Images from Archaeological Investigations at Dishforth Road, Boroughbridge, North Yorkshire, 2017-21

On-Site Archaeology, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5284/1103182. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1103182
Sample Citation for this DOI

On-Site Archaeology (2023) Images from Archaeological Investigations at Dishforth Road, Boroughbridge, North Yorkshire, 2017-21 [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1103182

Data copyright © On-Site Archaeology unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License


On-Site Archaeology logo

Primary contact

On-Site Archaeology
25A Milton Street
York
YO10 3EP

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1103182
Sample Citation for this DOI

On-Site Archaeology (2023) Images from Archaeological Investigations at Dishforth Road, Boroughbridge, North Yorkshire, 2017-21 [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1103182

Introduction

Settlement area. Structures 1,2 and 3.
Settlement area. Structures 1,2 and 3.

This collection comprises images from archaeological investigations at Dishforth Road, Boroughbridge, North Yorkshire, undertaken by On-Site Archaeology between 2017 and 2021.

The evaluation was required as part of Condition 24 of the grant of outline planning permission (Planning Reference 15/04164/OUTMAJ). A total of five evaluation trenches were excavated in this phase, each measuring 50m by 2m at the modern ground surface. These trenches were placed to investigate apparently blank areas as defined by the geophysical survey. Archaeological mitigation for this site was conducted in various stages. Initially, two areas of strip and record were excavated to target geophysical anomalies and archaeological features found during the evaluation phases. The eastern area of the site, where geophysical survey and trial trenching indicated a concentration of archaeology was excavated as Area A. The expansion of the area previously investigated by trench 5 during the second phase of evaluation was recorded as Area B. In the areas of the site that were not to be developed, but were to be retained as public open spaces, the archaeology was to be preserved in-situ, with the existing topsoil and subsoil remaining in place. These areas were located within the northeast and southeast corners of the site and included a corridor along the eastern development boundary. The other parts of the site, which did not contain significant archaeological remains, were developed without the need for archaeological mitigation as had been agreed upon within the Mitigation Method Statement. The second phase of works was undertaken outside the main development site along the line of a proposed surface water outfall pipe (Areas C and D). The field where the pipe trench was proposed lay partially within the registered battlefield site of the Battle of Boroughbridge. Therefore, discussions were held with Dr Keith Emerick, Inspector of Ancient Monuments, Historic England regarding the scale and scope of archaeological investigations required. Following an archaeological investigation by geophysical survey and metal detector survey, further archaeological mitigation was carried out during the construction of the outfall trench to preserve by record any archaeological remains that may be disturbed by the development. This comprised of an archaeologically monitored topsoil strip of the proposed pipeline route, followed, as appropriate, by archaeological hand excavation and recording of any features identified. The earliest phase of activity largely comprised an enclosed Iron Age settlement. Numerous internal features were identified consisting of several probable former roundhouses and associated ditches, pits and postholes. A small area of probable associated settlement activity, comprising poorly preserved structures comparable with the features within the enclosure, was also located to the northwest of the enclosure. Only Iron Age, hand-made pottery, was recovered from the internal features of the principal enclosure indicating abandonment or disuse of the internal area after the Iron Age period. Activity during the Roman period appears to be represented by the shallower redefinition and extension of the existing principal enclosure and the creation of additional land division. The lack of domestic features associated with the Roman ditches appears to reflect a change of use, from settlement to agricultural land use during the early Roman period.


ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo