skip to navigation
ADS Main Website
Help
|
Login
/
Browse by Series
/
Series
/ Journal Issue
Lithics 14
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
Lithics 14
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Lithics
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
14
Number of Pages
The number of pages in the publication or report
Number of Pages:
33
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Editor
The editor of the publication or report
Editor:
Alison Roberts
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
1995
Note
Extra information on the publication or report.
Note:
Editorial Expansion: Lithic Studies Society Newsletter 14
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
BIAB (biab_online)
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
URI:
http://www.lithics.org/lithics/lithics14.html
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
30 Jul 2014
Please click on an Article link to go to the Article Details.
Article Title
Access Type
Author / Editor
Page
Start/End
Abstract
Bifaces of Lower Palaeolithic type from Scotland
Alan Saville
1 - 7
In Lithics 13, Mithen et al gave the impression that bifaces of ostensibly Lower Palaeolithic type are generally absent from the north of Britain and Scotland, other than the example in the Islay Museum which forms the subject of their note. The present contribution seeks to correct this impression, with particular reference to Scotland. Several examples of artefacts categorised as Lower Palaeolithic-type bifaces and discovered in Scotland are discussed, although none can be accepted as in situ occurrences of such artefacts. Whilst there is no prima facie reason why all or part of Scotland should not have been inhabited during climatically favourable phases of the Pleistocene, and there are many reasons why any archaeological evidence from such habitation might not be found, the only conclusion that can be drawn at present is that there was either no early human presence in Scotland, or that any presence was so ephemeral that no trace remains. LD
Further Comment on the Islay Handaxe.
Phil Harding
8
Short note clarifying the unresolved issue of a Lower Palaeolithic handaxe in a museum on Islay, the subject of an article in Lithics 13 which was unable to provide a firm explanation for the presence of the object on the island. The chairperson of the Islay Museum Trust spoke to the widow of the recorded donor of the handaxe, who is certain that the artefact did not originate on the island. It had apparently formed part of a collection built up at Bowmore School on Islay in the 1960s. Its true provenance will probably never be known. LD
Making the Most of a Radial Core; The Topknot Flake
Lawrence Barham
9 - 14
Radial flaking is one of the oldest core reduction techniques known in the manufacture of stone tools. The cores are distinctive as are their flakes, marked by convergent dorsal scars. This paper proposes an additional identifying attribute of radial flaking, a core rejuvenation flake distinguished by its pyramidal shape and by its method of removal. The radial rejuvenation flake was recognised in a recently excavated Middle Stone Age assemblage from Mumbwa Caves, central Zambia. Experimental knapping of vein quartz suggested an origin for the flake and its role in the process of radial flaking. The steps involved in rejuvenating a radial core add to the complexity of this ancient technology and suggest some behavioural implications which are examined in this article. Regardless of its temporal and spatial distribution, the 'topknot' flake demonstrates the potential of seemingly unpromising waste material to contribute to the study of human behaviour.
A Waisted Axe from Bashley, Hampshire
Philippa J Bradley
15 - 17
Describes a polished stone axe found between Bashley and New Milton, near Christchurch, Dorset, in the early 1980s. The closest British parallels for this type of axe are mauls and so-called mining tools, which have a wide distribution and are generally thought to be Bronze Age in date; a number of examples are cited. Finely made waisted axes such as the example from Bashley may be regarded as prestige items perhaps also linked with metalworking. Further research into waisted axes, mauls and mining tools may clarify the uses of these artefacts. LD
Oetzi; The Iceman and His Equipment
Patrick N R Cave-Browne
18 - 20
Short account of the replication of some of the equipment of the 'Iceman' [a well-preserved natural mummy of about 1000 BC found in the Alps in the early 1990s]. The author used only materials and tools that the Iceman or his group would have had available: wood, flint, sinew, bast and grass. He recreated a dagger blade with a hilt and a woven scabbard. The flint tools used are listed. LD
Mesolithic and Neolithic Activity on the South Downs at Pyecombe, West Sussex
Chris Butler
21 - 23
Fieldwalking during the mid-1980s at Pyecombe, north of Brighton, recovered over 9000 pieces of worked flint dating from the Mesolithic, Neolithic and early Bronze Age. In 1990 a series of test-pits excavated across the area found that the site had been almost completely destroyed by ploughing. However, two trenches revealed possible evidence for flint quarrying. During further survey work, flint axe roughouts and preforms were found in such numbers as to indicate that this was a major Neolithic axe production site. It is becoming clear from other work nearby that this is just one of a number of similar sites occupying Clay-with-Flints outcrops in this area. LD
A Preliminary Note on the Palaeolithic Sites at Limpsfield, Surrey
David J Field
Pat Nicolaysen
24 - 27
A considerable amount of Palaeolithic flint material was recovered between 1883 and 1906 from sites around the headwaters of the river Darent at Limpsfield on the Surrey/Kent border; the collection has recently come to light and is now being studied. The relationship of the various Palaeolithic sites to the complex drift geology of the Limpsfield area is described here. The area around Ridlands Farm, where the greatest quantity of material originated, has recently been investigated. However, little material was recovered and most of it exhibited Mesolithic traits. The material recovered earlier seems to have been collected after a period of deep ploughing. If this is the case, further cultural layers could remain in situ awaiting discovery. The Limpsfield artefacts need not all be contemporary. The tools from the Brickearth deposits, however, are so similar in terms of technique, style and general condition that they could be near-contemporary. If not indicative of actual occupation, they could perhaps represent successive visits by the same group of hunters. LD