Little Paxton, Diddington, Cambridgeshire. Archaeological Evaluation 2004

Birmingham Archaeology, 2017

Data copyright © University of Birmingham unless otherwise stated

Historic England logo

Primary contact

Historic England
1 Waterhouse Square
138-142 Holborn
Tel: 01793 414700
Fax: 01793 414707

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:
Sample Citation for this DOI

Birmingham Archaeology (2017) Little Paxton, Diddington, Cambridgeshire. Archaeological Evaluation 2004 [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor]

Birmingham Archaeology logo
University of Birmingham logo


Birmingham Archaeology was commissioned by Aggregate Industries through Entec UK Limited to undertake a programme of trial trenching of a proposed extension to Little Paxton Quarry. The purpose of the trial trenching was to define the location, extent, date, character, condition, significance, and quality of any archaeological remains to permit the formulation of an appropriate mitigation strategy. This archive includes the results of a field evaluation carried out between August and September 2004, which was undertaken in accordance with the Institute of Field Archaeologists Standards and Guidance for Archaeological Evaluations (IFA 1994).

Most of the datable features identified may be attributes to the Iron Age. There was no evidence of Early Iron Age activity; no features of this data have been uncovered by excavation within the existing quarry concession. Comparatively few features datable to the Romano-British period could be identified. The only Roman ceramics derived from Trenches B2, B5 and B8. This apparent paucity of Roman features may be explained by an abandonment of the site in the mid-late 1st century. Despite the proximity of the deserted medieval village of Boughton very few post-Roman features could be identified. As an exception, a few features of post-medieval date were identified in Trench B41.