Surrey Archaeological Collections

Surrey Archaeological Society, 2003. (updated 2023) https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

Data copyright © Surrey Archaeological Society unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


Surrey Archaeological Society logo

Primary contact

Surrey Archaeological Society
Castle Arch
Guildford
Surrey
GU1 3SX
UK
Tel: 01483 532454
Fax: 01483 532454

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

The hard case of Sir Polycarpus Wharton

K R FAIRCLOUGH

In the last decades of the 17th century, Polycarpus Wharton, the son of an important Ordnance Board official, was by far the most important supplier of gunpowder to the government. He produced at several sites including Chilworth mills in Surrey, the largest gunpowder manufactory in England, and was so well thought of that he was asked by the Ordnance Board to help develop and improve the quality of gunpowder production. Yet growing financial problems meant that in 1698 he ceased production, and subsequently petitioned the Board about debts which he claimed were owed to him and his father. So severe were his problems that he spent some time in a debtor’s gaol, and the evidence suggests that he never recovered financially. This article attempts to recount what is known of his life and career, but cannot explain his quarrel with the Ordnance Board.

<< back


ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo