Bradley, R. (2006). The excavation report as a literary genre:. Debates in World Archaeology. Vol 38(4), pp. 664-671.
Title The title of the publication or report |
The excavation report as a literary genre: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Subtitle The sub title of the publication or report |
traditional practice in Britain | ||
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Debates in World Archaeology | ||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
World Archaeology | ||
Volume Volume number and part |
38 (4) | ||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
664 - 671 | ||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
The article investigates the relationship between accounts of stratigraphic evidence and the publication of the associated artefacts and ecofacts, and suggests that it results from the combination of two separate intellectual traditions in the late-nineteenth century. It also identifies certain widely shared proportions between the separate components of excavation monographs published over a long period of time. Their existence has never been acknowledged. It is argued that the excavation report has become a well-established literary genre and that authors who are familiar with such texts unconsciously reproduce the same structures in their writing. | ||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2006 | ||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
21 Feb 2007 |