Pole, C. (2008). 30 Old Palace Lane,Richmond Upon Thames; an archaeological watching brief report. AOC Archaeology Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5284/1011954. Cite this using datacite

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
30 Old Palace Lane,Richmond Upon Thames; an archaeological watching brief report
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
AOC Archaeology unpublished report series
Downloads
Downloads
Any files associated with the publication or report that can be downloaded from the ADS
Downloads:
aocarcha1-47626_1.pdf (30 MB) : Download
aocarcha1-47626_2.pdf (249 kB) : Download
aocarcha1-47626_3.pdf (109 kB) : Download
aocarcha1-47626_4.pdf (90 kB) : Download
aocarcha1-47626_5.pdf (82 kB) : Download
Licence Type
Licence Type
ADS, CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY 4.0 NC.
Licence Type:
ADS Terms of Use and Access icon
ADS Terms of Use and Access
DOI
DOI
The DOI (digital object identifier) for the publication or report.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5284/1011954
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Report (in Series)
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
The watching brief revealed several layers to a depth of 2.3m of post-medieval infill containing demolition material but little domestic waste. The dating is undiagnostic, but the building material of the earliest layer is probably post-Tudor, while a later layer had a small quantity of clay tobacco pipe stem and flower pot, and can be ascribed a post-Tudor date with more confidence. The combined thickness of the layers containing cultural material suggests something other than housebuilding, and it is possible that the deeper parts of the investigation were within the moat that surrounded Richmond Palace. This is recorded as having been backfilled during the extension of the Palace by Henry VII (1485-1509). While this would not fit with the post-Tudor probable date of the cultural material in the layers, the moat may not have been completely backfilled at that time. There was no direct evidence for the cut of the moat, but this is to be expected in such a small investigation. Alternatively the remains could represent a number of episodes of development of the site for housing, until the present house was built. The Palace was demolished in the Commonwealth period, and following an unsuccessful attempt to rebuild the Palace by Charles II the ruins were sub-divided and sold. If this is the case, the reason the ground was disturbed to such a depth is not known.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Chris Pole
Publisher
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
AOC Archaeology Ltd
Other Person/Org
Other Person/Org
Other people or organisations for this publication or report
Other Person/Org:
Historic England (OASIS Reviewer)
Greater London HER (OASIS Reviewer)
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2008
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Locations:
Site: 30 Old Palace Place
Parish: RICHMOND UPON THAMES
District: Richmond upon Thames
County: Greater London
Country: England
Grid Reference: 517470, 174980 (Easting, Northing)
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods
Subjects / Periods associated with this record.
Subjects / Periods:
UNCERTAIN (Historic England Periods) NONE (Find)
UNCERTAIN (Historic England Periods) NONE (Monus)
WATCHING BRIEF (Event)
Identifiers
Identifiers
Identifiers associated with the publication. These might include DOIs, site codes, Monument Identifiers etc.
Identifiers:
OASIS Id: aocarcha1-47626
Note
Note
Extra information on the publication or report.
Note:
A4 text with four site figures and four colour image plates
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
OASIS (OASIS)
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
22 Nov 2016