Chapter,File Name,Extensions,Purpose,Monograph Figure
Core Data,allfinds,.shp,All mappable finds from the Terminal 5 excavations. Finds are mapped as multi-point shapes with each point shown at a random location within the intervention where it was found. The attribute data included in this file includes both data about each object and about the deposit and feature where it was found. In some cases where it has not been possible to distinguish automatically between the excavated and unexcavated portions of features some finds may be located in the unexcavated portions of the feature.,
Core Data,allsamples,.shp,All mappable environmental samples from the Terminal 5 excavations. The samples are shown schematically around the centroid of the intervention. Samples shown vertically belong to the same parent series of samples. The schemetic display may mean that for heavily sampled features some samples are shown outside the extents of the intervention. Since in the process of environmental analysis a sample uniquely identified with a single number on site might be analysed and/or assessed by multiple environmental specialisms there may be multiple points for a single sample number,
Core Data,allentities,.shp,Map of  detailed entities. Each entity is represented by a single multi-part polygon which has been constructed from the individual features (mapped in features) assigned in the Framework database to that entity. ,
Core Data,areas,.shp,Map of the areas as excavated and described in the monograph. There may be multiple shapes for each excavated area ,
Core Data,DPs,.shp,Locations of drawing points used for hand survey (sections and site plans). This an aggregation of a number of differring survey methodologies used from 1998 to 2006 by Oxford Archaeology and Wessex Archaeology staff,
Core Data,entities,.shp,Map of  detailed entities. Each entity is represented by a single multi-part polygon which has been constructed from the individual features (mapped in features) assigned in the Framework database to that entity. This file is restricted to entities which are used on the Framework Free Viewer entities layer and therefore a subset of the file AllEntities,
Core Data,extrapolated,.shp,Edges of features which were extrapolated or otherwise uncertain on site. These highlight the boundaries of polygons in features.shp and T5 Volume 2.shp which are therefore made up to define the lines of for example recut features.,
Core Data,features,.shp,Map of archaeological features identified and excavated at Terminal 5. Each feature is represented by a single multi-part polygon which has been constructed from the excavated portions and unexcavated portions as mapped in the file T5 Voume 2. Each polygon has a unique identifier constructed from the Site Code and the Context Number assigned on site to uniquely identify the feature. At Terminal 5 context numbers across all sites formed a unique sequence. There is no guarantee that with any future Framework datasets this will continue to be the case.,
Core Data,hachures,.shp,"Map of the break of slope between the sides and base of excavated features and any detail that was considered worthy of display in the site plan: this typically includes burials, deliberately deposited finds and wood",
Core Data,modern,.shp,Map of  features surveyed on site as modern or disturbance.,
Core Data,sections,.shp,Map of hand-drawn sections,
Core Data,sites,.shp,Map of the excavations described by in T5 volume 2. This is constructed from multipart polygons with distinctions between unique shapes determined by labelling reqirements,
Core Data,T5 Volume 2,.shp,Map of constructed from the pre- and post-excavation plans. One multi-part polygon is drawn for each uniquely identified context number. Unexamined soil marks are identifiable with a Null value (may show as 0) depending on software in the field Context_ID. For excavated segments of features (interventions) the context number assigned to the intervention and site code combination have been used to uniquely identify the polygon. For the unexcavated segments the polygon has been identified with the Site Code and  context number assigned in the excavation to uniquely identify the archaeological feature identified as the result of the archaeological interventions. At Terminal 5 context numbers across all sites formed a unique sequence. There is no guarantee that with future Framework datasets this will continue to be the case.,
Chapter 1,1943Contours,.shp,Contour lines calculated from the Digital Elevation model 1943SplineBlanked.tif using ESRI ArcMap 3D Analyst's Raster Surface - Contour tool,1.4
Chapter 1,1943LevelsMetric,.shp,Points digitised and converted to metric measurements by Framework Archaeology from the 1943 Air Ministry survey,1.4
