ID,POTTERY_SUMMARY,NUMBER_SHERDS,WEIGHT,AMPHORA,MORTARIUM,SAMIAN,RELIGIOUS_VESSELS,POTTERY_WASTERS,GRAFFITO,AMPHORA_PRESENCE,MORTARIUM_PRESENCE,SMAIAN_PRESENCE
1001,Small but unquantified assemblage of later Iron Age and early Roman pottery. Some samian noted.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1002,"A large quantity of pottery was recovered, of which only four key groups were fully recorded. Much of the pottery dates to the late 1st–late 2nd/early 3rd century. Much of assemblage is utilitarian, but does include tazze and miniature pots indicative of a ritual role.",4337,45,,,749,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1003,"Substantial assemblage of mainly (63%) late 3rd/4th century pottery. Dominated by jars, then dishes. Local grey  coarse wares predominate and fine/imported wares uncommon. Amphorae (most Dr 20 but including rare Almond-rimmed form from Campania normally associated with military sites) and mortaria are particularly rare.",16010,227,46,120,82,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1004,"Large early 1st to mid 4th century assemblage, very fragmented. Dominated by local greywares, with Hadham greywares from c AD 70 and increasing wares from Colchester industry in mid Roman period. LR dominated by Hadham industry. Jars most common form, but more varied in cemetery, inc. platters, cups and rare lamp from Lyon.",21619,155,65,35,234,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1005,"A reasonable quantity of pottery suggests the site was near to domestic occupation. Dating spanned LIA to LR period, but with clear focus on LR (1480 sherds).",3623,36,43,2,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1006,A small quantity of pottery reflective of site identification as field system/trackway ditches. Typical of low status rural settlement in the area. Mostly early Roman in date.,614,5,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1007,Small assemblage of mostly early Roman local coarsewares and nothing to indicate a possible pottery production site.,171,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1008,Pottery comprises grog tempered wares dating in the region from the mid 1st century BC. No pottery report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1009,"Most of the assemblage dates to the late Iron Age (most local grog-tempered wares but including significant quantity (5%) of continental imports). A small proportion belongs to the early Roman period, but perhaps extended only a short way beyond c AD 43.",2841,21,2,4,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1010,"Considerable quantities of pottery recovered but not all recorded. Some LPRIA pot (& Dr 1 amphora fragment), but earliest main supply from Claudio-Neronian period spanning entire Roman period. No fragment counts provided, but in terms of minimal vessels: Amphorae: 11; mortaria: 28; samian: 28. 1 miniature vessel found.",,41,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1011,"1979-80 excavations produced 498 kg of pottery, mostly 1st-2nd century AD, with a further 150 kg of 1st-2nd C kiln pottery previously recorded. Kiln products comprised platters, dishes, bowls, beakers & jars. Only other record from earlier excavations is pottery from the ritual pit (LIA-ER), which includes 4 spouted strainer bowls linked with serving of beer.",,648,88,10,67,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1012,"Significant pottery assemblage, including material from the 3rd/4th C century pottery kiln. Kiln contexts produce 1165 sherds (9.9kg) of products: jars, beakers, dishes and bowls. Miniature beaker was foundation deposit for 4th C building.",34000,450,146,89,262,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1013,"Over 1067 sherds of LIA/ER pottery including terra nigra and terra rubra. Most Roman pottery derived from the kilns (overall quantification given here), dating to the mid 3rd century AD. Products: beakers, bowls, dishes, flagons, jars. Non-kiln pottery not recorded in detail. Mortaria present.",28085,352,2,,67,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1014,"Substantial LIA-Roman pottery assemblage, with an emphasis on the 1st-early 2nd C AD. Mostly grog-tempered ware, along with black-surfaced wares, Hadham grey wares, early shell-tempered ware, Verulamium region white-wares, South Spanish amphorae and Nene Valley colour-coated ware.",11043,103,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1015,"A relatively restricted chronology with LIA and separate ER phases. Significant amphorae, nearly all Dr 1 where identified, including 2 Dr 1A. No explicit quantification, but small amount of S Gaulish samian present.",,,86,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1016,"Significant pottery assemblage from Stansted sites, ranging from LIA to late 4th C, but not all explicitly quantified. 28 burials with pottery from LIA to later 2nd C AD, including 19 samian vessels.",,220,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1017,"Significant assemblage of late Roman pottery, with little from earlier periods, mainly due to the amount of redeposited material towards end of 4th C.",23000,245,168,103,499,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1018,Small pottery assemblage from ditches and graves. A pit contained pottery 'seconds' with spalled and popped surfaces suggesting manufacture nearby of finely grogged and greyware fabrics of broadly later 1st or 2nd-century date.,123,1,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1019,"Abundant pottery found from fieldwalking but not recorded in detail. Includes Gallo-Belgic platters, samian, Nene valley, Oxford and Hadham wares",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1020,A small assemblage reflective of outlying field ditches. Most pot from one pit - possible structured deposit.,293,14,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1021,"Most pottery from graves  - 11 vessels from 7 graves. 4 urns (3 jars, 1 large beaker). Of ancillary vessels: 3 jars, 1 samian dish, 1 beaker & 1 flagon.",828,9,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1022,"Small assemblage, mostly from enclosure ditches. Only a single sherd dating after early 2nd century AD.",,11,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1023,Relatively small low status assemblage as mostly an agriculture zone. One oven contained at least 15 bead-rimmed dishes. Mortaria 2% by weight. Nothing to suggest presence of villa in the area.,2308,26,,,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1024,"216 kg of LIA-Roman pottery from all  Blackwater Valley sites - no specific quantification for Slough House Farm, but assemblage contained imported wares, including Arretine ware.",,,5,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1025,Small unexceptional 1st-4th C AD assemblage.,,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1026,LIA pot comprised 13 vessels from 3 cremation burials (no imports) plus sherds from settlement features. Only Roman pot quantified below. Mortaria and samian indicated but not quantified.,2300,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1027,"Small pottery sample from 18 Red Hill sites, dating from 1st to 4th C AD.",179,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
1028,LIA pottery from graves and upper fills of enclosure ditches. Roman pottery more abundant but few quantifications.,,,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1029,"Substantial pottery assemblage, but very mixed. Only three groups fully recorded, including  9kg from the shrine. Mortaria all but absent.",,300,2,2,600,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1030,"1301 sherds of LIA - c AD 70 date, remainder later 1st-mid 2nd C late 3rd-4th C. Very small amounts of samian and mortaria but not quantified.",9817,64,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1031,"Pottery recovered from 10 separate excavations within the settlement, including a number from cremation graves. In addition to pottery quantified below an addition c 400kg of LIA-R pottery from another site not recorded in detail. 88kg of pot from mid-late 3rd C kiln - dishes, bowls and jars.",20350,324,62,51,426,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1032,"A substantial assemblage including Coarse grog-tempered ware, Black-surfaced ware, Black-burnished ware (BB1 and BB2), Hadham grey wares, Colchester buff ware, Oxfordshire ware, Nene Valley ware and Late shell-tempered ware.",16073,117,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1033,Only pottery from 4th C levelling layers recorded.,2753,35,,16,58,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1034,"A large quantity of pottery recovered but much not kept, so not all was quantified. Substantial amount of samian (including 31 stamps & 65 decorated sherds).",,,4,80,618,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1035,"25kg of pot in total, with 10.4kg (1091 sherds, 26 vessels) pottery from graves. (61% jars). Rest of assemblage dates 1st-mid 4th C AD, but little LR material. Pottery not quantified but includes samian (3 vessels), Dr 20 amphora and mortaria.",,25,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1036,Assemblage includes group of 4 mid 1st C AD vessels used as grave goods.,950,13,1,,8,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1037,"Specific pottery of LIA/ER date not quantified (657 sherds in total). No indication of mortaria, amphora or samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1038,"Potential pottery kiln, though very small pot assemblage.",111,2,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1039,"No published pottery report, but a small quantity of pottery is noted (4kg LIA-ER & 3.6kg Roman), including some imported wares. No mortaria or amphora.",,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1040,"No published pottery report, but a reasonable quantity of pottery is noted (2kg LIA-ER & 126kg 2nd-3rd C Roman). Restricted forms & few regional imports except N Kentish wares. Very few mortaria or amphora.",,128,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
1041,302 fragments not from graves and 15 vessels from graves not included in quantification below. These included 3 samian vessels and a miniature jar. All generally suggests low status assemblage.,302,2,,,9,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1042,"Mid 1st C burial pottery (8 vessels) includes terra nigra platters and cups. Other material spanned 1st to 3rd C AD. No quantification, but includes mortaria and samian.",,,,,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1043,Most pottery from LIA boundary ditch. Imports sparse - typical low status rural assemblage.,3074,45,3,6,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1044,Large quantity of pottery but no overall quantifications except samian.,,,,,387,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1045,"Only information from 1960s excavations and (aside from samian) not fully quantified, but includes mortaria and tazze. Dates range from 1st to end of 4th/5th C AD.",,,,,200,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1046,"Small assemblage, mainly from enclosure ditch. 90% local coarsewares.",667,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1047,"Small assemblage, mostly dating 3rd-4th C. Finewares less than 4% of total & mortaria rare at 3% by weight. No amphora.",813,12,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1048,"Small assemblage, suggesting not in main occupation area. No quantification in report. Most dates LIA-ER, with nothing from LR period. Very little samian & small quantities of amphora.",732,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1049,Most pottery LIA to early 2nd C AD (only 140 sherds 3rd-4th C). Imported fabrics rare but diverse.,2274,28,3,1,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1050,Small assemblage dating from mid 1st to early 5th C AD. Mortaria sherds all LR.,752,10,4,2,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1051,LIA-early 2nd C assemblage. No samian or mortaria noted.,2866,27,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
1052,Most pottery from Roman quarry pit. 1% mortaria by EVE.,2957,49,5,,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1053,"Large quantity of pottery. Amphorae are mostly (90%) Gauloise and Dr 20, but also Dressel 1 and 2-4. 17 mid-late 1st and 7 2nd C kilns across the site point to rural pottery industry. 20 examples of graffiti (3 literate). Funerary pottery not included in totals. Complete pots deposited in wells and ditches.",145000,,1129,530,2691,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1054,"Assemblage dominated by typical local coarsewares (mostly Hadham), but including unusual 'feeding bottle'. Ltd mortaria but not quantified.",5884,58,2,,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1055,"Moderate assemblage, with marked absence of 4th C material. Mostly 2nd-early 3rd C.",1049,10,6,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1056,"Small assemblage, not fully quantified in report.",,26,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1057,Most pottery probably redeposited from dumps associated with the small town.,6133,67,8,,69,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1058,"No detailed report on pottery from building, but dated 2nd-4th C AD. Quantifications only for Site B.",454,22,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1059,,1192,12,2,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1060,"Moderate sized assemblage, though the earlier excavations only recorded by weight (A total of 932 sherds (11kg) came from later excavation of 0.05ha). Pottery dates from later 1st to late 4th C AD. Miniature vessels (flask/flagon) accompanied the early Roman infant burial. Graffito on jar (non literate).",,42,12,,30,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1061,"Small assemblage, dating from late 3rd to early 5th C, including imported Mayan ware. 158 sherds from the 2009 excavations. Regional industries are well-represented, with pottery from Oxford, Hadham, Harrold (Bedfordshire) and the Nene Valley.",760,6,2,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
1062,"No overall quantifications in report, but includes mortaria and samian.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1063,"No overall quantifications in report, but includes mortaria, amphora and samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1064,"Large pottery assemblage, not quantified. Amphora and mortaria present in small nos. Two grave pots contained 'eight spoke wheel' on base.",,,,,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1065,"Substantial assemblage from a rural site, mostly local coarsewares, but including small % of fineware, including samian (43 vessels).",18312,178,40,43,214,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1066,Large assemblage from mid 1st to late 4th C including dumps of 4489 sherds from a local kiln. 4 graffito's. Mostly central Gaulish samian but not quantified in report. Mortaria present.,15300,181,74,,,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1067,"Large villa assemblage, though most from post-Roman contexts, so limited reporting. Includes one Dressel 1 and two Dressel 20 amphorae. Mortaria absent. 5 graffito's.",,180,3,,180,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1068,"Small assemblage from the kiln, including mortaria and flagons in early phase and jars, bowls, beakers and dishes in later phase. Limited quantifications.",,4,12,,25,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1069,No overall quantifications in report. Includes mortaria.,,,2,,29,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1070,All funerary pottery. Main tumulus contained burial urn and 8 pots (2 samian).,19,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1071,Large assemblage but no quantifications except samian. Includes mortaria,,,,,163,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1072,2159 sherds from malthouse excavations. Overall quantifications not provided for villa excavations.,2159,,,,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1073,"Large amounts of pottery recovered from 1st to late 4th/5th C in date, but not recorded in detail. Includes samian (34 stamps) and  female pottery facemask.",,200,,,,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1074,"Small mostly 1st C AD assemblage, which appears to have affinities with Great Chesterford and Cambridgeshire, as well as with material excavated at the near-by Roman villa site at Chinnel Barn.",106,11,1,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1075,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1076,"A small assemblage of mainly 2nd to 3rd C date. The fragmentary nature of most of the assemblage indicates deposition, and perhaps redeposition, of pottery along with domestic waste.",295,3,,,9,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1077,Most of the pottery recovered from the site is mid-2nd to 4th century in date. Mortaria fabrics account for just over 3% of all pottery. Amphora comprised 3 sherds of Gauloise IV,819,7,3,6,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1078,Much of the fragmented assemblage comprises grog-tempered pottery in both coarse and fine fabrics. There is nothing present which is much later in date than mid-1st century AD.,414,4,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1079,"A total of twenty-three wheel-made Late Iron Age or Roman fabrics or fabric groups were identified. They included local, regional and imported finewares and coarsewares. Amphorae include Dressel 2-4 and Pascual 1  - mid 1st C wine. Mortaria present but not quantified.",6016,51,35,,108,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1080,"Assemblage dominated by locally made coarse wares of both Late Iron Age and Roman date (Hadham wares comprise 23% of the total). Mortaria are uncommon,  at 4.6% by weight. Also a single inverted LIA-ER  CAM 254 cooking pot used for infant burial.",1524,17,5,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1081,"Pottery types span the whole of the Roman period from the 1st to the 4th century - the majority consists of local coarse reduced wares (78% by weight). Imports of Late Iron Age or early Roman date are present, and the inhabitants continued to have access to other imported wares throughout the 1st to early 3rd century. 10 samian vessels ID'd, and amphora predominantly of the Spanish olive oil vessels (Dressel 20), as well as a Gaulish type and a Haltern 70. Mortaria  are also present.",3984,66,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1082,Small quantity of 1st C AD pottery - mainly jars in grog-tempered fabric. Not quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1083,"Modest assemblage, dating from 1st to 4th C. No forms, except a grey ware platter were recognised. The majority of the Roman pottery dated to after AD 250, and included shell-tempered ware and Hadham oxidised ware with `Romano-Saxon' decoration, dating to the late 4th century or beyond.",543,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1084,No pottery report on the small evaluation assemblage over the site.,211,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1085,Very limited assemblage dating 1st to 4th C AD.,41,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1086,"Very small assemblage, suggesting away from main area of the town. The more closely-datable pottery is predominantly of 2nd- to 3rd-century date.",34,0,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1087,"Small assemblage of 3rd-4th C pottery. Coarse greywares predominate, and these may represent the products of more than one source. Finewares are represented by three whiteware mortaria from the Oxfordshire production centre, and colour coated wares either from Oxfordshire or the Nene Valley.",66,1,,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
1088,"Small pottery assemblage from a number of different evaluations., dated from 1st to 4th C AD. Most pottery (0.96kg) from area of possible farmstead. Amphora Dr 20. Also LIA pottery.",95,1,3,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1089,"Very small assemblage, with all dated sherds 1st-early 2nd C AD.",10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1090,Very small assemblage as expected for field systems. 1st-2nd C AD emphasis on datable sherds.,22,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1091,Only pottery from fieldwalking reported upon. No chronology or details provided.,125,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1092,"A large LIA-Roman assemblage recovered from the excavations (MIA pottery not included here).  Two major phases of activity. The first spans the mid to late 1st century continuing into the early 2nd century AD. Thereafter the 2nd century sees a steady decline which appears fairly rapid after about AD 150. Apart from a few long-lived forms, there is no evidence for activity into the 3rd century and beyond. Through all time periods there is a very low percentage of imported wares, in particular samian ware and amphorae fabrics. However, the rate of Romanisation of its coarse ware assemblage is quicker than at most other sites. No quantification of amphora, mortaria or samian in report.",15800,151,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1093,"A substantial assemblage, spanning the Late Iron Age and Roman periods. Many of the late Roman groups also contain Saxon pottery. A number of unusual vessel forms were identified, including cheese presses and strainer bowls. At least five near-complete mid 1st C AD beakers were also recovered from a pit, along with cremated animal remains. Mortaria present but not quantified.",28506,447,150,,227,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1094,"Pottery from evaluation (198 sherds) and excavation (1308 sherds), dating mainly from the later AD 1st to the mid-4th century.",1506,18,5,,37,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1095,"A small assemblage from the settlement periphery. Where datable, the bulk of the pottery fits into a narrow, mid-2nd century date band. There is some Hadham ware, which would extend the chronology of the site into the 3rd century and beyond. The bulk of the pottery comprised local sandy grey wares, with lesser amounts coming from Colchester, North Kent and also samian ware.",144,2,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1096,"A substantial assemblage, suggesting domestic occupation on site. Date ranges from early to late Roman, with emphasis on late. It is likely that most of the grey ware, which accounts for the bulk of the assemblage, derives from the Mucking kilns.",14363,212,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1097,A scatter of LIA and ER pottery. Most common ware types are grog-tempered. Included almost complete jar from one ditch fill.,441,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1098,"Modest sized assemblage, but no separate report. Dating from mid 1st to late 4th C, with most 2nd-3rd C. Low continental and regional imports.",,90,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1099,"The assemblage is mixed in date, but mainly mid to late Roman in character, and much is likely to have been redeposited midden material. Imported samian and amphorae are uncommon, appearing in sixteen and six contexts respectively.",1088,20,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1100,"Unquantified pottery assemblage dating from 1st to 4th C AD and including Dressel 20 amphora, mortaria and samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1101,"Small assemblage. No report, but mostly early Roman including the cremation urn.",186,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1102,"Assemblage dated 1st-4th C, with greater emphasis on early Roman period (and small no. of LIA sherds). The majority of pottery in use was jars, bowls, cooking pots and dishes, with a few beakers. Mostly local coarsewares.",909,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1103,"Dense concentration of pottery, most recovered from a series of early to mid-2nd century pits that probably represent the truncated or disturbed remains of at least one 'cremation group' related to those previously recorded adjacent to the site.",1230,37,,,34,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1104,Assemblage in both handmade and wheel made forms dating from the later 1st century BC into the 1st–2nd centuries AD. The majority of the sherds are coarse wares mostly handmade.,710,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1105,"Very rich assemblage of local and imported pots from the cremation graves, though no overall sherd count provided. Minimum number of pots is 149 (11 amphora, mainly Dr 2-4). Includes cups, flagons, beakers, platters, bowls, jars, lids and amphora. All date from LIA-early Roman period. 7 pots from one funerary chamber have marks scratched on them, some literate.",,,11,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
1106,Large quantities of pottery mentioned of 1st to 3rd C AD date but no overall quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
1107,"Moderate assemblage of mainly LIA-early Roman pottery (dominated by grog-tempered wares), though continuing until the later Roman period.",5265,48,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1108,Moderate sized assemblage of mostly mid-late Roman date.,5134,50,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1109,"Massive assemblage dating from LIA to late 4th C AD. Dominated by local grog-tempered wares, sandy greywares and black surfaced wares (along with storage jar fabrics) with comparatively low % of fine and specialist wares. Many graffito's including literate examples. Includes tazze and miniature vessels.",282405,6395,3904,2588,4903,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1110,A small but unquantified late Roman assemblage.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
1111,"Substantial (but largely unquantified) assemblage dating mainly from 2nd to 4th C, but with some 1st C material.",,,,,600,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
1112,"Unquantified pottery assemblage, mainly of 2nd-3rd C date, but with some 1st C AD pre-conquest material.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1113,A small (but unquantified) assemblage of late Iron Age pottery,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
1114,"A total of 104 cremation graves contained pottery - mainly in the form of once intact vessels, so no sherd count and weight. 130 individual vessels recorded dating mid 1st to early 2nd C. Jars most common cremation vessel and ancillary vessels comprised platters, jars, beakers, cups and flagons. Samian vessels found in 14 graves (dishes, cups and beakers) - the only continental import apart from a single terra nigra platter. Aside from graves, 409 sherds of pottery (2.5kg) recovered and recorded in this dataset.",409,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1115,"A total of 39.8kg of pottery were recovered from the excavation, with a large variety of pottery all dating from the mid 2nd to 3rd century, including Nene Valley ware",,40,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
1116,"A small though concentrated early Roman ceramic assemblage, dating mid 1st to mid/later 2nd C AD. Most were local sandy greywares, but also samian, Nene Valley ware, Verulamium region white ware, shell tempered ware and Colchester colour coat.",467,4,,8,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
1117,"A small assemblage of mid 2nd-3rd/4th C AD date, dominated by coarse wares which are likely to be of relatively local origin. Also a sherd of Dressel 20 amphora, and Dorset Black-Burnished ware (BB1).",24,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
2001,25.9kg (1509 sherds) of LIA pottery and 2.75 (305 sherds) of Roman pottery. Miniature jar from mid-late 1st C AD grave.,1814,29,,,4,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2002,"Pottery totals include 3835 (37.6kg) MIA-LIA/ER transition sherds and 5275 (78.4kg) of RB pottery. Modest mortaria (7 EVE), though increase in LR. 6 graffito's, all non-literate marks, 5 on coarseware.",9110,116,31,,33,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2003,"Small assemblage, mostly dated late 3rd-4th C.",211,4,,8,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2004,"Only the 2319 stratified sherds subject to analysis, dating mid 2nd to mid 4th C.",3437,35,,10,27,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2005,Reasonably large quantity of pottery indicating occupation.,2470,20,4,15,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2006,Significant quantity of pottery including kiln products. Literate graffito found on samian vessel during site evaluation.,9351,77,12,50,210,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2007,377 LIA and 132 RB sherds,509,7,1,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2008,"Large assemblage, from M-LIA to 4th/5th C AD, with most of 1st or 4th C AD date. Also 141 sherds of 5th C pottery, including 3 miniature cups.",8572,143,26,66,122,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2009,Small pottery assemblage but not quantified (except overall weight) or described separately in published report. Combined with overall assemblage - see record 2011.,,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2010,Small pottery assemblage but not quantified (except overall weight) or described separately in published report. Combined with overall assemblage - see record 2011.,,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2011,Quantifications (aside from weight) are for all Roman pottery on roadscheme as not broken down into sites. Mortarium 2.1 EVE. Large collection of perforated pottery (27 vessels) from Site 5 middle Roman farmstead - strainers in cheese making? Used in malting process? One cross graffito.,6266,64,5,,58,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2012,"Most pottery LIA-ER in date. Includes a large dump (c 57kg) of pottery from one section of the northern ditch ('closure deposit'), thought to belong period when site was being abandoned. Included a decorated samian bowl which had been drilled.",3772,87,23,,32,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2013,"A huge assemblage ranging from mid 1st to 5th C AD, with 32000 (560kg) from phased contexts. Reminder from surface spreads.  Samian 290 EVE; mortaria 195 EVE.",44000,743,46,977,348,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2014,Most pottery of mid 3rd to mid 4th C date.,,87,4,41,41,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2015,"No overall quantifications in report, but mortaria said to be 0.9% of assemblage by count.",,,,,21,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2016,Very small assemblage,81,1,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2017,"Reasonably large LIA-ER assemblage. No samian, amphora or mortaria. Includes a strainer.",891,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2018,"All pottery from one of the excavated sites, indicating occupation in this area. Large sherd weight. Pottery dates 2nd-4th C. Character is relatively high status.",574,14,3,12,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2019,Pottery from both phases of excavation - all local products.,553,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2020,"Small assemblage, mostly LIA.",236,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2021,Pottery from 2007 excavations only. Mostly late Roman from local sources.,405,4,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2022,"Pottery from two mid 1st C kilns - mostly bowls and jars. 20% of pottery wheel-made, 80% hand-made with some wheel-made finishing. Curiously, no wasters recovered.",780,19,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2023,Only a few sherds of pottery recovered. Dating on the basis of briquetage.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2024,"Large assemblage of LIA-ER pottery, including products from 11 pottery kilns belonging to conquest period, most on margins of settlement ('household industry'). Tiny amounts of samian (0.22 EVE), amphora and mortaria (0.2 EVE).",20876,273,1,,8,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2025,"No separate pottery report, but over 1000 sherds recovered including mortaria and samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2026,1183 sherds of M/LIA pottery and 1856 sherds of RB pottery (mostly 1st-early 2nd C AD).,3039,54,,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2027,"Assemblage spanned M-LIA to end of Roman period, but most was early-middle 2nd C AD. Mortaria 4 EVE and decreased over time. Cheese press also found. Samian present in small quantities but not quantified in report.",1454,20,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2028,Most pottery early to mid Roman in date. 2nd-3rd C gullies contained  5 complete vessels. 2 sherds of imported mortaria.,475,9,,2,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2029,"Around 7000 sherds recovered from 1999 excavations of which 6473 from stratified contexts. Includes kiln products - 7 complete vessels from kiln - oxidised shell-tempered jars. All amphora Dr 20. Colour coast form 14% of assemblage, nearly all Nene valley. Mortaria just 0.7% of assemblage. Samian represents 49 vessels, mostly 2nd C. Two graffiti noted - 'X' and 'XII'.",7000,,15,49,60,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2030,Number of sherds indicated only approximate based on data in the report.,120,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2031,"Totals are for pottery dating from MIA to later 1st C AD, with both handmade and wheel made vessels. Two vessels had perforated bases.",5311,60,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2032,"A large assemblage dating from LIA to LR period. Most samian was central Gaulish and all but 2 amphora was Dr 20 (other two were Dr 2-4). Jars most common form, followed by bowls/dishes - very little change from early to late Roman period.",11011,131,27,57,178,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2033,"Although site described in publication as LIA-ER, the only pottery reported on is MIA, and this is sparse.",156,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2034,Assemblage dates mainly 3rd-4th C AD. Both amphora sherds Dr 20. No mortaria. Jars were by far the most common form.,792,14,2,,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2035,1302 sherds (9.7kg) of M-LIA pottery from first phase of site and 429 sherds (6.6kg) of M-LR pottery from 2nd phase. Most samian central Gaulish. Most vessels jars then bowls/dishes.,1731,16,,3,24,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2036,Bowls/dishes and jars predominate in equal proportions. All amphora Dr 20. Mortaria included pre/early Flavian examples.,2205,36,9,16,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2037,"Small pottery assemblage, entirely of M-LIA date.",215,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2038,717 (9.25kg) of MIA and 933 (11.8kg) of LIA pottery recovered. Mostly bead-rimmed jars and necked cordoned bowl/jar forms. Also a single sherd of Dr 1 amphora.,1650,21,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
2039,RB pottery mentioned in overview but no report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2040,"Low status assemblage, nearly all of jar form. 1 Dressel 20 amphora sherd. 49 sherds of E-M Saxon pottery.",2431,19,1,6,35,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2041,"A very small pottery assemblage dating to the mid 1st C AD. Only 6 from stratified contexts, the rest from ploughsoil. Mainly jars and cooking pots.",91,,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2042,"A major assemblage, but no overall fragment count quantifications. Amphora includes 368 Dr 20, 43 Gauloise 4 (wine) and small quantities of others. Samian includes 300 decorated fragments. Specialist vessels include ceramic face mask handle. Mortaria 2.92% of assemblage (18.5kg). Note: overall weight below does not include samian or amphora. 11 graffito's.",,634,479,,3300,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2043,"Limited early Roman assemblage, but includes 'Hofheim' flagons. Absence of samian. Well preserved very late Roman groups dominated by jar and cooking pot forms. Appears a high quality domestic assemblage including colour-coated table wares. No pottery directly associated with the graves - all from surrounding ditches.",2494,33,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
2044,"Small pottery assemblage dating mostly to the 1st and early to mid 2nd C AD, but not quantified in report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2045,"A substantial pottery assemblage of later Roman date. It is dominated by products of the local Horningsea industry along with  typical regionally imported pottery, notably from the Lower Nene Valley, Oxfordshire and Hadham. Also some Pakenham ware, New Forest ware, late shell-tempered ware (Harrold?), Black-burnished ware (BB2), Overwey white (Portchester D) ware, Colchester ware, Swanpool colour-coated ware mortaria, and amphorae (Rhodian & Baetican).",8300,125,,,24,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2046,"Distribution, condition and nature of the assemblage are consistent with the deposition and redeposition of domestic debris from a rural farming community.",1562,23,,27,42,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2047,"Pottery of LIA to 4th C AD date - typical rural assemblage, though absence of any 1st C samian.",3215,58,,12,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2048,Pottery present but no report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2049,"Pottery kiln with a large assemblage but no real report or quantification. Included very large storage vessels, mainly Horningsea storage pots, and also mortaria and greyware bowls and dishes. Much waster material.",,50,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2050,"1131 fragments of LIA pottery and 622 fragments of RB pottery. Included some imported wares such as terra nigra platters, flagons and amphorae sherds. Roman pottery spanned 1st-2nd C AD. No mortaria and limited samian.",1753,18,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2051,"No pottery report, but 1st to 4th C pottery found, including minimal samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2052,"Large quantities of pottery from the excavated site, with greatest intensity in mid to late 3rd C and mid 4th C +. Most pottery of fairly local origin. Jars dominate, with increasing amount of dishes and mortaria over time. All amphorae Dr 20.",8699,101,49,64,195,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2053,"No overall quantification of pottery. Mostly 4th C, with plenty of Nene Valley and Oxford colour coats.",,,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2054,"A substantial assemblage but not quantified. Main emphasis on early Roman period, with large numbers of imports including samian. Minimal amphora",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2055,One of the largest assemblages of Middle-later Iron Age pottery excavated in eastern England. Most pottery came from enclosed phase 2 contexts and the alluvial deposits overlying the site.,15015,174,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2056,"A reasonable assemblage recovered from the shrine. Samian mainly eastern Gaulish and amphorae all Dr 20. Pottery dates mainly from mid 2nd to mid 4th C. Includes miniature flask/unguentarium. In terms of EVEs, ration of jars to dishes to bowls is 1:1:1 - greater emphasis on food serving/consumption than storage/preparation. Also 6 complete jars (mid-late 2nd C) found with sheep burials in NW corner of shrine enclosure.",2639,37,12,28,7,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2057,"Small assemblage, but much discarded prior to recording.",600,,,6,18,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2058,"Very limited report from 1960s, but mention of samian, mortaria and tazza. Dating mainly from 2nd C AD. More substantial assemblage from the 1988-95 excavations (including a graffito), though no further details as yet.",5114,195,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2059,Pottery recovered but no report. Samian and castor ware beaker recovered.,13,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2060,"Substantial pottery assemblage, 95% of which is directly associated with the kilns, with many wasters. Division of products based on broad stylistic affinity, between 'coarseware' vessels in the regional Iron Age tradition and 'fineware' vessels in a Gallo-Belgic/Romanizing tradition. Greater range of forms in the latter - flagons, platters, butt beakers, & necked jars. No samian.",15000,177,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2061,"No full quantifications in report, but includes a high % (6%) of samian, along with mortaria and amphora. In contrast to other fenland sites, more wheel-made vessels appear to have been used, and also the community employed Butt Beakers.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2062,"A substantial pottery assemblage, with 25% of it fully recorded. Roman pottery mostly mid 2nd to late 4th/early 5th C with especially large quantity of Nene Valley wares (24% of total), perhaps as the site was involved in the trading of these wares. Other wares include shell-tempered ware, Alice holt greywares, BB1 and BB2, Horningsea ware, Colchester ware, Hadham ware, Mancetter Hartshill ware, Oxford ware, Portchester ware and Verulamium whitewares. Samian vessels comprised the largest group of imported wares. Also Dr 20 amphorae and Central Gaulish black-slipped ware. Low quantity of mortaria. Eight vessels were recorded as having graffiti, seven of which comprised a scratched 'X' on the underside of the base. Also a possible ceramic inkwell (recorded in other finds).",73316,1648,2,,472,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2063,"451 sherds of IA and 604 sherds of RB pottery (only RB pot quantified). Most Roman sherds came from trackway ditches, probably in a single dump. Mostly later 1st C AD, with latest of late 2nd/early 3rd C.  Relatively high % of imports including S Gaulish samian and Dr 20.",604,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2064,"A small assemblage of LIA/RB pottery, mostly of 1st to mid 3rd C in date. Finewares very scarce, and no amphora or mortaria.",481,8,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2065,"60kg of RB pottery recovered, almost all 2nd C in date. Few imports. Includes a cheese press.",2817,60,3,21,35,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2066,"A small assemblage of LIA and RB pottery, reflecting position away from domestic occupation. No specialist wares apart from one Samian sherd.",183,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2067,A very small assemblage of late Iron Age-early Roman pottery. The assemblage is dominated by locally produced wares,70,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2068,"842 sherds from initial evaluation, 6385 sherds of pottery from  the 2007 excavation (most from a midden) and a further 3101 from the 2009 excavation. Range in date from 1st to 4th C, though with a peak in mid/late 2nd to 3rd C AD. Sandy greywares dominate, with finewares 12% of assemblage, and Horningsea products commonly occurring. Small number of imports. Jars most common, followed by dishes then bowls.",10328,161,,38,65,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2069,"Quite high density of pottery for area excavated, and comprising mostly lower Nene Valley wares. Most pottery was late Roman.",410,9,1,11,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2070,Small assemblage from outlying field system. Most of the wares are local to the Lower Nene Valley with grey wares current from the early 2nd century and colour-coated wares which appear from the mid to later 2nd century.,186,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2071,"Roman pottery dates mid 1st-4th C, though most is 2nd/3rd-4th C in date. The majority of the assemblage,  is of a utilitarian nature with locally produced domestic coarse wares, specifically shell tempered wares (Harrold kilns). A large quantity of (mainly Nene Valley) fine wares were identified and are generally Late Roman in date. Other wares include Black burnished ware (BB2), and Oxfordshire ware. A relatively large number of mortarium sherds. Small early 2nd C pottery kiln with wasters. Also 151 sherds of late Iron Age pottery.",7168,150,21,34,80,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2072,"Assemblage mostly comprised local wares from Nene Valley. No full report, but included small amount of samian, mortaria and amphora noted. Spans 1st to 4th C, but overwhelming majority was 2nd-3rd C AD.",,30,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2073,"A total of 50 sherds of Roman pottery was recovered from the Castor Barns evaluation, while a small but unspecified number of sherds came from the Cedars evaluation. 443 sherds from the Time Team excavation. Dates ranged from mid 2nd to late 4th C AD, and included amphora (Dr 20), samian and mortaria. Late Roman material more plentiful. As to be expected, dominating by local Nene Valley products.",493,7,4,6,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2074,Substantial 2nd-3rd C low status rural assemblage dominated by local coarsewares. Number of colour coated wares very low considering proximity to Nene Valley industries. Fabric and form suggest 'industrial' nature - range of vessels similar to briquetage in form. Also many vessels show evidence of burning and salt-related activities.,1576,25,,4,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2075,"A substantial assemblage dominated by locally produced shell or quartz tempered utilitarian coarse wares (jars, bowls and storage jars), although some fines wares, including samian were found in moderate quantities. Other specialist wares including a range of amphora and mortaria were also found (not quantified in assessment).",10224,197,,,265,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2076,"Small assemblage of RB pottery, from 1st to 3rd C AD, with most 2nd-3rd C. Most sherds very abraded. Quite a high % of samian. Also 149 sherds of M-LIA pottery.",179,2,,2,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2077,"Substantial assemblage, mostly of local origin - typical of the fabrics and forms produced in the Lower Nene Valley industry. An origin probably sometime in the Hadrianic/Antonine with no hiatus in activity between c.AD 130/140 - 410+, with a peak in ceramic activity in the later 3rd to 4th century, seem likely. Includes Dr 20 amphora, samian and mortaria.",1400,30,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2078,A small assemblage of IA (88 sherds) and RB (45 sherds) pottery (see also record 2004). Mostly typical Nene Valley wares. RB pottery severely abraded and probably redeposited from middening or ploughing. Also a single sherd of Saxon date.,138,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2079,"Mostly Nene Valley wares, but with relatively large % of samian ware (mostly 2nd C). Over 50% of the pottery from one pit - midden. Date ranges from mid 2nd to mid 3rd C AD.",737,13,1,5,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2080,No report but pottery from late 3rd to end of 4th C indicated.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2081,"Small but relatively rich assemblage, mostly dating to the 3rd C AD. Mostly local Nene Valley wares, with a single central Gaulish samian sherd and 22 Dr 20 fragments.",133,2,22,3,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2082,"LIA and Roman pottery largely comprises locally produced material and dates to the 1st through to the 4th century, with a significant component belonging to the 3rd and 4th centuries.",345,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2083,"The pottery dated to the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD, and was almost exclusively recovered from six features in Trenches 12, 13 and 14. The assemblage comprised fairly locally produced utilitarian vessels a lot were jars, some of which had been used as cooking pots but no fine wares possibly suggesting a low order Roman settlement.",120,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2084,"Small assemblage spanning 1st to 4th C, but with LR emphasis, dominated by unsourced coarsewares. Horningsea storage jar fabrics only 7.4% (by weight), despite the kilns only lying 3km to the east. Few fine wares - mostly LR Nene Valley colour coats. A further 2346 sherds (36kg) recovered from fieldwalking adjacent to evaluation area",229,4,4,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2085,A large quantity of locally produced sandy courseware storage and cooking vessels but no quantification or report in evaluation report. Dating from LIA to mid 2nd C AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2086,"A small assemblage in good condition, mostly of a utilitarian nature with locally produced domestic coarse wares (reduced and oxidised) and shell tempered wares forming the majority. Only five sherds of fine wares were identified, including a single sherd of central Gaulish Samian.",70,2,,4,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2087,"A modest assemblage of LIA and ER pottery, with limited access to high status products. Mostly locally produced sandy coarse wares.",206,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2088,Small assemblage. A rim sherd from a Central Gaulish samian dish and a sherd of Dressel 2-4 amphora  are the only imported pottery.,290,5,1,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2089,"Substantial concentration of pottery spanning the period between the early/mid 2nd century AD and the end of the Roman period, including  potential wasters from the pottery kiln. It is thought that the kiln mostly produced shelly wares. Also many Nene Valley wares. Only regional import comprises a single piece from a late Roman Oxfordshire colour-coated ware bowl.",1255,26,,4,8,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2090,"Small assemblage, predominantly local undiagnostic greywares. Sherds of Hadham ware and Oxfordshire redware are also present. Date range from 1st to 4th C, though predominantly 2nd C.",60,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2091,"A small but significant assemblage of Late Iron Age and Early Roman pottery was recovered from the evaluation. Primarily, the date range of the group is almost all consistently pre-Flavian (AD 43-70), with some late Iron Age or Conquest period groups and one early 2nd century group. Possibly much produced by nearby Greenhouse Farm kilns.",324,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2092,"Small assemblage of mainly local wares, ranging from 1st to 4th C AD. Most of the pottery probably falls into the 3rd and 4th Centuries.",97,,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2093,Small low status assemblage of probable 1st to 2nd century AD date. The majority of the assemblage was derived from locally made coarse wares - mostly kitchen and table wares.,210,4,,2,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2094,"Large predominantly local assemblage and minimal imports, which appear from Phase 2 (2nd-3rd C), along with most of the pottery. Very low % of samian, but includes complete samian bowl. Limited Dr 20 Amphora and mortaria just 5 EVE. Also ceramic Nene Valley colour coat lamps and cheese presses.",14381,,16,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2095,"Two main pottery groups - that from the trackway/settlement boundary ditch, dating to mid 1st C AD, possibly pre-Flavian, with forms predominantly necked and carinated jars. Another group from enclosure 2, dated to the mid-2nd C onwards.",424,5,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2096,"Considerable quantities of pottery, mostly dating from 2nd to mid 4th C, but with some 1st C AD material. 3rd century pottery kiln noted.  No report.",,771,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2097,"Assemblage dating from LIA to 4th C AD, with a peak in occupation between the mid/later 2nd and the 3rd C AD. Although later phases (particularly dumping deposits) include some imported wares, the earlier Roman pottery consists predominantly of local greywares, and of jars. This pottery is concentrated in the northern part of the excavation area, supporting the suggestion that the core area of the farmstead lay slightly to the north of the site-area. Miniature beakers in many of the inhumation graves.",943,18,,9,14,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2098,"Out of the 40 sherds of pottery, the majority could only be assigned a general early Roman date of 1st/2nd century, except one good assemblage which contained a number of Flavian/Hadrianic vessels c. AD 70-120/130. No imports or finewares were recorded in the groups and all the pottery is probably of local manufacture. 155 M-LIA pottery sherds from southern settlement.",40,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2099,"LIA pottery from the cremation graves includes pedestal urns, tazzae, jars and bowls. The Roman pottery dates overwhelmingly from the 2nd to early 3rd centuries with a few earlier and later pieces. Few fine wares or imports. Not quantified.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2100,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2101,"Very small LIA assemblage and modest Roman assemblage for size of investigations, with an emphasis on material of 2nd and 3rd-century date. Very much dominated by local sandy grey and brown wares with few recognisable imports.",1453,20,4,,29,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2102,"Reasonable assemblage, though no overall quantification by sherd count. Most of the pottery is locally produced coarsewares. The Nene Valley is the most numerous (36.1%) followed by the local kilns (34.2%), and Horningsea (22%). Finewares account for 13.6% of the total assemblage, of which over half are Nene Valley Grey Wares. No amphora and very small amounts of samian (0.9% by wgt) and mortaria (0.2% by wgt).",,27,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2103,"Substantial assemblage, mostly local coarsewares, supplemented by a wide range of regional products from lower Nene Valley. Relatively small % of samian and amphorae. Tazza recovered",21091,265,36,,365,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2104,The majority of the assemblage is largely Early Roman in date. Vessel forms present indicate a domestic coarse ware assemblage with limited access to high status products. Specialist wares are present in relatively small amounts.,1584,10,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2105,A single 2nd century cremation urn and ancillary vessel (cup).,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2106,"The potsherds recovered date to the 3rd-4th centuries AD. They consist largely of Nene Valley Colour-coated ware, Harold ware, and Grey ware storage vessels and table wares. No samian or other imported finewares were identified within this assemblage",288,4,1,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
2107,"Large amount of pottery for an evaluation, with significant quantities of shelly coarsewares (2659 sherds). Kiln furniture and poorly fired pottery indicates significant production site. Kilns probably functioned 2nd-early 4th C AD.",4065,72,,17,13,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2108,"A moderately sized assemblage of Romano-British pottery was recovered from fieldwalking and excavated features. Mostly 3rd Century in date. The  assemblage is dominated by greywares, most of which are probably Horningsea products (6.5km to the south) - especially storage jars. The range of vessels consists of fairly plain, utilitarian wares - bowls, dishes and jars with very rare beakers/cups and no flagons.",327,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2109,"Modest assemblage, mainly 2nd-3rd C, but continuing to late 4th C. Variety of forms and fabrics.",,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2110,"Substantial assemblage with typical  repertoire of pottery vessels, and all stages of culinary practice clearly represented - storage, food preparation and service, and drinking. An obvious and dramatic increase in vessel usage over time. The quantitatively dominant fineware is Nene Valley colour-coated ware, and the principal imported fineware is samian ware. No quantification by sherd number, but in terms of EVE, samian 266. Dr 20 and Gaulish amphora.",11946,20631,4,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2111,"A substantial assemblage for the area excavated, with high levels of post-depositional disturbance possibly the result of middening. The most common fabric type by weight are Horningsea wares and account for c.51% of the assemblage recovered. The majority of this assemblage is mid to late Roman in date. Identified within the grey ware assemblage are the remains of three dishes all containing post firing graffito scratched onto their exterior surface, one with name MACROBIUS, of Greek origin.",3413,65,7,34,17,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2112,"Most of the pottery was from local production sites at Horningsea, the Nene Valley, in Essex and Bedfordshire, and spanned the 1st to 4th C AD, mostly mid Roman. No quantifications.",,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2113,Relatively large amounts of pottery recovered but no quantification or report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2114,Small assemblage dominated by locally-produced coarse wares. The range of forms suggests a mostly late 1st to mid-2nd century date.,146,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2115,"The bulk of this pottery is assigned to two periods: mid 2nd-mid/late 3rd century and mid/late 3rd-mid 4 century. In the later Roman period, regional imports from Oxford, Hadham, Colchester and Verulamium have a limited impact on an otherwise locally dominated assemblage.",502,5,,3,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2116,Moderately sized assemblage dating from the mid 1st C BC to the 1st/2nd C AD.,1014,19,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2117,"Extensive LIA to late Roman assemblage, mostly dating to the early Roman period. Consists mostly of utilitarian coarsewares though some imported and specialist wares present, specifically 13 vessels from high status cremation. Pottery kiln on site, but no wasters and it is likely that it was never properly used.",15153,174,,,121,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2118,"Substantial assemblage, including 5481 sherds (76kg) of LIA-ER date. The main characteristics of the assemblage are the use of local shell-tempered clays to produce utilitarian jar forms throughout the Romano-British period, though non-local wares were certainly present. A single graffito and limited miniature jars recovered.",26659,344,,,385,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2119,"A small assemblage of M-LIA pottery, a rich pottery assemblage (including imported terra nigra platter) from LIA grave and later Roman pottery. No samian. No quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2120,[await data],,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2121,"The excavation recovered a relatively large ceramic assemblage with a high component of Horningsea wares, as might be expected given its proximity to a known kiln site. The group is of considerable value since most of the material is of Flavian to Hadrianic date. Amphorae are unusually well represented - most Dr 20 but also Gallic wine and 3 sherds of carrot amphora (dates from middle east?).",3984,80,123,19,87,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2122,"Modest (and unquantified in report) assemblage of LIA to 4th C AD date, though most 1st-2nd C date. Finewares uncommon. 50kg of pottery also from earlier excavations",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2123,A small modest typically rural assemblage from the field ditches dating from 1st to mid 3rd C AD. Most derive from local kilns such as Horningsea. Most of the samian came from Saxon SFBs.,579,,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2124,Reasonable density of mid to late 4th C pottery. Report missing,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2125,"Small assemblage mostly dating to the LIA, with just 20 Roman sherds dating from the 1st to 3rd C AD.",166,1,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2126,"Substantial assemblage, including from a roadside kiln dated pre-Flavian. Most pottery dated later 2nd/3rd C, but continuing until at least mid 4trh C AD. The majority of the assemblage (39% sherd count) is composed of Nene Valley products, with a large range of forms. Also imported or Romano-British fine wares. Samian was the most common continental import with 1.8% of the total number of Roman sherds.",6492,170,1,,117,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2127,Small 2nd-4th C AD assemblage with most commonly occurring fabric being Nene Valley greyware.,63,1,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2128,"Reasonable but modest assemblage, dominated by jars and with imports accounting for just 1%. Most pottery mid 1st to mid 3rd C, after which quantities decline. Nene Valley Wares dominate from mid 2nd C onwards. One mid 1st C AD inhumation burial accompanied by a pedestal tazza",1220,20,2,,12,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2129,"Of the pottery recovered, 225 sherds attributed to the inhumation graves and 325 to the cremation burials. The assemblage is dominated by coarseware vessels, with a lack of imported wares - only six sherds of Central Gaulish Samian. However, most of the vessels used as grave goods were finewares, including one Nene Valley colour-coated ware, two Pakenham colour-coated vessels and one Hadham red-slipped ware. The range of vessel forms was very limited - beakers, dishes, flagons and jars.",703,12,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2130,"A sizable assemblage of Roman pottery of 1st-4th C date, though with an increase in activity from the mid/late 2nd-3rd C onwards. Coarsewares and local fabrics dominate.",1804,28,1,18,37,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2131,"A total of 220 sherds (3kg) of IA-Roman pottery, mostly ER in date, from the evaluation. No report on pottery from the excavation as yet, but the quantity is considerable, with over 1100 sherds from one enclosure alone (though this appears to be somewhat exceptional - a dumped deposit perhaps at the end of the settlement's life). Terra nigra platter from one of the cremation burials.",1320,24,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2132,"High density of pottery, mostly 2nd-3rd C in date, but also LIA material. Good variety of fabrics and forms, with finewares accounting for 8% of assemblage.",1726,30,1,7,68,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2133,"Small assemblage of LIA-ER pottery, dominated by local sandy wares.",114,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2134,Modest size assemblage dating primarily to the 3rd C AD. A range of vessel fabrics and forms.,244,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
2135,"The assemblage comprised a variety of different vessel fabrics, including both local, non-local and imported wares. A small number of fine-wares were identified, representing just 5% of the assemblage.",568,7,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2136,Small assemblage broadly dating mid 2nd to 4th C in date. Finewares were moderately well represented. Quite a wide range of forms though dominated by jars.,163,3,,5,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
2137,"Reasonably high density of pottery, with a peak  during the mid/late 2nd-3rd century AD, although there were small amounts of both earlier and later dating pottery. The range of fabrics present was somewhat limited, being dominated by sandy greywares, with finewares representing  9% of the total assemblage (including a semi-complete Nene Valley colour-coated vessel) and imports very scarce. Jars dominate forms.",644,8,,3,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2138,"A modest assemblage, mostly Horningsea wares. Mostly 2nd-3rd C in date. The assemblage is was dominated by jugs, with a much lower percentage of tableware (dishes and bowls). Very little fineware.",463,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
2139,"Six vessels from the cremation grave including platters, terra nigra cup, Hofheim flagon and jars. All dated mid 1st C AD. Also 3 later 1st/2nd C vessels from 2nd possible cremation burial.",35,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2140,"No report in draft, but pottery types were mixed but included local grey wares, oxidised wares, Harrold ware, Burnished Grey ware, Nene Valley burnished ware and a possible samian bowl. Most 2nd-4th C AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2141,"No report on pottery from the excavations, but pottery from the evaluation included amphorae, Horningsea ware, Harrold ware and Nene Valley Greywares and colour coats. Also  Samian ware. Kiln wasters found. Overall, it seems a high status assemblage.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2142,Moderate assemblage of LIA and Roman pottery (MIA pot not quantified here). The majority of the Roman pottery is of 1st- to 2nd-century date with occupation ceasing by the middle of the 3rd century AD. The assemblage is characterised by coarse wares notably including sandy grey wares which are unsourced and probably locally produced. A small number of (probably early) grey ware wasters (20 sherds) are present suggesting that the source of production for these wares lay close to the site. Low overall levels of fine wares.,638,13,2,,5,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2143,Moderate sized assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman pottery. Evidence for complete pottery vessels deposited in pits.,2747,56,,,35,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2144,"A small (and unquantified) assemblage dominated (55% by count) by Nene Valley fine colour-coated wares. The vessel forms are mainly jars, bowls and dishes, beakers being extremely rare which suggests that although 'fine' pottery is well represented, it could still be everyday ware. Dated mid/late 2nd to early 3rd C AD",,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2145,"The largest amount of pottery was recovered from the Farcet Road site (274 sherds, 3.69kg) while only a small quantity came from Horsey Hill (28 sherds, 0.478kg).  Locally manufactured later Roman (mid 3rd to mid 4th century AD) Lower Nene Valley grey ware and colour coated dish forms constitute the bulk of the Farcet Road assemblage, while the latest Nene Valley colour coat wares formed the majority of the Horsey Road assemblage.",302,4,,4,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2146,"Three late Roman fabrics made up the majority of the pottery from the site: colour-coated wares from the Nene Valley, Hadham (Herts) red wares, and shell tempered pottery which resembles the products of the Harrold (Beds) kilns.",340,4,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
2147,"A complete Horningsea style pottery kiln was excavated on the bank at the canal's entrance and up to 17 other kilns in vicinity are part of the Horningsea industry. Most of the pottery is associated with the kilns (greywares). Kiln products include bowls, dishes and jars. There is also evidence for craft level mortarium production.",6954,120,,34,67,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2148,"Substantial assemblage, dominated by Horningsea greywares, with a high proportion of the sherds  (31% by count) in the Horningsea storage jars fabric.",1099,26,,6,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2149,"Substantial assemblage dating from the LIA to the late Roman period, though most late Roman. The bulk of the assemblage is of a local Nene Valley provenance represented by local colour coated, grey ware or cream/white ware products. 934 sherds (23kg) came from the stone-lined well (including 3 complete pots), possibly deposited for ritual reasons. This included a near complete bowl from the base, possibly deposited at the time of construction. Of particular interest are the series of 24 whole, circular bases from vessels in this feature.",3259,43,2,,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2150,Substantial assemblage dated to the 2nd to 4th century. Maximum of 7.94% finewares in later Roman period. Horningsea reduced and oxidised wares comprise 38.08% of the assemblage by sherd count (41.78% by weight).,2842,30,20,,36,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2151,Mainly 2nd-4th C assemblage dominated by local oxidised sandy wares and Nene Valley Colour coats.,472,7,,8,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2152,"Most of the sherds date 2nd-4th century AD, although a small number of features contained early Roman pottery (mid-late 1st century AD).",789,27,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
2153,"The pottery was typical of a later Romano-British domestic assemblage, and largely consisted of fairly average courseware and fine ware vessels (Nene Valley colour coats), with a few imported fine wares.",505,9,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2154,Just 46 sherds of Roman pottery point to its non-domestic nature. 98 sherds of M-LIA pottery. No finewares.,46,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2155,"Local Coarsewares dominated the assemblage (85%), along with 10 sherds of Nene valley colour coats.  The pottery ranges in date from the 1st to 4th century AD and within this the bulk dated 2nd-3rd  century AD.",159,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2156,"Small assemblage mainly from enclosure ditch. The bulk of the pottery almost certainly dates to the Earlier Roman period, between c. 80 AD and c. AD 200.",246,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2157,"The majority of datable pottery originates from the early Roman period and consist of locally produced proto-grey wares. Fine and specialist wares were not common, although a significant amount of Southern Gaulish, and one Central Gaulish sherd, of samian were retrieved.",1560,9,,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2158,"Roman assemblage from 2001 evaluation (250 sherds; 3kg) included sherds of the local Horningsea ware, grey wares, colour coats and occasional sherds of samian. This group can be assigned a broad date of mid 2nd-early 4th century AD. The 2012 assemblage (274 sherds; 5kg) dates between the early 2nd and 4th centuries AD. Illiterate graffito on mortaria. Single fragment of amphora from Gallic wine amphora.",524,8,1,3,9,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2159,The small assemblage was comprised entirely of abraded coarse ware pottery.,12,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2160,"A modest assemblage of mostly coarseware Roman pottery (IA pottery not included here). Very abraded and likely to be present as a result of manuring. The range of forms is poor with plain-rimmed dishes, flanged bowl, storage and other jars.",354,2,,1,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2161,"A moderately sized assemblage dating primarily to the 3rd and 4th centuries AD. 264 sherds (11kg) came from the well. Nene valley wares most common, including a complete small beaker from the well.",758,17,,5,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2162,"Moderate assemblage, much of which was very abraded. Mostly local coarse sandy greyware with few imports of specialist vessels.",1950,,2,,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2163,Limited local and regional coarsewares of 2nd-3rd C AD date.,,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2164,Small assemblage is dominated by locally manufactured 2nd-3rd/4th C  kitchen and tablewares in coarseware and fineware fabrics. Greywares make up 34.9% of the total by weight.,100,1,,6,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2165,A very dense assemblage of LIA-early Roman pottery from a small part of the enclosure ditch. Material is severely abraded. Mostly locally produced jars and bowls including small amount of imported wares.,3617,27,1,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2166,Small LIA-early Roman assemblage with over a half coming from a single context and mainly from only two vessels.,200,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2167,"The Roman assemblage largely comprises shelly wares and grey sandy wares there are at least three continental imports. Dating LIA to 2nd C AD, with c 60 sherds dating LIA.",334,6,1,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2168,Very small assemblage reflecting location away from settlement. Pottery early-mid Roman in date. Includes 3 sherds from a Horningsea reduced ware storage jar.,10,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2169,"All of the material dated to the Early Roman period, mid 1st-2nd century AD, dominated by coarse, sandy wares, most of which are likely to have been locally made, but includes ten Baetican amphora sherds from a single feature.",117,,10,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
2170,"Small late Roman assemblage dominated by locally made coarsewares, though a relatively wide variety of fabrics were present. Finewares represented 25% of the assemblage - mostly Nene valley colour coats.",150,4,1,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
2171,Small assemblage of mid 1st to 3rd C date dominated by locally made coarseware vessels.,72,0,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2172,Very small assemblage - all LIA except one Roman sherd.,9,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2173,"The pottery was comprised of coarseware fabrics, all of which are likely to have been made locally. The forms and fabrics suggest an earlier Roman date of mid 1st-early 2nd century AD.",11,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2174,"A huge density of pottery from the production  site - mostly the products of the two early 2nd C AD kilns. High concentrations  were contained in the kilns or as waster deposits associated with Horningsea ware production. Occasional other imported wares. Characteristic form types include carinated bowl-jars, jars with rilled decoration, and narrow-neck jars, while other jar types, storage jars, bowls, beakers, platters and lids are also present.",7960,119,,4,2,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2175,Very small LIA-Roman assemblage.,16,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2176,"A total of 524 sherds of late Iron Age/early Roman pottery and 16 sherds of late Roman pottery. The early group included imported Gallo-Belgic wares (Terra Nigra, Terra Rubra, North Gaulish white ware), a single sherd of south Gaulish samian ware and body sherds from a single fine ware beaker produced at Cherry Hinton. The late Roman pottery in the assemblage is dominated by regionally-imported fabric and form types, notably jars, bowls and mortaria of the Hadham and Lower Nene Valley industries. Also some Oxfordshire red-slipped ware.",630,8,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2177,"Small assemblage, providing little strong evidence for activity except for the later Roman period, mainly the 3rd to probably the early 4th century. There are no vessels for which a latter 4th century date would be applicable.",392,4,1,2,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2178,"Pottery assemblage spanning LIA to late Roman period, mostly 2nd-3rd C. Mainly local utilitarian reduced  and shell-tempered wares, with very few imported wares.",1155,19,1,2,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2179,Substantial but unquantified assemblage dating from 2nd to 4th C AD,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2180,"Pottery mainly from the kilns, but not quantified by sherd count. Products comprised Nene valley colour-coated wares from one pair of kilns and greywares from another. Kilns in use from late 2nd to mid 3rd C AD. Form include indented and bag shaped beakers and imitations of samian forms.",,240,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2181,"Moderate density of pottery, mostly mid 2nd to early/mid 3rd C in date and including a high proportion of British finewares, especially from the nearby Nene Valley.",659,14,2,,18,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2182,"Relatively small assemblage (mostly coarse local greywares), with 128 sherds from graves. Jars and bowls dominate (c 90%).",893,,,4,14,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
2183,Supposedly much pottery from site though unquantified. Included samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2184,"A total of 18 graves contained pottery (2nd-4th C AD in date), some whole pots, others very fragmentary. No details as yet on pottery from the settlements.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
2185,"A large quantity of predominantly early Roman (mid to late 1st century AD) pottery was recovered. Much of the assemblage would seem to be kiln products, which included many flagons. It is suggested that the potters were itinerant workmen from Gaul, perhaps producing specialised 'funerary' pottery. Aside from kiln products, other wares comprise Oxfordshire red-slipped wares, Nene Valley colour-coated sherds and single examples of early Colchester colour-coated ware, Hadham black-burnished ware and Verulamium whiteware. Three possible tazze.",3791,50,1,2,4,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
2186,"A small assemblage, mostly local greyware bowls/jars, of later 1st to 2nd C AD date. Other fabrics include Verulamium region whitewares and shell-tempered ware.",223,3,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2187,"A total of 168 (2.4kg) of late Iron Age pottery and 4767 sherds (52kg) of Roman pottery (including very latest LIA). Most Roman pottery dates 1st-2nd C AD. Nearly all were local fabrics, though some samian and a Dr 20 amphora sherd. Also Verulamium region whitewares and Nene valley wares.",4935,54,1,,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2188,"A substantial concentration of pottery, much of it produced on site. The kiln was producing grey ware sand tempered vessels in new forms such as cordoned and carinated jars and bowls as well as platters, dating mid/later 1st C AD (probably pre-Flavian).  Pottery not produced on the site includes a cheese press (from Longthorpe kilns?) as well as samian and a sherd of Verulamium region white ware.",441,7,,,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2189,"A small assemblage, all but one sherd from the area of the settlement, dating from the M-LIA to the Roman period, with an emphasis on the 1st to mid 2nd C AD. The majority of the pottery fabrics recovered are sandy grey wares, then shell tempered wares. Also a single oxidised sherd  from a Nene Valley mortaria.",123,2,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
2190,Just 14 sherds came from the Neath Farm excavations including south Gaulish samian and Horningsea greywares. A further 105 sherds from nearby excavations.,14,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2191,"A modest size assemblage of pottery from the various stages of investigation. Fabrics include early Roman shelly ware (from Lower Nene Valley), later shell tempered ware (from Harrold), Hadham ware, Nene Valley colour-coated ware and white ware,  Colchester-sourced black-burnished ware, local sandy grey wares, South and Central Gaulish samian ware and Horningsea ware. There also a single sherd of late Iron Age pottery. A possible incised graffito was recorded on a black-surfaced ware base.",92,1,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2192,"A total of 30 sherds of late Iron Age pottery and 43 sherds of early Roman pottery. With the exception of one sherd of Samian, all the pottery appears to be of local origin.",73,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
2193,"A relatively modest sized assemblage, mostly of later Iron Age and early Roman date. Late Iron Age pottery sherds (105 sherds) were limited to the area of the largest settlement. The assemblage mostly comprises local sandy reduced coarse wares, with some samian, Nene Valley ware and Horningsea wares. Some later Roman wares point to continuing activity of some kind.",1562,20,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
2194,"A significant sized assemblage dating from the middle Iron Age to the mid Roman period. The middle Iron Age pottery (713 sherds) is excluded here, though 1275 sherds (19kg) dates middle to late Iron Age. Also 1895 sherds of Roman pottery (25kg), mostly local reduced and oxidised wares, including Horningsea vessels. The only regional imports comprise sherds of Verulamium region ware.",3170,44,1,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3001,"A very large assemblage of pottery, but not quantified. 13 graffito's, including literate names.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3002,Moderate assemblage though only described in terms of phased contexts - 881 sherds in LIA-ER features and 1608 sherds in M-LR features. Local fabrics dominant.,2489,22,,,86,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3003,"Moderately high concentration of pottery dating from the 1st to 4th C AD and mostly comprising local greywares, though with a reasonable % of imported wares. Not all reports contained quantified data so quantity below is not accurate.",889,,10,,43,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3004,"Moderate assemblage, mostly derived from fills of wells, dating from the late 1st/2nd century AD through to the 4th/5th century AD. The bulk of the pottery came from relatively local sources.",791,9,1,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3005,"Moderate Roman pottery assemblage revealing two phases of activity on the site, the earliest dating to the mid 1st century AD, the latest dating to the later 2nd century AD. Parts of at least 6 2nd C samian vessels were recovered, but not quantified by sherd count.",115,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3006,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3007,"Dense concentration of pottery, undoubtedly from kiln in immediate vicinity as contained many wasters. The majority of the pottery is made from a granular, sandy fabric which was  typical of the Verulamium region industries. The assemblage includes a large number of flagons. Also tazze. All these vessels were manufactured during the 2nd half of the 1st century or the beginning of the 2nd century AD.",2019,25,,,2,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3008,"Assemblage dated from later 1st C BC to end of 2nd C AD. Grey wares from the kiln site at Hadham predominated in the 2nd century AD. The vast majority of the pottery fabrics were local or regional wares. Identified forms consisted of dishes, bowls, jars flagons and a cup.",642,7,,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3009,Pottery recovered but no quantification provided,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3010,A total of 1092 sherds (18164 g) were recovered. There is LIA and early RB activity on the site but the bulk of the pottery is Roman in date. No further information.,1092,18,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3011,"No sherd count quantification of pottery or any details other than overall weight, and indications of date range from LIA to 5th C AD, with concentration in 2nd-3rd C AD.",,42,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3012,"A large assemblage, though mostly unquantified (over 2000kg processed). Many imports including 1 complete Dr 1a amphora from LIA cremation grave.  Mortaria are common. 14 graffito's, mostly literate. A tazza came from a 2nd C cremation grave.",,2000,80,348,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3013,"Many complete or near complete pottery vessels (286) from the cremation graves, including those used as urns (134). 45 samian vessels in graves - all dish and cup forms, and some in graves dated much later than the pots. All accessory vessels concerned with food and drink, including 31 flagons. 7 examples of graffiti.",286,,,,45,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3014,"Huge assemblage, though no overall sherd count provided.  Verulamium region pottery most common fabric and dominated by jars and bowls. Large amounts of samian but unquantified. Includes tazze. 7 graffito's.",,1290,22,133,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3015,"No overall quantification of pottery, but ranges in date from 1st to 4th C and includes samian and mortaria.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3016,"A large dump of pottery from the enclosure ditch dating later 1st C BC to c AD 60s, with a small quantity of 2nd C material. No sherd count provided",,32,5,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
3017,"Substantial LIA (5514 sherds, 63kg) and to a lesser extent Roman (1636 sherds, 15.6kg) assemblage. Fine and specialist wares comprise significant amount (9.13%) of Roman assemblage, some of which extends into the 4th C. Some amphora in LIA assemblage.",7150,79,25,5,73,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3018,Modest assemblage of mainly 2nd C date. Largest group comprised Hadham wares.,509,8,,1,27,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3019,Late 2nd-4th C pottery recorded from pits but not quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3020,A modest sized assemblage of early-mid 1st C AD date. Includes amphora sherds and imported flagons.,536,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
3021,Substantial assemblage of pottery but no report or sherd count. Includes many samian sherds.,,24,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3022,Small assemblage mostly of local grog tempered ware.,183,3,1,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
3023,"Substantial  (but unquantified) assemblage including Arretine ware, Gallo-Belgic imports and large amounts of samian. Most amphora Dr 2-4 and Dr 20. 3 graffito's.",,,103,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3024,"Large and important assemblage with noteworthy collection of early imported wares, including Italian Arretine wares and Gallo-Belgic wares. 203 samian vessels but no sherd count. No overall quantifications. Amongst the largest group of early 1st century wall-sided mortaria in Britain, and very important group of amphorae - Dr 20, Dr 2-4 and Dr 7-11 (c 22kg).",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3025,"Pottery within the grave includes Dressel 1B amphora and 11 local wheel-tuned pots, including pedestal jar and bowls.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
3026,"Dense concentration of pottery spanning the mid 1st to end of 4th C AD, with emphasis on 2nd-3rd C. Quantification by EVE only, but includes mortaria, amphora (Dr 20) and samian.",6936,83,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3027,"Aside from a few residual sherds (including samian), most pottery was late Roman in date, continuing into 5th C. Unquantified.",,,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3028,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3029,"Total weight excludes cremation burial pottery. No report on pottery from earlier excavations. 713 sherds came from the later cable trench excavations, mostly dating 2nd-3rd C. Imported and fine wares make up a very low proportion of this assemblage. No amphora recorded.",,61,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3030,"Small assemblage of LIA and Roman pottery, mostly from LIA pit and ER ditch. The Roman material dates predominantly from the late 1st to 2nd century. Regional imports are not present in large numbers. Continental imports are represented by 7 sherds from Spanish Dressel 20 amphorae. Vessels recovered are indicative of a domestic assemblage, comprising tablewares and cooking pots.",233,3,7,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
3031,"Only the most recent excavations of the outlying enclosures provided a sherd count (228 sherds), so weight only is provided. Includes 1st C material but most is 2nd C in date and includes samian. Mostly local coarsewares.",,20,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3032,"Unquantified overall pottery assemblage. Amphora include Dr 20, Dr 1 and Dr 2-4",,,30,23,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3033,Modest sized assemblage including mortaria and samian.,714,,2,39,32,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3034,"Unquantified pottery assemblage including samian, mortaria and amphora.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3035,"A large pottery assemblage dating from the LPRIA to the end of the 2nd C AD. Includes amphora and samian, though finewares are generally very few and this appears a low status assemblage. Possible structured deposit of complete platter in a pit near the pond.",13135,103,40,1,64,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3036,Substantial assemblage (mostly Hadham wares) dating from mid 1st C AD to 4th C. Includes miniature beaker from grave. Includes over 6kg of samian but not quantified by sherd count(!). A large quantity of pottery (56kg) came from the LIA/ER well - possible ritual deposit?,30637,313,143,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3037,"Most pottery of LIA date (2465 sherds, 37kg), with just 42 sherds (0.5kg) of Roman pottery, including Dr 2-4 amphora and Verulamium flagon dated c AD 50.",2507,38,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
3038,"Unquantified LIA-Roman assemblage, including a tazza.",,,,,48,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
3039,Iron Age and Roman pottery recovered but only report is from small Watching Brief (details provided here).,,1,1,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
3040,"Large LIA assemblage, including Gallo-Belgic wares. Unquantified. Also Dr 2-4 and Dr 1 sherds.",,156,47,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
3041,"Moderate assemblage but no sherd count (263 vessels). Includes Gallo-Belgic imports, a little samian and significant quantity of amphorae - Dr 1, 2-4, 6, CAM 185 and Dr 20. Graffito on large storage vessel from LIA pit.",,,198,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
3042,"LIA and Roman assemblage from different excavations, unquantified but including samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3043,Moderate assemblage of LIA and mainly 1st- early 2nd C pottery. Includes Gallo-Belgic imports.,1596,11,10,1,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3044,Small assemblage of 1st-3rd C pottery.,39,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3045,"Substantial quantities of grey and oxidised Hadham wares recovered, along with a small amount of other pottery (59 sherds).",6286,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3046,Substantial quantity of 1st to 4th C pottery. No report.,7036,75,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3047,A small (and unquantified) amount of LIA-early Roman pottery. A kiln in the area of this evaluation had previously been excavated - part of the Hadham industry.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3048,"The 232 sherds from the evaluation were mainly 2nd C in date, whilst the excavation produced mostly 4th C pottery, from dumps of material in the large pits. This mostly comprised Oxford wares and late Roman shelly wares from Harrold, Beds.",1132,17,4,20,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3049,"A substantial assemblage dating 2nd-4th C AD. Most of the pottery was supplied by local and regional industries, including Hadham, Harrold and Verulamium. Imported and fine wares make a very small part of the assemblage, 2.38%. Samian includes 7 substantially complete vessels which have each been recorded as I sherd below. No mention of mortaria or amphora.",6010,83,,,180,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3050,"The LIA to 4th C AD pottery assemblage is dominated by coarse wares, particularly jars, with occasional bowls, dishes, beakers, flagons and mortaria and few finewares.",446,3,1,2,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3051,No pottery report,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
3052,A reasonable quantity of Roman pottery recorded but not quantified and no report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3053,"Small assemblage dominated by local coarsewares, especially jars.",455,7,1,4,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3054,"Substantial assemblage, dominated by material from contexts of early Roman date, with smaller amount of LIA and later Roman, up to the mid 4th C AD.",4936,54,34,38,86,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3055,A modest assemblage mostly from pits and a pottery kiln. The kiln pottery is early Roman whilst the overall range is LIA to late 4th C AD. Much of this material is derived from the Hadham industry kilns.,230,5,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
3056,"Modest assemblage, mostly 3rd-4th C AD.",373,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3057,"Unquantified assemblages from the different excavations including Gallo-Belgic wares, samian,  amphora and mortaria",,,,8,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3058,"Pottery from graves -  flagons (including miniature), platters, beakers, lamps, tazzae and urns, including a face urn. Includes samian vessels.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3059,"Moderate 1st C AD assemblage. Most pottery from the kiln, in normal oxidised Verulamium Region fabric. Forms and stamped mortaria suggests worked by potter OASTRIVS in period AD 55-75. Products were Hofheim and other flagons, jars, bowls, lids and mortaria. Included a single tazza.",407,,,75,,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
3060,Unquantified assemblage dating from 2nd to late 4th C AD. No indications of amphora.,,,,,52,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3061,Unquantified assemblage dating form later 1st to 4th C including samian.,,,,,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3062,Small but unquantified assemblage including samian.,,,,,42,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3063,LIA pottery including burial urns.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3064,Moderate assemblage of 1st to early 3rd C pottery including samian.,1965,,,,70,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3065,"Large assemblage of pottery from the cremation graves - most had some form of 'urn', in addition to platter, flagon and beaker. Much samian. Graffito's.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3066,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3067,"Substantial assemblage of 1st to 4th C date, though mostly 2nd-3rd C.",1694,19,,,59,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3068,"Unquantified LIA-early Roman assemblage, some from the kiln.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3069,Small assemblage mostly of early-mid 2nd C date. The most frequently occurring types of vessel are jars.,198,4,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3070,A small assemblage of later Roman date.,32,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3071,37 boxes of pottery but not quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3072,"Small assemblage, though containing a range of fine and specialist vessels. Generally dating LIA to 2nd C AD.",260,,5,3,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3073,Modest assemblage dominated by Verulamium products. The only imported wares were South Gaulish and Central Gaulish samian ware.,316,3,,23,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3074,Moderate assemblage mainly of late Roman date. A few residual samian sherds.,484,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3075,Small assemblage of mainly LIA and early Roman pottery.,62,1,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3076,Small assemblage of later 1st-2nd C pottery. No quantifications.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3077,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
3078,Moderate assemblage of LIA to early Roman pottery. Jars account for 90% of forms. A few amphora sherds are only imported wares.,1418,15,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
3079,Late Iron Age and Roman pottery dominated by middle Roman material. There is also a tazza.,5419,34,69,31,104,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
3080,"Substantial assemblage including material from the mid 1st C AD kiln, and tiny amounts of 2nd C+ pottery. Kiln products were mostly a range of jar forms, but aloes a few dishes and bowls. Period of production ended c AD 50/55.",4323,57,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
3081,"Assemblage included pottery from the late Roman cemetery, where most vessels were products of the Hadham kilns. Some grave pots were considerably old when deposited (50-200 years old) including a samian cup. No report on other pottery or any quantifications.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3082,"Substantial but unquantified assemblage, mostly dating to the later Iron Age.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
3083,"High density of pottery of 1st-early 3rd C date, but no quantification or detail, except mention of decorated samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4001,"192 sherds of LIA pottery and 5776 (2880 recorded) sherds of Roman pottery from the excavations. Dating from 1st to early 4th C AD, mostly local coarsewares with few fine or imported wares. Samian forms included an inkwell.",5968,41,1,2,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4002,"Substantial assemblage of late 1st/2nd to later 4th C date, indicating low status rural settlement, with few specialist and imported wares. Mostly grey micaceous wares and grey sandy wares. 2127 sherds (50kg) from 1ha of OA excavations and 3505 sherds (46kg) from TVAS excavation of 0.2ha in heart of settlement.",5632,96,16,38,75,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4003,"Significant assemblage of late Roman pottery dominated by local coarsewares, especially storage jars.",2027,27,56,27,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4004,Very small assemblage,33,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4005,Limited assemblage from the iron smelting area. Dating from mid 2nd to mid 3rd C.,356,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4006,"Moderate sized assemblage of 1st to 4th C date. Mostly local coarsewares with few fine and specialist wares. Pottery supply increased in 3rd, 4th and early 5th C.",2882,33,10,2,27,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4007,"Substantial assemblage of 1st-2nd C date including amphora, samian and mortaria. Graffitos on body sherds of amphora.",55681,148,101,33,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4008,"Substantial quantity of pottery, though total amount not quantified by sherd count. Mostly local coarsewares. Ranging in date from LIA to 4th C AD, it included 7.1kg of pottery from kiln dated c AD 60-80. Most products comprise jars and also flagons and dishes. All amphora Dr 20.",,225,22,96,183,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4009,Very small assemblage of mainly 1st C AD pottery.,79,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4010,"A total of 236 LIA sherds and 166 early Roman sherds, including hand made and wheel made wares. No amphora or continental finewares. Only non-local vessel was Hofheim flagon.",402,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4011,Four sherds of LIA and 57 sherds of early Roman pottery. Mostly local coarsewares but also south Gaulish samian and amphora (Dr 20).,61,1,5,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
4012,Substantial assemblage of M-LIA pottery (1507 sherds) and two sherds of early Roman pottery.,1509,12,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4013,"Small assemblage of late Roman pottery, mostly local greywares, including a mortarium and miniature jars.",228,3,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
4014,Unquantified pottery assemblage of (later?) 2nd-early 4th C date. Three graffito's.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4015,"Very small assemblage of stratified sherds from pits (81 sherds), dating mid 1st C AD, with 30 other sherds of 1st to 4th C date.",111,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4016,Modest pottery assemblage (no sherd count provided) of LIA and early Roman date. Few imports.,,36,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4017,Small assemblage of mainly 4th C date from the villa (11 sherds) and more from the bathhouse (516 sherds).,634,10,2,3,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4018,"Most pottery from area of shrine, ranging in date from 1st to 4th C, though mainly 3rd-4th C. All amphora Dr 20.",,45,8,19,80,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4019,"Reasonable density of pottery, with high quantity of samian.",,109,30,68,244,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4020,A small late 2nd-mid 3rd C assemblage.,37,1,1,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
4021,"Small but unquantified assemblage including samian, terra nigra and local coarsewares, dating mid 1st to late 2nd C AD.",,,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4022,"Small assemblage, mostly LIA in date but also with late 1st-2nd C sherds.",320,,,,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4023,Small unquantified assemblage dated 2nd-4th C. Includes miniature bowl.,,,,7,20,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4024,"Large assemblage though only partially quantified. Dominated by local coarsewares. Dated mid 2nd to 4th C, with emphasis on later 2nd-3rd C. amphorae were Dr 20 and 30. 614 sherds (7.8kg came from later evaluation).",,255,,,494,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4025,Small assemblage of local greywares. Graffito on one sherd of greyware.,210,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4026,"At least 50 complete vessels (jars, flagons, bowls) deposited in ritual shafts, along with other (unquantified) vessel fragments.",,,,,21,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4027,Substantial assemblage but not fully quantified. Include wasters from the kiln.,,,,,77,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4028,"A total of 141 pottery kilns found in the town, 132 strung along the road the SW. Only 14 excavated (see ID 4027), and dates ranges from 100 to at least 300 for production. Products include mortaria and flagons. No pottery report.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
4029,"Most pottery from the kiln were wasters, dating approximately to the 3rd C AD. Dishes, bowls, jars and beakers (jars most common).",,31,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4030,"Large assemblage though unquantified by sherd count. Dating mainly later 1st to 3rd C. 25kg of samian. Included face pot. 4 graffito's, including literate examples. 19 sherds came from later evaluation (inc. 3 samian).",,700,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4031,"Large assemblage from the excavation, mostly 2nd-3rd/4th C AD date and much of it from the dark earth covering many of the features. Modest sized assemblage from the watching brief (16kg) including miniature votive cauldron. No report. One pottery waster found.",15817,184,50,,735,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4032,"A small assemblage of later Iron Age (49 sherds, 0.42kg) and Roman (8 sherds)",57,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4033,"Modest sized assemblage, most locally produced sandy grey wares. Where the pottery can be dated, the majority is consistent with a late 2nd to 4th century date. Specialist wares found include a single large body sherd of an olive oil amphora (Dressel 20) and a single fragment of mortarium. Nene Valley colour coats included a miniature hunt cup.",273,4,1,1,17,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4034,The majority of the pottery consisted of locally produced sandy reduced wares. The only fine ware found was a small amount of samian.,146,2,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4035,"Small assemblage of mid to late Roman pottery, mostly local sandy grey wares.",170,6,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
4036,"A modest sized assemblage of mainly 3rd-4th C date. The majority of the pottery is made up by the Horningsea reduced ware storage jar fragments, followed by utilitarian Sandy grey wares. Fine wares are sparse with only one  Central Gaulish Samian sherd found. 7 sherds of pottery from southern field ditches.",234,4,,2,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4037,"Small assemblage, mostly early to mid Romano-British coarse wares.",229,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4038,"Small assemblage, all but 5 Samian sherds were locally produced, coarse, utilitarian wares. Nearly one third of the assemblage was from a kiln and associated features. Misfired pottery and wasters amongst the assemblage are unlikely to have been moved any distance.",366,5,,,5,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4039,Sixty-four very abraded sherds of LIA and early Roman date.,64,0,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4040,The pottery dates from LIA to 2nd C AD. No report.,97,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4041,"Two excavated pottery kilns (and 4 other noted) producing sandy grey ware and west Norfolk reduced ware jars, bowls and dishes. Wasters recovered. A number of the sherds  have areas of a patchy coarse green 'glaze', and small patches were seen on the rear wall of one kiln itself. First kiln dated approximately mid 1st to mid 2nd C, the second was mid/late 2nd to late 3rd C. The 3rd C AD was peak of production.",9911,260,22,,285,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4042,"Large assemblage, though only 408 sherds (8.6kg) stratified. The majority of the pottery consisted of local, Nar Valley coarse Ware, datable to the 3rd and 4th centuries AD. A complete coarse ware jar came from a large pit or reservoir. High proportion of jars, relating the industrial nature of the assemblage.",1163,20,,2,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4043,"Assemblage mostly locally produced coarse wares, although some fine and imported wares  (samian and amphorae) were also identified.",538,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
4044,"A sizable assemblage of late 2nd to 4th C pottery, including well-preserved and stratified pottery groups from kilns and associated features representing pottery production in the Nar Valley. Kiln products comprise bowls, lids and jars, including large storage jars. Includes near complete Dr 20 amphora from a pit next to a timber building, used as a pissoir. Also London 555 amphorae, which were used to import olives from Gaul.",3619,103,78,,31,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4045,"A large dump of pottery within the early Roman kiln, although not all of it had been produced in the kiln. Fine Grog Grey Ware, Red Ware and Flint Tempered Ware fabrics constitute the majority of pottery found within the kiln and represent the three fabrics that were probably manufactured within it. Forms include jars, beakers, cups, platters and dishes.",628,8,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
4046,"Sparse pottery assemblage for the size of area excavated, and all 4th C in date, much of it later 4th C. The largest percentage of identifiable fabrics are late Romano-British shell tempered wares. Jars completely dominate, with just one dish, a flanged bowl and mortaria body sherds. No wasters indicating pottery production in the kilns.",450,5,,4,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
4047,Very limited assemblage of mainly local greywares.,19,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4048,"The small Roman assemblage consisted of locally produced coarse wares, including Grey wares, Oxidised wares and Reduced wares. Fine wares were represented by sherds of Nene Valley colour-coated ware and 12 sherds of Samian ware. A distorted Grey ware jar rim could be a waster.",324,,2,3,12,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4049,"Assemblage dated later 2nd-early 3rd C AD. Most of the pottery originates from the Wattisfield kiln industry in the north Suffolk area although amphora, Samian, colour-coated ware and possibly even mortaria have also been imported from the continent. Significant range of fabrics and forms present.",467,6,2,2,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4050,Small assemblage (37 sherds) dominated by samian. A further 15 sherds of samian found in nearby fieldwalking.,37,1,,3,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4051,"Modest assemblage, mostly local sandy grey wares, including a miniature jar.",226,3,1,,3,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
4052,Over half the assemblage comprised locally produced utilitarian grey wares probably produced at Brampton. Of the specialist wares amphora (exclusively Dressel 20) and domestically produced mortaria are also well represented. Samian well represented. Further 247 sherds of Roman pottery came from the Watching brief. A complete miniature greyware pot was recovered.,6048,85,23,48,303,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4053,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4054,Small assemblage of LIA-early Roman pottery.,50,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4055,Small assemblage dating 2nd-4th C with emphasis on later Roman.,42,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4056,Mostly local mid to late Roman coarsewares with a small percentage of fine and specialist wares. No quantification or report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4057,"Moderate sized assemblage, mostly dating to 3rd and 3rd/4th C AD, but also including 1st and 2nd C sherds. Most amphora Dr 20 but also Gallic amphorae. Higher percentages and/or fresher samian, mortaria and amphorae than assemblage from the fort.",2026,224,36,48,63,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4058,"Small assemblage, mostly consisting of coarse reduced fabrics including Horningsea reduced ware and Sandy reduced ware.",150,3,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4059,"Modest sized assemblage broadly dating from the late 3rd to 4th centuries AD. The assemblage is dominated by sandy grey wares and shell-tempered wares, supplemented with significant quantities fine ware and mortaria from the Lower Nene Valley, Hadham and Oxfordshire industries.",231,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
4060,"A small group of pottery from within the lower fill of the pottery kiln, mostly comprising pottery produced in the kiln - jars and bowls in Nar Valley ware. Also a large (but unquantified) amount of pottery was recovered from nearby spoil heaps.",59,,,,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4061,"Unquantified 2nd C pottery assemblage (jars, bowls, mortaria and beakers), including samian.",,,,,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4062,"Unquantified assemblage from the pottery kiln. Products comprise jars and beakers, including large storage jars.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4063,"A significant assemblage including mortaria manufactured in the two kilns (837 from one and 647 from the other). Includes over 50 mortaria stamped by Regalis, a potter known to have worked at Colchester. Thought to have operated at Ellingham, c AD 170-190. Also stamps of Lunaucis. Most of the other pottery comprised flagons, then jars, dishes and bowls.",4442,,1,1484,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
4064,Small assemblage with no overall quantification by fragment count. Mostly local coarsewares.,,17,3,3,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4065,"Substantial assemblage from the three pottery kilns, much of which was manufactured here. Kiln products comprised jars, flagons, beakers, dishes, bowls and mortaria. Dated to 2nd C AD.",2408,32,5,68,14,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4066,Substantial pottery assemblage including large amounts (693 sherds) of painted white wares manufactured in the kilns. The main forms produced were narrow mouthed jars.,1842,30,,28,14,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4067,"Most pottery unquantified, with date ranging from 1st  to 4th C AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4068,"Six fragmented vessels in the two graves including terra nigra platters, flagons, beakers and jars.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4069,Two vessels in the grave - bowl and narrow necked jar. Other pottery found in area including mortaria and samian.,2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4070,"Small assemblage, mostly from field ditch and a post-road ditch, though also from a road repair and the canal. All 2nd-3rd C AD.",75,3,,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4071,"A substantial but unquantified assemblage, mainly dating 2nd-3rd C AD. Much of the samian came from a single depression in the chalk and is described as a 'samian hoard'.",,,,,201,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4072,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4073,"Small mid 2nd to 4th C Roman assemblage, mainly utilitarian coarsewares.",53,1,,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
4074,Small assemblage likely to date from the 2nd–4th centuries. If the kiln was for pottery production then surprising that pottery totals not greater and no wasters present.,55,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4075,"Small assemblage, mostly local coarsewares.",232,3,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4076,Seven sherds of pottery were recovered from four features in the evaluation - almost entirely unprovenanced greywares. A further 32 sherds from the excavation. A lack of finewares or imported pottery.,39,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4077,"The majority of pottery consists of utilitarian locally produced sandy grey ware jars, dishes and bowls. Finewares are well represented and of particular interest is a group of Samian vessels (inc. two cups, a platter and a deep bowl) that may be a funerary or votive deposit. Most of the best preserved groups of pottery, are of very late Roman date.",1148,21,5,,88,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4078,"Small assemblage of late Iron Age pottery in the pit. The sherds are from a single, incomplete vessel, a medium sized burnished jar with slack shoulders.",15,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
4079,"A fairly large assemblage coming largely from two features, a pit and ditch. Includes a large quantity of grey mortaria, unworn, all clearly from a nearby kiln. A 2nd century date seems likely. No quantifications in report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
4080,"Very small assemblage, mainly spanning 2nd-late 4th C AD. Types of pottery mainly indicate kitchen detritus.",59,1,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
4081,"Substantial assemblage dating from mid/later 1st C AD to 4th C AD. Dominated by local greywares (87%), but with a wide range of vessel forms. Many examples of graffito's.",52270,565,,,1388,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4082,"No data, except for a graffito found on a coarseware jar.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4083,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4084,Pottery dating from the 2nd to the 4th century AD found on the site. No report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
4085,"Pottery comprised a small middle to late Iron Age (3rd-1st C BC) assemblage (195 sherds, 1.8kg) and a large dump of late 2nd to early 3rd C pottery (1641 sherds, 15kg), including wasters. The wasters have sooting indicating their likely use.",1836,17,,,4,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4086,"A modest sized assemblage, 222 sherds (2kg) dating to the LIA and 577 (4.4kg) dated to the early Roman period, mostly reduced coarsewares. Amphora fragment of Dr 2-4 type.",799,6,1,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
4087,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4088,A very small abraded assemblage from the unusual winged building - mostly local greywares. Not quantified in interim. No report on pottery from the villa.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4089,"A total of 182 sherds of pottery from the early-mid Roman farmstead, with a good proportion of early finewares. 392 sherds from late Roman contexts. No further details.",574,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4090,Partially complete Gallo-Belgic vessels in structured deposits.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
4091,"A small assemblage of mostly early/middle Roman date, though including some Nene Valley pottery of later date.",182,,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
4092,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5001,"A substantial assemblage, dating from early to late Roman period. Not quantified by sherd count (except samian) in the assessment (estimated 24,000 sherds given here based on a 10% sample analysed in assessment).  Most local coarseware jar/bowls and storage jars, though a significant amount of imported and traded specialist wares also present.",24000,544,,,934,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5002,Small assemblage belonging to the later Iron Age and the early Roman periods - very high proportion of sand-tempered fabrics.,246,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5003,"Concentration of pottery from the kiln, as well as a few sherds from the immediate vicinity including samian. Kiln products were mostly greyware jars/bowls but also dishes.",122,,,,2,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5004,"Only pottery was a wide necked  sandy greyware jar used as an urn, dated to late 1st-2nd C AD. Four irregularly-spaced holes were neatly drilled through the basal exterior and three more were drilled through the vessel wall at about 40mm above the basal floor.",1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5005,"Just nine sherds of later Iron Age pottery and 1 sherd of Roman pottery recovered from excavations. A further 9 mid-late Roman sherds recovered from ditches and pits to the NE. 638 sherds of pottery from the extensive Watching Brief, ranging in date from the 1st to the 3rd century but the majority of it probably belongs to the mid 2nd or 3rd centuries. Mostly Horningsea grey wares and other sandy grey wares.",657,10,,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5006,"Substantial assemblage, some (10523 sherds, 127kg) derived from excavated features and others (15400 sherds, 85kg) from surface samples. Only excavated material recorded. Most (93.3% by sherd count) local and regional coarsewares. All amphora Dr 20.  Also Late Roman Mayen ware. Assemblage included mid 2nd-mid 3rd C kiln products.",25923,212,90,23,137,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5007,"Small assemblage of LPRIA-Roman pottery from four areas of evaluation (391 sherds, 7kg) and larger assemblage from the excavation (1482 sherds, 22kg). The majority of the assemblage consists of local and regional coarsewares but also samian and Dr 20 amphora.",1873,29,9,14,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5008,"Small assemblage, nearly all local coarsewares. There are no imported wares and only one fineware fabric – an unspecified colour-coated ware beaker fragment.",49,1,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
5009,"Dense assemblage of LIA to late Roman date, with the main focus of activity appearing to occur during the 2nd and 3rd centuries. Imported finewares account for 6.3% count and 4.2% weight.",2013,52,22,28,98,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5010,Assemblage is dominated by local and regional coarsewares but also includes a high proportion of provincially-traded late specialist wares (36% by count).,435,7,,6,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5011,"small assemblage of mostly local coarsewares, 2nd-3rd C.",41,0,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5012,Small assemblage representing the earliest and latest Roman periods,13,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5013,"The assemblage (1st-3rd C AD, mainly 2nd-3rd C) is dominated by local and regional coarsewares.",181,3,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5014,"Small assemblage dominated by local sandy grey wares and black-surfaced wares, dating from later 1st to early 4th C.",71,1,2,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5015,Pottery assemblage dating from the 2nd century onwards. The majority of the assemblage  consists of local or regional coarsewares. Included nine joining sherds belonging to a 3rd-4th C Nene Valley mortaria.,801,13,5,23,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5016,"Assemblage of LIA to 3rd C date. Local and regional coarsewares account for over 90% of assemblage, but imports include Gallo-Belgic finewares (terra nigra, terra rubra). A total of 2665 sherds of pottery weighing 26kg was collected from the stoke pit and chamber fills of two 2nd-3rd C kilns. Forms identified included dishes, bowls and jars.",6579,74,18,19,79,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5017,"Most of the assemblage (3886 sherds) came from the kilns, with good evidence for production of cups and platters stamped with a maker's mark. Varied full range including copies of glass bowls, flagons, jars and beakers. Also mortaria, lids and a single example of a tazza. Production limited to AD 50-70.",3932,65,2,14,2,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5018,"Assemblage of Roman pottery dominated by local coarsewares, with main date range being 2nd-3rd C AD. Most of the pottery was redeposited in later features.",6281,42,39,17,125,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5019,"Substantial assemblage including kiln products, but not fully quantified. Kiln products were mostly jars, dating 1st-2nd C AD, but other known kilns from area continued in use until the 3rd C and included beakers and mortaria.",,,,,578,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5020,Small unquantified assemblage including a beaker and jar from a grave. A complete face pot flagon found on site in an unknown context.,,,,,2,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5021,Small assemblage of later Iron Age pottery and just two sherds of Roman pottery.,116,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5022,"LIA pottery not fully quantified so not included here. Roman pottery mostly from 5 kilns, dating later 1st-mid 2nd C AD. Only quantification is for rim fragments but that is provided here. Kiln forms include flagons, jars, bowls, cups, beakers, mortaria, cheese press, miniature vessel and triple vase.",8030,,,176,75,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5023,"Large but unquantified assemblage, including much samian of 1st to 3rd C date. Overall pottery dates from LIA to 4th C AD. Eight graffito's.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5024,Pottery of 2nd to 4th C date. No quantifications provided. Large amount of samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5025,Pottery of LIA to late 4th C found but not quantified. No indications of samian or mortaria.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5026,"Small assemblage, nearly all of local grey coarsewares, dating generally mid 1st to 3rd C AD.",172,2,,,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5027,"High concentration of pottery, but no report on main assemblage. 722 sherds came from one small excavation at ERL 023 and 401 sherds from LKH191. Dates from 1st to 4th C. 75 sherds came from evaluation 350m to SW. Most of the pottery was probably made in Suffolk, including shell gritted pottery made near the present village of Lakenheath. Also included colour coated products from the Nene Valley, Much Hadham ware and a small amount of Oxford ware.",3076,34,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5028,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5029,No quantified data on the pottery. Includes a face pot.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5030,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5031,"A small assemblage dominated by coarse greywares, mostly of late Roman date. Literate graffito's found in earlier excavations along with tazze.",133,1,2,,1,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
5032,"Reasonable concentration of pottery, 95% grey coarsewares. Amphora (Dressel 20) fragment contains a complete stamped. Pottery dating evidence suggests initial activity on this site during the late 1st or early 2nd century AD which continued without a gap throughout the Roman period.",473,7,1,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
5033,Pottery from the kiln was not quantified but forms comprised medium and wide mouthed jars of mid 1st C AD form.,,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5034,"Partially quantified pottery assemblage, containing significant quantities of samian. Mostly 1st C AD to late 2nd C AD. Includes a castor box.",94,,,,52,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5035,"LIA/early Roman pottery from the cremation graves - 18 vessels from 1966 excavation (bowls, beakers and jars) and 28 from the 1925 excavations  (similar forms).",46,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5036,"Large (but unquantified) assemblage of pottery from the kiln. Forms comprise dishes, then jars and bowls. Dated later 3rd-early 4th C AD. Also recovered from the kiln was a small ceramic mould for the production of face masks for embellishment of jugs.",,,,5,2,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5037,Unquantified assemblage. Most pottery dates to 3rd and 4th C AD.,,,,1,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5038,"5-6 kilns of different form recorded. Two or three of typical 'pedestal' type dating to 2nd-3rd C not investigated but two large kilns producing colour-coated wares were fully excavated (2300 sherds), dating to the 3rd C. Products comprised mostly beakers (bag-shaped and indented), and also mortaria, jars and castor boxes. The small kiln dating to early 2nd C produced flagons.",2300,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5039,"Much pottery found though not fully studied and quantified. Generally 1st-2nd c in date, though some later material. Includes a few wasters indicating pottery production.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5040,"1st to 4th C pottery recovered, including castor beakers, colour coated wares and samian. Also a face mask.",,,,6,37,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5041,Small assemblage of late 1st to 3rd C date.,95,1,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5042,Small assemblage of 1st to late 3rd/4th C pottery. No report.,194,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5043,"Pottery of LIA-early Roman and late 2nd/3rd C date, with greater emphasis on the earlier material. Finewares account for only 1% of this assemblage and there were no imports.",239,2,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
5044,"Modest sized assemblage with finewares equalling less than 1%. Mostly Grey Sandy wares (35%) followed by Black-surfaced wares (17.2%). The most common forms identified were jar.  Also present were bottles or flasks, beakers, dishes, bowls, a cup, a lid and an Dr 20 amphora. Pottery dates from late 1st to mid 3rd C AD. 62 sherds from the evaluation, including two nearly complete vessels thought to be accessory vessels (Nene Valley beaker and greyware cup) from a burial group.",472,5,1,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5045,Moderate density of pottery dating from 1st to 4th C. No report.,794,11,,1,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5046,"Significant sized assemblage dating from 1st to 4th C AD, with an emphasis on 1st-2nd C AD. No full report, but wide range of forms and fabrics stated.",1112,18,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5047,Very small assemblage of 2nd C pottery.,22,0,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5048,"A total of 2229 (13kg) of Iron Age pottery recovered, but as this spans the whole Iron Age it is not included here. Instead, just 81 sherds of Roman pottery recovered from the field ditches, mostly local sandy greywares. Mostly 3rd-4th C.",81,1,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
5049,"Small assemblage, mostly local greywares, but including Dr 20 amphora and samian. Dating suggests continuous activity ranging from the late 1st to late 3rd or 4th centuries.",119,6,7,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5050,No pottery quantification or report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5051,Substantial assemblage of 1st-3rd C date but no report.,4884,45,,,89,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5052,No pottery report. Possible pottery kiln of 2nd C date producing grey ware jar forms.,1465,14,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5053,"Most pottery dates to later 3rd and 4th C, with some earlier material. Pottery dating to the very late Roman period (mid-late 4th/early 5th century) is also indicated. The range of vessels, dominated by jars, although with a significant number of dish and open bowls forms, is typical of rural assemblages and there is no indication of significant  status in relation to other Roman sites.",1139,17,2,13,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5054,"Small assemblage dating from mid 1st to late 2nd/early 3rd C AD. The majority of this material consists of grey micaceous wares, probably from kilns in the Wattisfield area.",36,1,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5055,"A total of 53 sherds from the evaluation and 558 sherds from the excavation. The pottery includes hand-made prehistoric, transitional, and wheel made late Iron Age or early Roman material, none of which has to be any later than the mid 1st century AD.",611,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5056,The assemblage is mostly dated from the mid to later 1st century with one or two contexts dated slightly later.,81,1,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5057,"Small assemblage of 1st-2nd C pottery, well abraded.",112,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5058,"High density assemblage dating from the early 1st C AD to late 2nd C, dominated by Black-surfaced wares and Sandy grey wares, though also includes terra nigra, terra rubra, North Gaulish fine white ware & Colchester white/buff ware. Assemblage including funerary pottery, including a flagon, beaker and samian dish (late 1st-2nd C AD) from the cremation burial.",1005,14,,,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5059,"Small assemblage of abraded sherds, most sandy grey wares. Only a broad Roman data assigned.",32,0,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5060,"Moderately dense assemblage, mostly grog-tempered wares and black-surface wares of 1st-2nd C date. Sherds from one, or possibly two tazza vessels came from a pit.",160,4,1,,1,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
5061,Small assemblage of general Roman date,27,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5062,"Moderately high density assemblage of wheel-made Late Iron Age and Roman pottery, mostly black-surfaced wares, sandy grey wares and storage jar fabrics. Dating from early-mid/late 1st C AD to mid 3rd C AD.",533,10,12,5,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5063,"The large majority (65% by count) of the pottery assemblage comprises reduced coarsewares, most of which are likely to derive from local sources. Finewares are predominantly regional imports and of Late Roman origin of which Lower Nene Valley (100 sherds or 6.2%) and Much Hadham (92 sherds or 5.7%) are most abundant. Two main periods of Roman activity can be identified: an early Roman phase, probably centring on the period c. AD 70 to c. AD 150 and a Late Roman phase which is probably largely confined to the 4th century AD. Activity c. AD 150 to 250/70 would seem to be limited across the site.",1647,23,3,14,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
5064,Small assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman pottery. Eight fabrics were identified and all of them are local or regional coarsewares which range in date from the first half of the 1st century AD to possibly the 2nd century.,60,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5065,"Modest assemblage, mainly of 2nd-3rd C date, though with some earlier and later material. Mostly local coarsewares. Recognisable imports  consist of the samian (4% by number of sherds), colour-coated beaker(s) from Colchester and the large narrow-necked jar or flagon from Hadham. The types of vessels are dominated by jar, bowl and dish forms. Also sherds from a face pot in sandy grey ware.",279,3,,,12,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5066,1st to 4th C pottery noted but no quantification,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5067,1st-2nd C pottery noted.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5068,"A large (though unquantified) assemblage of pottery, including many dumps of waster material. Forms included jars, cooking pots, bowls and dishes. A common decorative motif is rustication with gashes on the surface. Also included a face pot.",,,,,,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
5069,"Pottery found included samian, castor and painted wares and many local Wattifield products, but no quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5070,A single sherd of Roman pottery noted in a grave.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5071,Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age and early Roman date. Also 7 sherds of late Roman date in the topsoil.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5072,"A substantial assemblage for the area of excavation, including some complete vessels in ditches - possible structured deposits. The pottery dates late Iron Age to early Roman.",882,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5073,"A small assemblage of early to mid Roman pottery, probably reflecting the location of the excavation away form the settlement core.",99,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5074,A large but as yet unquantified assemblage.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5075,"A small assemblage mostly of 2nd-3rd C AD date. Most locally produced utilitarian domestic coarse wares, along with Horningsea-type storage jar fragments, Shell tempered wares, Nene Valley colour coated products and three sherds of Central Gaulish samian",124,1,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
5076,"A small assemblage of Late Iron Age and Early Roman pottery including six locally produced fine ware jars and bowls influenced in design by north Gaulish ceramic fashion in a single ditch, some partially complete.",209,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
5077,"A small assemblage, largely comprising early Roman (mid/late 1st to early/mid 2nd century) utilitarian sandy grey ware jar/bowl and storage jar forms. Some of this material may have been produced within the pottery kiln found on site.",200,6,1,,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
6001,"Moderate sized assemblage dating from the late Iron Age to the early 4th C AD. 41 sherds of samian from East and West Stagsden Sites, but no breakdown on quantity from each site.",1197,23,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6002,"Substantial assemblage dating from M-LIA to 2nd C AD. Includes much pottery from four LIA-early Roman pottery kilns (two LIA kilns succeeded by two early Roman kilns, all 1st C AD). Main kiln products were hand-made lid-seated jars and storage jars.",1846,160,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6003,Moderate assemblage mostly dating the 3rd-4th C AD. Includes a complete greyware face pot.,1383,25,1,3,24,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6004,Pottery assemblage dating from mid 1st C BC until the 2nd C AD. No quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
6005,"Very abraded collection of pottery, mainly from the ditch but also three of the cremation burials. Dated 1st c AD.",582,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6006,"Substantial concentration of pottery, dating mid/late 1st C to early 3rd C, with only small numbers of sherds post-dating this. Forms dominated by basic range of jars and dishes.",600,9,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6007,"An assemblage of 479 late Iron Age sherds (7.3kg) and 3054 Roman sherds (39kg), mostly dating 2nd and 3rd C AD. Dominated by sand-tempered reduced coarse wares.",3533,46,2,,79,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6008,Substantial late Iron Age  to early Roman assemblage. Dominated by LIA 'Belgic' forms - mainly jars and bowls. Less than 5% imported wares.  A smaller quantity of 3rd-4th C sherds points to some continued activity.,5941,75,3,5,72,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6009,"Forty eight individual vessels recovered from the graves, mostly fragmented, dating from early 1st C AD to early 2nd C AD. Includes one vessel that is seemingly a waster and a rare central Gaulish glazed ware flask dated AD43-75.",1496,16,,,38,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6010,"Good sized assemblage dating from the late Iron Age to 4th C, with most 2nd-3rd C AD. Dominated by sand-tempered reduced and oxidised coarse wares.",2834,46,,,48,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6011,Substantial assemblage of pottery of 1st to 4th C AD date. Dominated by local coarse wares with jars predominating. Only the 4th C AD assemblage quantified in the report.,2104,40,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6012,A moderate sized assemblage of LIA/early Roman (726 sherds) and Roman (608 sherds) pottery. No weights or fabric/form quantifications provided for phased assemblages.,1334,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6013,Moderate later Iron Age pottery assemblage. Mostly jars.,661,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6014,"Substantial assemblage (3107 sherds; 44kg) dating from middle Iron Age to early Saxon, but no sherd count or weight quantification for Roman phase. Roman pottery spans 1st-4th C, with shell-tempered wares (43%) and reduced sandy wares (45%) being most prolific. Most pottery 2nd-3rd C AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6015,"High density of pottery dating to the mid-late 1st C AD. Dominated by jars in local shelly ware, but also bowls and beakers.",399,9,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6016,"Large quantities of pottery, mostly from the kilns - shelly wares - dating 1st to 4th/5th C AD. Forms comprise jars, large storage jars, bowls, lids and dishes.",21000,,,17,58,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6017,"Substantial assemblage recovered from one ditch, all late Iron Age in date.",475,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6018,"A portion of the pottery (35kg) from the original excavations was examined. No sherd counts provided. Mostly grey coarsewares, but many later Roman finewares too. Common forms comprise jars, bowls, 'dog dishes', flanged bowls and mortaria.",,35,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6019,Substantial assemblage of pottery dated to the first half of the 1st C AD. Mostly grog-tempered wares in jar form.,1810,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6020,"Cremation urns and accessory vessels (jars, flagons, beaker).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6021,Unquantified pottery assemblage of 1st-early 2nd C AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6022,Pottery recovered but no quantification or report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6023,Pottery assemblage belongs to a single phase of activity in the 2nd half of the 1st C AD or early 2nd C AD. A mixture of late Iron Age and Roman type wares including some imported material.,1688,25,2,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
