Going, C. J. (1992). Economic `long waves' in the Roman period? A reconnaissance of the Romano-British ceramic evidence. Oxford J Archaeol 11 (1). Vol 11(1), pp. 93-117.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Economic `long waves' in the Roman period? A reconnaissance of the Romano-British ceramic evidence | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Oxford J Archaeol 11 (1) | ||||||||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Oxford Journal of Archaeology | ||||||||||
Volume Volume number and part |
11 (1) | ||||||||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
93 - 117 | ||||||||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | ||||||||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||||||||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
This paper explores some problems of Romano-British ceramic chronology and puts forward the suggestion that pottery production in Roman Britain rose and fell in a series of cyclical phases. The pattern matches that of samian production and also the increases and decreases in the speed (velocity) with which silver coinage circulated in the first to early third centuries AD and after. It is suggested that these data can be used to trace the progress of a multisecular cycle, the effects of which may also be detectable across the Roman world-economy as a whole. The archaeological and historical implications of this pattern, which may be perceived in the Iron Age and the post Roman periods, are discussed and a possible explanation is advanced for it. Some quantification methods which would help support or refute the hypothesis are considered and a way of reconciling pottery and context dates is presented. Au | ||||||||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
1992 | ||||||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||||||||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British Archaeological Bibliography (BAB))
|
||||||||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
20 Jan 2002 |