue of division and reaction to space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2 entity location + surrounding features **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4 entity location within BA landscape","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512066","PSH02",512066
689,"10038 Bronze Age Enclosure","300 Bronze Age",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Large bronze age enclosure on eastern part of area 49. (see sheet 2). Noticeably the largest of all those surrounding it, area of approximately 11000 square metres (1.1 hectares), about twice the size of most other BA enclosures. North, east and southern sides marked by ditches, western side by remnant cursus bank presumably. Absence of BA features from within this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This enclosure in spite of its size is still part of the BA enclosure system overall and was probably laid out as part of this development. There is no evidence to suggest it was an add on and there is no indication of internal divisions being laid out through the lifetime of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Where there is evidence for bank material it is suggested that the bank was external  to the enclosure and it can be assumed a hedgerow was established along this, tree throws have been noted, particularly along SG[538241], also in the medieval period some of these ditches were recut, they can't have been visible, but an extant hedgerow would have been. So we have a large field with a big hedge. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There is no evidence from within the enclosure itself to suggest what it was used for, e.g.; a waterhole to link it to livestock or structures to suggest settlement. However the proximity of entity 10009, settlement area and entity 10017, trackway may suggest the function of this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The trackway does lead to this area and during its earlier phases was open, only blocked later, which may suggest that at some stage access for livestock was desirable,  then later was not. Also possibly hinting at a change in function for this enclosure. Entity 10009 is also close and the trackway does appear to funnel from the enclosure to settlement suggesting an association and further connection to livestock. The durability of the hedges into the medieval period may suggest they were maintained during their early life which in turn suggests they were important for this enclosure,- probably to contain livestock. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity to the settlement may also suggest an arable aspect to the enclosure,- close to home, less distance to walk? If the trackway was blocked perhaps it was for this reason,- a shift to crops at this location? However the evidence is slight. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Another possible explanation may be that after the trackway was blocked this enclosure may have reverted to scrub, possibly there was a reduction in cattle numbers, a shift away from grazing, whether for environmental or economic reasons would be hard to say and this enclosure was just left as 'set aside' land or fallow. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the BA landscape is believed to have started in the west near the river Colne and progressed east towards the river Crane. The nature of the enclosures has also developed, they are narrower and E/W orientated in the west, moving to narrow N/S, then to larger enclosures, then to narrow NW/SE orientated enclosures. Entity 10038's location within this can be seen on Sheet 4. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It would appear that 10038 lies to the south of the narrow N/S enclosures and just to the west of the very large enclosures and could be seen as a transitional phase in the development of these enclosures. Perhaps a need for larger enclosures was first recognised here or a large enclosure at this location was part of the overall plan, as these 'zones' are quite distinct. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So a large enclosure, part of a wider planned/ organised BA landscape, which appears, for some of the BA at least to have probably been a livestock enclosure, a change in use is hinted at by the blocking off of access to the trackway 10017. Its size and proximity to the settlement 10009 may have been significant and indeed it must have survived more or less as a visible entity until some of the ditches were recut in the medieval period. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of any activity, if indeed there was any, in the intervening period from the BA to med is unknown, although I would suggest it survived as scrub land. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The next activity within the enclosure is the pre C12th structures,- see entity 10029. The suggestion is that the enclosure may have been visible in some form or other,- remnant/ overgrown hedgelines, within which most of this pre C12th activity occurred.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If there was some sort of continuity within the rest of the enclosures, as pasture for livestock through the iron age, roman and Saxon period, and 10038 remained marginal, then rather than build on valuable grazing land, 10038 would have been a suitable location. This is speculative of course.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Equally a certain amount of continuity of use into the iron age combined with the marginalisation of certain enclosures with progressive marginalisation through the following periods would have resulted in a large area of scrub/ heath, some of which may have been more readily converted back to grazing or arable and some not such as 10038 and consequently built on due to its lesser value. Although through the following medieval it does revert to grazing. Again this is pure speculation and may or may not support the theory that this enclosure became marginal land in the BA initially. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Anyway, this enclosure which was part of the everyday life of some people in the bronze age persisted as a more or less recognisable framing of space to become part of the everyday for some in the medieval. So how those people perceived and experienced the landscape they inhabited or part of it was determined quite some time previous in the Bronze Age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** (512, DMT): It is also possible that this enclosure may have contained small concentrations of post structures. These may have been truncated by the later medieval activity, or been relatively shallow in the first place and therefore not survived. Many of the postholes within this area are either undated or simply phased via extrapolation and therefore some may indeed relate to the original BA phase of enclosure. The level of modern truncation must also be considered as a large  central area, (contained within the medieval polygonal enclosure) has been well disturbed, as well as specific areas to the north of the polygonal space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It may be noted that the northern E-W boundary ditch SG[526240](recut 526249) to the west of the cursus aligns centrally to this enclosure (entity 10038) -See Sheet 2- and gives the impression of the two systems working as a whole within a newly organised and associated anthropogenic landscape. This does evoke the image of a planned discipline implemented upon the environment forcing the issue of division and reaction to space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2 entity location + surrounding features **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4 entity location within BA landscape","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525170","PSH02",525170
689,"10038 Bronze Age Enclosure","300 Bronze Age",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Large bronze age enclosure on eastern part of area 49. (see sheet 2). Noticeably the largest of all those surrounding it, area of approximately 11000 square metres (1.1 hectares), about twice the size of most other BA enclosures. North, east and southern sides marked by ditches, western side by remnant cursus bank presumably. Absence of BA features from within this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This enclosure in spite of its size is still part of the BA enclosure system overall and was probably laid out as part of this development. There is no evidence to suggest it was an add on and there is no indication of internal divisions being laid out through the lifetime of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Where there is evidence for bank material it is suggested that the bank was external  to the enclosure and it can be assumed a hedgerow was established along this, tree throws have been noted, particularly along SG[538241], also in the medieval period some of these ditches were recut, they can't have been visible, but an extant hedgerow would have been. So we have a large field with a big hedge. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There is no evidence from within the enclosure itself to suggest what it was used for, e.g.; a waterhole to link it to livestock or structures to suggest settlement. However the proximity of entity 10009, settlement area and entity 10017, trackway may suggest the function of this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The trackway does lead to this area and during its earlier phases was open, only blocked later, which may suggest that at some stage access for livestock was desirable,  then later was not. Also possibly hinting at a change in function for this enclosure. Entity 10009 is also close and the trackway does appear to funnel from the enclosure to settlement suggesting an association and further connection to livestock. The durability of the hedges into the medieval period may suggest they were maintained during their early life which in turn suggests they were important for this enclosure,- probably to contain livestock. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity to the settlement may also suggest an arable aspect to the enclosure,- close to home, less distance to walk? If the trackway was blocked perhaps it was for this reason,- a shift to crops at this location? However the evidence is slight. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Another possible explanation may be that after the trackway was blocked this enclosure may have reverted to scrub, possibly there was a reduction in cattle numbers, a shift away from grazing, whether for environmental or economic reasons would be hard to say and this enclosure was just left as 'set aside' land or fallow. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the BA landscape is believed to have started in the west near the river Colne and progressed east towards the river Crane. The nature of the enclosures has also developed, they are narrower and E/W orientated in the west, moving to narrow N/S, then to larger enclosures, then to narrow NW/SE orientated enclosures. Entity 10038's location within this can be seen on Sheet 4. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It would appear that 10038 lies to the south of the narrow N/S enclosures and just to the west of the very large enclosures and could be seen as a transitional phase in the development of these enclosures. Perhaps a need for larger enclosures was first recognised here or a large enclosure at this location was part of the overall plan, as these 'zones' are quite distinct. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So a large enclosure, part of a wider planned/ organised BA landscape, which appears, for some of the BA at least to have probably been a livestock enclosure, a change in use is hinted at by the blocking off of access to the trackway 10017. Its size and proximity to the settlement 10009 may have been significant and indeed it must have survived more or less as a visible entity until some of the ditches were recut in the medieval period. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of any activity, if indeed there was any, in the intervening period from the BA to med is unknown, although I would suggest it survived as scrub land. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The next activity within the enclosure is the pre C12th structures,- see entity 10029. The suggestion is that the enclosure may have been visible in some form or other,- remnant/ overgrown hedgelines, within which most of this pre C12th activity occurred.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If there was some sort of continuity within the rest of the enclosures, as pasture for livestock through the iron age, roman and Saxon period, and 10038 remained marginal, then rather than build on valuable grazing land, 10038 would have been a suitable location. This is speculative of course.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Equally a certain amount of continuity of use into the iron age combined with the marginalisation of certain enclosures with progressive marginalisation through the following periods would have resulted in a large area of scrub/ heath, some of which may have been more readily converted back to grazing or arable and some not such as 10038 and consequently built on due to its lesser value. Although through the following medieval it does revert to grazing. Again this is pure speculation and may or may not support the theory that this enclosure became marginal land in the BA initially. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Anyway, this enclosure which was part of the everyday life of some people in the bronze age persisted as a more or less recognisable framing of space to become part of the everyday for some in the medieval. So how those people perceived and experienced the landscape they inhabited or part of it was determined quite some time previous in the Bronze Age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** (512, DMT): It is also possible that this enclosure may have contained small concentrations of post structures. These may have been truncated by the later medieval activity, or been relatively shallow in the first place and therefore not survived. Many of the postholes within this area are either undated or simply phased via extrapolation and therefore some may indeed relate to the original BA phase of enclosure. The level of modern truncation must also be considered as a large  central area, (contained within the medieval polygonal enclosure) has been well disturbed, as well as specific areas to the north of the polygonal space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It may be noted that the northern E-W boundary ditch SG[526240](recut 526249) to the west of the cursus aligns centrally to this enclosure (entity 10038) -See Sheet 2- and gives the impression of the two systems working as a whole within a newly organised and associated anthropogenic landscape. This does evoke the image of a planned discipline implemented upon the environment forcing the issue of division and reaction to space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2 entity location + surrounding features **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4 entity location within BA landscape","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538241","PSH02",538241
689,"10038 Bronze Age Enclosure","300 Bronze Age",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Large bronze age enclosure on eastern part of area 49. (see sheet 2). Noticeably the largest of all those surrounding it, area of approximately 11000 square metres (1.1 hectares), about twice the size of most other BA enclosures. North, east and southern sides marked by ditches, western side by remnant cursus bank presumably. Absence of BA features from within this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This enclosure in spite of its size is still part of the BA enclosure system overall and was probably laid out as part of this development. There is no evidence to suggest it was an add on and there is no indication of internal divisions being laid out through the lifetime of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Where there is evidence for bank material it is suggested that the bank was external  to the enclosure and it can be assumed a hedgerow was established along this, tree throws have been noted, particularly along SG[538241], also in the medieval period some of these ditches were recut, they can't have been visible, but an extant hedgerow would have been. So we have a large field with a big hedge. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There is no evidence from within the enclosure itself to suggest what it was used for, e.g.; a waterhole to link it to livestock or structures to suggest settlement. However the proximity of entity 10009, settlement area and entity 10017, trackway may suggest the function of this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The trackway does lead to this area and during its earlier phases was open, only blocked later, which may suggest that at some stage access for livestock was desirable,  then later was not. Also possibly hinting at a change in function for this enclosure. Entity 10009 is also close and the trackway does appear to funnel from the enclosure to settlement suggesting an association and further connection to livestock. The durability of the hedges into the medieval period may suggest they were maintained during their early life which in turn suggests they were important for this enclosure,- probably to contain livestock. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity to the settlement may also suggest an arable aspect to the enclosure,- close to home, less distance to walk? If the trackway was blocked perhaps it was for this reason,- a shift to crops at this location? However the evidence is slight. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Another possible explanation may be that after the trackway was blocked this enclosure may have reverted to scrub, possibly there was a reduction in cattle numbers, a shift away from grazing, whether for environmental or economic reasons would be hard to say and this enclosure was just left as 'set aside' land or fallow. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the BA landscape is believed to have started in the west near the river Colne and progressed east towards the river Crane. The nature of the enclosures has also developed, they are narrower and E/W orientated in the west, moving to narrow N/S, then to larger enclosures, then to narrow NW/SE orientated enclosures. Entity 10038's location within this can be seen on Sheet 4. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It would appear that 10038 lies to the south of the narrow N/S enclosures and just to the west of the very large enclosures and could be seen as a transitional phase in the development of these enclosures. Perhaps a need for larger enclosures was first recognised here or a large enclosure at this location was part of the overall plan, as these 'zones' are quite distinct. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So a large enclosure, part of a wider planned/ organised BA landscape, which appears, for some of the BA at least to have probably been a livestock enclosure, a change in use is hinted at by the blocking off of access to the trackway 10017. Its size and proximity to the settlement 10009 may have been significant and indeed it must have survived more or less as a visible entity until some of the ditches were recut in the medieval period. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of any activity, if indeed there was any, in the intervening period from the BA to med is unknown, although I would suggest it survived as scrub land. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The next activity within the enclosure is the pre C12th structures,- see entity 10029. The suggestion is that the enclosure may have been visible in some form or other,- remnant/ overgrown hedgelines, within which most of this pre C12th activity occurred.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If there was some sort of continuity within the rest of the enclosures, as pasture for livestock through the iron age, roman and Saxon period, and 10038 remained marginal, then rather than build on valuable grazing land, 10038 would have been a suitable location. This is speculative of course.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Equally a certain amount of continuity of use into the iron age combined with the marginalisation of certain enclosures with progressive marginalisation through the following periods would have resulted in a large area of scrub/ heath, some of which may have been more readily converted back to grazing or arable and some not such as 10038 and consequently built on due to its lesser value. Although through the following medieval it does revert to grazing. Again this is pure speculation and may or may not support the theory that this enclosure became marginal land in the BA initially. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Anyway, this enclosure which was part of the everyday life of some people in the bronze age persisted as a more or less recognisable framing of space to become part of the everyday for some in the medieval. So how those people perceived and experienced the landscape they inhabited or part of it was determined quite some time previous in the Bronze Age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** (512, DMT): It is also possible that this enclosure may have contained small concentrations of post structures. These may have been truncated by the later medieval activity, or been relatively shallow in the first place and therefore not survived. Many of the postholes within this area are either undated or simply phased via extrapolation and therefore some may indeed relate to the original BA phase of enclosure. The level of modern truncation must also be considered as a large  central area, (contained within the medieval polygonal enclosure) has been well disturbed, as well as specific areas to the north of the polygonal space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It may be noted that the northern E-W boundary ditch SG[526240](recut 526249) to the west of the cursus aligns centrally to this enclosure (entity 10038) -See Sheet 2- and gives the impression of the two systems working as a whole within a newly organised and associated anthropogenic landscape. This does evoke the image of a planned discipline implemented upon the environment forcing the issue of division and reaction to space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2 entity location + surrounding features **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4 entity location within BA landscape","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538247","PSH02",538247
689,"10038 Bronze Age Enclosure","300 Bronze Age",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Large bronze age enclosure on eastern part of area 49. (see sheet 2). Noticeably the largest of all those surrounding it, area of approximately 11000 square metres (1.1 hectares), about twice the size of most other BA enclosures. North, east and southern sides marked by ditches, western side by remnant cursus bank presumably. Absence of BA features from within this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This enclosure in spite of its size is still part of the BA enclosure system overall and was probably laid out as part of this development. There is no evidence to suggest it was an add on and there is no indication of internal divisions being laid out through the lifetime of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Where there is evidence for bank material it is suggested that the bank was external  to the enclosure and it can be assumed a hedgerow was established along this, tree throws have been noted, particularly along SG[538241], also in the medieval period some of these ditches were recut, they can't have been visible, but an extant hedgerow would have been. So we have a large field with a big hedge. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There is no evidence from within the enclosure itself to suggest what it was used for, e.g.; a waterhole to link it to livestock or structures to suggest settlement. However the proximity of entity 10009, settlement area and entity 10017, trackway may suggest the function of this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The trackway does lead to this area and during its earlier phases was open, only blocked later, which may suggest that at some stage access for livestock was desirable,  then later was not. Also possibly hinting at a change in function for this enclosure. Entity 10009 is also close and the trackway does appear to funnel from the enclosure to settlement suggesting an association and further connection to livestock. The durability of the hedges into the medieval period may suggest they were maintained during their early life which in turn suggests they were important for this enclosure,- probably to contain livestock. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity to the settlement may also suggest an arable aspect to the enclosure,- close to home, less distance to walk? If the trackway was blocked perhaps it was for this reason,- a shift to crops at this location? However the evidence is slight. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Another possible explanation may be that after the trackway was blocked this enclosure may have reverted to scrub, possibly there was a reduction in cattle numbers, a shift away from grazing, whether for environmental or economic reasons would be hard to say and this enclosure was just left as 'set aside' land or fallow. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the BA landscape is believed to have started in the west near the river Colne and progressed east towards the river Crane. The nature of the enclosures has also developed, they are narrower and E/W orientated in the west, moving to narrow N/S, then to larger enclosures, then to narrow NW/SE orientated enclosures. Entity 10038's location within this can be seen on Sheet 4. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It would appear that 10038 lies to the south of the narrow N/S enclosures and just to the west of the very large enclosures and could be seen as a transitional phase in the development of these enclosures. Perhaps a need for larger enclosures was first recognised here or a large enclosure at this location was part of the overall plan, as these 'zones' are quite distinct. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So a large enclosure, part of a wider planned/ organised BA landscape, which appears, for some of the BA at least to have probably been a livestock enclosure, a change in use is hinted at by the blocking off of access to the trackway 10017. Its size and proximity to the settlement 10009 may have been significant and indeed it must have survived more or less as a visible entity until some of the ditches were recut in the medieval period. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of any activity, if indeed there was any, in the intervening period from the BA to med is unknown, although I would suggest it survived as scrub land. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The next activity within the enclosure is the pre C12th structures,- see entity 10029. The suggestion is that the enclosure may have been visible in some form or other,- remnant/ overgrown hedgelines, within which most of this pre C12th activity occurred.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If there was some sort of continuity within the rest of the enclosures, as pasture for livestock through the iron age, roman and Saxon period, and 10038 remained marginal, then rather than build on valuable grazing land, 10038 would have been a suitable location. This is speculative of course.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Equally a certain amount of continuity of use into the iron age combined with the marginalisation of certain enclosures with progressive marginalisation through the following periods would have resulted in a large area of scrub/ heath, some of which may have been more readily converted back to grazing or arable and some not such as 10038 and consequently built on due to its lesser value. Although through the following medieval it does revert to grazing. Again this is pure speculation and may or may not support the theory that this enclosure became marginal land in the BA initially. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Anyway, this enclosure which was part of the everyday life of some people in the bronze age persisted as a more or less recognisable framing of space to become part of the everyday for some in the medieval. So how those people perceived and experienced the landscape they inhabited or part of it was determined quite some time previous in the Bronze Age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** (512, DMT): It is also possible that this enclosure may have contained small concentrations of post structures. These may have been truncated by the later medieval activity, or been relatively shallow in the first place and therefore not survived. Many of the postholes within this area are either undated or simply phased via extrapolation and therefore some may indeed relate to the original BA phase of enclosure. The level of modern truncation must also be considered as a large  central area, (contained within the medieval polygonal enclosure) has been well disturbed, as well as specific areas to the north of the polygonal space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It may be noted that the northern E-W boundary ditch SG[526240](recut 526249) to the west of the cursus aligns centrally to this enclosure (entity 10038) -See Sheet 2- and gives the impression of the two systems working as a whole within a newly organised and associated anthropogenic landscape. This does evoke the image of a planned discipline implemented upon the environment forcing the issue of division and reaction to space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2 entity location + surrounding features **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4 entity location within BA landscape","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561142","PSH02",561142
689,"10038 Bronze Age Enclosure","300 Bronze Age",," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Large bronze age enclosure on eastern part of area 49. (see sheet 2). Noticeably the largest of all those surrounding it, area of approximately 11000 square metres (1.1 hectares), about twice the size of most other BA enclosures. North, east and southern sides marked by ditches, western side by remnant cursus bank presumably. Absence of BA features from within this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This enclosure in spite of its size is still part of the BA enclosure system overall and was probably laid out as part of this development. There is no evidence to suggest it was an add on and there is no indication of internal divisions being laid out through the lifetime of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Where there is evidence for bank material it is suggested that the bank was external  to the enclosure and it can be assumed a hedgerow was established along this, tree throws have been noted, particularly along SG[538241], also in the medieval period some of these ditches were recut, they can't have been visible, but an extant hedgerow would have been. So we have a large field with a big hedge. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There is no evidence from within the enclosure itself to suggest what it was used for, e.g.; a waterhole to link it to livestock or structures to suggest settlement. However the proximity of entity 10009, settlement area and entity 10017, trackway may suggest the function of this enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The trackway does lead to this area and during its earlier phases was open, only blocked later, which may suggest that at some stage access for livestock was desirable,  then later was not. Also possibly hinting at a change in function for this enclosure. Entity 10009 is also close and the trackway does appear to funnel from the enclosure to settlement suggesting an association and further connection to livestock. The durability of the hedges into the medieval period may suggest they were maintained during their early life which in turn suggests they were important for this enclosure,- probably to contain livestock. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The proximity to the settlement may also suggest an arable aspect to the enclosure,- close to home, less distance to walk? If the trackway was blocked perhaps it was for this reason,- a shift to crops at this location? However the evidence is slight. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Another possible explanation may be that after the trackway was blocked this enclosure may have reverted to scrub, possibly there was a reduction in cattle numbers, a shift away from grazing, whether for environmental or economic reasons would be hard to say and this enclosure was just left as 'set aside' land or fallow. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The development of the BA landscape is believed to have started in the west near the river Colne and progressed east towards the river Crane. The nature of the enclosures has also developed, they are narrower and E/W orientated in the west, moving to narrow N/S, then to larger enclosures, then to narrow NW/SE orientated enclosures. Entity 10038's location within this can be seen on Sheet 4. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It would appear that 10038 lies to the south of the narrow N/S enclosures and just to the west of the very large enclosures and could be seen as a transitional phase in the development of these enclosures. Perhaps a need for larger enclosures was first recognised here or a large enclosure at this location was part of the overall plan, as these 'zones' are quite distinct. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So a large enclosure, part of a wider planned/ organised BA landscape, which appears, for some of the BA at least to have probably been a livestock enclosure, a change in use is hinted at by the blocking off of access to the trackway 10017. Its size and proximity to the settlement 10009 may have been significant and indeed it must have survived more or less as a visible entity until some of the ditches were recut in the medieval period. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The nature of any activity, if indeed there was any, in the intervening period from the BA to med is unknown, although I would suggest it survived as scrub land. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The next activity within the enclosure is the pre C12th structures,- see entity 10029. The suggestion is that the enclosure may have been visible in some form or other,- remnant/ overgrown hedgelines, within which most of this pre C12th activity occurred.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  If there was some sort of continuity within the rest of the enclosures, as pasture for livestock through the iron age, roman and Saxon period, and 10038 remained marginal, then rather than build on valuable grazing land, 10038 would have been a suitable location. This is speculative of course.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Equally a certain amount of continuity of use into the iron age combined with the marginalisation of certain enclosures with progressive marginalisation through the following periods would have resulted in a large area of scrub/ heath, some of which may have been more readily converted back to grazing or arable and some not such as 10038 and consequently built on due to its lesser value. Although through the following medieval it does revert to grazing. Again this is pure speculation and may or may not support the theory that this enclosure became marginal land in the BA initially. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Anyway, this enclosure which was part of the everyday life of some people in the bronze age persisted as a more or less recognisable framing of space to become part of the everyday for some in the medieval. So how those people perceived and experienced the landscape they inhabited or part of it was determined quite some time previous in the Bronze Age. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** (512, DMT): It is also possible that this enclosure may have contained small concentrations of post structures. These may have been truncated by the later medieval activity, or been relatively shallow in the first place and therefore not survived. Many of the postholes within this area are either undated or simply phased via extrapolation and therefore some may indeed relate to the original BA phase of enclosure. The level of modern truncation must also be considered as a large  central area, (contained within the medieval polygonal enclosure) has been well disturbed, as well as specific areas to the north of the polygonal space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  It may be noted that the northern E-W boundary ditch SG[526240](recut 526249) to the west of the cursus aligns centrally to this enclosure (entity 10038) -See Sheet 2- and gives the impression of the two systems working as a whole within a newly organised and associated anthropogenic landscape. This does evoke the image of a planned discipline implemented upon the environment forcing the issue of division and reaction to space. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2 entity location + surrounding features **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4 entity location within BA landscape","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569092","PSH02",569092
692,"Bronze Age or Medieval fenceline",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** East west fence-line on area 49, comprised of 4 postholes. Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  See Sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  These 4 postholes have between them smaller ephemeral features, which may or may not be genuine, but the impression is of stakeholes or the remains of them. (see sheet 2) Never the less they appear to form a shot fence-line of approximately 13.5m in the south central part of area 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There are also other larger 'blobs' around but not all these were investigated. There are no relationships and any links are pure speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  No dating was recovered from any of the 4 postholes and any associated surfaces have long since been truncated away. So we have a fence-line, possibly a hurdle fence of unspecified date and no associated evidence to suggest its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10008 lies to the SW of a possible 6 post structure, entity 10039. (see sheet4). This is an undated structure but looks like it could be a chicken coop or something. This may suggest 10008 is also somehow connected to the control or penning of animals? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10008 is located within a BA enclosure; SG[526240] forming the northern boundary (see sheet4). So it is reasonable to suggest that this fence-line could also be of BA date and along with the 6 poster (entity 10039) be part of a BA farmyard with pens and so on. Entity 10009 to the north being settlement associated with this activity? This is quite circumstantial. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An alternative possibility is that the fence-line is of medieval date and associated with the medieval enclosures to the east. The axis of 10008 is perpendicular to that of entity 10022 (see sheet4), again this is quite circumstantial evidence. This fence-line would also have to belong to the pre C12th phase (entity 10029) as SG[560023], C12th ditch would have separated 10008 from the main medieval activity. Again the nature of 10008 and the 6 poster (entity 10039) would be interpreted in  a similar way  to before;- as associated with the keeping/ penning of animals. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So fence-line, exact extent unknown, so the assumption it is short and possibly part of a pen or division of animal enclosure, rather than linked to settlement but that is all based on conjecture. Also dating is problematic, no finds and any associated features or alignments are speculative. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So possible fence-line, may have been longer, of uncertain date and uncertain function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2:  Plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4:  Plan of 10008 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10008","PSH02 - 569009","PSH02",569009
692,"Bronze Age or Medieval fenceline",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** East west fence-line on area 49, comprised of 4 postholes. Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  See Sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  These 4 postholes have between them smaller ephemeral features, which may or may not be genuine, but the impression is of stakeholes or the remains of them. (see sheet 2) Never the less they appear to form a shot fence-line of approximately 13.5m in the south central part of area 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There are also other larger 'blobs' around but not all these were investigated. There are no relationships and any links are pure speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  No dating was recovered from any of the 4 postholes and any associated surfaces have long since been truncated away. So we have a fence-line, possibly a hurdle fence of unspecified date and no associated evidence to suggest its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10008 lies to the SW of a possible 6 post structure, entity 10039. (see sheet4). This is an undated structure but looks like it could be a chicken coop or something. This may suggest 10008 is also somehow connected to the control or penning of animals? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10008 is located within a BA enclosure; SG[526240] forming the northern boundary (see sheet4). So it is reasonable to suggest that this fence-line could also be of BA date and along with the 6 poster (entity 10039) be part of a BA farmyard with pens and so on. Entity 10009 to the north being settlement associated with this activity? This is quite circumstantial. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An alternative possibility is that the fence-line is of medieval date and associated with the medieval enclosures to the east. The axis of 10008 is perpendicular to that of entity 10022 (see sheet4), again this is quite circumstantial evidence. This fence-line would also have to belong to the pre C12th phase (entity 10029) as SG[560023], C12th ditch would have separated 10008 from the main medieval activity. Again the nature of 10008 and the 6 poster (entity 10039) would be interpreted in  a similar way  to before;- as associated with the keeping/ penning of animals. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So fence-line, exact extent unknown, so the assumption it is short and possibly part of a pen or division of animal enclosure, rather than linked to settlement but that is all based on conjecture. Also dating is problematic, no finds and any associated features or alignments are speculative. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So possible fence-line, may have been longer, of uncertain date and uncertain function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2:  Plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4:  Plan of 10008 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10008","PSH02 - 569011","PSH02",569011
692,"Bronze Age or Medieval fenceline",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** East west fence-line on area 49, comprised of 4 postholes. Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  See Sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  These 4 postholes have between them smaller ephemeral features, which may or may not be genuine, but the impression is of stakeholes or the remains of them. (see sheet 2) Never the less they appear to form a shot fence-line of approximately 13.5m in the south central part of area 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There are also other larger 'blobs' around but not all these were investigated. There are no relationships and any links are pure speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  No dating was recovered from any of the 4 postholes and any associated surfaces have long since been truncated away. So we have a fence-line, possibly a hurdle fence of unspecified date and no associated evidence to suggest its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10008 lies to the SW of a possible 6 post structure, entity 10039. (see sheet4). This is an undated structure but looks like it could be a chicken coop or something. This may suggest 10008 is also somehow connected to the control or penning of animals? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10008 is located within a BA enclosure; SG[526240] forming the northern boundary (see sheet4). So it is reasonable to suggest that this fence-line could also be of BA date and along with the 6 poster (entity 10039) be part of a BA farmyard with pens and so on. Entity 10009 to the north being settlement associated with this activity? This is quite circumstantial. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An alternative possibility is that the fence-line is of medieval date and associated with the medieval enclosures to the east. The axis of 10008 is perpendicular to that of entity 10022 (see sheet4), again this is quite circumstantial evidence. This fence-line would also have to belong to the pre C12th phase (entity 10029) as SG[560023], C12th ditch would have separated 10008 from the main medieval activity. Again the nature of 10008 and the 6 poster (entity 10039) would be interpreted in  a similar way  to before;- as associated with the keeping/ penning of animals. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So fence-line, exact extent unknown, so the assumption it is short and possibly part of a pen or division of animal enclosure, rather than linked to settlement but that is all based on conjecture. Also dating is problematic, no finds and any associated features or alignments are speculative. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So possible fence-line, may have been longer, of uncertain date and uncertain function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2:  Plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4:  Plan of 10008 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10008","PSH02 - 569013","PSH02",569013
692,"Bronze Age or Medieval fenceline",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** East west fence-line on area 49, comprised of 4 postholes. Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  See Sheet 2. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  These 4 postholes have between them smaller ephemeral features, which may or may not be genuine, but the impression is of stakeholes or the remains of them. (see sheet 2) Never the less they appear to form a shot fence-line of approximately 13.5m in the south central part of area 49. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  There are also other larger 'blobs' around but not all these were investigated. There are no relationships and any links are pure speculation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  No dating was recovered from any of the 4 postholes and any associated surfaces have long since been truncated away. So we have a fence-line, possibly a hurdle fence of unspecified date and no associated evidence to suggest its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10008 lies to the SW of a possible 6 post structure, entity 10039. (see sheet4). This is an undated structure but looks like it could be a chicken coop or something. This may suggest 10008 is also somehow connected to the control or penning of animals? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10008 is located within a BA enclosure; SG[526240] forming the northern boundary (see sheet4). So it is reasonable to suggest that this fence-line could also be of BA date and along with the 6 poster (entity 10039) be part of a BA farmyard with pens and so on. Entity 10009 to the north being settlement associated with this activity? This is quite circumstantial. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  An alternative possibility is that the fence-line is of medieval date and associated with the medieval enclosures to the east. The axis of 10008 is perpendicular to that of entity 10022 (see sheet4), again this is quite circumstantial evidence. This fence-line would also have to belong to the pre C12th phase (entity 10029) as SG[560023], C12th ditch would have separated 10008 from the main medieval activity. Again the nature of 10008 and the 6 poster (entity 10039) would be interpreted in  a similar way  to before;- as associated with the keeping/ penning of animals. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So fence-line, exact extent unknown, so the assumption it is short and possibly part of a pen or division of animal enclosure, rather than linked to settlement but that is all based on conjecture. Also dating is problematic, no finds and any associated features or alignments are speculative. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So possible fence-line, may have been longer, of uncertain date and uncertain function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2:  Plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 4:  Plan of 10008 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed","10008","PSH02 - 569015","PSH02",569015
693,"10039 ?Bronze Age or Medieval 6-post structure",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 6 post structure, comprised of 4 postholes forming a square approximately 2.6m x 2.7m with 2 postholes approximately 3.5m to the south. (see sheet 2). Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No dating was recovered from any of the postholes and no relationships exist. So the dating of the structure suggested by these 6 postholes is problematic. Also any associated surfaces have been truncated away so there is nothing to indicate its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The pattern of the postholes suggests that the 4 northernmost ones possibly formed the main part of the structure, possibly raised off the ground. The 2 southern postholes [555261], [555264] may have been associated with access to this, a ramp or ladder perhaps, so this suggests some sort of agricultural structure such as for grain storage or a chicken coop. If the structure was raised off the ground then there would be no associated surfaces anyway to indicate a particular function. The form this possible structure took and whether it was raised or not can only remain conjecture. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is located within a BA enclosure, its northern side represented by SG[526240], so it is possibly also BA. Possibly there are other unrecognised structures in that area of a similar agricultural nature, (see sheet 3). However settlement evidence lies beyond the enclosure at entity 10009. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is also located close to the medieval enclosures and in particular structures 10014 and 10022 (see sheet 3). So 10039 could be a chicken coop/ grain store within a medieval farmyard with the 10 and 12 posters (entities10014 and 10022) as the main buildings there. If 10039 was to belong to the medieval it would have to be pre C12th as SG[560023], a C12th ditch, would have separated them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So10039 is possibly part of the pre C12th landscape (see entity 10029) and would fit nicely as part of a farmyard connected to entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 6 post structure, possibly connected to agriculture, possibly a grain store or chicken coop. Date uncertain, may be BA or possibly/ likely to be medieval (pre C12th). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2: plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 3: location of 10039 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555249","PSH02",555249
693,"10039 ?Bronze Age or Medieval 6-post structure",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 6 post structure, comprised of 4 postholes forming a square approximately 2.6m x 2.7m with 2 postholes approximately 3.5m to the south. (see sheet 2). Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No dating was recovered from any of the postholes and no relationships exist. So the dating of the structure suggested by these 6 postholes is problematic. Also any associated surfaces have been truncated away so there is nothing to indicate its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The pattern of the postholes suggests that the 4 northernmost ones possibly formed the main part of the structure, possibly raised off the ground. The 2 southern postholes [555261], [555264] may have been associated with access to this, a ramp or ladder perhaps, so this suggests some sort of agricultural structure such as for grain storage or a chicken coop. If the structure was raised off the ground then there would be no associated surfaces anyway to indicate a particular function. The form this possible structure took and whether it was raised or not can only remain conjecture. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is located within a BA enclosure, its northern side represented by SG[526240], so it is possibly also BA. Possibly there are other unrecognised structures in that area of a similar agricultural nature, (see sheet 3). However settlement evidence lies beyond the enclosure at entity 10009. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is also located close to the medieval enclosures and in particular structures 10014 and 10022 (see sheet 3). So 10039 could be a chicken coop/ grain store within a medieval farmyard with the 10 and 12 posters (entities10014 and 10022) as the main buildings there. If 10039 was to belong to the medieval it would have to be pre C12th as SG[560023], a C12th ditch, would have separated them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So10039 is possibly part of the pre C12th landscape (see entity 10029) and would fit nicely as part of a farmyard connected to entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 6 post structure, possibly connected to agriculture, possibly a grain store or chicken coop. Date uncertain, may be BA or possibly/ likely to be medieval (pre C12th). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2: plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 3: location of 10039 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555251","PSH02",555251
693,"10039 ?Bronze Age or Medieval 6-post structure",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 6 post structure, comprised of 4 postholes forming a square approximately 2.6m x 2.7m with 2 postholes approximately 3.5m to the south. (see sheet 2). Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No dating was recovered from any of the postholes and no relationships exist. So the dating of the structure suggested by these 6 postholes is problematic. Also any associated surfaces have been truncated away so there is nothing to indicate its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The pattern of the postholes suggests that the 4 northernmost ones possibly formed the main part of the structure, possibly raised off the ground. The 2 southern postholes [555261], [555264] may have been associated with access to this, a ramp or ladder perhaps, so this suggests some sort of agricultural structure such as for grain storage or a chicken coop. If the structure was raised off the ground then there would be no associated surfaces anyway to indicate a particular function. The form this possible structure took and whether it was raised or not can only remain conjecture. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is located within a BA enclosure, its northern side represented by SG[526240], so it is possibly also BA. Possibly there are other unrecognised structures in that area of a similar agricultural nature, (see sheet 3). However settlement evidence lies beyond the enclosure at entity 10009. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is also located close to the medieval enclosures and in particular structures 10014 and 10022 (see sheet 3). So 10039 could be a chicken coop/ grain store within a medieval farmyard with the 10 and 12 posters (entities10014 and 10022) as the main buildings there. If 10039 was to belong to the medieval it would have to be pre C12th as SG[560023], a C12th ditch, would have separated them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So10039 is possibly part of the pre C12th landscape (see entity 10029) and would fit nicely as part of a farmyard connected to entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 6 post structure, possibly connected to agriculture, possibly a grain store or chicken coop. Date uncertain, may be BA or possibly/ likely to be medieval (pre C12th). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2: plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 3: location of 10039 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555254","PSH02",555254
693,"10039 ?Bronze Age or Medieval 6-post structure",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 6 post structure, comprised of 4 postholes forming a square approximately 2.6m x 2.7m with 2 postholes approximately 3.5m to the south. (see sheet 2). Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No dating was recovered from any of the postholes and no relationships exist. So the dating of the structure suggested by these 6 postholes is problematic. Also any associated surfaces have been truncated away so there is nothing to indicate its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The pattern of the postholes suggests that the 4 northernmost ones possibly formed the main part of the structure, possibly raised off the ground. The 2 southern postholes [555261], [555264] may have been associated with access to this, a ramp or ladder perhaps, so this suggests some sort of agricultural structure such as for grain storage or a chicken coop. If the structure was raised off the ground then there would be no associated surfaces anyway to indicate a particular function. The form this possible structure took and whether it was raised or not can only remain conjecture. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is located within a BA enclosure, its northern side represented by SG[526240], so it is possibly also BA. Possibly there are other unrecognised structures in that area of a similar agricultural nature, (see sheet 3). However settlement evidence lies beyond the enclosure at entity 10009. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is also located close to the medieval enclosures and in particular structures 10014 and 10022 (see sheet 3). So 10039 could be a chicken coop/ grain store within a medieval farmyard with the 10 and 12 posters (entities10014 and 10022) as the main buildings there. If 10039 was to belong to the medieval it would have to be pre C12th as SG[560023], a C12th ditch, would have separated them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So10039 is possibly part of the pre C12th landscape (see entity 10029) and would fit nicely as part of a farmyard connected to entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 6 post structure, possibly connected to agriculture, possibly a grain store or chicken coop. Date uncertain, may be BA or possibly/ likely to be medieval (pre C12th). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2: plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 3: location of 10039 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555257","PSH02",555257
693,"10039 ?Bronze Age or Medieval 6-post structure",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 6 post structure, comprised of 4 postholes forming a square approximately 2.6m x 2.7m with 2 postholes approximately 3.5m to the south. (see sheet 2). Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No dating was recovered from any of the postholes and no relationships exist. So the dating of the structure suggested by these 6 postholes is problematic. Also any associated surfaces have been truncated away so there is nothing to indicate its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The pattern of the postholes suggests that the 4 northernmost ones possibly formed the main part of the structure, possibly raised off the ground. The 2 southern postholes [555261], [555264] may have been associated with access to this, a ramp or ladder perhaps, so this suggests some sort of agricultural structure such as for grain storage or a chicken coop. If the structure was raised off the ground then there would be no associated surfaces anyway to indicate a particular function. The form this possible structure took and whether it was raised or not can only remain conjecture. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is located within a BA enclosure, its northern side represented by SG[526240], so it is possibly also BA. Possibly there are other unrecognised structures in that area of a similar agricultural nature, (see sheet 3). However settlement evidence lies beyond the enclosure at entity 10009. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is also located close to the medieval enclosures and in particular structures 10014 and 10022 (see sheet 3). So 10039 could be a chicken coop/ grain store within a medieval farmyard with the 10 and 12 posters (entities10014 and 10022) as the main buildings there. If 10039 was to belong to the medieval it would have to be pre C12th as SG[560023], a C12th ditch, would have separated them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So10039 is possibly part of the pre C12th landscape (see entity 10029) and would fit nicely as part of a farmyard connected to entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 6 post structure, possibly connected to agriculture, possibly a grain store or chicken coop. Date uncertain, may be BA or possibly/ likely to be medieval (pre C12th). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2: plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 3: location of 10039 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555261","PSH02",555261
693,"10039 ?Bronze Age or Medieval 6-post structure",,," Description **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** 6 post structure, comprised of 4 postholes forming a square approximately 2.6m x 2.7m with 2 postholes approximately 3.5m to the south. (see sheet 2). Date uncertain. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Interpretation **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No dating was recovered from any of the postholes and no relationships exist. So the dating of the structure suggested by these 6 postholes is problematic. Also any associated surfaces have been truncated away so there is nothing to indicate its function. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  The pattern of the postholes suggests that the 4 northernmost ones possibly formed the main part of the structure, possibly raised off the ground. The 2 southern postholes [555261], [555264] may have been associated with access to this, a ramp or ladder perhaps, so this suggests some sort of agricultural structure such as for grain storage or a chicken coop. If the structure was raised off the ground then there would be no associated surfaces anyway to indicate a particular function. The form this possible structure took and whether it was raised or not can only remain conjecture. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is located within a BA enclosure, its northern side represented by SG[526240], so it is possibly also BA. Possibly there are other unrecognised structures in that area of a similar agricultural nature, (see sheet 3). However settlement evidence lies beyond the enclosure at entity 10009. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  Entity 10039 is also located close to the medieval enclosures and in particular structures 10014 and 10022 (see sheet 3). So 10039 could be a chicken coop/ grain store within a medieval farmyard with the 10 and 12 posters (entities10014 and 10022) as the main buildings there. If 10039 was to belong to the medieval it would have to be pre C12th as SG[560023], a C12th ditch, would have separated them. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So10039 is possibly part of the pre C12th landscape (see entity 10029) and would fit nicely as part of a farmyard connected to entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  So 6 post structure, possibly connected to agriculture, possibly a grain store or chicken coop. Date uncertain, may be BA or possibly/ likely to be medieval (pre C12th). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 2: plan of constituent postholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Sheet 3: location of 10039 in relation to other features","Simon McCann","Excavation","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555264","PSH02",555264
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517229","PSH02",517229
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517232","PSH02",517232
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517262","PSH02",517262
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517284","PSH02",517284
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526276","PSH02",526276
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526279","PSH02",526279
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526281","PSH02",526281
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527215","PSH02",527215
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527261","PSH02",527261
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537016","PSH02",537016
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537023","PSH02",537023
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537034","PSH02",537034
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537044","PSH02",537044
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537056","PSH02",537056
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537068","PSH02",537068
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537082","PSH02",537082
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537093","PSH02",537093
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537134","PSH02",537134
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537187","PSH02",537187
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546065","PSH02",546065
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546066","PSH02",546066
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553032","PSH02",553032
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553037","PSH02",553037
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553044","PSH02",553044
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 560027","PSH02",560027
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561153","PSH02",561153
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569022","PSH02",569022
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570027","PSH02",570027
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570039","PSH02",570039
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570107","PSH02",570107
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575181","PSH02",575181
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578112","PSH02",578112
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578115","PSH02",578115
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 587037","PSH02",587037
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592033","PSH02",592033
698,"Medieval enclosure 1","625 Saxo-Norman",,"Formerly Entity 10029 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity represents a system prior to the construction of the well defined development of enclosure that was phased to the 12th century. This initial system has not been well defined by associated enclosure, nor through refined spot dates of finds from the features concerned. It has merely been the possibility of a pre-12th century date that has produced this Entity, either from ceramic that is usually indicative of Saxo-Norman dating, or from associated alignment that have made these assumptions necessary to be specified as a separate group. This is an important addition to our understanding of the development of the early Medieval movement of occupation and control through enclosure of the Burrow's Hill landscape, and indeed the Heathrow landscape as a whole. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Firstly, this group contains the building Entities 10014 and 10022. Although there are no stratigraphic relationships between these buildings, they are structurally similar, constructed by a series of post-pits creating a double line of vertical support posts. Entity 10014 consisted of ten posts, aligned east-west and was c. 7m away to the west from building 10022. Both buildings were c. 6.5m wide although 10014 was 12m long as opposed to 18m in length of the entity 10022. Entity 10022 was aligned NNE-SSW forming a non-squared movement/development of construction to the functionality of this primary medieval system of Burrow's Hill. There is a third associated structural entity located c.30m to the south-west of building 10014, below the south-western corner of SG 560023 (12th century rectangular enclosure). This structural group (Entity 10018) comprises three post-pits and a potential beam slot. All other associated elements to this group have been lost, either through truncation or from the fact that additional post-pits were concealed within the larger spreads of brickearth deposited around this area. Although there is no direct evidence to link these post-pits and beam slot to the same associated structure, they are similar in their construction with their alignments suggesting a potential for an associated design. The proximity of Entity 10018 to the Entities 10014 and 10022, make the possibility of these elements linking to an associated building within a defined space of development reasonably high. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** These buildings seemed to have developed in association with several ditches that may form a remnant example of pre-12th century enclosure.  The ditch SG 517232 was located c. 6m to the north of Entity 10014 and was recorded as being cut by the 12th century enclosure ditch SG 560023. It is possible that this gully may have been a remnant of an initial boundary that curved around the north and western face of the ten post structure. Ditches 526276, 526279 and 526281 are all formed on a NNE-SSW alignment and seem to flank the eastern face of building 10022. These ditches had no stratigraphic relationship with one another but it seems likely that they were representative of separate phases of boundary development along this specific orientation. It is probable that they linked directly with SG 537187 (SG 537189 adjacent to this was seen to be later than the enclosure SG 560023), a ditch remnant that was located to the north and would have provided a continuation of this flanking boundary. Adjacent to this, running on a parallel line some 17m to the west, was the SG 598017, which was also associated with the segment 570068. These flanked the western face of building Entity 10022 and contained evidence of post-settings held within them. SG 598017 and more specifically, 570068, lay between the buildings 10014 and 10022, almost forming a structural partition between the structures, possibly denoting a division of utility. At the northern end of Entity 10022, two pits (546065 and 546066) are located, both of which have been undercut in profile with the earlier of the two pits (546066) contained Early Medieval pottery (mid 11th to early 12th century). These were not midden pits as they were not packed with artefactual debris and it is likely that they represent specifically excavated storage pits, probably associated with Entity 10022. This may imply a use for the building 10022 other than storage or sheltering animals and may in-fact indicate a periodic inhabitation of the building. Although very small by the standards of other medieval occupation areas, the finds assemblage does point to more than a simple sheep shed or storage barn. The pottery is domestic with a concentration of CBM around the two structures, suggesting that perhaps these were in fact substantially constructed, not simply by the size of the posts used, but also by the degree of competence and use of fabric that they incorporated. It is clear by the simple fact of the construction of the rectangular enclosure ditch SG 560023 in the 12th century, that these buildings were utilised and bounded by this act of enclosure. This area was from the first instant a defined place of segmented activity where an enhanced level of control of the surrounding environment could be initiated.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The potential for pre-12th century development for medieval Burrow's Hill Close is not limited to the area later bounded by SG 560023 (rectangular enclosure). Approximately 66m to the north-east is situated another post-structured building (Entity 10002) constructed along the same alignment as Entity 10022. Again this structure was constructed along two parallel rows of posts with a rounded porch at the north-eastern end. The shape in plan of this building was quite different from the other two previously described as the rows of posts were seen to bow out slightly, so giving the impression of a boat, with the porch representing the prow. This style of construction can itself be suggestive of a Saxo-Norman date (examples of such construction techniques can be seen in Viking and Saxon architecture), but pottery indicative of a Saxo-Norman date was also recovered from the post settings of this structure. Although later pottery of the c. 13th century was found here also, this may relate more specifically to the demolition of the structure rather than giving a TPQ for its use. This would also tie in with the later pottery found within the upper fills of ditch segment 570068 as the original post settings (601011, 601013) located in the base of this segment were potentially removed by the ditch 570068. The ditch SG 598017 was also found to contain post settings that were removed by the cutting of re-cut SG 538260, inferring again that an initial structure of development was reformed around a 12th century plan. This is the next stage of more specific enclosure with the construction of the rectangular enclosure SG 560023 and SG's 529228, 529233 and 512072 to the north and east. These initial structural alignments seemed to be used as partition lines between the building Entities 10014 and 10022. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the main area of discussion tends to migrate around the structural development of this initial medieval phase, the location of the waterholes must not be separated too much from this appraisal of the pre-12th century development. Although the two waterholes located within the defined medieval boundaries are dated initially as 12th century, it is in all likelihood that both 529139 and 569022 co-existed during the primary pre-12th century stage of this development. It is clear that 569022 cannot have been contemporary with the enclosure SG 560023 as they would have overlapped, making both the waterhole and the terminus of the enclosure ditch unworkable in a practical sense. A number of the fills of the southern waterhole 569022 appear to resemble deliberate infilling and the pottery recovered from the fills indicative of earlier medieval fabrics rather than later. It is probable that the waterhole was in use initially along with the northern waterhole 529139 and that the two buildings were located centrally to them. The divisional alignment of structural ditch SG 598017 and posts 601011, 601013 and 512085 to the south, align directly with the centre of the two waterholes. It could be inferred from this that the waterholes in their initial construction were pivotal to the distribution and overall developmental design of this area. With the infilling of the waterhole 569022, the northern waterhole became the sole focus during the 12th century and from then on was integral to a scheme of boundary expansion and control, and thereby prepared the way for the continued development of the post 12th century design. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It is therefore reasonable to suggest that as the medieval landscape progressed, certain aspects of the original form of said landscape were either disregarded or enhanced even more. What had been specific to the agrarian Bronze Age in the western area of Burrows Hill, now seems to have been utilised successfully within the medieval as open fields and potentially common grazing. The realisation of deliberate medieval settlement here may allude more to the later missing hamlet of Southcote having a more prolonged development than was previously thought.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598017","PSH02",598017
699,"10030 12th century AD enclosure","715 Early Medieval",,"Medieval Enclosure 1: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity describes the main rectangular boundary of the 12th century system of enclosure. Although this is only a part of the overall system of enclosure in this area, it is specific to a purpose or utility and is significant to the on-going development and the need to segment and control the movement and access within the system as a whole.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 560023 forms the western and northern flank of the enclosure with a short return to the east at its southern extent. The northern line of the ditch is continued on its eastern extent by the ephemeral segments 553092 and 553096, where this western rectangular enclosure meets the polygonal enclosure immediately to the east. For this ditch to have been constructed, it is clear that the waterhole 569022 was in-filled in preparation for this, and a building was demolished and used as an alignment marker, the remnants of which is described as Entity 10018. SG 560023 terminated just short of where the in-filled waterhole 569022 was located. What appears to be an entranceway is created between this terminus and the terminus of the western end of the E-W ditch SG 561153 (which also provides the southern boundary to the polygonal enclosure Entity 10031). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although Entity 10018 has gone out of use as a structure by this time, part of its plan form has been incorporated into the ditch alignment, possibly to enhance the imagery of the boundary as much as for ease of construction. The fact that this structure has been removed gives the impression of the area of inhabitation shrinking somewhat from the west towards a more expansive measured system of segmented enclosure to the east. The ditch SG 560023 removed one building from the landscape, and yet incorporated two others. Entity 10014 in particular forms the north-west marker around which the enclosure wraps itself. As can be seen on plan, the E-W return of the northern line of SG 560023 kinks slightly as it moves past the Ten Post Structure (Entity 10014). This is because as it is cut further to the east along the northern flank of the Ten Poster, it needs to accommodate the northern end of the building Entity 10022 and the associated pits 546065 and 546066. This is reasonable evidence to infer that these buildings pre-existed the rectangular enclosure as a 12th century boundary, but also that the buildings were still actively utilised within the new order of the landscape and that they were important enough to form the basis for the new system.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The location of the southern entranceway confirms the importance of this building within its environment. The N-S gully 537102 is located centrally to the entranceway and contained post settings within the basal gravel fill. To the left of this gate / partition, one would be focused upon Entity 10014, while to the right it would be upon Entity 10022 that one would face. Whether or not this was a deliberate aspect of the enclosure design in respect of the utility of the building that was observed, or if it was simply the most useful place to build an access point to the enclosure it is unclear. Certainly, the regard within which buildings are held is often reflected in their stature of design within the landscape and how that is perceived. The entranceway to the enclosure is also interesting from the point that it takes in the waterhole 569022 and therefore continues to some extent the original axis of reference created in the pre-12th century development of this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the system of enclosure is a deliberate production of intent towards a limitation and control of access and movement upon the landscape around it, it is necessary to split the system up into reason and effect. The individual sections of the enclosure system identified here represent separate aspects to the manipulation and control of the landscape as a whole. The Entity 10030 is probably the most noticeably separate form within the enclosure system and has a much less organic definition to its design. This rectangular enclosure is definitive in its purpose, there is a specific form in its construction and it is this that separates it from the reason behind the adjoining enclosures (Entities 10031 and 10032). While the other sections of enclosure have almost certainly evolved around the control and movement of livestock, Entity 10030 has evolved around a pre- **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** existing specific element that has necessitated its form to take that of a far more regimented and regular plan. This has enforced the condition of utilitarian division within a developing landscape; that is to say the reason was the specific use and importance of the extant buildings, with the effect being a deliberate boundary specifically formed to enhance the meaning of the buildings utility within the expanding system. It may be that as the rectangular enclosure specifically contained buildings, then it probably created an area of inhabitation and multi-use. This is not an enclosure designed around the idea of animal husbandry, this is an area designed around the idea of peoples control of the landscape and their changing use of it.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553092","PSH02",553092
699,"10030 12th century AD enclosure","715 Early Medieval",,"Medieval Enclosure 1: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity describes the main rectangular boundary of the 12th century system of enclosure. Although this is only a part of the overall system of enclosure in this area, it is specific to a purpose or utility and is significant to the on-going development and the need to segment and control the movement and access within the system as a whole.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 560023 forms the western and northern flank of the enclosure with a short return to the east at its southern extent. The northern line of the ditch is continued on its eastern extent by the ephemeral segments 553092 and 553096, where this western rectangular enclosure meets the polygonal enclosure immediately to the east. For this ditch to have been constructed, it is clear that the waterhole 569022 was in-filled in preparation for this, and a building was demolished and used as an alignment marker, the remnants of which is described as Entity 10018. SG 560023 terminated just short of where the in-filled waterhole 569022 was located. What appears to be an entranceway is created between this terminus and the terminus of the western end of the E-W ditch SG 561153 (which also provides the southern boundary to the polygonal enclosure Entity 10031). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although Entity 10018 has gone out of use as a structure by this time, part of its plan form has been incorporated into the ditch alignment, possibly to enhance the imagery of the boundary as much as for ease of construction. The fact that this structure has been removed gives the impression of the area of inhabitation shrinking somewhat from the west towards a more expansive measured system of segmented enclosure to the east. The ditch SG 560023 removed one building from the landscape, and yet incorporated two others. Entity 10014 in particular forms the north-west marker around which the enclosure wraps itself. As can be seen on plan, the E-W return of the northern line of SG 560023 kinks slightly as it moves past the Ten Post Structure (Entity 10014). This is because as it is cut further to the east along the northern flank of the Ten Poster, it needs to accommodate the northern end of the building Entity 10022 and the associated pits 546065 and 546066. This is reasonable evidence to infer that these buildings pre-existed the rectangular enclosure as a 12th century boundary, but also that the buildings were still actively utilised within the new order of the landscape and that they were important enough to form the basis for the new system.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The location of the southern entranceway confirms the importance of this building within its environment. The N-S gully 537102 is located centrally to the entranceway and contained post settings within the basal gravel fill. To the left of this gate / partition, one would be focused upon Entity 10014, while to the right it would be upon Entity 10022 that one would face. Whether or not this was a deliberate aspect of the enclosure design in respect of the utility of the building that was observed, or if it was simply the most useful place to build an access point to the enclosure it is unclear. Certainly, the regard within which buildings are held is often reflected in their stature of design within the landscape and how that is perceived. The entranceway to the enclosure is also interesting from the point that it takes in the waterhole 569022 and therefore continues to some extent the original axis of reference created in the pre-12th century development of this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the system of enclosure is a deliberate production of intent towards a limitation and control of access and movement upon the landscape around it, it is necessary to split the system up into reason and effect. The individual sections of the enclosure system identified here represent separate aspects to the manipulation and control of the landscape as a whole. The Entity 10030 is probably the most noticeably separate form within the enclosure system and has a much less organic definition to its design. This rectangular enclosure is definitive in its purpose, there is a specific form in its construction and it is this that separates it from the reason behind the adjoining enclosures (Entities 10031 and 10032). While the other sections of enclosure have almost certainly evolved around the control and movement of livestock, Entity 10030 has evolved around a pre- **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** existing specific element that has necessitated its form to take that of a far more regimented and regular plan. This has enforced the condition of utilitarian division within a developing landscape; that is to say the reason was the specific use and importance of the extant buildings, with the effect being a deliberate boundary specifically formed to enhance the meaning of the buildings utility within the expanding system. It may be that as the rectangular enclosure specifically contained buildings, then it probably created an area of inhabitation and multi-use. This is not an enclosure designed around the idea of animal husbandry, this is an area designed around the idea of peoples control of the landscape and their changing use of it.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 553096","PSH02",553096
699,"10030 12th century AD enclosure","715 Early Medieval",,"Medieval Enclosure 1: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity describes the main rectangular boundary of the 12th century system of enclosure. Although this is only a part of the overall system of enclosure in this area, it is specific to a purpose or utility and is significant to the on-going development and the need to segment and control the movement and access within the system as a whole.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 560023 forms the western and northern flank of the enclosure with a short return to the east at its southern extent. The northern line of the ditch is continued on its eastern extent by the ephemeral segments 553092 and 553096, where this western rectangular enclosure meets the polygonal enclosure immediately to the east. For this ditch to have been constructed, it is clear that the waterhole 569022 was in-filled in preparation for this, and a building was demolished and used as an alignment marker, the remnants of which is described as Entity 10018. SG 560023 terminated just short of where the in-filled waterhole 569022 was located. What appears to be an entranceway is created between this terminus and the terminus of the western end of the E-W ditch SG 561153 (which also provides the southern boundary to the polygonal enclosure Entity 10031). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although Entity 10018 has gone out of use as a structure by this time, part of its plan form has been incorporated into the ditch alignment, possibly to enhance the imagery of the boundary as much as for ease of construction. The fact that this structure has been removed gives the impression of the area of inhabitation shrinking somewhat from the west towards a more expansive measured system of segmented enclosure to the east. The ditch SG 560023 removed one building from the landscape, and yet incorporated two others. Entity 10014 in particular forms the north-west marker around which the enclosure wraps itself. As can be seen on plan, the E-W return of the northern line of SG 560023 kinks slightly as it moves past the Ten Post Structure (Entity 10014). This is because as it is cut further to the east along the northern flank of the Ten Poster, it needs to accommodate the northern end of the building Entity 10022 and the associated pits 546065 and 546066. This is reasonable evidence to infer that these buildings pre-existed the rectangular enclosure as a 12th century boundary, but also that the buildings were still actively utilised within the new order of the landscape and that they were important enough to form the basis for the new system.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The location of the southern entranceway confirms the importance of this building within its environment. The N-S gully 537102 is located centrally to the entranceway and contained post settings within the basal gravel fill. To the left of this gate / partition, one would be focused upon Entity 10014, while to the right it would be upon Entity 10022 that one would face. Whether or not this was a deliberate aspect of the enclosure design in respect of the utility of the building that was observed, or if it was simply the most useful place to build an access point to the enclosure it is unclear. Certainly, the regard within which buildings are held is often reflected in their stature of design within the landscape and how that is perceived. The entranceway to the enclosure is also interesting from the point that it takes in the waterhole 569022 and therefore continues to some extent the original axis of reference created in the pre-12th century development of this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the system of enclosure is a deliberate production of intent towards a limitation and control of access and movement upon the landscape around it, it is necessary to split the system up into reason and effect. The individual sections of the enclosure system identified here represent separate aspects to the manipulation and control of the landscape as a whole. The Entity 10030 is probably the most noticeably separate form within the enclosure system and has a much less organic definition to its design. This rectangular enclosure is definitive in its purpose, there is a specific form in its construction and it is this that separates it from the reason behind the adjoining enclosures (Entities 10031 and 10032). While the other sections of enclosure have almost certainly evolved around the control and movement of livestock, Entity 10030 has evolved around a pre- **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** existing specific element that has necessitated its form to take that of a far more regimented and regular plan. This has enforced the condition of utilitarian division within a developing landscape; that is to say the reason was the specific use and importance of the extant buildings, with the effect being a deliberate boundary specifically formed to enhance the meaning of the buildings utility within the expanding system. It may be that as the rectangular enclosure specifically contained buildings, then it probably created an area of inhabitation and multi-use. This is not an enclosure designed around the idea of animal husbandry, this is an area designed around the idea of peoples control of the landscape and their changing use of it.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 560023","PSH02",560023
699,"10030 12th century AD enclosure","715 Early Medieval",,"Medieval Enclosure 1: **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity describes the main rectangular boundary of the 12th century system of enclosure. Although this is only a part of the overall system of enclosure in this area, it is specific to a purpose or utility and is significant to the on-going development and the need to segment and control the movement and access within the system as a whole.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 560023 forms the western and northern flank of the enclosure with a short return to the east at its southern extent. The northern line of the ditch is continued on its eastern extent by the ephemeral segments 553092 and 553096, where this western rectangular enclosure meets the polygonal enclosure immediately to the east. For this ditch to have been constructed, it is clear that the waterhole 569022 was in-filled in preparation for this, and a building was demolished and used as an alignment marker, the remnants of which is described as Entity 10018. SG 560023 terminated just short of where the in-filled waterhole 569022 was located. What appears to be an entranceway is created between this terminus and the terminus of the western end of the E-W ditch SG 561153 (which also provides the southern boundary to the polygonal enclosure Entity 10031). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although Entity 10018 has gone out of use as a structure by this time, part of its plan form has been incorporated into the ditch alignment, possibly to enhance the imagery of the boundary as much as for ease of construction. The fact that this structure has been removed gives the impression of the area of inhabitation shrinking somewhat from the west towards a more expansive measured system of segmented enclosure to the east. The ditch SG 560023 removed one building from the landscape, and yet incorporated two others. Entity 10014 in particular forms the north-west marker around which the enclosure wraps itself. As can be seen on plan, the E-W return of the northern line of SG 560023 kinks slightly as it moves past the Ten Post Structure (Entity 10014). This is because as it is cut further to the east along the northern flank of the Ten Poster, it needs to accommodate the northern end of the building Entity 10022 and the associated pits 546065 and 546066. This is reasonable evidence to infer that these buildings pre-existed the rectangular enclosure as a 12th century boundary, but also that the buildings were still actively utilised within the new order of the landscape and that they were important enough to form the basis for the new system.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The location of the southern entranceway confirms the importance of this building within its environment. The N-S gully 537102 is located centrally to the entranceway and contained post settings within the basal gravel fill. To the left of this gate / partition, one would be focused upon Entity 10014, while to the right it would be upon Entity 10022 that one would face. Whether or not this was a deliberate aspect of the enclosure design in respect of the utility of the building that was observed, or if it was simply the most useful place to build an access point to the enclosure it is unclear. Certainly, the regard within which buildings are held is often reflected in their stature of design within the landscape and how that is perceived. The entranceway to the enclosure is also interesting from the point that it takes in the waterhole 569022 and therefore continues to some extent the original axis of reference created in the pre-12th century development of this area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** While the system of enclosure is a deliberate production of intent towards a limitation and control of access and movement upon the landscape around it, it is necessary to split the system up into reason and effect. The individual sections of the enclosure system identified here represent separate aspects to the manipulation and control of the landscape as a whole. The Entity 10030 is probably the most noticeably separate form within the enclosure system and has a much less organic definition to its design. This rectangular enclosure is definitive in its purpose, there is a specific form in its construction and it is this that separates it from the reason behind the adjoining enclosures (Entities 10031 and 10032). While the other sections of enclosure have almost certainly evolved around the control and movement of livestock, Entity 10030 has evolved around a pre- **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** existing specific element that has necessitated its form to take that of a far more regimented and regular plan. This has enforced the condition of utilitarian division within a developing landscape; that is to say the reason was the specific use and importance of the extant buildings, with the effect being a deliberate boundary specifically formed to enhance the meaning of the buildings utility within the expanding system. It may be that as the rectangular enclosure specifically contained buildings, then it probably created an area of inhabitation and multi-use. This is not an enclosure designed around the idea of animal husbandry, this is an area designed around the idea of peoples control of the landscape and their changing use of it.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561153","PSH02",561153
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512072","PSH02",512072
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525172","PSH02",525172
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529241","PSH02",529241
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529266","PSH02",529266
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529267","PSH02",529267
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529268","PSH02",529268
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546100","PSH02",546100
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568068","PSH02",568068
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568079","PSH02",568079
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568083","PSH02",568083
700,"Medieval Enclosure 2",,"700 Medieval","Formerly Entity 10031 **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the south-east main enclosure area referred to as the 'Polygonal Enclosure'. This enclosure was certainly part of the initial 12th century system of landscape enclosure and as such was constructed with a specific utility in mind. This appears to have been the containment of livestock. This enclosure has undergone several phases of re-cutting and enhancement from the 12th to the 14th centuries, with the western and north-western boundaries re-used in the post-medieval period.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure backed onto the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) to the west utilising a central spinal ditch as its western boundary (and the same ditch forming the eastern boundary of Entity 10030). The earliest example of this central spinal ditch is the remnant SG 512072 which probably was originally associated with or was a continuation of the ditch SG 527192 to the north (linked to the Entity 10032, 'The Buffalo's Head'). This was retained on the south and eastern flanks by SG's 561153 and 569080 respectively, with an additional segment (525172) adding to the northern terminus of the SG 569080, possibly to form a staggered entranceway on the eastern face of the enclosure. This interpretation of the segment 525172 remains inconclusive as heavy modern truncation has left a gap of approximately 14m between 525172 and the associated return on the northern face of the enclosure (568068, SG's 568079 and 568082). There appears to be no visible gap in the remnant phases of the western boundary ditch and this seems to indicate a lack of communicative access between enclosures, emphasising the separate utility of each. Entity 10030 contained buildings, inferring inhabitation to a degree, and with the Polygonal enclosure appearing as a specific space for the divisional containment of livestock, it is not surprising to find access inhibited between the two areas. The entrance to this enclosure is actually located within the southern boundary between ditch SG 561153 and the N-S return SG 569080. Further possible access points to the north into Entity 10032 are probable but were not specifically identified (see additional sheet). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At least three medieval phases were present at the north (SG's 529266, 529267, 529268) and west boundaries (SG's 512072, 546100, 529241). There were possibly more but due to post-medieval and later medieval truncation, the initial phase of ditch cutting seems to have been lost. As the initial ditches from Entity 10032 (Buffalo's Head) can be seen coming in from the west and turning to a north-south alignment, it seems probable that they would have continued south and joined to the western edge of the Polygonal Enclosure. As can be seen from the plan overleaf, as the chronology progresses, the northern NE-SW ditch moves southward, with the western ditch taking on a more emphasised dog-legged appearance as it progresses to the west. By the time the ditch SG 529241 is cut, the southern east-west ditch of the rectangular enclosure (Entity 10030) is defunct as a shallow pit / waterhole (562143) was placed at the terminus of SG 529241 through the return west of the previous ditch SG 546100. This in itself does not mean that the Entity 10030 was disregarded at this time, but merely that the southern boundary ditch was. It may be in fact that the pit 562143 was in fact more significantly associated or contemporary with the late 14th century re-alignment of the rectangular enclosure (SG 537118 etc). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The general outline of the enclosure and its continuous deformation to the west suggests a corral type area, supposedly for the containment or manipulation of livestock. The continuing dog-legging of the western arm of the enclosure was to allow a greater form of control and particular herding within the Entity. To the north of this enclosure is the Entity 10032 ('Buffalo's Head'), which is a narrower and more movement orientated area of enclosure. This focused particularly upon the waterhole 529139, and the adjoining E-W enclosure entrance / trackway (SG's 961044, 961855 - north ditch, and SG's 961121, 961140, 961124, 961126 - southern ditch) investigated in POK 96. It is likely that an additional access point existed at the northern end of Entity 10031, allowing filtered access and movement towards Entity 10032.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569080","PSH02",569080
701,"10040 Pre-Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Pre-Stanwell Cursus (General) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has to be remembered that the nature of the landscape at Heathrow was so different from what we see or recognise today. The area was undoubtedly peppered with sporadic deciduous woodland across the gravel terrace becoming slightly more dispersed as the topography slid onto the alluvial plain of the flanking river, the Colne. Although the tree cover of the landscape was not dense, it would have hindered the visual references normally taken for granted in a more defined landscape such as the upland zones to the north or the chalk down landscape of the south and south-west.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although the topography of the Heathrow area is noticeably flat, this only emphasises the importance of what little topographic change occurs within this landscape. The subtle differences between the stepped gravel terracing, the alluvial boundaries to the shallow sloping river valleys seem to have an importance that would probably not be registered to such a degree within a more varied and diverse landscape category. It is this topographical importance that cannot be ignored when examining the location and form of the Neolithic features located on Burrows Hill.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although there is no evidence for general deforestation of the area in the Neolithic, there is abundant evidence for specific tree clearance strategies that were linked to particular designs of landscape reference and manipulation through the construction of formalised 'ritualistic' features and monuments. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two diverging ditches located in the south-east corner of Burrows Hill have been linked with this sequence of specific areas of clearance. These ditches (SG 537175 and SG 537181, west and east ditch respectively) are arranged at a right angle to one-another, aligned NNE - SSW with an entranceway situated at the northern corner. Approximately 8 metres to the north of this entrance is a sequence of inter-cutting pits (527117, 527135, SG 527142, 527124) dated to the Early Neolithic with mid-Neolithic Mortlake pottery being recovered from the tertiary silting deposits. This sequence then has been cut by a later gully (SG 527145) and hedgeline (SG 527148) from which was recovered Neolithic (Grooved Ware) pottery. The hedgeline is orientated E-W and forms a perfect alignment with another Neolithic sequence of features (pit 527200 and E-W gully SG 527233) located approximately 77 m to the west. What makes this sequential referencing interesting is not particularly the features themselves, but the deliberate clearance of trees that was undertaken to make this alignment work, as tree throws were encountered along this alignment and specifically below the E-W gully SG 527233. The N-S ditch SG 561136 is located c. 35m to the south of the E-W alignment and is central to this. This may infer a N-S line of reference located at the southern end of Area 49. This ditch also contained a reasonable quantity of Neolithic pottery. This evidence for an E-W swathe cut through the woodland made it possible for the first time in this area to physically sight on a distinct objective at a distance greater than 10 metres, a distance normally obstructed by trees prior to the cutting of this 'swathe'. One of the important factors of this idea is that the referencing of locals would not be noticed until one stood directly within this freshly cleared area. Beyond this, to all intents and purposes, the woodland would be intact, but once within this point of reference one would be able to see a path and therefore an objective.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If this catalyst of referencing is to be accepted then it also follows that the sequence described above occurred prior to the construction of the Stanwell Cursus as we know it. The pit and E-W gully sequence to the west of the diverging ditches (SG's 537175 and 537181) were clearly seen to be cut by the cursus monument. This in itself would appear to support an on-going strategy for reference within the immediate landscape. So it would seem that an initial phase of clearance was quickly followed by a phase of monument construction, that was then superseded by another phase of linear clearance, which in turn led to another phase in monument construction and further referencing.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The reference ideal would appear to have been initially biased towards the topography, but as the landscape became more and more influenced by its human occupants, the thought processes that initiated this complex sphere of Neolithic society diversified into referencing the anthropogenic landscape. This leads to the interpretation that rather than simply acknowledging these differences in landscape, Neolithic society at Heathrow was actually creating a system of sign posting on a grand scale. It may be that this was in part a hierarchical system of reference where the indicatory pattern moved the individual through the landscape via a relative increase in monumental importance. This system both encouraged interaction and yet could be classified as selective in that one had to be aware of ones location in order to interpret the indicators provided by peers or past generations.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527117","PSH02",527117
701,"10040 Pre-Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Pre-Stanwell Cursus (General) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has to be remembered that the nature of the landscape at Heathrow was so different from what we see or recognise today. The area was undoubtedly peppered with sporadic deciduous woodland across the gravel terrace becoming slightly more dispersed as the topography slid onto the alluvial plain of the flanking river, the Colne. Although the tree cover of the landscape was not dense, it would have hindered the visual references normally taken for granted in a more defined landscape such as the upland zones to the north or the chalk down landscape of the south and south-west.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although the topography of the Heathrow area is noticeably flat, this only emphasises the importance of what little topographic change occurs within this landscape. The subtle differences between the stepped gravel terracing, the alluvial boundaries to the shallow sloping river valleys seem to have an importance that would probably not be registered to such a degree within a more varied and diverse landscape category. It is this topographical importance that cannot be ignored when examining the location and form of the Neolithic features located on Burrows Hill.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although there is no evidence for general deforestation of the area in the Neolithic, there is abundant evidence for specific tree clearance strategies that were linked to particular designs of landscape reference and manipulation through the construction of formalised 'ritualistic' features and monuments. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two diverging ditches located in the south-east corner of Burrows Hill have been linked with this sequence of specific areas of clearance. These ditches (SG 537175 and SG 537181, west and east ditch respectively) are arranged at a right angle to one-another, aligned NNE - SSW with an entranceway situated at the northern corner. Approximately 8 metres to the north of this entrance is a sequence of inter-cutting pits (527117, 527135, SG 527142, 527124) dated to the Early Neolithic with mid-Neolithic Mortlake pottery being recovered from the tertiary silting deposits. This sequence then has been cut by a later gully (SG 527145) and hedgeline (SG 527148) from which was recovered Neolithic (Grooved Ware) pottery. The hedgeline is orientated E-W and forms a perfect alignment with another Neolithic sequence of features (pit 527200 and E-W gully SG 527233) located approximately 77 m to the west. What makes this sequential referencing interesting is not particularly the features themselves, but the deliberate clearance of trees that was undertaken to make this alignment work, as tree throws were encountered along this alignment and specifically below the E-W gully SG 527233. The N-S ditch SG 561136 is located c. 35m to the south of the E-W alignment and is central to this. This may infer a N-S line of reference located at the southern end of Area 49. This ditch also contained a reasonable quantity of Neolithic pottery. This evidence for an E-W swathe cut through the woodland made it possible for the first time in this area to physically sight on a distinct objective at a distance greater than 10 metres, a distance normally obstructed by trees prior to the cutting of this 'swathe'. One of the important factors of this idea is that the referencing of locals would not be noticed until one stood directly within this freshly cleared area. Beyond this, to all intents and purposes, the woodland would be intact, but once within this point of reference one would be able to see a path and therefore an objective.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If this catalyst of referencing is to be accepted then it also follows that the sequence described above occurred prior to the construction of the Stanwell Cursus as we know it. The pit and E-W gully sequence to the west of the diverging ditches (SG's 537175 and 537181) were clearly seen to be cut by the cursus monument. This in itself would appear to support an on-going strategy for reference within the immediate landscape. So it would seem that an initial phase of clearance was quickly followed by a phase of monument construction, that was then superseded by another phase of linear clearance, which in turn led to another phase in monument construction and further referencing.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The reference ideal would appear to have been initially biased towards the topography, but as the landscape became more and more influenced by its human occupants, the thought processes that initiated this complex sphere of Neolithic society diversified into referencing the anthropogenic landscape. This leads to the interpretation that rather than simply acknowledging these differences in landscape, Neolithic society at Heathrow was actually creating a system of sign posting on a grand scale. It may be that this was in part a hierarchical system of reference where the indicatory pattern moved the individual through the landscape via a relative increase in monumental importance. This system both encouraged interaction and yet could be classified as selective in that one had to be aware of ones location in order to interpret the indicators provided by peers or past generations.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527124","PSH02",527124