6024,"A modest assemblage, much of it residual in later contexts. Earliest pottery from the pits dates from mid 1st to 2nd C AD, while the smaller amount of pottery from graves and cemetery ditch all 2nd-4th C AD. An almost complete Nene valley miniature vessel came from the cemetery ditch.",567,7,3,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6025,Assemblage dating from the M-LIA to 2nd C AD,542,7,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6026,"The pottery assemblage comprised 37 vessels of late 1st to early 2nd C AD date (flagons, bowls, beakers, platters, cups, jars; 12 samian). Of these, 22 are cremation urns or accessory vessels.",,,,,205,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6027,Moderate assemblage of pottery spanning LIA to 3rd/4th C AD. Includes a single sherd of possible lamp or incense burner.,3071,51,,28,29,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6028,"Substantial assemblage, with 1129 sherds (16kg) from late Iron Age/early Roman contexts, 3610 sherds (61kg) from mid Roman contexts and 2429 sherds (42kg) from late Roman contexts. Includes three semi-complete vessels deposited on their sides in vicinity of upside down dog skull in a major boundary ditch.",7168,119,4,119,81,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6029,"Pottery vessels (mainly beakers) found in a few graves. Other pottery from wells and boundary ditches, but unquantified. Grave pottery includes one with a literate graffito (recording a funeral gift on behalf of a guild to a deceased member). Also complete pottery vessels in at least one of the wells.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6030,Pottery of 1st to 4th C AD - no report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6031,"A total of 234kg of pottery from the northern settlement, mostly locally made grey wares and shelly wares. The greatest concentration of ceramics falls within the early Roman period. Pottery from the kiln dated 1st-2nd C AD. Includes a face pot. 8kg pottery from the southern farmstead (not included in overall quantity)",15812,234,20,98,490,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6032,A small quantity of mid 2nd C pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6033,"A total of 539 sherds (10.5kg) came from late Iron Age/early Roman contexts, mostly from the pottery kilns (shell tempered storage vessels), and 1076 sherds (11.5kg) from mid/later Roman contexts. Mostly local coarsewares.",1615,22,,,10,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6034,A total of 2542 sherds (33kg) of pottery from late Iron Age/early Roman contexts and 3361 sherds (46kg) from mid/late Roman contexts.,5903,79,,2,24,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6035,"Modest sized assemblage dating mainly from the later 1st-2nd C AD, with some earlier and later material. Dominated by sandy and shelly grey wares with few regional or continental imports (no sherd counts provided).",1962,30,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6036,Relatively substantial pottery assemblage dating to the late Iron Age. Mostly jars and bowls. Seven sherds of Roman pottery.,1661,30,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6037,Substantial assemblage dating to the late Iron Age (1157 sherds; 10kg) and early Roman period (1st-2nd C AD: 2843 sherds; 26.6kg). Imported and specialist vessels rare but not quantified by sherd count. Overall dominated by sandy and shelly coarseware.,4000,37,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6038,Substantial assemblage dating from 1st to 4th C AD (most mid 2nd-late 4th C). Includes pottery from the mid to late Roman pottery kilns (mostly sandy wares jars). No fabric/form quantification by sherd count.,10580,140,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6039,"Assemblage mainly comprises late Iron Age-early Roman pottery (1019 sherds; 22.5kg), with a little of later date (98 sherds, 1.3kg)",1117,24,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6040,"Assemblage dating from 1st to 4th C, dominated (95%) by local coarsewares. No imported wares.",209,4,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
6041,"Pottery of 1st to 4th C date found, including late Iron Age fabrics. 1249 fragments from the evaluation and 1211 from the excavation. No fine or specialist ware quantification from the excavation.",1360,40,1,4,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6042,Small assemblage of late Iron Age-early Roman pottery. Mostly lower Nene Valley reduced wares and sandy grog tempered wares.,91,2,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6043,"Small assemblage of late Iron Age (16 sherds) and Roman (47 sherds) pottery, the latter dating mainly to the 2nd C AD.",63,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6044,very abraded pottery assemblage dating from the late Iron Age to the 2nd C AD. Most local greyware and shelly ware.,271,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
6045,Late Iron Age pottery recovered but no quantification or report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6046,"Small pottery assemblage, mostly early Roman with smaller quantities of 3rd C AD material.",125,3,1,1,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6047,A small assemblage of late Iron Age (30 sherds) and Roman (91 sherds) pottery. Fabric types represented are a standard range of locally manufactured reduced and oxidised sandy wares and shell tempered vessels.,121,2,,1,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6048,Moderate sized pottery assemblage mainly of 2nd to 4th C AD. Mostly local sand and shell tempered coarsewares.,2165,42,4,21,164,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6049,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
6050,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6051,"A small assemblage, mainly of later 2nd to 4th C date.",56,1,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6052,"Small assemblage from evaluation (excavation pottery not quantified in interim report). Mostly late Iron Age in date, continuing to the 3rd C AD.",186,2,2,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6053,"The majority of the assemblage is datable to the 2nd–3rd centuries, and is dominated by locally manufactured reduced and oxidised sand-tempered coarse wares.",210,4,4,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6054,Very abraded sherds of late Iron Age to 2nd C AD date. Probably derived from middens and used in manure.,373,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6055,"Substantial assemblage. The overall dating range covers mainly the 2nd to early/mid 3rd C AD; a number of contexts are dated to either side of this span. The assemblage contains a high number of dishes, beakers, cups and bowls alongside flagons and jars. Probable pottery production site.",8647,136,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6056,"Most pottery comprised complete vessels from cremation grave, including seven samian cups and dishes, and a flagon.",44,2,2,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
6057,"Pottery assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman date, about 90% of which is the product of local manufacture, including shelly wares, grey wares and grog tempered wares. Mostly jars, then bowls. Pottery kiln on site produced greywares in early to mid 2nd C AD, with platters and jars the most common form.",2091,30,3,18,118,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6058,"Evaluation pottery of late Iron Age (71 sherds) and Roman (421 sherds) data.  Excavation pottery comprises LIA/early Roman sherds (2099 sherds, 39kg) and Roman sherds (834 sherds, 10kg). The bulk of the Roman assemblage is of 1st-2nd/3rd century date and comprises local reduced and oxidised coarsewares  and shell tempered wares.",3425,56,,6,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6059,"Mostly local greywares and shelly wares, dating 1st to 4th C, with a late Roman emphasis. Also some late Iron Age pottery.",759,12,3,4,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6060,"Huge pottery assemblage, with no overall quantification by sherd count (only samian and amphora). Dates range from 1st to 4th C AD. The nature of the pottery indicates a primarily domestic assemblage, with a preponderance of cooking, storage and table vessels, such as jars, bowls and beakers. Includes tazze fragments from one context. The major sources of supply were local with large quantities of shelly and greywares.",,1165,811,,2182,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6061,Moderate sized assemblage from the evaluation dating from middle/late Iron Age to 3rd C AD. Most Roman pottery comprises locally manufactured reduced and oxidised coarsewares. Excavation pottery comprises 3758 sherds (61kg) of LIA/transition pottery and 2786 (71kg of Roman pottery).,7370,146,3,19,63,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6062,"Small assemblage of mainly 2nd-3rd C AD pottery, comprising locally manufactured reduced coarsewares and shell tempered wares.",112,2,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6063,"The majority of the assemblage is datable to the late 1st-early 2nd centuries AD, and includes wasters and seconds. Dominated by vessels in reduced sand tempered coarse ware type. Lid-seated jars are the dominant vessel form, supplemented by smaller quantities of cordoned and narrow-necked jars, bowls and platters.",620,12,,4,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
6064,Eight fragmented but substantially complete late Iron Age vessels came from cremation burials (1171 sherds). Also 83 Roman sherds.,1254,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6065,Small assemblage of late Iron Age pottery and four sherds of early Roman pottery.,78,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6066,Unquantified pottery assemblage of 1st C AD date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6067,Unquantified assemblage of 2nd to 4th C AD date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6068,At least 2000 sherds of pottery (not fully quantified) including substantial numbers of wasters indicating pottery manufacture. Dates range from late Iron Age to later 3rd C AD.,2000,,,,29,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6069,Sherds from a minimum of 125 vessels dating from mid 1st to early 4th C AD - most later Roman.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6070,"Pottery production site with six kilns, though no reports on the pottery from the earlier excavation. Pottery from 2011 excavation comprised 3222 sherds of LIA to early Roman date. Specialised Roman types such as mortaria, amphorae and samian ware are absent from this assemblage. Complete pots found within two pits (one between two tree throws) dating to the LIA-early Roman period.",3222,47,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6071,Substantial assemblage dating from late Iron Age to 4th C AD. Mostly local coarsewares,15311,267,39,86,379,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6072,"Small assemblage, mostly dating to 2nd and 3rd c AD.",190,2,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
6073,"Substantial assemblage of 1st to 4th C date. Mostly local coarsewares with few continental imports though significant regional imports from Verulamium, Nene valley and Oxfordshire. Wide variety of forms. A group of pits excavated during recent excavations contained a large group of samian ware, almost all of which showed evidence for repair or reworking. It is suggested (F Wild Britannia 2013, p. 271) that this is a samian repair workshop, dating to the late 2nd/early 3rd C AD.",19948,432,22,,816,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6074,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6075,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6076,"Assemblage of late Iron Age and early Roman pottery, with some later material.  548 sherds (7kg) from evaluation and 5972 sherds (70kg) from excavation. Fabric types are mainly locally manufactured reduced sand and shell tempered coarsewares. Jars dominated the forms.",6520,77,,2,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6077,Assemblage dating the late Iron Age and early Roman period dominated by jars in grog-tempered fabrics.,2268,16,,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6078,Small assemblage of late Iron Age to very early Roman date.,183,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6079,Mid/late Roman pottery assemblage dominated by sandy grey wares and shelly wares. Jars were dominant throughout.,3485,65,1,35,96,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6080,"Small assemblage of mainly 2nd C AD pottery, which does not demonstrate any great diversity in form or fabric.",271,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6081,"A small assemblage, most dating 2nd-3rd C AD, dominated by locally manufactured sand tempered and shell tempered coarseware vessels.",215,3,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6082,"The majority of the LIA-Roman pottery assemblage is local in character, largely low-status and domestic, as indicated by the basic, utilitarian types present, coupled with the relatively small amount of both regional and continental imports.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6083,"Pottery assemblage mostly of local origin, dating from the early/mid-1st  C to the late 2nd/3rd C. Late 3rd and 4th-C material comprise just a few abraded sherds. Dominated by locally manufactured kitchen and tablewares in coarseware and finewares fabrics, represented by Grog-tempered (16%), Shell-gritted (32%) and Greyware (28%) fabrics.",527,6,,10,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6084,"Modest sized assemblage mainly of Late Iron Age-early Roman date, with 92 sherds (1kg) being later Roman in date, all of this occurring north of the main enclosure. Jars dominate. A few sherds of samian.",418,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6085,Small assemblage dating to the Late Iron Age-early Roman period (41 sherds) and middle Roman period (51 sherds). Fabrics dominated by local greywares but also include a few sherds of samian and an amphora fragment.,92,1,1,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
6086,"Moderate sized assemblage dominated by local greywares and shelly wares, although with almost 12% samian. A predominance of jars, 57.19%, primarily used for cooking and storage. Other kitchen and storage vessels, such as amphorae and mortaria, make up 8.75%. Tablewares make up 33.75%.",4426,,13,18,519,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6087,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
6088,"Pottery mentioned but no report. Includes late Iron Age to 4th/5th C AD material. Fabrics include Gallic terra rubra, samian, North Gaulish white ware, Trier black-slipped ware, late Mayen ware, Oxfordshire white ware, Nene Valley colour coats, Hertfordshire and Harold-type shell-ware.  A near complete Nene Valley Colour coat beaker was possibly part of a structured deposit.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
6089,"Pottery dating from the LIA (59 sherds) early Roman period (2353 sherds) and later Roman period (4318 sherds). The assemblage is dominated by locally manufactured reduced and oxidised sand tempered coarsewares, and shelly coarsewares, a proportion of the latter representing products of the Harrold Lodge Farm kilns. Nene Valley colour coated vessels, manufactured from the mid 2nd - late 4th century, dominate the fineware assemblage. Graffiti or a possible tally mark was observed on the base of one of the stamped vessels.",6730,81,4,34,196,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
6090,A total of 139 sherds of late Iron Age date and 90 dating to the early Roman period.,229,5,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
6091,"A small late Iron Age to early/mid Roman assemblage, mostly local grog-tempered wares and coarse greywares, but also samian.",633,5,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7001,"The pottery consists almost entirely of wasters of 3rd or 4thC AD date, and primarily derive from both kilns and a nearby pit. A few imported Roman vessels were also present. The primary form of vessel present at the site was jars, though bowls, dishes and beakers were also present. Three phases of activity could be discerned though each falls within the date range: AD250-350+. No sherd counts are given in the report, only weight  and EVEs.",,364,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7002,,455,11,7,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
7003,"The cinery urn was of East Sussex ware, whilst accessory vessels included wares from Oxfordshire, Colchester, and New Forest industries.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7004,Only qualitative analysis of the pottery was carried out.,,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7005,The vast majority of the pottery is of grog-tempered fabric belonging to the East Sussex/Wealden group.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7006,The small quantity of Samian ware suggested to the specialist that the site's use went into decline sometime in the 2ndC AD.,1710,,1,1,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7007,"The burial group included 10 pottery vessels, four of which were 1st and 2ndC AD Samian. Most of the pieces were dining wares, though a miniature jug with a trefoil mouth was present.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7008,Samian and New Forest ware are both noted as present from the early records. The pottery cannot be quantified due to the piecemeal nature and long period of finds collection.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7009,"Pottery from fieldwalking is not included in these totals, though substantial quantities were recovered.",7876,,13,6,87,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7010,"Pottery from fieldwalking is not included in these totals, though substantial quantities were recovered.",4335,,10,2,131,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7011,"Finewares included a Samian dish and a hunt beaker from the Lower Rhineland. Coarse wares were mostly jars, though flagons and beakers were also present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7012,"East Sussex ware  was the dominant fabric recovered from the site. No sherd counts are given, though other methods, W/W%, MV and VE%, are used.",,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7013,"A large quantity was recovered from the excavation though has only been described by fabric. No quantification of the assemblage is given, other than noting that at least 400 vessels were probably present and that the 4thC AD material weighed around 10kg. Butt beakers and terra nigra as well as early Roman wares and imported Samian appear to indicate the continuity of late Iron Age and early Roman settlement. The 4thC AD material shows that a wide range of sources was exploited in the assemblage.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
7014,The pottery assemblage had been analysed in detail though no quantifiable data were given in the report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7015,The pottery can be dated as Claudian/Neronian. No quantification data are given.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7016,"East Sussex wares dominate the assemblage which is primarily 1stC AD in date. The pottery is largely abraded, suggestive of manuring.",122,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7017,"Although no pottery kiln was excavated, the presence of a number of wasters suggest that pottery manufacture was carried out. Even in such a small assemblage, imported vessels, fine wares, mortaria and amphora were all present, whilst only two coarse-ware vessels are represented. This suggests high-status activity in the vicinity.",17,1,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7018,"In general the character of the assemblage is typical of lower-status rural assemblages, used by communities with little access to complex supply systems supplying urban centres and other high status settlements. Only one feature appeared to date slightly later, containing 2ndC AD Samian, probable Alice Holt ware and an example of 'London ware' style decoration.",901,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7019,Only samian mentioned; few details.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7020,,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7021,"The pottery  assemblage contained a generally homogenous group of cooking pots, storage jars, pie dishes and bowls, primarily in local coarse ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7022,"The description of only 72 sherds of pottery suggests that the assemblage may have only been selectively detailed in the report. Possible religious vessels include a triple vase and a face vase. Note one graffito was identified on a 1st/2ndC AD glass bottle, with the inscription MR, whilst another was found on a greyware sherd, with the inscription AD IS.",72,,2,12,34,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7023,The pottery was primarily 'native ware typical of La Tene III'. A few pieces of imported ceramics were recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7024,Much of the pottery was small and abraded and only a sample had been quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
7025,"Large quantities of Roman pottery were recovered though no quantification was given. Samian ware, New Forest ware, Castor ware, stamped colour-coated ware, and coarse wares were all present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7026,Amphora and samian present,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
7027,Unidentifiable graffito's were found on three Samian sherds. Most of the pottery were from East Sussex wares.,,330,,,594,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7028,,,14,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
7029,"Samian accounts for 4% of the total pottery, whilst grog-tempered fabrics account for c.80% and these are represented by forms which can be related not only to late pre-Roman Iron Age types, but also to forms found in the third and fourth centuries AD. The proportion of the chief fabric groups has been assessed by weight, with quantification of forms by rim count.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7030,"Most of the Roman pottery derives from local sources, dominated by grog tempered wares, but also including finewares from the Wickham Barn kilns in East Sussex.",7035,63,27,41,308,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
7031,No data - no specialist reports yet available,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7032,"No finds report yet available, but the article suggests that preliminary analysis shows that changes of the supply source takes place.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7033,Six ceramic vessels were recovered. One a Gallo-Belgic jar with the other 5 being assigned to the 'South Eastern B' group.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7034,Pottery assemblage included 'Thundersbarrow ware' and a flanged bowl of colour-coated ware.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7035,Coarseware jars were used for all the cremation urns. A Drag. 18/31 dish and a Drag. 38 bowl were recovered with two of the burials. The former included a graffito on its side: 'MML' (L reversed). Other associated vessels included a poppyhead beaker and a coarseware platter.,,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7036,"Pottery was dominated by coarse wares, though 2ndC AD Samian was present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7037,2ndC AD Samian and Nene Valley wares were noted amongst a large assemblage of coarse wares.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7038,Very little information was given on the pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7039,"The pottery assemblage included a reasonable group of fine wares including Samian, New Forest, Oxford and Nene Valley wares. Bowls and drinking vessels were present. The assemblage was collected via fieldwalking.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7040,"All the pottery was grog-tempered, some possibly wheel-turned, and were likely to have been East Sussex ware.",216,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7041,"Finds of East Sussex ware with a broad date range of 1stC BC to the 4thC AD were recovered, though 1st-3rdC AD activity is suggested for the site.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7042,A small quantity of local 1stC AD pottery was recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
7043,"The pottery is predominantly of local late Iron Age type, plus a South Gaulish cup and a Belgic Butt beaker.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
7044,"Mostly locally made late Iron Age and early Roman wares are noted, but not in great detail. Samian ware and mortaria are present in a number of pit features.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
7045,"Fieldwalking produced about 800 small abraded sherds of local Romano-British course wares with some fine wares including black colour-coated beaker sherds, possibly from Wickham Barn at Chiltington and amphora. Most date from AD180-350 although some East Sussex Ware body sherds could be earlier. The excavated assemblage more broadly dated from mid-1stC to late 4thC AD. Fabrics included Samian, Gallo-Belgic Terra Nigra, Moselkeramik, and Cologne Whiteware, with New Forest and Oxford wares, as well as more local types such as East Sussex ware jars. A significant find was 7 fresh pieces from a reeded-rim bowl of Fishbourne type 89 dating to c.AD50-80. Late dating pottery included Overwey/Portchester fabric D which tends to be most common in post-AD370 assemblages. No detailed quantification data were given in the report however.",,,36,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8001,"A fragment with a graffito is noted in the finds section of the published report. The unpublished post-excavation assessment of the pottery shows that Much Hadham and Oxfordshire wares dominate the late Roman assemblage. The high frequency of the former is thought to be unusual for the area. These fabrics are supplemented by Nene Valley, Portchester D and other late imported wares. 2 tazza, 2 strainers and 1 unguentaria pot was recovered.",3207,,98,47,148,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8002,"A large quantity of coarseware was recovered from the site but absolute numbers are not given. However, 21kg were recorded from the later excavation of the small section of ditch, suggesting that the overall amount was probably quite considerable.",,,,,185,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
8003,"Pottery in and around the main habitation site dates the site mainly to the 1stC AD, and the presence of some imported pottery may, according to the excavator, indicate some pretentions to status. Samian and amphorae are noted in the report's text, and suggested to indicate wider trading practices at the settlement, also associated with imported plants foods (see Plant Data). The settlement pits included remains of a poppyhead beaker, carinated bowl, and an imitation Gallo-Belgic platter. A detailed pottery report was not provided with the publication.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
8004,"The pottery report is held in archive, though Oxfordshire whiteware mortaria, Alice Holt ware, a Baetican late Dressel 20 amphora, and other late Roman local wares were present. Though no Samian was present, items which indicate domestic activity were common.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
8005,"The majority of the material spans the known period of production at Brockley Hill (c.AD50-160), although a smaller, residual component is present in the assemblage. The site is known to be a primary production centre for mortaria, though some non-local mortaria sherds were also encountered. Note that the mortarium count is based on EVE rather than NISP in the report, whilst the other counts are all NISP. This has been recorded here to take account of the high proportion of mortaria in the assemblage. 648 of the 662 recorded here were locally produced. A total of nine different potters are known from mortaria stamps. Seven tazza vessels are also present in the assemblage, which are also thought to have been kiln products from the site. A graffito was found on part of a mortarium  reading, 'Catiae Mari[ae]', which suggested in the report to be a woman's name, whilst a graffito of 'MIA' was also identified from a fragment of south Gaulish Samian. A graffito, possibly containing the numeral 'VII', was identified on a BB dish from the Tennis Court Bank excavation in 1976.",10265,164,26,662,117,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8006,"Early Roman pottery was poorly represented and the majority dated to the 2nd C AD or later. Verulamium grey and white wares, in the form of necked jars and bead-rimmed bowls, are the most common type of pottery on site (by EVE). Mortaria were only represented by a single fragment of Verulamium white ware, the remainder coming from Nene Valley and Oxfordshire industries, indicating the later arrival of this form of pottery to the site (deposited after the mid-3rd C AD). The sherd count for mortaria was not given in the report but made up 6% of the assemblage by EVE. As well as imported ceramics (amphorae and Samian), Colchester and Alice Holt wares were all also present. Four out of the eleven Samian vessels were stamped (36%) which compares well with Insula 14 at Verulamium, and suggests the settlement had some pretensions to status.",1363,28,58,,28,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8007,"Highgate Wood B grog-tempered wares accounted for nearly half of the 1st C AD pottery, whilst south Gaulish Samian cups, bowls and platters supplemented North Kent fine wares being supplied to the site. Mortaria from the Verulamium region were also represented but not quantified. The early 2nd C AD saw a shift in the pottery supply as Highgate Wood B wares ceased to be imported, whilst ceramics from the Poole Harbour area now begun to be used, though Verulamium white wares and Alice Holt grey wares continued to be imported in small quantities. Pottery from the early excavations (e.g. Canham 1978) was not quantified, though Samian and mortaria figured prominently in the assemblage.",4649,70,40,,66,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8008,The pottery comes from a relatively wide range of fabrics and forms and almost exclusively derives from vessels dating from the 2nd to the 4thC AD. Sherd count of pottery types is only given in grey literature report; published report includes only quantification by EVE.,1592,28,21,11,38,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8009,"One third of the contexts do not date beyond AD160, though a few are later and an Oxfordshire white ware mortarium sherd, perhaps a stray find, dated AD270-400. The small percentage of grog-tempered ware (12%) indicates that early Roman occupation was limited.",285,1,4,3,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8010,"The ceramic assemblage was dominated by coarse sandy greyware and grog-tempered wares representing a continuation of the local late Iron Age tradition. Some Alice Holt, Oxfordshire, and Verulamium wares indicate regional import, whilst three sherds of south Gaulish Samian and one Spanish amphorae sherd are the only foreign imports.",209,3,1,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8011,Four sherds of a south Gaulish Samian platter were recovered from extended ditch feature.,34,,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
8012,"The assemblage primarily consisted of late Roman wares, mostly from the Alice Holt and Oxfordshire industries. Nene Valley and Portchester D wares were also present.",464,,1,29,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
8013,"178 sherd derived from the excavation on the eastern side of the road and 733 from the western side. Sand-tempered grey wares are the most common ceramic present, whilst Verulamium and Nene Valley wares are also relatively well represented. Oxfordshire wares are present but infrequently occur. A single sherd of La Graufesenque pottery represents the only foreign import to the eastern site, whilst 12 highly abraded sherds of central and southern Gaulish form are represented from the eastern site. A single 'X' graffito was marked on the base of black-burnished dish.",911,11,16,42,13,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8014,"The 2000 pottery report (Taylor-Wilson 2000) does not the separate the quantification of the assemblages between BA/IA and IA/RB types, only by area of excavation. Pottery reports in Mills (1984), McIsaac et al. (1979) and Harvey (1971 and 1972) only give form descriptions, no quantification data.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8015,"All the pottery had been quantified by EVE and weight though no data tables were given in the report. Grog-tempered and vesicular fabrics were the most common ceramic types with simple bead-rimmed jars providing the greater quantity of vessel forms. The dating of the group, particularly from the late Iron Age ditches, rests largely on the presence of the hand-made grog-tempered forms, plus the absence of products from the Romanised industries common on London sites by AD50/55. The early Roman assemblage is then characterised by the appearance of wheel-thrown sandy wares which were supplied to London and Southwark until the 2nd C AD, alongside Verulamium, Highgate Wood, and Alice Holt wares. South Gaulish Samian is also present in very small quantities.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
8016,"Only the pottery assemblages from Open Area 5, Structure 4 and Structure 8 were presented in the report. However, basic sherd counts were not given, only the number of rows within the Oracle database which a particular pottery 'type' occurred on, EVE and weight in grams. Samian wares consist 15% of the assemblage by 'row' and 7% by weight, amphorae consist 12% and 24% respectively and mortaria 3% and 6% respectively. Other fine wares, both imported and Romano-British, also provide high frequencies. Samian ware fragments were quantified by sherd count however. With the vast majority of this assemblage, unusually, coming from eastern Gaulish sources (67%), rather than south (6%) or central (27%) (though the latter forms were present). Plus, most of the Samian dates to the 3rdC AD. This is also unusual, particularly since most of the Samian ware from London dates to the 3rd C AD (see report). According to the Samian specialist, only one other site in Britain, the Roman quay at St Magnus House in London, includes a predominantly late Roman east Gaulish Samian collection, argued to have derived from a single shipment. No Samian wares were used in any of the burials, cremation or inhumation. The pattern from Shadwell gives greater weight to the site being an important 3rd C AD industrial/trading centre. Graffitos were noted on two Samian ware fragments (SAEX and an indecipherable marking).",,60,,,441,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8017,"A small quantity of grog-tempered in association with imported terra nigra was recovered from the earliest phase of activity, though these were replaced by sand-tempered wares and fabrics from Verulamium and Alice Holt industries. The late Roman period pottery includes almost no locally-made wares, most of which derives from Alice Holt, Nene Valley, Oxford region, and Portchester wares.",377,,2,3,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8018,"An almost complete Dr 30 Samian bowl was recovered from an early Roman ditch fill. The vessel is in the style of the potter X-13 ('Donnaucus') of Les Martes-de-Veyre, c.AD100-125. The pottery assemblage is quantified by EVE and weight but no data tables are provided. Whilst small, the assemblage is represented by a range of wares and forms. Alice Holt appears to be the principle supplier though, industries from Dorset, Nene Valley, Oxfordshire, and south Essex are also present.",,4,1,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
8019,"Only stratified coarseware pottery (282 sherds) was quantitated in the report. Samian wares were fully quantified however, which was noted to have made a substantial contribution to the assemblage. Samian ware from South, Central and Eastern Gaulish industries were recovered on site. Fragments from four well preserved face urns were also recovered.",,,,,480,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8020,"The pottery is only described by feature in an appendix report. There is no overall quantification of pottery fabrics or forms. No detailed discussion or overview summary is given of the typologies present, nor are any weights. Much of the late Iron Age/Roman pottery was found intruding in earlier prehistoric features. One well contains a near-complete Dressel 1 amphora dating to c.50BC-10BC, with the well fill dating c.AD50.",2842,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
8021,,15120,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
8022,No data; report not yet available,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8023,The amphora and Samian sherds were deposited before the Iron Age enclosure was backfilled at the end of the 1stC AD.,3364,,1,,36,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
8024,"The condition of the pottery assemblage as a whole is generally poor, with little in the way of diagnostic specimens. The late Iron Age assemblage consists a number of different fabrics including grog-tempered, flint-tempered, sandy and shelly wares. Roman imports are limited with British finewares coming predominantly from the Oxfordshire industries, whilst coarsewares derive from a number of sources ranging from Alice Holt, Oxfordshire and Hertfordshire production centres.",687,4,22,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
8025,"The assemblage was dominated by medium/coarse wares, with quantities of both Patch Grove grog-tempered wares and Alice Holt fabrics, and was primarily early Roman (c.AD50-200) in date.",291,5,1,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
8026,"The Late Iron Age forms are dominated by jars with a lower frequency of bowls, and a number of the late Iron Age body sherds displayed scoring on their external surfaces, often described as the East Midlands scored tradition, a technique used throughout the Middle and Late Iron Age periods. The late Iron Age/early Roman assemblage most commonly consisted of grog-tempered fabrics, although shell-tempered examples also occurred. The identifiable sandy greyware and oxidised ware vessels were dominated by 1st and 2nd century forms, predominantly upright-necked jars with everted rims, often decorated with a cordon. Roman finewares are poorly represented, accounting for just 3.3% of the sherd count, with late Roman Oxfordshire wares predominating, though a few Nene Valley wares were also present. Samian is the only imported fine ware, with vessels predominantly coming from production centres in central and southern Gaul; eastern Gaulish Samian was represented by only four sherds. One vessel, a Samian bowl, had been repaired with a rivet which was still attached to the sherd. Only three amphora were identified, whilst mortaria were rather better represented by comparison with products from the Oxfordshire and Verulamium industries present.",9049,114,3,122,99,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8027,One ditch section contained a substantial quantity of regionally-produced fine wares along with locally-produced coarsewares. 108 sherds of Roman pottery were recovered from the work by Archaeological Solutions.,1920,15,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
8028,"Samian vessels from La Graufesenque consisted a large proportion of the assemblage, though Alice Holt wares dominate. Verulamium, Highgate Wood, and mica dusted wares were also present. Sherd counts for fabrics and forms were only given in the unpublished assessment of the site.",695,17,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8029,"Jar sherds of sandy ware production were recovered, and much of the pottery can be thought of as 'Belgic', dating to the pre-Roman Iron Age. Some earlier Iron Age pottery was also present in the assemblage however, demonstrating the continuity of the settlement from this preceding phase.",240,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8030,"Two 1stC AD pits and gully produced small assemblages consisting a handmade storage jar in North Kent Shell-tempered ware and sherds in Highgate Wood B fabric. The two mid-late 3rd century quarry-pits produced mostly Alice Holt wares, but also North Kent White-slipped ware, Verulamium Whitewares, and sherd of the BB1 industry of Dorset. A sherd from a Portchester D ware jar came from the agricultural layer of the 4thC AD.",544,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
8031,"4083 sherds derived from the Tobacco Dock site and 2373 from the Babe Ruth site. The archive pottery report gives data for some period-based assemblages and not others, whilst some give sherd counts and others only EVE calculations. In the published report, each pottery type (Samian, mortaria, amphora) is analysed and reported on  separately within the main report. The mortaria assemblage interesting as it highlights the migration of a single potter from Oxfordshire to the Nene Valley. Also a number of the mortaria had been imported from Soller, Kr. Dueren in Lower Germany. The amphorae are restricted in the number of forms present, although the late Roman amphorae forms seem to show that these were imported over a comparatively long period of time. The spatial distribution of regional forms suggest that differences in site function could be picked, albeit on a general level. For example, Alice Holt wares, mostly comprised of cooking vessels were more prevalent in the west at Site A, whereas Nene Valley wares, largely consisting of drinking vessels, were more common to the east at Site B. This variation may indicate the difference between the preparation of food in the former to its consumption in the latter. A literate VIC graffito was identified on a black-slipped deep straight-sided dish.",6456,173,308,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8032,"The pottery assemblage was generally in a poor state of preservation. The vast majority of the Roman pottery existed in the form of jars, though bowls/dishes and mortaria were relatively well represented too.",1527,15,14,18,39,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8033,"Over 400 sherds dating c.AD60-150 were recorded, including Samian ware, Castor ware and an overwhelming predominance of coarse ware of local manufacture. The pottery was not quantified though it is mentioned that around 400 sherds came from fills in the first 'hut'.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
8034,,30,,4,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
8035,Only six sherds of early Romano-British pottery were recovered. These derived from the lowest silting of the ditch feature.,6,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8036,"A wide range of types was present, including imported fine wares such as Samian, with black burnished, Nene Valley, Highgate, Verulamium and other fine and coarse wares from southern Britain. The pottery dates from the 1st to 4th centuries, with the bulk of the assemblage was manufactured between AD250 and AD400. The 1902 assemblage was apparently similar to the 1999 one, though with more mortaria. A triple vase was included in the earlier material, now stored in Borough Museum, and a reported (now lost) piece of 'frilled' ware - perhaps a tazza - from 1902 represent the only pottery possibly associated with ritual from the site.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
8037,"No data was given in the interim report, though quantities of Samian, amphora, and mortaria are noted to have been present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8038,"The excavation produced material mostly dating to the 2nd century AD. The most common fabric types are both Kentish wares; Patch Grove ware makes up nearly 30% of the total assemblage by sherd count, whilst black burnished ware was also common. Imported wares make up only 9% of the total assemblage by sherd count, including Samian from workshops at Lezoux and Les Martres de Veyre in Central Gaul, a Baetican Dressel 20 globular olive oil amphora and a south Gaulish flat-bottomed Gauloise 4- wine amphora. The pottery is clearly derived from a domestic context, as represented by tableware, kitchenware (including mortaria), storage vessels and amphorae.",848,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8039,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8040,"Pottery derived predominantly from everyday cooking or tablewares dating c.AD250-400; the latter date is particularly indicated by the presence of Portchester D fabric. The assemblage also included material from Oxfordshire and Alice Holt, and also probable Patchgrove grog-tempered ware. Earlier material was rarely found and was largely residual. The unpublished report noted that a 'higher-than-usual proportion of Samian wares and amphorae' were present, though few mortaria. A single sherd of fine micaceous ware from a vessel with a small pinched solid lug was also recovered. Vessels of this form are quite common in the coastal regions of Frisia and Denmark, and the petrology is consistent with a continental source. The sherd most likely dates to the 5thC AD, perhaps towards the end of that century.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8041,"The assemblage is dominated by reduced wares, including a high proportion of unsourced grog-tempered wares. The grog vessels seem to mainly consist of storage jars, perhaps including Patchgrove ware. Finewares and oxidized wares were poorly represented though Samian, Nene Valley colour-coated ware, North Kent grey ware, fine Micaceous wares, Verulamium Region white ware, local oxidized wares and Hoo ware were all present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
8042,See site summary,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8043,"7520 rim sherds of pottery manufactured from the site were closely analysed, though the full number is not known, and is expected to have been many times greater. Most of the pottery found on site came from the final phase of production. Everted-rim jars constituted 45% of the assemblage, popper beakers and beaker-like jars 18%, bead-rim jars 8%, bowls and dishes with lid grooves 18%, bowls and dishes without lid grooves 10%, and miscellaneous types constituted the final 1%.",,,,,354,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
8044,"Little information was given on the pottery other than the cinery urns (though see burial data for the 'feeding bottle'). Much of the pottery was said to be bead-rim 'soapy' ware, though 2ndC AD Samian was also present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
8045,"57% (by weight) of the pottery was recovered from deposits associated with the two kilns. The pottery was in good condition with fresh breaks, but was often overfired representing the dumping of waster material. Late Iron Age grog-tempered, flint-tempered, sand-tempered and shell-tempered wares were all present, though these only constituted 4% of the assemblage. Belgic wares were present, as were fine oxidised wares, both white-slipped and orange-surfaced vessels including North Kent and Hadham products, and Verulamium white wares available mainly as flagons. South Gaulish Samian was present mainly as residual occurrences in 2nd or 3rd century contexts. Though no central Gaulish Samian was identified. A small amount of south Spanish amphora fabric completed the rather limited range of continental pottery. Pottery use declined after c.AD260; late Roman pottery accounts for 1% of the assemblage by weight. There is also no evidence of on-site pottery production after this date, and grey wares may have arrived from other centres. Mortaria derived from Oxfordshire and the Nene Valley and three bowl-jars in sandy grey ware, attest to settlement activity after AD 260. A shell-tempered necked jar hints at occupation at the site after AD 350.",8400,94,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8046,Early Roman pottery was recovered but no analysis of the material was presented in the report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8047,"About 10k pieces of pottery were recovered. The Samian ware derives from 203 vessels. Very few Samian vessels dated prior to the mid-second century, which is slightly unusual for Roman rural sites, though a few sherds were excavated from pre-villa deposits. Only 17 mortaria were sent for analysis and include three groups, one local type dating AD120-250, an Oxfordshire type dating AD240-400 and one vessel imported from the Rhineland dating AD150-300. Amphorae fragments were identified in the area west of the main villa house.",10000,,,50,298,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8048,"All the pottery is 1st or 2ndC AD. There were a few diagnostic sherds from early Roman Sandy ware B and sand-tempered wares, 14 bead-rimmed jars, a Cologne colour-coated ware beaker, and Central Gaulish Samian Dragendorff dish. The semi-complete vessel from context is a sandtempered bead-rimmed jar dated c.AD50-80.",112,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
8049,"There was a complete absence of continental imports and Romano-British finewares in the 1st/2ndC AD assemblage, which is dominated by jars. The exception is a mortaria rim from Colchester and an undiagnostic Highgate Wood beaker sherd. The main part of the assemblage comprises local coarsewares and the majority of these were probably produced in the Thurrock and Grays area. The assemblage has more in common with the ceramic tradition of Essex than London.",335,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
8050,"Excavations produced a small amount of early Roman pottery. The bulk of this material is formed of early Roman sandy wares with some shell-tempered vessels present. Most of this probably originated in the Essex region. Two vessels are worthy of specific comment: an almost complete Verulamium coarse white-slipped ware flagon and a Highgate Wood C ware bottle. These vessels may indicate 'special' deposits. A single sherd of chaff-tempered ware pottery was present, probably dating to the 6thC AD.",75,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8051,"Most of the Roman pottery came from the cremation burials and consisted 3rd-4thC AD sandy coarse wares. Other pottery included south Gaulish Samian, Oxfordshire ware and grog-tempered coarsewares, though much of this pottery was found redeposited in Saxon features and may well have been from items reused at this later date (see coin summary).",199,1,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
8053,"Post-excavation analysis in progress. Grog-tempered fabrics accompanied 'Romanised' greywares in 1st/early 2ndC AD contexts in the form of bead rim jars, bowls and cordoned jars. Other wares within the early Roman group include small quantities of coarse oxidised wares and some whitewares, possibly early Verulamium types, as well as some Samian. Later Romano-British wares included greywares, many of which may derive from the Alice Holt industry (frilled jars with hooked rims), whilst buff wares (Overwey types) were also present in very small quantities. The most numerous recognisable later wares are the Oxfordshire fine wares, mainly colour coated wares in open forms, and whiteware mortaria, with all identifiable forms dating from the mid 3rd century AD onwards.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
8054,"The pottery assemblage had yet to be quantified beyond number of boxes. Where datable the assemblage mostly consisted of vessels dating c.AD250/270-400 and AD350-400. There are some rare but poorly preserved sherds of Samian and coarse wares, dating to the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, which may indicate some earlier occupation in the area. The later Roman material is in better condition, containing relatively high proportions of Portchester D ware.  Oxfordshire and Alice Holt wares are also well represented. The lack of black-burnished wares is noted to be somewhat surprising.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
8056,"608 sherds (17.9kg) of Roman pottery was excavated from the Pre-Construct Archaeology site, whilst 11331 sherds (162.2kg) derived from the MoLAS excavation. The AD43-70 assemblages were overwhelmingly dominated by jar fragments in Highgate Wood B fabric, though fragments from Alice Holt ware jars and a large part of a Upchurch biconical from North Kent were also present. South Gaulish Samian includes fragments from a Dr.15/17 platter and a Dr.27 cup of pre-Flavian character. Malcolm Lyne argues (from the Pre-Construct Archaeology assemblage) that some assemblages across the AD70-200 period suggest a shift in patterns of pottery supply. The lowest fill of one ditch included small amounts of both Highgate Wood B and Alice Holt wares, whilst later levels consisted a dominance of Highgate Wood C wares with significant quantities of Colne Valley products (82%). Alice Holt wares were subsequently absent, perhaps coinciding with the decline in this industry after AD120. The revival of the Alice Holt industry and the collapse of the Colne Valley production centre is noted by a return to the products of the former in later Roman assemblages. These can be closely dated to c.AD270-330, and no Roman pottery from the site need be later than the early-4thC AD in date. However, R Featherby's analysis of the MoLAS assemblage suggests that a small quantity of later 4thC AD wares may have been present. Overall, the two analyses largely concur with one another. Featherby's analysis also identified fragments from a number of vessels normally considered 'ritual'. Up to five tazze were identified from 19 sherds, and parts of two face pots were also recovered.",11939,180,366,178,755,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8057,Pottery recovered from the site found to be mostly 2ndC AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8058,"There are approximately 100 sherds of Roman pottery, consisting almost entirely of abraded material and providing evidence of Roman presence in the area from the 1st century to the late Roman period. The largest group, from a ditch fill, was composed of reduced wares and included a locally hand-made, though smashed, shell/grog-tempered necked jar with incised arcading on the shoulder/body. Assignment of this group to the Roman period may have been uncertain if not for the presence of some Alice Holt Surrey ware sherds (c.AD 40-160). There are also two sherds tentatively identified as early Roman Micaceous Sandy ware which is of 1st century date. This group is possibly very early Roman but because of its small size and the absence of diagnostic identifiable types it has been dated broadly to c.AD 40-100. Smaller quantities of imported wares included a red colour-coated Oxfordshire ware bowl, a jar from Thameside in Kent, other Alice Holt vessels, Highgate Wood C, and Verulamium wares.",100,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8059,"A Samian bowl with an incision of the name 'Virius' was identified from one of the burial groups from the KARU excavations. Around coarseware 300 vessels were represented from approximately 2400 sherds, with at least one amphora, nine mortaria, and 54 Samian vessels also present. The number of sherds of amphora and mortaria are not stated in the report, and it is clear that only an assessment of the pottery assemblage as a whole has been carried out.",2474,,,,74,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8060,See site summary.,225,3,2,1,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8061,"Much of the pottery was in a poor and abraded condition and was generally found in small clusters. Pottery industries represented include Colchester, Much Hadham, Nene Valley and Oxfordshire wares, whilst the main late Roman ceramic forms represented include the bowl-jar and dishes, suggestive of domestic occupation.",1462,10,55,52,60,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8062,Only spot dates from the pottery were given in the report; no quantified analysis had been carried out.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8063,"The Roman pottery recovered ranged from locally produced wares from London and Alice Holt, plus vessels from slightly further afield from Oxford, Colchester, St Albans and Much Hadham in  Hertfordshire. A small quantity of continental pottery was also present. Unfortunately, no quantified analysis had been presented in the report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8064,"Sherds of Romano-British date consist largely of coarse greywares, oxidised wares and grog-tempered wares, plus three sherds of Spanish Dressel 20 amphora. Diagnostic sherds amongst these wares included one bead rim in a coarse, shelly fabric and a lid seated bead rim jar in Verulamium-region whiteware which suggests a date range in the later 1st or early 2ndC AD.",57,1,3,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
8065,"The groups of pottery from individual contexts were small and in many cases abraded. However, there was a strong emphasis on late Roman forms and fabrics typical of the fourth century such as Alice Holt and Oxfordshire wares. This suggests that the bulk of activity at the site occurred during the late Roman period.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8066,"Much of the pottery is abraded, with a small average size. It is nearly all late Roman (late 3rd to late 4th or early 5thC AD) with very little residual 1st or 2ndC AD material. A small amount of 3rdC AD pottery was recovered, notably imports such as East Gaulish and Lezoux Samian and late Cologne colour-coated. Much of this seems to have been redeposited in later context however. Late 4th to 5thC AD pottery is more common, though much of this also seems to have been redeposited. Alice Holt wares, Oxfordshire red colour-coated ware, and Portchester D or East Midlands shell-tempered wares are present. When looked at as a whole, most of the contexts are almost certainly the same date, c.AD350-400+. All the Saxon pottery is 7thC AD or later.",588,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
8067,"Excavations at Bellefield Road, Orpington recovered 2819 sherds of Romano-British pottery weighing 44kg from 75 contexts. Though no overall quantification on form types is given. The remainder, including the Samian sherd count, came from the Philp excavations.",3017,,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8068,The finds report which is stated to exist is not present on the Archaeological Data Service.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8069,,15,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
8070,"Detailed specialist reports are noted to be present in Appendices B & C. However, these were not included with the main report submitted to the ADS.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
8071,Only 22 sherds of Roman pottery were recovered due to the contaminated nature of the site.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8072,"Late Roman pottery was entirely absent from the site, whilst the vast majority of the assemblage came from a single pit (1013 sherds). A variety of sand, grog and flint tempered fabrics were present in the pit but only three fabrics could be identified. Fragments from a hook flanged mortarium (AD43-140) and jar sherds in Verulamium-region white ware vessel were present. A number of Alice Holt ware jars were also present of mid-1st to mid-2ndC AD date. However, the presence of sand and flint and grog-tempered wares point to a pre-Flavian date for the feature, c.AD43-70. Platters, dishes and cups were absent, whilst a large number of jars were noticeably pierced by post-firing holes mainly located in the basal region or lower part of the vessel. Perhaps eight or nine vessels had been treated in this fashion, including the VRW jar. Whilst a ritual interpretation is noted, the specialist prefers a dairying context for the assemblage, with the mortarium also noted to be involved in the cheese-making process.",1109,12,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
8073,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8074,"The pottery was mainly deposited in the fills of enclosure ditch. The majority of the pottery was a heterogeneous variety of handmade local fabrics, though non-local material included Verulamium Region wares, Highgate Wood C, La Graufesenque Samian and unsourced amphora. There are also sandy Thameside wares; the ritual jar was of South Essex Shell Tempered ware.",537,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
8075,Three sherds of Romano-British pottery were recovered in situ.,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
8076,The vast majority of this total dates to the 1st century AD and may be pre- or post-conquest in date. A very small proportion of the assemblage also appears to be of later Roman (c.3rd-4th century) date.,661,13,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
8077,"Around 420 sherds of pottery were identified as Iron Age, some of which pertains to the middle Iron Age when the fort was first constructed. Over 4000 Roman pottery sherds were recovered though, due to a lack of resources, a full analysis has not been carried out. A catalogue of wares exists, but no quantification. Of all the Roman sherds, less than 30 dated to the mid-1stC AD, coming from the middle zone of the inner ditch. A general absence of pottery dating between AD80-270 was noted.",4420,,,,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
8078,"Several sherds of abraded, undiagnostic Romano-British wares were recovered from the roadside ditches.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9001,"Well preserved assemblage of mostly 1st-2nd century date, but continuing into the 4th century. Fabrics include Samian, amphora, white wares, white-slipped fabrics, calcareous tempered fabrics, LIA/ERB Belgic-type wares, oxidised coarse wares, reduced coarse wares, black-burnished wares. Some examples included carbonised remains on the surfaces as well as the use of pitch on the rims and shoulders of some vessels.",8600,136,20,24,113,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9002,"Nearly all the pottery dates to AD50-70 apart from a few late and post Roman sherds which were found to be intrusive. Mostly hand-made coarsewares though some terra rubra cups are present, particularly associated with some of the cremation burials. No Samian, mortarium, or amphorae.",2704,17,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9003,"The full pottery assemblage represents a minimum number of 124 vessels. The recognition of a possible waster and other sherds with signs of distortion indicated to the excavator that a small kiln may have been located nearby. Amphora and mortarium quantified together along with other vessel types as 'coarse, hard sandy Romanised wares. One mortarium sherd includes a stamp.",2098,,,,12,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9004,Only 48 sherds from at least 5 coarseware vessels were recovered.,48,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9005,557 sherds deriving from at least 56 vessels were recovered ranging from local coarsewares to imported fine wares.,557,,1,2,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9006,"10 pottery sherds derived from at least 3 vessels, identified as local blake-ware types.",10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9008,"1097 sherds from a minimum of 83 vessel were recovered. Much of the pottery derived from local/regional wares, though a number of fine wares beyond the Samian were also identified.",1097,,2,4,26,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9009,"Excavation produced two pottery assemblages, one associated with the cemetery and another probably associated with nearby domestic activity. The cemetery included three burials recovered from Patch Grove vessels used as cinery urns, Samian cup and platter of mid/late 1stC date, and contemporary 'Roman' flagon and beaker. The domestic assemblage contained similar wares but had a slightly greater range of type and function. The assemblage derives from at least 24 individual vessels. Note that the counts given below represent the number of vessel and not necessarily sherds count, though these types were low in frequencies.",422,,,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9010,The pottery is not quantified though some are described - all local wares.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9011,"The pottery here derives entirely from the aisled building excavated in 1969, not the main villa house. The remains represent a minimum of 262 vessels. The counts given below for pottery types refers to number of vessels rather than sherds. The graffito was found on a pot base reading 'VITIA X', from the floor of the aisled building in association with 4th century coins.",4618,,5,14,54,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9012,Around 1000 sherds of late Iron Age pottery were recovered and are likely to be severely under-represented due to the limited excavation of the Iron Age settlement. Roman pottery was comparatively minimal however. Full and accurate quantities of the pottery assemblages were not given and only counts of the main types are mentioned.,,,5,6,49,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9013,"Samian ware ranges chronologically from the early Claudian-Neronian to late Antonine/third century wares. However, only the Samian is quantified, whilst the main Romano-British wares are instead given a detailed description of the large range of forms excavated from the site. These date from the late pre-Roman Iron Age to the early 5th century AD. The tazze were identified from two different fabric types, one fine oxidised ware, another coarse oxidised sandy ware. The contexts of these were not detailed, though the later may have been redeposited.",,,,,387,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9014,"660 vessels are described in the report, though fragment counts are not given. Pottery types are thus given in this mode of quantification throughout. Alongside Samian ware, a large number of olla were recovered from graves. Report written before modern standards of excavation and material analysis had been developed - certain information may be missing.",660,,17,,75,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9015,Unquantified late Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9016,"Around 26000 sherds derived from stratified deposits, with c. 6000 from unstratified deposits, from the 1967-78 excavations, whilst a further c.9000 sherds came from the 1978-80 excavations. All pottery data recorded here is combined from the two reports. Samian ware falls generally into two date bands, one of mid-Flavian and another of Antonine date. A few pottery wasters were recovered and imitations of Gallo-Belgic wares, together with pottery wheels at the sits, which suggest that vessels were being made at Keston dating to Period IV AD60-85. Evidence of graffito exists on two amphorae sherds, one of which is possibly a Chi-Rho symbol.",41000,,147,356,457,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9017,"The pottery is broadly in keeping with the coinage being largely late 3rd C, though some fragments of 2nd-3rd C mortaria exist. Apart from one vessel the site is notably devoid of 2nd C pottery which usually characterises sites in this region. A further absence of 4th C pottery is also notable. Only a very small quantity of fine ware is present.",2951,30,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
9018,"Quantities of pottery derive from stratified deposits of three of the mills, plus a quantity of mid-late 4th century pot found in areas associated with industrial activity. Most of the amphora derive from Dressel 20, but one sherd belonged to carrot amphora believed to carry fruit. There seems to be significant changes to the pattern of pottery supply to the site from the third to late fourth century. Neither the mortaria or the full assemblage is quantified.",,205,32,,174,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9019,"Grog-tempered wares account for around 80-90% of the early assemblage, primarily from cooking-vessels of both hand-made and wheel-turned, though some imported 1st C finewares were recovered.",74917,880,889,73,1732,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9020,"13 miniature vessels of late 1st/early 2nd C date recovered from the site, one in a cenotaph and two associated with viewing platform. Tazze, paterae, unguentaria and a triple vase all also recovered - the latter from the ritual shaft. Graffito most common on tablewares, i.e. Samian, local finewares, etc. Huge quantities of pottery also recovered from the main temple complex though unquantified. Includes tazze, face pots and complete pottery vessels in structured deposits. Literate graffitos.",55366,936,653,209,1843,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9021,"Two miniature vessels, a fragment from a possible tazza recovered from the roadside settlement. Graffito most common on tablewares, i.e. Samian, local finewares, etc.",64329,1209,695,404,2066,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9022,"No new imported finewares were received at Northfleet after c.AD240 until the 4th C, when western Gaulish marbled ware appears. A complete unguentaria was recovered from a late 1st/2nd C pit, and a single graffito was identified from an imbrex tile rather than pottery.",9594,144,135,107,273,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9023,2415 sherds of late prehistoric and Roman pottery were recovered though only 61 were conclusively of Romano-British date.,2415,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9024,"Pottery was recovered in all the burials, and twelve vessels in total were recorded, all from the 1st C AD appearing to be c.AD43-70. The vessels include two flagons, five platters, two butt-beakers, two cups, and one unidentified beaker.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9025,A Samian jug was recovered from an inhumation grave. Five amphorae vessels were used as cremation urns for 5 female burials (some with infants).,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9026,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9027,"A total of 379 sherds (6448g) of later prehistoric and Roman pottery was recovered from the site, with 36 from earlier excavations. However, much of this was Iron Age in date. The Roman assemblage consists of 43 sherds, weighing 3338g. Identifiable vessels comprise the rim from an Oxfordshire colour-coated flanged bowl (AD 240–400), from grave 1116; and a triangular-rimmed jar in the Alice Holt Overwey-Tilford fabric variant, of 4th-century AD date, from grave 1024. The assemblage was in poor condition, with abraded surfaces. Two semi-complete vessels came from a cremation burial and an inhumation grave.",79,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9028,"The pottery derives primarily from ditches, pits and the malting structure, and all seem to date c.25BC-AD150. Some local finewares are present alongside imported vessels. No Samian is present but regionally-made copies are.",244,,3,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
9029,"Over-fired wasters were recovered from the pre-villa ditch, suggesting that pottery production took place during the early occupation of the site, but not necessarily when the villa was occupied. The pottery report gives a breakdown of fabric by the percentage of EVEs, and are not compatible with the dataset used here.",27337,421,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9030,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9031,"Pottery report held in archive, though the report suggests that a range of regionally-made imported wares were present, dating from 100BC-AD300.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9032,Very little of the assemblage post-dated the 1st C AD.,1044,8,1,1,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9033,Quantities of pottery were recovered from the cremation cemetery and the domestic/industrial site though these were not properly quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9034,Final report to come,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9035,"Pottery was not quantified in the published report. Most of the pottery seems to be of 2nd to early 3rdC AD date and includes reconstructable pots from two cremation burials. These included, in cremation burial 1, three vessels dated c.AD 150-200: part of a truncated jar in very-fine Thameside fabric, a central Gaulish samian Dr 18/31 platter, and a flagon in North Kent fine greyware, plus sherds oxidized Hoo fineware and Belgic Grog-tempered/Native Coarse Ware fabric; and in cremation 2, a jar in grey 'Native Coarse Ware' and a flagon in red Hoo fineware. A further stray vessel is from one or other of these burials. The small amount of Roman pottery includes kiln wasters in North Kent (Upchurch) fine greyware.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9036,"Pottery described by fabric rather than form. As such, mortaria may be present, but it is not clear. The pottery dates from the late Iron Age to the 4th C.",1544,,,,18,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9037,"Little information is currently available on the pottery since the site is largely unpublished, but excavation is known to have produced Lezoux Samian ware dating AD155-175.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9038,"Associated with the burial was recovered a coarse pottery flask, a poppyhead beaker, a 1stC AD flagon and 2ndC AD Samian cups and dishes. Later excavation produced a large quantity of Roman pottery in an area between the stone platform and the burial mound, but the analysis of this assemblage is not presented. This may indicate feasting.",1100,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9039,"Some of the pottery dates to an earlier Iron Age phase. The main vessel form represented is a storage jar-type up until the 2nd C, after which tempered wares are replaced by sandy wares.",425,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9040,"Each cremation urn was made of grey grogged ware, though one was differently  made of sandy glauconitic clay.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9041,"Little pottery was recovered since the exposed features could not be excavated, though Belgic and Samian ware was picked up.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9042,"Most of the grave groups included between 3 and 5 vessels including flagons, bowls, and platters. At least 8 Samian ware vessels are represented amongst the burial groups.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9043,"Very little pottery of pre-Conquest or immediately post Conquest, though a small amount dating c.AD50-80 suggest some activity during that period. Small scatters of late Roman pottery were collected, though the vast majority of the pottery assemblage dates from the mid-2nd C to the early 3rd C.",33043,635,876,349,876,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9044,,614,6,13,2,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9045,"The vast majority of the pottery assemblage, though with a few Saxon and medieval sherds mixed in, were Belgic or early Roman. Though Roman wares were present, no absolute quantifications are given for them for them.",970,11,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9046,"The report does not state the full sherd count for the assemblage, though 70 sherds of Samian are noted.",,254,,,70,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9047,,1592,,,5,47,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9048,,338,4,7,2,36,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9049,,4109,,,,108,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9050,A small quantity of 'Belgic' pottery exists in the assemblage.,2585,90,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9051,A Dragendorff 31 Samian platter was placed with one inhumation alongside one black burnished Dorset dish.,224,7,1,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9052,"A wide range of wares were recovered of local, regional and more distantly imported vessels. Jars seem to dominate the assemblage, though bowls and platters were present.",2474,45,5,2,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9053,"The majority of sherds date to the 2nd/early 3rdC AD, though a few residual pieces dated to pre-Conquest and immediately post-Conquest. Quantification is given by EVEs. Pottery was also recovered from the earlier excavation (Kelly 1992) but was not quantified.",4067,36,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9054,"The pottery assemblage was only remarked upon in general and no detailed analysis is included in the published report, although c.20kg of Roman pottery was recovered in total.",,20,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9055,"Most of the pottery derived from stratigraphically isolated features, whilst an important part of the assemblage was deposited with many of the cremation burials. Whilst a range of pottery was recorded, the assemblage is not fully quantified in the report.",5305,67,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9056,A small quantity of pottery was recovered though is important since it represents one of the few from the Iron Age/Roman transition in the Romney Marsh area. Samian and other fine wares are completely absent from the assemblage.,288,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9057,"8970 sherds of pottery weighing  135kg were recovered from the 2008 ASE excavations, whilst 1024 sherds weighing 9kg derived from the 1992 Wessex excavations. The later report, however, does not quantify Samian, amphorae or mortaria, though each is present from both excavations. Quantities of pottery also derive from the 1964/5 excavation though no quantified analysis is given. Two graffito marks are noted on two Samian pots from the ASE excavation.",9994,144,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9059,"The plates and amphorae had been part of a 'cleaning up' fire lit after the funerary rites and then, once 'cleaned', placed in the deposits. Other cups and beakers were placed in these deposits without being burnt. The pottery has not been quantified, though only one fragment of Samian was recovered.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9060,"No data, other than the presence of Roman pottery types is given.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9061,"The vast majority of the late Iron Age/Roman pottery was specifically of late Iron Age date. Some pottery wasters and kiln debris were found in the ditch of the iron-working enclosures, though no pottery production kilns were uncovered on site.",3910,53,9,,9,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9062,"The pottery assemblage ranges in date from the Late Iron Age (50BC-AD 43) to late Roman (AD260-410) period but the majority of sherds date to between the mid-1st century and the early 3rd century AD. A small group of handmade flint-tempered body sherds from a variety of contexts may date to before 50BC but their fragmentary state and lack of distinguishing characteristics did not permit precise dating. Pottery was recovered from 180 contexts, the great majority of sherds deriving from enclosure ditches, but with smaller groups from pits, water holes and structural features associated with building 550. An incomplete miniature pot of Belgic coarseware, cf. Monaghan class 9A3.1, recovered from a pit.",4175,40,12,10,79,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9063,"Grog-tempered ware fabrics are the most significant and account for nearly half of all of the material by sherd count. The various quantifications of the pottery in the Late Iron Age and late 2nd and early 3rd century assemblages show that such wares remained significant throughout the entire occupation of the site but with a decline in their importance during the early 3rd century. Various Thameside coarse and fine ware fabrics make up another quarter of the sherds. However, south Gaulish Samian ware is absent, as are Gallo-Belgic fine ware imports. Central Gaulish and East Gaulish Samian between them make up a mere 3% of the pottery by sherd count. The paucity of Continental fine ware imports, coupled with a significant showing of both Late Iron Age and Roman handmade grog-tempered wares, suggests a site of low social status.",3144,22,7,24,51,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9064,A total of 2456 sherds of Late Bronze Age to Late Iron Age pottery was recovered from fieldwork and excavation. These were not divided into phase. It derives largely from stratified feature fills and appears to span at least two distinct ceramic phases.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9065,"The Iron Age pottery assemblage from Site L is not included here since this comprised a large quantity of early Iron Age vessels, whereas Iron Age assemblages from Sites A, B, C and D are predominantly mid-late Iron Age and so are included in sherd and weight counts. This correlates with the late Iron Age/Roman pottery assemblage from the HS1 (CTRL) excavation. An ex-graffito was inscribed in a beaker from site A and placed as a grave good. Whilst Samian and amphorae are present in the Roman assemblage, both forms were notably absent from sites A, L, B, and C. Samian ware vessels were present in the early Roman high-status burial groups.",19349,171,48,7,98,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9066,"As expected, a large proportion of the pottery derived from cinery urns. Graffito were noted on some Samian ware fragments.",27000,193,,5,444,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9067,"The greater part of the pottery evidence belongs to the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, with reduced quantities of 3rd century and later wares. The earlier Romano-British ceramic assemblage is dominated by grog-tempered and other coarsewares, mostly probably of local, or near–local origin, while lesser amounts of regionally marketed products such as Upchurch, Patch Grove and Nene Valley wares, and small quantities of Samian, amphora and lower Rhineland wares, all attest access to wider trading networks. In addition to the normal settlement context types of layers, pits, ditches and postholes, etc., pottery was recovered from 10 cremation burials.",4764,37,44,16,76,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9068,,2457,22,,8,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9069,"The excavation at Hockers Lane yielded 724 sherds (4915 g) of late Iron Age and pre-Flavian Roman pottery. Excavations at the villa site in Thurnham yielded 13911 sherds (127673 g) of late Iron Age and Roman pottery. These totals have been combined here. About 2000 further pottery fragments were gained from environmental sampling, though these were not quantified in the reports and so are not recorded here. One sherd of central Gaulish Samian was recovered from the Hockers Lane excavation. Three sherds of Italian Dressel 1B amphorae derived from the Thurnham villa excavation, amongst other types. A single tazza cup was identified, though its context was not discussed in either the main or pottery reports - this vessel may be a late Iron Age form.",14635,133,128,37,205,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9070,"Only 23 vessel forms were identified, the majority of which are jars. Three bowl/dish forms and a lid were also present.",453,7,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9071,A large globular Dressel 20 amphora was used as a cinery urn for a twin burial of an adult and a neonate. 16 vessels in total were buried in the graves.,16,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
9072,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9073,"3 sherds of 3rdC AD pottery were recovered from within two of the salt pans, indicating at least their latest period of use.",3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9074,Iron Age pottery recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9075,Winbolt notes the presence of 'Samian and coarse pottery of various dates.',,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9076,Pottery was recovered from surrounding pits though are yet to be analysed.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9077,"Potsherds found in the 19th C excavation included Upchurch and Caistor ware. As so little of the main villa house was excavated much of the pottery derived in small proportions, and mainly from unstratified layers. Most of the assemblage dated from the late 2nd to the mid 3rd C. A small number of sherds suggest diminished activity in the 4th C.",218,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
9078,Just over 1000 sherds of pottery were recovered and the vast majority dated c.50BC-AD150.,1000,,,1,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9079,A large quantity of pottery was recovered from the site which is described in detail but little quantifiable information is given. Over 3300 sherds of late Iron Age/early Roman material was analysed but the full quantity of Roman pottery is not given.,,,69,35,220,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9080,Very little information is given on the quantification of the coarse pottery.,,,,,76,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9081,"The pottery count more likely represents the number of vessels found on the site rather than the quantity of sherds, though this is not made explicit in the report.",278,,,3,39,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9082,None of the pottery had been quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9083,Pottery is present but no analysis had been carried out by the time the report was published.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9084,"The report includes 40 vessels from the cemetery site, 14 coming from the 1984-89 excavations and a further 26 recovered from quarrying between 1900 and 1913. The 'sherd count' here is used for the actual number of vessels, as specified in the report. As well as Samian ware, the report highlights a high frequency of imported Gallo-Belgic wares, including Gallo-Belgic parchment ware, as well as the presence of Arretine, Central Gaulish Lead-glazed ware, and two different types of tazza (one being a pedestal type). The presence of Arretine is very rare in burial contexts. The pottery is catalogued in Thompson (1982).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9085,"Information taken from Stevens (2004), though full analysis has yet to be taken on any of the pottery assemblages. Samian ware recovered from most of the evaluations.",813,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9086,"The pottery assemblage has yet to be fully analysed. However, a number of different ceramic industries were represented in the assemblage further the possibility that the site formed part of a trading settlement.",3256,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9087,"Four vessels were recovered from the burial group. All the vessels were jars, two of which were of Upchurch-type ware.",4,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9088,,154,2,6,6,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9089,"35 vessels recovered from the burial groups in total, including olla and other beakers.",35,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9090,"Briquetage was present on site though not enough to indicate that salt-making was taking place in situ, but may link the settlement to other salt-working sites in the area. The pottery recorded here only relates to the Archaeology South-East excavation at Holy Trinity Church, though further identifications of 1st-2ndC AD pottery, including Samian, were also described by Dale (1971) from earlier excavations nearby (see site summary).",689,5,1,2,48,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9091,"The Roman pottery dates from the mid 1st to 4th century AD, with the majority dating to the later 3rd and 4th centuries. Several contexts produced single sherds of local sandy wares, which were not closely dated. There is an absence of diagnostic pre-Flavian material and no types that can be attributed to the pre-Roman Late Iron Age traditions evidenced elsewhere in Kent. Locally-made wares dominated the assemblage though non-local ceramics included grey wares from Alice Holt and Much Hadham, and fine wares from the Nene Valley and Oxfordshire-region industries. An early Roman miniature votive vessel was also recovered from the interior of the enclosure.",513,,4,1,3,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9092,"A small quantity of Roman pottery was recovered, though was fully analysed.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9093,Samian ware vessels also accompanied in the cremation burial.,690,,,,26,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9094,"A large quantity of Romano-British kiln furniture was recovered along with locally-produced amphorae, leguna, and flagons, as well as pottery wasters. The majority of the pottery dates AD50-250, though no quantified analysis of pottery types had been undertaken.",959,10,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9095,"Many of the pot sherds were recovered in association with the hearth, whilst 424 were associated with the cremation burial. The material is likely to be largely or entirely of later first century AD date, though decorated Samian was recovered along with other 2nd C AD pottery from a ditch exposed during the 2010 trial trenching. One sherd of Samian included a possible graffito.",970,6,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9096,,128,,5,8,18,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9097,A large storage pot was recovered from a structured deposit in a pit. The pottery assemblage has not been analysed fully.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9098,Some late Iron Age grog-tempered ware is also present in the assemblage.,546,,,,18,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9099,Complete Samian ware vessels were recovered from the site. One from a pit; another from a cremation burial.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9100,Only 8 sherds belonged to the late Iron Age with the majority of the assemblage dating to the late 1st-3rd C. The assemblage was very poorly preserved and fragmentary.,1864,,1,1,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9101,"Despite the small sample, a wide variety of pottery types were present.",118,2,4,3,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9102,"Sand-, flint-, grog- and shell tempered wares were all present, and dating across the conquest period. Roman wares included La Graufesenque samian and Canterbury oxidised and reduced wares, Upchurch fine ware, grey ware, and Patchgrove grog-tempered wares.",348,2,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9103,LIA/ER pottery dominates the overall assemblage.,72,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9104,Only a very small quantity of LIA/ERB pottery was recovered.,16,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9105,A large corpus of pottery has yet to be analysed,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9106,A range of samian and coarse ware pottery found in the pits around the temple. Most of the coarseware was late Roman. Unquantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9107,"The pottery assemblage is dominated by coarsewares and storage vessels. The primary fabric group belongs to Thameside sand tempered products, but later includes grog-tempered and Oxfordshire wares. No imported wares are mentioned.",124,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9108,No mention of imported or fine wares is given.,194,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9109,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9110,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9111,Only 11 sherd of Roman pottery were recovered though one piece was from a decorated Samian vessel (AD120-250) which had been repaired at some point prior to deposition.,11,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9112,"Imported wares represent only 1.6% of the assemblage by sherd count, whereas reduced fines wares represented 6.8% of the assemblage by sherd count of which Upchurch wares comprise the greatest part. Late Roman fabrics are peculiarly absent for the assemblage showing that AD 250, activity at this site had completely ceased. A relatively narrow range of vessels has been identified with jars being most common at 18.9% by sherd count followed by flagons at 9.3%.",4159,,4,4,46,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9113,"Pottery finds from the site are mostly of 3rd and 4th century date. No formal analysis of these remains has yet been undertaken, but some further information regarding previous pottery finds on or around the site are given in the CAT grey literature report, including the presence of Samian ware and mortaria (CAT 2007).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9114,"Features on site range in date from the 1st century BC to the Hadrianic period with no clear hiatus in activity. A large proportion of the pottery appears Middle Iron Age in character; however, as these always seem to occur in association with grog-tempering, it seems likely that these contexts date to the beginning of the Late Iron Age. One large group of this type comprises around a third of the assemblage and includes many semi-complete vessels. Only c.10% of the assemblage is comprised of Romanised fabrics.",4275,56,28,1,21,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9115,"The pottery was mainly excavated from ditches, gullies and a pond, forming part of a rural settlement. Most of the well-dated contexts contained material likely to be of Flavian to Antonine date but the assemblage also contains significant amounts of grog-tempered pottery which shows traits associated with the Late Iron Age to early Roman 'Belgic' ceramic tradition.",5090,72,84,26,239,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9116,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9117,"Only two sherds of pottery were recovered from the site, from stratified ditch fills, one from a Dressel 20 amphorae vessel",2,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
9118,Area B2 yielded the largest assemblage of late Iron Age/Roman pottery from the pipeline. The composition of the Roman assemblage is clearly shaped by the proximity of the sites to an extensive centre of pottery production on the Upchurch marshes and Hoo peninsular.,1553,33,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9119,,86,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9120,"The date range of the Iron Age and Roman pottery exclusively spans the mid-1st C BC to the mid-1st C AD. The character of the assemblage as a whole suggests affinities with pottery from south Essex sites as much as with west Kent. This is seen in the widespread use of shell-tempering which was obviously readily available around the Thames estuary and in the predominance of forms like Thompson's C3 and C5-1. One sherd has a pre-firing incised criss-cross mark and two other sherds also have unusual curvilinear and diagonal inscribed markings. These may be examples of 'Essex graffiti' of a type found in large quantities at Mucking and identified at a small number of North Kent sites. There are a large number of near complete or semi-complete vessels in the assemblage. Almost all are in a fragmentary condition, and none seem to be wholly complete suggesting that they have been deliberately broken probably just prior to deposition. In one pit context, such a vessel is associated with a large animal bone assemblage. In some cases, sherds of one vessel were found across two interventions of the same feature. Interestingly structured deposition occurs across both ceramic phases and in a wide range of forms including butt-beakers, S-profile jars and even storage jars. Of particular interest is a butt-beaker which has been split in half and deposited in two different pits. This form may have associations with drinking in particular social contexts and is often found in graves and other special deposits. No evidence for Samian, amphora or mortaria was found.",2708,43,,,,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9121,"Some 600 vessels were represented, mostly coming from ditch deposits. Due to limited resources, a detailed fabric analysis was not possible. The main enclosure seemed to include a relatively high proportion of grog-tempered wares, whilst finer wares became present by the late 1st C AD, albeit in relatively small quantities.",16420,,,100,320,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9122,"None of the pottery assemblage had been quantified, but contains material from early, middle and late Iron Age phases. No imported wares are noted in the report, though a small amount of Roman wares were present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9123,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9124,"Sherds survived in poor condition (the mean sherd weight was only 5g) and almost all sherds had suffered a high degree of post-depositional surface abrasion and edge damage. Consequently, diagnostic sherds were relatively scarce. Two sherds from a tazza were also found in a pit located just outside the enclosure.",2714,15,34,3,69,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9125,"The pottery from late fills ranged from a very large comb-decorated storage jar, a well preserved mortaria, dishes, bowls and cups. At least one decorated Samian bowl was present along with a small undecorated cup, together with dishes in Dorset Black-Burnished ware. Rather than a deposit of rubbish it appears that a group of pots from a kitchen or store had been tipped into the hole with the burnt debris and midden material.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9126,A small assemblage of 2nd C pottery. Unquantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9127,Pottery was primarily recovered from the Roman well which was infilled around the mid-2nd C. Body fragments of large Ollae were excavated from one of the nearby pits. None of the pottery has been quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9128,"The area has produced large quantities of unstratified Roman pottery over many years, and it seems like pottery manufacture took place nearby. Six of the seven 'puppy-group' urns are almost certainly products of a single kiln.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9129,"No certain wasters were found at the site, but several pots found within and nearby the kiln are thought to have been fired within it (though see site summary). Only minimum numbers of vessels were quantified (42).",42,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9130,Central Gaulish Samian ware was recovered from a number of contexts.,211,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9131,"Present, but no data given. 2nd-4thC AD focus.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9132,Only 12 sherds of early Roman sandy ware pottery was identified from the site.,12,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9133,"Despite the quantity of late Iron Age/Roman pottery recovered, the report does not mention any amphorae, mortaria, and Samian ware from the site.",694,12,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9134,"Despite the quantity of late Iron Age/Roman pottery recovered, the report does not mention any amphorae, mortaria, and Samian ware from the site.",1009,15,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9135,"Pottery evidence suggests activity was relatively widely spread with some late Iron Age sherds, 70% of the Roman pottery was assigned to the later 1st/early 2nd C AD, whilst around 15% came from the period of villa activity (c.2nd-3rd C AD).",1594,29,10,3,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9136,Most of the pottery is of late Iron Age to 2nd century date but there is some 3rd and 4th century material; mainly cremation pots (40 vessels) and residual material in early Saxon features.,2914,87,48,3,431,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9137,"Of the 517 sherds recovered, 414 were from cremation vessels. Two phases of late Iron Age and Roman occupation can be distinguished: a small quantity dating to the late Iron Age-AD70, made up almost entirely of badly-broken up 'Belgic' grog-tempered ware body herds, and c.AD70-200 dated pottery which is mostly broken-up material other than five partially complete c.AD 43-100-dated cremation pots and which spans both phases.",517,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9138,Assemblage also contains a small proportion of post-Roman material. Pre-late Iron Age sherds have been removed from total.,3042,30,4,12,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9139,,76,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9140,"The coarsewares are almost all of Kentish manufacture. Although early and late fabrics are present, the pottery assemblage suggests that activity was most prominent during the 2nd and 3rd centuries.",893,,1,1,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9141,,13,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9142,"The flint-tempered sherds have been identified as prehistoric but cannot be more closely dated, though they have a long tradition of use in East Kent, continuing throughout the Iron Age and well into the 1st century AD. The grog-tempered fabrics have been dated to the late Iron Age/early Romano-British period and form part of the ceramic tradition commonly described as 'Belgic' or of 'Aylesford-Swarling' type. Grog-tempered fabrics were used, alongside flint-tempered, in the 1st century BC to the 1st century AD.",33,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9143,"The sherd count is distorted by 209 fragments from two grog-tempered, double-handled flagons from Canterbury kilns of late 1st century date deposited in the upper fills of one of the ditches, probably dating the end of the use of the site.",343,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9144,"Apart form one sherd of central Gaulish Samian ware, all the LIA/ERB pottery was grog-tempered ware.",30,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9145,"The datable pottery is from the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, though most of the sherds were abraded and redeposited in medieval features, perhaps redeposited through continual manuring activities. Two sherds were recovered from the upper fills of late Iron Age ditches. It is unclear if these sherds were intrusive or if they suggest continuity of use of these features into the Roman period.",24,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9146,"The assemblage was dominated by coarse grog- and shell-tempered fabrics, remaining in use throughout the life of the Roman settlement. The majority of the vessels were probably of local or near-local manufacture. Products of a number of known British sources were represented in the assemblage. Fine reduced and oxidised wares came from London and the Thameside kilns, including Upchurch, and shelly wares from south Essex/north-west Kent. Fine wares were uncommon and few continental imports were recognised, though small quantities of South Gaulish Samian and Terra Rubra were identified, whilst dishes and platters were amongst the forms represented.",491,4,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9147,"All but a few sherds of Roman pottery came from Roman cremation burials. The most complete vessel in the cremation deposit was a Samian Dragendorff 36 bowl of south Gaulish origin, c.AD70-100 which was almost certainly deposited as an accessory vessel. A separate cremation included a further fragment of Samian. Other pottery included vessels of the North  Kent/Thameside industry, also deposited as accessory vessels, c.AD43-120/140, and Romanised grog-tempered wares, similar to Patch Grove ware, first produced soon after the conquest, probably declining by the end of the Trajanic period. A small quantity of Anglo-Saxon pottery was also recovered from the site.",453,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9148,The assemblage was mostly comprised of grog-tempered and sandy wares.,229,3,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9149,"Sand and flint-tempered wares were most common, though a relatively wide range of fabrics were present. M-LIA material is omitted here. 'X' was the most common graffito mark, though literate examples were also present.",20969,282,205,76,365,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9150,"Grog-tempered and sandy wares dominate the assemblage suggesting the increased intensity of early-mid Roman activity. Some features from this period, including the early Roman sunken-feature building included relatively large quantities of pottery.",2462,45,122,2,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9151,The majority of the Roman pottery assemblage consisted of grog-tempered or grey wares.,3032,40,28,25,57,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9152,,520,8,8,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9153,Grog-tempered and grey wares form the majority of the assemblage. M/LIA sherds omitted from count.,5169,89,3,1,26,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9154,,156,2,17,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9155,"'X' was the most common graffito mark, though literate examples were also present.",1879,32,270,1,16,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9156,"Part of a Verulamium region tazza was found in a sunken-feature building. 'X' was the most common graffito mark, though literate examples were also present.",6420,98,118,42,454,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9157,"Consisting 32% of the assemblage by weight, sand-tempered wares form the majority of the late Iron Age/early Roman pottery, a form strongly associated with sites situated along the River Medway. Flint- and grog-tempered wares also constitute a significant proportion of the assemblage however. One of the amphora sherds is possibly from an Italian Dressel 1 form, a type rare on Kentish sites.",1036,10,2,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9158,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9159,"The early phase of late Iron Age occupation, c.100-25BC, saw local flint-tempered wares dominate the assemblage. The period after 25BC saw a considerable increase in the variety of pottery supplied to the site with 'Belgic' grog-tempered wares from the Canterbury area largely supplanting the flint-tempered pottery. There was no evidence for trade with the continent; Gallo-Belgic wares and amphorae were absent.",3795,38,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9160,"1stC AD pottery was almost completely absent, whilst the majority is 2ndC AD in date. Smaller quantities were recovered dating up to the middle of the 4thC AD. Patch Grove and sandy coarsewares dominate the assemblage, whilst fine wares were limited in quantity.",1484,,,2,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9161,"Several large groups of pottery were recovered from both ditch and pit features. Only a summary study of the assemblage had been made however. The assemblage primarily included cooking pots and storage jars, and most of the pottery was shell-tempered and locally-made. Post-Conquest, flagons, beakers and dishes begin to appear more regularly.",5449,,,,30,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9162,No detailed analysis of the pottery was undertaken other than on the Samian ware.,7110,,,,300,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9163,"None of the pottery had been quantified, only fabric descriptions were given.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9164,"Sherd counts are not given as most of the pottery was recovered as grave goods. Three burials contained three vessels, 18 contained two vessels, and 21 contained one vessel. Flagons, dishes, and beakers were all represented. Three Samian vessels were also recovered and each must have been at least 100 years old when they had been deposited in the graves. Possible graffitos were noted on a couple of vessels, including the Chi-Rho pot (see site summary).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9165,"The pottery recorded here comes from all features dating middle Iron Age to the mid-Roman period. Only assessments of important contexts have so far been carried out. The late Iron Age assemblage becomes dominated by grog-tempered wares, a pattern which continued well into the Roman period. Gallo-Belgic butt beakers were present in a number of contexts including one of the warrior burials. The early Roman trapezoidal enclosure to the south of the two warrior burials yielded an assemblage which included eight ritually-deposited fragmentary vessels, including a perforated pot base and fragments from a fine Upchurch greyware bowl. One tazza came from one of the roundhouses.",29515,237,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9166,The cinery urn was a 'Belgic'-style grog-tempered jar.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9167,"There is no quantification of the pottery. Samian, mortaria and coarse wares were present, the latter in a range of forms. All the coarse wares were wheel-turned. None appear to come from kilns most local to the site, though a number may derive from the Upchurch industry. More distant sources are evident however, such as Colchester, Alice Holt, New Forest, and Oxfordshire wares. Six pottery sherds included graffitos; all were literate.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9168,"The Oakleigh Farm site is just one of several BB2/grey sandy ware kiln sites that have been excavated around the lower Thames and its hinterland. The forms produced were primarily jars and bowls. Quantification of the assemblage, although very large, was only given in the report as vessel rim equivalents.",,,,,2,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9169,Six early 2ndC AD Samian vessels were recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9170,Pottery vessels in with the cremation burials including samian dishes and platters.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9171,"All the stratified pottery was late 1st-mid-2ndC AD in date. Grave goods are specified in the burial data, but forms included a Samian platter, flagon, jar, and poppy-head beakers. BB2, Thameside grey, North Kent shell-tempered, and fine Upchurch greywares were also present. Late Roman wares were present in the Roman topsoil.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9172,"The Roman pottery included an unworn BB1 dish, part of a sandy ware bowl, and an unworn sherd of early Roman grog-tempered ware.",3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
9173,"Only finds from the 2000 investigations were properly reported. Six basic fabrics were identified: grog-tempered Patchgrove ware (70%), red thin ware, grey thin ware, orange sandy ware, white colour coated, and Samian. Amphora and mortaria were also present.",456,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9174,"A large and heavily detailed pottery report, but with no basic quantification of sherd counts or weight. Large range of fabric types encountered. Grog-tempered wares dominate the earliest phase, AD60-150. The middle Roman phase, AD150-270 included less pottery than before and after, but included BB1, Oxfordshire, and Pompeiian red ware were present. A high proportion of late East Kent grog-tempered wares dominate the 4thC AD deposits, which also include Alice Holt forms.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
9175,"Grog-tempered wares acount for 33% of the assemblage by weight. Other fabrics include Upchurch, BB1, southern and central Gaulish Samian, Oxfordshire and Nene Valley finewares, and Oxfordshire mortaria. Jars dominate the forms found, with a few dishes and one flagon. The emphasis is on the early Roman period with a few identifiable late Roman wares.",828,8,31,5,32,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
9176,"The condition of the pottery was very poor and much of it was highly abraided. Mid/Late Iron Age fabrics included flint-tempered, grog-tempered, iron-gritted, and sandy wares (including mixtures of these types). The vast majority of the pottery sherds (over 4000) were late Iron Age/early Roman in date and were noted by the presence of Romanised fabrics, such as greywares, oxidised and white wares, were also present and here probably dated to the 1stC BC/AD. Terra nigra, terra rubra and samian were also present in small quantities. Very few post-conquest forms were identified, such as the presence of a whiteware flagon.",4917,52,,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
9177,"Raw form and fabric quantification data were not given. Fabrics were dominated by sand- and grog-tempered wares, probably from Canterbury, but also included LG samian, Thameside Kent ware, north kent grey ware, Oxfordshire colour-coated and white ware, locally-produced BB ware, and Baetican amphorae. Most of the pottery was late 1st-3rdC AD in date.",144,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
9178,"The ceramic assemblage consisted of beaded or everted rims in flint-tempered, grog-tempered and glauconitic sandy fabrics with external surfaces frequently textured by combing, brushing or scoring. Dressel 1A and 2-4 amphora forms were also recovered, as were three sherds of Roman grey and oxidised wares.",608,8,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
10001,"The mix of pottery from the excavations seems to be domestic and of Roman or 'native' types that date up until the late 2nd or early 3rd centuries, although it seems likely that the earliest period of occupation had been during the immediately pre-conquest period. Grog-tempered hand-made wares were common, as were wheel-thrown vessels from the Alice Holt industry. Small quantities of other coarseware and finewares were present, mostly of uncertain origin. Mortaria and imported amphorae were present but rare. The former is a Verulamium fabric, whilst the amphorae specimens are all from southern Spain. Samian ware is the most common fine-ware type on site.",2158,27,4,1,78,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10002,,331,,1,10,80,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10003,,82,,,3,21,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
10004,"Six of the bone counters included graffiti (see site summary), as does the base of two sandy ware vessels, both with crosses marked on them.",1346,24,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10005,"The pottery data recorded here relates only to the 1995 excavations. It is clear that a huge amount of pottery had been excavated from the site, and some of that now residing in museums has been referred to in the report, though none of this is a representative sample and has not been included here. Most of the Roman collection is of grey or grey/brown sand-tempered sherds of Alice Holt/Farnham types, which were, almost certainly, made in those Surrey/Hampshire border pottery production areas. A miniature bowl, presumably for votive offering, was recovered. Its inner surface was characterised by tiny scratches, indicating polishing of this side in antiquity. The concave interior was filled in the centre with a deposit which was found to be made of lead carbonate and litharge, which may have been used to make red lead pigment. No certain ritual pottery was identified, though Tupper did note 'some pieces of pottery decorated with human finger-tips, just as modern cooks do with pie-crust' and he may have been describing tazze.",3247,20,,21,18,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
10006,"More than half of the coarse wares found at Ewell Grove derived from the Alice Holt potteries. Most of the mortaria came from Oxfordshire potteries, whilst some Verulamium wares were also present. No sherd count was given for the Ewell Grove and Grove Cottage excavations, though 673 were recorded from the 46-50 High Street excavations.",673,,53,38,32,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10007,Sherd counts and weight of pottery was not given for the assemblage.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10008,"The site produced 8592kg of Iron Age to early Saxon pottery. The pottery was generally spread across many of the features on the site, and few contexts contained large sub-assemblages. Most of the pottery on site was (mid-)late Iron Age, and there is evidence from briquettes (see finds) that some pottery manufacture was carried out on site. Of the Roman wares, which were limited in quantity, Alice Holt, Verulamium, Oxfordshire, and Highgate Wood wares were noted from the assemblage.",432,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10009,Remains form six late Roman (4thC AD) vessels were recovered from the gravel pit within the vicinity of the weir including a complete Alice Holt flagon.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10010,"The majority of the assemblage comes from the Alice Holt potteries, primarily the sandy wares, with no obvious imports. The assemblage quantified here only relates to the settlement, not the cemetery. Samian ware vessels were recovered from cremation deposits.",443,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10011,"Most pottery was made locally, with 85-90% (count and weight) represented by Alice Holt coarsewares, and amongst the 7% of finer wares the most common was Samian which represented c.4% of the entire collection.",3679,128,5,22,127,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10012,"The pottery included regional and Continental imports  and suggested activity dating between the middle of the 2nd century and the end of the 3rd century AD. The group was dominated by sherds of Alice Holt or black surfaced reduced wares, although the presence of some earlier types could indicate late 1st or early 2nd century activity. Continental imports comprise single sherds of Central Gaulish colour-coated ware, céramique à l'éponge, and Dressel 20 amphorae, and Samian. The Samian ware accounted for 3.1% of the assemblage by sherd number and consisted mainly of Central Gaulish fabrics, with a single sherd of East Gaulish ware.",354,6,4,2,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10013,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10014,"Sherd counts were unfortunately not given, though mortaria and Samian wares seem to have been relatively common. No amphora sherds were mentioned.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
10015,"Spanish Dressel 20 and Italian Dressel 2–4 amphorae were imported during the earliest phase of occupation holding both olive oil and wine. Most of the Samian was in good condition, with little trace of wear on the footrings suggesting it had either been subject to sparing usage or used for comparatively short periods before being broken. Three vessels had been drilled for lead rivet repairs indicating some curation, but most appear to have been discarded once broken implying a relatively steady supply of replacements. Many of the finewares were supplied by local/regional industries. Mica-dusted wares perhaps derived from Pontibus itself, the Colne valley, London and/or the Verulamium region. Flagons were always the most common form of ceramic vessel, but others included jars, bowls, dishes and beakers, as well as more unusual types such as tazze and a small unguent jar. One amphorae vessel had had the numerals 'VII' scratched, after firing, into its exterior surface just beneath the rim, and the undersides of two central Gaulish platter bases had scratched geometric graffiti.",16222,286,781,170,537,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10016,See site summary,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
10017,"Although imported 1st-2ndC AD pottery was recovered from the Barclays Bank site, pottery from the Elmsleigh House site was predominantly late 3rd/4thC AD. Alice Holt wares account for c.70% of the assemblage, c.25% Oxfordshire with 5% pertaining to local and other types. No mention of imported wares were made for the latter site, and as no details are currently available for the former site's assemblage nothing has been assumed about its constitution.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
10018,"Alice Holt and Oxfordshire wares were present, as well as a single sherd of Verulamium ware.",140,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10019,Three small lumps of handmade prehistoric pottery were recovered amongst a tile dump.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10020,"The pottery came from field walking as well as excavation. The great majority of the pottery was 3rd and 4th century sandy grey ware with a preponderance of everted and hooked jar rims and flanged bowls, characteristic of the late Romano-British period.",121,,,6,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
10021,The dating of the small group of pottery  is primarily based on the wheel-turned necked jar fragments of a hand-made globular vessel as these provide upper and lower date-limits for the assemblage.,71,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10022,"The Alice Holt  potteries was the main supplier of ceramics to the site. Only three fineware vessels were recovered, including possible mica-dusted ware and a Brockley Hill bowl. No Samian was present. The specialist notes that an unusually high proportion of hand-made storage jars were present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10023,"Samian wares seem to have been reasonably common, though were not quantified from the Wheatsheaf excavation, and some early imports from the Alice Holt industry were present also.",845,8,1,2,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10024,"The middle Iron Age pottery was largely indistinguishable from the late Iron Age pottery and so these are not recorded here. The relatively minor quantities of Romano-British pottery indicates the peripheral nature of the post-Iron Age activity at the site, likely to be the enclosures seen at Hengrove Farm (see site summary). Gallo-Belgic whitewares were present in the Roman assemblage as well as fragments of fine 'Belgic' grog-tempered ware. The grey kitchen wares seem to be from the Alice Holt industry (south) and the Fulmer and Hedgerley kilns (north).",50,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10025,"Samian ware was recovered from Binscombe II, where the coarse pottery was mainly local products of the second and third centuries, extending possibly to the fourth. The Samian ware from Binscombe III all dates to the 2ndC AD or later. A possible tazza pot was noted from Binscombe III.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
10026,,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10027,"The 1999 excavation produced pottery primarily from the late Iron Age to 3rdC AD; no obviously 4thC AD material was present, though trial trenching had picked this up elsewhere. The assemblage from the 1985-86 excavations was not fully quantified and only that from the 1999 excavations is recorded here. An extensive range of pottery fabrics were present, though Alice Holt wares were particularly prominent in the assemblage overall. Sherds from at least three tazza were recovered, one of which was a Verulamium product recovered from a phase 6 deposit in the circular temple.",13463,83,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
10028,"More than 3000 rim sherds of Romano-British pottery were recovered from the site. The total number is not provided. Samian and mortaria are given by sherd count, though amphorae are only quantified by weight. Graffitos were observed on four south Spanish Dressel 20 amphora sherds. Alice Holt, Verulamium, and mica-dusted wares are all relatively common in the assemblage.",3000,,145,,166,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10029,The Samian report indicates that a relatively large proportion of 1st/2ndC AD South Gallic material is present.,40904,608,1973,425,1028,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10030,"A large quantity of pottery was recovered from the ditch (the 'aqueduct') with 2ndC AD material placed in the lower layers, whilst 3rd-4thC AD coarsewares frequented the upper layers. The amount of pottery at the site was noted to have been considerable; however, no quantified analysis was carried out. Samian ware was present.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10031,"The most common Overwey product was a light grey ware cooking jar with a horizontally striated outer surface. This form was a typical 4thC AD and was found in greatest numbers in kiln I. It was also found in quantity within kiln II, though the final load contained mainly fine wares. Kiln III, however, was a small structure and may have been used almost exclusively used for the manufacture of finer pottery. Other forms consisted mainly of fine ware jars and bowls in fine ware, though large storage jars were conspicuously absent. Many of the most carefully made vessels, particularly from kiln II, were fumed giving the surface of the pot a black colour, and the slip coating a very shiny black finish. A single sherd of Samian ware was recovered from the site, though was not necessarily associated with the kilns themselves.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10032,"The earliest pottery included Arretine and terra rubra alongside patch grove ware; thereafter Samian and coarse wares of typical Hadrianic and Hadrian-Antonine forms were more common. Alice Holt wares were also common, though the limited area of excavation meant that the total quantity of pottery recovered was generally minimal.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
10033,"Alice Holt wares seem to have been most common, though no quantified analysis of the pottery had been carried out.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
10034,Pottery was limited to a few sherds of coarse wares.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10035,"The three vessels form a group of late Belgic wares, and probably date from the period AD25-50/70 and represent activity prior to the construction of the temple, though the nature of this activity is unknown. Although the pottery assemblage was analysed in full, very little information is provided.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10036,A tazza pot was recovered from the site. No quantified analysis of the pottery was carried out.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10037,"A large quantity of pottery was recovered from the site, though quantified analysis was not available. Coarseware from the Upchurch industry was recovered, whilst Castor ware pottery was also present, one with part of a hunting scene with stags.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
10038,"The late 1stC AD assemblage is dominated by Alice Holt industry products, though small quantities of North Kent shell-tempered wares were also present from large storage vessels, flagons in white-slipped Hoo fabric and beakers in grey Upchurch fineware.",792,9,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10039,The Roman assemblage primarily dated to the 2ndC AD. It lacked quantities of finewares though fragments from central Gaulish Samian and a Pompeian redware platter were present. More than half the pottery comes from the Thameside kilns of north west Kent with a nominal amount coming from the Alice Holt kilns. Sherd counts were only given for one feature.,,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10040,"Whilst detailed descriptions of the late Iron Age and Roman pottery fabrics are given, no quantified analysis of the assemblages is reported. Archived reports from LAARC have been consulted, but no sherd counts were given. The late Iron Age assemblage is dominated by shell- and grog-tempered wares. The Roman assemblage is comprised of Alice Holt, Verulamium white wares, fine micaceous ware, Highgate Wood ware and black-burnished wares. Grog-tempered, shell-gritted and Portchester D wares were amongst the late Roman assemblage, whilst a few continental fine wares were also present (not including Samian). A relatively high proportion of later east Gaulish Samian is also present.",,165,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10041,"A very small quantity of Roman pottery, other than the cinery urns (see burial data), was recovered from the site. This included coarse greywares, grog-tempered and sandy fabrics, as well as Oxfordshire fine colour-coated wares.",33,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10042,"A large proportion of the assemblage comes from three late Roman waterholes, which included an abundance of Overwey-type coarse wares. Tablewares and mortaria from the Oxfordshire industries were also present.",9222,103,73,82,48,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10043,"99% of the Roman pottery derive from the earliest phase of occupation (Neronian-early Flavian), primarily form pits and a midden associated with the early roundhouses. A high proportion of late 1stC AD South Gaulish Samian was present, similar to the Elmsleigh Centre site. The late 1st/early 2ndC AD pottery is mostly of a domestic character, whilst the late 2nd/early 3rdC material primarily came from the ritual shaft and marked the period of decline in occupation at the site. Some vessels were believed to have been ritually deposited including a complete Samian bowl, a 'decapitated' greyware narrow-neck jar, a Rhineland hunt cup, and a 'debased' Oxfordshire mortarium.",7721,149,297,4,197,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10044,No data from the Roman assemblage was given since it was thought unlikely that it would yield any positive benefit. The assemblage was found to have been very mixed.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10045,"A mortarium sherd was found to have the stamp of SECVNDVS, a potter known to have been working in the Verulamium region. Alice Holt wares constitute 62% of the pottery by count.",385,11,5,,26,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10046,The early assemblage is dominated by Alice Holt wares.,22924,361,748,189,699,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10047,"In general terms the pottery assemblage is similar to that found in other areas of the town and points predominantly towards domestic use. Fabrics counts are only given by broad percentages, making recalculation unreliable.",14584,249,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10048,"A total of 5069 sherds weighing 38.32kg were attributable to the late Iron Age/early Roman phase. About 70% of this pottery is made up of Aylesford-Swarling style grog-tempered wares, analogous to Patch Grove ware in Kent. A total of 735 sherds weighing 5.42kg are attributable to the 3rdC AD phase. Local grey wares and Alice Holt pottery were the two major fabric types represented, making up around 30% and 20% of these groups respectively. Other fabric types were also represented, including BB1 and BB2, Oxfordshire red-slipped wares, Nene Valley colour-coated wares, and a continuing presence of moderate quantities of central and east Gaulish Samian.",5804,44,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
10049,"The Roman pottery is of later 3rd and 4th century types. The largest group is of Alice Holt/Farnham wares representing c.69% (count) of the site assemblage. Overwey-type fabrics are also relatively well represented, whilst Oxfordshire wares were recovered in lower quantities. The rarity of Black Burnished wares and the absence of Samian, amphorae and fine grey wares is in sharp contrast with other Staines sites.",878,11,,20,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
10050,"Roman pottery was recovered from a large, deep pit or waterhole, all but two are in a grey/brown sandy coarseware from vessels likely from the Alice Holt production centre. These include a jar of late 2nd or 3rd century type. Fineware fabric is also present in the form of a mortarium-like bowl. It too, was later 2nd/3rd century.",22,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
10051,"Most Roman sherds from the site are from late 3rd and 4th century vessels, but some, including those from the human burials, are of mid to late 2nd century date. Roman vessel form types are, in large part, the same as those published from the relevant production sites, most notably those of the Alice Holt industry. Finewares represent c.10% of all pottery from the site, of which about a half are Samian (all central Gaulish) and its red-slipped successor from the Oxfordshire region.",1351,,3,26,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10052,Most of the pottery was 2nd-3rdC AD coarseware. Hunt cups of Castorware were also present.,,,,,36,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10053,"All the Roman pottery was late in date, with most sherds of 4th century-type Alice Holt coarseware fabrics or related types. Oxfordshire and Nene Valley finewares were also present in small numbers. Some of the pottery may have been late 3rd C, but these appear to have been reworked into later deposits.",106,1,,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
10054,No data - though Alice Holt wares were recovered from both early and late Roman features.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10055,,139,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10056,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10057,"The provisional examination of this material has concluded that the assemblage is of importance due to the relatively large number of closely dated groups covering the transition from the Late Iron Age to the Early Roman period. The pottery includes not only Iron Age forms and fabrics, but also Roman forms in Iron Age fabrics before moving into Roman forms in Roman fabrics.",1700,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10058,Amongst the pottery was a class 1A narrow-mouthed jar (c.AD70-150) which had been mended using birch resin. The pottery had still to undergo full analysis.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10059,"The late Iron Age/early Roman collection includes a large collection of grog-tempered wares of many more types than found at Staines and Highgate. The  greywares of the Roman period are, almost exclusively, of the Alice Holt industry. Verulamium region and BB1 wares form significant minorities in their relevant sub-period, whilst most of the British fineware is from Oxford, London, and the Nene valley. Most imported fineware is of Samian, found in a similar proportion to that at Staines. Detailed analysis on all the pottery had yet to be undertaken.",7617,100,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10060,Includes a small amount of pottery from other periods. Alice Holt and Nene Valley wares were identified.,2266,15,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10061,The cremation jar likely derives from the later phase of Alice Holt production.,4,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10062,,2484,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10063,"The bulk of the Roman assemblage consists of coarsewares, although a significant proportion of finewares, including imports, is also present. The date range of the material from Tilly's Lane West is almost exclusively within the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, with only six contexts producing material which is possibly or probably of later date. Tilly's Lane East has a similar emphasis on the early Roman period, but with a greater proportion of later material (potentially from 34 contexts).",2935,,192,,115,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
10064,"The greater majority probably represents a continuum of usage that began in the pre-Conquest period, but perhaps preceding it by only a few decades, and continued until the last few years of the 1st century AD or the first quarter of the 2nd. Flint-tempered wares dominated. Five possible wasters was present, and as well as a large quantity of calcined flint (see other finds) these may be evidence for pottery production. Also present were four south Gaulish samian sherds and one unprovenanced amphora.",1396,25,1,,4,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
10065,Miranda Green (1976) notes the presence of a miniature vessel from the cemetery.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
10066,"1st and 2ndC AD fabrics include Patchgrove, grog-tempered and sandy greywares from the Alice Holt industries. Later wares include BB1 and Oxfordshire vessels. Dressel 20 amphora also present.",1915,21,40,15,65,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
10067,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
10068,"The five cinerary urns and the samian bowl all date from the mid-1st to the early 3rdC AD. Four urns were of coarse blue grey fabric and one in light buff. He latter was a pear-shaped flagon which had been repaired using a lead fixing. Since the early publication, Bird (2013) notes that further vessels have come to light in Guildford museum that may have come from the site, but the exact provenance is unknown. Some were certainly form other cremations, but other may equally have been grave goods or disturbed remains.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11001,"Pottery evidence suggests that the Littlehampton kiln may have been an extension of an Arun Valley production centre. A large proportion of the assemblage came from in situ fired ceramic, though both regional and continental imports, including some finewares, were present.",3189,34,,,29,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11002,"Because of the unstratified nature of much of the pottery, the specialist did not quantify it, though it is stated that a very large assemblage was present considering the relatively small area excavated.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11003,"The Romano-British assemblage includes local, regional and imported wares though focus appears to be on the early Roman period (1st-2nd C). 1597 sherds were also analysed from the work by Luke and Wells though the quantification is not recorded here since raw counts for individual pottery types are not given. The pottery assemblage relates solely to the Wessex evaluation. Graffitos were noticed on pottery from Winbolt's excavations. Marks included a 'TS', a 'X', and one was suggested to represent a Christian monogram, though this was doubtful. Pottery form Winbolt's excavations only describe vessels deemed 'worth recording', but these derive from the central part of the site.",1073,32,7,10,65,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11004,"The Roman pottery assemblage from Area 5 was dominated by Rowlands Castle wares, though New Forest and grog-tempered wares were also present, as were some fine wares, plus imported Samian and amphora. The assemblage is clearly 1st/2ndC AD in date. The distribution and abundance of the pottery suggests that activity in the area was at a low level of intensity.",286,4,5,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11005,"The Samian wares date from the early 2ndC AD to the mid-3rd; there is an emphasis on the late 2ndC AD. Regional coarse and fine wares were also present. Rowlands Castle wares dominated overall. The majority of the pottery assemblage derived from the phase 2 ditch, whilst a smaller quantity came from the phase 1 enclosure.",2580,40,6,3,60,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11006,"The Iron Age cemetery produced a maximum of 251 vessels from 150 graves and other related features, many complete or largely complete, whilst 114 complete or partial vessels derived from the Romano-British cemetery. Sixteen of the latter were Samian ware vessels, whilst other forms included poppyhead beakers, greyware jars, a flagon, a butt beaker, carinated bowls, and one British imitation Samian platter, stamped by the so-called 'Pulborough potter'.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11007,"The pottery assemblage was unfortunately not quantified, though elements of it are (see fine wares in the report). It is clear that a large range of fabrics and forms were present at the site, including Samian wares, imported and regional finewares, including wares from the New Forest and Oxfordshire industries.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
