CBA Research Reports

Council for British Archaeology, 2000 (updated 2007)

Data copyright © Council for British Archaeology unless otherwise stated


Council for British Archaeology logo

Primary contact

Council for British Archaeology
St Mary's House
66 Bootham
York
YO30 7BZ
UK
Tel: 01904 671417
Fax: 01904 671384

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

DOIs should be the last element in a citation irrespective of the format used. The DOI citation should begin with "doi:" in lowercase followed by the DOI with no spaces between the ":" and the DOI.

doi:10.5284/1000332

DOIs can also be cited as a persistent link from another Web page. This is done by appending the DOI Resolver with the DOI. This would look like:

http://dx.doi.org/10.5284/1000332

However, if it is possible it is best to hide the URL in the href property of the <a> tag and have the link text be of the form doi:10.5284/1000332. The HTML for this would look like:

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5284/1000332">doi:10.5284/1000332</a>
Sample Citation for this DOI

Council for British Archaeology (2007) CBA Research Reports [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] (doi:10.5284/1000332)

Joint Information Systems Committee logo
Heds Digitisation Services logo

The Saxon shore

D E Johnston (editor)

CBA Research Report No 18 (1977)


Abstract

Title page of report 18

The preface to this volume of papers given at a conference in 1975 contains a critique by R M Reece of the way that historical and archaeological evidence are mixed together when they should be kept separate. Barry Cunliffe's paper (1-6) summarizing the problems calls for a much more rigorous approach to excavation, analysis and publication. M W C Hassall (7-10) discusses the historical background, principally the Notitia Dignitatum, and the problems of identifying units and forts on both sides of the Channel. J C Mann's contribution (11-15) is on the military organization of duces and comites in the 4th century, plus a note on the Reculver inscription. The Classis Britannica is treated by Henry Cleere (16-19) from its beginnings in AD 40 or 43, through its iron-producing activities in the Weald, to its disappearance from the record in mid-3rd century. There follow papers on the detailed archaeological evidence: Dover (Brian Philp), Brancaster (D A Edwards and C J S Green), Lympne (Barry Cunliffe), the Channel Isles (David Johnston), Boulogne and coastal defences in 4th-5th centuries (C Seillier), Alet (Loïc Langouët), Brest (René Sanquer) and Oudenburg (J Mertens). The interpretation of the term 'Saxon Shore' is discussed by Stephen Johnson (63-9), and the evidence for religious missions in the shore forts is Stuart Rigold's subject (70-75). The absence of informative inscriptions from the shore forts is taken by J J Wilkes (76-80) as significant and possibly providing a date of AD 260-96 for the system.

Contents

  • Title pages
  • List of Contributors (p iii)
  • Editor's Foreword by D E Johnston (p v)
  • The Saxon Shore - some problems and misconceptions by Barry Cunliffe (p 1)
  • The historical background and military units of the Saxon Shore by M W C Hassall (p 7)
  • Duces and comites in the 4th century by J C Mann (p 11)
  • The Reculver inscription - a note by J C Mann (p 15)
  • The Classis Britannica by Henry Cleere (p 16)
  • The British evidence
    • Dover by Brian Philp (p 20)
    • The Saxon Shore fort and settlement at Brancaster, Norfolk by Derek A Edwards and Christopher J S Green (p 21)
    • Lympne - a preparatory comment by Barry Cunliffe (p 29)
  • The Gallic evidence
    • The Channel Islands by David E Johnston (p 31)
    • Boulogne and coastal defences in the 4th and 5th centuries by C L Seillier (p 35)
    • The 4th century Gallo-Roman site at Alet (Saint-Malo) by Loïc Langouët (p 38)
    • The castellum at Brest (Finistère) by René Sanquer (p 45)
  • Oudenburg and the northern section of the continental Litus Saxonicum by J Mertens (p 51)
  • Late Roman defences and the Limes by S Johnson (p 63)
  • Litus Romanum - the Shore forts as mission stations by S E Rigold (p 70)
  • The Saxon Shore - British anonymity in the Roman Empire by J J Wilkes (p 76)
  • Bibliography (p 81)
  • Index (p 89)

Download report

The Saxon shore (CBA Research Report 18) PDF 7 Mb