Tully, G. (2007). Community archaeology:. Public Archaeol 6 (3). Vol 6(3), pp. 155-187.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Community archaeology: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Subtitle The sub title of the publication or report |
general methods and standards of practice | ||
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Public Archaeol 6 (3) | ||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Public Archaeology | ||
Volume Volume number and part |
6 (3) | ||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
155 - 187 | ||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Community archaeology seeks to diversify the voices involved in the interpretation of the past. The sub-discipline facilitates mutual education between archaeologists and communities. However it is argued that wider recognition for the field is hindered by the fact that it lacks a clear methodological structure. In this analysis the various forms in which community archaeology is practised are addressed through six diverse case studies. The underlying principles of these examples are collated through a detailed comparison with the seven-part general methodology proposed by the Community Archaeology Project Quseir, Egypt (CAPQ), with which the author has worked for four years. The author demonstrates that a shared underlying community approach exists, and proposes an enhanced, wider-reaching methodology for the practice of community archaeology. She concludes that this more explicit methodology is necessary if the sub-discipline is to achieve sincere academic acknowledgement and truly benefit the communities and archaeological research that it represents. Overseas data. Includes | ||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2007 | ||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
10 Jan 2008 |