Data copyright © Dale Serjeantson unless otherwise stated
University of Southampton
Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.
DOIs should be the last element in a citation irrespective of the format used. The DOI citation should begin with "doi:" in lowercase followed by the DOI with no spaces between the ":" and the DOI.
DOIs can also be cited as a persistent link from another Web page. This is done by appending the DOI Resolver with the DOI. This would look like:
However, if it is possible it is best to hide the URL in the href property of the <a> tag and have the link text be of the form doi:10.5284/1000396. The HTML for this would look like:
Dale Serjeantson (2011) A Review of Animal Remains from the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of Southern Britain [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] (doi:10.5284/1000396)
This project is a review of the animal bone evidence from Neolithic and Early Bronze Age sites in southern England. A Regional Review report, for which this database serves as an online appendix, has been written which synthesises the faunal assemblages and discusses their implications for husbandry, hunting, meat consumption and ritual activities. The synthesis is based on 205 assemblages from 117 sites of the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age and on a list of 164 'placed' and possible placed deposits.
The counties covered are Berkshire, Cornwall, East Sussex, Devon, Dorset, Gloucestershire, Hampshire, Kent, the former county of Middlesex (now part of greater London), Oxfordshire, Somerset, Surrey, West Sussex, and Wiltshire.
The basic unit of the review and database is the animal bone assemblage, published or available in the grey literature. Some sites have more than one assemblage. All assemblages were included in which the number of identified specimens (NISP) was given. Additional bone deposits were included which were thought by the excavator or bone analyst to have been deliberately deposited and were also included in a data table with placed and possible placed deposits.
The dataset consists of CSV tables which give numbers of identified mammals, bird and fish, micro-mammals from selected sites, eruption and wear of teeth of cattle and pigs from selected sites, and details of placed and possibly placed deposits.
Summary tables are available of numbers of assemblages by period, assemblages by county, wild mammals by period, assemblages with wild mammals by period, placed deposit by deposit type and placed deposits by species.