skip to navigation
ADS Main Website
Help
|
Login
/
Browse by Series
/
Series
/ Journal Issue
Internat J Cult Prop 15 (1)
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Internat J Cult Prop 15 (1)
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
International Journal of Cultural Property
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
15 (1)
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Editor
The editor of the publication or report
Editor:
Alexander A Bauer
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2008
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
BIAB (The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
URI:
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=JCP
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
04 Aug 2008
Please click on an Article link to go to the Article Details.
Article Title
Access Type
Author / Editor
Page
Start/End
Abstract
Cultural heritage and international investment law: a stormy relationship
Valentina Sara Vadi
1 - 24
The paper investigates the relationship between international investment law and the protection of cultural heritage. After giving a brief look at the legal framework protecting foreign investments, the conflict areas between investment treaty provisions and national cultural policies are explored through an empirical analysis of the recent arbitral jurisprudence concerning cultural heritage. The paper holds that jurisprudential balancing may not provide an adequate protection to cultural heritage; thus, cultural exceptions should be included in investment agreements.
Nature and culture: a new world heritage context
Shabnam Inanloo Dailoo
Frits Pannekoek
25 - 47
It is argued that the understanding of the relationship between culture and nature as manifested in the UNESCO declarations and practices has changed over the last few years. The World Heritage Convention is continuing to evolve its definitions to reflect the increasing complexities of world cultures as they grapple with the heritage conservation policies that reflect their multiple stakeholders. They are also integrating a greater cultural perspective in their recent resolutions to the convention. Although the links between nature and culture have been clarified through this new attention to cultural landscapes, it is held that many countries and their bureaucracies have not yet adopted these new perspectives. The article suggests that to achieve an integrated approach to conservation, national, regional, and international bodies and their professionals must be involved. Two examples (Canadian and Iranian) are discussed to address the shortcomings of the application of the convention and to illustrate the complexities of defining and conserving cultural landscapes.
