Fuller, D. D., Allaby, R. G. and Stevens, C. J. (2010). Domestication as innovation. Special Issue. Vol 42(1), pp. 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240903429680.
 Title The title of the publication or report |
Domestication as innovation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Subtitle The sub title of the publication or report |
the entanglement of techniques, technology and chance in the domestication of cereal crops | ||
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Special Issue | ||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
World Archaeology | ||
Volume Volume number and part |
42 (1) | ||
Number of Pages The number of pages in the publication or report |
154 | ||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
13 - 28 | ||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Highlights some of the key innovations in human behaviours, such as soil preparation, harvesting and threshing, and discusses how these were coupled with genetic 'innovations' within plant populations. Identifies a number of 'traps' for early cultivators, including the needs for extra labour expenditure on crop-processing and soil fertility maintenance, but also linked gains in terms of potential crop yields. Compilations of quantitative data across a few different crops for the traits of non-shattering and seed size are discussed in terms of the apparently slow process of domestication, and parallels and differences between different regional pathways are identified. Argues for a need to bridge the gap between a Neolithic archaeobotanical focus on domestication and a focus of later periods on crop-processing activities and labour organization. | ||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2010 | ||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(biab_online)
|
||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
14 Nov 2012 |
