Title: | Confidentiality and PPG 16 |
---|---|
Issue: | Brit Archaeol News 7 (6) |
Series: | British Archaeological News |
Volume: | 7 (6) |
Biblio Note | Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. |
Publication Type: | Journal |
Abstract: | Cites an instance indicating that the phrasing of PPG 16 does not ensure free access to relevant information for everyone involved in the planning process. When proposed development threatened a Scheduled Ancient Monument at Downton the developers insisted the results of the ensuing archaeological evaluation should be kept confidential, which they were. The right of the `curators' to request such confidentiality caused much confusion and embarrassment. The development proposal was subsequently turned down, more as a result of confusion over procedure than because of the importance of the archaeological remains. |
Year of Publication: | 1992 |
Source: |
BIAB
(The British Archaeological Bibliography (BAB))
|
Created Date: | 20 Jan 2002 |