French, C. A I. and Lewis, H. (2005). New perspectives on Holocene landscape development in the southern English chalklands. Special issue: landscape and land use --. Vol 20(2), pp. 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.20039.

Title
Title
The title of the publication or report
Title:
New perspectives on Holocene landscape development in the southern English chalklands
Subtitle
Subtitle
The sub title of the publication or report
Subtitle:
the upper Allen Valley, Cranborne Chase, Dorset
Issue
Issue
The name of the volume or issue
Issue:
Special issue: landscape and land use --
Series
Series
The series the publication or report is included in
Series:
Geoarchaeology
Volume
Volume
Volume number and part
Volume:
20 (2)
Page Start/End
Page Start/End
The start and end page numbers.
Page Start/End:
109 - 134
Biblio Note
Biblio Note
This is a Bibliographic record only.
Biblio Note
The ADS have no files for download on this page but further information is available online, normally as an electronic version maintained by the Publisher, or held in a larger collection such as an ADS Archive. Please refer to the DOI or URI listed in the Relations section of this record to locate the information you require. In the case of non-ADS resources, please be aware that we cannot advise further on availability.
Publication Type
Publication Type
The type of publication - report, monograph, journal article or chapter from a book
Publication Type:
Journal
Abstract
Abstract
The abstract describing the content of the publication or report
Abstract:
A combination of on- and off-site palaeoenvironmental and archaeological investigations of the upper Allen valley of Dorset has begun to indicate a different model of prehistoric landscape development to those previously put forward for this part of the southern English chalk downlands. Woodland growth in the earlier Holocene appears to have been slower and patchier than the presumed model of full climax deciduous woodland rapidly attained in a warming environment. With open areas still strongly present in the Mesolithic, the area witnessed its first exploitation, thus slowing and altering soil development. Consequently, many areas perhaps never developed thick, well-structured, brown forest earths, but more probably thin brown earths. By the later Neolithic period, these soils had become thin rendzinas, largely as a consequence of human exploitation and the predominance of pastoral land use. The early presence of thinner and less well-developed soils over large areas of downland removes the necessity for envisaging extensive soil erosion and the accumulation of thick colluvial and alluvial deposits in the dry valleys and valley floor as often postulated. If there were major changes in the vegetation and soil complexes in this area of chalk downland, these had already occurred by the Neolithic rather than the Bronze Age as often suggested, and the area has remained relatively stable ever since. This has major implications for models of prehistoric land use in the southern chalkland region, such as a much greater degree of stability in prehistoric and historic times, variability within sub-regions, and differences between different parts of the chalk downlands than had previously been envisaged.
Author
Author
The authors of this publication or report
Author:
Charles A I French ORCID icon
H Lewis
Year of Publication
Year of Publication
The year the book, article or report was published
Year of Publication:
2005
Locations
Locations
Any locations covered by the publication or report. This is not the place the book or report was published.
Subjects / Periods:
Neolithic (Auto Detected Temporal)
Holocene (Auto Detected Temporal)
Bronze Age (Auto Detected Temporal)
Later Neolithic (Auto Detected Temporal)
MESOLITHIC (Historic England Periods)
Prehistoric (Auto Detected Temporal)
Source
Source
Where the record has come from or which dataset it was orginally included in.
Source:
Source icon
BIAB (The British & Irish Archaeological Bibliography (BIAB))
Relations
Relations
Other resources which are relevant to this publication or report
Relations:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.20039
Created Date
Created Date
The date the record of the pubication was first entered
Created Date:
26 May 2005