Evison, V. I. (1968). Quoit brooch style buckles. Antiq J 48 (2). Vol 48(2), pp. 231-249.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Quoit brooch style buckles | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Antiq J 48 (2) | |||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London | |||||
Volume Volume number and part |
48 (2) | |||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
231 - 249 | |||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | |||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Recently discovered buckles from graves at Orpington and Bishopstone, and in particular the splendid set from Mucking, have important new bearing on the quoit-brooch style. Other pieces from the same milieu can now be distinguished. Their close relationship to Romano-Germanic buckles is combined with insular quoit-brooch style motifs, notably in the case of the Mucking pieces, with their characteristic animals and masks. As argued elsewhere, this style was possibly introduced into England by Frankish craftsmen; the one-piece construction and some decorative features of the buckles also relate them to early 5th cent products of the Meuse area. Many quoit-brooch style pieces are now seen to come from the same or closely-linked workshops. Since most of the pieces are belt equipment, and possibly of military origin, they may have been made for early 5th cent foederati. The Mucking set also sheds an intriguing sidelight on the origin of the Irish 7th cent Moylough belt shrine, which is probably a copy of such a buckle set. Full descriptions of the buckles are given, and method of attachment discussed. LW | |||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
1968 | |||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(British Archaeological Abstracts (BAA))
|
|||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
05 Dec 2008 |