This page (revision-35) was last changed on 15-Oct-2014 11:59 by Administrator

This page was created on 22-Jul-2014 10:34 by Mesolithic

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
35 15-Oct-2014 11:59 79 KB Administrator to previous
34 23-Jul-2014 13:48 79 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
33 23-Jul-2014 12:11 79 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
32 23-Jul-2014 10:38 78 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
31 23-Jul-2014 10:37 78 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
30 23-Jul-2014 10:36 78 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
29 23-Jul-2014 10:32 77 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
28 23-Jul-2014 10:30 77 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
27 23-Jul-2014 10:28 77 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
26 22-Jul-2014 14:30 77 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
25 22-Jul-2014 14:29 77 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
24 22-Jul-2014 14:29 77 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
23 22-Jul-2014 14:28 77 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
22 22-Jul-2014 14:18 77 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last
21 22-Jul-2014 13:43 77 KB Mesolithic to previous | to last Mesol_Res_Cons_Framework ==> Meso_Res_Cons_Framework

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 54 added 20 lines
In terms of management and protection, most Mesolithic sites found on the Schedule of Ancient Monuments are there because of archaeology of another period, since designation requires there to be evidence of buildings, structures or works. Significantly, Star Carr was designated as
a Scheduled Monument in 2011 (see [http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/heritage-centenary/landmark-listings/star-carr|http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/heritage-centenary/landmark-listings/star-carr]) because of the discovery of a ‘house’, offering the possibility that the Mesolithic will be afforded increased statutory protection elsewhere when such features are recognised. The case at Star Carr has helped inform the rationale for designation in that it was scheduled both in order to encourage a dialogue with stakeholders over best management practices, including further excavation, and to support funding applications by official recognition of the importance of the site. A further step forward is that English Heritage has now published a ‘scheduling selection guide for sites of early human activity’ which outlines degrees of significance of various forms of evidence (see [http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/dssg-sites-early-human-activity/|http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/dssg-sites-early-human-activity/]).
A further challenge is the presentation of the period to the public. The 2008 Palaeolithic Framework identified rising sympathies with creationism as a cause for concern, to which can be added the low level of understanding of deep time and chronology amongst the public at large, and the persisting ‘caveman’ stereotype. In a recent questionnaire to members of the public in Scarborough over a period of three years, only 9% knew about the Mesolithic despite living a few miles away from the site of Star Carr (Milner et al forthcoming); although the sample size was relatively small (a total of 173 people over three years), the results were
consistent each year. This lack of knowledge is hardly surprising given the relative paucity of information in the public domain: the Mesolithic is not taught in schools, it has a minimal presence in most museums and there are very few popular books on the subject. In addition, some
representations of the period tend not to be the type of depictions that Mesolithic archaeologists would make: eg the film 10,000 BC bore no relation to the existing data for the period. However, other examples such as the graphic novel MeZolith (Haggarty and Brockbank 2010), and books like The Gathering Night (Elphinstone 2009), Wolf Brother (Paver 2004) and subsequent books in the Chronicles of Ancient Darkness highlight what can be achieved. In sum, there is a continuing need to disseminate our understanding of the Mesolithic widely, clearly, and in non-specialist language in order to explain the story of how the repopulation of Britain took place in a changing world.
Achievements since 1999
Since 1999, the shape of Mesolithic archaeology has changed significantly:
%%tabbedSection
%%tab-there have been a number of projects (research, community-based and developer-led) which have resulted in important discoveries (see below);
tab content 1
/%
%%tab-tabTitle2
tab content 2
/%
/%