11008,"The pottery assemblage was unfortunately not quantified, though elements of it are (see fine wares in the report). It is clear that a large range of fabrics and forms were present at the site, including Samian wares, imported and regional finewares, including wares from the New Forest and Oxfordshire industries.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
11009,"No quantification is given, though the early Samian is thought to have been Flavian, whilst New Forest wares present indicate activity though the 4thC AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11010,"The pottery was not quantified, though only a small quantity was recovered. A small number of fine wares were recovered. A wide chronology is attested by the material.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11011,"Despite their closeness in plan and in date range the burials show marked variation in the types of pottery, in both and fabrics, represented. Some burials include Samian vessels and flagons, whilst others include beakers. However, the cremation is always contained within a locally-produced greyware jar; a pattern widely seen in other local Romano-British cremation groups, including Westhampnett and St Pancras.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11012,"The successive seasons of excavation between 1988 and 1991 produced a total of 4935 sherds (24552 g) of Roman pottery ranging in date between the late-1st and 4thC AD, but with a predominance of 2nd and early 3rdC AD material. The 1977 excavation produced 7658 sherds of Roman pottery. A very small pit was just large enough to accommodate a miniature, intact, undecorated votive vessel. This vessel was deliberately buried very close to the south-east corner of the polygonal shrine. A miniature jar in sandy creamy pink ware was recovered in 1977.",12593,25,,,84,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
11013,"The bulk of the pottery from the site derived from the ditch. Of significance is the presence of Overwey/Portchester D ware; the kilns in East Sussex which produced Overwey-type products were all late 4thC AD, continuing into the early 5th. The Burgess Hill ditch has the highest percentage from a Sussex site east of the Adur. Pottery from the corn-dryer also dated this feature post-AD350.",925,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11014,Graffiti was found on a small sherd of Poppy-head ware.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11015,The poor state of the material archive did not allow for examination of the pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11016,The poor state of the material archive did not allow for examination of the pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11017,"Two  'significant' pottery groups survived from the site, though these were only quantified by EVE in the report. These primarily dated to the 3rd and 4th centuries. The dominant coarse fabric is BB1 East Dorset wares, which is said to have been marketed through Chichester on a large scale during the 3rdC AD. Around 55% of the total assemblage is made up of fine or specialist wares including New Forest colour-coated, Colchester colour-coated and Samian wares.",,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
11018,"Around 500 sherds of pottery were recovered from the late Iron Age site at Goff's Park, whilst around 14 boxes of Roman pottery were also stored after excavation. Most of the material had not been stored by context, and such information was subsequently lost. Also it is noted that much of the Roman pottery excavated from the site had not been deposited with that given to Crawley Museum. This is now lost. With this in mind the pottery was not fully quantified when analysed by David Rudling, who instead carried out a qualitative examination on the forms and fabrics present. Overall the assemblage primarily dates from the 1st-late 3rdC AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11019,,44,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11020,"451 sherds of prehistoric pottery is not included here, apart from the amphorae sherds which were late Iron Age (Dressel 1B and Dressel 2-4). However, the Roman pottery count does include material from field survey which was not separated from the excavated material in the report. All the excavated Samian ware was 1stC AD in date. New Forest and Alice Holt wares were present, though the vast majority of the Roman pottery was from Rowlands Castle kilns.",1331,,5,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11021,"Only a qualitative analysis of the full pottery assemblage was carried out, other than the total weight given.",,25,,,95,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11022,Most of the sherds recovered in the 1965 and 1981 excavations are small and are likely to have been material missed in earlier excavations.,458,,,3,27,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
11023,,375,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11024,"1043 sherds of Roman pottery was recovered from the terminal of the Devil's Ditch. As well as Samian (59 sherds), the ditch infill also includes 159 sherds of late Iron Age/early Roman fines wares including Terra Rubra, Terra Nigra and imitations of this imported pottery. Further quantities of this material also derived from features of the Romano-British settlement.",26110,,101,31,378,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11025,"The assemblage is overwhelmingly dominated by jars (72.5%). Both Rowlands Castle and Alice Holt wares were present. A scatter of Iron Age pottery perhaps hints at pre-Conquest origins. The Samian all dates c.AD75-150, though none of the coarse ware dates after AD350, and the majority is pre-4thC AD.",580,78,,2,57,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11026,"The vast majority of Roman groups from the site represent 1st century activity, although the absence of many fine-wares or imports makes it difficult to define whether this represents pre-Flavian or Flavian activity. The assemblage is very homogenous in character with around 90% of the total made up by local grey or oxidised sandy wares.",2096,22,3,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11027,"The assemblage was dominated by reduced sandy wares, mostly from local sources. A small quantity of Rowlands Castle ware were present, one over-fired waster and a fragment of Pulborough Samian were also identified.",428,3,,,7,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11028,"All the pottery derived from the Ainsworth Archive, field-walking and evaluation trenches. The quantity of 2ndC BC Italian amphorae is significant, indicating long-distance trade links with the continent. Alongside amphorae, high-status, Iron Age, imported finewares were also present in relatively high numbers.",237,9,55,,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11029,"Pottery assemblages from the main phases of occupation show substantial differences in the industries which supplied the site. The 2ndC assemblage was dominated by coarse Wiggonholt/Hardham wares, the 3rdC AD by Rowlands Castle wares, and the 4thC AD by Alice Holt wares. The assemblage is quantified by EVE only.",,,,,204,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11030,"A number of East Sussex grog-tempered ware specimens were recovered similar to those found on early salt-working sites on the Romney Marsh. The Ropetackle examples may have come from there, or could have been made locally as part of a salt-working industry of which the site was associated. A few sherds of amphorae, Samian, and Gallo-Belgic fine wares perhaps suggest that salt was being traded through the site.",430,4,2,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11031,"The assemblage is dominated by Wickham Barn grog-tempered wares, with jars dominating the type of ceramics found.",2438,15,2,3,42,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11032,A total of 153 complete or partially complete Roman vessels are known from the cemetery.,153,,,3,33,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
11033,"The vast majority of the pottery comes from local coarse wares, and the general absence of finewares from New Forest and Oxfordshire industries makes dating difficult. Hardham industry wares are most common, though Rowland's Castle wares are fairly well represented as well.",313,3,1,,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11034,"Much of the pottery was excessively abraded and none could be reconstructed. The specialist suggests that much of it could have been dumped through manuring; this might explain why clearly 2ndC AD pottery was found to have been mixed with late 3rdC AD material. Locally-made grog-tempered fabrics were common in most features, though were difficult to date. Rowlands Castle wares were very rare, indicating little economic relationship between the site and the Chichester area. It seems that continuity in activity took place from at least AD100 to the end of the 4thC AD. Pottery quantification in the report varied between sherd count and weight from different contexts, probably due to the poor quality of the material.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11035,"The pottery is primarily the saucepan pottery common of middle/late Iron Age sites in the region. Despite a detailed analysis of the assemblage, no quantification is given.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11036,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11037,"Only fabric analyses were presented in the report; no quantification was carried, although a large quantity of pottery was excavated. Imported wares were prominent in the early phase. Much of the Samian ware was Neronian/Flavian in date. Some Samian by the Pulborough potter was identified. Large pieces of flagon wasters were recovered from the wall of the larger kiln. The site seems to have produced carinated bowls, platters, dishes, and lids. Site activity is thought to have been less intensive in the 3rd and 4thC AD. No less than eight literate graffitos were found on various pot fragments.",,,,,,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11038,A small quantity of pottery from the site had been illustrated. This gives little information other than broad dating of the tileworks.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11039,At least 19 late Iron Age and Roman pots were found to have been deposited as complete vessels.,90,,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11040,No overall quantification has been given for the huge pottery assemblage from the 1960s excavations at the site of the Flavian Palace. It is therefore unwise to include just quantities from later excavations here. Substantial quantities of imported wares were present. Pre-Conquest wares are notable as are large quantities of decorated Samian.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11041,"Some specific details on the pottery are given, but little material seems to have been present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11042,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11043,"2478 of the pottery sherds dated from the late Iron Age phase, largely from the southern enclosure, whilst 1096 sherds of early Roman pottery were also present, primarily from the northern enclosure. Both local and imported finewares were present.",3574,,20,,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11044,Castor ware and New Forest wares were present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11045,"Other than the two sherds of Samian, the pottery appears to have been almost entirely 4thC AD.",35,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11046,"There are two sherds of very early mortaria - an import from Noyon in Gaul (c.AD50-80) and an early Wiggonholt example (c.AD50-120), though the majority come from the New Forest and Oxfordshire kilns during the latter part of the 3rdC AD. The majority of the coarsewares appear to be everted rim jars from Rowlands Castle, dating anywhere between c.AD60 and AD300. The early finewares also indicate a presence at the site from c.AD50 onwards.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11047,The pottery assemblage had yet to be analysed.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11048,"1st/2nd C AD material dominates, particularly Arun valley ware. Rowlands Castle ware is notably absent, whilst East Sussex wares are present. South Gaulish Samian is present.",434,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11049,"Local wares dominate, with finewares being poorly represented.",2868,35,,,54,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11050,,314,3,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11051,Pompeiian red ware and south Gaulish Samian sherds point to 1stC AD occupation. Whilst 2nd/3rdC AD Rowlands Castle ware was present and 3rd/4thC AD Alice Holt wares. An 'AP' graffito was noted on a Samian sherd.,134,,,,8,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11052,"Rowlands Castle wares dominate whilst a proportion of Arun Valley products are also present. Some late Roman finewares (Oxford, Nene Valley, etc.) are present but rare.",634,,10,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11053,"A large dump of material was encountered in the top of one of the ditches which included partial vessel and wasters of Hardham ware, mixed with a few local fine wares and imported Samian.",2412,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11054,"Dressel 1A Spanish amphorae sherds were present in the late Iron Age sample. The pottery assemblage was primarily made up of Arun Valley wares, with a smaller sample of Rowland Castle vessels. Fabric quantification is only given by EVE, though the single sherd of Samian is noted in the text.",3386,45,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11055,"Fabrics and forms were only quantified by EVE. The early Roman assemblage is dominated by Littlehampton wares, supplemented by imported Samian and Rowlands Castle vessels. Arun Valley products appear to have supplanted the Littlehampton supply after its kilns went out of use in the mid-late 2ndC AD, whilst Rowlands Castle wares became more dominant into this period and Alice Holt wares also began to make an appearance. Rowlands Castle and Alice Holt wares continue their dominance into the 4thC AD, with a few other imports of Oxfordshire and Moselkeramik for example.",5545,79,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
11056,"The pottery from Nalgo Lodge (24 sherds) included Rowlands Castle ware and local sand-tempered wares. Most are heavily abraded. The only unabraded sherd was from a BB1 flanged bowl. 127 sherds came from Greenfields and was mostly dated to the early 2ndC AD, including a Pulborough samian fragment.",151,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11057,No data - wrong report supplied,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11058,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11059,"The Iron Age pottery all falls into the group of saucepan pots and associated forms dating to the 3rd and 2nd centuries BC. The Roman pottery is mainly local coarse greyware, the forms ranging in date from the 1st to 2nd centuries AD; a few sherds of early fine ware and Samian are of similar date. IA pottery not included in counts given here.",494,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11060,,261,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11061,Both Roman fine and coarse wares were present including a flagon.,138,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11062,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11063,"Recognisable vessels include the greater part of a necked bowl in a black sandy micaceous ware with a red core. A hole had been drilled into the shoulder below the rim after firing; a storage jar in a handmade flint-tempered ware and two grey sandy wheel made jars. One bodysherd, probably from a bowl, was decorated with a grey line lattice.",138,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11064,"Every attempt was made here to not count pottery dating to the middle Iron Age or earlier. Five late Iron Age Aylesford type pottery were recovered from the warrior's grave. A few other fragments were found elsewhere, but these vessels are very rare from sites in West Sussex. LIA Southern Atrebatic wares were relatively common. Gallo-Belgic imports and amphorae were rare, but indicated some contact with the Roman world during the reign of Augustus. After AD50/55 the Southern Atrebatic wares either disappeared or developed into Romanized Arun Valley industry greywares, which were supplied in quantity to the site alongside a few Hardham 'London ware' fineware forms and cream Wiggonholt flagons from the same source. However, around c. AD70 Arun Valley greywares were largely dismissed in favour Rowlands Castle greyware which accounted for nearly 90% of all of the pottery in use on the site. Rowlands Castle wares continued throughout the 2nd and into the mid-3rd century. Most of the Late Roman pottery came from within and around the building complex in Area B, which indicated another change in the pattern of pottery supply with the appearance of substantial numbers of Alice Holt/Farnham greyware vessels and a corresponding decline in the supply of Rowlands Castle greywares. Dorset BB1 wares were also imported from the 3rdC AD, most likely through Chichester. The few finewares supplied to North Bersted after the mid-3rd century include fragments from a New Forest Purple Colour-coat beaker, a parchment ware bowl from the same source, a Lower Nene Valley Colour-coat beaker and an Oxfordshire Red Colour-coat bowl.",5490,,63,12,73,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11065,"Only preliminary analysis has been carried out so far. The pottery mostly dates to the later 3rd and 4thC AD, but there is a significant quantity of residual 1st and 2ndC AD material. The assemblage is dominated by Rowlands Castle type wares, including an unusual group of large jars with characteristic deliberate finger-marks on the inside and a perforated base suggesting some special function for these vessels. The assemblage also includes a high number of mortaria in Samian or imitation Samian fabrics, including two vessels in Central Gaulish Samian, four in Oxfordshire red-slipped ware and one New forest coarse red colour-coated ware. The 'table wares' also include between 4% and 8% beakers such as colour-coated wares from the Nene Valley and New Forest, this is more than villa sites usually produce.",2342,30,1,,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
11066,Grog-tempered wares made up the assemblage.,5,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11067,"The majority of the pottery is made up by fabrics typical of the period c.100BC-AD60. Very similar fabrics were recovered from the nearby site at Titnore Lane, Goring.",32,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11068,Roman pottery considerably outnumbered LBA sherds. Few details were given of the non-funerary material however.,124,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11069,"There were a few grog-tempered sherds which may pre-date the conquest, but there is little evidence for continuity from the Middle Iron Age phase. Transitional pottery included a burnished necked-cordoned jar, a Terra Nigra platter, and 1stC AD La Graufesenque Samian vessels. High levels of fine and imported wares, together with a rapid adoption of Romanised coarse wares may be indicative of high-status activity. Rowlands Castle wares are present, whilst later Roman activity is demonstrated by the presence of a wheel-thrown black-burnished style bead-and-flange bowl and by the presence of Alice Holt and late Roman grog-tempered ware, all of which point to a late 3rdC AD date.",109,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11070,"A small number of medieval sherds are included in the count, since these were not separated in the report. Most of the assemblage dates c.AD60-150, some pre-Conquest and early 3rdC AD wares were present. Arun Valley wares predominated. BB1 and Alice Holt wares were present. Most of the amphora comes from one context.",2281,18,91,,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11071,"Over 90% of the assemblage was made up of local sandy Arun Valley fabrics, the vast majority of which were coarse wares associated with necked jars, flat rim bowls and lids. Some finewares of similar origin were also recorded. A few sherds of Verulamium region white ware and single examples of BB1, BB2 and Rowlands Castle grey ware were also present. Large sherds from a decorated Lezoux Samian bowl and a cup or dish represented the only imported wares.",405,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11072,"A large quantity of pottery amongst the material, most 'mid-Roman', though nothing quantified. One of the cattle skulls was placed next to a complete small Romano-British red jar in a pit within the shrine.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11073,"Pottery recovered from the site was not reported on in terms of date, fabric or form, though some late 2nd-3rdC AD sherds were found in association with the corndrier.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11074,"Black burnished ware was present, though most of the finds were lost after the death of the excavator.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11075,"A counter-sunk-handled Iron Age urn, Samian ware and coarse pottery was recovered. Of particular interest are the finding of some Samian moulds as well as 'Samian' wasters.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11076,Amphora and Samian fragments are noted amongst the pottery assemblage from the main domestic area of the site.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11077,No information is given on the late Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11078,Small quantities of RB pottery have been recovered from the site during field-survey.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11079,Samian and amphora were recovered from graves. Samian ware from the site in general dates c.AD75-150/160. Samian imitations also found. Upchurch wares recovered. A waster dump in the north-east corner of the site suggests that pottery production was taking place at the site.,,,,,37,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11080,Samian noted in early report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11081,"Pottery, including Samian, was recovered from different layers within the slag heap and dating from the late 1stC AD to the end of the 3rdC AD.",30,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
11082,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
11083,"Although much of the assemblage is of early Romano-British date, there is also a substantial Iron Age component. The count here includes the Iron Age sample but not earlier prehistoric specimens. Vessels found in the flint-tempered category include a large number of saucepan-style vessels alongside jars of various sizes with everted, beaded or thickened rims. There was a particularly high incidence of decorated wares from pit 573 which produced a total 622 sherds perhaps suggesting the presence of 'special' deposits on the site. Roman pottery accounts for the bulk of the assemblage, some 12,236 sherds, most or all of which appear to date to the early Roman period, including a small but important collection of continental imports, both fine table wares and amphorae alongside more local wares. The fine wares comprise some 39 sherds of samian from both South and Central Gaul, five sherds of Gallo-Belgic terra nigra, 36 sherds of terra rubra largely from a single beaker, 21 sherds of early Central Gaulish colour-coated ware and 60 sherds of North Gaulish white ware mainly from butt beakers. Of the amphorae, 9 pieces of Campanian black sand wine amphorae were potentially from the pre-conquest period, 5 sherds of Baetican olive-oil amphorae from Southern Spain, several possible sherds of Gallic wine amphora and one sherd probably from Cadiz. The only identifiable regional imports are five sherds from the Dorset black burnished industry. The remainder of the assemblage appears to comprise local wares which are dominated by grey sandy wares and black sandy wares in both handmade and wheel made forms. A number of grey wares are probably products of the Rowland's Castle kilns near Chichester. The vessel repertoire is dominated by jars with a variety of rim forms including necked everted, beaded, sharp everted and rolled thickened. The group includes a number of large storage jars.",15591,167,18,,39,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
11084,"Pottery was comparatively rare but consisted of M-LIA flint-tempered-saucepan pots, and a harder sand-tempered ware common to Fishbourne and Chichester and dating to the 1st/2ndC AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12001,"One amphora handle was graffito inscribed. British finewares were dominated by the Oxfordshire industries, though Nene Valley and Verulamium wares were represented. Coarsewares were dominated by Alice Holt wares and local grog-tempered and shell-tempered wares. A similar range of pottery was identified to that recovered from the Heathrow Airport excavations.",5566,56,3,20,57,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
12002,"The pottery ranges from the period of the Conquest through to the 3rd-4thC AD. The earlier material includes flint-tempered Silchester ware, grog-tempered pottery and some BB1. Late Roman wares included grog-tempered and sandy coarsewares, and Oxfordshire colour-coated and parchment vessels. The latter included fragments of mortaria. A large l.2nd-m.3rdC AD Samian mortaria sherd was also recovered.",144,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12003,"Sandy grey and grog-tempered wares predominate, whilst Oxfordshire vessels are also present. Possible Portchester D ware was also identified.",175,1,,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12004,"Over 10% of the assemblage consisted of finewares, comparatively high for a rural settlement. Of the coarsewares, BB1, Oxfordshire, and Alice Holt vessels were commonest. Material reflects activity on site from the m.2nd-l.4thC AD, but sherds of late Iron Age pottery in ditch deposits suggest that activity began pre-Conquest.",1232,20,,10,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12005,Local grog-tempered wares dominated the assemblage.,151,1,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12006,The assemblage is primarily composed of local greywares. The pottery weighed 403gms.,59,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12007,"Oxfordshire wares replace Alice Holt, which predominated in the early Roman phase, by the 3rdC AD. A few wasters appeared in mid-2ndC AD features.",8330,122,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12008,"Most of the pottery recovered can be paralleled with material from Silchester, though much less in the way of finewares were recovered.",330,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12009,,1737,30,8,1,47,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
12010,"Assemblage includes some middle Iron Age pottery. Local wares dominate the assemblage, though Alice Holt vessels are also well represented. Pot wasters were found in a 1stC AD deposit in the a ditch terminal along with a probable kiln (dismantled).",11119,99,8,34,204,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
12011,Very little pottery recovered; likely reflects the non-domestic nature of the site.,73,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12012,"Most of the pottery appears to be local grog-tempered and sandy wares. Alice Holt, Oxfordshire, BB1, and Verulamium whiteware pottery were also represented. A small number of Saxon sherds may represent post-Roman re-use of the site.",133,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12013,The character of the assemblage mirrored that seen at Manor Farm.,739,10,,1,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12014,Grog-tempered wares dominated.,408,5,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12015,"Primarily Alice Holt products, plus some Portchester D ware. Forms include flanged bowls, white-slipped burnished jars with everted rims, and large storage jars. There is a strong possibility that Roman wares continued in use well into the 5thC AD since they were found in the SFB associated with Saxon material.",197,3,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
12016,,31,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12017,"The Roman, early Saxon and medieval sherds counts were given combined. Alice Holt wares were present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12018,"The reported assemblage includes some intrusive medieval pottery. Some individual assemblages give sherd counts, though not all, so the overall count is not known.",,115,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12019,"The pottery is not fully quantified and the full weight of the pottery includes prehistoric, Roman and medieval sherds.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12020,"15 vessels came from the LIA burials. These were closely dated to AD20-40, but the general assemblage from the site spans the 1st to 2ndC AD. Arretine ware was the only import. Silchester and sandy fabrics dominated the assemblage.",806,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12021,,247,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12022,"Pottery from Fields 2 and 4 is dominated by early Roman wares, suggesting an early date for the enclosure, though extends the full period of Roman occupation. All pottery recovered from fieldwalking.",456,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12023,A modest sized assemblage of late Iron Age-early Roman pottery (1st C AD). Dominated by grog-tempered wares and jar forms.,900,8,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12024,Grog-tempered and sandy fabrics dominate both the LIA/ER and Roman assemblages. Finewares were very minimal. A range of vessel types were represented.,2202,28,,1,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12025,'Homemade' sandy and organic wares were recovered alongside grog- and flint-tempered wares. Some Gallo-Belgic imports were also noted.,1303,13,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12026,Flint-tempered wares dominate. Amphora is present.,346,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
12027,"Considering the trackway/fieldsystem nature of the site, and the absence of settlement features, the pottery is suggested to have been representative of manuring activities. Samian is noted as present, but no quantification of the fabric is given on the table.",519,6,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12028,No quantification given.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
12029,No detailed examination of the forms or fabrics present was undertaken.,12892,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12030,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12031,"Quantified on microfiche, though no microfiche in journal copy. Local coarsewares predominate, though amphora, BB1, Alice Holt, New Forest, Oxfordshire and Nene Valley wares all present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
12032,"Silchester ware dominated the early pottery assemblages. Alice Holt, Oxfordshire and New Forest wares were all present in the late Roman assemblage. Only fabric descriptions were given; no quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12033,"The pottery was mostly late Roman, though some medieval sherds were recovered from backfills and may have been intrusive. Portchester type pottery was discernible.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12034,"The pottery found in Enclosures I/II is mainly coarseware, such as Silchester ware. A scarcity of finewares was noted. Assemblage not properly quantified. A tazza sherd was recovered from the Enclosure II ditch.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12035,Pottery not quantified but a late Iron Age tazza and a Hofheim flagon were recovered amongst coarsewares - all late Iron Age. No mention of wasters was given.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12036,Pottery not quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12037,None of the pottery was quantified but the majority dated to the first half of the 1stC AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12038,"Most of the pottery came from sections across the ditches, though some came from LIA/ER pits. The mid/late Iron Age pottery small and highly abraded, whilst the LIA/ER pottery was generally of fresher appearance. Highgate Wood B and Colne Valley fabrics were present.",301,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12039,"Overall, a wide range of fabrics, including a number of regional fabrics, were identified small a relatively small assemblage. Local grey wares dominated, though a sizable proportion of the assemblage belonged to late Roman shelly wares and Oxfordshire colour-coated wares which belonged to the late 4thC AD activity. A miniature pot was placed in a late Roman pit.",393,5,,5,5,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12040,"Over half the material came from the early Roman trackway ditches. Alice Holt vessels dominate, whilst Silchester wares account for c.15% of the assemblage.",5372,79,24,3,31,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
12041,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12042,"A limited range of wares was identified amongst the pottery assemblage. Grog-tempered wares constitute over 50%, though flint-tempered wares, including 'Silchester ware', and sandy wares all originated within the local late Iron Age ceramic tradition, but continued in use immediately after the conquest. Other contexts contained 'Romanised' wares, mainly in the form of wheel-thrown greywares, but also Samian, Black Burnished ware (BB1) from south-east Dorset, whiteware, oxidised ware, and colour-coated wares from the Oxfordshire and New Forest production centres. Some are late Roman (4thC AD).",729,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12043,"The pottery spans the late Iron Age to the 4thC AD in date, but could be divided into early phase 0-AD200 and late phase AD200-400. Jars dominated the assemblage throughout, with grog-tempered wares most common in the early phase and a more mixed range of local and regional fabrics present later on.",134,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12044,"The majority of the assemblage is mid-1st to 2ndC AD, with a small number of late Iron Age and 3rdC AD sherds. BB1 ware present.",49,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12045,"The vast majority of the pottery from the site is of Late Iron Age to very early Roman (probably AD1/20-60), though most could be placed in a pre-conquest bracket. Flint, grog and flint, and flint and iron oxide-tempered wares dominated, though sand-tempered wares were also present. Most vessels appeared to be jars and heavy storage jars with simple bead or out-turned rims of Silchester type. A black Gallo-Belgic platter copy and possible Terra Rubra sherds were also present. A notable gap between the mid/later 1stC AD and the 3rdC AD was noted. A number of small groups of 3rd-4thC AD material was present, including late Alice Holt and Thames Valley wares.",883,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12046,"The assemblage appears to be very mixed chronologically with quite a high level of redeposition or contamination. Second-century continental imports were limited to a single sherd from a Cologne roughcast colour-coated beaker and three sherds of Central Gaulish Samian from the same context. Regional imports dating to the 2nd and 3rdC AD include a sherd of Nene Valley colour-coat and a few sherds of Verulamium white ware including a 3rd-century flagon. Also present were a few sherds of Dorset black burnished ware spanning the later 2nd and 3rdC AD. Several sherds from the Oxfordshire industries are present, plus one New Forest ware sherd, suggesting some activity into the 4thC AD.",1046,15,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12047,The Romano-British pottery (748 sherds) suggests that the main period of occupation was in the 2nd-4thC AD. Activity in other periods is represented by small quantities of material including 12 sherds of middle-late Iron Age pottery.,760,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12048,"The pottery largely dates to the 1st-2ndC AD, with a very small amount of later Roman material. Much was recovered from linear features with a small quantity from pits. The assemblage was fairly fragmented with abraded sherds, though this was partly a reflection of the nature of the fabrics, many of which were not highly fired. Continental imports included Cadiz amphora, south Gaulish Samian and north Gaulish whiteware. Regional imports included Abingdon oxidised ware, BB1, Verulamium whiteware and Oxfordshire whiteware. Alice Holt wares accounted for 41.5% of the sample.",2421,25,4,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
12049,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12050,"The majority of the assemblage falls within a late Iron Age/early Roman date range, though most is likely to be post-Conquest. Flint-tempered and grog-tempered wares, continued in use into the early Roman period, whilst the 'Romanised' wares comprise coarse sandy wares (including BB1), and finewares in the form of Samian and Oxfordshire whiteware and colour-coated ware.",173,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12051,"Around 2/3 of the pottery (608 sherds) derives from the large mid-late Iron Age pits and dates c.300BC-AD43. The Roman group comprises a mixture of imports, both continental and regional, and probable local wares. There is little evidence for late 1stC/early 2ndC AD material, and is mostly constitutive of mid-2ndC to 4thC pottery. The imports are limited to just three sherds of central Gaulish Samian and single examples of a North African amphora, a north Gaulish mortarium and another burnt white ware mortarium. Most of the regional imports highlight the later Roman use of the site with examples of Dorset black burnished ware, late grog-tempered ware, Oxfordshire wares and Midlands shelly ware which usually signals a date from the last quarter of the 4th century. A small assemblage of 38 sherds of Saxon pottery were present. One included decoration which suggested a 6thC AD date. The preservation of all the pottery is relatively good.",929,17,1,4,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
12052,"Late Iron Age sherds include grog-tempered, flint-tempered and sandy fabrics, with forms dominated by necked and cordoned jars/bowls. Associated with these coarsewares is a small quantity of finer wares: a handful of very abraded Samian, a Terra Nigra platter, part of a whiteware butt beaker and at least one flagon in pink-buff fabric. All of these could be accommodated within a mid to late 1stC AD date. A smaller group of mid-3rd to 4thC AD material comprised coarse greywares, including products of the Alice Holt kilns.",815,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12054,"The majority of the assemblage comprises coarse, hand-made grog-tempered wares belonging to the regional Late Iron Age ceramic tradition. Overall, the wares seen constitute a potential date range of 1stC BC through to the later 1stC AD, possibly into the early 2ndC AD. Diagnostic forms are confined to grog-tempered bead rim jars of varying size and everted rim jars, some necked and cordoned, in wheel thrown greywares.",223,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12055,"Late 1st/2nd century pottery from earlier occupation. Also dishes, Jars and bowls (coarse & fineware) of 4th century date. No quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12056,"Nearly all of the datable sherds can be ascribed to the period AD150-270, with just a few earlier and one fragment of a Oxfordshire red colour-coat bowl dated mid-3rdC AD onwards.",212,4,5,3,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
12057,"367 sherds were Roman in date, with the remainder being late Iron Age (some middle Iron Age). Regional wares included Alice Holt, Nene Valley, New Forest, Oxfordshire, BB1, and 'Belgic' types suggesting a relatively wide range of fabrics. These together with the presence of amphora indicates the proximity and influence of Silchester on the local networking of the site, and intimates that the inhabitants may have been of moderately high-status.",656,10,13,1,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
12058,"156 middle Iron Age sherds have been removed from the count recorded here, with only fabrics of late Iron Age 'Belgic' type through to early-mid 2ndC AD types being included. Reduced early Roman coarsewares were most common in the assemblage. BB1, whitewares, 'Belgic' type, and white-slipped wares were also present. As well as some South Gaulish Samian, a fragment of Central Gaulish Rhenish ware was also present.",1556,29,,9,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12059,"Several waster sherds are interpreted as evidence of local pottery production in the general vicinity of the site in the 2nd to 3rdC AD and in the late 3rd and 4thC AD. Greywares dominate with Silchester, grog-tempered, BB1, Overwey, New Forest and Oxfordshire wares were also present.",608,,1,3,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
12060,"A small quantity of Iron Age pottery was recovered from the site, particularly flint-tempered fabrics, mostly of middle-late Iron Age date (c.3rd-1stC BC). A Belgic sherd and a possible terra rubra indicate 1stC AD activity, but no more than background scatter.",83,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
12061,"39 sherds dated to the LIA and were typical of local fabrics, many of 1stC AD date though earlier, overlapping types were also present. The Roman pottery was predominantly 2nd-4thC AD wares, including Alice Holt and BB1 fabrics. 14 sherds of Central Gaulish Samian were present, though 10 likely came from one cup. A Oxfordshire white ware mortarium fragment was also present.",158,1,,1,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
12062,"A few sherds of samian were recovered, mostly early 2ndC AD, though larger quantities of coarseware were recovered (2nd-3rdC AD). Quantities of pottery came form the backfill of some graves, but these did not appear to be from grave goods. One 4thC AD pot was a grave good (see burial data).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
12063,"Pottery included samian, pseudo-samian, New Forest ware, Castor ware, amphorae, mortaria from the early excavation but none were quantified. 416 sherds of Roman pottery were recovered from the fieldwalking, predominantly of greywares, mostly from Alice Holt.  Traded wares included two sherds of Central Gaulish samian, Dorset black burnished ware, one possible sherd of New Forest colour-coated ware and products of the Oxfordshire industries, including white wares, whiteware mortaria and colour-coated wares.",416,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13001,A substantial pottery assemblage of late Iron Age to late Roman date. Literate graffito found on pottery.,57000,800,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13002,"Reasonably substantial assemblage of later Iron Age and Roman pottery, including vessel from the cremation cemetery.",8000,100,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13003,Pottery of 2nd-4th C AD date but no quantification. Dr 20 amphora sherd.,,,1,,40,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
13004,2nd-4th C pottery but no quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13005,Pottery of 1st C AD date recovered but not quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13006,Pottery mostly of 2nd-4th C in date but unquantified.,,,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13007,No data,,,,,38,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13008,Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age and early Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13009,Unquantified assemblage of mid 2nd to later 4th C in date. Dr 20 amphora sherds,,,2,,92,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13010,Unquantified pottery of late Iron Age to late Roman date from excavation. Dr 20 amphora sherd. 43 pottery sherds of 2nd-4th  date from evaluation.,43,1,1,1,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13011,Pottery of 2nd-3rd C AD date. Dr 20 amphora sherds,,,2,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13012,Unquantified assemblage of 1st-2nd C AD date. Dr 20 amphora sherds,,,4,,182,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
13013,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13014,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13015,Substantial assemblage of late Iron Age to late Roman pottery. Substantially complete vessels came from late Iron Age enclosure ditch and Roman waterhole. Fine and specialist wares of late Roman assemblage account for 14.9% by sherd count.,2303,44,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13016,Substantial though unquantified pottery assemblage. All amphora Dr 20.,,,8,,268,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13017,A total of 12072 Roman sherds of 1st to 4th C date. Mostly Belgic grog tempered wares (many produced in on-site kilns) along with shell tempered wares. Miniature vessels with some burials.,12072,277,17,59,64,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13018,"A moderately large assemblage. The majority of the pottery has a date of manufacture in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, with a smaller group of 3rd-century pottery and very little, if any, which need be of the 4th century. The quantity of Samian is remarkably large and mostly from one dumped deposit of dining material.",556,6,4,,152,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13019,"Substantial assemblage, almost entirely of Romano-British date, with an emphasis on the early Roman period. Three broad groups comprise the bulk of the coarseware assemblage: shelly wares, grog-tempered wares and reduced sandy wares.",1152,18,1,,35,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13020,"There is no evidence for occupation on the site before the later 2nd century, nor convincingly in the last quarter of the 4th century.",250,5,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13021,"Small assemblage from evaluation dating from about the mid first century AD into the 4th C, with an emphasis on the early Roman period. The excavation pottery is not quantified in the publication report but includes samian, mortaria and amphora.",279,30,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13022,A small quantity of late Iron Age/early Roman pottery.,29,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13023,"A small assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman pottery. Roman vessels are indicative of a domestic assemblage, comprising tablewares and cooking pots. Roman coarsewares are predominantly represented by shell tempered vessels and local reduced wares. Diagnostic shell tempered forms include jars and bowls comparable to vessels produced at the Lodge Farm kilns in Harrold, which constitute 42% of the assemblage.",153,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13024,Evidence from pottery suggests a span of occupation at Walton from the mid third to fourth century. Not quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13025,"A modest assemblage, with two main fabric types represented: an oxidised, coarse shell-tempered pottery (which accounted for over 90%), and a less common hard, fine sandy grey ware. Some of the pottery types were diagnostic of Oxfordshire, Nene Valley, and more locally at Harrold in Bedfordshire. Most pottery dates to the late Roman period, that is the third and fourth centuries AD.",297,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
13026,"The bulk of the assemblage is made up of coarsewares, much of which are likely to have been produced locally.",249,4,1,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13027,Pottery assemblage dating from late Iron Age to 4th C AD. Uncertain quantification and that given below is estimation.,4000,50,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13028,"A modest assemblage of late Iron Age pottery, mostly grog tempered 'Belgic' pottery.",350,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13029,"A small group of Roman pottery dating from the 2nd to 4th centuries, mainly locally produced coarsewares.",47,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13030,"The assemblage mainly consists of locally manufactured kitchen, table and storage wares. The majority of diagnostic pottery dates to the 2nd to 4th century.",240,5,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13031,A single sherd of early Roman pottery.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13032,"The Romano-British pottery spans the 2nd to 4th centuries AD, with an emphasis on the Late Roman period. The assemblage is dominated by products of the Oxfordshire industry, along with Nene Valley ware, SE Dorset Black-burnished ware (BB1), shell-tempered wares (Harrold?), Verulamium whitewares and local greyware. The imported wares are scarce, including samian, Dressel 20 amphorae, central Gaulish black-slipped sherds and 3 sherds of Moselkeramick beakers.",2896,34,5,22,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13033,Romano-British pottery recovered from the site spanned the entire Roman period (1st to 4th centuries AD). No sherds of imported fine or specialist wares (amphorae or mortaria) were present.,136,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13034,A small assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD pottery.,65,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13035,"Substantial assemblage of late Iron Age and early Roman date. Includes complete vessels from the cremation cemetery. Dominated by grog-tempered wares. A single Dr 2-4 amphora sherd.  All grave vessels comprised flagons, dishes, bowls and beakers and included terra nigra, terra rubra and samian.",5176,37,1,,40,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13036,"Substantial assemblage of pottery including many complete vessels from the cremation burials. The assemblage spans a period of at least 500 years, but the majority is early Roman in date. Shell tempered ware account for 25% of the total assemblage, with reduced ware with grog inclusions and an oxidised surface representing 12% and reduced ware with grog inclusions representing 11%. Other wares include Verulamium ware, Horningsea ware, Oxfordshire ware, Nene valley ware & Mancetter Hartshill mortaria.",12449,224,8,,243,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13037,"The date range of the Roman pottery extends mainly through the 2nd to 4th centuries, with only scant evidence of earlier Roman material. Jars are the most frequent form represented, amongst a range of local and non-local kitchen, table and storage wares. The largest assemblages from the excavation were found in association with late Roman enclosure and pit.",581,13,2,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13038,"The grave pottery: the cremation vessel, probably a two-handled flagon. Then, coarse-ware 'dog bowls', large samian bowls, samian cups and a small platter in imitation Black-Burnished ware.",,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13039,Large but unquantified assemblage of pottery recovered from the occupation level of the building on the north side of the temple and from its yard. A general late Roman emphasis.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13040,Pottery of early 1st to 4th C date recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13041,"The cremation remains placed in an amphora (uncertain type). Grave goods comprised three plain samian vessels, a ring-neck flagon, a small colour-coated beaker and a miniature pot.",,,1,,3,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
13042,A small assemblage mainly of LIA and early Roman date. Mostly grog-tempered wares. No obvious wasters.,525,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13043,Pottery assemblage of late 1st to early 3rd C AD date. All sherds very abraded. 16% fine and specialist wares indicates a high status.,404,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13044,"Small assemblage reflecting peripheral nature of the site. Typical range of coarsewares, dating late 1st/early 2nd to mid 3rd c AD. The cremation burial contained a wide mouthed jar (used as urn) along with beaker and necked jar.",510,3,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
13045,A substantial collection of late Iron Age (927 sherds) and Romano-British (709 sherds) pottery sherds. LIA sherds in typical grog tempered wares and comprise almost all jars. The Roman material ranged from 1st to 4th C and included large parts of an Oxford colour-coated mortarium from one deposit.,1636,8,1,28,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13046,"A single pottery vessel (undecorated narrow necked jar) of 1st C AD date, used as cremation vessel.",1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13047,"Significant (though unquantified) volumes of pottery in dump layers above the burials, mainly late Roman in date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13048,"Modest assemblage of late Iron Age pottery, mostly coming from one ditch. Characterised by globular and fine necked jars.",580,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13049,"Substantial pottery assemblage of later 1st to later 4th C AD, mostly local grog and shell tempered wares. Unquantified in detail.",3831,56,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13050,A moderately large assemblage of later 2nd to 4th C Ad pottery. Dominated by grog and shelly wares.,2530,34,6,36,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13051,A small assemblage of 26 late iron Age/early Roman sherds and 10 later Roman sherds.,36,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13052,Small assemblage from the enclosure ditches including a complete pottery jar.,93,2,1,3,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13053,"Small assemblage mostly comprising grave vessels of late Iron Age/early Roman date (cups, jars, bowls) and a 2nd C flagon fragment from the enclosure ditch.",7,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13054,A large quantity of Roman pottery but not quantified and very little information,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13055,A moderate concentration of pottery of mid 2nd to mid 3rd C date.,523,,,4,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13056,"Large quantities of late Iron Age (9909 sherds; 79kg) and Roman period (9000 sherds;  pottery. The late Iron Age pottery included Gallo-Belgic imports, including tazze and pedestal cups. Roman pottery dates 1st to mid 4th C AD.  Literate graffitos on Roman pottery.",18909,160,35,270,275,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13057,"Very dense concentration of pottery, including wasters, from the kiln. The main forms produced were jars.",,31,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13058,Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13059,"Funerary containers comprised a pedestal urn and jar, with the accessory vessel in one grave comprising a poppy head beaker.",5,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13060,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13061,Small assemblage of mainly 2nd c AD pottery. Unquantified.,,,,2,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13062,"Unquantified assemblage mainly of 1st-2nd C AD date. Pottery also recovered from cremation graves: Flagons (3), dishes (8), bowls (2), beakers (4).",,,,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13063,"Large greyware assemblage though unquantified, from the kiln, including 1900 waster sherds. Products comprises narrow necked jars, lids, dishes and bowls. Also a ring necked flagon.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13064,Unquantified assemblage of 1st to 4th C Ad date. Includes examples of literate graffitos and a miniature ring necked jug.,,,,,42,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13065,"Substantial assemblage of 1st to 4th C pottery, mostly falling in the date range AD 50-200.",15862,62,180,58,240,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13066,Unquantified assemblage of pottery dating 2nd to 4th c AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13067,"The site produced a range of pottery forms and fabrics dating1st-4th C AD, though remains unquantified. One complete white bodied red painted flask incorporated into the well construction perhaps as a ritual offering. Pottery from well includes a tazza.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13068,"Pottery in the one undisturbed grave comprised three samian vessels, two amphorae and a poppy-head beaker.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
13069,"A large volume of pottery (though unquantified), including many wasters. Pottery dated to the mid 2nd C AD. Kiln products mostly comprised jars, dishes and bowls, with some cups, beakers, lids and colanders.",,,,,3,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13070,"Large volumes of pottery (mainly late Roman) but unquantified. Included many amphorae and mortaria, but only one fragment of samian suggesting a late date.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13071,Large amounts of pottery dating 1st-4th C AD. Mostly local coarsewares. Includes literate graffitos.,3805,,5,11,93,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13072,"Assemblage of late Iron Age-early Roman (1271 sherds; 25kg) and mid-late Roman date (2582 sherds; 36kg). A particularly large Roman assemblage was recovered from one pit, some 1689 sherds (26.85kg), which included a large number of overfired thick-walled bodysherds from one or more large storage jars. The bulk of the assemblage is early Roman in date.",3853,61,2,12,24,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13073,"Substantial but unquantified pottery assemblage, including pottery from the 3 kilns on site dating from mid 1st to mid 2nd c AD.",,,27,,240,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13074,"Limited later Iron Age pottery and substantial assemblage of Roman date, mostly comprising reduced coarsewares. Dated 1st to 4th C AD. Includes literate graffitos.",37707,935,253,925,2680,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13075,"Significant assemblage, with a relatively high level of activity in the early Roman period. This dropped during the 2nd and early 3rd century, but there was a significant increase the amount of pottery deposition from the late 3rd century onwards. The assemblage was dominated by sandy grey wares.",1436,14,3,14,27,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13076,"Small assemblage of pottery mainly dating later 1st/2nd to 4th C AD. Grey wares predominated, and much of this must be of local origin.",88,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13077,The pottery assemblage was dominated by utilitarian greywares. Only 68 sherds from the evaluation. No data from the excavation,68,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
13078,"Substantial quantity of late Iron Age-Roman pottery, mostly dating 1st-2nd C AD. Fine and specialist wares  form 4.5% of the pottery assemblage by sherd count, suggesting low status.  The most striking characteristic of the assemblage, apart from its (typical) domination by jars, is the paucity of bowls and dishes, which total only 5% of the assemblage. By contrast, liquid containers and drinking vessels (cups and beakers) formed 12.5% of the assemblage.",6850,85,11,27,79,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13079,"A highly fragmented pottery assemblage, mainly of late Iron Age-early Roman date, with a smaller amount of 4th C material. The later Iron Age assemblage is mainly characterized by grog-tempered wares. Early Roman wares occurring alongside the grog and flint-tempered wares are mainly grey sandy types, some possibly from the Alice Holt kilns.",1272,4,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13080,Assemblage of Roman pottery of 1st to 4th c AD in date. Little further information.,1493,19,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
13081,"Small assemblage (76 sherds) of late Iron Age to late Roman pottery. The majority of the Roman assemblage comprises locally manufactured coarsewares, of probable 2nd century date and later. 38 sherds of 1st-2nd C AD pottery from adjacent evaluation",114,2,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
13082,"A moderate sized assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman pottery, mostly dating 3rd-4th C AD , and of the Oxfordshire Industries, but local greywares, late shell-tempered ware (inc. Harrold), Nene Valley ware, Verulamium ware and Dorset Black-burnished ware (BB1). One Nene valley beaker had a barbotine phallus but in general little decorated pottery.",2582,35,11,52,70,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
13083,"A small assemblage, mostly of later 1st to 4th C date. Locally made wares form the bulk of the pottery assemblage, with comparatively small amounts of non-local pottery and imported fine wares.",344,,1,12,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
13084,Small assemblage of late 1st/2nd to 4th C AD in date. Grog-tempered wares and sandy wares dominate. No imported continental wares present.,85,1,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
13085,"A small assemblage of later 2nd-early 4th C AD pottery, mostly pink-grogged ware made in the immediate vicinity. Form include hook-rimmed jars and storage jars.",196,14,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13086,"Pottery from the grave comprised a flagon, 2 samian ware cups, 2 samian ware dishes and the cremation urn",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13087,A modest sized assemblage of pottery ranging in date from late Iron Age (587 sherds) to mid 3rd c AD.,1262,14,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
13088,"A modest sized assemblage of late Iron Age to late Roman date from two main occupation areas. Mostly local wares (grog-and-sand tempered) but also including Oxfordshire mortarium, Dorset Black Burnished ware (BB1), Verulamium whiteware and samian (22 sherds from one context).",983,,,2,90,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
13089,"A substantial assemblage of late Iron Age to late Roman date, with an emphasis on the early Roman period.  Three main fabric categories, grog-tempered wares, reduced grey wares and oxidised wares account for around ninety percent of the pottery by sherd count. Much lower quantities of Lower Nene Valley colour-coated ware, Dorset black-burnished ware (BB1), Verulamium ware and Oxfordshire colour-coated and white wares. Also Dressel 20 amphorae.",3800,63,7,,76,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
13090,"A moderate sized assemblage of later Iron Age to late Roman date, with an emphasis on the early Roman period. Mostly local grog-tempered wares, reduced grey wares, various oxidised wares and shell-gritted ware. Also black burnished ware (BB1), Lower Nene Valley colour-coated ware, Oxfordshire colour-coated and white wares and Dressel 20 amphora.",480,8,1,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14001,A small assemblage of 2nd-4th C date. Sandy reduced and oxidised fabrics of probable North Wiltshire manufacture dominate the assemblage.,93,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14002,"Quantifications only approximate. The ditches contained considerable quantities of mid 2nd-century pottery, principally coarse wares and Black Burnished ware.  Pottery from the upper silted levels of the ditches was dated  late 2nd or early 3rd century. Other ditches contained later 3rd to early 4th C pottery. Black-burnished wares from south-east Dorset are the most common of the major Romano-British regional wares. Severn Valley wares are present in most groups. The samian is of interest for the high number of repairs present but is unquantified. Several sherds of Dressel 20 olive-oil amphora.",2000,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14003,"Unquantified assemblage of later 3rd-4th C AD. 60% of the assemblage comprise greywares. Forms in this variant include everted-rim jars, bowls and dishes.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14004,"Moderate sized assemblage, mostly Severn Valley wares (and the Malvernian industry), dating 2nd-early 3rd C AD. Jars dominate, accounting for 60.5%, with tankards and bowls accounting for 15% each and all other forms for 2% or less.",951,10,1,2,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14005,"Substantial assemblage dated 1st-4th C AD, with an emphasis on 2nd-3rd C AD. Dominated by Severn Valley industry, Malvernian wares and Dorset black-burnished ware.",5952,59,9,22,90,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14006,"Of the 932 sherds of pottery examined from the site (area to the south of the villa only), 538 came from stratified contexts and the remainder from initial topsoil clearance. The assemblage consists largely of coarse wares displaying a restricted range of forms, while fine wares and mortaria are comparatively rare. Also 58 sherds from the 2007/8 watching brief on the villa, including Dressel 20 amphora, Dorset black burnished ware and Severn Valley ware, dating from 2nd C .",990,,2,,18,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14007,"Substantial assemblage dating from later 1st c to later 3rd/early 4th C. Local coarse wares belonging to the Severn Valley ware tradition dominate the assemblage, accounting for 60% of the stratified pottery.",3576,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14008,"Moderate concentration of pottery, mostly oxidised Severn Valley Ware.",1250,210,2,5,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14009,"Pottery unquantified. Most of the Roman pottery from the field survey consisted of greywares, but also samian, Dorset black-burnished ware, Oxford colour-coated ware, a few pieces of probable Oxford whiteware, Oxford mortaria, sherds of decorated Rhenish ware and one sherd of an uncertain type of amphora.",,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14010,"Assemblage of pottery dates to the later Roman period and comprises mainly Severn Valley Wares, Dorset Black-burnished Wares and Oxford  Colour Coat Wares.",1022,19,,18,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14011,"Home Farm contained a moderate sized assemblage (2007 sherds; 31kg), dominated by Severn Valley Ware, Malvernian Ware and Dorset Back burnished Ware. Fine and specialist wares not quantified. Gilder's Paddock contained a smaller fragmentary assemblage (139 sherds) of 2nd-early 4th C AD date, dominated by Severn Valley Ware.  A total of 334 sherds (3.6kg) from the excavations south of Church Road (inc. 8 samian sherds).",2480,37,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14012,Substantial assemblage of wheel-turned and hand-made 1st C AD pottery. Finewares represent only 1%.,1313,9,,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14013,"Substantial quantity of pottery recovered, mostly 2nd-4th C in date with an emphasis on the later Roman period. Mostly Severn valley ware, then Dorset black burnished ware and Oxfordshire ware.",6730,80,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14014,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14015,"Substantial quantity of pottery with high % of samian, dating 1st to early 3rd C AD. Mostly Severn Valley ware, Dorset Black-burnished ware and Malvernian ware.",1621,170,3,19,325,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14016,Large but unquantified assemblage mostly of late Roman date. Includes large grey storage jars.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14017,Pottery assemblage dates from 1st to 4th c AD and dominated by Severn Valley wares. Then other local greywares and Dorset black burnished wares.,972,,6,,51,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14018,No data except mention of pottery dating (mainly 2nd-3rd C AD) including samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14019,"Large assemblage of pottery from 1960s excavations including much samian, though this remains unquantified. Also large quantity of amphora, most Dr 20 but also pelichet 47, Cam 186 & Rhodian. Pottery dates 1st-4th C and dominated by Severn Valley Wares. Includes miniature pot. 48 sherds of pottery from the 2007 watching brief include 15 sherds of Baetican amphorae and two sherds of samian. Also Alice Holt grey ware and New Forest colour-coat.",8548,106,425,60,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14020,Substantial but unquantified assemblage of 1st to 4th C date including late Roman shelly wares. Dominated by Severn Valley Wares and other local greywares.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14021,"Substantial though unquantified pottery assemblage, with much of it probably made on site, as evidenced by wasters.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14022,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14023,"Large assemblage, dating from 2nd to 4th c AD, but only pottery from later 3rd c onwards is quantified. Includes tazze forms and literate graffitos. Considerable quantities of samian and amphorae but these are not quantified.",12888,,,267,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14024,Huge assemblage but remains unquantified. Amphorae comprise Dr 20 and a small amount of Dr 2-4.,,,,,531,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14025,Pottery from earlier excavations unquantified but of 2nd-4th C date with a late Roman emphasis. 485 sherds from the 1990s excavation to the NW. Most of the wares date to the later 3rd-4th C with products of the large regional industries particularly well represented.,485,1,,14,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14026,"Unquantified LIA and Roman pottery from earlier excavations. The 1998 evaluation produced a total 107 sherds, comprising a mixture of native handmade wares of later Iron-age origin alongside early Roman wheel made wares, including Malvernian rock-tempered ware, grey wares, Savernake ware and Severn Valley ware. Just 8 sherds of LIA/Roman pottery from the 2002 evaluation.",115,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14027,"Unquantified assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date from 1971 excavations. Comprised Severn Valley Wares, late Roman Calcite gritted wares, and black burnished wares. A small assemblage from the 1998-9 excavations is quantified, and range in date from the late 1st/early 2nd century through to the later 3rd-4th century.  Most of the sherds are local Severn Valley wares and traded Dorset black-burnished wares. Also some later Oxfordshire wares.",480,4,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14028,Large but unquantified assemblage of pottery dating from later 1st to 4th C AD. Also pottery discs.,,,3,,117,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14029,"Significant pottery assemblage, though remains unquantified.",,,,,109,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14030,"Substantial, though unquantified assemblage of pottery, much of it probably produced at the kiln site - typical Severn Valley Wares. Includes large numbers of wasters. Forms from the kiln comprise tankards, jars, bowls and dishes.",,25,,2,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14031,"A substantial pottery assemblage from the site, estimated at c 100,000 sherds, though only c 35% fully recorded. Stratified groups from three main phases of activity: Late Iron Age (4970 sherds; 100kg - mostly grog-tempered wares and reduced coarsewares), 2nd-3rd C (12984 sherds; 373kg - mostly reduced coarsewares and black-burnished wares) and 3rd/4th C (5415 sherds; 212kg, as previous). Includes a tazza fragments from the mid Roman shrine area (where there is also a higher % of finewares and drinking vessels). A miniature late Roman colour coated beaker inserted into the floor of the late Roman shrine.",35225,430,732,423,1482,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14032,A substantial assemblage mainly of mid 1st to late 2nd/3rd C date,10183,100,24,26,152,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14033,"Substantial assemblage with very high % of fine and specialist wares (15%) including much samian and amphorae (Dr 20). Wide variety of forms including jars, cups, bowls, beakers, dishes, platter and lids. All suggests high status activity.",3551,35,187,46,331,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14034,"Moderate sized assemblage, mostly of 2nd C AD date. Fine and specialist wares totalled 3.3%.",907,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14035,"Pottery from 1980s excavation comprised 7903 sherds (86kg) (excluding the MIA pottery), dating mainly from late Iron Age to early Roman period. The 2003-4 excavations produced 1197 sherds (6kg) (excluding early-middle Iron Age) dating LIA to early/mid Roman period. Includes 20 sherds of N Gaulish whiteware mortaria, along with Dr 2-4 and Dr 20 amphorae, grog-tempered ware, Dorset Black burnished ware (BB1), Savernake ware, Wiltshire greywares, Malvernian ware, Severn Valley ware and Oxfordshire ware.",9100,92,20,19,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14036,"Large volumes of pottery of late 1st to late 4th C date recovered over the years, though remains unquantified. Fabrics include Dorset Black-burnished ware, Oxfordshire ware, Severn Valley ware, local greywares, Rhenish ware, Nene Valley ware, Alice Holt ware, late Roman shelly ware Gallo-Belgic wares and Hofheim type flagons. Includes a tettine and a miniature pot. Literate graffitos on tiles. A complete pottery vessel in the backfill of a drain is suggested as a rite of termination.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14037,"Assemblage of late Iron Age (356 sherds, 0.8kg) and Roman (60 sherds, 0.3kg) pottery. Roman pottery dates 2nd-3rd C.",417,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14038,"Modest assemblage, mainly Severn Valley wares and Black Burnished ware, with a broad 2nd-4th C AD date.",281,4,3,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14039,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14040,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14041,"Assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman date, with an early Roman emphasis. Includes imported Gallo-Belgic wares, amphora & samian. 3858 sherds from 1982-3 excavations and c 4300 sherds from 1984-5. Forms include tazze.",8158,111,9,,298,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
14042,A small assemblage of pottery dating from late Iron Age to 3rd C AD.,130,1,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14043,"Moderate sized assemblage dated mainly 2nd-3rd C AD, mostly local Severn Valley wares. Unusually high % of Dr 20 amphora.",425,7,32,2,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14044,"Small assemblage, mostly Severn Valley Ware dating 2nd C AD.",49,1,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14045,"A substantial assemblage of early Roman pottery, mostly Severn Valley ware. Includes Dr 20 and one sherd of Dr 14 amphora, along with north Gaulish mortaria.",2865,68,16,,62,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14046,"Small assemblage of early Roman pottery, mostly Severn valley Ware.",339,3,,5,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14047,"Pottery only quantified from Site 2 (the villa buildings). Largest single source comprised Dorset black burnished wares, then Severn Valley Wares, Wilts black-burnished wares and Oxford colour coats. Pottery mostly dates 2nd-4th  AD.",30000,497,373,330,916,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14048,Potter ranges from 1st C AD to 5th C AD. No fragment count.,,53,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14049,A huge quantity of pottery found over the years but no quantifications. Includes many fragments of samian and amphorae. Miniature pots found.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14050,Huge amounts of pottery recovered but not recorded or quantified. Pottery dates 1st/2nd to late 4th C with a late Roman emphasis.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14051,"Significant assemblage of 1st-3rd C date, mostly Wilts greywares and Dorset black-burnished wares. 98 sherds of amphora (Dr 20) from one pit and probably one vessel. Dominated by jars.",10677,81,121,17,207,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14052,"Substantial assemblage of mainly 1st to 3rd C date, mostly comprising Severn Valley wares, along with Malvernian wares and Dorset Black burnished wares. The structured deposit of an almost complete Severn valley ware large necked jar (and complete rim of another vessel) from the lowest fill of a ditch, dating c AD 100. At least 6 complete Severn Valley vessels and a costrel found in the 3rd C stone-lined well",5838,82,,6,69,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14053,"Assemblage spanning 1st to late 4th c AD, mostly later 2nd-4th C. Dominated by Severn Valley ware and black burnished ware jars.",482,12,1,2,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14054,"A substantial pottery assemblage spanning the later iron Age and Roman periods. 9345 sherds assigned to ceramic phase groups. Locally produced coarsewares dominate, especially North Wilts reduced grey wares, but also Dorset black burnished wares and oxford wares. Also includes Dr 1 amphora. Fine and specialist wares comprise 2.9% of early/middle assemblage and 11% of late assemblage, placing well within 'low status' category. Evidence for pottery wasters indicating some production in vicinity.",21612,203,31,53,121,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14055,A small assemblage of pottery as befits the fact that the main excavation did not include the domestic zone. Mostly comprised local grey wares. Overall date range is mainly 2nd to early 4th C AD. Fine and specialist wares at 5.8%.,438,2,5,3,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14056,"A moderate sized assemblage of late Iron Age and early Roman pottery dominated by grog-tempered ware and limestone tempered ware, along with others such as black-burnished ware and Savernake grey ware. A paucity of fine and specialist wares",2150,14,2,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14057,"A moderate sized assemblage of 1st C AD date, up to c AD 60/65. The assemblage is a mixture of local handmade and wheel made wares along with several exotic imports dating to the Tiberio-Claudian period (similar to Bagendon), including amphora (Cam 185A and Dr 2-4) terra nigra, terra rubra and Arretine ware.",888,8,2,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14058,"Moderate sized assemblage of mid 1st C AD date, including local Wiltshire wares, Malvernian wares, Savernake ware and Severn Valley ware. Also Gallo-Belgic wares and amphorae (Cam 185A and Dr 2-4)",1890,10,18,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14059,"Minimal pottery recovered, generally of 1st-2nd  date, but no report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14060,"Substantial though unquantified (except samian) assemblage of 1st-4th C AD pottery. Mostly Severn Valley wares of later 2nd-4th C AD date, with some Malvernian ware.",,,,,60,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14061,"Unquantified assemblage including mortaria and samian, 2nd-4th C AD in date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14062,Unquantified pottery mainly of 2nd-3rd C AD date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14063,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14064,Pottery assemblage unquantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14065,"Small pottery assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date, but with a late Roman emphasis.",97,,,10,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14066,A small assemblage but with a high percentage of imported and specialist pottery.,86,,11,6,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14067,Small assemblage of mostly local coarsewares.,132,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14068,"Unquantified pottery assemblage from the main villa dating 1st-4th C AD, though with 2nd-4th C AD emphasis. The graffito is on wall plaster (see other finds). A reasonable sized assemblage from the 1990s investigations in the vicinity of the villa (1752 sherds), mostly Severn Valley wares and Dorset Black Burnished wares. These wares mainly comprised later pieces dating to the 3rd-4th centuries. Ceramic tile placed flat on the base of a ditch next to an inverted pottery vessel may be a 'structured' or 'formal' deposit. 551 sherds of Roman period came from the 2011 evaluation immediately south of the villa, dating 2nd-4th C AD. Similar range of wares.",2303,24,13,33,36,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14069,Unquantified 2nd-4th C AD assemblage,,,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14070,"Most pottery from earlier excavations was discarded. The earliest pottery from recent excavations dates 2nd half of 2nd C AD. Include Dr 20 amphorae, mortaria and samian (central and eastern Gaulish). North Wiltshire, Oxfordshire, Dorset black-burnished and Severn Valleys wares most common. [await full report]",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14071,"A small assemblage of later Iron Age and early Roman date. Includes Belgic type' grog-tempered wares, North Wilts greywares and Severn Valley ware.",171,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14072,A small amount of Romano-British coarse ware and samian pottery recorded from the terrace. No quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14073,"The pottery mainly comprises 'Belgic' type wares, including carinated bowls, bead rim bowls and jars.  Also a flagon and butt beakers. Includes a strainer type vessel with perforated base. An Arretine or south Gaulish samian dish recovered. Unquantified.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14074,"A large quantity of pottery found, but no quantification.  Limited quantities of samian. Vessel types include mortaria, cooking pots, jugs, bowls & dishes.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14075,"Pottery from the excavation was mostly 4th C AD in date, though earlier pottery recovered from surrounding fields including complete samian vessels (from burials?).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14076,Scraps of Roman pottery found in surrounding soil but no data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14077,"Pottery assemblage dating from at least the 2nd C to the end of 4th C AD. Included samian, New Forest Ware and Castor Ware. Unquantified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14078,"Pottery of 2nd-4th C date recovered, including Severn Valley ware, Black-burnished wares, Rhenish ware, Nene Valley ware and Oxfordshire red-slipped ware. Unquantified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14079,Late Roman pottery recovered but no report or quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14080,"A total of 2,509 sherds of pottery recovered. The pottery is quite diverse in terms of its composition, reflecting a high-status establishment, though still high % of Severn Valley wares and N Wilts greywares. Continental imports include Gaulish samian, mortaria and amphora, including Dr 20. Amongst the regional imports are mortaria rom Mancetter-Hartshill, black-burnished ware, Savernake ware and colour-coated wares from the Lower Nene Valley and Oxford industries. The chronological span appears to be from the early 2nd C through to the late 4th/5th C. A possible graffito on a sherd of late Roman shell-tempered ware. The",2509,25,10,61,56,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14081,Parts of a small greyware vessel dating to the 2nd C AD.,2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14082,"A high density of pottery (though unquantified in earlier report) including samian, amphorae. Poppyhead beakers and bead-rimmed jars. Also most of a small decorated beaker. Pottery from evaluations (5493 sherds) includes Dorset Black-Burnished ware, grog tempered ware, Severn Valley ware, white slipped flagon, Savernake ware, greyware, red-slipped micaceous ware and Dressel 20 amphora. Also a sherd from a Pompeian redware platter. The pottery spans the 1st to 4th century with a particular focus of activity in the 1st and early 2nd centuries. The samian is of particular importance and at 9.75% of the assemblage is well–represented. A fragment of ceramic tile had a graffito",5493,105,542,31,534,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14083,Mainly of the later Roman date (but including late 1st/2nd C pottery below 1st corridor floor) and not quantified.,,,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14084,Pottery recovered but not quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14085,An unquantified assemblage including many complete  pots.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14086,"A substantial but unquantified assemblage of later 1st-4th C date, including Severn Valley wares, Black-burnished wares, and Oxfordshire wares. Some late shell-gritted ware is evidence for occupation in the latter half of the 4th century.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14087,"A modest sized assemblage from the 1997 excavation largely dating 3rd-4th C AD and mostly comprising Severn Valley wares, with lesser Black-burnished wares and Malvernian wares. Also some Oxfordshire wares and late shelly wares. Pottery from the 1998 excavation remains unquantified in the report but is said to have been substantial, dating from 2nd to late 4th C AD, including Severn Valley ware, Malvernian ware, Oxfordshire ware, late Roman Midlands shell-tempered ware, Dorset Black-burnished ware (BB1), samian",436,6,,13,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14088,"Large assemblage mainly dating 3rd-4th C, but largely unquantified except 1960s-70s excavations. Dominated by Severn Valley wares, then Black-burnished wares and Oxfordshire wares. A literate graffito on a tile.",2800,90,34,,163,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14089,"Substantial assemblage including much terra nigra and terra rubra, South Gaulish samian and Arretine ware. A waster storage jar is evidence of pottery manufacture. Includes a number of strainers, amphorae and mortaria.",,,,,175,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14090,"A substantial assemblage mainly of mid 2nd to late 4th date. Dominated by Dorset black-burnished ware then Severn Valley ware, with significant quantities of Oxfordshire wares. A complete Dorset black-burnished jar placed in a small pit in centre of mid 3rd-early 4th C roundhouse doorway. Another semi-complete bowl came from the corn dryer.",16700,151,227,191,397,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14091,Small quantities of late Iron Age and early Roman pottery,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14092,A few small fragments of 2nd-3rd C AD pottery.,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14093,Pottery recovered but no indication of date or quantity. Samian mentioned.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14094,"A substantial assemblage of 1st-4th C AD date. Dominated by local course greywares, then Severn Valley wares and Dorset Black-burnished wares.",36072,222,16,230,894,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14095,"Unquantified assemblage of Mid-late Iron Age to late Roman date. includes  Severn Valley ware and imported terra rubra, along with Black-burnished wares, Nene Valley wares, Oxfordshire wares and some samian. No specific specialist analysis or report.",,15,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14096,"Much pottery mentioned in report but no quantifications, Included samian and mortaria.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14097,"Large amounts of pottery but unquantified. Includes a strainer. One complete and one semi-complete ceramic jug found with metal vessels, animal bone and human remains in the well.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14098,Only quantified pottery from the 1980s excavation of the industrial area. This mostly comprised Dorset black-burnished ware with some Severn Valley ware. Cooking pots predominate.,427,4,,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14099,"A substantial assemblage of pottery, with the great bulk of the material dating to the middle centuries of the Roman period. The dominant component was reduced coarse wares (most products of the north Wiltshire industry), supplemented by oxidised wares and black-burnished ware. Fine and specialist wares totalled 8.7% of the assemblage by sherd count (16% of weight). Amphorae mostly Dr 20. There is far less Oxford colour-coated ware (and other products) than would be expected had occupation on the site extended far into the 4th century on any significant scale. Graffiti or identification marks were recorded on three vessels, none certainly literate. . Overall, the fine and specialist ware component of the Arkells Land assemblage suggests a site of at least middling status in relation to the pattern indicated for earlier Roman sites in the region.",10141,127,136,57,361,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14100,"A very small assemblage from a large excavation, most of which are local products from the North Wiltshire industries. Imports are limited to 4 sherds of samian, a sherd of Gallic wine amphora, a few pieces of Dorset black burnished ware and a Severn Valley ware jar. The assemblage indicates activity in the 1st-2nd century AD.",109,1,1,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14101,"Unquantified assemblage of 1st-2nd C AD date. South and Central Gaulish samian and Dr 20 amphora (also Dr 20, 30 and 7-11)",,,,,36,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14102,"A moderate sized assemblage dated primarily 2nd-3rd C AD and dominated by Severn Valley oxidised wares, then Black-burnished wares. Also includes Dr 20 and Gallic amphora and north Gaulish mortaria. 344 sherds also from the evaluation. The range of wares is fairly limited with most of the types being typical of the 1st to 3rd centuries AD.",5654,52,18,,71,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14103,"A huge assemblage of pottery spanning 1st-4th C AD, dominated by Severn valley wares, then Malvernian limestone-tempered wares and Dorset Black-burnished wares. No quantifications of specific ware types. 94 miniature votive pots recovered , along with other 'specialist' type vessels, including one polygonal.",67345,479,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14104,Pottery found but no report or indications of quantity. Said to have been 2nd-3rd C AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14105,"A high concentration of pottery (though unquantified from excavation) comprising mainly Severn Valley ware, Black-burnished ware, Nene Valley ware and Oxfordshire ware mortaria. The pottery generally suggests a date of later 3rd to 4th c AD. A total of 69 sherds from the nearby evaluation dated 1st to 4th C AD.",69,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14106,"A small amount of pottery including Severn Valley ware, generally dating to the later Roman period.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14107,Many thousands of sherds of pottery discovered but no quantification (a nominal figure of 2000 sherds given here). This includes many wasters indicating pottery production in vicinity. The general date range is 2nd to 4th C AD.,2000,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14108,"The pottery assemblage is dominated by locally produced Severn Valley ware with smaller quantities of Dorset Black-Burnished ware and greywares. There are few examples of early Roman pottery, however the bulk post-dates AD 250.",620,5,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14109,A single sherd of identifiable late Iron Age pottery was  retrieved from rampart deposits suggesting that further remodelling took place at this time. No Roman pottery.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14110,"A moderate sized pottery assemblage made up of local fabrics, notably Severn Valley ware and Malvernian rock-tempered fabric including a wheelthrown Malvernian greyware. Also Dorset Black Burnished ware, Oxfordshire red-slipped ware, Oxfordshire whiteware mortaria, midlands shell-tempered ware, Savernake grog-tempered ware, New Forest colour coated ware, Lower Nene Valley colour coated-ware, and Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria. The pottery ranges in date from the late Iron Age/early Roman period to the later 4th century AD. Pottery from the 1991 evaluation was not quantified but dated mainly 1st-2nd C AD.",680,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14111,"A small group of pottery including local greywares, Severn Valley wares, Oxford colour coats, Dorset Black-burnished wares and Midland pink grogged wares.",36,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14112,"A very small assemblage considering the huge area excavated, mostly dating to the 2nd-3rd C AD, with some later Iron Age sherds. The majority of sherds are local Wiltshire reduced wares, with some Dorset black burnished ware, Severn valley ware and Oxfordshire red slipped ware. Also samian and Dressel 20 olive oil amphorae.",307,2,4,,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14113,"A very small abraded assemblage for the size of area excavated, mostly dating mid to late Roman. Main fabrics comprise sandy grey wares and Severn Valley wares, with some Black-burnished wares and a sherd of Oxfordshire mortarium.",42,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14114,"An assemblage of middle-late Iron Age date, with no evidence for wheel-made pottery.",600,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14115,"No overall fragment count, but a moderate sized assemblage dating early 2nd-mid 4th C AD. Mostly local greywares, Severn Valley wares and Black-burnished wares.",,,,,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14116,"Moderate sized assemblage ranging in date from late Iron Age to the 4th c AD. Dominated by Savernake wares but includes Malvernian wares, Severn valley wares, Black-burnished wares, Oxfordshire wares and New Forest Wares. Gaulish amphora found.",456,5,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14117,"A substantial assemblage of later 2nd-4th c AD pottery, mostly Severn Valley ware and Malvernian reduced wares and also Black-burnished wares and Oxfordshire colour coats. Relatively large amount of samian with high % of decorated vessels.",1520,21,8,,63,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14118,"Substantial pottery assemblage, mostly local and regional coarsewares including Severn valley Ware, North Wilts wares and Malvernian wares. Also British made Pulborough samian. Mostly dating later 1st - 3rd C AD, with some later  and earlier material. Three almost complete late Iron Age storage vessels recovered from small pits - ritual or for some form of cold storage?",5570,64,12,,68,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14119,"Pottery from fieldwalking includes samian local greywares, Severn valley wares and Black-burnished wares. Mostly 3rd-4th C in date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14120,Abraded sherds of Roman pottery found in and around the graves,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14121,"Small assemblage with a 2nd-3rd C AD emphasis, mostly comprising local (North Wilts) grey and oxidised wares, but also four sherds of (Central Gaulish?) samian, a sherd of southern Spanish amphora and a sherd of Dorset Black-Burnished ware.",23,,1,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14122,Modest assemblage comprising largely local coarsewares. Regional imports are limited to 13 sherds of Dorset black burnished ware and a sherd of white-ware flagon. The assemblage appears to comprise a mixture of mainly 2nd and 3rd-century types.,228,3,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14123,"A moderately small assemblage dominated by sherds of oxidised Severn Valley ware, local grey ware and black burnished ware.  Also Midlands pink grog-tempered ware, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria and Oxfordshire white-ware mortaria. The level of samian is surprisingly high and there are also Baetican amphora from southern Spain. All generally date mid/late 2nd to early 4th C AD.",143,2,9,2,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14124,Assemblage of 145 middle-late Iron Age sherds and 5 Roman sherds.,150,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14125,"A moderately small assemblage from the evaluation (no information for the villa), mainly local wares including  oxidised but some reduced Severn Valley wares and  grey sandy wares. Also Dorset black burnished ware, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, Oxfordshire white ware mortaria, Oxfordshire colour-coated ware and Savernake ware. Most of the assemblage dates to the 2nd through to the late 3rd/4th century with the greatest emphasis on material of 2nd century.",226,4,,4,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14126,1st to 4th C AD pottery recovered but no quantification or report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14127,A modest sized assemblage dominated by late Roman shelly wares. Also Severn Valley Ware and Black burnished ware.,119,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14128,"A total of 984 sherds was recovered from the evaluation and 259 sherds from the excavation. Pottery principally dated to the 2nd-4th C, although there are indications of a late 3rd/4th C concentration. The assemblage comprises mainly local wares, in particular Severn Valley ware as well as Black-Burnished ware, late Roman Malvernian ware and Oxfordshire wares. There is very little in the way of imported wares.",1243,11,,,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14129,"A small number of the sherds from the excavation, mostly 1st-2nd C AD in date, though some continuing into the later Roman period. Many fragments of a single early Roman pottery jar came from a ditch, perhaps originally a complete vessel.",22,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14130,"The pottery assemblage was large unabraded and dates later 2nd/3rd to 4th C AD. Local greywares predominate, then Dorset Black-burnished wares and Severn Valley wares. 94 sherds from the evaluation and 83 from the excavation. Presence of Midlands shell-tempered ware is an indication that activity extends into the second half of the 4th century.",177,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14131,"A small assemblage of pottery, consisting largely of Severn Valley ware with a few fragments of black-burnished ware and Samian. Most probably fall in the 2nd-3rd century date range. Also two possible late Iron Age sherds.",51,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14132,"Small assemblage of early Roman pottery, including Palaeozoic limestone-tempered ware, South Spanish olive-oil amphora, South Gaulish samian, Dorset black burnished ware, Savernake ware and Severn Valley ware.",58,,1,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14133,"Only four Roman sherds from the evaluation, dated 2nd c AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14134,"The assemblage is dominated by late Iron Age hand-made, Malvernian limestone tempered wares and local Severn Valley wares. Also Savernake wares, late Iron Age hand-made grog tempered wares, and from one context Dorset Black burnished ware. With the exception of the latter, the entire assemblage appears to date to the 1st century AD, in particular to the second half of that century.",271,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14135,"Just three sherds of pottery, two of them Oxidized Severn Valley ware",3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14136,Roman pottery recovered but no report or quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14137,"The excavations produced a substantial quantity of pottery of late Iron Age/early Roman date. Handmade wares belonging to the later Iron age native tradition along with early wheel made native wares dominate the assemblage throughout. Also Gallic amphora, (Gauloise type 5), and a sherd from a terra rubra platter.",4000,106,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14138,Pottery recovered but not recorded or dated closer than 'Roman'.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14139,"148 sherds recorded from the Inns Court evaluation,  6097 sherds from the excavation and 1127 sherds from the 2nd Filwood Park excavation remain the only quantified pottery from the site. The principal Romano-British types present were Black Burnished ware (18.8%), local Greywares (45.2%) and Severn Valley wares (2.75%), mostly dating to the 2nd or 3rd century, though there are some late Iron Age/early Roman sherds. Also small amounts of Oxfordshire, New Forest and Nene Valley wares. A large greyware storage jar (late 1st/early 2nd C AD) lay complete partially within a pit at Inns Court. It contained 3 complete/near complete vessels of a similar date, and is suggested as an urned cremation?",7372,80,,,50,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14140,"A small assemblage mainly of 2nd-3rd C AD date, mostly Severn Valley wares.",17,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14141,"A moderate sized assemblage mostly dated between the later 3rd and the mid 4th century. The most common fabric found was local greywares, (33%), Black Burnished ware (27%), then Severn Valley wares (11%). The Oxford industry was represented by just a small number of vessels including colour coated wares and parts of two Oxfordshire Whiteware mortaria. Also a cheese press.",921,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14142,"A modest assemblage, some of which dates to the late Iron Age-early Roman period (mainly calcareous types, including fossil shell tempered and calcite-tempered types), and some dating after AD 250 (Dorset Black-Burnished Ware, local greywares, Midlands shell-tempered ware, Oxfordshire red colour coated ware). Forms include a strainer bowl.",412,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14143,"Nine sherds likely to date to the late Iron Age/early Roman period and 235 mid-late Roman sherds (158 from evaluation). Local grey wares predominate and others include Dorset black burnished ware, Oxfordshire colour-coated ware and a single sherd of New Forest colour-coated ware.",244,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14144,"A moderate assemblage exclusively dating to the early Roman period, comprising local grey wares, Severn Valley ware and Savernake ware. Continental imports include 23 sherds of South Gaulish samian and several sherds of Dressel 20 olive oil amphora, some burnt, and a Haltern 70. 129 sherds from the 2011 watching brief dated 1-2nd C AD with the exception of a  Black-burnished wares cremation vessel of 3rd C AD date.",572,5,13,,32,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14145,"Moderate sized late Iron Age and Roman Pottery assemblage dominated by local greywares, then Black burnished wares, Limestone-tempered ware, Severn Valley ware and Oxfordshire colour-coated ware. The pottery is either 1st c AD or 3rd-4th C AD.",610,6,1,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14146,"Modest assemblage, ranging in date from between the 1st and late 4th centuries AD. Most material, including the Severn Valley ware and Micaceous Grey Ware, is of local origin. Non-local ware includes Oxfordshire mortaria.",203,2,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14147,"Moderate sized assemblage ranging from middle Iron to 2nd-3rd C AD. Romano-British wares were mostly local greyware, Severn Valley ware and Dorset black-burnished ware. Includes a cheese press. 27 sherds of 1st-2nd C AD pottery from the southern evaluation.",526,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14148,"Substantial assemblage of pottery of 3rd-4th C AD date. Sources include Oxfordshire ware, Nene Valley ware, Dorset Black burnished wares, New Forest painted wares and Severn Valley wares. Not quantified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14149,"A small collection of pottery consistent with a mainly late C3 to late C4 date for the site. Includes samian, Amphora, black burnished Dorset, south midlands shell tempered ware and Oxfordshire wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14150,"A small assemblage of 2nd C AD pottery, mainly black-burnished ware.",11,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14151,"A modest collection nearly all dating to the 2nd-3rd C AD, except one later 4th C AD sherd. Mostly Severn Valley Ware and Dorset black-burnished ware.",23,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14152,"A relatively high density of pottery dating 3rd-4th C AD, mostly comprising Black-burnished ware and local greywares. Also late Roman shelly ware and Oxfordshire colour coats.",479,3,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14153,"A significant of 2nd-4th C AD date, with a distinct late Roman emphasis. Dominated by local greywares and Severn Valley wares, along with Oxfordshire wares, Black-burnished wares and late Roman shelly wares.",1680,16,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14154,"A high density of pottery of 2nd-4th C AD date, with a late Roman emphasis. All the usual local greywares, Severn Valley wares, Black-burnished wares and 4th c Oxfordshire and New Forest wares. A detached face mask from a flagon/jug was recovered.",6452,65,,,103,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14155,A meagre assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date.,11,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14156,"15 sherds of mid to late Iron Age pottery and c 205 sherds of Roman pottery, mostly later 1st-2nd c AD. Mostly local greyware and oxidized ware, Severn Valley ware and micaceous greyware",220,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14157,The assemblage included late Iron Age sherds but all residual in Roman features. The Roman pottery was mainly late Roman but included1st-2nd C Savernake wares and early Severn Valley wares. Black-burnished wares formed c 30% of assemblage. Also Oxfordshire wares.,382,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14158,"A moderate sized 2nd-3rd C AD assemblage, dominated by local greywares and Severn valley wares, along with Black-burnished wares. Also 1st C AD Savernake ware, Oxford colour coats and a single Nene Valley beaker fragment.",523,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14159,"A modest sized assemblage with 59 Iron Age sherds and 239 Roman sherds, mostly 2nd-3rd C AD and dominated by local greywares and Severn Valley wares.",298,3,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14160,"Large assemblage of 1st to 4th C AD date, but it remains unquantified, except for the 1990 excavation, which is presented here. Mostly local reduced coarsewares, then Black-burnished wares. The fine and specialists wares formed 7.3% of the 2nd C assemblage and 11.1% of the late Roman assemblage.",2168,,17,24,75,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14161,2nd to 4th C AD pottery found but no quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14162,"A moderate sized assemblage including Malvern rock-tempered ware, Severn Valley oxidised ware and Iron Age limestone-tempered ware. The pottery dates Iron-early Roman and later Roman.",781,7,1,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14163,"Ceramic assemblage is dominated by the two major industries, Severn Valley ware and Malvernian ware, along with Dorset/SW black burnished ware and some Oxfordshire colour-coated ware. Limited evidence for 4th C material.",2848,50,,10,50,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14164,"The 2007-8 excavation produced 1692 sherds (22kg) dominated by Iron Age coarse fossil shell tempered wares, and Dorset black burnished ware (BB1) and Severn Valley ware, with some Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria,  Oxfordshire, Savernake ware and South Spanish amphora. The 2009 evaluation produced 676 sherds of pottery, almost entirely of Roman date with some mid-late Iron Age. Severn Valley ware formed 41% of the assemblage by count and Dorset black-burnished ware was 25%. The majority of the pottery appears to belong to the middle Roman period. A small pit contained a complete pottery vessel, dated after AD 150. The 2011 evaluation produced 38 sherds of pottery.",2406,32,4,,39,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14165,"The pottery almost all come from the 15 trenches over the cropmark settlement and is dated late Iron Age to late Roman. The Roman pottery comprises mainly local reduced, grey or black-firing and oxidised coarsewares. Grog-tempered greywares which probably comprise a mix of local material and Savernake ware are moderately abundant. Also Dorset Black Burnished ware, Severn Valley ware, Oxford red slipped or whitewares, New Forest colour-coated ware and Harrold shell-tempered ware. The pottery ranges across the Roman period, with perhaps the strongest emphasis on the Later Roman period after c. AD 250-70.",1261,12,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14166,"The Romano-British pottery assemblage was dominated by locally produced Severn Valley wares. Malvernian wares were recorded alongside other locally produced pottery with limestone-tempered wares, shell tempered wares and grog tempered wares featuring prominently. Also Dorset Black-burnished ware, Savernake ware, Mancetter/Hartshill and Oxfordshire ware. Lack of late shell-tempered wares indicate that occupation of the site had reduced, or shifted away, by the second half of the 4th century AD. Includes a near complete vessel from a ditch.",1200,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14167,"A moderate sized assemblage of middle Iron Age to late Roman date, including Malvernian limestone-tempered ware, Severn Valley ware and Black-burnished ware. A chronological emphasis on the late Iron Age-early Roman period.",928,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14168,"Assemblage mainly dating to the early Roman period and comprises wares from local sources, mainly in North Wiltshire. Also some Severn Valley ware.",156,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14169,"A very modest sized assemblage considering the scale of the excavations, with the bulk of the material dating to the middle centuries of the Roman period. Reduced coarse wares were the dominant component in the assemblage, most from North Wilts. Also Oxfordshire ware, Savernake ware, black-burnished ware and Severn Valley wares. Fine and specialist wares totalled only 6.7% of the assemblage by sherd count (but 17% by weight).",2825,31,14,15,72,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14170,"Most of the pottery dated to the 1st and 2nd centuries, though 3rd or 4th century pottery was represented. The assemblage was dominated by limestone-tempered wares and Severn Valley oxidised wares. Also Dorset black-burnished ware and Oxfordshire ware.",1752,11,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14171,"The assemblage was dominated by Severn Valley ware fabrics, then Dorset Black-burnished ware and Malvernian ware. 'Fine and specialist' wares formed 6.4% of the total sherds (10.7% of weight). A single mortarium sherd from the Mancetter-Hartshill industry. The emphasis of the assemblage falls largely if not entirely in the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD.",435,6,4,1,21,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14172,"The majority of the assemblage comprises local sand-tempered coarsewares, in both oxidised and reduced fabrics, of mid to late Roman date. Also large amounts of Dorset Black burnished ware and Severn Valley ware, along with Oxford fabrics and Mancetter-Hartshill vessels.",630,10,,10,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14173,"Assemblage dominated by local greywares and Dorset Black Burnished ware, with a main date range of 2nd-3rd c AD, though extending into the 4th C. Other wares include Nene Valley and Oxfordshire, Severn Valley and Midlands shelly wares.",529,5,2,5,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14174,"The pottery assemblage dates from Middle/Late Iron Age to Late Roman.  The Romano-British wares comprise mainly Severn Valley wares, local greywares and Dorset Black-burnished wares and have a mid Roman emphasis. Also Oxfordshire ware, samian and Dressel 20 amphorae. A large thick-walled early Roman storage jar had been placed in a small circular pit and packed with clay.",2095,24,14,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14175,"A moderate sized assemblage, mainly from the pits, dating mostly to the later 3rd and 4th C AD. Dominated by local greywares and Dorset Black-burnished wares.  Also Oxfordshire and New Forest wares. A number of the pits included substantially complete vessels (including one samian bowl and New Forest beaker).",1140,9,,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14176,A small assemblage of late Iron Age-early Roman date. Includes some Severn Valley ware and local greywares.,65,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14177,A small assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date.,41,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
14178,"A moderate sized assemblage dating from later 2nd to 4th/5th C Ad, with an emphasis on the later Roman period. Dominated by local greywares and Dorset Black-burnished wares, and also including Oxfordshire wares and Midlands shell-tempered wares.",1963,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14179,"A substantial assemblage, mostly of late Roman date. Dominated by local greywares and Black-burnished wares",8268,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14180,A small assemblage of mainly 1st-2nd C AD including some late Iron Age fabrics. Also some later Roman pottery found unstratified.,51,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14181,"Pottery only quantified from later excavation. Mostly dated late 2nd-4th C AD, dominated by Dorset Black-burnished wares and local greywares, along with some Oxfordshire wares.",800,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14182,A substantial assemblage of pottery including a significant amount of samian but not quantification or report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14183,"Unquantified assemblage of mid-late Iron Age date, along with 3rd C AD pottery.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
14184,"Assemblage of late Iron Age to late Roman date. A total of 200 Roman sherds from the 1918 excavation, including samian and New Forest beakers.",200,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14185,Pottery recovered including samian but no further details.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
14186,"A substantial assemblage, with a few sherds dating later Iron Age/early Roman, but most mid to late Roman. The assemblage is quite diverse in terms of compositions with imported continental fine wares (inc. Moselle black-slipped ware) and amphorae (Dressel 20 and Gallic wine), regional imports (Dorset black burnished ware accounts for 16% of all assemblage; also Severn Valley ware, Savernake ware, late Roman shelly ware, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, New Forest ware and Oxfordshire ware) and local wares (40%).",1985,,6,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
14187,"A substantial though unquantified pottery assemblage of later 1st to early 3rd C AD date. Black-burnished ware identified, along with two sherds of lead glazed ware.",,,,,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
14188,"A small but concentrated ceramic assemblage  dominated by locally produced coarsewares (inc. Severn Valley ware), along with Dorset Black-burnished ware (BB1), samian ware and Dressel 20 amphorae. The pottery is dated later 1st-2nd C AD.",103,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
14189,"A moderate sized assemblage in good condition dominated by Dorset Black Burnished ware (BB1) and local greywares, along with Severn Valley ware, Oxfordshire ware and Moselkeramik.",279,3,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15001,"The Alice Holt industry's speciality was large storage jars, which had a wide distribution over much of the country. Production continued up to the end of the Roman period, but in the 4th century a shift in emphasis occurred to the production of Hook rimmed jars and yellow fabric vessels. The quantities of pottery recorded here derive solely from the single kiln mound excavation by Bennett et al. (1963) and can thus be used with the area of investigation as a proxy indicator for pottery density.",4038,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15002,"The number of sherds were not presented in the publication, though 710 vessels were represented.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15003,"The number of sherds were not given in the publication, though 2815 vessels were represented. Much of the graffiti is associated with ceramic test pieces.",,,,1,8,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15004,,25593,156,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15005,"The pottery primarily derived from the Alice Holt industry, due to its close proximity to the kilns to its east. Much of the material from the pre-1074 excavations had been discarded after sorting, and the quantified data in the report pertains only to the stratified material. The data recorded here should be noted as being very under-represented. Two literate graffitos were identified on pottery. Face pots were also present.",,298,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15006,Sherd counts could not be distinguished between middle Iron Age and late Iron Age/early Roman material.,,,6,,24,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15007,"Alice Holt wares dominate the Roman assemblage. Large storage jars and dishes are present, though forms such as flagons and mortaria are absent. Very small quantities of Samian and mortaria suggest some long distance trade links. Late Roman wares were almost completely absent other than the funerary vessel and the odd sherd from the quarry pit backfill.",800,12,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15008,"Dressel 1B amphora present, though other imports such as terra nigra, Samian and Gallo-Belgic wares, as well as mortaria are absent. A few over-fired pottery sherds suggest small-scale ceramic production may have taken place on site. No quantification data are in the report.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
15009,"Belgic grog-tempered wares dominate the assemblage. Saucepan pots (MIA) were absent, as were Samian and mortaria.",574,7,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
15010,"The Iron Age pottery was predominantly middle Iron Age in date, though late Iron Age forms were present. Both grog- and flint-tempered vessels were present, mainly in the form of jars.",127,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15011,"A single sherd of Baetican amphorae derived from a corndrier. Regional imports included Dorset BB ware, New Forest ware, Oxfordshire ware and Verulamium ware. Local fabrics included Alice Holt ware, Hampshire grog-tempered, and Tilford ware.",2510,27,1,25,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15012,,18,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15013,"Specialist and imported wares are very poorly represented. Reduced coarse wares dominate, with Alice Holt, New Forest, Dorset Black Burnished, Grog-tempered, and Oxfordshire wares making up the remainder.",10157,124,7,12,55,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15014,"The pottery assemblage is characterised by a shift, in the mid-1stC AD away from imported Dorset wares towards more local sources, particularly Alice Holt vessels. Proportions of finewares are considerably low.",10668,122,8,27,86,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15015,"The presence of early fine wares, Samian and Central Gaulish black slip, indicates 2ndC AD occupation. A relatively high proportion of later fine wares from the Oxfordshire and New Forest industry is complemented by the presence of late Roman Hampshire grog-tempered ware.",3764,46,,25,30,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15016,"Reduced coarse wares were most common, with a reasonable percentage of Dorset BB ware.",5653,50,1,2,73,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15017,,1940,24,2,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15018,"A very wide range of forms were represented by the assemblage, and whilst coarse reduced wares dominated the fabrics utilised, Dorset BB, Alice Holt, Oxfordshire white ware, orange wares, and south Gaulish Samian were all relatively well represented. 17 sherds of Samian included graffiti.",15740,200,142,55,602,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15019,"Large quantities of early imported fine wares were present in the assemblage, as well as amphorae, Samian and imported mortaria. Other wares ranged from local Vectis wares, to New Forest, Oxfordshire, Rowlands Castle, Dorset BB, Durotrigian, and Alice Holt vessels, together demonstrating the range of extensive trade links through the period of occupation.",14497,134,1393,13,254,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15020,A small number of Dressel 1 amphora were recovered.,607,7,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15021,"Sandy, flint-tempered and grog-tempered fabrics made up the assemblage. Some were possibly post-Conquest, though no wheel-thrown 'Romanised' wares were recovered.",99,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15022,"Late Iron Age fabrics were dominated by sandy wares, perhaps from the Wareham-Poole region. Grog-, flint- and shell-tempered wares were also present. Storage jars tend to predominate. Two late Roman sherds were also identified.",298,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15023,,2132,22,1,,34,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15024,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15025,"The SFB contained New Forest, Alice Holt and Portchester D wares. Wasters of Hampshire grog-tempered ware were recovered from working hollows.",2526,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15026,"Some of the pottery was middle Iron Age in date, but this was not separated out by quantification.",730,12,,,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15027,"Straight-sided dishes and bowl were present along with larger storage vessels. Some new forms were also found, also thought to have been produced on site.",31534,349,,1,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15028,"The assemblage primarily consisted of local grey wares, though a couple of fragments of Oxfordshire and New Forest wares were present. A single sherd of Samian represented the only evidence of import.",401,3,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15029,The only imported sherd in the assemblage was from a terra rubra beaker.,1186,13,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15030,"The most common fabrics were South East Dorset black burnished ware, Wessex grog-tempered ware, and grey wares. Fine wares were generally rare and confined to Oxfordshire and New Forest wares. Moselkeramik was represented, as was central Gaulish Samian, thought to have been residual.",1036,19,1,8,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15031,"9560 sherds of pottery dating from the early Iron Age to the 1stC AD were also recovered, though the late Iron Age proportion was not separately quantified and are thus not recorded here. However, a significant proportion of the late Iron Age assemblage is noted to have been of the Wareham-Poole Harbour industry. A paucity of finewares was noted in the Roman assemblage until New Forest and Oxfordshire wares were introduced to the site towards the later Roman phase. A number of Roman sherds with pre-fired perforations in the neck and/or body of the vessel were also present (suggested to have been for bee-keeping).",3767,58,2,,95,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15032,"A high proportion of LIA wares came from the Wareham-Poole region (see also Suddern Farm). The Roman assemblage comprised mostly sand-tempered wares, predominantly from the Alice Holt kilns. BB1, grog-tempered, Oxfordshire and New Forest vessels made up a small proportion of the assemblage. Imported finewares were very rare but included a Rhenish ware sherd. Samian was notably absent.",2766,21,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15033,The LIA/ER assemblage was notably more varied in forms and fabrics than both of the earlier phased assemblages.,7590,86,2,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15034,Some middle Iron Age wares are included here as they were not separated in the report by quantity.,1370,11,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15035,"Vectis wares dominated the small assemblage, though other regional and imported vessel fragments were also present.",101,1,1,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15036,Only one fineware vessel fragment was recovered. Flint-gritted wares dominate the coarseware assemblage.,1265,18,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15037,The pottery was mainly of grog-tempered and sandy ware fabrics.,166,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15038,"No quantification of the pottery is given. The pottery primarily dates to the second  half of the 1stC AD. 2ndC AD pot, such as Dorset BB ware, only appears in the upper levels of features. Later Roman wares (3rd-4thC) only appear in the overlying soil layer. A number of coarseware type at the site have not been found at Clausentum, over the river, and suggest differences in chronology and perhaps the status of the people in the two areas. Standard imports of the late 1stC AD were well represented including Samian bowls and cups, terra nigra platters, whiteware flagons, North Gaulish mortaria and Spanish olive oil amphora, plus local copies of Gallo-Belgic and early Roman forms were also evident. It would appear that the site engaged in the exchange of items relating to long-distance trade.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15039,"Only 27 Roman sherds were recovered from the 1995-7 excavations (144g), consisting coarse grey wares and BB wares. The remainder comes from the earlier, more extensive excavations. Unfortunately earlier Iron Age pottery is included in this count, since no quantification by phase is given in the report. These are included here because the occupation of the site appears to have been continuous. BB1 and Alice wares were common.",27027,297,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15040,Forms and fabrics are not quantified in their entirety. A Samian base included a graffito reading 'AVM'.,919,11,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15041,"A number of different pottery groups of varying date were recovered, mostly produced on site as indicated by a relatively large quantity of wasters, and dating the full range of the Roman period.",,44,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15042,"Most pottery was of local grey ware type, but grog-tempered, New Forest and BB1 wares were also recovered. No quantification is given.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15043,,404,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15044,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15045,"Much of the pottery assemblage is likely missing, particularly form the earliest excavations, though the surviving sample includes a very wide range of regional British wares as well as some fine imports.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15046,No pottery quantification was given.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15047,"The Roman assemblage includes Samian, other imports and amphorae as well as more local products, representing a restricted date range from the middle of the 1stC AD to the first quarter of the 2ndC AD.",1992,32,22,,29,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15048,The pottery assemblage included BB1 ware and a sherd from a Spanish Dressel 20 amphora.,81,2,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
15049,"The assemblage is dominated by New Forest wares, but also includes BB1, grog-tempered and Oxfordshire wares. No imports were noted.",302,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15050,c.7.5kg of Roman pottery came from the well. Quantification of Samian and amphora is not given by sherd count.,,47,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15051,Pottery was only referred to in discussion.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15052,Grog-tempered fabrics dominate the assemblage.,154,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15053,"Now lost, an early Bronze Age red ware vessel (c.2300-1800BC) was reportedly recovered from the sandpit. A number of complete or near-complete vessels of LIA/ERB date were recovered, as well as some mid- and late Roman vessels.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15054,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15055,"The pottery assemblage was overwhelmingly of Alice Holt products, and mostly came from the three wells excavated. The material was only quantified by EVE.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15056,Two pots formed the grave good of the inhumation: a Samian dish (Dragendorff 31 - AD160-190) and an Alice Holt flagon with a swastika graffito (AD200-280).,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15057,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15058,"None of the pottery examined need have been earlier than the mid-2ndC AD. Alice Holt products dominated the assemblage, and jars were the most common form. The assemblage was only quantified by EVE.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15059,"Butt beakers and Gallo-Belgic imitations suggest an early date, at least as early as Flavian. The Samian ware supports this. The mortarium is 2ndC AD.",,22,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15060,"Other than local coarsewares, mostly Rowlands Castle industry, New Forest and BB2 wares were also present.",,26,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15062,"The quantity of fine ware and mortaria was said to have been in lower proportions than at Neatham, which suggested to the specialist that such items were traded through Neatham. However, local red fine ware was relatively common at the site.",608,8,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15063,2nd to 4thC AD pottery of New Forest and Alice Holt wares were noted from surface finds and a large black soil layer.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15064,"Pottery constituting some 1800 vessels were recovered, mostly wasters.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15065,"The LIA pottery is reported on separately and was not quantified in the same way as the Roman pottery recorded here. Only three sherds of fineware were identified. BB1, sandy and flint-tempered wares dominated the assemblage. Two body sherds included graffito: a cross and a grid. The single sherd of amphora may have been Dressel 1 or 2-4.",484,6,1,,1,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15066,Pottery associated with the bathhouse included New Forest and Oxfordshire finewares.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15067,The pottery from the 1960s-1980s excavations were not quantified and nothing is known about that from the 19thC excavations.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15068,"The vessels represented as grave goods were predominantly dishes, with flagons bowls jars and lids represented to a lesser degree. One grave included a beaker.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15069,No pottery quantification is given in the report. The bulk of the pottery suggests an wide chronology ranging from the late 1st to late 4thC AD date. Alice Holt vessels dominate the assemblage. Oxfordshire and New Forest wares were found much less.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
15070,Early forms of Alice Holt pottery was recovered from the final backfilling of the enclosure ditch.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15071,"960 (9.25kg) sherds came from a single pit. Wheel made forms include small jars, bead rim jars, large storage jars, lids, dishes, flagons, beakers and imitation Gallo-Belgic forms.",1800,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15072,"Excluding the grave goods, 262 sherds (1120gms) of Roman pottery were recovered from the site. The sherds from the road ditches traverse the full extent of the Roman period.",262,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15073,"The pottery assemblage was not fully quantified, though BB1 vessels were present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15074,"The pottery was not fully quantified, but contained late Iron Age and early Roman wares including Samian. Field walking produced later Roman wares from the New Forest and Alice Holt industries.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15075,"35 vessels were recovered in total, 5 of which were Samian, whilst New Forest fine wares were also present. 106 sherds were recovered from the evaluation, of similar types to the 1976 assemblage, but these are not included here since it would not reflect the area excavated.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15076,"The assemblage was weighed but no raw data were given. Alice Holt kilns appear to have provided the bulk of the grey ware in both early and late phases. Few fine wares were present and included butt beakers and Gallo-Belgic imitations, as well as a few fragments of Samian.",,,,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15077,"None of the pottery had been quantified, although a large report exists. The assemblage dates from the first half of the 1stC AD until the 4thC AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15078,Five glazed vessels of late 1st/early 2ndC AD date were recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15079,Seven miniature vessels of Alice Holt production were recovered from the coffin.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15080,"The kilns were producing two main types of fabric (alongside grey wares): a fine-grained, smooth paste and a medium-hard, sandy fabric. Forms included cups, bowls, beakers, bottles and jugs. A minimum of 534 vessels were recovered from the two kilns and associated waster dumps.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15081,"The kiln produced two main types of fabric (alongside grey wares): a fine-grained, smooth paste and a medium-hard, sandy fabric. Forms included cups, bowls, beakers, bottles and jugs. A minimum of 134 vessels were recovered from the kiln and its associated waster dump.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15082,"Only rim fragments were counted. Jars were most common (64.5%), followed by flagons (17.7%), bowls (9.6%), storage jars (3.5%), necked jars (2.5%) and lids (2.2%).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15083,"Only rims were counted. Jars were most common in the assemblage (52.5%) followed by storage jars (21.1%), bowls (15%), flagons (11.0%), necked jars (0.2%) and dishes (0.2%).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15084,"579 sherds of middle-late Iron Age pottery was recovered from the enclosure ditches including an amphora sherd. 14221 sherds of Roman pottery came form the villa. Early Roman material was scarce, mainly restricted to imported fine wares. Much of the pottery was mid-late 3rdC AD in date. Greywares dominated (7954 sherds), followed by grog-tempered (3607 sherds), New Forest wares (1454 sherds), SE Dorset BB1 (674 sherds), Oxfordshire wares (161 sherds), and oxidised ware (143 sherds). A few fragments of Overwey ware, central Gaulish black-slipped ware, and Moselkeramik were also recovered.",14800,203,1,75,59,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15085,The pottery was not quantified but the majority is said to have been southern Atrebatic ware.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15086,"A large amount of pottery was recovered. This was quantified by the minimum no. of pots rather than sherd count or weight. Large bead-rimmed carinated jars and Cavetto rim jars dominated the assemblage, though other than jars, only lids were also recovered, and the kiln clearly had a specialised production in pot form.",,,,,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15087,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15088,"The pottery was not quantified but consisted of local grey wares, primarily jars.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15090,"The high proportion of Silchester-type ware (58%) compared with smaller quantities of grog-tempered (10%) and early sandy (11%) wares, and together support a date for the use of the site after the middle of the 1st century AD.",2654,46,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
15091,"The grog-tempered, early sandy, and flint-tempered Silchester-type wares all formed part of this indigenous tradition, with varying degrees of continuity into the Romano-British period. These are predominantly from the Alice Holt industry, although other production centres, perhaps including those at Hampstead Marshall and Shaw-cum-Donnington, Berkshire and Shedfield, Hampshire may also be represented. The letter 't' graffito, incised into the underside of the base of a necked bowl and a small pedestal base with a post-firing graffiti 'X'.",5896,66,9,2,42,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15092,"The LIA/ER material consists flint-tempered, sandy fabrics, grog-tempered, micaceous, shelly, and organic wares, as well as some imports and other finewares. Of the amphora, Dressel 1A, 2-4 and 20 were all represented, the first two associated with wine from Campania and the latter associated with olive oil from Baetica.",3120,20,172,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15093,"Amphora ranged from Italian, Spanish and southern Gaulish products. Terra Nigra and Gallo-Belgic wares suggest the pre-Conquest origin of the settlement. A high proportion of fine wares and table wares are evident.",9814,120,39,,84,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15094,Pottery of Roman date (some 3rd/4thC AD) was recovered from pit and ditch features.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15095,"The site produced nearly 5000 sherds, but this dated from the early Iron Age to the Roman period, and it is not known exactly how much late Iron Age/early Roman pottery was present. Silchester ware predominates the assemblage, though one way in which the pottery at Kennel Farm differs from other Basingstoke area sites is in the presence of a variety of exotic Gallo-Belgic Terra Rubra and Whiteware and Central Gaulish imports of both late Iron Age and pre-Flavian date. These were present however, at Calleva.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
15096,"The pottery assemblages range in date between the late Iron Age and the early Saxon periods, with the bulk being of Romano-British date. Most of the Romano-British sherds come from vessels manufactured during the middle to late 1stC AD or 3rd to 4thC AD, with very little 2ndC AD material being present. There is a good sequence of assemblages spanning the transition from late Iron Age to fully Romanised pottery production, while the few sub-Romano or early Saxon sherds indicate continued occupation during the 5thC AD and possibly beyond. They pottery is typical of a low-status farmstead and consist largely of jars and a very few fine ware imports.",3335,55,3,10,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15097,Much of the pottery is middle Iron Age in date.,1883,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15098,"None of the pottery was quantified, but the vast majority appeared to be of 'Belgic' type dating to the 1stC BC.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15099,Dressel 1 or 2-4 amphora attests to the evidence for early activity at the site.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
15100,BB1 ware was most common in the assemblage followed by grey and grog-tempered wares. Vectis ware was present in much lower quantities. 11 sherds of fine ware were recovered from the excavation.,155,,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15101,"The pottery assemblage was not fully quantified, but contained Vectis ware, BB1, greyware, flint-tempered coarseware, quartz-tempered coarseware, saucepan pot, Dressel 2-4 and 20 amphorae, Samian, and terra nigra.",,,6,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15102,"Large quantities of pottery was recovered, though no details exist.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15103,The bulk of the pottery is of Vectis ware variants. Also present were BB1Rowlands Castle and Sussex grey wares.,250,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15104,Most finds have not been reported.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15106,LIA Gallo-Belgic wares were present. Roman-dated pottery formed by far the largest group within the assemblage.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15107,"The Romano-British assemblage is dominated by coarsewares, both sandy and grog-tempered wares. The sandy wares potentially include New Forest and Alice Holt types. A few sherds of the 4thC AD Alice Holt buff-firing variant (Overwey-Tilford fabric) were present, including the characteristic late Roman rilled jar form. BB1 wares was also present. The finewares include later Roman colour-coated products of the Oxfordshire and New Forest kilns, mainly the former. The range of fabrics and forms indicates a late Roman date for much of the assemblage, with activity extending well into the 4thC AD, although some earlier Roman material is certainly present, in the form of a Samian cup of 2ndC AD date.",581,6,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15108,"The vast majority of the Roman pottery comes from the Latchmere Green site, though a small quantity of sherds do come from other sites along the route. A complete absence of South Gaulish and a total lack of Martres-de-Veyre Samian are in keeping with the overall deficiency in late 1st and early 2ndC AD pottery. Nearly all of the Samian from the site is 2ndC AD in date and Central Gaulish in origin. Only one East Gaulish Samian fragment of possible early 3rdC AD date was present on the site. All the amphora fragments came from the Latchmere Green site and, with one possible exception, are all from Dressel 20 olive oil amphorae. The two rims are both of 3rdC AD date and the overwhelming bulk of the stratified sherds come from features belonging to that period. Two graffitos of unknown type were observed.",3077,10,70,,97,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15109,The pottery recovered spans the mid-1st to mid-4thC AD. Dressel 20 amphorae was well represented (c.3rdC AD). The presence of wasters possibly hint of an extension to the nearby Shedfield industry.,4322,54,90,21,62,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15110,"Undiagnostic Roman greyware was recovered from the ditches, though no specialist report was supplied.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15111,"A large quantity of pottery was recovered but not quantified. The assemblage is dominated by 3rd and 4thC AD New Forest ware. Many of the sherds of New Forest ware have letters and signs inscribed; over 50 potsherds included graffitos. Much of the pottery from the original excavations was discarded, but suggest a variety of sources.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15112,"The vast majority of the assemblage appears to be of 3rd to 4thC AD date though a little earlier material may also be present. The pottery is in a wide variety of fabrics and forms. These included coarse grog-tempered storage jars and amphorae as well as 'finer' coarsewares such as jars bowls and dishes. Fineware bowls and beakers were also present. The pottery appears to be from a number of sources, including the New Forest, Alice Holt, Upchurch and Rowlands Castle industries which appear to have supplied both coarse and finewares. Pottery quantified by context not by form or fabric. The pottery from the ASE evaluations also included here. At least three graffitos present; one is an 'X'.",5541,89,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15113,The assemblage largely comprised local wares with a small number of Continental and regional imports. The Roman group appears to span the 1stC AD through to the later 3rd or 4thC AD. A small quantity of post-med pottery was mixed in the assemblage.,380,5,1,2,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15114,"The assemblage was in poor condition, being heavily abraded. Potentially, the earliest wares are coarsely flint-tempered, occurring in bead rim jar forms, which may have been late Iron Age in origin, though continued in use in Hampshire and Berkshire into the early post-conquest period. All examples of this fabric occurred in association with early 'Romanised' wares. Rowlands Castle wares are present, the forms of which, together with a single sherd of Samian suggests an early  Roman date (later 1st to 2ndC AD).",370,5,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15115,"Local coarsewares in grey and sandy fabrics dominate the assemblage with smaller quantities of grog-tempered wares, oxidised wares and flint-tempered fabrics. Five sherds of south-east Dorset Black Burnished ware were present. Regional finewares comprise colour-coated wares and parchment wares from the Oxfordshire and New Forest industries. lmported material is represented by a single fragment of Samian.",167,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15116,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15117,"The pottery assemblage was exclusively late 1st-2ndC AD date. It was dominated by sandy grey wares and a related sandy micaceous ware, possibly from Alice Holt. Other fabrics included flint-tempered and general sandy wares, plus a single sherd of south Gaulish Samian. 29 vessels were calculated from rim sherds and included a dominance of bead rim jars, necked cordoned jars, and small necked jars. Bowl and dish/platter were also present in lower frequencies.",283,4,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15118,"The Iron Age pottery was dominated by quartz and organic-tempered fabrics, with flint-tempered, sandy sherds and one grog-tempered sherd playing a lesser role. The Romano-British assemblage was dominated by sandy wares (58%), followed by greywares (17%), grog-tempered (9%), flint-tempered (7%), sand and organic tempered (7%), and oxidised wares (1%). Bead rim jars and Gallo-Belgic platters were present. No samian or other imported pottery was present.",1148,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15119,"The ceramic material was very poorly preserved. Some of the fabrics could be linked with material recovered from the early pre-Roman horizons at Silchester. Silchester wares dominated, though Alice Holt fabrics were also recovered. A Campanian black sand amphora was represented by seven bodysherds from a single context, possibly from a single vessel. Timby suggests this vessel was of Dressel 2-4 form, though Dr. 1 could not be discounted.",491,3,7,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
15120,"The majority of the pottery falls into a generally narrow date range between the late 3rd and early/mid 4thC, though a smaller, likely residual, group of 2nd and 3rdC AD pottery was also present. Most of latter group was Samian ware, which was noticeably abraded. Grog-tempered wares dominated the assemblage, whilst BB1 and sandy wares also made up a significant proportion. A wide range of fabrics were recovered in total including Alice Holt and New Forest wares.",1194,18,6,11,39,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15121,"The majority of the assemblage was from the New Forest industry, including finewares.",3283,,,,50,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15122,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15123,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15124,"The pottery assemblage is mostly locally-made coarse wares, which range in date from the late Iron Age through the Roman period. 27 sherds of undecorated Samian ware was also present. The sherds were very fragmentary and quite abraded. By comparison, only six medieval sherds were recovered.",760,,,,27,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15125,"The microfiche report on the Roman pottery stated that the assemblage had been quantified by sherd count, weight and minimum number of vessels, though none of this raw data was supplied and instead, placed in archive. The specialist report notes a substantial increase in the form and fabric range going into the early Roman phase, 3B. Occupation continued from the late Iron Age to the 4thC, though no late 4thC material was identified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15126,"Substantial quantities of pottery were recovered though no formal report or quantification exists. The late Iron Age and early Roman phases contain much finewares and imported pottery, including Samian, Hofheim flagons, amphorae, tazze, terra nigra and terra rubra.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15127,"Sandy greywares (Alice Holt) predominate; New Forest, Oxfordshire, Moselkeramik and Tilford wares also present. Jars were the dominant form present, whilst bowls, dishes and finewares were also present to a lesser extent.",1835,32,,5,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15128,"The vast majority of the assemblage was locally-fired greyware. Some Oxfordshire, Tilford and grog-tempered wares were present. Most vessel forms can be paralleled within the published range for the Alice Holt industry and consist largely of jars, with smaller quantities of flanged bowls, strainers, straight- and convex-sided dishes, lids and flagons. Sherds from two new forms were also recognised: a fairly squat, indented or dimpled jar/bowl with a short, everted rim, and a square, pre-firing perforation in the base of a straight-sided bowl/dish indicates that cheese presses were also made by the Alice Holt potters.",2469,32,,7,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
15129,No post-ex has yet been carried out.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15130,"Where datable, the pottery appears to span the later 1st/early 2ndC AD to the mid-later 2ndC AD. The group almost exclusively comprises local sandy wares including vessels from the Rowland's Castle kilns, on the Sussex/Hampshire border. The only recognisable regional import is a single Dorset black-burnished ware bowl. On current evidence the assemblage suggests a fairly low-status rural settlement where basic utilitarian domestic cooking and storage wares dominate.",122,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15131,"A single base sherd in Alice Holt Farnham ware was recovered, c.AD270+",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15132,"The kiln assemblages are dominated by jars, 90.8% within the Kiln B assemblage and 60.6% from Kiln A. The remaining 9.2% from Kiln B are all dishes. The second commonest form from Kiln A are flagons (19.9%) followed by dishes (11.9%). The remaining 7.6% are storage jars, bowls, flasks and strainers. Similarly, the range of vessels found in association with Kiln C suggests this is also broadly contemporary with the other kilns. On the basis of the broad dating provided by Lyne and Jefferies (1979), all the kilns appears to have been in use some point in the period AD270-420. The presence of a few vessels considered to have ceased production around AD270 suggests an early start date. A lack of later vessels may suggest the kilns were going out of use into the late 4thC AD.",5190,200,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15133,"One sherd of Samian dates prior to AD250 but may be residual, whilst fragments of grog-tempered wares suggests a date between AD250-400.",12,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15134,"None of the pottery from the 1990s evaluation is presented. Black burnished ware is present, as well as organic-tempered wares.",15,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15135,Mostly late Roman grog-tempered wares though New Forest beakers were also present.,128,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15136,,75,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15137,The thirteen trenches yielded pottery that ranged in date from the late Iron Age to early post-Roman period. 230 sherds (not included here) were recovered from fieldwalking.,1247,13,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
15138,A BB1 vessel had been mended with lead.,855,,18,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
15139,,189,,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
15140,The accompanying amphorae fragments are from Catalan Dressel 1 (c.50BC-AD20) and a Dressel 2.4 (c.50BC-AD50+) vessel. The material was probably deposited during the last decades of the 1st C BC and is totally lacking in Vectis ware. Durotrigian Black Burnished ware imports are present.,1112,,76,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
15141,The majority of the pottery is 3rd/early 4thC AD Vectis ware. A lack of wasters associated with the kilns argues against pottery production at the site.,594,,,2,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15142,Graffito included 'XPF' and 'HF' on separate pottery sherds. The pottery was not fully quantified. Pottery from a ditch which underlay the villa house dated to the late 1stC AD. New Forest wares were present in 3rdC AD contexts.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
15143,"Pottery was noted to have been present in abundance, but not quantified. 'Rude' potsherds are noted to have come from a large deposit mixed with much iron debris to the south of the villa. These may have been wasters.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
15144,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15145,The pottery assemblage is made up of locally-produced flint-tempered wares (?produced at or near the site - though this is not suggested in the report) and grey wares possibly from the Rowlands Castle kilns 8km to the west of the site.,433,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
15146,"A small group of late Iron Age pottery was present. The substantial Roman pottery assemblage ranged in date from the late 1stC AD to the late 4thC AD, but was predominately mid-3rd to late 4thC AD in date. A wide range of fabrics and forms were present. Jar dominated with significant quantities of bowls and dishes. Apart from the fine table wares, other specialist wares were few, and no imported mortaria and amphora were identified. The large regional industries at Oxford and the New Forest dominated supply of fine wares to Liss during the villa phase, though the proportion of fine wares remained minimal, comprising less than 3.5% of the assemblage by count.",7406,84,,50,66,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16001,"Substantial pottery assemblage (11399 sherds; 144kg), dating mostly from later 1st to mid /late 4th C AD. Mostly reduced coarsewares, with local finewares dominated by the Oxford industry. Amphora mostly comprise Dr 20. Seven instances of sherds with graffiti, including two literate examples. Probable pottery kiln (and wasters) found in earlier excavation, as part of an assemblage of 3000 sherds (not included in breakdown).",11399,144,141,69,704,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16002,A relatively small (but unquantified) pottery assemblage  from Ashville spanning 1st to 4th c AD. The Wyndyke Furlong assemblage (c 0.6ha) was quantified and is presented here. This dates predominantly to the 1st-2nd C AD.,855,12,,4,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16003,"A moderate sized early Roman pottery assemblage, with a restricted range of wares dominated by 'Belgic' type wares and reduced coarsewares but with 7.2% finewares, which may suggest higher status than typical farmsteads in the area. Amphora sherds probably from a Dressel 2-4. Forms dominated by jar types (63.5%).",2862,47,3,6,48,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16004,"High density of pottery ranging from late Iron Age to the mid-late 2nd C, with much reduced activity after this. Dominated by 'Belgic' type wares and reduced coarse wares, though with 10.7% fine and specialist wares (6.2% of stratified assemblage) including considerable amounts of south and central Gaulish samian. Emphasis on drinking/related vessels (cups/beakers).",3082,36,17,13,203,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16005,"Moderate density of pottery, mostly local Oxford wares and mostly of later Roman date, up to the early 4th C.",811,13,,12,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16006,"A modest sized assemblage of Roman pottery, mostly local coarsewares of early Roman date. Also Late Iron Age pottery though not quantified separately from other later prehistoric pottery.",1046,17,1,19,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16007,"A total of 48 sherds of late Iron Age pottery and 1000 sherds of Roman pottery, dominated by local coarsewares. A further 606 sherds of Roman pottery from the TVAS evaluation, mainly comprising local wares from the Oxfordshire industry, whitewares, colour-coats and grey wares accompanied by a smaller number of continental and regional imports. Graffito on a samian sherd.",1654,12,,17,20,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16008,"Moderate sized assemblage, mostly of 1st and especially 2nd C date. Fine and specialist wares form significant proportion of assemblage, although dominated by sandy white wares.",2117,35,,8,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16009,"Substantial assemblage of pottery including 2101 sherds of late Iron Age/early Roman date (grog-tempered material) and 4925 of Roman date, mostly sandy coarsewares. Amphora sherds mostly Dressel 20. Very little late Roman material.",7027,76,44,18,80,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16010,"A small assemblage of 2nd-4th C date, mostly of later 3rd and early 4th C date. Mostly coarsewares from the Oxford potteries.",339,3,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16011,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16012,"Late Iron Age and Roman pottery was found in three main areas. Excavations in the hillfort (particularly within the rampart ditch) produced 2532 sherds (21kg), mostly late Roman midden material, while OA trenches outside to the west and south produced a further 193 sherds (2.7kg), mostly of late Iron Age and early Roman date. The time team excavations around the probable villa produced 386 sherds (5.3kg), with an emphasis on 3rd-4th C material.",3111,29,1,118,28,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16013,A modest sized assemblage of middle to late Iron Age pottery.,656,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16014,"A modest sized assemblage in poor condition, generally 2nd-3rd C AD in date. Dominated by fine greywares and oxidised sandy wares.",2081,19,,40,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16015,A very small assemblage of later Roman pottery from latest cemetery excavations. Also 53 sherds from 2003 excavations. No report on mass of pottery from 1987-9 excavations.,62,1,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16016,"Moderate sized assemblage of later Iron Age and Roman date, with an emphasis on 2nd-3rd C AD. 14% of the early Roman assemblage comprised fine and specialist wares, placing it among the higher status sites in the region. Two graffitos noted, one literate, on  1st C AD sherd.",1638,28,10,13,51,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16017,A moderate sized assemblage of Late Iron Age and Roman pottery. Most pottery from Oxford industry.,2168,31,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16018,"Moderate sized assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman pottery, the latter dominated by the Oxford industry. A sherd of grass-tempered pottery indicates activity into the 5th C in the area. No indication or quantification of samian, mortaria or amphora.",2486,33,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16019,"A high density of pottery from the site, unsurprisingly dominated by Oxfordshire products, including local mortaria (mostly whiteware mortaria). Most of the assemblage dates to the later Roman period.",2032,25,,161,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16020,"A relatively high density of pottery of early Roman date. Few imports (including a central Gaulish mortarium sherd) and dominated by local oxidised and sandy wares. High % (21.5%) of local finewares, mostly butt beakers.",680,10,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16021,"A small assemblage of abraded pottery, dating to the late Iron Age and early Roman period. Mostly local coarsewares.",54,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16022,"The pottery from the Chemistry Lab excavations (1361 sherds, 18kg) spanned the 2nd to 4th c AD, with the bulk of the assemblage dating to the later Roman period and dominated by Oxford product - sandy greywares and shell-tempered wares. Jars most common form, followed by bowls, mortaria, beakers and dishes. High levels of mortaria due to proximity of kilns. The pottery from the Mansfield College excavations (739 sherds, 14.3kg) was mostly late Roman in date.",2100,32,1,95,21,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16023,"An assemblage of M-LIA (1932 sherds, 25kg) and Roman (408 sherds, 5kg) pottery. A single Dressel 1 amphora sherd.",2340,30,1,30,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16024,"A moderate sized assemblage of Roman pottery, mostly local greywares. Assemblage spans the Roman period, but dominated by early Roman wares.",1444,13,,3,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16025,A total of 575 sherds came from the TVAS excavations and 3144 sherds from the OA excavations. Dominated by local reduced sandy wares. A further 141 sherds from the evaluation to the south were mainly of early Roman date with some late Iron Age sherds.,3860,44,1,5,29,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16026,Pottery not quantified by sherd count. Comprised mostly local products from the Oxfordshire Industries. A complete two handled Hofheim-type flagon (AD 50-75) deposited with a dog burial.,,6,3,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16027,"A small assemblage of late Iron Age/early Roman pottery from the OA excavations (374 sherds) , but much larger quantities from the Tempvs excavations (3263 sherds).",3637,48,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16028,"A very small assemblage, befitting location on fringes of settlement. Dominated by local Oxfordshire greywares.",84,1,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16029,Small quantity of mainly 2nd C AD pottery from the backfill of the corn dryer. Mostly local greywares.,122,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16030,A small assemblage of mid to late Iron Age pottery.,661,5,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
16031,139 sherds (4kg) of late Iron Age pottery and 147 sherds (2kg) of early Roman pottery.,286,6,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16032,An assemblage of middle to late Iron Age pottery. An almost complete pot deposited in bottom of main enclosure ditch (same ditch as animal skulls).,3757,23,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16033,"A substantial assemblage of pottery from excavation, mostly products of the on-site or local kilns. Overall date range of late 1st/early 2nd to later 4th C, with emphasis on later 2nd-early 4th C. Vessel forms include mortaria, jars, bowls, flagons, dishes and beakers.",10373,201,,1134,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
16034,"A moderate sized assemblage of mostly later Roman pottery, mostly comprising local Oxfordshire wares (especially fine greywares). Dominated by coarseware jars, with sparse tablewares. 15 sherds of Dr 20 amphora.",971,11,15,63,28,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16035,Small assemblage of early Roman pottery.,18,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16036,"Moderate sized assemblage from Wessex excavations (4134 sherds, 36kg), mostly of late Iron Age (1180 sherds of grog-tempered ware) to early/mid 2nd century date and comprising local coarsewares. A complete LIA necked jar came from an enclosure ditch and a near complete bowl came from a pit. Amphora comprise Dressel 1b and Dressel 20. A total of 1840 sherds (28kg) of late Iron Age and Roman pottery collected from the OA excavations, with an emphasis on later 1st/2nd C and later 3rd C AD and nearly all local coarsewares. Low level of finewares and near absence of specialist wares. Jars were the most common form.",5974,64,2,13,109,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16037,"Moderate sized assemblage of 2nd-4th century date. 1467 sherds (23kg) from Denchworth Road excavations, includes late 4th century shell-tempered wares and 15-17% fine and specialist wares, indicating relatively high status. 2880 sherds (58kg) from Mill St excavations.",4347,81,23,70,161,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16038,"1124 sherds of Roman pottery recorded from the site, though only a third from the graves (another third from early Saxon features). Largest group comprises Oxford colour coated wares, and most dated late 3rd - 4th/5th C AD.",1124,22,1,3,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16039,"Roman pottery not quantified in report. Mostly Oxfordshire wares, dating 2nd-4th C AD. Also ceramic disks interpreted as lids.",,,,,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16040,"Large assemblage of late Iron Age-Roman pottery from the main Yarnton excavation area. Fine and specialist wares are very low (2.8% for ER period, 5.4% overall), with assemblage mostly comprising reduced coarsewares. Two pottery kilns dating to the end of the 1st C AD were found to the east of the main settlement. Product probably comprised coarseware storage jars.",8896,171,4,68,61,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16041,"Huge assemblage though largely unquantified in terms of specific fabrics and forms, though seemingly dominated by local Oxfordshire wares. Most samian is 2nd C AD. Includes many literate graffitos.",126450,,,,3113,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16042,Just 8 sherds of pottery recovered.,8,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16043,"A modest assemblage of sherds from LIA features, though includes pottery of earlier date.",600,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16044,"Very small assemblage, mostly LIA-early Roman.",28,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16045,"Very small assemblage, mostly of 2nd-4th c date.",27,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16046,Small assemblage of LIA and early Roman pottery.,19,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16047,"A small assemblage, mostly dating 2nd-3rd C AD.",97,,,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16048,"A moderate sized assemblage dating to the late Iron Age-early Roman period. Dominated by 'Belgic ware' fabrics, with little fine and specialist ware. Dominated by jars.",1124,16,1,,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
16049,Pottery assemblage dated to LIA-early Roman period.,965,15,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
16050,"Moderate assemblage of LIA and Roman pottery, with an emphasis on the 1st-2nd C AD. Fine and specialist wares account for just 2% of the assemblage, suggesting a low status rural farmstead.",2815,,,3,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16051,"Modest sized assemblage of 2nd-3rd C date, dominated by sandy greywares, with low % of fine and specialist wares indicating a low status.",647,6,,6,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16052,"A substantial assemblage of pottery, mostly 2nd-3rd C AD in date. Mostly local reduced coarsewares.",12743,,25,,112,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16053,Moderate sized assemblage of mainly late 1st/2nd-early 3rd C date. Mostly local coarsewares.,3393,35,1,8,35,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16054,"Modest assemblage of late Roman pottery, mostly local grey sandy wares. Oxfordshire productions well represented, especially late Roman colour coats.",273,5,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16055,"Very large assemblage but no overall quantification. Literate graffitos, a face mask flagon and a jar lid with a moulded face. Most amphora is Dr 20, with some Gauloise 4 and Dr 2-4 along with carrot amphora. 12,493 sherds (132kg) of pottery from Cotswold Archaeology investigations (0.2ha).",,,987,,6121,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16056,"Substantial sized assemblage dating to the later Roman period. Mostly local grey sandy wares, with significant later Roman Oxford colour coats and late shelly wares.",2725,39,8,61,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16057,"Substantial assemblage of 96% locally produced pottery, mostly from a dump of pottery which included many wasters. Ranged in date from AD 100-350, and with high numbers of colour-coated wares and mortaria.  Part of Oxfordshire pottery industry.",14516,189,,1540,17,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16058,"Assemblage of early and late Roman pottery, mostly derived from topsoil. Dominated by local reduced coarsewares.",412,3,,11,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16059,Unquantified assemblage of mid 1st to mid 2nd C AD date.,,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16060,"A total of 315 sherds recovered from the pipeline excavations of the villa periphery, with a further 727 sherds from fieldwalking nearer the villa building (not included in totals below). Dated 2nd-4th  AD.",315,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16061,Substantial assemblage of LIA-early Roman pottery. Dominated by early grog-tempered wares and reduced coarsewares. Very few (2-4.5%) fine and specialist wares.,14471,207,1,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
16062,"Excavation: Substantial assemblage of 15,000 sherds including three large dumps of wasters. Watching brief: Large (but unquantified) assemblage of pottery from dumps of material, nearly all made at the site. White ware mortaria was principal form, dating 2nd C AD. Also many late Roman colour coats.",15000,,,3500,3,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16063,"Unquantified assemblage, mostly greywares and also Oxfordshire products.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16064,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16065,"A few Roman sherds found in the topsoil, though none could be closely dated.",12,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16066,Substantial concentration of pottery (not quantified by sherd count) of 1st to 4th C Ad date including samian (0.12% of weight) and mortaria (1.52% of weight). Mostly (c 79%) local reduced coarsewares.,,31,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16067,"Large quantities of later Iron Age and Roman pottery were found at the site over many years, but remains unquantified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16068,"Just nine sherds examined (of late Roman date), but uncertain if more came from the site.",9,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16069,Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman pottery.,,,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16070,Unquantified pottery assemblage of 2nd-4th century date. Includes a cheese press.,,,,,18,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16071,"Unquantified assemblage of early Roman pottery from the kilns. Forms comprise storage jars, necked jars and bowls.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16072,"'Several hundred sherds of pottery found' (indicated as 200 here), mostly local grey coarsewares with from Oxford colour-coated and post-Roman grass-tempered pottery.",200,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16073,Unquantified assemblage of 2nd-4th C Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16074,Unquantified late Roman pottery assemblage.,,,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16075,"No quantified data in interim reports, but main kiln products appear to be late Roman in date and include mortaria.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
16076,"Substantial pottery assemblage from the two kilns producing grey wares, mostly jars, dating to the first half of the 2nd C AD.",1480,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16077,Unquantified assemblage of late Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
16078,Unquantified assemblage of M-LIA pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16079,Unquantified assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16080,Middle to late Iron Age pottery recovered but unquantified.  Includes a drilled vessel.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16081,"Unquantified pottery assemblage from the kiln site.  The main 2nd century product was mortaria, and 3rd century products were colour coated bowls.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16082,"Five complete vessels and the fragmentary remains of a sixth. Two bowls and a narrow-necked jar accompanied inhumation burial, with a jar containing cremation accompanied by a bowl. All 2nd/3rd C AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16083,"Unquantified assemblage of late Roman pottery, mostly Oxfordshire wares - greywares, colour-coated wares and shelly wares. Significant quantities of mortaria, along with bowls, dishes, jugs, flagons, jars, beakers and a cheese press.",,,2,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16084,"A large but unquantified assemblage, mostly of M-LIA and late Roman date.",,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16085,"Pottery from 1970s excavations only of the bath suite. Dominated by local grey sandy wares, then late Roman shelly wares.",925,14,2,2,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16086,"The grave contained four vessels - two fine butt beakers, a bowl and a dish/platter. All late Iron Age.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16087,Unquantified pottery assemblage of late 1st to 4th century date.,,,,,27,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16088,"Large assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman pottery, not quantified by sherd count. 71.6kg of LIA date, 41.6kg early Roman, 285kg late Roman.",,425,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16089,"Large quantities of pottery, though that from the earlier excavations not fully quantified. 4723 sherds from the 1992 excavations (0.025m sq), 1000 of prehistoric date. Roman pottery of late 1st/2nd-4th C in date.",2690,13,,45,142,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16090,Unquantified pottery assemblage of early Roman date (late 1st to late 2nd C). An almost complete jar with a perforated base found in base of main enclosure ditch. Also miniature greyware jar placed in a 2nd C AD pit.,,,,,5,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16091,"Large but unquantified assemblage dating from LIA to 4th C AD.  Included products from three early Roman kilns, producing coarseware jars and bowls.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16092,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16093,Unquantified pottery assemblage of 1st to 4th C date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16094,Unquantified assemblage of 1st to 4th C AD pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16095,Unquantified assemblage. The lack of samian is noted. A waster was present. Graffitos noted on the tiles.,,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16096,"Unquantified assemblage, including many wasters. Products comprised greyware jars.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
16097,Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age-early Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16098,Roman pottery recovered but unquantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16099,"A huge but as yet unquantified assemblage of later Iron Age and early Roman pottery, including complete vessel in structured deposits.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16100,"Much Samian pottery, some New Forest ware and a few fragments of ware similar to Castor but probably from a kiln near Oxford. All unquantified. Also a possible pottery tettine.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16101,Assemblage of pottery included complete vessels from graves. Dated 1st-4th C AD. Some wasters but no other evidence for pottery production on site.,,27,,6,8,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16102,Unquantified assemblage of 1st-4th C date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16103,"Large but unquantified assemblage, most kiln products, which was in use during later Roman period to produce red colour-coated wares. Forms comprise mortaria and bowls. Much samian ware found in the puddling hole.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16104,"Large but unquantified assemblage, mostly made at the site. The kiln appears to have been producing greyware jars, bowls, beakers and mortaria during the 2nd-3rd C AD and probably red colour coated vessels during the later Roman period.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16105,"Unquantified assemblage, mostly of 3rd-4th C date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16106,Pottery not quantified but included a large quantity of samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16107,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16108,"No quantified data from burials though a colour coated beaker placed with one grave. From the hillfort interior came a reasonable assemblage of late Romano-British coarseware pottery. Fine and specialist wares just 10.5%, indicating low status.",2644,22,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16109,"A substantial assemblage of very late 1st to late 3rd C/early 4th C in date. Dominated by local reduced sandy ware, along with grog-tempered ware, Black burnished ware, Savernake ware, shell-tempered ware, Oxfordshire ware, and small amounts of Verulamium white ware, New Forest ware, samian and Rhenish ware. Fine and specialist wares account for 3.8% of the detailed quantified assemblage (6948 sherds), which does not suggest particularly high status.",12182,130,,17,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16110,"The majority of the pottery belonged to the late Roman period; contexts yielding the most diagnostic pieces were 4th century in date, and it is possible that most Roman material was deposited during this time. The assemblage was dominated by grey wares and Oxfordshire red colour-coated ware. A further 7kg of pottery from evaluation not quantified by sherd count and dates mid-late Roman period.",290,4,,20,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16111,"Most of the wares derive from local industries, in particular there are sherds recognizable as coming from the Oxfordshire industry (grey, white and oxidized sandy wares and whiteware mortaria). Most features dated 2nd-3rd C AD",308,3,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16112,Small assemblage of late Iron Age-early Roman pottery.,296,4,1,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16113,A small assemblage of local 4th C pottery.,10,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16114,"212 sherds of Roman pottery from the evaluation and 89 from the Watching Brief, with date range of late 1st/early 2nd century to 4th century. This consisted mainly of grey wares of unknown source. Finewares are present in smaller quantities, consisting of samian and Oxford colour-coated and white wares.",301,3,1,1,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16115,Pottery included both late Iron Age/early Roman and late Roman material. Mostly reduced coarse wares. Potential absence of material of middle Roman date.,578,9,,6,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16116,Reasonably substantial pottery assemblage of late Iron Age-early Roman date. Mostly reduced coarse wares. Fine and specialist ware accounts for 5.7% of sherds from the site.,1030,13,1,3,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16117,A very small assemblage of early Roman pottery.,120,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16118,Pottery assemblage mostly of 2nd C date with some earlier and later Roman. Roman-period finewares account for about 5% of the assemblage by all measures.,360,6,15,5,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16119,No quantification or report on the pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16120,"The pottery indicates settlement of 1st-2nd century date in the vicinity of the site, but the assemblage is small and for the most part in fairly poor condition. Assemblage almost entirely locally derived reduced and (to a lesser extent) oxidised fabrics.",40,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16121,Small assemblage of late Roman pottery. The fine wares and most of the reduced coarse wares are likely to have derived from the Oxford industry,47,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16122,"A small assemblage  from evaluation  (63 sherds) and much larger assemblage from excavation (1441 sherds) spanning the entire LIA and Roman period, with later 2nd-4th C most represented. Condition was generally poor and most sherds were very small and abraded. Local grey wares form the largest component of this assemblage. Jars, bowls, beakers, lids, dishes and a flagon are present. Fine and specialist wares account for almost 7% of early Roman assemblage and 15% of later Roman assemblage, suggesting relatively elevated status.",1504,15,,9,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16123,Small assemblage of middle-late Iron Age pottery (overall date range spanning the 1st century BC to the mid-1st century AD).,160,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16124,Small assemblage of Iron Age pottery.,161,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16125,"Substantial assemblage of Roman pottery, in good condition. Roman material dated from the mid 2nd century onwards. The fine and specialist wares were dominated by Oxford products. Coarse wares (84.3% of total sherds) dominated by oxidised and reduced ware groups, with a smaller but significant contribution from shell-tempered wares. Assemblage was dominated by jars, then bowls and dishes.",1816,36,,30,26,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16126,"A small quantity of late Iron pottery (13 sherds) and larger amount of Roman pottery (400 sherds). The assemblage spans the late Iron Age to late Roman periods, but the bulk of the material dates to the 2nd century AD.",413,6,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16127,"Huge assemblage of pottery, not yet fully recorded, ranging from the middle of the 1st century AD to the middle of the 4th century. The pottery reflects a major settlement of middling status. The range of material present is predominantly derived from local or regional producers, of which the Oxford industry and an unlocated 'west Oxfordshire' industry are the most important. One of the most notable aspects of the pottery evidence was the relative prevalence of very large jars. Reasonable quantities of samian, amphorae and mortaria but not yet quantified.",55000,800,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16128,Small assemblage of Roman pottery.,25,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
16129,"A moderately large assemblage, mostly dating to the late Roman period. Several late Roman shell-tempered wares were present, along with many colour-coated wares from the Oxfordshire industries. Earlier Roman activity is hinted at from a small number of early Roman sherds, mainly as residual or unstratified pieces.",2711,25,,63,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16130,Substantial assemblage. The nature of many of the sherds would strongly suggest the presence of nearby kilns. There were a few instances of multiple sherds from single vessels and one almost complete over-fired jar.,2526,26,,434,5,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16131,"Small pottery assemblage from the evaluation (252 sherds), including an almost complete red ware beaker from a possible structured deposit. Overall, mid Roman pottery (mid 2nd to mid 3rd century) dominated, though late Iron Age/early Roman fabrics present. A larger assemblage from the excavation (1604 sherds). The pottery ranges from late Iron Age to the early/mid 3rd century. Fine and specialist wares account for 7.2% of sherds. Jars formed the principal vessel class .",1856,21,,16,29,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16132,"Moderate sized assemblage of Roman pottery from earlier evaluation (783 sherds) and larger evaluation (1104 sherds; see below). Early Roman period pottery was found in low density. The bulk of the assemblage dates to the late Roman period and was probably derived from the Oxford industry. Coarse wares represent only 54.5% of the sherd count whilst fine and specialist wares account for 26.8% of the assemblage, indicating a relatively higher status for this site. Continental imports are restricted to sherds of Rhone valley mortaria, Gaulish samian and southern Spanish (Baetican) amphorae. NOTE: No quantifications given for samian, amphora or mortaria from the later CA evaluation, so totals of pottery for this investigation not presented. Almost 17,000 sherds (277kg) of late Iron Age and Roman pottery recovered from the 2010-12 excavation. No full quantification as yet, but includes local grog-tempered wares, samian, South Spanish amphorae, Oxfordshire wares, Nene Valley colour coated ware, Dorset (BB1) and local black-burnished wares, New Forest ware and Late Roman shell tempered ware. There are hints in the form of over-fired vessels (and possible wasters) for pottery production in the very near vicinity - an outlying past of the Oxfordshire industry? A number of substantially complete, near-complete and complete vessels, including two near-complete Drag. 31 dishes recovered from one context, were recorded,  hinting at deliberate or special deposition.",17783,286,,35,11,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16133,"Relatively modest assemblage of 1st/2nd to 4th C date, dominated by oxidised and reduced coarse wares. A heterogeneous collection of 'fine and specialist' wares totalled 8.2% of the assemblage.",280,,,3,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16134,A total of 132 early Roman pottery sherds. The character of the assemblage indicates a low status site with the total of 'fine and specialist' wares being no more than 3% of the sherd total.,132,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16135,A very limited assemblage indicating the evaluation trenches lay outside of the settlement core. Broadly 2nd-4th C date.,10,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16136,"All the sherds are probably datable to the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, and most are likely to be of 1st-early 2nd century date. The majority of the pottery is in sand tempered fabrics, both oxidised and reduced.",210,,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16137,"Some 2900 sherds of Roman pottery were recovered from the evaluation. with the great majority concentrated in two trenches where evidence for pottery production was located. The pottery spanned tile period from tile 2nd to 4th centuries. The fabrics present covered most of the range of typical Oxford products, and range of vessel Types present was quite wide, including cheese presses.",2900,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
16138,Small assemblage of pottery. No further information.,99,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16139,"Roman material appeared to range from the 2nd century AD through to the later  4th century AD. Most of the material was of relatively local manufacture hut a small quantity of imported samian and amphorae were also present (not quantified from TVAs evaluation). The mixture of tablewares and domestic and storage vessels suggest a moderately well-appointed, but fairly rural situation.",1472,16,,,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
16140,Unquantified pottery assemblage of 2nd-4th C date. 'Oxford' wares predominate.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16141,"Generally speaking the sherds are in poor condition. The majority of wares are of local manufacture, particularly products from the Oxfordshire industries",127,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16142,"Assemblage dominated by material of middle and late Roman date, with an emphasis on the later Roman period. Pottery largely comprises medium sandy grey wares, in which wide mouthed jars dominate. Oxfordshire colour coated wares also make up a substantial proportion of the assemblage. Overall, pottery indicates a higher status settlement, which fits the suggestion that there may have been a villa on the site.",350,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16143,"Small assemblage of 2nd-4th C date, mostly 3rd-4th C.",34,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16144,Small assemblage of later 2nd-4th C date.,200,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16145,Small amounts of 1st-4th C pottery. The majority of the Roman pottery was recovered from the topsoil.,25,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
16146,An unquantified assemblage of 4th C pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16147,A single burial urn.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16148,"The evaluation produced 277 sherds (3108 g) of late Iron Age and Roman pottery from excavated contexts, plus a further 325 sherds (2445 g) from the ploughsoil. The fabrics consist almost entirely of locally and regionally produced material. The only import was a single amphora sherd from the ploughsoil. The majority of the material can be assigned to the 1st century AD.",602,6,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
16149,"Trial trench excavations recovered a total of 66 sherds (640g) of Roman pottery in a fragmentary but well-preserved condition from four contexts, much from a late Roman cremation urn (Black-burnished ware 1 jar/cooking pot). Many other sherds Late Roman shell-tempered ware.",66,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16150,"a small assemblage of late Iron Age and early Roman pottery, mostly grog-tempered 'Belgic type' ware and coarse shell-tempered ware, dominated by jars and probable jars. 5.4% fine and specialist wares.",168,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
16151,"A reasonably substantial assemblage of Roman pottery including a mixture of continental and regional imports and more local wares, all spanning the 2nd through to the 4th centuries AD, with the emphasis on the later material.",869,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
16152,"Small assemblage with the emphasis very much on the later Roman period, typical of the range of fabrics and forms produced by the Oxfordshire pottery industry. There were no very clear examples of kiln wasters but one white-ware mortarium spout was burnt to a pale grey. The assemblage adds a couple of mortaria types and a beaker to the repertoire of types made at the Rose Hill kilns.",153,1,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
16153,"Most of the sherds comprise wares of the local Oxfordshire industry, particularly fine or sandy grey wares. Non-local wares include two worn pieces of Baetican amphora and two sherds of Central Gaulish samian. Most of the assemblage would appear to date to the 2nd and early 3rd centuries AD.",127,,2,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
16154,Small assemblage of late Iron Age mainly grog-tempered wares.,125,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16155,A single late Roman coloured coat beaker in one grave is the only pottery reported on.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16156,"A large quantity of 1st to 4th C AD pottery, but unquantified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
16157,Much pottery recovered but no report as yet.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17001,"Substantial assemblage, but not quantified. Includes literate graffitos. Several complete pots in 1st C AD ditches.",,,93,91,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17002,"Large amount of pottery but no further details except for 1967-8 excavation where 224 sherds recovered, mostly North Wilts ware and Dorset Black-burnished ware, along with New Forest, Oxfordshire & Severn Valley ware. Generally early/mid 2nd to 4th C AD in date. At least one literate graffito.",224,,,,12,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17003,"A small assemblage (211 sherds) largely comprising local greywares and Black-burnished wares, with some Savernake, New Forest and Oxfordshire wares. The pottery dates from the 1st to 4th C AD. An additional 289 sherds recovered from the grave fill and surrounding area, including samian.",500,6,2,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17004,"A modest sized assemblage of mostly late Roman date. Nearly all local greywares, with some Black-burnished ware.",289,2,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17005,A single complete late Iron Age/early Roman jar.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17006,"A moderate sized assemblage of early Roman pottery, mostly Savernake ware and local grog-tempered wares and a small amount of Severn Valley and Black-burnished wares. One terra rubra sherd.",805,9,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17007,"Huge quantities of pottery but not all fully quantified by sherd count, except the 1976 material, which is quantified here. Most common fabric comprised local greywares (11381 sherds), but includes 100 different fabric types, in particular Savernake (6316 sherds), and Dorset Black-burnished ware. Includes 78kg of amphora fragments, mostly Dr 20, but also South Spanish, Tarraconensian wine amphorae, South Gaulish Pelichet, Dr 30 and other types. Several complete pottery vessels found in Ermin St ditch, dating c AD 65-80. Large quantity of 1st and 2nd C AD samian but not quantified. Literate graffitos recovered. Also face pots and face-neck flagons.",31751,498,414,1172,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17008,"A substantial assemblage of pottery dominated by North Wilts reduced wares then Dorset Black-burnished ware and Savernake ware. The main assemblage dates early-mid 2nd to late 4thC AD, with some later 1st-early 2nd C AD sherds. Includes late 4th C Midlands Shelly wares.",4878,40,7,38,107,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17009,"Moderate assemblage of pottery dating 2nd-early 4th C AD, with some earlier late Iron Age sherds. The largest fabric group comprises Dorset Black-burnished wares.",560,10,5,1,26,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17010,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17011,"A small assemblage, some of early Roman date, but with most of late Roman date (AD 270+). Mostly local greywares then Savernake wares.",84,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17012,"Moderate sized assemblage dominated by local Wilts coarsewares. Also Dorset Black burnished ware, New Forest ware, Oxfordshire ware, late Roman Midlands shelly ware and Alice holt ware.",2506,24,2,24,24,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17013,"A small assemblage of 1st to 3rd C AD Roman pottery, mostly residual in later features. Mostly local greywares and Savernake wares, along with Severn Valley wares and Black-burnished wares.",204,2,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17014,"A substantial assemblage dating 2nd-4th C AD dominated by North Wilts greywares then Dorset Black-burnished wares and North Wilts sandy wares. Also some Savernake ware, New Forest ware and Oxfordshire ware. A single possible waster but no direct evidence for pottery production.",2050,18,1,,23,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17015,"Large amounts of pottery but not quantified by fragment count. Dated 1st to 4th C AD, and including Savernake Ware, Dorset Black-burnished ware, New Forest, Alice Holt, Oxfordshire and Midlands shell-tempered ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17016,"A substantial assemblage of pottery for the size of excavation dominated by local sandy coarsewares, then Dorset Black-burnished ware, Savernake ware, New Forest and Oxfordshire ware. Dated 1st-4th C AD. The Time Team evaluation produced a further 294 sherds of middle/late Iron Age pottery and 1520 sherds of Roman pottery. Similar main fabric groups but also presence of rare glazed ware. No breakdown of fabric groups or quantification of mortaria/samian in this report.",3394,37,,9,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17017,"A dense concentration of pottery of later 1st-early 4th C date, focussing on the middle Roman period (AD 120/40 to early/mid 3rd C AD). Dominated by local greywares, then Savernake ware and Dorset Black-burnished wares. Samian totalled c 5% of all sherds. The amphorae were mostly Dr 20 but also Gallic wine and Cadiz fish sauce amphorae.",1479,24,31,4,61,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17018,A small assemblage of mid 1st to early 2nd c AD date dominated by local North Wilts black sandy wares and Savernake ware.,269,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17019,"A total of 186 sherds of Iron Age pottery and 776 sherds of Roman pottery, dominated by local greywares and Savernake wares. The presence of just three sherds of Dorset Black-burnished ware suggests not much activity beyond early/mid 2nd C AD.",953,7,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17020,"Pottery of Iron Age and Roman date recovered, but no overall quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17021,"Pottery from the 1960s and 1970s excavations not fully quantified but includes Dorset Black-burnished ware, local greywares, New Forest ware and lead glazed ware. 161 fragments of pottery from a two-trench evaluation in 1999 and 52 sherds from a two-trench evaluation in 2001.",213,2,,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17022,Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age to 4th C AD date including much New Forest ware.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17023,"A moderate sized assemblage of late Iron Age to late Roman date. Dominated by north Wilts greywares, then Dorset Black-burnished wares, Savernake wares, Severn Valley wares and grog-tempered wares. Most of the assemblage dates 2nd to early 3rd C AD.",3716,45,27,27,32,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17024,"Most pottery dates to the middle Iron Age. Very limited later material, comprising 140 sherds of Malvernian limestone-tempered ware of middle-late Iron Age date. Just 59 sherds of Roman pottery of 2nd-4th C AD date. Most of the wares are local Wiltshire products, particularly grey wares, along with a small number of imported samian and Dorset black burnished ware sherds.",199,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17025,A very small assemblage for the area of excavation indicates a non-domestic zone. It comprised a mixture of continental and regional imports and local wares from the North Wiltshire kilns. Regional imports are dominated by black burnished ware. Most of the Roman pottery seems to date to the 2nd and later 2nd-3rd centuries. The latest wares present are Oxfordshire sherds dating to the later 3rd or 4th centuries.,170,2,,4,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17026,"Moderate sized assemblage largely dating to the early Roman period. Local wares effectively account for 93% of the assemblage, typically products of the North Wiltshire industries, along with Savernake wares. Regional wares are dominated by sherds of Dorset black burnished ware. There are no wares present to indicate activity after the early-mid 3rd century.",2734,21,2,3,74,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17027,"A moderate sized assemblage from the CA excavations, with 103 sherds dating to the late Iron Age-early Roman period and 1305 sherds dated 1st-4th C AD. The Roman assemblage was dominated by North Wilts reduced wares, then Savernake ware and Dorset Black-burnished ware. Limited later Roman Oxfordshire wares (mortaria) and nothing of certain 4th C AD date. No quantified data from the MoLA excavation report, but a complete misshapen (waster) Savernake jar came from a waterhole.",1408,13,3,,22,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17028,"A modest sized assemblage from the bathhouse excavations in 2007, mostly of late Roman date. Dominated by local greywares, then Dorset Black-burnished wares with some Oxfordshire wares.",150,2,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
17029,Large amount of pottery recovered but no specialist report. Includes many amphorae including Dressel 1b.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17030,"A substantial assemblage dominated by local greywares, South-West wares and Dorset black-burnished ware. Dated late 1st to late 4th C AD. Includes glazed vessels.",24200,196,74,182,743,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17031,"A small assemblage mostly comprising North Wilts greywares, along with Oxfordshire ware, Alice Holt ware and shell-tempered ware.",78,,,4,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17032,"Moderate sized assemblage mainly of 3rd-4th C AD date. Dominated by local greywares with limited Oxfordshire and New Forest wares. The range of fabric and forms indicates a lower status rural site, though this may just relate to occupation on the settlement periphery. Forms include cheese strainers.",4780,45,,28,43,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17033,"Very modest sized assemblage for the scale of excavation. Most of the wares are local Wiltshire products, with a mixture of oxidized and grey wares, but also Dorset black burnished ware and Savernake ware. Also single sherds of Oxfordshire colour-coat and Lower Nene Valley mortaria and two sherds of amphorae (Baetican Dressel 20 and probably a sherd from a Cam186 from Cadiz).",355,3,2,2,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17034,Small assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman date. Includes grog-tempered fabrics of Savernake type and Black Burnished ware. Some 3rd/4th C forms.,335,7,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17035,"Large assemblage mostly dating from the 2nd to 4th centuries AD, with some dating to the 1st century AD. Coarsewares make up the largest proportion of the assemblage (80% sherds), dominated by greywares, Savernake-Type wares and Black Burnished ware.  Finewares from New Forest, Nene valley and Oxfordshire. Amphorae assemblage dominated by Gallic wine types followed by Dressel 20. 3 sherds of Haltern 70. Most mortaria from the Oxfordshire kilns.",37391,623,533,203,2376,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17036,"A moderate sized assemblage dating mid 1st to early 3rd C AD, with an emphasis on the mid 2nd C AD. Dominated by local black sandy wares. A relatively large drinking vessel component.",5047,42,1,13,67,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17037,"Pottery all derives from the limited 2003 excavation. Dominated by local greywares, then some Black-burnished wares, Savernake ware, New Forest Ware, Nene Valley ware and Oxfordshire wares. Amphorae mostly Dr 20 with one possible Dr 2-4. The dating is mainly 2nd to 4th C AD and late Roman shelly ware indicates late 4th C occupation.",1641,7,17,,39,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
17038,"The ceramic assemblage comprised 96 sherds of late Iron Age pottery and 16384 sherds of Roman pottery. Dominated by local sandy coarsewares, then Savernake and Dorset Black burnished ware. Also New Forest wares and Oxfordshire wares, and some lead glazed wares.",16480,130,1,44,146,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17039,A single Romano-British pottery sherd was the only find,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17040,"A high density of pottery dating 1st to 4th C AD dominated by local sandy coarsewares, then Savernake ware and Dorset Black-burnished ware. Also Oxfordshire and New Forest ware and 3 sherds of lead glazed ware.",9227,87,,41,39,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17041,"The pottery derives from features on the fringes of the settlement and is dominated by local greywares, then Dorset and local Black burnished ware. Also some Oxfordshire and late shelly ware. Date range is 2nd-late 4th C AD with a late Roman emphasis.",782,6,1,1,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17042,"Substantial assemblage, mostly local greywares and Savernake ware. Also Black-burnished ware, Oxfordshire ware, New Forest ware and 3 sherds of Rhenish ware and Gallo-Belgic platters. Dated 1st to late 4th C AD with an early Roman emphasis",3150,70,,,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17043,"A total of 246 sherds dated later Iron Age-early Roman with the remainder dated later Roman. The earlier assemblage dominated by local sandy wares, with limited Savernake ware and 1 sherd of samian. Later assemblage (later 4th C AD) dominated by local greywares and oxidised wares, then Oxfordshire wares, Black-burnished ware, New Forest wares and late Roman shelly wares along with Overway/Tilford and Alice Holt ware.  Mortaria form 4.3% EVE. Complete miniature pottery beakers placed in two graves.",3080,52,2,,20,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17044,"A moderate sized assemblage mainly of middle-late Iron Age date (703 sherds), but with 29 sherds of late Iron Age/early date (mostly Savernake ware) and 59 sherds of Roman date (2nd-4th).",791,8,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17045,"A modest sized assemblage, dominated by local grey sandy wares, with some Dorset Black Burnished Ware and limited Oxfordshire and New Forest ware. While there are early Roman elements within the pottery assemblage, there was an increase in the intensity of activity in the later Roman period.",230,3,1,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
17046,Just three sherds of pottery.,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17047,"Grave pottery from 2002 excavations included five complete vessels, four being New Forest colour-coated ware globular beakers, and a miniature imitation Black Burnished ware jar. Grave pottery from 2004 excavations included 38 vessels deliberately deposited as grave goods (All of Late Roman date, extending well into the second half of the 4th century AD); 13 vessels were associated with cremation deposits in cemetery 4: narrow necked jars, jugs and indented Beakers. Also other pottery vessels in inhumation graves. Includes miniature vessels in Black Burnished ware, sandy greyware and New Forest colour-coated ware. The other Roman pottery came from ditches and gullies. Sandy grey coarsewares from a variety of sources predominated, with lesser quantities of Black Burnished ware and Oxfordshire ware. The majority of datable coarseware sherds suggested a preponderance of later Roman material, contemporary with the cemeteries.",1000,12,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17048,"A moderate sized assemblage, nearly all dating to the later Roman period. Mostly local greywares, with Black-burnished wares, Oxfordshire ware and New Forest ware. Includes a face pot fragment within a possible structured deposit.",6343,114,11,,20,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17049,A modest sized assemblage dominated by local greywares and black-burnished ware along with New Forest and Oxfordshire wares. The pottery generally dates mid 2nd-4th C AD.,447,6,1,,31,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17050,Roman pottery recovered including mortaria and imitation samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
17051,Unquantified assemblage of pottery including samian and mortaria.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17052,"Much pottery recovered, some of it glazed. No further information.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17053,Pottery recovered but no details other than the mention of samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17054,"The bulk of the ceramic assemblage was attributed to the late Romano-British period (2nd/3rd-4th centuries AD). Mostly local greywares and Dorset Black Burnished ware, along with smaller amounts of New Forest, Alice Holt and Oxfordshire ware. Imports limited to small amounts of samian, Dressel 20 amphorae and 9 Rhenish ware sherds. A complete late Roman Black Burnished ware jar had been placed between two animal burials in a pit.",9960,130,6,93,95,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17055,Late Iron Age and Roman pottery recovered but no available report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17056,"Modest sized assemblage mostly of 1st to early 2nd C AD date. Fabrics include local Wiltshire sandy greywares, Savernake ware, Severn valley ware and small amounts of Black-burnished ware.",366,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17057,"A modest sized assemblage concentrated mainly within two late Roman middens. The range of fabrics is typically later 2nd/3rd to 4th C AD, mostly local sandy greywares, then Oxfordshire colour coats/whitewares and Dorset Black burnished ware. Also limited Midlands grog-tempered ware and a few sherds of Nene valley ware. Amphora is Dr 20.",796,7,3,10,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17058,"A limited assemblage of Savernake ware, Dorset Black burnished ware and some Oxfordshire ware.",88,,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17059,"A moderate sized assemblage of predominantly early to mid Roman date, c AD 50- 250, although a small quantity of later Roman pottery is also present. Dominated by coarse wares, mainly of local origin (Savernake / North Wiltshire tradition), mainly large storage jars, rolled rim jars and cordoned jars. A comparatively large number of lids. Also South East Dorset Black Burnished wares in small amounts.",1471,16,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17060,"Large amounts of pottery but very little kept and no record made of discarded material. Includes samian, Savernake, New Forest and Oxfordshire wares. Forms include a strainer bowl.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17061,"Assemblages of 860 sherds (16kg) from the 2001 excavation of late Iron Age to later Roman date, and 486 (9kg) sherds from the 2003 excavation mainly of early Roman date, though with some later material. Mostly local sandy greywares, along side Dorset Black-burnished ware, Savernake, New Forest and Oxfordshire wares. One fragment of terra rubra. Finewares are less than 5%.",1356,25,,,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17062,"No pottery report or overall quantification, but fabrics mention in report comprise Dorset Black-burnished ware, New Forest ware, and coarse sandy greyware",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17063,"A modest sized assemblage (including 42 sherds from fieldwalking) dominated by local grey sandy coarsewares, small quantities of Savernake ware and Black-burnished ware. Oxfordshire wares also form a significant proportion and a late Roman emphasis is apparent.",197,2,1,1,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17064,"A substantial pottery assemblage mostly comprising local sandy greywares and Savernake ware, along with lesser amounts of Black burnished ware, Oxfordshire ware and shell-tempered ware. Forms included colanders. 23 sherds date LIA-early Roman but most date 2nd-4th C AD. A  complete 1st-2nd C AD pottery vessel set upright and in situ in a pit. Early Saxon pottery found.",2600,37,,,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17065,"A modest sized assemblage mostly comprising local sandy greywares, with some grog-tempered ware, Black-burnished ware, Oxfordshire and New Forest ware (inc. Parchment ware). Assemblage mostly dates to the late Roman period, but with a 2nd C AD element.",563,5,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17066,No pottery report or quantification but main report suggested the pottery would indicate that the Romano-British activity probably began in the 2nd century AD and continued into the 4th century AD. A complete miniature beaker found in the grave.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17067,"Unquantified assemblage of 1st-late 4th C AD date including local coarseware, South Dorset black burnished ware, Oxfordshire red coated ware and samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17068,"The pottery assemblage (samian, British finewares, coarsewares including Black Burnished ware) had a date range spanning most of the Roman period, from at least the 2nd century AD (possibly earlier) through to the mid 4th century.",114,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17069,"Evaluation: A small assemblage of later prehistoric (early-mid Iron Age; 57 sherds) and Romano-British pottery (21 sherds). Roman pottery nearly all coarse sandy ware. Excavation: 4233 sherds of Roman pottery, mostly late Roman, up to end of 4th C AD. Mostly local sandy greywares and also grog-tempered wares, Alice Holt, Dorset Black-Burnished, New Forest and Oxfordshire wares. Early Saxon pottery found.",4254,57,,49,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17070,"A small assemblage comprising local greywares, oxidised wares, Black Burnished ware, Savernake ware, Oxfordshire and  New Forest wares. The vessels dated 1st to 4th C AD. A small pit cut into the colluvium contained a complete Roman pottery vessel.",130,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17071,"Moderate sized assemblage dominated by grey sandy wares, probably products of the North Wiltshire pottery industry along with Oxidised wares, partly from the same industry, but probably including some Oxfordshire ware. Also Dorset black burnished ware, Savernake ware, a small amount of Oxfordshire ware and a single shell-tempered ware. Two sherds of Dressel 20 amphora. Most of the activity on the site dates to the 2nd-3rd centuries continuing into the 4th century.",1567,9,2,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
17072,Minimal pottery reflecting a zone away from settlement focus. Includes a colour coated ware sherd from the New Forest production centre,11,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17073,"A substantial pottery assemblage, mostly comprising Black Burnished Ware (43%), local greyware (27%), Severn Valley ware (9%), Oxfordshire Ware (4%), Savernake ware (4%) and very small quantities of other wares including New Forest and Nene Valley. The pottery would seem to be primarily 2nd to 4th C in date, with some 1st C AD elements.",3271,,,,130,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17074,"The bulk of the fabrics and vessel forms are broadly late Romano-British in date. Coarsewares are the predominate fabrics identified, including local sandy greywares, Black Burnished ware and Savernake type grog-tempered wares. British finewares recovered include colour-coated wares from the industries of the New Forest, Oxfordshire and possibly North Wiltshire regions.",441,5,,4,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17075,"Pottery of both early (1st/2nd century AD) and late Roman (3rd/4th century AD) date, dominated by coarseware fabrics - greywares, oxidised sandy wares and grog-tempered wares. Two fineware sherds are present: one sherd of samian and one possible sherd of Oxfordshire colourcoated ware.",130,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17076,"Of the 51 sherds of pottery recovered, 50 are in qrog-tempered fabrics characteristic of the Savernake ceramic tradition of the late Iron Age and early Roman period. Overall, the range of wares and forms would be consistent with an early post-conquest date, perhaps in the third quarter of the 1st century AD.",51,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17077,"Small assemblage, most of the material of 1st-2nd century date. Most pottery comprised products of the North Wiltshire industry, then Dorset Black-burnished ware and a few Oxfordshire colour-coated sherds. high proportion of the vessel types represented were jars.",200,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17078,"The Romano-British pottery from the watching brief (62 sherds) includes sandy greywares, grog-tempered wares and Black Burnished Ware, as well as two colour-coated fineware sherds from the New Forest and Oxfordshire production centres. Dated early and late Roman",62,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17079,"Small assemblage from the 2000 evaluation comprised local grey or oxidised sandy coarsewares, Savernake ware, Black Burnished ware, late Roman shell-tempered ware, and Oxford red slipped ware. The 2011 evaluation produced 386 sherds of Roman pottery including North Wiltshire greywares, Savernake wares, Dorset Black-Burnished ware, Oxfordshire ware and shell-tempered wares.",499,,,1,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17080,"The Roman pottery was in extremely good condition, with large, unabraded sherds. The range and quality of table, kitchen and storage wares are comparable to that from the late Roman occupation at Cirencester. Assemblage included coarse and fine grog-tempered wares, orange and grey coarsewares, Black Burnished-type wares, shell-gritted wares, Oxfordshire colour-coated wares and micaceous wares.",367,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17081,A total of 48 sherds of pottery were recovered from Trench 2. These are all from the same vessel - a jar used to contain a coin hoard. Dated late Roman.,48,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17082,A modest sized assemblage of later Iron Age to late Roman date; mostly Roman. Dominated by Grog-tempered wares (Savernake) then Black Burnished ware along with greywares and Oxfordshire colour coats.,595,10,,4,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17083,"The assemblage suggest a date range at least from the 2nd to 4th century AD. Fabrics comprised mostly local Wilts greywares, Dorset Black-burnished ware and fine wares from both New Forest and Oxfordshire production centres.",607,4,,,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17084,"A sizeable pottery assemblage, mostly comprising grog-tempered wares, local coarse sandy wares and Dorset Black-burnished ware. Also Savernake ware. 20 sherds of amphorae, both Dr 20 and Pelichet 47. The range of vessels suggests a mid 1st to mid 2nd C AD date.",1006,101,20,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
17085,"Only illustrated pottery quantified but included mortaria and flagons, dating mid 1st-early 2nd C AD. Fabrics included Savernake ware.  No mention of wasters but flagons thought to have been produced at the site.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
17086,"The 1966-8 excavations produced pottery of Neolithic to later Iron Age date. Minimal pottery from the 1991 excavation, ranging from Iron Age to Roman in date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17087,"A large pottery assemblage dating to the late Roman period, mostly comprising local coarsewares, but also New Forest and Oxfordshire wares.",2830,,,24,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17088,Fragments of a 'Roman cooking pot' found close to the coffin.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17089,"A large assemblage of pottery but much of it not retained and no quantification except samian, which was plentiful. Main fabrics comprised Local Wiltshire greywares, Dorset Black-burnished wares, Oxfordshire and New Forest ware. Also some Alice Holt and late Roman Midlands shelly ware. Dated later 1st to 5th c AD, and includes grass-tempered pottery. Many wasters found.",,,,,726,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17090,"Unquantified pottery of late Iron Age to late Roman date. Fabrics comprised local greywares, Savernake ware, Dorset Black-burnished ware & New Forest wares (including Parchment ware).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17091,Pottery of 2nd to 4th C AD found but no further details.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17092,Late Roman pottery recovered but no further information.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17093,A single sherd of pottery from the grave fill dated later 3rd-4th C AD.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17094,At least 39 sherd of Roman date were recovered which appear to span the 2nd through the later 3rd/4th century. Includes grey handmade sandy ware and burnished grog-tempered ware along with Savernake ware and Oxfordshire ware.,39,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17095,"Pottery assemblage of late Iron Age to late Roman date from the two settlement areas. The northern settlement contained mostly late Iron Age and early Roman wares (grog-tempered and flint-tempered), along with some Verulamium-region white ware. Pottery from southern settlement generally dated 2nd to 4th C AD including Dorset black-burnished ware and local greywares along with Oxfordshire, Nene Valley and New Forest wares. Part of a carinated bowl, possibly a tazza, was recovered.",668,9,,,1,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17096,"A modest sized pottery assemblage but in good condition, ranging in date from the first century AD to the late fourth century AD. Fabric comprise local grey sandy wares, Black Burnished ware, New Forest fine ware, Spanish amphora, Oxford area mortarium, Oxfordshire red-brown colour coated ware, Alice Holt ware, Severn Valley and Savernake ware. Romano-British kiln wasters were recovered.",155,4,7,3,28,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17097,"A total of 19 illustrated sherds of pottery but unlikely that this represents the whole assemblage. Includes Dorset Black-burnished ware, , New Forest ware, Alice Holt ware, local North Wiltshire greywares, and Oxfordshire wares.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17098,"Unquantified assemblage (except for samian) of 1st to 4th c AD date including local grey sandy wares, Oxfordshire ware and Black-burnished wares.",,,,,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17099,Small but unquantified assemblage including New Forest ware.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17100,A small (though unquantified) assemblage of mainly Savernake type pottery of early Roman date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17101,"Few details from 2002-4 excavations, except mention of a small complete pottery vessel (precise context unstated). Pottery from earlier investigations of burials included late Roman Black-burnished ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17102,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17103,Much pottery found but no further details.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17104,No report on the Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17105,"Pottery assemblage of later Iron Age to late Roman date, though only 7 late Iron Age sherds. Locally produced wares dominate (North Wilts reduced and oxidised wares and grog-tempered greywares, including Savernake ware). Also Oxfordshire red-slipped ware, including mortaria and a single sherd of Lower Nene Valley colour-coated ware",201,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
17106,"A large assemblage predominantly of late Roman date, mostly Sandy grey wares (55%) and oxidised wares (8%), along with grog-tempered ware (inc.  Savernake) (6%), Overwey/Tilford ware (3.6%) and Black Burnished ware (10%). Also New Forest (0.6%) and Oxfordshire wares (15%) (white wares, colour coats and parchment ware). At least one Dressel 20 amphora.",11370,118,2,,142,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17107,"Unquantified pottery of 1st to 4th C AD date including Savernake ware, Black-burnished ware, New Forest ware, Castor ware and Oxfordshire ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17108,Unquantified pottery of 1st to 4th C AD including Oxfordshire ware and a complete bowl of Sandford imitation samian form 38.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17109,Unquantified pottery of 1st to 4th C AD in date. Includes Dorset Black burnished ware and samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17110,"Pottery of 2nd to 4th C D date, though the kiln products are thought to be later 2nd C AD. Pottery wasters found. The kiln products were North Wilts greywares, with a range of forms including narrow mouthed jars, wide mouth jars, bowls, lids, platters, beakers and flagons. Most of the pottery came from the area of the one intact kiln. Imported pottery comprised Black-burnished ware, Oxfordshire ware, and Severn Valley ware. 15 sherds of pottery from the 2011 evaluation, of 2nd-4th c AD date.",1193,,,,2,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17111,Unquantified pottery of 1st to late 4th C AD date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17112,"Substantial but unquantified assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date, but with an emphasis on the later Roman period. Includes New Forest ware and samian",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17113,"Unquantified (except samian) pottery of Iron Age to late Roman date, including New Forest ware. Waster sherds found.",,,,,162,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17114,"An unquantified assemblage of local greywares, black-burnished ware, grog-tempered ware, samian and Oxfordshire ware. The date range of the assemblage is almost entirely within the later Roman period.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17115,"Unquantified assemblage ('several hundred sherds' mentioned) including mortaria, samian and castor ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17116,"Unquantified assemblage of Iron Age to late Roman date, including samian and New Forest ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17117,Two small New Forest 'thumb' pots were found by skeleton and Romano British domestic pottery sherds came from the soil in or near the grave.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17118,Romano-British pottery present but no further details.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17119,Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age date with some 1st C AD south Gaulish samian suggesting activity to at least AD 60. Amphora sherds also found.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
17120,"Unquantified assemblage, mostly of local greywares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17121,Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman pottery. Includes samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17122,"Large amounts of later Iron Age and Roman pottery, but unquantified. Includes late Iron Age imports and late Roman New Forest ware. Includes a tripod vessel.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17123,"Unquantified assemblage of pottery including samian, mortaria and amphora. A large proportion of the assemblage was of New Forest ware, indicating a late Roman emphasis. Forms include colanders.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17124,"Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman date including samian, Castor and New Forest ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17125,"A large assemblage, mostly comprising local North Wilts greywares and Savernake ware, but also Dorset Black burnished ware (12%), Oxfordshire ware (4%), late Roman shelly ware, New Forest ware and Overwey ware. The pottery ranges in date from 2nd to 4th C with a greater emphasis on the later Roman period. Amphora mostly comprises Dr 20 but also Gallic wine amphora and fish sauce amphora from Spain.",7152,43,48,,140,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17126,"A modest sized assemblage, mostly local North Wilts reduced and sandy oxidised coarsewares, along with Dorset Black-Burnished ware, New Forest colour-coated ware, Oxford red-slipped ware and Oxford whiteware mortaria. The pottery generally dates later 2nd-later 3rd C AD.",235,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17127,"A modest sized assemblage spanning the Roman period, mostly North Wilts coarseware types including Savernake ware, reduced wares, and oxidised wares. Also Dorset Black-Burnished ware, Oxfordshire red-slipped ware and New Forest colour-coated ware.",467,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17128,"A small assemblage of mainly local North Wiltshire wares, including Savernake ware. Also Black burnished, Severn valley and Oxfordshire ware. Mainly 2nd-3rd C AD in date.",110,1,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17129,A modest sized assemblage dated later 1st to early 4th C AD. Many of the wares are of local origin (North Wilts greywares and Savernake) though Dorset black burnished ware formed the largest group. Also Oxfordshire colour-coated ware and New Forest colour-coated ware.,363,4,,,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17130,"Fragments of early 2nd C AD pottery, including Savernake ware and 3 samian sherds.",241,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17131,A late Roman 'cooking pot' acted as a cremation urn.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17132,"Pottery remains unquantified. Most pottery is the grog-tempered greywares typical of the industry. Forms are principally necked jars, bead-rim jars and storage jars, with also plates, dishes, flagons and lids. Wasters noted. The pottery is dated late 1st/early 2nd C AD.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17133,The pottery was mostly of local New Forest ware and dated late Roman. Unquantified.,,,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17134,Large amounts of pottery of 2nd-4th C AD date including samian. Not quantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17135,Small fragments of Roman greywares within the burial mound.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17136,Sherds of New Forest ware pottery within the stone coffin.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17137,"The three pottery sherds are all coarsewares (greyware and oxidised wares) and, as undiagnostic body sherds, cannot be dated more closely within the Roman period.",3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17138,"Small assemblage, all either reduced coarsewares, mostly local in origin, or Dorset Black-Burnished ware. Dated 2nd-4th C AD.  Mostly jars.",16,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17139,"A small assemblage of Roman pottery dating 2nd-4th  AD, comprising grog-tempered wares, greywares, oxidised sandy wares and Black Burnished ware along with New Forest and Oxfordshire wares.",59,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17140,A few sherds of possible late Iron Age date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17141,"A moderate sized assemblage large comprising late Iron Age/early Roman grog- and sand-tempered fabrics, along with local North Wilts reduced wares, Savernake ware and limited black-burnished ware. Mostly jars.",614,8,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17142,"A small assemblage of late 1st-3rd century date. Includes Savernake ware, North Wiltshire sandy reduced ware, and Black-burnished ware.",9,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17143,A small assemblage of mid to late Iron Age date.,16,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17144,Pottery including samian found in and around the mounds.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
17145,A substantial assemblage of pottery of late Iron Age and Roman date. Forms include a colander.,15674,,,,437,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
17146,"A moderate sized assemblage of 2193 sherds of Roman pottery were recovered from the 2010 and 2011 seasons of excavations on the main settlement site. Mostly grey coarsewares (mostly South-East Dorset Black Burnished ware 1, along with Alice Holt Reduced ware and South Western Black Burnished ware; also unsourced local wares) with Grog tempered wares, a small number of Colour-Coated wares (Lower Nene Valley, New Forest & Oxfordshire) and late Roman Shelley ware. Single sherds of Moselkeramik black-slipped ware and Gallia-Belgica Terra Nigra. The pottery evidence suggested occupation of the site from the second to the fourth centuries",2193,17,,,88,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
17147,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
17148,"A substantial assemblage, not all available for examination, dating later 1st to early 3rd C AD (though later material found during fieldwalking). The main kiln fabric is a sandy grey ware, with forms dominated by jars, with some bowls and beakers. Non-local wares include a single sherd of central Gaulish samian, 2 sherds of Dr 20 amphorae and some Dorset Black burnished ware (BB1) sherds. Many second/waster vessels.",5878,42,2,,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
18001,"174 sherds from the 1996 excavation, dominated by standard gabbroic and gabbroic LV fabrics. A further 222 sherds from the 2006 investigations. Both excavations produced assemblages of which the majority of material belongs late in the Roman period. A small group of Dorset BB1 sherds.",396,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18002,"Pottery from the site unusual from Cornish rounds, including samian, mortaria, colour-coated ware, black burnished ware, grey wares and gabbroic jars and bowls.",57,,,1,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
18003,"No precise quantification of pottery from earlier excavations, 606 sherds quantified from most recent work, though 152 likely to be early medieval (not included below). Scraps of samian and Rhenish wares present. Some pottery possibly locally made.",454,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
18004,"Pottery from the 1992 excavation totalled 145 sherds. No differences between pottery from different contexts. BB1 present, but most South Devon ware, and all of mid-4th century date. Material from previous work at the site was unstratified and totalled 386 sherds, also virtually all South Devon ware, mostly from one storage jar (reused as possible oven).",531,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18005,"73 sherds weighing 526g. Of these 68 were of local, Scillonian or Cornish, fabrics, ranging from Later Iron Age to post-Roman in date (four post-Roman sherds also).",69,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
18006,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18007,"The assemblage is typified by the three features usual for Roman period pottery groups from Cornish sites: (1) the majority of the fabrics are gabbroic; (2) dating is difficult because Cornish sites do not generally produce good stratified sequences, types appear to change slowly, and associated datable artefacts are rare; (3) changes in forms and in the proportions of fabrics in circulation reflect to some extent what was happening at Exeter. A fairly high quantity of SE Dorset BB1 (and variant).",2089,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
18008,"25 sherds, weighing 285g. Pottery of South Western, La Tène decorated, 'Glastonbury' style, dated generally from the 4th to 1st centuries BC.",25,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18009,"Amphorae not quantified and other types not all quantified (each by different specialists). Estimate of approx. 1000 sherds represented based on information in published report. Amphorae, samian and mortaria all well represented. Also black-slipped samian, Rhenish ware and other Gaulish wares. Pottery suggestive of mid 1st to mid/late 3rd century in date.",1000,,,,172,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
18010,"No quantification. Some sherds of amphorae were recovered, some dated only loosely from between the mid-2nd century BC to the mid-2nd century AD, whilst others were of late-1st century BC to early-1st century AD in date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18011,"The majority of sherds of Gabbroic fabric from the Lizard peninsula. Roman traded wares all belong to the 1st century AD or early 2nd century. No tabulated quantification, and the number of sherds is an estimate based on the list. Caution needed.",103,15,7,6,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
18012,"Most pottery of gabbroic fabric. Some of the pottery is likely to be of mid-Iron Age date, but the gabbroic fabrics are not quantified by period in the report (however, only a small number of prehistoric sherds noted). Roman forms of 1st-3rd/4th centuries were represented. Quite notable number of amphorae sherds. Suggestion that if the 1st century amphora sherds are a stray occurrence then all pottery on the site associated with salt production could be 4th-6th century in date, though this is far from certain.",2200,37,88,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
18013,"No weight. Several types of fabric, some gabbroic.",115,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18014,"Pottery grave goods included a pot and a bowl, both complete, as well as 93 sherds from outside the cists, some Romano-British, some possibly Bronze Age - precise quantities of the different types not provided.",95,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18015,"Two body sherds only from the 1976 excavation, neither thought contemporary with the structure and considered to be earlier.",2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18016,"650 sherds of pottery recovered, visually all of similar fabric and found to be of gabbroic clay from the Lizard. Dating for the pottery is imprecise, but all was La Tène and included cordoned wares and South Western Third B or Glastonbury material. The presence of cordoned wares indicate activity towards the end of the Iron Age, in the 1st centuries BC and AD.",650,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18017,"126 sherds of Iron Age pottery recovered, all cordoned ware of gabbroic fabric. Notable that there was no Glastonbury ware and so occupation here may have begun later than at the nearby site at Killibury.",126,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18018,"The majority of vessels appear to have been of Glastonbury ware, with a few sherds of cordoned ware. Both types found in association with each other. All sherds were of gabbroic clays from the Lizard. Cordoned wares thought to have a use between c. 75 BC to AD 50. No precise quantification of pottery in the report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18019,70 sherds of gabbroic pottery from the Lizard peninsula. The pottery indicated a date for the site between the late 1st century AD and the end of the 2nd century.,70,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18020,"Pottery was thought to date from between the 2nd century BC to the 1st century AD, and included examples of convincing 1st century AD date. Most was gabbroic pottery from the Lizard.",112,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
18021,"No quantification of pottery in brief report but samian ware present of mid 2nd century. A large quantity of coarse ware, comparable with that from other Cornish sites - no further detail. Also a few sherds of post-Roman imports which preceded the black soil accumulation, indicating continuity into the 5th century AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
18022,The small assemblage of pottery from the site was coarseware and thought to be of 1st-early 2nd century AD in date.,28,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18023,"Amphorae and samian present, not quantification in the report. Date range of 1st century BC to 3rd and possibly 4th century AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
18024,"No sherd count but 10.kg of pottery and 931.3kg of briquetage (pottery less than 3% of the total ceramic assemblage). One possible Gallo-Roman import, but pottery otherwise of similar local fabric, including cordoned wares. The assemblage was thought to imply that the ovens were in use during the 2nd century AD.",,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18025,"Pottery included cordoned ware, amphorae, Black Burnished Ware. No clear quantification by sherd count or weight in the report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
18026,"42 sherds, all apparently of native Romano-British Cornish ware. No early wares and all seemingly mid-Roman, perhaps 3rd rather than 2nd century AD.",42,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18027,"A single sherd of samian, and the site otherwise rich in native coarse ware. Several hundred sherds recovered (no precise count in the report). All cordoned ware or contemporary or later native bowls and jars.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
18028,A sherd of a possible late first-second century amphora recovered. Also two complete late 2nd century AD gabbroic jars associated with the cremation.,4,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
18029,"Most pottery was of gabbroic fabric, whilst non-local fabrics, less than 1% of sherds and weight, consisted of samian, SE Dorset Black Burnished ware and probable Oxfordshire fabric. Local fabrics ranged in date from the mid-to-late Iron Age into the 3rd-4th centuries, and included cordoned ware.",779,14,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
18030,Assemblage dominated by local pottery of gabbroic fabric including cordoned wares dating from the 1st century BC through to the mid-2nd century AD.,21,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18031,"Approx. 1214 sherds forming a continuous sequence from the early Iron Age to the medieval period. Precise numbers of pottery by period not included in report, so these have been excluded below. South-Western Decorated Ware dating from the 4th to 1st century BC present, as well as cordoned ware of late 2nd century BC to 2nd century AD. Also local gabbroic ware of Roman date, though the assemblage of this period relatively small. A feature in the area alongside the fogou produced a single sherd of samian. Also a single amphora sherd.",,,1,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
18032,The assemblage was dominated by gabbroic fabrics of late Iron Age to Roman date.,150,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18033,"The ceramic evidence is regarded as not conclusive for a distinct period of Romano-British occupation at the site, being fairly meagre at just 45 sherds. Some sherds had a potential date range of 3rd-6th century AD, though others were certainly Roman, including mortaria of Oxford colour coat and flanged bowls dating from the late 3rd to fourth centuries AD. Local wares were of three distinct fabrics, Gabbroic, Granitic and Local.",45,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
18034,"Approx. 90% of the pottery was of gabbroic fabric from the Lizard, though samian, South Devon, South East Dorset BB1 and Oxfordshire wares were present in small quantities. Evidence for curation of samian over several centuries. Also a wide range of post-Roman Mediterranean imports. Notable that the imports contained an unguentarium. In addition to the 25 Roman amphorae sherds, many post-Roman amphorae sherds. However the imported pottery made up a tiny proportion of the assemblage.",7036,94,25,,60,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
18035,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18036,The pottery assemblage from the site spanned the first century BC to the fourth century AD. It was predominantly local but included some non-Cornish South Devon and South East Dorset Black Burnished Wares.,103,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18037,Very small assemblage of just three sherds of probable late Iron Age/Roman date.,3,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18038,A very small assemblage of sherds of gabbroic fabrics dating from the 1st century BC to the 2nd century AD.,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18039,Early-to-mid Iron Age pottery not included in these figures. Most of the late Iron Age and Romano-British pottery was cordoned ware and gabbroic fabric of Roman date. A small number of sherds of amphorae. Post-Roman pottery also present.,301,4,3,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
18040,All pottery seemingly of LIA/Roman gabbroic fabrics with a suggested emphasis on pottery after c. AD 150/200 in the Growth Area report and 1st/2nd centuries in the Strategic Route report.,98,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18041,"431 sherds from the excavation (4.235kg) and an additional 116 sherds (0.663kg) recovered from fieldwalking. Most sherds of mid-to-late Iron Age South Western Ware, with some Late Iron Age Cordoned Ware and some Roman pottery of 3rd-4th century date. All pottery gabbroic fabric except for two amphora sherds from a probable Dressel 1 amphora.",547,5,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
18042,The excavated assemblage comprised 139 sherds weighing 1.407kg. Most was South Western Decorated Ware of mid-to-late Iron Age in date though the association of some of this potter with Cordoned Ware at the site indicates activity in the 1st century BC or early 1st century AD. All was gabbroic fabric.,139,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18043,"Approx. 30 miniature pots, all of similar shape and size, recovered. Most were associated with a large circular 'table' in the centre of one of the buildings and one in a triangular stone 'box' nearby. The vessels were thought not to have been made locally.",30,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18044,"Most sherds were gabbroic Roman forms. A fragment of samian and some poorly preserve amphora fragments recovered from the first intervention at the site, though no precise quantification in that report. Also v small numbers of BB1.",320,3,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
18045,"All sherds with diagnostic form, and all of any size, were of gabbroic fabric, of the general character now identified as 'standard' for Roman Cornwall.",34,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18046,Pottery predominantly local and of Romano-British date with some of Iron Age date.,1651,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18047,No quantification but pottery thought to be of 3rd century BC to 1st century AD in date and included cordoned wares and seemingly South West Decorated Ware.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18048,"Pottery not quantified in the report. Pottery predominantly of Iron Age date, with some wheel thrown pottery suggesting activity in the 1st century AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18049,"Pottery from the site included South West Decorated Ware of 4th-1st century BC and Cordoned Ware of 1st century BC date. Two distinct groups present, granitic and gabbroic. Gabbroic ware by far the most dominant fabric. Small quantities of samian and Dressel 1A amphora present. BB1 also present. No quantification by sherd count, only by minimum number of vessels - 1173 min. vessels.",,,2,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
18050,"Roman pottery included a small number of sherds of samian, terra nigra and New Forest Ware. Most pottery was of gabbroic clay from the Lizard Peninsula. No clear quantification in the report. Evidence for pottery repair using rivets.",,,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
18051,"Pottery not abundant, and no samian or mortaria recovered, though some amphorae sherds were found. All pottery was seemingly of local origin. No quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
18052,"Several thousand pottery sherds recovered, but no precise quantification. Samian present in small numbers (2 sherds) and also some New Forest ware. Most pottery of Roman date, though some examples of Iron Age pottery found.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
18053,"Most pottery of local fabric, though amphora sherds and samian present. Cordoned wares present. No quantification by sherd count in the report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
18054,"A small ceramic assemblage was discovered, not analysed at the time of production of the report, but dating from between c. 300 BC and AD 500. A possible amphora sherd included. Most pottery of gabbroic fabric. Not all sherds listed below certainly LIA/Roman. A further 114 sherds recovered during the AC Archaeology evaluation, including Cordoned Ware and Glastonbury ware.",238,1,1,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
18055,"The Roman ceramic assemblage from Nancemere was broadly comparable to other Romano-British sites in the region, predominantly comprising local gabbroic fabrics and forms, though there was a lack of the Continental imported finewares such as samian and amphorae and other regional British wares seen on some sites. Minor quantities of South-east Dorset Black Burnished ware and South Devon ware. The Roman assemblage was dominated by jar forms. A further 232 sherds from the 2003 excavation, again predominantly gabbroic with a small number of imported wares including a mortaria fragment.",2939,36,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
18056,The assemblage is dominated by local Gabbroic wares. Samian present in small numbers and amphorae sherds surprisingly well represented.,104,1,4,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
18057,"Just 22 sherds (259.5g). Well made' Gabbroic fabric predominates the collection, though 'Standard' gabbroic also occurs. Forms include Mawgan-in-Pyder Type E jars, Mawgan-in-Pyder Type B or D jars, and also Cordoned ware vessels such as Mawgan-in-Pyder Type P jars and Mawgan-in-Pyder. Nine sherds were assigned to the Romano-British period, however none are diagnostic and it is possible that this material (especially considering the amount in 'well made' gabbroic fabric) is actually earlier, and of Iron Age date.",22,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18058,"One sherd only, 6g in weight. Standard gabbroic fabric, abraded, dating where from the Middle Iron Age to the fifth century AD.",1,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18059,"39 sherds, 428g.  Many of the sherds appear to have come from a single vessel, a Cordoned Ware Type DIE cooking pot, belonging to the first or second phases of Cordoned Ware, with a possible date range of first century BC through to mid-second century AD.",39,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18060,"2 sherds of Iron Age pottery of South Western Decorated Ware, 4th-1st centuries BC in date.",2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18061,No data though much pottery recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18062,"Approx. 3000 sherds recovered ranging from late Bronze Age to Roman in date. Many were Iron Age, including some Cordoned Ware, though late Iron Age and Roman pottery appears to form a minor part of the assemblage. No clear quantification of individual types.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18063,"81 sherds identified as Iron Age, all gabbroic with South West Decorated Ware and Cordoned Ware represented. 34 identified as Romano-British, again dominated by gabbroic ware, including pottery of late 2nd century date.",115,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18064,"26 sherds only - all Gabbroic, ranging from IA to Roman in date.",26,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
18065,"Pottery generally of late 1st/early 2nd century to early 5th century in date - no clear evidence for late Iron Age activity. Principally Roman period Gabbroic ware. The pottery assemblage is characterised by an absence of storage jars, and about half of the numbers of cooking pots and double the number of bows expected on domestic sites. Overall suggestion of a focus on consumption of food rather than storage or preparation - possibly regular feasting events. The small number of amphora sherds are probably post-Roman and not included here.",112,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19001,"152 sherds of pottery from the AC Archaeology excavation including 44 amphorae sherds and 12 samian. No precise quantification is available in the Exeter Archaeology assessment report, though the assemblage contains over 3000 sherds. Mortaria, samian and amphorae all present but not quantified in Exeter Archaeology assessment.",3152,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19002,"The Iron Age assemblage includes a significant proportion of diagnostic rim forms and decorative motifs deriving from South-Western or Glastonbury-style decorated wares. Burnt food residues and sooting were found on a number of sherds. Although fairly small, the assemblage was largest of its date from the county at the time of the report. The radiocarbon dates from the site indicate that the pottery ranges in date from the 4th to 1st centuries BC. A small number of Durotrigian wares were present, which appear in Dorset only from the mid-1st century BC - these presumably relate to the last use of the site, and it is thought that these sherds may have arrived at the site immediately prior to its abandonment, dating the abandonment of the site to the later 1st century BC.",521,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19003,"Most pottery was Iron Age, though an unstrat. RB sherd was also found. A number of the sherds had residues, thought likely to be domestic in origin. The assemblage was considered closely comparable to that from Blackhorse (this database site 19002). As at Blackhorse, the presence of Durotrigian ware may relate to the end of the sequence of activity in the late 1st century BC.",366,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19004,"The change from military to civil settlement is marked by the disappearance of some of the imported ingredients, in food preparation vessels and a reduction in the range of fine table wares. However, a wide range of pottery continues up to the 2nd century at least. The pottery spans the period from the mid-1st century AD into the 4th century. Outside Exeter, the assemblage is the largest group of Roman pottery found in Devon (at the time the report was published). 537 sherds of imported finewares included 407 sherds of samian. A small quantity of briquetage also present. British finewares included New Forest colour-coated wares, New Forest red-slipped ware and Oxfordshire red/brown colour-coated wares. Other fabrics included South-east Dorset Black-Burnished ware, South-Western Black Burnished ware, oxidised coarse wares, grey coarse wares, sandy grey wares. Suggestion that the pottery assemblage indicates that the site was not dependant on Exeter for pottery supply, and may have had access to trading network in its own right. Two sherds from a late 3rd-4th century Black Burnished Ware 1 jar had literate graffiti, possibly reading VII IANVARIVS. An additional 743 sherds including 27 sherds of samian, 29 sherds of amphorae and 2 mortaria were recovered from the Gittisham Forge excavation and Nag's Head Culvert watching brief. The date range of the assemblages were similar to the Pomeroy Wood evidence. An additional 85 sherds of Roman pottery were found in the Exeter Archaeology excavations of 2004 (included in the total number of sherds below). Most was 3rd-4th century AD.",17915,239,784,110,434,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19005,"Pottery spanned the 2nd-4th centuries. Fabrics included Dorset Black-burnished ware, South Devon ware, colour-coated ware (Cologne?), samian, a sandy amphora fabric, sandy greyware, fine black sandy ware and fine oxidised ware. Samian was not quantified. The most common were distinctive South Devon wares and Dorset Black burnished wares.",372,3,4,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
19006,"A single Romano-British Exeter Greyware sherd only, dating from the early 2nd century .",1,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19007,"The pottery assemblage spans the whole Roman period, from the middle of the 1st century to the end of the 4th century AD. The largest sub-group is South East Dorset Black Burnished 1 coarseware pottery. Fine ware  includes three much abraded Samian body sherds and a body sherd from a Nene Valley colour coated ware indented beaker dating from the mid-2nd to the 4th century AD.",52,1,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19008,Seven sherds of late Iron Age to early Roman pottery only.,7,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19009,"Some fragments of likely Iron Age kiln/oven furniture found. 61 sherds of Iron Age sherds of varying dates weighing 327g, mostly of local fabric tempered with Upper Greensand material but including gabbroic pieces from the Lizard and Black-Burnished sherds from Dorset.",61,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19010,"19 sherds weighing 197g. Pottery was of Iron Age date spanning the second half of the 1st millennium BC, with some South Western Decorated Ware (Glastonbury Ware) assigned 2nd-1st century BC dates.",19,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19011,"89 sherds (265g) of Roman pottery were recovered. The pottery was 3rd-4th century and mainly South East Dorset black-burnished and South Devon wares, but some sherds demonstrated the use of Taw/Torridge clays. A small number of other sherds were recovered from other parts of the island. Earlier Roman period activity is hinted at by a single sherd from a test pit from another part of the island.",89,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19012,"Much of assemblage in poor condition. Fabrics included Organic tempered wares, igneous rock-tempered wares, sandy wares with rock inclusions, Dorset black-burnished ware, South-West black-burnished ware, Severn Valley ware, Black sandy ware, various grey ware, fine oxidised ware and Central Gaulish samian. The group included handmade and wheel-made vessels, including some of pre-Roman Iron Age traditions. Most were local, with some evidence for wider contacts. The assemblage was regarded as typical of a rural settlement dating from the later Iron Age or early Roman period, contrasting with the nearby settlement at Pomeroy Wood.",305,3,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19013,"29 sherds weighing 0.756kg, mostly from a single context. The assemblage dates to the late 3rd or 4th century. The small group has a predominance of South Devon ware.",29,1,2,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
19014,1 sherd of local greyware dating from between the 1st to 4th centuries AD.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19015,"3.85kg of pottery recovered during the various excavations. Quantified only by weight and EVEs in the report (no sherd counts). A scrap of samian was present. Mortaria were presented as 1 EVE (a single sherd seems to have been found). Other fabrics included New Forest colour coated ware, south-east Dorset black burnished 1, south-west black burnished 1, south-west grey ware, South Devon ware, Exeter gritty grey ware, Exeter micaceous grey ware, unknown oxidised ware. The pottery was almost exclusively coarse ware. The date of the sherds can be divided into two groups, a first-century and a late 3rd-4th century group.",,4,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
19016,Tile wasters recovered. A graffito (illiterate - seemingly a tally or doodle) was recorded on one tile fragment.,,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19017,No precise quantification in the report - the assemblage appears to have been small and dominated by South Devon ware of late Roman date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19018,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19019,"3.210kg of pottery recovered, half from a single fragmented flagon. Pottery presented by weight, sherd count and EVEs in report. Pottery was of mixed dates but included a large quantity of South Devon ware, suggesting a late Roman date for one of the contexts. Pottery from the graves was limited and a number produced just one sherd, thought probably to be residual. A further 35 sherds (246g) recovered from previous evaluation, including 2 amphora sherds and 3 samian.",461,3,4,3,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19020,"290 sherds were recovered from Cunliffe's excavations, though many were prehistoric and the Roman material is not clearly separated in the report. Samian was present. The greatest proportion of the pottery (72%) is of local South Devon ware. Black burnished wares from south Somerset or west Dorset also well represented. A graffito inscribed pot sherd is described amongst the material recovered from the site in the mid-20th century. A group of tazze were found from the cemetery area, all belonging to a distinctive group of Cornish cordoned wares which probably originated during the 1st century BC - they are thought to be pre-conquest in date. Other aspects of the pottery are certainly Roman post-conquest imports. Also a small number of sherds from the AC Archaeology evaluation, including 3 fragments of samian. 5.2kg (over 300 sherds) present from the site in Plymouth City Museum. Illustrated pottery only discussed in the report. Pottery appears to indicate occupation spanning the whole Roman period.",300,5,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
19021,"Samian was associated with the fort phase. The bulk of the pottery from the 1st century occupation consisted of coarseware jars and bowls from south Devon and south-east Dorset. Amphorae present but scarce. The late assemblage was substantial (637 sherds) and consists almost entirely of Black Burnished ware from SE Dorset and South Devon ware, the second being marginally more common than the first. Of the late pottery, at least 3 fragments of a samian mortarium and two sherds of other mortaria.",671,,12,5,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19022,"37 sherds of Roman pottery from the ditch. Principal fabrics included South Devon ware (75%), BB1 (SE Dorset) and BB1SW, as well as Exeter gritty grey ware. The pottery had a terminus post quem of c. 345, and the assemblage generally was felt to be of 4th century date. Dressel 20 amphora represented, though no sherd count.",37,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
19023,"Fieldwalking and pottery produced a small (3.58kg) assemblage of Roman pottery. SE Dorset BB1 was the principal fabric with lesser amounts of SW BB1, South Devon ware, Exeter gritty ware, sandy grey ware and micaceous grey ware. Two sherds of Dressel 20 amphorae and fragments of four central Gaulish samian vessels were recovered. No other fine wares were found. No precise quantification of the general assemblage. Dating evidence from the limited pottery assemblage suggests a date ranging from the mid-to-late 2nd to the late 3rd centuries AD.",,4,2,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
19024,"An assemblage of 5.25kg of pottery was recovered. Dominated by South Devon ware. Also Exeter fabric, likely to be of 2nd-3rd centuries. Also small quantities of SE Dorset and SW BB1 and grey ware storage jars.",339,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19025,"A small assemblage of 43 sherds (520g). Most were South Devon ware, with Exeter micaceous ware and South Western BB1 also represented.",43,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19026,Pottery was mid-2nd-late 3rd century in date. Minimum number of vessels 32,41,1,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19027,A relatively small pottery assemblage (0.37kg) representing 46 vessels (seemingly not all sherds are quantified in the report). 12 amphora sherds included. Notable that a high proportion of sherds were imports of some quality.,27,0,12,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
19028,"The Roman pottery is dominated by South Devon ware, representing 66% by weight of the assemblage recovered. South Western BB1 present but in small numbers. South East Dorset BB1 represented by 95 sherds (21% by weight). Small numbers of samian and amphora sherds.",349,6,4,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
19029,"27kg recovered from stratified deposits with a further 11kg recovered through surface cleaning. No total sherd count, but minimum number of vessels recorded as 64. Only illustrated sherds described in catalogue, but samian, mortaria and amphorae present. Some wasters from grey ware storage jars found, indicating pottery production at the site. Some other forms, possibly mortaria, produced on site, though evidence only available from one waster.",,38,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19030,A single sherd of South Devon ware.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19031,"Tiny assemblage, mostly South East Dorset BB1. Very little in the way of dating evidence.",7,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19032,"18 sherds only (147g). All abraded and in poor condition. The assemblage includes South Western Black-Burnished ware (Exeter Fabric 40), with the only diagnostic piece comprising a flat-rim bowl dated as late 1st century. Other sherds comprise undiagnostic greywares.",18,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19033,"Pottery included BB ware, South Devon ware, grey ware, New Forest slipped ware. Mid-3rd-4th century.",117,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19034,"6 sherds (33g) of BB ware only, probably 1st-2nd century.",6,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19035,"Tiny assemblage of 8 sherds, including one scrap of samian. All dated 1st-2nd century AD. Also five 2nd-1st century BC Iron Age sherds, included below.",13,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19036,45 sherds of mid-to-late Iron Age pottery and 2 sherds of Romano-British pottery (216g total). One of the RB pottery sherds a sherd of South Devon ware of mid 2nd to 4th centuries.,47,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19037,Pottery fits into a Glastonbury or South-Western style of La Tène-decorated pottery assemblage. No clear quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19038,"7.61kg of pottery recovered from features associated with the square enclosure, 84% of which derived from refuse deposits in ditch terminals. Samian, and SE Dorset BB1 and SW BB1 present. Very large proportion of South Devon ware, and BB1 relatively scarce. Mortaria also present. Other major type sandy grey wares, but South Devon ware by far the dominant type.",,8,,2,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
19039,"Assemblage suggestive of a 3rd century date with no exclusively 4th century pottery. Dominated by SE Dorset BB1, but also SW BB1, South Devon Ware, Exeter Micaceous Grey Ware, Exeter Sandy Grey Ware, Exeter Gritty Grey Ware, South-Western Grey Ware Storage. Samian and amphorae present.",499,5,6,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
19040,"Small assemblage including SE Dorset BB1, New Forest red slipped ware, South Devon ware and unclassified grey ware.",9,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19041,"Limited pottery assemblage from the 1980s intervention - a number of sherds of a Durotrigian black-burnished ware, unlikely to be pre-AD 150 in date. Also finds of Iron Age pottery of late-Iron Age, pre-Roman date. No precise quantification. Finds from 1978 excavation included over 300 late Iron Age sherds, weighing less than 2.5kg and a considerable amount of Roman pottery. No quantification by weight or sherd count. Samian, mortaria and amphorae all present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19042,"The small pottery assemblage included general coarse pottery and La Tène pottery (Glastonbury ware) of late Iron Age date, dating from c. 300 BC onwards.",40,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19043,"Pottery included 189 sherds of La Tène decorated wares and 35 Roman sherds, though it is unclear how much pottery was lost during and after excavation. Earlier pottery also present, including LBA/EIA sherds. Amongst the sparse Roman material were 2 amphora fragments. The assemblage seems to span the Roman period. South Devon ware present.",224,3,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
19044,"Assemblage includes 1 sherd of amphora, and 256 sherds of BB1, 33 sherds of Gritty Grey ware, 36 sherds of South Devon ware. Notably high proportion of BB1. The majority of vessel types appear within the 2nd century AD, with a number which go into the 3rd, and examples of late 3rd-4th century in date. Also a limited number of earlier vessels, perhaps representing earlier, Iron Age, activity, but for which evidence is generally scarce. Samian notably absent.",326,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
19045,"Pottery mainly black burnished ware, though not clearly Dorset or South West ware. Possibly from just two pots.",35,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19046,"31 sherds of late Iron Age to Roman pottery from evaluation trenches, including 1st-2nd century and late Roman date. A fragment of mortaria included. Fabrics also included Black Burnished ware and South Devon ware. Also an abraded samian ware sherd from fieldwalking (and one Black Burnished ware sherd also from fieldwalking).",33,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
19047,"Small assemblage including samian and BB1, mostly mid-to-late 2nd century.",27,,,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19048,"23 sherds including SW BB1, Exeter Sandy Grey ware, Exeter Gritty Grey ware, and 2 sherds of amphora.",23,,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
19049,64 sherds of pottery of late 3rd-4th century date.,64,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19050,"The pottery assemblage included both local fabrics and imported pottery, such as samian and terra nigra.",74,3,17,6,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19051,"Most of the assemblage is of mid-to-late Iron Age in date, representing at least 20 vessels of South Western Decorated ware, common from the 3rd century BC until at least the 1st century BC. One almost complete pot from the enclosure ditch a possible structured deposit, and other vessels also likely to have been deliberately placed. Also 33 sherds of Roman pottery, including a few scraps of samian.",326,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19052,"A number of sherds recovered from the fill of the corn drier, including samian and amphora sherds, predominantly late 3rd-4th century.",112,,19,2,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19053,"Assemblage dominated by coarsewares, mostly in the form of cooking and storage vessels but also including bowls, beakers and flagons, a range suggestive of domestic activity and food consumption on the site. However, some vessels appear to have been used in unorthodox ways, such as a storage vessel functioning as a container for water used for quenching during smithing. Most vessels derived from within the local region; from east and south Devon, south Somerset and Dorset. Imported pottery is also present as a minor component of the assemblage in the form of samian vessels from Gaul and also Dressel 20 amphorae from southern Spain. See Bray's PhD, volume 2, Appendix A for quantification of different fabric types.",369,5,3,,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
19054,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19055,"Assemblage dominated by coarse ware cooking vessels, bowls and storage jars, but also includes imported fine wares from Gaul and Germany and amphorae from southern Spain. Although a large proportion of the assemblage is derived from redeposited contexts, it is consistently of a late 2nd to early 3rd century date.",1450,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
19056,"88 sherds, minimum number of vessels 40. Some SE Dorset BB1.",88,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19057,"Almost 37kg of pottery recovered, no sherd count (illustrated sherds only in the report). A considerable amount of the pottery was of late Roman date, from the second quarter of the mid-4th century, with few sherds of 1st-2nd century date. Samian thought to be residual from earlier phases. Sherds of amphorae, Dressel 20, from most contexts. Mortaria also present.",,37,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19058,"Finds were limited to a small quantity of Roman pottery of 2nd century AD date, some possible sherds of mortaria. Sherd count an estimate based on information in report.",15,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
19059,"A considerable percentage of the fine wares belong to the late 3rd-early 5th century AD, and come from the New Forest kilns and potteries around Oxford. Also a large quantity of Dorset BB1. No precise quantification by weight or sherd count. A Kimmeridge shale turned base may have been part of a tazza.",,,,,63,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19060,"No clear quantification by sherd count or weight, though minimum numbers of vessels presented. Mortaria, amphorae and samian all present, as well as Lyons ware and Terra Nigra.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
19061,"Small assemblage, samian of 2nd half of 2nd century AD. Most other sherds of local manufacture.",33,,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19062,"No quantification, illustrated sherds only in report. One sherd of samian. Predominantly a homogenous collection suggesting activity from around AD 50-80. Mostly provincial Roman wares and vessels of Belgic and Belgo-Roman types.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19063,"No precise quantification by sherd count or weight. Samian, mortaria present. Pottery dating from mid-to-late first century through to late third and fourth centuries. The pottery from the building all appears to have been mid-fourth century.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
19064,"No precise sherd count, but sherds from two cooking pots, thought to be late Iron Age in date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19065,"95 sherds of late Iron Age pottery, 271 sherds of Roman. Samian and mortaria present, and possible amphora sherds. Also BB1. Roman pottery of 1st-2nd century in date.",366,,2,1,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
19066,"Pottery recovered of 'Iron Age A' and 'Iron Age B' recovered. IA A thought to be mid-to-late Iron Age in date, with continuation into the 1st century BC. The presence of a 'Glastonbury' type bowl thought to indicate activity down to the 1st century BC. No quantification, illustrated pottery in report only.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19067,"Pottery dominated by 'Iron Age B ware' and thought to range from before 50 BC to not after around c. AD 25. No quantification, illustrated sherds only in the report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
19068,No data but pottery of late Iron Age to 4th century present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20001,"4285 sherds of LIA/Rom pottery derived from sieved samples, and were mostly small abraded sherds. 283 sherds from finewares were present. LIA Armorican and early Roman imports from western Gaul were present, though the assemblage primarily consisted of local Durotrigian and Black Burnished ware products. Amphorae included Baetican, Cadiz, Campanian, Catalan, and Gallic fabrics.",7087,58,105,3,78,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20002,The pottery derives from the Roman fort and other excavated sites in the hillfort. Iron Age 'A' and 'B' wares have been removed from the quantification where possible.,846,,27,6,51,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20003,"Black burnished wares of Durotrigian type dominated the assemblage. A few sherds of NEW Forest colour-coated wares were also present. Forms included rim jars, dog-dishes, flat flanged bowls, and dropped flanged bowls. Amphora from Normandy had been imported to the site, whilst the remainder were from southern Spain. At least 6 sherds of samian were present, if not more.",530,,4,1,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20004,Specialist report not yet available,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20005,Awaiting finds report. Majority of pottery was 3rd/4thC AD. Some details were given in the evaluation report (126 sherds).,4270,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20006,"Pottery included samian (central and south Gaulish), New Forest wares, and Black Burnished wares. No quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20007,"A small quantity of early Roman pottery was recovered from the excavation. Surface finds included samian, New Forest, Oxfordshire, Black Burnished and grey wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20008,"The pottery was not fully quantified, but material from both funerary and non-funerary contexts were present. Much of the latter derived from the circular hut, and was primarily Durotrigian or early Roman, though late Roman wares were present in upper layers. A possible sub-Roman grass-tempered sherd was also recovered from this feature. 83% of the pottery derived from local BB1 wares",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20009,"All the locally produced pottery belongs to the conquest period and the beginning of the 3rdC AD. Sherd counts only given for some assemblages, not all. Assemblages dominated by jars. Imports were few but included Baetican Dr 20 amphora and central and south Gaulish samian.",,127,1,,9,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20010,"Only a selection of the pottery remains from the test-pitting. It was not deemed sufficient for quantification. Some test pits produced very large quantities of pottery however. The material was predominantly 3rd and 4thC AD. Interestingly a distinctive motif found at site C has been identified from a number of sites across Britain. Forms include bowls, jars and flagons.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20011,"Only a selection of the pottery assemblage was retained. This was predominantly 2nd C AD, but ranged from LIA, including Durotrigian forms, to 3rd C AD dating material. Waster dumps were noted in a number of sections.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20012,Quantities of LIA pottery included mainly Hengistbury type. The Roman period pottery was of forms and fabrics very similar to those recovered from the redcliff sites to the east. A few imported vessels were noted.,,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
