Data from a Trial Trench Evaluation at M6 Junction 4, Coleshill, North Warwickshire, 2017-2023 (HS2 Phase One)

High Speed Two Ltd., AOC Archaeology Group, Connect Archaeology, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5284/1122124. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1122124
Sample Citation for this DOI

High Speed Two Ltd., AOC Archaeology Group, Connect Archaeology (2024) Data from a Trial Trench Evaluation at M6 Junction 4, Coleshill, North Warwickshire, 2017-2023 (HS2 Phase One) [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1122124

Data copyright © High Speed Two Ltd. unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under a The Open Government Licence (OGL).


High Speed Two Ltd. logo

Primary contact

High Speed Two Ltd.
2 Snowhill
Queensway
Birmingham
B4 6GA
United Kingdom
Tel: 08081 434 434

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1122124
Sample Citation for this DOI

High Speed Two Ltd., AOC Archaeology Group, Connect Archaeology (2024) Data from a Trial Trench Evaluation at M6 Junction 4, Coleshill, North Warwickshire, 2017-2023 (HS2 Phase One) [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1122124

AOC Archaeology Group logo
Connect Archaeology logo

Introduction

Noth facing view of Trench005. Copyright HS2 Ltd.
Noth facing view of Trench005. Copyright HS2 Ltd.

This collection comprises reports, images, spreadsheets, and GIS files from a trial trench evaluation carried out by Connect Archaeology at farmland off Coleshill Heath Lane, Coleshill, Warwickshire. A total of twenty-one trenches were excavated in September 2017.

Project Summary

In September 2017, Connect Archaeology carried out an archaeological evaluation of land at M6 Junction 4, which is located c. 1km to the south of Coleshill, North Warwickshire.

The aim of the investigation was to gain information about the archaeological resource in order to support an assessment of its character, extent, knowledge value and ability to contribute to Specific Objectives. The aims of the trial trenching were to:

  • Locate, characterise and record any remains relating to the field system identified and recorded in the HER within the site;
  • Identify and characterise any remains relating to the former medieval deer park with the survey boundaries;
  • Identify the presence/absence of Neolithic and Bronze Age Monuments;
  • Assess the extent and nature of archaeological remains within the survey boundaries;
  • Characterise the nature of any archaeological remains within the survey boundaries;
  • Assess the significance of any archaeological remains within the survey boundaries;
  • Assess the change to the significance of the identified heritage assets as a result of the detailed design;
  • Suggest measures, if appropriate and feasible for further archaeological investigation to mitigate identified significant impacts;
  • and contribute to the delivery of GWSI: HERDS Specific objectives.

The specific objectives of the trial trenching were to answer:

  • Does a lack of visibility of Neolithic and Bronze Age monuments reflect genuine area distinctiveness, or is this due to variation in geology or investigative techniques?
  • Can we identify regional patterns in the form and location of Late Bronze Age and Iron Age settlements across the route, and are there associated differences in landscape organisation and enclosure?
  • Identify patterns of change within medieval rural settlement from the 11th to the mid-14th century.

Re-Use Value Statement

Except for two 18th/19th-century field boundaries, no archaeological features were present, indicating that the Site has low potential for the presence of sub-surface archaeological remains. Ploughing, agricultural activity and the construction of a former works compound at the northern end of the Site would have impacted on any archaeological remains that may have been present. There is little potential for further archaeological works at this Site. There were no results of consequence which contribute to the wider historical context of the area.


ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo