skip to navigation
ADS Main Website
Help
|
Login
/
Browse by Series
/
Series
/ Journal Issue
London Archaeologist 10 (10)
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
London Archaeologist 10 (10)
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
London Archaeologist
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
10 (10)
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Editor
The editor of the publication or report
Editor:
Clive Orton
Publisher
The publisher of the publication or report
Publisher:
London Archaeologist Association
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2004
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
ADS Archive (ADS Archive)
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
21 Mar 2005
Please click on an Article link to go to the Article Details.
Article Title
Access Type
Author / Editor
Page
Start/End
Abstract
Contents
253
Commentary
Gromaticus
254
The late medieval bricks and brickwork of London wall in Saint Alphage Garden, EC2
Terence P Smith
255 - 263
Study of the remaining portion of late medieval brickwork from repairs to London Wall instigated in 1477 by Sir Ralph Jocelyn, Mayor of London, and of the documentary evidence relating to the repairs. The article considers the Wall's continuing defensive role at that time and up until the sixteenth century, as well as the evidence the surviving portion provides of brick making practices and brick building techniques in late medieval London.
Excavations and Post-Excavation Work
263
Roman and medieval occupation at 8-10 Old Jewry, City of London
Sadie Watson
264 - 270
Excavation in advance of construction work uncovered quarry pits partly overlaid by an early Roman road, plus evidence of an unknown structure and of two buildings, from one of which was recovered industrial waste indicating secondary smithing activity. Industrial waste was also recovered from the area between the buildings. During the later Roman period a new ditch was established along the boundary line; a large pit overlain by make-up deposits and a further domestic building represent continued occupation up until c. AD 400. The pottery assemblage provided dating evidence for both phases of Roman occupation. The lower parts of some medieval pits have survived modern truncation and contained early medieval pottery including a few fragments of whiteware crucibles, representing small-scale industrial activity. The remains of the foundations of late-twelfth or thirteenth-century buildings were also found, along with artefacts and environmental evidence from associated pits and dumps.
The Little Rose Estate: new insights into the Rose Theatre, Southwark: Part 2; new insights into the Rose Theatre, Southwark: par...
Simon Blatherwick
Chris Pickard
271 - 275
Second of a two-part report on an archaeological/engineering evaluation undertaken at 54 Park Street, London SE1, adjacent to the site of the archaeological remains of the Rose Theatre. The report details the archaeological results and conclusions, and links them to the original research aims. Finds included a ditch with a timber post-and-plank revetment, undated but possibly contemporary with the Rose Theatre. It is possible that it was a sewer. The fill from the ditch dates to the late-eighteenth to early-nineteenth century, including a mid-eighteenth-century two-pronged fork. A brick wall, series of fragmentary brick floors and brick drain also date to this period. The foundations of Southwark Bridge, constructed in 1819, were also uncovered in one area of the trial pit. A brick wall running east--west and brick floor date from the nineteenth or early twentieth century, with a further brick wall being added along the same alignment to the north. These were later backfilled.
Hindu finds from the Thames
Nikola Burdon
276 - 279
On a range of mostly modern objects associated with Hinduism that have been found on the Thames foreshore, along with a discussion of questions such as what they represent, why they were deposited and by whom, what should be done with the objects and whether their deposition is harmful.
Mosaic
280
Diary, Backcover
Frontcover