701,"10040 Pre-Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Pre-Stanwell Cursus (General) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has to be remembered that the nature of the landscape at Heathrow was so different from what we see or recognise today. The area was undoubtedly peppered with sporadic deciduous woodland across the gravel terrace becoming slightly more dispersed as the topography slid onto the alluvial plain of the flanking river, the Colne. Although the tree cover of the landscape was not dense, it would have hindered the visual references normally taken for granted in a more defined landscape such as the upland zones to the north or the chalk down landscape of the south and south-west.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although the topography of the Heathrow area is noticeably flat, this only emphasises the importance of what little topographic change occurs within this landscape. The subtle differences between the stepped gravel terracing, the alluvial boundaries to the shallow sloping river valleys seem to have an importance that would probably not be registered to such a degree within a more varied and diverse landscape category. It is this topographical importance that cannot be ignored when examining the location and form of the Neolithic features located on Burrows Hill.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although there is no evidence for general deforestation of the area in the Neolithic, there is abundant evidence for specific tree clearance strategies that were linked to particular designs of landscape reference and manipulation through the construction of formalised 'ritualistic' features and monuments. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two diverging ditches located in the south-east corner of Burrows Hill have been linked with this sequence of specific areas of clearance. These ditches (SG 537175 and SG 537181, west and east ditch respectively) are arranged at a right angle to one-another, aligned NNE - SSW with an entranceway situated at the northern corner. Approximately 8 metres to the north of this entrance is a sequence of inter-cutting pits (527117, 527135, SG 527142, 527124) dated to the Early Neolithic with mid-Neolithic Mortlake pottery being recovered from the tertiary silting deposits. This sequence then has been cut by a later gully (SG 527145) and hedgeline (SG 527148) from which was recovered Neolithic (Grooved Ware) pottery. The hedgeline is orientated E-W and forms a perfect alignment with another Neolithic sequence of features (pit 527200 and E-W gully SG 527233) located approximately 77 m to the west. What makes this sequential referencing interesting is not particularly the features themselves, but the deliberate clearance of trees that was undertaken to make this alignment work, as tree throws were encountered along this alignment and specifically below the E-W gully SG 527233. The N-S ditch SG 561136 is located c. 35m to the south of the E-W alignment and is central to this. This may infer a N-S line of reference located at the southern end of Area 49. This ditch also contained a reasonable quantity of Neolithic pottery. This evidence for an E-W swathe cut through the woodland made it possible for the first time in this area to physically sight on a distinct objective at a distance greater than 10 metres, a distance normally obstructed by trees prior to the cutting of this 'swathe'. One of the important factors of this idea is that the referencing of locals would not be noticed until one stood directly within this freshly cleared area. Beyond this, to all intents and purposes, the woodland would be intact, but once within this point of reference one would be able to see a path and therefore an objective.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If this catalyst of referencing is to be accepted then it also follows that the sequence described above occurred prior to the construction of the Stanwell Cursus as we know it. The pit and E-W gully sequence to the west of the diverging ditches (SG's 537175 and 537181) were clearly seen to be cut by the cursus monument. This in itself would appear to support an on-going strategy for reference within the immediate landscape. So it would seem that an initial phase of clearance was quickly followed by a phase of monument construction, that was then superseded by another phase of linear clearance, which in turn led to another phase in monument construction and further referencing.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The reference ideal would appear to have been initially biased towards the topography, but as the landscape became more and more influenced by its human occupants, the thought processes that initiated this complex sphere of Neolithic society diversified into referencing the anthropogenic landscape. This leads to the interpretation that rather than simply acknowledging these differences in landscape, Neolithic society at Heathrow was actually creating a system of sign posting on a grand scale. It may be that this was in part a hierarchical system of reference where the indicatory pattern moved the individual through the landscape via a relative increase in monumental importance. This system both encouraged interaction and yet could be classified as selective in that one had to be aware of ones location in order to interpret the indicators provided by peers or past generations.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527135","PSH02",527135
701,"10040 Pre-Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Pre-Stanwell Cursus (General) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has to be remembered that the nature of the landscape at Heathrow was so different from what we see or recognise today. The area was undoubtedly peppered with sporadic deciduous woodland across the gravel terrace becoming slightly more dispersed as the topography slid onto the alluvial plain of the flanking river, the Colne. Although the tree cover of the landscape was not dense, it would have hindered the visual references normally taken for granted in a more defined landscape such as the upland zones to the north or the chalk down landscape of the south and south-west.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although the topography of the Heathrow area is noticeably flat, this only emphasises the importance of what little topographic change occurs within this landscape. The subtle differences between the stepped gravel terracing, the alluvial boundaries to the shallow sloping river valleys seem to have an importance that would probably not be registered to such a degree within a more varied and diverse landscape category. It is this topographical importance that cannot be ignored when examining the location and form of the Neolithic features located on Burrows Hill.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although there is no evidence for general deforestation of the area in the Neolithic, there is abundant evidence for specific tree clearance strategies that were linked to particular designs of landscape reference and manipulation through the construction of formalised 'ritualistic' features and monuments. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two diverging ditches located in the south-east corner of Burrows Hill have been linked with this sequence of specific areas of clearance. These ditches (SG 537175 and SG 537181, west and east ditch respectively) are arranged at a right angle to one-another, aligned NNE - SSW with an entranceway situated at the northern corner. Approximately 8 metres to the north of this entrance is a sequence of inter-cutting pits (527117, 527135, SG 527142, 527124) dated to the Early Neolithic with mid-Neolithic Mortlake pottery being recovered from the tertiary silting deposits. This sequence then has been cut by a later gully (SG 527145) and hedgeline (SG 527148) from which was recovered Neolithic (Grooved Ware) pottery. The hedgeline is orientated E-W and forms a perfect alignment with another Neolithic sequence of features (pit 527200 and E-W gully SG 527233) located approximately 77 m to the west. What makes this sequential referencing interesting is not particularly the features themselves, but the deliberate clearance of trees that was undertaken to make this alignment work, as tree throws were encountered along this alignment and specifically below the E-W gully SG 527233. The N-S ditch SG 561136 is located c. 35m to the south of the E-W alignment and is central to this. This may infer a N-S line of reference located at the southern end of Area 49. This ditch also contained a reasonable quantity of Neolithic pottery. This evidence for an E-W swathe cut through the woodland made it possible for the first time in this area to physically sight on a distinct objective at a distance greater than 10 metres, a distance normally obstructed by trees prior to the cutting of this 'swathe'. One of the important factors of this idea is that the referencing of locals would not be noticed until one stood directly within this freshly cleared area. Beyond this, to all intents and purposes, the woodland would be intact, but once within this point of reference one would be able to see a path and therefore an objective.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If this catalyst of referencing is to be accepted then it also follows that the sequence described above occurred prior to the construction of the Stanwell Cursus as we know it. The pit and E-W gully sequence to the west of the diverging ditches (SG's 537175 and 537181) were clearly seen to be cut by the cursus monument. This in itself would appear to support an on-going strategy for reference within the immediate landscape. So it would seem that an initial phase of clearance was quickly followed by a phase of monument construction, that was then superseded by another phase of linear clearance, which in turn led to another phase in monument construction and further referencing.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The reference ideal would appear to have been initially biased towards the topography, but as the landscape became more and more influenced by its human occupants, the thought processes that initiated this complex sphere of Neolithic society diversified into referencing the anthropogenic landscape. This leads to the interpretation that rather than simply acknowledging these differences in landscape, Neolithic society at Heathrow was actually creating a system of sign posting on a grand scale. It may be that this was in part a hierarchical system of reference where the indicatory pattern moved the individual through the landscape via a relative increase in monumental importance. This system both encouraged interaction and yet could be classified as selective in that one had to be aware of ones location in order to interpret the indicators provided by peers or past generations.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527142","PSH02",527142
701,"10040 Pre-Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Pre-Stanwell Cursus (General) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has to be remembered that the nature of the landscape at Heathrow was so different from what we see or recognise today. The area was undoubtedly peppered with sporadic deciduous woodland across the gravel terrace becoming slightly more dispersed as the topography slid onto the alluvial plain of the flanking river, the Colne. Although the tree cover of the landscape was not dense, it would have hindered the visual references normally taken for granted in a more defined landscape such as the upland zones to the north or the chalk down landscape of the south and south-west.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although the topography of the Heathrow area is noticeably flat, this only emphasises the importance of what little topographic change occurs within this landscape. The subtle differences between the stepped gravel terracing, the alluvial boundaries to the shallow sloping river valleys seem to have an importance that would probably not be registered to such a degree within a more varied and diverse landscape category. It is this topographical importance that cannot be ignored when examining the location and form of the Neolithic features located on Burrows Hill.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although there is no evidence for general deforestation of the area in the Neolithic, there is abundant evidence for specific tree clearance strategies that were linked to particular designs of landscape reference and manipulation through the construction of formalised 'ritualistic' features and monuments. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two diverging ditches located in the south-east corner of Burrows Hill have been linked with this sequence of specific areas of clearance. These ditches (SG 537175 and SG 537181, west and east ditch respectively) are arranged at a right angle to one-another, aligned NNE - SSW with an entranceway situated at the northern corner. Approximately 8 metres to the north of this entrance is a sequence of inter-cutting pits (527117, 527135, SG 527142, 527124) dated to the Early Neolithic with mid-Neolithic Mortlake pottery being recovered from the tertiary silting deposits. This sequence then has been cut by a later gully (SG 527145) and hedgeline (SG 527148) from which was recovered Neolithic (Grooved Ware) pottery. The hedgeline is orientated E-W and forms a perfect alignment with another Neolithic sequence of features (pit 527200 and E-W gully SG 527233) located approximately 77 m to the west. What makes this sequential referencing interesting is not particularly the features themselves, but the deliberate clearance of trees that was undertaken to make this alignment work, as tree throws were encountered along this alignment and specifically below the E-W gully SG 527233. The N-S ditch SG 561136 is located c. 35m to the south of the E-W alignment and is central to this. This may infer a N-S line of reference located at the southern end of Area 49. This ditch also contained a reasonable quantity of Neolithic pottery. This evidence for an E-W swathe cut through the woodland made it possible for the first time in this area to physically sight on a distinct objective at a distance greater than 10 metres, a distance normally obstructed by trees prior to the cutting of this 'swathe'. One of the important factors of this idea is that the referencing of locals would not be noticed until one stood directly within this freshly cleared area. Beyond this, to all intents and purposes, the woodland would be intact, but once within this point of reference one would be able to see a path and therefore an objective.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If this catalyst of referencing is to be accepted then it also follows that the sequence described above occurred prior to the construction of the Stanwell Cursus as we know it. The pit and E-W gully sequence to the west of the diverging ditches (SG's 537175 and 537181) were clearly seen to be cut by the cursus monument. This in itself would appear to support an on-going strategy for reference within the immediate landscape. So it would seem that an initial phase of clearance was quickly followed by a phase of monument construction, that was then superseded by another phase of linear clearance, which in turn led to another phase in monument construction and further referencing.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The reference ideal would appear to have been initially biased towards the topography, but as the landscape became more and more influenced by its human occupants, the thought processes that initiated this complex sphere of Neolithic society diversified into referencing the anthropogenic landscape. This leads to the interpretation that rather than simply acknowledging these differences in landscape, Neolithic society at Heathrow was actually creating a system of sign posting on a grand scale. It may be that this was in part a hierarchical system of reference where the indicatory pattern moved the individual through the landscape via a relative increase in monumental importance. This system both encouraged interaction and yet could be classified as selective in that one had to be aware of ones location in order to interpret the indicators provided by peers or past generations.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527145","PSH02",527145
701,"10040 Pre-Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Pre-Stanwell Cursus (General) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has to be remembered that the nature of the landscape at Heathrow was so different from what we see or recognise today. The area was undoubtedly peppered with sporadic deciduous woodland across the gravel terrace becoming slightly more dispersed as the topography slid onto the alluvial plain of the flanking river, the Colne. Although the tree cover of the landscape was not dense, it would have hindered the visual references normally taken for granted in a more defined landscape such as the upland zones to the north or the chalk down landscape of the south and south-west.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although the topography of the Heathrow area is noticeably flat, this only emphasises the importance of what little topographic change occurs within this landscape. The subtle differences between the stepped gravel terracing, the alluvial boundaries to the shallow sloping river valleys seem to have an importance that would probably not be registered to such a degree within a more varied and diverse landscape category. It is this topographical importance that cannot be ignored when examining the location and form of the Neolithic features located on Burrows Hill.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although there is no evidence for general deforestation of the area in the Neolithic, there is abundant evidence for specific tree clearance strategies that were linked to particular designs of landscape reference and manipulation through the construction of formalised 'ritualistic' features and monuments. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two diverging ditches located in the south-east corner of Burrows Hill have been linked with this sequence of specific areas of clearance. These ditches (SG 537175 and SG 537181, west and east ditch respectively) are arranged at a right angle to one-another, aligned NNE - SSW with an entranceway situated at the northern corner. Approximately 8 metres to the north of this entrance is a sequence of inter-cutting pits (527117, 527135, SG 527142, 527124) dated to the Early Neolithic with mid-Neolithic Mortlake pottery being recovered from the tertiary silting deposits. This sequence then has been cut by a later gully (SG 527145) and hedgeline (SG 527148) from which was recovered Neolithic (Grooved Ware) pottery. The hedgeline is orientated E-W and forms a perfect alignment with another Neolithic sequence of features (pit 527200 and E-W gully SG 527233) located approximately 77 m to the west. What makes this sequential referencing interesting is not particularly the features themselves, but the deliberate clearance of trees that was undertaken to make this alignment work, as tree throws were encountered along this alignment and specifically below the E-W gully SG 527233. The N-S ditch SG 561136 is located c. 35m to the south of the E-W alignment and is central to this. This may infer a N-S line of reference located at the southern end of Area 49. This ditch also contained a reasonable quantity of Neolithic pottery. This evidence for an E-W swathe cut through the woodland made it possible for the first time in this area to physically sight on a distinct objective at a distance greater than 10 metres, a distance normally obstructed by trees prior to the cutting of this 'swathe'. One of the important factors of this idea is that the referencing of locals would not be noticed until one stood directly within this freshly cleared area. Beyond this, to all intents and purposes, the woodland would be intact, but once within this point of reference one would be able to see a path and therefore an objective.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If this catalyst of referencing is to be accepted then it also follows that the sequence described above occurred prior to the construction of the Stanwell Cursus as we know it. The pit and E-W gully sequence to the west of the diverging ditches (SG's 537175 and 537181) were clearly seen to be cut by the cursus monument. This in itself would appear to support an on-going strategy for reference within the immediate landscape. So it would seem that an initial phase of clearance was quickly followed by a phase of monument construction, that was then superseded by another phase of linear clearance, which in turn led to another phase in monument construction and further referencing.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The reference ideal would appear to have been initially biased towards the topography, but as the landscape became more and more influenced by its human occupants, the thought processes that initiated this complex sphere of Neolithic society diversified into referencing the anthropogenic landscape. This leads to the interpretation that rather than simply acknowledging these differences in landscape, Neolithic society at Heathrow was actually creating a system of sign posting on a grand scale. It may be that this was in part a hierarchical system of reference where the indicatory pattern moved the individual through the landscape via a relative increase in monumental importance. This system both encouraged interaction and yet could be classified as selective in that one had to be aware of ones location in order to interpret the indicators provided by peers or past generations.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
701,"10040 Pre-Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Pre-Stanwell Cursus (General) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has to be remembered that the nature of the landscape at Heathrow was so different from what we see or recognise today. The area was undoubtedly peppered with sporadic deciduous woodland across the gravel terrace becoming slightly more dispersed as the topography slid onto the alluvial plain of the flanking river, the Colne. Although the tree cover of the landscape was not dense, it would have hindered the visual references normally taken for granted in a more defined landscape such as the upland zones to the north or the chalk down landscape of the south and south-west.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although the topography of the Heathrow area is noticeably flat, this only emphasises the importance of what little topographic change occurs within this landscape. The subtle differences between the stepped gravel terracing, the alluvial boundaries to the shallow sloping river valleys seem to have an importance that would probably not be registered to such a degree within a more varied and diverse landscape category. It is this topographical importance that cannot be ignored when examining the location and form of the Neolithic features located on Burrows Hill.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although there is no evidence for general deforestation of the area in the Neolithic, there is abundant evidence for specific tree clearance strategies that were linked to particular designs of landscape reference and manipulation through the construction of formalised 'ritualistic' features and monuments. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two diverging ditches located in the south-east corner of Burrows Hill have been linked with this sequence of specific areas of clearance. These ditches (SG 537175 and SG 537181, west and east ditch respectively) are arranged at a right angle to one-another, aligned NNE - SSW with an entranceway situated at the northern corner. Approximately 8 metres to the north of this entrance is a sequence of inter-cutting pits (527117, 527135, SG 527142, 527124) dated to the Early Neolithic with mid-Neolithic Mortlake pottery being recovered from the tertiary silting deposits. This sequence then has been cut by a later gully (SG 527145) and hedgeline (SG 527148) from which was recovered Neolithic (Grooved Ware) pottery. The hedgeline is orientated E-W and forms a perfect alignment with another Neolithic sequence of features (pit 527200 and E-W gully SG 527233) located approximately 77 m to the west. What makes this sequential referencing interesting is not particularly the features themselves, but the deliberate clearance of trees that was undertaken to make this alignment work, as tree throws were encountered along this alignment and specifically below the E-W gully SG 527233. The N-S ditch SG 561136 is located c. 35m to the south of the E-W alignment and is central to this. This may infer a N-S line of reference located at the southern end of Area 49. This ditch also contained a reasonable quantity of Neolithic pottery. This evidence for an E-W swathe cut through the woodland made it possible for the first time in this area to physically sight on a distinct objective at a distance greater than 10 metres, a distance normally obstructed by trees prior to the cutting of this 'swathe'. One of the important factors of this idea is that the referencing of locals would not be noticed until one stood directly within this freshly cleared area. Beyond this, to all intents and purposes, the woodland would be intact, but once within this point of reference one would be able to see a path and therefore an objective.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If this catalyst of referencing is to be accepted then it also follows that the sequence described above occurred prior to the construction of the Stanwell Cursus as we know it. The pit and E-W gully sequence to the west of the diverging ditches (SG's 537175 and 537181) were clearly seen to be cut by the cursus monument. This in itself would appear to support an on-going strategy for reference within the immediate landscape. So it would seem that an initial phase of clearance was quickly followed by a phase of monument construction, that was then superseded by another phase of linear clearance, which in turn led to another phase in monument construction and further referencing.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The reference ideal would appear to have been initially biased towards the topography, but as the landscape became more and more influenced by its human occupants, the thought processes that initiated this complex sphere of Neolithic society diversified into referencing the anthropogenic landscape. This leads to the interpretation that rather than simply acknowledging these differences in landscape, Neolithic society at Heathrow was actually creating a system of sign posting on a grand scale. It may be that this was in part a hierarchical system of reference where the indicatory pattern moved the individual through the landscape via a relative increase in monumental importance. This system both encouraged interaction and yet could be classified as selective in that one had to be aware of ones location in order to interpret the indicators provided by peers or past generations.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527233","PSH02",527233
701,"10040 Pre-Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Pre-Stanwell Cursus (General) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has to be remembered that the nature of the landscape at Heathrow was so different from what we see or recognise today. The area was undoubtedly peppered with sporadic deciduous woodland across the gravel terrace becoming slightly more dispersed as the topography slid onto the alluvial plain of the flanking river, the Colne. Although the tree cover of the landscape was not dense, it would have hindered the visual references normally taken for granted in a more defined landscape such as the upland zones to the north or the chalk down landscape of the south and south-west.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although the topography of the Heathrow area is noticeably flat, this only emphasises the importance of what little topographic change occurs within this landscape. The subtle differences between the stepped gravel terracing, the alluvial boundaries to the shallow sloping river valleys seem to have an importance that would probably not be registered to such a degree within a more varied and diverse landscape category. It is this topographical importance that cannot be ignored when examining the location and form of the Neolithic features located on Burrows Hill.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although there is no evidence for general deforestation of the area in the Neolithic, there is abundant evidence for specific tree clearance strategies that were linked to particular designs of landscape reference and manipulation through the construction of formalised 'ritualistic' features and monuments. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two diverging ditches located in the south-east corner of Burrows Hill have been linked with this sequence of specific areas of clearance. These ditches (SG 537175 and SG 537181, west and east ditch respectively) are arranged at a right angle to one-another, aligned NNE - SSW with an entranceway situated at the northern corner. Approximately 8 metres to the north of this entrance is a sequence of inter-cutting pits (527117, 527135, SG 527142, 527124) dated to the Early Neolithic with mid-Neolithic Mortlake pottery being recovered from the tertiary silting deposits. This sequence then has been cut by a later gully (SG 527145) and hedgeline (SG 527148) from which was recovered Neolithic (Grooved Ware) pottery. The hedgeline is orientated E-W and forms a perfect alignment with another Neolithic sequence of features (pit 527200 and E-W gully SG 527233) located approximately 77 m to the west. What makes this sequential referencing interesting is not particularly the features themselves, but the deliberate clearance of trees that was undertaken to make this alignment work, as tree throws were encountered along this alignment and specifically below the E-W gully SG 527233. The N-S ditch SG 561136 is located c. 35m to the south of the E-W alignment and is central to this. This may infer a N-S line of reference located at the southern end of Area 49. This ditch also contained a reasonable quantity of Neolithic pottery. This evidence for an E-W swathe cut through the woodland made it possible for the first time in this area to physically sight on a distinct objective at a distance greater than 10 metres, a distance normally obstructed by trees prior to the cutting of this 'swathe'. One of the important factors of this idea is that the referencing of locals would not be noticed until one stood directly within this freshly cleared area. Beyond this, to all intents and purposes, the woodland would be intact, but once within this point of reference one would be able to see a path and therefore an objective.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If this catalyst of referencing is to be accepted then it also follows that the sequence described above occurred prior to the construction of the Stanwell Cursus as we know it. The pit and E-W gully sequence to the west of the diverging ditches (SG's 537175 and 537181) were clearly seen to be cut by the cursus monument. This in itself would appear to support an on-going strategy for reference within the immediate landscape. So it would seem that an initial phase of clearance was quickly followed by a phase of monument construction, that was then superseded by another phase of linear clearance, which in turn led to another phase in monument construction and further referencing.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The reference ideal would appear to have been initially biased towards the topography, but as the landscape became more and more influenced by its human occupants, the thought processes that initiated this complex sphere of Neolithic society diversified into referencing the anthropogenic landscape. This leads to the interpretation that rather than simply acknowledging these differences in landscape, Neolithic society at Heathrow was actually creating a system of sign posting on a grand scale. It may be that this was in part a hierarchical system of reference where the indicatory pattern moved the individual through the landscape via a relative increase in monumental importance. This system both encouraged interaction and yet could be classified as selective in that one had to be aware of ones location in order to interpret the indicators provided by peers or past generations.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537175","PSH02",537175
701,"10040 Pre-Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Pre-Stanwell Cursus (General) **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** It has to be remembered that the nature of the landscape at Heathrow was so different from what we see or recognise today. The area was undoubtedly peppered with sporadic deciduous woodland across the gravel terrace becoming slightly more dispersed as the topography slid onto the alluvial plain of the flanking river, the Colne. Although the tree cover of the landscape was not dense, it would have hindered the visual references normally taken for granted in a more defined landscape such as the upland zones to the north or the chalk down landscape of the south and south-west.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although the topography of the Heathrow area is noticeably flat, this only emphasises the importance of what little topographic change occurs within this landscape. The subtle differences between the stepped gravel terracing, the alluvial boundaries to the shallow sloping river valleys seem to have an importance that would probably not be registered to such a degree within a more varied and diverse landscape category. It is this topographical importance that cannot be ignored when examining the location and form of the Neolithic features located on Burrows Hill.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Although there is no evidence for general deforestation of the area in the Neolithic, there is abundant evidence for specific tree clearance strategies that were linked to particular designs of landscape reference and manipulation through the construction of formalised 'ritualistic' features and monuments. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two diverging ditches located in the south-east corner of Burrows Hill have been linked with this sequence of specific areas of clearance. These ditches (SG 537175 and SG 537181, west and east ditch respectively) are arranged at a right angle to one-another, aligned NNE - SSW with an entranceway situated at the northern corner. Approximately 8 metres to the north of this entrance is a sequence of inter-cutting pits (527117, 527135, SG 527142, 527124) dated to the Early Neolithic with mid-Neolithic Mortlake pottery being recovered from the tertiary silting deposits. This sequence then has been cut by a later gully (SG 527145) and hedgeline (SG 527148) from which was recovered Neolithic (Grooved Ware) pottery. The hedgeline is orientated E-W and forms a perfect alignment with another Neolithic sequence of features (pit 527200 and E-W gully SG 527233) located approximately 77 m to the west. What makes this sequential referencing interesting is not particularly the features themselves, but the deliberate clearance of trees that was undertaken to make this alignment work, as tree throws were encountered along this alignment and specifically below the E-W gully SG 527233. The N-S ditch SG 561136 is located c. 35m to the south of the E-W alignment and is central to this. This may infer a N-S line of reference located at the southern end of Area 49. This ditch also contained a reasonable quantity of Neolithic pottery. This evidence for an E-W swathe cut through the woodland made it possible for the first time in this area to physically sight on a distinct objective at a distance greater than 10 metres, a distance normally obstructed by trees prior to the cutting of this 'swathe'. One of the important factors of this idea is that the referencing of locals would not be noticed until one stood directly within this freshly cleared area. Beyond this, to all intents and purposes, the woodland would be intact, but once within this point of reference one would be able to see a path and therefore an objective.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** If this catalyst of referencing is to be accepted then it also follows that the sequence described above occurred prior to the construction of the Stanwell Cursus as we know it. The pit and E-W gully sequence to the west of the diverging ditches (SG's 537175 and 537181) were clearly seen to be cut by the cursus monument. This in itself would appear to support an on-going strategy for reference within the immediate landscape. So it would seem that an initial phase of clearance was quickly followed by a phase of monument construction, that was then superseded by another phase of linear clearance, which in turn led to another phase in monument construction and further referencing.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The reference ideal would appear to have been initially biased towards the topography, but as the landscape became more and more influenced by its human occupants, the thought processes that initiated this complex sphere of Neolithic society diversified into referencing the anthropogenic landscape. This leads to the interpretation that rather than simply acknowledging these differences in landscape, Neolithic society at Heathrow was actually creating a system of sign posting on a grand scale. It may be that this was in part a hierarchical system of reference where the indicatory pattern moved the individual through the landscape via a relative increase in monumental importance. This system both encouraged interaction and yet could be classified as selective in that one had to be aware of ones location in order to interpret the indicators provided by peers or past generations.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537181","PSH02",537181
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527192","PSH02",527192
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527195","PSH02",527195
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527197","PSH02",527197
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529228","PSH02",529228
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529233","PSH02",529233
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529237","PSH02",529237
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529239","PSH02",529239
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539051","PSH02",539051
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542094","PSH02",542094
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542095","PSH02",542095
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542102","PSH02",542102
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542106","PSH02",542106
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546103","PSH02",546103
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546107","PSH02",546107
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555283","PSH02",555283
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555285","PSH02",555285
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555287","PSH02",555287
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555290","PSH02",555290
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591043","PSH02",591043
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593006","PSH02",593006
703,"10032 Medieval enclosure","700 Medieval",," **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This Entity describes the northern Medieval enclosure known as 'The Buffalo's Head'. This enclosure system comprises several phases of external ditch, butting onto the northern boundary line of the Polygonal Enclosure (Entity 10031) to the south. The focal point of this enclosure is the waterhole 529139, which is likely to have had its origins in the early Medieval period. The simple form of the ditches informs us of the differential type of control that is instilled within this enclosure when compared to the Polygonal boundary to the south. Although the Polygonal Enclosure was specifically utilised for the holding of livestock within the specific parameters of a medieval small -holding, the animals were still unhindered within this enclosed area. This is not the case however with the 'Buffalo's Head', which, rather than simply containing livestock in a stationary method of control, the animals are in fact encouraged with movement. It is this specific difference that demonstrates the pivotal importance of this particular locale within this area. Although the enclosure itself demonstrates restriction of movement with the alignment of flanking ditches to the east, west and south, they are also forcing movement of a particular type by the simple format of their design. This simplicity of force is an important vision within the landscape that must be understood to realise the overall function of the Medieval landscape. Without the added complexity of separate phasing, which is an initial problem of interpretation, it ca be clearly seen that the design of the enclosure system throughout each individual facet of construction, is both visually and physically encouraging movement to the north (or north-west). The ditches of the Entity 10032 are diverging to the south, towards the Entity 10031where the livestock have been corralled / herded. The presumed access point at the northern end of the Polygonal enclosure, although never identified during excavation, must have existed between the NE boundary line (e.g. : SG 568079) and the NW boundary ditch (e.g. : SG 529266 - see add sheet 1, Entity 10031)). This would have allowed a particularly controlled access into the northern enclosure area, Entity 10032. Initially the restriction were in the mode of post alignments forming curvi-linear fences (Entity 10007) which formed a feeding line of access into the enclosure proper towards the funnelling ditches SG 546107 and SG 603039. These were enhanced at the northern end by further structural pits, hurdle lines and tethering posts that made control of formalised access to the waterhole area complete. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The initial phase of this area appears to have consisted of the two gullies SG's 603039 and 546107, which may have been primarily flanked by fencelines leading to the E-W ditch (SG 591043), and of course respecting the focal waterhole 539129. This was then added to by the construction of the ditch alignment referred to by SG's 529228 and 529233, which it is supposed would have originally continued south forming the original spinal trunk to the whole connecting system (identified in a later re-cutting phase as SG 512072). These ditches were superseded by the re-alignments SG 527192, SG 527195 and 527197. By the time these last re-cuts had been constructed, the original gullies SG's 546107 and 603039 were defunct and the controlling channels used were those of the particular flanking ditches described above. This continuous re-cutting through on-going phases was reflected by the matching re-cuts of the north-western boundary of the Polygonal enclosure (SG's 529266 / 267 and 268), forming a traceable re-use and development of the whole system from at least the 12th century and up to the end of the 14th century. The north-east flank of the waterhole was bounded by the ditch SG 529237 which formed a southern return with the N-S gully 539051. These last two alignments were re-cut in the later medieval period (by SG 529239 and SG 546103)as the life of waterhole 529139 was slipping into disuse. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** As described above, the 'Buffalo's Head' enclosure is directly associated with the Entity 10031 (Polygonal Enclosure) and Entity 10030 (Rectangular Enclosure), not simply as a physical attachment, but also as continuous employment of utility. Without one part the next has no reason to exist; the development of the system cannot be separated from the purpose which connects all these fragment s of the main organism of enclosure. The functionality of this system does not stop with what has been described within the confines of Area 49, but must also include the surviving elements identified during the excavations of POK 96 (SG's 961044, 961855, 961134 - north, 961121, 961040, 961124, 961126 - south). This so-called medieval trackway alignment immediately to the north of the Entity 10032 runs from the medieval re-cut of the BA trackway (Entity 10017) to the west and continues eastwards for approximately 55m. This is not a trackway, but in fact is a remnant of an additional enclosure system associated and directly referencing the waterhole 529139 within the Entity 10032. The staggered entranceway to the linear remnant is far too complex for a simple trackway form. Realistically this gives the impression of not only control of access and movement, but indeed suggests a directional stratagem of control that may have led to options of various points of utility within the enclosure to the north. This southern E-W remnant was all that remained of this entity and as such makes interpretation all the more difficult. It must be logically pursued however with the identified form and function of the triple system encountered to the south on Area 49. The distance between the ditches SG 591043 and SG 529237 associated with the Buffalo's Head and the southern line of the remnant E-W line of enclosure excavated within POK-96 is an almost constant 21m. This sustainability of a parallel formation between enclosure systems is not coincidence, and on the contrary is indeed deliberate in the design of the whole complex. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The nature of the waterhole 529139 as the main focal point of activity within this space does necessitate more discussion. Although artefacts suggest an Early Medieval date for this, it is probable that the origins of this feature date to before the 12th century (see Entity 10029). This feature is definitely a waterhole, but the artefacts recovered from its various fills signify a possible change in use, not particularly for the waterhole itself, but more significantly for the surrounding enclosures. The fills of the upper half of the waterhole contained c.2kg of Fe slag material. This is not to suggest that the feature was being used in its later life as part of an industrial processing pit, but more that the slag material was indicative of activities focused around, but outside the area specific to the waterhole. The pit 529107 that was recorded as containing post-settings within its fills was also found to contain Fe slag material, over 6kg of slag in fact. For the comparative size of features and the spread of deposits, this density of slag material in a pit fill must infer that some industrial activity was taking place in the immediate vicinity. The emphasis here being upon localised working and not on a scale indicative of large scale production or trade. This seems to be residual evidence of there having been a serious attempt to fulfil all necessities within the enclosure system. Not only were these enclosures used for livestock but presumably, around them might have been localised workshops specifically used for the purpose of keeping the area workable on every conceivable level. There is not enough evidence to suggest that a fully operational blacksmith was employed here, but the evidence does point to there having been a reasonable ability to keep equipment useable with small - scale facilities on site. We have no conclusive evidence of in-situ deposits of burning associated with furnaces or serious metalworking, but the amount of slag recovered from a relatively small area, albeit residual material, does support the inference of there having been some localised industrial activity situated here in the Medieval period.","512 : David Thomason","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 603039","PSH02",603039
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 312002","PSH02",312002
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 312050","PSH02",312050
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582353","PSH02",582353
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598071","PSH02",598071
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598075","PSH02",598075
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 627053","PSH02",627053
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 627055","PSH02",627055
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 628008","PSH02",628008
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636009","PSH02",636009
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636011","PSH02",636011
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636029","PSH02",636029
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636031","PSH02",636031
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636033","PSH02",636033
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636035","PSH02",636035
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636170","PSH02",636170
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663154","PSH02",663154
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663155","PSH02",663155
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 673013","PSH02",673013
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 673064","PSH02",673064
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 675046","PSH02",675046
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 676019","PSH02",676019
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110032","WPR98",110032
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122098","WPR98",122098
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128123","WPR98",128123
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147253","WPR98",147253
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148232","WPR98",148232
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155047","WPR98",155047
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155061","WPR98",155061
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159070","WPR98",159070
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159125","WPR98",159125
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160088","WPR98",160088
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161166","WPR98",161166
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167007","WPR98",167007
704,"1A\LIA\Livestock_management","430 Late Iron Age",,"dump entity to try and define livestock management system during IA/RB, this one describes ENE-WSW boundaries consistent with the purported 'LRB roman ladder system', partly to demonstrate the earlier origin of this alignement.","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167130","WPR98",167130
706,"Late Neolithic Scatter1/N of HE2/Knapping?","225 Late Neolithic",,"This group is located to the north of Horseshoe Enclosure 2 and consists of residual neolithic material, of broadly Late Neolithic date. There are a number of LNEB/LNBA cores and scrapers, along with a large amount of undated flakes/ spalls and burnt flint, all located to the north of Grooved ware scatter1. The large quantity of lithics, although undated, are suggestive of a prehistoric date and are likely to be associated with the LN activity in this area. This material possibly represents a knapping area, potentially even an area of settlement. These flakes/ spalls and burnt flint appear in greater quantities to the north east of this area suggesting this may be the edge of whatever activity is occurring here, the area further north and east being the focus but now truncated (unexcavated?).  Additionally, Grooved ware scatter1 may represent the southern boundary of this possible LN knapping, settlement zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 704009","TEC05",704009
706,"Late Neolithic Scatter1/N of HE2/Knapping?","225 Late Neolithic",,"This group is located to the north of Horseshoe Enclosure 2 and consists of residual neolithic material, of broadly Late Neolithic date. There are a number of LNEB/LNBA cores and scrapers, along with a large amount of undated flakes/ spalls and burnt flint, all located to the north of Grooved ware scatter1. The large quantity of lithics, although undated, are suggestive of a prehistoric date and are likely to be associated with the LN activity in this area. This material possibly represents a knapping area, potentially even an area of settlement. These flakes/ spalls and burnt flint appear in greater quantities to the north east of this area suggesting this may be the edge of whatever activity is occurring here, the area further north and east being the focus but now truncated (unexcavated?).  Additionally, Grooved ware scatter1 may represent the southern boundary of this possible LN knapping, settlement zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 705012","TEC05",705012
706,"Late Neolithic Scatter1/N of HE2/Knapping?","225 Late Neolithic",,"This group is located to the north of Horseshoe Enclosure 2 and consists of residual neolithic material, of broadly Late Neolithic date. There are a number of LNEB/LNBA cores and scrapers, along with a large amount of undated flakes/ spalls and burnt flint, all located to the north of Grooved ware scatter1. The large quantity of lithics, although undated, are suggestive of a prehistoric date and are likely to be associated with the LN activity in this area. This material possibly represents a knapping area, potentially even an area of settlement. These flakes/ spalls and burnt flint appear in greater quantities to the north east of this area suggesting this may be the edge of whatever activity is occurring here, the area further north and east being the focus but now truncated (unexcavated?).  Additionally, Grooved ware scatter1 may represent the southern boundary of this possible LN knapping, settlement zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 705052","TEC05",705052
706,"Late Neolithic Scatter1/N of HE2/Knapping?","225 Late Neolithic",,"This group is located to the north of Horseshoe Enclosure 2 and consists of residual neolithic material, of broadly Late Neolithic date. There are a number of LNEB/LNBA cores and scrapers, along with a large amount of undated flakes/ spalls and burnt flint, all located to the north of Grooved ware scatter1. The large quantity of lithics, although undated, are suggestive of a prehistoric date and are likely to be associated with the LN activity in this area. This material possibly represents a knapping area, potentially even an area of settlement. These flakes/ spalls and burnt flint appear in greater quantities to the north east of this area suggesting this may be the edge of whatever activity is occurring here, the area further north and east being the focus but now truncated (unexcavated?).  Additionally, Grooved ware scatter1 may represent the southern boundary of this possible LN knapping, settlement zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 705062","TEC05",705062
709,"1a\medieval settlement\sd3",,,"southern ditch phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547168","PSH02",547168
709,"1a\medieval settlement\sd3",,,"southern ditch phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547169","PSH02",547169
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509026","PSH02",509026
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524064","PSH02",524064
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524078","PSH02",524078
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524087","PSH02",524087
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524090","PSH02",524090
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524092","PSH02",524092
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524104","PSH02",524104
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524124","PSH02",524124
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524126","PSH02",524126
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525052","PSH02",525052
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525056","PSH02",525056
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525078","PSH02",525078
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547041","PSH02",547041
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547047","PSH02",547047
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554093","PSH02",554093
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554107","PSH02",554107
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554110","PSH02",554110
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555055","PSH02",555055
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555108","PSH02",555108
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555111","PSH02",555111
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555142","PSH02",555142
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555145","PSH02",555145
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555148","PSH02",555148
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555165","PSH02",555165
713,"Early/Middle Bronze Age Segmented Ditch (PSH02)","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Segmented ditch running east to west through Area 73/75.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555167","PSH02",555167
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509129","PSH02",509129
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509130","PSH02",509130
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509131","PSH02",509131
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509139","PSH02",509139
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509140","PSH02",509140
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509141","PSH02",509141
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509185","PSH02",509185
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510063","PSH02",510063
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510066","PSH02",510066
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510067","PSH02",510067
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510138","PSH02",510138
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510141","PSH02",510141
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510144","PSH02",510144
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510148","PSH02",510148
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510153","PSH02",510153
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510155","PSH02",510155
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510158","PSH02",510158
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510160","PSH02",510160
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510162","PSH02",510162
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510164","PSH02",510164
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510166","PSH02",510166
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510175","PSH02",510175
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510177","PSH02",510177
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510179","PSH02",510179
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510181","PSH02",510181
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510184","PSH02",510184
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 516052","PSH02",516052
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517051","PSH02",517051
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517068","PSH02",517068
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517070","PSH02",517070
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517098","PSH02",517098
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517102","PSH02",517102
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517104","PSH02",517104
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517113","PSH02",517113
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 518033","PSH02",518033
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 518056","PSH02",518056
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 518073","PSH02",518073
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 522100","PSH02",522100
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 522102","PSH02",522102
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524029","PSH02",524029
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525016","PSH02",525016
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525091","PSH02",525091
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525200","PSH02",525200
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525212","PSH02",525212
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528009","PSH02",528009
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528015","PSH02",528015
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528016","PSH02",528016
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528028","PSH02",528028
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528030","PSH02",528030
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528197","PSH02",528197
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529410","PSH02",529410
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 531024","PSH02",531024
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 531041","PSH02",531041
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 531053","PSH02",531053
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 531064","PSH02",531064
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539420","PSH02",539420
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542032","PSH02",542032
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542034","PSH02",542034
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542036","PSH02",542036
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542276","PSH02",542276
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542325","PSH02",542325
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542332","PSH02",542332
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544166","PSH02",544166
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545019","PSH02",545019
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545050","PSH02",545050
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545054","PSH02",545054
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545056","PSH02",545056
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545077","PSH02",545077
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545081","PSH02",545081
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546009","PSH02",546009
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547331","PSH02",547331
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 549063","PSH02",549063
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 549065","PSH02",549065
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 549187","PSH02",549187
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552236","PSH02",552236
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554011","PSH02",554011
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554584","PSH02",554584
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554586","PSH02",554586
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554598","PSH02",554598
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555008","PSH02",555008
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555561","PSH02",555561
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556014","PSH02",556014
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556016","PSH02",556016
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556025","PSH02",556025
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556033","PSH02",556033
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556041","PSH02",556041
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556043","PSH02",556043
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556060","PSH02",556060
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556080","PSH02",556080
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556082","PSH02",556082
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556102","PSH02",556102
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 556142","PSH02",556142
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558033","PSH02",558033
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558035","PSH02",558035
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558051","PSH02",558051
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558253","PSH02",558253
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558255","PSH02",558255
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561022","PSH02",561022
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568265","PSH02",568265
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568269","PSH02",568269
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578157","PSH02",578157
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578159","PSH02",578159
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578170","PSH02",578170
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578189","PSH02",578189
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578213","PSH02",578213
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578215","PSH02",578215
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578229","PSH02",578229
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578596","PSH02",578596
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578628","PSH02",578628
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578630","PSH02",578630
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580157","PSH02",580157
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580223","PSH02",580223
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580225","PSH02",580225
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580227","PSH02",580227
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580302","PSH02",580302
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580306","PSH02",580306
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580312","PSH02",580312
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 580372","PSH02",580372
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581182","PSH02",581182
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581200","PSH02",581200
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581268","PSH02",581268
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581294","PSH02",581294
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582195","PSH02",582195
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582434","PSH02",582434
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589086","PSH02",589086
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589098","PSH02",589098
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 589336","PSH02",589336
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591093","PSH02",591093
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594133","PSH02",594133
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594147","PSH02",594147
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594149","PSH02",594149
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594152","PSH02",594152
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594249","PSH02",594249
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 599081","PSH02",599081
714,"MLBA field system in the east (PSH02)","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Entity designed to bring together all elements of north west to south east field system found in the eas of the PSH02 excvations.  Excludes WPR98 data.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 619047","PSH02",619047
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 507004","PSH02",507004
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 507005","PSH02",507005
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 507006","PSH02",507006
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 507015","PSH02",507015
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 507017","PSH02",507017
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 507018","PSH02",507018
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 510077","PSH02",510077
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515035","PSH02",515035
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515042","PSH02",515042
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 518113","PSH02",518113
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 518132","PSH02",518132
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 518159","PSH02",518159
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 518160","PSH02",518160
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 521048","PSH02",521048
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 521055","PSH02",521055
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 521056","PSH02",521056
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 521060","PSH02",521060
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 521062","PSH02",521062
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 521065","PSH02",521065
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525397","PSH02",525397
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526047","PSH02",526047
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 534031","PSH02",534031
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 534053","PSH02",534053
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 544147","PSH02",544147
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 545068","PSH02",545068
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 551116","PSH02",551116
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554560","PSH02",554560
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555310","PSH02",555310
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555311","PSH02",555311
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555312","PSH02",555312
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557160","PSH02",557160
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557173","PSH02",557173
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557174","PSH02",557174
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 560006","PSH02",560006
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 560007","PSH02",560007
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 560008","PSH02",560008
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561010","PSH02",561010
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568084","PSH02",568084
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568085","PSH02",568085
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568086","PSH02",568086
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568087","PSH02",568087
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 577023","PSH02",577023
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 586035","PSH02",586035
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 586036","PSH02",586036
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 586037","PSH02",586037
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 586038","PSH02",586038
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 586039","PSH02",586039
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 586040","PSH02",586040
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598180","PSH02",598180
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603072","PSH02",603072
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603084","PSH02",603084
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603085","PSH02",603085
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603087","PSH02",603087
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603088","PSH02",603088
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603089","PSH02",603089
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603090","PSH02",603090
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603091","PSH02",603091
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603092","PSH02",603092
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603093","PSH02",603093
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603094","PSH02",603094
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603098","PSH02",603098
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603099","PSH02",603099
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603100","PSH02",603100
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603101","PSH02",603101
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,,"PSH02",603103
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603104","PSH02",603104
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 612094","PSH02",612094
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 612095","PSH02",612095
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 612096","PSH02",612096
718,"All Alluvial Layers and Palaeochannels (PSH02)",,,"All features described as alluvial layers and palaeochannels in PSH02","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 612099","PSH02",612099
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515103","PSH02",515103
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515105","PSH02",515105
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515109","PSH02",515109
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515114","PSH02",515114
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515126","PSH02",515126
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515130","PSH02",515130
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515134","PSH02",515134
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515136","PSH02",515136
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515143","PSH02",515143
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515148","PSH02",515148
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515165","PSH02",515165
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515168","PSH02",515168
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515188","PSH02",515188
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515191","PSH02",515191
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515193","PSH02",515193
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515224","PSH02",515224
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515227","PSH02",515227
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515229","PSH02",515229
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515231","PSH02",515231
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515233","PSH02",515233
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515253","PSH02",515253
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515266","PSH02",515266
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515272","PSH02",515272
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515275","PSH02",515275
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515279","PSH02",515279
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515281","PSH02",515281
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515284","PSH02",515284
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515291","PSH02",515291
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515293","PSH02",515293
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515296","PSH02",515296
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515307","PSH02",515307
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 538235","PSH02",538235
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 546047","PSH02",546047
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 546049","PSH02",546049
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 546051","PSH02",546051
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 546053","PSH02",546053
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 546055","PSH02",546055
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 563046","PSH02",563046
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 563062","PSH02",563062
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 563066","PSH02",563066
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 563071","PSH02",563071
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 563088","PSH02",563088
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 563089","PSH02",563089
719,"Middle Bronze Age Palisade Ditch  (PSH02+POK96)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Entity consists of all features which form part of the pallisade ditch on Area 49","EN","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 563093","PSH02",563093
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961009","POK96",961009
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961012","POK96",961012
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961020","POK96",961020
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961027","POK96",961027
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961071","POK96",961071
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961084","POK96",961084
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961086","POK96",961086
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961093","POK96",961093
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961103","POK96",961103
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962031","POK96",962031
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962038","POK96",962038
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962069","POK96",962069
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962083","POK96",962083
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962134","POK96",962134
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 513069","PSH02",513069
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 513073","PSH02",513073
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 513075","PSH02",513075
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 513077","PSH02",513077
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515103","PSH02",515103
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515105","PSH02",515105
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515109","PSH02",515109
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515114","PSH02",515114
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515126","PSH02",515126
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515130","PSH02",515130
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515134","PSH02",515134
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515136","PSH02",515136
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515143","PSH02",515143
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515148","PSH02",515148
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515165","PSH02",515165
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515168","PSH02",515168
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515188","PSH02",515188
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515191","PSH02",515191
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515193","PSH02",515193
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515224","PSH02",515224
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515227","PSH02",515227
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515229","PSH02",515229
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515231","PSH02",515231
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515233","PSH02",515233
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515253","PSH02",515253
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515266","PSH02",515266
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515272","PSH02",515272
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515275","PSH02",515275
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515279","PSH02",515279
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515281","PSH02",515281
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515284","PSH02",515284
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515291","PSH02",515291
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515293","PSH02",515293
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515296","PSH02",515296
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515307","PSH02",515307
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 515316","PSH02",515316
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517251","PSH02",517251
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526249","PSH02",526249
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538043","PSH02",538043
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538047","PSH02",538047
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538053","PSH02",538053
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538088","PSH02",538088
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538104","PSH02",538104
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538109","PSH02",538109
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538122","PSH02",538122
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538131","PSH02",538131
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538144","PSH02",538144
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538148","PSH02",538148
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538151","PSH02",538151
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538156","PSH02",538156
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538160","PSH02",538160
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538163","PSH02",538163
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538166","PSH02",538166
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538175","PSH02",538175
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538191","PSH02",538191
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538223","PSH02",538223
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538227","PSH02",538227
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538231","PSH02",538231
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538233","PSH02",538233
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538235","PSH02",538235
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546039","PSH02",546039
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546043","PSH02",546043
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546045","PSH02",546045
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546047","PSH02",546047
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546049","PSH02",546049
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546051","PSH02",546051
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546053","PSH02",546053
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546055","PSH02",546055
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550028","PSH02",550028
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 557019","PSH02",557019
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 557022","PSH02",557022
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 557027","PSH02",557027
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 557034","PSH02",557034
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 557037","PSH02",557037
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 557042","PSH02",557042
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 557088","PSH02",557088
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563044","PSH02",563044
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563046","PSH02",563046
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563060","PSH02",563060
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563062","PSH02",563062
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563066","PSH02",563066
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563071","PSH02",563071
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563088","PSH02",563088
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563089","PSH02",563089
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 563093","PSH02",563093
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591035","PSH02",591035
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591055","PSH02",591055
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591059","PSH02",591059
720,"Settlement 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features related to settlement excavated in Area 49 + POK.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591074","PSH02",591074
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512005","PSH02",512005
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523153","PSH02",523153
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523154","PSH02",523154
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526343","PSH02",526343
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527297","PSH02",527297
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527308","PSH02",527308
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529039","PSH02",529039
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539235","PSH02",539235
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539283","PSH02",539283
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546140","PSH02",546140
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546246","PSH02",546246
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546248","PSH02",546248
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546251","PSH02",546251
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546258","PSH02",546258
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546262","PSH02",546262
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546264","PSH02",546264
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546266","PSH02",546266
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546268","PSH02",546268
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546270","PSH02",546270
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546272","PSH02",546272
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546275","PSH02",546275
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546277","PSH02",546277
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557146","PSH02",557146
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568148","PSH02",568148
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583160","PSH02",583160
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588149","PSH02",588149
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588155","PSH02",588155
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588160","PSH02",588160
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588162","PSH02",588162
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588170","PSH02",588170
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 589283","PSH02",589283
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592337","PSH02",592337
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592393","PSH02",592393
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592394","PSH02",592394
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592397","PSH02",592397
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592400","PSH02",592400
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614078","PSH02",614078
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614104","PSH02",614104
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614119","PSH02",614119
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614122","PSH02",614122
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614235","PSH02",614235
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621089","PSH02",621089
721,"MBA field system to west of channel  (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All ditches and gullies dating to the MLBA which are situated to the west of the significant NS ditch which forms the eastern boundary of this blockof land.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621090","PSH02",621090
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526343","PSH02",526343
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527078","PSH02",527078
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546167","PSH02",546167
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546171","PSH02",546171
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546202","PSH02",546202
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546210","PSH02",546210
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546214","PSH02",546214
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546220","PSH02",546220
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546246","PSH02",546246
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546248","PSH02",546248
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546251","PSH02",546251
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546258","PSH02",546258
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546262","PSH02",546262
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546264","PSH02",546264
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546266","PSH02",546266
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546268","PSH02",546268
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546270","PSH02",546270
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546272","PSH02",546272
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546275","PSH02",546275
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546277","PSH02",546277
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 557146","PSH02",557146
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568179","PSH02",568179
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568197","PSH02",568197
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568204","PSH02",568204
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568207","PSH02",568207
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568212","PSH02",568212
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 583118","PSH02",583118
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588149","PSH02",588149
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588155","PSH02",588155
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588160","PSH02",588160
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588162","PSH02",588162
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588165","PSH02",588165
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 613092","PSH02",613092
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614001","PSH02",614001
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614022","PSH02",614022
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614078","PSH02",614078
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614122","PSH02",614122
722,"Settlement 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All features which could be related to a settlement in this area.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615008","PSH02",615008
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 512001","PSH02",512001
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 526322","PSH02",526322
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 527324","PSH02",527324
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 527336","PSH02",527336
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 530001","PSH02",530001
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 539261","PSH02",539261
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 543238","PSH02",543238
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 546222","PSH02",546222
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 546225","PSH02",546225
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 568117","PSH02",568117
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 570144","PSH02",570144
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 570148","PSH02",570148
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 583107","PSH02",583107
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 583109","PSH02",583109
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 583110","PSH02",583110
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 588091","PSH02",588091
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 588113","PSH02",588113
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 588115","PSH02",588115
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 589296","PSH02",589296
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 592357","PSH02",592357
723,"Tree throws related to settlement Area 24 (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All three throws in the vicinity of MBA settlement on Area 24 which may relate to land clearance prior to settlement.","EN","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 593077","PSH02",593077
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961501","POK96",961501
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 961515","POK96",961515
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 512070","PSH02",512070
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 512071","PSH02",512071
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 524167","PSH02",524167
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 524234","PSH02",524234
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 524238","PSH02",524238
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 524398","PSH02",524398
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526381","PSH02",526381
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529310","PSH02",529310
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529311","PSH02",529311
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529473","PSH02",529473
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529494","PSH02",529494
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541166","PSH02",541166
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 549109","PSH02",549109
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 588222","PSH02",588222
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 588229","PSH02",588229
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 588324","PSH02",588324
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 594241","PSH02",594241
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 603048","PSH02",603048
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 617042","PSH02",617042
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 621233","PSH02",621233
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128028","WPR98",128028
727,"C1 Stanwell Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","700 Medieval","Comprehensive entity to describe Stanwell Cursus","EN","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134029","WPR98",134029
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961009","POK96",961009
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961012","POK96",961012
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961020","POK96",961020
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961071","POK96",961071
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961085","POK96",961085
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961086","POK96",961086
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961093","POK96",961093
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961103","POK96",961103
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961532","POK96",961532
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961578","POK96",961578
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961631","POK96",961631
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961747","POK96",961747
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962303","POK96",962303
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963055","POK96",963055
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963389","POK96",963389
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 507019","PSH02",507019
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511071","PSH02",511071
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511089","PSH02",511089
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511109","PSH02",511109
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511116","PSH02",511116
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511121","PSH02",511121
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512066","PSH02",512066
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512119","PSH02",512119
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515039","PSH02",515039
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515083","PSH02",515083
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 516204","PSH02",516204
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 516207","PSH02",516207
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517240","PSH02",517240
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517247","PSH02",517247
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 518145","PSH02",518145
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523019","PSH02",523019
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523029","PSH02",523029
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523198","PSH02",523198
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523234","PSH02",523234
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523247","PSH02",523247
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523250","PSH02",523250
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524232","PSH02",524232
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524242","PSH02",524242
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524575","PSH02",524575
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524580","PSH02",524580
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524582","PSH02",524582
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525048","PSH02",525048
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525170","PSH02",525170
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526084","PSH02",526084
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526092","PSH02",526092
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526093","PSH02",526093
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526223","PSH02",526223
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526237","PSH02",526237
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526239","PSH02",526239
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526240","PSH02",526240
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526446","PSH02",526446
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526462","PSH02",526462
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527001","PSH02",527001
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531101","PSH02",531101
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531121","PSH02",531121
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531123","PSH02",531123
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531125","PSH02",531125
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538160","PSH02",538160
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538163","PSH02",538163
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538166","PSH02",538166
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538239","PSH02",538239
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538241","PSH02",538241
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538247","PSH02",538247
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539149","PSH02",539149
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539288","PSH02",539288
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541005","PSH02",541005
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541030","PSH02",541030
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541116","PSH02",541116
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541119","PSH02",541119
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541121","PSH02",541121
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541123","PSH02",541123
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541152","PSH02",541152
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542063","PSH02",542063
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542393","PSH02",542393
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542394","PSH02",542394
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542402","PSH02",542402
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543191","PSH02",543191
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547215","PSH02",547215
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547217","PSH02",547217
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547219","PSH02",547219
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547279","PSH02",547279
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547291","PSH02",547291
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 548041","PSH02",548041
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 550039","PSH02",550039
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 550041","PSH02",550041
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 552040","PSH02",552040
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 552042","PSH02",552042
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 552096","PSH02",552096
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 552118","PSH02",552118
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 552123","PSH02",552123
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 552309","PSH02",552309
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 552312","PSH02",552312
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554235","PSH02",554235
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555530","PSH02",555530
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559086","PSH02",559086
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559159","PSH02",559159
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559181","PSH02",559181
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559188","PSH02",559188
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559357","PSH02",559357
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559361","PSH02",559361
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559368","PSH02",559368
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559370","PSH02",559370
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559372","PSH02",559372
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559721","PSH02",559721
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561116","PSH02",561116
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561142","PSH02",561142
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 566038","PSH02",566038
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569092","PSH02",569092
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570467","PSH02",570467
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570478","PSH02",570478
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570479","PSH02",570479
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 572041","PSH02",572041
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573038","PSH02",573038
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573040","PSH02",573040
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573042","PSH02",573042
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573052","PSH02",573052
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575099","PSH02",575099
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575101","PSH02",575101
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575129","PSH02",575129
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575172","PSH02",575172
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575201","PSH02",575201
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575217","PSH02",575217
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575219","PSH02",575219
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 576030","PSH02",576030
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 576041","PSH02",576041
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 576043","PSH02",576043
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 576047","PSH02",576047
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 576050","PSH02",576050
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 576057","PSH02",576057
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578133","PSH02",578133
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578559","PSH02",578559
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579094","PSH02",579094
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579101","PSH02",579101
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580125","PSH02",580125
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580137","PSH02",580137
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580140","PSH02",580140
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580587","PSH02",580587
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582148","PSH02",582148
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582309","PSH02",582309
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582314","PSH02",582314
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582319","PSH02",582319
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582325","PSH02",582325
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582332","PSH02",582332
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582347","PSH02",582347
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582351","PSH02",582351
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 586060","PSH02",586060
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 586061","PSH02",586061
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 586062","PSH02",586062
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 591038","PSH02",591038
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 595018","PSH02",595018
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 595020","PSH02",595020
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597033","PSH02",597033
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597036","PSH02",597036
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598081","PSH02",598081
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598082","PSH02",598082
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598093","PSH02",598093
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 602264","PSH02",602264
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603025","PSH02",603025
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 603053","PSH02",603053
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614218","PSH02",614218
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615043","PSH02",615043
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615051","PSH02",615051
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615052","PSH02",615052
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621135","PSH02",621135
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621144","PSH02",621144
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621154","PSH02",621154
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621173","PSH02",621173
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621190","PSH02",621190
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621192","PSH02",621192
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621194","PSH02",621194
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103046","WPR98",103046
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103054","WPR98",103054
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 105009","WPR98",105009
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107149","WPR98",107149
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110007","WPR98",110007
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111012","WPR98",111012
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119014","WPR98",119014
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119034","WPR98",119034
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119317","WPR98",119317
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119322","WPR98",119322
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 120013","WPR98",120013
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121009","WPR98",121009
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132028","WPR98",132028
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132029","WPR98",132029
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 143011","WPR98",143011
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147026","WPR98",147026
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149112","WPR98",149112
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156143","WPR98",156143
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
729,"BA field system - central (PSH02, POK96 + WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity describes what is believed to be the earliest portion of the BA field system.  This zone covers the area adjacent to the cursus and can be described as spanning from the Twin Rivers in the east to the Palaeochannel running through the Perryoaks site in the west.  It does not include the area of BA ditches in the far West of Area 49 and 24 (PSH02) which look to be part of a separate field system.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963019","POK96",963019
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963020","POK96",963020
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963021","POK96",963021
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963040","POK96",963040
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963074","POK96",963074
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963097","POK96",963097
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963106","POK96",963106
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963138","POK96",963138
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963159","POK96",963159
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963161","POK96",963161
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963218","POK96",963218
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963280","POK96",963280
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963489","POK96",963489
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963517","POK96",963517
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512005","PSH02",512005
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523153","PSH02",523153
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523154","PSH02",523154
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526343","PSH02",526343
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527297","PSH02",527297
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527308","PSH02",527308
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529039","PSH02",529039
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539235","PSH02",539235
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539283","PSH02",539283
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546140","PSH02",546140
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546246","PSH02",546246
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546248","PSH02",546248
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546251","PSH02",546251
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546258","PSH02",546258
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546262","PSH02",546262
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546264","PSH02",546264
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546266","PSH02",546266
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546268","PSH02",546268
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546270","PSH02",546270
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546272","PSH02",546272
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546275","PSH02",546275
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546277","PSH02",546277
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557146","PSH02",557146
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568148","PSH02",568148
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583160","PSH02",583160
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588149","PSH02",588149
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588155","PSH02",588155
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588160","PSH02",588160
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588162","PSH02",588162
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588170","PSH02",588170
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 589283","PSH02",589283
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592337","PSH02",592337
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592393","PSH02",592393
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592394","PSH02",592394
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592397","PSH02",592397
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592400","PSH02",592400
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614078","PSH02",614078
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614104","PSH02",614104
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614119","PSH02",614119
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614122","PSH02",614122
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614235","PSH02",614235
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621089","PSH02",621089
730,"All BA fields to West of site (PSH02, POK96+WPR98)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All BA field system ditches excavated in the western part of site.  Look to be a distinct unit seperated from the central range of fields by the extinct palaeochannel.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 621090","PSH02",621090
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522049","PSH02",522049
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522070","PSH02",522070
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522076","PSH02",522076
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522078","PSH02",522078
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522080","PSH02",522080
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522084","PSH02",522084
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 522091","PSH02",522091
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525449","PSH02",525449
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 530059","PSH02",530059
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531130","PSH02",531130
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531139","PSH02",531139
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531146","PSH02",531146
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539365","PSH02",539365
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 545121","PSH02",545121
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 551355","PSH02",551355
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554614","PSH02",554614
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559824","PSH02",559824
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570337","PSH02",570337
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570501","PSH02",570501
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570504","PSH02",570504
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570507","PSH02",570507
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570511","PSH02",570511
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592083","PSH02",592083
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592261","PSH02",592261
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592315","PSH02",592315
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 601111","PSH02",601111
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 602110","PSH02",602110
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 602117","PSH02",602117
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615113","PSH02",615113
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615115","PSH02",615115
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615119","PSH02",615119
731,"BA field system south of site (PSH02)","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All Ba ditches and gullies which are situated on sites to the south of the western perimiter road.  The alignment of these ditche does not easily fit in with other alignments on site due to their isolation.  However, it could be argued that these ditches follow the alignment of field systems to the east of the WPR98 and PSH02 sites.","EN","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 618002","PSH02",618002
732,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\SFB group 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"Two pits broadly morphologically consistent with feature type. Also supported by their position just off the axis of the central entrances of the postulated hall house which may have occupied space directly north of this structure around the C7.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509180","PSH02",509180
732,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\SFB group 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"Two pits broadly morphologically consistent with feature type. Also supported by their position just off the axis of the central entrances of the postulated hall house which may have occupied space directly north of this structure around the C7.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538287","PSH02",538287
732,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\SFB group 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"Two pits broadly morphologically consistent with feature type. Also supported by their position just off the axis of the central entrances of the postulated hall house which may have occupied space directly north of this structure around the C7.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538326","PSH02",538326
732,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\SFB group 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"Two pits broadly morphologically consistent with feature type. Also supported by their position just off the axis of the central entrances of the postulated hall house which may have occupied space directly north of this structure around the C7.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582423","PSH02",582423
732,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\SFB group 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"Two pits broadly morphologically consistent with feature type. Also supported by their position just off the axis of the central entrances of the postulated hall house which may have occupied space directly north of this structure around the C7.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582426","PSH02",582426
732,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\SFB group 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"Two pits broadly morphologically consistent with feature type. Also supported by their position just off the axis of the central entrances of the postulated hall house which may have occupied space directly north of this structure around the C7.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582428","PSH02",582428
735,"Neolithic postholes POK96 West C1 ditch","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes excvated in POK96 in western C1 stanwell cursus ditch","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 962054","POK96",962054
735,"Neolithic postholes POK96 West C1 ditch","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes excvated in POK96 in western C1 stanwell cursus ditch","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 962063","POK96",962063
735,"Neolithic postholes POK96 West C1 ditch","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes excvated in POK96 in western C1 stanwell cursus ditch","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 962067","POK96",962067
735,"Neolithic postholes POK96 West C1 ditch","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes excvated in POK96 in western C1 stanwell cursus ditch","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 962081","POK96",962081
735,"Neolithic postholes POK96 West C1 ditch","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes excvated in POK96 in western C1 stanwell cursus ditch","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 962326","POK96",962326
