Roman Amphorae: a digital resource

University of Southampton, 2005 (updated 2014)

Data copyright © University of Southampton unless otherwise stated


Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) logo

Primary contact

Dr David Williams
Dept of Archaeology
University of Southampton
Avenue Campus
Highfield
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
England
Tel: 080 593032

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

DOIs should be the last element in a citation irrespective of the format used. The DOI citation should begin with "doi:" in lowercase followed by the DOI with no spaces between the ":" and the DOI.

doi:10.5284/1028192

DOIs can also be cited as a persistent link from another Web page. This is done by appending the DOI Resolver with the DOI. This would look like:

http://dx.doi.org/10.5284/1028192

However, if it is possible it is best to hide the URL in the href property of the <a> tag and have the link text be of the form doi:10.5284/1028192. The HTML for this would look like:

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5284/1028192">doi:10.5284/1028192</a>
Sample Citation for this DOI

University of Southampton (2014) Roman Amphorae: a digital resource [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] (doi:10.5284/1028192)

University of Southampton logo

Greco-Italic



Greco-Italic

Courtesy of Marguerite Attree
Marguerite Attree

Distinctive Features

This is one of the more important amphora types of the Roman Republican period. In general it has a triangular-rim, cylindrical neck and sharply carinated shoulder. The ovoid handles are attached below the rim and on to the shoulders. Examples are sometimes stamped on the handle in Greek and Latin characters and symbols (Vandermersch 1994: 159-84).

The body is commonly pear-shaped and has a short solid spike. It should be noted that the Dressel 1A also has a similar triangular-shaped rim, and identification between the two can be difficult on the basis of small fragments. In a pioneering work, Will (1982) distinguished five forms, 1A-1E that ran in a roughly chronological sequence. Although her typological groupings have been largely retained (except with the suppression of her form 1B), more recent work has changed the chronology and suggested origins of the form (particularly Tchernia 1986; Empereur & Hesnard 1987; Manacorda 1989; Vandermersch 1994). The typological sequence now runs as follows: 1A1, 1D, 1C and 1E: her type 1B is now understood to have been a transitional form 1D.
See characteristics

Date Range

The Will form 1A (=Vandermersch 5) dates to between the mid fourth and first decades of the third centuries BC. Will form 1B has been suppressed since it is now understood to be transitional to the Will form 1D (=Vandermersch 6), which dates to between c. 260/240 BC and c.220/210 BC. Will form 1C dates to between c. 260 and 210 BC and the first half of the second century BC, while the Will form 1E was produced between the late third and first half of the second century BC (see recent work by Lund, 2000).
Search: [4th century BC] [3rd century BC] [2nd century BC]

Origin

This form was widely produced in Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Italy, including Magna Graecia, southern Latium, Campania, Ischia, Etruria, Taranto, Salento, Spina/Adria and Aquileia (Empereur & Hesnard, 1987; Vandermersch, 1994; Tchernia, 1986: 42-53; Toniolo, 2000). More specifically analysis of name stamps and petrology led Will (1982) to suggest that her Type 1A may have been made in Sicily; this was confirmed by Vandermersch (1994: 79) along with evidence for kiln sites along the Golfo di Taranto in southern Italy. Will also suggested that her Type 1C may have been connected with Cosa, while Type 1D may have been made near Cosa and at Pompeii. It seems fairly clear now that Types 1C and 1D were manufactured at kiln sites in coastal Etruria, southern Latium and Campania, as well as in Lucania, Bruttium and in Punic Sicily (Vandermersch 1994: 85-7). Recent research has also suggested that the Greco-Italic type was also manufactured at Marseille in southern France, in the hinterland of Gades (Cádiz) in southern Spain (García Vargas, 1998: 69-71; 2000b: 61), and possibly north Africa (see Petrology for this type).
Search: [France] [Italy] [North West Europe] [Spain] [Western Mediterranean]

Distribution

The type as a whole is found predominantly in the western Mediterranean (Will, 1982), particularly in Italy and Sicily (Vandermersch, 1994), but also in southern France (Tchernia, 1986: 94-8), Spain (e.g. Molina Vidal, 1997: 63-153) and parts of north Africa, although it also occurs at a number of sites in the eastern Mediterranean, including Delos and Corinth (Will, 1982; Lund, 2000b).
Search: [Eastern Mediterranean] [France] [Greece] [Greek Islands] [Italy] [North Africa] [Spain] [Western Mediterranean]

Contents

Wine.
Search: [Wine]

Comments

Principal contributors: David Williams, Clementina Panella and Simon Keay

Classification

Lamboglia 4
Peacock & Williams 2
Republicaine 1