The Sutton Hoo Research Project 1983-2001

Martin Carver, 2004. https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266
Sample Citation for this DOI

Martin Carver (2004) The Sutton Hoo Research Project 1983-2001 [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266

Data copyright © Prof Martin Carver unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under the ADS Terms of Use and Access.
Creative Commons License


University of York logo

Primary contact

Prof Martin Carver
Department of Archaeology
University of York
King's Manor
Exhibition Square
York
YO1 7EP
England

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266
Sample Citation for this DOI

Martin Carver (2004) The Sutton Hoo Research Project 1983-2001 [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1000266

Downloads


Index to Field Report Volume 8ii: Field Report For Far East Sector Int. 20, 32, 38

Authors: Andy Copp, Madeleine Hummler and Martin Carver

  1. SUMMARY (M.HUMMLER)
  2. STRATEGY (M. CARVER, A.COPP)
    • 2.1 Location and Character of the Area
    • 2.2 Aims and Objectives
    • 2.3 The Workforce
    • 2.4 Operations Undertaken
    • 2.5 Analyses Undertaken
  3. METHODS AND RESULTS (A.COPP, M. CARVER)
    • 3.1 Pre-excavation surface and sub-surface surveys
    • 3.2 The trial trench, Int.20
    • 3.3 Recording and Recovery Levels
    • 3.4 Removal of the ploughsoil
    • 3.5 The Experimental Evolution of 'Horizon'definition
    • 3.6 The Experimental Evolution of 'Feature' definition
    • 3.7 Surface Mapping of Int.38 (MRH)
    • 3.8 Comment on the excavation of Int.32 (including Quality control of grave recording)
    • 3.9 The Assemblage (M. Hummler)
  4. ESTABLISHING THE SEQUENCE (M. HUMMLER)
    • 4.1 Stratigraphic Sequence
    • 4.2 Radiocarbon Dating
    • 4.3 Finds Distribution and Model of the Sequence
  5. SELECTED STUDIES: THE PREHISTORIC PERIOD (M. HUMMLER)
    • 5.1 "Postholes" F2/111, F3/112 etc.
    • 5.2 Double ditch boundary F133 and F135
    • 5.3 The Beaker pit F175, adjacent features and tree pit F178
    • 5.4 Ditch F1/130 and palisade F213 boundary
    • 5.5 Tree pits
  6. SELECTED STUDIES: THE ROMAN PERIOD
    • None
  7. SELECTED STUDIES: THE EARLY MEDIEVAL PERIOD (M. CARVER)
    • 7.0 Definition of Early Medieval features
    • 7.1 Execution Burials in Int. 32 (Group 1, Burials 17-34)
    • 7.2 Execution Burials in Int. 52 (Group 1, Burials 35-39)
    • 7.3 Other Early Medieval features (gallows)
    • 7.4 Empty, failed or unexcavated graves
  8. SELECTED STUDIES: MEDIEVAL AND LATER
    • 8.1 The Anti-glider Ditch, F220
Download full report:
Vol 8ii Field Report for the Far East Sector: Int 20,32,38 (PDF, 393Kb)

ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo
alt=