Burgess, C. B. (1969). Chronology and terminology in the British Bronze Age. Antiq J 49 (1). Vol 49(1), pp. 22-29.
Title The title of the publication or report |
Chronology and terminology in the British Bronze Age | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issue The name of the volume or issue |
Antiq J 49 (1) | ||||||||
Series The series the publication or report is included in |
Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London | ||||||||
Volume Volume number and part |
49 (1) | ||||||||
Page Start/End The start and end page numbers. |
22 - 29 | ||||||||
Biblio Note This is a Bibliographic record only. |
Please note that this is a bibliographic record only, as originally entered into the BIAB database. The ADS have no files for download, and unfortunately cannot advise further on where to access hard copy or digital versions. | ||||||||
Publication Type The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book |
Journal | ||||||||
Abstract The abstract describing the content of the publication or report |
A plea for an end to the persistent misuse of the traditional Three Age terminology which still governs the Irish-British Bronze Age, and for acceptance of work of the past decade which has either been ignored or misunderstood. Uniform terms of reference are needed, fitted to the new attitudes. Hawkes' scheme of 1960 provides a framework for this, and is summarised. The Early, Middle and Late divisions now have a techno-typological, rather than cultural basis. Associations of Urns, and the few available 14C dates, are examined to demonstrate their existence in EBA but, because of a remarkable ritual break at c 1400, not in MBA, let alone LBA. Similarly, Deverel-Rimbury is now MBA, not LBA, its position after c 1000 uncertain. Since much in our Iron Age is now thought indigenous, already apparent in Deverel-Rimbury, an awkward LBA gap is opened up, apparently devoid of settlements and pottery. But much nominally Iron Age material may prove to be LBA. There is a need for many more 14C dates to clarify these problems. Au(abr) | ||||||||
Year of Publication The year the book, article or report was published |
1969 | ||||||||
Locations Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published. |
|
||||||||
Source Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in. |
BIAB
(British Archaeological Abstracts (BAA))
|
||||||||
Created Date The date the record of the pubication was first entered |
05 Dec 2008 |