738,"Neolithic PH + Pits contemporary with C1 cursus","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes and pits whhc can be shown to cut lowest fills of C1 cursus but are sealed by or contemorary with middle fills.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 962117","POK96",962117
738,"Neolithic PH + Pits contemporary with C1 cursus","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes and pits whhc can be shown to cut lowest fills of C1 cursus but are sealed by or contemorary with middle fills.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128022","WPR98",128022
738,"Neolithic PH + Pits contemporary with C1 cursus","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes and pits whhc can be shown to cut lowest fills of C1 cursus but are sealed by or contemorary with middle fills.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 129013","WPR98",129013
738,"Neolithic PH + Pits contemporary with C1 cursus","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes and pits whhc can be shown to cut lowest fills of C1 cursus but are sealed by or contemorary with middle fills.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 150010","WPR98",150010
738,"Neolithic PH + Pits contemporary with C1 cursus","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes and pits whhc can be shown to cut lowest fills of C1 cursus but are sealed by or contemorary with middle fills.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 150011","WPR98",150011
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 510138","PSH02",510138
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 510141","PSH02",510141
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 510144","PSH02",510144
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 510148","PSH02",510148
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 510153","PSH02",510153
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 510155","PSH02",510155
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 510158","PSH02",510158
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 510160","PSH02",510160
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 517113","PSH02",517113
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 545050","PSH02",545050
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 545054","PSH02",545054
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 545056","PSH02",545056
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 545077","PSH02",545077
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 549063","PSH02",549063
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 549065","PSH02",549065
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 110060","WPR98",110060
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 125100","WPR98",125100
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 125102","WPR98",125102
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 126053","WPR98",126053
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 126066","WPR98",126066
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 127095","WPR98",127095
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 127101","WPR98",127101
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 128109","WPR98",128109
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 128113","WPR98",128113
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 128115","WPR98",128115
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 138162","WPR98",138162
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 138170","WPR98",138170
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 147114","WPR98",147114
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 159101","WPR98",159101
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 159103","WPR98",159103
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 159105","WPR98",159105
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 159107","WPR98",159107
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 159109","WPR98",159109
739,"Bronze Age Trackway 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Trackway aligned roughly north-west - south-east across landscape and associated with a number of different fields.  The trackway ditches produced a quantity of MBA pottery.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 163063","WPR98",163063
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 516204","PSH02",516204
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 516207","PSH02",516207
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 523198","PSH02",523198
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 531101","PSH02",531101
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 531121","PSH02",531121
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 531123","PSH02",531123
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 531125","PSH02",531125
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 539288","PSH02",539288
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 542393","PSH02",542393
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 542394","PSH02",542394
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 542402","PSH02",542402
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 542403","PSH02",542403
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 575237","PSH02",575237
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 582314","PSH02",582314
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 582319","PSH02",582319
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 582325","PSH02",582325
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 582332","PSH02",582332
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 582347","PSH02",582347
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 582351","PSH02",582351
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 599122","PSH02",599122
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 599125","PSH02",599125
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 615043","PSH02",615043
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 615052","PSH02",615052
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 636152","PSH02",636152
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 636155","PSH02",636155
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"PSH02 - 636175","PSH02",636175
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 103046","WPR98",103046
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 103054","WPR98",103054
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 107149","WPR98",107149
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 112042","WPR98",112042
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 119317","WPR98",119317
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 119322","WPR98",119322
740,"Bronze Age Trackway 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This trackway is more difficult to determine than some of the others, and in part this results from disturbance from modern linears.  It may also have been created in a piecemeal fashion, with elements tagged on later, even perhaps after other components of it had fallen out of use.  It seems to mimic the form/ curvature of the D-shaped enclosure ditch to the west.  In this sense it is quite different from the other trackway ditches which, although they meander slightly, they do not follow the sharp curve of trackway 2.  After running east-west for a short distance, the ditches of the track turn sharply, almost at 90 degress, to become reorientated almost completely north-south.  Further south, the ditches associated with the track become harder to distinguish and follow, but it is likely that part of the track is linked with a funnelling system.  The track does not continue south into Area 72/73 but may terminate or else turn again.","mal","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 149116","WPR98",149116
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542227","PSH02",542227
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542228","PSH02",542228
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542259","PSH02",542259
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542263","PSH02",542263
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 548058","PSH02",548058
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 548060","PSH02",548060
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 554235","PSH02",554235
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 562085","PSH02",562085
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580028","PSH02",580028
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580030","PSH02",580030
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580032","PSH02",580032
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582005","PSH02",582005
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 591066","PSH02",591066
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 594109","PSH02",594109
741,"Bronze Age Field 3","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"This entity term may be a slight misnomer.  It has been used for ease of parcelling together a number of diverse ditches within the landscape that may or may not make up a field.  It would appear that this set of boundaries in Area 73 constitute some rather unusual elements, and also the ditches may have been created over a very long temporal span, from the LN/EBA to the LBA.  They do appear to frame something, although not all the edges of the boundaries need have been in use at the same time.  In comparison to other components of the Bronze Age field systems in the T5 landscape, this one is distinctly 'askew', with the northern boundary meandering well off any of the normal BA alingnments.  In fact, this rather segmented ditch (Entity Segmented ditch system on Area 72) is of a rather different form and character to other BA field boundaries.  It is  more akin to the segmented meandering ditch system on Area 75, and may have originally fulfilled similar functions to the latter causewayed feature, perhaps delimiting specific zones of the land for ceremonial activities.  On the other hand, this field may be associated with activities of a domestic nature, and the finds signatures imply that there was settlement in the vicinity.  It is important to highlight the  fact that elements of these boundaries were clearly created in the EBA, adding weight to the argument that the origins of the field system in this part of the Thames valley may well be as early as this.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 594120","PSH02",594120
742,"Bronze Age Trackway 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small stretch of E-W orientated trackway coming of Trackway 1 and situated between two fields which are part of Bronze Age Fieldsystem 1.  This trackway is unusual for two main reasons - firstly it is demarcated by a relatively short length  and secondly it is aligned E-W.  All of the other tracks through the Heathrow landscape are oriented on N-S variations.  It may be that this track provided easy and efficient  movement between Trackway 1 and the enclosure to the east without the need for driving any animals through any fields belonging to Field System 1.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
742,"Bronze Age Trackway 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small stretch of E-W orientated trackway coming of Trackway 1 and situated between two fields which are part of Bronze Age Fieldsystem 1.  This trackway is unusual for two main reasons - firstly it is demarcated by a relatively short length  and secondly it is aligned E-W.  All of the other tracks through the Heathrow landscape are oriented on N-S variations.  It may be that this track provided easy and efficient  movement between Trackway 1 and the enclosure to the east without the need for driving any animals through any fields belonging to Field System 1.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
742,"Bronze Age Trackway 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small stretch of E-W orientated trackway coming of Trackway 1 and situated between two fields which are part of Bronze Age Fieldsystem 1.  This trackway is unusual for two main reasons - firstly it is demarcated by a relatively short length  and secondly it is aligned E-W.  All of the other tracks through the Heathrow landscape are oriented on N-S variations.  It may be that this track provided easy and efficient  movement between Trackway 1 and the enclosure to the east without the need for driving any animals through any fields belonging to Field System 1.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
742,"Bronze Age Trackway 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small stretch of E-W orientated trackway coming of Trackway 1 and situated between two fields which are part of Bronze Age Fieldsystem 1.  This trackway is unusual for two main reasons - firstly it is demarcated by a relatively short length  and secondly it is aligned E-W.  All of the other tracks through the Heathrow landscape are oriented on N-S variations.  It may be that this track provided easy and efficient  movement between Trackway 1 and the enclosure to the east without the need for driving any animals through any fields belonging to Field System 1.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Trackway",,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963019","POK96",963019
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963021","POK96",963021
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963040","POK96",963040
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963218","POK96",963218
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963280","POK96",963280
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 512005","PSH02",512005
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 512044","PSH02",512044
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,,"PSH02",514068
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523153","PSH02",523153
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 527030","PSH02",527030
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 527293","PSH02",527293
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 527297","PSH02",527297
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 546270","PSH02",546270
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 546272","PSH02",546272
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 546275","PSH02",546275
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 583155","PSH02",583155
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 583160","PSH02",583160
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 588155","PSH02",588155
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 588165","PSH02",588165
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 614108","PSH02",614108
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 614119","PSH02",614119
743,"Bronze Age Field System 3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It has been quite difficult to identify all the constituent components of this field system.  It is likely that many of the original Bronze Age elements have been recut in the medieval/ post medieval periods.  In some cases recuts may have obliterated the earlier ditches altogether.  Thus some of the ditch sections, for instance, SG 583155, have been dated as post-medieval, although no finds of that date were recovered.  This ditch in particular is a return of Bronze Age ditch SG 512005, and likely is associated with this part of the field system.  This entity has been created with the aim of making sense of a rather confused area of intercutting and cross-cutting ditches.  Although there are elements of uncertainty in creating this entity, a series of Bronze Age fields do lie here, and the northern, eastern and southern boundaries of the system are well defined.  It is unlikely that all these fields were open to the west and thus the western boundary must have existed, although it may no longer be visible due to post-medieval recutting.  This field system is associated with a Middle Bronze Age settlement which includes post-hole ?rectangular structures.  Large quantities of material culture, including Deverel-Rimbury pottery and burnt flint came from interventions in this area.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 614122","PSH02",614122
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 513088","PSH02",513088
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 515039","PSH02",515039
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 515083","PSH02",515083
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 517240","PSH02",517240
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523019","PSH02",523019
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523029","PSH02",523029
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526084","PSH02",526084
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526092","PSH02",526092
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 538035","PSH02",538035
744,"Bronze Age Field System 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","900 Modern","This entity has been assigned to an elongated block of fields in Area 49. The longer axis of the field system is orientated N-S.  The group comprises three rectangular blocks of land, with the largest one located in the southern part of the field system.   Many of these Bronze Age boundaries have been heavily reutilised in medieval and later periods.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 550041","PSH02",550041
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 110060","WPR98",110060
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 111067","WPR98",111067
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 111071","WPR98",111071
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 126038","WPR98",126038
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 126042","WPR98",126042
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 127095","WPR98",127095
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 128113","WPR98",128113
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 128115","WPR98",128115
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 128117","WPR98",128117
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 147114","WPR98",147114
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 155080","WPR98",155080
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 159107","WPR98",159107
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 159109","WPR98",159109
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 160092","WPR98",160092
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 160184","WPR98",160184
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 161124","WPR98",161124
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 161126","WPR98",161126
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 161130","WPR98",161130
745,"Bronze Age Field System 6","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This entity has been used to define a rectangular block of land that  is adjacent to and immediately to the east of Bronze Age Trackway 3.  Truncation in this part of the site is quite severe, and thus in areas the field system is quite segmented/ broken up.  East-west aligned components of this field system were difficult to identify, although undoubtedly they did exist.  Other wise the field system would have existed as a very large long single block, measuring c. 172 m in length by 70 m in width.  Some components of this system may have originated in the MBA, whike other elements may have been added in LBA.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 171063","WPR98",171063
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 517051","PSH02",517051
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 517068","PSH02",517068
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 517070","PSH02",517070
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 517098","PSH02",517098
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 517102","PSH02",517102
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 542032","PSH02",542032
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 542034","PSH02",542034
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 542036","PSH02",542036
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"PSH02 - 549065","PSH02",549065
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 111067","WPR98",111067
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 113062","WPR98",113062
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 127043","WPR98",127043
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 127053","WPR98",127053
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 127095","WPR98",127095
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 128113","WPR98",128113
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 128115","WPR98",128115
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 147081","WPR98",147081
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 147083","WPR98",147083
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 147114","WPR98",147114
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 160092","WPR98",160092
746,"Bronze Age Field System 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"A rather unusual field system component, slightly different in form and potentially function to the others surrounding it.  This field system is located to the west of field system 9 and to the east of Trackway 3.  It comprises two curvilinear ditches which may well have functioned as enclosures.  The entity may be slightly arbitrary since there is quite serious truncation in this part of the landscape, but it is worth grouping these features together for further analysis.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys2",,"WPR98 - 160184","WPR98",160184
747,"Bronze Age Field 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slightly truncated in areas but this entity represents a number of ditch and hedgerow elements that constitute a field or parts of two small fields  in the Northern taxiway area (area 100).  It is more precisely located between two droveways and to the west of the BA settlement on the Taxiway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542332","PSH02",542332
747,"Bronze Age Field 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slightly truncated in areas but this entity represents a number of ditch and hedgerow elements that constitute a field or parts of two small fields  in the Northern taxiway area (area 100).  It is more precisely located between two droveways and to the west of the BA settlement on the Taxiway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 554584","PSH02",554584
747,"Bronze Age Field 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slightly truncated in areas but this entity represents a number of ditch and hedgerow elements that constitute a field or parts of two small fields  in the Northern taxiway area (area 100).  It is more precisely located between two droveways and to the west of the BA settlement on the Taxiway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 554586","PSH02",554586
747,"Bronze Age Field 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slightly truncated in areas but this entity represents a number of ditch and hedgerow elements that constitute a field or parts of two small fields  in the Northern taxiway area (area 100).  It is more precisely located between two droveways and to the west of the BA settlement on the Taxiway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 554598","PSH02",554598
747,"Bronze Age Field 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slightly truncated in areas but this entity represents a number of ditch and hedgerow elements that constitute a field or parts of two small fields  in the Northern taxiway area (area 100).  It is more precisely located between two droveways and to the west of the BA settlement on the Taxiway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578159","PSH02",578159
747,"Bronze Age Field 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slightly truncated in areas but this entity represents a number of ditch and hedgerow elements that constitute a field or parts of two small fields  in the Northern taxiway area (area 100).  It is more precisely located between two droveways and to the west of the BA settlement on the Taxiway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 580157","PSH02",580157
747,"Bronze Age Field 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Slightly truncated in areas but this entity represents a number of ditch and hedgerow elements that constitute a field or parts of two small fields  in the Northern taxiway area (area 100).  It is more precisely located between two droveways and to the west of the BA settlement on the Taxiway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 589086","PSH02",589086
749,"Medieval Field 1","700 Medieval",,"Small field associated with Medieval Field 2 to its west.  Both these fields are aligned roughly north-north-east - south-south-west.  The southern boundaries of these two fields were not identified, and undoubtedly lay beyond the excavation zone.  Few finds were retrieved from either of these fields, and dating is primarily based on extrapolation.  The boundaries established by these fields in the Medieval period were continuously recut, and expanded upon, and some of the recutting events may also date to Medieval times, although respect for and reuse of these boundaries also carried on into the post-Medieval period.  This entity demarcates a relatively small field at least 30 x 30 m in size.  This field was originally constructed as a rather interrupted series of boundaries, comprising segmented elongated pits/ short ditch sections and associated post holes.  The post holes may imply  fencelines, so that the otherwise segmented/ interrupted nature of the field boundaries were made continuous.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555870","PSH02",555870
749,"Medieval Field 1","700 Medieval",,"Small field associated with Medieval Field 2 to its west.  Both these fields are aligned roughly north-north-east - south-south-west.  The southern boundaries of these two fields were not identified, and undoubtedly lay beyond the excavation zone.  Few finds were retrieved from either of these fields, and dating is primarily based on extrapolation.  The boundaries established by these fields in the Medieval period were continuously recut, and expanded upon, and some of the recutting events may also date to Medieval times, although respect for and reuse of these boundaries also carried on into the post-Medieval period.  This entity demarcates a relatively small field at least 30 x 30 m in size.  This field was originally constructed as a rather interrupted series of boundaries, comprising segmented elongated pits/ short ditch sections and associated post holes.  The post holes may imply  fencelines, so that the otherwise segmented/ interrupted nature of the field boundaries were made continuous.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578370","PSH02",578370
749,"Medieval Field 1","700 Medieval",,"Small field associated with Medieval Field 2 to its west.  Both these fields are aligned roughly north-north-east - south-south-west.  The southern boundaries of these two fields were not identified, and undoubtedly lay beyond the excavation zone.  Few finds were retrieved from either of these fields, and dating is primarily based on extrapolation.  The boundaries established by these fields in the Medieval period were continuously recut, and expanded upon, and some of the recutting events may also date to Medieval times, although respect for and reuse of these boundaries also carried on into the post-Medieval period.  This entity demarcates a relatively small field at least 30 x 30 m in size.  This field was originally constructed as a rather interrupted series of boundaries, comprising segmented elongated pits/ short ditch sections and associated post holes.  The post holes may imply  fencelines, so that the otherwise segmented/ interrupted nature of the field boundaries were made continuous.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578490","PSH02",578490
749,"Medieval Field 1","700 Medieval",,"Small field associated with Medieval Field 2 to its west.  Both these fields are aligned roughly north-north-east - south-south-west.  The southern boundaries of these two fields were not identified, and undoubtedly lay beyond the excavation zone.  Few finds were retrieved from either of these fields, and dating is primarily based on extrapolation.  The boundaries established by these fields in the Medieval period were continuously recut, and expanded upon, and some of the recutting events may also date to Medieval times, although respect for and reuse of these boundaries also carried on into the post-Medieval period.  This entity demarcates a relatively small field at least 30 x 30 m in size.  This field was originally constructed as a rather interrupted series of boundaries, comprising segmented elongated pits/ short ditch sections and associated post holes.  The post holes may imply  fencelines, so that the otherwise segmented/ interrupted nature of the field boundaries were made continuous.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578492","PSH02",578492
749,"Medieval Field 1","700 Medieval",,"Small field associated with Medieval Field 2 to its west.  Both these fields are aligned roughly north-north-east - south-south-west.  The southern boundaries of these two fields were not identified, and undoubtedly lay beyond the excavation zone.  Few finds were retrieved from either of these fields, and dating is primarily based on extrapolation.  The boundaries established by these fields in the Medieval period were continuously recut, and expanded upon, and some of the recutting events may also date to Medieval times, although respect for and reuse of these boundaries also carried on into the post-Medieval period.  This entity demarcates a relatively small field at least 30 x 30 m in size.  This field was originally constructed as a rather interrupted series of boundaries, comprising segmented elongated pits/ short ditch sections and associated post holes.  The post holes may imply  fencelines, so that the otherwise segmented/ interrupted nature of the field boundaries were made continuous.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581224","PSH02",581224
749,"Medieval Field 1","700 Medieval",,"Small field associated with Medieval Field 2 to its west.  Both these fields are aligned roughly north-north-east - south-south-west.  The southern boundaries of these two fields were not identified, and undoubtedly lay beyond the excavation zone.  Few finds were retrieved from either of these fields, and dating is primarily based on extrapolation.  The boundaries established by these fields in the Medieval period were continuously recut, and expanded upon, and some of the recutting events may also date to Medieval times, although respect for and reuse of these boundaries also carried on into the post-Medieval period.  This entity demarcates a relatively small field at least 30 x 30 m in size.  This field was originally constructed as a rather interrupted series of boundaries, comprising segmented elongated pits/ short ditch sections and associated post holes.  The post holes may imply  fencelines, so that the otherwise segmented/ interrupted nature of the field boundaries were made continuous.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581230","PSH02",581230
749,"Medieval Field 1","700 Medieval",,"Small field associated with Medieval Field 2 to its west.  Both these fields are aligned roughly north-north-east - south-south-west.  The southern boundaries of these two fields were not identified, and undoubtedly lay beyond the excavation zone.  Few finds were retrieved from either of these fields, and dating is primarily based on extrapolation.  The boundaries established by these fields in the Medieval period were continuously recut, and expanded upon, and some of the recutting events may also date to Medieval times, although respect for and reuse of these boundaries also carried on into the post-Medieval period.  This entity demarcates a relatively small field at least 30 x 30 m in size.  This field was originally constructed as a rather interrupted series of boundaries, comprising segmented elongated pits/ short ditch sections and associated post holes.  The post holes may imply  fencelines, so that the otherwise segmented/ interrupted nature of the field boundaries were made continuous.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581232","PSH02",581232
749,"Medieval Field 1","700 Medieval",,"Small field associated with Medieval Field 2 to its west.  Both these fields are aligned roughly north-north-east - south-south-west.  The southern boundaries of these two fields were not identified, and undoubtedly lay beyond the excavation zone.  Few finds were retrieved from either of these fields, and dating is primarily based on extrapolation.  The boundaries established by these fields in the Medieval period were continuously recut, and expanded upon, and some of the recutting events may also date to Medieval times, although respect for and reuse of these boundaries also carried on into the post-Medieval period.  This entity demarcates a relatively small field at least 30 x 30 m in size.  This field was originally constructed as a rather interrupted series of boundaries, comprising segmented elongated pits/ short ditch sections and associated post holes.  The post holes may imply  fencelines, so that the otherwise segmented/ interrupted nature of the field boundaries were made continuous.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581234","PSH02",581234
749,"Medieval Field 1","700 Medieval",,"Small field associated with Medieval Field 2 to its west.  Both these fields are aligned roughly north-north-east - south-south-west.  The southern boundaries of these two fields were not identified, and undoubtedly lay beyond the excavation zone.  Few finds were retrieved from either of these fields, and dating is primarily based on extrapolation.  The boundaries established by these fields in the Medieval period were continuously recut, and expanded upon, and some of the recutting events may also date to Medieval times, although respect for and reuse of these boundaries also carried on into the post-Medieval period.  This entity demarcates a relatively small field at least 30 x 30 m in size.  This field was originally constructed as a rather interrupted series of boundaries, comprising segmented elongated pits/ short ditch sections and associated post holes.  The post holes may imply  fencelines, so that the otherwise segmented/ interrupted nature of the field boundaries were made continuous.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581236","PSH02",581236
750,"Medieval Waterholes with Enclosure (Area 49)","700 Medieval",,"This is an Entity that brings together seven of the waterholes and wells of Medieval date that are associated with the field enclosures, barns and other post hole buildings on Area 49.  Four of these waterholes form a rough east-west alignment that is not directly linked to field boundary demarcation.  These four waterholes are situated in the southern part of the Site and three of them are tear-shaped.  The fourth one , 562142 cuts the Medieval field ditches and may be of a slightly later date. It is also a relatively shallow feature and is not of a typical waterhole form. Three other waterholes have been incorporated into this group - located further north.  Well 961834 is situated just to the N of the the main quadrangular enclosure while the upper fill of 529139 is actually cut by the same enclosure ditch, implying it was constructed prior to the main phase of Medieval activity on the Site.  To its east lies another smallish waterhole, also of Medieval date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961959","POK96",961959
750,"Medieval Waterholes with Enclosure (Area 49)","700 Medieval",,"This is an Entity that brings together seven of the waterholes and wells of Medieval date that are associated with the field enclosures, barns and other post hole buildings on Area 49.  Four of these waterholes form a rough east-west alignment that is not directly linked to field boundary demarcation.  These four waterholes are situated in the southern part of the Site and three of them are tear-shaped.  The fourth one , 562142 cuts the Medieval field ditches and may be of a slightly later date. It is also a relatively shallow feature and is not of a typical waterhole form. Three other waterholes have been incorporated into this group - located further north.  Well 961834 is situated just to the N of the the main quadrangular enclosure while the upper fill of 529139 is actually cut by the same enclosure ditch, implying it was constructed prior to the main phase of Medieval activity on the Site.  To its east lies another smallish waterhole, also of Medieval date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
750,"Medieval Waterholes with Enclosure (Area 49)","700 Medieval",,"This is an Entity that brings together seven of the waterholes and wells of Medieval date that are associated with the field enclosures, barns and other post hole buildings on Area 49.  Four of these waterholes form a rough east-west alignment that is not directly linked to field boundary demarcation.  These four waterholes are situated in the southern part of the Site and three of them are tear-shaped.  The fourth one , 562142 cuts the Medieval field ditches and may be of a slightly later date. It is also a relatively shallow feature and is not of a typical waterhole form. Three other waterholes have been incorporated into this group - located further north.  Well 961834 is situated just to the N of the the main quadrangular enclosure while the upper fill of 529139 is actually cut by the same enclosure ditch, implying it was constructed prior to the main phase of Medieval activity on the Site.  To its east lies another smallish waterhole, also of Medieval date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 533018","PSH02",533018
750,"Medieval Waterholes with Enclosure (Area 49)","700 Medieval",,"This is an Entity that brings together seven of the waterholes and wells of Medieval date that are associated with the field enclosures, barns and other post hole buildings on Area 49.  Four of these waterholes form a rough east-west alignment that is not directly linked to field boundary demarcation.  These four waterholes are situated in the southern part of the Site and three of them are tear-shaped.  The fourth one , 562142 cuts the Medieval field ditches and may be of a slightly later date. It is also a relatively shallow feature and is not of a typical waterhole form. Three other waterholes have been incorporated into this group - located further north.  Well 961834 is situated just to the N of the the main quadrangular enclosure while the upper fill of 529139 is actually cut by the same enclosure ditch, implying it was constructed prior to the main phase of Medieval activity on the Site.  To its east lies another smallish waterhole, also of Medieval date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 533039","PSH02",533039
750,"Medieval Waterholes with Enclosure (Area 49)","700 Medieval",,"This is an Entity that brings together seven of the waterholes and wells of Medieval date that are associated with the field enclosures, barns and other post hole buildings on Area 49.  Four of these waterholes form a rough east-west alignment that is not directly linked to field boundary demarcation.  These four waterholes are situated in the southern part of the Site and three of them are tear-shaped.  The fourth one , 562142 cuts the Medieval field ditches and may be of a slightly later date. It is also a relatively shallow feature and is not of a typical waterhole form. Three other waterholes have been incorporated into this group - located further north.  Well 961834 is situated just to the N of the the main quadrangular enclosure while the upper fill of 529139 is actually cut by the same enclosure ditch, implying it was constructed prior to the main phase of Medieval activity on the Site.  To its east lies another smallish waterhole, also of Medieval date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537164","PSH02",537164
750,"Medieval Waterholes with Enclosure (Area 49)","700 Medieval",,"This is an Entity that brings together seven of the waterholes and wells of Medieval date that are associated with the field enclosures, barns and other post hole buildings on Area 49.  Four of these waterholes form a rough east-west alignment that is not directly linked to field boundary demarcation.  These four waterholes are situated in the southern part of the Site and three of them are tear-shaped.  The fourth one , 562142 cuts the Medieval field ditches and may be of a slightly later date. It is also a relatively shallow feature and is not of a typical waterhole form. Three other waterholes have been incorporated into this group - located further north.  Well 961834 is situated just to the N of the the main quadrangular enclosure while the upper fill of 529139 is actually cut by the same enclosure ditch, implying it was constructed prior to the main phase of Medieval activity on the Site.  To its east lies another smallish waterhole, also of Medieval date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 562142","PSH02",562142
750,"Medieval Waterholes with Enclosure (Area 49)","700 Medieval",,"This is an Entity that brings together seven of the waterholes and wells of Medieval date that are associated with the field enclosures, barns and other post hole buildings on Area 49.  Four of these waterholes form a rough east-west alignment that is not directly linked to field boundary demarcation.  These four waterholes are situated in the southern part of the Site and three of them are tear-shaped.  The fourth one , 562142 cuts the Medieval field ditches and may be of a slightly later date. It is also a relatively shallow feature and is not of a typical waterhole form. Three other waterholes have been incorporated into this group - located further north.  Well 961834 is situated just to the N of the the main quadrangular enclosure while the upper fill of 529139 is actually cut by the same enclosure ditch, implying it was constructed prior to the main phase of Medieval activity on the Site.  To its east lies another smallish waterhole, also of Medieval date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569022","PSH02",569022
751,"Bronze-Iron Age Waterholes on Area 77","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These three waterholes are all associated with the MBA field system in Area 77.  Truncation has really affected our understanding of this area, and elements of the field boundaries have been removed altogether.  However, from the ceramic evidence it would appear that there is one MBA waterhole and two LBA-EIA waterholes. These features tend to remain in use for long perid sof time. Two of the wateholes are closely linked with the field boundaries thenselves, both cutting elements of the earlier ditches.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 510047","PSH02",510047
751,"Bronze-Iron Age Waterholes on Area 77","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These three waterholes are all associated with the MBA field system in Area 77.  Truncation has really affected our understanding of this area, and elements of the field boundaries have been removed altogether.  However, from the ceramic evidence it would appear that there is one MBA waterhole and two LBA-EIA waterholes. These features tend to remain in use for long perid sof time. Two of the wateholes are closely linked with the field boundaries thenselves, both cutting elements of the earlier ditches.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 551034","PSH02",551034
751,"Bronze-Iron Age Waterholes on Area 77","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"These three waterholes are all associated with the MBA field system in Area 77.  Truncation has really affected our understanding of this area, and elements of the field boundaries have been removed altogether.  However, from the ceramic evidence it would appear that there is one MBA waterhole and two LBA-EIA waterholes. These features tend to remain in use for long perid sof time. Two of the wateholes are closely linked with the field boundaries thenselves, both cutting elements of the earlier ditches.","cdg","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 581168","PSH02",581168
753,"Neolithic-EBA features east of Bank Barrow","240 Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a number of features of quite varying dates that broadly span the Neolithic - Early Bronze Age periods.  Although these features are not all contemporary, by bringing them together it is possible to highlight a concentration of activity spanning the Neolithic and Early Bronze Ages in a particular locale.  This fairly dense cluster of features undoubtedly relate to a wide variety of different activities, but their situation in close proximity both with the southern part of the Stanwell cursus and the smaller bank barrow, implies that some of the events represented by the features may be associated with the use of these monuments.  This entity is an uber-entity encompassing the more period specific entities.","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517191","PSH02",517191
753,"Neolithic-EBA features east of Bank Barrow","240 Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a number of features of quite varying dates that broadly span the Neolithic - Early Bronze Age periods.  Although these features are not all contemporary, by bringing them together it is possible to highlight a concentration of activity spanning the Neolithic and Early Bronze Ages in a particular locale.  This fairly dense cluster of features undoubtedly relate to a wide variety of different activities, but their situation in close proximity both with the southern part of the Stanwell cursus and the smaller bank barrow, implies that some of the events represented by the features may be associated with the use of these monuments.  This entity is an uber-entity encompassing the more period specific entities.","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 518078","PSH02",518078
753,"Neolithic-EBA features east of Bank Barrow","240 Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a number of features of quite varying dates that broadly span the Neolithic - Early Bronze Age periods.  Although these features are not all contemporary, by bringing them together it is possible to highlight a concentration of activity spanning the Neolithic and Early Bronze Ages in a particular locale.  This fairly dense cluster of features undoubtedly relate to a wide variety of different activities, but their situation in close proximity both with the southern part of the Stanwell cursus and the smaller bank barrow, implies that some of the events represented by the features may be associated with the use of these monuments.  This entity is an uber-entity encompassing the more period specific entities.","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 531011","PSH02",531011
753,"Neolithic-EBA features east of Bank Barrow","240 Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a number of features of quite varying dates that broadly span the Neolithic - Early Bronze Age periods.  Although these features are not all contemporary, by bringing them together it is possible to highlight a concentration of activity spanning the Neolithic and Early Bronze Ages in a particular locale.  This fairly dense cluster of features undoubtedly relate to a wide variety of different activities, but their situation in close proximity both with the southern part of the Stanwell cursus and the smaller bank barrow, implies that some of the events represented by the features may be associated with the use of these monuments.  This entity is an uber-entity encompassing the more period specific entities.","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551016","PSH02",551016
753,"Neolithic-EBA features east of Bank Barrow","240 Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a number of features of quite varying dates that broadly span the Neolithic - Early Bronze Age periods.  Although these features are not all contemporary, by bringing them together it is possible to highlight a concentration of activity spanning the Neolithic and Early Bronze Ages in a particular locale.  This fairly dense cluster of features undoubtedly relate to a wide variety of different activities, but their situation in close proximity both with the southern part of the Stanwell cursus and the smaller bank barrow, implies that some of the events represented by the features may be associated with the use of these monuments.  This entity is an uber-entity encompassing the more period specific entities.","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551061","PSH02",551061
753,"Neolithic-EBA features east of Bank Barrow","240 Neolithic or Bronze Age",,"This entity brings together a number of features of quite varying dates that broadly span the Neolithic - Early Bronze Age periods.  Although these features are not all contemporary, by bringing them together it is possible to highlight a concentration of activity spanning the Neolithic and Early Bronze Ages in a particular locale.  This fairly dense cluster of features undoubtedly relate to a wide variety of different activities, but their situation in close proximity both with the southern part of the Stanwell cursus and the smaller bank barrow, implies that some of the events represented by the features may be associated with the use of these monuments.  This entity is an uber-entity encompassing the more period specific entities.","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 579156","PSH02",579156
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 630116","PSH02",630116
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 630125","PSH02",630125
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 630128","PSH02",630128
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 630130","PSH02",630130
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 630139","PSH02",630139
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 630145","PSH02",630145
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 630148","PSH02",630148
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 639073","PSH02",639073
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 639075","PSH02",639075
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659057","PSH02",659057
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659060","PSH02",659060
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659062","PSH02",659062
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659065","PSH02",659065
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659068","PSH02",659068
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659070","PSH02",659070
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659072","PSH02",659072
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659077","PSH02",659077
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659092","PSH02",659092
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659097","PSH02",659097
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 659099","PSH02",659099
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 662086","PSH02",662086
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 662088","PSH02",662088
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 662099","PSH02",662099
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670020","PSH02",670020
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670022","PSH02",670022
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670025","PSH02",670025
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670027","PSH02",670027
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670029","PSH02",670029
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670031","PSH02",670031
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670033","PSH02",670033
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670035","PSH02",670035
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670037","PSH02",670037
755,"Roman Building B6","598 Late Romano-British",,"This entity relates to a fairly substantial post-hole constructed rectangular building in Area 58.  The post-holes are fairly regular in form and dimensions.  They are all roughly 0.55 m in diameter and are set c. 0.5 m apart from each other.  Their depths vary slightly from c. 0.08 m to 0.23 m, although on average they are c. 0.15 m deep.  Few provided evidence for post pipes; in most cases it appared the posts had been removed when the structure was decommisioned.  However a couple had dark humic layers that suggested that posts had rotted in situ, and a few also had evidence of post pads.  These post form a very regular structure measuring at least 10.2 m x 6.5 m in size.  However, the northern and eastern sides of this structure were not clearly indicated by post-holes.   This is due to modern disturbance and truncation (including cutting for Twin Rivers).  Evidence of some internal features (pits and posts) were noted.  Some of the posts within the structure may form an internal partition/ division within the building.  Certainly at least five posts form a line roughly orientated NE-SW, and following the same orientation as the main axis of the building.  Unusually for post-holes, these fetaures contained surprisingly large quantities of material culture, including burnt flint and Roman pottery.  In fact many of the posts produced sherds of pottery, the majority of Late Roman date (Nene Valley, Alice Holt, Greywares etc).  Other more unusual finds included a Copper alloy object and a Roman glass bead.  The quantity of finds retrieved imply that this building is more likely to have been associated with settlement rather than functioning as a storage barn.  It may have been located roughly centrally within a curvilinear enclosure.  This is quite an interesting structure, especially if it is related more to settlement rather than agricultural use, since there is relatively little evidence for this in the Heathrow landscape.  If it is a domestic structure it may relate to the two rectangular drip gully structures further to the east.  No entrance was identified but this may have lain on the eastern or northern side.  At least 25 post holes form part of this structure.","cdg","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 670039","PSH02",670039
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"POK96 - 960077","POK96",960077
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 512119","PSH02",512119
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 523234","PSH02",523234
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 523247","PSH02",523247
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 523250","PSH02",523250
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 580137","PSH02",580137
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 580140","PSH02",580140
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 582309","PSH02",582309
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 588368","PSH02",588368
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 595018","PSH02",595018
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 595020","PSH02",595020
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 597033","PSH02",597033
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 615051","PSH02",615051
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 615350","PSH02",615350
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 615355","PSH02",615355
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 630081","PSH02",630081
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 636072","PSH02",636072
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"PSH02 - 665024","PSH02",665024
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
757,"Large D-shaped Bronze Age Enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Very large D-shaped enclosure, in which a smaller D-shaped enclosuse of MBA date is roughly centrally located.  This smaller enclosure is likely associated with settlement.  The large D-shaped enclosure mimics the form of the smaller one on a massive scale.  Its eastern boundary also operates as an unusual trackway, which kinks and runs in more than one direction.  This area of ever decreasing D-shaped enclosures is rather unusual for the Heathrow landscape.  It does not conform to the more usual regular rectangular field system blocks, and the likelihood is that these enclosures  served a rather different purpose to that of simply field division.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","DEnclosure1",,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
760,"Neolithic Pre C1 cursus PH & pits WPR98","160 Mesolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Post holes and pits that predate the C1 stanwell cursus in the WPR98+POK96 areas. Only features which have either textual or section drawing evidence for this relationship are included","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 962054","POK96",962054
760,"Neolithic Pre C1 cursus PH & pits WPR98","160 Mesolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Post holes and pits that predate the C1 stanwell cursus in the WPR98+POK96 areas. Only features which have either textual or section drawing evidence for this relationship are included","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 962063","POK96",962063
760,"Neolithic Pre C1 cursus PH & pits WPR98","160 Mesolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Post holes and pits that predate the C1 stanwell cursus in the WPR98+POK96 areas. Only features which have either textual or section drawing evidence for this relationship are included","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 962067","POK96",962067
760,"Neolithic Pre C1 cursus PH & pits WPR98","160 Mesolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Post holes and pits that predate the C1 stanwell cursus in the WPR98+POK96 areas. Only features which have either textual or section drawing evidence for this relationship are included","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 962081","POK96",962081
760,"Neolithic Pre C1 cursus PH & pits WPR98","160 Mesolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Post holes and pits that predate the C1 stanwell cursus in the WPR98+POK96 areas. Only features which have either textual or section drawing evidence for this relationship are included","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 962132","POK96",962132
760,"Neolithic Pre C1 cursus PH & pits WPR98","160 Mesolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Post holes and pits that predate the C1 stanwell cursus in the WPR98+POK96 areas. Only features which have either textual or section drawing evidence for this relationship are included","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 178054","WPR98",178054
761,"Neolithic C1Post holes uncertain strat","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes which have an uncertian startigraphihc relationship with C1 cursus: unknown if the predate or cut the cursus ditches","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"POK96 - 962326","POK96",962326
761,"Neolithic C1Post holes uncertain strat","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes which have an uncertian startigraphihc relationship with C1 cursus: unknown if the predate or cut the cursus ditches","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 529184","PSH02",529184
761,"Neolithic C1Post holes uncertain strat","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes which have an uncertian startigraphihc relationship with C1 cursus: unknown if the predate or cut the cursus ditches","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 541163","PSH02",541163
761,"Neolithic C1Post holes uncertain strat","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes which have an uncertian startigraphihc relationship with C1 cursus: unknown if the predate or cut the cursus ditches","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146325","WPR98",146325
761,"Neolithic C1Post holes uncertain strat","200 Neolithic",,"Post holes which have an uncertian startigraphihc relationship with C1 cursus: unknown if the predate or cut the cursus ditches","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 146327","WPR98",146327
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 511119","PSH02",511119
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 511121","PSH02",511121
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555476","PSH02",555476
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555478","PSH02",555478
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555481","PSH02",555481
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555483","PSH02",555483
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555485","PSH02",555485
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555487","PSH02",555487
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555489","PSH02",555489
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555491","PSH02",555491
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555493","PSH02",555493
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555495","PSH02",555495
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555497","PSH02",555497
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555499","PSH02",555499
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 598081","PSH02",598081
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 598090","PSH02",598090
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 598093","PSH02",598093
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636125","PSH02",636125
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 639085","PSH02",639085
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 671050","PSH02",671050
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 671053","PSH02",671053
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 671057","PSH02",671057
762,"Bronze Age small D-shaped enclosure","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Small D-shaped enclosure that shows some evidence of palisading in the southern part.  Unusal shape and seems to form one of possibly three D-shaped enclosures - the other two are much larger and follow the shape of this one but radiate out from it.  Finds signatures suggest that MBA settlement may have been focussed within this enclosure.  There is a possible entrance in the eastern side of the enclosure which links up with the only E-W aligned track/droveway that has been identified within the Heathrow landscape.  Was this enclosure created first and form the focus/ template for other similarly shaped D-shaped enclosures and droveways that were later created on a much larger scale?  Or was it perhaps the other way around?  It is interesting that the shape of this enclosure  is quite different from the other Bronze Age boundaries/ ditches/ enclosures and fields encountered in this part of the Heathrow terrace.  It may be no coincidence that this enclosure lies at the heart of things within the BA landscape and at the point of transition between two quite differently orientated and differently laid out field systems to its west and east respectively","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 311021","PSH02",311021
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 311023","PSH02",311023
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 312017","PSH02",312017
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 312031","PSH02",312031
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 312033","PSH02",312033
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 312047","PSH02",312047
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 312048","PSH02",312048
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 521069","PSH02",521069
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 523187","PSH02",523187
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 523313","PSH02",523313
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 542387","PSH02",542387
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 570196","PSH02",570196
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 593129","PSH02",593129
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 593190","PSH02",593190
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 593207","PSH02",593207
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 593231","PSH02",593231
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 593234","PSH02",593234
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 614213","PSH02",614213
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 614215","PSH02",614215
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 614217","PSH02",614217
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 614222","PSH02",614222
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 614225","PSH02",614225
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 614229","PSH02",614229
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 617182","PSH02",617182
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 634112","PSH02",634112
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636056","PSH02",636056
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636060","PSH02",636060
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636063","PSH02",636063
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636073","PSH02",636073
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636076","PSH02",636076
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636077","PSH02",636077
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636080","PSH02",636080
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636090","PSH02",636090
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636093","PSH02",636093
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636100","PSH02",636100
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636103","PSH02",636103
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636115","PSH02",636115
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636138","PSH02",636138
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636139","PSH02",636139
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636156","PSH02",636156
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636159","PSH02",636159
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 636163","PSH02",636163
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 640007","PSH02",640007
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 641116","PSH02",641116
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 641123","PSH02",641123
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 649066","PSH02",649066
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 661062","PSH02",661062
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 663139","PSH02",663139
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 663154","PSH02",663154
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 669025","PSH02",669025
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"PSH02 - 677033","PSH02",677033
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"WPR98 - 113086","WPR98",113086
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"WPR98 - 130106","WPR98",130106
763,"Iron Age/Romano-British animal management system","401 Iron Age","598 Late Romano-British","Complex series of curvilinear enclosures, waterholes and funnelled short droveways that seem to form elements of a complicated system of animal management.  It is likely that these allowed animals to be sorted and in paddocks and contained within holding pens.  The first elements of this system may have been the series of waterholes in the southern part of the system (cut by later boundaries) which  date from the E/MIA through to the LIA/RB periods.  Evidence suggests that this system may have been in use from the IA and carried on into the E/MRB periods.  The numerous recuts in the ditches show periodic maintenance as would be expected if animals were constantly and intensively funnelling through the system, causing extensive trample and silting of ditches.  The system also develops, changes and probably expands to the north over time.  This explains the criss-crossing of some of the ditches, demonstrating alterations in the earlier pattern over time.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","AnimalManagement",,"WPR98 - 147237","WPR98",147237
764,"Neolithic Grooved Ware Pits WPR98","225 Late Neolithic",,"Late Neo Grooved Ware pits from WPR98 (Volume 1) analysis 31/08/05","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216121","GAI99",216121
764,"Neolithic Grooved Ware Pits WPR98","225 Late Neolithic",,"Late Neo Grooved Ware pits from WPR98 (Volume 1) analysis 31/08/05","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 127022","WPR98",127022
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110060","WPR98",110060
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125102","WPR98",125102
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126053","WPR98",126053
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126066","WPR98",126066
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127095","WPR98",127095
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128109","WPR98",128109
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128113","WPR98",128113
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128115","WPR98",128115
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 138162","WPR98",138162
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 138170","WPR98",138170
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147114","WPR98",147114
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159101","WPR98",159101
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159103","WPR98",159103
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159107","WPR98",159107
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159109","WPR98",159109
765,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 3","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trtackway in WPR 98 beds C and A to east of IA settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 163063","WPR98",163063
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961532","POK96",961532
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961578","POK96",961578
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963055","POK96",963055
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963389","POK96",963389
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963426","POK96",963426
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 105008","WPR98",105008
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 105009","WPR98",105009
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110007","WPR98",110007
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119034","WPR98",119034
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121009","WPR98",121009
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132028","WPR98",132028
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132029","WPR98",132029
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157025","WPR98",157025
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157034","WPR98",157034
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
766,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age landholding west of WPR / POK palaeochannel and east of BA double ditched trackway WPR 1. This block consists of rectangular fields aligned West - East and straddles the Stanwell C1 cursus. It is associated with the enclosed settlement on POK96/PSH02 area 49.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160031","WPR98",160031
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107082","WPR98",107082
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110060","WPR98",110060
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111044","WPR98",111044
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111049","WPR98",111049
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111065","WPR98",111065
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111067","WPR98",111067
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111069","WPR98",111069
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111070","WPR98",111070
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111071","WPR98",111071
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113062","WPR98",113062
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121130","WPR98",121130
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121135","WPR98",121135
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121137","WPR98",121137
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122036","WPR98",122036
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122088","WPR98",122088
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122100","WPR98",122100
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126038","WPR98",126038
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126042","WPR98",126042
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127043","WPR98",127043
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127053","WPR98",127053
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127055","WPR98",127055
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127095","WPR98",127095
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128051","WPR98",128051
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128068","WPR98",128068
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128088","WPR98",128088
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128113","WPR98",128113
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128115","WPR98",128115
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128117","WPR98",128117
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128244","WPR98",128244
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128246","WPR98",128246
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128248","WPR98",128248
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128250","WPR98",128250
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128252","WPR98",128252
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128294","WPR98",128294
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130149","WPR98",130149
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130178","WPR98",130178
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130182","WPR98",130182
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132071","WPR98",132071
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136153","WPR98",136153
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136156","WPR98",136156
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137069","WPR98",137069
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137084","WPR98",137084
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 138170","WPR98",138170
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140135","WPR98",140135
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140137","WPR98",140137
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141254","WPR98",141254
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 145016","WPR98",145016
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146090","WPR98",146090
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146091","WPR98",146091
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147081","WPR98",147081
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147083","WPR98",147083
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147114","WPR98",147114
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149031","WPR98",149031
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151063","WPR98",151063
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151210","WPR98",151210
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151214","WPR98",151214
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 155080","WPR98",155080
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159107","WPR98",159107
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159109","WPR98",159109
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160092","WPR98",160092
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160184","WPR98",160184
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161124","WPR98",161124
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161126","WPR98",161126
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161130","WPR98",161130
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161132","WPR98",161132
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161162","WPR98",161162
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166160","WPR98",166160
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166174","WPR98",166174
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166194","WPR98",166194
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 171063","WPR98",171063
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 180005","WPR98",180005
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 180011","WPR98",180011
767,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 5","300 Bronze Age",,"Filed block bounded by Trackways 3 and 4. Large expanse of truncated landscape, generally sub-divided into a series of long NW-SE rectangles.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 180018","WPR98",180018
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 211030","GAI99",211030
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214015","GAI99",214015
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214075","GAI99",214075
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216033","GAI99",216033
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218023","GAI99",218023
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121116","WPR98",121116
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121118","WPR98",121118
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121153","WPR98",121153
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128194","WPR98",128194
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130119","WPR98",130119
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136075","WPR98",136075
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136085","WPR98",136085
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141237","WPR98",141237
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149129","WPR98",149129
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166138","WPR98",166138
768,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 7","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block at exteme east of WPR98. Bounded to West by WPR trackway 5. Very truncated area, very shallow features surviving.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166140","WPR98",166140
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961532","POK96",961532
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961578","POK96",961578
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963055","POK96",963055
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963389","POK96",963389
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963426","POK96",963426
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132028","WPR98",132028
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132029","WPR98",132029
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157025","WPR98",157025
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157034","WPR98",157034
769,"Bronze Age land holding WPR 2 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"This is the same as BA landholding 2, but with the features from the western ditch of trackway 1 removed from the entity","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160031","WPR98",160031
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107082","WPR98",107082
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111044","WPR98",111044
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111049","WPR98",111049
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111065","WPR98",111065
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111067","WPR98",111067
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111069","WPR98",111069
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111070","WPR98",111070
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111071","WPR98",111071
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113062","WPR98",113062
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121135","WPR98",121135
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121137","WPR98",121137
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122036","WPR98",122036
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122088","WPR98",122088
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122100","WPR98",122100
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126038","WPR98",126038
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126042","WPR98",126042
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127043","WPR98",127043
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127053","WPR98",127053
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127055","WPR98",127055
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128051","WPR98",128051
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128068","WPR98",128068
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128088","WPR98",128088
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128117","WPR98",128117
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128244","WPR98",128244
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128246","WPR98",128246
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128248","WPR98",128248
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128250","WPR98",128250
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128252","WPR98",128252
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128294","WPR98",128294
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130149","WPR98",130149
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130178","WPR98",130178
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132071","WPR98",132071
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137069","WPR98",137069
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137084","WPR98",137084
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138170","WPR98",138170
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140135","WPR98",140135
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140137","WPR98",140137
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141254","WPR98",141254
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 145016","WPR98",145016
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146090","WPR98",146090
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146091","WPR98",146091
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147081","WPR98",147081
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147083","WPR98",147083
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149031","WPR98",149031
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151063","WPR98",151063
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151210","WPR98",151210
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151214","WPR98",151214
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155080","WPR98",155080
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160092","WPR98",160092
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160184","WPR98",160184
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161124","WPR98",161124
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161126","WPR98",161126
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161130","WPR98",161130
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161132","WPR98",161132
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161162","WPR98",161162
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166160","WPR98",166160
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166194","WPR98",166194
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 171063","WPR98",171063
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180005","WPR98",180005
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180011","WPR98",180011
770,"Bronze age land holding WPR 5 No Track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 5, but with the ditches from trackways 3 and 4 subtracted.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180018","WPR98",180018
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216033","GAI99",216033
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217021","GAI99",217021
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218066","GAI99",218066
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961747","POK96",961747
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962259","POK96",962259
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103019","WPR98",103019
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103046","WPR98",103046
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103054","WPR98",103054
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 105008","WPR98",105008
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 105009","WPR98",105009
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107013","WPR98",107013
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107029","WPR98",107029
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107149","WPR98",107149
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110007","WPR98",110007
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110060","WPR98",110060
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111012","WPR98",111012
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 112042","WPR98",112042
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119014","WPR98",119014
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119034","WPR98",119034
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119317","WPR98",119317
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119322","WPR98",119322
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121009","WPR98",121009
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121130","WPR98",121130
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125102","WPR98",125102
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126053","WPR98",126053
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126066","WPR98",126066
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127095","WPR98",127095
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128109","WPR98",128109
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128113","WPR98",128113
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128115","WPR98",128115
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129084","WPR98",129084
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130119","WPR98",130119
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130123","WPR98",130123
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130127","WPR98",130127
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130182","WPR98",130182
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136075","WPR98",136075
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136153","WPR98",136153
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136156","WPR98",136156
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138162","WPR98",138162
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138170","WPR98",138170
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141056","WPR98",141056
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147114","WPR98",147114
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149116","WPR98",149116
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149129","WPR98",149129
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149139","WPR98",149139
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149150","WPR98",149150
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159101","WPR98",159101
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159103","WPR98",159103
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159107","WPR98",159107
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159109","WPR98",159109
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 163063","WPR98",163063
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166174","WPR98",166174
771,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR 1 to 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity combining all WPR trackways, 1 to 6 to analyse general trackway finds signature","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
772,"1a\medieval fields\ditches4","700 Medieval",,"med field ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511075","PSH02",511075
772,"1a\medieval fields\ditches4","700 Medieval",,"med field ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 513088","PSH02",513088
772,"1a\medieval fields\ditches4","700 Medieval",,"med field ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 566049","PSH02",566049
773,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway early settlement features","300 Bronze Age",,"a few gullies which are cut by feature 218035, the westernmost boundary ditch of the settlement. In addiiton, undated ditch 212055 in the east.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 212055","GAI99",212055
773,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway early settlement features","300 Bronze Age",,"a few gullies which are cut by feature 218035, the westernmost boundary ditch of the settlement. In addiiton, undated ditch 212055 in the east.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216121","GAI99",216121
773,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway early settlement features","300 Bronze Age",,"a few gullies which are cut by feature 218035, the westernmost boundary ditch of the settlement. In addiiton, undated ditch 212055 in the east.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 217061","GAI99",217061
773,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway early settlement features","300 Bronze Age",,"a few gullies which are cut by feature 218035, the westernmost boundary ditch of the settlement. In addiiton, undated ditch 212055 in the east.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 218038","GAI99",218038
773,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway early settlement features","300 Bronze Age",,"a few gullies which are cut by feature 218035, the westernmost boundary ditch of the settlement. In addiiton, undated ditch 212055 in the east.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 218042","GAI99",218042
773,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway early settlement features","300 Bronze Age",,"a few gullies which are cut by feature 218035, the westernmost boundary ditch of the settlement. In addiiton, undated ditch 212055 in the east.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 218058","GAI99",218058
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214106","GAI99",214106
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214108","GAI99",214108
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214110","GAI99",214110
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214112","GAI99",214112
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214114","GAI99",214114
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214116","GAI99",214116
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214118","GAI99",214118
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214120","GAI99",214120
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214122","GAI99",214122
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214126","GAI99",214126
775,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway building 3","300 Bronze Age",,"collection of postholes in SE corner of settlement near ditch 212086. Forms a circular of sub-rectangular structure, but plan is not very clear. No dating evidence from post holes. Relatinship with bank from ditch 212086 problematical: this building would have been sealed by the bank, or would have cut through it. No evidence for either relationship though.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214128","GAI99",214128
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213034","GAI99",213034
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213036","GAI99",213036
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213038","GAI99",213038
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213040","GAI99",213040
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213042","GAI99",213042
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213044","GAI99",213044
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213046","GAI99",213046
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213048","GAI99",213048
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213050","GAI99",213050
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213052","GAI99",213052
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213054","GAI99",213054
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213056","GAI99",213056
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213058","GAI99",213058
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214106","GAI99",214106
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214108","GAI99",214108
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214110","GAI99",214110
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214112","GAI99",214112
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214114","GAI99",214114
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214116","GAI99",214116
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214118","GAI99",214118
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214120","GAI99",214120
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214122","GAI99",214122
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214126","GAI99",214126
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214128","GAI99",214128
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214130","GAI99",214130
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214132","GAI99",214132
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214134","GAI99",214134
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214136","GAI99",214136
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 214138","GAI99",214138
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216076","GAI99",216076
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216080","GAI99",216080
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216082","GAI99",216082
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216090","GAI99",216090
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216092","GAI99",216092
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 225041","GAI99",225041
776,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway settlement undated elements","300 Bronze Age",,"Buildings 2 + 3 and posthole group 2 which are undated but probably lie in the range of 1700 to 750 BC","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 225043","GAI99",225043
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210033","GAI99",210033
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210034","GAI99",210034
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210035","GAI99",210035
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210036","GAI99",210036
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210037","GAI99",210037
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210038","GAI99",210038
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210039","GAI99",210039
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210061","GAI99",210061
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210062","GAI99",210062
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210063","GAI99",210063
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210064","GAI99",210064
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210065","GAI99",210065
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210066","GAI99",210066
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210069","GAI99",210069
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210070","GAI99",210070
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210071","GAI99",210071
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210072","GAI99",210072
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210077","GAI99",210077
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210078","GAI99",210078
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210098","GAI99",210098
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210102","GAI99",210102
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210104","GAI99",210104
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210108","GAI99",210108
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 211081","GAI99",211081
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 212066","GAI99",212066
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216046","GAI99",216046
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216048","GAI99",216048
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 216063","GAI99",216063
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 217044","GAI99",217044
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 217052","GAI99",217052
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 218013","GAI99",218013
777,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway PDR elements","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Features on the Northern Taxiway settlement that contian Post-Dev Rim (LBA) pottery, or which proably post date the Dev Rim phase of the settlement. Includes the fence line and a scattering of pits, plus recut to westerly Trackway 4 ditch.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221009","GAI99",221009
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210026","GAI99",210026
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210033","GAI99",210033
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210034","GAI99",210034
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210035","GAI99",210035
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210036","GAI99",210036
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210037","GAI99",210037
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210038","GAI99",210038
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210039","GAI99",210039
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210061","GAI99",210061
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210062","GAI99",210062
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210063","GAI99",210063
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210064","GAI99",210064
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210065","GAI99",210065
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210066","GAI99",210066
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210069","GAI99",210069
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210070","GAI99",210070
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210071","GAI99",210071
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210072","GAI99",210072
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210073","GAI99",210073
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210075","GAI99",210075
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210077","GAI99",210077
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210078","GAI99",210078
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210098","GAI99",210098
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210100","GAI99",210100
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210102","GAI99",210102
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210104","GAI99",210104
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210106","GAI99",210106
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 210108","GAI99",210108
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 211081","GAI99",211081
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 212055","GAI99",212055
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 212066","GAI99",212066
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 212086","GAI99",212086
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213034","GAI99",213034
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213036","GAI99",213036
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213038","GAI99",213038
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213040","GAI99",213040
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213042","GAI99",213042
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213044","GAI99",213044
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213046","GAI99",213046
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213048","GAI99",213048
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213050","GAI99",213050
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213052","GAI99",213052
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213054","GAI99",213054
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213056","GAI99",213056
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 213058","GAI99",213058
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214106","GAI99",214106
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214108","GAI99",214108
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214110","GAI99",214110
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214112","GAI99",214112
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214114","GAI99",214114
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214116","GAI99",214116
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214118","GAI99",214118
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214120","GAI99",214120
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214122","GAI99",214122
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214126","GAI99",214126
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214128","GAI99",214128
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214130","GAI99",214130
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214132","GAI99",214132
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214134","GAI99",214134
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214136","GAI99",214136
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 214138","GAI99",214138
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216046","GAI99",216046
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216048","GAI99",216048
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216063","GAI99",216063
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216072","GAI99",216072
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216076","GAI99",216076
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216080","GAI99",216080
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216082","GAI99",216082
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216090","GAI99",216090
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216092","GAI99",216092
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 217044","GAI99",217044
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 217048","GAI99",217048
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 217050","GAI99",217050
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 217052","GAI99",217052
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218013","GAI99",218013
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218056","GAI99",218056
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218058","GAI99",218058
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221005","GAI99",221005
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221007","GAI99",221007
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221009","GAI99",221009
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221011","GAI99",221011
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221014","GAI99",221014
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221017","GAI99",221017
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221020","GAI99",221020
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221022","GAI99",221022
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221025","GAI99",221025
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221080","GAI99",221080
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221082","GAI99",221082
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221084","GAI99",221084
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221086","GAI99",221086
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221088","GAI99",221088
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221090","GAI99",221090
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 221092","GAI99",221092
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222018","GAI99",222018
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222020","GAI99",222020
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222022","GAI99",222022
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222024","GAI99",222024
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222026","GAI99",222026
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222028","GAI99",222028
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222030","GAI99",222030
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222032","GAI99",222032
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222034","GAI99",222034
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222036","GAI99",222036
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222040","GAI99",222040
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222042","GAI99",222042
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222044","GAI99",222044
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222046","GAI99",222046
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222050","GAI99",222050
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222052","GAI99",222052
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222064","GAI99",222064
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222066","GAI99",222066
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222068","GAI99",222068
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222070","GAI99",222070
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222092","GAI99",222092
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 225041","GAI99",225041
778,"Settlement 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Merger of all BA ntaxiway entities to form one settlement entity.","JSCL mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 225043","GAI99",225043
779,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR EW1","300 Bronze Age",,"East West Trackway in Bed B of WPR98 excavations.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
779,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR EW1","300 Bronze Age",,"East West Trackway in Bed B of WPR98 excavations.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
779,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR EW1","300 Bronze Age",,"East West Trackway in Bed B of WPR98 excavations.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
779,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR EW1","300 Bronze Age",,"East West Trackway in Bed B of WPR98 excavations.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
779,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR EW1","300 Bronze Age",,"East West Trackway in Bed B of WPR98 excavations.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 143011","WPR98",143011
779,"Bronze Age Trackway WPR EW1","300 Bronze Age",,"East West Trackway in Bed B of WPR98 excavations.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
780,"Middle Bronze Age ramped Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA Waterholes with ramped access in WPRPOK etc dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103040","WPR98",103040
780,"Middle Bronze Age ramped Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA Waterholes with ramped access in WPRPOK etc dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
780,"Middle Bronze Age ramped Waterholes WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"MBA Waterholes with ramped access in WPRPOK etc dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148108","WPR98",148108
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
781,"Bronze Age Waterholes with C14 dates WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterholes form WPR and POK which have produced C14 dates for the Volume 1 publication.","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960601","POK96",960601
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523193","PSH02",523193
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 523311","PSH02",523311
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526451","PSH02",526451
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559455","PSH02",559455
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570182","PSH02",570182
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 574040","PSH02",574040
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614227","PSH02",614227
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 632089","PSH02",632089
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633062","PSH02",633062
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633086","PSH02",633086
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 633088","PSH02",633088
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636013","PSH02",636013
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636126","PSH02",636126
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636130","PSH02",636130
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636133","PSH02",636133
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636144","PSH02",636144
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636149","PSH02",636149
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 648078","PSH02",648078
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 653082","PSH02",653082
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 655146","PSH02",655146
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663108","PSH02",663108
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663113","PSH02",663113
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107098","WPR98",107098
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107100","WPR98",107100
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107101","WPR98",107101
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108008","WPR98",108008
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108014","WPR98",108014
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113098","WPR98",113098
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113103","WPR98",113103
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113114","WPR98",113114
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113117","WPR98",113117
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113173","WPR98",113173
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113181","WPR98",113181
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126113","WPR98",126113
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128119","WPR98",128119
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128138","WPR98",128138
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128352","WPR98",128352
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130097","WPR98",130097
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134101","WPR98",134101
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134170","WPR98",134170
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140084","WPR98",140084
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140112","WPR98",140112
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146220","WPR98",146220
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146272","WPR98",146272
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147215","WPR98",147215
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148121","WPR98",148121
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155095","WPR98",155095
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158143","WPR98",158143
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158160","WPR98",158160
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158163","WPR98",158163
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160254","WPR98",160254
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166101","WPR98",166101
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166112","WPR98",166112
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172032","WPR98",172032
782,"Middle Iron Age settlement roundhouses","420 Middle Iron Age",,"All ring gullies in area of MIA settlement","BSB","Publication","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 183050","WPR98",183050
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107097","WPR98",107097
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107099","WPR98",107099
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107102","WPR98",107102
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107103","WPR98",107103
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108018","WPR98",108018
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108020","WPR98",108020
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108025","WPR98",108025
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 112021","WPR98",112021
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 112025","WPR98",112025
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126155","WPR98",126155
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130115","WPR98",130115
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134118","WPR98",134118
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134120","WPR98",134120
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134122","WPR98",134122
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140118","WPR98",140118
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146184","WPR98",146184
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148167","WPR98",148167
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157127","WPR98",157127
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157131","WPR98",157131
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157133","WPR98",157133
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157139","WPR98",157139
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159123","WPR98",159123
783,"1A\Nucleated settlement\all non-round gullies",,,"dump for other possible structures and small enclosures related to the roundhouses","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167037","WPR98",167037
784,"Bronze age burnt mound complex WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterhole 124100 and 'trough' 124085 forming boiling / burnt flint filled features in WPR98.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 124085","WPR98",124085
784,"Bronze age burnt mound complex WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Waterhole 124100 and 'trough' 124085 forming boiling / burnt flint filled features in WPR98.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
785,"Bronze Age pre 1700? Waterholes WPR","305 Early Bronze Age",,"waterholes which could possibly be pre 1700 BC at Perry Oask.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 180101","WPR98",180101
786,"Bronze Age Waterholes pollen fully analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age waterholes form WPR which Pat Wiltshire has fully analysed for Volume 1 publication","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
786,"Bronze Age Waterholes pollen fully analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age waterholes form WPR which Pat Wiltshire has fully analysed for Volume 1 publication","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
786,"Bronze Age Waterholes pollen fully analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age waterholes form WPR which Pat Wiltshire has fully analysed for Volume 1 publication","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155144","WPR98",155144
786,"Bronze Age Waterholes pollen fully analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age waterholes form WPR which Pat Wiltshire has fully analysed for Volume 1 publication","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
786,"Bronze Age Waterholes pollen fully analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age waterholes form WPR which Pat Wiltshire has fully analysed for Volume 1 publication","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
786,"Bronze Age Waterholes pollen fully analysed WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Bronze Age waterholes form WPR which Pat Wiltshire has fully analysed for Volume 1 publication","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554047","PSH02",554047
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555051","PSH02",555051
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555053","PSH02",555053
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575210","PSH02",575210
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598054","PSH02",598054
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598071","PSH02",598071
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598075","PSH02",598075
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 599054","PSH02",599054
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636011","PSH02",636011
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 676019","PSH02",676019
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110035","WPR98",110035
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110036","WPR98",110036
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110037","WPR98",110037
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111057","WPR98",111057
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111119","WPR98",111119
