Bochenski, Z. M. (2008). Identification of skeletal remains of closely related species:. J Archaeol Sci 35 (5). Vol 35(5), pp. 1247-1250.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
Identification of skeletal remains of closely related species: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Subtitle The sub title of the publication or report |
the pitfalls and solutions | ||
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
J Archaeol Sci 35 (5) | ||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Journal of Archaeological Science | ||
Volume Volume number and part |
35 (5) | ||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
1247 - 1250 | ||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
The paper explores the fact that there are very few perfect osteological characters differentiating closely related species of similar size. It is argued that most characters described in various guide books to the identification of skeletal remains turn out to be less than perfect if a longer series of specimens is checked. However, the atypical or intermediate specimens that are sometimes found do not necessarily mean that the character is useless. It is suggested that from the ethical point of view it is acceptable to describe less than perfect characters provided that the cut-off frequency is explicitly stated. | ||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2008 | ||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
23 Jul 2008 |
