Experimental Mapping of the Risk of Encountering Buried Archaeology on Aggregate Landscapes

Keith Challis, Andy J. Howard, Mark Kincey, Paul Breeze, 2014

Data copyright © University of Birmingham unless otherwise stated


Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund logo
English Heritage logo

Primary contact

Samantha Paul
Research Fellow
School of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology
University of Birmingham

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1025066
Sample Citation for this DOI

Keith Challis, Andy J. Howard, Mark Kincey, Paul Breeze (2014) Experimental Mapping of the Risk of Encountering Buried Archaeology on Aggregate Landscapes [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1025066

University of Birmingham logo

Introduction

Report front cover

This project has built on a number of significant aggregate related projects funded in the Trent Valley under previous rounds of the ALSF. The significant corpus of archaeological knowledge gathered for this valley floor provides arguably the best (national) opportunity to develop and test a model for archaeological decision making with respect to risk and for the direct transfer of this knowledge to the minerals industry via the regional HERs.

In simple terms, such models should allow any mineral operator, or other non archaeological stakeholder, to identify a parcel of land for aggregate extraction, consult the HER and to gain a first level of understanding of the likely archaeological value of that land (and hence an assessment of mitigation costs). It is anticipated that the development of such an approach will provide the following benefits to both the aggregates industry and heritage management community:

  • An easily accessible, interactive resource that can be the focus of query based interrogation.
  • A rapid first order assessment of the level of risk (and hence mitigation demands for both developers and heritage managers).
  • An easily up-datable resource, which can be refreshed as new data become available. New data fields could also be added which provide additional information about archaeological resource management (e.g. groundwater conditions).
  • A generic approach, which if the subject of successful trial in the Trent Valley, could be up-scaled to a national level.