Clay, C. (2004). Iconoclasm in Roman Chester:. J Brit Archaeol Ass 157. Vol 157, pp. 1-16.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Iconoclasm in Roman Chester: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subtitle The sub title of the publication or report |
the significance of the mutilated tombstones from the north wall | |||||
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
J Brit Archaeol Ass 157 | |||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Journal of the British Archaeological Association | |||||
Volume Volume number and part |
157 | |||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
1 - 16 | |||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | |||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | |||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
In the late nineteenth century over a hundred Roman tombstones were discovered built into the fabric of the north wall of the fortress at Chester. It has generally been assumed that the stones found their way into the walls as part of a rebuilding of the defences by Legio XX Valeria Victrix in the later Roman period. Although many of the stones showed signs of deliberate mutilation, this was dismissed as the consequence of their re-use. The paper aims to interrogate these assumptions by looking into the ideological implications behind the re-use of the monuments. It questions what happened to XX Valeria Victrix, which is not recorded in the Notitia Dignitatum, and whose last epigraphic traces are to be found on the coins of the defector Carausius, and suggests that the Twentieth was disbanded and its tombstones mutilated as a consequence of its involvement in the usurpbation. | |||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2004 | |||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
|||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
|
|||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
14 Jan 2005 |