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119333","WPR98",119333
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122104","WPR98",122104
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134046","WPR98",134046
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148092","WPR98",148092
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151082","WPR98",151082
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160088","WPR98",160088
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161157","WPR98",161157
787,"later roman re cuts",,,"Re cuts in the 'ladder system' proven by firm stratigrphic relationships.","Unknown","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161159","WPR98",161159
789,"Bronze Age cremations WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Two definate cremations from WPR: 106013 and 137032. The latter has a c14 date of 3030-2870 BC, but it also containe dminute fragments of copper alloy. Proably a contaminated second millenium cremation","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 106013","WPR98",106013
789,"Bronze Age cremations WPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Two definate cremations from WPR: 106013 and 137032. The latter has a c14 date of 3030-2870 BC, but it also containe dminute fragments of copper alloy. Proably a contaminated second millenium cremation","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 137027","WPR98",137027
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554038","PSH02",554038
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555047","PSH02",555047
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575205","PSH02",575205
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 599111","PSH02",599111
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636025","PSH02",636025
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107084","WPR98",107084
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110032","WPR98",110032
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110040","WPR98",110040
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111032","WPR98",111032
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111038","WPR98",111038
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111082","WPR98",111082
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111125","WPR98",111125
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 112029","WPR98",112029
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122098","WPR98",122098
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127073","WPR98",127073
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128226","WPR98",128226
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128228","WPR98",128228
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128230","WPR98",128230
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130161","WPR98",130161
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134046","WPR98",134046
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140143","WPR98",140143
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148093","WPR98",148093
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151084","WPR98",151084
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151226","WPR98",151226
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157080","WPR98",157080
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159070","WPR98",159070
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159078","WPR98",159078
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159080","WPR98",159080
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161164","WPR98",161164
790,"LRB/enclosure system 2/NP",,,"Posible enclosure interpretation for the late roman field system.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166195","WPR98",166195
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960572","POK96",960572
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960578","POK96",960578
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525342","PSH02",525342
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 651136","PSH02",651136
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 662080","PSH02",662080
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 678025","PSH02",678025
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113079","WPR98",113079
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126121","WPR98",126121
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126135","WPR98",126135
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127138","WPR98",127138
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133198","WPR98",133198
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148155","WPR98",148155
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149106","WPR98",149106
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167099","WPR98",167099
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 171116","WPR98",171116
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 174069","WPR98",174069
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178011","WPR98",178011
791,"lrb/enclosure system 3/discretes and structures/np",,,"Discrete features and possible settlement areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 183020","WPR98",183020
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401011","GAA00",401011
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401065","GAA00",401065
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401068","GAA00",401068
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401071","GAA00",401071
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401075","GAA00",401075
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 403030","GAA00",403030
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 403040","GAA00",403040
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405038","GAA00",405038
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405050","GAA00",405050
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405054","GAA00",405054
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 211030","GAI99",211030
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214015","GAI99",214015
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214075","GAI99",214075
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216033","GAI99",216033
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217021","GAI99",217021
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218023","GAI99",218023
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218066","GAI99",218066
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 229149","POK96",229149
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960077","POK96",960077
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961532","POK96",961532
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961578","POK96",961578
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961631","POK96",961631
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961747","POK96",961747
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962259","POK96",962259
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962313","POK96",962313
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963017","POK96",963017
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963018","POK96",963018
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963019","POK96",963019
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963020","POK96",963020
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963021","POK96",963021
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963040","POK96",963040
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963055","POK96",963055
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963074","POK96",963074
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963097","POK96",963097
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963106","POK96",963106
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963109","POK96",963109
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963138","POK96",963138
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963159","POK96",963159
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963161","POK96",963161
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963218","POK96",963218
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963280","POK96",963280
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963389","POK96",963389
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963426","POK96",963426
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963489","POK96",963489
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963494","POK96",963494
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963517","POK96",963517
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963519","POK96",963519
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103019","WPR98",103019
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103046","WPR98",103046
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103054","WPR98",103054
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 105008","WPR98",105008
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 105009","WPR98",105009
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107013","WPR98",107013
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107029","WPR98",107029
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107082","WPR98",107082
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107109","WPR98",107109
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107149","WPR98",107149
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108043","WPR98",108043
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108045","WPR98",108045
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108048","WPR98",108048
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108050","WPR98",108050
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108055","WPR98",108055
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108057","WPR98",108057
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108060","WPR98",108060
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110007","WPR98",110007
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110060","WPR98",110060
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111012","WPR98",111012
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111044","WPR98",111044
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111049","WPR98",111049
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111065","WPR98",111065
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111067","WPR98",111067
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111069","WPR98",111069
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111070","WPR98",111070
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 111071","WPR98",111071
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 112042","WPR98",112042
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113032","WPR98",113032
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113036","WPR98",113036
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113062","WPR98",113062
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119014","WPR98",119014
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119034","WPR98",119034
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119317","WPR98",119317
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119322","WPR98",119322
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121009","WPR98",121009
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121116","WPR98",121116
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121118","WPR98",121118
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121130","WPR98",121130
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121135","WPR98",121135
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121137","WPR98",121137
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121153","WPR98",121153
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122035","WPR98",122035
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122036","WPR98",122036
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122088","WPR98",122088
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122100","WPR98",122100
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124076","WPR98",124076
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125102","WPR98",125102
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126038","WPR98",126038
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126042","WPR98",126042
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126053","WPR98",126053
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126066","WPR98",126066
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127043","WPR98",127043
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127053","WPR98",127053
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127055","WPR98",127055
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127095","WPR98",127095
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128051","WPR98",128051
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128068","WPR98",128068
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128088","WPR98",128088
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128109","WPR98",128109
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128113","WPR98",128113
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128115","WPR98",128115
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128117","WPR98",128117
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128194","WPR98",128194
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128244","WPR98",128244
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128246","WPR98",128246
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128248","WPR98",128248
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128250","WPR98",128250
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128252","WPR98",128252
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128294","WPR98",128294
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129081","WPR98",129081
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129084","WPR98",129084
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130119","WPR98",130119
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130123","WPR98",130123
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130127","WPR98",130127
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130149","WPR98",130149
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130178","WPR98",130178
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130182","WPR98",130182
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132028","WPR98",132028
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132029","WPR98",132029
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132071","WPR98",132071
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136075","WPR98",136075
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136085","WPR98",136085
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136153","WPR98",136153
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136156","WPR98",136156
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137044","WPR98",137044
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137069","WPR98",137069
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137084","WPR98",137084
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137244","WPR98",137244
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138019","WPR98",138019
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138162","WPR98",138162
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 138170","WPR98",138170
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140135","WPR98",140135
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 140137","WPR98",140137
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141033","WPR98",141033
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141038","WPR98",141038
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141056","WPR98",141056
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141237","WPR98",141237
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141254","WPR98",141254
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 145016","WPR98",145016
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146090","WPR98",146090
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146091","WPR98",146091
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147026","WPR98",147026
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147056","WPR98",147056
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147081","WPR98",147081
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147083","WPR98",147083
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 147114","WPR98",147114
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148063","WPR98",148063
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148181","WPR98",148181
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149031","WPR98",149031
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149116","WPR98",149116
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149129","WPR98",149129
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149139","WPR98",149139
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149141","WPR98",149141
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149150","WPR98",149150
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151063","WPR98",151063
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151210","WPR98",151210
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151214","WPR98",151214
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155080","WPR98",155080
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157025","WPR98",157025
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157034","WPR98",157034
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159101","WPR98",159101
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159103","WPR98",159103
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159107","WPR98",159107
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159109","WPR98",159109
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160031","WPR98",160031
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160092","WPR98",160092
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160184","WPR98",160184
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 160356","WPR98",160356
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161124","WPR98",161124
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161126","WPR98",161126
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161130","WPR98",161130
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161132","WPR98",161132
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 161162","WPR98",161162
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 163063","WPR98",163063
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166138","WPR98",166138
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166140","WPR98",166140
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166160","WPR98",166160
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166174","WPR98",166174
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166194","WPR98",166194
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 171063","WPR98",171063
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 172057","WPR98",172057
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 176017","WPR98",176017
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180005","WPR98",180005
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180011","WPR98",180011
794,"Bronze Age all trackways and landholdings WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Entity merging all trackways and landholding entities","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180018","WPR98",180018
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 216121","GAI99",216121
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960023","POK96",960023
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960033","POK96",960033
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960112","POK96",960112
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960575","POK96",960575
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961017","POK96",961017
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961135","POK96",961135
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961501","POK96",961501
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961515","POK96",961515
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961634","POK96",961634
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961741","POK96",961741
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961757","POK96",961757
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962022","POK96",962022
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962027","POK96",962027
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962033","POK96",962033
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962200","POK96",962200
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962268","POK96",962268
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962326","POK96",962326
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962375","POK96",962375
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962378","POK96",962378
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962380","POK96",962380
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963439","POK96",963439
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 105026","WPR98",105026
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107042","WPR98",107042
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107052","WPR98",107052
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107058","WPR98",107058
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107059","WPR98",107059
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107067","WPR98",107067
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110011","WPR98",110011
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 120064","WPR98",120064
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 120092","WPR98",120092
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121173","WPR98",121173
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121261","WPR98",121261
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124043","WPR98",124043
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125108","WPR98",125108
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127022","WPR98",127022
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128028","WPR98",128028
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,,"WPR98",128029
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128032","WPR98",128032
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129013","WPR98",129013
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129109","WPR98",129109
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130051","WPR98",130051
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130055","WPR98",130055
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130218","WPR98",130218
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132009","WPR98",132009
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 133035","WPR98",133035
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 134011","WPR98",134011
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 134029","WPR98",134029
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136174","WPR98",136174
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136177","WPR98",136177
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136180","WPR98",136180
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136182","WPR98",136182
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137019","WPR98",137019
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141228","WPR98",141228
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141230","WPR98",141230
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141232","WPR98",141232
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 142008","WPR98",142008
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 150010","WPR98",150010
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 150011","WPR98",150011
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 153011","WPR98",153011
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 153048","WPR98",153048
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156169","WPR98",156169
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156191","WPR98",156191
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 158121","WPR98",158121
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 167082","WPR98",167082
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178066","WPR98",178066
795,"Neolithic Landscape WPR","200 Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All features with cut dates down to and includein Lateneo/early Bronze Age. This was created for the introduction of the Neolithic chapter of Volume 1 to show the landscape at a glance","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180045","WPR98",180045
796,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\all_IA_and_ERB_waterholes","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"dump for all waterholes in the wider period bracket of the nucleated settlement","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527374","PSH02",527374
796,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\all_IA_and_ERB_waterholes","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"dump for all waterholes in the wider period bracket of the nucleated settlement","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 642004","PSH02",642004
796,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\all_IA_and_ERB_waterholes","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"dump for all waterholes in the wider period bracket of the nucleated settlement","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 646018","PSH02",646018
796,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\all_IA_and_ERB_waterholes","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"dump for all waterholes in the wider period bracket of the nucleated settlement","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 649010","PSH02",649010
796,"1a\Nucleated Settlement\all_IA_and_ERB_waterholes","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"dump for all waterholes in the wider period bracket of the nucleated settlement","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 653026","PSH02",653026
797,"1A\Ladder system\BSB additional ditches","500 Romano-British",,"dump for potential candidates for inclusion in the 'ladder enclosure'","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107088","WPR98",107088
797,"1A\Ladder system\BSB additional ditches","500 Romano-British",,"dump for potential candidates for inclusion in the 'ladder enclosure'","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151059","WPR98",151059
797,"1A\Ladder system\BSB additional ditches","500 Romano-British",,"dump for potential candidates for inclusion in the 'ladder enclosure'","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151092","WPR98",151092
797,"1A\Ladder system\BSB additional ditches","500 Romano-British",,"dump for potential candidates for inclusion in the 'ladder enclosure'","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151175","WPR98",151175
797,"1A\Ladder system\BSB additional ditches","500 Romano-British",,"dump for potential candidates for inclusion in the 'ladder enclosure'","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151181","WPR98",151181
797,"1A\Ladder system\BSB additional ditches","500 Romano-British",,"dump for potential candidates for inclusion in the 'ladder enclosure'","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 151218","WPR98",151218
800,"right angle fence",,,"right angle fence by water hole.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582442","PSH02",582442
800,"right angle fence",,,"right angle fence by water hole.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582443","PSH02",582443
800,"right angle fence",,,"right angle fence by water hole.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593165","PSH02",593165
800,"right angle fence",,,"right angle fence by water hole.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614140","PSH02",614140
800,"right angle fence",,,"right angle fence by water hole.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127172","WPR98",127172
800,"right angle fence",,,"right angle fence by water hole.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127176","WPR98",127176
800,"right angle fence",,,"right angle fence by water hole.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127180","WPR98",127180
800,"right angle fence",,,"right angle fence by water hole.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148224","WPR98",148224
800,"right angle fence",,,"right angle fence by water hole.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148226","WPR98",148226
801,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\Corral system","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Features assigned to a possible cattle corral system dated to roughly the MIA","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615138","PSH02",615138
801,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\Corral system","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Features assigned to a possible cattle corral system dated to roughly the MIA","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130115","WPR98",130115
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 632089","PSH02",632089
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636149","PSH02",636149
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107100","WPR98",107100
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107101","WPR98",107101
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107102","WPR98",107102
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107103","WPR98",107103
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108018","WPR98",108018
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108020","WPR98",108020
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108025","WPR98",108025
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113114","WPR98",113114
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113173","WPR98",113173
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128354","WPR98",128354
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134118","WPR98",134118
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134120","WPR98",134120
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134122","WPR98",134122
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 166112","WPR98",166112
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167037","WPR98",167037
802,"1a\nucleated settlement\later features",,,"later recuts in nuc settlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 192021","WPR98",192021
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960033","POK96",960033
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960112","POK96",960112
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960575","POK96",960575
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961017","POK96",961017
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961018","POK96",961018
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961135","POK96",961135
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962022","POK96",962022
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962027","POK96",962027
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962033","POK96",962033
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962200","POK96",962200
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963439","POK96",963439
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511067","PSH02",511067
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511069","PSH02",511069
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 518078","PSH02",518078
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525481","PSH02",525481
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 532033","PSH02",532033
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 533059","PSH02",533059
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 550032","PSH02",550032
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 551016","PSH02",551016
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554080","PSH02",554080
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555449","PSH02",555449
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555466","PSH02",555466
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559083","PSH02",559083
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559086","PSH02",559086
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559165","PSH02",559165
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559166","PSH02",559166
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559183","PSH02",559183
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561096","PSH02",561096
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561111","PSH02",561111
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561164","PSH02",561164
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 581274","PSH02",581274
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588042","PSH02",588042
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 600005","PSH02",600005
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 600009","PSH02",600009
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 630040","PSH02",630040
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636180","PSH02",636180
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 641033","PSH02",641033
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 648041","PSH02",648041
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 650080","PSH02",650080
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 660042","PSH02",660042
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 120092","WPR98",120092
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 121261","WPR98",121261
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125108","WPR98",125108
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130051","WPR98",130051
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130218","WPR98",130218
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 134148","WPR98",134148
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136174","WPR98",136174
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136177","WPR98",136177
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136180","WPR98",136180
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136182","WPR98",136182
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141230","WPR98",141230
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141232","WPR98",141232
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156169","WPR98",156169
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156191","WPR98",156191
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167082","WPR98",167082
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180045","WPR98",180045
803,"Neolithic Tree Throws All","200 Neolithic",,"This entity has been used to bring together all tree throws that can be dated generally to the Neolithic either by finds assemblages, stratigraphy or both.  These include all phases of excavation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180069","WPR98",180069
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525287","PSH02",525287
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525293","PSH02",525293
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525295","PSH02",525295
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525301","PSH02",525301
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525323","PSH02",525323
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525327","PSH02",525327
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525331","PSH02",525331
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525333","PSH02",525333
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525335","PSH02",525335
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525338","PSH02",525338
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525340","PSH02",525340
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581222","PSH02",581222
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 612084","PSH02",612084
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 612087","PSH02",612087
804,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\pit cluster 1","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"rapidly intercutting pits, fanning out from an intact central area to the east which may have held a standing structure, such as a hoist or crane? All pottery EAS.","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 612090","PSH02",612090
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 539377","PSH02",539377
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 539379","PSH02",539379
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 539380","PSH02",539380
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555780","PSH02",555780
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555872","PSH02",555872
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555876","PSH02",555876
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578464","PSH02",578464
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578473","PSH02",578473
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578474","PSH02",578474
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578482","PSH02",578482
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578484","PSH02",578484
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578486","PSH02",578486
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582415","PSH02",582415
807,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 1","700 Medieval",,"E-W aligned cluster of pits, ditch segments, postholes and tree disturbances defining the northern side of the postulated hall house.","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 617141","PSH02",617141
808,"Plain Bowl Scatter1/East of C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together a fairly widespread scatter of lithics and pottery that occur in features to the east of the C2 cursus.  The focus concentrates in a zone within Area 61 and the Twin Rivers transect, immediately to the east of the small D-shaped Bronze Age enclosure.  It includes finds from features that occur both residually and 'in situ' and does hint at a locale of Neolithic activity that may have been associated with the use of the C2 cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 130218","WPR98",130218
808,"Plain Bowl Scatter1/East of C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together a fairly widespread scatter of lithics and pottery that occur in features to the east of the C2 cursus.  The focus concentrates in a zone within Area 61 and the Twin Rivers transect, immediately to the east of the small D-shaped Bronze Age enclosure.  It includes finds from features that occur both residually and 'in situ' and does hint at a locale of Neolithic activity that may have been associated with the use of the C2 cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158143","WPR98",158143
808,"Plain Bowl Scatter1/East of C2 cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,"This entity brings together a fairly widespread scatter of lithics and pottery that occur in features to the east of the C2 cursus.  The focus concentrates in a zone within Area 61 and the Twin Rivers transect, immediately to the east of the small D-shaped Bronze Age enclosure.  It includes finds from features that occur both residually and 'in situ' and does hint at a locale of Neolithic activity that may have been associated with the use of the C2 cursus.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178015","WPR98",178015
809,"Peterborough Ware Scatter2/NE part of site/","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Peterborough ware and MN flint including chisel arrowhead on north eastern part of site. Material is predominantly from pits which are recutting earlier pits (Plain Bowl pits entity). This activity would appear to be a continuation of the pit digging activity here, referencing this earlier place and possibly re asserting any meanings this had for the peolple living in this landscape. Also appears to be lack of Grooved ware in this location suggesting focus may have moved elsewhere in the later Neolithic?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547363","PSH02",547363
809,"Peterborough Ware Scatter2/NE part of site/","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Peterborough ware and MN flint including chisel arrowhead on north eastern part of site. Material is predominantly from pits which are recutting earlier pits (Plain Bowl pits entity). This activity would appear to be a continuation of the pit digging activity here, referencing this earlier place and possibly re asserting any meanings this had for the peolple living in this landscape. Also appears to be lack of Grooved ware in this location suggesting focus may have moved elsewhere in the later Neolithic?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555922","PSH02",555922
809,"Peterborough Ware Scatter2/NE part of site/","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Peterborough ware and MN flint including chisel arrowhead on north eastern part of site. Material is predominantly from pits which are recutting earlier pits (Plain Bowl pits entity). This activity would appear to be a continuation of the pit digging activity here, referencing this earlier place and possibly re asserting any meanings this had for the peolple living in this landscape. Also appears to be lack of Grooved ware in this location suggesting focus may have moved elsewhere in the later Neolithic?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555941","PSH02",555941
809,"Peterborough Ware Scatter2/NE part of site/","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Peterborough ware and MN flint including chisel arrowhead on north eastern part of site. Material is predominantly from pits which are recutting earlier pits (Plain Bowl pits entity). This activity would appear to be a continuation of the pit digging activity here, referencing this earlier place and possibly re asserting any meanings this had for the peolple living in this landscape. Also appears to be lack of Grooved ware in this location suggesting focus may have moved elsewhere in the later Neolithic?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559665","PSH02",559665
809,"Peterborough Ware Scatter2/NE part of site/","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Peterborough ware and MN flint including chisel arrowhead on north eastern part of site. Material is predominantly from pits which are recutting earlier pits (Plain Bowl pits entity). This activity would appear to be a continuation of the pit digging activity here, referencing this earlier place and possibly re asserting any meanings this had for the peolple living in this landscape. Also appears to be lack of Grooved ware in this location suggesting focus may have moved elsewhere in the later Neolithic?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561278","PSH02",561278
809,"Peterborough Ware Scatter2/NE part of site/","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Peterborough ware and MN flint including chisel arrowhead on north eastern part of site. Material is predominantly from pits which are recutting earlier pits (Plain Bowl pits entity). This activity would appear to be a continuation of the pit digging activity here, referencing this earlier place and possibly re asserting any meanings this had for the peolple living in this landscape. Also appears to be lack of Grooved ware in this location suggesting focus may have moved elsewhere in the later Neolithic?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180045","WPR98",180045
810,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches",,,"Early phase med ditches 49/47","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961036","POK96",961036
810,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches",,,"Early phase med ditches 49/47","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961571","POK96",961571
810,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches",,,"Early phase med ditches 49/47","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961959","POK96",961959
810,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches",,,"Early phase med ditches 49/47","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553092","PSH02",553092
810,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches",,,"Early phase med ditches 49/47","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553096","PSH02",553096
810,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches",,,"Early phase med ditches 49/47","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561153","PSH02",561153
810,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches",,,"Early phase med ditches 49/47","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569045","PSH02",569045
810,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches",,,"Early phase med ditches 49/47","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569080","PSH02",569080
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961114","POK96",961114
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961602","POK96",961602
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961603","POK96",961603
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961604","POK96",961604
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961605","POK96",961605
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961606","POK96",961606
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961607","POK96",961607
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961610","POK96",961610
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961611","POK96",961611
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961612","POK96",961612
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961613","POK96",961613
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961792","POK96",961792
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961794","POK96",961794
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961796","POK96",961796
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962241","POK96",962241
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512085","PSH02",512085
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512094","PSH02",512094
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512096","PSH02",512096
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512126","PSH02",512126
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517120","PSH02",517120
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517123","PSH02",517123
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517125","PSH02",517125
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517128","PSH02",517128
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517130","PSH02",517130
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517133","PSH02",517133
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517134","PSH02",517134
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517135","PSH02",517135
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517284","PSH02",517284
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527171","PSH02",527171
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527172","PSH02",527172
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527215","PSH02",527215
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527217","PSH02",527217
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527235","PSH02",527235
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527261","PSH02",527261
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527270","PSH02",527270
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529056","PSH02",529056
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529060","PSH02",529060
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529076","PSH02",529076
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529088","PSH02",529088
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529089","PSH02",529089
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529094","PSH02",529094
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529096","PSH02",529096
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529099","PSH02",529099
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529103","PSH02",529103
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529172","PSH02",529172
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529246","PSH02",529246
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 533057","PSH02",533057
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537016","PSH02",537016
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537023","PSH02",537023
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537032","PSH02",537032
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537034","PSH02",537034
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537044","PSH02",537044
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537056","PSH02",537056
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537068","PSH02",537068
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537076","PSH02",537076
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537082","PSH02",537082
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537093","PSH02",537093
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537098","PSH02",537098
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537100","PSH02",537100
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537134","PSH02",537134
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537136","PSH02",537136
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537183","PSH02",537183
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537184","PSH02",537184
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538251","PSH02",538251
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542086","PSH02",542086
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542090","PSH02",542090
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542093","PSH02",542093
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542094","PSH02",542094
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542095","PSH02",542095
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542102","PSH02",542102
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542106","PSH02",542106
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542109","PSH02",542109
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542112","PSH02",542112
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543088","PSH02",543088
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543091","PSH02",543091
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543093","PSH02",543093
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543095","PSH02",543095
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543100","PSH02",543100
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543103","PSH02",543103
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543105","PSH02",543105
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543183","PSH02",543183
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547161","PSH02",547161
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553032","PSH02",553032
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553037","PSH02",553037
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553044","PSH02",553044
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553048","PSH02",553048
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553100","PSH02",553100
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553125","PSH02",553125
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555245","PSH02",555245
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555249","PSH02",555249
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555251","PSH02",555251
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555254","PSH02",555254
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555257","PSH02",555257
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555261","PSH02",555261
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555264","PSH02",555264
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555271","PSH02",555271
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555276","PSH02",555276
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555279","PSH02",555279
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555281","PSH02",555281
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555283","PSH02",555283
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555285","PSH02",555285
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555287","PSH02",555287
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555290","PSH02",555290
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555446","PSH02",555446
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559043","PSH02",559043
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559051","PSH02",559051
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559054","PSH02",559054
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559057","PSH02",559057
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559060","PSH02",559060
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559063","PSH02",559063
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559066","PSH02",559066
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559069","PSH02",559069
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559071","PSH02",559071
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561121","PSH02",561121
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561126","PSH02",561126
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561131","PSH02",561131
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561133","PSH02",561133
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561138","PSH02",561138
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561140","PSH02",561140
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 562123","PSH02",562123
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 562126","PSH02",562126
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 562129","PSH02",562129
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 562132","PSH02",562132
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 562135","PSH02",562135
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568014","PSH02",568014
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568070","PSH02",568070
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569009","PSH02",569009
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569011","PSH02",569011
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569013","PSH02",569013
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569015","PSH02",569015
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569039","PSH02",569039
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569043","PSH02",569043
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569045","PSH02",569045
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569050","PSH02",569050
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569052","PSH02",569052
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570017","PSH02",570017
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570018","PSH02",570018
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570019","PSH02",570019
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570027","PSH02",570027
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570029","PSH02",570029
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570039","PSH02",570039
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570047","PSH02",570047
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570049","PSH02",570049
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570051","PSH02",570051
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570053","PSH02",570053
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570055","PSH02",570055
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570058","PSH02",570058
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570061","PSH02",570061
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570064","PSH02",570064
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570106","PSH02",570106
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570107","PSH02",570107
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573100","PSH02",573100
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573102","PSH02",573102
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573104","PSH02",573104
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573106","PSH02",573106
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573108","PSH02",573108
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573110","PSH02",573110
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573112","PSH02",573112
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573114","PSH02",573114
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575146","PSH02",575146
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575181","PSH02",575181
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575200","PSH02",575200
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578069","PSH02",578069
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578071","PSH02",578071
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578073","PSH02",578073
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578075","PSH02",578075
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578112","PSH02",578112
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578115","PSH02",578115
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579121","PSH02",579121
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579123","PSH02",579123
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580070","PSH02",580070
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580074","PSH02",580074
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580076","PSH02",580076
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580078","PSH02",580078
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580082","PSH02",580082
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580084","PSH02",580084
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580086","PSH02",580086
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580088","PSH02",580088
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582101","PSH02",582101
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582117","PSH02",582117
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582146","PSH02",582146
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583020","PSH02",583020
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583044","PSH02",583044
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 587035","PSH02",587035
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 587037","PSH02",587037
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592007","PSH02",592007
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592009","PSH02",592009
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592011","PSH02",592011
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 593236","PSH02",593236
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 593252","PSH02",593252
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 596011","PSH02",596011
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597005","PSH02",597005
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597009","PSH02",597009
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597011","PSH02",597011
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597013","PSH02",597013
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597017","PSH02",597017
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597019","PSH02",597019
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 600007","PSH02",600007
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 601011","PSH02",601011
811,"1a\medieval settlement\all postholes",,,"all postholes within the medieval settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 601013","PSH02",601013
812,"Grooved Ware Scatter 3/SE of HE2","225 Late Neolithic",,"A small quantity of Grooved Ware pottery was retrieved from ditch intervention 405028 to the south. Since the concentration of flint in this zone is broadly of Neo/Late Neo date, it may be feasible to suggest that all this residual material may relate to a focus of Grooved Ware activity in this locale.  This is a focus in Grass Area 21, to the south east of the horseshoe enclosure on Area 77.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401075","GAA00",401075
812,"Grooved Ware Scatter 3/SE of HE2","225 Late Neolithic",,"A small quantity of Grooved Ware pottery was retrieved from ditch intervention 405028 to the south. Since the concentration of flint in this zone is broadly of Neo/Late Neo date, it may be feasible to suggest that all this residual material may relate to a focus of Grooved Ware activity in this locale.  This is a focus in Grass Area 21, to the south east of the horseshoe enclosure on Area 77.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 402027","GAA00",402027
812,"Grooved Ware Scatter 3/SE of HE2","225 Late Neolithic",,"A small quantity of Grooved Ware pottery was retrieved from ditch intervention 405028 to the south. Since the concentration of flint in this zone is broadly of Neo/Late Neo date, it may be feasible to suggest that all this residual material may relate to a focus of Grooved Ware activity in this locale.  This is a focus in Grass Area 21, to the south east of the horseshoe enclosure on Area 77.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405038","GAA00",405038
812,"Grooved Ware Scatter 3/SE of HE2","225 Late Neolithic",,"A small quantity of Grooved Ware pottery was retrieved from ditch intervention 405028 to the south. Since the concentration of flint in this zone is broadly of Neo/Late Neo date, it may be feasible to suggest that all this residual material may relate to a focus of Grooved Ware activity in this locale.  This is a focus in Grass Area 21, to the south east of the horseshoe enclosure on Area 77.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 405050","GAA00",405050
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512054","PSH02",512054
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529077","PSH02",529077
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529078","PSH02",529078
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529241","PSH02",529241
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529249","PSH02",529249
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529266","PSH02",529266
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537105","PSH02",537105
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537164","PSH02",537164
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539051","PSH02",539051
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555453","PSH02",555453
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568068","PSH02",568068
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568079","PSH02",568079
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569022","PSH02",569022
813,"1a\medieval settlement\ditch1",,,"a fairly early ditch","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 591048","PSH02",591048
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960033","POK96",960033
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960112","POK96",960112
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961744","POK96",961744
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961757","POK96",961757
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962268","POK96",962268
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517310","PSH02",517310
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524230","PSH02",524230
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569099","PSH02",569099
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580140","PSH02",580140
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611039","PSH02",611039
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 630025","PSH02",630025
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 638008","PSH02",638008
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 673060","PSH02",673060
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128003","WPR98",128003
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135055","WPR98",135055
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
814,"C2 cursus/Neolithic finds within monument","200 Neolithic",,"All Neolithic finds (including Plain Bowl Ware sherds) from features that are within the confines of the C2 cursus ditches.  Much of the material is residual but implies that activities of Neolithic date (and possibly relating to Plain Bowl currency onwards) were undertaken within the boundaries of this monument","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148303","WPR98",148303
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 961050","POK96",961050
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 512083","PSH02",512083
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 513083","PSH02",513083
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 517262","PSH02",517262
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 517284","PSH02",517284
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 526276","PSH02",526276
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 526279","PSH02",526279
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 526281","PSH02",526281
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 526283","PSH02",526283
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 527215","PSH02",527215
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 527261","PSH02",527261
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 527270","PSH02",527270
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 537134","PSH02",537134
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 537136","PSH02",537136
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 537183","PSH02",537183
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 537184","PSH02",537184
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 537187","PSH02",537187
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 537189","PSH02",537189
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 538260","PSH02",538260
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 546065","PSH02",546065
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 546066","PSH02",546066
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553032","PSH02",553032
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553037","PSH02",553037
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553044","PSH02",553044
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 553048","PSH02",553048
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555271","PSH02",555271
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555276","PSH02",555276
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555279","PSH02",555279
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555281","PSH02",555281
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 560027","PSH02",560027
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 561121","PSH02",561121
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 561126","PSH02",561126
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 561131","PSH02",561131
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 561133","PSH02",561133
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 561138","PSH02",561138
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 561140","PSH02",561140
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 570068","PSH02",570068
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 570107","PSH02",570107
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 575181","PSH02",575181
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 575200","PSH02",575200
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578112","PSH02",578112
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 578115","PSH02",578115
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 579121","PSH02",579121
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 579123","PSH02",579123
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582101","PSH02",582101
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 582117","PSH02",582117
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 587037","PSH02",587037
815,"1a\medieval settlement\earliest features",,,"earliest features in the med settlement.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 601007","PSH02",601007
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509106","PSH02",509106
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509112","PSH02",509112
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538297","PSH02",538297
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538298","PSH02",538298
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538300","PSH02",538300
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538308","PSH02",538308
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554638","PSH02",554638
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554643","PSH02",554643
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555838","PSH02",555838
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555840","PSH02",555840
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555850","PSH02",555850
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578415","PSH02",578415
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578416","PSH02",578416
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581210","PSH02",581210
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 617109","PSH02",617109
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 617114","PSH02",617114
816,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 5","700 Medieval",,"A series of pits and ?postholes, partly intercutting, and strung along a N-S alignment. Probably marking a boundary. Thought to be related to the later stages of the development of the EAS settlement","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 617118","PSH02",617118
817,"1a\medieval settlement\middle area3",,,"middle ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527195","PSH02",527195
818,"Peterborough Ware Pits","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Two pits in NE part of site (area 99 ), which contained Peterborough ware. Also part of PW Scatter 2.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555922","PSH02",555922
818,"Peterborough Ware Pits","215 Middle Neolithic",,"Two pits in NE part of site (area 99 ), which contained Peterborough ware. Also part of PW Scatter 2.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561278","PSH02",561278
819,"1a\medieval settlement\sd4",,,"southern ditch phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547231","PSH02",547231
819,"1a\medieval settlement\sd4",,,"southern ditch phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 562142","PSH02",562142
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527171","PSH02",527171
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527172","PSH02",527172
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529060","PSH02",529060
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529246","PSH02",529246
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 533057","PSH02",533057
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537076","PSH02",537076
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547161","PSH02",547161
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553100","PSH02",553100
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553125","PSH02",553125
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583020","PSH02",583020
820,"1a\medieval settlement\truncating postholes",,,"postholes that truncate ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583044","PSH02",583044
821,"Intercutting Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"Intercutting Pits on TEC05 containing large quantities of Grooved ware. Repeated pit digging activity suggests this is a focal point in the later Neolithic landscape. Also part of GWS1.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 695058","TEC05",695058
821,"Intercutting Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"Intercutting Pits on TEC05 containing large quantities of Grooved ware. Repeated pit digging activity suggests this is a focal point in the later Neolithic landscape. Also part of GWS1.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 707016","TEC05",707016
821,"Intercutting Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"Intercutting Pits on TEC05 containing large quantities of Grooved ware. Repeated pit digging activity suggests this is a focal point in the later Neolithic landscape. Also part of GWS1.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 707021","TEC05",707021
821,"Intercutting Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"Intercutting Pits on TEC05 containing large quantities of Grooved ware. Repeated pit digging activity suggests this is a focal point in the later Neolithic landscape. Also part of GWS1.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 708007","TEC05",708007
822,"1a\medieval fields\early ditches","715 Early Medieval",,"ealriest medieval field ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512049","PSH02",512049
822,"1a\medieval fields\early ditches","715 Early Medieval",,"ealriest medieval field ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517236","PSH02",517236
822,"1a\medieval fields\early ditches","715 Early Medieval",,"ealriest medieval field ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526228","PSH02",526228
822,"1a\medieval fields\early ditches","715 Early Medieval",,"ealriest medieval field ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526232","PSH02",526232
822,"1a\medieval fields\early ditches","715 Early Medieval",,"ealriest medieval field ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539107","PSH02",539107
822,"1a\medieval fields\early ditches","715 Early Medieval",,"ealriest medieval field ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539108","PSH02",539108
822,"1a\medieval fields\early ditches","715 Early Medieval",,"ealriest medieval field ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 552009","PSH02",552009
822,"1a\medieval fields\early ditches","715 Early Medieval",,"ealriest medieval field ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561268","PSH02",561268
822,"1a\medieval fields\early ditches","715 Early Medieval",,"ealriest medieval field ditches.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 614119","PSH02",614119
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509026","PSH02",509026
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512066","PSH02",512066
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555142","PSH02",555142
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555145","PSH02",555145
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569092","PSH02",569092
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582309","PSH02",582309
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582314","PSH02",582314
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 597033","PSH02",597033
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614312","PSH02",614312
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614343","PSH02",614343
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614349","PSH02",614349
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615043","PSH02",615043
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615051","PSH02",615051
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615323","PSH02",615323
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615348","PSH02",615348
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615355","PSH02",615355
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 630081","PSH02",630081
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 630082","PSH02",630082
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636072","PSH02",636072
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636155","PSH02",636155
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 645024","PSH02",645024
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 645040","PSH02",645040
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 645055","PSH02",645055
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 665024","PSH02",665024
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108043","WPR98",108043
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108045","WPR98",108045
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
823,"MBA/D shaped enc ditch with spokes","315 Middle Bronze Age",," 'D' Shaped ditch, appears to reference smaller 'D' shaped enclosure (Entity: Bronze age small d-shaped enclosure) which lies within the NW portion of this entity. Spurs or spokes radiate off this linear, often corresponding to gaps in the line of the ditch and appear to be broadly contemporary. This suggests that this length of ditch played a significant role in the initial laying out of the field divisions. In the southern area of this entity many of these radiating spokes align with and appear contemporary to E/MBA segmented ditch alignments. The ditches here also contain some of the earlier pottery, Beaker/ Collared Urn as well as Deverel Rimbury contrasting to the northern parts which appear to contain predominantly Deverel Rimbury. Does this suggest that this ditch may have developed from south to north? Further land divisions appear between this and the smaller D shaped enclosure probably at the same time as this entity. This Enclosure ditch also forms the spine of a trackway which begins in the MBA and develops into the LBA.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149112","WPR98",149112
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 960033","POK96",960033
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"POK96 - 960575","POK96",960575
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 120092","WPR98",120092
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 121261","WPR98",121261
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 125108","WPR98",125108
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 130051","WPR98",130051
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 130218","WPR98",130218
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 141232","WPR98",141232
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156169","WPR98",156169
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156191","WPR98",156191
824,"Early Neolithic treethrows WPR","205 Early Neolithic",,"Tree throws for Volume 1 which can be dated by pottery and/or flint to 4000-3000 BC with some degree of confidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 180045","WPR98",180045
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 960502","POK96",960502
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 308018","PSH02",308018
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 507019","PSH02",507019
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525048","PSH02",525048
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526446","PSH02",526446
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526460","PSH02",526460
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526462","PSH02",526462
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542063","PSH02",542063
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 552042","PSH02",552042
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636120","PSH02",636120
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636121","PSH02",636121
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636123","PSH02",636123
825,"Bronze Age Field System 14","315 Middle Bronze Age",," This field system comprises a number of ditches, which lie between the small D shaped enclosure and the larger D shaped enclosure in the centre of the site. The date range of these ditches spans the Bronze Age and is suggestive of a long life span for this field system. These ditches appear to form two NS orientated fields next to each other with a possibly triangular one to the south, however there is a lot of truncation to the western and southern parts of this area, so further ditches may have existed at one time. The eastern ditches of this system form the western side of a trackway with the eastern side formed by the large D shaped enclosure ditch, this is the southern part of trackway 2. The northern part of this field system evidenced the most artefacts and recutting which may be explained by the proximity of LBA settlement 4 on the northern side of this entity. It would appear that the two D shaped enclosure ditches may have been layed out first, with parts of field system 14 following soon after and that these ditches represent the initial division of this internal space, firstly into larger fields before further subdivision during the Bronze Age.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 656039","PSH02",656039
826,"MBA/DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","315 Middle Bronze Age",," Deverel Rimbury element of north eastern part of trackway 2. Comprises several ditches which contain Deverel Rimbury pottery or are re-cut by ditches containing Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Ditches appear to control movement between Field 1 and area to north of Field1 and the area within large D (including Field 10 where LBA settlement 4 is located) thus restricting the vague east-west flow and introducing a more formalised north-south element. That all these ditches are re-cut suggests a heavy use and long life span of this route.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582314","PSH02",582314
826,"MBA/DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","315 Middle Bronze Age",," Deverel Rimbury element of north eastern part of trackway 2. Comprises several ditches which contain Deverel Rimbury pottery or are re-cut by ditches containing Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Ditches appear to control movement between Field 1 and area to north of Field1 and the area within large D (including Field 10 where LBA settlement 4 is located) thus restricting the vague east-west flow and introducing a more formalised north-south element. That all these ditches are re-cut suggests a heavy use and long life span of this route.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582325","PSH02",582325
826,"MBA/DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","315 Middle Bronze Age",," Deverel Rimbury element of north eastern part of trackway 2. Comprises several ditches which contain Deverel Rimbury pottery or are re-cut by ditches containing Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Ditches appear to control movement between Field 1 and area to north of Field1 and the area within large D (including Field 10 where LBA settlement 4 is located) thus restricting the vague east-west flow and introducing a more formalised north-south element. That all these ditches are re-cut suggests a heavy use and long life span of this route.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 599122","PSH02",599122
826,"MBA/DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","315 Middle Bronze Age",," Deverel Rimbury element of north eastern part of trackway 2. Comprises several ditches which contain Deverel Rimbury pottery or are re-cut by ditches containing Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Ditches appear to control movement between Field 1 and area to north of Field1 and the area within large D (including Field 10 where LBA settlement 4 is located) thus restricting the vague east-west flow and introducing a more formalised north-south element. That all these ditches are re-cut suggests a heavy use and long life span of this route.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636152","PSH02",636152
826,"MBA/DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","315 Middle Bronze Age",," Deverel Rimbury element of north eastern part of trackway 2. Comprises several ditches which contain Deverel Rimbury pottery or are re-cut by ditches containing Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Ditches appear to control movement between Field 1 and area to north of Field1 and the area within large D (including Field 10 where LBA settlement 4 is located) thus restricting the vague east-west flow and introducing a more formalised north-south element. That all these ditches are re-cut suggests a heavy use and long life span of this route.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636155","PSH02",636155
826,"MBA/DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","315 Middle Bronze Age",," Deverel Rimbury element of north eastern part of trackway 2. Comprises several ditches which contain Deverel Rimbury pottery or are re-cut by ditches containing Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Ditches appear to control movement between Field 1 and area to north of Field1 and the area within large D (including Field 10 where LBA settlement 4 is located) thus restricting the vague east-west flow and introducing a more formalised north-south element. That all these ditches are re-cut suggests a heavy use and long life span of this route.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636175","PSH02",636175
826,"MBA/DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","315 Middle Bronze Age",," Deverel Rimbury element of north eastern part of trackway 2. Comprises several ditches which contain Deverel Rimbury pottery or are re-cut by ditches containing Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Ditches appear to control movement between Field 1 and area to north of Field1 and the area within large D (including Field 10 where LBA settlement 4 is located) thus restricting the vague east-west flow and introducing a more formalised north-south element. That all these ditches are re-cut suggests a heavy use and long life span of this route.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103046","WPR98",103046
826,"MBA/DevRim Trackway Ditch/ NE side of large D","315 Middle Bronze Age",," Deverel Rimbury element of north eastern part of trackway 2. Comprises several ditches which contain Deverel Rimbury pottery or are re-cut by ditches containing Post Deverel Rimbury pottery. Ditches appear to control movement between Field 1 and area to north of Field1 and the area within large D (including Field 10 where LBA settlement 4 is located) thus restricting the vague east-west flow and introducing a more formalised north-south element. That all these ditches are re-cut suggests a heavy use and long life span of this route.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119322","WPR98",119322
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527197","PSH02",527197
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529077","PSH02",529077
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529078","PSH02",529078
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539051","PSH02",539051
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555276","PSH02",555276
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555281","PSH02",555281
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 560023","PSH02",560023
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561121","PSH02",561121
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561126","PSH02",561126
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561131","PSH02",561131
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561133","PSH02",561133
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561138","PSH02",561138
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561140","PSH02",561140
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579121","PSH02",579121
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579123","PSH02",579123
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582117","PSH02",582117
827,"1a\medieval settlement\ceramic phase 1",,,"Lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 591038","PSH02",591038
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 308018","PSH02",308018
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 516168","PSH02",516168
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 526446","PSH02",526446
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582319","PSH02",582319
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592048","PSH02",592048
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 641033","PSH02",641033
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 671057","PSH02",671057
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 106013","WPR98",106013
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108022","WPR98",108022
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113131","WPR98",113131
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 133198","WPR98",133198
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137114","WPR98",137114
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 142010","WPR98",142010
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148303","WPR98",148303
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149209","WPR98",149209
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 158143","WPR98",158143
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167037","WPR98",167037
828,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter 3/E of C2 cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"A general scatter of flints that can broadly be attributed a Mesolithic/Neolithic date in the eastern vicinity of the C2 cursus.  The majority of the material occurs residually in later features but implies the presence of activity of such a date in this locale.  Finds include broad flakes, retouched bladelets, blades, a microburin and Mesolithic core preparation flakes.  Some of the material is derived from tree throws that are stratigraphically early and may be conguent with activity of this early date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
831,"1a\medieval fields\ditches3","700 Medieval",,"medieval field ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517237","PSH02",517237
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961040","POK96",961040
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961505","POK96",961505
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527192","PSH02",527192
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529268","PSH02",529268
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529278","PSH02",529278
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537105","PSH02",537105
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546100","PSH02",546100
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555453","PSH02",555453
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568068","PSH02",568068
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569022","PSH02",569022
836,"1a\nucleated settlement\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 591043","PSH02",591043
849,"1a\medieval settlement\sd2",,,"southern ditch phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547173","PSH02",547173
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 402023","GAA00",402023
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 402027","GAA00",402027
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 212019","GAI99",212019
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 212045","GAI99",212045
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 212090","GAI99",212090
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 216104","GAI99",216104
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218025","GAI99",218025
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 106026","WPR98",106026
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107088","WPR98",107088
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111040","WPR98",111040
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111042","WPR98",111042
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111137","WPR98",111137
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113038","WPR98",113038
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113043","WPR98",113043
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113045","WPR98",113045
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113060","WPR98",113060
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125117","WPR98",125117
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127088","WPR98",127088
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128123","WPR98",128123
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128126","WPR98",128126
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129067","WPR98",129067
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136076","WPR98",136076
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 145018","WPR98",145018
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146105","WPR98",146105
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147108","WPR98",147108
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149231","WPR98",149231
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151059","WPR98",151059
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151076","WPR98",151076
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151134","WPR98",151134
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151137","WPR98",151137
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151163","WPR98",151163
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151175","WPR98",151175
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151181","WPR98",151181
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157080","WPR98",157080
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157108","WPR98",157108
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157110","WPR98",157110
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159078","WPR98",159078
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159115","WPR98",159115
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159119","WPR98",159119
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159121","WPR98",159121
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159125","WPR98",159125
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160088","WPR98",160088
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160097","WPR98",160097
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160102","WPR98",160102
858,"Roman putative field system","565 Middle Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Possible remains of co-axial RB field system.","nc","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172043","WPR98",172043
869,"Middle Iron Age pit 8","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA pit associated with adjacent rounshouse in Southern enclosure.","nc","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 141088","WPR98",141088
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 511071","PSH02",511071
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 517247","PSH02",517247
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526223","PSH02",526223
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526228","PSH02",526228
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526232","PSH02",526232
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526237","PSH02",526237
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526239","PSH02",526239
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526240","PSH02",526240
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526249","PSH02",526249
873,"Bronze Age Field 5","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large rectangular field in Area 49.  Its longer axis is aligned E-W (92.5 m), and the shorter N-S axis measures c. 74m.  Only the N, S and W ditches constituting this field can be discerned.  The lack of an eastern boundary to this field may be due to two factors, both of them implicating the Stanwell cursus.  An eastern boundary may originally have been constructed, but because it cut through cursus bank deposits, it was subsequently  ploughed away/ truncated at a higher level.  Alternatively, the Stanwell cursus central bank may have still been substantial enough to act as an eastern boundary for the field, thus making its creation superfluous. Both arguments imply that the Stanwell cursus was still extant and quite monumental during this time.  This is a large field but it is not directly linked to any drove or trackways, since Trackway 1 stops and turns some 40 m to its north.  Gaps implying entrances are hard to discern because of truncation, but the western boundary is certainly segmented, possibly indicating two entrance points.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 566038","PSH02",566038
881,"Penannular Gully 9","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 151143","WPR98",151143
881,"Penannular Gully 9","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 151145","WPR98",151145
881,"Penannular Gully 9","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 172012","WPR98",172012
881,"Penannular Gully 9","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 172014","WPR98",172014
881,"Penannular Gully 9","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 172018","WPR98",172018
881,"Penannular Gully 9","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 172032","WPR98",172032
885,"Medieval Ditch 20","300 Bronze Age","900 Modern","This ditch probably forms part of a Medieval field boundary or enclosure, elements of which have been dated to the Bronze Age and other elements of which have been assigned to the Medieval period.  In reality, it is likely that elements of this complex were constructed in the Bronze Age, and some of the ditches or at least recuts within them date to the medieval period.  Some ditches may have been constructed entirely as new features in the Medieval period.","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 511075","PSH02",511075
885,"Medieval Ditch 20","300 Bronze Age","900 Modern","This ditch probably forms part of a Medieval field boundary or enclosure, elements of which have been dated to the Bronze Age and other elements of which have been assigned to the Medieval period.  In reality, it is likely that elements of this complex were constructed in the Bronze Age, and some of the ditches or at least recuts within them date to the medieval period.  Some ditches may have been constructed entirely as new features in the Medieval period.","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 566049","PSH02",566049
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961017","POK96",961017
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961501","POK96",961501
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961540","POK96",961540
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 514046","PSH02",514046
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515231","PSH02",515231
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517237","PSH02",517237
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517247","PSH02",517247
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537016","PSH02",537016
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538156","PSH02",538156
888,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter2/Central C1cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic and Neolithic flint, including bladelets, tertiary flakes and blades, retouched flaks and adze thinning flakes.  These finds have been mainly recovered residually within later features.  They are focussed just to the north of the Medieval 11 post barn, and concentrate to the wast of the buffalo's head enclosure and east of the BA settlement enclosure.  Does this scatter indicate activity of a fairly early date that may help us to pinpoint the zone where the origins of the cursus may lie, or is it just indicative of some fairly early activity in this particular zone, perhaps prior to the C1 cursus construction?","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583001","PSH02",583001
901,"Unphased Palaeochannel","999 Unphased",,"Palaeochannels","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 960515","POK96",960515
901,"Unphased Palaeochannel","999 Unphased",,"Palaeochannels","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"POK96 - 960567","POK96",960567
906,"Plain Bowl Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"Seven pits in rough NE/SW alignment across  landscape representing some of the earliest Neolithic activity.  This activity points to a formalised way of deposition, of putting material in the ground. The rough NE/SW alignment may also point towards a formalisation of a route/ path through what may have once been and could still  be a quite wooded environment  The extension of this line further SW would approximately coincide with a suggested causeway in the C1 cursus and raise questions about adoption and manipulation of routes. However there would also be questions about whether this is a real or imagined spatial relationship.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527124","PSH02",527124
906,"Plain Bowl Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"Seven pits in rough NE/SW alignment across  landscape representing some of the earliest Neolithic activity.  This activity points to a formalised way of deposition, of putting material in the ground. The rough NE/SW alignment may also point towards a formalisation of a route/ path through what may have once been and could still  be a quite wooded environment  The extension of this line further SW would approximately coincide with a suggested causeway in the C1 cursus and raise questions about adoption and manipulation of routes. However there would also be questions about whether this is a real or imagined spatial relationship.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527142","PSH02",527142
906,"Plain Bowl Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"Seven pits in rough NE/SW alignment across  landscape representing some of the earliest Neolithic activity.  This activity points to a formalised way of deposition, of putting material in the ground. The rough NE/SW alignment may also point towards a formalisation of a route/ path through what may have once been and could still  be a quite wooded environment  The extension of this line further SW would approximately coincide with a suggested causeway in the C1 cursus and raise questions about adoption and manipulation of routes. However there would also be questions about whether this is a real or imagined spatial relationship.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 548010","PSH02",548010
906,"Plain Bowl Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"Seven pits in rough NE/SW alignment across  landscape representing some of the earliest Neolithic activity.  This activity points to a formalised way of deposition, of putting material in the ground. The rough NE/SW alignment may also point towards a formalisation of a route/ path through what may have once been and could still  be a quite wooded environment  The extension of this line further SW would approximately coincide with a suggested causeway in the C1 cursus and raise questions about adoption and manipulation of routes. However there would also be questions about whether this is a real or imagined spatial relationship.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555912","PSH02",555912
906,"Plain Bowl Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"Seven pits in rough NE/SW alignment across  landscape representing some of the earliest Neolithic activity.  This activity points to a formalised way of deposition, of putting material in the ground. The rough NE/SW alignment may also point towards a formalisation of a route/ path through what may have once been and could still  be a quite wooded environment  The extension of this line further SW would approximately coincide with a suggested causeway in the C1 cursus and raise questions about adoption and manipulation of routes. However there would also be questions about whether this is a real or imagined spatial relationship.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561277","PSH02",561277
906,"Plain Bowl Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"Seven pits in rough NE/SW alignment across  landscape representing some of the earliest Neolithic activity.  This activity points to a formalised way of deposition, of putting material in the ground. The rough NE/SW alignment may also point towards a formalisation of a route/ path through what may have once been and could still  be a quite wooded environment  The extension of this line further SW would approximately coincide with a suggested causeway in the C1 cursus and raise questions about adoption and manipulation of routes. However there would also be questions about whether this is a real or imagined spatial relationship.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 687001","TEC05",687001
906,"Plain Bowl Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"Seven pits in rough NE/SW alignment across  landscape representing some of the earliest Neolithic activity.  This activity points to a formalised way of deposition, of putting material in the ground. The rough NE/SW alignment may also point towards a formalisation of a route/ path through what may have once been and could still  be a quite wooded environment  The extension of this line further SW would approximately coincide with a suggested causeway in the C1 cursus and raise questions about adoption and manipulation of routes. However there would also be questions about whether this is a real or imagined spatial relationship.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 158121","WPR98",158121
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961747","POK96",961747
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962259","POK96",962259
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103019","WPR98",103019
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 105008","WPR98",105008
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 105009","WPR98",105009
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107013","WPR98",107013
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107029","WPR98",107029
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110007","WPR98",110007
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111012","WPR98",111012
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119014","WPR98",119014
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119034","WPR98",119034
910,"Bronze age Trackway WPR 1","300 Bronze Age",,"N-S trackway in Bed B created for Volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121009","WPR98",121009
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 509145","PSH02",509145
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547363","PSH02",547363
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547374","PSH02",547374
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554659","PSH02",554659
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555922","PSH02",555922
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555931","PSH02",555931
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555941","PSH02",555941
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559665","PSH02",559665
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 561277","PSH02",561277
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 561290","PSH02",561290
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 568244","PSH02",568244
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 568265","PSH02",568265
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578501","PSH02",578501
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578502","PSH02",578502
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 581272","PSH02",581272
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594103","PSH02",594103
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594249","PSH02",594249
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594275","PSH02",594275
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 613014","PSH02",613014
928,"Late Neolithic Scatter4/NE part of site/","225 Late Neolithic",,"This is an area of LNEB and LNBA lithic material located in the north eastern part of site and around the pit clusters (on area99). The majority of the material consists of cores and flakes as well as tools including scrapers, blades and an awl. All this is suggestive of a continued focus of activity on the pit clusters here. Potentially this could point towards a settlement although there is an absence of pottery so is probably more indicative of a possible knapping area.  Ammendment by CDG 6/04/06.  There  is a fair quantity of Peterborough Ware pottery from ditch 547363 and furthermore this scatter is associated with the two Neolithic intercutting pit complexes in Are 99, both of which contained substantial quantities of Neolithic pot.  The suggestion is a more generalised locale of Neolithic activity - not specifically related to knapping but perhaps demarcating settlement and other activities.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621063","PSH02",621063
930,"Late Bronze Age Pit 4","325 Late Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","LBA pit excavated in area C!. Substantial amount of pottery recorded in the fill of this pit.","ab","Analysis","Highlight","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"PSH02 - 509185","PSH02",509185
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"PSH02 - 518056","PSH02",518056
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"PSH02 - 518073","PSH02",518073
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"PSH02 - 524029","PSH02",524029
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"PSH02 - 525016","PSH02",525016
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"PSH02 - 528009","PSH02",528009
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"PSH02 - 528015","PSH02",528015
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"PSH02 - 528028","PSH02",528028
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"PSH02 - 546009","PSH02",546009
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 107082","WPR98",107082
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 111044","WPR98",111044
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 128248","WPR98",128248
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 128250","WPR98",128250
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 128252","WPR98",128252
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 130178","WPR98",130178
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 137084","WPR98",137084
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 140135","WPR98",140135
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 140137","WPR98",140137
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 145016","WPR98",145016
934,"Bronze Age Field System 8","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This system comprises at least four and probably five long and tapering fields.  They are aligned with the long axis orientated roughly NW-SE.    This field system may run for a length greater than 300 m and width of c. 60 m.  The fields are roughly evenly divided into blocks.  In fact they are quite exact divisions - each field measuring approximately 75 m in length.  The fields immediately to the east are on a quite different alignment implying that topography and/ or chronology are not the only contributing factors in field layout and design.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys1",,"WPR98 - 166160","WPR98",166160
936,"1a\medieval settlement\waterholes",,,"all waterholes or wells in the settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961036","POK96",961036
936,"1a\medieval settlement\waterholes",,,"all waterholes or wells in the settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961959","POK96",961959
936,"1a\medieval settlement\waterholes",,,"all waterholes or wells in the settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
936,"1a\medieval settlement\waterholes",,,"all waterholes or wells in the settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 533018","PSH02",533018
936,"1a\medieval settlement\waterholes",,,"all waterholes or wells in the settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 533039","PSH02",533039
936,"1a\medieval settlement\waterholes",,,"all waterholes or wells in the settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 537164","PSH02",537164
936,"1a\medieval settlement\waterholes",,,"all waterholes or wells in the settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 547313","PSH02",547313
936,"1a\medieval settlement\waterholes",,,"all waterholes or wells in the settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 562142","PSH02",562142
936,"1a\medieval settlement\waterholes",,,"all waterholes or wells in the settlement area","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569022","PSH02",569022
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 308018","PSH02",308018
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 312019","PSH02",312019
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 312049","PSH02",312049
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523234","PSH02",523234
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523247","PSH02",523247
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523250","PSH02",523250
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 526446","PSH02",526446
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582309","PSH02",582309
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 614218","PSH02",614218
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 615051","PSH02",615051
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 636072","PSH02",636072
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
938,"Bronze Age Field 10","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Smallish rectangular field to the east of the small D-shaped enclosure, and east of curving droveway.  This field is actually framed on three sides by droveways - one that runs E-W on its southern side and the N-S curving one that frames its northern and eastern sides.  The field is 98m N-S and at least 61m E-W. It is subdivided into three blocks by 2 smaller field boundaries, each of a similar size (each c. 30m x 61m in size).","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
939,"Bronze Age Field 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It is hard to know the full extent of this field, since the ditches associated with its northern and eastern boundaries have been truncated quite substantially, or lost under the lagoon beds.  However, it would appear that this field is a fairly large rectangular field aligned N-S (83 m) and the other E-W axis at least 25 m in width, but probably much larger in extent.  What is interesting about this field and Field 3 immediately to its west is that they do not appear to have been associated with trackways/ droveways.  It is of course possible that droveways did exist but have been destroyed by the lagoons to the west and east.  In this area, the fields are on a slightly different alignment to the north, oriented more or less directly north-south, rather than north-west - south-east.  It is also possible that the fiels in this southern zone functioned differently to those in the north.  The lack of droveways may imply that they were not for pastoral grazing but rather linked more closely with cereal production.  There is also the possibility that this field lay close or even bounded a small settlement or domestic activity area- perhaps no more than one or two houses.  Although no structural evidence for these survives, the rather dense concentrations of burnt flint in tandem with M & LBA pottery would support this suggestion.  It may be that this entity designation Field 4 actually corresponds to two fields, since a central  subdision  (SG594117) can be identified.  This ditch however, turns east-west to north-south and the north-south component is not a separate feature.  In other words, the sub-division was not added later but is part of the same enclosure, and since this component is slightly off-set from the southern part of the field, it may originally have functioned as a separate entity.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 510052","PSH02",510052
939,"Bronze Age Field 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It is hard to know the full extent of this field, since the ditches associated with its northern and eastern boundaries have been truncated quite substantially, or lost under the lagoon beds.  However, it would appear that this field is a fairly large rectangular field aligned N-S (83 m) and the other E-W axis at least 25 m in width, but probably much larger in extent.  What is interesting about this field and Field 3 immediately to its west is that they do not appear to have been associated with trackways/ droveways.  It is of course possible that droveways did exist but have been destroyed by the lagoons to the west and east.  In this area, the fields are on a slightly different alignment to the north, oriented more or less directly north-south, rather than north-west - south-east.  It is also possible that the fiels in this southern zone functioned differently to those in the north.  The lack of droveways may imply that they were not for pastoral grazing but rather linked more closely with cereal production.  There is also the possibility that this field lay close or even bounded a small settlement or domestic activity area- perhaps no more than one or two houses.  Although no structural evidence for these survives, the rather dense concentrations of burnt flint in tandem with M & LBA pottery would support this suggestion.  It may be that this entity designation Field 4 actually corresponds to two fields, since a central  subdision  (SG594117) can be identified.  This ditch however, turns east-west to north-south and the north-south component is not a separate feature.  In other words, the sub-division was not added later but is part of the same enclosure, and since this component is slightly off-set from the southern part of the field, it may originally have functioned as a separate entity.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 542227","PSH02",542227
939,"Bronze Age Field 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It is hard to know the full extent of this field, since the ditches associated with its northern and eastern boundaries have been truncated quite substantially, or lost under the lagoon beds.  However, it would appear that this field is a fairly large rectangular field aligned N-S (83 m) and the other E-W axis at least 25 m in width, but probably much larger in extent.  What is interesting about this field and Field 3 immediately to its west is that they do not appear to have been associated with trackways/ droveways.  It is of course possible that droveways did exist but have been destroyed by the lagoons to the west and east.  In this area, the fields are on a slightly different alignment to the north, oriented more or less directly north-south, rather than north-west - south-east.  It is also possible that the fiels in this southern zone functioned differently to those in the north.  The lack of droveways may imply that they were not for pastoral grazing but rather linked more closely with cereal production.  There is also the possibility that this field lay close or even bounded a small settlement or domestic activity area- perhaps no more than one or two houses.  Although no structural evidence for these survives, the rather dense concentrations of burnt flint in tandem with M & LBA pottery would support this suggestion.  It may be that this entity designation Field 4 actually corresponds to two fields, since a central  subdision  (SG594117) can be identified.  This ditch however, turns east-west to north-south and the north-south component is not a separate feature.  In other words, the sub-division was not added later but is part of the same enclosure, and since this component is slightly off-set from the southern part of the field, it may originally have functioned as a separate entity.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 542228","PSH02",542228
939,"Bronze Age Field 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It is hard to know the full extent of this field, since the ditches associated with its northern and eastern boundaries have been truncated quite substantially, or lost under the lagoon beds.  However, it would appear that this field is a fairly large rectangular field aligned N-S (83 m) and the other E-W axis at least 25 m in width, but probably much larger in extent.  What is interesting about this field and Field 3 immediately to its west is that they do not appear to have been associated with trackways/ droveways.  It is of course possible that droveways did exist but have been destroyed by the lagoons to the west and east.  In this area, the fields are on a slightly different alignment to the north, oriented more or less directly north-south, rather than north-west - south-east.  It is also possible that the fiels in this southern zone functioned differently to those in the north.  The lack of droveways may imply that they were not for pastoral grazing but rather linked more closely with cereal production.  There is also the possibility that this field lay close or even bounded a small settlement or domestic activity area- perhaps no more than one or two houses.  Although no structural evidence for these survives, the rather dense concentrations of burnt flint in tandem with M & LBA pottery would support this suggestion.  It may be that this entity designation Field 4 actually corresponds to two fields, since a central  subdision  (SG594117) can be identified.  This ditch however, turns east-west to north-south and the north-south component is not a separate feature.  In other words, the sub-division was not added later but is part of the same enclosure, and since this component is slightly off-set from the southern part of the field, it may originally have functioned as a separate entity.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 542259","PSH02",542259
939,"Bronze Age Field 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It is hard to know the full extent of this field, since the ditches associated with its northern and eastern boundaries have been truncated quite substantially, or lost under the lagoon beds.  However, it would appear that this field is a fairly large rectangular field aligned N-S (83 m) and the other E-W axis at least 25 m in width, but probably much larger in extent.  What is interesting about this field and Field 3 immediately to its west is that they do not appear to have been associated with trackways/ droveways.  It is of course possible that droveways did exist but have been destroyed by the lagoons to the west and east.  In this area, the fields are on a slightly different alignment to the north, oriented more or less directly north-south, rather than north-west - south-east.  It is also possible that the fiels in this southern zone functioned differently to those in the north.  The lack of droveways may imply that they were not for pastoral grazing but rather linked more closely with cereal production.  There is also the possibility that this field lay close or even bounded a small settlement or domestic activity area- perhaps no more than one or two houses.  Although no structural evidence for these survives, the rather dense concentrations of burnt flint in tandem with M & LBA pottery would support this suggestion.  It may be that this entity designation Field 4 actually corresponds to two fields, since a central  subdision  (SG594117) can be identified.  This ditch however, turns east-west to north-south and the north-south component is not a separate feature.  In other words, the sub-division was not added later but is part of the same enclosure, and since this component is slightly off-set from the southern part of the field, it may originally have functioned as a separate entity.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 542263","PSH02",542263
939,"Bronze Age Field 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It is hard to know the full extent of this field, since the ditches associated with its northern and eastern boundaries have been truncated quite substantially, or lost under the lagoon beds.  However, it would appear that this field is a fairly large rectangular field aligned N-S (83 m) and the other E-W axis at least 25 m in width, but probably much larger in extent.  What is interesting about this field and Field 3 immediately to its west is that they do not appear to have been associated with trackways/ droveways.  It is of course possible that droveways did exist but have been destroyed by the lagoons to the west and east.  In this area, the fields are on a slightly different alignment to the north, oriented more or less directly north-south, rather than north-west - south-east.  It is also possible that the fiels in this southern zone functioned differently to those in the north.  The lack of droveways may imply that they were not for pastoral grazing but rather linked more closely with cereal production.  There is also the possibility that this field lay close or even bounded a small settlement or domestic activity area- perhaps no more than one or two houses.  Although no structural evidence for these survives, the rather dense concentrations of burnt flint in tandem with M & LBA pottery would support this suggestion.  It may be that this entity designation Field 4 actually corresponds to two fields, since a central  subdision  (SG594117) can be identified.  This ditch however, turns east-west to north-south and the north-south component is not a separate feature.  In other words, the sub-division was not added later but is part of the same enclosure, and since this component is slightly off-set from the southern part of the field, it may originally have functioned as a separate entity.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 556124","PSH02",556124
939,"Bronze Age Field 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It is hard to know the full extent of this field, since the ditches associated with its northern and eastern boundaries have been truncated quite substantially, or lost under the lagoon beds.  However, it would appear that this field is a fairly large rectangular field aligned N-S (83 m) and the other E-W axis at least 25 m in width, but probably much larger in extent.  What is interesting about this field and Field 3 immediately to its west is that they do not appear to have been associated with trackways/ droveways.  It is of course possible that droveways did exist but have been destroyed by the lagoons to the west and east.  In this area, the fields are on a slightly different alignment to the north, oriented more or less directly north-south, rather than north-west - south-east.  It is also possible that the fiels in this southern zone functioned differently to those in the north.  The lack of droveways may imply that they were not for pastoral grazing but rather linked more closely with cereal production.  There is also the possibility that this field lay close or even bounded a small settlement or domestic activity area- perhaps no more than one or two houses.  Although no structural evidence for these survives, the rather dense concentrations of burnt flint in tandem with M & LBA pottery would support this suggestion.  It may be that this entity designation Field 4 actually corresponds to two fields, since a central  subdision  (SG594117) can be identified.  This ditch however, turns east-west to north-south and the north-south component is not a separate feature.  In other words, the sub-division was not added later but is part of the same enclosure, and since this component is slightly off-set from the southern part of the field, it may originally have functioned as a separate entity.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 594060","PSH02",594060
939,"Bronze Age Field 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It is hard to know the full extent of this field, since the ditches associated with its northern and eastern boundaries have been truncated quite substantially, or lost under the lagoon beds.  However, it would appear that this field is a fairly large rectangular field aligned N-S (83 m) and the other E-W axis at least 25 m in width, but probably much larger in extent.  What is interesting about this field and Field 3 immediately to its west is that they do not appear to have been associated with trackways/ droveways.  It is of course possible that droveways did exist but have been destroyed by the lagoons to the west and east.  In this area, the fields are on a slightly different alignment to the north, oriented more or less directly north-south, rather than north-west - south-east.  It is also possible that the fiels in this southern zone functioned differently to those in the north.  The lack of droveways may imply that they were not for pastoral grazing but rather linked more closely with cereal production.  There is also the possibility that this field lay close or even bounded a small settlement or domestic activity area- perhaps no more than one or two houses.  Although no structural evidence for these survives, the rather dense concentrations of burnt flint in tandem with M & LBA pottery would support this suggestion.  It may be that this entity designation Field 4 actually corresponds to two fields, since a central  subdision  (SG594117) can be identified.  This ditch however, turns east-west to north-south and the north-south component is not a separate feature.  In other words, the sub-division was not added later but is part of the same enclosure, and since this component is slightly off-set from the southern part of the field, it may originally have functioned as a separate entity.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 594109","PSH02",594109
939,"Bronze Age Field 4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"It is hard to know the full extent of this field, since the ditches associated with its northern and eastern boundaries have been truncated quite substantially, or lost under the lagoon beds.  However, it would appear that this field is a fairly large rectangular field aligned N-S (83 m) and the other E-W axis at least 25 m in width, but probably much larger in extent.  What is interesting about this field and Field 3 immediately to its west is that they do not appear to have been associated with trackways/ droveways.  It is of course possible that droveways did exist but have been destroyed by the lagoons to the west and east.  In this area, the fields are on a slightly different alignment to the north, oriented more or less directly north-south, rather than north-west - south-east.  It is also possible that the fiels in this southern zone functioned differently to those in the north.  The lack of droveways may imply that they were not for pastoral grazing but rather linked more closely with cereal production.  There is also the possibility that this field lay close or even bounded a small settlement or domestic activity area- perhaps no more than one or two houses.  Although no structural evidence for these survives, the rather dense concentrations of burnt flint in tandem with M & LBA pottery would support this suggestion.  It may be that this entity designation Field 4 actually corresponds to two fields, since a central  subdision  (SG594117) can be identified.  This ditch however, turns east-west to north-south and the north-south component is not a separate feature.  In other words, the sub-division was not added later but is part of the same enclosure, and since this component is slightly off-set from the southern part of the field, it may originally have functioned as a separate entity.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 594116","PSH02",594116
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 210026","GAI99",210026
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 212086","GAI99",212086
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 213062","GAI99",213062
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 218066","GAI99",218066
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221005","GAI99",221005
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221007","GAI99",221007
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221011","GAI99",221011
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221014","GAI99",221014
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221017","GAI99",221017
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221020","GAI99",221020
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221022","GAI99",221022
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221025","GAI99",221025
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221080","GAI99",221080
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221082","GAI99",221082
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221084","GAI99",221084
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221086","GAI99",221086
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221088","GAI99",221088
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221090","GAI99",221090
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 221092","GAI99",221092
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222018","GAI99",222018
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222020","GAI99",222020
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222022","GAI99",222022
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222024","GAI99",222024
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222026","GAI99",222026
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222028","GAI99",222028
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222030","GAI99",222030
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222032","GAI99",222032
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222034","GAI99",222034
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222036","GAI99",222036
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222040","GAI99",222040
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222042","GAI99",222042
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222044","GAI99",222044
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222046","GAI99",222046
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222050","GAI99",222050
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222052","GAI99",222052
942,"Bronze age Ntaxiway Dev Rim Enclosed phase","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features and entiies with  Dev Rim pottery or which can be attributed to the enclosed phase of the settlement","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"GAI99 - 222064","GAI99",222064
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 111070","WPR98",111070
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 121135","WPR98",121135
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 121137","WPR98",121137
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 122088","WPR98",122088
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 122100","WPR98",122100
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 137084","WPR98",137084
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 161130","WPR98",161130
944,"Bronze Age Field System 7","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"This is part of a much larger more composite and complex field system.  This component probably predominantly dates to the MBA.  The western boundary is also served by the eastern boundary of Bronze Age field system 6. Only very tentative and ephemeral evidence for east-west divisions.  However, it is probable that some east-west ditches (e.g. SG 160092 and SG 160184) both of which have been assigned to an IA phase, may in fact be components of this BA field system.  In fact, both of these ditches contained sherds of BA pottery. This field system forms the north-western part of a composite block of field systems, all of which can be brought together and viewed as a single field system.  However, a division was made on the basis that each component shows a different division of space and may have been used for different agricultural activities.  Intriguingly, the north-west corner has a rather idiosynchronatic form - a bite-shaped chunk has been removed from it - not sure what the purpose of this is.  Most fields within the overall Bronze Age landscape are rectangular, so this is unusual.  It may have been broken off at a later stage to form a small field.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 161132","WPR98",161132
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 687097","TEC05",687097
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 689034","TEC05",689034
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690101","TEC05",690101
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690120","TEC05",690120
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 691019","TEC05",691019
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695047","TEC05",695047
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695049","TEC05",695049
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695058","TEC05",695058
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695065","TEC05",695065
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705080","TEC05",705080
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705088","TEC05",705088
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705090","TEC05",705090
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 707016","TEC05",707016
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 707021","TEC05",707021
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 708007","TEC05",708007
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 708014","TEC05",708014
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 708028","TEC05",708028
952,"Grooved Ware Scatter1/ N of HE2/ Zone Division","225 Late Neolithic",," This entity consists of an intercutting LN pit cluster (entity??) and a number of other features containing later neolithic material. Many of these features consist of ditch segments and pits which form a  NE/SW alignment.  The pit cluster contains a large quantity of Grooved ware and LNEB/LNBA flint tools (Including a large number of scrapers, two cores, two knives and an arrowhead blank) and is suggestive of a ritual focus. The ditch/ pit alignment contains LNBA cores ,scrapers and flakes as well as undated cores, flakes and burnt flint, which could be argued as being either contemporary material or evidence of the focal nature of this location through the Neolithic period.  A hammerstone, nodule and flakes, recovered from one ditch segment, SG[695065], suggests a deliberate deposition of some sort and likely to be connected to the formalisation of this alignment. These are undated artefacts but are likely to be connected to the Late Neolithic activity here or possibly earlier Bronze age activity associated with laying out field sytems.  The material found to the north of this entity is predominantly LNEB/LNBA and is in large quantities, however to the southern side of this entity there is a gap, an absence of finds, with the exception of a few discreet features/ findspots until  closer to Horseshoe Enclosure 2.  This entity would seem to suggest a wider division within the landscape of an area close to and associated with HE2 and the activity there and the activity to the north and associated with Late neolithic scatter1. Potentially demarcating settlement/ knapping  from a ritual zone.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 729006","TEC05",729006
955,"Penannular Gully 15","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 137103","WPR98",137103
955,"Penannular Gully 15","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 155095","WPR98",155095
955,"Penannular Gully 15","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 155114","WPR98",155114
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555872","PSH02",555872
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 555876","PSH02",555876
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578385","PSH02",578385
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578387","PSH02",578387
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578391","PSH02",578391
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578395","PSH02",578395
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578484","PSH02",578484
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578486","PSH02",578486
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 578497","PSH02",578497
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 589228","PSH02",589228
957,"Medieval Field 2","700 Medieval",,"This field is very similar to Medieval Field 1, and lies immediately to its west.  Again its southern boundary has not been exposed and undoubtedly lies beyond the excavation area.  This field has been created in a very similar manner to Medieval Field 1, and has the same orientation, with the main boundaries aligned NNE-SSW.  The field is at least 26 x 20 m in size, and probably larger.  The field boundaries have been created through a series of interrupted sditch or elongated pit segments, associated with post holes that probably formed continuous fence lines.  Thes boundaries were later formalised more concretely through continuous ditches cutting through the earlier segmentation.  There is  good deal of recutting and some of this formalisation may also date to the Medieval period, while the further expansion of the system seems to occur in post-medieval times.   Little material culture was retrieved from these ditch segments and therefore precise dating is difficult.  A gap of c. 0.75 m exists between the eastern boundary of Medieval Field 2 and the western boundary of Medieval Field 1.  This gap is undoubtedly too narrow to have provided access as a trackway.  It seems that these fields were created as separate entities, and they do not share boundaries.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 589238","PSH02",589238
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 401011","GAA00",401011
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 401065","GAA00",401065
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 401068","GAA00",401068
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 401071","GAA00",401071
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 401075","GAA00",401075
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 403030","GAA00",403030
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 403040","GAA00",403040
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 405038","GAA00",405038
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 405050","GAA00",405050
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAA00 - 405054","GAA00",405054
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 212086","GAI99",212086
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111049","WPR98",111049
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113032","WPR98",113032
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113036","WPR98",113036
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121130","WPR98",121130
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122035","WPR98",122035
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122036","WPR98",122036
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 124076","WPR98",124076
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128068","WPR98",128068
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129081","WPR98",129081
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129084","WPR98",129084
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130123","WPR98",130123
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130127","WPR98",130127
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130149","WPR98",130149
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136153","WPR98",136153
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 136156","WPR98",136156
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137044","WPR98",137044
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141033","WPR98",141033
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141038","WPR98",141038
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141056","WPR98",141056
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147056","WPR98",147056
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148063","WPR98",148063
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149139","WPR98",149139
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149141","WPR98",149141
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
959,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 6","300 Bronze Age",,"Field block bounded by WPR trackways 4 and 5. Heavily truncated, so little internal subdivision survives.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172057","WPR98",172057
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 962117","POK96",962117
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524202","PSH02",524202
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529198","PSH02",529198
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529210","PSH02",529210
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 569066","PSH02",569066
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 598027","PSH02",598027
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605003","PSH02",605003
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605005","PSH02",605005
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605007","PSH02",605007
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605009","PSH02",605009
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605011","PSH02",605011
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 128022","WPR98",128022
961,"JustPostStanwellCursusFeatures","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All features that seem to have been cut into Stanwell Cursus very shortly after the cursus ditch was cut.  In other words, the upper silting of these features and those of the cursus ditch are the same  suggesting that later silting of cursus and pits/ditches and post-holes were pretty much contemporary.  In particular this applies to clusters of post-holes in the area where there are two cursus profiles.  In all cases, these post-holes cut Profile I of the cursus on both east and west ditch sides and then are truncated by the Profile II cursus. ENTITY EDITED BY JSCL JUNE 2008","cdg","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 129013","WPR98",129013
964,"Neo intercutting pit complex Area 49 (PSH02)","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"Cluster of intercutting pits in Area 49.  Contain Grooved Ware and Peteborough Ware assemblage and located at the end of NE/SW cursus.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527117","PSH02",527117
964,"Neo intercutting pit complex Area 49 (PSH02)","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"Cluster of intercutting pits in Area 49.  Contain Grooved Ware and Peteborough Ware assemblage and located at the end of NE/SW cursus.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527124","PSH02",527124
964,"Neo intercutting pit complex Area 49 (PSH02)","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"Cluster of intercutting pits in Area 49.  Contain Grooved Ware and Peteborough Ware assemblage and located at the end of NE/SW cursus.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527135","PSH02",527135
964,"Neo intercutting pit complex Area 49 (PSH02)","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"Cluster of intercutting pits in Area 49.  Contain Grooved Ware and Peteborough Ware assemblage and located at the end of NE/SW cursus.","EN","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527142","PSH02",527142
968,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches north",,,"northern area of the sttlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961040","POK96",961040
968,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches north",,,"northern area of the sttlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961124","POK96",961124
968,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches north",,,"northern area of the sttlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961133","POK96",961133
968,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches north",,,"northern area of the sttlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962206","POK96",962206
968,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches north",,,"northern area of the sttlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962327","POK96",962327
968,"1a\medieval settlement\early ditches north",,,"northern area of the sttlement","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 591038","PSH02",591038
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103046","WPR98",103046
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 103054","WPR98",103054
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107149","WPR98",107149
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 112042","WPR98",112042
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119317","WPR98",119317
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119322","WPR98",119322
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149116","WPR98",149116
975,"Bronze Age trackway WPR 2","300 Bronze Age",,"BA trackway in WPR beds C and A for volume 1","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
979,"Neolithic/eba pit alignment",,,"line of poorly dated pits - contained some struck flint","fab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149153","WPR98",149153
979,"Neolithic/eba pit alignment",,,"line of poorly dated pits - contained some struck flint","fab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149155","WPR98",149155
979,"Neolithic/eba pit alignment",,,"line of poorly dated pits - contained some struck flint","fab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149168","WPR98",149168
979,"Neolithic/eba pit alignment",,,"line of poorly dated pits - contained some struck flint","fab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149170","WPR98",149170
979,"Neolithic/eba pit alignment",,,"line of poorly dated pits - contained some struck flint","fab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149172","WPR98",149172
979,"Neolithic/eba pit alignment",,,"line of poorly dated pits - contained some struck flint","fab","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149174","WPR98",149174
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222018","GAI99",222018
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222020","GAI99",222020
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222022","GAI99",222022
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222024","GAI99",222024
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222026","GAI99",222026
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222028","GAI99",222028
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222030","GAI99",222030
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222032","GAI99",222032
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222034","GAI99",222034
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222036","GAI99",222036
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222040","GAI99",222040
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222042","GAI99",222042
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222044","GAI99",222044
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222046","GAI99",222046
984,"Bronze Age Ntaxiway posthole group 1","300 Bronze Age",,"Group of post holes that probably formed a building in the NE corner of the excavated settlement area, next to ditch 212086. Two post holes produced a few sherds of Deverel-Rimbury Pottery.","JSCL","Analysis","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 222050","GAI99",222050
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222018","GAI99",222018
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222020","GAI99",222020
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222022","GAI99",222022
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222026","GAI99",222026
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222028","GAI99",222028
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222030","GAI99",222030
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222032","GAI99",222032
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222034","GAI99",222034
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222040","GAI99",222040
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222042","GAI99",222042
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222044","GAI99",222044
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222046","GAI99",222046
985,"Bronze Age structure 5 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","this entity links all postholes associated with this structure excavated on the NTW.","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 222050","GAI99",222050
986,"Neolithic C2 cursus Eastern Ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"Eastern ditch of C2 Landgrab cursus in bed B + pok96","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961741","POK96",961741
986,"Neolithic C2 cursus Eastern Ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"Eastern ditch of C2 Landgrab cursus in bed B + pok96","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 124043","WPR98",124043
986,"Neolithic C2 cursus Eastern Ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"Eastern ditch of C2 Landgrab cursus in bed B + pok96","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 137019","WPR98",137019
988,"Bronze Age structure 3 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links togethre the postholes which appear to form part of the posthole structure in the NTW","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 213042","GAI99",213042
988,"Bronze Age structure 3 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links togethre the postholes which appear to form part of the posthole structure in the NTW","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 213050","GAI99",213050
988,"Bronze Age structure 3 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links togethre the postholes which appear to form part of the posthole structure in the NTW","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 213052","GAI99",213052
988,"Bronze Age structure 3 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links togethre the postholes which appear to form part of the posthole structure in the NTW","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 213054","GAI99",213054
988,"Bronze Age structure 3 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links togethre the postholes which appear to form part of the posthole structure in the NTW","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 213056","GAI99",213056
988,"Bronze Age structure 3 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links togethre the postholes which appear to form part of the posthole structure in the NTW","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 213058","GAI99",213058
988,"Bronze Age structure 3 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links togethre the postholes which appear to form part of the posthole structure in the NTW","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 225041","GAI99",225041
988,"Bronze Age structure 3 on NTW","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"this entity links togethre the postholes which appear to form part of the posthole structure in the NTW","ab","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"GAI99 - 225043","GAI99",225043
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107109","WPR98",107109
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108043","WPR98",108043
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108045","WPR98",108045
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108048","WPR98",108048
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108050","WPR98",108050
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108055","WPR98",108055
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108057","WPR98",108057
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 108060","WPR98",108060
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 137244","WPR98",137244
989,"Bronze Age Land holding WPR 4 No track","300 Bronze Age",,"Same as LH 4 but without ditches from Trackways 2 and 3","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 176017","WPR98",176017
992,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2 north",,,"second phase ditches in the north of the settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961043","POK96",961043
992,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2 north",,,"second phase ditches in the north of the settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961044","POK96",961044
992,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2 north",,,"second phase ditches in the north of the settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961122","POK96",961122
992,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2 north",,,"second phase ditches in the north of the settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961126","POK96",961126
992,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2 north",,,"second phase ditches in the north of the settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961134","POK96",961134
992,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2 north",,,"second phase ditches in the north of the settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961502","POK96",961502
992,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2 north",,,"second phase ditches in the north of the settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961847","POK96",961847
992,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2 north",,,"second phase ditches in the north of the settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961855","POK96",961855
992,"1a\medieval settlement\ditches2 north",,,"second phase ditches in the north of the settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 591043","PSH02",591043
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 211030","GAI99",211030
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212055","GAI99",212055
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 212086","GAI99",212086
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214015","GAI99",214015
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 214075","GAI99",214075
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218004","GAI99",218004
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218023","GAI99",218023
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218058","GAI99",218058
994,"Bronze Age ditches on the northern taxiway 1","300 Bronze Age",,"this entity was created for the boundary ditches on the northern taxiway site to separate them from the fourth entity which covers the enclosed landscape in the east.","ab","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 218066","GAI99",218066
997,"1a\medieval settlement\middle are2",,,"middle ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529228","PSH02",529228
997,"1a\medieval settlement\middle are2",,,"middle ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529233","PSH02",529233
997,"1a\medieval settlement\middle are2",,,"middle ditches","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529239","PSH02",529239
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511119","PSH02",511119
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511121","PSH02",511121
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 532021","PSH02",532021
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555476","PSH02",555476
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555478","PSH02",555478
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555481","PSH02",555481
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555483","PSH02",555483
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555485","PSH02",555485
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555487","PSH02",555487
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555489","PSH02",555489
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555491","PSH02",555491
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555493","PSH02",555493
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555495","PSH02",555495
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555497","PSH02",555497
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555499","PSH02",555499
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559290","PSH02",559290
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559305","PSH02",559305
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559328","PSH02",559328
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575217","PSH02",575217
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591061","PSH02",591061
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593044","PSH02",593044
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598081","PSH02",598081
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598090","PSH02",598090
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598093","PSH02",598093
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636125","PSH02",636125
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 639085","PSH02",639085
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 671050","PSH02",671050
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 671053","PSH02",671053
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125034","WPR98",125034
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146039","WPR98",146039
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146043","WPR98",146043
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148029","WPR98",148029
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
998,"Settlement 4","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Collection of features inside (and including) large enclosure ditch.  Finds signature is indicative of settlement.","mal","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
999,"Plain Bowl Scatter4/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"Area of concentrated Plain Bowl and early Neolithic flint in south west part of Plain Bowl scatter2. Possible focus of settlement area?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 125108","WPR98",125108
999,"Plain Bowl Scatter4/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"Area of concentrated Plain Bowl and early Neolithic flint in south west part of Plain Bowl scatter2. Possible focus of settlement area?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 127069","WPR98",127069
999,"Plain Bowl Scatter4/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"Area of concentrated Plain Bowl and early Neolithic flint in south west part of Plain Bowl scatter2. Possible focus of settlement area?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 127073","WPR98",127073
999,"Plain Bowl Scatter4/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"Area of concentrated Plain Bowl and early Neolithic flint in south west part of Plain Bowl scatter2. Possible focus of settlement area?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
999,"Plain Bowl Scatter4/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"Area of concentrated Plain Bowl and early Neolithic flint in south west part of Plain Bowl scatter2. Possible focus of settlement area?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156169","WPR98",156169
999,"Plain Bowl Scatter4/Halfway btwn HE2+C1/Settlement","205 Early Neolithic",,"Area of concentrated Plain Bowl and early Neolithic flint in south west part of Plain Bowl scatter2. Possible focus of settlement area?","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 156191","WPR98",156191
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 963426","POK96",963426
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 515316","PSH02",515316
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 517247","PSH02",517247
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 517251","PSH02",517251
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 538227","PSH02",538227
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 538231","PSH02",538231
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 541152","PSH02",541152
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 575172","PSH02",575172
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 575219","PSH02",575219
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"PSH02 - 603053","PSH02",603053
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
1007,"Bronze Age Field System 2","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Large system of fields in the western part of the site and spatially located in association with the Stanwell cursus.  The east-west divisions of this field system cut across the ditch and central bank of the cursus monument, with the ditches becoming more segmented or rather truncated over the (positive) bank, implying that it was quite extant when the fields were created.  The general alignment of these fields suggest a close relationship with the cursus, and the orientation of the north-south boundaries meander to mirror the cursus alignment to some extent, and also to incorporate this monument more fully into the BA landscape.  This block of fields is associated with a settlement enclosure in the southernmost field.  It is divided into a series of six fields, all roughly the same size, with the east-west ditches forming the longer axes.  The field system expands in width from north to south (from 95 m to 125 m east-west).   The N-S extent of the system is 192 m.  Each field block is fairly evenly divided, averaging c. 32 m in a N-S direction.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","BAFieldSys",,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
1008,"Two post structure 2","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron date. May be doorposts","BSB","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122066","WPR98",122066
1008,"Two post structure 2","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron date. May be doorposts","BSB","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133136","WPR98",133136
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110042","WPR98",110042
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110058","WPR98",110058
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110078","WPR98",110078
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119352","WPR98",119352
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132085","WPR98",132085
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134046","WPR98",134046
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134056","WPR98",134056
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134058","WPR98",134058
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137070","WPR98",137070
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137127","WPR98",137127
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137129","WPR98",137129
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137134","WPR98",137134
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137136","WPR98",137136
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137138","WPR98",137138
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 138145","WPR98",138145
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 155061","WPR98",155061
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 155062","WPR98",155062
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 156047","WPR98",156047
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 156049","WPR98",156049
1009,"Enclosure E1","515 Early Romano-British",,"Middle Roman enclosure in area C2.","ab","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 167007","WPR98",167007
1014,"Penannular Gully 12","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1. Author suggests that features 107106 and 107107 are entrance features","lb","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 107100","WPR98",107100
1014,"Penannular Gully 12","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring ditch excavated in area C1. Author suggests that features 107106 and 107107 are entrance features","lb","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 107101","WPR98",107101
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"GAI99 - 218064","GAI99",218064
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107084","WPR98",107084
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110035","WPR98",110035
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110036","WPR98",110036
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110040","WPR98",110040
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111032","WPR98",111032
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111038","WPR98",111038
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111082","WPR98",111082
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 111125","WPR98",111125
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 112029","WPR98",112029
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119286","WPR98",119286
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122098","WPR98",122098
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122104","WPR98",122104
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127073","WPR98",127073
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128107","WPR98",128107
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128226","WPR98",128226
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128228","WPR98",128228
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128230","WPR98",128230
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129097","WPR98",129097
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130131","WPR98",130131
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130145","WPR98",130145
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130161","WPR98",130161
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140143","WPR98",140143
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148092","WPR98",148092
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151084","WPR98",151084
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151226","WPR98",151226
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159070","WPR98",159070
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159076","WPR98",159076
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161157","WPR98",161157
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161166","WPR98",161166
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166195","WPR98",166195
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 171065","WPR98",171065
1016,"Late Roman ladder enclosure (initial phase)","598 Late Romano-British",,"LRB ladder enclosure as first built, with no re-cuts","nc","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 171067","WPR98",171067
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 516066","PSH02",516066
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 521069","PSH02",521069
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 593190","PSH02",593190
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 593194","PSH02",593194
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 615138","PSH02",615138
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 642004","PSH02",642004
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 132266","WPR98",132266
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 132301","WPR98",132301
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 137114","WPR98",137114
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 148303","WPR98",148303
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 155116","WPR98",155116
1018,"Middle Iron Age Water-holes","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Middle Iron Age waterholes shown in figure 4.02 of Volume 2. Two features shown in the publication figure (within the confines of the C2 cursus may be mistakes as one does not appear to have been excavated and the other is part of the bronze age field system","nad","Publication","Detailed","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 178015","WPR98",178015
1019,"Bronze Age Field 11","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Not sure exactly how this field worked, since southern return is impossible to discern.  However, appears to represent a partial rectangular field aligned roughly N-S and closely associated with droveways in this area.  Situated north of Field 10. Slightly off-set entrance noted on western side of field, providing access to the droveway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 531101","PSH02",531101
1019,"Bronze Age Field 11","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Not sure exactly how this field worked, since southern return is impossible to discern.  However, appears to represent a partial rectangular field aligned roughly N-S and closely associated with droveways in this area.  Situated north of Field 10. Slightly off-set entrance noted on western side of field, providing access to the droveway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 531121","PSH02",531121
1019,"Bronze Age Field 11","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Not sure exactly how this field worked, since southern return is impossible to discern.  However, appears to represent a partial rectangular field aligned roughly N-S and closely associated with droveways in this area.  Situated north of Field 10. Slightly off-set entrance noted on western side of field, providing access to the droveway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 531123","PSH02",531123
1019,"Bronze Age Field 11","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Not sure exactly how this field worked, since southern return is impossible to discern.  However, appears to represent a partial rectangular field aligned roughly N-S and closely associated with droveways in this area.  Situated north of Field 10. Slightly off-set entrance noted on western side of field, providing access to the droveway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542393","PSH02",542393
1019,"Bronze Age Field 11","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Not sure exactly how this field worked, since southern return is impossible to discern.  However, appears to represent a partial rectangular field aligned roughly N-S and closely associated with droveways in this area.  Situated north of Field 10. Slightly off-set entrance noted on western side of field, providing access to the droveway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 542394","PSH02",542394
1019,"Bronze Age Field 11","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Not sure exactly how this field worked, since southern return is impossible to discern.  However, appears to represent a partial rectangular field aligned roughly N-S and closely associated with droveways in this area.  Situated north of Field 10. Slightly off-set entrance noted on western side of field, providing access to the droveway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582337","PSH02",582337
1019,"Bronze Age Field 11","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Not sure exactly how this field worked, since southern return is impossible to discern.  However, appears to represent a partial rectangular field aligned roughly N-S and closely associated with droveways in this area.  Situated north of Field 10. Slightly off-set entrance noted on western side of field, providing access to the droveway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582340","PSH02",582340
1019,"Bronze Age Field 11","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Not sure exactly how this field worked, since southern return is impossible to discern.  However, appears to represent a partial rectangular field aligned roughly N-S and closely associated with droveways in this area.  Situated north of Field 10. Slightly off-set entrance noted on western side of field, providing access to the droveway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582347","PSH02",582347
1019,"Bronze Age Field 11","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Not sure exactly how this field worked, since southern return is impossible to discern.  However, appears to represent a partial rectangular field aligned roughly N-S and closely associated with droveways in this area.  Situated north of Field 10. Slightly off-set entrance noted on western side of field, providing access to the droveway.","cdg","Analysis","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 582351","PSH02",582351
1026,"Penannular Gully 2","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully. The eastern half including the probable entrance way were excavated during WPR98 with the remainder of the structure excavated during PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The likely construction date is the Middle Iron Age with the majority of interventions producing pottery of Middle Iron Age date. A single intervention at the junction with a later waterhole produced Late Iron Age and Romano-British pottery. This however is judged to be intrusive.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"PSH02 - 523193","PSH02",523193
1026,"Penannular Gully 2","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully. The eastern half including the probable entrance way were excavated during WPR98 with the remainder of the structure excavated during PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The likely construction date is the Middle Iron Age with the majority of interventions producing pottery of Middle Iron Age date. A single intervention at the junction with a later waterhole produced Late Iron Age and Romano-British pottery. This however is judged to be intrusive.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134101","WPR98",134101
1026,"Penannular Gully 2","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully. The eastern half including the probable entrance way were excavated during WPR98 with the remainder of the structure excavated during PSH02. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The likely construction date is the Middle Iron Age with the majority of interventions producing pottery of Middle Iron Age date. A single intervention at the junction with a later waterhole produced Late Iron Age and Romano-British pottery. This however is judged to be intrusive.","ab","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 160254","WPR98",160254
1027,"Roman Building B1","500 Romano-British",,"RB building in C1","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 113079","WPR98",113079
1027,"Roman Building B1","500 Romano-British",,"RB building in C1","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 126121","WPR98",126121
1027,"Roman Building B1","500 Romano-British",,"RB building in C1","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 126129","WPR98",126129
1027,"Roman Building B1","500 Romano-British",,"RB building in C1","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 126135","WPR98",126135
1027,"Roman Building B1","500 Romano-British",,"RB building in C1","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 126137","WPR98",126137
1027,"Roman Building B1","500 Romano-British",,"RB building in C1","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 148155","WPR98",148155
1040,"Neolithic landscape (Late) PSH02","225 Late Neolithic",,"All features including monuments that date and relate to the Late Neolithic components of the landscape revealed during PSH02 excavations","cdg","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 528117","PSH02",528117
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128344","WPR98",128344
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128346","WPR98",128346
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128352","WPR98",128352
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 128354","WPR98",128354
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134180","WPR98",134180
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134182","WPR98",134182
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134184","WPR98",134184
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134186","WPR98",134186
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134188","WPR98",134188
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134191","WPR98",134191
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134193","WPR98",134193
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134195","WPR98",134195
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134197","WPR98",134197
1042,"Penannular Gully 14","420 Middle Iron Age",,"MIA ring gully in southern enclosure","nc","Publication","Monument","Detailed",,"WPR98 - 134199","WPR98",134199
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 960601","POK96",960601
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 516083","PSH02",516083
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 516085","PSH02",516085
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523193","PSH02",523193
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523311","PSH02",523311
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526451","PSH02",526451
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527374","PSH02",527374
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537184","PSH02",537184
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538332","PSH02",538332
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538334","PSH02",538334
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538336","PSH02",538336
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538338","PSH02",538338
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538340","PSH02",538340
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538346","PSH02",538346
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539306","PSH02",539306
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539396","PSH02",539396
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539444","PSH02",539444
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539446","PSH02",539446
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539448","PSH02",539448
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542372","PSH02",542372
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546402","PSH02",546402
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546407","PSH02",546407
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546413","PSH02",546413
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550053","PSH02",550053
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550055","PSH02",550055
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550059","PSH02",550059
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550061","PSH02",550061
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550063","PSH02",550063
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550066","PSH02",550066
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550083","PSH02",550083
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550096","PSH02",550096
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559457","PSH02",559457
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559458","PSH02",559458
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 559459","PSH02",559459
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561064","PSH02",561064
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561067","PSH02",561067
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569164","PSH02",569164
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569166","PSH02",569166
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569168","PSH02",569168
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570182","PSH02",570182
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 574040","PSH02",574040
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575004","PSH02",575004
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575006","PSH02",575006
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575028","PSH02",575028
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 577003","PSH02",577003
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578532","PSH02",578532
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578534","PSH02",578534
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 579247","PSH02",579247
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582441","PSH02",582441
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582442","PSH02",582442
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582443","PSH02",582443
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592377","PSH02",592377
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593158","PSH02",593158
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593165","PSH02",593165
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 595051","PSH02",595051
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 599133","PSH02",599133
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 605190","PSH02",605190
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 605194","PSH02",605194
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614140","PSH02",614140
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614156","PSH02",614156
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614171","PSH02",614171
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614175","PSH02",614175
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614177","PSH02",614177
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614227","PSH02",614227
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615151","PSH02",615151
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615155","PSH02",615155
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615165","PSH02",615165
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615167","PSH02",615167
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615169","PSH02",615169
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615171","PSH02",615171
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615173","PSH02",615173
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615175","PSH02",615175
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615186","PSH02",615186
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615188","PSH02",615188
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615194","PSH02",615194
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615196","PSH02",615196
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615198","PSH02",615198
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 623028","PSH02",623028
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 623035","PSH02",623035
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626052","PSH02",626052
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626054","PSH02",626054
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626084","PSH02",626084
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626085","PSH02",626085
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626086","PSH02",626086
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626088","PSH02",626088
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 632089","PSH02",632089
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633062","PSH02",633062
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633086","PSH02",633086
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633088","PSH02",633088
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633090","PSH02",633090
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633092","PSH02",633092
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633094","PSH02",633094
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633096","PSH02",633096
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633098","PSH02",633098
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636013","PSH02",636013
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636118","PSH02",636118
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636126","PSH02",636126
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636130","PSH02",636130
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636144","PSH02",636144
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636147","PSH02",636147
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636149","PSH02",636149
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641044","PSH02",641044
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641046","PSH02",641046
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641048","PSH02",641048
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641050","PSH02",641050
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641055","PSH02",641055
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641057","PSH02",641057
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641073","PSH02",641073
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 642004","PSH02",642004
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 646018","PSH02",646018
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 648078","PSH02",648078
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 648108","PSH02",648108
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 648110","PSH02",648110
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 649010","PSH02",649010
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 653026","PSH02",653026
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 653082","PSH02",653082
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654038","PSH02",654038
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654040","PSH02",654040
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654042","PSH02",654042
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654044","PSH02",654044
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654046","PSH02",654046
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 655146","PSH02",655146
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 658192","PSH02",658192
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 660069","PSH02",660069
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662038","PSH02",662038
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662040","PSH02",662040
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662044","PSH02",662044
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662046","PSH02",662046
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662048","PSH02",662048
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662052","PSH02",662052
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662054","PSH02",662054
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662056","PSH02",662056
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662058","PSH02",662058
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662060","PSH02",662060
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662062","PSH02",662062
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662065","PSH02",662065
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662069","PSH02",662069
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662075","PSH02",662075
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663012","PSH02",663012
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663050","PSH02",663050
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663066","PSH02",663066
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663108","PSH02",663108
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663113","PSH02",663113
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 670043","PSH02",670043
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 673037","PSH02",673037
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 673039","PSH02",673039
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 673043","PSH02",673043
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 675023","PSH02",675023
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 675025","PSH02",675025
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 675027","PSH02",675027
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 675030","PSH02",675030
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 675032","PSH02",675032
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 675042","PSH02",675042
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 675044","PSH02",675044
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 679069","PSH02",679069
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 680101","PSH02",680101
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107097","WPR98",107097
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107098","WPR98",107098
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107099","WPR98",107099
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107100","WPR98",107100
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107101","WPR98",107101
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107102","WPR98",107102
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107103","WPR98",107103
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107106","WPR98",107106
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107107","WPR98",107107
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107108","WPR98",107108
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108008","WPR98",108008
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108011","WPR98",108011
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108014","WPR98",108014
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108018","WPR98",108018
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108020","WPR98",108020
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108022","WPR98",108022
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108025","WPR98",108025
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108053","WPR98",108053
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 112021","WPR98",112021
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 112025","WPR98",112025
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113098","WPR98",113098
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113103","WPR98",113103
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113114","WPR98",113114
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113117","WPR98",113117
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113129","WPR98",113129
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113150","WPR98",113150
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113166","WPR98",113166
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113173","WPR98",113173
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113181","WPR98",113181
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 119188","WPR98",119188
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 120107","WPR98",120107
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121219","WPR98",121219
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121225","WPR98",121225
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121227","WPR98",121227
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121229","WPR98",121229
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121231","WPR98",121231
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121233","WPR98",121233
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122066","WPR98",122066
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122068","WPR98",122068
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 124167","WPR98",124167
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 124179","WPR98",124179
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125123","WPR98",125123
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125126","WPR98",125126
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125156","WPR98",125156
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125168","WPR98",125168
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125171","WPR98",125171
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125174","WPR98",125174
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125176","WPR98",125176
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125178","WPR98",125178
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125184","WPR98",125184
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 125186","WPR98",125186
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126091","WPR98",126091
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126103","WPR98",126103
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126105","WPR98",126105
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126109","WPR98",126109
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126113","WPR98",126113
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126123","WPR98",126123
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126127","WPR98",126127
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126139","WPR98",126139
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126155","WPR98",126155
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127172","WPR98",127172
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127174","WPR98",127174
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127176","WPR98",127176
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127178","WPR98",127178
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127180","WPR98",127180
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127182","WPR98",127182
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127191","WPR98",127191
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127196","WPR98",127196
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 127217","WPR98",127217
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128119","WPR98",128119
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128138","WPR98",128138
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128170","WPR98",128170
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128172","WPR98",128172
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128174","WPR98",128174
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128176","WPR98",128176
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128178","WPR98",128178
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128180","WPR98",128180
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128182","WPR98",128182
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128344","WPR98",128344
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128346","WPR98",128346
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128348","WPR98",128348
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128350","WPR98",128350
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128352","WPR98",128352
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130097","WPR98",130097
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130115","WPR98",130115
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130246","WPR98",130246
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130248","WPR98",130248
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130250","WPR98",130250
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132146","WPR98",132146
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133056","WPR98",133056
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133059","WPR98",133059
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133086","WPR98",133086
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133119","WPR98",133119
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133123","WPR98",133123
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133125","WPR98",133125
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133127","WPR98",133127
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133129","WPR98",133129
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133134","WPR98",133134
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133136","WPR98",133136
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134064","WPR98",134064
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134066","WPR98",134066
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134101","WPR98",134101
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134110","WPR98",134110
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134112","WPR98",134112
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134114","WPR98",134114
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134118","WPR98",134118
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134120","WPR98",134120
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134122","WPR98",134122
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134170","WPR98",134170
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134180","WPR98",134180
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134182","WPR98",134182
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134186","WPR98",134186
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134188","WPR98",134188
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134193","WPR98",134193
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134195","WPR98",134195
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134197","WPR98",134197
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134199","WPR98",134199
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134204","WPR98",134204
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137103","WPR98",137103
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140064","WPR98",140064
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140066","WPR98",140066
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140068","WPR98",140068
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140072","WPR98",140072
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140074","WPR98",140074
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140076","WPR98",140076
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140078","WPR98",140078
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140080","WPR98",140080
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140082","WPR98",140082
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140084","WPR98",140084
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140112","WPR98",140112
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 140118","WPR98",140118
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146131","WPR98",146131
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146133","WPR98",146133
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146145","WPR98",146145
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146149","WPR98",146149
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146184","WPR98",146184
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146220","WPR98",146220
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146254","WPR98",146254
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146256","WPR98",146256
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146258","WPR98",146258
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146272","WPR98",146272
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146283","WPR98",146283
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146293","WPR98",146293
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146304","WPR98",146304
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146321","WPR98",146321
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147136","WPR98",147136
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147189","WPR98",147189
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147215","WPR98",147215
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147298","WPR98",147298
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147300","WPR98",147300
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147302","WPR98",147302
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147310","WPR98",147310
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147314","WPR98",147314
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147317","WPR98",147317
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147327","WPR98",147327
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147329","WPR98",147329
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147331","WPR98",147331
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147334","WPR98",147334
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147336","WPR98",147336
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147338","WPR98",147338
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148121","WPR98",148121
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148138","WPR98",148138
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148140","WPR98",148140
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148157","WPR98",148157
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148161","WPR98",148161
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148167","WPR98",148167
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148175","WPR98",148175
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148217","WPR98",148217
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148219","WPR98",148219
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148224","WPR98",148224
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148226","WPR98",148226
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148228","WPR98",148228
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148234","WPR98",148234
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148236","WPR98",148236
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148345","WPR98",148345
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149108","WPR98",149108
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149114","WPR98",149114
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149197","WPR98",149197
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149199","WPR98",149199
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149203","WPR98",149203
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149205","WPR98",149205
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149207","WPR98",149207
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149209","WPR98",149209
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151143","WPR98",151143
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151145","WPR98",151145
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 155095","WPR98",155095
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 155114","WPR98",155114
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157127","WPR98",157127
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157131","WPR98",157131
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157133","WPR98",157133
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 157139","WPR98",157139
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 158103","WPR98",158103
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 158105","WPR98",158105
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 158143","WPR98",158143
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 158148","WPR98",158148
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 158160","WPR98",158160
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 158163","WPR98",158163
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159123","WPR98",159123
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160239","WPR98",160239
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160241","WPR98",160241
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160243","WPR98",160243
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160245","WPR98",160245
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160254","WPR98",160254
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 163078","WPR98",163078
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 163082","WPR98",163082
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166088","WPR98",166088
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166094","WPR98",166094
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166096","WPR98",166096
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166098","WPR98",166098
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166101","WPR98",166101
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166112","WPR98",166112
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166117","WPR98",166117
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166162","WPR98",166162
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166164","WPR98",166164
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166166","WPR98",166166
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166168","WPR98",166168
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166170","WPR98",166170
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 167037","WPR98",167037
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 167141","WPR98",167141
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 170031","WPR98",170031
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172012","WPR98",172012
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172014","WPR98",172014
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172018","WPR98",172018
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172032","WPR98",172032
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 172083","WPR98",172083
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 175012","WPR98",175012
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 180003","WPR98",180003
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 182048","WPR98",182048
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 183050","WPR98",183050
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184007","WPR98",184007
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184009","WPR98",184009
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184023","WPR98",184023
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184026","WPR98",184026
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184028","WPR98",184028
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184030","WPR98",184030
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184032","WPR98",184032
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184034","WPR98",184034
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184036","WPR98",184036
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 184038","WPR98",184038
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 185009","WPR98",185009
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 185011","WPR98",185011
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 185013","WPR98",185013
1044,"1A\Nucleated Settlement\ All Settlement Features",,,"All features of the LBA to ERB settlement area.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 188020","WPR98",188020
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528154","PSH02",528154
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542227","PSH02",542227
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 542228","PSH02",542228
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 543201","PSH02",543201
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544061","PSH02",544061
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544069","PSH02",544069
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 544092","PSH02",544092
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 548053","PSH02",548053
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551163","PSH02",551163
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554208","PSH02",554208
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 554230","PSH02",554230
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 579172","PSH02",579172
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582132","PSH02",582132
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582137","PSH02",582137
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582139","PSH02",582139
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582141","PSH02",582141
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582143","PSH02",582143
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594057","PSH02",594057
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594060","PSH02",594060
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594074","PSH02",594074
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594091","PSH02",594091
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594109","PSH02",594109
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594112","PSH02",594112
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594114","PSH02",594114
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594115","PSH02",594115
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594116","PSH02",594116
1050,"10028 Middle to late Bronze Age enclosures","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"The Middle to Late Bronze Age enclosures **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Site 72 appears to have been a focus of occupation during the Middle to Late Bronze Age period. A number of artefacts dated to this period were retrieved with the main focus located centrally to the site.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *The enclosure ditches **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The ditches dated to the Middle to Late BA appear to form a system of two associated enclosures, a northern and a southern one. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A ditch system, composed of a N-S ditch turning E-W (SG 594116) could be part of a northern enclosure, and seems to reference the possible earlier system mentioned in entity 10027. A terminus has been identified at the northern end of this ditch, possibly for an entranceway to the northern enclosure. Another ditch running to the south of the previous one is located on the same alignment, possibly forming another entranceway (SG 594109), maybe part of another enclosure associated with the first one but of different function/activity. Two small re-cuts have been identified through SG 594116, one at the northern end (SG 594120) and one to the east (OG 594060). No dating evidence came out of these re-cuts but they must have been dug while the enclosure was still in use, maybe towards the Late Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** At the corner of SG 594114, a gap with SG 594109 forms an entranceway to the southern enclosure. Five phases of use and development of this entrance have been identified (see figure below). The first phase is a pit (SG 594115) prior to the enclosure, then the two enclosure ditches SG 594120 and SG 594109 were established, probably at the same time, forming an entranceway. At a later date, possibly a few generations later (SG 594109 has at least started to silt up) the access through this entranceway was restricted by a small gully (SG 594112) running N-S up to the northern terminus of SG 594109.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Phase 4 is composed of a tree-throw possibly cleared before the access was completely blocked by a series of 3 postholes ([594057], [594074], [594091]) which could have supported a fence line or similar structure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** SG 594109 is truncated at its southern extremity by a post-medieval ditch, but seems to prolong its course to the south of this one (numbered [542228]). A re-cut  ([542227]) has been identified in this latter part of the ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** A modern area of disturbance truncates the ditch making it unclear if this one terminates, turns to the east or runs further south. Another ditch (SG 542260), with a re-cut, runs to the south of the modern truncation but its profile, sequence of deposition, alignment (offset from [542228]) and lack of dating evidence do not allow an obvious association with the BA N-S ditch alignment. Another ditch running E-W (SG 556124) is another possible associated linear, however, the lack of physical relationships due to modern truncation and the lack of dating from this ditch, do not confirm its association with the BA enclosure. The eastern limits of these enclosures remain unknown mainly due to modern truncation, services and the presence of the Wessex Road. To the north, on area 73, a fragment of ditch orientated E-W (SG 546024) could also be the northern limit of the enclosure, but once again, no dating evidence came from this ditch. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Discovery of a late Bronze Age sherd of pottery within the top fill of SG 580028 infers that this NE-SW alignment was still in use in association with the enclosures. Although the recovery of this dating evidence seems to indicate that this ditch belongs to a late phase of use, the slightly different alignment from the BA enclosures and other evidence presented in the previous section suggests that this NE-SW alignment was established first. It would therefore have still been in use throughout the Bronze Age either through ditches being continuously re-cut, possibly to the same depth or through the existence and preservation of positive features such as banks and hedgerows. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Various discrete features have been identified around this area including five pits ([543201], [544069], [579172], [544061], SG 510044), three waterholes ([528154], SG 544092], SG 551006), four elongated ‘pits’ of indeterminate function ([582132], [554230], SG 551163, SG 548053) and four possible postholes ([582141], [582143], [582137], [582139]). The following section examines the evidence and artefacts associated with these features. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Pits and waterholes **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Out of the five pits mentioned above only one was external to the enclosure system. Three of the pits within the enclosures contained secure dating evidence. No artefact was recovered from the fourth one ([544069]), however, it was cut through a waterhole dated to the Middle Bronze Age, which gives a terminus ante-quem for this feature. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Two of the pits contained placed deposits of Deverel Rimbury Barrel urns at the bottom, evidence of ritual deposition, possibly associated with the abandonment of these features. One of these pits also contained a number of flint tools and a saddle quern fragment. The depth and sequence of deposition of these pits suggest they were utilised as wells or waterhole-type features, showing once again the ritual significance of this type of feature for the people of the Bronze Age.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The pit located outside the northern enclosure was dated to the same period. This pit seems to have also been also a well-type feature although it could have been used at a later date as a rubbish pit for dumping of organic material which is still visible in the deposition sequence of the section. A further 3 pits, 2 cutting through the earlier L-shape ditch discussed previously and a third one ([582008]) located in between ditch segments of the SW-NE alignment, have been identified. They did not produce any dating but are very similar to the Middle Bronze Age pits and are likely to belong to the same phase.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Three waterholes were also identified, one was located within the northern enclosure, on area 73 and two were situated in the southern enclosure. They all contained good dating evidence from the Middle Bronze Age. A fourth waterhole, from the same period, was identified in the south-west corner of the site, away from the enclosures. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** *Structural remains? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several features dug on site and located in the enclosures could be the remains of structures associated with the occupation of the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Four elongated pits were identified, located on either sides of the middle Bronze Age E-W enclosure ditch. They are all devoid of any dating evidence however, they all seem to respect this ditch (they are very close but do not have a physical relationship with the latter). The northern terminus of SG 548053 stopped just a short distance from the E-W enclosure ditch, which could be a coincidence but seems very likely to indicate an association/contemporaneity between these features. These elongated pits could possibly be of a structural nature, possibly with associated postholes, which would have been lost to truncation. Similar features have been excavated on area 49 in the BA settlement area. The only structural evidence found in the enclosure on site 72 are four very truncated postholes, apparently associated together, located to the north of SG 551163. These postholes are only about 0.10-0.15m deep but of very regular shape. They are too ephemeral to allow definitive interpretation relating to their function, however they do prove the presence of structural elements in the enclosure system and their shallow nature also shows that other postholes could have been completely truncated away.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The elongated pits may represent one structural element of otherwise truncated animal pens (fowl/poultry or other small animals) located within the enclosure or could have been used as segmented fences (but no evidence of posthole cuts within the fills). They could have held a row of posts or wicker hurdles, maybe to create internal partitions within the enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** On area 73, a possible ring gully has been identified. Three very truncated segments (depth varies between 0.05 and 0.11m) forming a sub-circular shape have been excavated. No dating evidence was recovered, however, this feature is located well within the northern enclosure and therefore likely to be associated with the middle-late Bronze Age occupation. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** * Settlement enclosures? **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The concentration of features in this specific area and the abundance and nature of the finds suggest these enclosures are linked to a settlement area, probably established around the Middle Bronze Age and through to the Late Bronze Age. The associated ditches described above possibly form the western boundary of the settlement enclosure, the total extent of which is unknown. The Structural remains are rare, possibly represented by the undated ‘post-holes’, sterile ‘elongated’ pits and truncated ring gully. The lack of structures may however be due to the level of truncation of the site. These possible structural remains seem to be mainly concentrated within the northern enclosure, whereas pits and waterholes are more numerous in the southern enclosure. This spatial distribution may correspond to specific activity areas, different in each enclosure. If these enclosures compose the settlement area, it is likely that the settlement (buildings) itself was located in the northern enclosure while the associated southern enclosure may have been used for the domestic animals and related activities. If the settlement is near these enclosures, but not actually on areas 72 and 73, they could have enclosed for specialised activities such as domestic industry (textiles, pottery, metalwork etc), storage etc. However, the actual remains present on site do not really allow to determine what it may have been. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Several environmental samples (bulk, monoliths) were taken from various features in an attempt to gain information regarding the natural environment and specific activities that may have taken place in the enclosures area. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This area appears different from other settlement areas discovered across the Perry Oaks landscape and more difficult to link into the overall landscape, partly due to the isolated location of this site. The settlement on area 72 seems to develop in a more open landscape, contrary to the settlement enclosure on area 49, for example, which is associated, at least to the west, to a structured field system. The lagoon area has destroyed any remains to the north of site 73, which explains the present isolation of these sites. It is possible that the Bronze Age trackway characterised in WPR 98 and also identified on area 75 was leading to this settlement area, linking this one to the Bronze Age fields to the east of the mentioned trackway. The southern extent of the BA trackway has not been identified, as the lagoon beds to the south of area 75 truncate it. No trackway was exposed on area 73. Therefore, there are two possibilities: either the BAtrackway terminates between sites 75 and 73, or it continues on a more eastern alignment. In both cases, it most certainly links area 72 settlement area to other parts of the landscape.  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The area to the west of the enclosures boundary has revealed a few Bronze Age features, including a large waterhole and an earlier segmented ditch system which seem to have survived and was still utilised in the division of the Middle Bronze Age landscape. This space to the west of the settlement area does not however compose a very enclosed field system as identified on WPR 98. It appears to be a possible communal ‘semi-open’ area. The SW-NE segmented ditches present, in places, some similarities with the segmented ditch excavated on Area 75 to the west of the BA trackway. This segmented ditch was on the same alignment as the one noted on area 72 and was devoid of finds apart from one segment (SG 525052) which contained large quantities of Deverel Rimbury pottery. Therefore making this segmented ditch on Area 75, contemporary to the establishment of the BA enclosures on site 72. It is possible however that the various segments belonged to different phases, following a similar pattern to the segmented ditch system on area 72. It is possible that both segmented ditch systems have served a similar purpose, possibly providing the northern and southern extents to a large delimited area.","548","Excavation","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 594120","PSH02",594120
1052,"Plain Bowl Scatter5/SW of site/monument?","205 Early Neolithic",,"Plain pottery was retrieved from a rather badly truncated curvilinear gully feature.  This may have originally been a more circular feature - and possibly represented a small monument.  It is likely coincidental that the BA field system appears to be aligned on this feature (576027), but it may not be coincidental that subsequent Neolithic activity of Peterborough and generally Later Neolithic date focussed around this locale.  To the south another pit/ treethrow also containe a number of sherds of Plain Bowl pottery in conjunction with Mesolithic and Neolithic flints. It is possible that these features were roughly contemporary.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511067","PSH02",511067
1052,"Plain Bowl Scatter5/SW of site/monument?","205 Early Neolithic",,"Plain pottery was retrieved from a rather badly truncated curvilinear gully feature.  This may have originally been a more circular feature - and possibly represented a small monument.  It is likely coincidental that the BA field system appears to be aligned on this feature (576027), but it may not be coincidental that subsequent Neolithic activity of Peterborough and generally Later Neolithic date focussed around this locale.  To the south another pit/ treethrow also containe a number of sherds of Plain Bowl pottery in conjunction with Mesolithic and Neolithic flints. It is possible that these features were roughly contemporary.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 576027","PSH02",576027
1053,"Peterborough Ware Scatter3/SW part of site","215 Middle Neolithic",,"A pit containing Peterborough Ware pottery associated with flints in the immediate vicinity of the Plain Bowl curvilinear feature (which may represent a badly truncated ring gully/ horseshoe monument).  Also a few sherds of Peterborough Ware pottery were retrieved from the curvilinear gully.  It would be worth checking for refits between these sherds and pit 574003 to see if they all form part of the same vessel.  The Peterborough Ware from the curvilinear gully may be intrusive or it may indicate that this feature was utilised during both the Plain Bowl Ware and Peterborough Ware periods.  It is unlikely that it is a coincidence that pit 574003 is located where it is - it is likely referencing the earlier ?monument/feature.  Certainly this spot in the landscape did form a focus for activity during the Early and Middle Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 574003","PSH02",574003
1053,"Peterborough Ware Scatter3/SW part of site","215 Middle Neolithic",,"A pit containing Peterborough Ware pottery associated with flints in the immediate vicinity of the Plain Bowl curvilinear feature (which may represent a badly truncated ring gully/ horseshoe monument).  Also a few sherds of Peterborough Ware pottery were retrieved from the curvilinear gully.  It would be worth checking for refits between these sherds and pit 574003 to see if they all form part of the same vessel.  The Peterborough Ware from the curvilinear gully may be intrusive or it may indicate that this feature was utilised during both the Plain Bowl Ware and Peterborough Ware periods.  It is unlikely that it is a coincidence that pit 574003 is located where it is - it is likely referencing the earlier ?monument/feature.  Certainly this spot in the landscape did form a focus for activity during the Early and Middle Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 576027","PSH02",576027
1054,"Beaker/Collared Urn Scatter1/SW part of site","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Scatter of Beaker/Collared Urn pottery coming from BA enclosure or field system in SW part of site  in Area 51.  Does it indicate an early date for the creation of the field system in this area? Since Beaker/Collared Urn material is generally rather rare across this part of the Heathrow landscape, it s presence in Area 51 is made all the more significant.  A small sherd south of this focus in ditches (comprising 10 sherds)  came from a pit and although is likely residual, indicates activity of this date to the south of the enclosure","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 541123","PSH02",541123
1054,"Beaker/Collared Urn Scatter1/SW part of site","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Scatter of Beaker/Collared Urn pottery coming from BA enclosure or field system in SW part of site  in Area 51.  Does it indicate an early date for the creation of the field system in this area? Since Beaker/Collared Urn material is generally rather rare across this part of the Heathrow landscape, it s presence in Area 51 is made all the more significant.  A small sherd south of this focus in ditches (comprising 10 sherds)  came from a pit and although is likely residual, indicates activity of this date to the south of the enclosure","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 559137","PSH02",559137
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511067","PSH02",511067
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511069","PSH02",511069
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 511089","PSH02",511089
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541119","PSH02",541119
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 541123","PSH02",541123
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 552093","PSH02",552093
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558072","PSH02",558072
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559075","PSH02",559075
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559078","PSH02",559078
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559083","PSH02",559083
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559086","PSH02",559086
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559137","PSH02",559137
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559139","PSH02",559139
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559165","PSH02",559165
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559166","PSH02",559166
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559183","PSH02",559183
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559361","PSH02",559361
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 571061","PSH02",571061
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 572041","PSH02",572041
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 573052","PSH02",573052
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 574003","PSH02",574003
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575081","PSH02",575081
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 576027","PSH02",576027
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 576030","PSH02",576030
1055,"Neolithic Scatter 19/SW part of the Site","210 Early or Middle Neolithic",,"A widespread scatter of Neolithic material that includes Plain Bowl Ware features, Peterborough Ware features and more general Neolithic lithic material in the south-western part of the Site (Area 51).  This implies a long chronological span for a focus of activity throughout the Neolithic in this particular zone.  Some of the material was certainly in situ, while other material was residual but the large quantities of flint finds (e.g. arrowhead and scrapers) underlines the importance of this zone for a number of activities (domestic, ritual, etc) during the Neolithic.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 576043","PSH02",576043
1056,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit group 5","700 Medieval",,"group of pits immediately west of pit cluster 3","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509115","PSH02",509115
1056,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit group 5","700 Medieval",,"group of pits immediately west of pit cluster 3","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 509116","PSH02",509116
1056,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit group 5","700 Medieval",,"group of pits immediately west of pit cluster 3","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538289","PSH02",538289
1056,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit group 5","700 Medieval",,"group of pits immediately west of pit cluster 3","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578397","PSH02",578397
1056,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit group 5","700 Medieval",,"group of pits immediately west of pit cluster 3","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578398","PSH02",578398
1056,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit group 5","700 Medieval",,"group of pits immediately west of pit cluster 3","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578399","PSH02",578399
1056,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit group 5","700 Medieval",,"group of pits immediately west of pit cluster 3","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578407","PSH02",578407
1056,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\pit group 5","700 Medieval",,"group of pits immediately west of pit cluster 3","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 581212","PSH02",581212
1057,"LBA BlockingDitches/Trackway2","325 Late Bronze Age",," This entity is an attempt to gather all those ditches which clearly block access to or from BA fields and trackways. At this time (15/12/05) it only includes ditches blocking gaps associated with trackway 2, hence title, so this entity may in the future be renamed and/or subsumed in a larger landscape wide 'gap blocking' entity.  Appears to block movement from field 10 to field 1 and direct movement N/S along trackway.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 107149","WPR98",107149
1057,"LBA BlockingDitches/Trackway2","325 Late Bronze Age",," This entity is an attempt to gather all those ditches which clearly block access to or from BA fields and trackways. At this time (15/12/05) it only includes ditches blocking gaps associated with trackway 2, hence title, so this entity may in the future be renamed and/or subsumed in a larger landscape wide 'gap blocking' entity.  Appears to block movement from field 10 to field 1 and direct movement N/S along trackway.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
1057,"LBA BlockingDitches/Trackway2","325 Late Bronze Age",," This entity is an attempt to gather all those ditches which clearly block access to or from BA fields and trackways. At this time (15/12/05) it only includes ditches blocking gaps associated with trackway 2, hence title, so this entity may in the future be renamed and/or subsumed in a larger landscape wide 'gap blocking' entity.  Appears to block movement from field 10 to field 1 and direct movement N/S along trackway.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156143","WPR98",156143
1057,"LBA BlockingDitches/Trackway2","325 Late Bronze Age",," This entity is an attempt to gather all those ditches which clearly block access to or from BA fields and trackways. At this time (15/12/05) it only includes ditches blocking gaps associated with trackway 2, hence title, so this entity may in the future be renamed and/or subsumed in a larger landscape wide 'gap blocking' entity.  Appears to block movement from field 10 to field 1 and direct movement N/S along trackway.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 171108","WPR98",171108
1058,"MBA Waterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Waterholes associated with settlement 4 in field 10. Amount of Deverel Rimbury potttery from these waterholes. Two are situated close to entrances to trackway 2 and may have been related to use by livestock. Cu Alloy spearhead was recovered from one of the waterholes in this entity.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 611100","PSH02",611100
1058,"MBA Waterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Waterholes associated with settlement 4 in field 10. Amount of Deverel Rimbury potttery from these waterholes. Two are situated close to entrances to trackway 2 and may have been related to use by livestock. Cu Alloy spearhead was recovered from one of the waterholes in this entity.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
1058,"MBA Waterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Waterholes associated with settlement 4 in field 10. Amount of Deverel Rimbury potttery from these waterholes. Two are situated close to entrances to trackway 2 and may have been related to use by livestock. Cu Alloy spearhead was recovered from one of the waterholes in this entity.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
1058,"MBA Waterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Waterholes associated with settlement 4 in field 10. Amount of Deverel Rimbury potttery from these waterholes. Two are situated close to entrances to trackway 2 and may have been related to use by livestock. Cu Alloy spearhead was recovered from one of the waterholes in this entity.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 103040","WPR98",103040
1059,"1a\medieval fields\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 514056","PSH02",514056
1059,"1a\medieval fields\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515041","PSH02",515041
1059,"1a\medieval fields\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539093","PSH02",539093
1059,"1a\medieval fields\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539094","PSH02",539094
1059,"1a\medieval fields\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
1059,"1a\medieval fields\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539108","PSH02",539108
1059,"1a\medieval fields\ceramic phase 2",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 542197","PSH02",542197
1060,"1a\medieval fields\ceramic phase 3",,,"lorraine's ceramic phasing","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539098","PSH02",539098
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517229","PSH02",517229
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517232","PSH02",517232
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 517284","PSH02",517284
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527215","PSH02",527215
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527261","PSH02",527261
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537134","PSH02",537134
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570107","PSH02",570107
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575181","PSH02",575181
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578112","PSH02",578112
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578115","PSH02",578115
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 587037","PSH02",587037
1061,"1a\medieval settlement\12 post structure","715 Early Medieval",,"post built structure","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 592033","PSH02",592033
1062,"LBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes in field 10 nr sett 4","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 611106","PSH02",611106
1062,"LBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes in field 10 nr sett 4","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 103038","WPR98",103038
1062,"LBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes in field 10 nr sett 4","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
1062,"LBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes in field 10 nr sett 4","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 125244","WPR98",125244
1062,"LBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes in field 10 nr sett 4","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
1062,"LBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement4","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA waterholes in field 10 nr sett 4","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
1064,"MBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"mba/ dev rim waterholes in small D assoc with sett3","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 559328","PSH02",559328
1064,"MBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"mba/ dev rim waterholes in small D assoc with sett3","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
1064,"MBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"mba/ dev rim waterholes in small D assoc with sett3","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
1064,"MBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement3","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"mba/ dev rim waterholes in small D assoc with sett3","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
1065,"LBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement 3","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Post dev rim + some dev rim .LBA waterholes in smallD assoc with sett3","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 146039","WPR98",146039
1065,"LBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement 3","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Post dev rim + some dev rim .LBA waterholes in smallD assoc with sett3","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 146043","WPR98",146043
1065,"LBAWaterholes/Assoc with Settlement 3","325 Late Bronze Age",,"Post dev rim + some dev rim .LBA waterholes in smallD assoc with sett3","Simon McCann","Analysis","Highlight",,,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
1066,"1A\Early Saxon settlement\scattered pits",,,"pits of no certain spatial assocs","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555842","PSH02",555842
1066,"1A\Early Saxon settlement\scattered pits",,,"pits of no certain spatial assocs","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555852","PSH02",555852
1066,"1A\Early Saxon settlement\scattered pits",,,"pits of no certain spatial assocs","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555857","PSH02",555857
1066,"1A\Early Saxon settlement\scattered pits",,,"pits of no certain spatial assocs","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578309","PSH02",578309
1066,"1A\Early Saxon settlement\scattered pits",,,"pits of no certain spatial assocs","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578312","PSH02",578312
1066,"1A\Early Saxon settlement\scattered pits",,,"pits of no certain spatial assocs","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 581206","PSH02",581206
1066,"1A\Early Saxon settlement\scattered pits",,,"pits of no certain spatial assocs","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597113","PSH02",597113
1067,"MBAWaterholes/ Assoc with LargeD Enc","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All waterholes of Mba date within large d shaped enc but external to small D.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960514","POK96",960514
1067,"MBAWaterholes/ Assoc with LargeD Enc","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All waterholes of Mba date within large d shaped enc but external to small D.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611100","PSH02",611100
1067,"MBAWaterholes/ Assoc with LargeD Enc","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All waterholes of Mba date within large d shaped enc but external to small D.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
1067,"MBAWaterholes/ Assoc with LargeD Enc","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All waterholes of Mba date within large d shaped enc but external to small D.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
1067,"MBAWaterholes/ Assoc with LargeD Enc","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All waterholes of Mba date within large d shaped enc but external to small D.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103040","WPR98",103040
1067,"MBAWaterholes/ Assoc with LargeD Enc","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All waterholes of Mba date within large d shaped enc but external to small D.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
1067,"MBAWaterholes/ Assoc with LargeD Enc","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"All waterholes of Mba date within large d shaped enc but external to small D.","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960529","POK96",960529
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 516082","PSH02",516082
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611106","PSH02",611106
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103038","WPR98",103038
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125244","WPR98",125244
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135055","WPR98",135055
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178122","WPR98",178122
1068,"LBAWaterholes/ Assocwith LargeDEnc","325 Late Bronze Age",,"LBA/Post dev rim waterholes in large d, but not including those in smallD","Simon McCann","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
1069,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\PM ditch alignment","800 Post-Medieval",,"PM ditches truncating farmstead area","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525269","PSH02",525269
1069,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\PM ditch alignment","800 Post-Medieval",,"PM ditches truncating farmstead area","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525277","PSH02",525277
1069,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\PM ditch alignment","800 Post-Medieval",,"PM ditches truncating farmstead area","BSB","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525279","PSH02",525279
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 525267","PSH02",525267
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545137","PSH02",545137
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 545141","PSH02",545141
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546353","PSH02",546353
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546357","PSH02",546357
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546359","PSH02",546359
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555848","PSH02",555848
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 595085","PSH02",595085
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 617110","PSH02",617110
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 617117","PSH02",617117
1070,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\fence line 1","700 Medieval",,"approx NW-SE fence line, poss med, seems to pre-date PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 617123","PSH02",617123
1071,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\fence line 2","800 Post-Medieval",,"vague NE-SW fenceline, prob PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555742","PSH02",555742
1071,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\fence line 2","800 Post-Medieval",,"vague NE-SW fenceline, prob PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555764","PSH02",555764
1071,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\fence line 2","800 Post-Medieval",,"vague NE-SW fenceline, prob PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578314","PSH02",578314
1071,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\fence line 2","800 Post-Medieval",,"vague NE-SW fenceline, prob PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 597109","PSH02",597109
1071,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\fence line 2","800 Post-Medieval",,"vague NE-SW fenceline, prob PM","BSB","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 597113","PSH02",597113
1072,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\post removal pits","700 Medieval",,"evidence for re-use of posts in Saxon or med","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555777","PSH02",555777
1073,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\animal skellie pits","700 Medieval",,"?pits with articualted parts of animals/full skellies","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555777","PSH02",555777
1073,"1A\Early Saxon farmstead\animal skellie pits","700 Medieval",,"?pits with articualted parts of animals/full skellies","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 559559","PSH02",559559
1074,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 6","700 Medieval",,"E-W division in line with EAS boundary 1 (to its south)","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 525281","PSH02",525281
1074,"1A\Early Saxon Farmstead\Boundary Group 6","700 Medieval",,"E-W division in line with EAS boundary 1 (to its south)","BSB","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 555884","PSH02",555884
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 512071","PSH02",512071
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524167","PSH02",524167
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524238","PSH02",524238
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524398","PSH02",524398
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529311","PSH02",529311
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529313","PSH02",529313
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529473","PSH02",529473
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529494","PSH02",529494
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 541166","PSH02",541166
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 588222","PSH02",588222
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 588229","PSH02",588229
1075,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch PSH 02","205 Early Neolithic",,"Western ditch of C1 cursus in PSH 02 areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 588324","PSH02",588324
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 512066","PSH02",512066
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 524575","PSH02",524575
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 542120","PSH02",542120
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 544092","PSH02",544092
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 554235","PSH02",554235
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 562121","PSH02",562121
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 569092","PSH02",569092
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 570478","PSH02",570478
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 570479","PSH02",570479
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 594109","PSH02",594109
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 594116","PSH02",594116
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 597033","PSH02",597033
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 614312","PSH02",614312
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 614343","PSH02",614343
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 614349","PSH02",614349
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 615323","PSH02",615323
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 615350","PSH02",615350
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 615355","PSH02",615355
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 630081","PSH02",630081
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 632125","PSH02",632125
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 634092","PSH02",634092
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 634096","PSH02",634096
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 634099","PSH02",634099
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 634100","PSH02",634100
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 634104","PSH02",634104
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 645040","PSH02",645040
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 661014","PSH02",661014
1077,"Early Bronze Age Field System1/SE of D enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age",,"Possible early focus of ditch digging activity in the southern part of the site associated with the D-shaped enclosure. This may represent a fairly early focus of activity associated with the creation of elements of the field system in the Early Bronze Age.  Could this zone (along with the material from associated waterholes) demaracte where the origins of the predominantly Middle Bronze Age field system lie?","cdg","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 665024","PSH02",665024
1078,"1a\medieval settlement\enc4","700 Medieval",,"enclosure4","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512072","PSH02",512072
1078,"1a\medieval settlement\enc4","700 Medieval",,"enclosure4","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527192","PSH02",527192
1078,"1a\medieval settlement\enc4","700 Medieval",,"enclosure4","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527195","PSH02",527195
1078,"1a\medieval settlement\enc4","700 Medieval",,"enclosure4","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527197","PSH02",527197
1078,"1a\medieval settlement\enc4","700 Medieval",,"enclosure4","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529237","PSH02",529237
1078,"1a\medieval settlement\enc4","700 Medieval",,"enclosure4","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529267","PSH02",529267
1078,"1a\medieval settlement\enc4","700 Medieval",,"enclosure4","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546103","PSH02",546103
1079,"1a\medieval settlement\enc5","700 Medieval",,"enclosure5","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529228","PSH02",529228
1079,"1a\medieval settlement\enc5","700 Medieval",,"enclosure5","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529233","PSH02",529233
1079,"1a\medieval settlement\enc5","700 Medieval",,"enclosure5","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529239","PSH02",529239
1079,"1a\medieval settlement\enc5","700 Medieval",,"enclosure5","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529267","PSH02",529267
1079,"1a\medieval settlement\enc5","700 Medieval",,"enclosure5","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546103","PSH02",546103
1080,"1a\medieval settlement\enc1","715 Early Medieval",,"enclosure1","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 560023","PSH02",560023
1080,"1a\medieval settlement\enc1","715 Early Medieval",,"enclosure1","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561153","PSH02",561153
1080,"1a\medieval settlement\enc1","715 Early Medieval",,"enclosure1","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569080","PSH02",569080
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529241","PSH02",529241
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529249","PSH02",529249
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529266","PSH02",529266
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529267","PSH02",529267
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529268","PSH02",529268
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546100","PSH02",546100
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561153","PSH02",561153
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568068","PSH02",568068
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568083","PSH02",568083
1081,"1a\medieval settlement\enc2","700 Medieval",,"enclosure2","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569080","PSH02",569080
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512052","PSH02",512052
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512054","PSH02",512054
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526268","PSH02",526268
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526272","PSH02",526272
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 526274","PSH02",526274
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537171","PSH02",537171
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539051","PSH02",539051
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 546103","PSH02",546103
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 568083","PSH02",568083
1082,"1a\medieval settlement\enc3","700 Medieval",,"enclosure3","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 591048","PSH02",591048
1084,"1a\medieval settlement\enc1a","700 Medieval",,"enclosure 1a","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 561153","PSH02",561153
1084,"1a\medieval settlement\enc1a","700 Medieval",,"enclosure 1a","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 569080","PSH02",569080
1086,"1a\medieval settlement\enc6","700 Medieval",,"enclosure6","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537118","PSH02",537118
1088,"K_Stanwell cursus E ditch WPR/POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"E ditch of Stanwell C1 Cursus, as exposed in POK 96 and WPR 98 excavated areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961501","POK96",961501
1088,"K_Stanwell cursus E ditch WPR/POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"E ditch of Stanwell C1 Cursus, as exposed in POK 96 and WPR 98 excavated areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 134029","WPR98",134029
1089,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch WPR/POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"W ditch of Stanwell C1 Cursus, as exposed in Pok 96 and WPR 98 excavated areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 961515","POK96",961515
1089,"K_Stanwell cursus W ditch WPR/POK","205 Early Neolithic",,"W ditch of Stanwell C1 Cursus, as exposed in Pok 96 and WPR 98 excavated areas.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 128028","WPR98",128028
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961515","POK96",961515
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 512071","PSH02",512071
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524167","PSH02",524167
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524238","PSH02",524238
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524398","PSH02",524398
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529311","PSH02",529311
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529494","PSH02",529494
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 541166","PSH02",541166
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588222","PSH02",588222
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588229","PSH02",588229
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 588324","PSH02",588324
1090,"K_W Stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic",,,"nick pankhurst","Analysis","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128028","WPR98",128028
1092,"Enviro Neolithic CPR","200 Neolithic",,"Samples that should be analysed or may have potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527233","PSH02",527233
1092,"Enviro Neolithic CPR","200 Neolithic",,"Samples that should be analysed or may have potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529306","PSH02",529306
1092,"Enviro Neolithic CPR","200 Neolithic",,"Samples that should be analysed or may have potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699072","LFA05",699072
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527078","PSH02",527078
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543201","PSH02",543201
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553191","PSH02",553191
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557027","PSH02",557027
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559328","PSH02",559328
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568092","PSH02",568092
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582095","PSH02",582095
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615008","PSH02",615008
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615043","PSH02",615043
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 646068","PSH02",646068
1093,"Enviro MBA CPR","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with CPR potential from MBA features for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 693006","TEC05",693006
1094,"Enviro M-LBA CPR","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Samples with potential for CPR that should go further to analysis stage for M-LBA features","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 711024","LFA05",711024
1094,"Enviro M-LBA CPR","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Samples with potential for CPR that should go further to analysis stage for M-LBA features","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
1094,"Enviro M-LBA CPR","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Samples with potential for CPR that should go further to analysis stage for M-LBA features","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554208","PSH02",554208
1094,"Enviro M-LBA CPR","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Samples with potential for CPR that should go further to analysis stage for M-LBA features","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
1094,"Enviro M-LBA CPR","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Samples with potential for CPR that should go further to analysis stage for M-LBA features","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563060","PSH02",563060
1094,"Enviro M-LBA CPR","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Samples with potential for CPR that should go further to analysis stage for M-LBA features","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570222","PSH02",570222
1095,"Enviro LBA-EIA CPR","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Samples of LBA/EIA date that show potential for further analysis for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 609020","PSH02",609020
1096,"Enviro EIA-MIA CPR","415 Early or Middle Iron Age",,"Samples of E/MIA date that have CPR/WPR potential that should be flagged up for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539450","PSH02",539450
1096,"Enviro EIA-MIA CPR","415 Early or Middle Iron Age",,"Samples of E/MIA date that have CPR/WPR potential that should be flagged up for further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
1097,"Enviro MBA Insect Potential","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with insect potential from MBA features that have been flagged up by specialists who are not insect specialists.  May we worth pursuing further","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 724018","LFA05",724018
1097,"Enviro MBA Insect Potential","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with insect potential from MBA features that have been flagged up by specialists who are not insect specialists.  May we worth pursuing further","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 510047","PSH02",510047
1097,"Enviro MBA Insect Potential","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples with insect potential from MBA features that have been flagged up by specialists who are not insect specialists.  May we worth pursuing further","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583160","PSH02",583160
1098,"Enviro Neo Charcoal","200 Neolithic",,"General Neolithic features with good charcoal potential that should be analysed","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
1099,"Enviro Late Neo Charcoal","225 Late Neolithic",,"Features of Grooved Ware date that have good charcoal assemblages that should be taken to the analysis level","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527288","PSH02",527288
1099,"Enviro Late Neo Charcoal","225 Late Neolithic",,"Features of Grooved Ware date that have good charcoal assemblages that should be taken to the analysis level","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531011","PSH02",531011
1100,"Enviro Neo Charcoal Potential","200 Neolithic",,"Neolithic features that would appear to have charcoal potential although it may not have been flagged up by the specialist.  Worth checking potential and doing more if not contaminated etc","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512071","PSH02",512071
1100,"Enviro Neo Charcoal Potential","200 Neolithic",,"Neolithic features that would appear to have charcoal potential although it may not have been flagged up by the specialist.  Worth checking potential and doing more if not contaminated etc","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
1101,"Enviro Late Neo Potential Charcoal","225 Late Neolithic",,"Features with potentially good charcoal that should be analysed.  However, check these as there is the possibility of contamination due to shallowness etc. of feature","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 695027","TEC05",695027
1102,"Enviro MBA Charcoal","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features with good well sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
1102,"Enviro MBA Charcoal","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features with good well sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558001","PSH02",558001
1102,"Enviro MBA Charcoal","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features with good well sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 693006","TEC05",693006
1103,"Enviro MBA Charcoal Potential","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features of MBA date with some potential for further analysis on charcoal.  However, there may be concerns because of slight contamination (feature may be shallow) or because the specialist has not flagged it up even if it seems to have some potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515233","PSH02",515233
1103,"Enviro MBA Charcoal Potential","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Features of MBA date with some potential for further analysis on charcoal.  However, there may be concerns because of slight contamination (feature may be shallow) or because the specialist has not flagged it up even if it seems to have some potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
1104,"Enviro LBA-EIA Charcoal","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Features of LBA-EIA date that have good well-sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699010","LFA05",699010
1104,"Enviro LBA-EIA Charcoal","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Features of LBA-EIA date that have good well-sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699016","LFA05",699016
1104,"Enviro LBA-EIA Charcoal","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Features of LBA-EIA date that have good well-sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699046","LFA05",699046
1104,"Enviro LBA-EIA Charcoal","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Features of LBA-EIA date that have good well-sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699048","LFA05",699048
1104,"Enviro LBA-EIA Charcoal","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Features of LBA-EIA date that have good well-sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 510127","PSH02",510127
1104,"Enviro LBA-EIA Charcoal","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Features of LBA-EIA date that have good well-sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580288","PSH02",580288
1104,"Enviro LBA-EIA Charcoal","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Features of LBA-EIA date that have good well-sealed and well-dated charcoal assemblages that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
1105,"Enviro LBA-EIA Charcoal Potential","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Samples with some charcoal potential from features of LBA-EIA date.  However potential may be slightly less because of possible contamination etc.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
1106,"Enviro MIA Charcoal","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Samples that should be take to analysis stage for MIA features","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 712001","LFA05",712001
1107,"Enviro LIA-ERB Charcoal","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"Samples with good well preserved charcoal assemblages from features of this period that should be taken to analysis level","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538348","PSH02",538348
1107,"Enviro LIA-ERB Charcoal","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"Samples with good well preserved charcoal assemblages from features of this period that should be taken to analysis level","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555767","PSH02",555767
1108,"Enviro Medieval Pollen potential","700 Medieval",,"samples of medieval date that may be worth further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
1109,"Enviro Saxon Pollen Potential","615 Middle Saxon",,"Saxon date sample that may be worth further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555805","PSH02",555805
1110,"Enviro Mid Roman Pollen Potential","565 Middle Romano-British",,"samples of Middle Romano-British date that may benefit from further analysis, but question may be to do with either scaling down number of samples from each feature (eg for waterhole 553169) or to do with dating .  Dating may not be precise enough and may only have generic Roman date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527374","PSH02",527374
1110,"Enviro Mid Roman Pollen Potential","565 Middle Romano-British",,"samples of Middle Romano-British date that may benefit from further analysis, but question may be to do with either scaling down number of samples from each feature (eg for waterhole 553169) or to do with dating .  Dating may not be precise enough and may only have generic Roman date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527388","PSH02",527388
1110,"Enviro Mid Roman Pollen Potential","565 Middle Romano-British",,"samples of Middle Romano-British date that may benefit from further analysis, but question may be to do with either scaling down number of samples from each feature (eg for waterhole 553169) or to do with dating .  Dating may not be precise enough and may only have generic Roman date.","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553166","PSH02",553166
1111,"Enviro LIA-ERB Pollen Potential","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"Samples of LIA-ERB date with some potential and may be worth further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 593207","PSH02",593207
1111,"Enviro LIA-ERB Pollen Potential","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"Samples of LIA-ERB date with some potential and may be worth further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 644006","PSH02",644006
1112,"Enviro LIA-ERB Pollen","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"Samples that are worth further analysis for pollen","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 646018","PSH02",646018
1112,"Enviro LIA-ERB Pollen","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"Samples that are worth further analysis for pollen","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 649010","PSH02",649010
1113,"Enviro MIA Pollen Potential","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Sample may have good pollen potential but may not be worth doing since we may not be able to date it very closely","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592384","PSH02",592384
1114,"Enviro LBA-EIA Pollen","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Promising pollen samples from well dated features with well-sealed fills with generally good preservation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 509174","PSH02",509174
1114,"Enviro LBA-EIA Pollen","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Promising pollen samples from well dated features with well-sealed fills with generally good preservation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
1114,"Enviro LBA-EIA Pollen","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Promising pollen samples from well dated features with well-sealed fills with generally good preservation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 638008","PSH02",638008
1114,"Enviro LBA-EIA Pollen","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Promising pollen samples from well dated features with well-sealed fills with generally good preservation","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
1115,"Enviro MBA Pollen","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"samples with promising pollen sequences that are stratigraphically secure and well-dated","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 510047","PSH02",510047
1115,"Enviro MBA Pollen","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"samples with promising pollen sequences that are stratigraphically secure and well-dated","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527069","PSH02",527069
1115,"Enviro MBA Pollen","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"samples with promising pollen sequences that are stratigraphically secure and well-dated","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557027","PSH02",557027
1115,"Enviro MBA Pollen","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"samples with promising pollen sequences that are stratigraphically secure and well-dated","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
1115,"Enviro MBA Pollen","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"samples with promising pollen sequences that are stratigraphically secure and well-dated","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636152","PSH02",636152
1115,"Enviro MBA Pollen","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"samples with promising pollen sequences that are stratigraphically secure and well-dated","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636175","PSH02",636175
1115,"Enviro MBA Pollen","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"samples with promising pollen sequences that are stratigraphically secure and well-dated","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 708014","TEC05",708014
1116,"Enviro MBA Pollen Potential","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples that may be worth analysing further but may in fact have rather low potential or not be too secure - possible contamination that needs to be checked","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
1116,"Enviro MBA Pollen Potential","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Samples that may be worth analysing further but may in fact have rather low potential or not be too secure - possible contamination that needs to be checked","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 639085","PSH02",639085
1117,"Enviro LBA-EIA insects","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age",,"Sample with good insect potential that should be analysed further","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
1118,"Enviro M-LBA Pollen","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"M-LBA feature that is worthy of further analysis - may be long-lived feature","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 711024","LFA05",711024
1119,"Enviro EBA-MBA Pollen Potential","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"this may be a hengiform structure.  However it is poorly dated and also needs checking of pollen potential.  However if EBA it is worth looking at for sequence","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636098","PSH02",636098
1120,"Enviro LNEO Pollen Potential","225 Late Neolithic",,"Not sure of pollen potential from here","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 708007","TEC05",708007
1121,"Enviro MNEO Pollen","215 Middle Neolithic",,"This could tell us quite a bit about landscape after construction of cursus in this zone","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594228","PSH02",594228
1122,"Enviro ENEO Pollen","205 Early Neolithic",,"samples associated with the cursus that are worthy of further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
1122,"Enviro ENEO Pollen","205 Early Neolithic",,"samples associated with the cursus that are worthy of further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636048","PSH02",636048
1122,"Enviro ENEO Pollen","205 Early Neolithic",,"samples associated with the cursus that are worthy of further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 650065","PSH02",650065
1123,"Enviro ENEO Pollen Potential","205 Early Neolithic",,"Samples that may be worth further analysis although pollen may not look too promising","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 617042","PSH02",617042
1124,"Enviro Medieval Insect","700 Medieval",,"Lots of insect potential.  With Med waterhole sample 17059 shows high potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
1125,"Enviro LIA-ERB Insect","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British",,"Further potential for insect analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 593207","PSH02",593207
1126,"C14 Neo dates don't do","200 Neolithic",,"C14 dates that have been flagged up for C14 but have no potential (too contaminated, too shallow, too disturbed etc)","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527233","PSH02",527233
1126,"C14 Neo dates don't do","200 Neolithic",,"C14 dates that have been flagged up for C14 but have no potential (too contaminated, too shallow, too disturbed etc)","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529306","PSH02",529306
1127,"C14 Neo dates do or maybe do","200 Neolithic",,"Features that have been flagged up for C14 dates that may have potential or definitely have potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531011","PSH02",531011
1127,"C14 Neo dates do or maybe do","200 Neolithic",,"Features that have been flagged up for C14 dates that may have potential or definitely have potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
1127,"C14 Neo dates do or maybe do","200 Neolithic",,"Features that have been flagged up for C14 dates that may have potential or definitely have potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580310","PSH02",580310
1128,"C14 E-MBA dates do or maybe do","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Contexts where C14 dates would be very useful and are dating a specific event.  In some cases we may need to check potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615043","PSH02",615043
1128,"C14 E-MBA dates do or maybe do","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Contexts where C14 dates would be very useful and are dating a specific event.  In some cases we may need to check potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 646068","PSH02",646068
1128,"C14 E-MBA dates do or maybe do","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age",,"Contexts where C14 dates would be very useful and are dating a specific event.  In some cases we may need to check potential","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 693006","TEC05",693006
1129,"C14 MBA dates do or maybe do","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Contexts of MBA date where C14 dates may be very useful and informative and relate to specific events","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
1129,"C14 MBA dates do or maybe do","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Contexts of MBA date where C14 dates may be very useful and informative and relate to specific events","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553191","PSH02",553191
1129,"C14 MBA dates do or maybe do","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Contexts of MBA date where C14 dates may be very useful and informative and relate to specific events","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557027","PSH02",557027
1129,"C14 MBA dates do or maybe do","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Contexts of MBA date where C14 dates may be very useful and informative and relate to specific events","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559328","PSH02",559328
1129,"C14 MBA dates do or maybe do","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Contexts of MBA date where C14 dates may be very useful and informative and relate to specific events","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615008","PSH02",615008
1129,"C14 MBA dates do or maybe do","315 Middle Bronze Age",,"Contexts of MBA date where C14 dates may be very useful and informative and relate to specific events","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615043","PSH02",615043
1130,"C14 dates M-LBA do or maybe do","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Features of this date with some potential or high potential for C14 and where it would be useful","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546202","PSH02",546202
1130,"C14 dates M-LBA do or maybe do","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Features of this date with some potential or high potential for C14 and where it would be useful","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563060","PSH02",563060
1130,"C14 dates M-LBA do or maybe do","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age",,"Features of this date with some potential or high potential for C14 and where it would be useful","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
1131,"Untitled","000 Prehistoric",,"All CPR samples of all prehistoric dates that should be taken forward to further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539450","PSH02",539450
1131,"Untitled","000 Prehistoric",,"All CPR samples of all prehistoric dates that should be taken forward to further analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
1132,"Enviro Insects Analysis",,,"All environmental samples that should go for further analysis of insects","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
1132,"Enviro Insects Analysis",,,"All environmental samples that should go for further analysis of insects","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 593207","PSH02",593207
1132,"Enviro Insects Analysis",,,"All environmental samples that should go for further analysis of insects","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
1133,"Enviro Insect Potential",,,"All insect samples that have potential and maybe should go for furter analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 724018","LFA05",724018
1133,"Enviro Insect Potential",,,"All insect samples that have potential and maybe should go for furter analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 510047","PSH02",510047
1133,"Enviro Insect Potential",,,"All insect samples that have potential and maybe should go for furter analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583160","PSH02",583160
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 711024","LFA05",711024
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 509174","PSH02",509174
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 510047","PSH02",510047
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527069","PSH02",527069
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557027","PSH02",557027
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 594228","PSH02",594228
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636048","PSH02",636048
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636152","PSH02",636152
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636175","PSH02",636175
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 638008","PSH02",638008
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 646018","PSH02",646018
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 649010","PSH02",649010
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 650065","PSH02",650065
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
1134,"Enviro Pollen Analysis",,,"All pollen cores of all dates that should be taken further to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 708014","TEC05",708014
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527374","PSH02",527374
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527388","PSH02",527388
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529139","PSH02",529139
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553166","PSH02",553166
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555805","PSH02",555805
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 592384","PSH02",592384
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 593207","PSH02",593207
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 617042","PSH02",617042
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 636098","PSH02",636098
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 639085","PSH02",639085
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 644006","PSH02",644006
1135,"Enviro Pollen Potential",,,"All pollen samples of all date that show some potential and perhaps should be taken forward to next stage of analysis","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 708007","TEC05",708007
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699010","LFA05",699010
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699016","LFA05",699016
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699046","LFA05",699046
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699048","LFA05",699048
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 712001","LFA05",712001
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 510127","PSH02",510127
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527288","PSH02",527288
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531011","PSH02",531011
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538131","PSH02",538131
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538348","PSH02",538348
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555767","PSH02",555767
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558001","PSH02",558001
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580288","PSH02",580288
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
1136,"Enviro Charcoal Analysis",,,"All charcoal samples that should definitely be taken to analysis stage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 693006","TEC05",693006
1137,"Enviro Charcoal Potential",,,"Charcoal samples with some potentiall that could be taken forward for analysis but assess","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512071","PSH02",512071
1137,"Enviro Charcoal Potential",,,"Charcoal samples with some potentiall that could be taken forward for analysis but assess","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515233","PSH02",515233
1137,"Enviro Charcoal Potential",,,"Charcoal samples with some potentiall that could be taken forward for analysis but assess","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
1137,"Enviro Charcoal Potential",,,"Charcoal samples with some potentiall that could be taken forward for analysis but assess","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
1137,"Enviro Charcoal Potential",,,"Charcoal samples with some potentiall that could be taken forward for analysis but assess","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
1137,"Enviro Charcoal Potential",,,"Charcoal samples with some potentiall that could be taken forward for analysis but assess","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 695027","TEC05",695027
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531011","PSH02",531011
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546202","PSH02",546202
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553191","PSH02",553191
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557027","PSH02",557027
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559328","PSH02",559328
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563060","PSH02",563060
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580310","PSH02",580310
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615008","PSH02",615008
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615043","PSH02",615043
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 646068","PSH02",646068
1138,"C14 Prehistoric dates do or maybe do","000 Prehistoric",,"All periods of prehistory where we should have C14 dates  done if possible","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 693006","TEC05",693006
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 699072","LFA05",699072
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 711024","LFA05",711024
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527078","PSH02",527078
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527233","PSH02",527233
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529306","PSH02",529306
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 539450","PSH02",539450
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 543201","PSH02",543201
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 553191","PSH02",553191
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554208","PSH02",554208
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557027","PSH02",557027
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 559328","PSH02",559328
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563060","PSH02",563060
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 568092","PSH02",568092
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 570222","PSH02",570222
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582095","PSH02",582095
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 609020","PSH02",609020
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615008","PSH02",615008
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 615043","PSH02",615043
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 646068","PSH02",646068
1140,"Enviro Prehistoric CPR Analysis","000 Prehistoric",,"All samples of prehistoric date (from Neolithic to Iron Age) that should be taken to analysis stage for CPR/WPR","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 693006","TEC05",693006
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527124","PSH02",527124
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527142","PSH02",527142
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 548010","PSH02",548010
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555912","PSH02",555912
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 561277","PSH02",561277
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 577016","PSH02",577016
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 579136","PSH02",579136
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 687001","TEC05",687001
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 141228","WPR98",141228
1141,"Plain Bowl Pits/All Plain Bowl Ware Pits","205 Early Neolithic",,"All Plain Bowl pits in the Heathrow landscape.  All these features have Plain Bowl pottery contained within them","cdg","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 158121","WPR98",158121
1142,"Bronze Age metal objects WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Location of features containing Bronze Age metal objetcs in Perry Oaks","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
1142,"Bronze Age metal objects WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"Location of features containing Bronze Age metal objetcs in Perry Oaks","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
1143,"Peterborough Ware Pits/All Pits","215 Middle Neolithic",,"All pits with Peterborough Ware pottery in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531027","PSH02",531027
1143,"Peterborough Ware Pits/All Pits","215 Middle Neolithic",,"All pits with Peterborough Ware pottery in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555912","PSH02",555912
1143,"Peterborough Ware Pits/All Pits","215 Middle Neolithic",,"All pits with Peterborough Ware pottery in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555922","PSH02",555922
1143,"Peterborough Ware Pits/All Pits","215 Middle Neolithic",,"All pits with Peterborough Ware pottery in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 556104","PSH02",556104
1143,"Peterborough Ware Pits/All Pits","215 Middle Neolithic",,"All pits with Peterborough Ware pottery in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561075","PSH02",561075
1143,"Peterborough Ware Pits/All Pits","215 Middle Neolithic",,"All pits with Peterborough Ware pottery in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 574003","PSH02",574003
1143,"Peterborough Ware Pits/All Pits","215 Middle Neolithic",,"All pits with Peterborough Ware pottery in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 666014","PSH02",666014
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 216121","GAI99",216121
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517191","PSH02",517191
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 531011","PSH02",531011
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 561104","PSH02",561104
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 580310","PSH02",580310
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 685019","TEC05",685019
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 695027","TEC05",695027
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 695058","TEC05",695058
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 708007","TEC05",708007
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 827269","TEC05",827269
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"TEC05 - 836009","TEC05",836009
1144,"Grooved Ware Pits","225 Late Neolithic",,"All Grooved Ware Pits in the Heathrow Landscape that contained pottery of Grooved Ware date. Edited by JSCL May 2009","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 127022","WPR98",127022
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 401011","GAA00",401011
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 401050","GAA00",401050
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 401053","GAA00",401053
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 401065","GAA00",401065
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 401068","GAA00",401068
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 401071","GAA00",401071
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 401075","GAA00",401075
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 403030","GAA00",403030
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 403040","GAA00",403040
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 405038","GAA00",405038
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 405050","GAA00",405050
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAA00 - 405054","GAA00",405054
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 211030","GAI99",211030
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 212086","GAI99",212086
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 213062","GAI99",213062
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 214015","GAI99",214015
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 214075","GAI99",214075
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 216033","GAI99",216033
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 217021","GAI99",217021
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 217048","GAI99",217048
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 217050","GAI99",217050
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 218023","GAI99",218023
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 218066","GAI99",218066
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 222052","GAI99",222052
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 229149","POK96",229149
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960077","POK96",960077
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960514","POK96",960514
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960529","POK96",960529
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961091","POK96",961091
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961532","POK96",961532
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961578","POK96",961578
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961631","POK96",961631
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961744","POK96",961744
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961747","POK96",961747
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962043","POK96",962043
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962259","POK96",962259
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962303","POK96",962303
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962313","POK96",962313
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962363","POK96",962363
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963017","POK96",963017
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963018","POK96",963018
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963019","POK96",963019
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963020","POK96",963020
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963021","POK96",963021
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963040","POK96",963040
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963043","POK96",963043
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963055","POK96",963055
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963056","POK96",963056
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963074","POK96",963074
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963097","POK96",963097
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963106","POK96",963106
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963109","POK96",963109
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963114","POK96",963114
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963138","POK96",963138
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963159","POK96",963159
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963161","POK96",963161
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963218","POK96",963218
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963267","POK96",963267
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963280","POK96",963280
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963389","POK96",963389
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963426","POK96",963426
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963489","POK96",963489
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963494","POK96",963494
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963517","POK96",963517
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963519","POK96",963519
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103019","WPR98",103019
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103038","WPR98",103038
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103040","WPR98",103040
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103046","WPR98",103046
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103054","WPR98",103054
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 105008","WPR98",105008
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 105009","WPR98",105009
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107013","WPR98",107013
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107029","WPR98",107029
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107082","WPR98",107082
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107109","WPR98",107109
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107149","WPR98",107149
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 108043","WPR98",108043
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 108045","WPR98",108045
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 108048","WPR98",108048
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 108050","WPR98",108050
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 108055","WPR98",108055
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 108057","WPR98",108057
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 108060","WPR98",108060
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110007","WPR98",110007
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110060","WPR98",110060
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111012","WPR98",111012
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111044","WPR98",111044
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111049","WPR98",111049
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111065","WPR98",111065
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111067","WPR98",111067
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111069","WPR98",111069
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111070","WPR98",111070
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111071","WPR98",111071
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 112042","WPR98",112042
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113032","WPR98",113032
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113036","WPR98",113036
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113062","WPR98",113062
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119014","WPR98",119014
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119034","WPR98",119034
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119317","WPR98",119317
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119322","WPR98",119322
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119416","WPR98",119416
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121009","WPR98",121009
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121116","WPR98",121116
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121118","WPR98",121118
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121130","WPR98",121130
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121135","WPR98",121135
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121137","WPR98",121137
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121153","WPR98",121153
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122035","WPR98",122035
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122036","WPR98",122036
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122088","WPR98",122088
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122096","WPR98",122096
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122100","WPR98",122100
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124076","WPR98",124076
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124085","WPR98",124085
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125102","WPR98",125102
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125244","WPR98",125244
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126025","WPR98",126025
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126038","WPR98",126038
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126042","WPR98",126042
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126053","WPR98",126053
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126066","WPR98",126066
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127043","WPR98",127043
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127053","WPR98",127053
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127055","WPR98",127055
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127095","WPR98",127095
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128051","WPR98",128051
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128068","WPR98",128068
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128088","WPR98",128088
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128109","WPR98",128109
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128113","WPR98",128113
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128115","WPR98",128115
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128117","WPR98",128117
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128194","WPR98",128194
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128244","WPR98",128244
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128246","WPR98",128246
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128248","WPR98",128248
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128250","WPR98",128250
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128252","WPR98",128252
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128294","WPR98",128294
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129081","WPR98",129081
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129084","WPR98",129084
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130119","WPR98",130119
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130123","WPR98",130123
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130127","WPR98",130127
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130149","WPR98",130149
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130178","WPR98",130178
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130182","WPR98",130182
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132028","WPR98",132028
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132029","WPR98",132029
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132071","WPR98",132071
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 135055","WPR98",135055
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136075","WPR98",136075
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136085","WPR98",136085
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136153","WPR98",136153
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136156","WPR98",136156
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137044","WPR98",137044
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137069","WPR98",137069
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137084","WPR98",137084
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137244","WPR98",137244
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 138019","WPR98",138019
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 138162","WPR98",138162
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 138170","WPR98",138170
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 140135","WPR98",140135
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 140137","WPR98",140137
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141033","WPR98",141033
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141038","WPR98",141038
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141056","WPR98",141056
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141237","WPR98",141237
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141254","WPR98",141254
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 143011","WPR98",143011
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 145016","WPR98",145016
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146039","WPR98",146039
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146043","WPR98",146043
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146048","WPR98",146048
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146090","WPR98",146090
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146091","WPR98",146091
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147026","WPR98",147026
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147056","WPR98",147056
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147081","WPR98",147081
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147083","WPR98",147083
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147114","WPR98",147114
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148042","WPR98",148042
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148063","WPR98",148063
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148108","WPR98",148108
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148181","WPR98",148181
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149031","WPR98",149031
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149116","WPR98",149116
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149129","WPR98",149129
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149139","WPR98",149139
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149141","WPR98",149141
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149150","WPR98",149150
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151063","WPR98",151063
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151210","WPR98",151210
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151214","WPR98",151214
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 155080","WPR98",155080
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 155144","WPR98",155144
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157025","WPR98",157025
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157034","WPR98",157034
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157065","WPR98",157065
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159101","WPR98",159101
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159103","WPR98",159103
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159107","WPR98",159107
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159109","WPR98",159109
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160031","WPR98",160031
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160092","WPR98",160092
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160184","WPR98",160184
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160356","WPR98",160356
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 161124","WPR98",161124
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 161126","WPR98",161126
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 161130","WPR98",161130
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 161132","WPR98",161132
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 161162","WPR98",161162
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 163063","WPR98",163063
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166138","WPR98",166138
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166140","WPR98",166140
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166160","WPR98",166160
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166174","WPR98",166174
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166194","WPR98",166194
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 167004","WPR98",167004
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 170007","WPR98",170007
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 171063","WPR98",171063
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 172057","WPR98",172057
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 176017","WPR98",176017
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178122","WPR98",178122
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180005","WPR98",180005
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180011","WPR98",180011
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180018","WPR98",180018
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
1145,"Bronze Age trackways, Landholdings, waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All trackways 1-6, Landholdings 1-7 and MBA and LBA steep and rampled waterholes and pits. Created to look at major BA landscape elements.","JSCL","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180101","WPR98",180101
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401050","GAA00",401050
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAA00 - 401053","GAA00",401053
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 213062","GAI99",213062
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217048","GAI99",217048
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 217050","GAI99",217050
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"GAI99 - 222052","GAI99",222052
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960514","POK96",960514
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 960529","POK96",960529
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961091","POK96",961091
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 961744","POK96",961744
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962043","POK96",962043
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962303","POK96",962303
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963043","POK96",963043
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963056","POK96",963056
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963114","POK96",963114
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 963267","POK96",963267
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103038","WPR98",103038
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 103040","WPR98",103040
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 122096","WPR98",122096
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124085","WPR98",124085
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 125244","WPR98",125244
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 126025","WPR98",126025
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135055","WPR98",135055
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146039","WPR98",146039
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146043","WPR98",146043
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 146048","WPR98",146048
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148042","WPR98",148042
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 148108","WPR98",148108
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 155144","WPR98",155144
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157065","WPR98",157065
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 167004","WPR98",167004
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 170007","WPR98",170007
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178122","WPR98",178122
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
1146,"Bronze Age pits and waterholes WPR","300 Bronze Age",,"All waterholes and pits from WPR, POK etc in Volume 1 dataset","JSCL","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 180101","WPR98",180101
1147,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter4/N Part of Site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic/Neolithic flints mainly occurring in later features in Area 14.  Most of these flints occur residually in later (Saxon, Medieval features), although some may be from Meso/Neo features.  This is a general scatter but does seem to highlight the presence of some activity of this date in this zone to the north-east of the cursus.  Finds are mainly blades but also include flakes and a single platform core, associated with a background nosie of less diagnostic flint debitage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 509112","PSH02",509112
1147,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter4/N Part of Site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic/Neolithic flints mainly occurring in later features in Area 14.  Most of these flints occur residually in later (Saxon, Medieval features), although some may be from Meso/Neo features.  This is a general scatter but does seem to highlight the presence of some activity of this date in this zone to the north-east of the cursus.  Finds are mainly blades but also include flakes and a single platform core, associated with a background nosie of less diagnostic flint debitage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 538289","PSH02",538289
1147,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter4/N Part of Site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic/Neolithic flints mainly occurring in later features in Area 14.  Most of these flints occur residually in later (Saxon, Medieval features), although some may be from Meso/Neo features.  This is a general scatter but does seem to highlight the presence of some activity of this date in this zone to the north-east of the cursus.  Finds are mainly blades but also include flakes and a single platform core, associated with a background nosie of less diagnostic flint debitage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 554638","PSH02",554638
1147,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter4/N Part of Site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic/Neolithic flints mainly occurring in later features in Area 14.  Most of these flints occur residually in later (Saxon, Medieval features), although some may be from Meso/Neo features.  This is a general scatter but does seem to highlight the presence of some activity of this date in this zone to the north-east of the cursus.  Finds are mainly blades but also include flakes and a single platform core, associated with a background nosie of less diagnostic flint debitage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555780","PSH02",555780
1147,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter4/N Part of Site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic/Neolithic flints mainly occurring in later features in Area 14.  Most of these flints occur residually in later (Saxon, Medieval features), although some may be from Meso/Neo features.  This is a general scatter but does seem to highlight the presence of some activity of this date in this zone to the north-east of the cursus.  Finds are mainly blades but also include flakes and a single platform core, associated with a background nosie of less diagnostic flint debitage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555805","PSH02",555805
1147,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter4/N Part of Site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic/Neolithic flints mainly occurring in later features in Area 14.  Most of these flints occur residually in later (Saxon, Medieval features), although some may be from Meso/Neo features.  This is a general scatter but does seem to highlight the presence of some activity of this date in this zone to the north-east of the cursus.  Finds are mainly blades but also include flakes and a single platform core, associated with a background nosie of less diagnostic flint debitage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555880","PSH02",555880
1147,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter4/N Part of Site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic/Neolithic flints mainly occurring in later features in Area 14.  Most of these flints occur residually in later (Saxon, Medieval features), although some may be from Meso/Neo features.  This is a general scatter but does seem to highlight the presence of some activity of this date in this zone to the north-east of the cursus.  Finds are mainly blades but also include flakes and a single platform core, associated with a background nosie of less diagnostic flint debitage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 578423","PSH02",578423
1147,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter4/N Part of Site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic/Neolithic flints mainly occurring in later features in Area 14.  Most of these flints occur residually in later (Saxon, Medieval features), although some may be from Meso/Neo features.  This is a general scatter but does seem to highlight the presence of some activity of this date in this zone to the north-east of the cursus.  Finds are mainly blades but also include flakes and a single platform core, associated with a background nosie of less diagnostic flint debitage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 595079","PSH02",595079
1147,"Mesolithic/Neolithic Scatter4/N Part of Site","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic",,"Scatter of Mesolithic/Neolithic flints mainly occurring in later features in Area 14.  Most of these flints occur residually in later (Saxon, Medieval features), although some may be from Meso/Neo features.  This is a general scatter but does seem to highlight the presence of some activity of this date in this zone to the north-east of the cursus.  Finds are mainly blades but also include flakes and a single platform core, associated with a background nosie of less diagnostic flint debitage","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 597115","PSH02",597115
1148,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter2/SW part of Site","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"General spread of LN and EBA flint scattered in south-western part of the Site around Area 24 and to the south of Neolithic scatter 5.  Finds include retouched blades and flakes and a barbed and tanged arrowhead.  There is a particular concentration around the small MBA settlement enclosure on Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 515126","PSH02",515126
1148,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter2/SW part of Site","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"General spread of LN and EBA flint scattered in south-western part of the Site around Area 24 and to the south of Neolithic scatter 5.  Finds include retouched blades and flakes and a barbed and tanged arrowhead.  There is a particular concentration around the small MBA settlement enclosure on Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 517247","PSH02",517247
1148,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter2/SW part of Site","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"General spread of LN and EBA flint scattered in south-western part of the Site around Area 24 and to the south of Neolithic scatter 5.  Finds include retouched blades and flakes and a barbed and tanged arrowhead.  There is a particular concentration around the small MBA settlement enclosure on Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 557034","PSH02",557034
1148,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter2/SW part of Site","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"General spread of LN and EBA flint scattered in south-western part of the Site around Area 24 and to the south of Neolithic scatter 5.  Finds include retouched blades and flakes and a barbed and tanged arrowhead.  There is a particular concentration around the small MBA settlement enclosure on Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
1148,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter2/SW part of Site","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"General spread of LN and EBA flint scattered in south-western part of the Site around Area 24 and to the south of Neolithic scatter 5.  Finds include retouched blades and flakes and a barbed and tanged arrowhead.  There is a particular concentration around the small MBA settlement enclosure on Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 563060","PSH02",563060
1148,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter2/SW part of Site","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"General spread of LN and EBA flint scattered in south-western part of the Site around Area 24 and to the south of Neolithic scatter 5.  Finds include retouched blades and flakes and a barbed and tanged arrowhead.  There is a particular concentration around the small MBA settlement enclosure on Area 49","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 583001","PSH02",583001
1149,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter3/E of C3 Cursus","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"Spread of flint some occurring residually and some ‘in situ’ to the east and south-east of the C3 cursus.  There is a particular focus around the N-S BA ditch 542227/549109 which may be significant.  Finds incude  retouched flakes, a knife, blades and bladelike flakes and serrated pieces","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 544092","PSH02",544092
1149,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter3/E of C3 Cursus","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"Spread of flint some occurring residually and some ‘in situ’ to the east and south-east of the C3 cursus.  There is a particular focus around the N-S BA ditch 542227/549109 which may be significant.  Finds incude  retouched flakes, a knife, blades and bladelike flakes and serrated pieces","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 546033","PSH02",546033
1149,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter3/E of C3 Cursus","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"Spread of flint some occurring residually and some ‘in situ’ to the east and south-east of the C3 cursus.  There is a particular focus around the N-S BA ditch 542227/549109 which may be significant.  Finds incude  retouched flakes, a knife, blades and bladelike flakes and serrated pieces","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 551006","PSH02",551006
1149,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter3/E of C3 Cursus","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"Spread of flint some occurring residually and some ‘in situ’ to the east and south-east of the C3 cursus.  There is a particular focus around the N-S BA ditch 542227/549109 which may be significant.  Finds incude  retouched flakes, a knife, blades and bladelike flakes and serrated pieces","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558001","PSH02",558001
1149,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter3/E of C3 Cursus","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"Spread of flint some occurring residually and some ‘in situ’ to the east and south-east of the C3 cursus.  There is a particular focus around the N-S BA ditch 542227/549109 which may be significant.  Finds incude  retouched flakes, a knife, blades and bladelike flakes and serrated pieces","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
1149,"Late Neolithic/EBA Scatter3/E of C3 Cursus","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age",,"Spread of flint some occurring residually and some ‘in situ’ to the east and south-east of the C3 cursus.  There is a particular focus around the N-S BA ditch 542227/549109 which may be significant.  Finds incude  retouched flakes, a knife, blades and bladelike flakes and serrated pieces","cdg","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579172","PSH02",579172
1150,"Possible Roman Buildings","500 Romano-British",,"Gullies surviving in a partially rectangular layout. Identified at PDUN2 stage as possible Romano-British buildings","nad","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 163097","WPR98",163097
1150,"Possible Roman Buildings","500 Romano-British",,"Gullies surviving in a partially rectangular layout. Identified at PDUN2 stage as possible Romano-British buildings","nad","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178011","WPR98",178011
1150,"Possible Roman Buildings","500 Romano-British",,"Gullies surviving in a partially rectangular layout. Identified at PDUN2 stage as possible Romano-British buildings","nad","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 192021","WPR98",192021
1150,"Possible Roman Buildings","500 Romano-British",,"Gullies surviving in a partially rectangular layout. Identified at PDUN2 stage as possible Romano-British buildings","nad","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 197003","WPR98",197003
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"POK96 - 960023","POK96",960023
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"POK96 - 961741","POK96",961741
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 522154","PSH02",522154
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524226","PSH02",524226
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547241","PSH02",547241
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570377","PSH02",570377
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570379","PSH02",570379
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 596044","PSH02",596044
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621231","PSH02",621231
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 627039","PSH02",627039
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633192","PSH02",633192
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636048","PSH02",636048
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 650065","PSH02",650065
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 650091","PSH02",650091
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 650094","PSH02",650094
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 673060","PSH02",673060
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 105026","WPR98",105026
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 110011","WPR98",110011
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 124043","WPR98",124043
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 132009","WPR98",132009
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133035","WPR98",133035
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 134011","WPR98",134011
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137019","WPR98",137019
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 142008","WPR98",142008
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 153011","WPR98",153011
1151,"C2 Cursus","205 Early Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","All elements of the C2 cursus from all phases of the excavation","cdg","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 153048","WPR98",153048
1152,"Neolithic C3 cursus western ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the western ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 537175","PSH02",537175
1152,"Neolithic C3 cursus western ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the western ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 580554","PSH02",580554
1152,"Neolithic C3 cursus western ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the western ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 580561","PSH02",580561
1152,"Neolithic C3 cursus western ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the western ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 580570","PSH02",580570
1152,"Neolithic C3 cursus western ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the western ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 580580","PSH02",580580
1152,"Neolithic C3 cursus western ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the western ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 621051","PSH02",621051
1152,"Neolithic C3 cursus western ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the western ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 621319","PSH02",621319
1153,"Neolithic C3 cursus eastern ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the eastern ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 522123","PSH02",522123
1153,"Neolithic C3 cursus eastern ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the eastern ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 522128","PSH02",522128
1153,"Neolithic C3 cursus eastern ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the eastern ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 522140","PSH02",522140
1153,"Neolithic C3 cursus eastern ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the eastern ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 522142","PSH02",522142
1153,"Neolithic C3 cursus eastern ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the eastern ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 522153","PSH02",522153
1153,"Neolithic C3 cursus eastern ditch","205 Early Neolithic",,"All segments and ditch sections that comprise the eastern ditch of the C3 cursus","cdg","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 615369","PSH02",615369
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960023","POK96",960023
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961501","POK96",961501
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961515","POK96",961515
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961741","POK96",961741
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510050","PSH02",510050
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,,"PSH02",510194
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512070","PSH02",512070
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512071","PSH02",512071
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 522123","PSH02",522123
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 522128","PSH02",522128
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,,"PSH02",522139
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 522140","PSH02",522140
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 522142","PSH02",522142
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,,"PSH02",522147
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,,"PSH02",522149
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 522153","PSH02",522153
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 522154","PSH02",522154
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524167","PSH02",524167
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524226","PSH02",524226
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524234","PSH02",524234
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524238","PSH02",524238
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524398","PSH02",524398
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 525386","PSH02",525386
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526381","PSH02",526381
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526493","PSH02",526493
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 528072","PSH02",528072
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 528117","PSH02",528117
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 528119","PSH02",528119
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 528135","PSH02",528135
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 529310","PSH02",529310
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 529311","PSH02",529311
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 529312","PSH02",529312
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 529313","PSH02",529313
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 531027","PSH02",531027
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 531048","PSH02",531048
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 537175","PSH02",537175
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 537181","PSH02",537181
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 541166","PSH02",541166
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 544170","PSH02",544170
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547241","PSH02",547241
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 549109","PSH02",549109
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 551052","PSH02",551052
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 551054","PSH02",551054
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 551100","PSH02",551100
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 551102","PSH02",551102
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 551138","PSH02",551138
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 556070","PSH02",556070
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 556104","PSH02",556104
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 558107","PSH02",558107
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 559782","PSH02",559782
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 570377","PSH02",570377
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 570379","PSH02",570379
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580310","PSH02",580310
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580554","PSH02",580554
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580556","PSH02",580556
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580561","PSH02",580561
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580570","PSH02",580570
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580580","PSH02",580580
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580582","PSH02",580582
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 588222","PSH02",588222
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 588229","PSH02",588229
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 588324","PSH02",588324
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 594241","PSH02",594241
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 596044","PSH02",596044
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 603048","PSH02",603048
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615369","PSH02",615369
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 617042","PSH02",617042
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 621051","PSH02",621051
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 621319","PSH02",621319
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 636048","PSH02",636048
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 650065","PSH02",650065
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 650091","PSH02",650091
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 650094","PSH02",650094
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 105026","WPR98",105026
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107042","WPR98",107042
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107052","WPR98",107052
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107058","WPR98",107058
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107059","WPR98",107059
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110011","WPR98",110011
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124043","WPR98",124043
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128028","WPR98",128028
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132009","WPR98",132009
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 133035","WPR98",133035
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 134011","WPR98",134011
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 134029","WPR98",134029
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137019","WPR98",137019
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 142008","WPR98",142008
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 153011","WPR98",153011
1154,"Neolithic All Neolithic Monuments","200 Neolithic",,"All monuments that are of Neolithic date in the Heathrow landscape","cdg","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 153048","WPR98",153048
1156,"KC_IsolatedSaxonFeatures","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"1 pit and 1 waterhole that lie beyond the main focus of early Saxon activity on Area 14.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 547384","PSH02",547384
1156,"KC_IsolatedSaxonFeatures","610 Early or Middle Saxon",,"1 pit and 1 waterhole that lie beyond the main focus of early Saxon activity on Area 14.","nick pankhurst","Analysis","Highlight",,,"PSH02 - 613067","PSH02",613067
2822,"HE3 enclosure","305 Early Bronze Age","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","Partially destroyed ring ditch in Area 21 on the Western Perimeter Road. Dating still (18/10/07) to be determined, but probably EBA?","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 584081","PSH02",584081
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 218021","GAI99",218021
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"GAI99 - 218035","GAI99",218035
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 509185","PSH02",509185
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 525200","PSH02",525200
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 528009","PSH02",528009
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 528028","PSH02",528028
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555561","PSH02",555561
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111049","WPR98",111049
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119268","WPR98",119268
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121130","WPR98",121130
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122035","WPR98",122035
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122036","WPR98",122036
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128068","WPR98",128068
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130149","WPR98",130149
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130182","WPR98",130182
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136153","WPR98",136153
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136156","WPR98",136156
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166174","WPR98",166174
2828,"Bronze Age Trackway 4","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","Trackway from settlement 7 into fields south","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 172049","WPR98",172049
2829,"Trackway 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","Those portions of Trackway 1 south of the 'stop' - the trackway leading north out of Settlement 2 into its fields.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
2829,"Trackway 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","Those portions of Trackway 1 south of the 'stop' - the trackway leading north out of Settlement 2 into its fields.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
2829,"Trackway 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","Those portions of Trackway 1 south of the 'stop' - the trackway leading north out of Settlement 2 into its fields.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
2829,"Trackway 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","Those portions of Trackway 1 south of the 'stop' - the trackway leading north out of Settlement 2 into its fields.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
2829,"Trackway 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","Those portions of Trackway 1 south of the 'stop' - the trackway leading north out of Settlement 2 into its fields.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
2829,"Trackway 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","Those portions of Trackway 1 south of the 'stop' - the trackway leading north out of Settlement 2 into its fields.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
2829,"Trackway 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","Those portions of Trackway 1 south of the 'stop' - the trackway leading north out of Settlement 2 into its fields.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 591061","PSH02",591061
2830,"BA Settlement 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","group of ditches, pits and such purportedly a settlement but which look more like some sort of stock enclosure","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 568212","PSH02",568212
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 312015","PSH02",312015
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526460","PSH02",526460
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526462","PSH02",526462
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527148","PSH02",527148
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542063","PSH02",542063
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 552042","PSH02",552042
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570595","PSH02",570595
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 588368","PSH02",588368
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 597033","PSH02",597033
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 614343","PSH02",614343
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615348","PSH02",615348
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615350","PSH02",615350
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615355","PSH02",615355
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 630081","PSH02",630081
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 630082","PSH02",630082
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 656039","PSH02",656039
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 665024","PSH02",665024
2831,"Trackway 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","Those features formerly known as the southern part of Trackway 2 i.e. INSIDE the large 'D'-shaped enclosure.","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
2832,"Settlement 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","4 postholes - probably not settlement at all. Safest to ignore for now","mal","Assessment","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132190","WPR98",132190
2832,"Settlement 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","4 postholes - probably not settlement at all. Safest to ignore for now","mal","Assessment","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132192","WPR98",132192
2832,"Settlement 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","4 postholes - probably not settlement at all. Safest to ignore for now","mal","Assessment","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132196","WPR98",132196
2832,"Settlement 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","4 postholes - probably not settlement at all. Safest to ignore for now","mal","Assessment","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132206","WPR98",132206
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 698028","LFA05",698028
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 698036","LFA05",698036
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 699034","LFA05",699034
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 699040","LFA05",699040
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 699048","LFA05",699048
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 699068","LFA05",699068
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702013","LFA05",702013
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702015","LFA05",702015
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702017","LFA05",702017
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702020","LFA05",702020
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702022","LFA05",702022
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702024","LFA05",702024
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702026","LFA05",702026
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702028","LFA05",702028
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702031","LFA05",702031
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702033","LFA05",702033
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702035","LFA05",702035
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702038","LFA05",702038
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702042","LFA05",702042
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702045","LFA05",702045
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702047","LFA05",702047
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702049","LFA05",702049
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702051","LFA05",702051
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702053","LFA05",702053
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702057","LFA05",702057
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702060","LFA05",702060
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702062","LFA05",702062
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702064","LFA05",702064
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 702066","LFA05",702066
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 703020","LFA05",703020
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 711005","LFA05",711005
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 711007","LFA05",711007
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 711009","LFA05",711009
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 711011","LFA05",711011
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 711015","LFA05",711015
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 711018","LFA05",711018
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 711020","LFA05",711020
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 715015","LFA05",715015
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 715019","LFA05",715019
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 715022","LFA05",715022
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 717033","LFA05",717033
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 727007","LFA05",727007
2833,"Settlement 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","330 Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age","MBA - EIA settlement in NW corner","mal","Analysis","Detailed",,,"LFA05 - 727009","LFA05",727009
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 685050","TEC05",685050
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 686018","TEC05",686018
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 686025","TEC05",686025
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 687097","TEC05",687097
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690084","TEC05",690084
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690086","TEC05",690086
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690088","TEC05",690088
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690090","TEC05",690090
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690092","TEC05",690092
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690094","TEC05",690094
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690097","TEC05",690097
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690099","TEC05",690099
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690101","TEC05",690101
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690105","TEC05",690105
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690107","TEC05",690107
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690112","TEC05",690112
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690118","TEC05",690118
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690119","TEC05",690119
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690120","TEC05",690120
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690121","TEC05",690121
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 691004","TEC05",691004
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 694021","TEC05",694021
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695047","TEC05",695047
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695049","TEC05",695049
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695060","TEC05",695060
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695065","TEC05",695065
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 697001","TEC05",697001
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704011","TEC05",704011
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704012","TEC05",704012
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704013","TEC05",704013
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704017","TEC05",704017
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705052","TEC05",705052
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705055","TEC05",705055
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705088","TEC05",705088
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705090","TEC05",705090
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 729004","TEC05",729004
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813021","TEC05",813021
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813023","TEC05",813023
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813036","TEC05",813036
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813056","TEC05",813056
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 815022","TEC05",815022
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 815034","TEC05",815034
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 815036","TEC05",815036
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 819048","TEC05",819048
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 819050","TEC05",819050
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 821054","TEC05",821054