Chapter 1,1943SplineBlanked,.tif,Digital elevation model created from 1943LevelsMetric using Spline based raster interpoaltion in ArcMap 3D Analyst,1.4
Chapter 1,T5_ResidualsNoSinks,.shp,Summary of residuals calculated in Surfer comparing the 1943 data to the top of the stripped modern ground surface. Contains the modern survey data.,1.5
Chapter 1,T5ContoursNoSinks,.dbf,Contours calculated from T5NoSinksBln.tif,1.5
Chapter 1,T5NoSinksBln,.tif,Digital elevation model representing the variance in metres of the modern excavated surface from the 1943 contour survey. Calculated from the file T5_RESIDUALsNoSinks.shp,1.5
Chapter 1,RCHMECrops,.shp,Map of digitisation of crop marks around Perry Oaks carried out by the Royal Commission for Historic Monuments of England. This was a two stage process and it is possible to see the overlap in the mapping of the Stanwell Cursus,
Chapter 2,_CursusExtents.shp,.shp,Map giving the extrapolated extents of Cursus at T5,
Chapter 2,_Palaeochannel,.shp,Map of the palaeochannel,
Chapter 2,Fig2_02Features,.shp,Overview of the hunter-gatherer landscape at Heathrow Terminal 5,2.2
Chapter 2,Fig2_21_HE1Banks,.shp,Plan of estimated dimensions of the internal banks of the HE1 enclosure and suggested arrangement of standing adults with site lines. This file contains the suggested location of the banks,2.21
Chapter 2,Fig2_21_HE1Enclosure,.shp,Plan of estimated dimensions of the internal banks of the HE1 enclosure and suggested arrangement of standing adults with site lines. This file contains the enclosure,2.21
Chapter 2,Fig2_21_HE1Sightlines,.shp,Plan of estimated dimensions of the internal banks of the HE1 enclosure and suggested arrangement of standing adults with site lines. This file contains the sightlines,2.21
Chapter 2,Fig2_25_C3Cursus,.shp,C3 Cursus ditches and position of banks,2.25
Chapter 2,Fig2_48_C4Cursus,.shp,Architecture of the C4 Cursus,2.48
Chapter 2,Fig2_52_NeolithicTreethrows,.shp,"Distribution of Early or Middle, Middle and Middle or Late Neolithic pits and tree-throws (c  3400 to 2000 BC)",2.52
Chapter 2,Fig2_57GroovedWarePotteryFeatures,.shp,Features associated with Grooved Ware pottery,2.57
Chapter 3,Fig3_01_BALandscape,.shp,Bronze Age landscape at Terminal 5 ,3.01
Chapter 3,Fig3_08_BATrackwaysAndFarmsteads,.shp,Bronze Age trackways and farmsteads [with BA waterholes added],3.08
Chapter 3,Fig3_09_BASettlementsAndFarmsteads,.shp,Bronze Age settlements and farmsteads [with BA waterholes added],3.09
Chapter 3,Fig3_56_1979to1985BAFields,.shp,Farmstead 12 in relation to O’Connell’s 1979-85 excavations,3.56
Chapter 3,Fig3_56_1979to1985Excavations,.shp,Farmstead 12 in relation to O’Connell’s 1979-85 excavations,3.56
Chapter 4,Fig4_02_MIASettlementOverview,.shp,The Middle Iron Age landscape - settlement,4.2
Chapter 4,Fig4_02_MIAWaterholes,.shp,The Middle Iron Age landscape -waterholes,4.2
Chapter 4,Fig4_02_OtherIAFeaturesshp,.shp,The Middle Iron Age landscape - other Iron Age features,4.2
Chapter 4,Fig4_02_RelictBAFields,.shp,The Middle Iron Age landscape - relict Bronze Age fields,4.2
Chapter 4,Fig4_03_LIAERBlandscape.,.shp,The Late Iron Age/early Roman landscape,4.3
Chapter 4,Fig4_04_ERB_MidRomanLandscape,.shp,The early-mid Roman landscape,4.4
Chapter 4,Fig4_05_MidLateRomanLandscape,.shp,The late Roman landscape,4.5
Chapter 4,Fig4_20_Phase1MIASettlement,.shp,Middle Iron Age settlement (Phase 1),4.2
Chapter 4,Fig4_26_Phase2MIASettlement,.shp,Middle Iron Age settlement (Phase 2),4.26
Chapter 4,Fig4_31_SouthernEnclosure,.shp,Landscape of the southern enclosure,4.31
Chapter 4,Fig4_32_PostStructures,.shp,Posthole structures in the Middle Iron Age settlement,4.32
Chapter 4,Fig4_43_LIAERBSettlement,.shp,Late Iron Age/early Roman settlement,4.43
Chapter 4,Fig4_50_LIAERB_LandscapeZones,.shp,Late Iron Age/early Roman landscape zones,4.5
Chapter 4,Fig4_55_ERB_MidRomanSettlement,.shp,Early-mid Roman settlement,4.55
Chapter 4,Fig4_67_MidLateRomanSettlement,.shp,Late Roman settlement,4.67
Chapter 5,Fig5_01_410to850AD,.shp,5.1 Distribution of all Saxon and medieval features ,5.1
Chapter 5,Fig5_01_Medieval,.shp,5.1 Distribution of all Saxon and medieval features ,5.1
Chapter 5,Fig5_01_Postmedieval,.shp,5.1 Distribution of all Saxon and medieval features ,5.1
Chapter 5,Fig5_03_EarlySaxonSettlement,.shp,Early Saxon settlement in Area 14,5.3
Chapter 5,Fig5_15_BurrowHillSettlement,.shp,Medieval settlement at Burrow Hill,5.15
Supplementary data,Images,.shp,Map of feature centroids showing features with photographs or sections included in the data distributions. The value of 1 in the field Photo or Section indicates the presence of at least one image of that type. The value of 0 indicates absence of an image.,
Supplementary data,Rocque1765Channels,.shp,Channels shown on Roque 1765 map. These were georeferenced and digitised by Framework Archaeology.,



,,,,
,,,,