Historic Graffiti on the Tower of St Oswald's Church, Filey, North Yorkshire

John Buglass, Historic England, 2019

Data copyright © Historic England, John Buglass unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License


Historic England logo

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1053683
Sample Citation for this DOI

John Buglass, Historic England (2019) Historic Graffiti on the Tower of St Oswald's Church, Filey, North Yorkshire [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1053683

Introduction

Historic Graffiti on the Tower of St Oswald's Church, Filey, North Yorkshire

During a visit to the roof of the tower of St Oswald’s Church in Filey it was noted that extensive, well-preserved graffiti covers the lead roof. A rapid consultation with a number of colleagues concluded that the quantity and diversity of these remains appeared to be quite rare and of a particularly early date for survival on a lead roof. At this point it was suggested that the graffiti on the tower roof at St Oswald’s could be used to as the test study to develop guidance notes for a methodology for recording graffiti. In conjunction with the production of the guidelines a study of the graffiti would also be made in order to try to place some form of historic interpretation on them. This report and collection represents the results of that study.

The collection comprises the project design and project report, a catalogue listing the inscribed graffiti by panel, several very large orthophoto files, and the photography used to create these via a structure-from-motion model of the church roof.

The project compared the traditional 2D rectified photography with the 3D Structure-from-Motion approach. This allowed a direct comparison of the two methods to evaluate the cost, speed and accuracy of results. It was also proposed to undertake an additional comparative assessment of part of the graffiti using digital images from a smart phone, a compact digital camera and a ‘professional’ high resolution digital SLR.