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 821057","TEC05",821057
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 821059","TEC05",821059
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823039","TEC05",823039
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823059","TEC05",823059
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823079","TEC05",823079
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823082","TEC05",823082
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 824016","TEC05",824016
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827037","TEC05",827037
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 828031","TEC05",828031
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 829014","TEC05",829014
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 829038","TEC05",829038
2836,"TEC05 and surrounding Bronze Age Fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","all ditches which look like they belong to the MLBA field system","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 106029","WPR98",106029
2837,"Post-built structure on TEC05","315 Middle Bronze Age","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age","pallisade west of and parallel to Trackway 5 on TEC 05","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813062","TEC05",813062
2837,"Post-built structure on TEC05","315 Middle Bronze Age","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age","pallisade west of and parallel to Trackway 5 on TEC 05","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813063","TEC05",813063
2837,"Post-built structure on TEC05","315 Middle Bronze Age","320 Middle or Late Bronze Age","pallisade west of and parallel to Trackway 5 on TEC 05","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 820207","TEC05",820207
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699034","LFA05",699034
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699072","LFA05",699072
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 703036","LFA05",703036
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717010","LFA05",717010
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717034","LFA05",717034
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717041","LFA05",717041
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717052","LFA05",717052
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717054","LFA05",717054
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717057","LFA05",717057
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 724004","LFA05",724004
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 724018","LFA05",724018
2838,"LFA 05 fields","315 Middle Bronze Age","325 Late Bronze Age","fields around settlement","mal","Analysis","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 725031","LFA05",725031
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 229149","POK96",229149
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963017","POK96",963017
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963018","POK96",963018
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963019","POK96",963019
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963020","POK96",963020
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963021","POK96",963021
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963029","POK96",963029
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963040","POK96",963040
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963043","POK96",963043
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963074","POK96",963074
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963096","POK96",963096
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963097","POK96",963097
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963106","POK96",963106
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963109","POK96",963109
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963113","POK96",963113
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963114","POK96",963114
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963138","POK96",963138
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963159","POK96",963159
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963161","POK96",963161
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963218","POK96",963218
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963235","POK96",963235
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963256","POK96",963256
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963267","POK96",963267
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963280","POK96",963280
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963489","POK96",963489
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963494","POK96",963494
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963518","POK96",963518
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963519","POK96",963519
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510001","PSH02",510001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510003","PSH02",510003
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 511022","PSH02",511022
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 512005","PSH02",512005
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 512046","PSH02",512046
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 514001","PSH02",514001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 514067","PSH02",514067
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 514074","PSH02",514074
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 514091","PSH02",514091
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 518001","PSH02",518001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 519001","PSH02",519001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 519002","PSH02",519002
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 520001","PSH02",520001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 520002","PSH02",520002
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 523094","PSH02",523094
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 523118","PSH02",523118
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 523153","PSH02",523153
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 523154","PSH02",523154
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525001","PSH02",525001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526001","PSH02",526001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527001","PSH02",527001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527030","PSH02",527030
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527069","PSH02",527069
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527273","PSH02",527273
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527293","PSH02",527293
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527297","PSH02",527297
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527303","PSH02",527303
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527308","PSH02",527308
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527315","PSH02",527315
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 528001","PSH02",528001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 528003","PSH02",528003
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 529011","PSH02",529011
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 529039","PSH02",529039
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 534001","PSH02",534001
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 539177","PSH02",539177
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 539188","PSH02",539188
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 539235","PSH02",539235
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 539283","PSH02",539283
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 546140","PSH02",546140
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 546189","PSH02",546189
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 548036","PSH02",548036
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 548039","PSH02",548039
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 548041","PSH02",548041
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 549132","PSH02",549132
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 549134","PSH02",549134
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 550113","PSH02",550113
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 552255","PSH02",552255
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 568143","PSH02",568143
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 568148","PSH02",568148
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 579094","PSH02",579094
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 579101","PSH02",579101
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 583160","PSH02",583160
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 583161","PSH02",583161
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 588170","PSH02",588170
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 589283","PSH02",589283
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592337","PSH02",592337
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592393","PSH02",592393
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592394","PSH02",592394
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592397","PSH02",592397
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592400","PSH02",592400
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 593069","PSH02",593069
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 614104","PSH02",614104
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 614119","PSH02",614119
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 614235","PSH02",614235
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621089","PSH02",621089
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621090","PSH02",621090
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 148181","WPR98",148181
2839,"Farmstead 1","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All fields, ditches, gullies, pits, etc and so on that lie within Farmstead 1","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 160356","WPR98",160356
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 698012","LFA05",698012
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 699001","LFA05",699001
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 699010","LFA05",699010
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 699042","LFA05",699042
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 699046","LFA05",699046
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 699060","LFA05",699060
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 711024","LFA05",711024
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 515233","PSH02",515233
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517310","PSH02",517310
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 521096","PSH02",521096
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527078","PSH02",527078
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 539096","PSH02",539096
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 539283","PSH02",539283
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 543201","PSH02",543201
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 543202","PSH02",543202
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 546202","PSH02",546202
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 553191","PSH02",553191
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 554566","PSH02",554566
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 557027","PSH02",557027
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 558016","PSH02",558016
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 559328","PSH02",559328
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 563060","PSH02",563060
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 581045","PSH02",581045
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 583160","PSH02",583160
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 592384","PSH02",592384
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 595072","PSH02",595072
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615008","PSH02",615008
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 646068","PSH02",646068
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 685032","TEC05",685032
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 693006","TEC05",693006
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827119","TEC05",827119
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 830083","TEC05",830083
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 142010","WPR98",142010
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
2840,"(E)MBA-EIA Features with c14 dates","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all features with radiocarbon dates","mal","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961085","POK96",961085
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961091","POK96",961091
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961532","POK96",961532
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963014","POK96",963014
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963055","POK96",963055
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963056","POK96",963056
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 511071","PSH02",511071
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 512098","PSH02",512098
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515039","PSH02",515039
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 515083","PSH02",515083
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517240","PSH02",517240
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517247","PSH02",517247
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 521026","PSH02",521026
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 523019","PSH02",523019
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 523029","PSH02",523029
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526084","PSH02",526084
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526092","PSH02",526092
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526093","PSH02",526093
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526121","PSH02",526121
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526160","PSH02",526160
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526223","PSH02",526223
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526237","PSH02",526237
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526239","PSH02",526239
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526240","PSH02",526240
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 529306","PSH02",529306
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 534107","PSH02",534107
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 538035","PSH02",538035
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 538169","PSH02",538169
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 538172","PSH02",538172
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 538239","PSH02",538239
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 538241","PSH02",538241
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 541005","PSH02",541005
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543191","PSH02",543191
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547279","PSH02",547279
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 550039","PSH02",550039
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 550041","PSH02",550041
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 557104","PSH02",557104
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 561142","PSH02",561142
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 566038","PSH02",566038
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 582148","PSH02",582148
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 587026","PSH02",587026
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594020","PSH02",594020
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 596029","PSH02",596029
2841,"Farmstead 2","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features making up Farmstead 2","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 603036","PSH02",603036
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 231001","POK96",231001
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 960077","POK96",960077
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 960502","POK96",960502
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 960514","POK96",960514
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 960518","POK96",960518
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 960529","POK96",960529
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 960569","POK96",960569
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 960572","POK96",960572
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961578","POK96",961578
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961631","POK96",961631
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961688","POK96",961688
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961744","POK96",961744
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961746","POK96",961746
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961879","POK96",961879
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 962313","POK96",962313
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"POK96 - 963389","POK96",963389
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 308015","PSH02",308015
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 308016","PSH02",308016
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 308018","PSH02",308018
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 312019","PSH02",312019
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 312049","PSH02",312049
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 507019","PSH02",507019
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 512061","PSH02",512061
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 512066","PSH02",512066
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 512119","PSH02",512119
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 516082","PSH02",516082
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 516125","PSH02",516125
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 518145","PSH02",518145
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 523234","PSH02",523234
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 523247","PSH02",523247
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 523250","PSH02",523250
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524242","PSH02",524242
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525048","PSH02",525048
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525172","PSH02",525172
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 526446","PSH02",526446
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 538247","PSH02",538247
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 539398","PSH02",539398
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 541152","PSH02",541152
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 546409","PSH02",546409
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547215","PSH02",547215
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547217","PSH02",547217
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547219","PSH02",547219
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547233","PSH02",547233
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 552023","PSH02",552023
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 552040","PSH02",552040
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558135","PSH02",558135
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558209","PSH02",558209
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 569092","PSH02",569092
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 575172","PSH02",575172
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 575201","PSH02",575201
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 575219","PSH02",575219
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578121","PSH02",578121
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578123","PSH02",578123
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578125","PSH02",578125
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578129","PSH02",578129
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580095","PSH02",580095
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580101","PSH02",580101
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580117","PSH02",580117
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580118","PSH02",580118
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580119","PSH02",580119
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580125","PSH02",580125
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580126","PSH02",580126
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580137","PSH02",580137
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580140","PSH02",580140
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 582309","PSH02",582309
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 590006","PSH02",590006
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 593158","PSH02",593158
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 595018","PSH02",595018
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 595020","PSH02",595020
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 597036","PSH02",597036
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 602262","PSH02",602262
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 602264","PSH02",602264
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 603053","PSH02",603053
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 611100","PSH02",611100
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 614218","PSH02",614218
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615051","PSH02",615051
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615052","PSH02",615052
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 625084","PSH02",625084
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 626050","PSH02",626050
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 626052","PSH02",626052
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 626054","PSH02",626054
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 636072","PSH02",636072
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 636112","PSH02",636112
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 636113","PSH02",636113
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 636118","PSH02",636118
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 636120","PSH02",636120
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 636121","PSH02",636121
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 636123","PSH02",636123
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639062","PSH02",639062
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 641046","PSH02",641046
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 641048","PSH02",641048
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 641050","PSH02",641050
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 641053","PSH02",641053
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 641055","PSH02",641055
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 648110","PSH02",648110
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 653046","PSH02",653046
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 653050","PSH02",653050
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 653062","PSH02",653062
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 653074","PSH02",653074
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 656005","PSH02",656005
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 656007","PSH02",656007
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 656012","PSH02",656012
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 660001","PSH02",660001
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 660069","PSH02",660069
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 660081","PSH02",660081
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 662035","PSH02",662035
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 662038","PSH02",662038
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 662042","PSH02",662042
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 662044","PSH02",662044
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 662048","PSH02",662048
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 662065","PSH02",662065
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 662069","PSH02",662069
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 663047","PSH02",663047
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 663066","PSH02",663066
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 663118","PSH02",663118
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 670043","PSH02",670043
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 671057","PSH02",671057
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 673037","PSH02",673037
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 673039","PSH02",673039
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 673043","PSH02",673043
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 679059","PSH02",679059
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 679069","PSH02",679069
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 680040","PSH02",680040
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 680101","PSH02",680101
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 103019","WPR98",103019
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 103040","WPR98",103040
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 106013","WPR98",106013
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 120013","WPR98",120013
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128022","WPR98",128022
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 130017","WPR98",130017
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132028","WPR98",132028
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132029","WPR98",132029
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 135055","WPR98",135055
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 138019","WPR98",138019
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 143011","WPR98",143011
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 146325","WPR98",146325
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 146327","WPR98",146327
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 147026","WPR98",147026
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 149112","WPR98",149112
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 154016","WPR98",154016
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 154018","WPR98",154018
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 156143","WPR98",156143
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 157025","WPR98",157025
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 157034","WPR98",157034
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 159027","WPR98",159027
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 159031","WPR98",159031
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 160031","WPR98",160031
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 178122","WPR98",178122
2842,"Farmstead 3","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 3","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 311010","PSH02",311010
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 312015","PSH02",312015
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 312024","PSH02",312024
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 509058","PSH02",509058
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 509071","PSH02",509071
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 509077","PSH02",509077
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 509081","PSH02",509081
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 516201","PSH02",516201
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 516212","PSH02",516212
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 517226","PSH02",517226
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 517274","PSH02",517274
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 517310","PSH02",517310
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 523162","PSH02",523162
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 523166","PSH02",523166
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 523180","PSH02",523180
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 523251","PSH02",523251
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524192","PSH02",524192
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524194","PSH02",524194
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524347","PSH02",524347
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524353","PSH02",524353
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524355","PSH02",524355
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524380","PSH02",524380
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524391","PSH02",524391
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524394","PSH02",524394
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 537199","PSH02",537199
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 537201","PSH02",537201
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 537202","PSH02",537202
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 542335","PSH02",542335
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 542336","PSH02",542336
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 542337","PSH02",542337
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 549123","PSH02",549123
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 549128","PSH02",549128
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 551166","PSH02",551166
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 551168","PSH02",551168
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 551181","PSH02",551181
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 552125","PSH02",552125
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 552149","PSH02",552149
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 552160","PSH02",552160
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 553191","PSH02",553191
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 555424","PSH02",555424
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 555436","PSH02",555436
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 555670","PSH02",555670
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 555680","PSH02",555680
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 555682","PSH02",555682
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 555684","PSH02",555684
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 555686","PSH02",555686
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 556151","PSH02",556151
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 556235","PSH02",556235
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 556239","PSH02",556239
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 556241","PSH02",556241
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 569099","PSH02",569099
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 575255","PSH02",575255
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 578249","PSH02",578249
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 579195","PSH02",579195
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 580035","PSH02",580035
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 580175","PSH02",580175
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 581045","PSH02",581045
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 581046","PSH02",581046
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 581121","PSH02",581121
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 581144","PSH02",581144
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 582095","PSH02",582095
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 582285","PSH02",582285
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 582337","PSH02",582337
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 582340","PSH02",582340
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 589176","PSH02",589176
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 593111","PSH02",593111
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 597038","PSH02",597038
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 597061","PSH02",597061
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 598100","PSH02",598100
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 609017","PSH02",609017
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 609020","PSH02",609020
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 611009","PSH02",611009
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 611019","PSH02",611019
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 612032","PSH02",612032
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 612034","PSH02",612034
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 613095","PSH02",613095
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 625018","PSH02",625018
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 625020","PSH02",625020
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 627001","PSH02",627001
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 627007","PSH02",627007
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 627024","PSH02",627024
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 636098","PSH02",636098
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 636141","PSH02",636141
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 638008","PSH02",638008
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 646066","PSH02",646066
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 648078","PSH02",648078
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 653026","PSH02",653026
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 655075","PSH02",655075
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 655077","PSH02",655077
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 655079","PSH02",655079
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 655081","PSH02",655081
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 655087","PSH02",655087
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 655100","PSH02",655100
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 655102","PSH02",655102
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 675049","PSH02",675049
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 107109","WPR98",107109
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 108043","WPR98",108043
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 108045","WPR98",108045
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 108048","WPR98",108048
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 108050","WPR98",108050
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 108053","WPR98",108053
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 108055","WPR98",108055
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 108057","WPR98",108057
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 108060","WPR98",108060
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 125158","WPR98",125158
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 137244","WPR98",137244
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 161172","WPR98",161172
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 171108","WPR98",171108
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 175037","WPR98",175037
2843,"Farmstead 4","000 Prehistoric","000 Prehistoric","All bits and pieces in the area that might ormight not be Farmstead 4","mm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 176017","WPR98",176017
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 308005","PSH02",308005
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 509026","PSH02",509026
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510032","PSH02",510032
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517139","PSH02",517139
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517150","PSH02",517150
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517194","PSH02",517194
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522100","PSH02",522100
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522102","PSH02",522102
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524052","PSH02",524052
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524064","PSH02",524064
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524066","PSH02",524066
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524070","PSH02",524070
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524078","PSH02",524078
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524087","PSH02",524087
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524090","PSH02",524090
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524092","PSH02",524092
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524104","PSH02",524104
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524124","PSH02",524124
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524126","PSH02",524126
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524560","PSH02",524560
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524575","PSH02",524575
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524580","PSH02",524580
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524582","PSH02",524582
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525052","PSH02",525052
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525056","PSH02",525056
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525078","PSH02",525078
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 531024","PSH02",531024
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 539420","PSH02",539420
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542120","PSH02",542120
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542123","PSH02",542123
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542157","PSH02",542157
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542215","PSH02",542215
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542226","PSH02",542226
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543018","PSH02",543018
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543020","PSH02",543020
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543023","PSH02",543023
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543025","PSH02",543025
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543030","PSH02",543030
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543037","PSH02",543037
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543201","PSH02",543201
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543202","PSH02",543202
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 545071","PSH02",545071
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 545074","PSH02",545074
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547041","PSH02",547041
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547047","PSH02",547047
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547058","PSH02",547058
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 548056","PSH02",548056
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 548058","PSH02",548058
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 548060","PSH02",548060
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 549037","PSH02",549037
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551014","PSH02",551014
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 552309","PSH02",552309
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554093","PSH02",554093
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554107","PSH02",554107
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554110","PSH02",554110
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554122","PSH02",554122
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554145","PSH02",554145
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554232","PSH02",554232
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554235","PSH02",554235
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555055","PSH02",555055
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555108","PSH02",555108
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555111","PSH02",555111
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555142","PSH02",555142
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555145","PSH02",555145
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555148","PSH02",555148
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555165","PSH02",555165
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555167","PSH02",555167
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555175","PSH02",555175
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555198","PSH02",555198
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555217","PSH02",555217
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555233","PSH02",555233
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555237","PSH02",555237
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555239","PSH02",555239
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555241","PSH02",555241
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556014","PSH02",556014
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556016","PSH02",556016
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556025","PSH02",556025
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556033","PSH02",556033
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556035","PSH02",556035
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556041","PSH02",556041
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556043","PSH02",556043
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556060","PSH02",556060
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556142","PSH02",556142
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559721","PSH02",559721
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 561052","PSH02",561052
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 561089","PSH02",561089
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 561136","PSH02",561136
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 561169","PSH02",561169
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 561181","PSH02",561181
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 562077","PSH02",562077
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 562085","PSH02",562085
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570478","PSH02",570478
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570479","PSH02",570479
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578559","PSH02",578559
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 579022","PSH02",579022
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 579042","PSH02",579042
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580028","PSH02",580028
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580030","PSH02",580030
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580032","PSH02",580032
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580587","PSH02",580587
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 582005","PSH02",582005
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 582032","PSH02",582032
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 589381","PSH02",589381
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 589383","PSH02",589383
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 589385","PSH02",589385
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 591051","PSH02",591051
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 591066","PSH02",591066
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594107","PSH02",594107
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 614312","PSH02",614312
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 614349","PSH02",614349
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615323","PSH02",615323
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615365","PSH02",615365
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 632125","PSH02",632125
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 632126","PSH02",632126
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 634092","PSH02",634092
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 634094","PSH02",634094
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 634096","PSH02",634096
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 635008","PSH02",635008
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639015","PSH02",639015
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639027","PSH02",639027
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639031","PSH02",639031
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639038","PSH02",639038
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639040","PSH02",639040
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639043","PSH02",639043
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639045","PSH02",639045
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639053","PSH02",639053
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 639056","PSH02",639056
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 643078","PSH02",643078
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 643081","PSH02",643081
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 645024","PSH02",645024
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 645036","PSH02",645036
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 645040","PSH02",645040
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 645055","PSH02",645055
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 649053","PSH02",649053
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 651029","PSH02",651029
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 661021","PSH02",661021
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 661037","PSH02",661037
2844,"Farmstead 5","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 5","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 661041","PSH02",661041
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 516052","PSH02",516052
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517051","PSH02",517051
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517068","PSH02",517068
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517070","PSH02",517070
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517098","PSH02",517098
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517102","PSH02",517102
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517104","PSH02",517104
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517109","PSH02",517109
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 517111","PSH02",517111
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 518056","PSH02",518056
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 518073","PSH02",518073
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 519045","PSH02",519045
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524029","PSH02",524029
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524036","PSH02",524036
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 524050","PSH02",524050
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525012","PSH02",525012
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525016","PSH02",525016
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525225","PSH02",525225
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525227","PSH02",525227
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525229","PSH02",525229
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525238","PSH02",525238
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 528015","PSH02",528015
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542032","PSH02",542032
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542034","PSH02",542034
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542036","PSH02",542036
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542332","PSH02",542332
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 545012","PSH02",545012
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 545019","PSH02",545019
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 546009","PSH02",546009
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547009","PSH02",547009
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 549070","PSH02",549070
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 549080","PSH02",549080
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554011","PSH02",554011
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554584","PSH02",554584
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554586","PSH02",554586
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554588","PSH02",554588
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554598","PSH02",554598
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 555008","PSH02",555008
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578157","PSH02",578157
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578159","PSH02",578159
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580157","PSH02",580157
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 582195","PSH02",582195
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 589086","PSH02",589086
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 591093","PSH02",591093
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594133","PSH02",594133
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594147","PSH02",594147
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594149","PSH02",594149
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 599039","PSH02",599039
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 599163","PSH02",599163
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 107082","WPR98",107082
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 111044","WPR98",111044
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 111065","WPR98",111065
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 111067","WPR98",111067
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 111069","WPR98",111069
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 111070","WPR98",111070
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 111071","WPR98",111071
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 113062","WPR98",113062
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 121135","WPR98",121135
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 121137","WPR98",121137
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 122076","WPR98",122076
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 122078","WPR98",122078
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 122088","WPR98",122088
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 122096","WPR98",122096
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 122100","WPR98",122100
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 122102","WPR98",122102
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 124085","WPR98",124085
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 126038","WPR98",126038
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 126042","WPR98",126042
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 127043","WPR98",127043
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 127053","WPR98",127053
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 127055","WPR98",127055
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 127063","WPR98",127063
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128051","WPR98",128051
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128088","WPR98",128088
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128117","WPR98",128117
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128244","WPR98",128244
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128246","WPR98",128246
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128248","WPR98",128248
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128250","WPR98",128250
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128252","WPR98",128252
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128294","WPR98",128294
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128296","WPR98",128296
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 130164","WPR98",130164
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 130173","WPR98",130173
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 130178","WPR98",130178
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132071","WPR98",132071
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132182","WPR98",132182
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132190","WPR98",132190
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132192","WPR98",132192
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132196","WPR98",132196
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132206","WPR98",132206
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 137069","WPR98",137069
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 137084","WPR98",137084
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 140135","WPR98",140135
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 140137","WPR98",140137
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 141254","WPR98",141254
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 145016","WPR98",145016
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 146090","WPR98",146090
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 146091","WPR98",146091
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 147081","WPR98",147081
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 147083","WPR98",147083
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 147264","WPR98",147264
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 148108","WPR98",148108
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 148320","WPR98",148320
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 149031","WPR98",149031
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 149241","WPR98",149241
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 151063","WPR98",151063
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 151210","WPR98",151210
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 151214","WPR98",151214
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 151222","WPR98",151222
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 155080","WPR98",155080
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 155144","WPR98",155144
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 157065","WPR98",157065
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 160092","WPR98",160092
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 160105","WPR98",160105
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 160184","WPR98",160184
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 161124","WPR98",161124
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 161126","WPR98",161126
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 161130","WPR98",161130
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 161132","WPR98",161132
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 161162","WPR98",161162
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 166160","WPR98",166160
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 166194","WPR98",166194
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 167004","WPR98",167004
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 171063","WPR98",171063
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 180005","WPR98",180005
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 180011","WPR98",180011
2845,"Farmstead 6","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 6","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 180021","WPR98",180021
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 401050","GAA00",401050
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 401053","GAA00",401053
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 401065","GAA00",401065
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 401068","GAA00",401068
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 401071","GAA00",401071
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 401075","GAA00",401075
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 402007","GAA00",402007
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 403030","GAA00",403030
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 403040","GAA00",403040
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 405038","GAA00",405038
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 405050","GAA00",405050
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 405054","GAA00",405054
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 218018","GAI99",218018
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510162","PSH02",510162
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510164","PSH02",510164
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510166","PSH02",510166
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510177","PSH02",510177
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510179","PSH02",510179
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510181","PSH02",510181
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510184","PSH02",510184
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551261","PSH02",551261
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578189","PSH02",578189
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580302","PSH02",580302
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580306","PSH02",580306
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 581182","PSH02",581182
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 581194","PSH02",581194
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 581196","PSH02",581196
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 581200","PSH02",581200
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 113032","WPR98",113032
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 113034","WPR98",113034
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 113036","WPR98",113036
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 124076","WPR98",124076
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 125070","WPR98",125070
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 126025","WPR98",126025
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 126051","WPR98",126051
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 127035","WPR98",127035
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 129084","WPR98",129084
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 137044","WPR98",137044
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 141033","WPR98",141033
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 141038","WPR98",141038
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 147056","WPR98",147056
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 148042","WPR98",148042
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 148063","WPR98",148063
2846,"Farmstead 7","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 7","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 172057","WPR98",172057
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAA00 - 401011","GAA00",401011
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 213062","GAI99",213062
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 214075","GAI99",214075
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 216098","GAI99",216098
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 216112","GAI99",216112
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 218023","GAI99",218023
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 221054","GAI99",221054
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 509174","PSH02",509174
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510047","PSH02",510047
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510048","PSH02",510048
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510063","PSH02",510063
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510066","PSH02",510066
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510067","PSH02",510067
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 510175","PSH02",510175
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525091","PSH02",525091
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 529410","PSH02",529410
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 531041","PSH02",531041
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 531053","PSH02",531053
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 531064","PSH02",531064
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 549152","PSH02",549152
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 549154","PSH02",549154
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 549198","PSH02",549198
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551034","PSH02",551034
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551244","PSH02",551244
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556080","PSH02",556080
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556082","PSH02",556082
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556084","PSH02",556084
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 556102","PSH02",556102
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558033","PSH02",558033
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558035","PSH02",558035
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558051","PSH02",558051
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558079","PSH02",558079
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558232","PSH02",558232
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558253","PSH02",558253
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558255","PSH02",558255
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559778","PSH02",559778
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 581168","PSH02",581168
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 581198","PSH02",581198
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 582189","PSH02",582189
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 619047","PSH02",619047
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 685014","TEC05",685014
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 685032","TEC05",685032
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 685050","TEC05",685050
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 686018","TEC05",686018
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 686025","TEC05",686025
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 687097","TEC05",687097
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 688001","TEC05",688001
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 688013","TEC05",688013
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690044","TEC05",690044
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690049","TEC05",690049
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690079","TEC05",690079
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690084","TEC05",690084
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690086","TEC05",690086
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690088","TEC05",690088
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690090","TEC05",690090
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690092","TEC05",690092
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690094","TEC05",690094
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690097","TEC05",690097
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690099","TEC05",690099
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690101","TEC05",690101
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690105","TEC05",690105
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690107","TEC05",690107
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690112","TEC05",690112
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690118","TEC05",690118
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690119","TEC05",690119
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690120","TEC05",690120
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 690121","TEC05",690121
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 691004","TEC05",691004
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 691010","TEC05",691010
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 693006","TEC05",693006
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 693013","TEC05",693013
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 694021","TEC05",694021
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 694025","TEC05",694025
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695001","TEC05",695001
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695047","TEC05",695047
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695049","TEC05",695049
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695060","TEC05",695060
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 695065","TEC05",695065
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 697001","TEC05",697001
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704011","TEC05",704011
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704012","TEC05",704012
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704013","TEC05",704013
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704015","TEC05",704015
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704016","TEC05",704016
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704017","TEC05",704017
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 704039","TEC05",704039
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705012","TEC05",705012
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705052","TEC05",705052
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705055","TEC05",705055
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705088","TEC05",705088
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 705090","TEC05",705090
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 708014","TEC05",708014
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 708028","TEC05",708028
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 709006","TEC05",709006
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 709007","TEC05",709007
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 718036","TEC05",718036
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 718041","TEC05",718041
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 718043","TEC05",718043
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 729004","TEC05",729004
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 729006","TEC05",729006
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 729014","TEC05",729014
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 729022","TEC05",729022
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 819048","TEC05",819048
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 819050","TEC05",819050
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 822018","TEC05",822018
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 824016","TEC05",824016
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 825005","TEC05",825005
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 825007","TEC05",825007
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 825009","TEC05",825009
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830056","TEC05",830056
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 106029","WPR98",106029
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 121116","WPR98",121116
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 121118","WPR98",121118
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 121153","WPR98",121153
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 127157","WPR98",127157
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 128194","WPR98",128194
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 136085","WPR98",136085
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 141237","WPR98",141237
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 166138","WPR98",166138
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 166140","WPR98",166140
2847,"Farmstead 8","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 166144","WPR98",166144
2848,"Trackway 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","the features that might be another trackway, or just bits of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 214015","GAI99",214015
2848,"Trackway 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","the features that might be another trackway, or just bits of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 221077","GAI99",221077
2848,"Trackway 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","the features that might be another trackway, or just bits of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525212","PSH02",525212
2848,"Trackway 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","the features that might be another trackway, or just bits of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 549187","PSH02",549187
2848,"Trackway 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","the features that might be another trackway, or just bits of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578229","PSH02",578229
2848,"Trackway 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","the features that might be another trackway, or just bits of Farmstead 8","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594152","PSH02",594152
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"GAI99 - 211030","GAI99",211030
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542279","PSH02",542279
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 544166","PSH02",544166
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 544170","PSH02",544170
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 612001","PSH02",612001
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 612003","PSH02",612003
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 622001","PSH02",622001
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 685001","TEC05",685001
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 687005","TEC05",687005
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 687006","TEC05",687006
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 687011","TEC05",687011
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813001","TEC05",813001
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813021","TEC05",813021
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813023","TEC05",813023
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813036","TEC05",813036
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813056","TEC05",813056
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 813060","TEC05",813060
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 814051","TEC05",814051
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 814058","TEC05",814058
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 814063","TEC05",814063
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 814065","TEC05",814065
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 814081","TEC05",814081
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 815022","TEC05",815022
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 815034","TEC05",815034
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 815036","TEC05",815036
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 815041","TEC05",815041
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 815049","TEC05",815049
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 816042","TEC05",816042
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 816149","TEC05",816149
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 816169","TEC05",816169
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 817065","TEC05",817065
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 817112","TEC05",817112
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 819093","TEC05",819093
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 821059","TEC05",821059
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 821074","TEC05",821074
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823027","TEC05",823027
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823039","TEC05",823039
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823059","TEC05",823059
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823077","TEC05",823077
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823079","TEC05",823079
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823082","TEC05",823082
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823152","TEC05",823152
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823154","TEC05",823154
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823156","TEC05",823156
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823181","TEC05",823181
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 825019","TEC05",825019
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 825021","TEC05",825021
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 825031","TEC05",825031
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 825092","TEC05",825092
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827158","TEC05",827158
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827166","TEC05",827166
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827171","TEC05",827171
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827185","TEC05",827185
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827187","TEC05",827187
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827189","TEC05",827189
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827222","TEC05",827222
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827250","TEC05",827250
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 829001","TEC05",829001
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 829014","TEC05",829014
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 829024","TEC05",829024
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 829026","TEC05",829026
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 829034","TEC05",829034
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830091","TEC05",830091
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830093","TEC05",830093
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830095","TEC05",830095
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830097","TEC05",830097
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830099","TEC05",830099
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830101","TEC05",830101
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830103","TEC05",830103
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830105","TEC05",830105
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830107","TEC05",830107
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830109","TEC05",830109
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830111","TEC05",830111
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830113","TEC05",830113
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830115","TEC05",830115
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830119","TEC05",830119
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830121","TEC05",830121
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830123","TEC05",830123
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 833123","TEC05",833123
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 834034","TEC05",834034
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 835030","TEC05",835030
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 835044","TEC05",835044
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 836052","TEC05",836052
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 837031","TEC05",837031
2849,"Farmstead 9","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 9","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 838080","TEC05",838080
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 542276","PSH02",542276
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 547337","PSH02",547337
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551265","PSH02",551265
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554566","PSH02",554566
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559665","PSH02",559665
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 568236","PSH02",568236
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 568244","PSH02",568244
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578501","PSH02",578501
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578502","PSH02",578502
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578598","PSH02",578598
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578630","PSH02",578630
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580366","PSH02",580366
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580372","PSH02",580372
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 581268","PSH02",581268
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 581294","PSH02",581294
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 588275","PSH02",588275
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 589333","PSH02",589333
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594272","PSH02",594272
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 594275","PSH02",594275
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 599083","PSH02",599083
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615235","PSH02",615235
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615237","PSH02",615237
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615244","PSH02",615244
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 815059","TEC05",815059
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 817063","TEC05",817063
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 821054","TEC05",821054
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 821057","TEC05",821057
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 821063","TEC05",821063
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 823117","TEC05",823117
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827037","TEC05",827037
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827119","TEC05",827119
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827150","TEC05",827150
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827152","TEC05",827152
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827191","TEC05",827191
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827195","TEC05",827195
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827199","TEC05",827199
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827201","TEC05",827201
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827203","TEC05",827203
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827205","TEC05",827205
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827207","TEC05",827207
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827211","TEC05",827211
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 827213","TEC05",827213
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 828031","TEC05",828031
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 829038","TEC05",829038
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830003","TEC05",830003
2850,"Farmstead 10","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all features of Farmstead 10","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"TEC05 - 830083","TEC05",830083
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 698001","LFA05",698001
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 698012","LFA05",698012
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699001","LFA05",699001
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699007","LFA05",699007
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699010","LFA05",699010
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699014","LFA05",699014
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699016","LFA05",699016
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699018","LFA05",699018
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699044","LFA05",699044
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699046","LFA05",699046
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699066","LFA05",699066
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 699072","LFA05",699072
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 701001","LFA05",701001
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 701003","LFA05",701003
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 701005","LFA05",701005
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 701007","LFA05",701007
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 702001","LFA05",702001
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 702003","LFA05",702003
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 703036","LFA05",703036
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 703039","LFA05",703039
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 703053","LFA05",703053
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 711024","LFA05",711024
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 713012","LFA05",713012
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 715013","LFA05",715013
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717010","LFA05",717010
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717017","LFA05",717017
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717019","LFA05",717019
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717021","LFA05",717021
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717032","LFA05",717032
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717034","LFA05",717034
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717039","LFA05",717039
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717041","LFA05",717041
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717045","LFA05",717045
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717051","LFA05",717051
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717052","LFA05",717052
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717054","LFA05",717054
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 717057","LFA05",717057
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 723019","LFA05",723019
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 724004","LFA05",724004
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 724011","LFA05",724011
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 724018","LFA05",724018
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 725031","LFA05",725031
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 725032","LFA05",725032
2851,"Farmstead 11","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","All features of Farmstead 11","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"LFA05 - 726001","LFA05",726001
2852,"Trackway 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","maybe a trackway, or not","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 140135","WPR98",140135
2852,"Trackway 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","maybe a trackway, or not","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 151214","WPR98",151214
2852,"Trackway 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","maybe a trackway, or not","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"WPR98 - 151222","WPR98",151222
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 511089","PSH02",511089
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 511109","PSH02",511109
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 511116","PSH02",511116
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 511130","PSH02",511130
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 511189","PSH02",511189
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522049","PSH02",522049
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522053","PSH02",522053
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522058","PSH02",522058
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522059","PSH02",522059
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522064","PSH02",522064
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522066","PSH02",522066
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522070","PSH02",522070
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522076","PSH02",522076
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522080","PSH02",522080
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522084","PSH02",522084
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522087","PSH02",522087
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522089","PSH02",522089
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522091","PSH02",522091
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522093","PSH02",522093
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 522095","PSH02",522095
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 525449","PSH02",525449
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 527420","PSH02",527420
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 530059","PSH02",530059
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 531139","PSH02",531139
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 531146","PSH02",531146
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 539136","PSH02",539136
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 539149","PSH02",539149
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 539365","PSH02",539365
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 541030","PSH02",541030
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 541116","PSH02",541116
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 541119","PSH02",541119
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 541121","PSH02",541121
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 541123","PSH02",541123
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543263","PSH02",543263
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 544135","PSH02",544135
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 545121","PSH02",545121
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551353","PSH02",551353
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551355","PSH02",551355
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551357","PSH02",551357
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551359","PSH02",551359
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551361","PSH02",551361
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551363","PSH02",551363
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 551365","PSH02",551365
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 552096","PSH02",552096
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 552312","PSH02",552312
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 554614","PSH02",554614
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 558265","PSH02",558265
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559159","PSH02",559159
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559181","PSH02",559181
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559188","PSH02",559188
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559357","PSH02",559357
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559361","PSH02",559361
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559368","PSH02",559368
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559370","PSH02",559370
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559372","PSH02",559372
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559824","PSH02",559824
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570328","PSH02",570328
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570337","PSH02",570337
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570487","PSH02",570487
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570501","PSH02",570501
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570504","PSH02",570504
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570507","PSH02",570507
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 570574","PSH02",570574
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 571041","PSH02",571041
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 572041","PSH02",572041
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 573038","PSH02",573038
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 573040","PSH02",573040
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 573042","PSH02",573042
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 573052","PSH02",573052
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 575099","PSH02",575099
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 575101","PSH02",575101
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 575129","PSH02",575129
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 576030","PSH02",576030
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 576041","PSH02",576041
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 576043","PSH02",576043
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 576047","PSH02",576047
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 576050","PSH02",576050
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 576057","PSH02",576057
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592083","PSH02",592083
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592261","PSH02",592261
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592267","PSH02",592267
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592315","PSH02",592315
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 601111","PSH02",601111
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 602095","PSH02",602095
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 602110","PSH02",602110
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 602117","PSH02",602117
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615113","PSH02",615113
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615115","PSH02",615115
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615119","PSH02",615119
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 615273","PSH02",615273
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 618002","PSH02",618002
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621135","PSH02",621135
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621144","PSH02",621144
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621152","PSH02",621152
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621154","PSH02",621154
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621190","PSH02",621190
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621192","PSH02",621192
2853,"Farmstead 12","315 Middle Bronze Age","999 Unphased","all the bits and pieces in the south west corner","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 621194","PSH02",621194
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543266","PSH02",543266
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 543269","PSH02",543269
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 559516","PSH02",559516
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578253","PSH02",578253
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578288","PSH02",578288
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578289","PSH02",578289
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578290","PSH02",578290
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578307","PSH02",578307
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578340","PSH02",578340
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 578616","PSH02",578616
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580454","PSH02",580454
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 580455","PSH02",580455
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 589347","PSH02",589347
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 592161","PSH02",592161
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 598118","PSH02",598118
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 598134","PSH02",598134
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 598137","PSH02",598137
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 618039","PSH02",618039
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 618055","PSH02",618055
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 618057","PSH02",618057
2854,"Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age stray features NW","325 Late Bronze Age","999 Unphased","pit clusters and other bits and bobs  that don’t fit anywhere else","mal","Publication","Unassigned",,,"PSH02 - 619020","PSH02",619020
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 230256","POK96",230256
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960008","POK96",960008
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960077","POK96",960077
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960502","POK96",960502
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961085","POK96",961085
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961091","POK96",961091
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961103","POK96",961103
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961503","POK96",961503
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961504","POK96",961504
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961508","POK96",961508
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961532","POK96",961532
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961577","POK96",961577
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961578","POK96",961578
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961614","POK96",961614
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961631","POK96",961631
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961720","POK96",961720
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961744","POK96",961744
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961745","POK96",961745
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961746","POK96",961746
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961747","POK96",961747
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961748","POK96",961748
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961754","POK96",961754
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961850","POK96",961850
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961900","POK96",961900
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962170","POK96",962170
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962211","POK96",962211
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962213","POK96",962213
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962216","POK96",962216
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962257","POK96",962257
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962259","POK96",962259
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962313","POK96",962313
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962328","POK96",962328
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962366","POK96",962366
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963008","POK96",963008
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963014","POK96",963014
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963055","POK96",963055
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963056","POK96",963056
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963068","POK96",963068
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963389","POK96",963389
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963456","POK96",963456
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963512","POK96",963512
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 308005","PSH02",308005
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 308015","PSH02",308015
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 308016","PSH02",308016
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 308018","PSH02",308018
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 312015","PSH02",312015
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 312019","PSH02",312019
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 312049","PSH02",312049
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 507019","PSH02",507019
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 509026","PSH02",509026
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 509185","PSH02",509185
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510063","PSH02",510063
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510066","PSH02",510066
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510067","PSH02",510067
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510162","PSH02",510162
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510164","PSH02",510164
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510166","PSH02",510166
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510175","PSH02",510175
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510177","PSH02",510177
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510179","PSH02",510179
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510181","PSH02",510181
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 511071","PSH02",511071
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 511119","PSH02",511119
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512061","PSH02",512061
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512066","PSH02",512066
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512098","PSH02",512098
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512119","PSH02",512119
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 515039","PSH02",515039
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 515083","PSH02",515083
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 516052","PSH02",516052
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 516082","PSH02",516082
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517051","PSH02",517051
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517068","PSH02",517068
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517070","PSH02",517070
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517098","PSH02",517098
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517104","PSH02",517104
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517113","PSH02",517113
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517240","PSH02",517240
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517247","PSH02",517247
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 518145","PSH02",518145
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 521026","PSH02",521026
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 523019","PSH02",523019
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 523029","PSH02",523029
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 523234","PSH02",523234
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 523247","PSH02",523247
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 523250","PSH02",523250
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524029","PSH02",524029
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524064","PSH02",524064
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524078","PSH02",524078
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524087","PSH02",524087
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524090","PSH02",524090
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524104","PSH02",524104
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524124","PSH02",524124
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524126","PSH02",524126
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524232","PSH02",524232
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524242","PSH02",524242
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524575","PSH02",524575
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524580","PSH02",524580
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524582","PSH02",524582
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 525016","PSH02",525016
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 525052","PSH02",525052
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 525078","PSH02",525078
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 525172","PSH02",525172
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526084","PSH02",526084
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526092","PSH02",526092
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526093","PSH02",526093
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526121","PSH02",526121
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526160","PSH02",526160
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526223","PSH02",526223
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526237","PSH02",526237
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526239","PSH02",526239
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526240","PSH02",526240
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526446","PSH02",526446
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526460","PSH02",526460
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526462","PSH02",526462
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527148","PSH02",527148
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 528009","PSH02",528009
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 528028","PSH02",528028
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 529410","PSH02",529410
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 534107","PSH02",534107
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 538035","PSH02",538035
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 538169","PSH02",538169
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 538172","PSH02",538172
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 538239","PSH02",538239
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 538241","PSH02",538241
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 538247","PSH02",538247
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 541005","PSH02",541005
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 541152","PSH02",541152
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 542032","PSH02",542032
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 542034","PSH02",542034
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 542036","PSH02",542036
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 542063","PSH02",542063
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 543191","PSH02",543191
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 545019","PSH02",545019
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 545050","PSH02",545050
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 545054","PSH02",545054
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 545056","PSH02",545056
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 545077","PSH02",545077
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 546409","PSH02",546409
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547041","PSH02",547041
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547047","PSH02",547047
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547215","PSH02",547215
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547217","PSH02",547217
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547219","PSH02",547219
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547279","PSH02",547279
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 549063","PSH02",549063
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 549065","PSH02",549065
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 549080","PSH02",549080
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 550039","PSH02",550039
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 550041","PSH02",550041
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 552023","PSH02",552023
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 552040","PSH02",552040
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 552042","PSH02",552042
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 552118","PSH02",552118
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 552123","PSH02",552123
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 552309","PSH02",552309
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 554011","PSH02",554011
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 554093","PSH02",554093
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 554107","PSH02",554107
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 554110","PSH02",554110
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555008","PSH02",555008
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555055","PSH02",555055
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555108","PSH02",555108
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555111","PSH02",555111
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555142","PSH02",555142
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555145","PSH02",555145
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555148","PSH02",555148
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555165","PSH02",555165
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555167","PSH02",555167
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555426","PSH02",555426
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555530","PSH02",555530
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 557104","PSH02",557104
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 558033","PSH02",558033
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 558035","PSH02",558035
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 558209","PSH02",558209
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 558255","PSH02",558255
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 559721","PSH02",559721
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 561142","PSH02",561142
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 566038","PSH02",566038
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 569092","PSH02",569092
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 570478","PSH02",570478
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 570479","PSH02",570479
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 573074","PSH02",573074
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 575172","PSH02",575172
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 575201","PSH02",575201
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 575219","PSH02",575219
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 578133","PSH02",578133
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 578559","PSH02",578559
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580095","PSH02",580095
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580125","PSH02",580125
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580137","PSH02",580137
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580140","PSH02",580140
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580302","PSH02",580302
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580306","PSH02",580306
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580587","PSH02",580587
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 581182","PSH02",581182
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 581200","PSH02",581200
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 582148","PSH02",582148
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 582309","PSH02",582309
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 586060","PSH02",586060
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 586061","PSH02",586061
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 586062","PSH02",586062
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 587026","PSH02",587026
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 588368","PSH02",588368
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 590006","PSH02",590006
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 591061","PSH02",591061
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 594020","PSH02",594020
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 595018","PSH02",595018
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 595020","PSH02",595020
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 596029","PSH02",596029
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 597033","PSH02",597033
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 597036","PSH02",597036
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 598081","PSH02",598081
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 598082","PSH02",598082
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 598093","PSH02",598093
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 602262","PSH02",602262
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 603025","PSH02",603025
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 603036","PSH02",603036
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 603053","PSH02",603053
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 614218","PSH02",614218
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 614312","PSH02",614312
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 614343","PSH02",614343
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 614349","PSH02",614349
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615051","PSH02",615051
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615052","PSH02",615052
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615323","PSH02",615323
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615348","PSH02",615348
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615350","PSH02",615350
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615355","PSH02",615355
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615365","PSH02",615365
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 622001","PSH02",622001
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 630081","PSH02",630081
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 630082","PSH02",630082
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 632125","PSH02",632125
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 632126","PSH02",632126
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 634092","PSH02",634092
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 634094","PSH02",634094
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 634096","PSH02",634096
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 636072","PSH02",636072
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 636120","PSH02",636120
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 636121","PSH02",636121
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 636123","PSH02",636123
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 636125","PSH02",636125
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 639062","PSH02",639062
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 639085","PSH02",639085
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 643078","PSH02",643078
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 643081","PSH02",643081
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 645024","PSH02",645024
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 645036","PSH02",645036
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 645040","PSH02",645040
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 645055","PSH02",645055
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 648110","PSH02",648110
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 656005","PSH02",656005
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 656007","PSH02",656007
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 656012","PSH02",656012
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 656039","PSH02",656039
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 661021","PSH02",661021
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 661037","PSH02",661037
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 661041","PSH02",661041
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 663047","PSH02",663047
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 663066","PSH02",663066
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 665024","PSH02",665024
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 670043","PSH02",670043
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 671050","PSH02",671050
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 671053","PSH02",671053
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 671057","PSH02",671057
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 679069","PSH02",679069
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 685050","TEC05",685050
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 686018","TEC05",686018
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 686025","TEC05",686025
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 687097","TEC05",687097
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690084","TEC05",690084
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690086","TEC05",690086
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690088","TEC05",690088
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690090","TEC05",690090
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690092","TEC05",690092
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690094","TEC05",690094
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690097","TEC05",690097
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690099","TEC05",690099
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690101","TEC05",690101
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690105","TEC05",690105
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690107","TEC05",690107
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690118","TEC05",690118
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690119","TEC05",690119
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690120","TEC05",690120
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 690121","TEC05",690121
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 691004","TEC05",691004
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 694021","TEC05",694021
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 694025","TEC05",694025
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 695047","TEC05",695047
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 695049","TEC05",695049
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 695065","TEC05",695065
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 697001","TEC05",697001
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 704012","TEC05",704012
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 704013","TEC05",704013
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 704015","TEC05",704015
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 704017","TEC05",704017
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 704039","TEC05",704039
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 705052","TEC05",705052
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 705055","TEC05",705055
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 705088","TEC05",705088
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 705090","TEC05",705090
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 729004","TEC05",729004
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 812007","TEC05",812007
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 812021","TEC05",812021
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 812026","TEC05",812026
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 812038","TEC05",812038
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 813021","TEC05",813021
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 813023","TEC05",813023
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 813036","TEC05",813036
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 813056","TEC05",813056
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 813062","TEC05",813062
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 813063","TEC05",813063
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 813064","TEC05",813064
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 819050","TEC05",819050
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 820200","TEC05",820200
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 820207","TEC05",820207
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 823146","TEC05",823146
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 824016","TEC05",824016
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827154","TEC05",827154
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827371","TEC05",827371
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827373","TEC05",827373
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827375","TEC05",827375
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827379","TEC05",827379
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827381","TEC05",827381
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827383","TEC05",827383
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827385","TEC05",827385
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827387","TEC05",827387
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 833109","TEC05",833109
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103019","WPR98",103019
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103024","WPR98",103024
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 105008","WPR98",105008
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 105009","WPR98",105009
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 106029","WPR98",106029
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107011","WPR98",107011
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107013","WPR98",107013
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107029","WPR98",107029
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107082","WPR98",107082
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 107109","WPR98",107109
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110007","WPR98",110007
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110009","WPR98",110009
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110010","WPR98",110010
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110014","WPR98",110014
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111012","WPR98",111012
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111015","WPR98",111015
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111044","WPR98",111044
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111049","WPR98",111049
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111065","WPR98",111065
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111067","WPR98",111067
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111069","WPR98",111069
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111070","WPR98",111070
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 111071","WPR98",111071
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113006","WPR98",113006
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113032","WPR98",113032
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113034","WPR98",113034
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113036","WPR98",113036
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113048","WPR98",113048
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113062","WPR98",113062
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113082","WPR98",113082
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 113124","WPR98",113124
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 115007","WPR98",115007
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119014","WPR98",119014
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119032","WPR98",119032
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119034","WPR98",119034
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119235","WPR98",119235
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 119268","WPR98",119268
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 120013","WPR98",120013
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121009","WPR98",121009
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121116","WPR98",121116
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121118","WPR98",121118
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121135","WPR98",121135
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 121137","WPR98",121137
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122035","WPR98",122035
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122036","WPR98",122036
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 122088","WPR98",122088
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124076","WPR98",124076
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124091","WPR98",124091
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125070","WPR98",125070
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125100","WPR98",125100
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125102","WPR98",125102
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126038","WPR98",126038
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126042","WPR98",126042
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126051","WPR98",126051
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126053","WPR98",126053
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126066","WPR98",126066
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127035","WPR98",127035
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127043","WPR98",127043
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127053","WPR98",127053
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127055","WPR98",127055
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127063","WPR98",127063
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127095","WPR98",127095
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 127101","WPR98",127101
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128011","WPR98",128011
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128013","WPR98",128013
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128051","WPR98",128051
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128068","WPR98",128068
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128088","WPR98",128088
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128109","WPR98",128109
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128113","WPR98",128113
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128115","WPR98",128115
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128117","WPR98",128117
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128194","WPR98",128194
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128244","WPR98",128244
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128246","WPR98",128246
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128252","WPR98",128252
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128294","WPR98",128294
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 128296","WPR98",128296
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129006","WPR98",129006
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 129081","WPR98",129081
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130016","WPR98",130016
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130017","WPR98",130017
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130119","WPR98",130119
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130123","WPR98",130123
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130127","WPR98",130127
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130149","WPR98",130149
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130178","WPR98",130178
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132028","WPR98",132028
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132029","WPR98",132029
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 132208","WPR98",132208
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 135007","WPR98",135007
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136044","WPR98",136044
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136046","WPR98",136046
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136075","WPR98",136075
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136085","WPR98",136085
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136153","WPR98",136153
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136156","WPR98",136156
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 137044","WPR98",137044
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 138018","WPR98",138018
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 138019","WPR98",138019
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141033","WPR98",141033
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141038","WPR98",141038
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141056","WPR98",141056
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141254","WPR98",141254
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 143011","WPR98",143011
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 145016","WPR98",145016
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146090","WPR98",146090
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146091","WPR98",146091
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147020","WPR98",147020
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147026","WPR98",147026
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147056","WPR98",147056
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147081","WPR98",147081
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147083","WPR98",147083
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147106","WPR98",147106
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 147114","WPR98",147114
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148063","WPR98",148063
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148320","WPR98",148320
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149031","WPR98",149031
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149099","WPR98",149099
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149112","WPR98",149112
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149129","WPR98",149129
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149139","WPR98",149139
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149141","WPR98",149141
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 149150","WPR98",149150
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151011","WPR98",151011
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151028","WPR98",151028
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 151063","WPR98",151063
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 155011","WPR98",155011
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156007","WPR98",156007
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156029","WPR98",156029
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156143","WPR98",156143
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157017","WPR98",157017
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157021","WPR98",157021
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157025","WPR98",157025
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157034","WPR98",157034
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159101","WPR98",159101
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159103","WPR98",159103
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159107","WPR98",159107
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159109","WPR98",159109
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160016","WPR98",160016
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160031","WPR98",160031
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160104","WPR98",160104
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160108","WPR98",160108
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160233","WPR98",160233
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 163030","WPR98",163030
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 163063","WPR98",163063
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166138","WPR98",166138
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166160","WPR98",166160
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166174","WPR98",166174
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 166194","WPR98",166194
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 171063","WPR98",171063
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 171108","WPR98",171108
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 172057","WPR98",172057
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180005","WPR98",180005
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180011","WPR98",180011
2855,"The First Agricultural Landscape","315 Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Hypothetical reconstruction of features belonging to the establishment of the agricultural landscape, probably around 1600 cal BC. Based on c14 determinations, morphology, later developments and informed guesswork.","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180021","WPR98",180021
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 698028","LFA05",698028
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 698036","LFA05",698036
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 711024","LFA05",711024
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"LFA05 - 726001","LFA05",726001
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960514","POK96",960514
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960529","POK96",960529
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961744","POK96",961744
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963043","POK96",963043
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963114","POK96",963114
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963235","POK96",963235
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963267","POK96",963267
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963518","POK96",963518
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963519","POK96",963519
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 311010","PSH02",311010
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 509174","PSH02",509174
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 510047","PSH02",510047
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 516082","PSH02",516082
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517274","PSH02",517274
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 517310","PSH02",517310
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 538144","PSH02",538144
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 544092","PSH02",544092
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547058","PSH02",547058
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 549198","PSH02",549198
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 551006","PSH02",551006
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 551034","PSH02",551034
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 553191","PSH02",553191
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 554659","PSH02",554659
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 557034","PSH02",557034
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 559665","PSH02",559665
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 563032","PSH02",563032
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 563060","PSH02",563060
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 568236","PSH02",568236
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 568244","PSH02",568244
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 569099","PSH02",569099
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 578501","PSH02",578501
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 581168","PSH02",581168
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 582285","PSH02",582285
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 594020","PSH02",594020
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 594272","PSH02",594272
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 611100","PSH02",611100
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 611106","PSH02",611106
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 611107","PSH02",611107
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 615008","PSH02",615008
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 625018","PSH02",625018
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 627024","PSH02",627024
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 635008","PSH02",635008
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 638008","PSH02",638008
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 641097","PSH02",641097
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 648078","PSH02",648078
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 653026","PSH02",653026
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 653046","PSH02",653046
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 653050","PSH02",653050
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 653062","PSH02",653062
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 685032","TEC05",685032
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 687005","TEC05",687005
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 687006","TEC05",687006
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 687011","TEC05",687011
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 693006","TEC05",693006
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 708014","TEC05",708014
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 708028","TEC05",708028
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 709006","TEC05",709006
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 709007","TEC05",709007
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 815041","TEC05",815041
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 816042","TEC05",816042
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 823156","TEC05",823156
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 823181","TEC05",823181
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 827250","TEC05",827250
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 830056","TEC05",830056
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 833123","TEC05",833123
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 834034","TEC05",834034
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 835044","TEC05",835044
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 836052","TEC05",836052
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103038","WPR98",103038
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 103040","WPR98",103040
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 110107","WPR98",110107
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 124100","WPR98",124100
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125233","WPR98",125233
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125244","WPR98",125244
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 126025","WPR98",126025
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 135055","WPR98",135055
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 135071","WPR98",135071
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 141024","WPR98",141024
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146039","WPR98",146039
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146043","WPR98",146043
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 146048","WPR98",146048
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148042","WPR98",148042
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148108","WPR98",148108
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 155144","WPR98",155144
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156028","WPR98",156028
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156031","WPR98",156031
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 157243","WPR98",157243
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 159200","WPR98",159200
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178108","WPR98",178108
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178122","WPR98",178122
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
2856,"Wells and waterholes","315 Middle Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","all wells and waterholes","mal","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180101","WPR98",180101
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 516082","PSH02",516082
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 593158","PSH02",593158
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 625084","PSH02",625084
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 626050","PSH02",626050
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 626052","PSH02",626052
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 626054","PSH02",626054
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 636123","PSH02",636123
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 662035","PSH02",662035
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 662038","PSH02",662038
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 662042","PSH02",662042
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 662044","PSH02",662044
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 662048","PSH02",662048
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 662065","PSH02",662065
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 662069","PSH02",662069
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 663118","PSH02",663118
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 663167","PSH02",663167
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 673037","PSH02",673037
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 673039","PSH02",673039
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 673043","PSH02",673043
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 679059","PSH02",679059
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 679069","PSH02",679069
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 680101","PSH02",680101
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 103038","WPR98",103038
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 106013","WPR98",106013
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 136194","WPR98",136194
2857,"LBA/EAI settlement in Farmstead 3","325 Late Bronze Age","410 Early Iron Age","possible later settlement in the eastern half of the outer 'D'-shaped enclosure","mal","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 180080","WPR98",180080
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524218","PSH02",524218
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524220","PSH02",524220
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 524224","PSH02",524224
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 555536","PSH02",555536
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 578138","PSH02",578138
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 120028","WPR98",120028
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 137021","WPR98",137021
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 159025","WPR98",159025
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160021","WPR98",160021
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 162010","WPR98",162010
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 165003","WPR98",165003
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 165005","WPR98",165005
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 165007","WPR98",165007
2858,"Mesolithic Burnt Pits in WPR and PSH near C1 cursu","160 Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","All The Meso burnt flint -filled pits and post holes dating to late seventh millennium BC in WPR 98 bed B and PSH02","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 165009","WPR98",165009
2859,"Undated post holes nearC1 cursus","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of post joles near C1 cursus. Originally thought to be Mesolithic due to their association with burnt flint pits. However there is no independent dating evidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 590017","PSH02",590017
2859,"Undated post holes nearC1 cursus","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of post joles near C1 cursus. Originally thought to be Mesolithic due to their association with burnt flint pits. However there is no independent dating evidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 590021","PSH02",590021
2859,"Undated post holes nearC1 cursus","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of post joles near C1 cursus. Originally thought to be Mesolithic due to their association with burnt flint pits. However there is no independent dating evidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 590023","PSH02",590023
2859,"Undated post holes nearC1 cursus","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of post joles near C1 cursus. Originally thought to be Mesolithic due to their association with burnt flint pits. However there is no independent dating evidence.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 590025","PSH02",590025
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 801012","BCU02",801012
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 801076","BCU02",801076
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 806028","BCU02",806028
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 806030","BCU02",806030
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 806032","BCU02",806032
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 806034","BCU02",806034
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 806036","BCU02",806036
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 807017","BCU02",807017
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 807023","BCU02",807023
2860,"Mesolithic stakehole complex at Bedfont Court","170 Late Mesolithic","170 Late Mesolithic","Stakeholes and pits in two test pits (TP2081 and 2084) at BCU02. C14 on one piece of wood from stakehole 807024 gave date centering on 6,100 BC. Other features dated to the same period as they cut tuffa 807016 and were sealed by tufa 807015.","JSCL","Analysis","Highlight",,,"BCU02 - 807024","BCU02",807024
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 962054","POK96",962054
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 962063","POK96",962063
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 962067","POK96",962067
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 962081","POK96",962081
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 962132","POK96",962132
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"POK96 - 962200","POK96",962200
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 512103","PSH02",512103
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 513080","PSH02",513080
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 521022","PSH02",521022
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524204","PSH02",524204
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 525481","PSH02",525481
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 527229","PSH02",527229
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 527233","PSH02",527233
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529196","PSH02",529196
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529198","PSH02",529198
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529210","PSH02",529210
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529516","PSH02",529516
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529520","PSH02",529520
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 555449","PSH02",555449
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 555466","PSH02",555466
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 559507","PSH02",559507
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 569066","PSH02",569066
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 575149","PSH02",575149
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 579136","PSH02",579136
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 579140","PSH02",579140
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 579142","PSH02",579142
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 582115","PSH02",582115
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 587028","PSH02",587028
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 588042","PSH02",588042
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 598027","PSH02",598027
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605003","PSH02",605003
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605005","PSH02",605005
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605007","PSH02",605007
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605009","PSH02",605009
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 605011","PSH02",605011
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 128032","WPR98",128032
2861,"Features stratigraphically earlier than C1 Cursus","180 Mesolithic or Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","All pits, post holes and tree throws, and gullys that definitely pre-date either phase of the C1 Stanwell cursus.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 178054","WPR98",178054
2863,"Penannular Gully 19","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Middle iron Age roundhouse 19 with a rather nice possible doorway surviving as a charred beamslot","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 574040","PSH02",574040
2863,"Penannular Gully 19","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Middle iron Age roundhouse 19 with a rather nice possible doorway surviving as a charred beamslot","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 577003","PSH02",577003
2863,"Penannular Gully 19","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Middle iron Age roundhouse 19 with a rather nice possible doorway surviving as a charred beamslot","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 577024","PSH02",577024
2863,"Penannular Gully 19","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Middle iron Age roundhouse 19 with a rather nice possible doorway surviving as a charred beamslot","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614227","PSH02",614227
2863,"Penannular Gully 19","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Middle iron Age roundhouse 19 with a rather nice possible doorway surviving as a charred beamslot","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636013","PSH02",636013
2864,"Penannular Gully 20","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Slightly irregularly shaped penannular gully truncated by one of the Twin Rivers. The likely construction date for the penannular gully is derived from pottery within 636133 which probably marks the entrance to the structure","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636130","PSH02",636130
2864,"Penannular Gully 20","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Slightly irregularly shaped penannular gully truncated by one of the Twin Rivers. The likely construction date for the penannular gully is derived from pottery within 636133 which probably marks the entrance to the structure","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636133","PSH02",636133
2864,"Penannular Gully 20","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Slightly irregularly shaped penannular gully truncated by one of the Twin Rivers. The likely construction date for the penannular gully is derived from pottery within 636133 which probably marks the entrance to the structure","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663108","PSH02",663108
2864,"Penannular Gully 20","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Slightly irregularly shaped penannular gully truncated by one of the Twin Rivers. The likely construction date for the penannular gully is derived from pottery within 636133 which probably marks the entrance to the structure","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663113","PSH02",663113
2865,"Penannular Gully 21","420 Middle Iron Age","500 Romano-British","Penannular gully of likely Middle Iron Age construction date. The eastern side and northern sides  of the gully were recut and fills of the recut surrendered a Roman military buckle which may indicate the longevity of the structure.  More likely however it is a chance find that accumulated in the surviving gully after the abandonment/destruction of the structure itself. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The construction date for the roundhouse is probably indicated by the Middle Iron Age pottery contained in t he one surviving and almost central post hole (with surviving post-pipe) and the material of equivalent date that accumaulated in the penannular gully fills. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Here is some uncertainty concerning the precise form of the southern side of the probable south-eastern entrance. It is unclear whether feature 663208 belongs to the penannular gully although this appears to be the interpretation favoured by the excavator. It is possible that there was some confusion with a possible continuation of feature 538359 which lies some metres to the east","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633115","PSH02",633115
2865,"Penannular Gully 21","420 Middle Iron Age","500 Romano-British","Penannular gully of likely Middle Iron Age construction date. The eastern side and northern sides  of the gully were recut and fills of the recut surrendered a Roman military buckle which may indicate the longevity of the structure.  More likely however it is a chance find that accumulated in the surviving gully after the abandonment/destruction of the structure itself. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The construction date for the roundhouse is probably indicated by the Middle Iron Age pottery contained in t he one surviving and almost central post hole (with surviving post-pipe) and the material of equivalent date that accumaulated in the penannular gully fills. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Here is some uncertainty concerning the precise form of the southern side of the probable south-eastern entrance. It is unclear whether feature 663208 belongs to the penannular gully although this appears to be the interpretation favoured by the excavator. It is possible that there was some confusion with a possible continuation of feature 538359 which lies some metres to the east","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633117","PSH02",633117
2865,"Penannular Gully 21","420 Middle Iron Age","500 Romano-British","Penannular gully of likely Middle Iron Age construction date. The eastern side and northern sides  of the gully were recut and fills of the recut surrendered a Roman military buckle which may indicate the longevity of the structure.  More likely however it is a chance find that accumulated in the surviving gully after the abandonment/destruction of the structure itself. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The construction date for the roundhouse is probably indicated by the Middle Iron Age pottery contained in t he one surviving and almost central post hole (with surviving post-pipe) and the material of equivalent date that accumaulated in the penannular gully fills. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Here is some uncertainty concerning the precise form of the southern side of the probable south-eastern entrance. It is unclear whether feature 663208 belongs to the penannular gully although this appears to be the interpretation favoured by the excavator. It is possible that there was some confusion with a possible continuation of feature 538359 which lies some metres to the east","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636144","PSH02",636144
2865,"Penannular Gully 21","420 Middle Iron Age","500 Romano-British","Penannular gully of likely Middle Iron Age construction date. The eastern side and northern sides  of the gully were recut and fills of the recut surrendered a Roman military buckle which may indicate the longevity of the structure.  More likely however it is a chance find that accumulated in the surviving gully after the abandonment/destruction of the structure itself. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The construction date for the roundhouse is probably indicated by the Middle Iron Age pottery contained in t he one surviving and almost central post hole (with surviving post-pipe) and the material of equivalent date that accumaulated in the penannular gully fills. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Here is some uncertainty concerning the precise form of the southern side of the probable south-eastern entrance. It is unclear whether feature 663208 belongs to the penannular gully although this appears to be the interpretation favoured by the excavator. It is possible that there was some confusion with a possible continuation of feature 538359 which lies some metres to the east","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636147","PSH02",636147
2865,"Penannular Gully 21","420 Middle Iron Age","500 Romano-British","Penannular gully of likely Middle Iron Age construction date. The eastern side and northern sides  of the gully were recut and fills of the recut surrendered a Roman military buckle which may indicate the longevity of the structure.  More likely however it is a chance find that accumulated in the surviving gully after the abandonment/destruction of the structure itself. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The construction date for the roundhouse is probably indicated by the Middle Iron Age pottery contained in t he one surviving and almost central post hole (with surviving post-pipe) and the material of equivalent date that accumaulated in the penannular gully fills. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Here is some uncertainty concerning the precise form of the southern side of the probable south-eastern entrance. It is unclear whether feature 663208 belongs to the penannular gully although this appears to be the interpretation favoured by the excavator. It is possible that there was some confusion with a possible continuation of feature 538359 which lies some metres to the east","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636149","PSH02",636149
2865,"Penannular Gully 21","420 Middle Iron Age","500 Romano-British","Penannular gully of likely Middle Iron Age construction date. The eastern side and northern sides  of the gully were recut and fills of the recut surrendered a Roman military buckle which may indicate the longevity of the structure.  More likely however it is a chance find that accumulated in the surviving gully after the abandonment/destruction of the structure itself. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The construction date for the roundhouse is probably indicated by the Middle Iron Age pottery contained in t he one surviving and almost central post hole (with surviving post-pipe) and the material of equivalent date that accumaulated in the penannular gully fills. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Here is some uncertainty concerning the precise form of the southern side of the probable south-eastern entrance. It is unclear whether feature 663208 belongs to the penannular gully although this appears to be the interpretation favoured by the excavator. It is possible that there was some confusion with a possible continuation of feature 538359 which lies some metres to the east","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 658192","PSH02",658192
2865,"Penannular Gully 21","420 Middle Iron Age","500 Romano-British","Penannular gully of likely Middle Iron Age construction date. The eastern side and northern sides  of the gully were recut and fills of the recut surrendered a Roman military buckle which may indicate the longevity of the structure.  More likely however it is a chance find that accumulated in the surviving gully after the abandonment/destruction of the structure itself. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The construction date for the roundhouse is probably indicated by the Middle Iron Age pottery contained in t he one surviving and almost central post hole (with surviving post-pipe) and the material of equivalent date that accumaulated in the penannular gully fills. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Here is some uncertainty concerning the precise form of the southern side of the probable south-eastern entrance. It is unclear whether feature 663208 belongs to the penannular gully although this appears to be the interpretation favoured by the excavator. It is possible that there was some confusion with a possible continuation of feature 538359 which lies some metres to the east","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663208","PSH02",663208
2866,"Penannular Gully 22","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Fragmentary remains of a Middle Iron Age penannular gully with only the north side surviving in a heavily truncated form","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 655105","PSH02",655105
2866,"Penannular Gully 22","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Fragmentary remains of a Middle Iron Age penannular gully with only the north side surviving in a heavily truncated form","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 655146","PSH02",655146
2867,"Penannular Gully 24","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Penannular gull -like feature of Middle Iron Age construction date. Southern circuit of the structure/enclosure may be completed by postholes","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633086","PSH02",633086
2867,"Penannular Gully 24","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Penannular gull -like feature of Middle Iron Age construction date. Southern circuit of the structure/enclosure may be completed by postholes","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633088","PSH02",633088
2867,"Penannular Gully 24","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Penannular gull -like feature of Middle Iron Age construction date. Southern circuit of the structure/enclosure may be completed by postholes","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633090","PSH02",633090
2867,"Penannular Gully 24","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Penannular gull -like feature of Middle Iron Age construction date. Southern circuit of the structure/enclosure may be completed by postholes","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633094","PSH02",633094
2867,"Penannular Gully 24","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Penannular gull -like feature of Middle Iron Age construction date. Southern circuit of the structure/enclosure may be completed by postholes","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633096","PSH02",633096
2867,"Penannular Gully 24","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Penannular gull -like feature of Middle Iron Age construction date. Southern circuit of the structure/enclosure may be completed by postholes","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633098","PSH02",633098
2867,"Penannular Gully 24","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Penannular gull -like feature of Middle Iron Age construction date. Southern circuit of the structure/enclosure may be completed by postholes","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641057","PSH02",641057
2868,"Penannular Gully 25","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Possible pennanular gully.","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113098","WPR98",113098
2868,"Penannular Gully 25","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Possible pennanular gully.","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148121","WPR98",148121
2869,"Penannular Gully 29","420 Middle Iron Age","500 Romano-British","Possible penannular gully although size of the ditches suggests that this enclosure formed a separate function to the penannular gullies. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The enclosure has been heavily truncated by the eastern of the Twin Rivers which explains the unusual shape. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Romano-British CBM recovered in upper fills suggests that this enclosure was still in use or visible in the landscape in the Romano-British period","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633062","PSH02",633062
2870,"Penannular Gully 23","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Probable ring gully or possible enclosure. Heavily truncated and missing the entirety of its southern side.","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523311","PSH02",523311
2870,"Penannular Gully 23","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Probable ring gully or possible enclosure. Heavily truncated and missing the entirety of its southern side.","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 570182","PSH02",570182
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141106","WPR98",141106
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141108","WPR98",141108
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141110","WPR98",141110
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141112","WPR98",141112
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141114","WPR98",141114
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141118","WPR98",141118
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141120","WPR98",141120
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141124","WPR98",141124
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141126","WPR98",141126
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141128","WPR98",141128
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141130","WPR98",141130
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141136","WPR98",141136
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141138","WPR98",141138
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141147","WPR98",141147
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141149","WPR98",141149
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141151","WPR98",141151
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141186","WPR98",141186
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141204","WPR98",141204
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141208","WPR98",141208
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141210","WPR98",141210
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141212","WPR98",141212
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141214","WPR98",141214
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141216","WPR98",141216
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141218","WPR98",141218
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141220","WPR98",141220
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141222","WPR98",141222
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141224","WPR98",141224
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 141226","WPR98",141226
2871,"Middle Iron Age pit cluster - possible midden","420 Middle Iron Age",,"A cluster of shallow inter-cutting pits lying within the boundary of the later Middle iron Age southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Interpreted in Volume 1 as indicating evidence of a range of well-established activities, possibly resulting in the creation of a midden","nad","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 166061","WPR98",166061
2872,"Penannular Gully 26","420 Middle Iron Age",,,"nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 632089","PSH02",632089
2872,"Penannular Gully 26","420 Middle Iron Age",,,"nad","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 680099","PSH02",680099
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961505","POK96",961505
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961685","POK96",961685
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 961864","POK96",961864
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963075","POK96",963075
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963095","POK96",963095
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963189","POK96",963189
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 963390","POK96",963390
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512040","PSH02",512040
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512042","PSH02",512042
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512044","PSH02",512044
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512046","PSH02",512046
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512054","PSH02",512054
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512087","PSH02",512087
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 514046","PSH02",514046
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 514056","PSH02",514056
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 514074","PSH02",514074
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 514091","PSH02",514091
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526249","PSH02",526249
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526272","PSH02",526272
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 526274","PSH02",526274
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 529267","PSH02",529267
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 532018","PSH02",532018
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 541139","PSH02",541139
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 542197","PSH02",542197
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 546100","PSH02",546100
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 546103","PSH02",546103
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547179","PSH02",547179
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 548047","PSH02",548047
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 559090","PSH02",559090
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 566093","PSH02",566093
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 568083","PSH02",568083
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 593057","PSH02",593057
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 597031","PSH02",597031
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 148201","WPR98",148201
2873,"Features mapping directly to 1748 estate map",,,"All features (including both medieval and post-medieval, and at least one BA ditch) which map directly on to the 1748 Stanwell Estate Map. The overlay is not exact but is convincing. Some features also appear on the 1867 OS map (and are closer to these on overlay)","LNM","Analysis","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 160362","WPR98",160362
2874,"Penannular Gully 8 recut","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Larger and deeper recut for Penannular Gully 8","nad","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 113114","WPR98",113114
2874,"Penannular Gully 8 recut","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Larger and deeper recut for Penannular Gully 8","nad","Analysis","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 113173","WPR98",113173
2875,"Penannular Gully 8 original","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Original extent of penannular gully 8 before the larger and deeper recut","nad","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 113117","WPR98",113117
2875,"Penannular Gully 8 original","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Original extent of penannular gully 8 before the larger and deeper recut","nad","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 125123","WPR98",125123
2875,"Penannular Gully 8 original","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Original extent of penannular gully 8 before the larger and deeper recut","nad","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 147136","WPR98",147136
2876,"Penannular Gully 27","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Possible Middle Iron Age penannular gully located just to the west of Bronze Age trackway 3 which appears to mark the eastern limits of the Middle Iron Age settlement. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This feature has been differently interpreted at various times in the project's history","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 128119","WPR98",128119
2877,"Penannular Gully 28","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Possible Middle Iron Age penannular gully located just to the west of Bronze Age trackway 3 which appears to mark the eastern limits of the Middle Iron Age settlement","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 183050","WPR98",183050
2878,"Round house settlement boundaries","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","The eastern boundary is probably defined by the Bronze Age track way 3, although it was no longer used as a trackway as can be seen by the pits of Middle Age date that are cut through it and which help emphasis the boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The southern boundary to the Middle Iron Age roundhouse settlement  is marked by gully 121075. It is stratigraphically earlier than the Southern enclosure boundary ditches and it is unlikely that the gully continued in use after the construction of the Southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity has been constructedto contain only features of Iron Age date and should be shown with Bronze Age trackway 3 (entityID 739) when displaying the settlement boundaries","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 121075","WPR98",121075
2878,"Round house settlement boundaries","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","The eastern boundary is probably defined by the Bronze Age track way 3, although it was no longer used as a trackway as can be seen by the pits of Middle Age date that are cut through it and which help emphasis the boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The southern boundary to the Middle Iron Age roundhouse settlement  is marked by gully 121075. It is stratigraphically earlier than the Southern enclosure boundary ditches and it is unlikely that the gully continued in use after the construction of the Southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity has been constructedto contain only features of Iron Age date and should be shown with Bronze Age trackway 3 (entityID 739) when displaying the settlement boundaries","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 156100","WPR98",156100
2878,"Round house settlement boundaries","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","The eastern boundary is probably defined by the Bronze Age track way 3, although it was no longer used as a trackway as can be seen by the pits of Middle Age date that are cut through it and which help emphasis the boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The southern boundary to the Middle Iron Age roundhouse settlement  is marked by gully 121075. It is stratigraphically earlier than the Southern enclosure boundary ditches and it is unlikely that the gully continued in use after the construction of the Southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity has been constructedto contain only features of Iron Age date and should be shown with Bronze Age trackway 3 (entityID 739) when displaying the settlement boundaries","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161089","WPR98",161089
2878,"Round house settlement boundaries","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","The eastern boundary is probably defined by the Bronze Age track way 3, although it was no longer used as a trackway as can be seen by the pits of Middle Age date that are cut through it and which help emphasis the boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The southern boundary to the Middle Iron Age roundhouse settlement  is marked by gully 121075. It is stratigraphically earlier than the Southern enclosure boundary ditches and it is unlikely that the gully continued in use after the construction of the Southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity has been constructedto contain only features of Iron Age date and should be shown with Bronze Age trackway 3 (entityID 739) when displaying the settlement boundaries","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161093","WPR98",161093
2878,"Round house settlement boundaries","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","The eastern boundary is probably defined by the Bronze Age track way 3, although it was no longer used as a trackway as can be seen by the pits of Middle Age date that are cut through it and which help emphasis the boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The southern boundary to the Middle Iron Age roundhouse settlement  is marked by gully 121075. It is stratigraphically earlier than the Southern enclosure boundary ditches and it is unlikely that the gully continued in use after the construction of the Southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity has been constructedto contain only features of Iron Age date and should be shown with Bronze Age trackway 3 (entityID 739) when displaying the settlement boundaries","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161099","WPR98",161099
2878,"Round house settlement boundaries","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","The eastern boundary is probably defined by the Bronze Age track way 3, although it was no longer used as a trackway as can be seen by the pits of Middle Age date that are cut through it and which help emphasis the boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The southern boundary to the Middle Iron Age roundhouse settlement  is marked by gully 121075. It is stratigraphically earlier than the Southern enclosure boundary ditches and it is unlikely that the gully continued in use after the construction of the Southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity has been constructedto contain only features of Iron Age date and should be shown with Bronze Age trackway 3 (entityID 739) when displaying the settlement boundaries","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 161101","WPR98",161101
2878,"Round house settlement boundaries","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","The eastern boundary is probably defined by the Bronze Age track way 3, although it was no longer used as a trackway as can be seen by the pits of Middle Age date that are cut through it and which help emphasis the boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The southern boundary to the Middle Iron Age roundhouse settlement  is marked by gully 121075. It is stratigraphically earlier than the Southern enclosure boundary ditches and it is unlikely that the gully continued in use after the construction of the Southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity has been constructedto contain only features of Iron Age date and should be shown with Bronze Age trackway 3 (entityID 739) when displaying the settlement boundaries","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 178015","WPR98",178015
2878,"Round house settlement boundaries","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","The eastern boundary is probably defined by the Bronze Age track way 3, although it was no longer used as a trackway as can be seen by the pits of Middle Age date that are cut through it and which help emphasis the boundary. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** The southern boundary to the Middle Iron Age roundhouse settlement  is marked by gully 121075. It is stratigraphically earlier than the Southern enclosure boundary ditches and it is unlikely that the gully continued in use after the construction of the Southern enclosure. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** This entity has been constructedto contain only features of Iron Age date and should be shown with Bronze Age trackway 3 (entityID 739) when displaying the settlement boundaries","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 178023","WPR98",178023
2879,"Penannular Gully 30","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Small penannular gully excavated in WPR98 but not treated as a penannular gully in the Volume 1 publication","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 126155","WPR98",126155
2880,"Penannular Gully 31","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Small enclosure/penannular gully","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 653082","PSH02",653082
2881,"C1 cursus phase 1 area 49","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Two parallle ditches in area 49 which underlie and predate the C1 stanwell cursus. Called Cursus Profile 1 in many of the site records.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529310","PSH02",529310
2881,"C1 cursus phase 1 area 49","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Two parallle ditches in area 49 which underlie and predate the C1 stanwell cursus. Called Cursus Profile 1 in many of the site records.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529311","PSH02",529311
2881,"C1 cursus phase 1 area 49","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","Two parallle ditches in area 49 which underlie and predate the C1 stanwell cursus. Called Cursus Profile 1 in many of the site records.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529473","PSH02",529473
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962054","POK96",962054
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962063","POK96",962063
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962067","POK96",962067
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962081","POK96",962081
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962132","POK96",962132
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"POK96 - 962200","POK96",962200
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 512103","PSH02",512103
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 513080","PSH02",513080
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 521022","PSH02",521022
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 524204","PSH02",524204
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 525481","PSH02",525481
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529196","PSH02",529196
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529198","PSH02",529198
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 529210","PSH02",529210
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555449","PSH02",555449
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 555466","PSH02",555466
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 569066","PSH02",569066
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 575149","PSH02",575149
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579136","PSH02",579136
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579140","PSH02",579140
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 579142","PSH02",579142
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 582115","PSH02",582115
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 587028","PSH02",587028
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 588042","PSH02",588042
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 598027","PSH02",598027
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 605003","PSH02",605003
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 605005","PSH02",605005
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 605007","PSH02",605007
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 605009","PSH02",605009
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"PSH02 - 605011","PSH02",605011
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 128032","WPR98",128032
2882,"Features earlier than C1","205 Early Neolithic",,"excluding twin gullies on area 49","jscl","Analysis","Overview",,,"WPR98 - 178054","WPR98",178054
2883,"2 Gullies on area 49, predating C1 stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","two gullies running eastwards roughly perpendicular from the Stanwell cursus in area 49. cut by C1, and probably associated with the activity resluting in the M1 monument","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 527233","PSH02",527233
2883,"2 Gullies on area 49, predating C1 stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","two gullies running eastwards roughly perpendicular from the Stanwell cursus in area 49. cut by C1, and probably associated with the activity resluting in the M1 monument","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529516","PSH02",529516
2883,"2 Gullies on area 49, predating C1 stanwell cursus","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","two gullies running eastwards roughly perpendicular from the Stanwell cursus in area 49. cut by C1, and probably associated with the activity resluting in the M1 monument","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529520","PSH02",529520
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962054","POK96",962054
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962063","POK96",962063
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962067","POK96",962067
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962081","POK96",962081
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962132","POK96",962132
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524202","PSH02",524202
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524204","PSH02",524204
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 529196","PSH02",529196
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 529198","PSH02",529198
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 575149","PSH02",575149
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 579136","PSH02",579136
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 582115","PSH02",582115
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 587028","PSH02",587028
2884,"PH and Pits earlier than C1 cursus ALL T5 areas","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ALL post holes and pits that are stratigraphically earlier than the Stanwell Cursus in ALL T5 areas.. Similar to entity 760 which was confined to WPR and POK.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 178054","WPR98",178054
2885,"Group of postholes in PSH02 Neo?","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of undated post holes in PSH02 area 47 next to 3 posthioles cut by eastern C1 cursus ditch (see entity 2884). They could all form some sort of structure which pre-dated the C1 cursus, especially as it is situated on the midwinter sunset sightline form the HE1 enclosure (see T5 Vol.1 P. 75, Fig 2.23","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524199","PSH02",524199
2885,"Group of postholes in PSH02 Neo?","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of undated post holes in PSH02 area 47 next to 3 posthioles cut by eastern C1 cursus ditch (see entity 2884). They could all form some sort of structure which pre-dated the C1 cursus, especially as it is situated on the midwinter sunset sightline form the HE1 enclosure (see T5 Vol.1 P. 75, Fig 2.23","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524208","PSH02",524208
2885,"Group of postholes in PSH02 Neo?","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of undated post holes in PSH02 area 47 next to 3 posthioles cut by eastern C1 cursus ditch (see entity 2884). They could all form some sort of structure which pre-dated the C1 cursus, especially as it is situated on the midwinter sunset sightline form the HE1 enclosure (see T5 Vol.1 P. 75, Fig 2.23","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524209","PSH02",524209
2885,"Group of postholes in PSH02 Neo?","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of undated post holes in PSH02 area 47 next to 3 posthioles cut by eastern C1 cursus ditch (see entity 2884). They could all form some sort of structure which pre-dated the C1 cursus, especially as it is situated on the midwinter sunset sightline form the HE1 enclosure (see T5 Vol.1 P. 75, Fig 2.23","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 524210","PSH02",524210
2885,"Group of postholes in PSH02 Neo?","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of undated post holes in PSH02 area 47 next to 3 posthioles cut by eastern C1 cursus ditch (see entity 2884). They could all form some sort of structure which pre-dated the C1 cursus, especially as it is situated on the midwinter sunset sightline form the HE1 enclosure (see T5 Vol.1 P. 75, Fig 2.23","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 559281","PSH02",559281
2885,"Group of postholes in PSH02 Neo?","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of undated post holes in PSH02 area 47 next to 3 posthioles cut by eastern C1 cursus ditch (see entity 2884). They could all form some sort of structure which pre-dated the C1 cursus, especially as it is situated on the midwinter sunset sightline form the HE1 enclosure (see T5 Vol.1 P. 75, Fig 2.23","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 559288","PSH02",559288
2885,"Group of postholes in PSH02 Neo?","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of undated post holes in PSH02 area 47 next to 3 posthioles cut by eastern C1 cursus ditch (see entity 2884). They could all form some sort of structure which pre-dated the C1 cursus, especially as it is situated on the midwinter sunset sightline form the HE1 enclosure (see T5 Vol.1 P. 75, Fig 2.23","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 568134","PSH02",568134
2885,"Group of postholes in PSH02 Neo?","999 Unphased","999 Unphased","Group of undated post holes in PSH02 area 47 next to 3 posthioles cut by eastern C1 cursus ditch (see entity 2884). They could all form some sort of structure which pre-dated the C1 cursus, especially as it is situated on the midwinter sunset sightline form the HE1 enclosure (see T5 Vol.1 P. 75, Fig 2.23","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 599014","PSH02",599014
2886,"C1 cursus Phase II profile Area 49","999 Unphased","700 Medieval","Upper, recut of both western and eastern C1 cursus Phase 1 ditches in southern part of area 49. Dating unknown, could be any thime after 3,600-3,300 BC. May possibly be part of Nelithic remodelling of the monument, possibly even in the late Neolithic /EBA (2 Barbed and Tanged arrowheads form fills of western phase 2 ditch). However, the recutting may hav ebeen simply to recreate the more substantial central bank as part of the MBA field system.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529312","PSH02",529312
2886,"C1 cursus Phase II profile Area 49","999 Unphased","700 Medieval","Upper, recut of both western and eastern C1 cursus Phase 1 ditches in southern part of area 49. Dating unknown, could be any thime after 3,600-3,300 BC. May possibly be part of Nelithic remodelling of the monument, possibly even in the late Neolithic /EBA (2 Barbed and Tanged arrowheads form fills of western phase 2 ditch). However, the recutting may hav ebeen simply to recreate the more substantial central bank as part of the MBA field system.","JSCL","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 529313","PSH02",529313
2887,"Features possibly associated with HE2","225 Late Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","Natural features and pits possibly associated with the HE2 enclosure(Entity 82) in Area 77. No direct evidence for them being contemporary, other than some flintwork, but this could be residual.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 510045","PSH02",510045
2887,"Features possibly associated with HE2","225 Late Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","Natural features and pits possibly associated with the HE2 enclosure(Entity 82) in Area 77. No direct evidence for them being contemporary, other than some flintwork, but this could be residual.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528072","PSH02",528072
2887,"Features possibly associated with HE2","225 Late Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","Natural features and pits possibly associated with the HE2 enclosure(Entity 82) in Area 77. No direct evidence for them being contemporary, other than some flintwork, but this could be residual.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528118","PSH02",528118
2887,"Features possibly associated with HE2","225 Late Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","Natural features and pits possibly associated with the HE2 enclosure(Entity 82) in Area 77. No direct evidence for them being contemporary, other than some flintwork, but this could be residual.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 528119","PSH02",528119
2887,"Features possibly associated with HE2","225 Late Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","Natural features and pits possibly associated with the HE2 enclosure(Entity 82) in Area 77. No direct evidence for them being contemporary, other than some flintwork, but this could be residual.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551052","PSH02",551052
2887,"Features possibly associated with HE2","225 Late Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","Natural features and pits possibly associated with the HE2 enclosure(Entity 82) in Area 77. No direct evidence for them being contemporary, other than some flintwork, but this could be residual.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 551054","PSH02",551054
2887,"Features possibly associated with HE2","225 Late Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","Natural features and pits possibly associated with the HE2 enclosure(Entity 82) in Area 77. No direct evidence for them being contemporary, other than some flintwork, but this could be residual.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558024","PSH02",558024
2887,"Features possibly associated with HE2","225 Late Neolithic","230 Late Neolithic or Bronze Age","Natural features and pits possibly associated with the HE2 enclosure(Entity 82) in Area 77. No direct evidence for them being contemporary, other than some flintwork, but this could be residual.","JSCL","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 558028","PSH02",558028
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962200","POK96",962200
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 525372","PSH02",525372
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527288","PSH02",527288
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 548010","PSH02",548010
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 561277","PSH02",561277
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 659082","PSH02",659082
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 120092","WPR98",120092
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156191","WPR98",156191
2888,"ENO Pits+tree throws with >40g of plain bowl pot","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","ENO Pits and tree throws with over 40g of plain bowl pot for publication in Vol 2","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 158121","WPR98",158121
2889,"Neolithic pit complex in TEC05 area p2a5","215 Middle Neolithic","225 Late Neolithic","Neo pit 833069 contining Peterborough Ware cut by large pit or 'waterhole' 833067 contining Peterborough Ware, Grooved Ware and plain bowl and PDR! Pit 833068 also cut by 833067, but pot not identifiable.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 833067","TEC05",833067
2889,"Neolithic pit complex in TEC05 area p2a5","215 Middle Neolithic","225 Late Neolithic","Neo pit 833069 contining Peterborough Ware cut by large pit or 'waterhole' 833067 contining Peterborough Ware, Grooved Ware and plain bowl and PDR! Pit 833068 also cut by 833067, but pot not identifiable.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 833068","TEC05",833068
2889,"Neolithic pit complex in TEC05 area p2a5","215 Middle Neolithic","225 Late Neolithic","Neo pit 833069 contining Peterborough Ware cut by large pit or 'waterhole' 833067 contining Peterborough Ware, Grooved Ware and plain bowl and PDR! Pit 833068 also cut by 833067, but pot not identifiable.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 833069","TEC05",833069
2889,"Neolithic pit complex in TEC05 area p2a5","215 Middle Neolithic","225 Late Neolithic","Neo pit 833069 contining Peterborough Ware cut by large pit or 'waterhole' 833067 contining Peterborough Ware, Grooved Ware and plain bowl and PDR! Pit 833068 also cut by 833067, but pot not identifiable.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 833070","TEC05",833070
2890,"Early or Middle Neolithic pits etc","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","Early or Middle Neolithic features scuh as pits and treethrows","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527124","PSH02",527124
2890,"Early or Middle Neolithic pits etc","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","Early or Middle Neolithic features scuh as pits and treethrows","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 539196","PSH02",539196
2890,"Early or Middle Neolithic pits etc","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","210 Early or Middle Neolithic","Early or Middle Neolithic features scuh as pits and treethrows","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 836044","TEC05",836044
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 518035","PSH02",518035
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 531027","PSH02",531027
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 554080","PSH02",554080
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555912","PSH02",555912
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555922","PSH02",555922
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 556104","PSH02",556104
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 561075","PSH02",561075
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 561096","PSH02",561096
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 561278","PSH02",561278
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 574003","PSH02",574003
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 580401","PSH02",580401
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 594228","PSH02",594228
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 663010","PSH02",663010
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 833069","TEC05",833069
2891,"Middle Neolithic pits treethrows etc","215 Middle Neolithic","215 Middle Neolithic","Middle Neolithic pits, treethros etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 836042","TEC05",836042
2892,"Middle to late Neo pits etc","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","Middle orLate Neo treethrows, pits etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524530","PSH02",524530
2892,"Middle to late Neo pits etc","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","Middle orLate Neo treethrows, pits etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524536","PSH02",524536
2892,"Middle to late Neo pits etc","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","Middle orLate Neo treethrows, pits etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524544","PSH02",524544
2892,"Middle to late Neo pits etc","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","Middle orLate Neo treethrows, pits etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524556","PSH02",524556
2892,"Middle to late Neo pits etc","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","Middle orLate Neo treethrows, pits etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 547363","PSH02",547363
2892,"Middle to late Neo pits etc","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","Middle orLate Neo treethrows, pits etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555937","PSH02",555937
2892,"Middle to late Neo pits etc","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","Middle orLate Neo treethrows, pits etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 559782","PSH02",559782
2892,"Middle to late Neo pits etc","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","220 Middle or Late Neolithic","Middle orLate Neo treethrows, pits etc","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 559785","PSH02",559785
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960033","POK96",960033
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 960575","POK96",960575
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962027","POK96",962027
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962033","POK96",962033
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 524202","PSH02",524202
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527117","PSH02",527117
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527135","PSH02",527135
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527142","PSH02",527142
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527200","PSH02",527200
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 548010","PSH02",548010
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 561277","PSH02",561277
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 561303","PSH02",561303
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 569066","PSH02",569066
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 579136","PSH02",579136
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 587028","PSH02",587028
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 614101","PSH02",614101
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130051","WPR98",130051
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130055","WPR98",130055
2893,"ENO Pits","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","An attempt to obtain at least a representative selction of Early Neo pits associate dwith plain bowl pot or stratigraphicllay earlier than cursus monuments etc.","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 158121","WPR98",158121
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"POK96 - 962200","POK96",962200
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 511067","PSH02",511067
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 512103","PSH02",512103
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 513080","PSH02",513080
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 525372","PSH02",525372
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 527288","PSH02",527288
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555449","PSH02",555449
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 555466","PSH02",555466
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 558057","PSH02",558057
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 559507","PSH02",559507
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 579140","PSH02",579140
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 588042","PSH02",588042
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 600009","PSH02",600009
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 641033","PSH02",641033
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 650080","PSH02",650080
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"PSH02 - 659082","PSH02",659082
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"TEC05 - 836048","TEC05",836048
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 120092","WPR98",120092
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 125108","WPR98",125108
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 130218","WPR98",130218
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 136180","WPR98",136180
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156169","WPR98",156169
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 156191","WPR98",156191
2894,"EN Plain Bowl tree throws","205 Early Neolithic","205 Early Neolithic","EN treethrows used to compare flint assemblages with pit entities 1144 and 2891(Grooved Ware and Peterborough War epits) and 2893 (Plan Bowl pits)","JSCL","Publication","Landscape",,,"WPR98 - 180045","WPR98",180045
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 687097","TEC05",687097
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 689034","TEC05",689034
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 690101","TEC05",690101
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 690121","TEC05",690121
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 695047","TEC05",695047
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 695049","TEC05",695049
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 695065","TEC05",695065
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 705088","TEC05",705088
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 705090","TEC05",705090
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"TEC05 - 729006","TEC05",729006
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 113034","WPR98",113034
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 127035","WPR98",127035
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 141064","WPR98",141064
2895,"Wavey E/MBA ditch in WPR and TEC05","310 Early or Middle Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","Possible very early ditch, partly predating MBA fields, partl part of them. Aligned on Grooved Ware and EBA pit entity 821.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 141066","WPR98",141066
2896,"Enclosure EC1: internal divisions","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Internal divisions within the southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 119190","WPR98",119190
2896,"Enclosure EC1: internal divisions","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Internal divisions within the southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 140118","WPR98",140118
2896,"Enclosure EC1: internal divisions","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Internal divisions within the southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 166092","WPR98",166092
2896,"Enclosure EC1: internal divisions","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Internal divisions within the southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"WPR98 - 166119","WPR98",166119
2897,"Enclosure EC2: possible western entrance","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Features making up a possible wesetern entrance to the Southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 550083","PSH02",550083
2897,"Enclosure EC2: possible western entrance","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Features making up a possible wesetern entrance to the Southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 550096","PSH02",550096
2897,"Enclosure EC2: possible western entrance","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Features making up a possible wesetern entrance to the Southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 561064","PSH02",561064
2897,"Enclosure EC2: possible western entrance","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Features making up a possible wesetern entrance to the Southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 561067","PSH02",561067
2897,"Enclosure EC2: possible western entrance","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Features making up a possible wesetern entrance to the Southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 575004","PSH02",575004
2897,"Enclosure EC2: possible western entrance","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Features making up a possible wesetern entrance to the Southern enclosure","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 575006","PSH02",575006
2898,"Four post structure FP2","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Four post structure within confines of the southern enclosure. Only three post-holes surviving.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539444","PSH02",539444
2898,"Four post structure FP2","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Four post structure within confines of the southern enclosure. Only three post-holes surviving.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539446","PSH02",539446
2898,"Four post structure FP2","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Four post structure within confines of the southern enclosure. Only three post-holes surviving.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 539448","PSH02",539448
2899,"Four post structure FP3","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","Four post structure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662040","PSH02",662040
2899,"Four post structure FP3","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","Four post structure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662054","PSH02",662054
2899,"Four post structure FP3","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","Four post structure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662058","PSH02",662058
2899,"Four post structure FP3","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","Four post structure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662060","PSH02",662060
2899,"Four post structure FP3","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","415 Early or Middle Iron Age","Four post structure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662062","PSH02",662062
2900,"Two post structure TP1","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Two post structure (might be door posts)","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122068","WPR98",122068
2900,"Two post structure TP1","420 Middle Iron Age","420 Middle Iron Age","Two post structure (might be door posts)","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 133134","WPR98",133134
2901,"Two post structure TP3","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149207","WPR98",149207
2901,"Two post structure TP3","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 149209","WPR98",149209
2902,"Two post structure TP4","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iiron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550053","PSH02",550053
2902,"Two post structure TP4","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iiron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 550055","PSH02",550055
2903,"Two post structure TP5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615186","PSH02",615186
2903,"Two post structure TP5","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615188","PSH02",615188
2904,"Two post structure TP6","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654044","PSH02",654044
2904,"Two post structure TP6","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654046","PSH02",654046
2905,"Two post structure TP7","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654051","PSH02",654051
2905,"Two post structure TP7","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654053","PSH02",654053
2906,"Two post structure TP8","420 Middle Iron Age",,,"lp","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 623028","PSH02",623028
2906,"Two post structure TP8","420 Middle Iron Age",,,"lp","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 623035","PSH02",623035
2907,"Two post structure TP9","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 675027","PSH02",675027
2907,"Two post structure TP9","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 675042","PSH02",675042
2908,"Two post structure TP10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160241","WPR98",160241
2908,"Two post structure TP10","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Two post structure of Iron Age date. May be door posts","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160243","WPR98",160243
2909,"Post Arc (roundhouse?) PA1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"May have been a post-ring roundhouse but is incomplete","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538332","PSH02",538332
2909,"Post Arc (roundhouse?) PA1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"May have been a post-ring roundhouse but is incomplete","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538334","PSH02",538334
2909,"Post Arc (roundhouse?) PA1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"May have been a post-ring roundhouse but is incomplete","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538336","PSH02",538336
2909,"Post Arc (roundhouse?) PA1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"May have been a post-ring roundhouse but is incomplete","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538338","PSH02",538338
2909,"Post Arc (roundhouse?) PA1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"May have been a post-ring roundhouse but is incomplete","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 538346","PSH02",538346
2910,"Post Arc (roundhouse?)  PA2","420 Middle Iron Age",,"May have been a post-ring roundhouse but is incomplete. Feature 615173 may have been an internal post hole or hearth.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615165","PSH02",615165
2910,"Post Arc (roundhouse?)  PA2","420 Middle Iron Age",,"May have been a post-ring roundhouse but is incomplete. Feature 615173 may have been an internal post hole or hearth.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615167","PSH02",615167
2910,"Post Arc (roundhouse?)  PA2","420 Middle Iron Age",,"May have been a post-ring roundhouse but is incomplete. Feature 615173 may have been an internal post hole or hearth.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615169","PSH02",615169
2910,"Post Arc (roundhouse?)  PA2","420 Middle Iron Age",,"May have been a post-ring roundhouse but is incomplete. Feature 615173 may have been an internal post hole or hearth.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615173","PSH02",615173
2911,"Post hole Group PHG1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Post hole group of Iron Age date. May be a structure.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626084","PSH02",626084
2911,"Post hole Group PHG1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Post hole group of Iron Age date. May be a structure.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626085","PSH02",626085
2911,"Post hole Group PHG1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Post hole group of Iron Age date. May be a structure.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626086","PSH02",626086
2911,"Post hole Group PHG1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Post hole group of Iron Age date. May be a structure.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626088","PSH02",626088
2911,"Post hole Group PHG1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Post hole group of Iron Age date. May be a structure.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654038","PSH02",654038
2911,"Post hole Group PHG1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Post hole group of Iron Age date. May be a structure.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654040","PSH02",654040
2911,"Post hole Group PHG1","420 Middle Iron Age",,"Post hole group of Iron Age date. May be a structure.","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 654042","PSH02",654042
2912,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC2","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Small enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146184","WPR98",146184
2912,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC2","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Small enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 146187","WPR98",146187
2912,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC2","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age","Small enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 148167","WPR98",148167
2913,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC3","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523313","PSH02",523313
2913,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC3","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614229","PSH02",614229
2913,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC3","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641116","PSH02",641116
2913,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC3","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 641123","PSH02",641123
2914,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC4","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107102","WPR98",107102
2914,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC4","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107103","WPR98",107103
2914,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC4","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107105","WPR98",107105
2915,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC5","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107097","WPR98",107097
2915,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC5","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 107099","WPR98",107099
2916,"Middle/Late Iron Age Enclosure EC7","420 Middle Iron Age","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 130115","WPR98",130115
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 630116","PSH02",630116
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 630145","PSH02",630145
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659077","PSH02",659077
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670022","PSH02",670022
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670025","PSH02",670025
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670027","PSH02",670027
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670029","PSH02",670029
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670031","PSH02",670031
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670033","PSH02",670033
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670035","PSH02",670035
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670037","PSH02",670037
2918,"Roman Building B6 - west wall","500 Romano-British",,"Postholes making up the west wall of the Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670039","PSH02",670039
2919,"Roman Building B6 - South wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes making up the south wall of Building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659057","PSH02",659057
2919,"Roman Building B6 - South wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes making up the south wall of Building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659060","PSH02",659060
2919,"Roman Building B6 - South wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes making up the south wall of Building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659062","PSH02",659062
2919,"Roman Building B6 - South wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes making up the south wall of Building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659065","PSH02",659065
2919,"Roman Building B6 - South wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes making up the south wall of Building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659068","PSH02",659068
2919,"Roman Building B6 - South wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes making up the south wall of Building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659070","PSH02",659070
2919,"Roman Building B6 - South wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes making up the south wall of Building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659072","PSH02",659072
2920,"Roman Building B6 - East wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes forming the east wall of building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 639073","PSH02",639073
2920,"Roman Building B6 - East wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes forming the east wall of building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 639075","PSH02",639075
2921,"Roman Building B6 - Internal partition wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes forming an internal partition within building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 630139","PSH02",630139
2921,"Roman Building B6 - Internal partition wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes forming an internal partition within building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 630148","PSH02",630148
2921,"Roman Building B6 - Internal partition wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes forming an internal partition within building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659092","PSH02",659092
2921,"Roman Building B6 - Internal partition wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes forming an internal partition within building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659097","PSH02",659097
2921,"Roman Building B6 - Internal partition wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes forming an internal partition within building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659099","PSH02",659099
2921,"Roman Building B6 - Internal partition wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes forming an internal partition within building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 662088","PSH02",662088
2921,"Roman Building B6 - Internal partition wall","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British","Postholes forming an internal partition within building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 662099","PSH02",662099
2922,"Roman Building B6 - other internal","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 670020","PSH02",670020
2923,"Roman building B6: related external postholes","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 639074","PSH02",639074
2923,"Roman building B6: related external postholes","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 639076","PSH02",639076
2923,"Roman building B6: related external postholes","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 639077","PSH02",639077
2923,"Roman building B6: related external postholes","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 639078","PSH02",639078
2923,"Roman building B6: related external postholes","598 Late Romano-British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 659089","PSH02",659089
2924,"Roman building B6 : north wall","598 Late Romano-British",,"probable postholes defining the north wall of Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 630125","PSH02",630125
2924,"Roman building B6 : north wall","598 Late Romano-British",,"probable postholes defining the north wall of Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 630128","PSH02",630128
2924,"Roman building B6 : north wall","598 Late Romano-British",,"probable postholes defining the north wall of Roman building B6","lb","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 630130","PSH02",630130
2925,"LIA and Roman enclosure E3","430 Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614231","PSH02",614231
2925,"LIA and Roman enclosure E3","430 Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108027","WPR98",108027
2925,"LIA and Roman enclosure E3","430 Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108028","WPR98",108028
2925,"LIA and Roman enclosure E3","430 Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 108032","WPR98",108032
2925,"LIA and Roman enclosure E3","430 Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113131","WPR98",113131
2925,"LIA and Roman enclosure E3","430 Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 113145","WPR98",113145
2925,"LIA and Roman enclosure E3","430 Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 147253","WPR98",147253
2926,"Roman enclosure E4","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593231","PSH02",593231
2926,"Roman enclosure E4","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593234","PSH02",593234
2926,"Roman enclosure E4","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614222","PSH02",614222
2926,"Roman enclosure E4","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614225","PSH02",614225
2926,"Roman enclosure E4","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 617182","PSH02",617182
2926,"Roman enclosure E4","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636100","PSH02",636100
2927,"Roman enclosure E5","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 312029","PSH02",312029
2927,"Roman enclosure E5","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636103","PSH02",636103
2927,"Roman enclosure E5","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636106","PSH02",636106
2927,"Roman enclosure E5","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636108","PSH02",636108
2927,"Roman enclosure E5","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663139","PSH02",663139
2927,"Roman enclosure E5","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 677033","PSH02",677033
2928,"Enclosure E6","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636115","PSH02",636115
2928,"Enclosure E6","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636116","PSH02",636116
2928,"Enclosure E6","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636118","PSH02",636118
2928,"Enclosure E6","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 662012","PSH02",662012
2928,"Enclosure E6","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663154","PSH02",663154
2928,"Enclosure E6","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 663155","PSH02",663155
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 311021","PSH02",311021
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 614217","PSH02",614217
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 627055","PSH02",627055
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636073","PSH02",636073
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636076","PSH02",636076
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636077","PSH02",636077
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636080","PSH02",636080
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636090","PSH02",636090
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636138","PSH02",636138
2929,"LIA and Roman enclosure E7","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 640011","PSH02",640011
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523162","PSH02",523162
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523166","PSH02",523166
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582281","PSH02",582281
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 611038","PSH02",611038
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626041","PSH02",626041
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 634035","PSH02",634035
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 634112","PSH02",634112
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636053","PSH02",636053
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636055","PSH02",636055
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636056","PSH02",636056
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636060","PSH02",636060
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636063","PSH02",636063
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636066","PSH02",636066
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636068","PSH02",636068
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636070","PSH02",636070
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 640001","PSH02",640001
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 640007","PSH02",640007
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 666026","PSH02",666026
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 666040","PSH02",666040
2930,"Enclosure E8","460 Late Iron Age or Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 669025","PSH02",669025
2931,"Roman enclosure E9","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575287","PSH02",575287
2931,"Roman enclosure E9","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582367","PSH02",582367
2931,"Roman enclosure E9","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 582369","PSH02",582369
2931,"Roman enclosure E9","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 602073","PSH02",602073
2931,"Roman enclosure E9","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 602076","PSH02",602076
2931,"Roman enclosure E9","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636166","PSH02",636166
2931,"Roman enclosure E9","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636167","PSH02",636167
2931,"Roman enclosure E9","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 648091","PSH02",648091
2933,"Enclosure E11","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122110","WPR98",122110
2933,"Enclosure E11","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122113","WPR98",122113
2933,"Enclosure E11","425 Middle or Late Iron Age",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 122116","WPR98",122116
2934,"Enclosure E12","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 129067","WPR98",129067
2934,"Enclosure E12","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151134","WPR98",151134
2934,"Enclosure E12","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 151137","WPR98",151137
2934,"Enclosure E12","520 Early or Middle Romano British","598 Late Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"WPR98 - 160102","WPR98",160102
2935,"Enclosure E13","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 813035","TEC05",813035
2936,"Enclosure E14","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 626045","PSH02",626045
2936,"Enclosure E14","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633206","PSH02",633206
2936,"Enclosure E14","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633208","PSH02",633208
2937,"Roman trackway 1","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 813043","TEC05",813043
2937,"Roman trackway 1","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 813044","TEC05",813044
2937,"Roman trackway 1","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 813046","TEC05",813046
2937,"Roman trackway 1","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"TEC05 - 833117","TEC05",833117
2938,"Roman trackway 2","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633150","PSH02",633150
2938,"Roman trackway 2","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633152","PSH02",633152
2938,"Roman trackway 2","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633154","PSH02",633154
2938,"Roman trackway 2","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633193","PSH02",633193
2938,"Roman trackway 2","500 Romano-British",,,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 633195","PSH02",633195
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 311014","PSH02",311014
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 311031","PSH02",311031
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 311033","PSH02",311033
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 311035","PSH02",311035
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 312027","PSH02",312027
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 312032","PSH02",312032
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523145","PSH02",523145
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523202","PSH02",523202
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523217","PSH02",523217
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523222","PSH02",523222
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 523241","PSH02",523241
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 624001","PSH02",624001
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 630023","PSH02",630023
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 630025","PSH02",630025
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 630027","PSH02",630027
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 634011","PSH02",634011
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 643094","PSH02",643094
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 643125","PSH02",643125
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 643127","PSH02",643127
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 643129","PSH02",643129
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 643131","PSH02",643131
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 649061","PSH02",649061
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 656044","PSH02",656044
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 664006","PSH02",664006
2939,"LIA and Roman trackway 3","515 Early Romano-British","500 Romano-British",,"lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 664010","PSH02",664010
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"POK96 - 960517","POK96",960517
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"POK96 - 960574","POK96",960574
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 511112","PSH02",511112
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 575205","PSH02",575205
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598054","PSH02",598054
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598071","PSH02",598071
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598075","PSH02",598075
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 598077","PSH02",598077
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636011","PSH02",636011
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636025","PSH02",636025
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636027","PSH02",636027
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 636136","PSH02",636136
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 676019","PSH02",676019
2940,"Enclosure E10","598 Late Romano-British",,"It is actually quite interesting because, unlike the eastern ladder complex, elements of it are very well dated by large quantities of distinctive late Roman pottery. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Previously known  as the small ladder enclosure","lb","Publication","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 676033","PSH02",676033
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 529278","PSH02",529278
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 537118","PSH02",537118
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547167","PSH02",547167
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547168","PSH02",547168
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547169","PSH02",547169
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547171","PSH02",547171
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 547179","PSH02",547179
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593239","PSH02",593239
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 593317","PSH02",593317
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 615343","PSH02",615343
2941,"Medieval Enclosure 5","720 Later Medieval",,"Later medieval (13th/14th century) enclosure which cuts through Medieval Enclosure 1 (Entity 10030), and butts on to Medieval Enclosure 2 (Entity 10031). It extends to the south the area enclosed by 10030 and 10031; the eastern edge (seen in the SE corner) aligns with the eastern edge of 10031 (and like the latter also appears to recut a BA ditch alignment). **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** Most of the dating from the ditches is 13th to 14th century (pottery), but there are 2 clay pipe stems & 1 fragment of post-med brick.","lnm","Analysis","Monument",,,"PSH02 - 621038","PSH02",621038
2942,"EBA? features pre-dating MBA field boundary 552309","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","1 pit (588271, contining EBA pot) and 3 three throws in a line. The Treethrows are all cut by MBA fierld boundary 552309, but th epit is not. Use as an example of how the MBA field boundarues may have developed from EBA antecedents.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 552281","PSH02",552281
2942,"EBA? features pre-dating MBA field boundary 552309","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","1 pit (588271, contining EBA pot) and 3 three throws in a line. The Treethrows are all cut by MBA fierld boundary 552309, but th epit is not. Use as an example of how the MBA field boundarues may have developed from EBA antecedents.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 552285","PSH02",552285
2942,"EBA? features pre-dating MBA field boundary 552309","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","1 pit (588271, contining EBA pot) and 3 three throws in a line. The Treethrows are all cut by MBA fierld boundary 552309, but th epit is not. Use as an example of how the MBA field boundarues may have developed from EBA antecedents.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 552289","PSH02",552289
2942,"EBA? features pre-dating MBA field boundary 552309","235 Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age","315 Middle Bronze Age","1 pit (588271, contining EBA pot) and 3 three throws in a line. The Treethrows are all cut by MBA fierld boundary 552309, but th epit is not. Use as an example of how the MBA field boundarues may have developed from EBA antecedents.","JSCL","Publication","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 588271","PSH02",588271
2943,"Medieval Building 4","700 Medieval",,"Six post-holes making up what appears to be the northern end of a rectangular post-built structure in Area 51. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No datable finds in any of the post-holes. Possibly associated with ditch 575228 to the north.","lnm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 566060","PSH02",566060
2943,"Medieval Building 4","700 Medieval",,"Six post-holes making up what appears to be the northern end of a rectangular post-built structure in Area 51. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No datable finds in any of the post-holes. Possibly associated with ditch 575228 to the north.","lnm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 566062","PSH02",566062
2943,"Medieval Building 4","700 Medieval",,"Six post-holes making up what appears to be the northern end of a rectangular post-built structure in Area 51. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No datable finds in any of the post-holes. Possibly associated with ditch 575228 to the north.","lnm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 566064","PSH02",566064
2943,"Medieval Building 4","700 Medieval",,"Six post-holes making up what appears to be the northern end of a rectangular post-built structure in Area 51. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No datable finds in any of the post-holes. Possibly associated with ditch 575228 to the north.","lnm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 566066","PSH02",566066
2943,"Medieval Building 4","700 Medieval",,"Six post-holes making up what appears to be the northern end of a rectangular post-built structure in Area 51. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No datable finds in any of the post-holes. Possibly associated with ditch 575228 to the north.","lnm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 566068","PSH02",566068
2943,"Medieval Building 4","700 Medieval",,"Six post-holes making up what appears to be the northern end of a rectangular post-built structure in Area 51. **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed**  **Linefeed** No datable finds in any of the post-holes. Possibly associated with ditch 575228 to the north.","lnm","Analysis","Detailed",,,"PSH02 - 566070","PSH02",566070