Palmer, D. (2002). A Post Excavation Assessment of Archaeological Work Carried out at Phase 8 of the Chertsey Revitalisation Scheme. AOC Archaeology Ltd.

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
A Post Excavation Assessment of Archaeological Work Carried out at Phase 8 of the Chertsey Revitalisation Scheme
Number of Pages
Number of Pages
The number of pages in the publication or report
Number of Pages:
103
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions.
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
An excavation was undertaken prior to the redevelopment of the site. All areas not included in the excavation that were subject to redevelopment were recorded as part of a watching brief. No prehistoric features were recorded during the excavation. The presence of struck flint, including one piece dating to the Mesolithic period, suggested that there was prehistoric activity in the area, but it was not clear how far these residual finds had travelled, and therefore uncertain how close this site was to any settlement. A few residual Roman tile fragments were recovered from some of the post-medieval features on the site. It was reasonable to assume that if there had been Roman settlement in the vicinity of the site, then greater quantities of Roman finds would have been recovered. There was no evidence to suggest that Guildford Street was Roman in origin. A number of medieval features were recorded during the excavation, although far fewer features were conclusively medieval than had been expected. Most of the features recorded during the excavation were post-medieval in date. Whilst some of the recorded features were 18th or 19th century, the majority were 15th and 16th century and showed that the site had been in use through the late medieval period onwards. [Au(adp)]
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
D Palmer
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
AOC Archaeology Ltd
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2002
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
Location - Auto Detected: Guildford Street
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
Medieval (Auto Detected Temporal)
19th Century (Auto Detected Temporal)
Postmedieval (Auto Detected Temporal)
MESOLITHIC (Historic England Periods)
PREHISTORIC (Historic England Periods)
16th Century (Auto Detected Temporal)
ROMAN (Historic England Periods)
Note
Note
Extra information on the publication or report.
Note:
Date Of Issue From: 2002 Date Of Coverage From: 01 Date Of Coverage To: 01 Editorial Expansion: Site name: PHASE 8, CHERTSEY REVITALUSATION SCHEME
Study area:
Investigation type: Post-determination/Research
District: Runnymede
Monument: DITCH. Medieval (1066-1540), POST HOLE. Post-medieval (1540-1901), PIT. Post-medieval (1540-1901), DRAIN. Post-medieval (1540-1901), DITCH. Post-medieval (1540-1901), POST HOLE. Modern (1901-present), [finds]. Roman (AD43-410), [finds]. Post-medieval (154
Ngr: TQ03956645
Parish:
Postcode: KT168DL
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
BIAB (Archaeological Investigations Project (AIP))
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
19 Jan 2009