n.a. (1990). 8. The lithic assemblage: use and deposition. In: n.e. Rhum. Mesolithic and later sites at Kinloch: excavations 1984-86. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. pp. 103-116.
Title The title of the publication or report |
8. The lithic assemblage: use and deposition | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Rhum. Mesolithic and later sites at Kinloch: excavations 1984-86 | |||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Monograph Series | |||
Volume Volume number and part |
7 | |||
Number of Pages The number of pages in the publication or report |
183 | |||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
103 - 116 | |||
Downloads Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS |
|
|||
Licence Type ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC. |
ADS Terms of Use and Access
|
|||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
MonographSeriesChapter | |||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
This chapter is concerned with the period of time between the manufacture of the assemblage and its incorporation into the archaeological deposits. It includes analysis of both the function and deposition of the assemblage and the nature of the relationship between the recovered assemblage and the assemblage that was originally deposited. Although the artefactual deposits were composed primarily of knapping debris, the evidence does not suggest that Kinloch was primarily a production site. Production was geared towards the manufacture of blades and modified tools based on blades, and a number of other morphological tool types were made. There is evidence that at least some of these tools were used for a range of tasks, and the different patterns of the tools across the site suggest that particular activities were concentrated in separate areas. The interpretation of these patterns is problematical as, although a variety of features was examined, the level of truncation and the long period of use of the site make the detailed association of the artefact patterns with stratified features difficult. Furthermore, the present analysis cannot suggest whether the activities carried out on site involved the maintenance, use, or curation of tools. | |||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
1990 | |||
ISBN International Standard Book Number |
0 903903 07 5 | |||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(DigitalBorn)
|
|||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
12 Oct 2014 |