20013,See site and burial summaries,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20014,"A moderate quantity of pottery was recovered, but not identified nor quantified. Though it was found mixed with oyster shell and animal bone suggesting the remains of consumption episodes.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20015,"Overall pottery assemblage not quantified in the report, though samian was quantified by decorated and non-decorated sherds and source types.",,,,,143,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20016,"The late Iron Age phase produced quantities of imported fine wares and amphorae. Amphorae included Pascual 1, Dressel 2-4, Dressel 20, Pelichet 47, and Campanian forms. Samian, arretine, Gallo-Belgic wares, were also present. The Roman pottery was predominantly 3rd/4thC AD BB1 wares, as well as contemporary New Forest and Oxfordshire vessels. All fine wares and imports are well quantified by sherd count. Unfortunately, the remainder of the assemblage is only quantified by vessel counts.",,,361,12,113,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20017,"Over 5000 pottery fragments were analysed from the site, but these contain early and middle Iron Age samples. The Durotrigian phase brings with it an increase in the number of forms present at the site and a continuing standardisation of fabrics used. Decorated wares also become more common during this phase. The Roman phase brings with it the fully-developed Black Burnished ware industry types with its typical range of bowls, jars, and dish types, but also the introduction of flagons, skillets, and dishes. These also reflect the increasing importance of table wares into the Roman period and date to the end of the 4thC AD.",,,,,30,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20018,"The site produced over 75000 pottery sherds from all phases. Unfortunately these were quantified by vessel number by form, and not by phase. Arretine, Gallo-Belgic, samian and amphorae were recovered from Durotrigian levels.",,,13,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20019,"Black Burnished wares I dominated the assemblage. Other significant fabrics included, Alice Holt products, New Forest reduced and fine wares, and Oxfordshire wares. A wide range of amphora products were present including Dressel 1A, Dr 1B, Dr 1sp, Dr1-Pascual 1, Dr 2-4, Dr 20, Cam. 185A, and Cam. 186 sp. A range of imported fine wares include Gallo-Belgic flagons, beakers and platters, central Gaulish beakers, and tazze, platters and bowls from Aquitania. Total numbers of Samian not given in report. Two shale vessels are in 'tazze form'.",8963,120,1367,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20020,"Only a very small quantity of Roman pottery was recovered from the site reinforcing the interpretation that the site formed a peripheral area of a settlement, perhaps involved in stock raising and cereal processing/storage. Most of the sherds were BB1 wares, though New Forest and Oxfordshire wares were also present, and some abraded imported wares.",47,1,1,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20021,"BB1 wares overwhelmingly dominated the assemblage. Very small quantities of New Forest, Oxfordshire, samian and amphora were present. The majority of the assemblage derived from pits and major ditches.",3120,43,1,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20022,"Vast majority of the assemblage is Black Burnished wares. Some finewares, plus New Forest and Oxfordshire wares present.",3298,34,13,16,40,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20023,"The Roman pottery assemblage was predominantly 3rd-4thC AD in date (c.2/3rds), and mostly of BB wares. A smaller number of local fine and coarsewares, plus regional and continental imports. A single literate graffito was identified on a BB vessel, reading: MAX…",13511,,30,10,141,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20024,The Roman pottery was primarily Black Burnished ware from the ditch and posthole features. One sherd of possible Oxfordshire colour-coated ware present.,10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20025,"Two complete pots were placed as grave goods and sherds of at least four other vessels were recovered from the grave. The complete vessels consisted of a carinated bead-rim bowl and a high-shouldered jar. The former was of the typical local BB1 wares, but the latter belonged to the south-west Dorset BB ware fabrics.",6,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20026,"A high degree of rims, bases and handles suggest selective recovery. Of the 987 sherds, 873 were LIA or Roman. Fabrics included BB1 and grog-tempered ware. New Forest and Oxfordshire ware vessels were minimally represented.",868,,1,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20027,"Samian, Oxfordshire and New Forest wares found as surface remains and in the evaluation trenches. Mostly 2nd-4thC AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20028,No data - antiquarian excavation,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20029,"Pottery not quantified by sherd count or weight. Some EVE data provided. Lyne suggests that some of the pots may have been used for the processing of brine and insinuates that wasters were present. Jars overwhelmingly dominated the assemblage, mostly of BB1 wares.",,,,,19,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20030,"No sherd counts or weights were given, though the type of site survey undertaken would not lend the assemblage to comparative analysis. BB1 storage jars overwhelmingly dominated the assemblage, of which at least 48 vessels were represented from a relatively small area of investigation. Other forms present include bowls, dishes, and beakers, and other fabrics include New Forest, and Moselkeramik wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20031,"Body sherds were under-represented which may be due to recovery. Poole Harbour fabrics (1a and 1b) accounted for 85% of the assemblage and with all other fabrics accounting for less than 1% each. Jars, bowls, dishes and flagons were all present. Some earlier Iron Age sherds were counted, but these were relatively minimal. Oxfordshire and Rhineland mortaria were present. Finewares included New Forest and Oxfordshire wares. Grave goods are detailed in the burial data.",1064,,2,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20032,"The pottery is generally very fragmented and abraded. A wide variety of fabrics was identified. Durotrigian pottery was comparatively rare but present, as were continental imports such as Gallo-Belgic, Gaulish wares and Samian. RB lead-glazed pottery was also present. Later fabrics included New Forest and Oxfordshire wares.",,92,,,115,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
20033,Imported wares included Cordoned wares from Armorica and Italian Dressel 1 amphora. The local pottery was entirely of LIA wares. No quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
20034,"BB1 wares produced over 90% of the assemblage. A few sherds of Samian were present, but the assemblage was mostly local wares. Jars and bowls dominated with some flagons.",863,,,,18,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20035,"Much of the middle Iron Age and late Iron Age pottery could not be distinguished. All have been included here so not to discriminate against the latter. 2125 sherds derive from the Wheeler collection; these are vastly over-represented by rim sherds compared to the 1980s collection. The late Iron Age sample was influenced by Poole Harbour wares (over 90%), showing a change from earlier periods. Armorican fine wares were present.",25415,223,5,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20036,"Although the assemblage was counted and weighed, since it was argued that minimum vessel counts or EVEs would give an unrealistic quantification, no sherd counts were actually given in the report. BB1 wares appear to have been common, whilst New Forest storage jars, beakers, bowls, and mortaria, and Oxfordshire colour-coated wares and mortaria were also present. No Samian or amphorae were present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
20037,"All total 'several thousand' sherds of pottery were recovered from the site, though only limited data are given in the report. The early assemblage was represented by coarse ware heavy flat-rimmed jars, bead-rim jars, Maiden Castle ware bowls and vessels with counter-sunk handles. The later assemblage dates into the 4thC AD and is represented by flange-rim bowls, storage jars, pie-crust rimmed jars, mortaria, New Forest colour-coated wares and parchment wares, and Oxfordshire colour-coats. The Samian was from central and south Gaul.",,23,,,115,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
20038,"Large quantities of 3rd and 4thC AD pottery recovered from the site, plus earlier material, but post-ex is yet to be carried out.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20039,"Jars were the most common form of pottery, whilst mortaria was also recovered. Samian and BB1 wares were present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
20040,All the pottery from the ditch was consistent with a late 3rd-4thC AD date including sherds from BB1 bowls and platters and New Forest beakers and flagons.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20041,The pottery is consistent with an assemblage dating c.150-50BC. Saucepan-type pottery and Maiden Castle-Marnhull types were identified. Bowls and jars were represented.,,75,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20042,Only 293 sherds of the c.2500 recovered were analysed in detail. A range of domestic wares were present in BB1 and New Forest wares fabrics. The Samian dates from c.AD60 to the early 3rdC AD.,2500,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20043,"No samian was recovered and the pottery is consistent with a late 3rd to 4thC AD date, though no report exists.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20044,"Pottery not fully analysed, though late 2ndC AD Samian ware and 3rd-4thC AD  coarsewares were noted as present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20045,Two locally made hand-produced Durotrigian-type bead-rim vessels were recovered with one of the burials. These included a jar and a bowl.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20046,"Pottery recovered was predominantly local BB1 ware including an ornate bowl, and sherds from beaker, jar, and mortaria vessels.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
20047,"The pottery assemblage was catalogued by type relating to each structure but no quantifications are given. Black burnished ware appears to have been common. Some LIA hand-made vessels are present, whilst the late Roman phase produced New Forest vessels. Domestic wares including bowls, beakers, flagons and jars were all represented. Much of the Samian was badly weathered, but fabrics included both south and central Gaulish wares dating from the Flavian to the early 3rdC AD.",,,,,60,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20048,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20049,"The pottery was not quantified, but sherd of Durotrigian types, including jars, bowls and wide-mouthed vessels and 4thC AD material, including black-fumed bowls, jars and mortaria, was recovered. The Samian was central and south Gaulish ware, mostly late 1stC AD.",,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
20050,"In total 27713 sherds weighing 270kg were recovered from the site, but the raw data are not given in the report, and much of this may date to the early Iron Age. The vast majority however derives from the LIA/ER phase. Samian and amphorae represent the only imported wares. None of the Gallo-Belgic, Armorican or other continental fineware fabrics, as found at Hengistbury and Ower, were recovered. No eastern Gaulish samian was identified. Amphora consisted of Dr 20 and Dr 2-4. British finewares include Oxfordshire and New Forest products. Mortaria were only represented by vessels from these industries. Black burnished wares of Wareham/Poole Harbour and South-western industries dominated dating from the EIA to the LR periods. All standard forms were recorded: jars, bowls, dishes, beakers, jugs, flagons, as well as a colander, skillet, and lamp.",27713,,4,,28,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20051,"Numerous pottery forms illustrated and described, though these do not represent the full assemblage. Full quantification given in the Woodyates report. Many typologies not recognised at this time - most fabrics described as 'earthenware vessels'. Much Samian ware present. New Forest wares suggest 3rd and 4thC AD occupation. Much dark/black pottery described, which may well have been Black Burnished wares. Two tazze found. Numerous Samian stamps identified.",27721,,,,585,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
20052,"The pottery fabric typologies were not well known during the period of the excavation. New Forest wares constituted nearly 8% of the assemblage. Imitation Samian was also present, but not as frequent as Samian. The Samian was suggested to of a later date. Tazze were found in inhumation burials.",28489,,,,248,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20053,"Roman Black Burnished pottery was the most frequently encountered fabric type and included jars, dishes and lids. Other fabrics present includes prehistoric grogged and calcareous fabrics, various Roman oxidised and greywares, Baetican (Southern Spanish) amphora, Samian ware, New Forest colour-coated ware, Central Gaulish colour-coated ware, and wheelthrown 'Durotrigian' type wares. 837 sherds were recovered in total but these include earlier prehistoric and later medieval wares.",,,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20054,"48 of the 50-odd Roman pottery sherds recovered were Black Burnished wares and included cooking jars, storage pots, bowls and dishes. Sherds from two fineware vessels of 2ndC AD date, one from a beaker, were also identified.",50,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20055,"The pottery assemblage was largely of late Iron Age and early Roman date (1stC BC and 1stC AD) but overall, spanned the early Iron Age to medieval periods. This was predominantly the local sandy fabrics made in Wareham/Poole Harbour, characterised by bead rim jars and bowls, triangular rimmed storage jars, upright necked jars, and hemispherical bowls and lids. Samian and amphora represented the only other imports, the latter including sherds of the Campanian black sand fabric, Dressel 2-4 and Dressel 20 types. A smaller range of later Roman vessel forms were also identified, including everted rim jars, shallow, plain-rimmed dishes, flat, incipient and dropped flanged bowls/dishes as well as a New Forest colour-coated ware beaker base.",3966,33,11,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20056,"The pottery was generally in accordance with the 3rd-4thC AD dating of the coinage from the occupation levels. Forms included cooking pots with splayed rims, flanged dishes, mortaria, imitation Samian, and storage jars. Fabrics include New Forest wares and Samian. No quantification. Some Durotrigian pottery and Domitianic Samian suggest earlier occupation.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
20057,"The pottery assemblage was dominated by Dorset Black Burnished ware, which were accompanied by small numbers of sand-tempered, shelly, Oxford colour-coated, New Forest colour-coated, fine oxidised, sandy oxidised, sandy grey and Samian wares. Ceramic funnels of unknown use and said to be rare were also identified.",176,1,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20058,"The bulk of the c.17000 sherds of pottery dated to the early Iron Age, and though a significant proportion came from the late Iron Age/early Roman periods, the phased assemblages were not quantified in the report. Wareham/Poole Harbour vessels predominate, and vessel forms included bead-rimmed and necked bowls and jars, dishes and lids. Six complete vessels were placed in three LIA inhumations as grave goods. One of these was a possible tazza.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20059,"Black burnished ware and Samian from the settlement focus suggested a late 1stC/2ndC AD date (380 sherds). New Forest and Oxfordshire pottery from the eastern excavation extended the chronology of the site into the 3rd/4thC AD (712 sherds). 108 sherds came from the later evaluation, all from similar pottery types.",1200,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20060,"Four categories of imported fine wares were present including Pompeiian red, Samian, Gallo-Belgic, and Rhenish wares. 608 Samian vessels represents a minimum number rather than a sherd count. Other fine wares included Corfe Mullen, New Forest and Oxfordshire vessels. Residue analysis on the pottery identified a number of food groups being consumed at the site, including honey, wine, beer, fish oil, dairy, fruit extract, olive oil and meat.",,,174,56,608,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20061,"Over 90% of the pottery was of Black Burnished ware. Other types included terra nigra, Moselkeramik, Corfe Mullen whiteware, buff/red ware, Oxford colour-coated, New Forest colour-coated, New Forest grey,  and Nene Valley ware. The three main Samian groups were all present, including the remains of two Dechelette vases from the special deposit.",41554,1058,191,36,381,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20062,"Samian derived from 46 contexts and dated between the mid-1st and mid-3rdC AD. BB1 wares produced the vast majority of the assemblage and forms covered the LIA to the late Roman periods. Other fabrics included Corfe Mullen ware, terra nigra, terra rubra, and New Forest colour-coated ware. Amphora were very common with a number of different types present.",14676,112,949,90,302,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20063,"The LIA/ER pottery was predominantly local Poole/Wareham ware, whilst Roman wares were mostly BB1, a continuation of the earlier industry. Together these date to the 1st and 2ndC AD, though the later may include some later dating sherds. A sherd from an indented New Forest beaker dated AD270-400.",196,,1,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20064,"The majority of the assemblage is late Iron Age to late Roman in date (1stC BC to 4thC AD). This is made up of a relatively restricted range of ware types, dominated by two coarseware types – Black Burnished 1 ware and sandy wares. Two sherds of amphora came from one of the early Roman boundary ditches. The overall condition ranges from fair to poor.",399,7,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
20065,9 Roman grey ware sherds were recovered from fieldwalking and 3 BB1 sherds were excavated. None of the pottery can be directly attributed to the ritual activity seen at the site.,12,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20066,"Four vessels were found in situ within the kiln and were all jars of WA type 18. Other vessel forms found in the same trench included a 'dog dish' and two dropped flange bowls. The complete vessels and other sherds from the trench, are oxidised, with an external slip which has fired to an off-white colour – such firing colours are typical of vessels recovered from a kiln context. Other sherds show signs of cracking and distortion consistent with a 'waster' group from pottery manufacture. The kiln is of interest because of its relatively late date. It probably dates to the last quarter of the 4thC AD, when the main industry, based in Purbeck, was in decline. The location of the kiln is the most westerly site of Black Burnished ware manufacture yet located in Dorset.",141,5,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20067,Some pottery was recovered though no specialist report was supplied.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20068,"The majority of the sherds are of late Iron Age or Roman date. Lattice decorated sherds of BB1 and other fabrics were present, including a fragment of Samian Romanised forms and fabrics (e.g. a necked jar in a buff or greyware fabric). An emphasis on the 1st to 2ndC AD is noted. No diagnostically late Roman elements were present within the assemblage.",50,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20069,"A small pottery assemblage was recovered from 12 contexts from the watching brief. The assemblage ranges in date from late Iron Age/Romano-British transition to the later Roman period, and ranges from moderate to fair condition. Coarse grey and oxidised sandy fabrics are common, whilst BB1, Samian, and Oxfordshire fineware were also present.",124,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20070,"Black Burnished ware fabrics included a bead rim jar/bowl rim and a platter rim. A Samian sherd provided the only certain post-conquest material. The pottery was quantified, but not divided by phase.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20071,"The bulk of the pottery is coarse quartz-tempered Durotrigian ware. Seven sherds of Romano-British pottery was recovered, mainly undiagnostic BB1 sherds. Three conjoining sherds of Dressel 2-4 amphora were also recovered. All the pottery dated 1stC BC-AD.",59,1,3,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
20072,No data - though LIA/RB pottery is present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20073,"New Forest and local wares present, but no detailed analysis was carried out.",814,14,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20074,"The assemblage comprised unoxidised sandy wares all dating to the late Iron Age/Early Roman period, and includes one globular jar with a proto-bead rim and one thicker walled jar with a countersunk handle. From the 1950s excavations, a single sherd of Samian was recovered along with 2nd-4thC AD grey wares and New Forest wares. None of this material was quantified however.",76,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20075,"Although 140kg of Roman pottery was recovered for study, the vast majority of body sherds had previously been discarded. It should also be noted that over 1200 later prehistoric (43kg) sherds were also present which included late Iron Age wares, some of which may have been in use in the earliest Roman phase. The majority of the Roman pottery was BB wares. Fine wares were most common in the later Roman period and included New Forest and Oxfordshire colour-coated wares. Imports included Spanish colour-coated ware, terra rubra, and Rhenish colour-coated ware. 87 of the samian sherds were decorated and 14 stamped. The report is very short and does not mention mortaria or amphora, but this does not preclude their presence.",,140,,,365,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20076,Eleven sherds of Flavian pottery were recovered from the pits under the barrow. A basal sherd included both a potter's stamp and a literate graffito (DVN).,11,,,,11,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20077,"The pottery was not quantified but included Samian, 3rd/4thC AD New Forest ware, Maiden Castle type bowls, and an amphora handle.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20078,"15 Roman sherd were recovered, as were some IA sherds from the lower layers cut through by the grave.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20079,"Coarse wares included 'early' and 'later black ware', presumably BB1, in the form of bowls, and jars, dishes, and flagons, plus grey and New Forest wares.",,,,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
20080,"2560 sherds (24.5kg) of M/LIA pottery has been omitted here, since it dates 4thC BC-1stC BC. Poole Harbour wares dominate the assemblage. Finewares include small numbers of New Forest, Oxfordshire and Samian ware. Rhenish ware and Spanish Dressel 20 sherds were also present.",19281,160,2,44,37,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20081,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20082,"1674 sherds of Durotrigian pottery came from the early settlement. However, the Roman pottery was not quantified.",,,,,130,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
20083,"Pottery included Samian, 'later black ware' presumably LR Black Burnished wares, and New Forest wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20084,"Sherds of New Forest ware, coarse wares, Samian and amphora were all present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
20085,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20086,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
20087,"Over 90% of the assemblage was of Black Burnished wares, with the remainder of the assemblage consisting of other coarsewares, amphora, mortaria, New Forest, Oxfordshire, Samian, imported finewares (including terra nigra and Pompeiian red ware), and Corfe Mullen ware.",11277,168,162,34,239,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20088,"The greatest quantity of the assemblage was SE Dorset BB ware, though SW BB and coarse oxidised BB were also relatively common, with smaller quantities of greyware, Corfe Mulle, New Forest and Oxfordshire colour-coats, SW fine micaceous greyware, and a few imported vessels. The assemblage is predominantly later 3rd-4thC AD.",4266,47,21,10,75,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
20089,"A significant proportion of the pottery came from the late Iron Age/early Roman settlement, but the vast majority derived from the mid-late Roman BB production centre. A lack of Armorican vessels is suggested to indicate that the IA settlement was not established until after 50BC. Imported vessels, in general, made up a small proportion of the assemblage, and include Samian, Campanian, Terra nigra, and North Gaulish grey ware. Late Roman Oxfordshire (399 frags) and New Forest (94) finewares were also present. Of the pottery recovered from the kilns on site dating between AD200-400, jars overwhelmingly dominated, though bowls and dishes appeared to be more numerous through time, whilst beakers, storage jars, and 'others' generally constituted smaller proportions. Percentage of pot form by kiln is given in the report (page 238).",111695,1223,8,,49,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
21001,"A modest sized assemblage. Most Roman pottery is late 3rd and 4th C in date, 57% being Black-burnished ware, then local greywares and Oxfordshire and New Forest wares. Includes Dr 20 and post-Roman Bii amphorae. Also 6th C African red-slipped ware.",623,,9,,28,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21002,"A substantial assemblage (25000 sherds from 1972-3 excavation, though only 7661 sherds analysed in detail from phased contexts - the samian and amphora totals are from this number only; 5000 sherds from 1979 excavation), dominated by Dorset Black-burnished ware (c 80%), then local greywares, Severn Valley ware, Nene Valley ware, Oxfordshire ware and New Forest ware. Almost all amphora comprised Dr 20, with some Dr 2-4. Two literate graffitos. Ten fragments of a late Roman Oxfordshire colour-coated beaker contained decoration of a figure interpreted as sol invictus and is presumed to have been made for ritual purposes.",30000,,155,,221,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21003,"A modest sized assemblage of (?)late Iron Age-early Roman pottery. Dominated by limestone-tempered ware, with lesser amounts of grog-tempered ware, sandy greywares, Severn valley ware, Savernake ware and Dorset Black Burnished ware.",93,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21004,A moderate sized assemblage of mainly late Roman pottery.,3000,,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21005,"Assemblage included imported Mediterranean ware, local and Gaulish pottery. 538 sherds ascribed to the Roman period (1st-4th C AD), c 50% local greywares, and also black-burnished ware and Oxfordshire colour coated ware. Also 211 indigenous post-Roman hand-made pottery, 173 sherds of Byzantine fine ware (Phocaean red slip ware and African red slip ware) and 547 sherds of post Roman imported B-ware amphorae.",1469,,547,35,56,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21006,"Small assemblage of late Iron Age (1020) and Roman (420) pottery including Savernake ware, terra nigra, terra rubra, Pompeian red ware, local greywares and Black-burnished ware.  Includes tazze pottery forms. Amphorae include Dr 20 and Dr 2-4. Some late Roman New Forest and Oxfordshire ware.",1440,,23,,29,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
21007,"The small assemblage comprised a mixture of material from the Late Iron Age through to later Roman wares including LIA limestone or calcite-tempered fabrics, South-East Dorset Black-burnished ware and local Congresbury grey ware and a single sherd of Oxfordshire colour-coated ware. Forms include a single sherd of a colander. Most of the Roman fabrics can be dated to the third century.",304,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21008,"Substantial assemblage of mainly late Roman pottery (later 3rd-mid 4th C AD), though in poor condition with about half from the topsoil. Grey wares account for 61%  by weight of the total assemblage, most probably from Congresbury kilns. The Dorset black burnished ware (31%), some Severn Valley ware (2%), Oxfordshire and New Forest wares (2.5%)",2800,22,,,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21009,"Limited pottery assemblage included South-East Dorset black-burnished ware, local Congresbury grey ware, and one possible sherd of Oxfordshire ware.",136,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21010,"A large assemblage from both 1990 (27777 sherds) and 1996-7 (20267 sherds), though not all quite fully recorded (31842 sherds). Dominated by local reduced grey wares and Dorset Black-burnished wares and also Severn valley ware, New Forest ware, Oxfordshire ware, Savernake ware and small amounts of  Verulamium ware, Nene Valley ware, Mancetter-Hartshill ware, Caerleon ware, Rhenish ware and late Roman shelly ware. Amphorae mostly comprised Dr 20 and also Gauloise 4 and S Spanish amphora. Wasters present and it is likely that much of the local pottery was produced on site. Literate graffitos found. The assemblages date from later 1st to later 4th C AD. Also 302 sherds from the 2009 excavations",48346,387,1132,,1035,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21011,"A large but unquantified assemblage, dating from the later Iron Age to the late Roman period. Fabrics include local greywares, New Forest ware, Rhenish ware, Castor ware and black-burnished ware.  Samian was common on the site. Includes a face urn. Form include colanders. It is suggested that pottery production took place on site.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21012,An unquantified assemblage of pottery including what is probably black-burnished ware and samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21013,"A small assemblage of pottery comprising local greywares, Black-burnished ware and some samian.",113,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21014,"Significant quantities of pottery though not all quantified. A total of 660 sherds came from the 1991 evaluation, mostly local greywares then Black burnished wares, but also some Oxfordshire colour coats. C 220 sherds from the 2000 watching brief and c 369 from two different 1999 evaluations. 112 sherds from the 2007 evaluation (60% local greywares, primarily from the Congresbury kilns, and almost 40% South Dorset Black Burnished ware).",1391,,,,47,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21015,A reasonable sized assemblage of middle to late Iron Age pottery with some Roman material.,800,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21016,"Large but unquantified pottery assemblage of Iron Age to late Roman date. Includes local Congresbury greywares, New Forest ware, and black-burnished ware. Also some lead-glazed pottery.  A number of complete vessels came from the late Roman well (total = 1500 sherds from this feature).",,,,,157,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21017,"Substantial assemblage of late Iron Age and early Roman pottery (with a few later Roman contexts), nearly all comprising Dorset Black-burnished ware, with some local greyware and a few sherds of New Forest ware. 12 sherds of Baetican amphora.",1067,,12,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
21018,"Only the pottery from the 2003 excavation were quantified. Most of the assemblage appears to date to the 2nd-3rd centuries AD, mainly comprising local grey wares accompanied by Dorset and South-West black burnished wares. Also a few sherds of New Forest ware and Oxfordshire colour-coated ware.",515,6,,,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21019,No report. A complete pot and lid containing a late Roman penannular brooch came from the enclosure ditch.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21020,"A large quantity of Roman pottery was recovered from earlier excavations. A total of 66 sherds from the 2000 evaluation, dating to the late Roman period, including Black-burnished ware.",66,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21021,"The 1971 excavations produced a substantial assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date.  Mostly Dorset Black burnished ware, then SW Black burnished ware; also  Mew Forest and Oxfordshire ware, Savernake ware, Severn Valley ware, Verulamium ware and local greywares.  Many large storage vessels and amphorae (93.6% Dr 20, and also Gallic wine and Haltern type 70). 12 sherds of imported north Gaulish mortaria. At least two triple ring vases and a colander.",6923,120,329,84,261,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21022,A moderate sized assemblage including a high proportion of Dorset Black-burnished ware and Dressel 20 amphora.,566,,9,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
21023,"A moderate sized assemblage, with 8 sherds of late Iron Age date and the remainder of Roman date, most assigned to three fabric groups thought to be associated with pottery production on the site. There was a very limited range of forms, including an unusual emphasis on sherds of large storage jars. A wide range of firing was apparent, with wasters/seconds observed. The local assemblage is perhaps broadly of 3rd century date, and can be placed within a recognisable if in detail little-known regional tradition. Non-local sherds comprised sherds of black-burnished ware.",518,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21024,"The assemblage generally dates from the later 1st to mid/later 2nd C AD, including local greywares, Dorset Black-Burnished Ware and South-West Storage Jars. Also Dressel 20 Amphora.",125,2,5,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
21025,An unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age-early Roman pottery including local greywares and black-burnished ware.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21026,"Apart from a single sherd of Nene Valley ware, all of the pottery identified was coarseware: Savernake, black-burnished, Severn, coarse sandy grey ware, fine sandy grey ware, and sandy oxidised ware.",170,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21027,"Substantial assemblage of middle-late Iron age pottery (mainly 2nd-1st C BC, but continuing to post-Roman conquest period; including Glastonbury Ware pottery, which seems to have been reserved for special deposition, with at least three half vessels being identified), along with some later Romano-British sherds (Black Burnished ware & greywares). A total of 1142 sherds (8 RB) from 2003 excavation, and c 2756 (66 RB) sherds from 2011-12 excavations",3898,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
21028,"Just three sherds of pottery are of Romano-British date - coarse grog-tempered ware, coarse greyware and an Oxfordshire colour-coated mortarium.",3,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
21029,"A significant assemblage of late Iron Age to 3rd/4th C date, comprising mainly south-east Dorset Black Burnished ware and sandy grey coarsewares,  along with New Forest ware, Oxfordshire ware, grog-tempered ware, a single sherd from a Moselkeramik beaker and a sherd of lead-glazed ware. One piece from a Dressel 1 wine amphora was recovered and two examples of Southern Spanish olive oil amphorae (Dr 20).",8044,81,3,8,56,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21030,"A relatively high density of Romano-British pottery, though no further information.",396,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21031,"Most, (77% by weight) of the Roman pottery was black-burnished ware including cookpots, flange-rimmed bowls, plain bowls and a lesser number of lids. Dating ranges from the 2nd to late 4th/5th C AD, though most is late Roman. Also colour-coated vessels from the New Forest, Oxfordshire and probably Nene Valley, and mortaria (10% by weight), and Amphora  sherds (3% by weight).",291,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
21032,"A substantial assemblage of pottery of 1st to late 4th C AD date (6800 sherds examined in detail). Includes substantial quantities of Dorset Black-burnished ware (50% sherd count), and local (Congresbury) greywares (32%). Also New Forest (3.3%), Oxfordshire (4.8%) and Rhenish ware. A Chi-Rho graffito on a beaker sherd comprises evidence for Christianity.",20000,,,38,41,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21033,"Unquantified assemblage from 1993-5 excavations including small quantities of Iron Age material, but mostly of early Roman date. A small assemblage (225 sherds) from the two 2005 excavation trenches, dominated by local reduced coarsewares  and Black-burnished wares, dating from the late 1st to end of 3rd C AD.",225,2,,1,30,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21034,"A substantial amount of mostly late Roman pottery revealed but not recorded. Includes samian, New Forest wares and glazed wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
21035,"A substantial assemblage from fieldwalking (457 sherds), test pitting (15 sherds) and excavation (3013 sherds), dating from the late Iron Age to the mid 4th C AD. Dominated by Dorset Black-burnished ware, and also local greywares, Savernake, Severn Valley, Oxfordshire and New Forest wares. Dressel 20 amphorae.",3485,20,10,,81,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21036,"Pottery from fieldwalking (220 sherds) and excavation (282 sherds), dominated by Dorset Black-burnished ware then local greywares and Severn valley wares. A small number of Oxfordshire wares. The assemblage dates from later 1st to early 4th C AD.",502,3,1,,24,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21037,"A substantial concentration of Roman pottery, dating 2nd to early 4th C AD. Dominated by Dorset Black-burnished ware, then local greywares and some Oxfordshire, New Forest, Savernake and Severn valley wares. Also Moselle black slip ware. Amphorae from Spain (Dr 20) and Gaul.",2283,16,9,,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21038,"A substantial concentration of Roman pottery, mostly early 4th C in date. Dominated by Dorset and SW Black-burnished ware, along with local greywares. Also Oxfordshire, New Forest and Severn Valley ware, along with Moselle black-slipped beaker. A complete late Roman SW Black-burnished ware jar had been buried in burnt material within the building, probably at a much later date.",3122,24,,,26,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21039,"A modest assemblage of 1st to 4th C AD date dominated by Dorset Black-burnished ware, then local greyware. Very limited quantities of New Forest and Oxfordshire ware.",794,5,7,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
21040,"High concentration of pottery of late iron Age to 3rd/4th C AD in date, dominated by Dorset Black-burnished ware then local greywares. Also Savernake ware, grog-tempered ware, and some Oxfordshire and Severn valley ware.",1140,7,2,,29,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21041,"'Well over 5000' sherds of pottery recovered, mostly dating 1st-2nd C AD.",5000,,,,325,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21042,"A small assemblage, nearing all comprising SW Black-burnished ware.",19,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21043,"A high density of pottery dating to the later Roman period (AD 250/70-400), dominated by Dorset Black-burnished ware, then local greywares, New Forest and Oxfordshire ware.",649,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21044,"A moderate sized assemblage of mainly early Roman date, comprising mainly SW Black-burnished wares, along with local greywares and a few sherds of New Forest and Savernake ware.",362,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21045,"A substantial though unquantified pottery assemblage, dominated by Black-burnished ware (62%). A comparatively large amount of amphora (5.1%), mostly Gallic wine types (Gaulish type 4). Also limited Oxfordshire and New Forest wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21046,"The only data is from the small evaluation to the south of the villa, where a small quantity of early and late Roman pottery was recovered. This includes black burnished, New Forest and Oxfordshire ware.",21,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21047,"Over 3000 sherds 'retained for study' though the original assemblage size remains unknown. The assemblage was dominated by local Congresbury coarseware, along with Dorset Black-burnished ware, Oxfordshire, New Forest and Severn Valley wares. Also Rhenish ware. Cooking and storage vessels are the most common forms. However, the amount of tableware was still in excess of surrounding domestic sites, suggesting that feasting was an important activity. Fragments from at least 16 mortaria.",3000,,2,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21048,"Substantial assemblage dominated by Dorset Back-burnished ware, then greywares, with some Oxfordshire and New Forest wares. The latest pottery is suggested as early 4th C AD. One waster sherd.",1745,30,,,4,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21049,"A small assemblage of Roman pottery was recovered, dominated by Dorset Black Burnished ware (66%), then local greyware (33%). The pottery generally dates later 2nd-3rd  AD.",150,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21050,"Pottery dominated by products of the Black-Burnished ware industry, along with local sandy greywares. Finewares were largely confined to the products of the Oxfordshire and New Forest kilns. Dressel 20 amphora recovered. Overall the pottery dates to the later Roman period.",146,2,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
21051,Modest sized assemblage mostly comprising Dorset Black-burnished ware. A late Roman emphasis.,240,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21052,"Unquantified assemblage dating from the late Iron Age to late Roman period. Fabrics include Dorset Black-burnished ware. Pottery from the 1998 evaluation also  unquantified, but consists almost exclusively of sherds of coarse greywares which probably derive from a number of different sources.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21053,"Huge pottery assemblage of 1st to 4th C AD date recovered in 1996 and 1998 including amphorae, samian, micaceous greywares, early and late Black Burnished wares and late C3/C4 colour coats, such as New Forest and Oxfordshire wares. The only quantified pottery comes from the very small 2003 excavation, where the vast bulk were Black Burnished Wares.",602,4,1,,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21054,"Dorset Black Burnished pottery is overwhelmingly predominant in the later settlement, though proportionally less common in the early phase. No report or quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21055,Dorset Black Burnished ware found in the grave.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21056,"Assemblage mostly comprises Dorset Black-burnished ware as well as a few local greywares, Oxfordshire and New Forest wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21057,"c 100 sherds of later Iron Age pottery and 200 sherds of Roman date. Grey Wares, in particular 2nd-3rd century Congresbury Types predominated but significant quantities of early Black Burnished forms and a small quantity of Samian was also recovered",300,3,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21058,"Small assemblage from the evaluation. Most pottery comprises local/regional coarsewares including south-western type Black-Burnished ware, Severn Valley ware and coarse greywares. No report from the excavations as yet.",72,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21059,A modest assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman wares including Black-Burnished ware and local greywares.,105,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21060,Pottery of 1st to 3rd C AD date found during the watching brief. Unquantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21061,"A total of 107 sherds of middle-late Iron Age date and 140 sherds of late Iron Age-Roman date. Roman sherds mostly comprised local greywares, with some Dorset Black burnished ware.",247,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21062,No contemporary pottery with the burials.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21063,"A substantial assemblage of 1st to 4th C AD date, mainly later Roman, dominated by SE Dorset Black-burnished ware, then local greywares, and also New Forest and Oxfordshire wares along with some shelly ware. Amphorae comprise Dr 20, Gallic and North African.",5196,74,15,23,93,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21064,"Large but  assemblage, firstly of late Iron Age-early Roman date and also of late Roman date (3472 sherds) including much Black-burnished ware, with also Oxfordshire ware, New Forest ware, shell-tempered ware and greywares.",3472,,,,41,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21065,Unquantified assemblage of 1st to 4th C AD date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21066,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21067,"A large though unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age to late Roman date recovered, though seemingly not going beyond the early 4th C AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21068,A small quantity of 2nd-3rd C AD pottery.,50,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21069,Pottery of 2nd to 4th C AD date found but no report or quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21070,"Pottery remains unquantified (3 large boxes), and includes Black-burnished, Oxfordshire and New Forest wares. The assemblage indicates a general 3rd-4th C date of occupation.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21071,"A moderate sized assumable of late Iron Age and Roman date, though primarily dating later 3rd-4th C AD, relating to the settlement. Dominated by Dorset Black-burnished ware with some greywares and Oxfordshire ware.",505,6,,10,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21072,"A substantial assemblage of Roman pottery dating 2nd-4th C AD, with a later Roman emphasis. Dominated by Dorset Black-burnished ware, with smaller amounts of greyware, Rhenish ware, Severn Valley, New Forest and Oxfordshire ware. Amphorae all Dr 20 except one possible Catalonian Dr 1.",12486,80,4,,258,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21073,A small assemblage including 8 sherds of late Iron Age coarse shelly ware along with black-burnished ware and a little samian.,38,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21074,"A moderate density of pottery of 2nd to 4th C AD date, dominated by Dorset Black Burnished ware, along with some Oxfordshire and New Forest ware.",117,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21075,"A small assemblage from the topsoil, with a late Roman emphasis, dominated by late Black-burnished ware, with Oxfordshire and New Forest ware.",56,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21076,An unquantified assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21077,"A moderate density of pottery, mostly of late Roman date, though with some 2nd C sherds. Dominated by Poole Harbour Dorset Black burnished ware (mainly late Roman forms), along with a range of sandy greywares, New Forest and Oxfordshire wares. No samian.",356,4,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
21078,"At least 200 sherds of Roman pottery recovered from the 1945 excavation, though nothing quantified from the larger 1946 excavation. The overall date range of the pottery is said to be middle Iron Age to at least the 4th C AD. Includes samian and Black-burnished ware.",200,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21079,"Unquantified pottery of middle Iron Age to 4th C AD found, with a late Roman emphasis. Includes Dorset Black-burnished ware and Oxfordshire colour coats.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21080,Unquantified assemblage dating from the middle Iron Age to the late Roman period. Roman fabrics include Dorset Black-burnished ware and Oxfordshire ware.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
21081,"No record of pottery found during 1920s excavations. The 4-trench 1992 evaluation produced 366 sherds and the 2012 evaluation south of the settlement produced just 15 sherds. The material ranges in date from later 1st to 4th C AD, and includes local greywares, Dorset Black-burnished ware, Severn Valley ware, Savernake ware, Oxfordshire and New Forest ware. Also late Roman shelly ware. Amphorae comprise Dr 20 and Gallic. A tazza vessel found adjacent to one of the Roman stone coffins.",381,4,8,,18,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21082,"Pottery from the 1998 evaluation to the front of the villa produced a small assemblage of 205 fragments on mainly 4th C AD pottery including late shell-tempered ware, Black-burnished ware and Oxfordshire ware.",205,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21083,"A small but unquantified late Roman assemblage including Oxfordshire colour coats, and Dorset Black-burnished ware.",,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
21084,"Moderate sized pottery assemblage of late Roman date mainly comprising Dorset Black-burnished ware and Congresbury greywares, along with Oxfordshire and Severn valley/Gloucester wares. Includes mortaria and amphorae.",394,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
21085,"Pottery assemblage of middle/late Iron Age and early Roman date (298 Roman sherds), including a black-sandy ware, Savernake grog-tempered ware, North Wilts ware and limited Dorset Black-Burnished ware. The scarcity of Dorset Black-Burnished ware suggests that most material date before the mid 2nd century AD.",298,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21086,A total of 941 Middle to late Iron Age sherds (not included here) and at least 700 Roman sherds (analysis incomplete). No further information.,700,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21087,"No data of the pottery from the 1959 excavation. An assemblage of 124 sherds came from the 2008 evaluation trench, comprising wares of later Roman date. Mostly North Somerset greywares. The regional imports are largely sherds of Dorset and South-west black burnished ware, along with two sherds of Oxfordshire colour-coated ware.",124,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21088,"A substantial assemblage of pottery, mostly from the cave entrance (though also late Roman pottery from the cemetery chamber). The pottery mostly comprises local greywares and Dorset Black-burnished wares, along with Oxfordshire and New Forest colour-coats and shell tempered ware. Also Iron Age pottery (not quantified). Most of the dateable pottery is 3rd-4th C in date. The pottery vessels were biased towards vessels used for cooking and eating, not storage, which may be related to a potential ritual aspect of the site.",2800,,,35,50,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21089,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21090,"A significant assemblage of late Roman pottery was recovered from the hillfort, 90% of which was of local manufacture. Non-local wares comprise Black-burnished ware and just 3 sherds of Oxfordshire ware. Forms mostly comprise jars and then bowls.",3600,48,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21091,A very small assemblage including a sherd of samian.,5,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21092,"A total of 24 sherds attributed to Gough's Old Cave (greywares, Dorset Black-burnished ware, Oxfordshire wares and a single sherd of samian). At least 40 sherds from Gough's New Cave, and c 60 sherds from Long Hole cave (similar types). Most  pottery is dated late Roman and contains a variety of cooking and storage vessels.",124,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21093,"Pottery of late 3rd-4th C AD date, mostly comprising Dorset Black-burnished ware.",98,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21094,A small amount of late Roman pottery (mostly Dorset Black-burnished ware). Four sherds illustrated.,4,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21095,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21096,"A total of 1817 sherds of Roman pottery (13kg) found during the 1996 watching brief, including samian, amphorae, Oxfordshire ware and New Forest ware. The pottery appears to span the Roman period.",1817,13,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
21097,A large assemblage of greywares produced at the site including wasters. Unquantified.,,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21098,"A limited amount of pottery from the site, including samian ware. The pottery dates 1st to 4th C AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21099,"Over 8000 sherds of pottery from the 1966-8 excavations, with the later material remaining unquantified. The material ranges in date from late Iron Age to late Roman with an emphasis on the later period. Dominated by greywares (including Congresbury wares), Dorset Black-burnished ware, and Oxfordshire colour coats.",8000,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21100,"A substantial assemblage, mostly of local greywares and Dorset Black-burnished ware, ranging from 2nd to 4th C in date. Also New Forest, Oxfordshire and Rhenish ware. A complete New Forest greyware jar with a late 3rd C coin formed a structured deposit while an Oxfordshire beaker found in wall foundations may be another.",13588,,15,57,317,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21101,No report or quantification of the pottery,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21102,An unquantified assemblage of later Iron Age and later Roman date. Roman pottery includes Dorset Black-burnished ware,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21103,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21104,No quantification or report on the pottery,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21105,Unquantified assemblage mainly of later 3rd/4th C in date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21106,"Unquantified assemblage of late Roman date. The presence of large quantities of pottery in the north-eastern courtyard and building may hold significance. The assemblages here seem to differ from the well, in that they contained much higher proportions of tableware and cooking utensils, including mortaria and the only piece of samian from the site.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21107,"Unquantified assemblage mainly of later Roman date, but including some earlier material.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21108,A small assemblage of mainly late Iron Age-early Roman date.,132,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21109,"A small assemblage from the watching brief, mostly 3rd-4th C AD in date, comprising Dorset Black-burnished ware and Oxfordshire ware.",17,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21110,"Limited pottery from the 1911 trenches, dated later Iron Age to the 4th C AD, including Black-burnished ware and Oxfordshire ware.",39,,,,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21111,"A moderate sized assemblage, mostly of late Roman date, comprising Dorset Black-burnished ware, local greywares, New Forest and Oxfordshire ware.",1480,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21112,An unquantified assemblage dating from the middle Iron Age to the late Roman period.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21113,A small but unquantified assemblage of mainly 3rd-4th  AD date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21114,An unquantified assemblage of late 1st/2nd C AD date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21115,A few fragments of Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21116,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21117,Unquantified assemblage of later Iron Age to early Roman date. A small quantity of samian pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21118,Unquantified assemblage of late Roman date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21119,"A large, though unquantified assemblage of pottery dating fro the late Iron Age to the late Roman period.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21120,Fieldwalking in the vicinity of the adult stone coffined burial found large volumes of Roman pottery. No further details.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21121,"A unquantified assemblage of late 1st to late 4th  AD date, including samian and mortaria. Also includes a ceramic tettine.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21122,Pottery of 2nd-4th C date including New Forest ware and samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21123,"A moderate sized assemblage dating from late 2nd/3rd c to 4th C AD. Mostly Black-burnished ware, with some New Forest and Oxfordshire ware. No mortaria or samian.",390,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21124,"Pottery of later Iron Age to early Roman date recovered, including local Congresbury greywares and Dorset Black Burnished ware.",92,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21125,"Small assemblage of Roman date, though possibly starting in the late Iron Age. The assemblage as a whole is dominated by Black Burnished ware then local greywares.",179,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21126,A small pottery assemblage dominated by South-east Dorset black burnished ware and south western gritty grey wares. Also a single sherd of New Forest Parchment ware. The main part of the assemblage dates to the 3rd-4th C AD.,86,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21127,"A considerable concentration of pottery of mainly late Roman date. Dominated (c 60%) by Dorset Black-burnished ware, then local greywares, New Forest and Oxfordshire ware. Also some Rhenish ware and shell-tempered ware. At least 8 complete miniature pottery vessels found and fragments of many others.",5363,,,,21,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
21128,"A huge quantity of middle to late Iron Age pottery was recovered, though unquantified by sherd count (over 5200 vessels). Also a small amount of Roman pottery.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
21129,"A large (though unquantified) assemblage of middle to late Iron Age date, though also including some Roman material, including samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
21130,"The pottery assemblage is predominantly of Romano-British date (mainly 3rd-4th C AD) although small numbers of Iron Age sherds were recovered. The bulk of the assemblage, however, is made up from a range of utilitarian coarsewares, 'kitchen' vessels for food-preparation and storage purposes. Mostly local greywares (perhaps some from Shepton Mallett), along with South-East Dorset Black Burnished ware, Severn Valley wares, Oxfordshire and New Forest ware.",1672,12,4,,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21131,"Modest sized assemblage dominated by greywares and south-east Dorset Black Burnished ware, and also Oxfordshire and New Forest ware. A single sherd of Dressel 20 amphora",530,6,1,,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
21132,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22001,"Approximately 1000 sherds. Derbyshire ware dominates with approx. 70 per cent DW jars. Wares and vessel types suggestive of activity from second to third century. High proportion of wasters indicate manufacture taking place in the vicinity. Other types include BB1 and BB1 types in greyware. Also Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, small numbers of fine ware - Nene Valley colour coated and Samian. Only a small number of non-local products. Small amount of pottery from the Derby Racehorse kilns demonstrate manufacture and commercial links, particularly from stamped mortarium. Further limited trade suggested by presence of Samian, Nene Valley colour coat, BB1 and Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria. No evidence for high status but BB1 possible link to military supplies. Fine tableware sparse but presence of wasters suggestive of industrial site including pottery manufacture.",920,,,26,3,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
22004,"Pottery report produced in Leary, DAJ 2003. No quantification (this is archived on a disk in Microsoft Access format and not in the report). Form characterisation identified four principal products - medium necked jars with cupped and hooked rims, wide-necked jars and narrow-necked ovoid jars as well as single examples of misc. types including fragments of cheese press also manufactured on site. Non local types included burnt samian and Mancetter-Hartshill mortarium as well as grey wares and unstratified Nene Valley colour coated ware and a rim sherd of BB1.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
22007,RB Pottery assemblage has three principal elements - mid-late IA handmade pottery; Late IA to early Romano-British wheel made pottery and Romano-British pottery.  Samian all central Gaulish and most dating from the second half of the 2nd century. Small assemblage size means that absence of decorated ware not necessarily suggestive of low status.,1611,18348,1,38,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
22008,"Only the stratified coarseware and mortaria published in this report - the rest is in the archive at Sheffield Museum. 4102 coarseware and mortaria sherds recovered - predominantly Roman, but including some medieval and later wares. Derbyshire ware accounted for 43 per cent of the assemblage, BB ware 3.4 per cent and the remainder made up by orange, grey and buff wares, mostly of local origin, and small amounts of colour-coated, white, calcite gritted, lead-glazed and amphora fabrics.53 Amphora sherds all body sherds of Spanish fabric. Mortaria predominantly in Mancetter/Hartshill fabrics.",4288,,53,19,186,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
22009,"Pottery assemblage dominated by Derbyshire ware, as to be expected in this area. The pottery overwhelmingly dates from the late-third to fourth centuries. No amphorae recorded.",3529,,,5,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
22010,"Pottery not well quantified in the reports - some types are illustrated and quantified but variation between the reports makes exact quantification difficult. Derbyshire ware dominated and amphorae, mortaria and samian were all present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
22011,"All quantification of sherds below is actually the number of vessels identified, as this is how the pottery has been quantified in the reports. Derbyshire ware dominates. The 3 samian ware vessels are made up of 9 sherds.",97,,1,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
22012,Limited information available. Samian ware present in small numbers.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
22014,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22015,No detailed information but Romano-British pottery has been recovered from the area which dates from at least the 3rd to 4th centuries.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22021,"Limited data, though many RB sherds recovered.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22022,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22031,No data but a large amount of 2nd to 3rd century pottery was apparently recovered from the sites by the Heathcotes in the mid-20th century.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22050,"Limited data, but Dool (1978) refers to pottery sherds recovered during excavations and as casual finds by detector users which included straight-sided flanged bowls of fourth-century type, Derbyshire ware, mortaria and a single sherd of samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
22055,Almost 200 sherds of RB pottery recovered but little detail provided. The RB pottery was not considered to be closely datable. The presence of three sherds of Antonine samian ware suggests occupation may have origins in the later 2nd century and other wares imply continuation into the 3rd and possibly 4th century.,200,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
22057,"The spatial distribution of sherds indicates linear occupation following the course of the Roman road running east from Little Chester. The range of fabrics is broadly comparable with that reaching Little Chester. The date range in the pottery indicates a 2nd century hiatus in occupation. After this occupation continued on a much diminished scale (T.S. Martin). Two 'lid' sherds of a 'wine cooler' are worth noting as the type is not common in Britain, but found on both civilian and military sites.",1636,,17,20,69,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
22058,No detailed data but 'a substantial quantity of Iron Age and Roman-British pottery' was recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22062,No data but reports of Iron Age and Roman pottery recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22063,"The assemblage comprised three ceramic phases: a small group of handmade sherds, small and abraded, a group of wheel-thrown vessels of LIA to ERB forms, and a group of vessels in RB fabrics and forms. Preliminary analysis of the pottery suggested activity that began in the late IA, continuing until the middle of the second century AD, perhaps continuously. The few sherds of handmade IA pottery may suggest earlier IA activity also. Evidence from at least one waster and vitreous fuel ash may suggest a kiln in the area, although evidence is not compelling.",355,,,3,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
22064,"The impression from the pottery assemblage is of material dating from the late 1st and 2nd centuries AD. The latest sherds appear to be of Antonine date and no later. There is no distinctive pottery of 3rd to 4th century date. The pottery in the report is not well quantified. Samian, mortaria and amphorae were all reported to have been excavated from between this site and Farmstead II (record number 22072), but the findspots for individual sherds are not given in the report. Quantities are also not provided",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
22065,"Most of the pottery is typical of a first to second century AD date. Amphorae, mortarium and samian all present.",262,4547,12,1,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
22066,One single sherd of Roman grey ware,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22067,Seven sherds,7,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22068,"No data, but pottery of AD 2nd century date reported from the site.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22070,"The dominance of local coarse wares, the scarcity of regional imports and the absence of finewares and continental imports suggests that the site was a rural farmstead. Locally made coarsewares comprised 94.7 per cent of the pottery assemblage. Derbyshire ware is dominant. One Mancetter-Hartshill mortarium was recovered. Only the 94 stratified sherds were quantified in the report, though one of the sherds of mortaria was unstratified and discussed separately.",94,2,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
22071,"The pottery predominantly dates from AD 150 to 300 based on the presence of distinctive Derbyshire ware. All pottery was coarse ware and apparently of local origin. The lack of Black Burnished Ware is considered to be worthy of note considering the proximity of the site to Navio fort at Brough-on-Noe, suggesting that the inhabitants of this site may not have had access to BB1.",39,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22072,"The pottery is not well quantified in the report. However, the general range of the pottery covers the late 1st to 2nd centuries AD with a bias towards the period AD 120-200. A few unstratified sherds may indicate occupation in the 3rd century. A number of 3rd and 4th century unstratified pottery sherds may indicate occupation shift to another area of the site that was not excavated. Samian, mortaria and amphorae were all reported to have been excavated from between this site and Farmstead I (record number 22064), but the findspots for individual sherds are not given in the report. Quantities are also not provided",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
22073,"No data, but at least 30 sherds of Derbyshire ware have been recovered from the site.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22074,"The full samian report is part of the excavation archive and only selected 'important, stratified, decorated, pieces together with a few unstratified sherds considered to be worth illustrating' are listed in the published report. Only the stratified coarse sherds are listed in the report, and those associated with burials. The quantities below are therefore only an estimate. Pottery from the 1980 Brassington report includes facepots. Only illustrated coarseware listed in report, no overall quantification. Mortaria present and 8 sherds of samian. Other notable finds included a feeding bottle and a tazza. The specialists note that there is more samian from Les Martres-de-Veyre at the fort to the west than is usual for Britain, but very little of this source from this site. The proportion of East Gaulish ware is also considered to be low from this site. No amphorae are listed in the report. A small quantity of Iron Age pottery suggests activity nearby, although no pre-Roman evidence for settlement was recovered.",437,,,19,70,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
22075,"The Romano-British pottery ranged in date from the late 1st to early 2nd century to the late 3rd to mid 4th century, though most type belonged to a narrower period - late 1st/early 2nd to late 2nd/early 3rd. Waster sherds from Derbyshire ware jars and underfired grey wares suggest potting activity nearby. Some BB1 and Colour-coated ware present, though the ceramic assemblage was considered typical of rural settlement in Derbyshire, with 90% obtained locally and dominated by utilitarian jars.",1865,22,,21,14,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
22076,"No data, but a range of local and imported pottery was present - pottery suggested dating extended until 4th century.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22077,"Four sherds of Iron Age pottery were recovered, six sandy ware shards of RB date and 13 sherds from a single grey ware vessel were recovered. The grey ware vessel is thought to be of AD 2nd century in date and the sandy ware also of early Roman date. The relatively large average sherd weights of the Iron Age and Roman pottery, at, 18.7 and 13.7 grams respectively, suggests that archaeological levels may survive relatively undisturbed in the vicinity.",23,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22078,"Most pottery local coarse wares - two small frags. Of samian. Pottery of late 2nd date, predominantly early 3rd, and some late 3rd. Only small number of assemblage illustrated and listed in report. Pottery from Torksey kilns and Hazelwood Derbyshire ware most common. Bowls, jars etc. found.",,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
22079,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22080,A coarse ware vessel associated with one of the burials believed to be late Iron Age date.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
22081,"The cremation appears to have been within a Romano-British vessel. Much of the pottery originally recovered is now lost, but 84 sherds are in the Buxton Museum. As most missing no quantification is provided below, but a single samian sherd was present, as well as four colour coated sherds, seven mortaria sherds, including two with indecipherable graffiti. Much of the remaining pottery is Derbyshire ware. The extant pottery suggests a date range of 2nd-3rd centuries.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
22082,"The Romano-British material suggests activity within the 2nd century, most likely the second half. Local coarse wares are dominant with the Black Burnished ware jar the only regional import. This, along with the absence of any fine wares, mortaria or amphora suggests occupation within a rural farmstead type site.",37,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23001,"One Bronze Age vessel recovered - five sherds of a collared urn found unstratified after mechanical excavation. Iron Age pottery recovered from pits, gullies and other features in Site 1a. Absence of Roman material associated notable. Scarcity of late La Tène ceramics also notable indicating a break in the occupation. Broad date range for the IA pottery at Whitwell suggested as 400-100 BC. Roman pottery not fully quantified in report. Samian ware included one with a potter's stamp - [MAC].RI.MAN, dating from circa AD 60-75. Three sherds of medieval pottery also recovered.",,,,,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
23002,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23003,"In addition to the 104 sherds of Roman pottery, 40 sherds of prehistoric pottery of mid-to-late Iron Age date were also found. The majority of the RB pottery dates between the late first to second century AD, along with a smaller assemblage of pottery dating to the later third-fourth century. An additional 40 Roman sherds, including one of samian, were recovered during an evaluation of the site.",184,,3,3,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23004,Based on the pottery assemblage the settlement dates from the early and middle decades of the first century AD up until c. AD 60 or 70. The pottery assemblage is regarded as a 'transitional 'Belgic' style. No samian ware was recovered.,245,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23006,"The pottery suggests activity during the 4th century, most likely early to mid, but with some post-AD 350 pottery.",807,14,,47,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23007,"The rise in the relative numbers of bowls and dishes in the final phase indicates a shift towards 'Romanised' dining habits with foodstuff laid out on a plate for individual consumption. Compared with similar groups from Roman Leicester, this rural site appears to be some 200 years behind. The level of bowls and dishes in the final phase at this site may indicate a relatively high status for a rural site. A Castor box lid and a sherd from a Castor box may be an indicator of sophisticated dining habits.  Most of the pottery is likely to have been locally produced. White wares were presumably traded through Leicester. Other traded wares such as samian, amphorae and others were rare here.The report provides the overall quantity and weight of sherds but does not provide numbers for the amphorae, mortaria or samian. An amphora sherd was inscribed with a graffito.",529,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23008,"The pottery is not well quantified in the report but amphorae, mortaria and samian were all present. The presence of several amphora types, including characteristic wine amphorae, indicates a rise in status for the site from the mid-2nd century to the fourth century, as does the increase in samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23009,"The earliest pottery dates from the early-to-mid second century at the shortest, the mid-or-late first to mid-second century at the longest. The earliest phase has the most diverse assemblage and suggests a prosperous settlement during this period. The pottery from the site is not precisely quantified, but amphorae, samian and mortaria are present. Other imported wares included Nene Valley wares. Girth wear on the narrow-necked vessels recovered from the well may be the result of being lowered down the well, whilst wear on the base may have been from being placed on rough surfaces around the well. One of the jugs from the well was a second.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23010,The late IA pottery suggests a local source from the Charnwood Forest area to the north. A small group of Roman grey ware fabrics of probable 4th century date were recovered. Three body sherds of Cheshire briquetage were also identified. The sherds were not precisely quantified in the report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23011,"The pottery assemblage included Bronze Age, Iron Age a small amount of Roman and a small amount of Saxon pottery. This record focusses on the Iron Age and Roman pottery. Only four sherds of Roman coarse ware were recovered during fieldwalking and 18 during excavation, all of coarse ware and grey wares. The general impression of the IA assemblage was of a scored ware assemblage of large and medium sized vessels, suggesting a site with possible dates anywhere between the fourth century BC to the early first century AD, and can be regarded as a general rural assemblage with no fine wares or easily dated imported pottery.",1947,35,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23012,"Late Iron Age pottery was prolific but not well quantified in the report. A 1st or 2nd century Roman grey ware vessel from the enclosure ditch may suggest continuity into the early Roman period, although as scored wares (which dominated the IA assemblage) continued into the 1st century AD it is possible that the whole site was occupied during the 1st century AD. Three sherds of Cheshire briquetage were located.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23013,"A high incidence of mortaria were noted in comparison with similar sites, although the site is close to the major mortaria production centre at Mancetter-Hartshill. The overall date range spans around 150 years, spanning the early 2nd century until just after the mid third century. Only 19 of the pottery sherds are listed in the report, and so the samian and mortaria have not been quantified. No amphorae were listed.",373,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23014,13 fragments of mid to late Iron Age pottery were recovered.,13,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23015,"A number of Bronze Age and late BA to early IA sherds were recovered. This record focusses on the mid-to-late Iron Age and late Iron Age material. Most of the pottery is typical of East Midlands scored ware assemblages. Dating can be problematic, with a range from mid-to-late Iron Age. The complete absence of Roman pottery suggests that the site did not continue beyond the early 1st century AD. One vessel was of 'Belgic' form, showing cultural links beyond local ones. Although the pottery may be domestic waste, similar deposits have been considered as structured depositions.",6709,67,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23016,"The Iron Age pottery is considered to be small and homogenous, given the size and complexity of the site. No IA sherd count is given in the report, but a maximum number of 215 Iron Age vessels were represented, with a weight of 20.394 kg. Briquetage from Cheshire is represented in the Iron Age ceramics by one sherd. The IA pottery is regarded as fairly typical for a rural community of the period. The Roman pottery is quantified in the report and so the numbers below relate only to the Roman pottery and not the IA. The Roman pottery, including some imported wares, suggests a community existing above subsistence level, but whose luxuries were modest.",662,5,,1,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23017,"The finewares were dominated by the products of the lower Nene Valley, particularly 4th century forms. The range of fabrics is considered to be similar to the material gathered from the site during an earlier fieldwalking survey.",208,1,,4,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23018,Only a few sherds of pottery were found including one sherd of Iron Age and four sherds of Romano-British pottery.,5,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23019,"The report does not quantify the pottery, but the vessel sherds suggest a founding date for the villa in the mid-2nd century AD with occupation into the 4th century. Of note is the absence of the AD 1st century calcite gritted wares found in Leicester, and the presence of Derbyshire ware. The latter pottery is rare further south in Leicestershire but might be expected here owing to the proximity of the production centres, circa 18-20 km to the north-west.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23020,No good data but pottery from the 1975 excavations dated from the mid-second century AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23021,"The late Iron Age to early Roman area, dated mid 1st to mid 2nd century AD, produced a total of 52 sherds with a combined weight of 771gms, 31% of the total by weight. The pottery dated to the 2nd to 4th centuries AD produced 81 sherds with a combined weight of 1680gms, 69% of the total by weight. The ceramics as a whole are indicative of low status rural activity.",133,2,,2,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23022,One sherd of wheel thrown shell tempered ware and one sherd of BB1 or GW1 dating from AD 120-400. Lumps of burnt clay were also recovered.,2,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23023,A small assemblage of just 5 sherds including 4 sherds of South Gaulish samian and 1 sherd of GW3 fine greyware.,5,0,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
23024,"The quantities below refer to the stratified assemblage. In addition another 72 sherds weighing 1.018 kg were collected. The pottery dating indicated a late Roman assemblage. The proportion of imported samian is typical of a rural site although it is notable that the group contains some of the latest samian forms. The assemblage is jar dominated (79 per cent of identifiable sherds), as would be expected from a rural site, with bowls and dishes making up 10 per cent.",528,7,3,15,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23025,"The site is considered to be a rare example of a Late Iron Age occupation with clear Gallo-Belgic influence on the pottery assemblage. The assemblage represents a tightly dated group of otherwise discrete features belonging to the conquest period of the 1st century AD. A small number of small sherds might be described as fully Romanised grey and oxidised wares, but otherwise the group contains transitional material comprising both scored wares and Belgic style handmade (and wheelmade) wares. A number of both Iron Age and Belgic vessel form profiles are reconstructable. In addition to the stratified pottery listed in the table below 46 grams of unstrat. Pottery was recovered.",400,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23026,"A total of 4.384kg of Iron Age pottery (200 sherds) was recovered. An additional 148g was unstratified and included occasional abraded Roman sherds. Additionally an assemblage of 126 sherds of later prehistoric pottery weighing 0.575kg was retrieved during the evaluation phase. The assemblage comprises a tightly associated collection of stratified groups. The preservation of diagnostic vessel profiles in East Midlands scored ware, especially from Group 18 (cut 5063) indicates primary deposition of material. The material from Group 19 (pits to the north) is in a coarse white quartz fabric and may be of Neolithic or Bronze Age date, perhaps relating to the single, possibly Neolithic, feature on Site 6 adjacent.",326,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23027,"A total of 24.765 kg of Roman period pottery (estimated as 2500 sherds) was retrieved from stratified Roman deposits on this site, with a further 1.282kg unstratified. Additionally an assemblage of 311 sherds of Roman period pottery weighing 1.807kg was retrieved during the evaluation phase. Only the fabric types from the evaluation are individually quantified, and the individual numbers for amphora, mortarium and samian relate only to those from the evaluation. The stratified material is in good condition and looks to be the result of primary or secondary rubbish disposal (middening). Brokenness appears comparatively low for a rural site with a number of vessels largely complete. In particular, the material from Group 28 (Structure) includes a single context deposit from (6037) cut 6042 weighing 8.980 kg containing a near-complete samian form18/31 dish stamped by the Central Gaulish potter Roppus with the die ROPPUS.FE dated AD 100-140 (105-135).",2811,27,1,14,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23028,"Four sherds (joining) weighing 37g of mid- to late Iron Age scored ware in a shell-tempered fabric S1 (Marsden 1998, 45). Fossil shell tempering is the typical opening material used for scored ware in this part of the East Midlands. The thickness of the body (13mm), which has deep irregular scoring on the external surface, suggests a large barrel shaped jar. The dating is likely to fall between the second century BC (when the tradition becomes widely established) and the mid-first century AD. The freshness of the breaks and the lack of surface abrasion suggests that the fill of the feature may be predominantly of this date and that the pottery was quickly incorporated rather than being exposed for any period. Three sherds weighing 15g in a poorly sorted, quartz sand fabric also containing red ironstone (Sandy Ware: SW1 Pollard 1994, 73). The fabric represents a transition between late Iron Age sandy fabrics and Roman grey wares proper and a date in the middle decades of the 1st century AD is appropriate. Two of the sherds are small and abraded, the third slightly so. If these were found close to the top of the feature, it may confirm a late Iron Age date for the filling with some early Roman/transitional material sitting on the surface.",7,56,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23029,"No accurate information or quantities but pottery ranging from the 1st century to 4th century AD was recovered, with more 1st century sherds than 4th century.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23030,"A total of 20 stratified sherds weighing 921g of Romano-British pottery was recovered from the site, along with two sherds (20g) of re-deposited material. The average sherd weight is 46g however this high figure is due to the presence of three large sherds of mortaria and grey ware. Excluding these sherds from the calculation provides an average sherd weight of 18g, which still suggests a good level of preservation. A single fragment of Roman ceramic building material was also recovered.",20,1,0,3,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23031,Limited data. Late Iron Age pottery indicates that the site developed from at least the mid 1st century AD. Much pottery has reportedly been recovered from the site. Over 200 sherds of Roman pottery dating from the late 1st-early/mid2nd century were recovered during the 2005 excavations. 3rd and 4th century pottery was also recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23032,"The pottery from the pit alignment and subsequent ditch would seem to represent activity at the site from around the end of the early Iron Age to the late Iron Age. However, interpretation of the pottery from these features is hindered by problems such as intrusion and the fact that sherd size is mostly small and diagnostic pieces uncommon. There is a lack of diagnostically late Bronze Age pottery, such as post-Deverel-Rimbury plainwares, or late Bronze Age to early Iron Age forms and decoration, from the post-barrow features. The pottery from the pit alignment is perhaps most likely to date to the early-middle Iron Age transition. Further ceramic evidence could suggest a later Iron Age date for the ditches cutting the pit alignment, although if the ceramics are part of the disuse, the ditch may have been originally constructed prior to this, perhaps in the middle of the Iron Age. Activity during the middle to late Iron Age 'Scored ware period' is more securely represented by pottery from the fill of the 'marker' pit. The presence of later Iron Age or 'transitional' Conquest period pottery in a large pit east of the South Pit Alignment  shows continued activity until at least the end of the Iron Age. A total of 38 sherds of 'transitional' early Roman pottery weighing 545g were recovered from the excavations. Three grog-tempered sherds in fabric GT3 came from an upper fill of the post pit alignment ditch system, suggesting that the feature was probably going out of use around the middle of the first century AD. A single sherd in a grog-tempered fabric came from fill (176), also in the ditch system, and is also likely to be mid-first century AD in date. In addition, 31 sherds weighing 412g were recovered by stripping in the east windrow from layer (140). These are mostly from a Belgic style narrow-necked jar in a grog-tempered fabric (GT2, Fig. 15.7). Similar vessels in grog-tempered fabrics have been found in 'transitional' period levels in Leicester, for example in the West Bridge area (Pollard 1994 fig.50 no.7). Sherds from two further vessels from (140) are in fabrics SW2 and GT4. The ceramics from this context are all consistent with a mid 1st century AD date. Three other sherds of unstratified 'transitional' grog-tempered pottery came from Area B. The 'transitional' period Roman pottery recovered is contemporary with, or slightly later than, the sandy ware vessels from the large pit east of the South Pit Alignment described above.",38,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23033,The 2008-9 the evaluation and watching brief produced a stratified assemblage of 25 sherds of Roman period pottery weighing 189g.,25,365,,2,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23034,"In terms of the fabrics represented and their proportions, all of the pottery probably dates between the Conquest (AD 43) and the second half of the 2nd century, with nothing necessarily dating after about AD 150 or so. The occurrence of transitional fabrics (sandy and grog-tempered wares) indicates activity in the decades after the Conquest and a single 'Belgic' style vessel from (23) which may date to before the Conquest, although deposited later. A single sherd of South Gaulish samian, dating to the second half of the 1st century is the only import to the site and the only regional imports are a BB1 jar probably dating to the middle of the 2nd century and a white ware mortarium from Mancetter-Hartshill (Fabric MO12 with white quartz) where the bead sits below the flange and therefore dates to c.AD 100 to 150. The remainder of the material (60%) comprises grey ware vessels all produced locally, probably from kilns in the vicinity of Leicester Forest, except for one sherd from the Lower Nene Valley dating to the middle decades of the 2nd century. Two other vessels are of note. The first is an example of a 'London ware'-type vessel copying samian Form 37 with compass drawn decoration from (19) (as Howe et al. 1980 no.23) dating to the second quarter of the 2nd century, but not from the Nene Valley. The second is a necked grey ware jar with beaded rim, with a single impressed wavy line around the neck. Such jars date to the early or middle decades of the 2nd century.",133,2,,3,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23035,A total of 11 sherds of mid-to-late Iron Age pottery (55g) were retrieved from nine contexts across nine trenches (one sherd may be later Iron Age). A total of 88 sherds of Roman pottery weighing 873g were retrieved from 11 contexts across 10 trenches (including six unstratified sherds). The remains of a single Anglo-Saxon vessel dating from the 5th to 7th century was also recovered.,99,1,,3,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23036,"The pottery assemblage included grey ware, BB1, oxidised ware and earthen ware. The date range of the pottery was from the 2nd to 4th century AD, although none of it was closely dated.",7,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23037,"Limited data. Pottery was recovered, including 2nd century samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
23038,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23039,"As well as the stratified mid-to-late Iron Age pottery recovered, fifteen other sherds of Prehistoric pottery including ten, possibly from an Early Bronze Age beaker (Trench 16), and five of Iron Age date (Trenches 49 and 54) were unstratified. Additionally, two sherds of Romano-British pottery (one from Trench 49) and eight sherds of medieval pottery were also unstratified. The Roman and medieval material is likely to result from manuring of the area rather than occupation, whilst the Iron Age material derives from stratified contexts indicative of settlement.",355,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23040,"The majority of the pottery falls into the East Midlands Scored Ware tradition (Elsdon 1992a) and at least 18 separate vessels were identified from individual rims (15 of which are typical scored ware forms). The material derives from the fills of round house gullies and associated ditch and pit features, a total of 40 features. The largest and most coherent group comes from (123) with smaller groups from (8), (93), (114), (131) and (137). The average sherd weight of 18g is relatively high compared to other nearby contemporary assemblages and although there is some surface abrasion, there are large numbers of joins and sherds belonging to the same vessel. This would indicate that much of the assemblage represents primary rubbish incorporated into features soon after breakage. The overall dating of the assemblage would appear to be late Iron Age. The broad similarity of forms with those of the early phase at Grove Farm, Enderby, dated c. 175 BC to AD 20 and the occurrence of non-scored ware vessels from in finer fabrics may suggest a date closer to the first century AD, although the clear lack of Roman material would suggest no long occupation after AD 43.",348,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23041,"Pottery from the Iron Age ritual area would appear to reflect activity nearby, dating mainly from the first half and especially to around the middle of the first century AD. The pottery is typical of other sites in the region before and after the conquest. Pottery from the Roman features indicates activity continuing after the ceremonial area went out of use, possibly continuing throughout the Roman period from the later 1st century until the 4th. The assemblage is dominated by Roman pottery, with at least 539 being Roman, though these are from the Roman features and primarily not the ritual area. The majority of the Roman pottery is of late Roman date although some 1st to 2nd century material is present. The Roman pottery is not precisely quantified in the report as the focus is the ritual area. Samian and mortaria were present, although quantities are unclear.",645,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23042,"A large pottery assemblage was recovered, mostly typical of East Midlands Scored ware assemblages of ,od-to-late Iron Age date, dating from the 4th to 1st centuries BC. The Iron Age pottery amounted to 5651 sherds weighing 77047g whilst a small assemblage of Roman pottery amounted to just 9 sherds, weighing 150g. This included a single sherd of samian.",5660,8,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
23043,"There are early and late elements to the assemblage, suggesting either distinct two phases of activity or that activity on site was long-lived.",355,4,,14,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23044,All but 2 of the sherds date to the period c.AD.50-150/200. The remaining 2 sherds comprise two fragments from 'Belgic' grog tempered ware jars of c.25BC - AD.50 date. 9 of the sherds are from a wheel-turned jar included in the inhumation as a grave good.,27,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
23045,A small assemblage of pottery was recovered but was not precisely quantified in the report. The sherds were from two vessels: a colour coated jar/bowl of late 3rd-early 4th century in date and a possible East Midlands burnished ware jar/bowl of possible 4th century date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23046,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23047,"The NA evaluation assemblage comprised 284 sherds, weighing 3.71kg. Seven sherds of Iron Age pottery weighing 82g were included in the assemblage. Overall, there is evidence for activity throughout the Roman period from the mid-late 1st century to the mid-4th century. The small quantity of late Iron Age pottery may suggest some pre-Roman activity. The Albion excavation assemblage included 43 late Iron Age and 1815 Roman sherds and weighed 30.9kg. Pottery displayed a wide date range from the Iron Age to the Saxon period, though most was Roman.",2099,35,1,18,57,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23048,"The assemblage as a whole spans the Late Iron Age to the middle or possibly later decades of the 2nd century. Excavation data: 1313 sherds. Evaluation data: 113 sherds -  most of the pottery comprises early Roman grog-tempered, mixed-gritted, shelly and sandy transitional wares dating from the middle to the end of the 1st century. The grey and oxidised wares also appear to be fairly early, dating from the later 1st century into the first part of the 2nd. The two samian ware dishes are the latest datable vessels, as they could potentially date up to c.AD150; however taken together with the rest of the pottery a date earlier in the 2nd century would seem more likely. A scan of the small amount of re-deposited material showed it to be comparable to the stratified assemblage, with material dating from the mid-late 1st century or early 2nd century.",1426,10,,3,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23049,"94 sherds (569g) of Iron Age Pottery was found. Based on the presence of scored ware the Iron Age group can be broadly dated to the middle to late Iron Age, spanning the 4th to 1st centuries BC. 199 sherds (2.35kg) of Roman pottery was recovered. The Roman pottery appears to mainly date to the mid/later 2nd to later 3rd / early 4th century. The group is overwhelmingly dominated by local wares, accompanied by modest amounts of regional imports from the Nene Valley and Poole Harbour, Dorset. There are no continental imports present. This is a very small assemblage which appears to suggest Roman activity at the site from around the later 3rd and 3rd centuries. There is little to suggest continued use into the 4th century. The complete absence of samian may be a reflection of the date of the site and as such would suggest no real 2nd century or earlier Roman activity. The overall dominance of local wares and a limited vessel repertoire is suggestive of a fairly low status establishment.",290,3,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
23050,"A large group of late prehistoric pottery ranging from late Bronze Age to late Iron Age in date was recovered, amounting to 4537 sherds. These have not been included in the statistics below, as it is not clear what proportion is earlier than late Iron Age. The Roman sherds included 3184 sherds weighing 25.592kg and 79 of unknown date. These have been combined with estimated weights for the additional 79 sherds. The assemblage suggests a date for occupation in the mid to late 1st century through to the mid 3rd century AD. The assemblage is regarded by the report author as a typical domestic assemblage. The report is not a full report and is an assessment only, and quantities of amphorae, mortaria and samian are not provided, although mortaria are mentioned in the text and imports are noted (though whether or not these were continental is not stated).",3263,26,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
23051,"The assessment report provided little information. 18 of the sherds were Iron Age, the rest Roman, predominantly of 2nd/3rd century AD date. The range and variety of this material comprised greyware and shell-tempered ware of local and regionally traded origin, mortaria from Mancetter-Hartshill, and Lower Nene Valley and Oxfordshire Colour-coats. It also included a small amount of imported ware, such as samian and amphorae. Mortaria, amphorae and samian sherds were not quantified in the assessment report.",301,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23052,A small Roman assemblage of 22 sherds (104g) was recovered. No close dating information was provided in the report.,22,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23053,Pottery was not quantified in the report although pottery of late Iron Age through to 4th century AD was found.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23054,"The total quantity of Romano-British pottery numbered 21 sherds, weighing 451 grams. A small group of pottery was recovered including a stratified assemblage dating to the late third to fourth century with earlier sherds in less securely stratified contexts indicating the possibility of a multi-phased site lasting some 2-300 years. The pottery was principally Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria of the mid third to mid fourth centuries with a small amount of locally produced grey ware, at least one jar from Harrold in Bedfordshire and a samian mortarium from Gaul.",21,0,,10,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23055,"The pottery assemblage included 1184 (12.5kg) sherds of mid-late Iron Age pottery and late Roman pottery. However, only the phased pottery were quantified in the report and only the phased pottery is therefore included here. Late Iron Age sherds amounted to 504 sherds (5812g) and Roman pottery 186 sherds (1774g). A single sherd of amphora was recovered and 2 sherds of mortaria were present. No samian was present. The Iron Age pottery was of 4th-1st century BC in date and the Roman pottery was of later 2nd to 4th century.",690,8,1,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
23056,"Whilst only a small assemblage, the presence of 'Belgic'-style forms has informed the character of the earlier groups which appear to lie within the second half of the 1st century. The occurrence of regionally traded wares such as SS1 and Derbyshire ware have helped to define the later 2nd-century groups. Across all the groups, the predominance of sandy transitional reduced wares rather than fully developed grey wares would tend to indicate that nearly all the material could date within the first two centuries AD with the possibility of extending into the early 3rd. The character indicates a typical early Roman rural assemblage with a predominance of jar forms and low numbers of imports and specialist wares, but with traded wares beginning to appear in the later groups as these industries emerge during the 2nd century.",114,2,,2,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23057,"A very limited pottery assemblage was recovered, including 10 handmade sherds of 1st millennium date, sherds of greyware that may be post-Roman in date and a single sherd of confidently attributed 1st-2nd century Roman pottery. Only the Iron Age and Roman pottery is included in the quantities below.",11,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23058,"Mortaria sherds were present but were not quantified in the report, which states 'Regional imports include a number of Lower Nene Valley products, both whiteware mortaria and colour-coated wares, four sherds of Dorset black burnished ware, and three colour-coated wares and a whiteware mortaria (Young 1977, type M21) from Oxfordshire'.",314,18,48,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23059,"No quantification in the report. A limited amount of Iron Age pottery was discovered, and pottery of the 1st - early 2nd century AD was not present. Samian and mortaria are mentioned in the report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23060,There is limited discussion of the pottery assemblage in the report. The assemblage is believed to be of late 1st-2nd century AD in date.,25,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23061,The pottery was not quantified in the report and not discussed in detail. Mortaria sherds were present but no mention of samian or amphorae are made.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
23062,"Pottery was not well quantified in the report. However, 'much mortaria' and samian are mentioned.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23063,"The earliest pottery from the site is late Iron Age shell gritted ware and some of the grogged ware may also be of Iron Age or early Roman date. The pink grogged ware is probably of later 1st century date but the hard cream variety was also produced in the 2nd century. The probable Verulamium mortarium is of late 1st to mid 2nd century date while the LNVCC hunt cup and the CGS form 31 are of mid to later 2nd century date. Much of the grey and oxidised wares date to the later 1st or 2nd centuries, but some could belong to the 3rd century. The LNVCC imitation samian ware form 36 has a grey colour coat and is more likely to be of early to mid 3rd century date. The LNVCC plain rim dish, the shell gritted ware jars and the BB1 vessels could belong to the 3rd century but are more likely to date to the 4th century. The assemblage is limited in its range of fabrics and forms. The small amounts of regional and continental fine wares, the few mortaria, the absence of amphora, together with the fact that the majority of the recognisable forms are jars, suggest that activities on the site were predominantly utilitarian, with little to suggest anything of a sizeable domestic or higher status nature.",350,34,,3,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23064,"Pottery of Iron Age to fourth century date recovered - together 3239 sherds. The Iron Age assemblage is dominated by quartz-tempered fabrics, followed by the quartz sandy ware, together making up 94.5% of the IA assemblage. Of the Roman pottery, grey, shelly, sandy, mixed-gritted and grog-tempered coarse wares account for 74.3%, with grey wares dominant at 58.3%.",3239,60,,34,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
23065,"8 of the sherds were of late Iron Age date whilst the rest of the assemblage was Roman. The Roman pottery spans the 1st to 3rd or 4th centuries AD. The earlier Roman pottery includes body sherds from an olive oil amphora, an unusual occurrence in a rural assemblage of this small size.",144,3,8,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
23067,"232 sherds of Iron Age pottery were found, of mid-late Iron Age date, as well as 320 sherds from a previous investigation. The presence of 'Belgic' vessel forms in the assemblages indicate continuity of activity into the pre-Roman Iron Age, and Roman pottery was recovered from the enclosure. The Iron Age pottery is not included below, as it is potentially mid-Iron Age in date. 192 sherds of Romano-British pottery were recovered. The Roman assemblage is dominated by local grey wares with some regional imports. The quantity of samian is typical of rural sites in the region.",192,3,,11,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23068,"Seven sherds representing four vessels were associated with one of the burials, including a possible miniature Nene Valley colour-coated ware beaker. The remainders were most likely jars and bowls. Another vessel, a miniature copy of a late Roman Black Burnished Ware 1 vessel, may have been deposited with either burial. Three small sherds of samian were present but were redeposited.",29,0,,,3,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
23069,"27 sherds of mid-to late-Iron Age pottery are included (236g). The Roman pottery was dominated by grey wares (75.9%), mostly typically late Roman. Other types include Nene Valley colour-coat, mortaria (not quantified by sherd count) and a small amount of BB1.",603,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
23070,"The Roman assemblage comprises 106 sherds, weighing 1.8kg, and is dominated by wheel thrown grey wares in a range of fine to coarse sandy fabrics, mainly datable from the late 1st or 2nd centuries. These are of uncertain, but probably local sources. The vessel repertoire comprises undecorated jars with simple everted rims, narrow-necked jars, flanged bowls and straight-sided bowls or 'dog dishes'. Six calcite-gritted sherds, common to the Midlands and south-east were recovered, and four unprovenanced Midlands oxidised sherds in a coarse sandy fabric. Although not closely datable, they are likely to be of 2nd-century century origin. Traded wares from more distant regional production centres are scarce. They comprise two sherds of 2nd–3rd-century Dorset Black Burnished ware, ten sherds from a Nene Valley mortarium, and a single abraded colour-coated sherd from the Nene Valley, datable to the 3rd century. Continental imports comprise two abraded early Roman samian sherds and an unstratified amphora sherd of Baetican Dressel 20 form, the latter known to occur widely on post-conquest sites and up to the mid 3rd century.",106,2,1,11,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23071,"Significant quantities of IA pottery recovered, but some mid-IA and the chronology is not clear. Therefore only Roman quantities included here. The bulk of the Roman pottery appears to have been 3rd-4th century in date.",3014,21,,29,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23072,"Pottery was principally late Iron Age scored ware, associated with Hunsbury quern stones, unlikely to be earlier than mid-1st century BC. No useful quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
23073,"The limited pottery assemblage suggested activity in the 2nd century AD, with possibly some in the mid/late 1st century and into the 3rd century. One sherd of decorated samian.",152,2,29,31,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
23074,,175,2,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
23075,"The small assemblage has a limited range of fabrics and forms, with few regional or continental imports, suggesting that activities on the site were predominantly simple domestic or utilitarian, and little to suggest anything of a sizeable higher status nature.",19,2,1,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
24001,Roman pottery ranges widely in date from the later 1st century through to mid-third century or later. IA pottery also represented.,216,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24002,"Not all pottery available from the site, a result of the incomplete records of some of the excavations. The list below therefore is incomplete, and based on the reports for the 1960-63 excavations as well as information from the 1997 APS pipeline excavations. Pottery reports were produced by different specialists and results were not uniformly presented, making quantification problematic. The samian pottery in the 1997 monograph is quantified in histrogram format rather than tabulated and so the numbers provided are an estimate. The samian assemblage comprises a maximum of 414 vessels, some of which are decorated and some stamped. Those from the APS excavation have been added to this total. The mortaria represent at least 66 bowls, of which most must be later than early third century. Again, it is not the entire collection.The coarse ware pottery from the multiple excavations is not easily quantified and the total number of sherds includes the specialist wares from the 1997 monograph and all IA and Roman pottery from the APS excavation, though not coarse wares from the 1997 monograph. Figures must therefore be treated with caution. Of the APS 1997 excavations 618 sherds were recognised as late Iron Age and some were finewares, indicating a site of high status.",4423,,129,175,337,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24003,"Reports on the pottery were prepared by different authors and not presented in a standard format, making quantification difficult. Sherd numbers were not always succinctly provided in the text and readers are directed to the site archive. The numbers for mortaria below relate to vessel counts as that is what is provided in the report whilst the numbers of amphorae are individual sherds. No quantification was possible for the samian, the list being in the archive. A considerable amount of Iron Age and Roman pottery was recovered and the site revealed pottery kilns.",,,437,191,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24005,"Much of the pottery recovered was only tentatively dated as late Iron Age or Roman, and much is of a poorly dated fossil shell fabric which may be of Roman to medieval in date. Caution is urged on dating in the report. Not all of the pottery came from the trenches in the area of the enclosure; some came from trenches dug at other parts of the site. Aside from the probable and possible LIA/E Roman pottery 2 sherds of probable 3rd-4th century Nene Valley ware were recovered. Grey ware was also represented.",154,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24006,"The pottery is not well quantified but was all hand-made, flint tempered coarse ware, indicative of locally made pottery of the late IA/early Roman period.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24007,"The bulk is 3rd century, and probably the latter half, but extends to the late 4th century on a single vessel. The earliest sherd is a jar body sherd in an Iron Age tradition pimply fabric, the date range of which could extend to the mid-late 2nd century. The quantity is too small to draw many conclusions beyond overall date-range which is likely to be 2nd to late 4th century; one sherd in a long-lived fabric is insufficient to indicate 1st century. There are no exceptional vessels or fabrics, and for the size and date, there appears to be a normal mix of vessels.",206,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24008,"Over 91 per cent of the pottery was Iron Age in date. Early Iron Age vessels were represented but the majority was of undiagnostic mid-to-late Iron Age date, between 5th century BC to 1st century AD. The quantity of pottery was not succinctly presented in the report and so the quantification is an estimate only.",894,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24009,"A single tazza represented in the assemblage. Three assemblages of fieldwalking ceramics were collected but are not included here. The excavated sherds were 3094 in number. The assemblage ranged from late pre-Roman Iron Age to late fourth century in date, though only a small quantity of late fourth century material was present. Fabric types also included BB1, Black early Roman wares, colour-coated wares, shell or shell gritted wares, white, cream or pinkish cream wares, greywares, GTA ware, oxidised wares. Forms included storage jars, bowls and dishes, wide-mouthed jars, beakers, flagons, flasks and narrow-necked jars, everted-rim jars, everted-rim jars similar to Roxby B and C, Rebated-rim jars similar to Roxby A, and other jar forms.",3094,38,13,1,27,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24010,89 probable late IA sherds were found as well as unstratified Roman pottery. Bronze Age pottery was also recovered.,89,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24011,Of the 101 sherds recovered during the 1986 excavations 68 were of mid-to-late IA in date and 30 were Roman (3 were medieval).,98,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24012,"A total of 364 Roman and earlier sherds were recovered from the excavated features. These sherds are predominantly of mid to late 2nd century AD with smaller quantities of material indicating continued activity into the 3rd and possibly 4th centuries AD. Two sherds probably belonging within the 1st millennium BC were also identified. Overall, the Romano-British pottery recovered indicates that most of the activity on the site dates from the 2nd century AD. The presence of small quantities of Dales wares as well as the various colour-coated finewares, hints that this activity extended into the 3rd century, and possibly even into the 4th century. This later activity may be more extensively represented in areas of the site not examined by the pipeline trench. The assemblage borrows heavily on the native, Iron Age ceramic traditions of the area and comprises a full range of fabrics and vessel types suitable for cooking, storage and food presentation purposes. There is no evidence from the ceramic assemblage recovered, to suggest that the site represents anything other than a rural  farming settlement.",364,6,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24013,"All sherds were Romano-British. A miniature vessel, possibly copying a dolia, and a wide-mouthed bowl, both probably of 2nd century date, were found together in a post hole, possibly representing structured deposition. Three other semi-complete coarse ware pots may also represent deliberate deposition, found in ditches and a pit.",494,7,,,10,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24014,"The kiln manufactured grey ware products including dishes, bowls, jars, beakers, lids and colander. Not all pottery is well quantified in the report, and so the total number of sherds is not available, although the mortaria, amphorae and samian sherds are listed. The minimum number of vessels of the kiln products were 926 vessels with a weight of 134 kg (individual sherd counts were not provided), but this does not include the mortaria, amphorae and samian sherds nor the other pottery which occurred in small numbers. These figures have been given in the number of sherds and weight boxes below, whilst the total number of sherds for mortaria, amphorae and samian have been added to the total. The figures must therefore be treated with extreme caution.",1033,136,12,2,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24015,"The kiln manufactured grey ware products including dishes, bowls, jars, beakers, lids and, unusually for kilns in this area, mortaria. Not all pottery is well quantified in the report, and so the total number of sherds is not available. The minimum number of vessels of the kiln products were 142 vessels with a weight of 290 kg (individual sherd counts were not provided). These figures have been given in the number of sherds and weight boxes below.",142,290,,5,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
24016,No data available.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24017,"A detailed report of the pottery is not provided in the evaluation report but sherds are reportedly predominantly of 3rd to 4th century in date. 292 sherds were recovered in the eval (no weights provided), whilst 144 were recovered during the excavation (2.715kg). The ceramic evidence suggests that the cemetery was likely to have been sited in an area of abandoned occupation. It ranges in date from the early to the mid third century with the furnishings from the earliest graves appearing to conform to the tradition of supplying the deceased with a meal for the journey to the afterlife. The grave goods from the later graves are more sparse perhaps reflecting the general decline in furnishings during the mid-later third century. It would seem from the fact that grave goods are present that Saltersford is likely to be a Romanised urban settlement rather than a rural site. This is also reflected by the diverse forms present within the pottery assemblage as a whole, despite the small size of the group, which appears to be drawing from a relatively wide rather than a confined market. There is an absence of mortaria and definite amphorae from the site and the samian ware is minimal, but this again might be due to the small size of the assemblage. Mortaria also mentioned in Henry Preston's lecture on the finds from Saltersford in 1915, who describes a large quantity of pottery. Also notes an 'abundance of samian'. A female head adorning the mouth of a flask may represent a religious vessel. Literate Graffito also present - DICCUS FECIT.",436,3,2,,2,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24018,"As may be expected in this region greywares predominate followed by shell-gritted fabrics of which the majority were either late Iron Age or early Roman. Minor quantities of Nene Valley colour-coated wares, whitewares and oxidised wares were also identified as well as a few sherds of Samian Ware and one sherd from a Dressel 20 amphora. Most of the vessel forms are small containers such as beakers, jars or dishes. Few of the larger wide mouthed bowls more typical of rural sites further eastwards were found. Apart from the colour-coated wares, and mortaria from Swanpool, it was not possible to attribute kiln groups to most of the material. However, the bulk of the greywares are broadly similar in form and fabric to the kiln products from the Trent Valley at Lea, Knaith and the later Torksey kilns. One greyware sherd from context 138 was reminiscent of the Blaxton fabrics but this may have been coincidence or the result of over firing. Greyware fabrics for Dalesware type jars as well as conventional shell-gritted Dalesware fabric confirm the Lincolnshire origins of the collection. Likewise the general range of forms is not unusual and agrees with the range found in the earlier 1993 excavations. One of the samian sherds is a spindle whorl made from a reused samian base.",667,,21,6,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24019,No precise data though pottery was of first to second century AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24021,"No general quantification of the pottery but the pottery from the kilns were of types dating from the late third to mid fourth century. Forms included bows, jars, pie dishes, and coarse gritted storage vessels. Mortaria sherds were present in the general scatter of material.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
24022,"Four forms of vessel were created in the kiln; wide and narrow mouthed jars, bowls and dishes. The products are not well dated, but the flanged bowls are thought possibly to reflect a late third century date for the kiln. All pottery presented in the report was found in the kiln oven.  Only the rim sherds and complete vessels are quantified (but only the weight of the rim sherds are provided). The figures below must be regarded with caution.",353,16,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24023,Pottery from the site was predominantly of grey ware.  Only the illustrated pottery is quantified in the report and the number below reflects this. Included amongst the assemblage is a moulded face mask in Nene Valley colour coated ware.,34,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24025,,138,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24026,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24027,No quantification or description other than that the pottery recovered indicated a date between the mid and late third century AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24028,The pottery recovered is predominantly of late Roman date.,49,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24029,"The pottery evidence suggests Roman activity in the mid-to-late 2nd century AD with slighter evidence for evidence in the 3rd century. There was no 4th century pottery at all. No weights were provided. A further 910 sherds, weighing 15.512 kg, were recovered during the 2001 excavations. These included 682 sherds of Iron Age and 148 Roman sherds. The dating of the Roman pottery centres on the 3rd to 4th century. An additional 27 sherds, weighing 0.317kg, were recovered during the 2005 excavations.",1912,,1,1,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24030,,34,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24031,"The pottery from the first investigation at the site comprised 733 sherds, weighing 16.603kg. The site produced one remarkable vessel, body sherds with an applied male figure, tentatively identified as a representation of a Smith God, holding perhaps a pair of tongs. It is presumably this vessel that the pottery specialist identifies as 'ritual' in the functional overview of vessel forms. The spatial distribution of pottery was very heavily weighted to the Ermine Street frontage. The ceramic evidence from the site relates almost totally to the Roman period. There are a few sherds from trenches 1 and 6 which might date to the LIA. No Roman sherds of exclusively 1st century date were found, although some from trench 3 could span the later 1st to early 2nd century period. 2nd century pottery occurred in all trenches but was notably very sparse. Only five samian vessels occurred, ranging from the early to later 2nd century. The main emphasis was in the 3rd century, and probably more the latter part, running into the 4th century. Of the trenches adjacent to Ermine Street, the southern trench 7 closed earlier than those to the north, trenches 4 and 5, between which was a sherd link. The fills of the (?)quarry pits in trenches 2 and 5 closed in the late 4th century. The earliest fill of both pits is dated ML3. If the upper fills represent rubbish accumulating or being dumped in the sinkage of the original fill, this would indicate building or road work activity in the ML3. A further 300 sherds, (6.984kg) were recovered during the 2001 evaluation. The main chronological emphasis of this assemblage was in the later Roman period, 3rd to 4th century, but there is evidence for 2nd century occupation",1172,26,28,2,22,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24032,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24033,No quantification but sherds of 2nd to 3rd century pottery were recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24034,,77,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24035,"Pottery was of between mid-2nd and 4th century date, with the bulk of mid-to-late 3rd century date. Samian and mortaria are quantified, yet whilst a moderate quantity of amphora sherds are mentioned no quantification of these is provided.",7032,,,33,312,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24036,No quantification by weight. The amphora sherd was reused as a spindle whorl.,92,,1,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
24037,"The majority of the wares are grey wares, mostly in the same fabric which may be similar to the Torksey grey wares. If further work allowed it would be useful to have a good fabric description. There were some wares in a coarse fabric, some of which proved to be early Saxon. Others could be Roman but require further investigation. Very little fine wares mostly Samian and Nene Valley Colour Coated. The Samian is unusual in that there are some 1st century South Gaulish wares in an otherwise largely 3rd century assemblage. Despite the coinage, only one group produced certainly 4th century pottery. No amphorae, and only one mortarium of local source. In general the pottery was in very good condition. Mainly a very basic domestic assemblage.",276,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24038,"The site produced a moderate sized assemblage of 231 Roman sherds (no weights were provided), ranging in date from possibly the late Iron Age period to the late fourth century. The majority of the pottery is late Roman in date, predominantly mid and mid to late third century, but with a high proportion of fourth and some late fourth-century pottery. However most of the fourth-century material was derived from contexts containing post Roman ceramics. There is a very small proportion of second-century pottery, but most interesting, given the site proximity to the Iron Age site at Old Place, Sleaford, is the presence of several sherds of late Iron Age tradition.",231,,1,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24039,"Generally broad. South Gaulish samian from context 8 c. AD 70-100 is the earliest diagnostic pottery from the site. Context 18 with sherds of a cream ware flagon is probably early to mid to late 2nd century. Contexts 20 and 30 may be broadly dated to the 2nd century, whereas 10 and 22 range from the 2nd to 3rd centuries, and 11 from the first to the early 3rd century. Contexts 12 and 23 are dated more convincingly to the 3rd century by the presence of Nene Valley colour coated ware. Contexts 25 and 26 are undiagnostic but probably Roman. The fragments are very similar to those noted at excavations at Hangman's Road, Stainfield with cream and grey wares that have been noted in the Peterborough area which may be related to Nene Valley production. There is a small group which are also related to Nene Valley grey ware, but with coarser quartz intrusions, which were thought to be similar in date to the finer Nene Valley grey wares but are probably from the upper Nene Valley. Also worthy of note in view of the location of this site are the shell tempered wares, some of which are noted from the Roman kilns at Bourne, which are of a silty matrix with moderate inclusions of larger quartz and moderate oyster shell but no obvious bryozoa. There is a second group with much more abundant fine shell with bryozoa. There is a range of forms, some of which are burnt and obviously used for cooking, flagons, beakers and some colour coated table wares, as well as a plate or bowl in South Gaulish samian. No amphorae or mortaria were noted. However, John Samuels' PhD thesis refers to samian and mortaria from the site and in addition, evaluation trenching in 2001 revealed 4 sherds with a 1st-2nd century AD date, predating the pottery known from the kilns. This report refers to at least one mortaria sherd found previously and one amphora sherd, found during that phase of evaluation. The 2001 excavation produced a further 40 sherds weighing 1.336g, which included an amphora sherd. The assemblage was predominantly Antonine in date with a sherd of 1st century date. The 2002 evaluation produced a further 10 sherds of pottery. The 2003 watching brief produced a further 32 Roman sherds. The 2004 excavation produced just 4 sherds.",85,,2,2,2,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24040,"The pottery date of the site ranges from the Late Iron Age to the  very late 4th century, but with some diversity in the different areas. Pottery imported from the continent and found on the site includes samian from Central Gaul (forming the highest percentage of imported wares) and Southern Gaul, Dressel 20 amphorae from Spain, a fragment of colour-coated ware possibly from Cologne, a possible sherd of Pompeian red ware and a few sherds of Moselle Keramik from the Rhineland. As iterated in the pottery assessment although the presence of these type infers some status, the imported wares form only a small percentage of the complete assemblage. Nene Valley ware and unsourced grey wares comprise the most popular pottery type, but also present are examples of Black Burnished ware from Dorset and Verulamium region white ware from Hertfordshire.",7455,16,410,47,270,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24041,"The distribution of pottery indicates a clear distinction between these two areas. The pottery from the northern end of the site was a more mixed assemblage with finer shell-tempered wares concentrated here. Coarse shell-tempered fabrics dominated the pottery in the south. This may be chronological with perhaps a trend towards finer domestic wares over time, which would indicate a shift in occupation from the southern to the northern end of the site. Over 90% of the Roman material came from the north. The more mixed assemblage of fine table wares at the northern end of the site could have been deposited in features closer to the centre of domestic activity in both the Late Iron Age/Early Roman and Late Roman phases of occupation. The southern area, outside the settlement boundary in the Late Iron Age and on the periphery of the Late Roman settlement, had a greater distribution of coarse wares, which can be seen as the result of different activities taking place, possibly manuring of the enclosures, particularly during the Roman period.",396,10,1,7,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24042,"No weights provided. The Roman pottery ranges in date from the later 1st century, indicated by the presence of late 1st century samian from Gaul, to possibly the 4th century. The majority of the contexts date to the 3rd and mid-late 3rd century. The highest percentage of the assemblage, with Nene Valley products forming the second largest group. The latter consists mainly of Nene Valley grey and colour-coated wares, but also a small proportion of sandy grey wares, probably Nene Valley products (NVGY). Shell tempered wares are mainly represented by Dales-ware types, but also those similar to the Bourne-Greetham repertoire - previously noted at Market Deeping, Stainfield, Morton and Thurlby sites. Mortaria, mainly Nene Valley and Mancetter Hartshill types; amphorae - wine containers from South Gaul (PE47); and samian from South, Central and Eastern Gaul are represented within the assemblage. There is a range of fine wares, mainly Nene Valley colour-coats but also rough-cast beakers. Cream ware flagons are also present, but the majority of the wares are cooking vessels in grey and shell-tempered fabrics - the latter mainly Dales-ware type jars (JDW). The presence of several large thick sherds indicates storage vessels.",734,,5,11,42,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24043,Some of the pottery identified as Iron Age could also be mid-Saxon in date. No weights are provided.,22,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24044,"Only two contexts without post-Roman sherds. The presence of Nene Valley colour coated ware gives a broad date of late 2nd at the earliest into the 3rd century. Shell-gritted sherds were commonest. Most of the rest were Nene Valley products, grey and colour-coated, and the pottery in general is as would be expected for the area The only clearly datable vessel type is a low bead-and-flange bowl in a version of NVGW, which would fit with a late 2nd into the 3rd century date range, probably more 3rd century. There are no sherds necessarily later than the early to mid 3rd century.",40,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24045,A tiny assemblage of 7 sherds. No weight provided. Assemblage not earlier than early C3rd; broadly C3rd/C4th. Grey ware and NVCC.,7,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24046,"The pottery was not distinguished by period and so the quantification here is based upon those which are clearly or probably IA or RB in date. Only single sherds of amphorae, mortaria and samian were recorded.",116,4,1,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24047,"The varied content, fine vessels and imports suggest fairly high status rubbish. The range covers most vessels to be expected from an occupation site, from tablewares to cooking and storage vessels. The condition is good, most sherds being fairly fresh. Non-local wares included a single samian vessel, a decorated beaker of form 67 from South Gaul, represented by 4 sherds, the base showing the kiln grits still in situ suggesting it had barely been used. A Flavian date is probable. 4 colour-coated sherds from a rough-cast beaker (clay rough-casting), in a fine cream fabric with dark coating. This is more likely to be from Cologne than a local product, and is almost certainly a cornice-rimmed type. An early to mid 2nd century date is feasible. All the other vessels are likely to come from the Nene Valley and general area. These comprise vessels in SLGY South Lines. Grey ware, indeterminate GREY fabrics, many of which would fit into the general area. SLCR South Lines. Cream ware, SLSH South Lines. Shell-gritted ware, and the relatively rare LOND, London ware. This last is almost without question made in the area of the Nene Valley; the fabric is generally very close to that of SLGY, although the fabric colour is somewhat darker",68,1,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24048,Only  a few fragments were recovered. The pottery recovered was 2nd to 3rd century in date.,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24049,No pottery,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24050,"Apart from imported samian and the dales ware shell-gritted jar, virtually all the pottery is likely to have come from the neighbourhood, the most important suppliers being the potters making shellgritted cooking and storage jars (SLSH) at 38%, the Nene Valley at 33% and other South Lincolnshire potters at about 14%. The London type ware is almost certainly a local product, and several of the sherds archived as unsourced GREY may well be atypical products of local kilns. The samian sherds included a Central Gaulish bowl with a potter's name stamp.",768,12,,2,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24051,"A solitary sherd of South Gaulish samian is evidence for some 1st century activity in the area, but the bulk of the pottery was 2nd century, extending into the latter part of the 3rd century. The fabric assemblage differs in its content to that seen at the MHB96 site (database number 24050), mainly due to the later dating emphasis. The only positive sherds from outside the immediate area were the samian sherds, but it is notable that there were far more miscellaneous grey fabrics, not positively sourced to the area. These clearly take the place of the earlier S. Lincs Grey, and suggest a diversification of sources in the later Roman period. The proportion of shell-gritted cooking and storage vessels is also lower than at MHB96.",232,3,,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24052,"No quantification of the assemblage. Samian, mortaria and amphorae were present but not quantified. The Roman pottery assemblage contains wares from Lincoln, e.g., mortaria and Swanpool oxidised wares. The assemblage as a whole resembles Lincoln assemblages rather than those from South Lincolnshire, e.g., Stainfield and Market Deeping. But there are cross-overs which make this a regionally important site. In terms of status, the presence of samian and other fine-wares including amphorae and mortaria suggests some relatively wealthy occupation. Also of regional importance is the presence of Dales wares, which are virtually absent from South Lincolnshire sites. No evidence for Iron-Age pottery was recovered from the site.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24053,"Only eight Iron Age sherds were retrieved from this site. Seven (21g) derived from a deposit of sandy clay (204) which formed the upper fill of ditch 203; six of these joined. A small abraded sherd (2g) was recovered from an ovoid feature, 209. All of the sherds from ditch 203 were manufactured from Fabric SHSM, but the sherd from feature 209 was in a coarser shelly fabric (SHMC). The six joining sherds from ditch 203 derive from a vessel with a high concave neck, terminating in a rounded direct rim and displaying on the outer face a slight but clearly discernible angularity of profile at the junction between the shoulder and neck. All sherds seem to derive from handmade vessels, and none shows traces of decoration. Close dating is not possible, although a later Iron Age date might be suggested on the basis of fabric comparisons with the material from the Harby enclosure. In addition, the clearly defined concave neck of the vessel from ditch 203 invites consideration of a typological link with the Late Iron Age tradition of 'necked bowls', attributable to contact with the new ceramic style which characterises the Aylesford-Swarling tradition (cf May, 1996, 413- 4: Type Group 4). The argument is undoubtedly a tenuous one, but if accepted a date in the late first century BC to mid-first century AD should be considered.",8,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24054,"The small quantity of pottery recovered had a wide date-range from the later 1st-early 2nd century through to the later 3rd or 4th century. The earliest vessels followed an Iron Age tradition, and the latest was a bowl of a type produced at the Rookery Lane kiln, Lincoln. An unusual occurrence was a bodysherd from a South Spanish amphora, possibly of the Haltem 70 type, the original contents considered to be defrutum or olives. This amphora type is normally confined to the 1st century in Britain. Such a find on a rural site is extremely rare, and while the sherd may have come from a re-used amphora, it suggests the site may be other than a normal rural homestead.",64,2,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
24055,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24056,"No weights provided. Aside from the samian the other sherds are NVCC and greyware. The sherds date from the 2nd to 4th century, the samian mid to late 2nd century, Rim, Drag 37.",9,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24057,"All sherds but one were Iron Age and of characteristic 'native' Iron Age type, being shell tempered coarse wares. One sherd was of a wheel thrown Romano-British ware.",10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24058,"All sherds were of late Iron Age to early Roman date, but probably not later than the mid-to-late 1st century AD.",92,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24059,"The small numbers of sherds, their generally fragmented and abraded condition (both making the identification of hand- or wheel-made sherds difficult), and the lack of diagnostically datable sherds limits conclusions. The jar or cooking pot rim fragment is probably wheel-made, although finishing with a slow-wheel or turntable is possible. The hand-made base from a similar type of vessel is a fairly standard Iron Age type, and is burnished on the moulding and slightly above it. While the date of the base could extend back into the Middle Iron Age, both of these would fit into a Late Iron Age tradition, which continues into the Roman period. The occasional grey sherd in standard Roman quartz-gritted fabrics cannot be dated closely",44,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24060,One sherd of LIA pottery. It is considered unusual due to its use of iron slag as a temper.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24061,"The pottery from the first intervention is virtually all of later Roman date, broadly from the mid 3rd century into the late 4th century. Very little earlier pottery can be certainly identified except for three sherds of Central Gaulish samian, datable to the mid to late 2nd century. A number of vessels were from the late Roman pottery industry centred around the Rookery Lane and Swanpool kilns in Lincoln, including a classic Swanpool mortarium. These fit the overall dating. Also notable is the presence of five sherds of the late coarse fabric LCOA only seen in the latest deposits in Lincoln. The Nene Valley colourcoated wares included later Roman bowls and dishes, and a bodysherd from a late painted beaker with round indentations. The few PART sherds fit into the later phase of this fabric rather than that producing Parisian ware, and the Dales ware sherds and single BB2 bowl are consistent with the coastal location. Some of the shell-gritted sherds were not definitely from Dales ware jars, and included burnished bowls and dishes, usually confined to the later Roman period. There were no amphorae. The functional analysis is close to that from sites in Lincoln with a distinct late Roman emphasis, and thus has an urban emphasis, significant for any socio-economic assessment of the site. A further 41 sherds were recovered during the evaluation and watching brief off Hall Lane in 2001, ranging in date from at least the 2nd to the 4th century, though the largest groups produced pottery of late 3rd to 4th century date. The assemblage included 3 sherds of samian.",255,5,,1,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24062,"Although the occasional context has been given a tentative IA/Roman dating, there is no strong evidence, and most should be regarded as LIA+, the pottery being of a LIA type likely to continue into the Roman period.",369,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24063,"the dominant component of the assemblage as ordinary locally produced grey wares, although given the dating, little from the known North Hykeham kiln (Thompson 1958). The presence of only three sherds of samian, and a single sherd of colour-coated ware highlights the functional imbalance of the group towards kitchen vessels. Four separate mortaria are present, but as fragmentary abraded sherds except for the Mancetter-Hartshill rim of a hooked flange type. The other mortaria are probably of local origin. The three sherds of Central Gaulish samian were all abraded (including forms 33, a probable 31 and a curved bowl bodysherd). The amphora sherds were all Dressel 20, the South Spanish olive oil globular type, the fabric suggesting a 2nd century date rather than later, these were scrappy and abraded. An exceptional find is an unbroken small colour-coated folded beaker, which appears to be from the New Forest potteries, a very rare find for this area.",610,18,2,4,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24065,"The assemblage from the evaluation trenching was significantly smaller than that of the subsequent excavations with 376 sherds, 6kg. In the evaluation the two amphora sherds both come from the same type of amphorae, probably from Spain, but appear to be from two different vessels. The three mortarium sherds belong to a single mortarium, almost certainly from the late Swanpool kilns in Lincok, but lacking the common white-slip finish. The later excavated assemblage included 1698 sherds of late Iron Age and Roman date, 17.118kg. The assemblage indicates occupation in the 3rd century of relatively high quality, given the appearance of samian, colour-coated wares, imported amphorae (becoming rare on any site in the later 3rd century), and mortaria. Activity seems to start in the Iron Age, after which there appears to have been a break in occupation until perhaps the mid to late 2nd century, and thereafter continued through the 3rd century, and probably ceased relatively early in the 4th century. The occasional later 4th century sherd gives little evidence for significant occupation.",2074,23,4,9,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24066,"The earliest possible date would he in the latter part of the 2nd century, but most of the pottery fits a 3rd century date. There are no sherds necessarily much later than the mid 3rd century",346,6,1,4,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
24067,"A fairly large proportion of sherds show signs of misfiring as would be expected from a pottery production site. A few fragments of fired clay likely to have come from kiln superstructure occurred with the pottery, in addition to the quantity recovered from the site. The assemblage as a whole is as would be expected from the environs of a pottery production area. The analysis in terms of vessel types would be highly unusual for a normal domestic site, with the main class being open forms, bowls and dishes, and comparatively little in terms of jars, normally the commonest form. Analysis based on vessels represented by rims shows bowls and dishes to represent over 70% of the normal grey ware, the main fabric produced. 85 fragments of kiln fabric and furniture were also found. The dating of the pottery from these areas differs from that currently accepted for this pottery industry of c.AD 150-200. It seems clear that the Market Rasen pottery industry has a long-life, certainly starting in the 2nd century, but continuing through into the later Roman period. A single tazza sherd in greyware was found.",10913,351,,13,12,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24068,"No quantification. The range of forms suggests an Antonine date, broadly c AD 130/140 to perhaps AD170/200. Products included flanged bowls and dishes, the characteristic carinated beaker, narrow-necked jars or flasks, plain-rimmed dishes, wide-mouthed bowls (often of the neckless variety, pre-dating the main 3rd to 4th century forms so common in Lincolnshire), beakers (including the occasional sherd from a folded type), lug-handled jars, lid-seated jars (again a common Lincolnshire type, also made at the Roxby kilns), rusticated jars with linear rustication (often as relatively thin-walled vessels), bowls with small beads and flanges (not the later type), lids. Some large jars are probable, but no jars of the size classified as storage jars were seen. A single fragment of a jug with a folded rim (fabric with oxidized surfaces) occurred amongst unstratified material, which needs examination to check whether it is a kiln product. A flagon handle was also found. There is an admixture of coarser fabrics, alongside what may be viewed as the standard fabric, a sound well-fired grey fabric. Whether these coarser fabrics were made at these particular kilns is unclear, but a larger sample, particularly from such features as stokeholes, together with microscopic examination of the fabrics and inclusions should enable this question to be decided. A small number of oxidized sherds occur, some of these appear to have been the result of re-firing in an oxidizing atmosphere. The other well-known fabric from Market Rasen kilns, the so-called Parisian ware (Elsdon 1982), is certainly present in the material from the evaluation, although no stamped sherds were found.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24069,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24070,,72,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
24071,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24072,"The specialist writes 'This is a varied assemblage, as may be expected from a large village or small town'.",2287,56,25,23,100,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24073,,524,,,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24074,"Although middle IA pottery was found no late IA pottery was recovered and only the Roman pottery is included here. More mid IA pottery was recovered than Roman. The Roman pottery was predominantly 2nd to 3rd century, though the unstratified samian sherds are of late 1st century.",72,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24075,,242,5,1,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24076,The pottery was dominated by wares of 4th century in date.,1338,31,,22,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24077,"68 sherds of probable late Iron Age pottery were found along with 222 sherds of Roman pottery. The 2004 excavation and watching brief produced a further 139 sherds, ranging in date from the mid to late Iron Age (62 sherds) to the end of the 2nd century AD, including three sherds of samian.",290,,,2,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24078,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24079,"The Roman pottery reflects the local pattern in South Lincolnshire seen in the Fenland Project. This can be broadly summarised in that South Lincolnshire does not seem to have produced its own pottery on the same scale as North Lincolnshire and, apart from one kiln at Bourne Grammar School relied on importing materials. Much of this came from the major production centres of the Nene Valley in the Peterborough area and to a lesser extent from the Lincolnshire Wolds and Lincoln. More specialised pottery such as Samian and amphorae was imported from further afield and a limited number of wares, white ware and mortaria from the Mancetter/Hartshill kilns near Birmingham It is a remarkable feature of South Lincolnshire Roman sites that they often produce an unexpected proportion of good quality imported pottery, especially colour-coated and Samian wares. Around Bourne this should be less surprising if the settlement was of town status, perhaps an inland port with a wide-reaching trading pattern.",831,,2,6,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24080,,27,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24081,"The assemblage is consistent with a 3rd century date. This watching brief near the new Vets Hospital at Newport, Lincoln produced 21 sherds from only two contexts, the majority being in fresh condition. Exceptions are the rim sherd from a Central Gaulish cup and a fragment from a local greyware jar. The largest amount, 19 sherds, came from Context 048 consisting of unstratified material from an area of the trench displaying clearly pre-graveyard deposits at its base. These deposits included a large flat stone which was overlain by apparently burnt material. Two further sherds came from a layer of metalling just above natural, Context 034. Despite the small size of the group most of the sherds from Context 048 are diagnostic and likely to have been contemporary, dating to the mid-3rd century. Initially, the presence of Central Gaulish samian, which ceased to be imported into Roman Britain at the end of the 2nd century, may seem anomalous within this group. However this is not an unusual occurrence on sites from the City of Lincoln where Central Gaulish samian, in good condition, is frequently found in layers dating to the 3rd century. The remaining forms consist of at least two cooking vessels in Black-burnished ware 1 from a probable Dorset origin, and a Dalesware cooking jar in a shell-tempered fabric manufactured in North Lincolnshire. All the rims are sooted, some heavily. The presence of BB1, in particular, is frequently associated with a military presence. This combination of BB1 cooking pots together with these particular samian forms: a cup (Dr33), a plate (Drl8/31-31) and a decorated bowl (Dr37), occurs in the Roman military, barrack assemblages from the Minster Library extension, York, but in much larger quantities (Precious 1999). These vessels, together with a finely decorated Nene Valley, colour-coated beaker, may indicate a military connection at NPC00, possibly representing the remains of a legionary's individual issue.",21,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24082,"A total of 93 Iron Age sherds (0.961kg) and 7 Roman sherds were recovered. Many of the IA sherds had a broad date range of mid-to-late Iron Age, although some appears to be demonstrably late Iron Age. The Roman sherds were of late 1st century or more probably 2nd century in date.",100,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24083,No report on the IA pottery is available. 4 LIA/early Roman sherds were recovered.,4,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24084,"The site produced a small assemblage of pottery - 50 sherds, consisting of very small groups from five contexts, and consequently, broadly ranging in date from the later 2nd to at least the early 3rd century. Context 44 is the largest of the groups (42 sherds), and produced the most diagnostic vessels from the site, dating from the later 2nd to the early 3rd century. There are no direct sherd links but vessels in the same greyware fabric with an obvious 'sandwich' effect came from Contexts 25 and 29 (GRSAN).",50,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24085,"Only 4 sherds of Roman pottery were recovered in the first evaluation phase. Subsequent trial trenching produced a further 9 sherds of pottery, but all was considered to be residual and probably the result of agricultural manuring. However, samian and mortaria were found (but not quantified in the evaluation reports). The overall impression is of activity mostly in the later Roman period, mid 3rd century onwards, but with a scatter of earlier material.",52,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24086,"The site produced a large assemblage of Roman pottery giving 936 sherds weighing 12213 grams. This total includes a small amount recovered from various samples. The bulk of the material falls within a close date-span of the early to mid 2nd to the early 3rd century, though the earliest pottery from the site is of LIA/early Roman date. This date is mainly based on the substantial presence of Nene Valley grey wares, a ware that was first manufactured in small quantities in the early 2nd century (mainly beaker forms) with the floruit being from the later 2nd into the 3rd century.",936,12,,2,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24088,"This assemblage is too small for detailed analysis, but appears to be a late Roman group, probably confined in dating to the later 3rd and 4th centuries. The range of vessels is consistent with what would be expected on a rural site of that period, although the inclusion of the parchment dish suggests a higher status site within the vicinity. The presence of only a single mortarium is perhaps unusual, although this may be due to the small sample size. The absence of any amphorae is acceptable for a late Roman rural site. The total absence of any colour-coated beakers could be taken to indicate an exclusively 4th-century date, but this could be due to the small size of the sample, or alternatively, it could be an indication of a low status site. This latter alternative would, however, be at odds with the presence of the fine parchment ware dish. Vessels likely to indicate earlier occupation in the 3rd century would include samian, probably Nene Valley grey ware, and certainly the occasional colour-coated beaker.",349,,,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
24089,"At least 108 vessels are represented on the basis of rims, bases and diagnostic sherds. All except one sherd of the Roman pottery are in grey fabrics, with a small amount of variation, some almost certainly from firing differences and mishaps. 12 fragments of kiln furniture (weighing 1642g) and 2 fragments of fired clay (13g) were also found. Many sherds were under-fired, with clear signs of being waste from pottery production, partially oxidized, with crazing of surfaces, and some distortion. Of particular interest is the fact that there appears to be little evidence for later Roman vessels in this small collection. This is important in view of the widespread evidence for pottery production in Market Rasen on the one hand, and the lack of evidence for any settlement site on the other. Spatial differences between assemblages from the kiln area are therefore especially interesting, and the apparent absence of later material from this group may suggest that it is early in the sequence of pottery production in Market Rasen, known to extend from the 2nd to the 4th centuries.",135,4,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24090,"The site produced a moderate sized assemblage of Roman pottery consisting of 575 sherds weighing 7301.5 gms, ranging in date from the late Iron Age to the late 4th century AD. Pottery assigned from the Iron Age to the early Roman period consists of a few very friable fragments of shell-tempered ware. Definite 1st century pottery is represented by 2 sherds of South Gaulish samian, but these abraded sherds are residual within contests with later Roman wares. Two fresh sherds of early 2nd century samian from Les Martres de Veyre are also residual. Other 2nd century samian from the Lezoux kilns in Central Gaul occurs either as the only representative or with one or two undiagnostic sherds within a context. There is a gradual increase in the amount of Roman pottery present from the mid 2nd to 3rd century - 39 sherds; then in the 3rd century - 64 sherds; increasing to 76 sherds in the 3rd, probably mid 3rd, to the 4th century. However the bulk of the material is 4th century in date - 267 sherds, mainly the product of Context 1901 which produced 215 sherds. There is also a good sized group of mid to late 4th century wares - 81 sherds.",602,8,3,3,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24091,"The emphasis of the Roman pottery is earlier than seen in several other recent interventions into Navenby. The dating for the demolition deposit cannot be closely defined, but probably lies within the range of the later 2nd to 3rd century. There are no sherds for which a 4th century date is applicable.",82,2,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
24092,"Over 90% of the material was grey ware with Parisian wares, Oxidised wares and Iron Age tradition coarse fabrics forming only 1 % or more of the material. Very few sherds of mortaria and Samian wares were recovered from the site.",9991,313,,10,9,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24093,"The site produced evidence for activity from the Iron Age, probably but not certainly, the Late Iron Age, some possible 2nd century sherds, and more dating to the mid 3rd century or later. There is no positive evidence for 4th century pottery. The assemblage is too small to draw many conclusions about the occupation which produced it, but the range of fabrics and vessel types would fit a rural farmstead, the main cooking vessel being the dales ware jar, all examples having burning and sooting indicative of cooking. There is only a single fragment of a mortarium and sparse fine wares. The absence of any sherds of amphorae is consistent with the main activity centring on the 3rd century. The fresh nature of the pottery from the ditch suggests an occupation site relatively nearby.",313,5,,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24094,A single sherd of Nene Valley ware was found.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24095,"An assemblage of 143 Iron Age and Roman pottery was recovered. The evidence for the bulk of the material dating to the Late Iron Age period relies on the presence of several vessels which can be paralleled amongst the Late Iron Age material from Dragonby. 27 of the sherds were Roman. The Roman pottery consists of more precisely datable sherds. A single oxidised sherd is of grog-tempered ware, a fabric of probable Iron Age origin that may have continued in production into the early Roman period. However, the bulk of the material is 2nd century in date, most probably dating from the 1st quarter of the 2nd century, c. AD 120. This is based on the presence of a Cream ware flagon with a prominent top ring, a sherd of Central Gaulish samian, and the curved rim of a beaker in colour-coated ware. Specifically late Roman pottery is absent but a sherd of Black-burnished 1 could have continued in manufacture into the later 3rd to 4th century.",143,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24096,1 sherd of greyware was found.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24097,"Mid-to-late Iron Age pottery included 7 sherds and there were 156 sherds of Roman pottery. The assemblage spanned the Roman period with an emphasis on the 3rd and 4th centuries. The overall impression is that the lack of amphorae, the low quantities of imported finewares (the high quantity of late Nene Valley finewares is a regional particularity affected by the omnipresence of the Nene Valley industry in the local market and does not reflect any special site status) and the functional pattern suggest a basic rural site.",163,6,,7,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24098,"The pottery evidence suggests that the site was occupied between the 3rd and 4th centuries AD, with the main thrust of activity taking place during the 3rd century.",176,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24099,"The overwhelming majority of the pottery was Roman, with just 15 sherds of probable Iron Age pottery. The pottery was primarily of mid-3rd century and later. The Roman assemblage is largely drawn from the Nene Valley, as can be expected at that time when the Nene Valley kilns were at the peak of production, and the content is consistent with occupation on a rural site in the area, as evidenced by its similarity to groups at Orton Hall Farm in the heart of the Nene Valley.",488,10,,5,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24100,"The large assemblage ranges in date from the late Iron Age to the mid-4th century. Samian sherds amounted to 3% of the total pottery assemblage. The most notable feature of the fabrics is the sheer quantity coming definitely from the Nene Valley kilns, comprising the colour-coated, parchment, grey wares and mortaria, accounting for 40-41% of all pottery. Notable finds include a number of fragments of crucibles, mostly with molten red deposits. There is also a mould fragment, with impressions of a strip of fine decoration.",6621,124,10,90,207,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24101,"1960 sherds (3.5143kg) were found during the 2005 investigations and 268 (approx. 8kg) during the earlier investigations. The assemblages of both sites contain Conquest period wares, but the assemblage from the 2003 investigation has an earlier bias with several sherds of Late Iron Age date. This is not surprising as this site lies in the eastern portion of the Old Sleaford, Late Iron Age and Romano British settlement. Both sites show continuous occupation into the 4th century, and both have examples of rare vessels with either unusual types of decoration or rare fabrics. The pottery ranged in date from Conquest period through to 4th century and was considered to be evidence for relatively high status occupation from the mid-2nd century to the very late 4th century. A small group of imported wares, mortaria and fine, colour-coated wares, mainly from the Nene Valley kilns, attest to the relatively high status of the occupants of the site. Oxidised wares and Cream wares are relatively well represented, mainly as flagon forms. Less common forms consist of fragments of strainer and a sherd from a cheese press. A small quantity of early Anglo-Saxon pottery was also recovered.",1228,12,27,14,34,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24102,"The pottery assemblages from the different phases of archaeological intervention were different, with the group from the earliest archaeological intervention predominantly a Late Roman assemblage with a higher proportion of non-local wares, suggesting a more affluent community. The assemblage from the later excavation was not well represented by fine wares and specialist wares, indicating this is a largely utilitarian coarseware group of pottery from a community with some limited access to imported goods. Of the 1825 sherds recovered during the 2005 excavations 25 were prehistoric, 300 were transitional (late Iron Age to early Roman) and 1500 were Romano-British.",2059,34,,7,41,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24103,"Three contexts produced sherds of Iron Age gritty ware that is dated from the mid-1st to the early 2nd century -the earliest Roman pottery from the site. All of the sherds are wheel made suggesting a date towards the end of the 1st century. One of these contexts also contained the only sherd of 1st century South Gaulish samian from the site. The groups from Contexts 5004 and 5704 consist of smashed vessels, suggesting that they were primary depositions, and are dated to the mid-4th and late 3rd to 4th centuries, respectively.",108,3,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24104,A small assemblage of 9 sherds were found during the initial evaluation. 2 further sherds of grey ware were found during the subsequent evaluation.,11,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24105,"This small assemblage therefore has many problems of interpretation, with evidence for very early Roman activity, possibly connected with the Roman army, sparse abraded and fragmentary pottery of 2nd century date, not closely datable, and only the occasional sherd likely to date to the 3rd century. The main evidence is from site 1 in field 4. The occurrence of native tradition cooking vessels in this area would occasion little surprise. It is the association of these vessels, known to have been used extensively by the Roman army in the legionary fortress at Lincoln, with South Gaulish decorated samian, a cream flagon of early type and sherd from a rusticated jar in a fabric known from the legionary fortress deposits that is extremely unusual. Occasional sherds of similar pottery have been found at Old Winteringham on the Humber estuary (Rigby & Stead 1976, figs 74, 75, no 28) but a military establishment is more likely in that location. Without further evidence from the area, it is impossible to speculate as to how this pottery arrived on this site, too close to the legionary fortress at Lincoln for a military site. Soldiers on exercises or duty from the fortress might make a temporary camp, but pottery vessels would be highly unlikely. Moreover, these earlier sherds are associated with 2nd century pottery, so some interaction between military and civilian may be considered.",102,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24106,"The date range for the assemblage from Field 13 appears to be the early to mid 2nd century through to the later 3rd century, possibly into the 4th century.",204,4,,1,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24107,"149 sherds, weighing 2.975kg were found. The date-range for the assemblage as a whole appears to be mid to late 2nd century through to the 4th century, possibly relatively late 4th century.",149,3,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24108,"The presence of possible burials close to the ditch system, where the pottery was located, may indicate that this is a ritual assemblage. Several of the vessels are heavily sooted on the exterior, but not over the broken edges, indicating that they were used over a relatively fierce heat. One of these vessels is a mortarium with a heavily sooted rim and was normally used for grinding ingredients. Another example is a Cream ware flagon, used for pouring liquids, that is also sooted on the exterior. Both these vessels are rarely used for cooking purposes. These unusually sooted examples may also indicate ritual use or destruction. There is no external dating for the assemblage, for example imported samian ware, but there is an absence of pottery common in mid to late 2nd century groups, such as black-burnished wares. Therefore a later 1st to early 2nd century date seems secure for this group with, perhaps, a late 1st century bias. Most importantly, this assemblage is of homogenous date and appears to be a single event. The pottery from the 2005 watching brief confirmed an early to mid-2nd century date. A Dressel 20 amphorae sherd was present. There are no fine wares from this site but the presence of sherds from an amphora containing olive oil from Southern Spain suggests a degree of refinement, and access to markets supplying imported pottery.",181,5,1,5,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
24109,"Pottery recovered from fieldwalking and evaluation trenching amounted to 172 Roman sherds. Pottery identified as Romano-British  consists mainly of coarse greywares, and the possibility exists that further sherds remain unidentified amongst the Late Saxon and medieval greywares. Diagnostic sherds are scarce but appear to represent exclusively jars. Oxidised sandy wares are also present in small quantities; two or three sherds from mortaria, gritted with iron slag, could be Nene Valley products. There are also a few sherds of grog-tempered wares. Finewares comprise a few sherds of samian (no further quantification in the report) and colour-coated ware, the latter possibly from the local kilns at South Carlton.",172,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24110,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24111,"18 sherds, 0.427kg, including a single sherd of samian. The pottery was of 2nd to 4th century in date.",18,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24112,The pottery was recovered during fieldwalking survey and was predominantly of 2nd to 3rd century in date.,433,6,14,2,31,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24113,"Roman pottery was recovered during the initial watching brief but the material was lost and no report is available. A sherd of possible samian was recovered. 376 sherds were recovered during the subsequent watching brief. For a small group, the number of vessels surviving fairly substantially suggests a rubbish deposit, probably of secondary deposition given the fragmentation, with a relatively close chronological range, making this a valuable group in this area, where so little is known of the local pottery. The functional range is mixed, indicating occupation, and the absence of samian or mortaria is consistent with the size of the group and their relative rarity. Chronologically it ranges possibly from the Iron Age, through to the late 3rd or possibly 4th century, but the only later pottery came from a subsoil sand layer, and the main group of pottery from the gullies dates to the mid 2nd century.",376,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24114,"The presence of definite, mainly legionary-type wares (CR, GRSA and LEG), suggests that the early legionary forces that occupied the City of Lincoln may have deposited this pottery. These are mainly flagons, and jars. The presence of amphorae and imported samian ware indicates that the occupants had access to and could afford fine and rather exotic imported goods.",57,2,16,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
24115,"The notable features of the pottery assemblage can be summarised: that most sherds are unlikely to date after the mid 2nd century, and includes fabrics and vessels known from deposits in the legionary fortress in Lincoln, alongside South Gaulish samian, including a rare pre-Flavian cup of form Ritterling 9, early amphorae, Dressel 20 and Camulodunum 186 extending in date to the early 2nd century. The 2nd century vessels share many types in common with the Roxby kiln in North Lincolnshire, and some of the pottery from the Dragonby kilns of Trajanic-Hadrianic date (Rigby & Stead 1976, 136-9; Gregory 1996; Gregory & Swan 1996, fig 20.34). Also notable is the diversity of fabrics represented in the native type vessels, from coarse quartz-gritted grey, to IAGR, GROG and shell-gritted fabrics. The possibility of late Iron Age activity in the area cannot be excluded. The local mortarium was stamped.",501,12,7,4,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24116,"442 sherds of mid-to-late Iron Age pottery weighing 7.364kg were found. Dating for this pottery was broad, although a late Iron Age element was suggested by 3 globular vessels. 183 sherds of Roman pottery weighing 3.196 were found. The Roman pottery is fairly typical of domestic assemblage although the range of fabrics and forms was limited. This may be a reflection of the status of the settlement. If the Nene Valley wares can be counted as local, there were no non-local wares, suggesting that the supply of goods to the site from outside of the local area was limited. Earlier Iron Age and Bronze Age pottery was also represented.",625,11,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24117,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24118,,4,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24119,The amphora sherds are likely to have come from one vessel.,166,5,40,1,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24120,"The evaluation produced 92 sherds (1.937kg) of pottery. While the earliest sherds date to the late 1st to early 2nd century, most of this small group of pottery has a consistent early to mid-2nd century date. Imports include samian from South Gaul broadly datable to the 1st to early 2nd century and Central Gaul including a fragment from a decorated bowl form 37 from the curvilinear feature 310 which can be more closely dated to c. AD 125-150, report below. There is also an unusual Central Gaulish bowl from the pit or ditch terminal  with strange smeared decoration, At least two Dressel 20 (DR20) amphorae occur, one body sherd possibly dating to the late 1st or early 2nd century, while the other sherd, a rim, is more likely to be early to mid 2nd century. The mortaria sherds all come from a single mortarium with a single damaged potter's stamp made in Lincolnshire (MOLO) by the potter Q. IVSTIVS CRESCENS, who worked in the period c. AD. 90-110/120, the complete stamp reading QIVS CRES. Only the pottery reports for three seasons of excavation were available (1 season is therefore missing). Only approximate sherd counts were available for some of the seasons: 467 from 2005;  942 from 2006; 852 from 2007. No individual fabric counts were available. The summary suggests that the assemblage is strongly related to that occurring in Lincoln, particularly in the 2nd century. The early imported fine wares from Lyon and Central Gaul provide very important new evidence. The dating for both is Neronian rather than later, although both could be still around into the later 1st century, c. AD 75. As fine table wares, such vessels could have a relatively long life. Further evidence is desirable to confirm the earliest date for the occupation on the site. There are no sherds for which a 4th century date is applicable. An unusual find is an unstratified mortarium, which appears to have the remains of fugitive red pigment on the upper part of the interior; there are also similar traces of a light red-brown deposit on the exterior. This is very unusual, and while mortaria are known to have been used for grinding pigments for plaster decoration, the traces on this vessel are confined to the upper part of the wall.",2261,2,2,11,35,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24121,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24122,"A small assemblage of just 7 sherds was recovered. All were mid-late 3rd century, apart from a sherd of samain (Dr 37) , which was 2nd century. Other fabrics were grey ware and Nene Valley grey ware.",7,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24123,"Assessment only, no quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24124,"The 2006 excavated assemblage was of predominantly 3rd to 4th century in date, the most diagnostic being a sherd of Nene Valley beaker from dating to at least the 3rd century. A small number of sherds of mid-2nd century date were also recovered, as well as sherds from a rusticated jar of late 1st to early 2nd century date. The 2002 evaluation assemblage included sherds from a latticed cooking pot of early-to-mid 2nd century and a single sherd of samian.",121,1,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24125,"Imports to the site included samian from both Central and East Gaul, all from plain vessels, and sherds from a single Dressel 20 Spanish olive oil amphora. These sherds, from either the upper or lower part of the body had an irregular hole, which had been plugged with a lead repair. Although the fabric is not the standard later fabric, it is probably in the later range of importation, towards the later 2nd century, but these vessels are commonly re-used and have a long life. Nene Valley colour-coated ware was well represented. Another vessel probably from outside the area is a wheel-thrown copy of a dales ware jar in shellgritted fabric. The range of fabrics is as would be expected from a later Roman urban assemblage. Apart from the Central Gaulish samian, and possibly the Dressel 20 amphora, all the other vessels date to the later Roman period, 3rd to 4th century, with definite later 4th century activity represented by a bowl. Apart from a single sherd, the activity in the area is concentrated in the later Roman period, and represents normal domestic occupation.",122,4,6,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
24126,"The most striking aspect of the fabrics is the very high percentages of shell-gritted fabrics of Late Iron Age date, accounting for 57% sherd count, and over 60% on weight. Also of paramount importance to any assessment of the site is the occurrence of terra nigra and white-wares imported from Gallo-Belgica, Northern France. These make it quite clear that important Iron Age deposits occur on this site.",737,20,2,4,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24127,"A notable feature of the pottery assemblage was the presence of Terra Rubra, a rare import of the Claudian period, suggesting a site of high status. Another very rare vessel was used for parting and refining metals and was part of a metal working assemblage, the only example of Late Iron Age to early Roman date from Lincolnshire. Pottery from the site was exclusively late Iron Age to early Roman.",1202,12,9,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
24128,18 sherds (85g) of Iron Age pottery were recovered and 33 (123g) Romano-British.,51,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24129,The most significant vessels from the site are those that reflect the industrial activity. There are numerous triangular-rimmed crucibles of Iron Age date for the site.,722,11,3,3,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24130,"The samian and mortaria include stratified and unstratified material. The figures are approximations as the report was not specific about some of the numbers of fragments. The report listed only the stamped amphorae, and the figure is therefore an underestimate of the total number of amphora sherds. Terra nigra and terra rubra were also present. The general number of pottery sherds is also an estimate as the report did not provide the quantities succinctly and was not always clear on the number of fragments present. 4 sherds of graffito were present, on flagon, amphora and samian sherds. A further 1168 sherds (25kg) recovered in the later work.",1526,33,6,30,151,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24131,"Pottery evidence suggests that occupation spanned the late Iron Age through to the early 3rd century. A small number of mid-Iron Age sherds were also recovered.  This is an important and large body of evidence for occupation in this area during the early years of the Roman Conquest. The influence of Late La Tène traditions suggests a site of some status. This is indeed the case for the Roman pottery where imported wares from the Continent, and finer beakers are an indication of moderate to high status settlements. One vessel may have been used as a lamp holder.",990,25,,11,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24132,"Early Roman pottery is absent from the site, and there is only a scatter of pottery that can be assigned a broad mid 2nd to 3rd century date. This site has produced a good, relatively homogenous example of 4th and late 4th century pottery assemblage, with only a small proportion of residual earlier material - for example Cream and samian ware. One vessel, a fragment of very burnt, possibly oxidised ware with what appears to be madder dye on the interior is indicative of some industrial use.",463,9,2,5,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24133,"Apart from 2 sherds of possible prehistoric pottery the pottery assemblage produced no evidence for occupation before the early to mid 2nd century. There were no mid to late 4th century wares from the site, suggesting that it went out of use, possibly at the end of the 3rd century, but more definitely by the early 4th.The presence of a high proportion of Continental imports, samian from several sources in Gaul and Dressel 20 amphorae form Southern Spain, as well as a higher than average quantity of fine wares, including several colour-coated beakers from the Nene Valley kilns, emphasises that this is a site of high status.",217,5,3,8,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24134,"The pottery ranges in date from the 2nd century on the evidence of a chip of samian from Central Gaul (Lezoux), the lower part of a bowl or jar with a possible carinated profile, and a fragment from a dish with a chamfered base, all only broadly dated to the mid to later 2nd century. A mortarium fragment was unfortunately too fragmentary to identify the type, but has an upstanding bead, and may be of a type made in one of the Nene Valley kilns. The fabric is atypical of the usual Nene Valley mortaria but has traces of slag trituration which would suggest that source, and judging from what remains of the rim, it may be a later 3rd century type. A similar date range can be applied to fragments of possibly three dales ware shell-gritted jars. These derive from the Humberside region, and although rare in south Lincolnshire, they undoubtedly arrived by coastal trading, confirmed by occasional examples from coastal sites in Norfolk and on Hadrian's Wall. The pottery therefore has a date range of mid 2nd to later 3rd century, bearing in mind that dales ware cooking pots continue in use into the 4th century.",15,0,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24135,"The most notable find is a residual fragment of a patera handle  These are very rare finds, often associated with military sites in Roman Britain, or Romanised urban centres, and belong to shallow dishes with flanged rims, often decorated, broadly copying bronze originals. The usage of this type of vessel is in the performance of ritual offerings and sacrifice. The type is purely continental, probably deriving from the eastern part of the Roman Empire (Greene 1977, 123), with many parallels from continental sites. Apart from early finds at the legionary works depot at Holt (for Chester) and from York, they occur at Colchester and London. Given the history of Ancaster, it would seem most likely that this derives from the military period rather than the later civil settlement, and is an important find. Whilst the patera fragment is early, the general assemblage was of later Roman date and the patera fragment is residual within a later context.",19,0,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24136,"Although small the pottery assemblage provided good evidence for mid to late 3rd century occupation at this site. The bulk was composed of primarily local grey ware fabrics in a range of forms. The assemblage also included Dales type and at least two fine ware beakers in Nene Valley colour-coated style indicating a settlement that had access to markets that imported pottery from the Peterborough area, and were sophisticated enough to want good quality fine wares. The bulk of the vessels consisted of cooking wares, with some oven-to-tableware in the form of plain rimmed dishes. Also included was a handled jar that may have been used for holding liquids, and there were several beakers used for drinking. There were no imported wares at this site, which is mainly a reflection of the later Roman date, but also of a rural rather than higher status occupation. However, there were at least two fine ware beakers in Nene Valley colour-coated ware with rouletted decoration indicating a settlement that had access to markets that imported pottery from the Peterborough area, and were sophisticated enough to want good quality fine wares. A beaker sherd in the same fine fabric as Parisian-type ware but without any stamped decoration also fits within this category.",70,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24137,"The samian and mortaria include stratified and unstratified material. The figures are approximations as the report was not specific about some of the numbers of fragments.  The general number of pottery sherds is also an estimate as the report did not provide the quantities succinctly and was not always clear on the number of fragments present. This figure is also likely to be an underestimate. A group of tesserae made from samian were present in one of the mosaics. No amphorae are listed in the report, although it is possible that they were recovered.",365,,,38,104,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24138,"The assemblage ranged in date from Late Iron Age to Romano-British, with the majority (141 sherds) being Roman.",189,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24139,"The date range for the Roman period starts with the Central Gaulish samian in the 2nd century, both tiny flakes, while the bulk of the pottery belongs to the later Roman period, broadly mid 3rd century onwards, although there is little for which an exclusively 4th century date is applicable.",90,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24140,"The most notable feature of this pottery is the extremely high percentage of fine wares, Nene Valley colourcoated ware and parchment ware. Although the samian indicates some later 2nd century activity, most pottery belongs within the 4th century, suggesting a later Roman date for the features.",88,1,1,3,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24141,"The bulk of the material from the site is in fairly fresh condition and of homogenous, mid 3rd to 4th century date. This, together with the fairly high sherd/weight ratio of 16 gms, and the presence of a larger sherd giving a complete profile, suggests that this group may be a primary deposit.",36,1,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
24142,"Apart from dales ware coming from the Humber area, the only sherd from outside the area is a fragment from a bowl or dish in Nene Valley colour-coated ware, unstratified. Occupation appears to be mainly in the later Roman period, essentially 3rd century, with the possibility of some 2nd century activity. The only sherd which might extend the date into the 4th century is the Nene Valley colour-coated sherd, but this is from a type, probably a dish, which starts in the later 3rd century and continues into the 4th century.",66,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24143,"118 sherds of Iron Age pottery of mid-late Iron Age date were found and 24 sherds of Roman pottery of 2nd to 3rd century date, with occasional earlier sherds were found. Mortaria and samian were present but not quantified.",142,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24144,"281 sherds of late Iron Age pottery were recovered, probably dating to the period immediately before the conquest. Five sherds of Romano-British pottery were recovered. The only sherd with any dating information is a grey ware sherd of 2nd century date.",286,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24145,"One sherd of late IA pottery was found, whilst the others were all Roman and of late 2nd to 4th century in date.",13,0,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
24146,The assemblage was predominantly of mid-2nd to 3rd century with a smaller number of 4th century sherds.,83,3,,4,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24147,"The pottery assemblage is the earliest dated group from Market Rasen, producing a consistent date of early-to-mid 2nd century AD. Overall kiln fabrics account for up to 93% of the pottery. Forms were predominantly jars.  The main fabrics produced at Market Rasen are the grey wares. There is a notable paucity of Parisian ware found in excavations of other Market Rasen kilns. Samian is, however, better represented, and includes a notable collection of South Gaulish sherds, only previously seen in the assemblage from the 1960s excavations, together with three vessels from Les Martres-de-Veyre, and two from Lezoux. Five mortaria occur, two of which are stamped, one made by the potter Catto, who worked at the South Carlton kilns while the other is only the edge of a stamp on a grey mortarium, which seems to be a local product. Another grey mortarium is too burnt for certainty as to its origin.",3556,103,,9,12,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
24148,"All vessels dated from the early/mid 2nd century AD to mid/late 3rd century AD. The assemblage was dominated by shell-tempered wares, which collectively represented 42.1% of the entire assemblage. On first look, the pottery from this site appears to be a 'typical' Roman domestic assemblage, which is dominated by jars of varying size. However, the assemblage is more diverse than many with a range of vessel forms present, although this could be simply be due to the size of the assemblage.",4187,88,5,7,83,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24149,"No detail in the pottery report. Pottery appears to be of late Iron Age to early Roman in date, with some 3rd century sherds.",446,,6,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
24150,"Humberside Archaeology data: assemblage entirely typical of assemblages from North Lincs - most of local manufacture. No quantification in the Humberside Archaeology Report, though samian present as well as mortaria. Northamptonshire Archaeology Evaluation data: A small number of Iron Age sherds could be of any Iron Age date. Three aspects stand out in the fabrics: the paucity of fine wares, particularly samian given the 2nd century dating and colour-coated wares later; the absence of mortaria and the source of much of the coarse wares to the west across the Wolds. The pottery assemblage was believed to be one of low status, with a scarcity of fine wares and a limited range of vessels. There is no definitively 1st century or 4th century pottery, most fitting into the 2nd and 3rd century. This would suggest on available evidence that there was a break in occupation between the Iron Age and later Roman activity on the site.",765,22,2,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24151,"The assemblage from the building excavation provides good dating evidence for a settlement establishing itself from the late Iron Age into the Post-Conquest period. There is a range of regional Late Iron Age fabrics and forms. Although there are several examples of finer Late Iron Age vessels with the carinations and cordons typical of this period there are no imported wares or Romano-British finewares within this assemblage. This indicates a settlement of moderate, but not low, status. The presence of flagons, albeit very abraded moulded, foot rings, together with a single sherd of grey ware, is the only evidence from the site for any degree of Romanisation. Pottery from the evaluation trenches to the east include Roman pottery of later date, ranging from the 2nd to 4th centuries. An unusual pottery sherd is not a mortarium but may be modelled on the form.",373,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24152,Pottery was predominantly Roman with 41 sherds of late Iron Age/early Roman pottery recovered. The pottery suggest a date range from the late Iron Age through to the 4th century.,633,15,4,2,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24153,"There is no 1st century or very late Roman pottery from the site. The earliest groups are 2nd century in date, and a small amount of Central Gaulish samian ware of 2nd century date provides external dating for the assemblage. This assemblage is unusual for the high proportion of pottery manufactured at the Nene Valley kilns, in particular Nene Valley grey ware (NVGW), which occurs in groups from all areas of the site. Dating of the Roman pottery is complex, and mainly relies on the proportions of the individual form types and fabrics of the Nene Valley industries.",1703,21,18,8,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24154,"This assemblage contains important 1st- early 2nd century AD groups of pottery. Diagnostically later Roman material is absent. Along with the more typical iron Age Tradition' fabrics known from other sites of this period in the Sleaford area a number of vessels, most notably from ditch 104 (fill 103), suggest some of the Roman pottery may have been brought from the modern day Cambridgeshire/ Northamptonshire area. A number of vessels can be paralleled with published vessels from the Legionary fortress at Longthorpe, suggesting military contact. Previous work in the area produced groups of a similar date but also some material suggesting continued activity on the site into the late Roman period.",308,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24155,"A very small assemblage. One sherd of possible mortaria, one sherd of samian. 3 Iron Age sherds were found.",14,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24156,Just six sherds of Roman pottery were recorded. The datable sherds were of 4th century date.,6,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24157,"This assemblage is remarkable as it contains wasters and kiln fragments from a previously unknown, early Roman kiln site. Although the group gives limited information about the range of forms produced and the date of production it highlights the location of a kiln site. Few kiln assemblages from south east Lincolnshire have been studied and this small group is important as it is a potential production site for vessels found at other sites in the area. These finds highlights the regional importance of the site in the event of further work in the vicinity. One sherd, stylistically dating to the Late Iron Age, is in a fabric similar to the rest of the kiln products, and as such may have also have been produced in the kiln. The pottery mostly dates to the late 1st- early 2nd century with one context containing 2 handmade sherds in a late Iron Age style, which were probably still contemporary with the rest of the pottery. A greyware sherd associated with another group of pottery from a separate building plot suggests a slightly later date into the 3rd century.",40,1,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24158,Data from two evals. The pottery from this site contains material of 1st to early 2nd century date along with late Roman pottery including some sherds which date to the very late 4th century or ‘final’ man period. The groups of pottery from this site are what might be expected from a higher status Roman rural site in Lincolnshire with a few exceptions. The lack of samian from this group may merely be as a result of the sample size but imports present include a colour coated beaker and a mortarium from the Nene Valley and a single scrap of Dressel 20 amphora from southern Spain.,206,3,1,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
24159,This small group suggests early Roman occupation in the area.,11,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24160,"The pottery are a small group of Roman pottery which mostly dates to the late Roman period although there are a number of residual sherds dating to the 2nd century AD present. This assemblage is one of a growing number from the Barton and Barrow area. The pottery present suggests a Roman settlement was located in the vicinity of this site. The presence of Crambeck grey ware in this group is of interest as it is a rare find in Lincolnshire. Crambeck grey ware was manufactured in north Yorkshire and it appears it was mostly distributed north of the Humber-Mersey line but a small number of sherds have been found along the north Lincolnshire coast, perhaps as a result of coastal trade in other goods or as personal possessions. The range of forms present is typical of Roman sites in the area with a high percentage of jars or large bowls. There is single mortarium fragment from the Mancetter/Hartshill industry and three sherds of imported samian tableware. The majority of the pottery present was probably primarily used for cooking or storage.",54,1,,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24161,"An interesting small group of pottery was recovered during the strip map and sample investigation. The pottery ranges in date from the first or second to the fourth century, with most contexts dated to the third or fourth centuries. This is in contrast to the material recovered during the evaluation which yielded mostly second or third century pieces. Together these two groups suggest a long period of both industrial and domestic activity on the site during the Roman era. The dearth of imports, finewares or drinking paraphernalia may suggest a relatively low status level of occupation throughout the Roman period, perhaps on the periphery of a larger settlement. A sherd from a possible face pot has been included under specialist vessels.",67,2,,,1,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24162,The pottery is typical of rural settlement of the late Iron Age.  The presence of an imported sherd raises the possibility of a higher status settlement as such imports are uncommon on rural sites.  The rest of the assemblage and the near complete absence of any tableware may indicate that any settlement of higher social status may have been sited some distance from the excavations.,35,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24163,"No information on the pottery provided, other than that the assemblages from the main polygonal enclosure and the area of possible settlement adjacent to the trackway leading to the north both date from the mid-1st to late 2nd century AD and may be contemporaneous. The assemblage from the rectilinear enclosures to the south, in contrast, dates to the 3rd to late 4th century AD.",589,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24164,"486 sherds were of late Iron Age type and 294 were Roman. All Iron Age vessels appear to be classic late Iron Age types, many of which are likely to continue into the Roman period. All forms and fabrics are typical of late Iron Age pottery in Lincolnshire. One peculiarity in the assemblage is the absence of Roman pottery of 1st century date, possibly suggesting a gap in settlement, although also possibly variation in rubbish disposal. The main emphasis of the Roman pottery was on the 3rd century, just extending into the 4th century. The earliest Roman pottery is possibly early 2nd, more confidently mid-2nd century.",780,14,2,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
24165,All pottery was of 1st-2nd century in date and typical of Romano-British assemblages from rural sites in North Lincolnshire.,285,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24166,"The majority of the sherds were greyware. The forms and fabrics were common for late-first and second century assemblages in North Lincolnshire. Rusticated ware is often found on military sites, and its presence here may reflect a relationship with the fort at Kirmington. The material was indicative of an early 2nd century phase of activity at the site.",397,8,1,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
24167,"791 sherds of pottery from the excavation, a further 106 from the earlier evaluation.  Limited fine wares. Virtually all pottery was 2nd century, mostly early to mid-2nd century, with less of broadly late 2nd-3rd century. A fieldwalking assemblage included pottery with a wider chronological span, and included samian, though it is not clear how the fieldwalked material relates to that from the excavation.",897,18,2,1,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24168,"A few fragments of only broadly dated 1st millennium BC pottery were included within the assemblage, possibly Iron Age in date. Conquest period pottery is present in the assemblage, but rare, although there is a small group of pottery dating from the later 1st to 2nd century Pottery dating from the mid to late 2nd into the 3rd century is more common, but the largest group consists of wares dating from the mid 3rd to mid 4th century. There is no ceramic evidence for late 4th century occupation.",568,9,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24169,"The over-all date range of the assemblage is estimated at early 2nd through to the later 3rd century, possibly just into the 4th century. No sherds can be dated to the 1st century.",273,4,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24170,"383 sherds were found. No specialist report had been undertaken at the time of the interim report, and no further detail was available. Most sherds were Romano-British, with some possible Iron Age sherds.",383,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24171,"A small assemblage of 22 sherds were recovered, 12 of which belong to two individual vessels. The main emphasis of the pottery seems to indicate a mid to late 2nd century date for the occupation of the site.",22,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24172,"Only 8 sherds weighing 35g were recovered. The presence of fineware from central Gaul, the Nene Valley and the South Carlton kilns suggest a site of some status.",8,0,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24173,"Early material belonging to the first century is absent as is pottery dating to the mid-fourth century or later. Well-dated types such as the samian, mortaria and fine wares point to a date range from the early/mid-second century until the late third to early fourth century. The wares present suggest a relatively high status rural settlement with access to both imported and traded fine wares. No amphorae were present. The vessel types confirm this impression with a reasonable proportion of table ware. More than half the assemblage was made up of beakers, cups, bowls and dishes suggesting a high status within the rural settlement range on which jars normally form the greatest proportion of the total assemblage.",220,3,,4,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24174,"The presentation of the pottery in the report makes it unclear whether all sherds are listed. Residual material may not have been included in the report. The assemblage was characterised by cooking pots, flagons and bowls. No amphorae are mentioned in the report, although a Nene Valley mortaria and a fragment of samian are mentioned. The report implies that further samian may have been recovered from unstratified contexts, but if so these are not included in the report.",51,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24175,Pottery in the report was not well quantified and only 'outstanding examples' were illustrated and described. Several sherds of samian are illustrated and an amphora handle and a fragment of mortarium is discussed in the text.,,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24176,"The most important result of this evaluation has been to indicate late Iron Age to early Roman activity at Market Rasen, hitherto only hinted at by the appearance of 1st century South Gaulish samian. Assessment of the Market Rasen industry on available evidence has suggested the industry started in the late 1st to early 2nd century. The fabric and form of a late Iron Age tradition necked bowl appears to be the earliest vessel known to date. Why a pottery industry should develop at Market Rasen has been a mystery, since there has been no evidence for an existing settlement. Thus, any early evidence, as these vessels, is of considerable importance.",710,16,,1,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24177,"The assemblage is dominated by greywares, although finewares are well represented and a large proportion of samian ware is included in the group. Drinking vessels made up a large proportion of the assemblage, and pottery from the evaluation of the site was seen as evidence for feasting, probably in connection with funerary ritual. The high proportion of drinking vessels here may reflect this. Most of the material dated from the 2nd to 3rd centuries, with some 4th century material also represented. The assemblage as a whole was seen as relatively high status urban living and consumption, with possible evidence for funerary activities.",280,4,2,1,18,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24178,"The pottery specialist suggests that the overall ratios of jars to tableware and the proportions of amphorae and samian all suggest the site is urban rather than rural in character and are consistent with the status of Sleaford as a small town. This is at odds with the author of the report's interpretation of the site as a farmstead, although perhaps can be explained by the proximity of Sleaford. The pottery specialist suggests that activity represented in the excavated area clearly related to funerary rites and thus have particular characteristics relating to that function. Much of the pottery showed clear signs of a funerary function in the form of evidence for burning and scorching on the cremation pyres and of a function as an accompanying cremation urns and grave goods. This activity would appear to span much of the second century. Some of the burnt pottery included samian, which appears to have been included as a pyre good. The use of samian is of interest. Samian is rarely included on the pyre on cemetery sites and where present, the sites are predominantly military in character. The late third to fourth century group was rather too small for analysis but did show a rise in jars and bowls perhaps signalling a change in use of the site from funerary to domestic at this time or, more probably in the second half of the third century. Grey ware sherds made up the greatest proportion of the assemblage. The ceramics indicate activity on the site from the late pre-Roman Iron Age or Conquest period until the fourth century AD. Most of the contexts belonged to the earlier part of Roman period from the Conquest to the late second/mid-third century with the greatest number belonging to the early second to mid-third century. Only two contexts dated to the late third to fourth century.",546,10,37,3,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24179,"Apart from minor fabrics, the pottery divides between grey reduced wares, the standard product of the Swanpool and Rookery Lane kilns, and Nene Valley colour coated ware. The grey wares occur in more than one fabric, albeit all in known Swanpool pottery types and made locally, if not actually in the kiln found in trench 4. Since virtually all the coarse wares belong to the later Roman period, the single very abraded samian sherd from Trench 6 is a stray residual sherd. Apart from two vessels of Swanpool type, most mortaria are from the Nene Valley kilns. One deposit is extraordinary with its high content of colour-coated vessels, and impossible to understand in relation to the pottery production in the area on current evidence. The high average sherd weight suggests a primary rubbish deposit, and there is some evidence to suggest some unused vessels were deposited, rare in normal occupation debris.",677,35,,13,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24180,"Assessment only. Most pottery was of late Roman date, particularly the latter part of the 4th century, though pottery of mid-Roman date suggests some earlier occupation. The Lincoln Swanpool kilns supplied the bulk of the pottery including an unusually high proportion of mortaria. Romano-British wares from further afield mainly consist of colour-coated fine wares, but also include grey wares from the Nene Valley kilns, a mortarium from a probable Mancetter/Hartshill source and two examples of mortaria from the Oxfordshire kilns. Wares imported from the Continent are rare, consisting of two examples of Central Gaulish samian and a single very abraded sherd of Dressel 20 amphora from Baetica in Spain. Three small vessels may have had ritual associations.",599,23,1,25,2,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24181,"A mixed assemblage of LIA and Roman pottery, including samian, mortaria and amphorae. The overall date range is from LIA through to mid-late 3rd century, with very late 4th century sherds from unstratified levels.",1033,13,8,4,42,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24182,"Only 17 sherds, eight of which were unstratified finds. The stratified sherds were all shell-gritted except for a single grey vessel, wheel-made, with cordons. The shell-gritted include fine shell-gritted wares, possibly necked bowls, and certainly another cordoned vessel. This would suggest the late Iron Age. The unstratified sherds were not closely datable, but were probably of mid to late 2nd century date, possibly later.",17,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24183,"The pottery from the ring gullies can all be dated to the later Iron Age. The only evidence for Roman activity came from a larger curvilinear ditch but the bodysherds cannot be dated. There were several sherds grey with minimal shell inclusions, common in the late Iron Age, including carinated and cordoned vessels, probably necked bowls, and most of the shell-gritted sherds appeared to be wheel-made.",100,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24184,"Virtually all the sherds are of Iron Age date, and where identifiable, of later Iron Age. The shell-gritted Iron Age pottery included both hand- and wheel-made vessels, bowls, cooking vessels and a storage jar. A necked bowl is wheel-thrown in a silty grey fabric with occasional shell of a type probably confined to the latest Iron Age and continuing into the early Roman period.  The assemblage as a whole is directly comparable with Late Iron Age pottery occurring at Sleaford.",300,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24185,"All the pottery apart from two or three indeterminate Roman bodysherds in the subsoil was of Iron Age date, almost certainly from Late Iron Age activity. Both hand-made and wheel-thrown vessels occurred, almost all in shell-gritted fabrics.",186,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24186,All 196 sherds was of mid-to-late Iron Age and therefore not included here.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24187,"All the datable pottery from this field system belongs to the later Roman period, from the mid 3rd century onwards including a dales ware jar in a gritty fabric, together with specifically later 4th century sherds, such as sherds from a red-slipped mortarium (number of sherds uncertain) from the Oxfordshire kilns, a bead-and-flange bowl, double-lid-seated jars in a late coarse fabric known from the latest Roman deposits in Lincoln, and also in VESIC. A rarity is a strainer. There were no fine wares, 77% of the sherds being grey wares, probably mostly from the late Lincoln kilns at Swanpool.",101,3,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
24188,"Pottery largely dates from the mid-second century through to the later third century. The earliest Roman pottery consists of an abraded samian dish and a fragment of a carinated jar or bowl of a type well known in the Lincoln area in the mid-second century. It is possible that eight of the pottery sherds belong to the late Iron Age, though they could also be Roman.",117,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24189,Pottery was predominantly of 3rd-4th century AD in date.,155,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24190,"Pottery not all clearly quantified - mortaria are an estimate based on percentages in report (mortaria only quantified by minimum vessel count - 53 vessels), must therefore be treated with some caution.",12067,,12,120,322,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24191,"3rd-4th century, not beyond mid-4th. No quantification other than that substantial amounts recovered from fills of features.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24192,"Iron Age pottery mostly hand made and not closely dated, assumed to be mid-late IA. Roman pottery of 1st-4th centuries AD, predominantly 4th. Quantification below is only the Roman sherds.",4343,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24193,No quantification - late 1st to 2nd century pottery. Complete pot within pit.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24194,"Homogenous group with high proportion of shell-tempered 'native' sherds. Mostly local, some Nene Valley wares. No amphorae, imported wares or mortaria. Pottery dates suggest late 1st/early 2nd century through to mid-2nd at latest.",263,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24195,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24196,"Tiny assemblage listed in both reports, can only be selection. Mortaria and amphora sherds present. Also no good quantification in Greenfield's report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
24197,"Striking characteristic of the pottery is the variety of vessels produced, with bowls, jars, mortaria, flagons, plates. No overall quantification, illustrated sherds only listed. Possible face mask flagon.",,,,,,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
24198,"Illustrated sherds in report only, no overall quantification. Kiln notable for production of rustic ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24199,"Pottery of LIA, early Roman and late Roman date. Few fine wares in Roman assemblage, a single samian sherd and small quantity of Nene Valley colour coat. Also single mortaria and amphora sherds.",871,12,1,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24200,"Aside from early IA pottery, earliest pottery native and of c. AD 25-75 in date. Uncertain whether all sherds listed, given small size of assemblage presumably not. Mortaria and samian both present, mortaria sherd stamped. One complete bowl found in a pit, very likely a structured deposition.",39,,,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24201,"Pottery included a group of 3rd century date, but kilns thought to be in use from c. AD 300-325. Only small number of sherds listed. Samian present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24202,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24203,"Fragments of samian, mortaria and colour coated ware found as well as pottery wasters. No useful quantification of pottery. Pottery made from the kilns include flagons, handled jars, roll rim store jars, flat rimmed urns, stewpans and colanders, lids, carinated urns, cups, folded and small plain urns, urns with lattice patterns, miniature urns (actual size and function uncertain, so specialist religious vessel has been ticked), platters, wide mouthed vessels with inturned rims, urns with flattened or incised rims, wide mouthed vessels with flattened rims and miscellaneous forms.",,,,,,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24204,"The pottery was predominantly jars (36%) though a wide range of forms were recovered including bowls, dishes, cups, flagons, storage jars, and mortaria. A wide range of fabrics was also identified including BB1, Nene Valley, Mancetter, Market Raisen, and grey wares all recovered. None of the pottery necessarily dated to the 4thC AD, although it is possible.",628,,,5,21,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
24205,"Pottery all coarse ware - no precise quantification. Most of 3rd century, with a suggested emphasis on the later 3rd century.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24206,Assemblage of late Iron Age to Roman in date. Roman assemblage had emphasis on 2nd century AD. Predominantly grey ware.,29,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24207,"A very small amount of Roman material, considered intrusive from the nearby RB activity recorded in 24208 and 24209. The overwhelming majority of the pottery was mid-to-late IA pottery typical of other sites in the region.",868,15,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24208,"The assemblage was dominated by grey ware fabrics with very small amounts of Iron Age type wares, shell tempered vessels and samian were also present. The diagnostic forms identified indicate that the whole assemblage was deposited within a relatively short period. An additional 1467 sherds from the early excavation.",1648,26,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
24209,"Characterised by Romano- British material of the 2nd and early 3rd century AD, only one or two contexts apparently going into the later 3rd or early 4th. A further 431 sherds were recovered during the earlier adjacent WYAS excavation.",668,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
24210,"IA-4th century pottery with a peak of mid-3rd century, declining to a small quantity in the 4th century. A small number of wasters - some possible local pottery production.",7555,120,2,26,40,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
24212,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25001,"Most of the fragments are plain body sherds deriving from handmade vessels of uncertain form, but gully 101 yielded a base angle from a flat-based vessel and the rim and upper profile of an ovoid vessel with a short everted neck and a rounded direct rim, smoothed on the outer face. Such ovoid vessels are particularly characteristic of later Iron Age ceramic assemblages, dating broadly from the fifth/fourth centuries BC to first century AD, in the Trent Valley and beyond (e.g. Cunliffe, 1991, 85-88, figs A22-A24; Knight, 1984, i, 99; 1992, 43, 50, fig.20), although these have an ancestry stretching well back to the earlier first millennium BC and cannot be closely dated. The other sherds from this site could easily belong to the later Iron Age, but again close dating is not possible.",10,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25002,"The assemblage incorporates a remarkable group of sherds from one or possibly more handmade vessels embellished with an elaborate combination of grooved, stamped and probably rouletted designs related in general terms to the La Tène ornamental style of eastern England (cf Elsdon, 1975; 1986).",94,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25003,Eleven sherds of pottery (28g) dating to the middle of the 1st century AD were recovered from context alongside a single unstratified sherd dating to the later 1st century AD.,11,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25004,A tiny assemblage. All of the three sherds probably date to the 2nd century AD.,3,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25005,"Within the assemblage, 237 sherds accounting for 20.654kg of the total weight belonged to a single large amphora vessel. One sherd (19g) of prehistoric pottery and a further 1.735kg of re-deposited Roman material was also recovered (unstrat. sherds not quantified by sherd count). The pottery assemblage suggests Roman activity largely during the 2nd century, although later regional wares are present indicating continued activity into the 3rd and 4th centuries. Although most of the material is probably local, there is a wide range of regional wares encompassing Black Burnished ware, Derbyshire ware and products from the Nene Valley, Mancetter-Hartshill and Bourne-Greetham industries.",542,28,250,5,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25006,"There is evidence for Roman activity from the later 1st-early 2nd century through to the 4th. The stratified Roman features appear to be largely 2nd century, however later material found within post-Roman features suggests the site was occupied throughout the Roman period in some form. The presence of imported Samian ware and amphora along with regional Romano-British wares such as Black Burnished ware, Derbyshire ware, Swanpool mortaria and Nene Valley colour-coated wares suggests access to a wide range of goods, possibly from a market at nearby Margidunum.",98,1,1,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25007,"A stratified assemblage comprised 28 sherds of late Iron Age pottery weighing 159g and 17 sherds of Romano-British pottery weighing 238g, along with four sherds (56g) of re-deposited material. The Romano-British pottery is dominated by grey wares, most likely locally made jars dating from the late first-early second century.",49,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25008,The Romano-British assemblage is of generally late Roman date including the fourth century repertoire of the Lower Nene Valley Colour coated ware industry and characteristic late Roman grey wares vessels  of the East Midlands Burnished ware industry produced in the Trent Valley. Small sherds of samian of second century date are also present. Most of the assemblage was probably residual in post-Roman contexts.,125,2,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
25009,The pottery assemblage would appear to date to one phase of activity spanning the 3rd and 4th centuries. East Midlands grey ware dominates the group and continental imports are sparse. The assemblage is dominated by jars followed by bowls/dishes and could perhaps be seen as typical of a rural assemblage.,872,17,1,9,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25010,"Late Iron Age and Romano-British pottery (and some 6th-7th century Saxon) pottery were found, but not well quantified in the report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25011,"A large assemblage of approx. 15000 sherds were recovered. The report does not include a specialist pottery report, which had not been produced at the time of the report's creation. Samian, mortaria and occasional sherds of amphorae were present. A further 978 were found during Ponsbury's earlier excavations. Most pottery from Ponsbury's excavations was 1st-3rd century in date.",15978,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25012,Pottery was largely of 2nd-4th century AD in date. No weight provided.,1447,,3,10,21,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25013,Pottery dated from the 1st to 4th centuries.,245,,1,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25014,Pottery ranged in date from the 2nd to 4th centuries AD.,397,,1,4,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25015,"The types of fabrics and forms identified in the assemblage date from the mid 1st to early 2nd century and could all belong to the mid-late 1st century AD. The quality of the grey ware vessels may favour a date in the late 1st when local kilns serving the military would be established and fine vessels such as the carefully made colander/strainer might be available to civilians. Although small, this group is of particular interest on account of the near complete colander.",81,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25016,"Pottery from the 2003 and following excavation both included here. Pottery was principally of 2nd century date, with some continuity into the 3rd-4th century. There is also some evidence to suggest Iron Age activity in the area. Mortaria were scarce and amphorae absent. Most pottery, 75-83% were grey wares. No pottery definitely manufactured in the kiln.",3438,69,,5,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25017,"Mortaria, amphorae and samian found in both evaluations but were quantified in the 2001 report only (the figures for these types below therefore refer only to those from the later evaluations and proportions must be treated with caution). In the latter evaluation 679 sherds were found and around 60% of the assemblage was of grey ware type with fairly high proportions of non-local wares such as Mancetter Hartshill mortaria (4%), samian (8%) and other fine wares (c.11 %) (only percentages of these types were provided and have been used to estimate actual figures below). The pottery was not all well dated, but types of 2nd to 4th century were identified. The presence of a severely distorted waster sherd from a bifid-flange rim jar of the type made at the Little London kilns in the late second to early third century sheds some light on the nature of pottery production in Newark at that time. Approx. 950 sherds were recovered during the earlier evaluation, though types are not precisely quantified in the report. The majority of both the coarse and fine wares from this evaluation belong to the later second and third century.",1629,7,,27,54,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25018,"The assemblage was comprised principally of pottery dating to the second or early third centuries, with a small number of sherds of prehistoric or first century date, and probably none of later third or fourth century date.",72,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25019,A single pottery sherd of mid - late 1st century pottery was found.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25020,"Limited data as interim reports only. 17 sherds of 2nd-4th century AD Romano-British pottery are described in the evaluation report. An additional 3 sherds, including one of samian, were found during the watching brief.",20,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
25021,Only 15 of 29 sherds were identified as being of confident late Iron Age (12 sherds) or Romano-British (3 sherds).,15,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25022,"The sherd count is approximate. Pottery was principally of late 2nd to 3rd century AD in date, with infrequent late 1st century and 4th century sherds. A single Mortaria sherd was present.",131,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
25023,Most of the pottery can only be dated as 2nd to 4th century greywares.,44,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
25024,"The pottery included 4 sherds of vesicular ware, 43 grey ware sherds and 2 sherds of samian. The pottery broadly ranged in date from the 1st-4th century, with a possible emphasis on the later 2nd to 3rd century.",49,1,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
25025,No detailed quantification but large quantities of mid and late Iron Age as well as Romano-British pottery were recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25026,"762 Romano-British sherds were recovered during the 2007 evaluation of the site. Continental imports include 58 sherds of samian (South, Central and East Gaulish) and 14 sherds of amphorae. Most of the pottery appears to date to the 2nd and 3rd centuries with a small amount of material which could potentially extend into the 4th century. There is no evidence of any pre-Roman material. Not all mortaria fabrics are quantified in the report and so the figure below for mortaria is something of an estimate - the true number is likely to have been higher.",713,19,14,12,58,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25027,"The pottery assemblage ranged in date from late Iron Age to Romano-British. Pages of the pottery report are missing from the report, making calculation of samian, mortaria and amphorae difficult, but all were present. No weights provided. The relatively large quantity of samian was regarded as evidence for a fairly high status. The pottery from Besthorpe shows affinities with nearby kilns at Lea and Newton on Trent as well as with products from the kilns at Lincoln.",386,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25028,"No weight. The pottery recorded here is from two separate evaluation pottery reports. In addition to the Roman pottery there were 11 probable Iron Age sherds (included in the count). Pottery from British kilns included BB1, Nene Valley, Derbyshire and Dales wares, as well as Mancetter Hartshill products and Parisi type pottery. Samian, amphora and mortaria sherds were present. The principal datable assemblage consists of Romano-British pottery with a few residual Iron Age sherds. Grey wares predominate with a smattering of samian and finer wares. The presence of some early Flavian samian in context, also the Trajanic potter's stamp on a Drag 18/31, indicate that the site was occupied at some point in the early Roman period. The majority of the pottery is broadly dated to the third century and the virtual absence of very late Roman assemblages points to the 3rd-early 4th centuries as the period of greatest activity on the site.",1574,,1,16,44,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25029,"40 sherds, no further detail.",40,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25030,Numerous Romano-British pottery sherds of 1st-4th centuries AD recovered. No further information.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25031,Romano-British pottery and a smaller amount of Iron Age pottery were recovered. No further information.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25032,85 sherds were recovered - no further data.,85,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25033,"Pottery forms and fabrics belonged to 2 chronological phases, the late Iron Age to Conquest period and the 4th century AD, with no definite continuity. The groups were small and the site may have been on the edge of a domestic settlement. Most of the pottery was regional coarse ware, dominated by jars.",122,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25034,"All pottery recovered during the watching brief was of late 1st-2nd century date, contrasting with the finds from the earlier excavations which produced pottery of predominantly 3rd-4th century date. 9 sherds only recovered during the watching brief. No quantification in earlier report, but all of late 2nd to early 4th century.",9,0,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25035,"Pottery based on fieldwalking report presented in the 2003 report and from the 1982 report. Roman pottery from 2003 report spanned the whole period, although most was 2nd century AD. Grey wares predominated. Samian, Rhenish, amphorae and mortaria were present. The high quality of the samian is noted. A small amount of late Iron Age pottery indicated activity at the site prior to the Roman period. See burial data for info on child cremation in decorated beaker. In pottery from 1982 report IA pottery not well quantified, but about 65 vessels recorded (prob early IA). A smaller amount of LIA pottery. Of 107 Roman sherds 62 were from temple/shrine. At least 8 sherds of samian and 12 mortaria fragments.",974,,16,56,64,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25036,"A small pottery assemblage was recovered. Pottery dates from throughout the Roman period, with most sherds of 2nd century, and 2 Iron Age. Most sherds are Derbyshire wares, few from outside the region.",173,2,,2,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25037,The very small group of pottery ranged in date from the conquest period to the late 2nd-mid 3rd centuries. These included five grey ware and four samian sherds.,16,0,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
25038,Dating evidence from pottery was c. 50 BC to AD 80. A large assemblage of pottery was recovered but not quantified in the report (only illustrated sherds quantified).,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25039,"7.6kg of RB pottery recovered (no sherd count, but a minimum of 305 vessels). Amphorae, samian and mortaria present. Samian nor mortaria not clearly quantified by sherd count. Most pottery dated to the late 3rd to 4th centuries, mostly 4th.",,8,20,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
25040,"Limited quantification in publications - over 2000 sherds. Samian, mortaria present, samian unexpectedly high proportion. Virtual absence of 3rd-4th century pottery.",2001,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25041,One of the vessels appears to have been used to raise water from the well. No fine wares or non-local wares present.,163,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25042,"Pottery was predominantly of Iron Age - last few centuries BC and earlier 1st century AD. Only pottery definitely from phases 3 (rectilinear boundaries) and 4 (2nd enclosure) have been included, as other phases could be significantly earlier. Also 24 sherds of Roman pottery.",195,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25043,Grey wares over 50% of assemblage. Small quantities of samian (no sherd count) and mortaria (no sherd count).,185,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25044,Limited data but amphorae and samian fragments were present. No sherd count but at least 130 vessels spanning late 1st century AD to at least AD 250.,,,8,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
25045,A single burnt samian ware sherd recovered. Mortaria present. No diagnostically 4th century pottery from the site. Pottery types limited in range and was predominantly local.,942,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25046,Pottery suggests 2nd century date. No quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
25047,Only illustrated pottery quantified. Date range between c. AD 100-300. Samian and mortaria present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25048,"Large quantity of pottery recovered, no quantification in the report. Mostly local. Most pottery of 3rd-4th century in date. 12 sherds of samian.",,,,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25049,"Significant number of 1st century vessels, but majority from post AD 200. No overall quantification. Mortaria present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
25050,"No full quantification, only those illustrated. Samian and mortaria present. Pottery suggested activity from c. AD 80 to AD 350.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
25051,"Pottery not well reported on but included mortaria and samian and pottery of 2nd and late 3rd or 4th century date. Small amount of early 2nd century wares, and preponderance of 3rd and 4th century types.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26001,"The majority of pottery appears to have been of mid Iron Age date, although 13 sherds of Roman date were present, although some may have been intrusive. The pottery may relate to activity in the near area rather than on this site itself. The remainder of the 1095 sherds recovered were likely to be of mid-Iron Age in date.",13,0,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26002,"185 of the 811 sherds were of mid-late Iron Age in date, whilst the rest were Romano-British. The Romano-British assemblage comprised mainly late Iron Age 'native' wares, which probably continued to be used into the 2nd century AD. A small number of sherds, including two of samian, indicate a date in at least the second half of the first century AD, possibly even into the 2nd century AD.",811,8,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26003,"Just 12 sherds of Romano-British pottery were recovered. These were grog tempered, grogged greyware and greyware, dating from the late 1st to early 2nd century AD.",12,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26004,"The range of fabric types is typical of early Romano-British sites in the region. The preponderance of shelly and grogged wares, coupled with an almost complete lack of grey wares suggests that the bulk of the activity dates to the mid/late first – early second century AD. This date is supported by the presence of several shelly ware jar rims with incised rim seatings and a fragment of probable Gallo-Belgic style beaker along with the sherds of Verulamium White ware, which are all from the same vessel, a jar. The assemblage is generally in fairly good condition and individual vessels well represented.",128,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26008,"The assemblage suggests a small early Roman rural site. The condition of the material is not good, but is better preserved than that from Field 2 and has slightly more potential. However, most of the wares are local in origin and there are markedly few imports present. The pottery largely comprises sherds of local grey or black sandy ware, various grog tempered wares and shelly ware. In addition there are three sherds of Samian and two pieces of mortaria. The range of material is likely to date to the later 1st or very early 2nd century.",677,7,,2,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26009,"The recovered pottery dates primarily to the later Roman period, between the 3rd and 4th centuries AD. Material from selected contexts is earlier, dateable to the mid/later 2nd century AD. Pottery of similar date and very small quantities probably of 1st century AD dating was present as residual material. Mortaria sherds were present but not quantified in the report. However, they were recovered from 15 contexts, so at least 15 sherds must have been represented.",1982,34,1,,59,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26010,The small assemblage included sherds of late Iron Age date and Roman sherds of the late 1st century or later.,24,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26011,65 Roman sherds were found during Oxford Archaeology's programme of fieldwalking in 1991. No further information was provided. 5 Roman sherds are reported on in the 2007 OA report.,70,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26012,"107 sherds (1995g) of late Iron Age, 1st century BC, pottery were recovered. A further 173 sherds (3795kg) of Roman pottery were found. Much of the pottery appears to be of local origin and broadly ranges in date from the early 1st century through to the mid 2nd century. Chronologically the earliest forms represented are Gallo-Belgic type wares in grog-tempered fabrics, which date to the early-mid 1st century. Later material (mid to late 1st –mid 2nd century) is represented by channel-rim jars in hard-fired burnt white oxidised fabrics with grog-temper, and shell-gritted wares, some furnished with close set horizontal rilling on the body. In addition there are undiagnostic body sherds from greyware vessels, some displaying a range of decorative techniques, including burnishing, rouletting and faint horizontal rilling, all stylistic features characteristic of pottery of this date.",280,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26013,"The assemblage is dominated by sherds of mid-late 1st to 2nd centuries. With the exception of one sherd of Samian, the entire assemblage comprises locally manufactured domestic wares in coarseware fabrics. Hard-fired grog tempered wares are dominant and diagnostic forms include channel rim jars and a necked jar with everted rim. There are few diagnostic forms in the other fabrics represented; those worthy of note include a shell-gritted jar with lid-seating and a necked jar in a sand tempered fabric. There are no diagnostic sherds of greyware. Imported wares are represented by one sherd of Samian recovered from the subsoil. The sherd is highly abraded and much of the exterior slip is lost, it comes from a Dragendorf Type 32 dish with curving sides and a footring. This form dates to the late 2nd century.",69,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26014,"The evaluation produced a small group of late 1st to mid 2nd century pottery. A total of thirty one sherds with a combined weight of 0.357kg were recovered from two individual deposits in two trenches (T10, T26). The assemblage includes locally produced wares in grog-tempered (23), greyware (1) and oxidised ware (7). The only identifiable vessel form is a hard-fired grog tempered jar with everted rim. Patches of a burnt residue are evident on the interior surface of the vessel and the broken edges are heavily burnt, suggesting that the vessel may have fallen into the fire during use. The remaining sherds are all undiagnostic.",31,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26015,"1816 sherds (26,039g) of late mid to late Iron Age pottery were found, but have not been included here as they are not certainly of late Iron Age date. 3476 sherds of pottery weighing 72.6kg dated to the Romano-British period. The assemblage appears to show modest activity from the later 1st-2nd century, increasing through the 2nd and 3rd centuries and continuing into the second half of the 4th century. The pottery trends appear to show a decrease from shelly and grog-tempered wares in the early-mid Roman period to products of the Nene Valley in the mid-later Roman phases accompanied by regional imports mainly from the Dorset black burnished ware kilns and the Oxfordshire industries. Although in some respects the Upton assemblage would appear to be fairly typical for a rural settlement site with a fairly limited range of continental and regional imports it has some slightly aberrant features to the norm. The moderately high percentage of samian at 4.6% by count is unusual as this is higher than might be expected from a site of this nature. It is also curious why a site which clearly had a demand for imported finewares from this date has negligible other imported wares. In terms of vessels present coarseware jars dominate accounting for just over half the assemblage  followed by bowls/dishes. The proportion of jars to bowls/dishes places the site almost at the boundary between typical rural and urban assemblages for the Midlands. Whilst there appears to be no extant traces of habitation on the site, the pottery from the mid 2nd century would suggest a fairly well-appointed household in the immediate locality. Despite the presence of a kiln no wasters were identified and it is not clear which, if any, of the pottery was manufactured on site.",3476,73,10,32,160,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26016,"The pottery from the kilns is not fully quantified in the report. Products were well thrown and forms included jars, jugs, bowls as well as over-fired wasters. Two chips of samian were found.",,,,,2,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26017,"The pottery assemblage is consistent with a rural settlement and the chronological spread is of late 1st or early 2nd century to early 4th century AD. The general assemblage was not quantified in the report. However, Samian and mortaria were present and quantified and the 6 sherds of samian were said to make up just under 1 % of the total. An estimate of 650 sherds in total has therefore been provided below. The majority of pottery from the site was local shell tempered, local grog-tempered and local grey sandy wares.",650,,,2,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26018,"Pottery was gathered from several interventions, including fieldwalking and excavation. The pottery evidence suggests Roman activity from the late 2nd through to the 4th century. The assemblage on the whole appears to be consistent with a late Roman rural villa. Amphorae, mortaria and samian were represented but are poorly quantified in the publication (full quantification is reportedly available in the archive).",3672,32,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26019,"The pottery suggests a period of occupation from the late first century AD with the main period of occupation occurring during the early to mid second century. Occupation appears to have come to an end in the late second or early third century, though there is evidence for some activity nearby during the fourth century. In addition to the 2002 pottery, pottery was also recovered from a 1984 watching brief, immediately north of the villa, for which no other report exists, but where amphorae, samian and mortaria were found (there is no overall quantification of this assemblage in the report). The 1984 group generally had an earlier date range, from the mid-first to early-second century AD, perhaps indicating that the earliest settlement was to the north. The 2002 assemblage contained a large range of fabrics, the most common being grey ware, mostly of Nene Valley type. The amphora assemblage was surprisingly large. The sherds in the pottery summary and the specialist reports are not the same and the figures provided in the specialist reports have been provided below, but the overview gives numbers of 251 sherds for amphorae and 153 sherds for samian (mortaria are not quantified in the pottery summary). Pottery from the 2010 excavations included 26 sherds of late Iron Age pottery (235g). A further 8476 Roman sherds were recovered (168kg). In summary the assemblage recovered from the 2010 excavations is very much dominated by local fabrics, which can broadly be split into four groups: shelly wares, sandy wares, grog-tempered and products of the Lower Nene Valley. A further 459 sherds of samian were recovered, as well as 127 sherds of amphorae and 75 of mortaria.",11636,226,403,85,605,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26020,"Three distinct chronological groups of pottery were recognised. Late Iron Age (1st century BC), Pre-Roman Iron Age (1st century AD) and early Roman (mid 1st century AD). Most are of a fabric containing crushed shell.",293,12,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26021,"The earliest pottery was of late Iron Age date, up to c. AD 70, represented by just 25 sherds. The assemblage suggests activity gradually increased in intensity throughout the 2nd century AD, and continued until the late 3rd and possibly mid-4th century. The assemblage is consistent with low-status activity and locally produced ceramics dominate.  The assemblage is poorly quantified in the report, and whilst samian, mortaria and amphora sherds were present they are not quantified. A few sherds of samian are mentioned in the report.",1249,17,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26022,"Pottery was recovered from previous excavations at the site but was not well quantified in the report (some was, some wasn't). Only the pottery from the 2004/5 excavations is included here. Four sherds were of late Iron Age date. Samian was quantified but mortaria not, though several sherds of mortaria were found. Amphora sherds were not present in the 2004/5 assemblage, but a single sherd was recovered in 1957, so the box has been ticked. The relatively large group of samian suggests a high status site, although this is tempered by the lack of other continental imports and scarcity of regional imports. The assemblage shows a reliance on locally produced ceramics on the whole.",1069,13,1,,46,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26023,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26024,"Products of the Nene Valley industries dominate the group from the early-mid 2nd century onwards, with fabrics dominated by local shell gritted, Lower Nene Valley grey ware, coarse ware and colour-coated ware. Most of the assemblage dates from the 2nd-3rd centuries, though there is clear evidence from the 4th century. A further 621 sherds (10kg) from Creed Road investigations - notable focus on 2nd century AD here (samian present but not quantified in Creed Road assemblage).",7370,112,19,76,130,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26025,"101 sherds of late Iron Age pottery and 1020 sherds of Roman pottery were recovered. The Roman pottery included a small quantity of samian and the assemblage spanned the 1st to 4th centuries, with 2nd to 3rd century pottery predominating. The pottery is not well quantified in the report. 12 samian sherds are mentioned, although it is not clear whether there may have been more. No amphorae are mentioned and mortaria are mentioned but not quantified. Graffiti was present on a ceramic tile, but the box has been ticked below.",505,28,,,12,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26026,Pottery  dated from the 2nd to 4th centuries AD. Most was greyware. Mortaria were present but not quantified. Samian was also present.,705,14,,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26027,"The late Iron Age pottery included 516 handmade sherds, weighing 19.37kg, whilst the Roman pottery included 1851 sherds weighing 56.040kg. Most of the Roman assemblage is mid 1st century AD into 2nd century. There was little 3rd or 4th century pottery from the excavated site although this may only reflect a sharp decline in activity within this northern part of the area. There is a wide selection of pottery types, with some samian (including imitation Terra Nigra), mortaria, amphorae as well as regional wares (Black Burnished, Colour Coated and Oxford) and local wares. The latter included fine locally produced pottery from Rushden. Of particular interest is a rare flagon top with female head, identified as of Oxford ware dating c350-400 AD. It is a high status object and seems to have vague religious connotations, for example, two were recovered from the temple of Nodens, at Lydney, Gloucestershire. The chief interest in the assemblage is its middle 1st century pottery. There seems to be continuity between the pre-conquest occupation and post-conquest activity. The samian, mortaria and amphorae are not quantified in the report.",2367,75,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26028,"The pottery assemblage from the site included 1948 'Later Prehistoric' sherds and as many of these were of mid-Iron Age in date they have been excluded in the quantification below. The bulk of the assemblage appears to date to the early Roman period. There are a few imports to the site, mainly South Gaulish and Central Gaulish samian of which there were 13 sherds and a single colour-coated beaker sherd, possibly a Gaulish import. Although it is interesting to note its presence, the samian forms less than 1% of the total assemblage and is unaccompanied by other imports such as amphorae and mortaria. This suggests a relatively modest status site. There are very few regional imports to the site most of the wares appearing to be of relatively local manufacture.",1948,32,,,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26029,"173 sherds included 10 sherds of pottery of late Iron Age or early Roman date. Much of the pottery was residual in medieval contexts. The date range for the Roman group as a whole suggests mainly a later 2nd to 3rd century AD date, perhaps extending only a decade or so into the 4th century as only minimal amounts of possible later 4th century pottery types are present. Perhaps not surprisingly, the 3rd century pottery is dominated by Lower Nene Valley colour coated types, but even here there is nothing very significant.",173,2,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26030,Late Iron Age and Belgic pottery were found but are not quantified separately from the earlier Iron Age pottery in the report and therefore have not been included here.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26031,"Much of the pottery from the pits or quarries, found both within and around the enclosure, dates to the late Iron Age/early Roman period.",279,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26032,No data but pottery suggests activity from the 2nd to 4th centuries.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26033,"Limited data. No quantification. Finds included a samian libatory or sacrificial patera, as well as the ceramic urns.",,,,,1,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26034,No quantification. Belgic through to 4th century pottery was recovered. Samian was present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26035,"No quantification in the report. Pottery was notably scarce. Some Nene Valley fine and coarse grey wares were recovered, but the prevalent type found at all levels and in the foundations of the wall was a coarse shell-gritted ware. Fragments ranged from parts of well-made cooking pots, to large storage jars, and hand-made vessels of a soft gritty fabric. Only one significant deposit of pottery was found, consisting of the body of a thick white pipeclay vessel lodged on the edge of the east end of a robber trench dividing Rooms 2 and 3. Samian was present and a mortarium fragment was found. Pottery ranged in date from the 2nd to 4th centuries.",,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26036,"No quantification. The majority of the pottery recovered from the site dates from the later first to third centuries, with some diagnostic material dating to the later third and fourth centuries. The impression is that occupation did not continue until the end of the Roman period. This is based on the distinct lack of diagnostic regional wares which become widespread in the second half of the fourth century such as the late products of the Harrold shell tempered industry, the late products of the Lower Nene Valley colourcoated ware industry, and red colourcoats from Oxfordshire, all of which have been identified in such groups from sites in the Milton Keynes area, immediately to the east of Potterspury.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26037,"The majority of the pottery in all three kilns is chronologically coherent, dating to the mid-to late 1st century A.D, though there are however a few sherds in which are typologically later. The presence of these pieces, the samian, and a possible Verulamium-region mortarium indicates the mixed nature of the assemblages, and casts doubt on how representative they are as kiln groups. Grog-tempered and grey sandy wares were made at the site, and possibly shelly ware. It is uncertain which kilns were used for the production of the particular types. Only the pottery from the kilns are quantified in the report, and as pottery was also recovered from other features the figure below is certainly an underestimate. Mortaria and samian are noted in the report but not quantified.",952,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26038,"The pottery ranged in date from the mid-2nd to 4th century in date, although the bulk of the material was late Roman. It was not possible to refine the date of the 4th century assemblage. Mortaria and samian are mentioned in the report but not quantified.",761,17,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26039,"The pottery was only quantified in the Hall and Nickerson report from their earlier investigation. For the latter excavation most was unstratified and recovered from the ploughsoil. The site building was considered likely to be of 2nd century date given the scarcity of third century and later fabrics, and the bulk of the pottery was 1st-2nd century in date. The pottery recovered from both excavations forms a typical domestic assemblage. Parts of eight Samian vessels are noted in the report.",747,,,,31,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26040,"Limited data, no overall quantification. Samian and mortaria were present. No diagnostically early Roman pottery was identified, and the main ceramic range extends from the late 1st or early 2nd century to at least the 4th century. Throughout this period the pottery is typical of ceramic assemblages in East Northamptonshire. The majority of the material was probably produced fairly locally, the Lower Nene Valley industry providing the main source of colour-coated wares. Occasional pieces from further afield include Oxfordshire colour-coated ware and one sherd of BB1. A small assemblage of early-to-mid Saxon pottery was also found.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26041,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26042,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26043,"The pottery is not well quantified in the report and only stratified groups and intrinsically interesting sherds are published. Amphorae, samian and mortaria were present. Some probable late Iron Age pottery was present and the assemblage included sherds of 1st-4th century AD in date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26044,All sherds were recovered from the kiln. The majority were wide mouthed jars and were of 2nd century date. The pottery was notable for being of poor quality and badly prepared.,177,11,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26045,Very limited data in the report. No quantification. Samian and mortaria are mentioned but no amphorae are discussed.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26046,"The pottery assemblage included 1703 sherds which were predominantly of middle Iron Age in date, but which showed continuation into the later Iron Age. 28 sherds were of Roman date and the enclosure is thought to have been abandoned in around AD 60-65. A single sherd of samian was present.",1703,26,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26047,The assemblage was largely of first to third century date. The only imports are a shed of Oxfordshire White Ware mortarium and a sherd of Central Gaulish samian.,44,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26048,"The assemblage was mainly wares of local origin, particularly soft pink-grogged wares. Of particular note amongst the assemblage are two sherds with graffiti. One is a base sherd with a small X incised, whilst the second has a small floral motif scratched into the sherd. The latest sherds present are late fourth century in date.",382,8,,19,3,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26049,"The vast majority of the assemblage was Iron Age, and included wares of early, middle and late Iron Age date. A group of sherds were of typical 'Belgic' late Iron Age/early Roman date. Only 2 sherds were of specifically Roman date. Only the 193 likely late Iron Age and Roman sherds have been included in the data below, although it is possible that some of the mid-to-late iron Age pottery was also of the same period.",193,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26050,The assemblage appears to date from the later 1st century AD through to the 3rd century. The principal fabrics are grog-tempered wares and grey and oxidised sandy wares. Samian and mortaria were present.,1097,12,,5,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26051,"Most of the pottery assemblage was of late 1st-3rd century in date. The group is conservative and dominated by local products with few imported wares. A quantity of pottery was recovered from the kilns, and these seem to have been manufacturing one ware type, a sandy textured grog. One fabric may be waster material, but on the whole most sherds did not show signs of being kiln waste.",2433,46,,2,4,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26052,"The pottery was not well quantified in the report and no overall figure is provided.  2520 sherds (63.160g) were of phase 1, 3344 sherds (79.510g) were of phase 2, but the ceramics from the Roman phase, phase 3, are not quantified, except those from the pottery kilns, which produced 1723 sherds. This gives a minimum of 7587 sherds from the site, although this is an underestimate as it does not include the general Roman pottery assemblage and the figure has therefore not been included below. Samian was quantified but amphorae and mortaria were not. Both were present to some degree however (amphorae perhaps represented by as little as one sherd). The kilns produced mostly jars and were dated to the mid-1st century in date. The late Iron Age pottery assemblage was regarded as interesting and important. An unusually large collection of La Tène pottery was present.",,,,,130,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26053,"Two separate assemblages from quarry pits dated from the 1st-early 2nd century AD and the 3rd-early 4th century. Pottery from both phases were predominantly locally made wares. The pottery is not quantified in the report. Samian was found, including one with literate graffito which reads [PH]ILIPPA. Mortaria were also present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26054,No quantification. Pottery ranged from a small number of mid-Iron Age sherds to late Roman in date. The earliest Roman pottery probably dated from the mid-1st century in date. A single amphora sherd is mentioned in the report and samian occurred in small quantities. Mortaria were also present.,,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26055,"The overall assemblage was not quantified. The pottery included some material of mid-Iron Age date, but most Iron Age pottery was 'Belgic' of late Iron Age date. The Roman assemblage was considered to be small. 26 sherds of samian were recovered.",,,,,26,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26056,The pottery assemblage was not quantified but was noted to be small. 2 sherds of samian were found. The pottery from the site spanned the Roman period.,2,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26057,"A small amount (5 sherds) of late Iron Age pottery was recovered, typical of other late Iron Age assemblages. 72 per cent of the Roman pottery were grey wares, 7.4 per cent colour coated wares, 10.6 per cent samian and 9.9 per cent other wares. A further 478 Roman sherds found during fieldwalking, mostly grogged and shelly wares, with some colour coat and samian.",1099,24,1,6,77,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26058,"Pottery from the site fell into two groups: mid 1st century 'Belgic' pottery and later 1st-early 2nd century material. The earlier material is fairly consistent as a group and is regarded as produced on site. The later material, however, is rather more variable and fragmentary and would not be considered as a kiln assemblage if not associated with the kiln-like structure. Products were jars and beakers. No amphorae, mortaria or samian were present. The sherd count is approximate and no weight was provided.",858,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26059,"No data, although a few sherds of unstratified Roman pottery were found.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26060,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26061,The pottery is poorly quantified in the report and only illustrated sherds are catalogued. 'Belgic' pottery of mid-1st century AD was represented and samian and mortaria were present. Up to 70 individual samian vessels may have been represented. No amphorae are noted.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26062,Only illustrated pottery was catalogued. The ceramics dated from the late 2nd century/early 1st century BC until the early/mid 1st century AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26063,"Pottery was not well quantified. The assemblage ranged in date from late Iron Age to 2nd century in date. Mortaria and samian were present, amphorae appear not to have been.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26064,The sherd count is an approximation. A little over 7000 of the sherds came from the large pit containing late 3rd century pottery. Only these are fully quantified in the report. Samian and mortaria were present at the site in small numbers and whilst no actual sherd numbers are given for either both formed less than 1% of the total number of sherds from the site. Fabrics from the site were predominantly of grey wares and to a lesser extent calcite gritted wares. Very little 1st century AD material was present and the assemblage as a whole suggested fairly intensive occupation from the 2nd through to the 4th centuries,12250,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26065,"The pottery report was selective and not all of the assemblage was discussed, although approximately 8000 sherds were recovered (no weight is provided in the report). Samian apparently represented 1% of this total and Mancetter Hartshill mortaria less than 1% (at least 33 sherds are catalogued in the report). As the figures are approximate and the samian and mortaria expressed as percentages these quantities must be treated with caution. 59% of the total were local greywares and 18% were limestone gritted wares and these clearly dominated.",8000,,,33,80,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26066,"Pottery has not all been quantified. 23 sherds of samian were recorded in the 1999 report, approx. 263 from the 1979 report and approx. 75 from 1974 report. The 1999 quantification of coarse wares was presented in a very confusing way. Approx. 1700 sherds appear to have been present in 1999, although this must be regarded with caution as the report is confusing. Mortaria appear not to have been present in the 1999 report, but 36 sherds were listed in the 1979 report. Only illustrated coarse pottery quantified in the 1974 report. 9 fragments of mortaria listed in 1974 report .",12526,,1,45,361,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26067,"Pottery from the site was predominantly of two distinct chronological groups, 2nd century and late 3rd-4th century. Only one area produced Late Iron Age/early Roman pottery. Most of the pottery was of late 3rd-4th century and Lower Nene Valley wares dominated. Samian and mortaria were present but were not individually quantified in the ceramic report.",205,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26068,"All of the pottery (with the exception of one samian sherd) is of a local origin and appears to represent some type of low status activity. The assemblage as a whole is of an early Roman date. The grog tempered sherds alongside the Roman pottery, indicate at least one context is dated to the post-conquest period (the samian sherd may also be slightly earlier).",51,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26069,"Pottery ranged in date from a small number of late 2nd/1st century BC Iron Age pottery to mid-to-late 4th century Romano-British wares. Pottery of mid-to-late 1st century through to mid 2nd century date dominated the assemblage, with a dip in pottery of mid 2nd to early 3rd century date, and an increase again during the late 3rd to 4th centuries. Amphorae, mortaria and samian were present and a tazza base had been trimmed down for use as a lid. Mortaria are not quantified in the report but are fairly common in the assemblage. Amphorae are regarded as 'virtually absent' although a single vessel is mentioned in the report text. Two cremation burials were well furnished with samian matched sets demonstrating relative wealth during the Roman period. Whilst no kilns were excavated the presence of wasters and kiln furniture suggest kilns in the vicinity.",12152,207,1,,120,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26070,The assemblage included pottery of possible Iron Age through to 2nd or early 3rd century date. The Iron Age sherds could date from the mid-Iron Age through to the 2nd century and were not diagnostic. The assemblage appears to suggest a small rural site dating from the pre-Roman Iron Age through to the late 2nd/ early 3rd century. Most of the wares are local in origin and there are markedly few imports present.,421,5,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26071,"The assemblage is dominated by locally produced grey, grog and shell-tempered wares (88%), which are typical of rural sites in Northamptonshire and Buckinghamshire during the later first and second century in particular. Mid-to-late 1st century 'Belgic' style pottery was also present. The occurrence of diagnostic regional imports such as Lower Nene Valley colourcoated ware, BB1, and mortaria from Mancetter Hartshill and Oxfordshire, indicates that some of the assemblage derives from activity on the site during the third century or later. The assemblage is on the whole consistent with a Romano-British rural site.",255,4,2,3,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26072,"The bulk of the 434 sherds from the excavated assemblage are of late 1st-early 2nd century AD date. A small number of possible early-mid 1st century AD sherds were also recovered. Forms were predominantly kitchen and tablewares in local and regional coarse and finewares. A number of sherds of samian were also recovered. 3rd-4th century pottery was mostly Lower Nene Valley Colour Coat, including bowls and jars. A further 75 sherds (1.666kg) were found during an earlier watching brief. Mortaria were also recovered during this investigation.",509,8,,22,80,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26073,"Then unquantified assemblage included greywares, combed coarsewares, samian, Nene Valley colour-coated types, and amphorae.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
26074,"No quantification. Diagnostically earlier Roman material included grogged ware, shelly wares and hard grogged wares, and a small amount of samian. Later material included lower Nene Valley colour-coated wares and a few beaker sherds. A small quantity of lower Nene Valley grey wares were found. Some possible late Iron Age sherds were also present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26075,"A small number of late Iron Age sherds were recovered. The assemblage is fairly homogenous chronologically and is probably dated from the 1st to mid 2nd century. In particular, the lack off rilled rims, lid seated jars or wider mouth bowls indicate that pottery use here has ceased by the early 3rd century. Whilst it is also possible that the Iron Age pottery is intrusive, perhaps from one of the other nearby identified settlements, this would seem unlikely.",359,9,2,13,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26076,"In general the pottery predominantly dates to the mid-late 1st century and 2nd centuries. The majority of the assemblage is represented by locally produced coarsewares in three main fabric types, grog-tempered wares, shell-gritted wares and greywares. Chronologically the earliest form represented is the channel rim jar, which occurs in hard and soft grogged fabrics and shell-gritted ware. Necked and neckless jars are also present in the same fabrics. Greywares dominate the assemblage are represented by necked and neckless jars together with shallow dishes with plain rims. The 3rd and 4th century material is represented by 19 sherds of Nene Valley Colour Coat and one undiagnostic sherd of Oxford ware Colour Coat. The only imported wares are fragments of samian.",376,8,,8,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26077,433 sherds were of late Iron Age/early Roman date and 183 were Roman. Some early-mid Saxon pottery was present.,616,13,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26078,Pottery was of late Iron Age to early Roman in date. None dated beyond the 2nd century AD. 3 sherds of early-mid Saxon pottery were also recovered.,43,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26079,Limited quantification. 22.9kg of pottery were recovered from the early 2nd century kiln itself. The majority of the material comprises jars and flagons in a fine creamware fabric which had probably been produced in the kiln since a number of wasters and other spoiled pieces were also present.,,,23,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26080,"The assemblage was largely of typical 2nd-4th century Lower Nene Valley wares including mortaria, greyware BB1 copies, and Lower Nene Valley colour-coat copies of flanged bowls, as well as a Lower Nene Valley greyware deep dish/bowl. In addition, small quantities of residual samian were noted.",193,2,,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26081,"The assemblage included Lower Nene Valley Colour Coat, BB1, Oxfordshire colour coat and white wares, London ware, possible Lower Nene Valley grey and cream wares, BB2, possible amphorae and south and central Gaulish samian as well as North France white ware. Grey wares were most abundant. The vessel forms represented comprise various types of jars, bowls and dishes, together with a few lids, flagons, mortaria, beakers and a 'Castor Box'. Approximately 160 separate vessels were noted, of which jars of various types comprise over half, with bowls and dishes accounting for around another third. The presence of a 'carrot' amphorae is notable as these are rare. The amphorae and mortaria sherds were not clearly quantified in the report.",960,24,,,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26082,"A total of 37 sherds of Iron Age and 109 sherds of Roman pottery were found, weighing 740g and 1347g respectively. The Iron Age pottery was not more precisely dated and so has not been included here. The Roman pottery dated from between the 2nd and 4th centuries AD. The assemblage includes grey and shelly wares, together with lower Nene Valley colour coated wares.",109,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26083,A small assemblage of only 9 sherds of 2nd to 3rd century pottery.,9,0,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26084,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26085,No quantification. Samian and mortaria were present. Pottery spanned the Roman period.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26086,No quantification. The range of pottery is typical for west Northamptonshire and spans the first to fourth centuries although with an emphasis on late first/early second to third century. A small amount of early-mid Saxon pottery was also found.,,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26087,All pottery was 'pre-Belgic' Iron Age of 2nd or 1st centuries BC.,190,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26088,"A small assemblage of late Iron Age pottery was recovered. The assemblage of pottery is small and indeterminate. The material is superficially similar to that of coarse wares normally found on sites dating to the end of the iron age period, but there is no wheel-turned Belgic pottery in the group, and no forms or fabrics which are clearly diagnostic for dating. The possible combing on the surfaces of some vessels would support a date for the assemblage in the late 1st century BC or the 1st century AD, but equally if it is not combing, a date in the early-middle iron age cannot be discounted.",62,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26089,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26090,No detailed information available. A small assemblage only.,16,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26091,"The assemblage from the Iron Age area is exclusively Iron Age in date with no Roman material. Whilst shell-tempered wares dominate, with a number of globular bodied forms suggestive of a middle-late Iron Age date, several features produced occasional sherds of grog or grog and shell suggesting that these may have been amongst the latest features, dating to the later Iron Age. The Roman assemblage from the possible farmstead produced an assemblage of 209 sherds (3.145g), and just over half of the sherds came from the well.",792,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26092,A small group of late Iron Age and early Roman pottery was found.,13,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26093,"The ceramic assemblage appears typical of many R-B sites in the region, starting with 'Belgic' pottery and often continuing in use until the 3rd or 4th centuries. The range of ware types present indicates that the main period of activity was during the 1st and perhaps the 2nd century AD, with the single Nene Valley Colour-Coat sherd being the only evidence of activity beyond this period. The Iron Age pottery is impossible to date other than within the broad period, and most, if not all, is residual.",98,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26094,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26095,"Assessment only. 50% of the total IA assemblage was examined and these included 15,000 sherds (approximate). Some of these were of early/mid Iron Age in date, and the quantity of late Iron Age pottery was not specified. The Iron Age pottery has therefore not been included in the figures below. The approximate weight in kg for the pottery excludes the Iron Age, medieval and Saxon pottery from the site. No overall quantification of pottery was available by sherd count, but 15046 forms were noted. Samian from the site included 5497 sherds, representing 3615 vessels including 392 decorated bowls and 106 identified potters' stamps. The mortaria included one incidence of graffiti. Amphorae included Dressel 20, Gauloise 4, Dressel 2-4, Southern Spanish and unassigned. There were a minimum of 14 amphorae. No details are provided, but 'at least one vessel has decoration with probable religious significance'. Early and middle Saxon pottery was also recovered from the site.",,25384,114,1327,5497,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26096,"Pottery from the site was principally of mid-late 'pre-Belgic' Iron Age and 'Belgic' late Iron Age in date, although there was also an assemblage of  Roman wares. The 'pre-Belgic' Iron Age group included 938 sherds, the 'Belgic' 2285 and the Roman 224 sherds. Four sherds of samian came from a single vessel. 239 early-mid Iron Age sherds were also recovered, although these have not been included in the quantities below.",3447,42,,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26097,"The pottery assemblage included 47 sherds of mid-late Iron Age 'pre-Belgic' pottery, 1676 late Iron Age 'Belgic' sherds and 3344 Roman sherds. Within the Roman assemblage only a single distinct ceramic phase was identified and dated to between the 2nd to 4th century AD.",5067,104,,3,58,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26098,"No overall quantification, though the amphorae, samian and mortaria are quantified. There is little pottery that need date before the end of the 1st century AD. The 2nd century is well represented, especially the second half of the century. There seems to be a strong 3rd century presence and there is a reasonable quantity of 4th century material. Most of this is difficult to date closely, though some are certainly likely to date to the second half of the 4th century. None of the few recognisable later 4th century forms is present.",,,45,128,298,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26099,"A large assemblage of pottery was recovered, although only the illustrated vessels are catalogued in the report. No details have therefore been included here, although samian and mortaria were present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26100,No precise quantification. 'Several thousand sherds of coarse pottery were unearthed'. Only illustrated vessels are included in the catalogue. These included a small number of late Iron Age sherds of mid-1st century BC to mid-1st century AD. A single fragment of samian was recovered.,,,,,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26101,"Pottery from the site included sherds of mid-late Iron Age in date, through to the 4th century AD. 291 of the sherds were mid-to-late IA in date; 433 were of late Iron Age 'Belgic' in date; 3041 were Roman. The Roman The assemblage is conservative with few imports or regional wares and small quantities of fine and specialist wares. The very small quantity of regional wares could indicate a decline in the intensity of activity after the middle of the 2nd century, as from the later 2nd and 3rd centuries onwards Romano-British regional wares become more commonplace over a wider area. Most noticeable is the paucity of later Lower Nene Valley colour-coated wares; as this is a major local ware in the area, its absence suggests little activity or occupation taking place during the 3rd and 4th centuries. Cumulatively the range of pottery fabrics indicates a peak of occupation during the later 1st and 2nd centuries, suggesting a change in the nature of activity or occupation had taken place by the 3rd century. Notable finds included two strainers, possibly used for making cheese.",3765,56,,7,54,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26102,"140 sherds of Iron Age pottery weighing 2.585kg were recovered, ranging from early-mid Iron Age to late Iron Age. Only approx. 20% of the sherds were of late Iron Age date, and so only 28 have been included.",28,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26103,"Pottery from both excavations. Mainly of late 2nd-3rd century in date, local in character, dominated by coarse grey and shell tempered wares. The assemblage is largely low status and domestic, indicated by the basic, utilitarian types present, and coupled with the relatively small amount of both regional and continental imports. Fine wares mostly Nene Valley Colour Coat. The assemblage suggests occupation in the main between the late 2nd and 4th centuries. Little evidence for IA activity. Mortaria present but no quantification in the assessment report for the Bungalow site.",3507,66,2,36,45,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26104,Limited data. Pottery from fieldwalking only. 19 LIA sherds. Variety of fabrics suggests continuous occupation throughout the Roman period.,2221,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26105,Limited excavation has taken place. Many sherds were of Lower Nene Valley colour coat. Grey ware and shell-gritted wares also present.,1139,29,3,,41,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
26106,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26107,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26108,"Pottery production at the site changed dramatically from a 'cottage industry' at the beginning of the 1st century AD, and the report terms the pottery manufacture of the mid 1st century as an 'Intrusive Group Potter' phase, when a range of fine tablewares were created not previously seen in the region. The impetus for the change is seen as the presence of the Roman army. The report only lists positively identified and illustrated 'Intrusive Group Pottery', and so quantification has not been included here.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26109,"Pottery was of pre-Belgic and Belgic type, ranging from the end of the 1st century BC to post-AD 25. No quantification of all sherds, only the illustrated pottery listed.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26110,"Pottery was of pre-Belgic late Iron Age in date, with a few Roman and 'Belgic' late Iron Age sherds. Only illustrated pottery listed, so no good quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26111,"Quantification difficult as over 25 years of excavation and not all pottery quantified in reports. Amphorae, mortaria, samian all present in numbers, and pottery notable for having a range of continental pottery and fine Gallo-Belgic copies in the late Iron Age phase.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26112,"No good quantification - sherds from 356 vessels, suggested date mid-2nd to 3rd century. Pottery for a local market. Mortaria included amongst kiln products.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
26113,"No overall quantification, largely illustrated sherds only. Samian and mortaria present. Samian sherds with graffiti on foot rings. Small beaker found inserted into floor of shrine a structured deposit.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26114,"In 1998 report pottery of 1st-early 4th century date, greater quantity of 2nd century. No overall quantification, only illustrated sherds. Samian and mortaria present. In 1986 report 129 sherds (1 mid-IA, the rest all first half of 1st century AD, perhaps towards the beginning of the century).",128,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26115,"Several vessel sherds had graffiti. Otherwise, pottery assemblage on the whole fairly typical for the region. Pottery indicated particularly high level of activity between mid-2nd and mid-4th centuries. Four main wares dominate the assemblage; sandy grog-tempered, shelly ware, Lower Nene Valley grey ware and Lower Nene valley colour coat. LNV grey ware particularly dominant. High proportion of beakers perhaps a result of religious focus for site. Four groups of particularly high concentrations of samian including a pit, a building, a well and the interior of the shrine, possibly representing special deposits. Shrine interior also included several other unusual vessels including a glazed sherd, Moselle ware, a lamp chimney and two unguent jars. Beaker with duck motif possibly of ritual significance, similar to an example from Ratcliffe on Soar, Notts.",28574,487,23,300,1103,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
26116,"408 sherds (approx. 6kg), most not clearly dated and could be of mid-3rd- late 1st c BC or early 1st c AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26117,"Extensive surface scatters recovered during fieldwalking. Mixed Iron Age, mostly mid IA assemblage and a large Roman assemblage. Roman pottery mostly grog and greyware.",9542,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26118,"IA pottery not closely dated. 117 sherds of Roman, suggesting occupation 2nd-4th centuries AD. Grey wares dominated whilst shelly ware were also significant component of assemblage.",117,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26119,"No quantification. Pottery predominantly 2nd century, with decline towards later Roman period.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26122,"177 sherds dated from 4th to 1st centuries BC, much of it later Iron Age but precise quantity not listed.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26123,"No overall quantification, illustrated sherds listed only. Samian and mortaria (some locally made) present. A large Iron Age and Romano-British assemblage. RB assemblage spanning whole Roman period. Small amount of fine table wares and specialist kitchen vessels regarded as exceptional. The production of pottery at Wakerley appears to have been a short-lived and not altogether successful venture.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26124,No quantification but evidence for activity from late Iron Age through to 4th century. Thousands of imported fine ware from late Iron Age ditch.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26125,"No quantification. Pottery of Nene Valley grey ware, though many wasters. Pottery from kiln suggests a mid 2nd century AD date for manufacture.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26126,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26127,"Illustrated pottery listed only, no overall quantification. All vessels wheelmade and Roman in fabric, with 'Belgic' forms. Mid-1st century date suggested for the pottery.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26128,533 LIA and LIA/ER sherds present. The rest Roman. Samian on site rare but present (no quantification of it in pottery report). Mortaria and amphorae absent.,2262,19,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26129,No good data available. Samian and mortaria present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26130,Pottery dated from 2nd century and included Nene Valley ware as well as wares from Oxford and Stowe. No quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
26131,"The majority of the assemblage was early Roman in date (82%), with a mid-late 1st century AD date.  However, the relatively small quantity of Roman greywares compared to grog-tempered sherds, as well as the presence of some Late Iron Age pottery within the same contexts, suggests a pre-Flavian date for the bulk of the assemblage (AD43-69). Approximately 18% of the assemblage (147 sherds, 2251g) was dated Late Iron Age, with a date range of 50BC-AD50.  Of this material, 50% of sherds were handmade, while the remaining 50% comprised either wheel-finished, wheel-turned or those where the manufacturing technique was unclear. In several cases, pottery made in the Late Iron Age tradition occurred alongside wheelmade 'Romanised' vessels.  The occurrence of these two potting traditions within single contexts is not unusual, and is a pattern seen at other sites both within this region. A relatively wide range of vessel fabrics were identified. Imported wares were very limited within the assemblage. 16 sherds of tazza present.",821,26,,,4,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26132,"The assemblage dated from the early Roman period, from the mid-late 1st century, into the 2nd. Considered to be a low-status assemblage.",422,4,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
26133,"MIA pottery not included here. Shelly fabrics remained important in the late Iron Age and early Roman period, but were joined by grog-tempered jars, bowls and dishes of 'Belgic' type. The presence of a North Gaulish beaker points to wider trade links, and the sherd of samian suggests that these were maintained into the 2nd century. The range of late Roman period pottery evident – shell-tempered jars, dropflange dishes, black-burnished ware and Nene Valley ware – reflect patterns of supply and use in the period, for example the increased importance of supra-regional industries and diversification of forms.",233,6,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
26134,"The majority of the assemblage is of an utilitarian nature with locally produced domestic sandy coarse wares, predominantly Sandy Grey wares accounting for the majority of the material recovered. Dating approximately from the mid/late 2nd to 3rd centuries AD, fabrics and forms present within the assemblage are typical of a utilitarian domestic assemblage recovered from low order settlements.",172,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27002,"A small pottery assemblage of 17 sherds was recovered, weighing 231g. The pottery sherds dated from the later 2nd to early 3rd century AD.",17,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27003,The diagnostic pottery recovered was all apparently of late Bronze Age to early Iron Age.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27004,"Limited data but 'pottery was extremely plentiful'. In the first interim report only the pottery from the destruction layer is reported on in the publication. This included approximately 3000 sherds of pottery including mortaria, samian and amphorae. It is important to note that the figures below relate only to this one layer. Also, the number of individual sherds were not presented for pottery types and an estimate of the number of vessels was instead provided. The numbers for amphorae, mortaria and samian below therefore reflect numbers of vessels. A sherd of 'Romano-Saxon' pottery is also noted, considered to be a fabric of Roman type but decorated in 'purely Anglo-Saxon taste'. The bulk of the Great Casterton pottery is likely to have come from the Castor kilns, 10 miles away along Ermine Street. In the second interim report some individual sherds are illustrated and commented on, including two sherds of samian. These have been added to the numbers of samian vessels below.",3000,,1,3,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
27005,No useful data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27006,"Much of the pottery was unsourced shell tempered, grog and shell tempered and white wares, and could range from the mid Iron Age to early Roman period. Dorset BB ware, lower Nene valley reduced ware, black surfaced/Romanising wares were also present.  In addition, 37 Roman sherds were recovered during fieldwalking, including a further sherd of samian.",225,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
27007,"A stratified assemblage of 236 sherds of Romano-British pottery weighing 4.035kg was retrieved from the excavations. The material is well preserved with an average sherd weight of 17.1g. In addition, three sherds of Late Iron Age pottery (28g) and two sherds of Early Saxon pottery (6g) were also recovered. The pottery from ceramic phases 1-3 were based on local production with no imports suggesting that the settlement was of a lower status with local contacts. In the 4th century (Ceramic Phase 4), however the pottery displayed a wider variety of vessel type and much higher levels of table wares and imports from the continent. This reflects the change from a rural farmstead to a higher status villa. An interesting point is the complete absence of Black Burnished ware, oxidised ware, amphora or mortaria. Grey, shelly, grog-tempered, mixed-gritted and sandy coarse wares account for 89% of the assemblage. The majority of these are most likely locally made and predominantly provide the utilitarian jars and bowls for general household use. Shelly ware jars constitute the largest single fabric group at 44.5%, most of which date within the first and second centuries. A few later Roman shelly wares from the Rutland/Lincolnshire border and the South Midlands are also present (Bolton 1968: 1-3; Brown 1994; Pollard 1994: 114). The grey wares (35.2%) are also mostly jars ranging from cordoned Belgic styles dating to the late first century through to Nene Valley grey wares dating to the later second and third centuries (Howe et al 1980: 12-15). Grog-tempered, mixed-gritted and sandy wares are sometimes known as 'transitional' fabrics, largely dating within the first century but possibly continuing into the very early second century (Pollard 1994: 74-75). The forms present here include cordoned, scored and combed decoration suggesting a date largely within the later first century. The white wares are flagons dating to the late-1st and 2nd centuries including an example from Verulamium. Likely sources for the rest include Mancetter-Hartshill or Northamptonshire (Swan 1984: 95-101; Pollard 1994: 113-114). Fine wares account for 9.8% of the assemblage. Romano-British colour-coated wares from the Nene Valley form the majority of the fine wares (8.5%). Beakers, bowls, jars and flagons ranging in date from the late 2nd century through to the 4th are present (Howe et al 1980: 16-25). The remaining fine wares are small amounts of imported Gaulish Samian tableware (dishes and bowls), typical of the late first and second centuries (Webster 1996). Taken together, the variety of fabrics and forms within the assemblage and across phases reveals some interesting points relating to the nature of activity on the site over time. Phases 1-3 most likely represent typical rural farmstead type occupation ranging from the middle of the 1st century through the 2nd and possibly the 3rd century. Earlier occupation during the Late Pre-Roman Iron Age is also possible. Phase 4 is essentially represented by Pit 1 which appears to be a demolition dump associated with a late Roman building with at least one room heated and decorated with painted wall plaster, and as such reflects a change in the nature of occupation from rural farmstead to probable villa. The likely villa, Structure 1, is located in the northern half of the site with the earlier Structure 2 south of the probable enclosure ditch, Ditch 1. This could represent a change or break in occupation, but not necessarily so as generations of the same family groups may have continued to occupy the area, perhaps changing their habitation as fortunes and desires changed. There is also some evidence for Early Saxon occupation, though it is not possible to say if occupation was continuous or if the site was re-occupied some time after the abandonment of Structure 1 which probably took place during the later 4th century.",236,4,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
27008,Early 2nd and 3rd century pottery recovered. No information or quantities provided.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27009,"No detailed information provided in the report, but ring-necked flagons and samian ware were present which dated from circa AD 150-200. 70 per cent of the pottery was of Nene valley colour coated ware and there were only 3 or 4 sherds of greyware. A number of 4th century flanged bowls of Gillam 230 form were also recovered. The earlier pottery came from the north of the site and the later from the south, perhaps indicating some settlement shift.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
27010,"A stratified assemblage of 236 sherds of mid-late Iron Age pottery, weighing 1.320kg and with an estimated vessel equivalent (EVEs) value of 0.94, was retrieved during excavations. A further ten sherds weighing 72g were unstratified. Small quantities of daub (total 30g)were recovered and heavily abraded sherds of Roman pottery, confined largely to Area 3, were also retrieved from stratified contexts. The occurrence of pottery belonging to the distinctive East Midlands scored ware tradition across the assemblage would indicate a Middle to Late Iron Age date for the activity between the third century BC and the first century AD. A total of 19 sherds of Roman pottery were retrieved from stratified contexts. The highly abraded condition of the material (average sherd weight of 5g but in most cases much lower), suggests that this material has become incorporated into the tops of fills probably due to subsequent manuring activity rather than settlement. Where it occurs alongside Iron Age material it is most likely to be intrusive. Where it occurs as the sole dating evidence, caution is advised. The fabrics occurring comprise those normally expected in a rural site of this kind with grey ware (GW) most common and smaller amounts of white ware (WW), oxidised ware (OW), shelltempered ware (CG) and transitional sandy ware (SW) also present. The assemblage appears to date to the earlier Roman period and the lack of Nene Valley colour-coated ware, which would be expected if it were later Roman in date, supports this generalisation.",255,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27011,"A total weight of 223 kg were retrieved from the site, of which 102.610 were stratified. Only the stratified material is well quantified in the report. No amphorae were present in the assemblage. In addition, four vessels were associated with one of the burials (not included below), all 4th century in date.",2529,103,0,4,98,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
27012,"The stratified pottery assemblage from the site suggests occupation in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, although only a very small number of sherds were present.",8,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27013,A total weight of 32.5kg of pottery was recovered of which 5.962kg were stratified. The pottery is predominantly of 4th century in date and the Antonine samian ware may be residual.,113,6,,8,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
27014,No data,79,1248,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27015,"The pottery was largely unabraded and of broadly 4th century date, although none was securely stratified. The pottery are only quantified by weight. 10 grams of mortaria was recovered, representing 0.2 per cent of the assemblage. Aside from this the assemblage is dominated by Lower Nene Valley colour-coated ware.",,3,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
27016,"The 7.6kg of pottery retrieved does not include four vessels unavailable for study. The total number of vessel sherds are not provided in the report, but 8 nearly complete vessels were found in the lower fill of the stone-lined well. No amphorae, mortaria or samian vessels are recorded.",,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27017,The pottery assemblage included,1028,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27018,"Iron Age (no more precise dating available) pottery represented 26.4 per cent of the assemblage, the remainder being Roman. Fabrics represented included grey ware and a BB1 dish of the 2nd century AD.",92,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27019,"Assessment only. 75 sherds, 369g, of the pottery was  Iron Age, between 400 BC- 1st century AD in date. 756, 7.081g, of the sherds were Roman. Very little data is included in the report. The material shows bias towards Nene Valley Colour Coated wares. No samian, mortaria or amphorae are mentioned, although it is possible that they occurred",831,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27020,"The pottery assemblage was not reported on in detail in the report. It included 189 sherds, of which 79 were of Iron Age date and 110 were Roman. Most of the Roman pottery was of 1st-2nd century date, and some sherds were described as 'transitional'.",189,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27021,"The pottery was predominantly of 3rd-4th century date with some 2nd-4th century wares, and included NVGW, NVCC, greyware, oxidised ware, shell tempered ware and white ware.",122,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
27022,"541 mid-late Iron Age sherds (3.14kg) and 863 sherds of Roman pottery (14.4kg) were found. The Iron Age pottery is suggestive of occupation from the 2nd to 1st centuries BC, perhaps into the early decades of the 1st century AD. The main Roman assemblage indicates activity from around the mid-2nd century through to the later 4th century, with probable continuous occupation.",1404,18,,1,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
27023,"The pottery assemblage incorporated the material from both the evaluation and excavation. The pottery was seen as indicative of low-level rural occupation throughout all periods, with abandonment of the settlement some time in the mid-2nd century. The lack of diversity, in terms of forms and fabrics, amongst the pottery assemblage is further evidence for the low status and domestic character and nature of occupation.",990,7,1,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
27024,"Only the Roman pottery associated with the shine are included here. The Iron Age pottery is likely to be of mid-Iron Age date and has not been included. A box of the Roman pottery was lost and was not available for study. A possible tazza in Lower Nene Valley white ware was amongst the assemblage.  The overall character of the assemblage from the site is fairly rural. Although imports are present these form a very minor component; samian wares for example only contributing 1.3% by sherd count, a typical percentage for a rural site although this could also reflect the later date of the site. This is in complete contrast with, for example, the small roadside settlement at Higham Ferrers, Northamptonshire with various religious foci, where samian contributed 3.9% to the much larger assemblage (Timby 2009). The local wares are very typical of the Midlands but the lower incidence of grog-tempered wares, a distinct local tradition of the 1st and 2nd centuries, suggests these were no longer current when the site at Rutland was active, placing its use to the later end of the 2nd century onwards.",1528,188,13,22,19,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
27025,3 sherds only. Possibly 3rd-4th century.,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28001,"The pot containing the coins was of coarseware, probably Severn Valley ware.",1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28002,"Kilns associated with jar, flagon, mortaria, beakers, bowls, jars colanders tazze, feeding bottles and imitation samian forms. All in a buff fabric common to the Cheshire Plain. Also some unusual forms. Kilns in operation from c. AD 90 until the end of the 2nd century. Tile wasters also suggestive of tile production. Nearly 215kg of pottery from the 1993 Gifford excavations dated AD 70/80-230. Most from kilns associated with the settlement, but also mortaria from North-East Gaul, Verulamium and Mancetter-Hartshill, samian, and other colour-coated vessels from Gaul and amphorae from Spain and Southern Spain and Southern Gaul. Black Burnished Ware accounted for 10% of the assemblage. Mortaria was mostly locally produced. No precise quantification by sherd count in Hinchliffe and Williams - catalogued sherds only discussed.",17367,215,1327,330,898,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28003,Finds recovered during Hinchliffe's excavation included samian and mortaria. Not quantified by sherd count in the reports. 43 mortaria but no number of sherds. Considerable importance of local kilns in the supply of pottery. Dorset Black Burnished Ware present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28004,"The pottery assemblage was regarded as unusual in that it contained a relatively restricted date range of mid-late-2nd century and contained a relatively high proportion of imported material consisting of Spanish amphorae, Gaulish samian and also a mortarium from Mancetter-Hartshill, as well as BB coarse wares from Dorset and Severn Valley ware.",63,1,2,1,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28005,"Legible graffito - AMVRCA - on an amphora. Also reports of an infant burial from an amphora that had been placed in the ground. Also some graffiti on samian and some coarse ware vessels, some literate. Pottery wasters associated with a small kiln of late 1st to early 2nd century date - probably only local market production. The Williams and Reid's King Street excavations produced 6994 sherds (190.965kg) (approx. half unstratified).",6994,191,579,156,925,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28006,"Samian, mortaria and amphorae present. Samian quantified by maximum number of vessels and sherd count in the report. The samian presented little evidence for 1st century occupation and most was second century Gaulish ware. The coarseware assemblage comprised predominantly locally made vessels, manufactured in Wilderspool, but also other Romano-British coarse wares. Dorset BB1 also present. Also Cologne colour-coated and Central-Gaulish colour coated wares.",1896,69,125,47,179,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28007,Five samian sherds all Hadrianic or early Antonine. Two sherds of coarse ware of 2nd century date. One of the sherds of samian included a graffito. This was retrograde and reads (probably) 'property of Primus'.,7,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
28008,,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28009,"No Iron Age pottery, only VCP (see other finds).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28010,"Assemblage almost entirely of coarsewares, though a small amount of samian and amphorae. Most very abraded. Dominant fabric local orange Cheshire Plain wares. Also  Dorset Black-burnished ware made up 25% of the assemblage. Also products of kilns of Oxfordshire and Mancetter-Hartshill. 21 sherds from cheese presses identified.",960,6,30,33,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28011,"Pottery predominantly of 2nd century  date. Dominated by a sandy oxidised fabric, thought to be produced in the Wilderspool area. The number and restricted range perhaps suggests the presence of a settlement or production/distribution site nearby, at least in the second century.",450,,,4,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
28012,"Small assemblage, all seemingly local apart from single sherd of samian.",7,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
28013,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28014,"Most of the pottery assemblage came from the Industrial zone, amounting to 72% of the stratified assemblage. Total of 3919 sherds recovered, of which 3301 were stratified. Only the stratified pottery is clearly quantified in the report. A relatively high range of Dorset BB1 (21.8% of stratified assemblage). Also some Nene Valley Colour Coated ware and Oxfordshire wares. Only one sherd with graffito - a decorated samian sherd, graffito illiterate. Repairs noted on some samian vessels. Pottery suggested a peak in the Antonine period, a decline in the later 2nd century, a lower peak in the first half of the 3rd century and a decline again with little more than sporadic deposition of material in the later 3rd and 4th centuries. A small assemblage from the Oxford Archaeology North watching brief is not included here as the sherd count was not clearly quantified.",3301,102,264,79,432,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28015,A literate graffito on a Mancetter-Hartshill mortarium read AN. No quantification of assemblage in brief report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28016,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28017,"There was a very limited range of fabrics and vessel types present. The majority of the pottery was in local oxidised fabric, probably from the Wilderspool kilns. There was small amount of reduced ware of local origin and even less fine oxidised ware. Traded wares were represented by the ubiquitous Dorset BB1 and Severn Valley ware. There were two sherds of Samian recovered and one sherd of South Spanish amphora (Dressel 20). Mortaria sherds are absent entirely. All pottery suggested a mid-2nd century date.",217,3,1,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
28018,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28019,"A small assemblage of Romano-British coarse ware recovered from the foundations of the building, four very abraded and several further unstratified sherds.",4,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28020,"Two sherds of 2nd century samian from the 1975 report, and pottery finds of late 3rd/early 4th century from the previous investigation (for which no quantification).",,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
28021,"No useful quantification in the report. Samian and mortaria present and amphorae noted in the 1933 report by Petch. Graffiti also mentioned by Petch, though seemingly not literate.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28022,"One sherd only, late 1st/2nd century Cheshire Plains ware.",1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28023,"Seven sherds (100g). 3rd-4th century mortarium, Black Burnished Ware 1 cooking pot, 2nd-4th century Nene Valley colour coated ware vessel. Suggested 3rd-4th century date for the pit fill.",7,0,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
28024,"72 sheds, 530g. BB1 and amphorae present. Most of the assemblage Cheshire Plains ware, some burnt (possibly derived from cremations) and some apparently wasters. The types of fabrics and forms identified in the assemblage date from the Flavian period to the 2nd century.",72,1,1,,2,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
28025,"Pottery included Black Burnished Ware and Severn Valley Ware, a Nene Valley mortarium, Oxfordshire Ware, locally produced grey ware and samian. The dominant fabric type was local Cheshire Plains ware typical of the Wilderspool kilns.",27,,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
28026,The small pottery assemblage consisted of a sherd of Oxfordshire ware colour-coated beaker and four sherds of orange ware dating to the late 3rd-4th centuries.,5,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
28027,No quantification or detail in the report though at least one sherd of samian recovered.,,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
28028,"80 sherds and over 1500g prehistoric (late Iron Age) pottery recovered. Over 1kg of this is VCP (briquetage) and therefore not included in the data below. Approx. 25 sherds of non-VCP prehistoric pottery (calculated by weight). 49 sherds (500g) of Roman pottery, dominated by Cheshire Plain Ware but also mortaria of Holt fabric, Dorset Black Burnished Ware and unstratified amphorae and samian sherds.",74,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28029,"Pottery from the kiln included stamped mortaria of a local potter. Other products included jars, cooking-pots, flagons or flasks and bowls including imitation samian. No precise quantification of sherds.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
28030,"The assemblage was of 1st-early 2nd century in date. The extremely low representation of Black Burnished ware (three fragments) is a good indicator of the early dating of the assemblage, as is not regarded as taking a significant part of the northern military pottery market until after c AD 120.",363,13,29,19,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29001,"At least 96 coarseware and 27 samian fragments discovered in/around the shrine, mostly early Roman though continuing to the 4th C AD. High % of local bowls/cooking pots. 4 sherds of amphorae. High degree of fragmentation.",127,,4,,27,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
29002,"The enclosure ditch contained handmade mudstone tempered Iron Age pottery, including an everted rim from a jar, typical of late Iron Age date. Early Roman pottery was found higher up the fill including Severn Valley ware and Black burnished ware.",97,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29003,Modest assemblage of 2nd-3rd C AD pottery including Severn Valley ware and Black burnished ware. Also limited Malvernian ware and 3 sherds of samian.,119,1,,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
29004,"Pottery from various excavations and fieldwalking events from 1963 onwards. Dominated by Severn Valley wares, mostly oxidised types, and also frequent Black-burnished wares and some Malvernian wares. Oxfordshire products also well-represented. Included Dressel 20, dr7-11 Gauloise 4 amphorae. Central Gaulish samian is predominant. A face pot was also discovered in a Severn Valley ware fabric.",2116,,57,,274,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29005,"Pottery mainly comprised Severn Valley ware, Black-burnished ware and wheel-made Malvernian ware, dating late 1st - 3rd/4th C. A total of 48 sherds of Samian ware were recovered from the main site, and 13 sherds from one of the pits. Mortaria  and amphora recovered.",775,,,,61,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29006,"The large quantity of mainly early Roman pottery recovered included a particularly high percentage of South Gaulish samian, with 30% decorated vessels, together with other imported vessels (including mortaria and flagons) and at least three types of amphora (Dressel 20, CAM 186 and Gallic wine amphorae). Also specialised vessels - 'honey pots', which may suggest early military occupation.",1651,,27,,99,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29007,"Small assemblage, but including Dr 20 amphorae, mortaria and samian. Other vessels comprise Severn Valley Wares, Black-burnished wares and south Wales grey wares (jars, bowls and tankards).",60,,3,6,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29008,"Only a small proportion of the pottery recovered was analysed. This comprised a variety of finewares (Moselle, Nene valley, New Forest & Oxford) as well as Black burnished wares (forming the majority) and Severn Valley wares. All samian was central or eastern Gaulish and overall the assemblage dates 2nd-4th C AD, along with mid 1st C AD pottery from the earlier enclosure. Beakers, bowls and jars comprise most common forms.",215,,2,9,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29009,Unquantified mid to late Iron Age pottery and 4 sherds of Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29010,"A significant quantity of pottery, though unquantified except amphora. Includes much samian, amphorae (Dressel 1, 14 and 20 + CAM 186c), Oxfordshire wares, Nene valley wares, Black burnished wares and Malvernian wares.",,,313,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29011,"Modest sized assemblage including samian, mortaria and amphorae. No report.",845,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29012,A small assemblage from the 1970s trial trenches indicating a 3rd-4th C date for occupation. A few sherds from 1990s suggested 2nd-4th C.,26,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
29013,"Minimal pottery recorded, ranging from 2nd-4th C in date. And mostly comprising Black-burnished wares",,,,,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
29014,A small assemblage of 1st C AD pottery,92,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29015,Unquantified assemblage of 1st to 3rd C AD date. Includes Severn Valley ware,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29016,"A total of 96 sherds of pottery came from the main enclosure ditch, dated between the mid/late Iron Age and the 1st century AD through to the 2nd century AD.",124,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29017,Considerable quantities of pottery dating 1st-2nd C AD including Black Burnished ware.,2100,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29018,109 sherds of late Iron Age Malvernian pottery and 3506 of Roman pottery including Severn valley ware and Black-burnished ware.,3615,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29019,"Most pottery from first evaluation (176 sherds) dates later 2nd-early 4th C, with a limited number of possible 1st/earlier 2nd C fragments. The majority of the sherds (52% by count) are from Severn Valley ware vessels; vessels made in the Malvernian region make up 13%, with Black Burnished ware sherds making up over 20%. Includes three very abraded sherds of Oxfordshire mortaria. The 91 sherds from the later evaluation were in a limited but similar range of fabrics, dominated by Severn valley ware, primarily 2nd-3rd C AD.",267,3,,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
29020,"The Roman pottery assemblage comprised 2090 sherds (31kg), dating 1st-4th C AD with an emphasis on the later Roman period. Severn Valley wares formed the majority fabric, while the non-local assemblage was heavily dominated by Black-burnished ware. A total of 355 sherds from the lower half of a single vessel of Dressel 20 amphora were retrieved from a pit, where it had been deliberately sunk. The jar was the dominant vessel type present (57.88%), with bowls and dishes at just 23.36%, and drinking vessels 9.52%.",2090,31,355,25,47,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29021,"A small assemblage though mostly concentrated in one trench. The pottery was composed mainly of Severn Valley ware and Palaeozoic limestone tempered ware. There were single sherds of an Oxford mortarium. greyware, a colour coated flagon rim-neck and one tiny samian sherd.",87,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
29022,"A total of 543 sherds from roadscheme excavation  and 295 sherds from subsequent investigations. The bulk of the assemblage comprised a range of Severn Valley ware fabrics, mainly oxidised, though other sources was also represented, including Black-burnished ware from Dorset, Oxfordshire ware and imported samian and amphorae (Dressel 20). The chronology ranges from later 1st to mid 4th C AD.",838,,45,5,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
29023,"The majority of the assemblage comprised Severn Valley ware. Malvernian wares, both handmade and wheel made where also well represented and the only other fabric occurring in any quantity was Black burnished ware. The main chronology was mid 2nd-early/mid 3rd C AD with only minimal evidence for any activity after this date.",652,10,,4,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
29024,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29025,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29026,The Roman and putative Roman sherds are so small and abraded that they are likely to have been part of a general surface or manuring scatter. They include Severn Valley wares and Malvernian wares,7,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29027,"Assemblage dominated by Severn Valley ware then Malvernian limestone-tempered ware, with some Dorset black burnished ware  and other minor fabrics including two sherds of Oxfordshire white ware mortaria. The range of wares present is very limited and mostly local in origin, suggesting a fairly modest, rural settlement, possibly not that long-lived and largely dating to the second half of the 2nd century. The pottery could suggest a later 1st century / early 2nd century start date when the indigenous local wares were still in circulation.",534,6,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
29028,"A small assemblage of 41 sherds of pottery dating to the early Roman period. Earliest pottery comprises Malvernian rock tempered and limestone-tempered ware, which typically date from the later Iron Age but continued to be used into the early Roman period. The association of the fabric with Roman sherds indicates a likely early Roman date. Of the remaining 30 Roman sherds, 21 are oxidised Severn Valley wares, one is a sherd of Dorset black burnished ware, and eight are a local Malvernian wheel made variant.",41,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
29029,An apparent abundance of pottery (including samian) but no report or further information.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
29030,"Pottery not quantified but includes Black-burnished ware, Oxfordshire Colour coats (imitating Dr 36 and Dr 38 and a beaker), Severn Valley Ware and Grey Ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30001,"A substantial assemblage mostly dating later 2nd-3rd C AD and dominated by Severn Valley wares, then Black-burnished wares. Also a high incidence of imported wares (East and Central Gaulish samian and amphorae - Dressel 20 and Italian 'Almond-rimmed'). A small number of wasters present. A considerable quantity of Romano-British pottery was also recorded in the evaluation to the north, but this remains unquantified. It comprised mainly Severn Valley wares, but included significant proportions of imported wares (i.e. amphora and Samian pottery), imported regional wares (Black Burnished and Colour Coated wares), and mortaria.",3705,90,365,87,380,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
30002,Only 32 sherds of middle-late Iron Age pottery.,32,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30003,Assemblage dates late 2nd/early 3rd C AD and includes a dump of waster material from Severn Valley ware production. Black-burnished wares form the only other sizable component. The amphora comprise Dr 20. East and central Gaulish samian,1130,16,3,8,23,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
30004,A small assemblage mostly comprising Severn Valley wares. Three sherds came from the south enclosure (including a 2nd C mortarium rim) and 10 from the northern double-ditched enclosure.,13,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
30005,"A small assemblage (not quantified for the evaluation), mostly composed of Severn Valley Wares, but also Malvernian wares. These all appear to date to the early first - second century AD",163,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30006,A substantial quantity of Romano-British pottery was recovered but no quantification or specialist report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30007,"A substantial assemblage from the pottery kilns, mostly kiln products, including wasters. The assemblage comprises 94% Severn Valley Wares (including red colour coated wares), mostly bowls, storages jars and flagons. Dated later 4th C AD.",1084,8,,4,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
30008,"Middle to late Iron Age pottery assemblage, mostly LIA and of local origin.",100,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30009,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30010,Black-Burnished Ware and Severn Valley Ware pottery encountered but the only quantification was from latest excavation in 2009. The pottery was dated mainly 3rd – 4th century AD.,133,1,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
30011,"A very limited quantity of Later Iron Age/early Roman pottery, including Severn Valley wares and a single south Gaulish samian sherd.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
30012,"A limited ceramic assemblage of late Iron Age to 2nd C AD date, mostly later 1st-2nd C and dominated by Severn Valley ware. 127 sherds came from the earlier excavation and 347 from the later excavation. All amphora Dr 20.",474,3,10,2,27,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
30013,A small assemblage of middle-late Iron Age and early Roman pottery. Most Iron Age pottery was Malvernian fabric produced in Worcestershire. The Roman pottery comprised Severn Valley ware.,34,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30014,"A small assemblage of most very abraded sherds, including Severn Valley wares.",37,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30015,A small assemblage of late Roman pottery including Severn Valley wares.,116,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30016,Small assemblage of 2nd C date. Includes mortaria and black-burnished ware.,100,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
30017,"Approximately 200 sherds including many wasters from the production site. The wasters comprised red colour coated wares, tankards, colanders, flasks, bowls and jars. The pottery is generally 4th C in date.",200,,,15,2,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
30018,Pottery of later 2nd-4th C found but no further details.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30019,Small assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date.,20,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
30020,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30021,Later 2nd to 4th c pottery found but not recorded and reported.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30022,"A small assemblage of 3rd-4th century pottery, with east Midlands shell-tempered wares, later Black-burnished wares and Oxfordshire and Mancetter-Hartshill wares. A low proportion of Severn Valley wares. No quantification of ceramic wares by sherd count.",325,4,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
30023,"A moderate sized assemblage of pottery spanning 2nd-early 4th c AD. The pottery was generally in moderate condition and dominated by Severn Valley ware, then Dorset black-burnished ware. The amphorae were all Dr 20. Wide mouthed jars were the dominant form.",224,4,7,2,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
30024,"A very small quantity of very abraded pottery was recovered, indicating there not no settlement in the immediate vicinity. Mostly Severn Valley ware but including 3 sherds of samian. All dated 2nd-3rd c AD.",35,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30025,A very small quantity of high abraded Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30026,"A substantial but unquantified quantity of Roman pottery, mainly Severn Valley ware, but including some Black Burnished Ware, a fragment of Samian pottery, and a number of other coarse and fine wares.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
30027,"A relatively significant quantity of well preserved large fragments of Romano-British pottery, including black burnished ware, Severn Valley ware and other red wares. Dated later 3rd-4th C AD. No report or quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
30028,"A modest sized assemblage (only quantified for the 2011 evaluation; 0.0269ha) mostly comprising Severn Valley ware, along with Black burnished ware, Mancetter/Hartshill mortaria and handmade Malvernian ware. Most dating later 1st-3rd c AD. Twelve sherds of Samian were recovered, including two, very abraded decorated pieces. Amphorae included:  Dressel 20 olive oil amphora and a sherd of possible Rhodian (pink) wine amphorae. A ditch terminus  contained a near complete amphora.",228,4,8,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
30029,"An unusually large quantity of pottery for the region (including some very large sherds), dating from 3rd century AD onwards. The pottery was largely made up of Severn Valley wares with some Black Burnished ware and a small fragment of Samian ware. The Severn Valley forms present include a large proportion of at least two large jars, at least three wide mouthed jars and fragments from two tankards. It is suggested that they may have been deposited in the ditch during the later 3rd C AD as a structured deposit.",394,10,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
30030,"A small assemblage of mainly 2nd C AD date including Severn Valley wares, Black-burnished wares, samian, Nene Valley wares and Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria. Forms includes flagons, cups tankards, bowls, dishes and jars.",228,3,,,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
30031,"Most of the assemblage (58%) came from surface collection at the site. As a whole the assemblage dated late 1st/2nd C to late 3rd/4th C. Includes an almost complete jar of late 2nd/3rd C date in a ditch fill. Mostly Severn valley wares, with minor Verulamium wares, Mancetter-Hartshill wares and Nene Valley wares.  Absence of BB1.",213,2,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
31004,No data but pottery reported from the site.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
31005,"Notable ceramic finds included a samian inkwell. Pottery not quantified in the published report, though nearly 15kg reported in the 1994 grey lit report (no sherd count). 30 sherds recorded in 1998 evaluation report. Not included below as so much of the rest of the pottery is unquantified. Flavian samian from Southern Gaul noted. Some with erotic decoration. A jug with a moulded phallus suggests a possible religious function. Literate graffiti on some pottery.",,15,,,,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31006,"Pottery included here includes all pottery apart from that recorded from the potential domestic settlement (area H - database record 31007). The pottery from the area is notable in that the pottery seems to include pottery from two broad traditions, including both Derbyshire ware and Severn Valley ware, though the assemblage is thought to be more consistent with East Midlands traditions. Pottery was suggestive of activity in the mid-late 2nd to early 3rd century.",644,12,2,7,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31007,"A relatively large assemblage of pottery was recovered, including small quantities of amphorae, mortaria and samian. Most pottery was domestic cooking ware, and a large number of mid-2nd century sherds were recovered. The pottery from the area is notable in that the pottery seems to include pottery from two broad traditions, including both Derbyshire ware and Severn Valley ware, though the assemblage is thought to be more consistent with East Midlands traditions.",1015,6,2,12,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31008,Most of the sherds were of a Severn Valley ware type but there was a single sherd of samian ware.,8,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
31009,Most if not all of the Roman pottery was probably of 2nd century date. Some local fabrics from a kiln at Sutton Coldfield (unpublished).,79,,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
31010,"Approx. 6000 sherds recovered in total, though some prehistoric. No precise quantification, but samian and mortaria present.",6000,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
31011,"The uppermost fill of the cremation produced four sherds from a thin-walled jar or beaker of an undiagnostic fabric, but which dated to the 2nd Century AD.",4,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
31012,Pottery of 2nd-3rd century date recovered.,10,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
31013,"Pottery was predominantly of mid-late 2nd century in date, with a small number of late 1st to 2nd century sherds from the ditch and tree-throw holes to the south east of the main site.",331,5,1,7,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31014,"No sherds of certain LIA or Roman date from the excavation, though 38 sherds of IA pottery recovered. 4 sherds of Roman pottery recovered during the evaluation phase.",4,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
31015,"The composition of the assemblage is much as would be expected in this region. Little pottery earlier than 2nd century AD, and pottery of 3rd to 4th century date also recovered. A single samian sherd reported by Webster in his 1981 report.",453,4,,9,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
31016,1 sherd from a mortarium - 2nd century.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
31017,"No quantification, though pottery suggested activity between the 2nd and 3rd centuries.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
31018,1 sherd of abraded 1st century Romano-British pottery.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
31019,"Pottery quantification an estimate based on information in report. Thought to date from between AD 125-200, with some a little later. Several fragments of 11 mortaria represented, not quantification of individual sherds.",71,,,11,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
31020,"Pottery predominantly of late 1st-mid-2nd century. Some imported wares present including an amphora sherd and samian. The sparse dating evidence suggests occupation probably from the early 2nd century, possibly extending into the 3rd century. The vessels and wares were thought indicative of a rural domestic settlement of low status in the area.",70,1,1,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31021,Relatively high proportion of samian sherds. Pottery from the site generally is suggestive of an early-mid 2nd century date. Very few BB1 jars.,392,3,4,2,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31022,"Specialist vessels included lamp-holders and an incense burner, as well as a face mask jar (possibly produced in the kiln). Some of the pottery produced suggestive of a military influence, and the group is thought to have been Neronian in date. No precise quantification in the report, though amphorae present and mortaria and samian present in numbers, and the samian included Southern Gaulish, 1st century wares.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31023,"No quantification in the report, but samian, amphorae and mortaria present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31024,"35 sherds of samian and grey ware found, though no other quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
31025,"The site was considered unusual for having a large number of mortaria, and the only site to have an example of mortaria from the Shenstone kiln. Most diagnostic sherds dated to the late 2nd-3rd/mid-4th centuries, with the exception of a 2nd century BB1 jar and a flagon. Two mortaria wasters also.",71,,,13,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
31026,"Archaeomagnetic dating of the kiln gave a final firing date of c. AD 125-175. Pottery sherds came principally from linear features, two structures and a pottery kiln. Overall date range for the assemblage was mid-late 2nd-late 3rd/early 4th century, and the pottery was thought to be representative of a modest rural settlement. Majority of pottery in fabrics made at the kiln, and the most common product were wide-mouthed jars. Mortaria possibly produced on site. Also BB1 Dorset and some Severn Valley wares as well as Derbyshire ware jars. Most of the white wares thought likely to have come from Mancetter-Hartshill, and a relatively high proportion of mortaria may either reflect ready access from Mancetter-Hartshill or else manufacture on site. Also small amounts of Nene Valley fine ware and some Oxfordshire colour-coated ware. Majority of the assemblage were jars, with a few beakers or cups and relatively low numbers of bowls and dishes.",3147,44,7,117,46,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31027,No quantification but samian was present. Mortaria also illustrated in the report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
31028,"Much of the pottery was unstratified, though a small quantity came from stratified deposits. Coarse ware and samian were recovered, as well as some amphorae. Quantities not precise, but at least 28 sherds of samian, 217 various coarse wares, 97 sherds of Black Burnished ware, 35 of mortaria, 13 miscellaneous coarse wares, 76 amphorae fragments.",472,,82,35,28,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31029,"Much of the ceramic evidence related to funerary urns. Most was late 1st to mid 2nd century in date. BB1 well represented. Reduced wares were common, reflecting the use of reduced ware jars as cremation urns in the early 2nd century.",5462,43,1,21,43,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
31030,"All the Roman sherds were similar in condition and apparent date and probably represent a relatively short-lived occupation in the 4th century. Greyware was most common, with a single Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria sherd, a small number of Nene Valley Colour-Coated ware, oxidized wares and some miscellaneous white wares.",52,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
32001,Tiny assemblage of just 9 sherds. Most were Iron Age.,9,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32002,"A small number of amphorae, samian and mortaria sherds were found. Sherd counts for these had to be worked out from percentages provided and are therefore estimates.",845,16,5,11,13,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
32003,"A small amount of samian recovered, but generally low levels of fine wares and the assemblage is suggestive of a low status rural site.",230,,,13,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32004,"The pottery assemblage from the site is regarded as a 'basic level rural site' assemblage. Fired clay plates also present, thought to be kiln furniture, and wasters also suggest the presence of a kiln site nearby.",1985,33,1,6,50,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
32005,Most of the Romano-British pottery was of late Iron Age/early Roman type and of late La Tène/'Belgic' type. Oven plate fragments also found.,244,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32006,"21529 sherds were recovered in total but 4648 were unstratified - as most of the detailed quantification of the pottery did not include unstratified material (samian etc.), this has been omitted from the figures below. No weight provided. The samian formed 4.9% of the stratified assemblage. Amphorae were fairly well represented. Mortaria likely to be particularly well represented because of the proximity to the production site at Mancetter/Hartshill. At least 20 miniature vessels were present, occurring from the timber temple phase onwards. Face fragments from vessels also recorded, as well as a pedestal from a possible tazze (or lamp), and a triple vase.  A tile fragment included part of a literate cursive graffito. Additional samian, mortaria and amphorae fragments found during evaluation trenching, south and east of the main temple area - types not quantified, but 361 sherds found during the evaluation.",17603,,304,2062,825,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
32007,Illustrated pottery only listed. Samian and mortaria present. Face pot vessel noted.  Four fired clay flat discs also noted.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32008,"Pottery predominantly of 'Belgic' type of late Iron Age/early Roman date, in the 1st century AD. The data here include 172 IA/Roman sherds from the excavation and 35 sherds from an earlier evaluation. Some Tiddington kiln products present.",207,2,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
32009,The large majority of the Roman pottery comprises coarsewares of likely local origin including Severn Valley wares and sandy reduced wares.,510,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32010,"319 sherds of RB pottery recovered from all areas excavated, but not divided in the report, although most of the assemblage reportedly came from the enclosure annexe ditches, so a nominal 300 sherds have been included here.",300,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32011,"Pottery not divided by area in the 2010 quarry report (which includes multiple sites), and as the report states that most pottery came from another area, none has been included in this record. Only three sherds were recorded in the 1999 road scheme report, all from a carinated bowl of 1st century date.",3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32012,"No weight provided. Relatively little 1st-2nd century pottery, the majority being 3rd-4th century. No indication in the 1st-2nd centuries in the pottery assemblage of anything other than a basic rural site. The later Roman assemblage shows indications of the site's increased status.",2958,,18,94,97,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
32013,"This area dominated by 1st century, particularly pre-Flavian pottery.",876,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32014,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32015,"A Severn Valley ware vessel buried with one of the burials, an adult male. No further data.",1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32016,"The assemblage was considered to be non-urban, though possibly reflective of a nucleated rural site, with a typical rural assemblage. Supply seems to have been fairly local. The assemblage was mostly of early-to-mid Roman date, and nothing necessarily later than 3rd century. Severn Valley wares almost absent.",1435,13,,3,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32017,"Most material residual in medieval contexts, only a small number of sherds from gullies. Severn Valley wares dominant, and the dates spanned 1st-4th century. Likely to be mostly manure scatters.",55,1,1,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
32018,"Six sherds only, mostly Severn Valley ware. Of surface finds recovered but not well recorded, the bulk date from the 3rd-4th centuries AD.",6,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32019,"Site dominated by pottery of early-mid 1st century in date, suffering a rapid decline by the Flavian period. A further peak in the late 2nd-early 3rd century. A small amount of LIA pottery, but no certain features and pottery likely residual. Two storage jars were almost complete and buried in pits in mid-1st century - these thought not to be ritual, but for storage.",428,8,,1,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32020,"Some pre-Flavian, Belgic pottery, with a high proportion of storage jars. Predominantly 1st century.",540,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32021,"Pottery largely typical of other Tiddington assemblages. Many local fabrics. Some evidence for seconds, but not wasters, from Tiddington kiln. None of the pottery necessarily later than around AD 200. Overall the pottery suggest fairly intensive activity in the later 1st-2nd centuries, while also including occasional earlier and later pieces.",75,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32022,"Tiny assemblage. Earliest material was 'Belgic' and probably 1st century in date, though the majority was 2nd century onwards. A component of late fabrics of late 3rd-4th century present, though only in small numbers.",51,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32023,The Romano-British pottery was mainly undiagnostic 2nd-4th century material. It included some Severn Valley ware and Black Burnished ware but there were no fine wares.,27,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32024,3 RB sherds from evaluation.,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32025,"Pottery from the settlement is not well quantified in the interim reports, but samian and mortaria were present, and the assemblage is regarded as 'normal'.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32026,52 sherds of LIA/RB pottery and 33 sherds of RB pottery.,85,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32027,2 sherds of Romano British pottery only.,2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32028,,49,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32029,8 sherds from 25a Grange Road (387g). Most are Severn Valley ware.,8,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32030,"The majority of the stratified pottery recovered was probably locally produced and dates from the mid/late 1st-century AD. A further 7 sherds found during OA evaluation to south. Pottery from the 1988 excavation (1452 sherds) was notable for the quantity of 1st century material (and Anglo-Saxon pottery), and some fine table wares.",1550,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32031,Pottery was not dated more closely than Romano-British.,10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32032,"A maximum of 20 sherds of Belgic fabric, and a further 2 sherds of late 1st century AD date. A few scraps of samian mentioned in the 1960 report.",22,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32033,"Pottery deposition started later than c. AD 60-70, and most pottery was 2nd-3rd century in date. No late 4th century, pottery and only confirmed activity up until the mid-4th, although it is possible that activity did continue later. Severn Valley wares dominant. Fineware data are at higher levels than is usual for rural sites in this region. Samian and mortaria were quantified as a proportion of the stratified assemblage only (846 sherds), whilst amphorae were only unstratified and were presented as a proportion of the whole assemblage.",2429,24,2,19,32,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
32034,"71 sherds from the evaluation, all of mid-late 2nd century except for one intrusive 4th century sherd. However, a 1991 watching brief produced 57 sherds, some of which was 3rd-4th century.",128,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32035,"Pottery suggested activity from the 2nd to 4th centuries AD. The pottery suggested that the site may have been more than a basic rural settlement. Samian had a distinctly later 2nd century emphasis. The earliest Severn Valley ware pieces seem to have a 2nd-3rd century date range, and the bulk of the material has a later 3rd-4th century date range. The evidence seems to suggest some occupation from the Hadrianic period onwards, but the bulk of the recovered material is probably of later 3rd-4th century date. The evidence is not good enough to indicate whether occupation ran on until the end of the 4th century. BB1 included in assemblage.",286,4,1,2,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
32036,The assemblage mainly comprises wares spanning the later Iron Age through to the 2nd century AD.,192,5,1,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
32037,"Pottery recovered from the earlier investigation consisted mainly of Severn Valley wares, Black Burnished ware and grey wares with some colour coated ware and Mancetter mortaria. It was dated to the 3rd-4th century AD. A small assemblage of pottery (7 sherds) from the later watching brief was regarded as similar.",7,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
32038,"Small assemblage of 137 sherds. Iron Age pottery was not closely dated, but was of mid-to-late Iron Age in date. The Roman assemblage (110 of the sherds) was predominantly of 2nd century date, and nothing to suggest occupation beyond the 2nd century.",137,1,,2,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32039,,27,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32040,Pottery of 2nd-4th century date recovered.,48,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32041,"A single sherd was found in the watching brief, whilst 246 were recovered from the evaluations. Pottery generally of 1st-4th century in date, with most diagnostic wares of 1st-2nd century. 1st century material included the carinated jars in grog-tempered 'Belgic' fabrics common elsewhere at Tiddington. Fragments of rusticated cooking pot suggested an early 2nd century date for one ditch. Other regional and foreign imports included Severn Valley ware, Black Burnished ware, pink grogged ware and some samian (no quantification).",247,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32042,,22,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32043,"Most pottery was local grey ware and Severn Valley ware, but Black Burnished ware and other imports were present, including mortaria and samian. Finewares noted as high. A further 10291 sherds in Warwick Museum are reportedly from the 1930s excavation at this location, but as they were not recovered during the watching brief they have been excluded from the data below. No quantification of individual pottery types.",150,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32044,"Several tiles had pre-fired literate graffiti, including a tile with alphabet on it. Illustrated pottery only in the report, no good quantification. Decorated samian present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32045,Three sherds only,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32046,No quantification but samian and mortaria both present. 1st-2nd century with an emphasis on the early 2nd century.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32047,V small assemblage. One sherd of samian.,8,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32048,Limited detail in the report  - illustrated sherds described only. Samian present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
32049,Limited detail in the report  - illustrated sherds described only. Samian and mortaria present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32050,Pottery not quantified by sherd count in report and only illustrated vessels are discussed. Mortaria and samian present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32051,"No total sherd count, though samian and mortaria both present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32052,Only illustrated pottery discussed in detail. Mortaria present but not quantified. Pottery ranged in date from the late first to fourth century AD.,524,,,,32,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32053,Illustrated sherds only in the report. Thought typical of 2nd-3rd centuries. Mortaria and samian present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32054,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32055,"Pottery not precisely quantified in the report - coarse pottery seemingly not all listed, though mortaria and samian all possibly listed. At least 63 coarse ware sherds, though likely to be many more. Also 'several' sherds of an amphora. Earliest pottery is of late 1st or early 2nd century in date, with pottery of the 2nd century and 4th century also represented.",,,,19,59,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
32056,Limited quantification. Pottery of late 1st-early 2nd and 4th century date recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32057,"Illustrated sherds only in the report. Products were storage jars, jars, bowls, dishes as well as other types. One kiln likely to be first half of second century, the others likely to be early-mid 4th century. Fabric of the kiln described as a hard, slightly gritty medium grey colour.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32058,No data other than that wasters were present and the site is thought to be a kiln site. Pottery of 2nd-3rd century and 3rd-4th century recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32059,"No quantification, though surface finds include mortaria, samian, Nene Valley ware, colour coated and oxidised ware. Pottery dated from the mid-Iron Age through to the late 4th century, with a range of fabrics and vessel types. Coarse ceramic discs also found. Most pottery was coarse ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
32060,"No data, though pottery recovered.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32061,"4.2kg of pottery recovered (no count), of which 3kg was mortaria. None of the mortaria had been used and much was under-fired. Other pottery included grey wares, orange wares, and these were dated to the 3rd century AD.",,4,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
32062,"No quantification in the short report. All three kilns manufactured sandy reduced coarse wares, though one also produced oxidised wares. The range of vessels produced was limited, and the forms were suggestive of a production date in the first half of the 2nd century AD. Non-kiln pottery was of 3rd-4th century in date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32063,"Two small pottery kilns of late 1st-early 2nd century date were found. The first, probably late 1st century, produced vessels in buff sandy fabrics and a coarser brown sandy fabrics, and these were mostly jars but also included a tanker and beaker. The second, probably first half of the second century, appears to have produced jars in sandy oxidised and reduced versions. No further data.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32064,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
32065,"No quantification. Pottery production not confined to mortaria, though mortaria increasingly important from the mid-2nd century. Some kilns focussed only on mortaria production. See Swan 1984 for overview of the industry.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
32066,"A possible waster included in the assemblage. Pottery deposits generally regarded as deposits of domestic rubbish. Relatively high numbers of bowls, dishes and flagons noted, falling on the border between rural and villa and urban sites. Overall impression of relatively high status for a rural site, confirmed by presence of several amphorae as well as fine wares such as Oxfordshire red colour-coated ware, Nene Valley colour-coated wares and samian. High level of both amphorae and mortaria notable, and the number of mortaria may reflect proximity to supply at Mancetter/Hartshill. BB1 also present in reasonable numbers.",823,12,35,42,12,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
33001,"1439 sherds (1.549kg) of pottery came from Area A (double ditched enclosure) - the pottery dated from the 2nd to 4th centuries AD. Severn Valley ware the dominant type. Assemblage seen as typical of low-status, small-scale rural RB domestic occupation. Area B (Livestock Herding Structures) produced a further 1372 (10.7kg) sherds of Romano-British pottery. Again Severn Valley ware dominant. Main period of late 2nd to early 3rd century. At least one waster present. Areas C-D (Roadside plots) produced 483 sherds (3.7kg) of 2nd/3rd-4th century pottery. Severn valley ware dominant. An additional 50 sherds were recovered from other investigations.",3344,16,,32,60,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
33002,"4 sherds, mostly Severn Valley ware. Pottery dated only broadly from 1st to 4th centuries.",4,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
33003,One residual sherd of IA pottery. Roman pottery was of 1st/2nd century in date. Some Severn Valley ware.,17,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
33004,2 sherds of Roman pottery only.,2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
33005,"The products were red ware and grey ware tankards, jars and bowls. Samian also present in small numbers. A suggested date for the industry at the site is second half of the 2nd century AD, or possibly later.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
33006,"Very little pottery of mid-late 1st century, but much more of mid-late 2nd/early 3rd centuries.",745,12,18,19,33,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
33007,"Several near complete vessels were recovered and wasters included tankards, jars, bowls, dishes, lids, cheese presses and mortaria. The main products appear to have been jars and bowls. Only 6 sherds recovered from watching brief. A single diagnostic Severn Valley ware sherd amongst the assemblage. Wasters were found associated with the excavated kiln.",5270,101,,3,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34001,"No detail, though samian recovered.",118,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34002,"Only 17 sherds, 266.5g recovered. Moderately well preserved. Most unfeatured body sherds of oxidised Severn Valley ware - 1st-4th centuries. Most likely to be mid or later Roman than earlier. Other sherds Malvernian rock-tempered and Oxfordshire colour-coated flanged cup - both likely to be 4th century, and pottery supports a late Roman date.",17,0,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34003,"The majority of sherds recovered were of late Iron Age and Roman fabrics. Pottery sherds suggested occupation at the site probably started during the late Iron Age, though most was residual within Roman contexts so this is not confirmed. Range and forms standard for a Roman rural site in the region. Assemblage dominated by locally produced coarse wares. Some mortaria present including single sherd of Severn Valley ware mortaria. Non-local traded wares included BB1, Nene Valley ware, Oxfordshire wares, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, West Mids mortaria, Wroxeter Raetian mortaria, Brockley Hill mortaria, a single amphora sherd, Rhenish ware, German or Rhenish mortarium… A single Severn Valley sherd displayed a non-literate graffito, possibly depicting a modius holding ears of corn. Other ceramic objects included oven material, also a group of ceramic plates, seemingly  a regional object (only seen elsewhere in Oxfordshire and Warwickshire).",4644,5621,1,23,30,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34004,"Most pottery spanning 2nd-3rd centuries. Typical rural assemblage, with typical utilitarian assemblage. A further 252 sherds recovered and published in the 2000 report not yet included in the figures below.",1999,17,2,6,54,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34005,"A much large assemblage of sherds from mid Roman (2nd-3rd centuries), and expanded repertoire of forms and fabrics. Dominant fabrics Severn Valley ware.",2071,41,1,7,41,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34006,"Assemblage dominated by Severn Valley industry wares. Other main components Malvernian wares. The single Gallic amphora sherd only possible. Assemblage also dominated by jars. Assemblage considered typical for the area, probably a fairly low-status settlement.",2421,36,1,1,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34007,Most LIA/Roman pottery of 2nd century AD date.,2371,61,5,4,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34008,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34009,"IA pottery (212 sherds) dated mid-to-late IA, no closer dating available. Also small group (71) of RB pottery. Assemblage noted as v. different from IA assemblage at Droitwich.",283,2,6,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
34010,"Small assemblage, mostly Severn Valley Ware. Mid-1st to 3rd century.",106,2,1,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34011,Locally produced Severn Valley wares dominated. Also small number of finewares. Samian present in small numbers but not quantified in report.,80,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34012,"Iron Age and Roman pottery recovered, 192 sherds (2.533kg) and 1456 sherds (17.04kg) respectively. IA pottery is 3rd-2nd century to 1st century BC. Dominated by Severn Valley Ware. In general Roman assemblage of standard composition for rural site.",1648,20,5,22,30,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34013,"Severn Valley oxidised ware dominated assemblage. Most not closely datable beyond broad Roman date. Possible wasters present, though no suggestion of production in the local vicinity.",106,942,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34014,"Main pottery Severn Valley ware, but coarsely tempered Malvernian wares also present. Important group as first large group of SVW recovered from production site. V limited proportion of imported wares.",53283,896,,65,83,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34015,Roman military assemblage not included here. Only a tiny LIA assemblage was recovered. IA fabrics included briquetage,98,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34016,"Main report on pottery from 1967-77 excavations. Not all pottery recovered therefore reported on. Earliest pottery on site associated with the IA salt working. Briquetage only from IA phase. Bulk of pottery Roman. Individual finds include a miniature cup (though note to say possibly not Roman). Bulk of Roman assemblage Severn Valley ware and BB1. Samian, Oxfordshire ware and Nene Valley ware present as fine wares. Graffiti on two joining fragments of tile (literate), and on a BB ware sherd, also literate. Samian only listed by estimated vessel number - roughly 203 vessels. Pottery in the 1959 report includes on illustrated vessels and is therefore not included here.",9485,,20,511,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34017,5 sherds only.,5,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34018,"Generally typical rural assemblage although with a high proportion of bowls and tankards, reason for this unclear. Assemblage dominated by Severn Valley ware. Unusual vessel was a 'lamp filler' or 'baby feeder' (tettine). Four other unusual vessels found.",2572,26,,10,69,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34019,"Severn Valley wares dominant fabrics. Small quantity of samian, precise quantity not recorded.",137,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34020,"Assemblage predominantly of late 2nd/3rd century, with some earlier first/2nd century material also present. Predominantly local Severn Valley wares and some Malvernian. Emphasis on local products.",259,4,,8,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
34021,Assemblage dominated by locally manufactured Severn Valley wares (65% by weight). Also substantial Malvernian wares (30% of assemblage).,603,9,,5,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34022,"Limited data presented. Pottery predominantly of local Severn Valley ware manufacture followed by Malvernian ware, though Malvernian ware takes over in late Roman phase. Much more evidence for occupation in late 2nd to early 3rd centuries. Some mortaria but no good quantification - at least three sherds present. 'lamp filler' or 'baby feeder' (tettine) also recorded.",648,9,,3,7,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34023,"Severn Valley ware dominated but also some samian, mortaria and amphorae (olive oil). Forms also included flat ceramic plates in Malvernian fabric.",1259,,1,18,58,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34024,"Most pottery Severn Valley ware. Mortaria and samian present but not quantified. Date ranging from c. 1st-4th century, but narrower dating of some forms and fabrics suggestive of a date range between early 2nd and mid-3rd century AD.",565,9,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34025,"Pottery assemblage mostly (75%) Severn Valley Ware in a range of forms. Broadly datable to the 3rd to 4th century, probably after mid-3rd century, and likely late 3rd-early 4th century. No samian but mortaria present.",319,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
34026,Majority of the assemblage is Severn Valley ware. Also large proportion of Malvernian wheelthrown ware. Mortaria and samian present in small quantities but not quantified. Some burning on mortaria.,743,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34027,Imports in the 2nd century included Gaulish mortaria as well as samian and amphorae. Lack of late 3rd and 4th century pottery suggests abandonment during mid-3rd century. Quantity of samian and mortaria sherds is approximate as the sherds were not clearly quantified in the report and the number is from the counted catalogue lists. All amphora sherds are plain body sherds of the flat bottomed amphora from Gauloise 4.,3102,54,7,29,188,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34028,IA pottery included 183 sherds of briquetage (no other ceramics) - not closely dated so not included in the total. The major element in the assemblage was Severn Valley Ware. A small quantity of mortaria but no precise quantification. Fine wares represented only by samian and Nene Valley wares. Amphorae not present. Microfiche gives samian count as 101.,1622,14,,,101,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34029,"Sherd quantity an approximation as Roman pottery  presented only as a percentage of entire assemblage, which itself was an estimate. Total does not include sherds of briquetage, of which there were many thousands. Most coarse wares were Severn Valley and related wares. Some wasters present in coarse ware assemblage, but no evidence of a kiln recovered. Mortaria were rare, but not quantified in the report or microfiche. Besides samian, other finewares included Terra Nigra and Rhenish wares, some Nene Valley and Oxfordshire wares. Samian ware total not exact, but over 800 sherds recovered. Ceramic plates were also found - common finds from the region. Literate graffiti present on some sherds including a Severn Valley ware bowl.",29120,,243,,800,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34030,"Pottery quantities estimates only as they have been calculated from the graphical display of sherd numbers and weights. IA briquetage has not been included, though the figure includes a small amount of Iron Age pottery. The Roman assemblage was mainly Severn Valley ware. Imports included samian and amphorae. No clear quantification of amphorae or mortaria.",2170,27,,,37,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34031,"A very small pottery assemblage spanning the 1st to late 3rd-4th centuries AD. Suggestion that the pottery relates to occasional temporary occupation throughout the Roman period. Approx. 20 sherds of samian recovered (26 imports, but some noted as Rhenish ware - exact number uncertain). Four sherds of late pre-Roman Iron Age pottery also included below.",109,1,,,20,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34032,"Pottery assemblage from the site regarded as unusual, primarily as it is principally late Roman. Oxfordshire fineware quantity also regarded as high for a rural settlement. The dating of the pottery highlighted two distinct phases of occupation on the site - 1st to early 3rd century and late 3rd-late 4th/early 5th century. Early assemblage typical of rural sites in the region and dominated by Severn Valley ware. The majority of the pottery (70%) was late and from the domestic settlement. Again Severn Valley ware dominated. A further 422 sherds (including 3 samian and 6 mortaria) recovered during the evaluation trenching.",1610,21,,30,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34033,Pottery mostly of Iron Age date (235 of the sherds). Most Roman pottery was Severn Valley ware and included a complete carinated beaker of mid 1st-2nd century in date.,307,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34034,Assemblage predominantly Severn Valley ware.,100,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34035,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34036,Pottery included Severn Valley ware (the dominant fabric present) and Malvernian ware.,140,3,,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
34037,"A small assemblage of Roman pottery. All other pottery quantified in bulk as prehistoric only, and so it is unclear if it is late Iron Age.",56,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34038,Pottery predominantly of Severn Valley ware. The pottery was typical of domestic assemblages of late 2nd-3rd century in date.,585,5,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34039,"Pottery was predominantly Severn Valley ware, and the site proved to be a production site for the ware. Vessel forms included tankards, jars, bowls, flagons and other vessels. No quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
34040,Pottery not well quantified. A 'few small fragments' of samian recovered. Small number of mortaria fragments also present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34041,"No quantification. Predominantly Severn Valley wares, and one scrap of samian.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34042,Pottery was predominantly Severn Valley ware and some Black Burnished ware. Also a small quantity of samian and one incomplete mortarium. No overall quantification.,,,,1,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34043,Severn Valley ware dominant (though less so than in most other regional rural sites). Slightly higher proportion of Malvernian ware. A number of sherds of samian were recovered.,925,23,,2,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34044,Pottery was primarily local and of Severn Valley ware. Dated sherds suggested a late 1st to late 3rd/4th century date. Small amounts of samian and mortaria present. No quantification of samian or mortaria however.,873,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34045,"Some late Iron Age fabrics present. Severn valley wares dominate the assemblage. A single samian sherd and an amphora sherd. In addition to 451 sherds found in the BUFAU excavation, 315 were found in the earlier CA evaluation. Occasional samian also present in CA assemblage but no quantification. Mortaria absent in both groups. Repertoire of forms limited, comprising just jars, bowls/dishes, beakers and tankards, dominated by jars.",764,15,1,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
34046,"Tiny assemblage (29 sherds from excavation, 3 from fieldwalking). Severn Valley ware and Malvernian ware.",32,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34047,"Some prehistoric pottery also found, but none definitely late IA date (some mid or late IA). The Roman pottery assemblage contained standard fabrics for the region, but the composition was considered highly unusual with oxidised Severn Valley wares completely dominating. Reduced SV wares much lower in number. Pottery assemblage also considered exceptionally large given the area excavated.",2081,20,,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34048,Pottery mostly Severn Valley wares.,61,,1,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34049,"The assemblage was dominated by locally produced coarsewares (predominantly Severn Valley then Malvernian wares), though samian, mortaria and amphorae were present. Peak period of pottery use seems to have been AD 120-60, with little evidence for continuation into the 3rd century. Willis noted in the samian report that there is a strong representation of decorated samian bowls within the samian assemblage, possibly indicative of comparatively wealthy consumers.",3581,43,15,24,32,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34050,Pottery assemblage regarded as native in character - paucity of imported and Romanised wares. Dominant fabric Severn Valley ware. Five jars had non-literate graffiti/possible graffiti.,2784,57,,8,7,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34051,Severn Valley ware dominates the assemblage. Ceramics suggest a 1st-2nd century date for the settlement.,313,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34052,"37 sherds of Roman pottery (500g), though 531 sherds of Iron Age pottery dating from the 2nd-1st century BC.",568,12,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34053,Pottery was dominated by Severn Valley ware.,222,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34054,Most pottery recovered during fieldwalking. Severn Valley wares dominant. A later Roman date was suggested for most of the assemblage.,414,2,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34055,"No useful quantification, but cooking pots and necked bowls and jars and flanged bowls were present and thought to have been made in the kiln. Fabrics described as Malvernian grit. Fabrics not from the kiln included mortaria.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
34056,"No good quantification - no samian or mortaria, but some Romanised red ware. Pottery assemblage thought to suggest activity between c.1 to 50 AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34057,No overall quantification and only illustrated pottery described. Samian and mortaria present. A general Severn Valley ware bias. Pottery thought to date from c. AD 120-200.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34058,"No good quantification - 19 vessels described in the report. Samian present. Some pottery of late Iron Age date, though principally of 3rd-4th century.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
34059,"Pottery not precisely quantified in the report, though sherds of 'over six hundred vessels' recovered. Samian, mortaria and amphorae all present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34060,"No quantification of all pottery in the brief report, though fieldwalking produced 1519 Iron Age and Roman sherds, the vast majority of which were Severn Valley ware. Other fabrics included red colour-coated Oxford ware, local imitation BB ware, red and brown colour-coated Nene Valley ware, undecorated samian, Malvern ware, local RB wares, white Oxford ware mortaria, BB ware, red colour coated Oxford mortaria and white Mancetter mortaria.",1519,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34061,"No quantification of pottery other than illustrated examples. All late Iron Age, including 'duck-stamped' wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34062,"The Roman pottery assemblage related predominantly to the early Roman period, before c. AD 200, with small quantities of 3rd or 4th century material. The assemblage is dominated by Severn Valley wares and Malvernian wares - typical for the region. Continental imports present in only small quantities. The composition is consistent with a low status rural settlement. Regional imports poorly represented, with Dorset BB1 most abundant, with the rest Oxfordshire whiteware and colour-coat.",1013,11,1,1,14,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
34063,A small assemblage recovered - the bulk is Severn Valley ware. Non-local forms represented by a sherd of Black Burnished ware only.,122,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34064,No quantification - Pottery suggests activity from the later 2nd to later 3rd centuries AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34065,"No good quantification, though a graffito was found on a storage jar sherd associated with the corn drier. A high proportion of Glevum ware amongst the pottery, with a chronological range of 2nd century to the mid-3rd.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
34066,"No good quantification - samian and mortaria present, and 'Glevum' ware common. Also 'native' Iron Age pottery similar to that at Bredon Hill, indicating a late Iron Age date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
34067,"Pottery included Severn Valley ware, grey ware, Malvernian ware, Oxfordshire mortaria, BB1. Most sherds not identified individually.",66,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
35001,"The pottery from the 1962 excavations was not quantified but included coarse and gritted-ware dishes and jars, and colour-coated beakers. All are characteristic of the local East Riding industry and date from the mid-3rdC AD to the first half of the 4thC AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35002,"The pottery is overwhelmingly from hand-made vessels in the two main regional late Iron Age to early Romano-British tempering traditions. The limited amount of evidence suggests a date from the late 1stC BC through to the 2ndC AD. Most of the Samian was badly abraided. Two vessels were South Gaulish and the others were Central Gaulish, with one fragment possibly y of Les Martres-de-Veyre. An unstratified footring may have been East Gaulish. The assemblage as a whole gave the impression of early to mid-2nd-century date. A single sherd of Dressel 20 amphora was also present. A possible waster was recovered.",4932,58,1,2,11,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35003,"Fabrics which dated to the late Iron Age/early Roman period dominated the assemblage, c.83% (though the site probably began mid-late 1stC AD).",3171,31,,3,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35005,"Of the total pottery assemblage from the 2010-12 investigations, including earlier prehistoric and medieval, 56.7% was of LIA/ER hand-made wares and 10% was Roman wheel-turned wares. From the 1990s excavations the pottery was fully catalogued but not quantified. The assemblage appears to be essentially regionally derived with hand-made calcite-gritted fabric of Knapton type, supplemented by wheel-turned greyware from North Lincolnshire. Crambeck and the Home-on-Spalding industries are represented in later forms. There are only very small amounts of finewares and specialised products such as samian, amphora, mortaria and colour-coated wares, such as Nene Valley imports.",5038,73,2,2,22,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35006,"Some information given for Roman fabrics and forms, but the full quantity is not certain. Crambeck ware and Huntcliffe cooking pots present.",,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35007,"Amphora is rare, the majority being Baetican Dressel 20. Mortaria were also scarce. Black-burnished 1 and Black burnished 2 were present. Colour-coated wares included Rhenish, Nene valley, Cologne, Brough, Swanpool, Oxfordshire, and Hadham wares. Non-colour-coated wares included Ebor red painted ware and Crambeck ware. A range of gritted wares were also present. Samian and whitewares formed the remainder of the assemblage. Percentages are given for each fabric but only in relation to trench 3. Jars dominated the assemblage, followed by bowls and dishes, with smaller quantities of beakers, flagons, and lids. A single graffito was identified on a beaded rimmed dish (M).",25304,492,,,204,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35008,"The majority of the mid-late IA pottery was calcite-gritted fabric, with a small quantity of sandstone-tempered fabric. The late IA phase showed an increase in the range of fabrics used, including handmade shell-tempered fabrics. 2ndC AD material included Central Gaulish samian from Lezoux and Les Martres-de-Veyre, and mortaria from Mancetter Hartshill and Malton. Later 2ndC material includes an East Gaulish 'Rhenish' beaker and BB2 ware. 3rdC AD material includes finewares, such as Oxford Colour-Coated wares and Nene Valley Colour-Coated wares. Crambeck White Ware perhaps dates to the mid-4thC AD. Mortaria are represented by oxidized ware and a Crambeck mortarium. There is also a significant number of Holme-on-Spalding Moor products, along with Dales Ware jars and some products in Crambeck Grey Ware. Later 4thC AD material is dominated by calcite-gritted Huntcliff type jars and Dales-type and Dales Ware forms and fabrics. There is a continuing residual presence of Central Gaulish samian, suggests that reworking of earlier deposits occurred during this phase. Other fine wares include Nene Valley, Crambeck Parchment and a possible Crambeck or Catterick copy. Crambeck Parchment Ware mortaria are also present. Holme-on-Spalding Moor types, Crambeck types, Dales-types and Dales-type copies also continue. No recognised graffiti was found, apart from on a tile fragment, CANDID[…]. There are only two examples of evidence for riveting of pottery (Samian).",14032,204,24,319,497,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35009,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35010,"Significant pottery types included 2nd/3rdC AD stamped Parisian Ware, 2nd/3rdC AD and 4thC AD colour-coated beaker fragments, 2ndC AD white-slipped wares, a fragment of a mid-2ndC AD mica-dusted dish, a large fragment of a late 2ndC AD Samian bowl and an amphora sherd.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
35011,"5549 sherds of pottery were recovered from fieldwalking and included Samian Ware, Nene Valley Ware, Ebor Ware, Amphora, Mortaria, Dales Ware, Crambeck Ware, Huntcliff Ware, as well as Roman CBM and roof slate. The material was quantified but the data are not included here, so not to compare with excavated material on other sites. However, some pottery was recovered from the trial trench excavations, though only Samian and amphora were reported on - these counts are included in the database: 79 sherds of Samian and 78 sherds of amphora (all Spanish Dressel 20).",,,78,,79,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35012,"High degree of abrasion on the samian, and several had been burnt (all m.1stC - Antonine). Dressel 20 amphora most common of this type. General assemblage dominated by greywares and Limonite oolith tempered. Range of different wares was quite wide, though long-distance imports were comparatively rare. Sources of pottery changed abruptly over the mid-1stC AD. Forms were overwhelmingly dominated by jars.",1471,22,17,14,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35013,"Pottery from the Roxby and Dragonby and Roxby kilns south of the Humber were noted in the assemblage, as well as honeypot and Spanish amphorae sherds, suggesting some local redistribution and trade. 3500 sherds were noted in the site description though less than 2000 was recorded by the pottery specialist. The pottery was largely unabraded and many sherds could be refitted suggesting a short period of deposition, most likely during the mid-2ndC AD.",1943,29,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
35014,"The pottery assemblage was almost entirely late Iron Age handmade wares. The assemblage has only received preliminary analysis so far. A small number of early Roman wares, probably from the very earliest phase was recovered including Roxby-type jars.",1554,41,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35015,"Ceramics present are largely quartz-tempered and fine wheel-tempered wares. Wares from the Dragonby kilns were well represented. Forms include platters, jars, dishes, bowls and flagons. It was noted that several 'dumps' of pottery consisting of large sherds and some near complete vessels, thought possibly to be from 'ritual activities' were noted (there are few details on these as yet however).",466,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35016,"The assemblage was dominated by greywares and include everted-rim jars, carinated bowls and one rusticated jar. Most fabrics are suggestive of a 2ndC AD date.",37,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35017,"Pottery dating between the 1stC BC and the 4thC AD was recovered from the site, though the period of greatest intensity appears to have been in the 2nd and 3rdC AD. Local greywares predominate, with bowls and a carinated jar present.",141,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35018,"Three sherds of handmade pottery perhaps point to an early (LPRIA?) date. The Roman pottery all appears to be 1st-2ndC AD in date, but caution must be exercised over such a small sample.",8,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35019,"The pottery assemblage was not well dated, but was exclusively hand-made ceramics normally attributed to the LIA-ER period. The absence of wheel-thrown vessels perhaps suggests an early date however.",36,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35020,"The Ellerby site produced a substantial assemblage of hand-made pottery consisting of 3416 sherds weighing 61625 grams, representing a maximum of 3076 vessels. Diagnostic sherds were limited, but those identified included 'native-tradition types' dating c.100BC and AD200. The presence of later Romano-British hand-made wares, principally 3rd-4thC AD Dales ware, suggests that the site was occupied from the later pre-Roman Iron Age throughout the Roman period. In addition, there were 438 sherds of Romano-British wheel-thrown pottery, weighing 5402 grams. RB fabric types were quantified for the pipeline as a whole, rather than for each site, but the assemblage from Ellerby contained North Gaulish mortarium, Samian, Nene Valley colour-coated ware, Norton and Malton type mortaria, Dales ware Nene Valley beaker forms, late Holme-on-Spalding grey ware, Huntcliff wares, and Crambeck grey ware. Most of the material was of mid/late 1st-early 2ndC AD to as late as the mid-late 4thC AD.",3854,67,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35021,"Iron Age hand-made pottery totalled 8535 sherds, weighing 142909 grams and representing a maximum of 8049 vessels, though much of this may have pre-dated the LIA. 938 Roman wheel-thrown sherds were recovered weighing 13116 grams. Sherds were predominantly later 3rd-early 4thC AD with some sherds dating to the mid-late 4thC AD. RB fabric types were quantified for the pipeline as a whole, rather than for each site, but the assemblage contained Dales ware jars, East Yorkshire proto-Huntcliff and Huntcliff jars, Crambeck wares and late Holme-on-Spalding grey wares, and oxidised mortaria.",9473,156,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
35022,"Together Plots 25 and 26 produced a hand-made pottery assemblage consisting of 2016 sherds of pottery weighing 29432 grams and representing a maximum of 1921 vessels. Many of these may date to the period before the late Iron Age. 181 sherds of Roman wheel-thrown wares were present at both sites, weighing 2597 grams. Forms included sherds from a Dressel 20 amphora, carinated and shallow bowl forms made at Roxby, one rim sherd of Dales ware, an oxidised flanged mortarium, and samian sherds. The majority of the forms and fabric present suggest a late 1st to early/mid-2ndC AD date range.",2197,32,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35023,"The site produced an assemblage of LIA/ER hand-made pottery consisting of 1187 sherds weighing 24668 grams representing a maximum of 1137 vessels. 132 wheel-thrown sherds weighing 1943.5 grams were also present. These predominantly dated to the 2ndC AD, and included grey rusticated sherds, early grog-tempered ware sherds, sherds from carinated bowls, Roxby type jars, bowls/dishes copying 2ndC AD BB1 types and BB1 type jars.",1319,27,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
35024,"The hand-made LIA/ER pottery assemblage consisted of 2171 sherds of pottery weighing 38074 grams and represented a maximum of 2074 vessels. Wheel-thrown sherds were comparatively rare with only 33 sherds (301g) almost exclusively of 1st/2ndC AD date, including Roxby type A jars, carinated bowls, and Nene Valley colour-coated beaker.",2204,38,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35025,The site produced an assemblage of 673 sherds of hand-made LIA/ER pottery weighing 10427 representing a maximum of 619 vessels. Wheel-thrown pottery was minimal including 29 sherds weighing 500 grams.,702,11,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35026,"The site produced an assemblage of 254 sherds of pottery weighing 3832 grams, representing a maximum of 237 vessels. Datable sherds were rare although an everted rim globular jar was similar to an example dated by Rigby to AD70 to AD120, though post-Conquest material was thought to have been rare. No wheel-thrown material was identified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35027,"Plot 51 produced an assemblage of 997 hand-made sherds weighing 19560 grams and represented a maximum of 827 vessels. The fact that the group included only three small sherds of Roman wheel-thrown pottery (grey ware) suggests that it largely predates the Conquest, though the possibility of deliberate avoidance of 'Roman' material culture should not be ruled out.",1000,20,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35028,The hand-made assemblage from plot 68 consisted of 241 sherds of pottery weighing 3858 grams and represented a maximum of 228 vessels. Some of it may have been very early post-Conquest in date. 3 wheel-turned grey ware sherds point to some later activity.,244,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35029,"Plot 73 produced a small group of fifteen LIA/ER hand-made sherds. The diagnostic wheel-turned sherds from this plot gave a date range in the late 3rd to 4thC AD, comprising a Crambeck grey ware lugged jar and a Holme on Spalding lugged jar, a late Nene Valley colour-coated dish or bowl base and a East Yorkshire calcite-gritted lid. Other sherds of grey ware were not closely datable within the Roman period.",33,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35030,"Plot 88 produced a hand-made assemblage of 721 sherds weighing 13311 grams and represented a maximum of 645 vessels. Datable sherds were not abundant although the group did include some Dales ware type vessels of the 3rd to mid-4thC AD. The base of one jar had a fine, sandy textured fabric which resembled that of Roman greyware although the vessel was clearly hand-made. The overall date range of the wheel-turned pottery was from the mid-2nd to mid-3rdC AD. Sherds from the carinated bowls, inturned rim dishes and wide-mouthed jars similar to those made at Roxby were present. Together with the samian, these suggest activity in the Antonine period. Another grey ware wide-mouthed jar compared better with types made at Norton in the third century and a bead-rim bowl probably also belongs to the late second to mid-third century.",764,15,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35031,"Plot 98 produced a hand-made assemblage of 424 sherds of pottery weighing 6166 grams representing a maximum of 395 vessels. Datable material from this group was rare with a single wedge-rimmed jar from context 119968 resembling a type Rigby has dated to between c.100BC and c.AD100. A comparatively higher number of wheel-turned sherds were also present (475, weighing 5278 grams). This assemblage comprised 2nd-3rdC AD vessel types, including everted rim wide-mouthed jars, dishes, bead-rim bowls copying BB2 types, lugged jars and carinated bowls of Roxby type, and l.3rd-4thC AD types, including Holme-on-Spalding type carinated bowls, developed bead and flange bowls, a Dales ware jar, a grey ware jar, a lower Nene Valley reeded rim mortarium and a late hooked rim bowl.",899,11,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
35032,"Plot 104 produced a substantial assemblage consisting of 2148 sherds of hand-made pottery weighing 34438 grams which represented a maximum of 2071 vessels. The group was also diverse in character with a number of distinctive vessel types and decorative styles. Wheel-turned pottery included 389 sherds weighing 5365 grams. A large group of late Iron Age/Conquest-period to early Roman pottery was found in this plot which included early imports and unusual vessel types. The assemblage included a range of bead and everted rim bowls, burnished externally, at least one platter, a girth beaker, a white ware flagon of first century type, probably imported, an early flagon probably from the Flavian kiln at Dragonby, rusticated ware and a near complete tripod bowl closely comparable to vessels made at the Flavian kiln at Dragonby. The presence of a Pompeian Red ware was unexpected, whilst Samian ware was also present.",2537,40,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35033,The hand-made pottery assemblage consisted of 629 sherds weighing 8334 grams representing a maximum of 591 vessels. Datable vessels were rare although a group of fine sherds with burnished surfaces appeared to be of later Iron Age date. Burnished and smoothed surfaces appeared to be relatively common. Only 4 sherds of wheel-turned pottery were recovered. One rim sherd was in a quartz-tempered dark grey ware similar to early Roman wares in north Lincolnshire. The rim was slightly everted and appeared handmade rather than wheel thrown and may belong to the late Iron Age or Conquest period.,633,8,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35034,"Plot 108 produced 628 sherds of hand-made LIA/Roman pottery weighing 10486 grams representing a maximum of 620 vessels, plus 3 sherds of wheel-turned grey ware.",631,10,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35035,"Plot 113 produced 169 sherds of pottery weighing 1458 grams and representing a maximum of 167 vessels. The pottery assemblage recovered from the field system, enclosure and ring gully comprised only Iron Age or hand-made Roman wares. The assemblage is not well dated as the use of such pottery extends from the Iron Age well into the Roman period. However, the absence of any wheel-thrown pottery or distinctively Roman period wares at the site suggests that the field system and settlement were established before significant Roman cultural influence in the area.",169,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35036,"Plot 115 produced an assemblage of 213 sherds of hand-made pottery weighing 2418 grams representing a maximum of 202 vessels. Few sherds were datable and the most distinctive item, a horizontal pierced lug, was a rather different shape to the pierced lugs from other sites and may possibly be somewhat earlier in date. Only 6 sherds of wheel-turned vessels were recovered.",219,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35037,"The pottery assemblage was predominantly local grey wares (Roxby) with calcareous-tempered and coarse-tempered wares (Dales wares) also providing a significant proportion. The assemblage also produced a notable quantity of imported vessels, including Moselkeramik and Samian, plus some oxidised finewares, potentially from York.",476,6,,2,29,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35038,"The acidic soils had affected some of the pottery assemblage, particularly the calcareous material. Calcareous and quartz-tempered fabric types were roughly equal in quantity. Only one vessel, a Roman greyware sherd, showed any signs of having been wheel-thrown. The vessels compare well to other local late Iron Age assemblages from East Yorkshire, from sites which tend to have been occupied into the 1stC AD. Some sherds compare well with those deposited at Rudston dating into the 2ndC AD.",319,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35039,"The assemblage contained both local handmade and wheel-turned coarsewares of late Iron Age-early Roman date as well as other wheel-thrown wares, including a distinctive late 4th-early 5thC AD element. 186 sherds came from the Albion Road evaluation, but these were not quantified by phase; medieval material was also recovered.",106,2,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35040,"The Romano-British component of the pottery assemblage was not fully quantified, though more than 2000 sherds may have been identified. The assemblage was predominantly 2nd-4thC AD. The majority of the pottery sherds were grey ware fabrics, some probably derive from the Holme on Spalding Moor kilns. Colour coated ware sherds were all from beakers. Bowls, beakers and jars were all present. Production centres such as Crambeck supplied a range of distinctive kitchen-wares including red painted bowls and mortaria (mixing-bowls).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35041,The assemblage is yet to be refined into phased groups and may include some pottery pre-dating the 1stC BC. Further work on the assemblage is required more generally.,4909,73,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35042,"The site seems to have had access to fully Romanised wares in varying amounts from soon after the Roman conquest of the north in AD71. The most notable being the presence of rusticated ware, which is not only closely datable (c.AD70-130) but which usually suggests early contact with Roman institutions such as the army. Much material is local and regional, especially in the 3rd and 4thC AD, with coarsewares supplied largely by the Holme-upon-Spalding Moor industries, though vessels from South Yorkshire and Lincolnshire are also noted. Mortaria may have first been used on the site in the early 2ndC AD, though many vessels were dated 3rd and 4thC AD. The samian possibly includes some South Gaulish wares, but it seems largely to be a fairly undistinguished assemblage, consisting mainly of common 2ndC AD forms. As only 10 decorated fragments out of a total of 78 were present suggests that a lack of high status elements are reflected in the assemblage. Post-ex work still required.",13991,240,6,43,78,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35043,"Late Iron Age handmade wares present, though these were not quantified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35044,"The greater part of the site assemblage dates to the later 3rd and 4thC AD, though activity resulting in ceramic deposition on site seems to commence in the very late Iron Age or early post-conquest period. There are numerous reflections of this, including the presence of unstratified rusticated ware (c.AD70-130). There is a smattering of colour-coated wares and samian, and a reasonable number of mortaria. The assemblage still requires full analysis.",5651,79,,19,22,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35045,"The pottery evidence points consistently to the late Iron Age and very early Roman period. More specifically, several vessels seem to point to the 1st and early 2ndC AD. Interestingly, a phase of late Roman activity, not represented in the excavated features, was present in the topsoil. This may either reflect material from truncated late Roman features, or from late Roman ploughing activity at the site or nearby.",542,4,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35046,"The pottery has only been assessed, but a late Iron Age/early Roman group and a middle Roman group, the latter dating c.late 1stC AD-early 3rdC AD, was present.",461,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35047,The pottery assemblage still requires full analysis and more sherds of mortaria and samian were probably present. There appears to have been a real lack of 4thC AD wares.,1078,12,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35048,"All the pottery dates to the late Iron Age through to the mid-4thC AD, but it still requires full analysis.",524,7,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35049,"In general, the was thought to be of very limited value, and no further work is therefore recommended. Imitation Samian recovered.",7,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35050,"Assemblage still at assessment stage. Early Roman rusticated ware suggests that the site was part of the local economic infra-structure, perhaps associated with the Roman military, supported by the presence of Samian, amphora, and mortaria.",7646,102,15,77,79,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35051,Fabrics and the two jar forms suggest a date in the later Iron Age or very early in the Roman period.,19,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35052,"The assemblage was predominantly represented by calcareous and mixed coarsewares, plus wheel-thrown greyware. Smaller quantities of native tradition hand-made wares, Dalesware, oxidised wheel-thrown vessels, colour-coated wares, whiteware, plus amphora, mortaria and Samian.",477,11,8,28,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35053,Sherds from East Yorkshire greywares - Holme upon Spalding Moor - and calcite-gritted vessels - Huntcliffe -predominate.,395,10,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35054,"The whole site assemblage suggests occupation from at least the earlier 2nd to the mid-4thC AD. Only a single vessel could legitimately be dated to the second half of the 4thC AD. The material has, so far, only been assessed, but a relatively wide range of fabrics were present, with greywares making up around 50%, the largest proportion. An undecorated tazze was noted as being present.",3915,68,217,31,97,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35055,"The Roman pottery dated between the 1st and 4thC AD, but was predominantly 3rd/4thC AD, mostly grey or calcite-gritted wares.",153,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35056,"Late Iron Age or early Romano-British calcareously tempered wares present, likely dating between the 1stC BC and the 2ndC AD. A small fragment of Samian ware was also recovered, which may date up to the mid-3rdC AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35057,"A total of 230 sherds, weighing 5748g, came from the settlement evaluation, and predominantly dated between the 1st and 3rdC AD. A total of 693 sherds of pottery, weighing 17108g, came from the peripheral area and dated to the late 3rdC to 4thC AD (though overwhelming  the later 4thC AD). Hand-made material tempered with calcareous filler dominated (60%), with a significant quantity of Roman wheel-thrown greywares (30%). There was an absence of samian and mortaria from the early-mid-Roman settlement, but these forms were recovered from the eastern activity area.",923,23,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35058,"The majority of the material was Romano-British, with a chronological range from the 2ndC AD through to the late 4th or early 5thC AD. The majority of features containing diagnostic pottery suggest the first half of the 4th century as the main period of deposition.",210,3,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35059,"LIA/ER hand-made vessels predominated, constituting over 75% of the overall assemblage. Wheel-turned wares were mostly Roman grey wares, but also included BB1, rusticated ware, oxidised ware, colour-coated ware, amphora, mortaria and Samian.",2241,24,1,21,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35060,"The pottery was not quantified, but consisted of a range of type, mostly jars and bowls, which were said to have been produced to supply a local market. The pottery is described as Dales ware. Some Samian present.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35061,"Over 80% of the pottery was produced in the kilns excavated on site, with smaller amounts of local hand-made pottery, East Yorkshire grey wares, and imported pottery. The assemblage was quantified by weight and by EVE. Jars and bowls together dominated the assemblage, with lesser quantities of dishes, flagons, and mortaria.",,105,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35062,"Calcite-gritted hand-made wares dominated the late Iron Age assemblage, but declined into the late 1stC and 2ndC AD with the appearance of wheel-turned grey wares.",1858,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35063,"Over a ton of pottery was said to have been removed from the site in one day, with the site remaining 'littered with sherds', mostly wasters. A range of bowls, jars, colanders, beakers, large storage jars, pitchers, dishes, and cups were all recovered from the kilns and waster areas.",,,,,1,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35064,"The pottery assemblage was not fully quantified in any of the reports. Samian ware was recovered in quantity, predominantly of Central Gaulish ware of Antonine date. Over half of the mortaria were late 2nd/early 3rdC AD in date, and four source areas were identified: Malton-York, Mancetter-Hartshill, , the Nene valley and Crambeck. Imported pottery from southern Britain and Gaul included butt beakers and flagons, plus colour-coated and Parisian wares. No extensive fabric analysis of the coarsewares was undertaken. Two amphora specimens included a stamp and a literate graffito respectively. A wall plaster frag also included a literate graffito.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
35065,"No quantification of the pottery was carried out, but the report indicates the presence of Samian ware, some sherds 'similar to Iron Age type', and vessels from Throlam, Crambeck and Huntcliffe (late 4thC AD).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35066,"Dales ware placed the pottery assemblage within the AD230 and AD370 date range. The pottery assemblage derives from excavation and field-walking however. Bowls and jars were most common, but other forms were indicative of domestic occupation.",1132,,,12,28,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35067,"371 sherds were late Iron Age in date, and 18 were Roman. A small quantity was recovered from field-walking (included here). The Roman pottery was found in the upper fills of features, indicating a late phase of activity. Quartz-tempered pottery dominated alongside calcareous-tempered. All Iron Age vessels were jars, other than one bowl.",389,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35068,"No pottery report was given with the published excavation report. Fabrics noted were Samian, and reduced wares, the latter argued to have been produced in the vicinity due the presence of wasters.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35069,"The pottery assemblage was small but consisted of calcite-gritted wares, grey wares and Crambeck wares.",46,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35070,Most of the material was locally-produced.,125,1,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
35071,"The pottery assemblage was not quantified in the report, but it contained material dating to the latter half of the 1stC BC of wheel-thrown Dragonby type, 2nd-e.3rdC AD lipped bowls, wide-mouthed bowls and carinated jars, and l.3rd-4thC AD material including Nene Valley wares, Holme-on-Spalding Moor type bowls, plus Huntcliffe and Crambeck painted wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
35072,"The assemblage was well preserved with a large average sherd weight. Over 60% of the assemblage consisted of hand-made stone-tempered ware, followed by Roman greyware (c.12%), and other hand-made sherds. In lesser quantities were recovered amphorae, Roman rusticated, oxidised and white wares, and mortaria.",1427,26,3,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
35073,"Local handmade wares of 1stC BC and AD date were overwhelmingly dominant in the assemblage. Small quantities of Roman greyware, samian and mortaria were also recovered.",4572,54,,4,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
35074,No report available Crambeck ware and samian noted as present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
36001,"The majority of the assemblage was of local greywares, though a small number of imported sherds were also present, including a Dressel 20 amphora and possible Nene-valley products. The remainder of the assemblage included white and oxidised wares, shell-tempered wares, and calcareously tempered wares.",899,15,5,7,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36002,"The pottery is all of 3rd-4thC AD date, consistent with the coinage. Crambeck ware was identified, but most notably a face-jug was present.",94,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36003,"113 sherds were late Roman (3rd-4thC AD) wares, with three dating prior to this period. Calcite gritted fabrics and Crambeck wares were present.",116,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36004,Some Iron Age pottery was recovered but with little detail.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36005,"None of the pottery appears to have been earlier than LIA in date, but the majority of wares dated from the 2nd-4thC AD. Most of the pottery is of greyware other than a single abraded Samian rim sherd.",27,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
36006,"A fragment of Mancetter mortarium came from the corndrier. The pottery is mostly greyware and comparatively little was found. The excavator suggests that pottery formed a minor component of the economy of these types of sites in the region, despite the proximity of major pottery industries south of Doncaster. A few sherds of Central Gaulish Samian hint at earlier domestic activity.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36007,"The pottery was not fully quantified, though some sherds were described by fabric, of which four different types were present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36008,Mid-late 2ndC AD Samian ware and 3rd-4thC AD Crambeck ware present.,44,,,3,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36009,"Pottery dates from the late Iron Age through to the 2ndC AD, but not beyond. The mortaria find similarities with that found in 2ndC AD York.",29,,,7,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
36010,"Pottery from the Crambeck kilns dominated the assemblage. Pottery from other kilns included Huntcliffe, Rhenish, Dales and Nene valley. One piece of Samian was 2ndC AD, but is thought to have been imported later. Forms included cooking pots, bowls, dishes, storage jars, other jars and amphora.",1093,,,13,19,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36011,"Hand-made gritted wares were most common, though pottery was in general minimal. Crambeck sherds were recovered in smaller quantities. Assemblage not fully quantified, though pottery is noted to have been poorly represented.",,,,4,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36012,"Jugs, jars, dishes and mortaria were all present. Crambeck and calcite-gritted wares were present. Assemblage not quantified.",,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
36013,"Over 50% of the assemblage was calcite-gritted wares, with quartz-gritted wares also relatively abundant. Colour-coated, oxidised and reduced wares were also present.",379,6,7,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
36014,"Most of the assemblage was recovered from field-walking. A notable lack of fine ware was present in the assemblage. Mortaria of from Crambeck industry present. None of the Samian recovered is earlier than Antonine (mid-2ndC AD). The amphora is Dressel 20, whilst Dressel 2-4 was recovered by field-walking.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36015,"The pottery assemblage was not quantified. The majority of bowls and dishes are 4thC AD in date. Jugs, pitchers, jars and beakers were also present. Calcite-gritted wares were common. Crambeck wares were present.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36016,"Samian ware, mortaria, and amphora were found associated with the settlement evidence. The pottery manufactured by the kilns was predominantly flanged bowls and dishes (47%), but also included straight-sided dishes (16%), hammerhead mortaria (15%), storage jars (9%), deep wide-mouthed bowls (4%), hemispherical bowls (3%), painted ware (2%), 'vesicular' ware (2%), beakers (1%), and jugs, flagons, etc. (1%).",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36017,"No quantification of the pottery is given in the report, but the forms present are mostly similar to that found at the Jamie's Craggs site. Mortaria were being produced by the kilns at the Mount Pleasant Farm site, as well as face pots.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
36018,"Pottery was not quantified, but the assemblage was primarily 4thC AD Crambeck wares and calcite-gritted ware, as well as a few sherds of plain Samian and colour-coated Castor ware. Pottery from the kilns consisted most forms also associated with other local kiln sites including mortaria and face pots.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36019,"Fabrics included amphora, BB1, BB2, colour-coated Rhenish and Nene valley wares, gritted wares, mortaria, oxidised wares, IA tradition fabrics, reduced wares, and whitewares. No 1st/early 2ndC AD Samian was present in the assemblage. Jars dominated, then dishes and bowls, with smaller quantities of flagons, mortaria, beakers, lids, and amphora. Percentages for Samian, mortaria and amphora are given by context. Absolute numbers could be recalculated.",8681,187,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36020,"The pottery from the site is primarily coarse gritted ware and is comparable with other local late Iron Age sites. The pottery is not concisely datable due to a lack of understanding of local ceramic chronologies, but it is thought to belong to the 'immediately pre-Roman undecorated' group of Yorkshire pottery types.",104,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36021,"Local sandy fabrics dominate throughout the period of occupation, dropping slightly in proportion into the late 2nd and 3rd C AD when coinciding with a substantial introduction of BB1 cooking wares. Early whitewares cease to be a significant component of the assemblage after the mid-2nd C AD. Central and Eastern Gaulish Samian is still in use into the early 3rd C AD. The low proportion of South Gaulish Samian suggests that early occupation of the site was fairly minimal compared to the latter period. The report includes an analysis of forms and use-wear. Several graffitos identified but the types were not stated in the report.",12463,254,661,129,934,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36022,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36023,"Only stratified rim sherds are listed with only brief mention to others, including local grey wares (Crambeck, Huntcliffe, etc.), BB1 copy, Nene Valley, and Dressel 20 amphora.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36024,"Some regional fine wares were recovered along with a small quantity of Samian. Three sherds included graffitos, one with a simple 'X' and an amphora sherd reading 'SECUN'. The assemblage does not appear to have been fully quantified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36025,"An assemblage representing a rim equivalent total of 6.92 EVE derived almost entirely from the stokehole and kiln with only a few sherds coming from the ditches. The kiln products characteristically have a black core, grey or brown margins and black surfaces and is usually handmade although there are some clearly wheel made examples, with common, moderate sand-temper. All appear to be BB1 imitations. Nene Valley and Crambeck sherds were also found at the site.",284,6,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36026,"4300 sherds (31kg) came from the earlier excavation (2012), and was predominantly LIA and early Roman in date. Over 4000 sherds were of local handmade fabrics. Samian, amphora and mortaria were recovered from the earlier excavations, but they were not quantified in the report. Material from the later (2014) excavation, 315 sherds, ranged from fresh to abraded. None of the characteristic 3rdC AD forms from regional kilns were noted at the site, with little evidence for activity extending beyond the 2ndC AD.",4615,5,2,10,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36027,"Pottery from strip phases 1 and 2. The assemblage was comparatively minimal considering the extent and character of the settlement. A few LIA sherds were present though the majority were mid-1st to 2ndC AD in date. None needed to be later than the 2ndC AD. BB1 wares, calcite-tempered, grog-tempered, oxidised, reduced, Dressel 20 amphorae, and white-slipped Oxford wares were all present. Jars overwhelmingly dominated the forms, though a range were present.",438,5,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36028,No pottery recovered from field-system features.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36029,"The pottery assemblage dated broadly from the 4thC to the 1stC BC. Many large sherds were recovered including complete or near complete bases and profiles. Most vessels were large wide-mouthed storage or straight-sided cooking vessels, with very few fine wares present. Many included external sooting marks and some were found with reddened/heated pebbles within.",1250,23,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36030,"Seven sherds of pottery were inscribed with graffiti, including literate examples. The pottery assemblage was only partially quantified. The coarse wares were weighed (572kg), but no sherd count given. The mortaria were fully weighed but not counted. The samian was only partially examined, these sherds were counted but not weighed (the number in the report counted and recorded here, but this is unlikely to have been the full quantity). The amphorae assemblage were only partially available - these were counted and weighed. A wide range of fine wares were represented in the assemblage. Sherds from painted face pots were also identified, said to have been very rare in the western Empire. Further detailed descriptions were given from the 1949-52 excavations but no quantification was provided.",,606,268,,692,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36031,Only a few sherds of samian and mortaria were recovered. No mention of other pottery was made in the report.,,,,2,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36032,"The assemblage was indicative of moderate high-status elements at the settlement, including a high ratio of dishes and bowls to jars. Most of made of local fabrics, but BB1 and imported mortaria were present. The quantity of samian, amphora and colour-coated wares also separate the settlement from others in the region. It may have been influenced economically by Elslack fort nearby.",420,6,19,26,16,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36033,"Small quantities of 'Native-style' pottery was recovered from the enclosures and other features at the site, but not amounts suggestive of occupation sites. Jars appear to dominate.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36034,"Both local 'native-style' and imported Romanised forms were recovered during excavations, predominantly the latter. The assemblage largely consisted small, abraded sherds due to the poor soil conditions. Fabrics included BB1 and Oxidised (most common) wares. Jars were very well represented, whilst beakers, bowls, dishes, and flagons were all present. Extra pottery (129 sherds), including Samian and amphora, was recovered from the Scotch Corner Hotel site, an assemblage which was biased towards tablewares.",388,4,16,11,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36035,"112 Sherds came from the BB1 jar which was used as a grave good, whilst 30 sherds came from the greyware urn. He remaining material derived from the field boundaries which was predominantly 2nd/3rdC AD in date.",199,1,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
36036,"A large quantity of Iron Age sherds were recovered from the site, but much of this pertains to the middle Iron Age settlement, and so these are omitted. 11 sherds of Romano-British pottery suggest the continued use of the site as a field-system.",11,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
36037,Mostly IA calcareous-gritted ware and quartz-tempered wares and Roman greywares.,60,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36038,"380 sherds of LIA/ER pottery was recovered weighing c.5kg, whilst 10864 sherds from wheel-turned Roman vessels weighing 329kg were also recovered. The pottery assemblage includes a small Flavian element, though the samian suggests occupation began in earnest in the Trajanic period. A large amount of material datable to the Hadrianic-early Antonine period was identified with very close ties with York pottery types. Rather less pottery was dated to the late Antonine period and 3rdC AD though at some point in the late 3rd-4thC AD a revival in settlement intensity ensued. A very late group of pottery indicating settlement in the late 4th or early 5thC AD was also identified. No pottery report presented from the gas pipeline excavation. The assemblage was noted as being primarily 2nd and 3rdC AD with some early 4thC AD wares.",11244,334,,,1632,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36039,"Although only a relatively small area was excavated over enclosures A, B, C and D, the pottery assemblage is relatively substantial. It consists predominantly of local hand-made wares and a smaller proportion of Roman wheel-turned wares, with some late Roman grey wares.",1946,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36040,"No quantification was presented. Types include Samian ware, butt beakers, 'Brigantian' wares, and mortaria.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36041,"Pottery assemblage not quantified, but included Samian (late 1st/early 2ndC AD), Castor ware, Throlam and Crambeck ware, and mortaria, with forms including flagons, bowls, dishes, and cups.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36042,"Little survives of the 19thC-excavated pottery. Types include Samian, colour-coated vessels, oxidised wares, West Yorkshire wares, Dales ware, and calcite-gritted ware. Forms include mortaria, flagons, bowls and dishes, beakers, cooking pots and jars.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36043,The assemblage is predominantly of the late Iron Age/early Roman handmade fabric.,337,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36044,"A small quantity of LIA/ER handmade pottery (27 sherds were recovered, plus some wheel-turned Roman wares including Dales ware and Holme-on-Spalding Moor vessels. Unfortunately the Roman wares were not quantified or discussed in the pottery report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36045,"The assemblage included a range of wares dating from the 2nd to early 5thC AD, including 7 sherds of LIA/ER handmade wares. However, it was dominated by late 3rd/4thC AD Dales wares. Other types included Crambeck, calcite-gritted wares, BB1, Nene valley ware, and Samian. Jars predominated, with lesser quantities of bowls, beakers, flagons, mortaria and dishes present.",811,13,1,3,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36046,"The pottery assemblage was not thought sufficient enough for discussion in the pottery report, and no quantification was given.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36047,The pottery assemblage was not deemed large enough for quantification data and discussion to be presented in the report 9though see site summary).,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36048,Shell-tempered ware recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36049,"Amphora, samian and black burnished wares were noted in the text, including a high proportion of dining wares, but no specialist report was included.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
36050,"The pottery assemblage has yet to be fully analysed. Handmade sherd were present, whilst the Roman pottery was exclusively Flavian in date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36051,"No close analysis of the fabrics had been undertaken, though the main types noted were local Roman greyware, samian ware and 'native tradition' fabrics used for Iron Age and Roman vessels, both hand-made and (wholly or partially) wheel-thrown.",257,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
36052,"The vast majority of the pottery is consistent with manufacture and/or deposition in the later 3rd and 4thC AD with only occasional sherds, such as the worn piece of samian, hinting at the presence of earlier material. Activity belonging to the very late 3rdC AD or the first half of the 4th is signalled by the presence of Dales-type (of which an almost complete example was recovered) and proto-Huntcliff jars. The range of material is fairly typical for late Roman assemblages in the region, dominated by a combination of East and possibly South Yorkshire grey wares, proto-Huntcliff and Huntcliff jars, and Crambeck products including mortaria. The assemblage contains little potential for further analysis, however, submission of the samian and the mortaria for specialist examination, as recommended, may narrow the dating of, and provide a provenance for, this material.",809,12,,7,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36053,A small assemblage was recovered from the limited area of excavation. There is evidence for occupation in the 2ndC AD and in the 4thC AD. The presence of an amphora sherd in such a small assemblage is of note.,39,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
36054,Pottery was recovered but no specialist analysis carried out.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36055,"Pottery included BB1, oxidised ware, grey ware and gritted ware. The small assemblage was predominantly 2ndC AD.",62,,1,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36056,"Two assemblages were recovered from the sites from different excavations, one producing 568 sherds and the other 2988 sherds. Calcite-gritted wares consisted the majority of both assemblages: 70% and 85% respectively. Smaller quantities of sandy handmade, quartz-tempered handmade, organically-tempered handmade, mortaria, amphorae, oxidised, reduced and Samian wares. Sherd counts for Samian, mortaria and amphora were only given for the smaller assemblage. The date range of the assemblage stretched between the late Iron Age and the 2ndC AD.",3556,,2,1,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36057,"The Roman pottery assemblage appears to commence around the middle of the 2ndC AD, with the latest material dating to the middle or late 4thC AD. Both samian and colour-coated fabrics were also present.",25,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
36058,"The range of fabrics present was common to the Catterick area, comprising Crambeck ware, calcite-gritted ware, Nene Valley colour-coated ware, and locally-made coarse and fine grey and oxidised wares. Amphora and Samian represented imports.",64,1,12,,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
36059,"The pottery assemblage ranged in date from the late Iron Age to the immediate post-Roman period, though there was significant intra-site variability, reflecting the shifting settlement foci. Amphora were notably absent. BB1 and BB2 were present. Calcite gritted ware is the dominant fabric present. Mortaria are strongly represented (c.5%). Finewares on the sites are poorly represented (c.1%).",322,8,,16,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36060,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36061,The pottery assessment does not distinguish material from the settlement from the remainder of the pipeline route.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36062,"The pottery consists almost exclusively of Crambeck greywares, with very small quantities of parchment ware mortaria and calcite-gritted wares. The kilns were only producing greywares. The small amounts of associated calcite-gritted wares were of importance for dating evidence. It was notable that no Huntcliff-type jars were found. The forms consist of two Knapton-type jars, two S-bend jars, and two proto-Huntcliff types which would imply activity from sometime in the 3rdC AD until the middle of the 4th. Amongst the Crambeck greywares, the only type datable within the production range was between c.AD285-400+.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
36063,"The assemblage was predominantly of Hadrianic-early Antonine date, c.AD120-160. The vessels present comprised at least two flagons, a grey ware flanged bowl, a BB1 dish, sherds from two BB1 cooking jars, at least two B3 cooking jars and at least one G12 bead rim jar. In addition an Ebor tankard base was present. The Ebor tankard is an exotic vessel based on Continental types and is a form known to have made by potters serving the military at York.",61,,,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
36064,"Very small quantity of 2nd/3rdC AD local Roman wares from Crantley Hill, near Doncaster, dated the use of the field-system.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36065,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36066,"Some LIA/RB pottery recovered, but no analysis carried out.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36067,"The assemblage consisted of 781 sherds of late Iron Age/Romano-British calcite-gritted ware, and 33 Romano-British greyware and oxidised coarseware sherds. The wares dated through to the 3rd/4thC AD.",814,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36068,"Ninety-five greywares (a number of which appear to have been made at York, Eboracum wares) were recovered, whilst sherds of BB1, amphora, mortaria and samian ware were also present. In total, 22 sherds were imported, 15 came from other British provinces. 7 were of York origin and the remaining 103 were of unknown, but probably northern origin.",147,,10,9,12,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36069,No pottery analysis yet carried out.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36070,One sherd of LIA/ER handmade ware was recovered from one of the four-poster postholes.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36071,LIA Calcite-gritted wares dominated.,27,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36072,"The Roman pottery present on site varied in date from the later 1st century AD to the 4th century AD. Sherds of an Iron Age tradition were present but it was not at all clear whether they represented an Iron Age phase of activity or the continued production of this pottery type into the Romano-British period. The quantity of finewares was considered to be relatively high. Pottery types included Samian, mortaria, white-slipped flagon fabrics, oxidized wares, greywares and gritted wares.",318,,,38,32,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36073,"The colour-coated wares include Cologne and Nene Valley sherds of Hadrianic/Antonine range, whilst two samian sherds were Central and Eastern Gaulish respectively.",39,,1,3,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36074,"Iron Age pottery forms included shallow bowls, large jars, medium jars, round bowls and strainers. The few Romano-British potsherds represented mortaria, grey ware, and orange ware.",789,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
36075,"The majority of the material is in handmade fabrics. Most of these are Iron Age tradition fabrics, though many likely date to the 1st or 2ndC AD (possibly even later); no clear Iron Age deposits were present. The wheel-turned Roman material can be dated to the 2nd century, particularly the Antonine period, and to the end of the 3rd to the mid-later 4thC AD. Detailed analysis was still required.",553,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
36076,"Almost all of the pottery is of late Roman date, much dating to the 4thC AD, though late 2nd and 3rdC AD wares were also reasonably well represented. The includes a range of finewares and imports which are consistent with the identification of the site as a villa, and, overall, a wide range of forms and fabrics were quantified in the report. A handful of vessels were of very late or sub-Roman type, comparable with the latest types found in Roman York where they are dated to the late 4th or early 5thC AD. Early Anglo-Saxon pottery was recovered from five or six contexts.",967,,4,33,36,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36077,"The pottery assemblage included both calcite-gritted/vesicular forms as well as a small amount of 'Roman' types (amphora, greyware and oxidised coarseware), dating the settlement to the late Iron Age through to the 2ndC AD.",189,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
36078,'Romano-British' pottery recovered from the roundhouse gullies and associated features - no analysis carried out yet.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36079,Pottery recovered but not detailed in the report. Said to date to the 2nd/3rdC AD and the 3rd/4thC AD.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36080,"The pottery is in a very abraded condition. The material is consistent with debris from occupation with a range of material present, including two types of imported amphorae, Samian ware, York-made Eboracum wares, BB2, Dales-type shelly ware, Crambeck ware, and some sherds of heavily-gritted handmade pottery. The pottery ranges from the late 1st/early 2nd century through to the late 3rd or early 4th century. No pottery report from the excavation; only material from the eval. Is given here.",64,,10,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36081,"Over 2200 sherds of pottery were recovered from the site, but this includes late Bronze Age and early-middle Iron Age material. C.200 Roman sherds were identified comprising Ebor wares, grey wares, a relatively high proportion of samian and a small amount of colour-coated and white wares. The assemblage had yet to be analysed by a period specialist.",200,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
36082,"Includes material from UoY and OSA excavations. A very wide range of fabrics were encountered including local, regional and imported wares. The dominant ware groups comprised grey wares belonging to Monaghan's later grey burnished group. The identifiable amphora sherds were predominantly from Dressel 20 from southern Spain originally containing olive oil but Gallic types, Dr2-4 and a possible Rhodian vessel were also identified. Nene Valley colour-coated ware accounted for most of the non-samian fine ware but vessels from the Argonne, Cologne were also identified as were sherds from several Trier black-slip beaker and at least one Central Gaulish black slip beaker. Anglian pottery was also found. Three Ebor tazze were present. Only pre-firing graffitos were identified on pottery and CBM. 707 sherds of IA handmade pottery was also identified (included here in overall quantification). All the fabrics were fully quantified.",8230,113,269,195,236,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36083,"No overall quantification of the pottery from Holme House villa (percentages given but no sherd count), though most is mid to late 2nd C AD in date and it includes samian, Dressel 20, Black Sand and Pelichet 47 amphorae, North kent ware, Severn valley ware, Parisian ware, Ebor 1&2 ware, BB1, BB2, Crambeck ware and local coarsewares.",,,,21,74,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36084,"A substantial assemblage, mostly dating to the mid 1st C AD (AD 55-75/80). Amphorae (Dr 20, Rhodian & S Gaulish) and samian predominate, along with Gallo-Belgic beakers, Verulamium flagons and mortaria, Mancetter-Hartsill mortaria, and some local wares.",709,6,515,3,62,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36085,A small assemblage of late Iron Age date.,89,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36086,The three closely set timber roundhouses were associated with 130 sherds of late Iron Age pottery. The stone-built roundhouse was associated with 140 sherds of pottery dating from the late Iron Age to the 5th-6th C AD.,270,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36087,"A substantial assemblage of Roman pottery, the bulk of which was coarse local calcite-gritted fabrics, though there were also late fine wares demonstrating activity very late in the Roman period. Most dateable pottery belonged to the 4th C AD. Pottery kilns and waster material also found. No detailed analysis as yet.",20000,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36088,The pottery recovered from the site ranges from native British wares of the local Iron Age tradition through to fourth century Roman material.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36089,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36090,"3rdC AD pottery was recovered from the settlement site, but no further details or a specialist report was available.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36091,"Romano-British pottery was recovered but not quantified. The assemblage included mortaria, Huntcliffe wares, buff and grey wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
36092,"The pottery assemblage came from the roadside ditch and occupation layers of the roadside structure. It included sherds of samian, mortaria, amphorae, grey wares, calcite-gritted wares, oxidised ware, reduced ware, Parisian ware, and possible imported fine ware. Vessel forms included bowls, platters, lid and jars.",135,,4,1,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36093,"Despite the small Roman pottery assemblage, a relative wide range of wares was recovered including grey ware, calcite-gritted ware, Crambeck ware, samian, Black Burnished 1 ware, a 1stC AD Rhenish import, and a probably southern colour-coated sherd. A grey ware miniature jar was also recovered.",37,,,,1,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
36094,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36095,"The assemblage of Roman pottery represents a large range of fabric and forms with a date range from the 1st to 3rdC AD. The assemblage included finewares such as Samian, Rhenish and Nene Valley ware to the more common grey and orange wares indicative of military occupation and locally-produced calcite-gritted wares. Other fabrics included Black Burnished and Parisian ware, but the assemblage lacked regionally-distinctive 4thC AD forms such as Crambeck and Huntscliffe type pottery. A possible grey ware waster was identified.",3632,,32,10,160,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36096,"The full assemblage was not quantified. For example, over 500 sherds were recovered from the paved, occupation area, though these were not further analysed. The pottery from the kilns were usefully quantified by form however (286 sherds); as were the large quantity of pottery from Pit C (374 sherds). Straight-sided dishes (24%), lipped bowls/dishes (33%), and large jars (21%) dominated overall. Other forms included flanged bowls, small jars/beakers, flagons, large calcite-gritted jars, and some miscellaneous forms. Pit C included a similar proportion of forms to the kilns, but with less straight-sided bowls and more flagons.",660,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
36097,"No information about the pottery, other than it was the same as that found in other kilns nearby.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36098,"Most of the pottery (38kg) came from the filling of the kiln and the stokehole, whilst the ditches produced 11kg. The kiln features included almost exclusively kiln products, with only a very few sherds of other pottery types, whilst imported pottery derived from the ditch fills and subsoil in greater quantities. Other pottery types included two sherds from a funnel-necked Nene Valley ware beaker, two sherds from a colour-coated indented beaker, reduced wares including flanged bowls, flat-rimmed bowl/dishes, lids, funnel-necked beaker imitations, and a pinch-necked flagon, plus sherds of Ebor ware and other oxidised wares. Of the on-site produced Norton ware three fabrics could be discerned: a highly-fired mid-grey fabric, a softer fabric distinguished by burnishing (BB1 imitations), and calcite-gritted ware. Additionally, there were two sherds from 'smith' pots with applique hammers, and a small beaker with an applique human arm.",2006,52,5,5,17,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
36099,The pottery is largely of the mid-third to early fourth centuries. There is relatively little residual material predating AD 190 and none of the pottery typical of the late Roman after AD 360. No quantification analysis was undertaken.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
36100,The majority of sherds were of locally-produced calcite-gritted wares. The sherds indicate a wide range of jars and cooking pots. There were relatively small amounts of locally-produced 2ndC AD greywares and 3rdC AD Crambeck wares.,860,,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
37001,77 sherds of late Iron Age pottery forming substantial portions of one or two vessels were recovered from one ditch.,77,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37002,"A high ASW and EVE count suggests primary or secondary waste disposal in boundary ditches with little post-depositional disturbance taking place. Based upon EVE calculations the assemblage is roughly equally divided between jars (30.1%), bowls (39.6%) and dishes (24.2%), with the vast majority being of local greyware. The Samian are Central Gaulish and Antonine in date.",649,18,,6,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37003,Only two pieces of pottery were recovered from the excavation from a late Roman Samian imitation vessel. Though other Roman pottery has been recovered from the intruding quarry including Samian.,2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
37004,"The pottery was mostly 4thC AD in date, though some 3rdC AD wares were present, as was mid-2ndC Samian. Little detail and no quantification of the assemblage was given.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
37005,"The stratified assemblage was quantified by rim. Many of the vessels showed a roughly burnished surface, and Samian imitations were of an orange oxidised fabric. Flanged bowls and wide-mouthed jar predominated, with other forms encountered including lipped dishes and bowls, cheese-presses, medium-sized jars, large handled and non-handled jars, plus a few shallow dishes, pitchers, imitation Samian, and mortaria. All forms found occurred as wasters.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
37006,"Enormous quantities of pottery was recovered, though only that from the interior of the kilns was examined, and only rim sherds were quantified (see report). The range of forms consisted of lipless platters, pie-dishes, flanged bowls, lid-seated jars, mortaria, wide-mouthed bowls, jars with and without loop handles, rustic ware, hemispherical cordoned bowls, and neckless jars. Of these the jars dominated the assemblages, followed by the wide-mouthed bowls.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
37007,"Enormous quantities of pottery was recovered, though only that from the interior of the kilns was examined, and only rim sherds were quantified (see report). The range of forms consisted of lipless platters, pie-dishes, flanged bowls, lid-seated jars, mortaria, wide-mouthed bowls, jars with and without loop handles, rustic ware, hemispherical cordoned bowls, and neckless jars. Of these the jars dominated the assemblages, followed by the wide-mouthed bowls.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
37008,"Enormous quantities of pottery was recovered, though only that from the interior of the kilns was examined, and only rim sherds were quantified (see report). The range of forms consisted of lipless platters, pie-dishes, flanged bowls, lid-seated jars, mortaria, wide-mouthed bowls, jars with and without loop handles, rustic ware, hemispherical cordoned bowls, imitation Samian, shallow bowls with hooked rims, hemispherical flanged bowls, reeded rim bowls, and neckless jars. Of these the wide-mouthed bowls dominated the late dating assemblage, whilst the earlier period kiln was more similar to those kilns at sites 1 and 2. Two sherds of Samian were recovered from one of the pits on site, and small number of further sherds were recovered from other contexts also.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37009,Large quantities of pottery were recovered - details were given in a later publication (see nearby site pottery summaries for general details).,,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37010,See other sites nearby for pottery details. Kiln 14 was of particular interest as it produced quantities of large sherds in good condition compared to other kilns in the vicinity.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37011,Roman greyware sherd demonstrates Roman period activity.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37012,"The majority of pottery are from 'Roman' types, plus 8 sherds of local handmade wares. The latest dating pottery from the fills is Mancetter mortaria which is mid-3rd-mid-4thC AD. BB1 ware also present.",77,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
37013,"A substantial pottery assemblage was produced containing a range of fabrics and forms including early shell and grog-gritted wares, Dr 20 amphorae, mortaria. Nene Valley colour-coated wares, oxidised wares, BB1, and late Roman shell-gritted wares. Some groups were large and in a fresh condition. Few vessels appear to have been reworked and there is no evidence for repair. The mortaria including grinding wear. Jars were common.",6433,102,2,19,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
37014,"The pottery assemblage was relatively well preserved and included some large fragments. The specialist argues that the range of material present is not indicative of a domestic rural site. Grey wares dominated, whilst Dales wares was also well represented. Other fabrics included BB1, mortaria from the Nene Valley, Mancetter-Hartshill, and Cantley. Oxfordshire and Samian was also present. Fine wares are very well represented for a rural site. Bowls/dishes and beakers were unusually prolific. One small and shallow vessel had been burnt and was argued to have been used as a tazza; it showed similarities with another tazza example from Lincoln. Two other sherds showed similar morphology and use-wear. The pottery was almost exclusively mid-3rd-mid-4thC AD.",653,15,,11,2,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37015,"A large quantity of waster material was recovered, but mostly retrieved from the bucket of a mechanical digger quarrying for aggregate. However, 4333 rim and 2006 base sherds were identified from stokehole and kiln groups, and these were quantified by form. These included mortaria, bead-rimmed dishes, other dishes and bowls, beakers, lid-seated jars, large jars, flagons, colanders, shouldered bowls, cheese presses, imitation Samian, and miscellaneous lids.",6339,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37016,"The pottery assemblage ranged from the late pre-Roman Iron Age to the early-mid-4thC AD. Occasional pottery dumps were recovered from different areas of the site, and there appears to have been good evidence for spatial variation in deposition. Jars tended to dominate, though bowls were deposited in comparatively significant quantities, and in Area C during phase 4 (2nd-4thC AD) were slightly more prevalent than jars. Dishes, flagons, beakers and mortaria were also present. Vessels from the Doncaster potteries dominated from the 2nd-4thC AD and were added to by amphora, Nene valley wares, Dales ware and Derbyshire wares.",7475,89,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
37017,"Seven sherds of Romano-British coarse pottery came from the excavations; all Doncaster grey ware. These were not well dated, but tend to be 2nd-3rdC AD.",8,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
37018,"Three reduced shell-tempered sherds of a type characteristic of the immediately pre-Conquest period were recovered from one area, whilst the remaining assemblage was Romano-British in date. All the pottery was heavily abraded and could not be more closely dated than mid-2nd to mid-4thC AD, but are likely to come from the kilns around Doncaster.",23,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37019,"The majority of the Roman pottery forms a coherent group of apparently 2ndC AD date with only a single context producing material that might be later Iron Age to 1stC AD. The commonest fabric is South Yorkshire greyware. Black burnished ware (BB1) is strongly represented. Wheelmade grog-tempered wares provided a small proportion. Finewares were limited to a single sherd of Central Gaulish decorated Samian. Forms include wide-mouthed jars, other jars, bowls, dishes, beakers and mortaria.",513,,,3,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37020,"the pottery assemblage includes one LIA/ER handmade ware sherd, Samian, BB1, and Dalesware.",12,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
37021,"Pottery was mostly of Romano-British grey wares, with small percentages of red oxidised wares and black burnished wares. Also present was a stamped rim and spout of a buff fabric mortarium. The assemblage has been provisionally characterised as being mainly of 1st to 2ndC AD date.",,12,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
37022,"The pottery identified comprised a small assemblage of 10 sherds of pottery. All appears to be Roman in date and comprises nine undiagnostic body sherds of a black, shell tempered ware and a single rim sherd, which suggests a 2ndC AD date, which would correlate with the pottery identified in earlier phases of work at the site.",10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37023,"Most of the pottery appears to be 2ndC AD date, though some may be 1stC AD. South Yorkshire products dominated, though oxidised wares and BB1 were also present. Samian and other fine wares were notably absent. Jars formed over 75% of the assemblage.",410,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37024,"The assemblage was overwhelmingly of local South Yorkshire grey wares, predominantly 2nd and 3rdC AD.",5300,54,,,45,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
37025,"Over 90% of the pottery came from two trenches, Trench 26 and Trench 59, which included the two sherds of Iron Age pottery. Only four fabric types were represented: South Yorkshire grey wares, oxidized wares, Rossington Bridge Burnished Ware fabric 1, and Rossington Bridge Mortaria fabric MO2. The pottery can be dated to the late 1st to 2ndC AD. There are no finewares represented in the assemblage - jars and bowls represent the majority of forms. The assemblage does not appear to represent a domestic assemblage.",278,,,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
37026,"Local greywares dominated the assemblage; the site is located within 10 kilometres of a number of Roman kiln sites. Other fabrics included black burnished ware, oxidised ware, Dales Ware, Lower Nene Valley colour coated ware, and Central Gaulish Samian ware. The form range is limited, comprising various jars, bowls, dishes and a few mortaria.",376,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37027,Prehistoric sherds plus coarse oxidised (pale orange) fabric in a samian imitation form were present.,6,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37028,"The pottery has only been assessed, but includes Iron Age and Roman types.",429,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37029,"A clear emphasis on pottery deposition in the 2ndC AD was observed. Types include samian, mortaria, BB1, and whiteware. Grog-tempered and greywares were notably absent.",128,,,2,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37030,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37031,"The pottery assemblage was minimal but included rusticated ware, BB1, and shell-tempered ware, together representing 1st and 2ndC AD activity.",10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37032,"Predominant amongst the Romano-British assemblage were greywares found in three main forms: neckless, everted rim jars, flanged bowls and dropped flange bowls. The second largest group is made up of coarse shelly wares, occurring alongside the greywares. Derbyshire ware, south-east Dorset Black Burnished ware (BB1), and a colour-coated body sherd from the Nene Valley production centre were also present.",191,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37033,"The assemblage included cordoned bowls and jars of the transitional period. Roman pottery included Derbyshire ware, grey ware, oxidised ware, BB1, BB2 and Samian.",52,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
37034,"Fabrics included Black-burnished ware, Colour-coated, Dalesware, Greyware, Rusticated ware, Mortaria, Oxidised ware, Samian, Shell-tempered, Vesicular ware and unattributed Gritty ware. Greywares overwhelmingly predominated.",501,7,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37035,"A moderate sized assemblage of pottery, much of it derived from the potential shrine gully including near complete vessels (late 1st/early 2nd C AD). 111 sherds identified as of Iron Age type, with 365 Romano-British wares (1st-early 3rd  AD), the latter including South Yorkshire greywares, Dalesware, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, and samian.",476,,,3,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37036,"Second to fourth century AD pottery recovered, with an emphasis on the later Roman period. No quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
37037,"Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age and Roman date, including substantially complete vessels of both periods.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37038,Over 1000 sherds of pottery came from a large 3rdC AD dump of kiln waste which also included fired clay debris. Deep dish bowls and jars were most common. Mortaria wasters were also identified.,2198,63,,4,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
37039,"Large quantities of Roman pottery recovered, much of which is usefully described in the report, but no full quantifications are given. Assemblages include samian, mortaria, and amphorae. Three literate graffitos were recovered.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
37040,"Pottery sherds were recovered from secure groups were associated with three cremation groups, four individual cremation burials, two inhumation burials, two possible cenotaphs, a possible pyre area, dumped pyre deposits and a further 13 pits and hollows. Two cremation urns were recovered and two possible cenotaphs pots. Pottery vessels associated with the cremations were limited to jars, wine and oil amphorae and flagons. Ceramic pyre goods were common and included grey ware and grog?tempered jars and flagons. Unusually high numbers of amphora sherds were identified and these included wine and oil amphorae. Many of the oil amphora sherds were burnt and a small number of the wine amphorae were slightly scorched perhaps as a result of being placed near the pyre. The quantities of amphorae contrasted markedly with contemporary deposits from the vicus at Doncaster and other wares such as samian and fine wares were much lower. Pottery from non?burial deposits had a different profile. Although it include a little redeposited material, the group mostly comprised samian, particularly decoration samian bowls and beakers, fine ware beakers, mortaria and coarse ware dishes and bowls? types not found in the graves. These may derive from burial and memorial rites contemporary with the cremation cemetery. This material was largely unburnt.",1508,43,727,45,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
37041,"The group was dominated by local grey wares from the South Yorkshire kilns with a small amount of black burnished ware (BB1), also made locally. Seven grog-tempered sherds indicate early activity in the vicinity dating to the mid-late 1stC AD. Dales wares, Nene Valley colour-coated ware beakers, Trier black-slip beaker, a Cologne roughcast beaker, white slipped, oxidised vessels, Dressel 20 amphora and mortaria from Mancetter-Hartshill, Crambeck Parchment ware, and locally produced mortarium from the kilns at Cantley, were all present. A wide range of forms were noted. The types of fabrics and forms identified in the assemblage date from the mid to late 1stC AD to the late 4thC AD, but the majority of the pottery centred on the mid to late 2ndC AD.",703,9,6,4,35,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
37042,No specialist reports though Roman pottery was noted to have been recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37043,"Pottery came from the cemetery phase of the site, but mostly from the later Roman period of use. The assemblage included wide range of fabrics and forms, including fine and imported wares.",1888,29,42,35,67,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
37044,"Quantities of pottery have long been recovered from within Eglington Wood and many directly from the areas of the buildings and enclosures. The assemblages are entirely unstratified but include samian, mortaria and coarsewares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37045,"Pottery sherds were few, but included 3rdC AD mortaria, cooking pots and platter rims.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
37046,"Rim counts from pottery at the site totalled over 5000. Wasters were common from waste heaps. Much of the material suffered from being poorly recorded on site and poorly curated in the old Doncaster Museum. Much information is now lost. The kilns produced a range of forms including mortaria, shallow dishes, lipped dishes and bowls, beakers, jars, large jars, flagons, colanders, large bowls, cheese presses, imitation samian and lids. A minimum of 115 samian vessels were recovered. Links to the mortaria potters Sarrius, Setibogius and Secundua, were all noted from stamps.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
37047,"A specialist pottery was not given, but ceramics dating to the 2ndC AD were recovered from multiple features.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
37048,"The Roman pottery assemblage included samian, mortaria, Black Burnished 1, Parisian ware, Nene Valley colour-coated wares and roughcast wares, as well as the predominant locally-made coarsewares. Only sherd count, weight and EVE percentages given for main fabric types. Amphorae quantified by rim counts.",3915,107,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
37049,"The pottery was not quantified, but included mortaria, Derbyshire ware, grey ware, samian, and grey-sandy ware probably from the Doncaster-Cantley kilns.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38001,"The small assemblage is all of late Roman date, mostly calcite-gritted fabric.",11,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38002,"Most of the pottery types found at Grimescar were also present at Slack Roman fort, along with the presence of numerous wasters, suggests that the tilery was producing and supplying the military site. The pottery is mostly orange-red and yellow fabric coarsewares. A small amount of dark grey wares may not have been produced at the site. No quantification given, but fabric descriptions by vessel form is provided. Reeded-rim bowls, cooking pots, flagons, cheese-presses, beakers, and a possible mortarium fragment were all present.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
38003,The samian sherds dated AD120-200.,6,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
38004,"The assemblage was very small and was predominantly of grey wares. Colour-coated and oxidised wares were also present. All the pottery fits a 2ndC AD date. It is uncertain why so little pottery was recovered from the site, but it does not appear to have preserved well.",66,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
38005,"A very small quantity of pottery was recovered from the site predominantly form BB1 ware and single sherds of Samian and mortaria. A complete profile from a Belgic jar was identified and most of the pottery dated to the 2ndC AD, whilst the mortaria dated to the 3rdC AD. No fine wares were present.",44,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38006,"Very little pottery was recovered due to the nature of the excavation, but the trackway and field boundaries produced sherds from an early creamware flagon, a Dales-ware jar, and a Yorkshire white-slipped mortarium.",26,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
38007,"The Samian and amphora were 2ndC AD in date whilst the Huntcliffe, late shelly, and Crambeck wares demonstrate activity through to the late 4thC AD.",31,1,2,,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
38008,"Pottery was recovered in very small quantities from the site. 20 sherds of later Iron Age pottery and 44 from Romano-British wares (though the latter also the included the total from Site P as well, since these were not separated in the report. The former is more likely to have contributed the bulk however). The vessels were mainly East Yorkshire calcite-gritted wares such as Huntcliffe.",64,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38009,"The strong evidence for pre-Flavian Roman pottery deposition at the site appears to be rare in the region. Most of the pottery dates to the 2ndC AD, however, signifying the most intensive period of activity. A small amount of 3rd/e.4thC AD pottery was found in the form of Dalesware and Crambeck greyware. Though no sherds dating to the latter half of the 4thC AD was identified. Other forms present include BB1, early Belgic wares, some finewares e.g. Nene Valley, and white wares.",617,12,11,21,43,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38010,"Most of the pottery suggests a date range between the mid-2ndC AD and the late 4th, though the lower fills of many features were left unexcavated. Fabrics included Crambeck ware, BB1, Dressel 20, South Yorkshire oxidised, East Yorkshire calcite-gritted, Dalesware, and South Yorkshire greyware.",684,8,,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38011,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38012,"Nearly 300 sherds 'native' handmade ware; the presence of some samian mixed with this material suggests it was being used up until the development of the villa by the beginning of the 3rdC AD. 14840 sherds of Roman wheel-turned vessels were present, of which 5940 came from a large deposit in one of the wells. The chronological rang stretched the late Antonine period to the mid-4thC AD. The range of types was comparatively limited however, with most being of Yorkshire/north Lincolnshire origin. No detailed quantification given on the pottery assemblage is given other than that from the well. Local greywares and Huntcliffe vessels clearly dominate this assemblage. The amphora, samian and mortaria counts recorded here are only those from the well and so will be under-represented overall.",15140,,2,11,28,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38013,"The earliest Roman assemblage includes a range of Flavian-Trajanic forms including amphora, flagons, beakers, 'honey-pots', rusticated jars, reeded-rim bowls, white ware bowls, and painted beakers, and together are suggestive of military use at the site, as this combined group is very rare on local rural settlements. Quantities of wasters were also found from this early phase. 23 sherds of hand-made vessels were also present. Flagons, cups and beakers are largely absent after the mid-2ndC AD and the assemblage as a whole is less unusual for a local rural site. Mortaria may have been produced on or near the site from the late 3rdC AD. Other fabrics included BB1, colour-coated, Dales ware, Derbyshire ware, Dressel 20, early grey ware, glazed ware, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, Rossington BB1, South Yorks wares, and shell-tempered wares.",2042,29,1,40,36,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38014,"The pottery assemblage consisted of 325 hand-made and 6332 Roman sherds, all probably broadly contemporary. The assemblage dates from the late Iron Age to the early post-Roman period, but the majority derives from the late 4th/early 5thC AD phase, dated by remains of Huntcliffe and Crambeck wares. Other fabrics included BB1 (both local and Dorset), calcite-gritted, Ebor ware, white ware, grey ware, other coarse gritty wares, oxidised and colour-coated wares. The assemblage included a high proportion of jar forms (c.67%), but a wide range of forms were present.",6657,89,3,60,48,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38015,"Of the 126 Roman sherds from the site, 96 were recovered from a single Dales ware jar. 5 sherds of handmade pottery was recovered. BB1 was present as well as South Yorkshire greyware.",131,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38016,"5 sherds of LIA/ER handmade wares were recovered. The Roman assemblage was overwhelmingly 4thC AD in date, possibly indicating a greater domestic presence in this phase. Crambeck and Huntcliffe wares were prominent. Nene valley colour-coated wares were present. Forms included flagons, bowls, dishes, and mortaria. Jars dominated however (>70%).",235,2,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
38017,"The pottery assemblage from Becca Banks included a range of 2nd-3rdC AD fabrics including predominantly South Yorkshire greywares, plus a relatively high proportion of BB1 (c.25%). Other local coarsewares wares were present in smaller quantities, whilst sherds of amphora, Antonine Samian and Nene valley colour-coated wares were imported. Although analysis of relative frequencies were displayed in the report, no raw data or samples sizes was provided.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
38018,"No details or data from the assemblage was given in the specialist report, though the excavation report describes the recovery of 2ndC AD Samian and greyware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
38019,"A small quantity of LIA/ER handmade pottery was recovered, but unfortunately the wheel-turned Roman wares were not discussed in the specialist, nor were any data given.",20,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38020,"Forms included cooking pots, flanged bowls, bowls, mortaria, amphora and jars. Crambeck and Castor wares were identified.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38021,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38022,Mostly wheel-turned greyware of 2nd/3rdC AD date from the field boundaries.,10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38023,"Fabrics include oxidised wares, reduced wares, BB1, Crambeck wares, Huntcliffe wares, Dales shelly wares, Derbyshire wares, Nene valley wares, Verulamium wares, Samian and BB2. No quantification was carried out.",,,,25,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38024,The pottery was all dated to the LIA/ER period.,4,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38025,The 25 sherds recovered from the site: a greyware vessel and a white ware flagon.,25,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38026,The assemblage was not well dated but thought to be LIA/ER.,7,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38027,"South Yorkshire greywares produced the bulk of the assemblage, whilst BB1 vessels were also very well represented. Storage jars represented over half of the assemblage, which also included narrow-neck jars, deep bowls, wide-shouldered jars and beakers. The materials was mostly 2ndC AD. Sherds of Crambeck Greyware, one of Crambeck white mortarium, and one from a Nene Valley bowl, indicated some activity into the later 3rd and 4thC AD.",321,,,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38028,"The majority of the pottery is from shell-gritted Dalesware jars, plus some south Yorkshire greywares. Together the assemblage points to activity in the late 3rd to earlier 4thC AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38029,"The pottery assemblage consisted of 24 sherds of RB handmade pottery, 4 sherds of Baetican olive-oil amphora Dressel 20, and a greyware sherd.",29,,4,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
38030,"The pottery assemblage was highly abraded, and predominantly consisted of South Yorkshire greywares. BB1 and Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria were also present, though finewares were absent. The material ranged in date from the late 1stC AD to the 4thC AD.",87,1,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
38031,"The assemblage was principally low density, handmade fabric. Despite its poor quality, the assemblage is predominantly dated to between the 1stC BC and the 1stC AD. 21 sherds of Roman pottery were also recovered, including coarse grey and orange wares, plus Black Burnished Ware.",72,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38032,"Very little pottery use was identified between the Hadrianic period (AD120-140) and the end of the 3rdC AD, but included some BB1 and oxidised sherds. The majority of the collection likely dates to the early 4thC AD with Dales ware, South Yorkshire grey ware, and East Yorkshire calcite-gritted ware, all probably of this date; the calcite-gritted ware certainly suggests that occupation continued to c.AD330-350. An Oxfordshire colour-coated ware dish was an unusual feature on such a site.",265,4,,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
38033,Handmade pottery dating to the 2nd-4thC AD were recovered from stratified features.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38034,"A relatively large quantity of domestic-use pottery derived from the ditch fills including Samian, BB1, local coarseware and mortaria, though no detailed analysis or quantification of the material was carried out.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38035,"The pottery assemblage was generally quite abraded. A range of fabrics were identified including Dales type greyware, Dales type shell-tempered ware, sandy greyware, Crambeck greyware, Ebor 1 red ware, BB2, and whiteware. Only bowls and jars were present.",131,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38036,"The pottery assemblage included BB1, Crambeck greyware and Dalesware. The 576 sherds includes some medieval and post-medieval material. Numbers not specified.",576,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
38037,"The vicus pottery assemblage contains a great range of different types of fabrics and forms. A very large quantity of pottery was recovered, particularly Samian, mostly from a burnt down shop/storehouse. Emphasis is given to the amphora trade as well. 53 tazze were recovered. Literate graffitos found.",9337,,2474,675,2338,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38038,The pottery was predominantly 1st-2ndC AD with a few 3rd/4thC AD demonstrating some later activity.,35,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
38039,"Pottery dating from the late 1st to the 4thC AD was recovered, including samian and mortaria.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38040,"A moderate sized assemblage of mainly 2nd to 3rd C AD date including South Yorkshire greywares, Dales ware and Dorset Black-burnished ware. Also some samian and Nene Valley ware. Fabrics not quantified.",1218,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38041,A very limited assemblage of middle to late Iron Age date.,10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38042,"A small assemblage of later Iron Age date, along with a larger assemblage of late Roman date. The Roman wares include South Yorkshire greywares, Dales ware, Dorset Black-burnished wares and Dressel 20 amphora.",150,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
38043,"A moderate quantity of pottery from the well, generally dating later 2nd to later 3rd/early 4th C AD, including many complete vessels. Includes South Yorkshire greywares, Dorset Black burnished ware, Dr 20 amphora, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, Crambeck grey wares and Nene Valley colour coats.",254,11,,,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38044,"Although pottery was low in quantity, the site produced sherds of high average size, suggesting that the assemblage was well preserved and suffered minimal redeposition. The assemblage was not quantified to sherd count by type, but forms and fabrics included a barrel jar of LIA type (though this may date to 1st or 2ndC AD), BB1, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, other mortaria, Huntcliffe wares, samian, and a sherds from a Rhenish vessel.",64,2,,7,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38045,"The assemblage included local greyware, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, oxidised ware, BB1,  and La Graufesenque. The pottery dated from the 1stC AD to the 4thC AD.",56,,,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38046,"Fabric supply was dominated by South Yorkshire material and a small amount of BB1. A Crambeck mortaria is present, but not necessarily 4thC AD; Dales ware was absent. Form types were quantified by percentage of rims. Over half were form jars. Bowls, dishes and mortaria present. Flagons, constricted neck jars, and cups/beakers were absent.",242,3,,3,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38047,"The comments fabric recovered was South Yorkshire grey ware followed by East Yorkshire calcite-gritted ware, Crambeck grey ware, gritty hand-made fabrics, and BB1. Fine wares were poorly represented. 4thC AD wares were most common, with both early and late pottery from that century being present, including Dalesware. Jars dominated by rim count (63%), followed by bowls (25%), dishes and mortaria (both 6%). Flagons, cups and beakers were absent.",152,4,,2,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
38048,The site appears to have belonged to a largely aceramic phase of occupation during the late Iron Age. No Roman wares were identified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38049,"The assemblage only yielded a single sherd of later Iron Age pottery, further suggesting this period to have been largely aceramic. 77 sherds of early Saxon pottery was also identified. Jars heavily dominated the Roman assemblage (66% by rim count), followed by dishes, mortaria, bowls, constricted-neck jars, and cups/beakers. Flagons were absent. Gritted-wares and reduced wares dominated overall.",659,7,12,34,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38050,"South Yorkshire grey ware was most common, followed by BB1, Dales ware, calcite-gritted ware, and Crambeck grey ware. Pottery predominantly dated from the 2nd-4thC AD, deriving form the enclosure ditch and the road quarries.",226,1,1,6,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
38051,One oxidised sherd recovered (LIA/Roman),1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
38052,"The small amount of pottery probably suggests that the enclosures were not permanently inhabited. The assemblage included greyware and calcite-gritted ware, probably all dating to the 1st and 2ndC AD.",5,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39001,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39002,"A substantial ceramic assemblage for the region comprising 2110 sherds of 'native' local handmade fabrics and 2221 shards of Roman and Romano-British wares, these comprised local black and grey wares, Dorset Black-burnished wares, along with Cologne white wares, Thames estuary BB2, and Lower Nene Valley ware. Amphorae comprised Dressel 20 except one sherd of Gallic wine amphora. Literate graffitos found ('(property of) Januarius'), along with a tazza fragment.",4334,66,58,107,228,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
39003,"A huge assemblage (sherd count approximate) with a large volume of 2nd/early 3rd C AD samian. Includes BB1, BB2, Oxfordshire, Nene Valley and Cologne colour coats, Severn valley ware, Horningsea ware, Crambeck ware, local greywares, North Kent ware, and 'native' hand-made Romano-British wares (437 sherds). Amphorae mostly Dr 20, but also a wide variety of others (Gallic, Black sand, Campanian, N African, CAM 186, Biv, carrot). Chimney pots, head pots and face flagons found. Many literate graffitos. An early 2nd C AD pottery kiln was discovered, which produced mortaria, along with jars, bowls and flagons.",50000,1330,1492,1876,7018,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
39004,A modest assemblage of Iron Age pottery.,575,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39005,"Unquantified assemblage of mainly later 2nd-3rd C AD in date, including Dorset and Thames estuary Black-burnished ware and a complete colour coat beaker (3rd C AD).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
39006,"A moderate assemblage of 1522 fragments of  'native' hand man pottery and 1.5kg of Romano-British pottery (not quantified by sherd count in report), which included samian and black-burnished ware. This pottery dates mid 1st to mid 2nd C AD.",1522,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
39007,"Over 2000 sherds of late Iron Age and Roman pottery found from the earlier excavations (no quantifications from later excavations). The pottery includes samian, a sherd of terra nigra, Gallo-Belgic butt beaker, local greywares, possible Nene Valley ware and Crambeck ware. Unexpectedly large number of mortaria sherds from 1987 excavation.",2000,,,,30,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
39008,"A small assemblage of 2nd-3rd  AD date, including greyware and Black-burnished ware.",202,2,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
39009,"Modest assemblage from evaluation only, includes sherds of Hartshill/Mancetter mortarium, black-burnished ware and local greywares.",41,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
39010,A modest assemblage of pottery. No further details.,334,6,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39011,"Unquantified assemblage including coarsewares, Castor ware and samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
39012,"A modest size assemblage for the area excavated, mainly dating later 2nd-late 4th C AD. Dominated by East Yorkshire Calcite gritted wares and other local gritted wares, Crambeck greywares and local greywares. Also small quantities of Nene Valley colour coats, Rhenish ware, Oxfordshire colour coats, Black burnished ware (BB1 & BB2), southern shell-tempered ware, Dressel 20 amphorae, Dalesware, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria, Noyon mortaria, and Crambeck parchment ware.",1761,44,15,46,45,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
39013,"A moderate sized assemblage (1029 sherds; 16kg) of mid 2nd to late 3rd C AD date (the totals exclude unstratified pottery) from the southern excavation.  The bulk of the pottery comprises a variety of presumably locally made sandy grey wares, but there were a wide range of sources: Dorset Black burnished ware (BB1: 5%), North Kent Black-burnished ware (BB2: 3%),  Mancetter-Hartshill (2%), Nene Valley colour-coats and amphorae (Gallic, Italian Dressel 2-4 and S Spanish Dressel 20: 51% by wgt). Central & East Gaulish samian.  Graffiti on the amphora sherds A smaller assemblage (124 sherds; 2kg) from the northern excavations including 28 sherds of samian and 12 sherds of amphorae.",1153,18,,,127,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
39014,A very small assemblage of Iron Age hand made pottery.,8,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39015,"17 sherds of Iron Age hand made pottery (late Iron Age or early Roman in date), and 19 sherds of Romano-British pottery, including a single fragment of handle of Dressel 20 amphora, 2 sherds of samian, 3 BB2 sherds, 1 BB1 sherd, a sherd of Crambeck Reduced ware and local greywares.",36,,1,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
39016,"A moderate sized assemblage dating  from the middle of the 3rd century to the middle of the 4th century AD. Fabrics include Black Burnished Ware 1, Calcite Gritted Huntcliffe Ware and Crambeck wares (White, reduced, parchment).",513,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
39017,"Part of the base and lower wall of a small jar was recovered, dating to the later Iron Age or early Roman period. All other pottery was late Roman in date, including calcite?gritted ware, Crambeck reduced ware, Mancetter?Hartshill mortaria and other mortaria sherds from Cantley or Catterick. A complete calcite gritted ware cooking pot (AD 275?325) found in a small circular pit cut into a larger pit.",92,,,6,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
39018,"A relatively large quantity of Local Traditional Ware that could be either Iron Age or Roman in date, a small quantity of 2nd?century pottery, and some late 3rd? or 4th?century pottery. Includes Crambeck reduced ware and calcite?gritted ware",178,,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
39019,"No quantified data, though large amounts of ceramics from the site, some made at kilns within the settlement, which have been dated later 2nd to early 3rd C AD. A complete small pot came from an entrance ditch terminal of an enclosure fronting onto Cades Road.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39020,Just five sherds of Roman pottery recovered from 2012 watching brief.,5,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
39021,"A substantial assemblage from the Time Team evaluation with a substantial proportion of samian, along with local greywares, orange buff wares, BB1, BB2, Nene Valley colour coats & mortaria and amphorae (most Dressel 20 & also Gaulish).",660,15,42,14,72,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
39022,"A small assemblage including samian and other second-century AD pottery, along with local traditional wares and one sherd of calcite-gritted ware, likely to be fourth-century in date. The report does not quantity pottery from different sites, but groups together 128 sherds from 5 sites.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
39023,"Small assemblage including a single sherd of samian, and a number of small sherds in grey wares (2nd-3rd C AD). Also local traditional ware vessels which could date late Iron Age to late Roman,  three sherds of Crambeck reduced wares (late 3rd C +) and three Huntcliff-type rims dating to AD 360+. No specific site quantification but less than 100 sherds.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
39024,"A small assemblage of 2nd-3rd C AD pottery from the 2005 watching brief including central Gaulish samian, calcite-gritted ware, Mancetter-Hartshill mortarium, Nene valley colour-coated ware, and Black-burnished ware II (BB2). A larger assemblage from the 2006 excavation (136 fragments) including Dorset BB1, Crambeck grey ware, Northern Kent BB2, Nene Valley colour-coats, possible Derbyshire ware,  East Gaulish Rhenish ware, Dr 20 (and possibly Dr 2-4) amphora, Central Gaulish samian and a rim fragment from a jar made in a local 'native' ware.",173,,,1,36,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
39025,A moderate sized assemblage of Iron Age hand made pottery.,162,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39026,A small assemblage of hand made Iron Age pottery.,19,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39027,One sherd of Samian Ware.,1,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
39028,Just three sherds of later prehistoric pottery were recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39029,"A small assemblage of 59 sherds from the 2001 evaluation. Includes BB1, Crambeck greywares and Hartshill-Mancetter mortaria.  Material is dated 1st to 4th C AD. 209 sherds from the 2008 evaluation with high percentage of samian and amphora (Dressel 20 & CAM 186). The pottery ranges in date from the Flavian period to no later than the mid-third century.",268,3,39,8,92,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
39030,"A modest pottery assemblage including Castor ware, dating up to the later 3rd/early 4th C AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39031,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39032,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39033,"A small (though unquantified) assemblage of abraded sherds, mostly of local 'Iron Age' type handmade wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39034,"A small assemblage, but with a high proportion of samian. Other fabric include Iron Age wares, and black-burnished wares. The pottery dates to about the mid 2nd C AD.",44,,,1,15,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
39035,A very small pottery assemblage comprising entirely late Iron Age hand made fabrics.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39036,There were no sherds of pottery contemporary with the occupation of the enclosed settlement.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39037,A small assemblage of 69 sherds representing 39 vessels dating approximately the later Iron Age. They are all made coil-constructed vessels.,69,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39038,"Much pottery was recovered, but no quantification or detail except 2nd C AD pottery said to have been associated with the metalworking activity.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39039,"A substantial assemblage of pottery from the vicus though only quantified by weight and EVEs. Fabrics include Black burnished ware (BB1 and BB2), greywares (inc. from E Yorks), Nar Valley ware, Calcite-gritted ware, Nene valley, Crambeck, Mancetter-Hartshill, Severn Valley ware, Oxfordshire, Colchester colour-coated ware, Rhenish ware & Parisian ware. Mostly dates later 2nd-3rd C AD. Dressel 20 and Campanian Amphorae. Literate graffitos found.",,102,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
39040,A small assemblage of hand made Iron Age pottery.,15,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39041,A moderate sized assemblage of Iron Age pottery.,409,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39042,A small assemblage of late Iron Age-Romano-British pottery. No further refinement of date.,79,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39043,"A small assemblage, mostly of Iron Age date with a small proportion of Romano-British sherds.",54,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
39044,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40002,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40003,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40004,Unquantified assemblage including samian pottery,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
40005,A small assemblage of course hand made wares dating later 1st-2nd C AD,60,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40006,A very limited assemblage mainly of native hand built pottery along with two sherds of Romano-British coarsewares.,9,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40007,"A unquantified assemblage of 2nd C AD and 4th C AD date including Black-burnished ware, Crambeck colour-coated ware, Huntcliff ware and other greywares.",,,,3,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
40008,A small assemblage of 'native' hand-made coarseware pottery.,8,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40009,A small though unquantified assemblage of pottery including 'native' hand made wares and 2nd-3rd C AD Roman pottery.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40010,"A small assemblage of 'native' hand made and Romano-British coarsewares, with a flagon dated late 1st-late 2nd C AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40011,A small assemblage of hand-made 'native' pottery,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40012,A single sherd of late Iron Age pottery recovered.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40013,A small assemblage of handmade Iron Age pottery,171,4,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40014,A small assemblage of handmade Iron Age pottery. Also single unstratified sherd of uncertain type amphora.,115,3,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
40015,A modest sized assemblage of hand-made Iron Age pottery.,181,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40016,"A modest assumable of early Roman pottery, including Dr 20 and Gallic amphorae, Noyon mortaria, and handmade Iron Age pottery. The composition of the assemblage is described as 'odd', with both military and some indigenous associations. It is not what may be expected on a 'normal' rural site.",614,,215,5,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
40017,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40018,"A small assemblage of hand-made pottery, dated by rim forms to c AD 150-400. Nearly all pottery came from the terminus of a gully and represents three vessels, perhaps a structured deposit.",26,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40019,A total of 550 sherds of Iron Age hand-made pottery recovered along with a small amount of Roman pottery including samian and Dressel 20 amphora.,564,,1,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
40020,"All sherds were of undecorated hand-made wares, mostly jars.",130,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40021,"At least 100 sherds of pottery recovered (not fully quantified in report) including 11 sherds of 'native' hand made pottery, castor ware, samian, Dorset Black-burnished ware, and amphorae. The dating is generally 1st-2nd C AD.",100,,18,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
40022,"A small assemblage of 9 sherds of 'native' hand-made pottery and 26 sherds of Romano-British wheel-made pottery, mostly of 2nd C AD date, including Dr 20 amphora and Dorset Black-burnished ware.",35,,10,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
40023,"A total of 165 sherds of 'native' hand-made pottery was recovered, along with 15 sherds of Romano-British pottery, dating later 1st to early 3rd C AD.",180,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40024,A small assemblage of 'native' hand made pottery (35 sherds) and Roman pottery (7 sherds).,42,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
40025,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40026,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40027,"A comparatively large assemblage of Iron Age hand made pottery (most ovoid jars), along with a sherd of early Roman (South Gaulish) samian. An AMS date from carbonised residues from one Iron Age sherd was cal BC 500-460 or cal BC 430-380.",154,4,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
40028,The excavations produced one of the largest assemblages of native tradition pottery from the region.,242,7,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40029,A small amount of pottery recovered but no report. Three sherds of samian came from the central cremation burial.,,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
40030,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40031,"A total of 170 sherds of hand-made Iron Age pottery recovered, some dating from the early Iron Age, although the exact total chronology is uncertain. There were also 9 sherds of Roman pottery, used to date the later phase of enclosed farmstead. These include 3 sherds of Dressel 20 amphora.",179,,3,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
40032,"Small assemblage of Iron Age (26) and Roman (51) date, the Roman pottery dating mid/late 2nd C AD. Includes black-burnished ware and a Colchester type flagon.",77,,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
40033,A single sherd of 2nd C AD pottery noted in the report.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40034,"A modest assemblage of pottery including hand made-'native' wares (10+ sherds), and Roman wares (162 sherds) samian and Dressel 20 amphora. The material is dated late 1st to late 4th C AD, with an emphasis in the later 2nd C AD.",172,,29,,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
40035,A small assemblage of hand made pottery.,25,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40036,A small assemblage of tiny abraded sherds of 'native' pottery from the enclosure ditches. Unquantified.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40037,Pottery recovered but no quantification within interim report. Includes barrel and bucket-shaped vessels.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40038,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40039,Just two sherds of probable 2nd C AD pottery mentioned.,2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
40040,"An assemblage of 166 sherds of 'native' hand made pottery and a small (unquantified) assemblage of early Roman pottery, including scraps of samian.",180,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
40041,"Unquantified assemblage of 'native' hand made wares and Roman wares, the latter including samian, amphora and mortaria. Most Roman pottery is of 2nd C AD date.",,,,1,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
40042,"Pottery recovered from the settlement, but no specific details.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41001,Coarse ware associated with both phases and samian associated with the first phase of occupation. Mortaria and BB1 also present. The assemblage spanned the 2nd to early 4th century.,159,,2,6,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41002,"One sherd samian, three mortaria and one BB1. All seemingly 3rd century.",65,,,3,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
41003,"Relatively unabraded greyware, amphorae, redware mortarium.",90,2,2,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
41004,"The majority of the assemblage (1149 sherds) can be dated to the late first and second centuries AD, the period during which the fort at Kirkby Thore flourished. The large proportions of amphorae and samian ware suggest that the extramural settlement was well integrated into the military supply network at this time. As at other military sites in the North West, the proportion of decorated to undecorated samian vessels is high (c 10%), a phenomenon also taken to indicate a close link with military sources of supply. BB1 also present as well as Nene Valley Colour Coated ware and Huntcliff ware. In addition, a further 323 sherds were recovered during work in the 1980s, including 102 sherds of samian. Pottery was again mainly of 2nd century date.",1487,,96,88,237,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41005,"Nine sherds of pottery recovered from the latest evaluation. Oxidised and grey wares, mostly of local cooking pots and bowls.",9,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41006,Small assemblage including a sherd of samian and two of amphorae. Otherwise local grey ware.,9,,2,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
41007,Coarse and fine wares present though no quantification. Samian present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
41008,"64 sherds, much abraded and in poor condition. Earliest of late 1st/early 2nd century date. Mostly of local production, though some samian, amphorae and mortaria (one of the mortaria sherds was samian). The other Mortaria included Mancetter-Hartshill ware and Raetian-type.",64,1,2,3,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41009,A single sherd of Roman pottery from a post-medieval deposit. Not associated with the field system and so not included below.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41010,"Pottery assemblage included fragments of fineware and coarseware, including samian, amphorae, Black Burnished Ware, and locally made products (individual types not quantified in report for first watching brief). The date and range of the fabrics and vessel forms suggests the site had access to the military supply network, at least during the 2nd century, and possibly into the 3rd. A further 58 pottery sherds recovered during the second watching brief. Pottery again overwhelmingly of 2nd and 3rd century in date, and samian and amphorae present. Also Black Burnished Ware and Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria.",179,,3,4,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41011,"The group of projects produced 643 sherds including 150 samian. Central Gaulish samian most common. The proportions of decorated ware are regarded as especially high. Coarsewares dominated by BB1, whilst BB2 present in small quantities. Mortaria mostly of locally produced fabrics. The range of fabrics and forms suggest a Hadrianic start date for activity near the fort and a more general second century date for its continuance.",643,,148,24,150,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41012,"Some vitrified pottery recovered, but no data in report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41013,"Pottery mostly dated to the 4th century AD, though some sherds suggest earlier occupation in the first or second centuries AD. Sherds included BB1, greyware, mortaria from Mancetter-Hartshill, East Yorkshire calcite gritted ware, Huntcliff type jars and a local handmade vessel in a local north-west fabric.",29,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
41014,"5 mortaria sherds - Stibbington Ware reeded mortarium, first half of fourth century AD.",,,,5,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
41015,"Samian included a complete cup from the 'cremation' area known as Pots Lands. Most of the material was 2nd century in date, with a fairly constant level throughout the 2nd century. Besides samian, other fabrics included BB1, Nene Valley Colour Coat, Rhenish Ware and Wilderspool ware. Legible graffito on two Dressel 20 amphora sherds.",211,7,41,25,88,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41016,A base sherd from a probable flagon in a hard orange fabric of early Roman date.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41017,Pottery ranged from c. AD 120-275 and included Black Burnished Ware and mortaria. No quantification.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
41018,"Pottery included sherds of abraded samian, though no quantification in the report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
41019,A single sherd of samian dated AD 90-180.,1,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
41020,"Pottery included Black Burnished Ware, mortarium. The assemblage was regarded as very small (only 383g total). Possible that sherds were residual. Earliest mid-to-late 2nd century, latest 3rd-4th century.",14,0,,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
41021,A small assemblage including Nene Valley ware and samian.,4,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
41022,"Pottery from the cemetery area and fort itself not included here. Pottery from the vicus not quantified precisely in report, and only illustrated sherds are described. Black burnished ware, samian and mortaria represented.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
41023,"18 sherds only, including fragments of mortaria, samian and amphorae. Also Black Burnished Ware.",18,,5,4,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41024,"No precise quantification of ceramics in the report, and illustrated material only is listed. Mortaria, samian and amphorae all present. Black Burnished Ware also present. Some apparent wasters present. A possible tazza or incense bowl included. Samian from the vicus particularly well represented. Almost 1600 vessels from the fort and vicus combined. Graffiti present on a number of vessels, mostly literate.",,,,,,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41025,"Range of late 1st-4th century, though pottery principally of mid-2nd-3rd century date, very little of 4th century, suggesting settlement decline by the late 3rd century. BB1 well represented.",1032,,88,61,86,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41026,"Coarseware included BB1, the earliest of which dated c. AD 125. Late pottery including 4th century in BB1 and Huntcliffe-type jars associated with the burials, used as urns.",208,,28,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41027,"6 sherds only, 4 of mortaria.",6,,,4,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
41028,10 sherds only. Five sherds of BB1. The group thought to be best placed within the 3rd century AD.,10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41029,"The pottery assemblage included BB1, amphora and mortarium sherds (Mancetter-Hartshill) as well as samian. Dating was predominantly of the 2nd half of the 2nd century AD.",55,,1,2,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41030,Sherds from two vessels (267 grams) were recovered from the enclosure ditches. 1 sherd of Raetian mortarium rim.,8,0,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
41031,Fragments of vessels from the cremations were both BB1 (SE Dorset) and dated mid-3rd century or later.,145,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41032,"Approx. 800 fragments of coarse ware pottery and tiles recovered, dating the site to c. AD 100-125. A high number of wasters recovered, suggesting pottery as well as tile production. Samian absent.",800,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
41033,"Pottery recovered from the vicinity of three probable Roman iron bloomeries. No precise quantification, though the date range appears to be confined to the late-4th century. Fabrics included a dark grey fabric, black calcite gritted ware and a brown fabric.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41034,"A small assemblage of pottery recovered, ranging in date from c. AD 180-350. Fabrics predominantly in grey fabric, but also sherds from a hammer-head cream mortarium.",14,,,4,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
41035,"Several fragments of pottery recovered, not certainly Roman.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41036,Limited pottery assemblage and no good evidence for pottery production. Wasters were associated with tile manufacture. No precise quantification. Pottery seemingly all of 2nd century AD in date. Reports of a literate graffito on a tile in Bellhouse's first report on the site.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41037,"Five sherds from the same coarse red-ware vessel, dated only to 'the latter half of the Roman period'. The additional sherd was of handmade ware.",6,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41038,"The pottery recovered was of two groups: crude handmade pottery in a coarse fabric and a number of different types of Roman provincial pottery, together with three fragments of samian. Pottery believed to date from a fairly short period from the end of the 3rd century to the beginning of the fourth. No quantification of pottery, though abundant pottery has reportedly been recovered from the location.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
41039,"No quantification, but finds of Hadrianic pottery of typical northern Roman provincial groups was recovered, including mortaria from the well.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
41040,"No quantification but 'a fair amount of pottery was found', dated to the late 3rd-early 4th centuries.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41041,"30 sherds of Roman pottery, 2 prehistoric. 19 of the Roman sherds were of 4th century date - 18 Huntcliff ware and 1 BB1. A single sherd of amphora also found. Also Nene Valley Colour-coated ware and a small number of grey and oxidized wares.",30,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41042,"Many vessels represented ranging from early-to-mid 2nd century to the second half of the 4th century - precise sherd count uncertain. One burial placed within a samian vessel with a BB1 vessel used as a lid. Two BB1 miniature cooking pots also recovered from a burial group. All vessels thought associated with burials, some as urns, some as grave goods. Two pots containing bones were found to have had numbers scratched onto them after firing (II and XX) and another cooking pot of early 4th century date used as a cremation urn included the graffito VROCATAE.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
41043,"Graffito KARVS on a piece of samian. Much pottery recovered by Robinson and others, but no quantification. The University of Newcastle pottery assemblage was regarded as very small, suggesting that area was not domestic - 295 sherds from this work. Much pottery recovered from the OA North excavations, though no report is yet available.",295,4,24,3,57,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41044,"The pottery found includes the rim of a 2nd-century cooking-pot and the rim of a hammer-headed mortarium of late 3rd or early 4th-century date (this information on pottery date taken from Pastscape website, not the report).",62,,4,3,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41045,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41046,"Full pottery data available on ADS. Three miniature BB1 jars, six examples of graffiti, some literate, some illiterate marks. A single waster indicating use of a pottery second. Types of vessels placed in graves were also influenced by the age and sex of the deceased. Trier colour-coat beakers were clearly felt to be particularly appropriate for infants and children in the earliest years of the cemetery, both as urns and as grave goods. Dr. 33 samian bowls were the preserve of adults. Decorated Central Gaulish samian bowls made in the later 2nd century appear to have been reserved for mature adults – showing a possible association between old items and people who may have been the elders of the community. Black Burnished Ware 1 jars were the principal dating evidence indicating use of the cemetery between c. AD 200 and 310.",19835,222,16,203,1354,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41047,No report though pottery predominantly of 3rd century date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
41048,"Specialist vessels included a miniature BB1 jar/cooking pot from a pit containing human bone. Pottery was to a large extent traded wares, especially BB1, Severn Valley ware, and to a lesser extent Nene Valley ware, Rhenish ware and BB2.",2186,20,6,9,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
41049,"Selective reporting on pottery and not all well quantified. 1980 sherds of samian, but coarse pottery only provided as maximum number of vessels (2500 vessels), weighing 267kg. Minimum number of 190 mortaria. 494 amphorae sherds. Specialist vessels included a face pot.",,,494,,1980,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
41050,"Assessment only. Tazze, Nene Valley colour coated boxes, a facepot sherd, and sherds from headpots all present. No quantification of mortaria and amphorae.  The assemblage dates predominantly to the third century AD.",8826,126,,,1369,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42001,"The assemblage was regarded as similar to that from the Northgate site, Manchester, and thus military. A high proportion was orange-and-buff Severn Valley ware, with some samian, black burnished and grey and cream-coloured wares. The quantity and composition strongly suggests military occupation with a short period of duration. Some possible kiln furniture indicating a kiln in the vicinity. Small quantities of amphorae and mortaria but these were not quantified. No weight given.",1023,,,,53,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42002,Pottery recovered including samian but no data.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
42003,Only 16 sherds of Roman pottery survive. Samian and Black Burnished ware present. Also amphorae and mortaria.,16,,3,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42004,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42005,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42006,Pottery recovered from the cave included samian and what is referred to in the 1910 report as 'Late-Celtic' ware. Some Beaker pottery indicates that not all activity within the caves was of Romano-British date.,,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
42007,"Pottery not quantified in report - only illustrated material is listed. Samian (much decorated), amphorae and mortaria all represented. At least one tazza recovered. Other fabrics included Black Burnished Ware, Severn Valley Ware and vessels from Wilderspool.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42008,"A small assemblage from the vicus area of the 1994 excavation (99 sherds), but these included 33 sherds of samian and 22 amphorae (Dressel 20). Also BB1 and mortaria of Wilderspool, Verulamium and Gallo-Belgic origin. A single sherd of BB1 recovered during the OA North watching brief, dating post AD 120. 18 sherds recovered during the evaluation, mostly 2nd century. 11 sherds from the Dowbridge Close watching brief, including 6 samian and 1 mortarium.",129,,24,8,41,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42009,"Roman pottery was predominantly of late 1st to late 2nd century in date and included amphorae, mortaria (Mancetter/Hartshill), samian and Black Burnished Ware. Occasional later sherds of 3rd/4th century date.",25,,4,2,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42010,"13 sherds from the 2007 excavation to the west of the farmstead. Mostly local orange oxidised fabric, with two possible BB ware sherds and one possible sherd of mortaria. 959 sherds from the 1993 excavation. A reasonable quantity of BB1. The majority of pottery was of late 1st-2nd century in date.",140,8,12,2,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42011,,12,,,3,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
42012,"Specialist reports that a characteristic feature of the late prehistoric pottery assemblage from the site is its diversity. The prehistoric pottery was thought to be of pre-Roman Iron Age date, though some types may have continued into the Roman period. The relative quantity of samian at the site is regarded as notable and the site may have been of high status.  Roman pottery included BB1, Cheshire Plains, Nene Valley Colour Coat, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria and samian.",880,,,21,47,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
42013,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42014,"A group of 91 sherds recovered. The group comprised a single vessel in Severn Valley ware, probably dating to the second-third century AD, and single sherds in two other fabrics.",91,,1,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
42015,"Single sherd only from the ditch, regarded as consistent with local Romano-British fabrics, though not conclusively dated.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42016,"The bulk of the pottery would fit into a 2nd century date-range, with a single Nene Valley colourcoat sherd extending the chronology into the mid-3rd century and later. The absence of any diagnostic late BB1 suggests that the chronology of the site does not extend beyond the mid-3rd century, however. The samian sherds were Central Gaulish and of 2nd century in date.",87,1,1,,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
42017,"The assemblage included sherds of samian, mortaria, amphora, and coarsewares, including Black Burnished Ware 1. The coarsewares were dominated by 22 fragments of soft orange oxidised ware representing 30% of the total Roman assemblage.",45,,4,1,10,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42018,"15 sherds only, in two fabrics. Fabric A not closely dated but recovered from a context radiocarbon dated to 1870 +/-90 BP (mid 1st century AD to early 3rd century). Fabric B radiocarbon dated to 2140 +/- 70 BP. Fragments of a vessel of very similar fabric were found during excavation of the phase 2 Roman fort at Manchester, in 1982. This pottery was thought to date from the first century AD, representing a native Brigantian type.",15,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42019,A small assemblage recovered but no quantification. Principally of 2nd century AD in date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42020,"16 sherds only, 10 Romano-British, 6 local-'native'. Roman pottery included BB1, greyware sherds, and a possible amphora sherd.",16,,1,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
42021,"No quantification of pottery but Romano-British pottery recovered from trackways including BB1, and 2 sherds of RB pottery recovered from latest roundhouse. 2 sherds of late prehistoric pottery associated with first roundhouse.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42022,"142 sherds from 77-79 Penny Street, including 6 of samian. The assemblage appears to fall into two groups, around the second century AD and around the fourth century AD. Which might indicate two phases of activity. In addition to the sherds detailed above, a Black Burnished ware vessel was found during the evaluation. A further 491 sherds from the King Street excavation - mostly BB1 but also some in reduced grey wares, some colour coated fine wares. No mortaria and only one small fragment of amphora. All late 1st-early 3rd century AD in date.",633,,1,,8,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
42023,Small but significant assemblage including samian and Black Burnished Ware. Also grey ware and colour-coated ware.,108,0,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
42024,Over 2000 sherds of locally produced and imported pottery. No further detail.,2000,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42025,Three coarse ware sherds only.,3,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42026,Date range of late 1st-mid-late 2nd centuries AD. Flavian-Trajanic pottery present in some quantity and activity began in this period. Absence of obvious 3rd century forms suggests activity ended by around end of 2nd century.,175,1,8,6,11,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42027,"The pottery assemblage included 'nearly 5000 sherds of Romano-British coarse pottery', as well as  838 samian sherds from around 678 vessels. There were 399 sherds of amphorae and  Graffiti on some sherds of amphorae including an incised W and also several on coarse pottery including some literate. 211 mortaria sherds recovered. Several miniature vessels also present as well as two examples of tazze. A small number of wasters present. At least one unguent pot also present.",6468,160,399,199,858,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42028,No detail other than approx. sherd count.,1800,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42029,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42030,"Finds from the earlier work included 8313 sherds of coarse/fine wares, 339 mortaria sherds, 1088 amphorae sherds and 1850 samian sherds.",11590,,1088,339,1850,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42031,17 sherds of Romano-British pottery recovered from the northernmost of the kilns.,17,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42032,"Much of the pottery is poorly quantified from the excavations in the 1970s and 80s and illustrated vessels only are catalogued in many of the reports. Accurate quantification is therefore problematic. The pottery evidence from the 1978 Church Street excavation suggested activity between the early 2nd century and the early-mid 3rd century, though reduced from the late 2nd century. At least 260 sherds of samian are known from the vicus excavations. Literate graffito present on at least two sherds of samian and a greyware jar. Finds recovered during 1990 evaluations at Market Street and Damside Street included 102 sherds of RB pottery including 12 sherds of samian and one mortarium.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42033,"Pottery of Flavian-Trajanic date was recovered, though no quantification available.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42034,"Pottery recovered of late 1st- early-mid 2nd century in date, including mortaria which was possibly manufactured nearby. No quantification.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
42035,"Besides the Roman pottery Iron Age VCP was also present, not included here.",21,0,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
42036,"Ceramic evidence suggested activity in the Hadrianic period, perhaps extending into the early Antonine period. Little of Flavian-Trajanic date. No later RB ceramics identified.",41,1,3,3,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42037,"Early emphasis on the assemblage, in the late first-early 2nd century. Presence of a waster jar suggests production at a kiln nearby. The general composition of the assemblage was regarded as typical of a military site, with a relatively large proportion of tableware to kitchen ware. A flagon bore an X graffito.",498,12,48,21,86,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42038,"Assemblage typical of a military site, with a relatively large proportion of bowls, dishes and platters to jars and a high proportion of drinking vessels such as flagons and beakers. Date range late 1st to mid-2nd century.",189,5,33,10,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42039,"The ceramics recovered suggests activity in the Hadrianic period, perhaps extending into the early Antonine period. There is very little material of Flavian-Trajanic type. The oxidised fabrics are for the most part typical of the Cheshire Plains industries developing in the Hadrianic-Antonine period. No later Romano-British ceramics were identified.",37,1,3,3,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
42040,"A large proportion of samian ware recovered, with what is regarded as an exceptionally high proportion of decorated samian. Five literate graffiti on pottery included four with personal names. Pottery predominantly of 2nd century, with some of late 1st century date. Little beyond c. AD 200.",2128,92,440,21,432,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42041,"No report but pottery suggested activity from late 2nd to mid-3rd century, and the assemblage was regarded as large for the region.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
42042,Pottery probably all of late Roman date.,12,,1,5,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
42043,,35,,3,1,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42044,"No pottery report in draft volume, but a pottery kiln was noted and mortaria wasters also noted. Graffiti also present.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42045,"V large pottery assemblage from the 1980/89/90 excavations in the extramural settlement - more than 20000 sherds and 560kg. No clear quantification by type in the report, though samian, amphorae and mortaria occurred in quantities, and over 3000 samian vessels were represented. Specialist pottery included tazza. Literate graffiti present on a single sherd of coarse ware and 22 on samian. The pottery in Edwards and Webster's reports from the civil settlement is also not quantified by sherd count. Graffiti also present though no further information available. Notable that late Roman pottery is rare from the extramural settlement though 4th century pottery does occur in the fort. A single pottery waster noted.",20811,560,,,,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
42046,"Eleven main RB ware types recovered: amphora, BB1, calcite gritted, colour-coated, grey ware, oxidised ware, oxidised mortaria, samian, shell-tempered ware, white-firing mortaria and white ware. Two body sherds bore graffiti, one literate (LV[…) the other an X.",2592,14,23,89,57,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43001,"Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age to early 4th C AD date. Fabrics include local grey wares (Caldicot), Dorset Black-burnished wares, Caerleon ware, Nene valley ware, and Oxfordshire colour coated ware.",,,,,482,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43002,"An unquantified assemblage dating from the early 1st  to early 4th C AD, with a later Roman emphasis. Fabrics include LIA 'Glastonbury' style wares, Dorset Black Burnished wares samian, local greywares, Oxfordshire colour coats, Nene Valley Wares, Severn Valley wares and Dr 20 amphora.",,,23,46,22,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43003,"Unquantified assemblage of later 1st to early 4th C AD date. Fabrics include Dorset Black burnished ware, Oxford colour coated ware, Severn Valley ware, limestone tempered (local) ware, local grey wares (much from Caldicot kilns) and 'London' ware.",,,,,21,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43004,"Unquantified assemblage of 1st-4th C AD date. Fabrics include Glastonbury types, Dorset Black-burnished ware, local greywares, Caerleon ware, Oxfordshire colour coats and samian.",,,,19,65,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43005,"Unquantified assemblage of South Wales Reduced  greyware. The range of forms is restricted, frequently imitating Severn Valley and black-burnished style. Typical forms comprise narrow-neck jars with handles and wide-mouth jars.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43006,"A large ceramic assemblage dating from the later Iron Age to the 4th C AD. Fabrics include South Wales sandy grey wares (50.9% of sherd count), Dorset Black-burnished ware (BB1: 24.1% of sherd count), Severn Valley ware (11%), Oxfordshire colour coats & parchment ware, Rhenish ware, Savernake ware, Caerleon ware, South-West white slipped ware, and samian. A single literate graffito from the site, probably a personal name on a 1st-2nd C AD greyware sherd.",10585,64,3,27,161,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43007,"Pottery assemblage remains unquantified in the report.  Fabrics include Caerleon ware, Dorset Black-burnished ware (BB1), samian, Nene Valley ware, Rhenish ware, Oxfordshire ware, New Forest ware, Severn Valley ware, shell-tempered ware and local South Wales greywares. A tile graffito was found ('P'). Pottery from the 2005 watching brief included a number of Roman 'greywares', Dorset Black burnished ware, probale Oxfordshire and Caerleon ware mortaria and a single sherd from a Spanish amphora.",,,,352,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43008,"A modest assemblage of pottery, comprising elements of two substantially complete middle-late Iron Age jars from a pit and a small collection of later 3rd- mid 4th C AD pottery, dominated by local greywares but with quite high levels of regional imports including SE and SW black burnished wares and Oxfordshire wares. Much of the later Roman pottery came from a single pit.",156,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43009,"A moderate sized assemblage of Romano-British pottery for later 1st/2nd to later 3rd/early 4th C AD date, with an emphasis on the later 2nd-3rd C AD. Fabrics mainly comprised South Wales greywares, then Dorset Black-burnished wares, and Oxfordshire wares. Also very limited Severn Valley ware and Savernake ware. All amphora were Dr 20.",1821,25,11,2,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43010,A total of 268 sherds of late Iron Age calcite gritted pottery and 468 sherds of Romano-British pottery of 2nd-3rd C AD date. These comprised  mainly local South Wales greywares and Dorset Black-burnished ware (BB1). Dressel 20 amphorae.,736,5,4,,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
43011,"A moderate sized assemblage of later Iron Age and Romano-British pottery, mostly comprising local South Wales greywares and Black-burnished wares, predominantly dating to the 3rd-4th C AD.",1200,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43012,"The assemblage of pottery from the 1997 excavations remains unquantified, but dates 1st to 4th C AD, with a late Roman emphasis. Fabrics include Black-burnished wares (BB1), Severn Valley ware, South Wales grey wares and Oxfordshire wares. Just 73 sherds of pottery came from the excavations to the north (along with two greyware cremation urns), dating mainly to the late Iron Age-early Roman period.",75,,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43013,"A substantial pottery assemblage within the cave including Black-burnished ware (BB1), samian, Oxfordshire colour coats and late shell-tempered wares and South Wales greywares. Mostly later Roman in date.",750,,,3,30,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43014,"Unquantified assemblage including mortaria and amphorae, dating 2nd-4th C AD. Possible tazza found.",,,,,48,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43015,"A small assemblage mostly comprising Dorset black burnished ware (BB1), along with South Wales grey wares. The pottery dates later 3rd-early/mid 4th C AD.",38,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43016,"A substantial assemblage from one excavated area - the presumed periphery of the settlement, dated early/mid 2nd-early 4th C AD. Only a single sherd of Black-burnished ware came from the drainage ditches found in the evaluation.",513,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43017,"A substantial concentration of pottery within some of the ditches, including mortaria and samian, along with Dorset Black-burnished wares and South Wales greywares.",250,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43018,"A moderate sized assemblage of later 1st/2nd to later 3rd/early 4th C AD date, comprising Dorset Black Burnished Ware (BB1), South Wales Grey Ware, Severn Valley Ware, Miscellaneous Sandy Grey Ware, Caerleon oxidised 'Legionary' Ware, Caldicot Grey Ware, and Oxfordshire Colour-coated Ware.",308,5,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
43019,"A small assemblage of pottery from the ditch included samian, Oxfordshire ware, Dorset Black burnished ware (BB1), and South Wales Grey wares. Most pottery is mid 3rd to mid 4th C AD, though some dates back to the later 2nd C AD.",96,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
43020,"The ceramic assemblage is unquantified by sherd count but dates from the 2nd C to the early 4th c AD and includes Dorset Black-burnished wares (BB1), South Wales greywares, Calcite gritted wares, Mancetter-Hartshill ware, Caerleon ware and Oxfordshire wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
43021,"No overall pottery report. The ceramic assemblage from investigations in the western part of the settlement was dominated by black-burnished wares and amphora (mostly from funerary contexts), although significant amounts of samian, redware, buff wares, and local greywares were present. Two pottery kilns discovered, 800m apart and  connected with the production of fine wares. A complete early 2nd C AD black-burnished ware jar was sealed underneath a building, perhaps as a foundation deposit.",,,,,,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43022,Unquantified assemblage,,,,,30,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43023,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43024,"A small assemblage of 2nd-3rd C AD pottery, including Severn Valley wares, Caerleon ware, Black-burnished ware and local greywares.",88,1,,2,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43025,"Unquantified assemblage including samian, amphorae, Black-burnished wares and local greywares. A later 1st-2nd C AD emphasis.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
43026,Unquantified pottery assemblage of late 2nd-4th century date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43027,Unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age to early Roman date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
43028,"An unquantified assemblage, mainly of later 1st to 4th C AD in date, though with some Iron Age material.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43029,"A small but unquantified assemblage mostly of later 3rd to early 4th C AD date. Includes Dorset Black-burnished wares, Caerleon ware and Oxfordshire ware.",,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43030,"Unquantified assemblage of late 1st-early 2nd C AD date. No specific wasters noted, but no specialist report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43031,"A relatively modest (though currently unquantified) assemblage, mostly of 3rd-4th C AD date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
43032,"A moderate sized assemblage, mostly of later 2nd-later 3rd C AD date. Dominated by local coarsewares and Dorset Black burnished wares, with a small amount of Caerleon ware and Oxfordshire ware. Gallic and Italian wine amphorae present.",1450,10,12,6,85,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43033,"Unquantified assemblage of late 1st-4th C date,. Included a large amount of samian and amphorae.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
43034,A small (though unquantified) assemblage of late Roman date.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43035,"Two urns of early Roman Usk ware, along with a flagon and a green glazed beaker.",5,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43036,Unquantified assemblage including samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
43037,"Partially quantified assemblage including South-west Black burnished ware, Severn Valley ware, Oxfordshire ware, New Forest ware, Midlands calcite gritted ware, Dr 20 amphorae and a few sherds of Nene Valley ware and South Wales greyware. The assemblage dates mostly from the 4th C, with some earlier material. Pottery from the 2011 excavation included a samian sherd with literate graffito.",225,,,,5,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43038,The pottery recovered indicates a date range between the middle Iron Age and the later 1st C AD. No further details.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43039,"A few small sherds of Iron Age pottery represents the earliest ceramics found during the excavations. Most of the assemblage dates later 1st-2nd C AD (min 30 vessels; no sherd count), with two later Roman sherds. Includes Black-burnished ware. No samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43040,Unquantified assemblage including samian and 2nd-3rd C AD coarsewares.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
43041,"The assemblage from Area A comprised 952 sherds of handmade Iron Age pottery (2842g) and 235 sherds (929g) of wheel-thrown/turned vessels characteristic of the areas either side of the Severn Estuary during the 1st century AD (Early Severn Valley Ware). The Roman pottery comprised a total of 439 sherds, weighing c 2.9kg, mainly associated with the rectangular building in Area D, dating from the 2nd to late 3rd or early 4th C AD. Includes Severn Valley ware (19%), Caerleon ware, South Wales grey ware (31%), Dorset Black-burnished ware BB1 (30% of assemblage), Rhenish ware, samian and South West mortarium. Distinct lack of finewares. Mostly jars, with a few dishes, bowls, tankards and flagons.",1671,7,,1,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43042,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43043,"A small assemblage, including Black-burnished ware, local greywares, south and central Gaulish samian, S Spanish amphora, Oxfordshire ware & Caerleon ware. All dated later 1st-mid 3rd C Ad, with a 2nd C AD emphasis.",119,2,2,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43044,"A large though unquantified assemblage of late Iron Age to early Roman date was found during the 1930s excavations, including samian (17 sherds), mortaria and amphora. A small assemblage of 65 sherds was found in 1998, with a similar date range, including Seven Valley ware, limestone tempered 'native' wares, an imported mortarium sherd and a sherd of Gauloise 4 amphora.",65,,1,1,17,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43045,Unquantified assemblage of 2nd-4th c AD date including Caerleon ware.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43046,"A small assemblage of mid 1st to early C AD date, including local wares, Dorset black-burnished wares, Malvernian ware, Severn Valley ware, Lyon ware, terra nigra, samian and amphorae. Literate graffitos.",127,,11,10,35,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43047,"The only quantified vicus data (by sherd count) is from the 2008 watching brief, which comprised samian ware, Dorset-Black-Burnished ware, Caerleon slipped ware, miscellaneous (probably local) greywares, North Gaulish mortaria, a local South Wales type mortarium and Baetican (Southern Spanish) Dr 20 amphora type. The assemblage has a late 1st to 2nd century AD date. An estimated 163 vessels from the 2010 excavation (no sherd count but including 36 samian fragments, mostly south Gaulish). Vessels include all fabrics previously noted.",95,,,,36,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43048,"Pottery found within two graves, dating 1st  AD, including samian & Severn Valley ware.",21,,,,6,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
43049,"Pottery was mainly of Iron Age date (include LIA pot), but also limited pottery of 2nd-4th C AD date. Unquantified. Includes a mortarium rim and a few scraps of samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43050,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43051,No mention of pottery in report.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43052,"A single greyware jar, probably a grave good.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43053,A single 'black ware pie dish' and greyware jar of 2nd-4th C AD date.,2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43054,"Most, if not all, Iron Age and Roman pottery recovered from the site is from residual contexts. It includes samian, South Midlands shell-gritted ware, Dorset Black-burnished ware (BB1), Severn Valley ware, Oxfordshire ware, Ceramique a` l'e´ponge and S Wales grey ware. Jars make up 68% of the entire assemblage. The majority of the pottery probably belongs to the later part of the Roman period.",140,,,4,5,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43055,Unquantified pottery of 2nd-4th C AD date found above the cremation deposit.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43056,"Unquantified assemblage of 2nd-3rd C AD date, including Oxfordshire ware.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43057,"A small assemblage, mostly dating later 3rd to late 4th C AD, including late Black-burnished ware (BB1) and Cirencester mortaria.",17,,,2,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
43058,"Large quantities of pottery recovered including much samian, along with Black-burnished ware (BB1), Severn Valley ware, Usk ware, South Wales Grey ware, Oxfordshire ware, Mancetter/Hartshill mortaria,  Dr 2-4, Dr 20 & Cam 186 amphorae. Literate graffitos noted.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43059,Pottery recovered but no further details.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43060,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43061,"A moderate quantity of Roman pottery was recovered during the evaluation, most broadly dateable to the late 1st/2nd C to 4th C AD. Includes Dorset Black-Burnished Ware (BB1), South Wales greyware and Severn Valley Ware. Two sherds of Middle to Late Iron Age pottery were recovered from alluvial layers.",310,4,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
43062,"Substantial assemblage generally dating later 2nd to mid/late 4th C AD. Includes Limestone-tempered ware, South Wales greyware, Severn Valley ware, Dorset Black burnished ware (BB1; 47.7% by count), Oxfordshire ware, New Forest ware and Midlands type shell-tempered coarsewares. Includes a spouted strainer.",1281,16,1,7,23,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
43063,The only pottery recorded is a fragment of 2nd C AD redware mortarium.,1,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
43064,A single fragment of late Iron Age pottery and a fragment of late 1st - 2nd C AD samian.,2,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
43065,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
43066,"A small assmblage of pottery, dated 2nd C AD. Mostly South Wales greywares, but also includes Black burnished ware (BB1).",80,1,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44001,"A small assemblage from the 1961-2 excavations of the villa building, dating mid/late third to the mid 4th century. Fabrics include Black-burnished ware (BB1) and South Midlands calcite gritted ware.",15,,,4,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
44002,"A total of 8 sherds of late Iron Age pottery and 'large quantities' of Roman pottery, nearly all coarsewares of 2nd-3rd C AD date.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44003,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44004,"A small assemblage of later 1st-early 2nd C AD date, including grog-tempered 'native wares', and 2 sherds of South Gaulish samian. Assemblage unquantified in the report.",,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
44005,"Unquantified assemblage of 1st-2nd C AD date including native/Malvernian ware, 'Belgic' redware, Severn Valley ware, Dorset Black-burnished ware, greyware, South Gaulish samian, a single fragment of Verulamium/ Brockley Hill mortarium and Dr 20 amphora.",,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
44006,"A small assemblage including 'native'/Malvernian ware, redware and fragments of a 4th C AD Oxfordshire ware mortarium.",44,,,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
44007,"Pottery from various excavations dates mainly later 1st-early 2nd C AD, with some later material, including samian, local greywares, Severn Valley ware, Dorset black-burnished ware (BB1), Verulamium mortaria, terra nigra and North Gaulish ware. Includes a tazza fragment.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
44008,"The assemblage includes 92 sherds of later Iron Age date (including bead rim bowls) and 2408 sherds of Romano-British date, including Black-burnished ware (BB1), castor ware, mortaria, and some samian. A small quantity of 5th-6th C imported amphorae.",2500,,,74,30,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
44009,"A moderate sized assemblage for the region, dating from later 1st to early/mid 4th C AD, including samian, Severn Valley ware, Dorset Black burnished ware (BB1; 22 sherds) and Oxfordshire ware.",235,,,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
44010,"Pottery is mainly of late 3rd-early 4th C AD, though with a few sherds of later 1st-2nd C AD date. Includes samian and Dorset  Black Burnished ware (BB1). No report.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
44011,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44012,A spindlewhorl was made from a fragment of Severn valley ware pottery. No other indications of ceramics.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44013,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44014,A small assemblage of c 15 later Iron Age pottery sherds and a single sherd of possible later Roman pottery.,16,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44015,"Unquantified pottery assemblage of 2nd-4th C AD date including samian, mortaria, amphorae and coarsewares (probably including BB1 from description).",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
44016,"No data, though the pottery assemblage is said to include imported Roman wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44017,"A small assemblage of Roman pottery, mostly Dorset Black-burnished ware (BB1), dating 1st to 4th C AD, with most probably dating later 2nd to 4th C AD. Other fabrics comprise samian, Oxfordshire mortarium,, Severn valley ware, and greywares.",88,,,1,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
44018,A total of 9 possible Iron Age sherds and a single sherd of early Roman Severn Valley ware.,10,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44019,A single sherd of Iron Age pottery.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44020,Small sherds of undetermined prehistoric pot.,2,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44021,A small assemblage of mostly late Roman pottery (though including at least 2 sherds of samian and black-burnished ware). Mortaria noted.,31,,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
44022,A small but unquantified assemblage of Iron Age pottery including late Iron Age Malvernian ware,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44023,"Unquantified assemblage of later Iron Age and Roman date. Includes samian, Oxfordshire ware, Dorset Black-burnished ware, and possible New Forest ware.",,,,8,24,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
44024,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44025,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44026,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44027,A single early Roman greyware urn.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44028,"Unquantified assemblage from the evaluation including Dorset Black Burnished ware, local greyware, samian, Dressel 20  & South Gaulish amphorae, Severn-Valley ware, Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria & Malvernian ware. A pedestal base of a tazza was also recovered.",,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
44029,Pottery sherds recovered of possible Roman date. No further information.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44030,A 2nd C AD black-burnished ware (BB1) cremation urn.,1,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44031,"One of the pits produced five sherds from a handmade, tubby Malvernian ware jar, dating later iron Age into the early Roman period.",5,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44032,"Roman pottery mostly found within the upper fills of the henge ditches, includes three sherds of Baetican (Dr. 20) amphora and Dorset black burnished ware (BB1). The small assemblage dates 1st-2nd C AD.",13,,3,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE
44033,"A small assemblage representing a minimum of four vessels. The assemblage is described as essentially a 'native' one but apparently largely, or completely, composed of vessels imported from outside the region, including grog-tempered ware and Malvernian ware.",14,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
44034,"A small assemblage, though quite diverse, including several continental and regional imports, such as two sherds of Central Gaulish samian, Oxfordshire colour-coated and whiteware mortaria, Dorset black burnished ware (BB1), South-west black burnished ware, Late Roman Midlands shelly ware jar and a New Forest colour-coated beaker. The assemblage is later Roman in date. Exact quantification not provided, though at least 15 sherds.",15,,,2,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
45001,"No quantification available, but sherds of black-burnished ware from the first half of the second century were found in the ditches and Severn Valley ware in the ditches and on the cobbles. All were overlain by alluvium. At least one sherd of pottery was dated to c.100-150 AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
45002,"Assemblage regarded as atypical of a farmstead, containing numbers of amphorae, black burnished ware I and fine table wares. Excavated finds in the published report include only those from the 1994/5 excavations. Illiterate graffito cross present on one base.",2236,44,115,97,169,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45003,"Pottery suggested mid-2nd to 3rd/4th century activity. Also Black-burnished ware, red wares, grey wares, white wares and colour-coated/fine wares.",176,4,,2,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
45004,"No detail from the earliest work, but quantification of the CPAT 1997 excavations.  Pottery from the site predominantly of 3rd-4th century date, with some 2nd century vessels.",87,1,1,6,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45005,Large quantities of pottery discovered but no quantification. Samian and mortaria both present. Considerable quantities of red Holt ware and grey ware. Black burnished ware also present. Pottery predominantly dating from c. AD 80-180 with a small amount of late 3rd/early 4th century pottery suggesting possible re-occupation in the late Roman period or robbing of the masonry building.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45006,"A small number of pottery sherds were recovered during Manley's excavations including four sherds of samian. No precise quantification of the small assemblage from the Quinnell excavation. BB1, mortaria, samian present. Much residual.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
45007,"194 sherds of RB pottery, mostly unstratified. Some black burnished ware.",194,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
45008,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
45009,"No quantification. Pottery no later than c. AD 100, including some samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
45010,"Pottery included Red Wares, Black Burnished Wares, Grey Wares, White Wares, Colour-Coated Wares, Amphorae, Mortaria. Date range of 2nd-4th century.",1191,15,17,20,58,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45011,"No finds reports in 2011 grey lit report, 160 sherds from 2009 excavation. No useful quantification in Wheeler's report.",160,,9,2,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45012,No finds report but mortaria present.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
45013,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
45014,"A reasonable pottery assemblage recovered but no quantification in the grey lit report. Several features were notable, however, including a complete lack of Black-burnished ware and mortaria, and an absence of any obviously late pottery. Severn Valley ware and similar redwares predominate, while other forms include Samian, Malvernian-type tubby cooking pots, Dressel 20 amphorae and flagons.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
45015,No finds yet analysed from the excavations.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
45016,"No clear quantification - chiefly illustrated sherds only. Samian suggests activity between. C. AD 87 and the mid-3rd century, with a reduction in domestic occupation from the late 2nd century. 173 decorated wares and 39 potter's stamps amongst the samian. Large numbers of mortaria and amphorae recovered. Specialist wares included a ceramic head, probably part of the neck of a jug. Also a stamp with the head of Silenus in low relief – apparently unused and may have been the master die. Also a further five stamps for pottery. Literate graffiti present on several (at least 17) tiles. Also a small number of graffitos (at least five), mainly personal names, on pottery. Also 33 legionary stamps. Twelve tazza are represented amongst the assemblage as well as five incense burners. Also a group of unguent-pots - four definitely identifiable examples. A number of potter's tools were also found, generally small stones for burnishing and retouching vessels. Animal bones also adapted for the same purpose. Wasters also present.",,,,,,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45017,"Pottery included stony VCP, Romano-British coarse wares (Severn Valley) and samian. No quantification from the earlier excavations. A small assemblage of 387 sherds was recovered from CPAT's 2002-3 excavations. Limited range of fabrics and forms and a notable absence of white wares, colour-coated wares and amphorae. Fabrics included red wares (the dominant fabric - mostly Severn Valley ware), black burnished wares (BB1) and Malvernian. Also a total of 35 sherds of briquetage.",387,2,,5,26,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
45018,"Most pottery related to the late Roman phases and very little prehistoric and early Roman pottery was found. No precise quantification, though samian and mortaria was present in the assemblage.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
45019,"As well as the samian, mortaria and amphorae, coarse wares included red wares, grey wares, BB1, white wares, colour-coated/fine wares. Red wares considerably predominant, mostly Cheshire Plain fabrics. Specialist wares included a fragment of face pot.",3597,52,423,113,515,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45020,"Much coarse ware from the Cheshire Plain kilns, also some Severn Valley ware and BB1. No quantification by sherd count.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45021,"1711 sherds of RB data, including samian, amphorae and a surprisingly large number of mortaria sherds. Severn Valley wares predominant, BB1 second most common.",1711,,6,127,71,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45022,No quantification of pottery in the report. Literate graffito on a tile. Generally little samian. Coarse ware dominated by Cheshire Plain wares and Black Burnished ware. The ceramics suggest settlement near the site is unlikely to have occurred outside the period c. AD 90-300 and the building complex itself appears to be of the period c. AD 120-240. Specialist vessels included a tazza in light red fabric similar to types from Holt or Wilderspool. Another tazza from Holt or Wilderspool. Also a 'honey pot'.,,,,,,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45023,"A large assemblage of samian present and a graffito on a samian sherd. A large proportion of the total assemblage was of local origin, but also a large number of imports. Some from Cheshire Plains kilns, but most local wares assumed to have been manufactured in North Wales.",4143,95,782,58,570,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45024,Small assemblage. The only recognisable Roman vessel forms in the assemblage are a sherd probably from a Dressel 20 amphora and mortaria in two different cream wares. One of the mortaria is of a hooked rim type with white and translucent quartz grits; the other is a body sherd with a mixture of white and coloured translucent quartz and ironstone grits. The assemblage appears to be of later 1st century date.,17,0,1,2,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE
45025,"The later evaluation produced 10 sherds. Majority of sherds were Severn Valley ware, with a single samian rim. None closely dated. The earlier evaluation produced 5 sherds of Severn Valley ware.",15,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
45026,"Red wares were predominant and there were no examples of fine wares, colourcoated vessels, or any white ware fabrics. BB1 present (9.5%) of assemblage.  Two redware pottery vessels were associated with the original discovery in 1959 of rich metalwork. Pottery ranged from 1st/2nd c AD to 4th century in date. That associated with the metalwork seemingly all 1st/2nd c.",118,1,3,2,7,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45027,Small assemblage of 20 sherds including Black Burnished Ware copy and red ware. None closely dated.,20,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
45028,"Among the assemblage Black Burnished Ware was present at approx. 20%. Also Red Wares (mostly Cheshire Plain), fabrics similar to Severn Valley ware (though no actual SV ware recognised), and also grey wares.",288,4,30,10,66,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45029,"Little detail on pottery, not yet subject to full analysis.",126,1,32,1,36,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
45030,"As well as the Severn Valley Ware jar in which the coins were found, a further 21 sherds were recovered during the excavation, mostly Severn Valley Ware, but also a few sherds of Black Burnished Ware jar, 2nd-3rd century, and grey ware fabrics.",22,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
45031,"Just four sherds, three of samian, one of greyware.",4,,,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
45032,90-100 sherds of Romano-British pottery of at least 16 vessels.,100,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
45033,"Pottery ranged broadly from late 1st/early 2nd to 4th century, with majority of late 1st/early 2nd and particularly 2nd century AD. Also present red wares, BB wares, grey wares, white wares, colour-coated wares.",890,11,117,63,29,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
46001,"Of the c.600 sherds of pottery, 571 were considered to be Roman. The proportion of fine tablewares to utilitarian vessels was seen to be higher than average including items such as an amphora handle. Other types included BB1, orange ware, grey ware, and Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria. Presumably the site was trading with Segontium.",600,,1,26,25,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
46002,"Roman pottery was reaching Bush Farm from the1stC AD until the 4th, with prehistoric pottery coming from the earliest phase of occupation. Types included 2ndC Samian, BB1, Gauloise amphorae, and Mancetter-Hartshill mortaria. The Bush Farm assemblage had an emphasis on tablewares; form types were quantified by minimum vessel count. Samian not quantified by count.",404,,1,19,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
46003,The pottery assemblage was not quantified but included a quantity of decorated and plain samian and late 1st-2ndC AD coarsewares.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
46004,"Pottery was minimal but consisted of Dorset BB1, jar fragments and a small fragment of Samian.",16,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46005,"Fragments from 46 vessels were recovered. Almost an eighth of the vessels were from samian. Other vessels include mortaria and BB1. Some late Roman pottery also present, but the emphasis was on the first 2 centuries.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
46006,"No pottery report but the main report notes the presence of samian, oxidised wares, BB1, mortaria and amphorae.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
46007,"Pottery generally small and abraided, but included parts of jar, bowl/dish and tankard. Fabrics were mostly soft sandy buff ware.",40,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46008,The majority of the pottery was BB1; all small sherds.,29,,1,1,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
46009,"The pottery recovered from the sites were mostly small poorly preserved sherds. A very high proportion of pottery were of samian, of which 14 included decoration. Much of the coarsewares and samian dated to the 1st and 2ndC AD, predating the construction of the 4thC AD wall.",300,,,,113,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46010,"Numerous coarse pottery sherds found, but few details given.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46011,"The coarse pottery was not analysed or published in full, apart from a selection recovered from one of the wells which represented a considerable 1st-2ndC AD collection. Forms included jars, bowls, and flagons.",,,,,86,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46012,"Over 3000 sherds of pottery were recovered, but we await the specialist report. The assemblage is thought to cover the 2nd to mid-4thC AD.",3000,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46013,"Black burnished ware sherds were recovered from occupation layers, and a mortarium sherd was found in a disturbed context beyond the enclosure wall.",3,,,1,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE
46014,"Much of the dated pottery to have been 2ndC AD, though 1stC AD wares and olla of 3rd/4thC AD type were also identified. 135 sherds of amphorae from one hut probably derived from more than a single vessel.",,,135,,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
46015,"About 650 sherds were recovered (though the total number was not specified), mostly of Dorset BB1, with other coarsewares, and small numbers of samian. Common forms included cooking pots, whilst cups, bowls, dishes and flagons were lesser represented.",650,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46016,"The assemblage was dominated by Dorset BB1 ware, with a few sherds of coarse ware and samian. Over half the assemblage consisted of jars, then dishes (28%), with small numbers of bowls (4%), mortaria (8%), and beakers (4%).",336,2,,3,4,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
46017,The Roman pottery assemblage was mostly Dorset BB1 ware.,22,,2,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
46018,"Clear evidence of pottery use form the later 1stC AD was recovered, with strong evidence for 2ndC AD deposit, whilst the BB1 was commonly of later 3rd-4thC AD. Based upon rim sherds mortaria and jars each made up around 30% of the assemblage. Dishes and bowls were relatively well represented (12%), and lesser numbers of beakers and constricted neck jars were present.",194,,,32,42,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
46019,Assemblage dominated by Dorset BB1 wares. Samian present.,88,,,,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46020,"The pottery assemblage was entirely of Roman date, and predominantly 2ndC AD, but going into the early 4thC AD.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46021,"A single grey olla sherd was recovered from one of the roundhouses, whilst sherds of grey pottery similar to that found at Hafotty-Wern-Las were also found at the smithy, along with pink and orange buff wares.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46022,"6 sherds of pottery were recovered from the corn-drier feature, all probably of 2ndC AD, though including single sherds of samian, mortarium, and amphora. The pottery from the bathhouse was not fully examined, but the report noted the presence of mortaria, and the assemblage was placed in the 2nd-4thC AD.",6,,1,1,1,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
46023,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46024,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46025,"A large quantity of amphora and samian were found on the floors of two buildings, though this has yet to be properly analysed.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE
46026,Pottery recovered included coarse ware and samian.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46027,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46028,Decorated samian and 4thC AD pottery was recovered.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46029,"The pottery assemblage appears to have been mostly 'black pottery, usually known as Romano-British'. It is possible that this was BB1. Coarse ware and 'red Gaulish ware' pottery also present. Imported continental wares certainly present.",1141,,,4,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE
46030,"Some pre-Roman LIA pottery had been recovered along with 3 sherds of samian and 6 sherds of amphorae. 15 sherds in total dates from the early phase of occupation. Late Roman sherds include olla, colour-coated jars, mortaria, bowls, and local grey ware, but much of the material could not be separated from 5th and 6thC AD material, so no quantifications are given here.",,,6,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE
46031,"No pottery report, but main report highlights fragments of samian ware from Roman features.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46032,"A small pottery assemblage dated occupation to the 2ndC AD. These included a fine black ware with some decoration (included a bowl/dish), a hard grey/orange sandy ware (jar), and hard fine pink ware (form not known).",17,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46033,"No pottery report was given, but it was said to be dated between the middle of the 2ndC AD and the 4thC AD. Prior to this occupation is thought to have been aceramic.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46034,"Samian ware recovered, probably east Gaulish.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46035,"All the pottery was 2nd-4thC AD, mostly sandy fabric including some South Gaulish Samian.",,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46036,"All of the pottery appears to be Roman black or dark grey wares, mainly from ollae or plates, plus a few dishes.",,,,,3,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46037,"Most of the pottery was of Roman black or grey ware, dating to the later 2nd/3rdC AD. Forms included ollae, plates and dishes. The pottery forms and fabrics were the same as those found at Caerau I.",,,,,9,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE
46038,No data,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46039,Part of a Roman flagon was unearthed by metal-detectorists.,,,,,,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE
46040,"Most of the pottery came from one of the circular huts (not the smithy), though the others included pottery too. The samian was highly abraided, late Roman colour-coated ware, a pink-buff ware, a hard, black sandy ware (most common fabric), stony black ware, black burnished ware, and five fragments of 'globular amphorae'. Forms included everted-rim jars, conical bowls, and wide bowls.",121,,5,,2,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE