Murphy, E. M. (2011). Children's burial grounds in Ireland (cilliní) and parental emotions toward infant death. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 15 (3). Vol 15(3), pp. 409-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-011-0148-8.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Children's burial grounds in Ireland (cilliní) and parental emotions toward infant death | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
International Journal of Historical Archaeology 15 (3) | ||||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
International Journal of Historical Archaeology | ||||||
Volume Volume number and part |
15 (3) | ||||||
Number of Pages The number of pages in the publication or report |
227 | ||||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
409 - 428 | ||||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability. | ||||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
Cilliní'”or children's burial grounds'”were the designated resting places for unbaptized infants and other members of Irish society who were considered unsuitable by the Roman Catholic Church for burial in consecrated ground. The sites appear to have proliferated from the seventeenth century onwards in the wake of the Counter-Reformation. While a number of previous studies have attempted to relate their apparently marginal characteristics to the liminality of Limbo, evidence drawn from the archaeological record and oral history accounts is argued to suggest that it was only the Roman Catholic Church that considered cilliní, and those interred within, to be marginal. In contrast, it is argued that the evidence suggests that the families of the dead regarded the cemeteries as important places of burial and treated them in a similar manner to consecrated burial grounds. | ||||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
2011 | ||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(biab_online)
|
||||||
Relations Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report |
|
||||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
25 Aug 2012 |