Surrey Archaeological Collections

Surrey Archaeological Society, 2003. (updated 2023) https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

Data copyright © Surrey Archaeological Society unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


Surrey Archaeological Society logo

Primary contact

Surrey Archaeological Society
Research Centre
Hackhurst Lane
Abinger Hammer
Surrey
RH5 6SE
Tel: 01306731275

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221
Sample Citation for this DOI

Surrey Archaeological Society (2023) Surrey Archaeological Collections [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000221

The later owners of Bletchingley Castle

+Dennis Turner

The story of the de Clare owners of Bletchingley, earls of Gloucester and Hereford, is here continued, together with that of subsequent owners of the castle site. Tradition asserts that Bletchingley Castle was 'slighted' [ie rendered untenable] at the time of the battle of Lewes (1264). This paper argues that a persistent animosity between the de Clare family and Roger de Leyburn, sometime steward of the Lord Edward and later sheriff of Kent, which was never resolved, may have had a fundamental bearing on the ultimate fate of Bletchingley Castle, and a new scenario and date for its destruction are proposed.

<< back


ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo