Surrey Archaeological Collections

Surrey Archaeological Society, 2003. (updated 2023) https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

Data copyright © Surrey Archaeological Society unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


Surrey Archaeological Society logo

Primary contact

Surrey Archaeological Society
Castle Arch
Guildford
Surrey
GU1 3SX
UK
Tel: 01483 532454
Fax: 01483 532454

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

Two walh names in the fields of Kingston

JOAN WAKEFORD

Gravel-working and building in the last 150 years may have put an end to the discovery of tangible evidence of pre-Saxon settlement on Kingston Hill. It becomes all the more important to make the best use of any other available information. From the 16th century antiquaries have reported finds (often called Roman) in such terms that the sites and the associations of each are doubtful; the artefacts themselves have usually been lost from their contexts (the case of the more recent finds, mainly of the Bronze Age, is of course different). Documentary research may bring more precision to the old reports, by identifying the original or earliest surviving version, eliminating later distortions, and locating sites with lost names. Sometimes early field and minor names may be archaeologically significant, but may be difficult to place with sufficient accuracy to be useful.

The situation of Wallpits, with Coombe Road on the south, and its association with Adwell mead, leave little doubt that Wallpits and Wall Pleate are corrupted forms of Waleport. The location of Walehulle is also discussed.

<< back


ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo