This page (revision-10) was last changed on 24-Jul-2014 13:27 by Mesolithic

This page was created on 17-Jul-2014 15:22 by Mesolithic

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
10 24-Jul-2014 13:27 5 KB Mesolithic to previous
9 24-Jul-2014 13:26 5 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last Introduction ==> Aims and Objectives
8 24-Jul-2014 13:26 5 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
7 23-Jul-2014 11:38 3 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
6 23-Jul-2014 11:38 3 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
5 23-Jul-2014 11:35 3 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
4 22-Jul-2014 13:26 3 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
3 22-Jul-2014 12:05 17 bytes Mesolithic to previous | to last
2 22-Jul-2014 10:22 89 bytes Mesolithic to previous | to last
1 17-Jul-2014 15:22 17 bytes Mesolithic to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 1 changed one line
!!!Introduction
!!!Aims and objectives of the project
At line 3 changed one line
!!Aims and objectives of the project
[{Image src='Main/microlith_web_copy.jpg' width='300' align='right'}]
At line 5 removed 2 lines
[{Image src='Main/microlith_web_copy.jpg' width='300' height='..' align='right' style='..' class='..' }]
At line 22 added 14 lines
!!Overview
The framework has been produced by undertaking broad-ranging consultation across the sector using a dedicated website to disseminate information, an on-line discussion forum to generate interactive debate, email correspondence, and a meeting to convene a group of interested experts from across the sector. Other national, regional and local framework documents were also used to help assess the resource and set objectives.
The framework process was composed of three parts, as set out by Olivier (1996) in ''Frameworks For Our Past''. The first part was a [Resource Assessment|Resource_Assessment]: a statement of the current state of knowledge and a description of the archaeological resource. The second part was a research agenda: a list of the gaps in that knowledge, of work which could be done, and of the potential for the resource to answer questions. This was discussed at the expert meeting and formed the basis for the final part of the process, the production of the [Research and Conservation Framework|Meso_Res_Cons_Framework], which sets out key issues and priorities for future work as well as methods and approaches for achieving these.
However, the project was also designed to ensure monitoring of progress against the framework objectives and that has been facilitated by the ADS. On the [Mesolithic Framework|Mesolithic_Framework] page, as well as being able to download the original documentation, it is possible to made updates against each of the objectives set out in the Framework document.
In addition, we have designed this ADS resource to become a hub for Mesolithic projects. By visiting the Mesolithic hub it will be possible to gain access to PhD research projects, excavation information, databases and documents. Some of these data draw upon existing ADS archives; however, it is also possible to develop the resource further via ongoing contributions from the community.
''References:''
Olivier, A. (1996) ''Frameworks for our Past.'' London: English Heritage.