Surrey Archaeological Collections

Surrey Archaeological Society, 2003. (updated 2023) https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

Data copyright © Surrey Archaeological Society unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


Surrey Archaeological Society logo

Primary contact

Surrey Archaeological Society
Castle Arch
Guildford
Surrey
GU1 3SX
UK
Tel: 01483 532454
Fax: 01483 532454

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

Green Lane, Wanborough: excavations at the Roman religious site 1999

DAVID WILLIAMS

Following a geophysical survey of the field to the south of the known Romano-Celtic square temple a series of trial trenches was opened. Pre-Roman activity was largely confined to what may be a ritual well or shaft that appears to be connected to the site occupied by the later temples by a curving trackway, thought to be ceremonial. To the west of the square temple an apparent ditch terminal was succeeded by a small, probably circular, enclosure, at the centre of which may have been a prominent tree. This phase, which began in the middle of the 1st century AD, was associated with the burial of lambs and other votive deposits and might have been the focus for the coin hoard deposited c AD50--60, and which was robbed and largely dispersed in the 1980s.

This phase was succeeded before the middle of the 2nd century by a hitherto unsuspected flint-built temple of sub-circular form with an eastern entrance porch and possibly a wooden floor and which appears to be a formalisation of the plan of the earlier enclosure. This temple appears to have suffered a dramatic structural failure and seems to have collapsed partially shortly after construction. The circular temple was quickly replaced, following a re-dedication ceremony, by the square temple in about AD160/170. In any event it had been dismantled by the late 2nd century and its site largely respected by later activity, with the exception of a few, possibly ritually positioned, pits. Later activity is confined to the construction of a parish boundary bank across the site and an associated small group of medieval pennies, which may indicate a memory of the religious site.

<< back


ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo