"File Name","Description","Creation date","Supporting documentation file names (this should be enclosed separately and include any abbreviations, codes or notations used)","Software used","Software version"
"SA_Jackson-_Contesting_the_Expert-_Appendix_2_-_Bradford_Odeon.xlsx","A table listing and analysing letters received by HE and DCMS in relation to designation requests for the Bradford Odeon, West Yorkshire.","16-Oct-17","OTHER_Appendix_Two_Notes.pdf","Microsoft Excel","2016"
"","","","","",""
"Sheet Name","Sheet Description","Number of rows","Field name (Please start a new cell for each row)","Field description (inc. units of measurements, description of codes, etc. used within each field).",""
"Appendix 2","A table listing and analysing letters received by Historic England and DCMS in relation to designation requests for the Bradford Odeon, West Yorkshire. Requests for these were sent to Historic England and DCMS Freedom of Information teams on 2nd August 2011 and papers were sent to the author in response to these within 21 days. A final version of this spreadsheet was created on 16th October 2017 following minor corrections requested by the author's PhD examiners.","299","HE Case Number","The reference number for the designation case that the letter relates to",""
"","","","HE File Ref","The reference number for the designation case file that the letter is archived in at Histioric England",""
"","","","Correspondence Type","Letter, email or fax",""
"","","","From","The category of person/organisation who has sent the letter",""
"","","","To","Whether the letter was sent to Historic England, DCMS or the Bradford Odeon Campaign Group",""
"","","","Date of Correpondance","Date on the letter",""
"","","","Is local significance referred to? (1)","As with the applications in Appendix 1, this was recorded as 'yes' if the correspondence included specific reference to the significance of the building to the local community.",""
"","","","Local Significance Type (2)","The local significance referred to in the applications has been categorised here according to a number of values which became evident during the analysis. Where more than one value was referred to, the application was categorised according to what appeared to be most prominent within the reasons for applying section of the application form. ",""
"","","","Is continued/future use assumed? (3)","Recorded as 'yes' if the application refers to designation ensuring that the asset will remain open, will have to re-open, or would become a community asset etc.",""
"","","","Them & us","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used 'them and us' vocabulary.",""
"","","","Contested Decision","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used vocabulary contesting the designation decision.",""
"","","","Views not heard/considered","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used vocabulary suggesting that their views had not be heard/considered.",""
"","","","Previous losses","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used vocabulary related to previous losses of locally valued heritage assets.",""
"","","","Civic Pride/Identity","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used vocabulary relating to civic prode/identity in relation to the Odeon building.",""
"","","","Remembrance & Memory","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used remembrance and memory vocabulary.",""
"","","","Restoration and re-use","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used vocabulary related to restoration and re-use of the Odeon.",""
"","","","Save' the Odeon","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used 'save the Odeon' vocabulary.",""
"","","","Demolition = crime","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used vocabulary which equates demolition of the Odeon with a crimes.",""
"","","","Campaign vocab","Discourse analysis: Recorded as yes if the letter used campaigning vocabulary.",""